BtE Toolbox 2014

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

BTE toolbox

Citation preview

  • BtE case competition Toolbox

    About the Toolbox The Beat the Elite Toolbox is a collection of useful guidelines and frameworks that will assist your case solving process. Although its primary objective is to be used for Beat the Elite, you may also find it useful for other case solving exercises, such as in classes or in job interviews. Much of the content in the Toolbox are meant to serve as a foundation for non-experienced case solvers, thus the Toolbox does not contain a certain right way to solve a case. It does however contain a lot of useful tips and tricks. It is not intended to be a winning formula, but by reading through this collection of frameworks and guidelines the team might be one step closer to be able to Beat the Elite. - Enjoy.

    Disclaimer This Toolbox is a collection of useful tips, tools, advices and frameworks that have proven useful for several different case solvers and winners in the past. The Beat the Elite Toolbox is developed by past case team members and winners and therefore all material rights belongs to CBS Case Competition. Beat the Elite Toolbox by CBS Case Competition is licensed under a: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. For further information, please visit: www.casecompetition.com/bte

    2 2013

  • BtE case competition Toolbox

    Introduction Problem solving:

    This section describes how to structure the problem solving part of your solution.

    Presentation: How to set up your presentation and ensure the output looks nice, neat and professional.

    Practicalities: This section describes some of the practical things that can be done before the case launch, as well as some insiders tips from previous participants.

    Industry overview: This section highlights the key traits for a wide range of industries. It is intended to enlighten people with limited knowledge of business on what areas to focus on during the case solving

    Additional reading: External sources and readings.

    Content Problem solving pp 4-8 Presentation pp 9-24 Practicalities pp 25-27 Industry overview pp 28-36 Additional reading pp 37

    3 2013

  • Problem Solving

    Introduction Structuring of the problem solving process is very important. The teams are only given 24 hours to solve a complex problem and hence a systematic approach will help prioritize and structure the task at hand. This section is about exactly how to do that. Hypothesis-driven problem solving: This section describes one the most time efficient ways to attack a problem. MECE approach: The MECE approach is widely used within the management consulting industry and for a good reason; This framework ensures that the whole problem solution space is tested. Issue tree: Issue trees are often combined with the MECE approach in order to prioritize and break down the problem. Sanity check: This section describes the importance of doing a sanity check.

    Content Hypothesis-driven problem solving MECE approach Issue tree Sanity check

    4 2013

  • Hypothesis-driven problem solving

    Description Hypothesis-driven problem solving is, as the name states, all about forming a hypothesis and then testing whether one is right or wrong about the initial hypothesis. As an example look at the figure on the right. This example describes the hypothesis that changing the quality of the product will lead to an increase in the price and thus the profitability of the product sold. First the initial hypothesis is stated, this is then followed by an analysis which can lead to either confirming or refuting the initial hypothesis. After this, a series of new hypothesis can then be formed, here are two examples: Do not look for profit by changing quality since the analysis shows that neither in- or decreasing quality will change profitability. Or check if reduction of quality instead will lead to increased profitability.

    Looking at price sensitivity, consumer demand, capital investments needed and uptake rates,

    After analysis we refute the hypothesis. Increasing quality will not increase profit pr. item.

    Increasing quality of the product by 5-10% will lead to a 2% increase in profit pr. item.

    Hypothesis

    Refute hypothesis

    Confirm hypothesis

    Analysis conclusion

    Data

    Analysis

    or

    No additional profit can be found by changing quality.

    Reducing quality by 20% will lead to 5% increase in volume and 10% increase in price pr. item.

    New hypothesis /

    final conclusion

    New hypothesis /

    final conclusion

    Stating initial hypothesis

    Confirm or refute Research, analysis and conclusion

    Formation of next step

    hypothesis

    5

    or

    2013

  • Total possible solution space

    MECE

    Description MECE stands for Mutually Exclusive and Collectively Exhaustive and is a tool commonly used within the management consulting industry. The framework makes it easier to break complex problems down into smaller, more simple problems. If the breakdown is MECE the team ensures that all the sub-issues collectively exhaust the total solution space (no grey area is left uncovered) and that the sub-issues are mutually exclusive (no sub-issues are overlapping) as seen on the right. By structuring a problem this way the team ensures that they do not miss any possible solution options. It will also be possible to distribute the work among the team members without duplication of any work, thus the limited time will be used more efficiently.

    Total possible solution space

    Sub-issue #1

    Sub-issue #2

    Sub-issue #4

    Sub-issue #3

    A non-MECE issue tree

    Sub-issue #1

    Sub-issue #2

    Sub-issue #4

    Sub-issue #3

    A MECE issue tree

    6 2013

  • Form solution hypothesis

    Overall problem

    MECE

    Prot

    Cost

    Revenue

    Volume

    Price / item

    Variable costs

    Fixed cost

    Brand percep;on

    Quality

    New markets

    New segments

    Export to China?

    Exis;ng customers

    Increase customer base

    Other

    Export to Brazil?

    Updated exis;ng products Expand product porIolio

    A MECE issue tree

    Description The issue tree deconstructs an issue into its sub-issues and the sub-issues into its sub-issues and so forth. A complete issue tree makes identification of possible solutions easier and guides the problem solving process. In this example an issue tree is constructed around a profit problem in a company, so in order to know how to fix the profit problem, a MECE issue tree can be constructed. The overall issue is profit. On the next level, profit is deconstructed into revenue and cost. Please note that revenue and cost are the only drivers of profit and they are not overlapping - henceforth the issue tree is MECE at this level. Looking at revenue this is deconstructed into price / item and volume, again this is two MECE elements of revenue. This issue tree is MECE but all branches are not fully developed. Note: No issue tree is the only right way to structure a problem but many are wrong, which is why making it MECE must be top priority.

    7 2013

  • Sanity check

    8

    Description Early on in the process it is important to do a sanity check of your solution. As seen in the figure, the sanity check is supposed to make sure that the proposed solution is both creative, has sound analysis to back it up, is feasible and has impact. If all these four elements are in place the team could have a winning solution. The sanity check is also a good opportunity for the team to stop working, take a step back and ask the question: Is this solution something that the company might actually consider? Again, there is not one way to get it right, but many ways to get it wrong. An example of a creative, but non-feasible solution, could be to open a store on Mars. An example of a solution that have all elements but creativity, could be to optimize all current operations by 2%. Neither solution are winning solutions due to their complete lack of one of the four elements. So make sure that at least these four are somewhat present.

    Feasibility

    Impact

    Creativity

    Analysis Winning solution

    2013

  • Presentation

    Description This section entails everything you need in order to convey your solution in a compelling and convincing way. There are two major parts of a good storyline: 1. Structure of content telling the right things. 2. Structure of argumentation telling it the right

    way. If you have these two elements you have a good storyline. This section first describes and exemplifies a logical way to structure the content of your presentation. That is which analysis and finding to present in which order. Then, this section describes the two most used argumentation structures, the inductive and the deductive which is then exemplified. Lastly, in the final part of this section everything is put together in an example of a good case solution storyline.

    Content Storyline pp 10-15

    Structure of content Structure of argumentation Inductive vs. Deductive

    reasoning Putting it all together

    The executive slide pp 16 Powerpoint dos

    and donts pp 17-24

    9 2013

  • How to structure your content in a logical way

    Setting the stage

    Identify problem

    Solution

    Arg. 1 Arg. 2

    Impact

    Description An often used structure of the content in the presentation is based upon what the reader expects to come next. On the right is an example of how to structure the different parts of your solution. This flow ensures that the structure of the solution is easy to follow for the reader/listener. These four parts are based upon what you are telling the reader, as seen on the right. First the overall situation of the company is presented. Then, the implication (problem) of that situation is identified. In the third part of the story, the solution to the problem is presented. In the solution part it is also vital to present the arguments as to why the team has settled on that particular solution. Lastly, the impact of the solution should be presented.

    10

    Logic of structure - we are telling you

    1: Where are we now?

    2: Why is this a problem and what is the problem?

    3: What is our solution to the problem?

    4: What is the impact of our solution?

    The four major elements

    2013

  • How to structure a strong logical argument throughout your presentation

    Inductive method: 1. Tell your recommendation/solution up

    front in the presentation.

    2. Then, in the following section tell why you recommend what you do.

    Deductive method: 1. First, show all your analysis and

    conclusions.

    2. Then, in the end serve your final recommendation for the company based on the results of your analysis. Note:

    While the deductive method can be really powerful if used correctly, it is recommended that the team uses the inductive storylining. The reason being that if using the deductive reasoning, the team must be absolutely sure that the reader will agree on the results and the logic of the argumentation or else the complete argument for the solution could fall apart. The inductive also has the advantage that it follows the logic of: First tell them what your going to tell them, tell them and then tell them what you told them.

    Description Having secured that the structure of the content in the presentation is good, the team must also make sure that the storyline follows a strong logical argument. That is, how to structure the four elements. This means that it should be easy for the reader to follow the logical flow of why the next slide looks like it does. E.g. setting the stage: the companies revenue is stalling due to maturity in market the next slide indentifies the problem of the situation. Broadly speaking there are two possibilities for how to build the logical argumentation of a good storyline. A good story in a solution almost always follows either the inductive or the deductive method.

    Solution

    Argument

    Argument

    Solution

    Flow of argum

    ent Flow

    of argument

    11 2013

  • Example of the inductive storyline

    The company should expand their business to China By first targeting the coastal region And pack items in smaller packages Resulting in a net turnover growth of USD 1bn in 2015

    Reasons for going to China 1. Because the market potential is huge. 2. The growth is strong. 3. Current markets are mature. 4. There are certain risks but they are limited. 5. We will be able to boost revenue by USD

    1bn by moving into China. 6. Which is more than other considered

    possibilities.

    Why to target the coastal region 1. Large share of population. 2. Fastest growing region. 3. Highest share of net wealth people.

    Reasons to consider product modifications 1. Cultural differences make Chinese

    consumers seek different value propositions.

    2. Small is beautiful in China. 3. Current consumer trends support smaller.

    Financial analysis of revenue growth by 2015

    Wrap up

    We recommend that

    because (supportive analysis and conclusions)

    Note: This box is basically what to tell on the executive slide

    12 2013

  • Example of the deductive storyline

    The company should expand their business to China By first targeting the coastal region While consider product modifications Resulting in a net turnover growth of USD 1bn in 2015

    1. The market potentials 2. The growth rates 3. Current markets potential 4. Risks involved 5. Revenue possibilities in different markets China comes up as the most

    lucrative market

    1. Distribution of population and their net wealth 2. Growth across Chinese regions The coastal area is where the

    Chinese expansion should start

    1. Cultural differences Value propositions needed Spending patterns Consumer trends

    Packaging in smaller bundles is needed

    Financial analysis of revenue growth by 2015

    Wrap up

    leads us to recommend that

    Looking at (analysis and conclusions)

    Note: Again, this box is similar to the content of the executive slide.

    13 2013

  • Another example of the inductive storyline

    14

    Description One can see how this structure is closely linked to the MECE framework. In fact a good logical structure will almost always follow from a correctly constructed MECE tree. In the figure on the right it is shown how one argument builds upon the underlying arguments. First the solution and its

    impact is told. Then on level 2 the

    possible markets are presented.

    On level 3 the different analysis are presented. The Chinese outperformed taking market size, risk analysis, impact and ease of implementation into account.

    Finally, on level 4 the roll out plan is justified.

    Expand to china realizing a USD 1bn

    revenue growth

    Chinese market

    Market size & growht Risk analysis Roll out plan

    Region feasibility

    Product portfolio & channels

    Consumer behavior

    Financial impact

    Current markets

    Market size & growth

    Other markets

    Market size & growth

    Risk analysis

    Which new market should the company expand to?

    2013

  • Putting it all together: Telling a story during the progression of the presentation

    Key focus areas: Logic of progression through the presentation should be easy to follow. By reading only the headers, the reader should be able to understand case solution. See the example below.

    Executive slide We recommend the company to expand their business to China and gain USD 1bn in

    revenue because home markets are under pressure.

    Home market is weak We see weak growth Increased competition Weak spending due to

    financial crisis

    So other revenue sources are needed

    1. Brazil 2. Russia 3. India 4. China China is the best option

    China is the most promising market

    High growth Large market Weak customer loyalty Resistance towards

    western brands

    They can be won by adapting product

    Given consumer behaviour, best way to enter is: 1. Enter 2. Adapt 3. Expand

    And will make further expansion possible.

    Start in major cities Expand to coastal region 500 stores by 2015

    So while still taking risks into account

    Risk 1 Risk 2 Risk 3 How to mitigate risks

    Although Chinese customers are different Resistance towards

    western brands due to 1. Reason 1 2. Reason 2

    Our solution will grow topline by USD 1bn

    Wrap up Tell them what you told

    them. USD 1 bn

    2020

    Note: This presentation is not a solution for how you need to structure (or design) your presentation, but only meant as an illustrative example.

    15 2013

  • The executive slide

    [Setting the stage] What is the current situation for the firm? [Identify the problems(s) or opportunity] [Propose solution] Argument 1 Argument 2 [Discuss impact/implications] Financial and strategic impact

    Executive slide

    Setting the stage

    Executive slide

    Identify problem

    Solution

    Arg. 1 Arg. 2

    Impact

    Description It is recommended to put an executive slide in the beginning of your presentation, since this supports the inductive reasoning. The executive slide should Make the reader able to understand your solution and why you have reached your conclusions. Be the introductory slide for the presentation presented to the judges, should the team reach the finals. Tell the same story as all the headlines of the presentation.

    Example A Example B

    16 2013

  • Powerpoint dos & donts

    17

    Introduction This following sub-section is a collection of dos and donts regarding the visual setup of your slides. Since you only have 10 slides, it is vital that nothing is lost in translation, meaning do not succumb to the usual Powerpoint mistakes. The following examples are not an exhaustive list of all powerpoint mistakes but a collection of some of the most common mistakes that can easily be avoided. By making sure that your slides look more like the do-examples and less like the dont-examples you increase the possibility for the reader to understand the slides as it was intentionally meant to be understood. On the right you will find a list of the following slides.

    Overview

    Notation on graphs pp 18 Key takeaway in header pp 19 One message pr. slide pp 20 Less is more in graphs pp 21 Less is more in effects pp 22 Supporting the message pp 23 Illustrate instead of excessive

    use of bullets pp 24

    2013

  • Remember notations on your graphs

    Do Dont

    52.6 41 -20 2 -2 -10

    -100

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

    52.6 41 -20 2 -2 -10

    -100

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

    M DKK

    r

    Revenue EBITDA

    Note: Only include data labels if they are needed to prove your point. Also remember to include your source in the bottom of the slide. This adds credibility to your presentation.

    Source: Annual report 2012

    18 2013

  • Make sure to put the key takeaway from your slides in the header

    Do Dont Recent financial development

    526

    410

    123

    270

    180 170

    52.6 41 -20 2 -2 -10

    -100

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

    M DKK

    r

    Revenue EBITDA

    Case Company has faced stagnating revenue growth and swindling margins since financial crisis in 2009

    -100

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

    M DKK

    r

    Revenue EBITDA

    19 2013

  • Tell only one key message pr slide

    Do Dont CaseCompany has not recovered from financial crisis and current plan will not meet 2015 turnover target

    Note: Due to the limitation of 10 slides pr solution it may prove neccesary to cram more information into every slide, but it is strongly recommended to only deliver one key message per slide

    CaseCompany has important revenue drivers, but it has resulted in poor post-crisis growth and cost savings initiatives from previous strategy plan will not be able to satisfy shareholder expectations of USD 1 bn in turnover by 2015

    Revenue

    Driver1 Driver2

    Cost Driver 1 Driver 2 Driver 3

    Prot

    Cost saving ini;a;ves from 2015-Plan Reduce overhead by 10% Divest subsidiary1 Procurement Savings Plan

    Tager: 50M DKK Outsource of produc;on to India

    Recent performance Turnover forecast

    2015 Target

    20 2013

  • Less is more when it comes to data presentation

    Do Dont

    Note: Design your graph so the reader quickly and easely can read it

    Revenue split into carrier type and region

    21 2013

  • Less is more when it comes to colours and effects

    Do Dont

    Note: and it looks unprofessional

    22 2013

  • Make sure only things that back up the message of the slide is included

    Do Dont

    Note: Images should only be included if they help to make a point clearer. Here this is hardly the case, even on the left-hand slide the value-added from the images is limited.

    23

    Design for social change requires three key initiatives

    Structure new business models to diversify withholding and manage assets

    Gravitate to situation-oriented business models

    Find new eco-friendly consumer-oriented byproducts

    2013

  • A figure is worth a thousand bullets

    Do Dont

    Note: Excessive use of bullets dilutes their purpose. A bullet point is a short concise point dont put 20 short concise points on one slide. Not only is it tedious to read, it also hide the message of the slide.

    24 2013

  • Practicalities

    Description This section describes some the most important practicalities that lies outside the actual problem solving process and case solution. That being said, the practicalities included and described in this section has a high probability of making the 24 hours of case solving easier. If ignored, there is a high probability of making the case solving hours more difficult. Time management: Due to the time pressure, a good plan will ensure that the team makes the most of the available time. Quotes from the insiders: This section includes some insiders tips for what things the team would be like to have under control before the actual case launch.

    Content: Time management pp 26 Quotes from the

    insiders pp 27

    25 2013

  • Develop solu;on

    19:00

    Ini;al data research Retest hypethesis Brain storm

    Struc-turing

    10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00

    2hr checkup. Are we aligned?

    Develop inital hypothesis

    Draw up a time plan before the case launch

    Develop solu;on

    Buer/rehearse

    20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 24:00 01:00 02:00 08:00 09:00

    2hr checkup 2hr checkup Gather slides Final version

    Sleep

    The time plan does not have to be as specific as this one, but a rough time plan will certainly prove helpful as it will help the team to not spend too much time on unnecessary tasks. E.g. analysis of market irrelevant for the case solution, spending too much time on date search etc. Also the team should note that the time plan will almost certainly not be held, as unavoidable events will happen during the case solving. However, making a time plan will keep reminding the team that time is precious and spending it unwisely is not recommended. Lastly, this time plan is not the golden rule as to how to allocate the 24 hours but only an example. The golden rule that does persist is, the more specific the time plan, the more it will help throughout the process.

    Description Example

    26 2013

  • Quotes from the insiders

    My five cents on practicalities would definitely be to assign team roles and know each others relative strengths and weaknesses. Having the discussion before the launch as well as a time manager saved us time.

    Remember to buy snacks, snacks, snacks & more snacks.

    Set up the master slide before the case launches. We wasted at least 3 hrs. setting up and agreeing on the layout.

    Practice makes perfect. It was so evident that the more training cases we did, the better we got.

    Know your data sources. Having the best data available is a competitive advantage.

    27

    It is very wise to save some time in the end for iteration, going through every slide asking the questions: What do we want to tell with this slide and will the reader understand it.

    2013

  • Industry Overview

    Description This section describes some the typical industries that cases evolve around. The given industry description serves as a guideline of the key aspects to consider within a particular industry. Please note, the industry list is not exhaustive, and there may therefore be additional industries that you may need to do research on yourself. Additionationally, please note that the industry snap shots are not a recipe for success, but rather a guideline and help for those who have limited knowledge about the industry (for instance non-business students) Each industry snapshot gives entails a short description of key trends, competitive landscape, customers, channels, and profit summary.

    Content: Transportation pp 26 Consumer Packaged

    Goods (CPG) pp 27 Entertainment Finance Manufacturing Media Pharmaceuticals Technology

    28 2013

  • Transportation companies provide transport services for passengers and/or for freight, and can be done either via rail, road, air, or water

    Transportation Industry

    Description

    29 2013

    Increase of cost competition as more transportation service types become more freely available

    Can be seasonal for certain types of transportation services

    Private individuals Corporations/small businesses Travel web sites/resellers

    Fare revenues; administrative & handling fees; add-on service sales

    Variable costs: fuel; food and beverage; staff/hourly employees Fixed costs: fleet leases; gate/port leases; IT/admin costs; salaried employees

    Key trends

    Customers

    Revenue drivers

    Cost drivers

  • CPG companies provide consumers with a range of household products and the like, such as soaps, pet supplies, snack foods etc.

    Consumer Packaged Goods (CPG)

    Description

    30 2013

    Consumer lifestyle, e.g. aging population, social networks, online ads, go green, etc Product mix and brand management are critical to CPG companies

    Individual Customers Business Customers

    Volume of goods sold; price premium on branded goods; new product introductions

    Branding; sales; marketing; COGS (commodity costs raw & packaging material)

    Key trends

    Customers

    Revenue drivers

    Cost drivers

  • Broad range of financial products (deposit services, credit cards, loans, etc.) are sold by banks whose main function is to collect money from those who have savings and loan money to those who need it.

    Finance (Consumer Banking)

    Description

    31 2013

    Financial crisis threatened solvency of industry due to illiquid and un-valuable assets Consolidated, mature industry with growth through acquisitions Demographic shift creating a large market for retirement products

    Individual consumers, especially high net worth consumers Small/medium businesses without sufficient size for larger investment banking financing

    services

    Difference between the banks borrowing cost and the interest rates charged to borrowers; administrative fees for services

    Administration; salaries; writing off bad debt, bank branch offices

    Key trends

    Customers

    Revenue drivers

    Cost drivers

  • Manufacturing sector includes companies that are in the business of mechanical, physical, or chemical transformation of materials/substances/components into new products

    Subsectors of manufacturing include: textile, paper, chemical, computer/electronics, transportation equipment, machinery

    Manufacturing

    Description

    32 2013

    Manufacturing is highly cyclical in most sectors Higher cost structure (labour in many cases) lead companies to outsource manufacturing

    to lower-cost regions of the world

    End-consumer; OEM (original equipment manufacturer); B2B (Business-to-business)

    Diversity of customers; volume; emerging markets; adjacent industries; new technologies/products

    Potential outsourcing quality costs; supply chain management (inventory turns); labor; raw material; channel management; marketing; capital investment in equipment

    Key trends

    Customers

    Revenue drivers

    Cost drivers

  • The media sector includes print, audio ,and video content generation Primarily an advertising-supported industry, the traditional media space faces

    unprecedented challenges as online media continues to disrupt traditional business models Media

    Description

    33 2013

    The rapidly advancing speed of the internet and wireless devices change the consumption pattern of media

    The proliferation of free content has harmed content generators but created opportunities for new channels.

    Individual end-consumers Business users Advertisers

    Advertising; subscriptions; individual sales

    Variable costs: salaries; technological equipment Fixed costs: Studios/press offices; overhead; marketing; advertising

    Key trends

    Customers

    Revenue drivers

    Cost drivers

  • Pharmaceutical companies produce original patent-protected (for a certain period of time) drugs for human and animal diseases

    Generic drug producers produce copy-cat drugs (with the same medical result) at a lower development cost when the originator drugs patent expires

    Pharmaceuticals

    Description

    34 2013

    Price competition from generic drug manufacturers Increasing pressure from health insurance companies and hospital chains to reduce prices R&D challenge of finding high revenue drugs

    Doctors who prescribe these medicines Insurance companies that pay for them Patients/consumers who need these drugs/medicines

    Patent premium; buy-in from doctors that will prescribe; speed to market; niche products Variable costs: sales; marketing; raw material, salaries Fixed costs: R&D; equipment; machines

    Key trends

    Customers

    Revenue drivers

    Cost drivers

  • The entertainment industry provides different services and products for customers' leisure time

    Entertainment

    Description

    35 2013

    Increasing competition from stay-at-home or other free alternatives of entertainment compared to traditional entertainment types

    Individual customers Business arrangements

    Service/product/ticket sales, subscriptions, gadgets sales; add-on sales Variable costs: raw materials; salaries Fixed costs: equipment, venue areas; advertising

    Key trends

    Customers

    Revenue drivers

    Cost drivers

  • The technology industry broadly consists of the systems (PCs, servers), semiconductors, communications equipmentl software, internet and IT services subsectors. Technology Description

    36 2013

    Increasing M&A activity: aggregation offering customers a one stop shop proposition Co-opetition: Leading vendors co-exist as competitors and collaborators. Cloud Computing: Offering IT as outsourced utility has implications across subsectors Individual customers Enterprise, SMB (small/medium businesses), Retail channel customers Subscriptions; licenses; maintenance; renewals, revenue per click Variable costs: salaries, advertising Fixed costs: R&D; equipment: gross margins, R&D

    Key trends

    Customers

    Revenue drivers

    Cost drivers

  • Additional reading

    Online Here we have listed external sources and additional reading that is also useful for the case solving team. Choosing the right kind of chart:

    http://extremepresentation.typepad.com/files/choosing-a-good-chart-09.pdf

    Previous cases:

    http://www.casecompetition.com/case_solving/previous_cases

    www.caseinterview.com www.bcgperspectives.com

    Data sources: http://www.eiu.com/ http://research.thomsonib.com/

    Offline How to structure your argument:

    Barbera Minto The pyramid principle

    Presentation design advice: Gary Reynolds Presentation Zen Nancy Duarte - Slideology

    37 2013