Mecklenburg County

February 17, 2015

@ 3:00 p.m.

Agenda

Building-Development

Commission

1. Minutes Approved

2. BDC Member Issues

3. Public Attendee Issues

4. AE-GC-Builder Task Force Report / Best Practice……….….J.Bartl/G.Morton/P.Granson

5. Adjournment

The next BDC Meeting is scheduled for 3:00 p.m., March 17th, 2015.

Please mark your calendars.

BUILDING DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION

Minutes of January 20, 2015 Meeting

Jonathan Bahr opened the Building-Development Commission (BDC) meeting at 3:07 p.m. on Tuesday,

January 20, 2015.

Present: Jonathan Bahr, Rob Belisle, Tom Brasse, Melanie Coyne, Bernice Cutler, Travis Haston, Hal

Hester, Ed Horne, Ben Simpson and John Taylor

Absent: Chad Askew

1. MINUTES APPROVED Bernice Cutler made the motion to approve the BDC Meeting Minutes from the January 20th meeting;

seconded by Ed Horne. The motion passed unanimously.

2. BDC MEMBER ISSUES Tom Brasse asked for an update on the County City collaborative to repair the holds process.

Jim Bartl replied that we are working on it and have a three (3) part strategy to address it.

Tom Brasse asked how many demo permits we have per month and is it broken out by residential and

commercial?

Patrick Granson stated that this is difficult to break out; although we can break it out by UCC codes.

There is total demo and renovation demo. The total demo is what you look for.

Jonathan Bahr asked how this information is beneficial.

Tom Brasse shared that it allows him to see how many projects are being built on areas that had a

structure previously.

3. PUBLIC ATTENDEE ISSUES No public attendee issues.

4. BDC BUDGET SUBCOMMITTEE WORK Jim Bartl discussed the upcoming budget subcommittee work and the memo in draft that will be

distributed to budget members. The Department has tentatively planned these meetings for Friday, Feb.

6th, Wednesday, Feb. 25th and Friday March 13th with meetings lasting 2-3 hours. The March 17th BDC

meeting will be entirely made up of the budget presentation. Jim stated last year’s volunteers as Jonathan

Bahr, Elliot Mann, John Taylor, Travis Haston and Bernice Cutler/Chad Askew then asked for volunteers

for the FY16 budget subcommittee work. Volunteers included Jonathan Bahr, Travis Haston, Tom

Brasse, John Taylor (problem w/ the 26th but can attend all others). Bernice Cutler suggested

collaborating with Chad Askew and tag teaming the subcommittee meetings since she is only available to

attend the 2nd budget subcommittee meeting being held on Wed. Feb. 25th. Bernice to contact Chad

Askew then get back to JNB if this works. Jonathan Bahr asked that JNB contact Jon Morris to see if he

would be interested in participating on this budget subcommittee. Ed Horne suggested that previous BDC

member Wanda Towler did a great job on the budget subcommittee in the past.

5. UPDATE STATUS OF HYBRID COLLABORATIVE DELIVERY TEAM Howard Grindstaff presented an update status on the Hybrid Collaborative Delivery Team. Team initiatives include the web page on Meckpermit.com that went live on Friday, Jan. 16th, have finalized the internal policy and procedures manual, Plan Submittal Guidelines Document and the HCDT BIM/IPD Process Flow Chart. Currently benchmarking the use of Surface pro with data connected through an IPhone 6 which includes data use and compatibility; ease of accessing BIM models on intranet G: drive and the use of BIM software on surface cloud account for transferring Models. Project updates include the VA Care Center with the completion of footings foundations with exterior skin 50% complete. The interior build out has begun on all levels in all phases, rough-in inspections are taking place on the basement and level 1, Plan review is ongoing as changes occur. The estimated completion date is December 2015. The Davidson College Martin Science Building has footings complete, the foundation structural elements are being erected. Most of the underground trade work has been completed. The interior build out review of model is underway with an estimated completion date June 2017. Davidson College New Athletic Building (Baker Arena) currently has footings complete and under slab trade work is complete. Slab on grade is 60% complete with structural steel erection

BDC Meeting

January 20, 2015

Page 2 of 8

to begin end of January. Plan review is 100% complete and estimated completion date is November 2015. Currently our open positions include one (1) BIM Navigator Position; this opening to post January 21, 2015. Four (4) HCDT Code Officials (previously approved and funded). We know there are large BIM-design/build projects in the works that will double the HCD Team’s workload in the next 9-12 months. Consequently, we requested & received permission from the LUESA Director to begin advertising and fill the 4 open HCDT positions. The team is currently working with management to identify new HCDT projects to include downtown high-rises, construction on area hospitals and construction at Charlotte Douglas Airport. BC: Do you work off a schedule from the design team?

HG: The model is in the cloud, put in app with scoping letter approve at that time and move forward.

BC: Do they typically have semi-weekly meetings that you get invited to?

HG: VA yes, at one point in VA we went to RPA design once per week.

BS: What makes this process better? This process saves times because reviews are going on

simultaneously?

JB: The cycles have been replaced by validation documents and encourages continuous dialogue; not set

cycles.

BS: What’s negative?

HG: None. We have had nothing negative at all.

JT: I asked our teams about the Davidson projects. Our teams had a different experience. Have you

reached out to different contractors and owners what the experienced been so far on the pros/cons and

have you created a pro/con list?

HG: One of the owners of the VA contacted me after the topping out. He wanted to sit w/ me, put it

down on paper and take it across the country. He had never had a project move so swift, fast and the

collaboration was so good.

JT: What is going to be the outlook? Our involvement w/ BIM is that it is different w/ every project.

How is Building Standards going to incorporate it after going through the test pilots?

JB: We are assuming it is going to be different.

RB: What is the fee?

JB: Hourly on the plan review side and will come back to you on the inspection side once we have

assessed this.

HG: At every preliminary we give an estimate timeframe per trade.

BC: See strong benefit on inspection end and will go back and look at that?

HG: We are already seeing it.

RB: How are you identifying folks that can change direction and be open minded on procedures that can

be done?

JB: Hiring process having a strong understanding that this is different and doesn’t run the way typical

P&I processes work. It’s a hard agreement that is working well.

TB: Can’t see this on your iPad now?

HG: We can. You can give me rights to log into your cloud account.

Jim shared that if other questions, Howard will stay after the meeting to answer all your questions.

6. QUARTERLY REPORTS Code Compliance Report

Joe Weathers provided the Code Compliance Report as listed below:

o Note; all of the Department quarterly reports we’re available in the drop box last week. You should

have received an e-mail around last Friday (Jan 16) from Rebecca advising of same.

o “Not ready”; Bldg – 6.98% (was 7.31%), Elec – 7.52% (was 8.54%), Mech – 6.71% (was 5.6%),

plbg – 7.93% (was 9.45%)

o Rough/finish % split varies, some up, some down

o Bldg; rough @ 36.81% (was 39.52%), finish @ 21.67% (was 19.63%)

o Elec; rough @ 23.29% (was 19.89%), finish @ 52.02% (was 53.52%)

o Mech; rough @ 29.49% (was 30.62%), finish @ 52% (was 58%)

BDC Meeting

January 20, 2015

Page 3 of 8

o Plbg; rough @ 26.01% (was 30.32), finish @ 41.25% (was 40.57%)

o “Top 15” repeating topics; building at 87%, Electrical at 93%, Mech at 74% and Plbg at 87%

Technical Advisory Board Quarterly Report

Lon McSwain reported that The TAB held no meetings in the last quarter.

Consistency Team Report

Lon McSwain summarized the Consistency Team Report as listed below:

o Building: held three sets of meetings this quarter.

Bldg-Residential: addressed a total of 17 questions. Contractor attendance averaged 7.5 at each

meeting.

Bldg-Commercial: addressed a total of 24 questions. There were no contractor or AE attendees at

any of these meetings.

Bldg December meeting: the regular meeting was replaced by the December 3 legal presentation,

followed by a presentation on Chapter 4 of the NC Energy code by an outside vender.

o Electrical: held two consistency meetings. In total, the October and November meetings addressed 30

topics, with 14 contractors attending the November meeting. The December meeting was conducted

by an outside vendor discussing Hazardous locations surrounding fuel dispensers and proper wiring

methods.

o Mechanical/Fuel Gas: there were two Mechanical/ Fuel Gas meetings, addressing 12 Mechanical

questions. Contractors attending included 4 in October and 7 in November. The December meeting

was cancelled due to the holiday.

o Plumbing: there were two Plumbing meetings, addressing 14 questions. Contractors attending

included 3 in October and 4 in November. The December meeting was cancelled due to the holiday.

Commercial Plan Review Report

Part I: 65% of projects pass on 1st rev’w (down from 74%); 91% passed on 2nd rev’w (up from 81%)

o pass rates on 1st review by trade:

Bldg–75% (was 84%); Elec – 88% (was 89%); Mech – 85% (was 81%); Plbg – 82% (was 81%);

Part II: most common defects: examples

Bldg: Appendix B, exit related (3), structural, UL assembly , energy summary, hardware,

Elec: services/feeders, general, branch circuits, grounding & bonding, transformers, swimming pools,

class 1 locations

Mech: eqpt location & installations, duct systems, exhaust, fresh air req’t, gas pipe size & inst’l, gas

eqpt installation

Plbg: plbg syst inst’l, drainage piping, venting, minimum facilities, water distr piping & mat’ls, water

heater installation, traps

Part III: 1st use of “approved as noted” (AAN) at 34% by all trades on average (last quarter was 35%)

biggest users; CFD (84%) and MCFM (78%)

critical path users; Bldg (30%, down from 32%), Elec (15%, up from 14%),

Mech (13%, down from 15%), Plbg (10%, down from 12%)

So Bldg and M/P down 2%, Elec up a little.

Clarification on Commercial Plan Review Stats sent to members on February 10th, 2015.

The Commercial Plan Review numbers on individual discipline pass rates were double checked. The 1st

cycle pass rates read in the meeting were correct at: Building 75%, Electrical 88%, Mechanical 85%,

and Plumbing 82%. The projection also indicated the total average discipline pass rates for all

cycles. These were also correct at Building 84%, Electrical 86%, Mechanical 88%, and Plumbing 88%.

BDC Meeting

January 20, 2015

Page 4 of 8

7. QUARTERLY BDC BULLETIN EXERCISE Previous bulletin topics:

January, 2013 April, 2013 July, 2013 October, 2013

IOS Commercial score of 1 BOCC approves 21 positions

Change of BDC leadership Lien agent legislative change

Ft14 Code Enforcement budget proposal

New BDC members

Racking permit process discussions

Status of 12/4/2012 betterment

Economic data trends and betterment proposal

Code interp search engine goes live

Revisions to inspections auto notification

Trends considered in Fy14 budget development CTAC-EPS installation takes Dept to 98% paperless

POSSE upgrade announcement Fy14 budget technology enhancements

Owner-developer webpage and “starting a small business” webpage BIM-IPD and future Department challenges

January, 2014 April, 2014 July, 2014 October, 2014

Role of the BDC 2014 CSS survey distribution HCD Team concept CSC design project BDC discussion of BCC 6 year code cycle proposal

CA web search engine available Customer Service Center design project work BDC Select Comm to meet with industry IRT Subcommittee recommendation to add inspector positions

Customer Service Center Project status Phased Occupancy Best Practice Summary Select Committee status and following Task Force work Overview of the Department’s work

AE-GC-Builder Task Force startup and progress MF Elec Service revised DOI interpretation Reminder on paperless review process AE feedback tool Fy14 results BDC Select Committee completes assignment

January, 2015

Gartner Report Status AE-GC-Builder Task Force Recommendations Best Practice Summaries Hybrid Collaborative Delivery (HCD) Team Progress Looking Forward to the FY16 Budget Process

8. DEPARTMENT STATISTICS AND INITIATIVES REPORT

Permit Revenue: December permit (only) rev - $1,512,231, compares to November permit rev - $1,314,145

Fy15 budget projected monthly permit rev = $1,716,109; so Dec is $204k below projection

YTD permit rev = $10,746,524, is above projection ($10,296,655) by $450k or 4.37%.

o Note: for comparison, December 2013 permit (only) revenue was $1,681,309

Construction Value of Permits Issued: November total - $326,300,737, compares to November total - $295,546,037

BDC Meeting

January 20, 2015

Page 5 of 8

YTD at 12/31/14 of $2,654,418,991; 37% above Fy14 constr value permitted at 12/31/14 of $1.930M

Permits Issued: Nov Dec 3 Month Trend

Residential 3879 3872 4490/4784/3879/3872

Commercial 2226 3237 2855/2835/2226/3237

Other (Fire/Zone) 387 461 434/546/387/461

Total 6492 7570 7779/8165/6492/7570

Changes (Nov-Dec); Residential same; commercial up 45%; total up 16.6% Note; after 6 months, SF new construction permits total 1637; up 8% from 1517 SF permits at 12/31/13

Inspection Activity: Inspections Performed:

Insp.

Req. Nov Dec

Insp.

Perf. Nov Dec

%

Change

Bldg. 5944 6532 Bldg. 5872 6327 +7.75%

Elec. 6413 7198 Elec. 6376 7275 +14.1%

Mech. 3541 4163 Mech. 3437 4313 +25.5%

Plbg. 2865 3092 Plbg. 2835 3119 +10%

Total 18,673 20,985 Total 18,520 21,034 +13.57%

Changes (Nov-Dec); all trades down 23-25%; Insp performed were 100.2% of insp requested

Inspection Activity: Inspections Response Time (New IRT Report)

Insp.

Resp.

Time

OnTime % Total % After 24

Hrs. Late

Total % After

48 Hrs. Late

Average Resp. in

Days

Nov Dec Nov Dec Nov Dec Nov Dec

Bldg. 80.2 81.9 96.2 96.7 99.13 99.5 1.24 1.24

Elec. 61.3 59.9 94.1 93.1 99.2 99.4 1.45 1.47

Mech. 60.3 44.9 92.2 74.1 98.8 94.5 1.48 1.87

Plbg. 77.5 67.6 98.1 96.7 99.9 99.5 1.23 1.37

Total 69.6 64.6 95.0 90.8 99.2 98.5 1.35 1.47

Per the BDC Performance Goal agreement (7/20/2010), the goal range is 85-90%, so the IRT

report indicates the December average is currently 20.4% below the goal range.

Inspection Pass Rates for December, 2014:

OVERALL MONTHLY AV’G @ 81.63% in November, compared to 82% in November

Bldg: November – 76.87% Elec: November – 78.97%

December – 77.36% December – 77.77%

BDC Meeting

January 20, 2015

Page 6 of 8

Mech: November – 86.04% Plbg: November – 90.34%

December – 84.61% December – 90.59%

Bldg and Plbg up <1/2%; Elec down 1%, Mech down 1.4%

Overall average down <1/2% from last month, and above 75-80% goal range

OnSchedule and CTAC Numbers for December, 2014: CTAC:

78 first reviews, compared to 108 in November.

Projects approval rate (pass/fail) – 64%

CTAC was 32% of OnSch (*) first review volume (78/78+162 = 240) = 32.5%

*CTAC as a % of OnSch is based on the total of only scheduled and Express projects

OnSchedule:

November, 13: 207 -1st rev’w projects; on time/early–95.87% all trades, 94% B/E/M/P only

December, 13: 157 -1st rev’w projects; on time/early–96% all trades, 92.5% B/E/M/P only

January, 14: 252 -1st rev’w projects; on time/early–92.38% all trades, 94% B/E/M/P only

February, 14: 199 -1st rev’w projects; on time/early–85% all trades, 95.25% B/E/M/P only

March, 14: 195 -1st rev’w projects; on time/early–97.38% all trades, 95% B/E/M/P only

April, 14: 242 -1st rev’w projects; on time/early–94% all trades, 90.5% B/E/M/P only

May, 14: 223 -1st rev’w projects; on time/early–97.63% all trades, 96% B/E/M/P only

June, 14: 241 -1st rev’w projects; on time/early–94% all trades, 95% B/E/M/P only

July, 14: 203 -1st rev’w projects; on time/early–90.4% all trades, 96% B/E/M/P only

August, 14: 248 -1st rev’w projects; on time/early–85.75% all trades, 96% B/E/M/P only

September, 14: 189 -1st rev’w projects; on time/early–92% all trades, 94.75%B/E/M/P only

October, 14: 239 -1st rev’w projects; on time/early–95% all trades, 94%B/E/M/P only

November, 14: 194 -1st rev’w projects; on time/early–95.6% all trades, 95.25% on B/E/M/P

only

December, 14: 203 -1st rev’w projects; on time/early–95.25% all trades, 94.25% on B/E/M/P

only

Booking Lead Times:

o On Schedule Projects: for reporting chart posted on line, on December 29, 2014, showed

o 1-2 hr projects; at 2 work days booking lead, except Health-4 and City Zoning - 6 work days

o 3-4 hr projects; at 2 work days lead, except Health-4 and City Zoning - 6 work days

o 5-8 hr projects; at 3-6 days, except Health at 9 work days

o CTAC plan review turnaround time; BEMP at 4 work days, and all others at 1 day.

o Express Rev’w booking lead time; 10 work days for small projects, 19 work days for large

projects

Status Report on Various Department Initiatives

Follow-up from BDC December Meeting Discuss Gartner recommendations with AE-GC-Builder Task Force In meeting #7 the Task Force reviewed the Gartner Executive Summary recommendations, in comparison to the Task Force work on the 19 action items referred by the BDC. In meeting #8 the Task Force agreed to a specific recommendations related to Gartner’s report, which will be included in the Task Force Final Report, to be delivered to the BDC in their February meeting.

BDC Meeting

January 20, 2015

Page 7 of 8

Organize BDC Participation in “Best Practice” Discussions Best Practice discussions held with the industry on Commercial inspections; Monday, January 5, with 5 construction industry attendees; on Residential inspections; Tuesday, January 6, with 6 construction industry attendees; and on Commercial Plan Review; January 9, with 15 AE attendees. The plan moving forward to confirm results of all three sessions includes meeting notes distributed to session attendees, along with a draft of best practice summaries for both inspection requests (how the work is presented to the Department) and inspections performed (how the inspector goes about their work). After incorporating any final comments, a final drafts will be distributed to TF members before the January 22 and Feb 5 meetings. The final draft will be incorporated in the Task Force Final Report and presented to the BDC in their February 17 meeting.

Consistency Data Report Follow-up on Defect Codes This is a follow up to July 15 and Sept 16 meeting discussions with the BDC on the Consistency Data Report work executed by the Department at the request of upper County Management. Topics to cover, identified in JNB’s Sept 8 memo to BDC members, include develop common language among the individual trade defect lists. The defect lists were initially developed in 1998 on a trade-by-trade basis with industry representatives; consequently, the same topics may use different language in differing trades. An example of this is “not ready” vs. “task requested is incomplete”. Another is “defect on previous list not corrected”. Develop common criteria for the use of “too many defects to list”. Eliminate obsolete terms; such as “call clerk”, replacing with direct connection to inspection failure information on the web. Develop new tools for paper based sites; so that failure notes left on site are also auto entered into the project’s POSSE record. Eliminate all code defect references to “other; further research required. In a meeting on November 3, items ‘’, ‘c’ and ‘e’ were resolved, as reported in the December Special Report to the BDC. The 2nd meeting to discuss item “b” (“too many defects to list”) and ‘d’ is scheduled for Feb 3rd at 10-11:30am in Hoffman conference room.

AE-GC-Builder Task Force The Task Force held meetings on December 18th and January 7th. Work is now focused on wrapping up the Best Practice summaries and developing a final report. Task Force meetings scheduled in the next month include:

Meeting #9; Thursday, January 22

Topic #2 ; AE-plan review Best practice summary conclusions

Continue review of final report

Meeting #10; Thursday, February 5

Topic #2 ; GC-inspector Best practice summary conclusions

Complete review of final report

Wrap up all TF work We would like to deliver this report to you in the February 17th meeting. The front end of the report summarizes all the task force work and has 5 parts w/ 17 pages, the appendix is over 110 pages. Our goal is to take the next 4 days to make the remaining changes then send the document to you on February 10th or 11th so you will have a week to review prior to our next BDC meeting. The four items that will come out of this will require recommendation on action by the BDC.

#4 Training on services/mechanisms/staff roles #5.5 Consistency #17 Contractor priority based on pass rates #18 Inspection trip time allocation

Jim reiterated we would send e-copies on February 10th or 11th. He also asked if any members would like paper copies. T. Brasse, T. Haston, B. Cutler, R. Belisle, R. Kiser

Updates on Other Department Initiatives in the Works

Customer Service Center (CSC) Design Project Patrick Granson shared that an RFBA will go before BOCC in February. This pushes back our Phase I regarding acquisition of technology and process consultant; the four added positions are part of Phase II. Staffing to include a Senior Customer Liaison/CSC Manager, Sophia Hollingsworth started Jan. 5;

BDC Meeting

January 20, 2015

Page 8 of 8

currently orienting to our mission, processes, and customer base. Offering on training coordinator position currently in the works. Acquisition of Phase I tech purchases and process consultant (to define next steps & workflows) pending BOCC ok of RFBA. Also relates to Gartner report discussed in December. Next steps include incorporating findings from Gartner report, as instructed by CM and LUESA Director. Train manager and training coordinator; they will then spearhead work on developing CSC Answer Book, processes and workflows and actual CSC startup. Purchase tech/hire tech & workflows consultant. Phase 1 (all of above) to be in place by March 31; followed by hiring of remaining two customer liaison positions. The design criteria frame of reference will be the 3 parts the BDC accepted on 5/20/2014, including; design criteria grid, how the CSC might work, and supporting tech list. Specific features included in the strategy are “tiered deployment” as requested by the CSC Focus Group. Interim space plan, until plans for relocation to former Charlotte School of Law Building are finalized. Ideally, this move will include a custom space for the CSC. CSC won’t replace PM-CEM’s ownership of projects, problems and resources to solve them. PM/CEM Support Pilot Revising the draft responsibility list to include MCFM related issues. Managers and staff still working to review/confirm; goals and expectations, duty list, and BDC streamlining pilot. Directors are studying staffing strategies with HR and LUESA leadership, to initiate the pilot as soon as possible.

7. MANAGER/CA ADDED COMMENTS Chuck Walker shared that the local PENC chapter on 2-14th needs graders or proctors at the Cone Center UNCC. Rob Belisle also shared they are looking for donations. Melanie Coyne asked where we are in raising some of the salary levels. JNB shared that the directors are currently working with Maia Setzer on this.

8. ADJOUNMENT The January 20th meeting of the Building Development Commission adjourned at 4:35 p.m. Next meeting of the Building Development Commission is scheduled for, Tuesday, February 17, 2015.

2,079,120.00

3,794,721.00

5,910,480.00

7,920,148.00

9,234,293.00

$10,746,524.00

$12,297,260.00

$0.00

$5,000,000.00

$10,000,000.00

$15,000,000.00

$20,000,000.00

$25,000,000.00

Bu

ild

ing

Pe

rmit

Re

ve

nu

e

Building Permit RevenueFiscal YTD

Projected Revenue Actual Revenue

INCREASE/DECREASEJanuary 2015 Permit Revenue = $1,550,736

FY15 Year-To-Date Permit Revenue = $12,297,2602.87% above Projected YTD Permit Revenue

74

5,8

27

74

6,6

07

99

5,2

93 1

,14

1,3

93

90

4,2

48 1

,06

3,2

64

85

4,5

23

89

8,0

73

96

1,0

32

1,0

24

,20

8

82

1,1

10

83

6,2

25

80

6,9

42

1,0

53

,63

1

1,2

91

,86

8

1,1

82

,38

0

1,0

39

,73

4

1,4

34

,55

1

1,3

24

,68

8

1,5

35

,97

8

1,3

08

,74

7

1,1

71

,78

4

1,0

34

,52

9

1,0

38

,73

3

1,4

43

,55

6

1,3

61

,48

8

1,4

35

,29

3

1,1

55

,07

8

1,9

13

,72

9

1,5

28

,10

7

1,4

22

,72

1

1,4

77

,82

8

1,2

00

,32

5

1,6

42

,00

6

1,4

37

,35

6

1,4

61

,62

8 1,6

36

,15

2

1,2

85

,33

7

1,5

50

,20

6

1,6

42

,50

8

1,9

75

,96

5

1,5

75

,33

4 1,7

35

,61

0

1,9

60

,63

8

1,6

10

,11

6

1,8

22

,53

9

1,8

50

,83

9

1,6

81

,30

9

1,5

49

,19

3

1,6

55

,76

5

1,6

93

,06

5

1,9

82

,76

1

1,6

83

,12

2

1,9

01

,78

6 2,0

79

,12

0

1,7

15

,60

1

2,1

15

,75

9

2,0

09

,66

8

1,3

14

,14

6

1,5

12

,23

1

1,5

50

,73

6

0.00

500,000.00

1,000,000.00

1,500,000.00

2,000,000.00

2,500,000.00

Jan

-10

Feb

-10

Mar

-10

Ap

r-1

0

May

-10

Jun

-10

Jul-

10

Au

g-1

0

Sep

-10

Oct

-10

No

v-1

0

De

c-1

0

Jan

-11

Feb

-11

Mar

-11

Ap

r-1

1

May

-11

Jun

-11

Jul-

11

Au

g-1

1

Sep

-11

Oct

-11

No

v-1

1

De

c-1

1

Jan

-12

Feb

-12

Mar

-12

Ap

r-1

2

May

-12

Jun

-12

Jul-

12

Au

g-1

2

Sep

-12

Oct

-12

No

v-1

2

De

c-1

2

Jan

-13

Feb

-13

Mar

-13

Ap

r-1

3

May

-13

Jun

-13

Jul-

13

Au

g-1

3

Sep

-13

Oct

-13

No

v-1

3

De

c-1

3

Jan

-14

Feb

-14

Mar

-14

Ap

r-1

4

May

-14

Jun

-14

Jul-

14

Au

g-1

4

Sep

-14

Oct

-14

No

v-1

4

De

c-1

4

Jan

-15

PERMIT REVENUE1-2009 thru 1-2015

$0

$100,000,000

$200,000,000

$300,000,000

$400,000,000

$500,000,000

$600,000,000

Construction Valuation

Residential Commercial Total

INCREASE/DECREASE January 2015 Total = $391,339,768

FY15 YTD Total = $3,045,758,759FY14 YTD Total = $2,247,863,976

FY15 up 35.54% from this time FY14

3,9

60

3,2

27 3

,970

4,9

22 5,5

63

5,2

42

5,3

79

4,1

71

4,4

90

4,7

84

3,8

79

3,8

72

3,8

93

2,2

64

2,2

13 2,7

40

2,8

09

3,0

14

2,9

59

3,2

19

2,7

58

2,8

55

2,8

35

2,2

26

3,2

37

2,4

71

6,644

5,870

7,253

8,324

9,0888,767

9,109

7,4217,779

8,165

6,492

7,570

6,727

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

9,000

10,000

Nu

mb

er

of

Perm

its

Permits Issued

Residential Commercial Total

INCREASE/DECREASEResidential sm - 0.01% Commercial up - 23.7%

Overall up - 11.4%

.

FISCAL YEAR TO DATE PERMIT TOTALSResidential December FY15 = 30,468 FY14 = 28,401

Commercial December FY15 = 19,601 FY14 = 17,233Total FY15 = 53,263 FY14 = 48,858

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

Inspections Performed

Building Electrical Mechanical Plumbing Total Trade Inspections

INCREASE/DECREASE

January 2015 Inspections Performed dn 7.1%

IRT REPORT January 2015

Inspection Activity: Inspection Response Time (IRT Report)

Dec. Jan. Dec. Jan. Dec. Jan. Dec. Jan.

Bldg. 81.9% 81.6% 96.7% 94.3% 99.5% 97.5% 1.24 1.36

Elec. 59.9% 65.5% 93.1% 92.8% 99.4% 99.1% 1.47 1.68

Mech. 44.9% 73.8% 74.1% 95.5% 94.5% 99.5% 1.87 1.31

Plbg. 67.6% 72.0% 96.7% 91.2% 99.5% 98.9% 1.37 1.37

Total 64.6% 73.1% 90.8% 93.5% 98.5% 98.6% 1.47 1.46

Insp.

Resp.

Time

Total % After

24 Hrs. Late

Total % After

48 Hrs. Late

Average Resp. in

DaysOnTime %

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

Pe

rce

nt

Pa

ss

ed

Inspection Pass Rates

Building Electrical Mechanical Plumbing

January 2015 Pass RatesBuilding 77.38% Electrical 77.11% Mechanical 85.28%Plumbing 90.71%OVERALL: 81.41%

117

83

122129

136

92

120 118 118128

108

78 75

January 2015CTAC First Reviews

71% 72% 73%

83%

68% 70% 72%67%

75% 72% 75%

64% 64%

CTAC Approval Rate

35% 35%

44%

40%43%

32%

45%

37%

45%42%

40%

32%34%

CTAC % of On-Sch. & Express

Jan-14 Feb-14 Mar-14 Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15

94.0%

85.0%

95.0%

90.5% 90.5%

95.0%96.0% 96.0% 96.0%

94.0%95.0%

94.0% 93.5%

OnTime/Early BEMP

92.4%

90.4%

97.4% 97.5% 97.63%

94.00%

90.38% 90.38%

92.00%

95.0%95.6% 95.3%

92.9%

OnTime/Early All Trades

252

199 195

242223

241

203

248

189

239

194 203185

January 2015OnSchedule 1st Reviews

2/2/15 Building ElectricalMech /

PlumbingCounty Fire

County

Zoning

Backflow -

CMUDHealth City Zoning City Fire

Working Days 5 4 6 3 2 4 2 5 9

2/2/15 Building ElectricalMech /

PlumbingCounty Fire

County

Zoning

Backflow -

CMUDHealth City Zoning City Fire

Working Days 6 9 6 3 2 4 2 5 9

2/2/15 Building ElectricalMech /

PlumbingCounty Fire

County

Zoning

Backflow -

CMUDHealth City Zoning City Fire

Working Days 6 11 13 4 3 4 3 5 9

Green: Booking Lead Times within 2 weeks

Yellow: Booking Lead Times within 3-4 weeks

Red: Booking Lead Times exceeds 4 weeks

All booking lead times indicated are a snapshot in time on the date specified. 

The actual booking lead time may vary on the day you submit the OnSchedule Application.

February 2, 2015

Plan Review Lead Times for OnSchedule Review

1-2

hour

Revie

ws

(21 work days or greater)

3-4

hour

Revie

ws

5-8

Hour

Revie

ws

(10 - 14 work days = The Goal)

(15 - 20 work days)

Appointments are available for:

Appointments are typically determined by the furthest lead time.

2/2/15 B/E/M/PCounty

Fire

County

ZoningHealth

City

ZoningCity Fire

Working Days 3 1 1 1 1 1 -

Green: Review Turnaround Times are within CTAC goal of 5 days or less

Red: Review Turnaround Times exceed CTAC goal of 5 days or less

February 2, 2015

Express Review

Small projects in 11 working days

Large projects in 16 working days

For Example: If M/P is 11 days, the project's

appointment will be set at approximately 11 days.

Plan Review Lead Times for CTAC Review

CTAC R

evie

ws