Upload
mohib-haque
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/28/2019 Building Entry Barriers
1/24
Building Entry barriers
7/28/2019 Building Entry Barriers
2/24
Porters Five Forces model
7/28/2019 Building Entry Barriers
3/24
Five forces analysis helps themarketer to contrast a competitiveenvironment
Five forces looks at five key areasnamely the threat of entry, the powerof buyers, the power of suppliers, the
threat of substitutes, and competitiverivalry
7/28/2019 Building Entry Barriers
4/24
The threat of entry
Economies of scale e.g. the benefits associated withbulk purchasing.
The high or low cost of entry e.g. how much will it costfor the latest technology?
Ease of access to distribution channels e.g. Do ourcompetitors have the distribution channels sewn up?
Cost advantages not related to the size of the companye.g. personal contacts or knowledge that largercompanies do not own or learning curve effects.
Will competitors retaliate? Government action e.g. will new laws be introduced that
will weaken our competitive position?
How important is differentiation?
7/28/2019 Building Entry Barriers
5/24
The power of buyers
This is low where there a few, largeplayers in a market.
If there are a large number ofundifferentiated, small players, thenpower of buyers is high.
The cost of switching between brands
is low.
7/28/2019 Building Entry Barriers
6/24
The power of suppliers
Fewer suppliers.
Where the switching costs are high.
There is a possibility of the supplierintegrating forward.
Location allows supplier to sell to anycompany
Undifferentiated parts
Parent company support
7/28/2019 Building Entry Barriers
7/24
The threat of substitutes
Where there is product-for-productsubstitution e.g. email for fax
Where there is substitution of need
Where there is generic substitution(competing for the currency in yourpocket).
7/28/2019 Building Entry Barriers
8/24
Competitive Rivalry(intra industry rivalry)
This is most likely to be high whereentry is likely; there is the threat ofsubstitute products, and suppliers
and buyers in the market attempt tocontrol. This is why it is always seenin the center of the diagram
This will determine the: Market structure
Market conduct
Market performance
7/28/2019 Building Entry Barriers
9/24
Market structure
Characteristics of the market
No. of players
Demand
Degree of seller and buyer concentration
What influences competition
Entry condition
Product differentiation
Flow of information
7/28/2019 Building Entry Barriers
10/24
Market conduct
Pattern of behaviour in adapting tomarkets
Methods employed to determineprices
Sales promotion
Predatory or exclusionary tacticsdirected against established rivalsand new entrants
7/28/2019 Building Entry Barriers
11/24
Market performance
Results
Profitability
7/28/2019 Building Entry Barriers
12/24
Ideal competitive situation
Entry barriers- High
Suppliers bargaining power- Low
Buyers bargaining power Low Threat of substitutes Low
Intra industry rivalry - Low
7/28/2019 Building Entry Barriers
13/24
Entry barriers
Entry barriers
Government/ Legal Production based Marketing related
Cost Technology Distribution Service Brand
7/28/2019 Building Entry Barriers
14/24
Porters five forces model of competitive advantageInputoutput routes to building entry barriers
Entry Barriers
Production related Marketing related
Suppliers Bargaining Buyers Bargaining
Power power
Threat of substitutes
Intra Industrycompetition
7/28/2019 Building Entry Barriers
15/24
Reduce Suppliers side bargainingpower by increasing production basedentry barriers.
*Cost of prod *Better Technology
Reduce Buyers side bargaining powerby increasing marketing based entry
barriers.
*Distribution *Service *Brand
7/28/2019 Building Entry Barriers
16/24
Increase Production based entrybarriers by Dependence matrix
Dependence of buyer on supplierDependence of
supplier (inputs) on
buyerLow High
High
Several Suppliers and Fewbuyers
Eg: Jatropa
Interdependence
Eg: Refinery
Low
Multiple buyers and
suppliers
Eg: Steel
Several Buyers/ Specialized
component
Eg: Intel
7/28/2019 Building Entry Barriers
17/24
Short term: Cost based Strategies
Dependence of buyer on supplierDependence ofsupplier on buyer Low High
High Low Inventory
JITLow Price from SuppliersHigh Credit terms
Assured Supply
Contract
Low High Inventory
Bulk BuyingOrder by Economic order qty
Reduce cost
TQMBackward integration
7/28/2019 Building Entry Barriers
18/24
Reduce Cost
Improvedrecyclability of thebottle by changingthe sleeve to a label.
This initiativeresulted in: 38% reduction in the
weight of the bottle,and
98,580 kilograms ofreduced packagingmaterial per year
7/28/2019 Building Entry Barriers
19/24
Long term: Technology based
Dependence of buyer on supplierDependence of
supplier on buyer Low High
High
Expansion
Low
Low grade inputs Process Modification
7/28/2019 Building Entry Barriers
20/24
Chemical recycling converts post-consumer bottle-grade plastic into resin suitable for food-gradeapplications
The new chemical reprocessingmethod can convert post-consumer PET bottles (center)into a material called a low-molecular-weight oligomer(right), which is suitable forrecycling into bottle-grade PETresin (left).
7/28/2019 Building Entry Barriers
21/24
Lightweight stretch blow moldedpet copolymer container
7/28/2019 Building Entry Barriers
22/24
Building Marketing Barriers
7/28/2019 Building Entry Barriers
23/24
Component Branding
7/28/2019 Building Entry Barriers
24/24
This leapfrog strategy of marketing to end-user has since worked so well that PCbuyers now ask for Intel. Market research
has indicated that end-users show a strongpreference for computer systems containingIntel microprocessors. Around 70% ofhome PC buyers and 85% of business
buyers state a preference for Intel, sayingthey will pay a premium for the securityand peace-of-mind offered by the brand.