23
Building the Case for Multi-Tiered Instruction

Building the Case for Multi-Tiered Instruction. The best way to predict the future is to invent it. John Sculley, 1987

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Building the Case for Multi-Tiered Instruction. The best way to predict the future is to invent it. John Sculley, 1987

Building the Case for Multi-Tiered Instruction

Page 2: Building the Case for Multi-Tiered Instruction. The best way to predict the future is to invent it. John Sculley, 1987

The best way to predict the future is to invent it.

John Sculley, 1987

Page 3: Building the Case for Multi-Tiered Instruction. The best way to predict the future is to invent it. John Sculley, 1987

What is Multi-Tiered Instruction? Systematic, data driven organization Smart use of resources Differentiation: more options EARLY INTERVENTION Accountability New ways for adults to work together A response to ever increasing

diversity

Page 4: Building the Case for Multi-Tiered Instruction. The best way to predict the future is to invent it. John Sculley, 1987

First, getting it straight:

Is a system of organizing general education curriculum and instruction to meet the needs of all students

Integrates all supplementary support programs in order use resources more efficiently

Applies to all students in a school

Can exist without using Response to Intervention

Is an evaluation procedure identified in the IDEA for identifying children as having learning disabilities

Is a special education procedure that is limited to assessment

Applies only to children suspected of having LD

Cannot be implemented without a system like MTI in place

Multi-Tiered Instruction Response to Intervention

Page 5: Building the Case for Multi-Tiered Instruction. The best way to predict the future is to invent it. John Sculley, 1987

Why?

One size doesn’t fit all

We don’t have enough resources to intervene one by one

We miss kids

We wait too long to intervene

Page 6: Building the Case for Multi-Tiered Instruction. The best way to predict the future is to invent it. John Sculley, 1987

Because reading is normally distributed. . .

. . .a substantial number of students will need ongoing reading instruction through much of their schooling

Page 7: Building the Case for Multi-Tiered Instruction. The best way to predict the future is to invent it. John Sculley, 1987

We can’t intervene one by one. . .

Overall, national longitudinal studies show that more than 17.5 percent of the nation's children--about 10 million children--will encounter reading problems in the crucial first three years of their schooling" (National Reading Panel Progress Report, 2000).

In a 500 student school: 400 students will do fine with a good core curriculum 75 students will need systematic, ongoing specialized

instruction 25 students will need intensive, individualized intervention

Page 8: Building the Case for Multi-Tiered Instruction. The best way to predict the future is to invent it. John Sculley, 1987

We miss kids. . .

We over-identify some childrenBoysLanguage minorityEconomically disadvantaged

We under-identify some childrenGirls

Page 9: Building the Case for Multi-Tiered Instruction. The best way to predict the future is to invent it. John Sculley, 1987

We wait too long to intervene. . .and it really matters because:

Reading makes you smarter

Every week a child is not reading, the chance there will be long term negative effects increases: Reading Cognitive Motivation

Page 10: Building the Case for Multi-Tiered Instruction. The best way to predict the future is to invent it. John Sculley, 1987

Reading makes children smarter:

“This is a stunning finding because it means that students who get off to a fast start in reading are more likely to read more over the years, and, furthermore, this very act of reading can help children compensate for modest levels of cognitive ability by building their vocabulary and general knowledge. In other words, ability is not the only variable that counts in the development of intellectual functioning. Those who read a lot will enhance their verbal intelligence; that is, reading will make them smarter.”

Cunningham and Stanovich, 1998

Page 11: Building the Case for Multi-Tiered Instruction. The best way to predict the future is to invent it. John Sculley, 1987

What did he say?

Those who read have more:Vocabulary General Knowledge

When you learn more, your brain and intellect develops

Shaywitz, Fletcher, Dweck, etc.

This is more important for those with poor backgrounds or less innate ability

Reading and the Brain

Page 12: Building the Case for Multi-Tiered Instruction. The best way to predict the future is to invent it. John Sculley, 1987

Early reading can change a child’s future:

Reading is a key to vocabulary development

Vocabulary is the lynchpin of comprehension, prior knowledge and many cognitive skills

Page 13: Building the Case for Multi-Tiered Instruction. The best way to predict the future is to invent it. John Sculley, 1987

Implications for vocabulary development:

ESTABLISHED READERS:

Learn about 3000 words per year by reading

POOR READERS: Could learn 300-500 words per year if provided explicit vocabulary instruction

Page 14: Building the Case for Multi-Tiered Instruction. The best way to predict the future is to invent it. John Sculley, 1987

Implications for vocabulary development

Independent Reading

%tile Minutes Per Day Words Read Per Year

98 65.0 4,358,00090 21.1 1,823,00080 14.2 1,146,00070 9.6 622,00060 6.5 432,00050 4.6 282,00040 3.2 200,00030 1.3 106,00020 0.7 21,00010 0.1 8,0002 0.0 0

Adapted from Anderson,Wilson, and Fielding (1988).

Page 15: Building the Case for Multi-Tiered Instruction. The best way to predict the future is to invent it. John Sculley, 1987

The Matthew Effect

For to everyone who has, more shall be given, and he will have an abundance; but from the one who does not have, even what he does have shall be taken away.

(Matthew 25:29)

In other words, good readers get smarter while poor readers fall farther and farther behind.

Page 16: Building the Case for Multi-Tiered Instruction. The best way to predict the future is to invent it. John Sculley, 1987

Stanovich on the Matthew Effect:

"Slow reading acquisition has cognitive, behavioral, and motivational consequences that slow the development of other cognitive skills and inhibit performance on many academic tasks ... to put it more simply -- and sadly -- in the words of a tearful nine-year-old, already falling frustratingly behind his peers in reading progress, ‘Reading affects everything you do.’ " (Adams, 1990, pp. 59-60).

Page 17: Building the Case for Multi-Tiered Instruction. The best way to predict the future is to invent it. John Sculley, 1987

Reading skill forms self concept:

“When kids are hesitant, disfluent, inaccurate, slow and labored in reading, that is very visible to their peers and remember

the peers, the other kids, again look at reading as a proxy for intelligence. It doesn’t matter if this kid is already a genius and can do algebra in the second grade, reading produces particular perceptions. Better said, lousy reading produces a perception of stupidity and dumbness to peers and clearly to the youngster who is struggling. That is the shame. There are very visible differences between kids who are doing well with print and youngsters who are struggling with print. They feel like they’re failures; they tell us that .”

Reid Lyon, Children of the Code, 2006

Page 18: Building the Case for Multi-Tiered Instruction. The best way to predict the future is to invent it. John Sculley, 1987

We wait too long to intervene. . .and it matters

If intervention does not occur before age 7: 75% of children will continue to struggle

throughout school (Adams, 1990)

Approximately 75% of students identified with reading problems in the third grade are still reading disabled in the 9th grade. (Shaywitz, et al., 1993; Francis et al., 1996)

Page 19: Building the Case for Multi-Tiered Instruction. The best way to predict the future is to invent it. John Sculley, 1987

What about developmental readiness?

More on Reading and the Brain

Page 20: Building the Case for Multi-Tiered Instruction. The best way to predict the future is to invent it. John Sculley, 1987

Cocktail party:

I believe. . .

I doubt. . .

I am concerned about. . .

Page 21: Building the Case for Multi-Tiered Instruction. The best way to predict the future is to invent it. John Sculley, 1987

So What?

How does this research about early learning and the brain change your thinking about Kindergarten?

What practices would change in your school in grades K-3?

Page 22: Building the Case for Multi-Tiered Instruction. The best way to predict the future is to invent it. John Sculley, 1987

So. . . we adopt a new way of thinking about:

Kids

Curriculum

Time

Teamwork

Page 23: Building the Case for Multi-Tiered Instruction. The best way to predict the future is to invent it. John Sculley, 1987

TIER I:Research-Based

Core Instruction & Screeningfor ALL students

TIER II:Strategic Intervention &

Progress Monitoring

TIER III:Intensive Intervention &

Progress Monitoring

~80% of Students

~15%

~5%

3-Tiered Continuum (Walker, 1996)

The Multi-Tiered Model: