Bristol Comp Politics List.pdf

  • Upload
    hojiang

  • View
    217

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/29/2019 Bristol Comp Politics List.pdf

    1/17

    POLI 11103 COMPARATIVE GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS: AN INTRODUCTION

    2009/10 Teaching Block 2, weeks 13-24

    Unit Owner: Dr Andrew Wyatt Level: C

    Credit points: 20Phone 0117-928-8477 Prerequisites: None

    Email [email protected]

    Office 2.1, 10 Priory Road Monday, 12.10-1.00 and Thursday 12.10-1.00

    Lectures: Friday 11.10, location Chemistry LT3

    Curriculum area: Comparative Politics

    Unit description

    Why and how do states form? Why are some states democratic? How can conflict be managed?

    What difference does civil society make to political outcomes? Do political institutions matter? All

    of these questions can be answered by comparing the experiences of different countries. This unitintroduces students to the comparative study of politics and government. Students will become

    familiar with a broad range of theories and concepts used in comparative studies of politics. The

    theories and concepts will be applied intensively and comparatively to ten country cases: France,

    Germany, Japan, Russia, Brazil, China, India, Mexico, Iran and Nigeria. The unit begins by looking

    at some fundamental topics in the study of comparative politics including the purpose of

    comparison and leading theoretical approaches to comparative politics. A consideration of the

    process of state formation leads into a comparative analysis of transitions to democracy. The next

    section of the unit examines the role played by political parties as mediators between social forces

    and the formal institutions of government. The unit then examines the impact that formal

    institutions of government have on political outcomes. Themes covered in the final section of the

    unit include management of the economy, presidential executives, parliamentary systems, federal

    and consociational devices used to manage political conflict.

    Teaching arrangements

    1 lecture and 1 seminar per week.

    Requirements for credit points

    Satisfactory attendance at seminars

    A passing mark for the two essays and the end of unit exam.

    Summative assessment

    A two hour exam (100%)

    Core readingMark Kesselman, Joel Krieger & William A. Joseph (eds) (2010), Introduction to

    comparative politics: Political challenges and changing agendas, 5th edition, Boston: Houghton

    Mifflin. ISBN 0-495-79741-3

    Objectives

    to introduce students to key theories and concepts used in the study of comparative politics

    to introduce students to the key literature on comparative politics

    to introduce students to the outline of core political institutions

    to develop a critical approach to understanding political institutions

    Learning outcomes

    By the end of this unit students will:

    have read and understood some of the key literature on comparative politics.

    have demonstrated familiarity with key ideas used in the literature on comparative politics.

  • 7/29/2019 Bristol Comp Politics List.pdf

    2/17

    be able to use these ideas to frame explanations of political outcomes.

    be able to integrate empirical evidence into conceptually grounded arguments.

    be able to compare the political experiences of different countries.

    have a working knowledge of key institutions of government and

    have a working knowledge of politics in the country cases

    have demonstrated an ability to participate in seminar discussions

    Transferable skills Analytical thinking and problem solving

    Academic writing

    Verbal reasoning

    Development and feedback

    Feedback will be provided for the essays and the exams on this unit. The essay feedback will help

    you develop your writing skills and it will also indicate how you might be better prepared for the

    exam.

    Details of coursework and deadlines

    The written work requirements for this unit are two essays. The first essay is due on or before 12

    Noon, Friday, 5 March 2010 (week 18), the second on or before 12 Noon, Friday, 23 April 2010(week 21). Each essay should be between 1,500 and 2,000 words long.

    Although the required and supplementary reading indicated below is grouped in terms of weeks you

    should think about what other sources might be relevant to your essay.

    To write a good essay ensure that you: a) read widely, b) answer the question, c) explain in the

    introduction the context of the question, your basic argument and how the essay will proceed step

    by step (the structure), and d) signpost the structure throughout the essay, indicating the logical

    progression from paragraph to paragraph and section to section.

    TEACHING ARRANGEMENTS

    Lectures

    There are 11 lectures on this unit. There will be one 50 minute lecture each week, from week 13 to

    23. The lectures will take place on Fridays at 11.10 am. An outline summary of each lecture will

    be posted on the Blackboard virtual learning environment for the unit.

    Seminars

    There are 10 seminars on this unit. There will be one 50 minute seminar a week from week 13 to

    22. There are no seminars in weeks 23 and 24 to allow time for revision. It is vital that you read

    the required reading before participating in the seminar. Seminar tutors will work on the assumptionthat students have done the assigned reading in advance of the class and will ask students direct

    questions about the reading. Tutors will assign you to a reading group which also be the basis for

    small group discussion in the seminar classes.

    Contact details for the tutors:

    Ana Juncos Garcia

    Alvaro Mendez

    Hannah Parrott

    Andrew Wyatt

    LEARNING HOW TO LEARN

    In the course of this unit students are expected:

  • 7/29/2019 Bristol Comp Politics List.pdf

    3/17

    To read the core reading before attending seminars

    To do some supplementary reading in preparation for the essays and the exams

    To become familiar with the country cases by reading the core text

    To apply material from the country cases in a thematic way

    To reflect on the reading in the light of the seminar discussion questions

    To participate actively and demonstrate verbal reasoning skills in seminar discussions To take careful notes during lectures and synthesise this material with the reading material

    and seminar discussions

    To work in groups

    LEARNING RESOURCES

    Required text

    You need to purchase a copy of:

    Mark Kesselman, Joel Krieger & William A. Joseph (eds) (2010), Introduction to comparative

    politics: Political challenges and changing agendas, 5th edition, Boston: Houghton Mifflin. ISBN 0-

    495-79741-3 [The 4th edition can be used; be aware of different page numbers I will make a listavailable]

    Optional purchases

    The main text concentrates on country cases. The course pack outlines the conceptual material but

    the following textbooks cover conceptual material in an accessible way and you might want to buy

    one of the following for the purposes of supplementary reading:

    J. Bara & M. Pennington (2009), Comparative Politics, London: Sage. This book has very good

    chapters relevant to lectures 1, 6, 9 and 10.

    R. Hague & M. Harrop, Comparative government and politics: an introduction, various editions are

    available second hand.

    Course pack

    A course pack contains all of the set readings for the seminar discussion not included in the core

    text. The pack also includes some supplementary items, which along with the core readings, will be

    very useful for essay writing.

    Short-loan items

    A selection of useful items for essay writing is available on 3-hour short-loan. These items are

    designated with the symbol *.

    Blackboard Virtual Learning Environment

    The Department of Politics encourages the use of this package for all of its units. Course material is

    posted on this website. Announcements and email messages will also come through this route. It is

    essential that you register to use this learning tool. You may log in and generate a password at .

    Academic Journals

    This syllabus includes references to articles in academic journals. You should also browse journals

  • 7/29/2019 Bristol Comp Politics List.pdf

    4/17

    relevant to this unit. It is also helpful to read reviews of books listed on the reading list in the

    academic journals. Journals to browse include:

    Journal of Democracy

    Comparative Politics

    Comparative Political Studies

    World PoliticsElectoral Studies

    Electronic Journals

    The University library has a subscription to a large number of journals that are available through the

    library website (including most of those named above). It is also easy to find book reviews by

    searching online databases that are available when you log in via Athens. Electronic journals can be

    found at:

    http://www.bris.ac.uk/is/library/electronicjournals/

    This page also has a link showing how you can access electronic journals from off-campuslocations.

    Please do not use wikipedia. Consult sources directly.

    Lecture and seminar schedule

    Week Lecture topic Deadlines Seminar topic

    13 Comparisons and the study of Politics (Fri 29 Jan) Unit introduction

    14 State formation (Fri 5 Feb) Comparisons

    15 Civil society (Fri 12 Feb) State formation

    16 Transitions between Democracy and Authoritarianism (Fri 19 Feb) Civil

    society

    17 Social and Political divisions (Fri 26 Feb) Democratic transition

    18 Parties (Fri 5 Mar) Essay 1 deadline (Fri 5 Mar) Social and political divisions

    19 Party Systems and Electoral Systems (Fri 12 Mar) Parties

    20 States and economic development (Fri 19 Mar) Party systems

    21 Presidential and parliamentary systems (Fri 23 April) Essay 2 deadline (Fri 24 Apr)

    States and Economic Development

    22 Managing conflict: federal and consociational devices (Fri 30 Apr)

    Presidential and parliamentary systems

    23 Revision lecture (Fri 7 May) No seminar

    Seminar schedule

    Core reading is given for each weeks seminar. You must read ALL this material. The core seminar

    reading provides the basis for discussion. Some of this is taken from the core text (which you are

    expected to buy). The rest of the core material is included in the course pack (these are designated

    with the symbol ). Although you must complete this reading, you should not, of course, confine

    yourself to such material. Supplementary reading is given at the back of this syllabus. A further list

    of supplementary reading for the latter half of the unit is provided in the references at the end of

    each set of lecture notes. Please note that some of the reading overlaps and informs seminar

    discussions for more than one week. This will help you make connections across the subject anddevelop an understanding of broad themes in the study of comparative politics.

  • 7/29/2019 Bristol Comp Politics List.pdf

    5/17

    Week 13: Introduction and assignment of country cases

    Seminar tutors will assign students to one of two reading groups. This is to guide students through

    the reading schedule for the following country cases: France, Germany, Japan, Russia, Brazil,

    China, India, Mexico, Iran, and Nigeria. One objective of the course is for you to learn how to

    make use of the country cases and use them as evidence to test the leading theories of comparative

    politics. The reading groups will facilitate comparison and small group discussion in classes.

    Learning outcome:

    Familiarity with the unit structure, teaching methods and required work.

    Week 14: Why Compare?

    Discussion Questions:

    How do comparisons help us extend our understanding of politics? What are the shortcomings of

    studying politics on a country by country basis? What do the leading theories of comparative

    politics tell us about how politics works? What comments do you have about the selection and

    classification of the country cases in the core text?

    Core Reading:

    M. Kesselman, J. Krieger, & W.A. Joseph (eds) (2010), Introduction to comparative politics:

    Political challenges and changing agendas, pp. 4-25

    Extracts from M. Lichbach and A. Zuckerman (eds) (2007), Comparative Politics: Rationality,

    Culture and Structure, pp.3-8 and 242-249.

    Learning Outcomes:

    An understanding of the insights gained from comparative study

    A knowledge of the theoretical foundations of the sub-discipline of comparative politics

    Week 15: State formation

    Discussion Questions:

    How and why do states form? Do European models provide a useful guide to the process of state

    formation elsewhere? What kind of comparison are we making when we compare Germany and

    Japan? What do the paired comparisons tell us? Which is more illuminating: comparing Iran with

    Germany/Japan or comparing Iran with India/Nigeria?

    Core Reading:

    C. Tilly (1985) War Making and State Making as Organized Crime, in P.B. Evans, D.

    Rueschemeyer & T. Skocpol (eds) Bringing the state back in, pp. 169-191.

    B. Moore (1967), Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making

    of the Modern World, pp.433-442.

    Kesselman et al (2010), pp. 579-597 (Iran)

    Group A Group B

  • 7/29/2019 Bristol Comp Politics List.pdf

    6/17

    Kesselman et al, pp. 266-278 (India) and 364-377 (Nigeria) Kesselman et al, pp.158-170

    (Germany) and 212-224 (Japan)

    Learning Outcomes:

    An understanding of general and particular historical legacies following from the process of

    state formation.

    Week 16: Civil Society

    Discussion Questions:

    What have been the distinctive contributions of civil society to political development in the two

    cases you have read about? What similarities and differences are revealed by comparing the two

    cases you have read about? Does the evidence from your country cases confirm or challenge

    existing conceptual and theoretical assumptions about civil society?

    Core Reading:

    Group A Group B

    Kesselman et al, relevant section on Germany (199-203) and Japan (252-8) Kesselman et al,

    relevant sections on India (301-6) and Nigeria (404-6)

    R. Putnam (2000), Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community, pp.15-28.

    A. Varshney (2002), Ethnic Conflict and Civic Life, pp.3-18

    S. Berman (1997), 'Civil Society and the Collapse of the Weimar Republic', World Politics,

    49/3 pp. 401-429

    Learning Outcome:

    A recognition of the ambiguous political character of civil society

    Week 17: Transitions between Authoritarianism and Democracy

    Discussion Questions:

    On the basis of your accumulated reading how would you explain the transitions in the consolidated

    democracies of France, Germany and Japan?

    Individuals in group A: What do the experiences of Mexico and Russia tell us about the process of

    transition?

    Individuals in group B: What, if anything, might lead you to expect China to make a transition to

    liberal democracy?

    Core Reading:

    Kesselman et al (2010), pp. 25-31, 100-14 (France), 158-170 (Germany) and 212-224 (Japan)

    Group A Group BKesselman et al, pp. 518-530, 553-572 (Russia) and 472-85 (Mexico) Kesselman et al, pp. 626-

    39 and 675-680 (China)

  • 7/29/2019 Bristol Comp Politics List.pdf

    7/17

    B. Moore (1967), Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy, pp.413-32

    G. Therborn (1977), The Rule of Capital and the Rise of Democracy, New Left

    Review, 103, pp.3-41

    Learning Outcomes: An awareness of the range of explanations for the development of democratic politics

    Week 18: Social and Political Cleavages

    Discussion Questions:

    How and why do social divisions become politically relevant? In what ways have social divisions

    influenced the political development of India and China? How would you explain differences

    between the two cases?

    Core Reading:

    Kesselman et al, pp. 266-284, 296-306 (India) and 660-80 (China)

    E.E. Schattschneider (1960), The Semisovereign People: A Realists View of Democracy in

    America, pp. 62-77.

    A. Varshney (2007) Ethnicity and Ethnic Conflict, in Boix and Stokes (eds) Oxford Handbook

    of Comparative Politics, pp.274-94.

    Learning Outcomes:

    An understanding of how social divisions influence political conflict in particular cases

    An ability to explain how political entrepreneurs exploit social divisions or use political

    cleavages to conceal latent conflict

    Week 19: Political Parties

    Discussion Questions:

    Why do political parties form? What functions do parties perform in the cases of Mexico, Brazil

    and France? How are they similar and how do they differ?

    Core Reading:Kesselman et al (2010), pp. 137-142 (France), 450-456 (Brazil) and 499-506 (Mexico)

    J. Aldrich (1995), Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America,

    pp.18-27.

    G. Sartori (1976), Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis, pp.24-9.

    E.E. Schattschneider (1960), The Semisovereign People, pp. 62-77. (see reading for previous

    week)

    P. Webb (2002), Introduction, in P. Webb, D. Farrell, & I. Holliday (eds), Political Parties inAdvanced Industrial Democracies, pp.11-13.

  • 7/29/2019 Bristol Comp Politics List.pdf

    8/17

    Learning Outcomes:

    An understanding of the range of functions political parties might perform

    An understanding of the diversity of political parties within and across states

    Week 20: Party Systems and Electoral systems

    Discussion Questions:

    What relationships are said to exist between electoral systems and the party system? What

    relationships exist between social divisions and party systems? What do the party systems of

    Germany and France have in common? How do they diverge? What do the party systems of India,

    Japan and Mexico have in common? How do they diverge?

    Core Reading:

    Kesselman et al (2010), pp. 137-42 (France), 189-199 (Germany), 248-52 (Japan), 296-301 (India)

    and 499-506 (Mexico)

    S.M. Lipset & S. Rokkan (eds) Party Systems and Voter Alignments, pp.13-23 and 47-54.

    M. Duverger, (1964) Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State,

    pp.217-26

    Learning Outcomes:

    An understanding of structural accounts of party system formation

    An understanding of institutional approaches to party system maintenance

    An ability to explain processes of party system change in particular cases

    SUMMER TERM

    Week 21: States and Economic Development

    Discussion Questions:

    How, if at all, have political priorities shaped the economy of the countries you have compared?

    How have economic factors influenced political development in the countries you have compared?

    What similarities and differences are revealed by your comparisons? Does the evidence from your

    country cases confirm or challenge existing conceptual and theoretical assumptions about how

    states interact with their economies?

    Core Reading:

    Group A Group B

    Section 2 of Kesselman et al on: Nigeria and Iran Section 2 of Kesselman et al on:

    Brazil and Mexico

    R.H. Bates (1981), Markets and states in tropical Africa: the political basis of agricultural policies,

    pp.119-128.

    P. Evans (1995), Embedded autonomy: states and industrial transformation, pp. 3-13.

    A. Kohli (2002), State, Society, and Development in I. Katznelson & H. Milner (eds), Political

    Science: the state of the discipline, pp.109-114.

  • 7/29/2019 Bristol Comp Politics List.pdf

    9/17

    Learning Outcomes:

    An understanding of how economic factors impact on political development

    A broad understanding of how political factors might determine economic outcomes

    Week 22: Presidential and parliamentary systems

    Discussion Questions:

    What are the perils of presidentialism? What technical flaws are there in the argument presented by

    Linz? What other cases might you apply Linzs argument to? What are the strengths and

    weaknesses of the system of government detailed in your selected country cases?

    Core Reading:

    All: Kesselman et al (2010), pp.234-40 (Japan) and 493-496 (Mexico)

    Group A Group BKesselman et al, pp. 122-130 (France) and 286-8 (India) Kesselman et al, pp. 180-6 (Germany)

    and 440-7 (Brazil)

    All:

    J. Linz (1993) The Perils of Presidentialism, in L. Diamond and M. Plattner (eds), The Global

    resurgence of democracy, pp.108-26.

    S. Mainwaring & M. Shugart (1997) Juan Linz, Presidentialism, and Democracy: A Critical

    Appraisal, Comparative Politics, 29/4, pp. 449-71.

    Learning Outcomes:

    An understanding of the contested relationship between political executives and democratic

    stability

    The first essay for this unit should be taken from questions 1-4.

    The core text, with its data on different country cases, is assumed to be an important source for the

    writing of your essays. However to write a good essay you are expected to read beyond this source

    and make use of a wider range of sources. You are especially encouraged to use some of the

    sources listed below to help you develop the conceptual aspect of your essays. Be wary of online

    sources with out an academic provenance. It is better to use work by academic authors which tendsto be carefully researched and has usually been read by at least one referee to check its quality.

    There is a good deal of material available in the electronic journals provided by the library and

    accessible through the library website. And dont forget the material included in the course pack!

    1. What are the advantages of a comparative approach over the study of a single case?

    2. Why do states form?

    3. By what mechanisms does civil society shape political outcomes?

    4. Which theoretical approach to explaining democratic transition do you find most persuasive?

    Illustrate your answer with reference to at least two of the country cases.

  • 7/29/2019 Bristol Comp Politics List.pdf

    10/17

    ESSAY QUESTIONS FOR SECOND ESSAY SUBMISSION

    The second essay for this unit should be an answer to one of the two questions given below. Again

    some sources are listed below but do also seek out other scholarly material.

    5. The party system of the Federal Republic of Germany between 1949 and 2009 was determined

    by the social structure of German society. Explain why you would agree or disagree with the

    statement.

    6. To what extent have the institutions of the French Fifth Republic limited the development and

    influence of political parties?

    SUPPLEMENTARY AND ESSAY READING

    Topic 1: Comparison and the study of Comparative PoliticsSources available online:

    D. Collier (1993), The Comparative Method', in A.W. Finifter (ed) (1993), Political Science: The

    State of the Discipline II, available at:

    A. Lijphart (1971) Comparative Politics and the comparative method, American

    Political Science Review, 65/3, [Electronic Journal]

    C. Ragin & J. Sonnett (2004), Between Complexity and Parsimony: Limited Diversity,

    Counterfactual Cases, and Comparative Analysis, COMPASSS Working Papers, WP2004-23,

    available at:

    C. Ragin (2003), 'Making Comparative Analysis Count', COMPASSS Working Papers,

    WP 2003-10, available at: < http://www.compasss.org/RaginDayOne.PDF>

    T. Skocpol & M. Somers (1980), Approaches to Historical Comparison: The Uses of

    Comparative History in Macrosocial Inquiry, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 22/2,

    pp.174-97. [Electronic Journal]

    R. Snyder (2001) Scaling Down: The Subnational Comparative Method, Studies in Comparative

    International Development, 36/1, pp. 93-110. available at:

    Coursepack items:

    M. Lichbach and A. Zuckerman (eds) (1997), Comparative Politics: Rationality,

    Culture and Structure, pp.1-8.

    J. Hopkin (2002) Comparative Methods in D. Marsh and G. Stoker (eds), Theory

    and methods in political science, pp.249-67.

    B.G. Peters (1998), Comparative Politics: Theory and Methods, pp.28-46, 56-7.

    Other sources:

    * J. Bara & M. Pennington (2009), Comparative Politics, Ch 2, JF51 COM

    P. Burnham, K. Gilland, W. Grant & Z. Layton-Henry (2004), Research Methods in Politics,

    JA86 RES*R. Hague & M. Harrop (2007), Comparative government and politics: an introduction, JF51

    HAG

  • 7/29/2019 Bristol Comp Politics List.pdf

    11/17

    G. King, R.O. Keohane and S. Verba (1994), Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific

    Inference in Qualitative Research, H61 KIN

    D. Laitin (2002), Comparative Politics: The State of the Subdiscipline, in I.

    Katznelson & H. Milner (eds), Political Science: the state of the discipline, JC11 POL

    A. Lijphart (1975) The comparable cases strategy in comparative research,

    Comparative Political Studies, 8/2. Serial JA1.C6

    T. Landman (2003), Issues and methods in comparative politics: an introduction, chs1 & 2, JF51 LAN

    P.H. O Neil, Essentials of Comparative Politics, Ch 1, JF51 ONE

    *B.G. Peters (1998), Comparative Politics: Theory and Methods, Ch1, JF51 PET

    *D. Rueschemeyer (2003), Can One or a Few Cases Yield Theoretical Gains?, in J.

    Mahoney & D. Rueschemeyer (eds) Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, H61

    COM

    Topic 2: State Formation

    Sources available online:

    L. Anderson (1987) The State in the Middle East and North Africa, Comparative

    Politics, 20/1, pp. 1-18. [Electronic Journal]R. Bean (1973), War and the Birth of the Nation State, The Journal of Economic

    History, 33/1,pp. 203-221. [Electronic Journal]

    R. Brubaker (1994), Nationhood and the National Question in the Soviet Union and

    Post-Soviet Eurasia: An Institutionalist Account, Theory and Society, 23/1, pp. 47-78. [Electronic

    Journal]

    A. Cooley (2001), Booms and Busts: Theorizing Institutional Formation and Change

    In Oil States, Review of International Political Economy, pp.163 180,

    [Electronic Journal]

    P. Gorski (1988), Review of Birth of the Leviathan: Building States and Regimes in

    Medieval and Early Modern Europe by Thomas Ertman, Contemporary Sociology, 27/,2, pp.186-

    8. [Electronic Journal]

    J. Herbst (1989) The Creation and Maintenance of Boundaries: Africa, International

    Organization, 43/4, pp.67392 [Electronic Journal]

    J. Herbst (1990) War and the State in Africa, International Security, 14/4, pp.11739,

    [Electronic Journal]

    T. Knudsen & Bo Rothstein (1994), State Building in Scandinavia, Comparative

    Politics, 26/2, pp. 203-220.

    R.H. Jackson (1987) Quasi-States, Dual Regimes, and Neoclassical Theory:

    International Jurisprudence and the Third World, International Organization, 41/4: 51950.

    [Electronic Journal]

    M. Olson (1993), Dictatorship, Democracy, and Development, The AmericanPolitical Science Review, 87/3, pp. 567-576, [Electronic Journal]

    R. Stubbs (1999), War and Economic Development: Export-Oriented

    Industrialization in East and Southeast Asia, Comparative Politics, 31/3, pp. 337-355, [Electronic

    Journal]

    Coursepack items:

    C. Tilly (1985) War Making and State Making as Organized Crime, in P.B. Evans, D.

    Rueschemeyer & T. Skocpol (eds) Bringing the state back in, Cambridge: Cambridge University

    Press, pp. 169-191.

    Other sources:A. Adu Boahen (1987), African Perspectives on Colonialism, JV 246 BOA.

    L. Anderson (1986), The state and social transformation in Tunisia and Libya, 1830-

  • 7/29/2019 Bristol Comp Politics List.pdf

    12/17

    1980, HN784.A8 AND

    B. Davidson (1992), The black man's burden: Africa and the curse of the nation-state,

    DT30 DAV

    *H. Spruyt (2007) War, Trade and State Formation in C. Boix and S. Stokes (eds)

    Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, JF51 OXF

    M. Mann (1986), The sources of social power, volume 1, HM131 MAN

    M. Mann (1993), The sources of social power, volume 2, HM131 MANJ. Migdal (1988), Strong societies and weak states, JF60 MIG

    *B. Moore (1967), Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy, HN15 MOO

    O Neil, Essentials of Comparative Politics, Ch 2, JF51 ONE

    G. Poggi (1990) The state: its nature, development and prospects, pp.86-116, JC421

    POG,

    Topic 3: Civil society

    Sources available online:

    E. Bellin (1994), Civil Society: Effective Tool of Analysis for Middle East Politics?,

    PS: Political Science and Politics, 27/3: pp.509-10, [Electronic Journal]S. Berman (1997), 'Civil Society and the Collapse of the Weimar Republic', World Politics,

    49/3 pp. 401-429, [Electronic Journal]

    S. Berman (1997) Civil Society and Political Institutionalization, American Behavioral

    Scientist, 40/5, available at:

    S. Berman (2003) Islamism, Revolution and Civil Society, Perspectives on Politics,

    1/2, available at:

    N. Bermeo (1992), Democracy and the Lessons of Dictatorship, Comparative

    Politics, 24/3, especially pp.283-8, [Electronic Journal]

    A. Brysk (2000), Democratizing Civil Society in Latin America, Journal of Democracy,

    11/3, pp.151-165, [Electronic Journal]

    M. Foley & B. Edwards (1996), Paradox of Civil Society, Journal of Democracy, 7/3, pp. 38-

    52, [Electronic Journal]

    F. Fukuyama (2001), Social Capital, Civil Society and Development, Third World

    Quarterly, 22/1: pp. 7-20, [Electronic Journal]

    J. Hearn (2000), Aiding Democracy? Donors and Civil Society in South Africa, Third

    World Quarterly, 21/5, pp.815-830. [Electronic Journal]

    R. Jenkins (2001) Mistaking Governance for Politics: Foreign Aid, Democracy and the

    Construction of Civil Society, in S. Kaviraj & S. Khilnani (eds.), Civil Society:

    History and Possibilities, pp. 250-68, available at:

    R. Jenkins (2005) Indias Civil Society, in P. Burnell & V. Randall (eds), Politics inthe Developing World, available at:

    N. Kasfir (1998), The Conventional Notion of Civil Society: A Critique,

    Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, 36/2: pp.1-20.

    R. Lemarchand (1992), 'Uncivil States and Civil Societies: How Illusion Became

    Reality', Journal of Modern African Studies, 30/2, pp.177-191. [Electronic journal]

    P. Mouritsen (2003), Whats the Civil in Civil Society? Robert Putnam, Italy and the

    Republican Tradition, Political Studies, 51/4, pp.65068, [Electronic journal]

    P. Norris and R. Inglehart (2003) Gendering Social Capital: Bowling in Womens

    Leagues?, a paper presented at the conference Gender and Social Capital, St Johns College,

    University of Manitoba, 2-3 May. Online. Available at:

    P. Oxhorn (1994), Understanding Political Change after Authoritarian Rule: The

  • 7/29/2019 Bristol Comp Politics List.pdf

    13/17

    Popular Sectors and Chile's New Democratic Regime', Journal of Latin American Studies, 26/3, pp.

    737-759, [Electronic Journal]

    A. de Tocqueville (1835), Relationships between Civil and Political Associations, in

    Democracy in America, available online at:

    G. White (1995), 'Civil society, democratization and development (II): Two country

    cases', Democratization, 2/2, pp.56-84, [Electronic Journal]L. Whitehead (1997), Bowling in the Bronx: The Uncivil Interstices between Civil and

    Political Society, Democratisation, 4/1:pp. 94-114, [Electronic Journal]

    S. Yom (2005), Civil Society and Democratization in the Arab World, Middle East

    Review of International Affairs, 9/4, available at:

    Coursepack items:

    B. Moore (1967), Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy, pp.413-32.

    R. Putnam (2000), Bowling alone, pp. 15-28.

    Other Sources:J. Bayart (1986) 'Civil Society in Africa', in P. Chabal (ed), Political domination in

    Africa, JQ1872 POL

    J. Harriss (2001), Depoliticizing development: the World Bank and social capital, ch.

    4, HC79.C3 HAR

    J. Keane (1988), Democracy and civil society, JC423 KEA

    *M. Morje Howard (2003), The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe,

    JC 599.E92 HOW

    R. Putnam, R. Leonardi & R. Nanetti (1993) Making democracy work, JN5477.R35

    PUT

    E. Shils (1991), The Virtue of Civil Society, Government & Opposition, Serial

    JA1.G6

    *S. Tarrow & C. Tilly (2007) Contentious Politics and Social Movements in C. Boix &

    S. Stokes (eds) Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, JF51 OXF

    Topic 4: Transitions to Democracy

    Sources available online:

    R. Barro (1999) Determinants of Democracy, The Journal of Political Economy,

    107/6, pp.158-83. [Electronic Journal]

    S. Berman (2007), Lessons From Europe', Journal of Democracy 18/1, pp. 28-41,[Electronic Journal]

    N. Bermeo (1992), Democracy and the Lessons of Dictatorship, Comparative

    Politics, 24/3, especially pp.276-9. [Electronic Journal]

    L. Diamond (2002), Thinking About Hybrid Regimes, Journal of Democracy, 13/2:pp.

    21-35, [Electronic Journal]

    T. Karl (1990), Dilemmas of Democratization in Latin America, Comparative Politics,

    23/1, pp.1-21. [Electronic Journal]

    T. Karl & P. Schmitter (2002), Concepts, Assumptions & Hypotheses about

    Democratization: Reflections on Stretching from South to East, esp. pp.12-24, unpublished paper,

  • 7/29/2019 Bristol Comp Politics List.pdf

    14/17

    available at:

    D. Rustow (1970), Transitions to Democracy: Towards a Dynamic Model, Comparative

    Politics, 35/1, pp. 5166. [Electronic Journal]

    L. Whitehead (2005), 'Freezing the Flow: Theorizing About Democratization in a

    World in Flux', Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 1/1, available at:

    < http://www.tfd.org.tw/docs/dj0101/001-020.pdf>

    Coursepack items:

    K. Adeney and A. Wyatt (2004), Democracy in South Asia: Getting beyond the

    Structure-Agency Dichotomy; Political Studies, 52/1, pp.1-18.

    S.P. Huntington (1991), The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth

    Century, pp.3-30.

    H. Kitschelt (1992), Political Regime Change: Structure and Process-Driven

    Explanations?, American Political Science Review, 86/4, pp.1028-34.B. Moore (1967), Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy, pp.413-32.

    G. Therborn (1977), The Rule of Capital and the Rise of Democracy, New Left

    Review, 103, pp.3-41.

    Other Sources:

    K. von Beyme (1996), Transition to democracy in eastern Europe, JN96.A58 BEY

    M. Bratton & N. van de Walle (1997), Democratic experiments in Africa: regime

    transitions in comparative perspective, JQ1879.A15 BRA

    P. Burnell & V. Randall (eds) (2007), Politics in the Developing World, JF60 POL

    G. ODonnell, P. Schmitter & L. Whitehead (eds.), Transitions from Authoritarian Rule:

    Prospects for Democracy. JF1051 TRA

    B. Fowkes (1995), The Rise and Fall of Communism in Eastern Europe, HX240.7.A6

    FOW

    J. Haynes (ed) (2001), Towards sustainable democracy in the Third World, JF60

    TOW

    *J. Linz & A. Stepan (eds) (1996), Problems of Democratic Transition and

    Consolidation, JN94.A2 LIN

    A. Lijphart (1990), The Southern European Examples of Democratisation: six

    lessons for Latin America, Government and Opposition, Serial JA1.G6

    *B. Moore (1967), Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy, HN15 MOO

    L. Morlino (1998), Democracy between consolidation and crisis: parties, groups, andcitizens in Southern Europe, JN94.A91 MOR

    J. Nagle & A. Mahr (1999), Democracy and democratization: post-communist

    Europe in comparative perspective, JC421 NAG

    O Neil, Essentials of Comparative Politics, Ch 5, JF51 ONE

    *D. Potter (ed) (1997), Democratization, JC421 DEM

    G. Pridham (1991) (ed.), Encouraging Democracy: the International Context of

    Regime Transition in Southern Europe, JN94.A91 ENC

    T. Vanhanen (1997), Prospects for democracy, JC421 VAN

    L. Whitehead (2000), Comparative politics: democratization studies, in R. Goodin &

    H. Klingemann (eds), A New Handbook of Political Science, JA71 NEW

    P.W. Zagorski (2009), Comparative Politics: Continuity and Breakdown in the ContemporaryWorld, JF51 ZAG

  • 7/29/2019 Bristol Comp Politics List.pdf

    15/17

    SUPPLEMENTARY READING FOR THE SECOND ESSAY

    Topic 5: The German Party System

    Online Sources/Electronic journals

    R. Dalton (2007) Politics in Germany: The Online Edition, Ch 8, available at:http://www.socsci.uci.edu/~rdalton/germany/ch8/chap8.htm

    J. Lane & S. Ersson (1997) Parties and Voters: What Creates the Ties?, Scandinavian

    Political Studies 20/2, pp.179196 [a reply to Mair (1993)]

    L. Helms (2007), The German federal election, September 2005, Electoral Studies, 26/1, pp.

    223-227.

    M. Janowitz and D. Segal (1967) Social Cleavage and Party Affiliation: Germany, Great Britain,

    and the United States, The American Journal of Sociology, 72/6, pp.601-18

    C. Lees (2006), The German Party System(s) in 2005: A Return to Volkspartei

    Dominance, German Politics, 15/4, pp.361 375.

    P. Mair (1993) Myths of electoral change and the survival of traditional parties. The 1992

    Stein Rokkan Lecture, European Journal of Political Research 24/2, pp.121133P. Mair (1997a), Party System Change: Approaches and Interpretations, Chapter 1, available

    via the library website at Oxford Scholarship Online (IGNORE the message that says only the

    abstract is available). http://www.bristol.ac.uk/is/library/electronicbooks/

    S. Padgett (2001), The German Volkspartei and the Career of the Catch-all Concept,

    German Politics, 10/2, pp. 51-72

    F. Pappi (1984), The west German party system, West European Politics, 7/4, pp. 7 26

    T. Poguntke (2001), The German Party System: Eternal Crisis?, German Politics,

    10/2, August 2001 , pp.37 50.

    K.M Roberts (2005), Explaining Party System Stability and Change, a paper presented to the

    Political Economy Research Colloquium, Cornell University, 17 November. Available at:

    http://falcon.arts.cornell.edu/Govt/PERC_files/roberts.pdf

    Coursepack items

    S.M. Lipset and S. Rokkan (eds) (1967), Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-

    national Perspectives, pp.13-23, and 47-54.

    M. Maor (1997), Political Parties and Party Systems: Comparative Approaches and the

    British Experience, pp.17-26

    Books and Articles

    *C.S. Allen (2001) Transformation of the German political party system: institutional crisis or

    democratic renewal?, JN3971.A979 TRA*D. Caramani (2008), Comparative Politics, ch 13: Party Systems, JA86 COM

    *M. Gallagher, M.Laver, & P. Mair (2001) Representative Government in Modern Europe,

    JN94 GAL

    *A. Gould (2005), Germany, in J. Kopstein & M. Lichbach (eds) Comparative Politics:

    Interests, Identities, and Institutions in a Changing Global Order, JF51 COM

    P. Mair and G. Smith (eds) Understanding Party System Change in Western Europe,

    JN94.A979 UND

    Y. Mny & A. Knapp (1998), Government and politics in Western Europe: Britain, France,

    Italy, Germany, JF52 MEN

    S. Padgett (1986), Political Parties and Elections in West Germany, Ch 6, JN 3971.A98

    S. Padgett (ed) (1993), Parties and party systems in the new Germany, JN3972.A979 PAR*S. Padgett & T. Poguntke (eds) (2002) Continuity and change in German politics :beyond

    the politics of centrality?, JN3971.A58 CON [This book includes hard copy versions of

  • 7/29/2019 Bristol Comp Politics List.pdf

    16/17

    the papers listed issue in 10/2 in the electronic journal German Politics]

    *G Smith, W.E. Paterson, S. Padgett (eds) (1996) Developments in German politics 2,

    JN3971.A91 DEV

    *A. Ware (1996), Political Parties and Party Systems, JF2011 WAR

    Topic 6: The French Party System

    Online Sources/Electronic journals

    S. Bartolini (1984), Institutional constraints and party competition in the French party system,

    West European Politics, 7/4, pp.103 127.

    A. Cole (1993), The Presidential Party and the Fifth Republic, West European Politics, 16/2,

    pp.86-103

    P. Mair (1997), E.E. Schattschneiders The Semisovereign People, Political Studies, 45/5,

    947-54

    Jae-Jae Spoon (2008), Presidential and legislative elections in France, April-June 2007,

    Electoral Studies, 27/1, pp.155-60

    Coursepack items

    S.M. Lipset and S. Rokkan (eds) (1967), Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-

    national Perspectives, pp.13-23, and 47-54.

    M. Maor (1997), Political Parties and Party Systems: Comparative Approaches and the

    British Experience, pp.17-26.

    Books and Articles

    *D. Caramani (2008), Comparative Politics, ch 13: Party Systems, JA86 COM

    A. Cole & P. Campbell, (1989) French electoral systems and elections since 1789, JN2959

    COL

    A. Cole (1990), The Evolution of the Party System, in A. Cole (ed), French Political Parties

    in transition, JN2997 FRE

    A. Cole (2000), The Party System: the End of Old Certainties, in G. Raymond (ed),

    Structures of Power in Modern France, pp.19-38, JN2594.2 STR

    *J. Evans (ed) (2003), The French Party System, JN2997 FRE

    P. Culpepper, P. Hall, B. Palier (2008), Changing France, HN425.5 CHA

    *M. Gallagher, M.Laver, and P. Mair (2001) Representative Government in Modern Europe,

    JN94 GAL

    A. Knapp & V. Wright (2001), The government and politics of France, JN2594 WRI

    *A. Knapp & F. Sawicki (2008), Political Parties and the Party System, in A. Cole, P. Le

    Gales & J. Levy (eds), Developments in French Politics 4, JN2594.2 DEVA. Knapp (2002), France: Never a Golden Age, in P. Webb, D. Farrell & I. Holliday (eds),

    Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies, JF2051

    A. Knapp (2004), Parties and Party Systems in France, JN 2997 KNA

    *Y. Meny (2008), France: The Institutionalisation of Leadership, in J. Colomer (ed),

    Comparative European Politics, JN94.A58 COM

    A. Stevens (1996), The Government and Politics of France, JN 2594 STE

    General departmental rules for undergraduates

  • 7/29/2019 Bristol Comp Politics List.pdf

    17/17

    Attendance at classes

    The Department of Politics takes attendance and participation in classes very seriously. Seminars

    form an important part of your learning and you need to make sure you arrive on time, having done

    the required reading. If you miss seminars, even if it is for a valid reason, you will be asked to

    complete catch-up work to demonstrate that you are not falling behind on the unit. These pieces

    of work are required for credit points and it will affect your progression if you do not complete

    them. You should also fill out a self-certification form. See section 2.4 of the Handbook for furtherdetails.

    Submission of coursework

    Please note you will be required to submit coursework electronically using Blackboard, the

    University of Bristols Online Learning Environment. Without an extension late work is subject to

    penalties. See section 2.8 of the Handbook for details of these penalties.

    Length

    Each piece of coursework must conform to the length requirements listed in the syllabus. The

    syllabus will confirm whether appendices are allowed. Work that does not conform to length

    requirements will be subject to penalties. See section 2.8 of the Handbook for further details.

    Referencing

    Where sources are used they must be cited. Most types of coursework must contain a bibliography

    and reference the material used. Inadequate referencing will result in marks being deducted. See

    section 2.7 of the Handbook for penalties, where to get help with referencing and how bad academic

    practice and plagiarism is dealt with.

    Extensions

    Extensions will only be granted by the Progress Tutor. Requests should be made directly to her.

    Extensions will only be allowed in exceptional circumstances and they should be accompanied with

    supporting documentation, for example medical certificates. See section 3.3.4 of the Handbook for

    further details.

    Fails and resits

    See section 3.3.7 of the Handbook.

    Course packs

    Most units have course packs, which will be available from the end of week 0 from the Department

    at 10 Priory Road. These are provided free of charge.

    Mid-unit evaluationsEach unit will provide a mid-unit evaluation on Blackboard. Students will be asked to complete a

    short survey to indicate how they feel the course is going so far. We appreciate your feedback and

    encourage you to complete this survey.

    Surveys will be open in week 5 (Teaching Block 1) and 17 (Teaching Block 2).

    For further information, students should consult the Politics Undergraduate Handbook (available

    online at http://www.bris.ac.uk/politics/current-ug/handbook.html) and the appropriate Faculty

    Handbook.