2
BUGA SINGH v KOH BON KEO ACJ KL RAJA AZLAN SHAH J CIVIL APPEAL NO 16 OF 1966 16 July 1966 Facts of Case: 1. In this matter the case of the appellant had been dismissed by the learned magistrate as on the date of the hearing neither the appellant nor his counsel was present in court. 2. The appellant claimed for a new trial on the ground that it was not his mistake that his counsel had failed to appear. Issue: Whether or not dismissal of a case due to absence of plaintiff and his counsel can be set aside? Judgment: 1. A new trial should be ordered, so long as the claim showed some merits and justice could be done by compensating the other side for any costs thrown away. 2. The appellant claimed for a new trial on the ground that it was not his mistake that his counsel had failed to appear.

Buga Singh v Koh Bon Neo

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

kes

Citation preview

BUGA SINGH v KOH BON KEO

ACJ KLRAJA AZLAN SHAH JCIVIL APPEAL NO 16 OF 196616 July 1966

Facts of Case:1. In this matter the case of the appellant had been dismissed by the learned magistrate as on the date of the hearing neither the appellant nor his counsel was present in court.

2. The appellant claimed for a new trial on the ground that it was not his mistake that his counsel had failed to appear.

Issue:Whether or not dismissal of a case due to absence of plaintiff and his counsel can be set aside?

Judgment:

1. A new trial should be ordered, so long as the claim showed some merits and justice could be done by compensating the other side for any costs thrown away.

2. The appellant claimed for a new trial on the ground that it was not his mistake that his counsel had failed to appear.

3. So long as the claim shows some merits and justice can be done by compensating the other side for any costs thrown away, then a new trial ought to be ordered.

4. The appeal was allowed and Court ordered a fresh trial. The appellant had to bear all costs thrown away by the respondent.