BRT in Latin America: The Metrobus Experience

BRT in Latin America: The Metrobus experienceYorgos VoukasCTS-Mexico, Transport Director

Sürdürülebilir Ulaşım 2011, Kocaeli, April 2011

2009: ONG Nacional, miembro de la red EMBARQ, alcance en diversas ciudades, enfoque

sustentable e integral del transporte, 45 colaboradores de múltiples disciplinas

1. CTS México

National NGO, member of the EMBARQ network, presence in many cities, focus on sustainable transport, multidisciplinary team of more than 45 in house professionals

Our mission“Catalyze sustainable mobility solutions to improve the quality of life in Mexican cities.”

• Integral planning of public transport, housing, non motorized mobility and public space.

• Development of Communities with livable environments where mixed land use makes it easier for people to live in.

CTS México promotes:

EMBARQ NETWORK

Mexico City: Facts & Figures

MEXICO CITY: BASIC DATA

73 municipalities

Population: 19,239,910

Density: 67 hab/ha

Autos: 5,592,293

IM: 291 auto/1000 p

Trips per day: 48,804,197

2,172 deaths per year on traffic

accidents*

*Number 1° in Latin America

MEXICO CITY: MOTORIZATION TRENDS

For every child that is born in Mexico City, 2 cars enter in traffic; in total? 200,000 autos per year

MOTORIZATION TRENDS LATIN AMERICA

Source: Observatorio de Movilidad Urbana. CAF. 2009

B. Horiz

onte

Bogotá

Buenos A

ires

Caracas

Cd. Méx

ico

Curitiba

Guadala

jara

León

Lima

Montevideo

Porto Aleg

re

R. Janeir

o

San Jo

sé

Santiag

o

San Pab

lo0.0

50.0

100.0

150.0

200.0

250.0

300.0

350.0

290.7

329.7

136.7

Car Ownership

Autos/mil hab

Motos/mil hab

Population: 106 millons Autos: 24 millons Motos: 2.4 millons

CONGESTION

Greenhouse Gas Emission are expected to increase from 170 million tones of CO2 to 440 million by 2030 if current paterns will not change (MEDEC)

EMISSIONS

ACCIDENTS

2,172 deaths per year from road accidents

4,000 heavily injured

Externalities: 1.3% of GDP

Mexico City: Public Transport

METRO 4.5 million pax/day 11 lines, aprox. 250 km Investment 11,851m USD*

TROLLEY-BUS & LIGHT RAIL 286,000 pax/day 13 trolley lines + 1 Light rail line Investment 470 m USD*

* Infrastructure

BUSES – MICRO BUSES 19,899,500 pax/day 54,532 buses

SUBURBAN RAIL 200,000 pax/day 26 km (State of Mex.-DF)

METROBUS 650 000 pass/day 3 lines 67 km 283 articulated buses

Transport systems

PUBLIC TRANSPORT SYSTEMS

MODAL SPLIT

Microbuses / Autobuses

42%

Metro10%Metrobus

1%

Taxi4%

Auto17%

Pie25%

Bicicleta1%

Connection to 12 Metro lines and the Sub-urban Light Rail

2011- 650,000 pax/day- 67 km- Flat fare: 0,45 usd- No operational

subsidies- 100% electronic &

prepaid card

METROBUS, DF

NORTH TO SOUTH

EAST TO WEST

NORTH TO SOUTH

20 km

50 km

2005

20082011

67 km

METROBUS 2011 67 KILOMETERS,

235% MORE THAN 2005

METROBUS NETWORK

240 PASSENGERS / 25 METERS

160 PASSENGERS / 18 METERS

13 X

270 X

80

270ARTICULATED

2005

2010 13BI-ARTICULATED

228

2011

283

BUS FLEET

EMISSIONS REDUCTION: TECHNOLOGICAL IMPROVEMENT EURO 0Microbuse

s

TECHNOLOGY CHANGE

DESTRUCTION OF OBSOLETE UNITS647 MICROBUSES AND 31 BUSES DESTROYED BETWEEN LINES 1 AND 2, IN LINE 3 IT WILL BE DESTROYED 430 MICROBUSES

SCRAPPING of MICROBUSES

Quit using cars in order to travel by Metrobus

Over 72,000 people leaving their vehicle

every day

EMISSIONS REDUCTION: MODAL SHIFT

MODAL SHIFT

CARBON CREDITS

PERIOD EMISSIONS REDUCTION PAYMENT TO METROBÚS

2005 – 2006 29,177 CO2eq tons 121,959 Euros

2006 – 2007 38,210 CO2eq tons 159,717 Euros

2007 – 2008 39,870 CO2eq tons 166,655 Euros

Total 107,257 CO2eq tons 448,331 Euros

EMISSIONS REDUCTION: GHG EMISSIONS REDUCTION

EMISSIONS REDUCTION

METROBUS (PUBLIC ENTITY)

PLANS, MANAGES,

SCHEDULES AND

SUPERVISES THE SERVICE

UNIVERSAL FARE

COLLECTION

SYSTEM

PRIVATE AND

STATE-OWNED

TRANSPORT

ENTERPRISESTRUST FUND

System

INSTITUTIONAL MODEL

Transport operator shares

TRANSPORT OPERATORS. SHARES

MIV19%

COPSA5%

CTT SA7%

TSAJJ SA3%

CE4 - 17 MSA7%

CISA28%

RECSA7%

RTP22%

Before Metrobus

TRAFFIC DISORDER

After Metrobus

TRAFFIC ORDER

Before Metrobus

TRAVEL CONDITIONS

After Metrobus

TRAVEL CONDITIONS

AVERAGE SPEED:12 KM / HR

TRAFFIC/ CONGESTION

Before Metrobus

AVERAGE SPEED :17 KM / HR

SPEED AVERAGE:20 KM / HR

After Metrobus

TRAFFIC/ CONGESTION

Before Metrobus

INDIOS VERDES, TERMINAL

After Metrobus


After Metrobus


Before Metrobus

TEPALCATES, TERMINAL


Before Metrobus

After Metrobus


ACCESSIBILITY

Before Metrobus

After Metrobus

ACCESSIBILITY

After Metrobus

FARE COLLECTION SYSTEM

Insurgentes Avenue

Year Accidents recorded

Reduction comparing with previous year

2005 822

2006 381 54%

2007 318 17%

2008 290 9%

2009 182 37%

2010 128

Fuente: Dirección de Ingeniería de Tránsito SSP de la Ciudad de MéxicoDatos de accidentes viales en el corredor insurgentes.

ACCIDENTS REDUCTION

After Metrobus

INDIOS VERDES DOCTOR GÁLVEZ EL CAMINEROL1

BEFORE 2 HOURS, 40 MINUTES

…TODAY, WITH MB 1 HOUR, 23 MINUTES

…45% FASTER!

…50% FASTER!TACUBAYA TEPALCATESL2

BEFORE 2 HOURS

…TODAY, WITH MB 60 MINUTOS

TRAVEL TIME

TENAYUCA ETIOPÍAL3

BEFORE 1.7 HOURS

…TODAY, WITH MB 60 MINUTOS

…40% FASTER!

MULTIMODAL INTEGRATION

91% OF MB PASSENGERS

CONSIDERS THE SERVICE AS FAST OR VERY FAST

Cuarta encuesta de opinión a usuari@s de MB sobre equidad de género; Investigaciones Sociales Asociadas S. C. Septiembre 2009.

USER’s OPINION: FASTNESS

USERS’ OPINION

SECURITY AT MB

¿DO YOU CONDSIDER MB AS A SECURE TRANSPORT?

85%

90%


USER’s OPINION: SECURITY

USERS’ OPINION

THE 75% OF MB PASSENGERS

QUALIFY AS ABOVE

8


USER’s OPINION: OVERALL QUALITY

USERS’ OPINION

PHASE I (2007 - 2009)

PHASE II (2009 - 2011)

PHASE III (2011 - 2012)

6. PROL. DIV. DEL NORTE (2009)

10. TLAHUAC – CHALCO (2011 - 2012)

5-b. PERIFÉRICO II (2010 - 2011)

5-c. PERIFÉRICO III (2011 - 2012)

2. INSURGENTES SUR (2007)

5-a. PERIFÉRICO I (2008 - 2009)

8. EJE 6 SUR (2010)

3. EJE 4 SUR (2007 - 2008)

4. EJE 3 ORIENTE (2008 - 2009)

7. EJE 1 PONIENTE (2010)

9. EJE 8 SUR (2011)

REFORZAMIENTO STE

• EJE CENTRAL

• EJE 3 NORTE

• EJE 5 NORTE

• EJE 8 SUR

FUTURE

COMMON ARGUEMENTS

Government Vs Operators:

Bus operators are stubborn, they never agree on anythingThey have no idea how this business worksThe complain all time, although they earn big moneyThey never want to invert on new buses or technologies

Bus operators Vs Government

Administration of transport authorities changes all the time and we have to deal with new people that know nothing about transportWe have 30 years in the business, they know nothing about itThey never give to us enough informationHow can we make investments if they don’t raise the tariff?

SUCCESS

TRANSPORT OPERATOR

PUBLIC AUTHORITY

PUBLIC TRANSPORT

RIDER

Fair Business

Development, Equity Quality at service

INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE

BUS OWNER/ INDIVIDUAL OPERATOR

BUS OPERATION COMPANIES

Regulation at Service Safety and accessibility Organized operation Preventive & centralized maintenance Economies of Scale Financial Solvency Zero cash leakage (due to electronic fare

collection) Better working conditions High quality public transport service in

affordable cost

BENEFITS OF NEW SCHEME

Macrobús

Integrated fareConnection with the Light Rail

BRT SYSTEM AL 2011125,000 pass/day16 km

41 Articulated buses

104 feeder buses

15 feeder routes

27 Stations

MACROBUS

Before Macrobus

MACROBUS

Before Macrobus

MACROBUS

Before Macrobus

MACROBUS

Before Macrobus

MACROBUS

After Macrobus

MACROBUS

After Macrobus

MACROBUS

After Macrobus

KOCAELI VISIT AT MEXICO

¡

Teşekkürler!

[email protected]

Documents

BRT in Latin America: The Metrobus Experience