2

Click here to load reader

Building the IJSO: An International Editorial Perspective · EDITORIAL Building the IJSO: An International Editorial Perspective David A. Rew Received: 12 January 2012 /Accepted:

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Building the IJSO: An International Editorial Perspective · EDITORIAL Building the IJSO: An International Editorial Perspective David A. Rew Received: 12 January 2012 /Accepted:

EDITORIAL

Building the IJSO: An International Editorial Perspective

David A. Rew

Received: 12 January 2012 /Accepted: 30 January 2012 /Published online: 16 February 2012# Indian Association of Surgical Oncology 2012

The IJSO is a new peer reviewed journal for a specialistprofessional audience. All new journals face challenges indeveloping a vision and strategy, and establishing a styleand a “Unique Selling Proposition” (USP). The USP estab-lishes the place of the journal in the world literature and inthe minds of potential authors and readers, and it is sensiblefor the Editorial Board to have a clear business plan andappropriate targets by which to measure progress. A Societyjournal such as the IJSO exists to serve the interests of thesociety members and subscribers, and to provide a platformfor the exchange of information in that professional com-munity through the peer reviewed publication process. Asthe journal grows, so its influence and academic weight mayincrease, and it can take on wider challenges with greaterambition.

AsMedical Subject Chair of the Elsevier SCOPUS ContentSelection and Advisory Board (CSAB), I am privileged toassess several hundred specialist journal titles which are seek-ing accession to this major citation index each year, from awide variety of regional and national institutions, and with awide range in quality. In the process, I have learned muchabout the variation in standards of publication, and about whatit takes to build a successful journal.

So far as the future of the IJSO is concerned, there are anumber of key points to make that will help the journalsucceed.

Firstly, the international professional surgical oncologycommunity does not need another “me too” surgical oncologyjournal. Surgical Oncology already has an abundance of suchjournals, including the World Journal (WJSO), the European

Journal (EJSO), the Journal of Surgical Oncology (JSO) andthe Annals of Surgical Oncology (ASO). These journals al-ready struggle to find new and original material, and manypublished papers are never cited and probably rarely read.Any new journal must find an original strategy.

Secondly, many journals and their content suffer frompoor quality, unimaginative editing, bloated with words anddata, and are difficult to read. The general reader will alwaysprefer the article with a clear, meaningful title and informa-tive abstract, and concise content with a clean, simple, directstyle and well argued, thoughtful and self-critical conclu-sions. Authors and editors should always write with thereader’s time and attention in mind.

Thirdly, modern publishing must strike a balance be-tween publishing the printed journal, the process of whichdictates the quality standards, and the demands of the Inter-net, which secures the widest distribution of content andwhich determines the citations of the papers and authors. Itis important that a journal has an excellent internet distribu-tion platform, preferably provided by a major publisher suchas Springer, and that particular editorial attention is given toclear, informative titles and structured abstracts. After all,these are the most that browsers and potential readers willever see of the journal.

Citations are taken to be an indirect hallmark of quality.Quality is a measure of trustworthiness and respect for a pieceof published work; for the authors and for the journal in whichthe work is published. Each reference or citation thus repre-sents, in effect, a positive vote for that work. Citation meas-ures are the summation of references to published articles inother articles, and the science of bibliometrics exists for thestatistical analysis of citations. The Impact Factor of a journaland the H Index of an author are two of many such biblio-metric indices. Data systems such as Elsevier’s SCOPUS andThomson-Reuters’ Web of Science reflect huge financial and

D. A. Rew (*)Southampton University Hospitals,Southampton, Hampshire, UKe-mail: [email protected]

Indian J Surg Oncol (March 2012) 3(1):2–3DOI 10.1007/s13193-012-0131-9

Page 2: Building the IJSO: An International Editorial Perspective · EDITORIAL Building the IJSO: An International Editorial Perspective David A. Rew Received: 12 January 2012 /Accepted:

intellectual investments to understand and exploit the knowl-edge derived from bibliometrics.

Local and regional subspeciality journals such as theIJSO are thus most likely to make an Impact and to be readand cited by other authors if they publish material of a highquality which is readable, which is accessible, which istrustworthy and of high quality, and which is of uniqueinterest. They should focus on local and regional profession-al issues and challenges, and develop their own identity. Aneffort to compete in terms of nature and style of content withthe best established journals in the field will be unlikely tosucceed, as the journal will not be widely read, authors willbe disappointed, and the Impact Factor will languish.

Conversely, a subspeciality journal in a developing countrywhich takes courageous steps in identifying challenges andproblems of health and service provision in its own region,and which commissions discussion and argument as to possi-ble solutions, will be read with considerable interest in thewider world, and will secure credibility and influence.

Herein, in my view, lies a marvellous opportunity for theIJSO and for the surgical oncology community of India. TheIJSO represents a community of educated and ambitious pro-fessionals for whomEnglish is the common language, just as itis the world’s common language of scientific communication.The problems of providing and delivering an acceptable stan-dard of care to a growing and aging population of some 1200million Indians, 900 million of whom are currently only ableto access and afford the most basic health care are enormous,and provide fertile ground for imaginative writing in thesurgical oncology specialities, as in all other health disciplines.

How can the Indian surgical profession expand to meetthose needs, and provide training and career opportunitiesfor surgeons that will make working among rural commu-nities as attractive as among metro elites? How can wellestablished Western practices such as multidisciplinary can-cer team working, governance and professional oversight beadapted to local conditions, and how can information flow

around the mixed private-public sector surgical health econ-omy, which is very different to that in many Westerncountries? How can the skills of the Indian IT sector beadapted to remedying the huge information gaps that stillexist in our understanding of the consequences of our inputsand outcomes in our cancer treatments, and how can we usethe new technologies of the television, internet and mobiletelephony to educate and engage with the cancer needs ofthe increasingly interconnected rural communities? Howcan we address huge problems such as provision for pallia-tive and terminal care, which are often held to be thehallmark of a caring society?

Moreover, if “I” stands for “Indian Subcontinent” ratherthan “Indian”, then that sphere of influence and academicopportunity is substantially increased to include Pakistan,Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and the Himalayan states. Furtherafield, China, many countries in Africa, Asia and SouthAmerica face health care delivery problems similar to thosefaced in India. Indeed, of the six billion or so people whoinhabit the planet, only one billion or so enjoy the livingstandards of the most advanced economies and metro elites.The moral and practical obligations to meet the needs andraising expectations of the remainder create fertile ground forintelligent authorship and debate in a new professional jour-nal, which now has the opportunity to develop a substantialsphere of influence.

Thus in summary, I believe that the IJSO has a prosper-ous future ahead if it develops a unique identity, and if itfocuses on the search for regional solutions to regionalchallenges, rather than in slavish replication of the work ofsurgical oncologists in the advanced economies. Over thenext few years, it will need to build solid foundations, withwhich to secure the credible track record necessary to reg-ister on the major citation indices. If it succeeds in thesechallenges, then the lives of countless people around theworld will be enhanced. I wish the Editorial Board of theIJSO well as the seeds of its ambition take root.

Indian J Surg Oncol (March 2012) 3(1):2–3 3