Brinson Memorial Elementary School’s Vision

Thank You for all that you have done!

Congratulations on a fantastic school year! We

have a lot to celebrate.

Brinson Memorial Elementary School’s

Vision• Brinson Memorial Elementary

School will be the highest performing elementary school in North Carolina

Brinson Memorial Elementary School’s

Mission• Brinson Memorial, in partnership

with families and communities, will provide opportunities for all students to reach their highest potential and become responsible citizens in a global society

21st Century Content-Core Content -Entrepreneurial-Global Awareness -Health and

Wellness-Financial Literacy -Information and-Economic Literacy Communication-Business Literacy Technology-Civic Literacy

21st Century SkillsSkills (The 4 C’s)

CollaboratationCommunicationCreativityCrticial Thinking

Future Ready Students for

the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina

State Board of Education is that every public school student will graduate from

high school, globally competitive for work and postsecondary education and

prepared for life in the 21st century.

www.21stcenturyskills.org

ELA and Math Common Core Transition Plan

• Essential Standards for Social Studies will be taught this year

• ELA and Math will be taught and tested in the 2012 -2013 school year

• “Begin with the End in Mind (Covey)”-What will your 45 day plans look like by June of 2012 as your prepare for the next school year

• How will you house your new resources for future lesson planning?

Celebrate Our Facilico TeamHead Day Porter-Austin Mitchell

Head Night Porter-Kimothy Mclaurin

Welcome our new Title I Teacher• Melissa White

Welcome Our Staff Members in their New Teams

• Michelle Sheaffer - new member of the 3rd grade team

• Cathy Rock -new member of the 4th grade team

Welcome Our New Members of the Bus Driving Team

• Alton Kinsey-EC Monitor• Barbara Dixon

• Shannon Lee – EC BUS • Teresa Green- PM

Welcome our New 1st Grade Team Member!

Jill Grant

Welcome Our New 2nd Grade Team Member!

Kimberly Valenti

Welcome Our New 5th Grade Team Member!

Michele Owens

CabinetKathy Barber-co-facilitatorK-2 Reading-Linda Edwards3-5 Reading-Ashley FillingameMath-Kathy BarberSafety Standards-Gregg Carlaccini

Cabinet• Safe and Inviting-Sherri Grubbs• Drop Out Goal Team-Debbie Hunter • Title I and FastForword-Stacey

Dimattia• Media Technology and Information-

Mary Batten

Cabinet Vote• Please complete the cabinet vote

on my admin wiki on the Cabinet page

• This is due by 3:00 on Friday, August 19th

Grade Level Chairs• EC-Kathy Pike• Resource-Sherri Grubbs• Kindergarten-Jan Hemphill• 1st Grade-Katie Hiligan• 2nd Grade-Dawn Jones• 3rd Grade-Betsy Gatchel• 4th Grade-Ginny Mangum• 5th Grade-Roberta Ebron

National Board Certified Teachers and or Master’s

DegreesCurrently we have 9 teachers with

their Boards! District average is 6 and at the state level 5

Please Stand at this time

Master’s and Teacher’s Degrees

• 27% of our staff have their advanced degree (49 certified staff) 13 teachers!

• 26% at the district level• 27% at the state level

*Jill Grant and Ryan Hill received their Teaching degrees this past fall

International Society for Technology in Education

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania June 26th-June 29th

Professional Learning Network

-3rd Grade and their Teacher and Student Wikis

-BME Techspot-Facilitating Summer Professional

Development for future 1:1 programs-BME’s 3rd grade Wiki that was shared

with people all over the world

“If there is anything that the research community agrees on, it is this: The right kind of continuous, structured teacher collaboration improves the quality of teaching and pays big, often immediate, dividends in student learning and professional morale in virtually any setting.”

DeFour

Ensuring That Students LearnEnsuring That

Students Learn

It is not the strongest of the species

that survive, nor the most intelligent,

but the one most responsive to change

• What is it we expect them to learn?• How will we know when they have

learned it?• How will we respond when they don’t

learn?• How will we respond when they

already know it?

Ensuring that all students learn critical corollary

questions

Group IQ “While a group can be no

smarter than the sum total of the knowledge and skills of its members, it can be much “dumber” if its internal workings don’t allow people to share their talents.”

Robert Sternberg (1988)

Collaborate What? congeniality and focus on building group camaraderie

consensus on operational issues

discipline, technology, social climate, field trips, attendance, tardies

What do students need to learn and be able to do?

How do we know students are learning it?

What will we do if the students have not learned it?

What will we do if students have learned it?

They quickly learn which teammate has been particularly effective in teaching a certain skill.The othersreplicate the

effective practice!

Professional Learning Communities

Excu

ses!T

hey

are

all

OU

R s

tud

ents

.

RESULTS Focused!

Teacher Assistants and EC Caregiver

• Connie Faircloth -TA with Jan Hemphill• Tammy Whitley -TA with Jill Grant• Tameka Strayhorn –TA with Nikki

Manning• Shirley Blount -TA with 2nd grade• Kimberly Lassiter -4th/5th EC Caregiver

with Jennifer Turner

Kagan Trained Teachers

-27 out of 31 (87%) trained in Kagan-100%-Celebrate 2nd, 3rd and EC Teams-Next steps: Developing new structures for 2011-

2012-Principal Expectation: 100% of grades 1-5 students

will be placed into Kagan flexible groups by October 3rd, 2011. Kindergarten students should be placed into Kagan groups by October 24th

Formative Assessment’s Critical Features

• There are five attributes that have been identified from the literature as critical features of effective formative assessment:

1. Learning Progression2. Learning Goals and Criteria for Success3. Descriptive Feedback4. Self and Peer Assessment5. Collaboration

NC DPI-Professional Learning Community (State and

District Initiative)• 5 Modules completed during school year• Passwords distributed to staff• All certified staff required to complete• District Reading Goal Team will meet monthly

to monitor and provide support for schools• We will utilize S Days and PW (now

Professional Development) Days• Aug. 24th, Oct. 31st, Jan. 20th, Mar. 30th and

June 8th

DPI Modules1. Call for Change2. Understanding the Standards3. Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy4. Formative Assessment-NC Falcon5. Developing Local Curricula6. NC Professional Teaching Standards

and the Evaluation Tool

Brinson’s PLC-District and School Initiated

• Common Core Transition• Guided Reading: Good First Teaching for

All Children, Fountas and Pinnell• Revisiting Professional Learning

Communities at Work: New Insights for Improving Schools, DuFour, DuFour, Eaker

• Administrative Wiki• DPI Modules

Inclusion Model Teachers

• Kindergarten-Jan Hemphill• 1st grade-Nikki Smith• 3rd grade-Ashley Fillingame• LD Resource for 1st and 3rd-Kathy

Pike• LD Resource for 4-5-Sarah Everhart

(part-time)

BME Administrative Wiki

• How to navigate, utilize and download information

• Paperless tool• Professional Learning Community• Teacher and Student Resources

Craven County SchoolsDistrict EOG Trend DataSource: ABCSummary Report (Preliminary 2011)

Subject 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

DIFF 2010

to 2011

Growth 2011

Math 66.1 69.6 73.5 82.6 82.5 84.0 1.4 EXP

Reading 88.1 88.4 60.5 73.1 75.4 75.7 0.3 EXP

Science 0.3 0.0 50.7 69.8 73.9 74.1 0.2 ~

EOG 77.1 79.0 67.0 76.7 78.3 79.1 0.8 EXP

Craven County Schools

COMPOSITE PRELIMINARYPerformance Results

2007-2008 thru 2010-201164% or16 of 25 schools increased

Composite1

SCH 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11

AHB 72.3 80.0 81.6 82.4

BDQ 69.0 82.4 84.3 81.9

BES 71.0 73.1 73.6 78.7

BME 80.6 87.6 88.2 91.6

CES 88.4 90.3 92.2 94.9

VFL 69.6 78.6 82.2 81.1

GAB 71.2 72.9 85.8 82.1

HES 62.0 71.7 71.9 77.7

JTB 69.4 69.5 68.2 71.2

JWS 56.3 66.4 64.7 66.3

ORE 51.7 68.3 64.5 64.4

RBE 59.7 70.1 68.8 64.9

TPE 53.5 65.6 71.5 83.4

WJG 79.6 88.7 86.2 87.9

AWE 77.8 83.4 86.4 82.2

GCF 64.9 76.6 77.7 78.7

HJM 68.1 77.5 77.0 79.4

HMS 66.9 78.9 75.8 75.9

TCM 75.7 87.3 87.3 87.4

WCM 60.4 72.3 75.0 74.5

3-8 68.8 76.7 80.2 80.0

Composite1

SCH 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11

CECH 80.3 79.3 92.2 96.8

ECE 99.0

HHS 82.9 82.8 88.7 89.2

NBH 68.6 73.1 83.0 78.0

WCH 67.8 69.8 77.1 75.8


MATHPRELIMINARYPerformance Results

2007-2008 thru 2010-2011Grades 3-8

75% or15 of 20 increased

High School Math is based on AYP data

(pending)

Math

SCH 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11

AHB 77.3 85.6 88.0 89.5

BDQ 81.6 86.3 87.8 86.0

BES 73.5 75.6 75.2 82.9

BME 87.5 91.3 91.1 95.1

CES 92.8 93.8 94.3 96.8

VFL 75.4 86.0 87.7 85.1

GAB 77.2 81.5 90.1 89.1

HES 66.7 81.3 77.6 84.1

JTB 72.0 76.3 73.5 75.7

JWS 66.0 75.9 71.7 73.1

ORE 61.3 74.3 69.3 70.4

RBE 69.5 75.5 74.7 75.4

TPE 61.1 75.9 77.5 87.0

WJG 87.4 93.0 88.9 92.2

AWE 86.7 88.4 89.3 86.5

GCF 69.1 81.0 81.4 83.5

HJM 69.8 81.3 81.1 83.9

HMS 73.7 83.1 81.6 84.4

TCM 81.6 91.5 90.5 91.6

WCM 62.6 75.3 78.3 76.6

3-8 73.5 82.6 82.5 84.0


READINGPRELIMINARYPerformance Results

2007-2008 thru 2010-2011Grades 3-8

55% or11 of 20 increased

High School Reading is based on AYP data

(pending)

Reading

SCH 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11

AHB 68.1 76.3 79.2 76.4

BDQ 58.4 83.3 82.4 80.5

BES 62.7 73.6 72.6 76.0

BME 71.1 85.4 86.2 88.3

CES 83.3 87.2 91.4 94.0

VFL 64.9 73.6 79.2 75.9

GAB 64.1 69.9 83.0 77.6

HES 57.4 64.2 66.1 74.2

JTB 62.7 67.2 65.3 65.4

JWS 46.4 63.4 63.3 63.5

ORE 44.6 66.3 61.5 61.3

RBE 55.7 63.7 65.0 60.9

TPE 45.6 57.1 63.8 77.4

WJG 74.9 87.4 84.4 85.1

AWE 70.8 79.7 83.5 81.0

GCF 55.0 70.6 74.3 73.6

HJM 61.9 71.9 73.3 76.2

HMS 57.6 72.9 71.9 72.9

TCM 68.0 83.1 83.9 83.1

WCM 52.3 64.5 71.8 71.1

3-8 60.5 73.1 75.4 75.7


SCIENCEPRELIMINARYPerformance Results

2007-2008 thru 2010-2011Grades 3-8

65% or 13 of 20 increased

Science

SCH 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11

AHB 51.4 74.6 69.6 78.5

BDQ 52.0 66.7 79.0 73.3

BES 61.0 64.0 71.8 74.5

BME 54.5 82.9 85.3 90.3

CES 75.4 88.7 88.3 92.0

VFL 43.4 71.7 75.2 82.3

GAB 54.8 58.2 81.6 73.2

HES 40.8 63.8 71.8 67.4

JTB 51.9 55.9 59.6 75.0

JWS 23.2 45.7 47.9 54.7

ORE 20.3 54.2 57.4 54.8

RBE 31.3 73.3 61.7 47.1

TPE 34.6 60.9 77.6 90.2

WJG 61.5 79.3 83.2 83.9

AWE 62.4 79.8 86.7 71.8

GCF 47.9 70.2 73.7 76.5

HJM 68.2 74.2 72.8 70.4

HMS 40.0 65.5 67.1 64.2

TCM 71.8 80.1 85.4 86.4

WCM 48.2 66.6 72.7 75.6

3-8 51.8 69.8 73.9 74.1


ABC Growth PRELIMINARYPerformance Results

2007-2008 thru 2010-2011

ABC Growth

SCH 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11

AHB High High High EXP

BDQ High High High NM

BES EXP EXP EXP NM

BME High High High High

CES High High High High

VFL High EXP EXP NM

GAB High EXP High NM

HES EXP High EXP EXP

JTB High EXP NM NM

JWS EXP EXP NM NM

ORE High EXP EXP NM

RBE High EXP High NM

TPE NM EXP High EXP

WJG High High High High

AWE High EXP EXP EXP

GCF High High High High

HJM EXP NM EXP EXP

HMS High EXP EXP EXP

TCM High EXP EXP EXP

WCM High EXP High EXP

ABC Growth

SCH 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11

EXP EXP High High

ECE NM

HHS High High High High

NBH NM NM High EXP

WCH EXP EXP High NM

16 H 8 H 14 H 6 H

6 Ex 14 Ex 8 Ex 9 Ex

2 NM 2 NM 2 NM 10 NM

CECH

SchoolGrowth Average

Expected Growth Status

High Growth Ratio

High Growth Status

# MET Growth*

# In Growth Count*

% MET Growth**

CES 0.276 Met 2.513 Met 196 274 71.53%

WJG 0.219 Met 2.365 Met 227 323 70.28%

HHS 0.177 Met 1.913 Met 732 1158 63.21%

CEC 0.163 Met 2.123 Met 144 212 67.92%

BME 0.161 Met 1.519 Met 234 388 60.31%

GCF 0.132 Met 1.608 Met 603 978 61.66%

TPE 0.117 Met 1.247 Not Met 101 182 55.49%

NBH 0.116 Met 1.492 Not Met 979 1973 49.62%

HMS 0.083 Met 1.275 Not Met 445 794 56.05%

HES 0.076 Met 1.29 Not Met 89 158 56.33%

LEA 0.072 Met 1.269 Not Met 7845 14460 54.25%

HJM 0.068 Met 1.231 Not Met 874 1584 55.18%

TCM 0.067 Met 1.292 Not Met 536 951 56.36%

WCM 0.059 Met 1.241 Not Met 798 1441 55.38%

AHB 0.047 Met 1.241 Not Met 139 251 55.38%

AWE 0.04 Met 1.071 Not Met 120 232 51.72%

ORE -0.021 Not Met 1.09 Not Met 133 255 52.16%

BDQ -0.026 Not Met 1.052 Not Met 162 316 51.27%

GAB -0.029 Not Met 0.877 Not Met 71 152 46.71%

JWS -0.035 Not Met 0.799 Not Met 139 313 44.41%

VFL -0.038 Not Met 0.944 Not Met 168 346 48.55%

ECE -0.045 Not Met 0.814 Not Met 35 78 44.87%

WCH -0.048 Not Met 0.809 Not Met 594 1337 44.43%

JTB -0.072 Not Met 0.722 Not Met 78 186 41.94%

BES -0.091 Not Met 0.772 Not Met 125 287 43.55%

RBE -0.136 Not Met 0.732 Not Met 123 291 42.27%


Overall Growth

Sorted by Growth Average


Composite Comparison 2008-2009, 2009-2010, 2010-2011

Sorted by 2011 Percent Proficient

Congratulations, Trent Park Elementary

11.9 increase!

Congratulations, BME: Honor School of Excellence!

Craven County Schools Expected and High Growth 2010-2011: TotalSource: ABCSummary2011 - Growth Average

Sorted by Growth Average

-0.5

-0.4

-0.3

-0.2

-0.1

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

Series1 0.276 0.219 0.177 0.163 0.161 0.132 0.117 0.116 0.083 0.076 0.072 0.068 0.067 0.059 0.047 0.04 -0.021 -0.026 -0.029 -0.035 -0.038 -0.045 -0.048 -0.072 -0.091 -0.136

CES WJG HHS CEC BME GCF TPE NBH HMS HES LEA HJM TCM WCM AHB AWE ORE BDQ GAB JWS VFL ECE WCH JTB BES RBE

Met H igh Growth

Met Expected Growth

Distr ict (Exp. Growth)

Growth Not Met0.189

0.232

-0.25

-0.076

Designates EOC Growth only for high schools pr ior to inclusion of CP CTC and Drop Out HHS and CEC Growth went down with inclusion; NBHS and W CHS Growth went up; ECE unaffected.

Craven County Schools Grades 3-8Percent Students MET Growth ~ EOG ~ 2010-2011

Sorted by % MET EOG Growth

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

% MET Growth** 71.53% 70.28% 61.70%60.31% 56.39% 56.33% 55.84%55.49% 55.38% 55.28% 55.20%55.10% 52.16% 51.72% 51.27%48.55% 46.71% 44.41% 43.55%42.27% 41.94%

CES WJG GCF BME TCM HES HMS TPE AHB WCM LEA HJM ORE AWE BDQ VFL GAB JWS BES RBE JTB

= MET High Growth

= MET Expected Growth

= Growth NOT METORE: Growth Avg = -0.021 Not Met while % MET EOG Growth = 52.16

4 out 15 elementary schools met high growth

Craven County Schools Grades 3-8Percent Students MET READING Growth ~ 2010-2011

Sorted by % MET READING Growth

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

% MET RD Growth** 65.7% 60.9% 59.6% 56.2% 55.1% 54.5% 53.7% 53.5% 53.4% 52.4% 51.2% 50.6% 48.7% 48.0% 47.2% 45.9% 44.9% 43.8% 43.0% 40.8% 40.7%

CES WJG TPE GCF HMS HJM WCM BDQ BME LEA TCM HES AWE AHB ORE VFL JWS JTB BES GAB RBE

= MET High Growth


= Growth NOT MET

BDQ: Growth Avg = -0.046 Not Met while % MET RD Growth = 53.5

Craven County Schools Grades 3-8Percent Students MET MATH Growth ~ 2010-2011

Sorted by % MET MATH Growth

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

% MET MA Growth** 79.63%77.37%67.01%67.01%62.70%62.03%61.64%57.92%56.84%56.82%56.62%55.70%54.70%52.63%51.61%51.15%49.06%44.14%43.95%43.84%40.21%

WJG CES GCF BME AHB HES TCM LEA WCM ORE HMS HJM AWE GAB TPE VFL BDQ BES JWS RBE JTB

= MET High Growth


= Growth NOT MET

4th out of 20 schools in Math growth

Brinson Memorial Elementary2010-2011

• Honor School of Excellence with High• High Growth the past four years• 100% (13 out of 13) targets met • Overall composite 91.6%• 2nd out of 15 elementary schools

Expected and High Growth Schools

• 22/24 schools met Expected Growth in 2010• 9/24 schools met Expected Growth in 2011• Brinson was one of 13 schools in Craven County that met High

Growth 2010• Brinson was one of 3 elementary schools that met High

Growth in 2011. GCF and HHS are the only two other schools that met High Growth

• 9 schools did not meet growth this year. 8 of those elementary schools

• 4-5 Math met High Growth• Grade 4 met Expected Growth in Reading • Grade 5 met Expected Growth in Reading

High Yield Strategy• Reading Across the Curriculum

• 100% of students should be reading by the end of 2nd grade (DPI)

Brinson Memorial Schoolwide Strategic

Learning Goals• Brinson Memorial Elementary School will

have the highest growth ratio in Craven County Schools based on EOG results of 2011-2012 with at least a 2.0 overall high growth ratio

• Brinson Memorial Elementary School will have a high growth ratio of 2.25 in Reading based on the EOG results of 2011-2012

Classroom Level Strategic Learning Goals

• 65% or more students will meet or exceed predicted scale score in Reading and 70% in Math based on EOG results for 2011-2012

• 2009-2010 64% of students met growth (1.779) Target is (1.5)

• 2010-2011 Overall was 60.31%, 53.4% in Reading and 67.01% in Math

Student Level Strategic Learning Goal

• I will meet or exceed growth based upon the Reading and Math EOG results

Brinson Memorial Strategic Learning Goals

for Math• Brinson Memorial Elementary

School will have a high growth ratio of 2.5 in Math based on the EOG results of 2011-2012

• Math for 2009-2010 68% met growth (2.161)• 4th grade-(1.714) 63% high growth• 5th grade-(2.741) 73% high growth• Math for 2010-2011 67.01% met growth (2.031)• 4th grade-( 67%) in high growth-(2.081)• 5th grade-(66% ) in high growth-(1.964)

Technology Strategic Learning Goals

• 100% of my students will complete a project based learning unit utilizing technology that is aligned with the NCSCOS and the NETS (National Educational Technology Standards)

Reading Strategic Learning Goals

• 100% of my students will be divided into guided reading groups by October 1st, 2011 utilizing either DRA/SEL/EOG/Local Assessment Data

• 100% of our targeted priority 1 students in K-5 will complete at least two products in the FastForword program

• Reading 59.5% met high growth (target is 60%) 1.474 (target is 1.5)

• 4th Reading-63% met high growth (1.714)• 5th Reading-56% met high growth (1.279)• 2010-2011 • Reading 55.4% met high growth (target is 60%) 1.146 (target

is 1.5) • 4th Reading-54.3% met high growth (1.2)• 5th Reading-50.8% met high growth (1.077 )

Math Strategic Learning Goal

• 100% of our 2nd through 5th grade students will be engaged in Accelerated Math at least 20 minutes per day five days a week

Cooperative Learning Strategic Learning Goals

• 100% of my 3-5 students will be placed into flexible cooperative learning groups by October 1st based on their EOG performance and teacher feedback

• 100% of my K-2 students will be placed into flexible cooperative learning groups by October 1st based on their DRA data/SEL data and Teacher Feedback

Cooperative Learning Strategic Learning Goals

• 100% of all certified K-5 staff will be trained in Kagan by August of 2011

Proficiency Composite Scores

• Reading 2008-2009 (3rd out of 15 schools)• Reading 2009-2010 (2nd out of 15 schools)• Reading 2010-2011 (2nd out of 15 schools)

• Math 2008-2009 (3rd out of 15 schools)• Math 2009-2010 (2nd out of 15 schools)• Math 2010-2011 (2nd out of 15 schools)

• Science 2008-2009 (2nd out of 15 schools)• Science 2009-2010 (3rd out of 15 schools)• Science 2010-2011 (2nd out of 15 schools)

Whohoooo!

AYP 2009-2010AYP 2009-2010AYP 2009-2010AYP 2009-2010

Craven County SchoolsCraven County Schools

Office of Testing and AccountabilityOffice of Testing and AccountabilityAugust 2010August 2010

What is AYP?• AYP = Adequate Yearly Progress

• AYP measures the yearly progress for each of 10 NCLB-defined student subgroups toward the NC Proficiency Target Goals

• AYP measures the participation and proficiency levels of the subgroups and all students

• All students are expected to be proficient by the year 2013-2014, i.e. AYP target goal = 100%

What tests are used to determine AYP?

• Grades 3-8– EOG Reading including NCEXTEND1 and NCEXTEND2– EOG Math including NCEXTEND1 and NCEXTEND2

• Grade 10– Math = Algebra I EOC including NCEXTEND1 Math– Reading = Combined English I and Writing including

NCEXTEND1 Reading and Writing– Scores from all grade 10 students are used including

“banked” scores if tests were taken previously to grade 10

AYP Subgroups: 2009-2010 (40 or more students)

• ALL Students• American Indian• Asian• Black• Hispanic

• Multi-Racial• White• EDS• LEP• SWD

School Level:School Level: Students must have been in membership at the school for a “Full Academic Year” (FAY) = 140 days (year) or 70 days (semester)

District Level:District Level: Students must have been in membership in one or more schools in the district for a “Full Academic Year”

AYP Components: 2009-2010AYP

Participation Proficiency OAI

Reading95%

Math95%

Reading3-8 = 43.2HS = 38.5

Math3-8 = 77.2HS = 68.4

1010 1010

AttendanceElementary andMiddle Schools(Early College HS)

Graduation Cohort RateHigh Schools

1

Grad Cohort Rate OAI = 80%+ or increase of

2 percentage pointsPossible # of AYP targets

for a school = 41

Attendance OAI = 90%+

All subgroups with 40 students or more must meet AYP All schools must meet OAI

AYP Proficiency TargetsYear Grades 3-8 Grade 10

Reading Math Reading Math2009-10 43.2 77.2 38.5 68.42010-11 71.6 88.6 69.3 84.2

If just one student subgroup in one subject (math or reading) at a school does not meet the targeted proficiency goal, then the school does not make AYP for that year, with some exceptions.

BME 88.2% BME 95.1%

Superintendent Proficiency Expectations

for 2010-2011

SUPERINTENDENT PROFICIENCY EXPECTATIONS

2011 - 2012All students shall be reading on grade level by the end of second gradeReading and Math proficiency shall increase a minimum of 5 percentage points from the previous year at all elementary and middle schools, unless proficiency is greater than or equal to 90%A minimum of a 5% increase on each EOC at all high schools unless proficiency is equal to or greater than 90%All schools shall achieve expected or high growthWriting proficiency shall increase a minimum of 5 percentage points from previous year at all high schoolsAll schools shall be recognized as a School of Distinction or School of ExcellenceAttendance rate at all schools shall be equal to or greater than 95%Dropout rate at all high schools shall be equal to or less than 3%Dropout rate at all middle schools shall be at 0%All schools shall meet all AYP target goalsAll student subgroups at all schools shall meet minimum AYP requirementsA minimum standard of 90% satisfaction rating on every stakeholder survey question with a minimum return rate of 65%All employees will meet the standard of “progressing,” “proficient,” or “at standard” as a minimum on their respective End of Year or State EvaluationSchools shall meet all identified district facility safety standards as found in District Action Plan 2.1A minimum combined reading, math and writing SAT result of 1,500 or higher or a minimum ACT result of 19 or higher.Graduation cohort rate equal to or greater than 80%, or a 2% increase over the previous year’s graduation cohort rate

Principal Expectations• Status of the Class for Accelerated

Reader 1st 30 minutes of the day• Guided Reading Instruction 2-3 times a

week as school wide reading strategy• Focus on non-fiction reading• Focus on non-fiction writing• Reading across the curriculum

Principal Expectations• Accelerated Math being utilized to

support Math instruction 20 minutes per day, five days a week

• Student objectives adjusted for each student based on need

• Participation rates for grades 3-5 100%

• Success Index rates 80% or higher

FOCUS“Make the Main Thing, the Main

Thing…LEARNING”

Focus on Learning and Teaching“Don’t let tough times stop good

teaching”

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

• Brinson Memorial met 13 out of 13 targets

Budget Impact• Title I-K-2 DRA/K-5 Curriculum Connections-Supplies/Education City/Brainpop• 411 (Instructional Supplies)• Personnel-Funding a 4th grade teacher, 2 TA

positions not filled, 1 administrative assistant position not filled

• Facilico• Sharing of Assistant Principals• School funds

Technology Allocation• Craven County Board of

Commissioners (pending). Must be replacement computers used for students

• No textbook, staff development or computer dollars

Next Steps 2011-2012• 100% of certified staff will have a Wiki for Common Core

transition in preparation for the 2012-2013 school year. This Wiki will have 45 day plays with aligned resources embedded in plan and or Wiki

• Grow mobile learning device environment in 4th grade• 1:1 laptop in 1 4th grade class. 2:1 environment set up with

at least one team• Buddy system established with 3rd and 4th grade teachers• BME TechSpot will have over 200 resources• 3rd grade will provide support for other 1:1 classrooms• Students will be given leadership opportunities to help

facilitate technology integration

Next Steps 2010-2011• PW Days will be staff development days and

will help support the common core transition through school wide, department and grade level training and collaboration

• Analyzing weak areas and planning technology projects based on ISTE Standards

• Sharing of technology integration• Continued staff development support for 3rd

grade in the 1:1 initiative

Volunteer HoursHUG

-2008-2009 6,743 hours-2009-2010 6,431 hours-2010-2011 3,500 hours

EC Playground• We raised 29,000 dollars for the

new EC playground

• Goal is $40,000 dollars

Principal Expectations

• Brinson Memorial Elementary will be designated as a Honor School of Excellence (Composite Score of 90% or greater of Brinson’s students proficient and meeting AYP) and meet High Growth as a school for the 2009-2010 school year (Currently: 88.2%)

• Brinson Memorial Elementary will be designated as a Title I Distinguished School for the 2010-2011 school year

• Brinson Memorial Elementary will meet 100% of AYP targets for 2010-2011 school year

• Brinson Memorial Elementary will meet high growth for grades 4-5 in Math and Reading:

• Brinson Memorial Elementary will meet high growth in grade 5 Science based on EVAAS data

• Brinson Memorial Elementary will meet and maintain a 100% participation rate and 85% Success Index Rate for Accelerated Reader school wide

Principal Expectations

• Targeted K-5 students will have 30 minutes of FastForWord (Web Based Literacy program) every day

• Third, Fourth and Fifth grade will have a planned focused remediation/enrichment time (Bear Pause) that involves flexible grouping based upon local assessment data, teacher input, parent input and student needs for at least 30 minutes per day, 3-5 days a week All teachers will read, know understand and follow the IEP and 504 of each student in their classroom

• All teachers will submit at least one lesson plan/resource for a technology based unit and submit it to our BME TechSpot

• All staff development opportunities shall be aligned and differentiated for all staff with the teacher’s Individual Growth Plan as part of their North Carolina Evaluation Rubric

• All certified teachers will actively participate in a professional learning community with the focus on developing the three block framework for literacy and completing, understanding and implementing the NC DPI modules

• All certified staff will attend the Fall and Spring PTO programs/meetings

Principal Expectations• Teachers will have a positive attitude as a role model for students

and colleagues• Teachers will be their own best advocates in the educating of

children and supporting each other as teammates (family members)

• Teachers will maintain a safe and orderly atmosphere at all times.• Teachers will support and help build capacity for professional

learning communities for our school• Teachers will implement Kagan structures in the classroom to

increase student engagement and improve student achievement • Teachers will model and implement Formative Assessments

process for their students supporting the Classroom as a System model.

• Teachers will meet a minimum of proficient on the Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina Teachers on the summative of NC Teacher Rubric

Principal Expectations• Each grade level will have a documented 45 day

planning process including Kagan Structures that will be be posted on their Teacher Wiki

• Teacher Assistants will support instruction in the classroom. They will help remediate and accelerate students. (Staff Development will be tailored for all staff. EC, Reg Ed, TAs and Resource)

• Teachers will use and document in their lesson plans the ISTE Student and Teacher Standards and the North Carolina Standard Course of Study for Computer and Information Skills

Principal Expectations• Teachers will send home the blue communication

folder every Tuesday (completed)• Teachers will provide several means of

evaluating students work• Teachers will read, understand and implement

guidelines set forth for students with special needs

• Teachers will call/notify parents if they have a child that is having academic difficulty

Principal Expectations• Teachers will keep all cum folders in a secure location at all

times (4:15 cum vault).• Teachers will have lesson plans for substitute teachers in a

classroom folder with needed information (Red Folder/Emergency Lesson Plan)

• Teachers will have an up to date website that includes teacher name, a brief welcome message, subjects taught and daily schedule

• Teachers will arrive on time and greet all students as they arrive in their classroom doorway each morning at 7:55.

• Teachers will turn in their attendance on time (by 9:30).• Teachers will contact students after 3 unexcused absences.• Teachers will utilize cross curricular teaching methods.

Ongoing

Field Trips• Field Trip List due to Kathy Barber • Overnight trips must be approved

by Dr. Annette Brown• 1 Field Trip per grade per semester• We will not have any out of county

fieldtrips this year

Allergies• Peanut• Dairy• Seafood• Wheat

Know your students and work with your parents. Be aware at all times. Post outside your door.

Documents

Brinson Memorial Elementary School’s Vision