Brimbal Ave. - Environmental Notification Form - 9.2.14 - Volume 2 of 2

8/11/2019 Brimbal Ave. - Environmental Notification Form - 9.2.14 - Volume 2 of 2

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brimbal-ave-environmental-notification-form-9214-volume-2-of-2 1/798



August 18, 2014

Secretary Richard K. Sullivan, Jr.

Executive Office of Energy & Environmental Affairs

Attn: MEPA Office100 Cambridge Street, Suite 900

Boston, MA 02114

Re: Corrective Action Design DocumentsSohier Road and Brimbal AvenueBeverly, Massachusetts

Dear Secretary Sullivan:

The attached documents were submitted to Massachusetts Department of Environmental

Protection (DEP) Bureau of Waste Prevention – Solid Waste Division as part of a Corrective

Action Design (CAD) application in 2009. Massachusetts DEP approved the CAD and providedAuthorization to Construct on December 31, 2009. The currently proposed project is a similar

commercial development on the same parcel. The following documents are attached with this

letter:

Engineering Design Report, Tetra Tech, March 5, 2009

Human Health and Environmental Risk Characterization, Tetra Tech, March 5, 2009

Corrective Action Design Plans, Tetra Tech, March 5, 2009, Revised November 24, 2009

Corrective Action Design Specifications, Tetra Tech, November 24, 2009

Approval of the Corrective Action Design and Authorization to Construct, December 31,2009.

Please let me know if you have questions.

Very truly yours,

Matthew T. Madden, P.E., L.S.P.

Senior Project Manager





Engineering Design Report

Former Brimbal Avenue Landfill

Brimbal Avenue and Sohier Road

Beverly, Massachusetts

Submitted to:

Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection

Northeast Regional Office

March 5, 2009















































































































































































































































































































































































Executive Summary

Human Health and Environmental Risk Characterization


Brimbal Avenue and Sohier Road, Beverly, Massachusetts

Tetra Tech Rizzo (TTR) has conducted a Method 3 Human Health and Environmental Risk

Characterization for the former landfill property located at Brimbal A venue and Sohier Road in

Beverly, Massachusetts (the Site). This Risk Characterization was conducted in conformance

with the requirements

of

the Massachusetts Solid Waste Regulations 310 CMR 19.000, the

Landfill Technical Guidance Manual,

and the Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP), 310

CMR 40.0000. The Massachusetts Department

of

Environmental Protection (DEP) Guidance

document for risk characterization, Guidance

for

Disposal Site Risk Characterization -In

Support of he Massachusetts Contingency Plan (the "Guidance"), and related guidance, such as

Characterizing Risks Posed by Petroleum Contaminated Sites: ImplementationofVPHIEPH

Approach, has been followed in this analysis.

A portion of the human health risk characterization which evaluates potential exposures and risks

to Site receptors due to the inhalation of volatile vapors emitted from the inactive landfill (inside

the proposed new buildings and outside the buildings in the near-field ambient air) was

conducted by our Tetra Tech EC (TTEC) office. The risk characterization report prepared by

TTEC is included as Appendix

F.

The Site consists

of

approximately 6.5-acres

of

vacant land located between Brimbal A venue and

Sohier Road immediately south

of

Route 128 in Beverly, Massachusetts. The Site.is identified

by the Town

of

Beverly (the Town) Tax Assessor's Office as Map 55 Lot 29 and is currently

owned by Brimbal Avenue Development LLC. The Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM)

Coordinators for the Site are Zone 19 East 345470 North 4715300. The Site locus is shown on

Figure

1.

A Site Plan is included as Figure 2. The Site is an inactive landfill that was used by the

Town

of

Beverly from approximately 1946 through 1961. The footprint

of

the landfill extends

beyond the property boundary primarily

to

the south

of

the subject property. When operations

ceased, the landfill was reportedly covered with 2-3 feet of clean sand and gravel and left fallow

for more than 40 years. The Site had been allowed to re-vegetate, but has been largely cleared in

anticipation of future development. Brush and shrubs are still present along portions of the Site's

perimeter. The Site is proposed to be developed into a mixed use property called the North Shore

Commons upon closure

of

the inactive landfill.

Observations during borings at the Site indicated that shallow soil at the Site is primarily sand

and gravel fill. Solid waste including brick fragments, wood, plastic, and glass was observed

mixed with sand and gravel fill at deeper elevations. Tetra Tech Rizzo reviewed available soil

analytical data from previous investigations, and collected soil samples during soil borings

advanced as part

of

the assessment. Soil samples were collected from the Site by Vanasse

Hangen Brustlin, Inc. (VHB) and TTR in 2007. A summary

of

the Site soil data and the

laboratory certificates

of

analyses are presented in Appendix E. The results

of

the soil sampling

and analysis were typical of a heterogeneous matrix of soil and solid waste. Metals, petroleum

hydrocarbons, and other contaminants were detected in some samples. Because of the

heterogeneous nature of the matrix, it was not feasible to obtain a representative set of soil

concentration data. Furthermore, the Corrective Action Design and Post-Closure Use plans

include provisions for maintaining physical separation from the waste, limitations on post-

Tetra Tech Rizzo








collected from the Site by Griffin Engineering Group, LLC (Griffin Engineering) in 2007 and

2008. A summary

of

the groundwater data collected from the Site and used to evaluate risks is

presented in Table

1.

The landfill gas data is presented in Table I

of

the TTEC report included in

Appendix F.

Landfill gas (LFG) analytical data from on-site and off-site sampling performed in 2007 and

2008 were compiled and evaluated with regard to spatial trends by TTEC. Based on differences

in the detected sets ofLFG contaminants, the overall site was broken down into a Western

Inhalation Exposure Area (where a Day Care facility is proposed to be built), an Eastern

Inhalation Exposure Area (where Commercial/Retail and Residential facilities are proposed to be

built), and a Site-Wide Inhalation Exposure Area (i.e., the whole site). The landfill gas

characteristics for each Inhalation Exposure Area were used in combination with conservative

indoor air vapor intrusion modeling and outdoor air atmospheric mixing and dispersion modeling

to estimate the concentrations

of

the landfill gas constituents that may be present in the air at

potential future exposure points associated with site development. These concentrations were

then combined with inhalation toxicity values to project the potential cancer and non-cancer risks

for the persons that may access and use this area in the future.

The findings of the risk assessment conducted by TTEC were as follows:

• The analyses indicated that there is "No Significant Risk"

of

harm to human health for

any of the evaluated receptors in any portion of the Site with the exception of a potential

future resident with lifelong exposure to the released LFG constituents in the western

portion of the site. The projected Excess Lifetime Cancer Risk (ELCR) for this scenario

exceeded the DEP threshold of 1.0 E-5, due to potential vapor intrusion into the indoor

air

of

a hypothetical new slab-on-grade residence ·in this area. The LFG constituent

tetrachloroethene was the principal risk driver. No inhalation risk concerns were

identified for the other receptors in the Western Inhalation Exposure Area,

or

for any

of

the evaluated receptors in the Eastern Inhalation Exposure Area. The tetrachloroethene in

the western portion

of

the site also caused the projected cancer risk for a potential future

resident with lifelong Site-Wide exposure to exceed the DEP threshold. The

tetrachloroethene was only detected in the landfill gas at one location in the Western

Inhalation Exposure Area. No inhalation risk issues were identified relative to exposure

to the outdoor air under any of the evaluated scenarios.

• Regarding the potential significance of hydrogen sulfide (H

2

S) relative to development,

no sampling was performed for

HzS

in the Eastern Inhalation Exposure Area, and only 2

of 3 samples collected in the Western Inhalation Exposure Area were analyzed for H

2

S.

The detection

of

H

2

S in the Western Inhalation Exposure Area (at a maximum

concentration of 4.2 parts per million (ppm)) exceeded a number of published odor

thresholds (which ranged between 0.13 ppm and 8.1 ppm). As such, it is likely that

people would be able to smell H

2

S in the Western Inhalation Exposure Area

if

no

mitigative steps are taken.

HzS

levels in the landfill gas in the eastern portion of the Site

have not been quantified. Therefore, it is not known whether H

2

S may pose an odor

problem

or

a potential health concern in this area. There are no known complaints

of

ambient air odors at the Site. In addition, no evidence of strong, pungent or noxious odors

Tetra Tech Rizzo

iii








average groundwater concentrations ofCOCs do not exceed the UCLs.

Based on the above information, we find a condition of"No Significant Risk" of harm to public

welfare exists at the Site for the conditions observed at the Site.

The general definition

of

harm to safety in the MCP (31 0 CMR 40.0992(4) and 310

CMR

40.0960) states that a level

of

no significant risk to safety exists or has been achieved

if

the

conditions at a site which are related to a release of oil and/or hazardous material do not

currently and will not in the foreseeable future pose a threat ofphysical harm or bodily injury to

people. Threats to public safety include physical conditions and chemical agents that may cause

bodily harm or injury (e.g., bums or fractures) as opposed to illness. No uncontained materials

exhibiting characteristics

of

corrosivity, reactivity, or flammability were found on the Site. No

open pits, lagoons, drums, dangerous structures,

or

other apparent threats to public safety and no

danger

of

fire from the conditions evaluated in this report have been observed. Methane was

detected above the Lower Explosive Limit (LEL) in some gas wells located at the Site. No

methane was detected in the building on the abutting residential complex, or in the soil gas in the

vicinity

of

the building. Indoor air methane levels were not measured at the Site since there are

no buildings currently located at the Site. Thus, we find a condition of"No Significant Risk" of

harm to public safety exists for the conditions observed at the Site.

The proposed development includes the construction of several buildings for retail, office,

restaurant, and childcare use. The presence

of

methane gas above the LEL in the subsurface

could pose a potential risk to public safety. However, the Corrective Action Design includes

mitigating measures such as vapor barrier and gas venting systems to be implemented during the

· development of the Site to prevent potential entrainment of methane in future Site buildings.

Once the Site is developed, the condition of "No Significant Risk" will depend on maintenance

of

the mitigating measures mentioned above. The proposed mitigation measures and plans for

maintenance and monitoring during the post-closure period are described in the Engineering

Design Report and Corrective Action Design plans.

In conclusion, a condition

of"No Significant Risk" of harm to public safety, public welfare and

the environment has been found to exist on the Site for the conditions evaluated. However, there

is a condition of "Significant Risk" of potential harm to human health at the Site for the

conditions evaluated. Specifically, the ELCR estimated for potential future residents with

lifelong exposure to the released LFGs was above the DEP risk limit

of

1.0 E-5, due to potential

vapor intrusion into the indoor air

of

a hypothetical new slab-on-grade residence in this area. The

LFG constituent tetrachloroethene was the principal risk driver.

We have prepared these risk assessment estimates using conservative (i.e., health-protective)

assumptions. Thus, the hazard indices and cancer risks presented herein provide an upper-bound

estimate of health risks from quantified Site compounds to the groups of potentially exposed

individuals considered in the assessment. Health risks resulting from differing durations or

frequencies from those described in this report could increase or decrease proportionately in

accordance with particular changes in exposure patterns.

Tetra Tech Rizzo

v














Compounds of concern were evaluated for both carcinogenic toxicity and chronic or subchronic

systemic toxicity, depending upon the duration of exposure. Carcinogenic toxicity always refers

to a lifetime cumulative effect

of

a given substance, while systemic (noncarcinogenic) toxicity

may refer to several exposure durations. Subchronic, or short-term, exposures generally occur

over a period

of

two weeks to seven years, while chronic exposures generally occur over a

greater period

of

time. In this report, we evaluated chronic systemic exposures for hypothetical

future utility workers that perform utility repair and maintenance who may be exposed for longer

than seven years. Similarly, we evaluated subchronic systemic exposures for construction

workers on the Site who may be exposed for approximately one year.

4.1.1 Noncarcinogenic Effects

The systemic toxicity of noncarcinogenic substances can be estimated using Reference Doses

(RIDs). A chronic RID is an estimate of the daily exposure to an individual human that may

occur without an appreciable risk of harmful effects during a lifetime of exposure. The units of

the reference dose for humans are milligrams

of

compound per kilogram

of

body weight over

one day

of

exposure (mg/(kg•day)). For inhalation exposures, EPA establishes chronic

Reference Concentrations (RfCs), from which benchmark doses may be derived using standard

exposure assumptions: an inhalation rate of 20 cubic meters per hour and a body weight of 70 kg.

RIDs and RfCs are derived from No Observed Adverse Effect Levels (NOAELs) measured in

animal experiments and extrapolated to human dose. RIDs and RfCs are inversely proportional

to toxicity; that is, a lower RID or RfC signifies a greater toxicity.

The EPA also derives subchronic RIDs and RfCs, which estimate the daily exposure to an

individual human that may occur without an appreciable risk

of

harmful effects from an exposure

ranging from two weeks to seven years. Whenever possible, EPA estimates these subchronic

toxicity values using studies comparable to subchronic exposures. However, when appropriate

studies are unavailable, EPA adopts the chronic RID as the subchronic RID or does not publish a

subchronic toxicity value. EPA publishes subchronic RIDs and RfCs in HEAST.

The subchronic and chronic effect(s) of a compound measured by RIDs do not include

carcinogenic effects of the compound. RIDs and RfCs for the Site COCs are presented in Table

4. Carcinogenic effects are considered separately and are discussed below.

4.1.2 Carcinogenic Effects

The toxic effect of carcinogenic substances can be estimated using a Cancer Potency Factor

(CPF). The CPF is the result

of

a low-dose extrapolation procedure and is presented as the risk

per dose of compound (mg/(kg•day)r

1

• From the CPF, risk per concentration in air (J. g/m

3

r

1

or

unit risks for the inhalation pathway have been derived. EPA has not developed cancer potency

factors for dermal exposures, and we apply ingestion CPFs for dermal exposures in this

assessment.

The EPA classifies carcinogenic compounds using a Weight of Evidence classification. In

general, EPA's classification is as follows:

Tetra Tech Rizzo

5












5.6 Estimation of Receptor-Specific Exposure Factors

After estimating EPCs, we estimate exposure doses to humans. We first estimate an average

daily dose

on

a day

of

exposure [ADD (d)] separately for each compound and pathway for each

receptor. Generally, we calculate dose

via

the following equation:

Dose= EPC

*

Receptor-specific Exposure Factor

*

RAF

The RAF is the Relative Absorption Factor, a percentage representing the

how

readily a

compound is absorbed into the body. RAFs are specific to the route

of

exposure and the medium

to which exposure occurs.

In general, the Receptor-specific Exposure Factors incorporate the following similar features:

• Rate

of

exposure

or

intake

• Frequency

of

exposure(#

events/time)

• Duration

of

exposure events (time/event, i.e., hours exposed)

• Duration

of

exposure period (time, years)

• An averaging period (70 years for carcinogenic exposures, shorter periods for

noncarcinogenic exposures [1 to 25 years])

• Conversion factor to reconcile the units

• Body weight

of

the receptor (kg)

The exposure calculations are presented in Tables C-1 and C-2 in Appendix C.

6.0 Risk Characterization

This section combines information

on

chemical toxicity with modeled exposures to estimate

risks and hazards associated with compounds detected in environmental media at the Site.

6.1 Noncancer Health Hazards

The Hazard Index (HI) is a measure

of

systemic (noncancer) toxicity and is defined as the ratio

of

an estimated dose

of

a compound to its RfD. We estimate the chronic

or

subchronic HI as the

ratio

of

the Average Daily Dose to the chronic

or

subchronic RID for each compound and each

pathway.

We estimate His separately for each COC and pathway from the equation below. In the absence

of

specific information

on

possible synergisms or antagonisms, we sum across all compounds

and all exposure pathways to obtain a Total Site HI for each receptor. We calculate His for the

most sensitive receptor. As stated, for the resident receptors, the HI is calculated for the child.

The following general equations are used to calculate hazard indices for each exposure.

Tetra Tech Rizzo

9














Assessment is to eliminate from further evaluation those situations that are unlikely to result in

ecological harm. For sites for which either potential for exposure has not been identified or at

which "apparent significant harm" is not likely to occur, a condition

of

"no significant risk

of

harm to the environment" exists. However, for sites at which the potential for exposure exists

and "apparent significant harm" may occur, a quantitative assessment (Method 1 or 2) for that

site must be performed.

8.1 Stage I Screening Assessment

The Site setting was reviewed to determine

if

potential environmental receptors, exposure

pathways, and exposure points were situated

on

and near the Site. Potential receptors were

defined as those receptors situated within 500 feet

of

the Site and exposed to oil and/or

hazardous materials in groundwater. The Massachusetts Natural Heritage Atlas

(11th Edition

valid from July 1, 2003) and the Massachusetts Surface Water Quality Standards, Basin

Classification and Maps (314

CMR

4.06) were also inspected to determine the presence

of

rare

wetlands wildlife habitat and the DEP-assigned surface water classification

in

the area

of

the

Site.

Potential environmental receptors identified within 500 feet

of

the site include resident and

transient wildlife. Potential exposure pathway at the Site is identified as groundwater flow. The

potential exposure point identified for the Site is contact with groundwater. According to the

Massachusetts Geographic Information System (MassGIS) map

of

the Site area (Figure 3), no

Areas of Critical Environmental Concern

or

Outstanding Resource Waters are located within 500

feet

of

the Site. The MassGIS map shows wetlands and an intermittent brook within 500 feet

of

the Site to the east/southeast. The Massachusetts Natural Heritage Atlas

(11th

Edition) 'shows no

Priority Habitat for Rare Species, Estimated Habitat

of

Rare Wildlife

or

Certified Vernal Pools

within 500 feet

of

the Site.

The potential for adverse effects on environmental receptors within 500 feet

of

the Site that are

potentially exposed to OHM in groundwater was evaluated using an effects-based screening

approach. The EPCs for groundwater were compared to DEP UCLs as shown in Table

8.

In

addition, the groundwater EPCs were diluted by a factor

of

10 corresponding to the percentage

used by DEP to calculate GW-3 groundwater standards from EPA surface water Ambient Water

Quality Criteria (AWQC). These adjusted data were then compared to the A WQC chronic

values for freshwater, where available (Table 9). No exceedences ofUCLs or A WQCs were

identified. Therefore, we find a condition

of"No

Significant Risk"

of

harm to the environment

exists for the Site conditions evaluated.

Therefore, it is determined that a condition

of"No

Significant Risk"

of

harm to the environment

Based on the Stage I Screening Assessment, a Stage

II

Environmental Risk Characterization is

not required for this Site. ·

Tetra Tech

Rizzo

14











LEL

LFG

LOAEL

L

MCP

MMCL

MDL

M

Mg

flg

MW

ND

NOAEL

OHM

PPB

PPM

PRG

RAF

RAO

RIC

RID

RSF

s

UCLs

VOCs

Vp

y

Lower Explosive Limit

Landfill Gas



Brimbal Avenue and Schier Road, Beverly, Massachusetts

Lowest Observed Adverse Effects

Level

Liter

Massachusetts Contingency Plan

Massachusetts Maximum Contaminant Level

Method Detection Limit

Meter

Milligram

Microgram

Molecular weight

Not detected

No Observed Adverse Effect

Level

Oil and Hazardous Material

Parts Per Billion

Parts Per

Million

Preliminary Remediation Goal

Relative Absorption Factor

Response Action Outcome

Reference Concentration

Reference Dose

Receptor-Specific Factor

Solubility (aqueous)

Upper Concentration Limits

Volatile Organic Compounds

Vapor pressure

Year

12.0 References

Agency

for Toxic Substances and Disease

Registry.

Toxicological

Profiles for

Chemicals.

Bodek,

I., W. J.

Lyman,

W. F. Reehl, and D. H. Rosenblatt. Environmental Inorganic

Chemistry,

Properties, Processes,

and Estimation Methods, Pergamon

Press, New York. 1988.

Bowen, H.

J.

M. Environmental Chemistry of

the

Elements, Academic Press, London.

1979.

Dean,

J.

A.

Lange's Handbook

of

Chemistry,

13th

Edition,

McGraw-Hill Book Company,

New

York. Ed. 1985.

GCA Corporation. Development of Statistical Distributions or Ranges of Standard

Factors

Used

in Exposure

Assessments

(EPA 68-02-351 0), Septem\Jer 1984.

Howard,

P. H.

Handbook

of

Environmental Fate

and

Exposure

Data for

Organic Chemicals,

Lewis

Publishers, Chelsea, Missouri. 1990.

Tetra Tech Rizzo

19






Lyman, W. J., W. F. Reehl, and D. H. Rosenblatt. Handbook of Chemical Property Estimation

Methods-

Environmental Behavior of Organic Compounds, McGraw-Hill Book Company,

New York. 1982 .

. Massachusetts Department

of

Environmental Protection. Characterizing Risks Posed by

Petroleum Contaminated Sites: Implementation ofVPH/EPH Approach, Final, October, 2002.

Massachusetts Department

of

Environmental Protection. Guidance for Site Risk Characterization

and Related Phase II Activities In Support

of

the Massachusetts Contingency Plan. May 17,

1989, updated July 1995.

Massachusetts Department

of

Environmental Protection. Documentation for the Risk Assessment

Shortform Residential Scenario. Policy #WSC/ORS-142-92. October 1992.

Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife. Natural Heritage

and

Endangered Species

Program. Massachusetts Natural Heritage Atlas. JJ'h Edition. Part 1 -Eastern Massachusetts.

Valid from July

1,

2003.

United States Environmental Protection Agency. Handbook ofRCRA Ground-water Monitoring

Constituents: Chemical

&

Physical Properties (40 CFR Part 264, Appendix 9). Office of Solid

Waste EPA530-R-92-022. September 1992.

United States Environmental Protection Agency. EPA-ECAO Regional Support Provisional

Values published in the EPA Region III Risk Based Concentration document, 1999.

United States Environmental Protection Agency. Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables,

FY 1997. OERR 9200.6-303(97-1), March 1997.

United States Environmental Protection Agency. Exposure Factors Handbook. Office of Health

and Environmental Assessment, EPA/600/C-99/001. May 1999.

United States Environmental Protection Agency. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund,

Volume I, Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part A), Interim Final, EP A/540/1-89-002,

December 1989.

United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2000 Database Documented in Integrated Risk

Information System, Volume 1 and Electronic Information System. Office of Health and

Environmental Assessment. November, 2000.

United States Environmental Protection Agency. Method for Estimating Fugitive Particulate

Emissions from Hazardous Waste Sites. Hazardous Waste Engineering Research Laboratory,

Cincinnati, Ohio. EPA/600/2-87/066. 1987.

Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data on Organic Chemicals, Second Edition. Van

Nostrand Reinhold, New York. 1983.

Tetra Tech Rizzo

20









Table 3

Compound name

Benzene

Butyl Alcohol

Butylbenzene, n-

Butylbenzene, tert-

Ethyl tert-butyl ether

lsopropyltoluene, p-

Methyl tert-butyl ether

Naphthalene

Tert-amyl methyl ether

(TAME)

Toluene

Trichlorotrifluoroethane 1,1 ,2J

(Freon 113)

Trimethylbenzene,

1

2,4-

Xylene (total)

Acenaphthene

Anthracene

Benzo(a)anthracene

Benzo(b)fluoranthene

Fluoranthene

Fluorene

Methylnaphthalene, 2-

Naphthalene

Phenanthrene

Pyrene

Carbazole

Dibenzofuran

Dimethylphenol, 2,4-

Methylphenol, 2-

Methylphenol, 3-

Phenol

Antimony, Total

Arsenic, Total

Barium, Total

Chromium, Total

Manganese, Total

Mercury, Total

Nickel, Total

Zinc, Total

C11-C22 Aromatics

Page 1 of

1

Natural and Anthropogenic Concentrations for Site Compounds

of

Concern

Maximum Detected

Concentration in

Site Groundwater

( ~ g / L )

1.5

2,890.0

1.3

1.2

18.0

2.7

3,870.0

180.0

33.7

1.9

4.4

1.6

6.0

12.4

6.4

0.10

0.12

8.9

12.0

14.8

92.0

32.9

6.4

16.3

12.0

12.0

11.0

28.0

8.8

6.0

47.3

892.0

6.3

11,500.0

0.3

17.0

99.0

203.0

Low

( ~ g / L )

0.5

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

0.005

NA

1

NA

NA

0.2

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

0

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

0.95

<1

3

NA

Common Ranges

Found in

Water

~ g i l

High

( ~ g / L )

80

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

17

NA

3,500

NA

NA

9.9

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

1

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

20

2,000

NA

Sources. ATSDR, Toxicological Profiles for Chemicals

Bradley et al., 1993

DEP Documentation for the Risk Assessment Shortform Residential Scenario, 1992

USGS Professional Paper 1270, 1984.

Notes:

Bold print indicates the maximum detected concentration

of

the COG is less than or equal to

the lowest concentration commonly found in groundwater.

NA = Not Available

P:\Pre-FY2008\12700000112700961\Risk Assessment\Beverly RA_CW

&

UW\CHEM_CW

&

UWAnthro











Page 1 of 1

Table

6

Exposure Assumptions

Construction

Receptor: Worker Utility Worker

Occurrence: Future Future

Existence:

Potential Potential

Location:

Outdoors

Outdoors

Exposure: Subchronic Chronic

Age:

Adult (18+)

Adult (18+)

BodyWeight(kg)

1

:

58 58

Surface Area (m

2

)

1

:

1.82 1.82

Lifetime (y):

70 70

Groundwater Exposures

Dermal Contact

Fraction exposed

1

(frac.)

0.05 0.05

Time Exposed

1

(h/d)

8 8

Days of Exposure (d/wk)

5 5

Weeks of Exposure (wkly)

8

1

Years of Exposure

(y)

25

United States Environmental Protection Agency, Exposure Factors Handbook, 1999.

P:\Pre-FY2008\12700000\12700961\Risk Assessment\Bever1y

RA_CW

& UW\EXP_CW & UWExposure Assumptions





Table 8

Compound name

Benzene

Butyl Alcohol

Butylbenzene, n

Butylbenzene, tart


lsopropyltoluene, p

Methyl tert-butyl et her

Naphthalene

Tert-amyl methyl ether (TAME)

Toluene

Trichlorotriffuoroethane1,1 ,2-

{Freon 113)

Trimethylbenzene, 1,2,4-

Xylene (total)

Acenaphthene

Anthracene

Benzo(a)anthracene


Fluoranthene

Fluorene

Methylnaphthalene, 2·

Naphthalene

Phenanthrene

Pyrene

Carbazole

Dibenzofuran

Dimethylphenol, 2,4-

Methylphenol, 2-

Methylphenol, 3-

Phenol

Antimony, Dissolved

Arsenic, Dissolved

Barium, Dissolved

Chromium, Dissolved

Manganese, Dissolved

Mercury, Dissolved

Nickel, Dissolved

Zinc, Dissolved

C11-C22 Aromatics

Upper Concentration Limits for Site Compounds of Concern

MCP Method 3

Upper Concentration Limits

(UCls)

310 CMR 40.0996(5)

Average Groundwater Groundwater UCls

Concentrations (pg/l) (pg/l)

1.3

281.9

1.2

1.5

2.5

1.3

256.0

9.1

3.3

1.4

1.7

1.4

2.3

5.1

4.4

32

3.2

4.6

5.1

5.0

11.3

6.5

4.4

6.2

3.9

4.2

3.6

6.2

3.7

3.7

13.0

270.8

2.8

3,834.3

0.1

12.7

26.1

77.0

NA

- Not Available

100,000

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

100,000

100,000

NA

80,000

NA

NA

100,000

50,000

30,000

10,000

4,000

2,000

30,000

100,000

100,000

3,000

BOO

NA

NA

100,000

NA

NA

100,000

80,000

9,000

100,000

3,000

NA

200

2,000

50,000

100,000

Page 1

of

1

P:\Pre-FY2008\12700000\12700961\Risk Assessment\Beverly

RA_CW

& UW\CHEM_CW & UWUCl









Figure 3

·MA DEP - Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup

SITE NAME:

Site Scoring Map: 500 feet & 0.5 Mile Radii

Sohier Road and Brimbal Avenue

Beverly, MA 01915

423424n 705246ew

Roads:

limited

kcess, Divided, Major

Road,

Connector, Street, Track,

rail

is the best available at the date jdtii-= GIS

Grographic and

The information shown on this map

I ~ I Office uf

of printing. Please refer to the

i .v

E ; ~ : : , ' : t ; " ' ; a l

data source descriptions document. MJIIM«kowtu Ertc11tilllt

Dffic• of ~ ' D i t m t m n ~ t o l Afflli,. _2001

EPA Sole Source

Aquifer;

FEMA

100-year floodplain

......

ITIIJ

I<:;:

::

:J

Pubtic Water Supplies: Ground,Surface,Non Comm.mity 0 0 •

Boundaries:

lOwn,

County, DEP Region;

Train;

A:lwertine;

P i p e ~ n e ;

l>queduct Approved Zone

2

; IWPA; Surface Water Supply Zone A

~ r z z . J E3

8 8 -

Basins: Major, Sub; Streams: Perennial, Intermittent, Man Made Shore, Dams

H ~ r o g r a p h y :

Water Features, Public Surface Wate r Supply

••• c::::::::J -

_ _ W tlands : Fresh,Salt,NHESP Wetlands Habitat

••••••• ~ [ I i ]

A:ltentiaUy Productive Aquifers: Medium,High Yield

•••••••

, , , c::::::::Jc::::::::J Protected Open Space; ACEC

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••• [[]]]] I22Z.J

Non-A:ltential Drinking Water Source Area: Medium, High Yield . c::::::::J DEP P e r m ~ e d Sofid Waste

F a c i ~ t i e s ;

Certified Vernal A:lols •

MILP

~

SCALE1:15000

, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~

W*E

April

11

, 2





Appendix A: Limitations

I. The observations described in this report were made under the conditions stated therein. The

conclusions presented in the report were based solely upon the services described therein, and

not on scientific tasks or procedures beyond the scope

of

described services or the time and

budgetary constraints imposed by the CLIENT. The work described

in

this report was

carried out in accordance with the Terms and Conditions in our contract.

2.

In

preparing this report, ENGINEER has relied on certain information provided by state and

local officials and other parties referenced therein, and on information contained in the files

of state and/or local agencies available to ENGINEER at the time of the site assessment.

Although there may have been some degree

of

overlap in the information provided by these

various sources, ENGINEER did not attempt to independently verify the accuracy or

completeness of all information reviewed or received during the course of this site

assessment.

3. Observations were made of the Site and of structures on the Site as indicated within the

report. Where access to portions

of

the Site

or

to structures on the Site was unavailable or

limited, ENGINEER renders no opinion as to the presence of hazardous materials or oil, or to

the presence of indirect evidence relating to hazardous material or oil, in that portion of the

Site or structure.

In

addition, ENGINEER renders no opinion as to the presence of hazardous

material or oil, or the presence of indirect evidence relating to hazardous material or oil,

where direct observation of the interior walls, floor, or ceiling of a structure on a Site was

obstructed by objects or coverings on or over these surfaces.

4. ENGINEER did not perform testing or analyses to determine the presence or concentration of

asbestos at the Site or

in

the environment at the Site.

5.

It

is ENGINEER's understanding that the purpose of this report is to assess the physical

characteristics of the subject Site with respect to the presence on the Site of hazardous

material or oil. This stated purpose has been a significant factor in determining the scope and

level

of

services provided for in the Agreement. Should the purpose for which the Report

is

to be used or the proposed use ofthe site(s) change, this Report is no longer valid and use of

this Report by CLIENT or others without ENGINEER's review and written authorization

shall be at the user's sole risk. Should ENGINEER be required to review the Report after its

date of submission, ENGINEER shall be entitled to additional compensation at then existing

rates or such other terms as agreed between ENGINEER and the CLIENT.

6.

The conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based in part, where

noted, upon the data obtained from a limited number of soil samples obtained from widely

spaced subsurface explorations. The nature and extent

of

variations between these

explorations may not become evident until further exploration.

If

variations or other latent

conditions then appear evident, it will be necessary to reevaluate the conclusions and

recommendations of this report.

7. Any water level readings made

in

test pits, borings, and/or observation wells were made at

the times and under the conditions stated on the report. However, it must be noted that

fluctuations

in

the level of groundwater may occur due to variations in rainfall and other

factors different from those prevailing at the time measurements were made.

Tetra Tech Rizzo

1







Appendix 8:

Benzene

Appendix B

Short Toxicological Profiles

Short Toxicological Profiles for Site Compounds

Benzene contains six carbon atoms and six hydrogen atoms and is the parent compound

of

a

class

of

chemicals known as monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. As a pure chemical, it is a

colorless to light liquid with an aromatic odor.

It

has a low molecular weight and displays high

water solubility, a medium volatility, and a low affinity to organic carbons in soils. It is a

naturally occurring substance produced by volcanoes and forest fires and is present in plants and

animals, but benzene is also a major industrial chemical obtained from coal and oil. In industry it

is used to make other chemicals, as well as some types

of

plastics, detergents, and pesticides. It is

also a component

of

gasoline. The highest exposure area is in the workplace; however, humans

are commonly exposed to benzene in tobacco smoke and automobile exhaust. Environmental

sources

of

benzene include gasoline filling stations, leaking underground storage tanks,

wastewater and landfills containing benzene, and possibly food products. People living near

industries such as petroleum refineries and chemical manufacturing plants may be affected by

benzene released to the air. Consumer products containing benzene include glues, cleaning

products, and paint strippers. Since benzene evaporates rapidly, the most common exposure

method route is through inhalation

of

air containing benzene. However, absorption, ingestion,

and contact with the skin are also other possible routes

of

exposure. Death may occur

in

humans

after brief ingestion or inhalation exposures to high doses

of

benzene; however, the main effects

of

this type

of

exposure are dizziness, drowsiness, and headaches. Benzene is known to attack

the blood, central nervous system, skin, bone marrow, eyes, and respiratory system. Benzene is

known to be a human carcinogen, and the EPA categorizes benzene as Class A Human

Carcinogen, with sufficient evidence from epidemiological studies.

Butyl Alcohol

Butyl alcohol (CASRN 71-36-3), also commonly referred to as Butanol, is a colorless liquid with

a slightly rancid, sweet odor. Butyl alcohol is primarily used as a solvent and is commonly

found in paint removers and industrial cleaners. It is a corrosive compound, and can break down

some forms

of

plastics, rubber and coatings. Occupational exposure to Burtyl alcohol may occur

through inhalation or dermal contact; however, the general population is commonly exposed

through the ingestion

of

foods that contain Butyl alcohol

or

the inhalation

of

vapors. Short-term

exposure

of

humans to Butanol can cause a variety

of

affects, including headaches, giddiness,

ataxia, confusion, delirium and possible coma. Additionally, vapors from Butyl alcohol can

cause irritation to the eyes and skin. Brief, repeated overexposures with the skin can cause

depression

of

the central nervous system, and in extreme cases may cause death. EPA considers

Butyl alcohol to be not classifiable as a carcinogen (Class D).

Butylbenzene, n-

n-Butylbenzene is a liquid at room temperature and is not soluble in water. No toxicity

information was available from IRIS, HSDB, or ATSDR.

Tetra Tech Rizzo

1



Butylbenzene, tert-

Appendix 8


tert-Butylbenzene is a liquid a room temperature and is not soluble in water. A toxicity value was

available from the Region III Risk-Based Concentration Table, however this was the only

toxicity information identified after searching IRIS, HSDB and ATSDR.

Carbazole

Pure carbazole (CASRN: 86-74-8) appears at room temperature as white crystals.

It

is an

extremely weak base and exhibits strong fluorescence and long phosphorescence on exposure to

ultraviolet light. Carbazole is an important dye intermediate, in making photographic plates

sensitive to ultraviolet light.

It

is a reagent for lignin, carbohydrates and used in formaldehyde

manufacture

of

insecticides, lubricants, rubber antioxidants and as an odor inhibitor in

detergents. There is mo known commercial production

of

this compound. Carbazole is naturally

contained in coal, petroleum, and peat indicating that it will be released to the environment from

the incomplete combustion

of

these materials. Carbazole may be released to the environment in

emissions from waste incineration, tobacco smoke, aluminum manufacturing, and rubber

combustion. Carbazole may be released to the environment ineffluents from coal processing, and

wood-treatment facilities. Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons, such as carbazole, are found in

food as a result

of

char-broiling and smoking. Carbazole is released to the atmosphere in

emissions from waste incineration, tobacco smoke, aluminum manufacturing, and rubber,

petroleum, coal, and wood combustion.

If

released to the atmosphere, vapor-phase carbazole is

rapidly degraded by photochemically-produced hydroxyl radicals (estimated half-life

of3

hr). In

the particulate phase, the rate

of

degradation depends upon the adsorbing substrate. Substrates

containing carbon ( > 5%) stabilize carbazole and permit long-range atmospheric transport.

Physical removal via wet and dry deposition is important. If released to soil, environmental

substrates that commonly adsorb carbazole may limit or prevent photolysis. Biodegradation

in

soil should be the dominant fate process providing the presence

of

specific degrading bacteria in

the microbial community (biodegradation half-life

of

4.3 min-6.2 hr in screening studies).

Carbazole may partition from the water column to sediment and suspended matter. limiting the

rate

of

photolysis. Human exposure to carbazole occurs through inhalation

of

contaminated air

and consumption

of

water and char-broiled food. High exposure occurs through smoking

cigarettes. No carcinogenicity data are available in humans. There is limited evidence

of

carcinogenicity in animals. Carbazole is not classifiable as to its carcinogenicity to humans.

Dibenzofuran

Dibenzofuran is a manmade white crystalline solid with a medium molecular weight.

It

is

released into the air during the combustion

of

coal, biomass, refuse and diesel fuel and

wastewater emissions can occur from coal tar, coal gasification and shale oil operations. Once in

the air, dibenzofuran will exist primarily in the gas phase where it can be degraded by

photochemical processes. Dibenzofuran released into the water will tend to sorb to sediment and

suspended material. In soils, dibenzofuran will be sorbed and is not expected to leach in most

soil types. The general population is primarily exposed to dibenzofurans through inhalation of

air

which has been contaminated with a variety

of

combustion sources; dibenzofurans have been

identified in tobacco smoke. There is no available toxicity information

of

dibenzofuran alone.

The U.S. EPA considers dibenzofuran to be not classifiable as a carcinogen (Class D).

Tetra Tech Rizzo

2





Appendix B

Short Toxico'logical Profiles

processes. Exposure to 2-Methylphenol may cause respiratory tract irritation, including dryness,

nasal constriction and throat irritation. It is a corrosive material that can cause severe eye and

skin burns -

if

large areas of skin are wetted by 2-Methylphenol, serious or even fatal poisoning

may occur. The EPA categorizes 2-Methylphenol as Class

C -

a possible human carcinogen,

based on an increased incidence of skin papillomas in mice and an initiation-promotion study.

Methylphenol, 3-

3-Methylphenol occurs as a colorless to yellow liquid with a phenolic odor; below 54 degrees

Farenheight it is a solid. 3-Methylphenol is used as a textile scouring agent, industrial solvent,

for synthetic resins, disinfectants and fumigants, in explosives and in insecticides. Because of

the wide use of 3-Methylphenol, it can be released to the environment through various waste

streams, incuding through automobile exhaust and tobacco smoke. Exposure to 3-Methylphenol

can cause irritation of eyes, nose and throat, with symptoms including tearing, conjunctivitis and

corneal edema. The EPA categorizes 2-Methylphenol as Class C - a possible human carcinogen,

based on an increased incidence of skin papillomas in mice and an initiation-promotion study.

Methyl tert-butyl ether

Methyl-tert-butyl ether (MTBE) is a clear liquid with a disagreeable odor. It is a volatile organic

ether with extensive water solubility and lipophilicity.

It

is used clinically in the treatment of

gallstones, as an industrial solvent, and as a gasoline-oxygenated octane enhancer. MTBE is

expected to be very mobile in the soil, subject to volatilization and leach to groundwater. MTBE

is not expected to adsorb to sediment or suspended particles in water bodies or to bioaccumulate

in aquatic organisms. MTBE in air produces local irritation

of

the nose, throat, and eyes. High

acute exposures produce central nervous system depression, including sedation, slowed reflexes,

tremors, incoordination, and altered behavior. Long-term exposure has resulted in minor changes

in the blood, kidneys, liver, and nervous system. The EPA does not classifY MTBE with regard

to human carcinogenicity. ·

Naphthalene

Naphthalene is a white solid at room temperature.

It

has a distinct odor

of

mothballs or tar.

Humidity and sunshine cause evaporation into the air within a few hours. When placed in water

or soil, bacteria will destroy naphthalene or will render it airborne within a few hours. Tobacco

smoke is known to release 3 of naphthalene per cigarette. The compound

is

used in the

production of dyes, solvents, lubricants, and motor fuels and is a major component of many

mothball preparations.

Humans can absorb naphthalene by dermal, inhalation, and oral routes. Adults and children

experience vomiting, abdominal pain, and anemia. Most

of the data is for inhalation of

naphthalene from mothballs. The primary site of toxicity is the erythrocyte resulting in hemolytic

crisis. Jaundice is seen upon dermal, inhalation, and oral exposures, as are kidney effects. Near

blindness resulted in male and female subjects with a 5 gram ingestion.

Tetra Tech Rizzo

4











Appendix B


molecular weight element; its solubility in water, affinity for organic carbon (e.g., in soil), and

tendency to bioaccumulate in aquatic organisms depends

on

the particular compound present.

Since antimony belongs to the same periodic grouping as arsenic, it is thought to be similar

metabolically. Like arsenic, antimony has beneficial effects and is used to treat people infected

with parasites. However, long-term exposure to antimony may cause heart problems, vomiting,

and diarrhea. The U.S. EPA does not classifY antimony with regard to human carcinogenicity.

Arsenic

Arsenic is a metallic element that is commonly present in its elemental form and in inorganic and

organic compounds. Arsenic and arsenic compounds are commonly used

in

metal alloys, in the

production

of

agricultural pesticides, pharmaceuticals, pigments, glass, and textiles, and in

tanning and taxidermy. Elemental arsenic has low molecular weight, is a solid at room

temperature, and displays low volatility. Its solubility in water, affinity for organic carbon (e.g.,

in soils), and tendency to bioaccumulate in aquatic organisms depend

on

the particular

compound present. Information

on

the crustal abundance

of

arsenic and its potential essentiality

for humans is provided

in

the main report. Organic arsenic complexed with carbon and hydrogen

is generally less toxic than inorganic arsenic. In this report, we conservatively assume that all

reported arsenic is inorganic. Oral ingestion results in such effects as irritation

of

the

gastrointestinal tract, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. Arsenic affects several organs, including

the skin, blood, heart, circulatory system, liver, and kidneys. Neurological effects in the

extremities have also been reported. Arsenic is a likely fetotoxic agent in animals. Carcinogenic

effects have been demonstrated

in

humans from inhalation

of

airborne arsenic containing dusts

near smelters. The U.S. EPA has noncarcinogenic and (inhalation) carcinogenic toxicity values

for arsenic and classifies it as a Human Carcinogen (Class A).

Barium

Barium is a somewhat soft, silver white metal that occurs naturally

in

the minerals barite and

witherite. It is a medium molecular weight element that,

in

its pure form, may ignite

spontaneously in air. Barium occurs in many different forms in the environment, and its

solubility in water, affinity for organic carbon (e.g., in soil), and tendency to bioaccumulate

in

aquatic organisms depend

on

the specific compound. Barium has many uses including in metal

alloys, paints, pesticides, soaps, rubber, ceramics, glass, and x-ray diagnostics. Ingested soluble

forms

of

barium may affect the heart, lungs, liver, kidney, spleen, central nervous system, and

respiratory system, although barium poisoning is virtually unknown. The U.S. EPA has not

classified barium with regard to human carcinogenicity.

Chromium

Chromium is a metallic element that may

be

present

in

its elemental form or in inorganic and

organic compounds. Typical uses

of

chromium and chromium compounds include chrome

plating, copper stripping, organic synthesis, photography, and the production

of

metal alloys.

Chromium is a low molecular weight element and is a solid at room temperature. Its solubility in

water, affinity for organic carbon (e.g., in soils and sediments), and tendency to bioaccumulate

in

Tetra Tech Rizzo

9



Appendix B.


aquatic organisms depend strongly

on

the compound type. Information

on

the crustal abundance

of

chromium is provided in the main report. Most chromium is found in the environment in two

valence forms: trivalent chromium(III) and hexavalent chromium(VI). Chromium(VI) is much

more toxic than chromium(III), which is the form found in foods. The predominant

environmental form is chromium(III). Inhalation exposures to chromium(III) are reported to

adversely affect the immune systems

of

experimental animals, and injected doses (typically into

the area around the intestines) have adverse developmental and reproductive effects. Animal

studies suggest that chromium(III) probably is not a genotoxic agent. Extremely high oral doses

of

chromium(III) can be lethal to laboratory animals. Chromium(III) is not thought to be

carcinogenic. In fact, small amounts

of

chromium are regularly ingested by people as a natural

component

of

many foods, and in these quantities it is considered an essential nutrient. However,

the U.S. EPA classifies chromium(VI) as a Human Carcinogen (Class A).

Lead

Lead is a naturally occurring metal that is widely distributed throughout the environment and is

found

in

small quantities in food and drinking water. Common uses include the manufacture

of

electrical storage batteries and ammunition. Lead was formerly commonly used

in

gasoline,

solders, pipes, and paints. Inhalation exposure to dusts containing lead is common, particularly in

urban areas. Lead is released as a result

of

the combustion

of

coal, petroleum products, and solid

waste. Elemental lead has a medium molecular weight, is a solid at room temperature, and

displays low volatility. Its solubility

in

water, affinity for organic carbon (e.g., in soils), and

ability to bioaccumulate

in

aquatic organisms depend

on

the compound type. Soils

in

urban areas

are usually contaminated with some lead, which may result in exposure due to soil contact.

Children are at particular risk for lead toxemia both because their characteristic mouthing

behavior may increase their potential for lead ingestion and because they are more susceptible to

neurologic damage. Lead, by any exposure route, is highly toxic to the developing fetus a:nd can

result

in

premature birth, lowered birth weight, and reduced intelligence

in

the offspring. Lead

can adversely affect organs such as the brain and kidneys, and it also has adverse reproductive

effects. Studies in animals suggest that lead may be a carcinogen, and U.S. EPA classifies lead as

a Probable Human Carcinogen (Class B2).

Manganese

Manganese is a naturally occurring metal that is found in various types

of

rocks. It is an essential

trace element and is necessary for good health. Manganese can be found

in

several food items,

including grains and cereals, and is found in high amounts in other foods, such as tea. Pure

manganese is silver-colored, but does not occur naturally. It combines with other substances such

as oxygen, sulfur,

or

chlorine. Manganese can also be combined with carbon to make organic

manganese compounds. Common organic manganese compounds include pesticides, such as

maneb

or

mancozeb, and methylcyclopentadienyl manganese tricarbonyl (MMT), a fuel additive

in gasoline. Manganese is used in the iron and steel industry in steel alloys and is in the

manufacture

of

dry cell batteries

(Mn02),

paints, varnishes, inks, dyes, matches and fireworks,

as a fertilizer, disinfectant, bleaching agent, laboratory reagent, drier for oils, an oxidizing agent

in the chemical industry particularly

in

the synthesis

of

potassium permanganate, and as a

decolorizer and coloring agent in the glass and ceramics industry. Manganese can cause a variety

Tetra Tech Rizzo

10









Appendix C

Exposure Profiles and Calculations



Appendix C


Appendix

C:


This attachment provides exposure profiles for the receptors that are evaluated in this risk

characterization. Tables C-1 and C-2 present the calculations

of

the receptor-specific factors.

Construction Worker

Construction workers working at the Site may be exposed to compounds via dermal contact with

groundwater during trenching or excavating. Construction workers are assumed to come into

contact with groundwater 8 hours per day, 5 days per week, for 8 weeks

of

one year at the Site.

We consider workers to be 18 years

of

age and older, with a life span

of

70 years, average body

weight of

58 kg and body surface area

of

1.82 m

2

.

We assume construction workers will work in

long pants and short-sleeved shirts, leaving their head, lower arms, and hands exposed.

Utility Worker

Utility workers repairing utilities at the Site may be exposed to groundwater COCs via dermal

contact during trenching or excavating. Utility workers are assumed to come into contact with

groundwater at the Site 8 hours per day, 5 days

per

week, for 1 week per year for 25 years. We

consider workers to be 18 years

of

age and older, with a life span

of

70 years, average body

weight

of

58 kg and body surface area

of

1.82 m

2

. We assume construction workers will work

in

long pants and short-sleeved shirts, leaving their head, lower arms, and hands exposed.

Exposure Equations

After estimating exposure point concentrations, we estimate exposure doses to humans. We first

estimate an average daily dose

on

a day

of

exposure [ADD(d)] separately for each compound

and pathway for each receptor. We then estimate an average daily dose averaged over a year

in

which exposure occurs and, finally, averaged over the lifetime

of

the receptor.

In general, the formulas to estimate dose incorporate the following similar features:

• Exposure point concentration

• Rate

of

exposure

• Term

of

exposure (if measured in hours rather than days)

• Conversion factor to reconcile the units

• Body weight

of

the receptor

Tetra Tech Rizzo

1







Table C-2

Utility Worker-

Dermal Contact

with Groundwater

Notes:

Variables

Receptor-

UW

Age

Average body weight (BW)

Frequency of Exposure (EF)

Duration of Exposure Event (ED)

Duration of Exposure Period (EP)

Averaging Period (AP)

for noncancer risk

for cancer risk

Skin surtace area in contact with soil on days exposed (SA)

Skin surface area

Fraction of skin exposed

Skin Permeability Coefficient (Kp)

Dermal Relative Adsorption Factor (RAF)

Exposure Point Concentration (EPCgw)

Exposure Assumptions

Utility

Worker

Adult(18+)

years

58 kilograms

5 events/year

a hours/event

25 years

25 years

70 years

910 cm

2

/day

18,200 cm

2

0.05

Contaminant-specific em/hour

contaminant- specific

arithmetic mean tJg/L

Note:

(1)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(B)

(9)

(10)

Subchronic Noncarcinogenic Effects

Utility Worker Noncancer

Dermal Groundwater (UWNCDGW) Factor (Ukg-day)

UWNCDGW

Factor

Subchronic Average Daily Dose (mg/kg-day)

SA (cm2)

x

Kp (em/hour)

x

EF (events/year)

xED

( hours/event)

x

EP (years)

x

(1/1,000

Ucm

3

)

x (1

year/365 days)

x

(1/BW (kg))

x

(1/AP (years))

1.7E-03 Ukg-day

EPCgw (tJg/L)

x UWNCDGW

Factor (Ukg-day)

x

dermal RAF X 1/1,000 (mg/f.Jg)

Carcinogenic Effects

Utility

Worker

Cancer

Dermal Groundwater (UWCDGW) Factor (Ukg-day)

UWCDGW Factor

Lifetime Average Daily Dose (mg/kg-day)

SA (cm

2

)

x

Kp (em/hour)

x

EF (events/year)

xED

(hours/event)

x

EP (years)

x

(1/1

,000 Ucm

3

)

x (1

year/365 days)

x

(1/BW (kg))

x

(1/AP (years))

EPCgw {f.Jg/L)

x

UWCDGW Factor (Ukg-day)

x

dermal RAF

x

1/1,000 (mg/f.Jg)

(1) Adults, 18 to 65 years of age, were used to represent Potential Future on-site utility workers. These potential receptors

may

be exposed to

contaminants

in

groundwater during underground utility repair and maintenance work

at

the Site.

(2) Average body weight

of

receptor population obtained from U.S. EPA Exposure Factors Handbook, Volume I of II, Office

of

the Health and Environmental Assessment,

Washington, D.C., EPA 600/C-99/001, February 1999.

(3) Frequency

of

exposure describes how often each even t occurs

over

a given period

of

time. It was assumed that workers would be exposed to contaminants

in groundwater while working on underground utilites at the Site 5 days per week

for

1 week,

for

a total of 5 events per year.

(4) The duration of each exposure describes how long each individual exposure event might

last

For dermal exposure to groundwater, exposure duration is

a hours/event. During this event, the utility worker is assumed to dermally contact contaminants in groundwater.

(5) The exposure period describes the length

of

time

over

which the utility worker may contact contaminants

in

groundwater within a trench.

We a.ssume that utility workers will be exposed to contaminants in groundwater while repairing/maintaining underground utilities at the Site so we evaluate a 25 year exposure.

{6) For noncancer risks, the averaging period is set equal to the exposure period. The averaging period is equal to a lifetime (i.e., 70 years) when estimat ing cancer risks.

(7) Skin surface areas are based on U.S. EPA Exposure Factors Handbook, Office

of

the Health and Environmental Assessment, Washington, D.C., EPA 600/C-99/001, February

Fraction exposed assumes head, forearms, and hands exposed based on assumption in DEP Documentation for Risk Assessment Shortform Residential

Scenario- October, 1992.

(8) Skin permeability values were obtained from Dermal Exposure Assessment : Principles and Applicat ions 1 terim Report EPA 600/8-91/011 B.

(9) Refer to Table 5 for contaminant-specific dermal groundwater contact RAFs.

(1

0) Please refer to Section 5.5 for the derivation of exposure point concentrations.

P:\Pre-FY2008\12700000\12700961\Risk Assessment\Beverly RA_CW

&

UW\EXP

_CW

& UWUtil. Worker Dennal

GW





Appendix

D:

Risk Calculations

Appendix D

Risk Calculations

Table 7 summarizes the risks calculated for tbe Site. Tables D-1 and D-2 provide the calculations

for tbe risk characterization.

Tetra Tech Rizzo

1





TABLE

D-1

CALCULATION

OF AVERAGE

DAILY

DOSES

AND

RISK ESTIMATES

FOR DERMAL CONTACT

WITH

GROUNDWATER

RECEPTOR:

Constrution Worker

CARCINOGENIC EFFECTS

Exposure

Lifetime

Oral Exc

Point

Dermal Skin Average

Cancer

Life

Contaminant Concentration X Relative

X Permeability X

CWCDGW

=

Daily

X

Slope

=

Can

EPCgw

Absorption

Constant

Factor

Dose

Factor Ri

~ a t L

Factor (Ucm

2

h)

U k g - d a ~ l

{ m g l k g - d a ~ )

{ m g / k g - d a ~ r

Estim

Benzene

1.5

1.00 2.1E-02 2.0E-04 6.2E-09

5.5E-02

3.4E

Butyl Alcohol

2,890.0 1.00

2.8E-03 2.0E-04 1.6E-06

none

N

Butylbenzene, n-

1.3

1.00 2.8E-01 2.0E-04 7.1E-08

none

N

Ethyl

tert-butyl ether

18.0

1.00 4.5E-04 2.0E-04 1.6E-09

none N

lsopropyltoluene, p-

2.7

1.00 1.4E-01 2.0E-04 7.4E-08

none N

Methyl tert-butyl

ether 3,870.0 1.00 3.1E-03 2.0E-04 2.4E-06

none N

Naphthalene 180.0 1.00 6.8E-02 2.0E-04 2.4E-06 none N

Tert-amyl methyl ether (TAME)

33.7

1.00 6.2E-03 2.0E-04 4.1E-08

none

N

Toluene

1.9 1.00 4.5E-02 2.0E-04

1.7E-08

none

N

Trichlorotrifluoroethane

1,1

,2-

(Freon 113)

4.4

1.00 2.4E-02 2.0E-04 2.1E-08

none N

Trimethylbenzene, 1 2.4-

1.6 1.00 1.3E-01 2.0E-04

4.2E-08

none

N

Xylene (total)

6.0

1.00 8.0E-02 2.0E-04 9.4E-08

none N

Acenaphthene

12.4 1.00 1.5E-01 2.0E-04

3.6E-07

none

N

Anthracene

6.4

1.00 2.3E-01 2.0E-04 2.8E-07

none N

Benzo(a)anthracene

0.1

1.10 8.1

E-01

2.0E-04 1.8E-08 7.3E-01 1.3E


0.1

1.10

1.2E+OO

2.0E-04 3.2E-08 7.3E-01 2.3E

Fluoranthene

8.9 1.00

3:6E-01 2.0E-04 6.3E-07

none N

Fluorene

12.0

1.00 1.7E-01 2.0E-04 4.1E-07

none N

Methylnaphthalene,

2-

14.8

1.00 1.4E-01 2.0E-04 4.1E-07

none

N

Naphthalene

92.0 1.00

6.9E-02

2.0E-04

1.2E-06

none

N

Phenanthrene 32.9 1.00 2.7E-01 2.0E-04 1.7E-06 none N

Pyrene

6.4

1.00 3.3E-01 2.0E-04 4.1E-07

none

N

Carbazole

16.3

1.00 8.0E-02 2.0E-04 2.6E-07 2.0E-02

Dibenzofuran

12.0

1.00 1.5E-01 2.0E-04 3.6E-07

none

N

Oimethylphenol, 2,4-

12.0

1.00 1.5E-02 2.0E-04 3.5E-08

none

N

Methylphenol, 2-

11.0

1.00 1.0E-02 2.0E-04 2.2E-08

none

N

Methylphenol,

3-

28.0

1.00 1.0E-02 2.0E-04 5.7E-08

none

N

Phenol

8.8

1.00 5.5E-03 2.0E-04 9.5E-09

none

N

Antimony, Total

6.0

1.00 1.0E-03 2.0E-04 1.2E-09

none

N

Arsenic, Total

47.3

1.00 1.0E-03 2.0E-04 9.3E-09

1.5E+OO

1.4E

Barium, Total

892.0

1.00

1.0E-03

2.0E-04

1.8E-07

none

N

Chromium, Total

6.3

1.00 1.0E-03 2.0E-04 1.2E-09

none

N

Manganese, Total

11,500.0 1.00 1.0E-03 2.0E-04 2.3E-06

none

N

Mercury, Total

0.3

1.00 1.0E-03 2.0E-04

5.1E-11

none

N

Nickel, Total

17.0

1.00 1.0E-04 2.0E-04 3.3E-10

none

N

Zinc, Total

99.0 1.00 6.0E-04 2.0E-04 1.2E-08 none N

C11-C22 Aromatics

203.0

1.00 6.8E-01

2.0E-04

2.7E-05

none

N

SUBTOTAL:

S.OE

NA = Not Analyzed/Not Applicable; NC = Not Calculated; NO= Not Determined.

P:\Pre-FY2008\12700000\12700961\Risk Assessment\Bever y RA_CW & UW\RISK_CW & UWConst. Worker Dermal GW



TABLE D-2

CALCULATION OF AVERAGE DAILY DOSES

AND

RISK ESTIMATES

FOR DERMAL CONTACT

WITH

GROUNDWATER

RECEPTOR: Utlility Worker

SUBCHRONIC NONCARCINOGENIC EFFECTS

Exposure Chronic Oral

Point Dermal Skin Average

Chronic

Haz

Contaminant

Concentration X

Relative

X

Penneability

X

UWNCDGW

=

Daily Reference Ind

EPCgw

Absorption

Constant Factor Dose Dose

~ g i L )

Factor

iUcm

2

( U k g - d a l : ~

{mg/kg-day) (mg/kg-day)

Benzene 1.5 1.00

2.1E-02 1.4E-02 4.3E-07

4.0E-03

1.1E

Butyl Alcohol

2,890.0 1.00

2.8E-03 1.4E-02 1.1 E-04 1.0E-01 1.1E

Butylbenzene, n-

1.3

1.00

2.8E-01

1.4E-02 5.0E-06 1.0E-02 5.0E

Butylbenzene, tert- 1.2 1.00

2.4E-01 1.4E-02 4.0E-06

1.0E-02 4.0E


18.0

1.00 4.5E-04 1.4E-02 1.1E-07

none N

lsopropyltoluene, p- 2.7 1.00

1.4E-01

1.4E-02 5.2E-06 none N

Methyl tert-butyl ether 3,870.0 1.00

3.1E-03 1.4E-02 1.7E-04

1.0E-01

1.7E

Naphthalene

180.0

1.00 6.8E-02 1.4E-02 1.7E-04 2.0E-02 8.5E


(TAME)

33.7 1.00

6.2E-03 1.4E-02 2.9E-06 1.3E-01 2.2E

Toluene 1.9

1.00 4.5E-02 1.4E-02 1.2E-06 2.0E-01 5.9E

Trichlorotrifluoroethane 1,1 ,2-

(Freon 113)

4.4 1.00

2.4E-02 1.4E-02 1.5E-06 3.0E+01 4.8E

Trimethylbenzene, 1 2,4-

1.6

1.00

1.3E-01

1.4E-02 2.9E-06 5.0E-02

5.9E

Xylene (total) 6.0 1.00

8.0E-02 1.4E-02 6.6E-06

2.0E-01

3.3E

AcenaJ)hthene 12.4

1.10 1.5E-01 1.4E-02 2.8E-05 6.0E-02

4.6E

Anthracene 6.4 1.10

2.3E-01 1.4E-02

2.2E-05

3.0E-01 7.3E

Benzo(a)anthracene

0.1

1.00

8.1

E-01

1.4E-02 1.1E-06 3.0E-02 3.7E

Benzo(b)fluoranthene ·

0.1

1.00 1.2E+OO 1.4E-02 2.0E-06 3.0E-02

6.8E

Fluoranthene

8.9

1.10

3.6E-01

1.4E-02

4.8E-05

4.0E-02

1.2E

Fluorene 12.0 1.10

1.7E-01 1.4E-02 3.1E-05 4.0E-02 7.8E

Methylnaphthalene, 2-

14.8 1.00

1.4E-01 1.4E-02 2.9E-05 4.0E-03 7.3E

Naphthalene

92.0

1.00

6.9E-02

1.4E-02 8.7E-05 2.0E-02

4.4E

Phenanthrene

32.9 1.00 2.7E-01 1.4E-02 1.2E-04 3.0E-02 4.1E

Pyrene 6.4 1.10

3.3E-01 1.4E-02 3.2E-05 3.0E-02

1.1E

Carbazole 16.3 1.00

B.OE-02 1.4E-02 1.8E-05

none

N

Dibenzofuran

12.0 1.00

1.5E-01 1.4E-02 2.5E-05 4.0E-03

6.3E

Dimethylphenol, 2,4 -

12.0

1.00

1.5E-02

1.4E-02 2.5E-06 2.0E-02

1.2E

Methylphenol, 2-

11.0 1.00

1.0E-02

1.4E-02

1.5E-06 5.0E-02 3.1E

Methylphenol, 3- 28.0 1.00

1.0E-02 1.4E-02 4.0E-06 5.0E-02

7.9E

Phenol 8.8 1.00

5.5E-03 1.4E-02 6.7E-07 3.0E-01

2.2E

Antimony, Total

6.0 1.00

1.0E-03 1.4E-02 8.3E-08 4.0E-04

2.1E

Arsenic, Total 47.3 1.00

1.0E-03 1.4E-02 6.5E-07 3.0E-04

2.2E

Barium, Total

892.0

1.00

1.0E-03

1.4E-02 1.2E-05

7.0E-02

1.8E

Chromium, Total 6.3 250.00

1.0E-03 1.4E-02 2.2E-05 3.0E-03

7.2E

Manganese, Total

11,500.0 1.00

1.0E-03 1.4E-02 1.6E-04 4.6E-02

3.4E

Mercury, Total

0.3

6.70 1.0E-03 1.4E-02 2.4E-08

3.0E-04

8.0E

Nickel, Total

17.0 10.00

1.0E-04 1.4E-02

2.3E-07

2.0E-02

1.2E

Zinc, Total

99.0 2.20 6.0E-04 1.4E-02 1.8E-06 3.0E-01 6.0E

C11-C22 Aromatics 203.0 1.10

6.8E-01

f4E-02 2.1E-03

3.0E-02

6.9E

SUBTOTAL:

1.2E

Notes:

NA = Not Analyzed/Not Applicable; NC = Not Calculated; NO= Not Determined.

P:\Pre-FY2008\12700000\12700961\Risk Assessment\Beverly R A ~ C W & UW\RISK._CW & UWU ilily Worker Dermal GW



TABLE D-2

CALCULATION OF AVERAGE

DAILY

DOSES

AND

RISK ESTIMATES

FOR

DERMAL

CONTACT

WITH

GROUNDWATER

RECEPTOR: Utlility Worker

CARCINOGENIC EFFECTS

Exposure

Lifetime Oral Exce

Point

Dermal Skin

Average Cancer

lifeti

Contaminant Concentration

X

Relative

X

Permeability

X

UWCDGW

=

Daily

X

Slope

=

Can

EPCgw

Absorption Constant Factor

Dose

Factor Ris

( ~ g / L }

Factor

{Ucm

2

h)

( U k g - d a ~ )

{ m g / k g - d a ~ }

{ m g / k g - d a ~ r

Estim

Benzene

1.5 1.00

2.1E-02 2.0E-04

6.2E-09 5.5E-02 3.4E

Butyl Alcohol

2,890.0 1.00 2.8E-03 2.0E-04

1.6E-06

none

NC

Butylbenzene, n- 1.3 1.00

2.8E-01 2.0E-04 7.1E-08 none NC

Butylbenzene, tert- 1.2 1.00

2.4E-01 2.0E-04

5.7E-08

none NC

Ethyl

tert-butyl ether

18.0

1.00 4.5E-04

2.0E-04 1.6E-09 none

NC

lsopropyltoluene,

p-

2.7 1.00

1.4E-01 2.0E-04 7.4E-08 none

NC

Methyl tert-butyl ether 3,870.0 1.00

3.1E-03 2.0E-04

2.4E-06

none

NC

Naphthalene

180.0

1.00 6.8E-02

2.0E-04 2.4E-06 none

NC


(TAME)

33.7 1.00

6.2E-03 2.0E-04

4.1E-08 none

NC

Toluene

1.9

1.00 4.5E-02

2.0E-04 1.7E-08

none

NC


1,1 ,2-

(Freon 113) 4.4 1.00

2.4E-02 2.0E-04

2.1E-08 none

NC

Trimethylbenzene, 1 2,4-

1.6 1.00

1.3E-01 2.0E-04 4.2E-08 none

NC

Xylene total) 6.0 1.00

8.0E-02 2.0E-04 9.4E-08

none NC

Acenaphthene

12.4

1.00 1.5E-01

2.0E-04 3.6E-07

none NC

Anthracene 6.4 1.00

2.3E-01 2.0E-04 2.8E-07 none NC

Benzo a)anthracene 0.1 1.10

8.1

E-01

2.0E-04

1.8E-08 7.3E-01 1.3E

Benzo b)fluoranthene

0.1

1.10

1.2E+OO 2.0E-04 3.2E-08 7.3E-01 2.3E

Fluoranthene 8.9 1.00

3.6E-01 2.0E-04 6.3E-07

none NC

Fluorene 12.0 1.00

1.7E-01 2.0E-04

4.1E-07 none

NC

Methylnaphthafene, 2-

14.8

1.00

1.4E-01

2.0E-04

4.1E-07

none NC

Naphthalene 92.0 1.00

6.9E-02 2.0E-04 1.2E-06 none

NC

Phenanthrene 32.9 1.00 2.7E-01 2.0E-04 1.7E-06

none

NC

Pyrene 6.4

1.00 3.3E-01 2.0E-04

4.1E-07

none

NC

Carbazole 16.3 1.00

8.0E-02 2.0E-04 2.6E-07

2.0E-02 5.1E

Dibenzofuran

12.0 1.00

1.5E-01 2.0E-04

3.6E-07

none NC

Dimethylphenol,

2,4-

12.0

1.00 1.5E-02 2.0E-04

3.5E-08 none

NC


1.0E-02 2.0E-04 2.2E-08

none

NC


1.0E-02 2.0E-04

5.7E-08

none

NC

Phenol 8.8

1.00 5.5E-03 2.0E-04

9.5E-09

none

NC

Antimony, Total 6.0 1.00

1.0E-03 2.0E-04

1.2E-09

none

NC

Arsenic,

Total

47.3 1.00

1.0E-03 2.0E-04

9.3E-09

1.5E+OO

1.4E

Barium, Total

892.0

1.00

1.0E-03 2.0E-04 1.8E-07

none

NC

Chromium, Total 6.3 1.00

1.0E-03 2.0E-04 1.2E-09

none NC

Manganese,

Total 11,500.0

1.00

1.0E-03 2.0E-04

2.3E-06

none NC

Mercury, Total

0.3

1.00 1.0E-03

2.0E-04 5.1E-11 none

NC

Nickel, Total 17.0 1.00

1.0E-04 2.0E-04 3.3E-10

none

NC

Zinc, Total

99.0 1.00 6.0E-04 2.0E-04 1.2E-08

none

NC

C11-C22

Aromatics 203.0 1.00

6.8E-01 2.0E-04 2.7E-05 none

NC

SUBTOTAL:

5.6E

Notes:

NA =

Not Analyzed/Not Applicable;

NC =

Not

Calculated; ND =

Not

Determined.

P:\Pre-FY2008\12700000\1270 0961\Risk Assessment\Beverly RA_CW

&

UW\RISK_CW

&

UWUtility Worker Dermal

GW



Appendix E

Soil Analytical

Data









Project Name: Not Specified

Project Number: 12700960

Lab Number:

Report Date:

05180713:48

L0706797

05/18/07

MADEP MCP Response

Action Analytical

Report

Certification

This form provides certifications

for

all samples performed by MCP methods. Please refer

to

the Sample Results

and

Container Information sections of this report for specification of

MCP methods used for each analysis. The

following

questions pertain

only

to MCP

Analytical Methods. ·

An affirmative response to questions A, B, C & 0 is required for "Presumptive Certainty" status

A

YES

'

'

Were all samples received by the laboratory in a condition consistent with those described on

their Chain-of-Custody documentation for hE)data set? ..

--------i

B

c

D

Were all QAIQC procedures required for the specified analytical methods(s) included

in

this

report followed, including the requirement to note and discuss in a narrative QC data that did not

meet appropriate performance standards org.uidelines?

Does the analytical data included in this report meet all the requirements for "Presumptive

Certainty", as described

in

section 2.0 of the MADEP document CAM VII

A,

"Quality Assurance

and Quality Control Guidelines for the Acquisition and Reporting of Analytical Data"?

VPH and EPH methods only: Was the VPH or EPH method run without significant modifications,

as specified in Section 11.3?

YES

YES

YES

A response to questions E and F is required for "Presumptive Certainty" status

~ ~

E Were all QC performance standards and recommendations for the specified method(s)

-----'a"'c..,hieved?

F

Were results for all analyte-list compounds/elements for the specified method(s) reported?

NO

··------j

NO I

_ _ _ _ _ __j

For any questions answered "No", please refer to the case narrative section on the following page(s).

Please note that sample matrix information is located in the Sample Results section

of

this report.

Page 3

of83



05180713:48

Project Name: Not Specified Lab Number:

Project Number: 12700960 Report Date:

Case Narrative

The samples were received in accordance with the chain

of

custody and no significant deviations were

encountered during preparation or analysis unless otherwise noted below.

MCP Related Narratives

VPH

L0706797 03 and -04 fell short of the recommended 1 1 methanol:soil ratio.

In reference to question F:

L0706797

05/18/07

At the client's request, all submitted samples were not analyzed for the full MCP list of compounds specified for

the Method.

EPH

L0706797-01: The C9-C18 and C19-C36 Aliphatic range results were obtained from re-analysis on dilution

due to the elevated concentrations of these compounds present in the sample.

L0706797-03: The C11-C22 Aromatic range results were obtained from re-analysis on dilution due

to

the

elevated concentrations

of

these compounds present in the sample.

The WG279975-1 method blank was re-fractionated due to a low surrogate recovery on the original analysis.

The results of the re-fractionation are reported.

In

reference

to

question

E:

The surrogate% recovery for o-Terphenyl is above method acceptance criteria on L0706797-01, possibly due

to co-elution. The chromatogram of the sample

is

provided as an attachment.

The surrogate% recoveries for Chloro-Octadecane and o-Terphenyl are below method acceptance criteria

on

L0706797 02. Re-extraction and re-analysis confirmed possible matrix interference. Both analyses are

reported.

The surrogate% recovery for o-Terphenyl is above method acceptance criteria on L0706797-03, possibly due

to co-elution. The chromatogram

of

the sample is provided as an attachment.

The surrogate % recovery for Chloro-Octadecane is below method acceptance criteria on L0706797 -03. Re

extraction and re-analysis confirmed possible matrix interference. Both analyses are reported.

The surrogate% recovery for Chloro-Octadecane is below method acceptance criteria on L0706797-04. Re

extraction and re-analysis confirmed possible matrix interference. Both analyses are reported.

Page4

of 83





Project Name:

Project Number:

Not Specified

12700960

Case Narrative (continued)

Lab Number:

Report Date:

05180713:48

L0706797

05/18/07

L0706797 03 has an elevated detection limit due to the dilution required by the elevated concentrations

of

target compounds in the sample.

The surrogate % recovery is above method acceptance criteria on L0706797 03, possibly due to co-elution

with sample matrix.

I, the undersigned, attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that, to the best of my knowledge and

belief and based upon my personal inquiry of those responsible for providing the information contained

in this analytical report, such information is accurate and complete. This certificate

of

analysis is not

complete unless this page accompanies any and all pages

of

this report.

Authorized Signature:

Title: Technical Director Date: 05/18/07

Page 6

of83



05180713:48

ORGANICS

Page 7

of

83



Page 8 of 83

PETROLEUM

HYDROCARBONS

05180713:48

··&?nA

w f > . ~ h . , • • . «

, . . ,



Project Name:

Not Specified

Project Number:

12700960

Lab ID: L0706797-01

Client ID: RIZ-1 (5'-7')

Sample Location: BEVERLY,

MA

Matrix:

Soil

Anaytical Method: 1,8015B(M)

Analytical Date: 05/14/07 18:35

Analyst:

RT

Percent Solids:

90%

TPH

Surrogate

o-Terphenyl

Page 9 of

83

SAMPLE RESULTS

NO

Lab Number:

Report Date:

Date Collected:

Date Received:

Field Prep:

05180713:48

L0706797

05/18/07

05/09/07 08:30

05/10/07

Extraction Method:

Not Specified

EPA3545

05/11/07 20:30xtraction Date:

ug/kg

37000

Acceptance

%Recovery Qualifier Criteria

72 40-140



Project Name:

Not Specified

Project Number:

12700960

LabiD:

L0706797 02

Client

ID:

RIZ-2 (5'-7')

Sample Location:

BEVERLY, MA

Matrix:

Soil

Anaytical Method:

1 8015B(M)

Analytical Date:

05/17/07 02:04

Analyst:

MF

Percent Solids: 80%

TPH

Surrogate

o-Terphenyl

Page 10

of

83

Lab Number:

Report Date:

SAMPLE RESULTS

Date Collected:

Date Received:

Field Prep:

05180713:48

L0706797

05/18/07

05/09/07 10:50

05/10/07

Extraction Method:

Not Specified

EPA 3540C

05/11/07 22:20

xtraction Date:

1260000

ug/kg

208000

5

Acceptance

%Recovery

Qualifier Criteria

100

40-140



Project Name:

Not Specified

Project Number:

12700960

Lab ID: L0706797-03

Client ID: RIZ-3 ( 10'-12')

Sample Location: BEVERLY, MA

Matrix:

Soil

Anaytical Method: 1,8015B(M)


Analyst:

MF

Percent Solids:

73%

TPH

Surrogate

o-Terphenyl

Page 11 of 83

Lab Number:

Report Date:

SAMPLE

RESULTS

Date Collected:

Date Received:

Field Prep:

05180713:48

L0706797

05/18/07

05/09/07 13:00

05/10/07

Extraction Method:

Not Specified

EPA3540C

05/11/07 22:20

xtraction Date:

8490000

ug/kg

1140000

25

Acceptance

%Recovery

Qualifier Criteria

186

40-140



Project Name:

Not Specified

Project

Number:

12700960

Lab ID:

L0706797-04

Client

ID:

RIZ-4 (5'-7')


Matrix:

Soil

Anaytical Method: 1 8015B(M)


Analyst:

MF

Percent Solids:

77%

TPH

Surrogate

o-

Terphenyl

Page 12

of

83

SAMPLE

RESULTS

138000

Lab

Number:

Report Date:

Date Collected:

Date Received:

Field Prep:

05180713:48

L0706797

05/18/07

05/09/07 14:45

05/10/07

Extraction Method:

Not Specified

EPA3540C


ug/kg 43300

Acceptance


72

40-140





Project

Name:

Project Number:

Analytical Method:

Analytical Date:

Analyst:

TPH

Not Specified

12700960

1 8015B(M)

05/16/0714:12

MF

Surrogate

o-Terphenyt

Page 14 of 83

Method Blank.

Analysis

Batch Quality Control

NO

ug/kg

Lab Number:

Report

Date:

05180713:48

L0706797

05/18/07

Extraction Method: EPA 3540C

Extraction Date: 05/11/07 22:20

33300

Acceptance


90

40-140



Project Name:

Not Specified


Parameter

TPH

Surrogate

oMTerphenyl

TPH

Surrogate

o-Terphenyl

Page

15

of

83

LCS

Lab

Control

Sample

Analysis


LCSD

%Recovery %Recovery

%Recovery

Limits

40-140

LCS LCSD

%Recovery Qualifier %Recovery Qualifier

61

40-140

LCS LCSD

%Recovery Qualifier %Recovery Qualifier

101

Lab

Repo

RP

Acceptance

Criteria

40-140

Acceptance

Criteria

40-140



Pro ject Name: Not Specified


Parameter

Lab Duplicate Analysis


Native Sample Duplicate Sample Units

Acceptance

Surro late %Recoverv Qualifier %Recoverv Qualifier Criteria

o-Terphenyl 79 78

40-140

Acceptance

Surro late %Recoverv Qualifier %Recoverv

_

Qualifier Criteria

o-Terphenyl 96

89

40-140

Page

16

of

83

RP



Project

Name:

Not Specified


Lab ID:

Client 10:

Sample Location:

L0706797-01

RIZ-1

(5'-7')

BEVERLY, MA

Soil

59,VPH-04-1.1

05/11/07 16:26

n

Matrix:

Anaylical Method:

Analytical Date:

Analyst:

Percent Solids:

90%

Condition of sample received:

Sample Temperature upon receipt:

Were samples received in methanol?

Methanol ratio:

Parameter

C5-C8 Aliphatics, Unadjusted


C9-C10 Aromatics

C5-C8 Aliphatics, Adjusted


Surrogate

2,5-Dibromotoluene-PID

2,5-Dibromotoluene-FID

Page 17

of

83

SAMPLE RESULTS

Result

Qualifier

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

%Recovery

Qualifier

----------

100

110

Units

mg/kg

mg/kg

mg/kg

mg/kg

mg/kg

Lab Number:

Report Date:

Date Collected:

Date Received:

Field Prep:

05180713:48

L0706797

05/18/07

05/09/07 08:30

05/10/07

Not Specified

Satisfactory

Received on Ice

Yes (Covering the Soil)

1:1 +/- 25%

RDL Dilution Factor

3.50

3.50

3.50

3.50

3.50

Acceptance

Criteria

70-130

70-130



Project

Name: Not Specified


Lab ID:

Client ID:

Sample Location:

L0706797-01

RIZ-1 (5'-7')

BEVERLY, MA

Soil

61,EPH-04-1

05/14/07 23:11

BN

Matrix:

Anaytical Method:

Analytical Date:

Analyst:

Percent Solids:

90%

Condition

of

sample received:


Sample Extraction method:

Parameter

C11-C22 Aromatics, Unadjusted

C11-C22 Aromatics, Adjusted

Page

18

of83

Surrogate

Chloro-Octadecane

o-Terphenyl

2-Fiuorobiphenyl

2-Bromonaphthalene

SAMPLE RESULTS

Result

2320

2290

mg/kg

mg/kg

Lab Number:

Report

Date:

Date Collected:

Date Received:

Field Prep:

Extraction Method:

Extraction Date:

05180713:48

L0706797

05/18/07

05/09/07 08:30

05/10/07

Not Specified

EPA 3545

05/11/07 09:00

Satisfactory

7.41

7.41

Received on Ice

Extracted Per the Method

Acceptance

%Recovery

Qualifier Criteria

67

141

127

70

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140




Project

Number: 12700960

Lab ID:

Client ID:

Sample Location:

Matrix:

Anaytical Method:

Analytical Date:

Analyst:

Percent Solids:

L0706797-01 R

RIZ-1 (5'-7')

BEVERLY, MA

Soil

61

,EPH-04-1

05/16/07 00:33

BN

90%


Sample Temperature upon receipt


C9-C18 Aliphatics

C19-C36 Aliphatics

Page 19 of 83

SAMPLE RESULTS

3160

750

mg/kg

mglkg

Lab Number:

Report

Date:

Date Collected:

Date

Received:

Field Prep:

Extraction Method:

Extraction Date:

05180713:48

L0706797

05/18/07

05/09/07 08:30

05/10/07

Not Specified

EPA 3545

05/11/07 09:00

Satisfactory

37.0

37.0

Received on Ice


5

5



Project

Name:

Not

Specified


Lab 10:

Client ID:

Sample

Location:

L0706797-02

RIZ-2 (5'-7')

BEVERLY,

MA

Soil

59,VPH-04-1.1

05/11/0717:18

TT

Matrix:

Anaytical Method:

Analytical Date:

Analyst:

Percent Solids:

80%




Methanol ratio:

Parameter

CS-CB Aliphatics, Unadjusted


C9-C10 Aromatics



Surrogate


2,5-0ibromotoluene-FID

Page 20 of83

SAMPLE

RESULTS

Result Qualifier

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

%Recovery

Qualifier

105

115

Lab Number:

Report

Date:

Date Collected:

Date Received:

Field Prep:

05180713:48

L0706797

05/18/07

05/09/07 10:50

05/10/07

Not

Specified

Satisfactory

Received

on

Ice


1:1 +/- 25%

Units

RDL

Dilution

Factor

mg/kg 4.15

mg/kg 4.15

mg/kg 4.15

mg/kg 4.15

mg/kg

4.15

Acceptance

Criteria

-- -

-----

70-130

70-130



Project

Name:

Not

Specified


Lab ID:

L0706797 02

ClientiD:

RIZ-2 (5'-7')

Sample Location:

BEVERLY,

MA

Matrix:

Soil

Anaytical Method: 61,EPH-04-1

Analytical Date: 05/14/07

23:44

Analyst: BN

Percent Solids:

80%




Parameter

C9-C18 Aliphatics

C1 9-C36 Aliphatics



Page 21

of 83

Surrogate

Chloro-Octadecane

o-Terphenyl

2-Fiuorobiphenyl

2-Bromonaphthalene

SAMPLE

RESULTS

Result Qualifier

8.99

114

85.6

82.1

%Recovery

Qualifier

23

37

92

91

Units

mg/kg

mg/kg

mg/kg

mg/kg

Lab Number:

Report Date:

Date Collected:

Date Received:

Field Prep:

05180713:48

L0706797

05/18/07

05/09/07 10:50

05/10/07

Extraction Method:

Not Specified

EPA 3545


Satisfactory

Received on Ice


RDL Dilution Factor

8.33

8.33

8.33

8.33

Acceptance

Criteria

4 0 ~ 1 4 0

40-140

40-140

40-140



Project

Name:

Not Specified

Project Number:

12700960

Lab ID:

Client ID:

Sample Location:

L0706797 -02

RE

RIZ-2 (5'-7')

BEVERLY, MA

Soilatrix:


05/17/07 04:50

BN

Analytical Date:

Analyst:

Percent Solids:

80%




Parameter

C9-C18 Aliphatics

C19-C36 Aliphatics



Page 22

of83

Surrogate

Chloro-Octadecane

o-Terphenyl

2-Fiuorobiphenyl

2-Bromonaphthalene

SAMPLE

RESULTS

Result Qualifier

9.83

132

125

108

%Recovery

Qualifier

36

62

71

74

Units

mg/kg

mglkg

mg/kg

mglkg

Lab Number:

Report

Date:

Date Collected:

Date Received:

Field Prep:

05180713:48

L0706797

05/18/07

05/09/07 10:50

05/10/07

Extraction Method:

Not Specified

EPA 3545


Satisfactory

Received on Ice


RDL

Dilution Factor

8.33

8.33

8.33

8.33

Acceptance

Criteria

4 0 ~ 1 4 0

40-140

40-140

40-140



Project Name:

Not

Specified

Project

Number:

12700960

Lab ID:

Client ID:

Sample Location:

L0706797-03

RIZ-3 (10'-12')

BEVERLY,MA

Soil

59,VPH-04-1.1

05/11/07 18:09

TT

Matrix:

Anaytical Method:

Analytical Date:

Analyst:

Percent Solids:

73%

Condition

of

sample received:

Sample Temperature upon

receipt


Methanol ratio:

Parameter

C5-CB Aliphatics, Unadjusted


C9-C10 Aromatics



Surrogate



Page 23 of83

SAMPLE

RESULTS

Result

Qualifier

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

%Recovery Qualifier

90

100

Units

mg/kg

mg/kg

mg/kg

mg/kg

mg/kg

Lab Number:

Report

Date:

Date Collected:

Date Received:

Field Prep:

05180713:48

L0706797

05/18/07

05/09/07 13:00

05/10/07

Not Specified

Satisfactory

Received on Ice


1.5:1

RDL Dilution Factor

6.52

6.52

6.52

6.52

6.52

Acceptance

Criteria

70-130

70-130



Project Name:

Not Specified


Lab ID:

Client ID:

Sample

Location:

L0706797

03

RIZ-3 (10'-12')

BEVERLY,

MA

Soil

61,EPH-04-1

05/14/07 22:37

Matrix:

Anaytical Method:

Analytical Date:

Analyst: BN

Percent Solids:

73%

Condition

of

sample received:



Parameter

C9-C18 Aliphatics

C19-C36 Aliphatics

Page 24 of83

Surrogate

Chloro-Octadecane

o-Terphenyl

2-Fluorobiphenyl

2-Bromonaphthalene

SAMPLE RESULTS

Result

Qualifier

ND

26.6

Recovery

Qualifier

23

340

85

89

Units

mg/kg

mg/kg

Lab Number:

Report Date:

Date

Collected:

Date

Received:

Field Prep:

05180713:48

L0706797

05/18/07

05/09/07 13:00

05/10/07

Extraction Method:

Not Specified

EPA 3545

05/11/07

09:00

xtraction Date:

Satisfactory

Received on lee


RDL

Dilution Factor

9.13

9.13

Acceptance

Criteria

40M140

40-140

40-140

40-140



Project

Name:

Not Specified

Project

Number:

12700960

Lab ID:

Client ID:

Sample Location:

Matrix:

Anaylical Method:

Analytical Date:

Analyst:

Percent Solids:

L0706797 -03 RE

RIZ-3 (10'-12')

BEVERLY, MA

Soil

61

,EPH-04-1

05/17/07 05:23

BN

73%




Parameter

C9-C18 Aliphatics

C19-C36 Aliphatics

Surrogate

SAMPLE RESULTS

Result

Qualifier

ND

14.5

%Recovery

Qualifier

Page

25 of 83

Chloro-Octadecane

o-Terphenyl

2-Fiuorobiphenyl

2-Bromonaphthalene

7

110

66

73

Units

mglkg

mg/kg

Lab Number:

Report

Date:

Date Collected:

Date Received:

Field Prep:

05180713:48

L0706797

05/18/07

05/09/07 13:00

05/10/07

Extraction Method:

Not Specified

EPA 3545

05/16/07 12:30

xtraction Date:

Satisfactory

Received on Ice

Extracted Per the

Method

RDL

Dilution Factor

9.13

9.13

Acceptance

Criteria

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140





Project Name:

Not Specified


Lab ID:

Client ID:

Sample Location:

Matrix:

Anaytical Method:

Analytical Date:

Analyst:

Percent Solids:

L0706797

03

R

RIZ-3 (10'-12')

BEVERLY,

MA

Soil

61

,EPH-04-1

05/15/07

22:54

BN

73%




C11wC22 Aromatics, Unadjusted


Page

27

of

83

SAMPLE RESULTS

1420

775

mgfkg

mgfkg

Lab Number:

Report Date:

Date

Collected:

Date

Received:

Field Prep:

Extraction Method:

Extraction Date:

05180713:48

L0706797

05/18/07

05/09/07 13:00

05/10/07

Not Specified

EPA

3545

05/11/07

09:00

Satisfactory

91.3

91.3

Received on Ice


10

10




Project

Number:

12700960

Lab 10:

Client ID:

Sample Location:

L0706797 04

RIZ-4 (5'-7')

BEVERLY, MA

Soil

59,VPH-04-1.1

05/11/07 19:01

n

Matrix:

Anaytical Method:

Analytical Date:

Analyst:

Percent Solids:

77%

Condition

of

sample received:



Methanol ratio:

Parameter



C9-C10 Aromatics



Page

28 of 83

Surrogate



SAMPLE

RESULTS

Result

NO

36.6

18.2

NO

17.5

Units

mg/kg

mg/kg

mg/kg

mg/kg

mg/kg

Lab Number:

Report Date:

Date Collected:

Date Received:

Field Prep:

05180713:48

L0706797

05/18/07

05/09/07 14:45

05/10/07

Not Specified

Satisfactory

Received on Ice


1.6:1

RDL Dilution Factor

6.33

6.33

6.33

6.33

6.33

Acceptance

%Recovery

Qualifier Criteria

102

109

70-130

70-130



Project

Name:

Not Specified

Project

Number: 12700960

Lab ID: L0706797-04

Client ID:

RIZ-4 (5'-7')


MA

Matrix: Soil



Analyst: BN

Percent Solids:

77%

Condition

of

sample received:



C9-C18 Aliphatics

C19-C36 Aliphatics



Page 29

of83

Surrogate

Chloro-Octadecane

o-Terphenyl

2-Fiuorobiphenyl

2-Bromonaphthalene

SAMPLE RESULTS

Result

Qualifier

10.4

28.5

35.2

29.7

Recovery Qualifier

29

50

78

77

Units

mg/kg

mg/kg

mg/kg

mg/kg

Lab

Number:

Report

Date:

Date Collected:

Date Received:

Field Prep:

05180713:48

L0706797

05/18/07

05/09/07 14:45

05/10/07

Extraction Method:

Not Specified

EPA3545


Satisfactory

Received on Ice


RDL Dilution Factor

8.66

8.66

8.66

8.66

Acceptance

Criteria

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140



Project Name:

Not Specified

Project Number:

12700960

Lab ID: L0706797 -04 RE

Client ID:

RIZ-4 (5'-7')


Matrix: Soil

Anaytical Method:

61,EPH-04-1


Analyst: BN

Percent Solids: 77%

Condition

of

sample received:



Parameter

C9-C18 Aliphatics

C19-C36 Aliphatics



Page 30

of

83

Surrogate

Chloro-Octadecane

o-Terphenyl

2-Fiuorobiphenyl

2-Bromonaphthalene

SAMPLE

RESULTS

Result

Qualifier

NO

29.1

31.1

25.5

%Recovery

Qualifier

25

36

75

73

Units

mglkg

mg/kg

mg/kg

mglkg

05180713:48

Lab Number: L0706797

Report

Date: 05/18/07

Date Collected: 05/09/07 14:45

Date Received: 05/10/07

Field Prep: Not Specified

Extraction Method: EPA 3545


Satisfactory

Received on Ice

Extracted Per the

Method

RDL

Dilution

Factor

8.66

8.66

8.66

8.66

Acceptance

Criteria

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140





Analytical Method: 59,VPH-04-1.1

05/11/07 07:29

TT

Analytical Date:

Analyst:

Page

31

of 83

C 5 ~ C 8

Aliphatics, Unadjusted

C9·C12 Aliphatics, Unadjusted

C9-C10 Aromatics



Surrogate

2,5-0ibromotoluene-PID


Method Blank Analysis


NO

mg/kg

NO

mg/kg

NO

mg/kg

NO

mg/kg

NO

mg/kg

Lab Number:

Report Date:

2.67

2.67

2.67

2.67

2.67

Acceptance

%Recovery

Qualifier

Criteria

79

85

70-130

70-130

05180713:48

L0706797

05/18/07





Analytical Method:

61

,EPH-04-1

05/14/07 08:54

BN

Analytical Date:

Analyst:

Page 32 of 83

C 9 ~ C 1 8 Aliphatics

C19·C36 Aliphatics



Surrogate

Chloro-Octadecane

o-Terphenyl

2-Fiuorobiphenyl

2-Bromonaphthalene

Method

Blank

Analysis


NO

NO

NO

NO

mg/kg

mg/kg

mg/kg

mg/kg

Lab Number:

Report Date:

05180713:48

L0706797

05/18/07



6.67

6.67

6.67

6.67

Acceptance

%Recovery

Qualifier

Criteria

43

40-140

41 40-140

63

40-140

61

40-140



Project Name:

Not Specified


Parameter

C5·C8 Aliphatics

C9-C12 Aliphatics

C9-C10 Aromatics

Benzene

Toluerie

Ethylbenzene

p/m-Xylene

a-Xylene

Methyl tert butyl ether

Naphthalene

1 2,4-Trimethylbenzene

Pentane

2-Methylpentane

2,2,4-Trimethylpentane

n-Nonane

n-Decane

n-Butylcyclohexane

Page

33

of

83

LCS

Lab Control Sample

Analysis


LCSD

%Recovery %Recovery

%Recovery

Limits

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

30-130

70-130

)[;; : m ~ m n 1 t s : a ; m m i ~ i i w :

:;rmm

H m : ~ o ; : t ; m m t m : ; : w ' 70-130

Lab

Repo

RP





Parameter

Surrogate

2,5-Dibromotoluene-P D


C9-C18 Aliphatics

C19-C36 A iphatics

C11-C22 Aromatics

Naphthalene

2-Methylnaphthalene

Acenaphthylene

Acenaphthene

Fluorene

Phenanthrene

Page 34 of 83

LCS

Lab Control Sample

Analysis


LCSD

%Recovery %Recovery

%Recovery

Limits

LCS LCSD

%Recovery Qualif ier %Recovery Qualifier

98 99

106 107

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

Lab

Repo

RP

Acceptance

Criteria

70-130

70-130



Project Name:

Not Specified


Parameter

Anthracene

Fluoranthene

Pyrene

Benzo(a)anthracene

Chrysene

Benzo(b )fluoranthene

Benzo(k)fluoranthene

Benzo(a)pyrene

lndeno(1 ,2,3-cd)Pyrene

Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene

Benzo(ghi)perylene

Nonane (C9)

Decane (C10)

Dodecane (C12)

Tetradecane (C14)

Hexadecane (C16)

Octadecane (C18)

Nonadecane (C19)

Eicosane (C20)

Docosane (C22)

Tetracosane (C24)

Page 35 of 83

LCS

Lab Control Sample

Analysis


LCSD

%Recovery %Recovery

%Recovery

Limits

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

30-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

Lab

Repo

RP





LCS

Lab Control Sample Analysis


LCSD

Parameter

%Recovery %Recovery

%Recovery

Limits

Hexacosane (C26)

Octacosane (C28)

Triacontane (C30)

Hexatriaconlane (C36)

Page

36

of

83

Surrogate

Chloro-Octadecane

o-Terphenyl

2-Fiuorobiphenyl

2-Bromonaphthalene

% Naphthalene Breakthrough

% 2-Methylnaphthalene Breakthrough

LCS

%Recovery Qualifier

58

73

81

82

0

0

LCSD

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

%Recovery Qualifier

57

73

70

71

0

0

Lab N

Repo

RP

Acceptance

Criteria

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140




12700960roject Number:

Parameter

C9-C18 Aliphatics

C19-C36 Aliphatics

C11-C22 Aromatics

N"aphthalene

2-Methylnaphthalene

Acenaphthylene

Acenaphthene

Fluorene

Phenanthrene

Anthracene

Fluoranthene

Pyrene

Benzo(a)anthracene

Chrysene



Benzo(a)pyrene

1 deno( 1,2,3-cd)Pyrene

Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene

Nonane

Decane

Dodecane

Tetradecane

Hexadecane

Octadecane

Nonadecane

Eicosane

Docosane

Tetracosane

Hexacosane

Octacosane

Triacontane

Hexatriacontane

Page 37 of 83

Fractionation Check Standard

Quality Control

Recovery

78

82

101

91

90

96

94

95

99

104

102

103

102

102

93

103

96

88

95

95

65

70

73

74

75

76

78

79

84

86

86

84

83

86

Lab Number:

Report Date:

QC Criteria

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

30-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

05180713:48

L0706797

05/18/07





Surrogate

Chloro-Octadecane

o-Terphenyl

2-Fiuorobiphenyl

2-Bromonaphthalene

Page 38 of 83

Fractionation Check

Standard

Quality Control

%Recovery QC Criteria

74 40-140

95

40-140

90

40-140

97 40-140

Lab Number:

Report Date:

05180713:48

L0706797

05/18/07



05180713:48

PCBS

Page 39

of83



05180713:48

Project Name:

Not Specified


Project

Number: 12700960

Report Date:

05/18/07

SAMPLE

RESULTS

Lab ID: L0706797 01 Date Collected:

05/09/07 08:30


Date Received:

05/10/07

Sample Location: BEVERLY, MA Field Prep:

Not Specified

Matrix: Soil Extraction Method:

EPA3540C

Anaytical Method:

64,8082 Extraction Date:

05/14/07 20:50

Analytical Date: 05/16/07 11 :33 Cleanup

Method :

EPA3665A

Analyst:

ss

Cleanup Date1:

05/16/07

Percent Solids:

90%

Aroclor 1016

NO

ug/kg

37.0

Aroclor 1221

NO

ug/kg

37.0

Aroclor 1232

NO

ug/kg

37.0

Aroclor 1242

NO

ug/kg 37.0

Aroclor 1248

NO

ug/kg

37.0

Aroclor 1254 NO ug/kg 37.0

Aroclor 1260

NO ug/kg 37.0

Aroclor 1262 NO ug/kg 37.0

Aroclor 1268

NO ug/kg 37.0

Acceptance

Surrogate

%Recovery

Qualifier

Criteria

Column

2,4 5,6-Tetrachloro-m-xylene 101 30-150

A

Oecachlorobiphenyl

97 30-150

A

2,4,5,6-Tetrachloro-m-xylene

87

30-150

B

Decachlorobiphenyl

99 30-150

B

Page 40 of83



Project Name:

Project

Number:

Lab

ID:

Client ID:

Sample Location:

Matrix:

Anaytical Method:

Analytical Date:

Analyst:

Percent Solids:

Aroclor 1254

Aroclor 1260

Not Specified

12700960

L0706797-02

RIZ-2 (5'-7')

BEVERLY,MA

Soil

64,8082

05/16/07

12:01

ss

80%

Surrogate

Page

41 of 83


Decachlorobiphenyl


Decachlorobiphenyl

SAMPLE

RESULTS

165

119

%Recovery

Qualifier

81

126

63

138

05180713:48

Lab Number:

L0706797

Report

Date: 05/18/07

Date Collected:

05/09/07 10:50

Date Received:

05/10/07

Field Prep:

Not Specified

Extraction Method:

EPA

3540C

Extraction Date:

05/14/07 20:50

Cleanup Method1:

EPA3665A

Cleanup Date1:

05/16/07

ug/kg

41.7

ug/kg

41.7

Acceptance

Criteria

Column

30-150

A

30-150

A

30-150

B

30-150

B



Project

Name:

Not Specified

Project Number:

12700960

SAMPLE

RESULTS

Lab ID:

L0706797 -02

Client ID:

RIZ-2 (5'-7')

Sample Location:

BEVERLY, MA

Matrix:

Soil

Anaytical Method:

64,8082

Analytical Date: 05/16/07

12:01

Analyst: ss

Percent Solids: 80%

Aroclor 1016

ND

Aroclor 1221

ND

Aroclor 1232

ND

Aroclor 1242

ND

Aroclor 1248

ND

Aroclor 1262

ND

Aroclor 12-68

ND

Surrogate

%Recovery

Qualifier

· ·

2,4,5,6-Tetrachloro-m-xylene 81

Decachlorobiphenyl 126


Decachlorobiphenyl

138

Page 42 of83

Lab

Number:

Report

Date:

Date Collected:

Date Received:

Field Prep:

05180713:48

L0706797

05/18/07

05/09/07 10:50

05/10/07

Not Specified

Extraction Method:

EPA3540C


Cleanup Method1: EPA3665A

Cleanup Date1:

05/16/07

ug/kg

41.7

ug/kg 41.7

ug/kg

41.7

ug/kg

41.7

ug/kg

41.7

ug/kg

41.7

ug/kg

41.7

Acceptance

Criteria

Column

30-150 A

30-150 A

30-150

8

30-150

8



Project Name:

Not Specified

Project

Number:

12700960

SAMPLE RESULTS

Lab ID:

L0706797 03

Client ID:

RIZ-3 (10'-12')

Sample Location:

BEVERLY,MA

Matrix: Soil

Anaytical Method: 64,8082


Analyst: ss

Percent Solids: 73%

Aroclor 1016

ND

Aroclor

1221 ND

Aroclor 1232

ND

Aroctor 1242

ND

Aroclor 1248

ND

Aroclor 1254

ND

Aroclor 1260

ND

Aroclor 1262

ND

Aroclbr 1268

ND

Surrogate

%Recovery

Qualifier


118

Decachlorobiphenyl 90


Decachlorobiphenyl

104

Page

43 of83

Lab Number:

Report Date:

Date Collected:

Date Received:

Field Prep:

05180713:48

L0706797

05/18/07

05/09/07 13:00

05/10/07

Not Specified

Extraction Method:

EPA3540C


Cleanup Method1:

EPA3665A

Cleanup Date1:

05/16/07

ug/kg

183 4

ug/kg

183

4

ug/kg

183

4

ug/kg

183

4

ug/kg

183

4

ug/kg

183

4

ug/kg

183

4

ug/kg

183

4

ug/kg

183

4

Acceptance

Criteria

Column

30-150 A

30-150 A

30-150

8

30-150

8



Project

Name:

Project

Number:

Lab ID:

Client ID:

Sample Location:

Matrix:

Anaytical Method:

Analytical Date:

Analyst:

Percent Solids:

Aroclor 1016

Aroclor 1221

Aroclor 1232

Aroclor 1242

Aroclor 1248

Aroclor 1254

Aroclor 1260

Aroclor 1262

Aroclor 1268

Not Specified

12700960

L0706797 04

RIZ-4 (5'-7')

BEVERLY, MA

Soil

64,8082

05/16/07 12:58

ss

77%

Surrogate

Page

44 of83


Decachlorobiphenyl

2,4 5,6-Tetrachloro-m-xylene

Decachlorobiphenyl

SAMPLE RESULTS

ND

ND

ND

NO

ND

NO

NO

NO

ND

Recovery

Qualifier

64

59

51

53

Lab

Number:

Report Date:

Date Collected:

Date Received:

Field Prep:

05180713:48

L0706797

05/18/07

05/09/07 14:45

05/10/07

Not Specified


Extraction Date:

05/14/07 20:50

Cleanup Method1:

EPA 3665A

Cleanup Date1:

05/16/07

ug/kg

43.3

ug/kg

43.3

ug/kg 43.3

ug/kg

43.3

ug/kg

43.3

ug/kg 43.3

ug/kg

43.3

ug/kg 43.3

ug/kg

43.3

Acceptance

Criteria

Column

30-150

A

30-150

A

30-150

B

30-150

B





Analytical Method:

64,8082

05/16/07 14:24

ss

Analytical Date:

Analyst:

Aroclor 1016

Aroclor 1221

Aroclor 1232

Aroclor 1242

Aroclor 1248

Aroclor 1254

Aroclor 1260

Aroclor 1262

Aroclor 1268

Surrogate


Decachlorobiphenyl


Decachlorobiphenyl

Page 45 of83



ND ug/kg

ND

ug/kg

ND

ug/kg

ND ug/kg

ND

ug/kg

ND

ug/kg

ND ug/kg

ND

ug/kg

ND

ug/kg

Lab Number:

Report Date:

05180713:48

L0706797

05/18/07



Cleanup Method1: EPA 3665A

Cleanup Date1: 05/16/07

33.3

33.3

33.3

33.3

33.3

33.3

33.3

33.3

33.3

Acceptance

%Recovery

Qualifier

Criteria

Column

112 30-150

A

64 30-150

A

83

30-150

B

91

30-150

B



Project Name:

Not Specified


Parameter

Aroclor 1016

Aroclor 1260

Surrogate


Oecachlorobiphenyl

2 4 5,6-Tetrachloro-m-xylene

Decachlorobiphenyl

Page 46 of

83

LCS



LCSD

%Recovery %Recovery

%Recovery

Limits

LCS

%Recovery Qualifier

107

68

81

83

LCSD

40-140

40-140

%Recovery Qualifier

105

70

83

82

Lab

Repo

R

Acceptance

Criteria

30-150

30-150

30-150

30-150



05180713:48

PESTICIDES

Page 47 of 83



Project

Name:

Project Number:

Lab ID:

Client ID:

Sample Location:

Matrix:

Anaytical Method:

Analytical Date:

Analyst:

Percent Solids:

4,4'-000

Endosulfan

II

Not Specified

12700960

L0706797-01

RIZ-1 (5'-7')

BEVERLY, MA

Soil

64,8081A

05115107 19:47

JB

90%

Surrogate

Page

48

of83


Decachlorobi phenyl

2,4,5,6-Tetrachloro-m-xyJene

Decachlorobiphenyl

SAMPLE

RESULTS

NO

NO

%Recovery

Qualifier

60

81

56

84

Lab Number:

Report Date:

Date Collected:

Date Received:

Field Prep:

05180713:48

L0706797

05118107

05/09107 08:30

05110/07

Not Specified


Extraction Date: 05111107 14:45

Cleanup Method : EPA3620B

Cleanup Date :

05115107

ug/kg

3.70

ug/kg

3.70

Acceptance

Criteria

Column

30-150

A

30-150 A

30-150 B

30-150

B



Project Name:

Not Specified

Project

Number:

12700960

Lab ID: L0706797 01



Matrix: Soil

Anaytical Method: 64,8081A


Analyst:

JB

Percent Solids:

90%

Delta-BHC

Lindane

Alpha-BHC

Beta-BHC

Heptachlor

Aldrin

Heptachlor epoxide

Endrin

Endrin ketone

Dieldrin

4,4'-DDE

4,4'-DDT

Endosulfan I

Endosulfan sulfate

Methoxychlor

Chlordane

Hexachlorobenzene

Surrogate


Decachlorobiphenyl

2,4,5,6-T etrachloro-m-xylene

Decachlorobiphenyl

Page 49 of

83

SAMPLE

RESULTS

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Recovery

Qualifier

60

81

56

84

Lab Number:

Report

Date:

Date Collected:

Date Received:

Field Prep:

05180713:48

L0706797

05/18/07

05/09/07 08:30

05/10/07

Not Specified

Extraction Method:

EPA3545

Extraction Date:

05/11/07 14:45

Cleanup Method1:

EPA 36208

Cleanup Date1:

05/15/07

ug/kg 3.70

ug/kg

2.96

ug/kg

3.70

ug/kg

3.70

ug/kg

3.70

ug/kg 3.70

ug/kg

3.70

ug/kg 3.70

ug/kg 3.70

ug/kg 3.70

ug/kg

3.70

ug/kg 3.70

ug/kg 3.70

ug/kg 3.70

ug/kg 14.8

ug/kg

14.8

ug/kg 3.70

Acceptance

Criteria

Column

30-150

A

30-150

A

30-150

B

30-150

B



Project Name:

Project

Number:

Lab ID:

Client ID:

Sample Location:

Matrix:

Anaytical Method:

Analytical Date:

Analyst:

Percent Solids:

Delta-BHC

Lindane

Alpha-BHC

Beta-BHC

Heptachlor

Aldrin

Heptachlor epoxide

Endrin

Endrin ketone

Dieldrin

4,4'-DDE

Endosulfan I

Endosulfan sulfate

Methoxychlor

Chlordane

Hexachlorobenzene

Not Specified

12700960

L0706797 02

RIZ-2 (5'-7')

BEVERLY,MA

Soil

64,8081A

05/15/07 22:11

JB

80%

Surrogate

Page

50 of

83

2,4,5,6-Tetrachloro-m-xytene

Decachlorobiphenyf


Decachlorobiphenyl

SAMPLE RESULTS

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

602

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

%Recovery

0

0

0

0

Qualifier

05180713:48


Report Date:

05/18/07

Date Collected:

05/09/07 10:50

Date Received:

05/10/07

Field Prep:

Not

Specified

Extraction Method:

EPA3545

Extraction Date:

05/11/0714:45

Cleanup Method1:

EPA3620B

Cleanup Date1:

05/15/07

ug/kg 83.3

20

ug/kg

66.7

20

ug/kg 83.3

20

ug/kg 83.3

20

ug/kg

83.3

20

ug/kg 83.3

20

ug/kg

83.3

20

ug/kg 83.3

20

ug/kg

83.3

20

ug/kg 83.3 20

ug/kg 83.3 20

ug/kg

83.3

20

ug/kg

83.3

20

ug/kg 333 20

ug/kg

333

20

ug/kg

83.3 20

Acceptance

Criteria

Column

30·150

A

30·150

A

30·150

B

30·150

B



Project Name:

Project

Number:

Lab ID:

Client ID:

Sample Location:

Matrix:

Anaytical Method:

Analytical Date:

Analyst:

Percent Solids:

4,4'-DDO

4,4'-DDT

Endosulfan

II

Not Specified

12700960

L0706797 02

RIZ-2 (5'-7')

BEVERLY,

MA

Soil

64,8081A

05/15/07 22:11

JB

80%


Decachlorobiphenyl


Decachlorobiphenyl

Page

51

of

83

SAMPLE

RESULTS

>853

875

ND

%Recovery

Qualifier

0

0

0

0

Lab

Number:

Report

Date:

Date Collected:

Date Received:

Field Prep:

05180713:48

L0706797

05/18/07

05/09/07 10:50

05/10/07

Not Specified

Extraction Method:

EPA3545

Extraction Date:

05/11/07 14:45

Cleanup Method1: EPA3620B


ug/kg

83.3

20

ug/kg

83.3 20

ug/kg 83.3 20

Acceptance

Criteria

Column

30-150 A

30-150

A

30-150 B

30-150

B



Project Name:

Not Specified

Project Number:

12700960

Lab ID:

L0706797 02

R

Client ID:

RIZ-2 (5'-7')


Matrix: Soil


Analytical Date:

05/15/07 20:15

Analyst: JB

Percent

Solids:

80%

4,4'-000

Page

52

of83

SAMPLE RESULTS

2610 ug/kg

Lab Number:

Report Date:

Date Collected:

Date Received:

Field Prep:

05180713:48

L0706797

05/18/07

05/09/07 10:50

05/10/07

Not Specified

Extraction Method:

EPA3545

Extraction

Date:

05/11/07 14:45

Cleanup Method1:

EPA3620B


417 100



Project Name:

Not Specified

Project

Number:

12700960

SAMPLE

RESULTS

Lab ID:

L0706797-03

Client ID:

RIZ-3 (10'-12')

Sample Location:

BEVERLY, MA

Matrix: Soil

Anaytical Method:

64,8081A


Analyst: JB

Percent Solids: 73%

Delta-BHC

NO

Lindane

NO

Alpha-BHC

NO

Beta-BHC

NO

Heptachlor

NO

Aldrin

NO

Heptachlor epoxide

NO

Endrin

NO

Endrin ketone

NO

Dieldrin

NO

4,4'-DDE

NO

4,4'-0DT

NO

Endosulfan I

NO

Endosulfan sulfate

NO

Methoxychlor NO

Chlordane

NO

Hexachlorobenzene

NO

Surrogate

%Recovery

Qualifier

---- --

--·····-


0

Decachlorobiphenyl

0

2,4,5,6-T etrach o ro-m-xylene

0

Decachlorobiphenyl

0

Page

53 of83

Lab Number:

Report

Date:

Date Collected:

Date Received:

Field Prep:

05180713:48

L0706797

05/18/07

05/09/07 13:00

05/10/07

Not Specified

Extraction Method:

EPA3545

Extraction Date:

05/11/0714:45

Cleanup Method1: EPA 36208


ug/kg

91.3

20

ug/kg

73.0

20

ug/kg 91.3 20

ug/kg 91.3 20

ug/kg 91.3 20

ug/kg 91.3 20

ug/kg

91.3

20

ug/kg 91.3 20

ug/kg 91.3

20

ug/kg 91.3

20

ug/kg 91.3 20

ug/kg

91.3

20

ug/kg

91.3

20

ug/kg 91.3

20

ug/kg

365

20

ug/kg 365

20

ug/kg 91.3

20

Acceptance

Criteria

Column

..

30-150 A

30-150

A

30-150

B

30-150

B



Project Name:

Not Specified

Project Number:

12700960

Lab ID:

L0706797-03

Client

ID:

RIZ-3 (10'-12')

Sample Location:

BEVERLY, MA

Matrix:

Soil



Analyst:

JB

Percent Solids:

73%

4,4'-DDD

Endosulfan

II

Surrogate

Page

54 of83


Decachtorobiphenyl


Decachlorobiphenyl

Lab Number:

Report

Date:

SAMPLE

RESULTS

Date Collected:

Date Received:

Field Prep:

05180713:48

L0706797

05/18/07

05/09/07 13:00

05/10/07

Not Specified

Extraction Method: EPA3545

ND

ND

%Recovery

0

0

0

0

ug/kg

ug/kg

Extraction Date:

Cleanup Method1:

Cleanup Date1:

91.3

91.3

Acceptance

Qualifier

Criteria

30-150

30-150

30-150

30-150

Column

A

A

8

8

05/11/07 14:45

EPA3620B

05/15/07

20

20



Project Name:

Not Specified

Project Number:

12700960

Lab ID:

L0706797

04


Sample Location:

BEVERLY, MA

Matrix: Soil


Analytical Date:

05/15/07 23:08

Analyst:

JB

Percent Solids:

77%

4,4'-DDD

Endosulfan

II

Surrogate

Page 55 of83


Decachlorobiphenyl


Decachlorobiphenyl

SAMPLE RESULTS

ND

ND

%Recovery

Qualifier

43

67

34

41

05180713:48

Lab Number:

L0706797

Report

Date:

05/18/07

Date Collected:

05/09/07 14:45


Field Prep: Not Specified

Extraction Method:

EPA3545

Extraction Date:

05/11/07 14:45

Cleanup Method :

EPA3620B

Cleanup

Date :

05/15/07

ug/kg 21.6

5

ug/kg

21.6

5

Acceptance

Criteria

Column

30-150

A

30-150

A

30-150

B

30-150

B



Project

Name:

Not Specified

Project

Number:

12700960

Lab ID: L0706797 04

Client ID:

RIZ-4 (5'-7')


Matrix: Soil



Analyst: JB

Percent Solids:

77%

Delta-BHC

Lindane

Alpha-BHC

Beta-BHC

Heptachlor

Aldrin

Heptachlor epoxide

Endrin

Endrin ketone

Dieldrin

4,4'-DDE

4,4'-DDT

Endosulfan I

Endosulfan sulfate

Methoxychlor

Chlordane

Hexachlorobenzene

Surrogate


Decachlorobiphenyl

2,4,5,6-Tetrachforo-m-xylene

Decachlorobiphenyl

Page

56 of 83

SAMPLE

RESULTS

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Recovery

Qualifier

43

67

34

41

Lab Number:

Report

Date:

Date Collected:

Date Received:

Field Prep:

05180713:48

L0706797

05/18/07

05/09/07 14:45

05/10/07

Not Specified

Extraction Method:

EPA3545


Cleanup Method :

EPA 36208

Cleanup Date1:

05/15/07

ug/kg

21.6

5

ugfkg 17.3 5

ug/kg 21.6

5

ug/kg 21.6

5

ug/kg 21.6

5

ug/kg 21.6

5

ug/kg 21.6

5

ug/kg 21.6

5

ug/kg 21.6

5

ug/kg 21.6

5

ug/kg 21.6

5

ug/kg 21.6

5

ug/kg

21.6

5

ug/kg 21.6

5

ug/kg

86.6 5

ug/kg

86.6 5

ug/kg 21.6

5

Acceptance

Criteria

Column

- - - - - - - - - - - - -

30-150

A

30-150

A

30-150

B

30-150

B





Analytical Method: 64,8081A

05/15/07 18:21

JB

Analytical Date:

Analyst:

D e l t a ~ B H C

Lindane

Alpha-BHC

Beta-BHC

Heptachlor

Aldrin

Heptachlor epoxide

Endrin

Endrin ketone

Dieldrin

4,4'-DDE

4.4'-DDT

Endosulfan I

Endosulfan sulfate

Methoxychlor

Chlordane

Hexachlorobenzene

Surrogate


Oecachlorobiphenyl


Decachlorobiphenyl

Page 57 of 83

Method

Blank Analysis

Batch

Quality Control

ND

ug/kg

ND

ug/kg

ND

ug/kg

ND

ug/kg

ND

ug/kg

ND ug/kg

ND

ug/kg

ND

ug/kg

ND

ug/kg

ND ug/kg

ND

ug/kg

ND

ug/kg

ND

ug/kg

ND

ug/kg

ND

ug/kg

ND

ug/kg

ND

ug/kg

Lab Number:

Report

Date:

Extraction Method:

Extraction Date:

Cleanup Method1:

Cleanup Date1:

3.33

2.67

3.33

3.33

3.33

3.33

3.33

3.33

3.33

3.33

3.33

3.33

3.33

3.33

13.3

13.3

3.33

Acceptance

%Recovery

Qualifier

Criteria

Column

56 30-150 A

75 30-150

A

50

30-150

8

78

30-150 8

05180713:48

L0706797

05/18/07

EPA3545

05/11/07 14:45

EPA3620B

05/15/07





Analytical Method: 64,8081A

05/15/07 18:21

JB

Analytical Date:

Analyst:

4,4'-000

Endosulfan II

Surrogate


Decachlorobiphenyl

2,4 5,6-T

etrachloro-m-xylene

Decachlorobiphenyl

Page 58 of 83

Method

Blank Analysis


NO

NO

ug/kg

ug/kg

Lab Number:

Report Date:

Extraction Method:

Extraction Date:

Cleanup Method1:

Cleanup Date1:

3.33

3.33

Acceptance

%Recovery

Qualifier

Criteria

Column

56

30-150 A

75

30-150

A

50 30-150

B

78

30-150

B

05180713:48

L0706797

05/18/07

EPA 3545

05/11/07 14:45

EPA3620B

05/15/07



Project Name:

Not Specified


Parameter

Oelta-BHC

Lindane

Alpha-BHC

Beta-BHC

Heptachlor

Aldrin

Heptachlor epoxide

Endrin

Endrin ketone

Dieldrin

4,4'-DDE

4,4'-DDT

Endosulfan I

Endosulfan sulfate

Methoxychlor

Hexachlorobenzene

Page 59 of 83

LCS

Lab Control Sample

Analysis


LCSD

%Recovery %Recovery

%Recovery

Limits

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

40-140

Lab

Repo

R

B l t i i i l i l





Parameter

4,4'-DDO

Endosulfan

II

Page 60 of

83

Surrogate

2 4 , 5 , 6 ~ Tetrachforo-m-xylene

Decachlorobiphenyl

2,4 5 ,6-Tetrachloro-m-xylene

Decachlorobiphenyl

Surrogate

2 4,5,6-Tetrachloro-m-xylene

Oecachlorobiphenyl

2,4 ,5, 6-T etrachloro-m-xylene

Decachlorobiphenyl

LCS



LCSD

%Recovery %Recovery

%Recovery

Limits

LCS

%Recovery Qualifier

41

56

37

57

LCS

%Recovery Qualifier

41

56

37

57

LCSD

%Recovery Qualifier

65

82

61

86

LCSD

40-140

40-140

%Recovery Qualifier

65

82

61

86

Lab

Repo

RP

Acceptance

Criteria

30-150

30-150

30-150

30-150

Acceptance

Criteria

30-150

30-150

30-150

30-150



05180713:48

METALS

Page

61 of

83



05180713:48

Project

Name: Not Specified Lab Number: L0706797

Project Number:

12700960

Report Date: 05/18/07

SAMPLE RESULTS

Lab

ID: L0706797-01 Date Collected: 05/09/07 08:30

Client

ID:

RIZ-1 (5'-7') Date Received: 05/10/07

Sample Location: BEVERLY, MA Field Prep: Not Specified

Matrix: Soil

Percent Solids: 90%

Dilution

Date

Date

Prep Analytical

Parameter Result

Qualifier Units

RDL

Factor Prepared

Analyzed Method

Method

Analyst

Antimony, Total

ND

mg/kg

2.2

05/15/0716:10 05/17/07 16:22

EPA

30508

60,60108

MG

Arsenic, Total 7.8 mg/kg

0.44

05/15/0716:10

05/17/0716:22

EPA3050B

60,60108

MG

Barium, Total

55

mg/kg

0.44

05/15/0716:10

05/17/0716:22 EPA 30508

60,60108

MG

Beryllium, Total

0.85

mg/kg

0.22

05/15/0716:10

05/17/0716:22 EPA 30508

60,60108

MG

Cadmium, Total ND mg/kg

0.44

05/15/07 16:10

05/17/07 16:22 EPA 30508

60,60108

MG

Chromium, Total

16

mg/kg

0.44

05/15/0716:10

05/17/07 16:22

EPA

30508

60,60108

MG

Copper, Total

11

mg/kg

0.44

05/15/0716:10

05/17/07 16:22

EPA3050B

60,60108

MG

Iron, Total

16000

mg/kg

2.2

05/15/0716:10

05/17/0716:22 EPA

30508

60,60108

MG

Lead, Total

6.8

mg/kg

2.2

05/15/0716:10

05/17/0716:22 EPA

30508

60,60108

MG

Manganese, Total

170

mg/kg

0.44

05/15/0716:10

05/17/0716:22 EPA

30508

60,60108

MG

Mercury, Total

ND

mg/kg

0.08

05/14/07 18:30

05/15/0714:45 EPA 7471A

64,7471A

DM

Nickel, Total 12

mg/kg

1.1

05/15/07 16:10

05/17/07 16:22 EPA

30508

60,60108

MG

Selenium, Total

ND

mg/kg

2.2

05/15/0716:10

05/17/07 16:22 EPA30508

60,60108

MG

Silver, Total ND mg/kg 0.44

05/15/0716:10

05/17/07 16:22 EPA 30508

60,60108

MG

Thallium, Total

ND

mg/kg

2.2

05/15/0716:10

05/17/07 16:22

EPA

30508

60,60108

MG

Zinc, Total 39 mg/kg

2.2

05/15/0716:10

05/17/0716:22

EPA

30508

60,60108

MG

Page 62 o f 83



05180713:48

Project Name: Not Specified Lab Number: L0706797

Project Number:

12700960


SAMPLE RESULTS

Lab ID: L0706797 02 Date Collected: 05/09/07 10:50

Client ID:

RIZ-2 (5'-7') Date Received: 05/10/07


Matrix: Soil

Percent Solids: 80%

Dilution

Date

Date

Prep Analytical

Parameter Result

Qualifier

Units

RDL

Factor Prepared Analyzed Method

Method

Analyst

Antimony, Total NO mg/kg

12

5

05/15/0716:10

05/17/07 16:29 EPA 30508

60,60108

MG

Arsenic, Total 21 mg/kg

2.5

5 05/15/07 16:10

05/17/0716:29

EPA 30508

60,60108

MG

Barium, Total

96

mg/kg

2.5 5

05/15/07 16:10

05/17/0716:29

EPA3050B

60,60108

MG

Beryllium, Total NO mg/kg

1.2

5

05/15/07 16:10

05/17/0716:29

EPA 30508

60,60108

MG

Cadmium, Ta al NO mg/kg

2.5

5

05/15/0716:10

05/17/0716:29 EPA 30508

60,60108

MG

Chromium, Total

49

mg/kg

2.5

5

05/15/0716:10

05/17/07 16:29

EPA

30508

60,60108

MG

Copper, Total

210

mg/kg

2.5

5

05/15/0716:10

05/17/07 16:29 EPA 30508

60,60108

MG

Iron, Total

75000 mg/kg

12

5

05/15/0716:10

05/17/0716:29

EPA 30508

60,60108

MG

Lead, Total

590

mg/kg

12

5

05/15/07 16:10

05/17/0716:29 EPA 30508

60,60108

MG

Manganese, Total

530

mgfkg

2.5

5 05/15/07 16:10 05/17/0716:29 EPA 30508

60,60108

MG

Mercury, Total

0.57

mg/kg

0.10

05/14/0718:30

05/15/0714:47

EPA 7471A

64,7471A

OM

Nickel, Total

45

mg/kg

6.2 5

05/15/0716:10

05/17/07 16:29 EPA 30508

60,60108

MG

Selenium, Total

ND mg/kg

12 5

05/15/0716:10

05/17/07 16:29

EPA30508

60,60108

MG

Silver, Total

NO

mg/kg

2.5 5

05/15/0716:10

05/17/07 16:29 EPA 30508

60,60108

MG

Thallium, Total NO mg/kg

12

5

05/15/0716:10

05117/0716:29 EPA 30508

60,60108

MG


12

5

05/15/07 16:10

05/17/0716:29

EPA 30508

60,60108

MG

Page 63 of 83



05180713:48

Project Name: Not Specified Lab Number:

L0706797

Project Number:

12700960

Report Date:

05/18/07

SAMPLE RESULTS

Lab

ID:

L0706797 03

Date Collected:

05/09/07 13:00

Client ID: RIZ-3 (10'-12') Date Received:

05/10/07


Matrix: Soil

Percent Solids: 73%

Dilution

Date

Date

Prep Analytical

Parameter

Result

Qualifier Units RDL


Method

Analyst

------------------

Antimony, Total 3.5

mg/kg

2.7

05/15/0716:10

05/17/0716:24 EPA 30508

60,60108

MG

Arsenic, Total

13

mg/kg

0.54

05/15/0716:10

05/17/0716:24

EPA 30508

60,60108

MG

Barium, Total

230

mg/kg 0.54

05/15/0716:10

05/17/0716:24 EPA30508

60,60108

MG

Beryllium, Total 0.74

mg/kg

0.27

05/15/0716:10

05/17/0716:24 EPA 30508

60,60108

MG

Cadmium, Total 2.6

mg/kg

0.54 05/15/07 16:10

05/17/0716:24

EPA 30508

60,60108

MG

Chromium, Total

56

mg/kg 0.54

05/15/07 16:10

05/17/07 16:24

EPA 30508

60,60108

MG

Copper, Total

400

mg/kg 0.54

05/15/07 16:10

05/17/07 16:24 EPA 30508

60,60108

MG

Iron, Total

36000

mg/kg 5.4 2

05/15/0716:10

05/17/07 17:08 EPA 30508

60,60108

MG

Lead, Total 610 mg/kg 2.7

05/15/0716:10

05/17/0716:24 EPA 30508

60,60108

MG

Manganese, Total

380

mg/kg 0.54

05/15/0716:10

05/17/07 16:24

EPA 30508

60,60108

MG

Mercury, Total

0.33

mg/kg 0.11

05/14/0718:30

05/15/07 14:49 EPA 7471A

64,7471A

OM

Nickel, Total

38

mg/kg 1.3

05/15/0716:10

05/17/0716:24 EPA 30508

60,60108

MG

Selenium, Total

NO

mg/kg 2.7

05/15/0716:10

05/17/0716:24 EPA 30508

60,60108

MG

Silver, Total NO mg/kg 0.54

05/15/0716:10

05/17/0716:24 EPA30508

60,60108

MG

Thallium, Total

NO

mg/kg

2.7

05/15/0716:10

05/17/0716:24

EPA 30508

60,60108

MG

Zinc, Total 360

mg/kg

2.7 05/15/0716:10

05/17/0716:24

EPA

30508

60,60108

MG

Page 64 of 83



05180713:48

Project Name:

Not Specified


Project Number:

12700960


SAMPLE RESULTS

Lab ID: L0706797 -04 Date Collected: 05/09/07 14:45




Matrix: Soil

Percent Solids: 77%

Dilution Date Date Prep

Analytical

Parameter Result

Qualifier

Units

RDL


Method

Analyst

- - - - ~ - - - - - · ·

Antimony, Total NO mg/kg

2.6

05115/07 16:10 05/17/0716:27 EPA 30508

60,60108

MG

Arsenic, Total 8.6

mg/kg

0.52

05/15/0716:10 05/17/07 16:27 EPA 30508

60,60108

MG

Barium, Total 100

rna/kg

0.52

05/15/0716:10

05117/07 16:27 EPA 30508

60,60108

MG

Beryllium, Total 0.66 mg/kg 0.26

05/15/0716:10

05/17/0716:27

EPA 30508

60,60108

MG

Cadmium, Total NO mg/kg 0.52

05/15/0716:10

05/17/0716:27 EPA

30508

60,60108

MG

Chromium, Total 16

mg/kg

0.52

05/15/07 16:10

05/17/07 16:27 EPA 30508

60,60108

MG

Copper, Total

9.0

mg/kg

0.52

05/15/07 16:10

05/17/07 16:27

EPA 30508

60,60108

MG

Iron, Total

13000

mg/kg 2.6

05/15/0716:10

05/17/07 16:27 EPA 30508

60,60108

MG

Lead, Total 100

mg/kg

2.6

05/15/0716:10

05/17/07 16:27 EPA 30508

60,60108

MG

Manganese,

Total 110

mg/kg

0.52

05/15/0716:10 05/17/0716:27

EPA 30508

60,60108

MG

Mercury, Total

NO

mg/kg

0.11

05/14/07 18:30 05/15/07 14:50

EPA 7471A

64,7471A

OM

Nickel, Total 9.8 mg/kg

1.3

05/15/0716:10

05/17/0716:27 EPA 30508

60,60108

MG

Selenium, Total

ND

mg/kg

2.6

05/15/07 16:10

05/17/0716 :27 EPA 30508

60,60108

MG

Silver, Total ND

mg/kg

0.52

05/15/0716:10

05/17/07 16:27

EPA30508

60,60108

MG


2.6

0511510716:10

05/17/07 16:27 EPA 30508

60,60108

MG


2.6

05/15/0716:10

05/17/0716 :27 EPA 30508

60,60108

MG

Page 65

of83





Parameter

Mercury, Total NO

Method

Blank Analysis


Lab Number:

Report Date:

05180713:48

L0706797

05/18/07

Dilution

Factor

Date

Prepared

Date Analytical

Analyzed Method

Analyst

R ~ ~ j , ~ i i i j l

mg/kg

0.08 05/14/0718:30 05/15/0714:16 64,7471A

OM

Prep

l n f o r m a t i ~ n _

__

Digestion Method: EPA 7471A

Dilution

Date

Date

Analytical

Parameter

Result Qualifier

Units RDL

Factor

Prepared

Analyzed Method

Analyst

Antimony,

Total

NO

mg/kg 2.0

05/15/07 16:10

05/17/07 16:07 60,60108 MG

Arsenic, Total NO mg/kg

0.40

05/15/0716:10

05/17/0716:07 60,60108

MG

Barium, Total

NO mg/kg

0.40

05/15/0716:10

05/17/07 16:07 60,6010B

MG

Beryllium, Total

NO

mg/kg 0.20

05/15/0716:10

05/17/0716:07 60,60108

MG

Cadmium,

Total

NO

mg/kg

0.40

05/15/0716:10

05/17/0716:07 60,60108 MG

Chromium, Total NO mg/kg

0.40

05/15/0716:10

05117/0716:07 60,60108

MG

Copper, Total NO

mg/kg

0.40

05/15/0716:10

05/17/0716:07

60,60108

MG

Iron, Total

NO

mg/kg

2.0

05/15/07 16:10

05/17/07 16:07

60,6010B

MG

lead, Total NO mg/kg

2.0

05/15/07 16:10

05/17/07 16:07

60,60108

MG

Manganese, Total

NO

mg/kg

0.40

05/15/07 16:10

05/17/07 16:07 60,60108

MG

Nickel, Total

NO

mg/kg

1.0

05/15/0716:10

05/17/07 16:07

60,6010B

MG

Selenium, Total

NO

mg/kg

2.0

05/15/0716:10

05/17/07 16:07

60,60108

MG

Silver, Total

NO

mg/kg 0.40

05/15/0716:10

05/17/0716:07 60,60108

MG


2.0

05/15/0716:10

05/17/0716:07

60,6010B

MG

Zinc, Total

NO

mg/kg

2.0

05/15/0716:10

05/17/0716:07 60,60108

MG

Prep Information

~

- - - - - - -

Digestion Method:

EPA3050B

Page 66 of 83



Project Name:

Not Specified


Parameter

Mercury, Total

Antimony, Total

Arsenic, Total

Barium, Total

Beryllium, Total

Cadmium, Total

Chromium, Total

Copper, Total

Iron, Total

Lead, Total

Manganese, Total

Nickel, Total

Selenium, Total

Silver, Total

Thallium, Total

Zinc, Total

Page

67

of

83

LCS



LCSD

%Recovery %Recovery

%Recovery

Limits

75-125

75-125

75-125

75-125

75-125

75-125

75-125

75-125

75-125

75-125

75-125

75-125

75-125

75-125

75-125

75-125

Lab N

Repo

RP



Page 68 of 83

INORGANICS

&

MISCELLANEOUS

05180713:48




Lab Number:

Project Number:

12700960

Report Date:

SAMPLE

RESULTS

Lab

ID:

L0706797-01

Date Collected:

Client

ID: RIZ-1

(5'-7')

Date Received:

Sample Location:

BEVERLY, MA

Field Prep:

Matrix: Soil

Dilution Date Date

Parameter

RDL Factor Prepared Analyzed

- -------

Cyanide, Total ND mg/kg

1.0

05/16/07 16:30 05/16/07 21:39

Solids, Total 90 %

0.10 05111/0715:00

Page 69

of

83

05180713:48

L0706797

05/18/07

05/09/07 08:30

05/10/07

Not Specified

Analytical

Method

64,9014

30,2540G

1lJ.:?MA

• ~ ~ ~

••

'."dl-' ••••

DD

LR



Project Name:

Not Specified

Lab

Number:


Report Date:

SAMPLE RESULTS

Lab 10: L0706797-02 Date Collected:


Date Received:


MA

Field Prep:

Matrix:

Soil

Dilution Date Date

Parameter

Result Qualifier Units

RDL Factor Prepared Analyzed

------ ----

Cyanide, Total

ND

mg/kg

1.2

05/16/07 16:30 05/16/07 21:39

Solids, Total % 0.10 05/11/07 15:00

Page 70 of83

05180713:48

L0706797

05/18/07

05/09/07 10:50

05/10/07

Not Specified

Analytical

Method

Analys

64,9014 DD

30,2540G LR

zi\;?1-iA

;;

. . •• « ........



05180713:48

Project Name:

Not Specified

Lab Number:

L0706797

Project Number:

12700960


SAMPLE RESULTS

Lab ID:

L0706797-03

Date Collected: 05/09/07 13:00

ClientiD:

RIZ-3 (10'-12')


Sample Location:

BEVERLY,

MA

Field Prep:

Not Specified

Matrix: Soil

Dilution Date

Date Analytical

Parameter

Result Qualifier

Units

RDL

Factor Prepared

Analyzed Method

Analyst

Cyanide, Total ND

mg/kg

1.2

05/16/0716:30

05/16/07 21:40 64,9014

DD

Solids, Total 73 %

0.10

05111/07 15:00 30,2 540G LR

Page 71

of

83



Project Name:

Not Specified

Lab Number:

Project Number:

12700960

Report

Date:

SAMPLE RESULTS

Lab ID: L0706797-04 Date Collected:

ClientiD: RIZ-4 (5'-7')

Date Received:

Sample Location:

BEVERLY,

MA

Field Prep:

Matrix:

Soil

Dilution Date

Result Qualifier Units

RDL

Factor Prepared

Date

Analyzed

Cyanide, Total ND mg/kg 1.2 05/16/0716:30 05/16/07 21:41

Solids, Total

77

%

0.10

05/11/0715:00

Page 72

of83

05180713:48

L0706797

05/18/07

05/09/07 14:45

05/10/07

Not Specified

Analytical

Method

Analyst

··

64,9014

DD

30,2540G

LR

. ,&c?t;A

. ~ · · - ~ , ~

.. · ....



Project

Name:


Parameter

Cyanide, Total

ND

Page 73 of 83



Units

Dilution

RDL Factor

Lab Number:

Report Date:

Date

Prepared

Date

Analyzed

mg/kg

0.97

05/16/07 16:30 05/16/07 21:35

05180713:48

L0706797

05/18/07

Analytical

Method

64,9014

DD



Project Name:

Not Specified


Parameter

Cyanide, Total

Page

74

of

83

LCS



LCSD

%Recovery %Recovery

%Recovery

Limits

80-120

Lab

Repo

RP





Parameter

Solids, Total

Page

75

of

83

Lab Duplicate

Analysis


Native Sample Duplicate Sample Units

77

76

%

R



05180713:48


Lab Number:

L0706797

Project Number:

12700960


Sample Receipt and Container Information

Were project specific reporting limits specified?

YES

Cooler Information

Cooler Custody

Seal

A

Absent

Container Information

Container

10

Container Type

Cooler

pH

Temp

Pres Seal Analysis

L0706797-01A

Vial

MeOH

preserved A

NA

4.1C

y

Absent VPH-04

L0706797-01B Vial water preserved A

NA

4.1C

y

Absent VPH-04

L0706797-01C Vial water preserved A

NA

4.1C

y

Absent VPH-04

l0706797-01D

Amber

250ml unpreserved

A

NA 4.1C

y

Absent EPH-04,MCP-8081-04,MCP-

8082-04,TPH-DRO-D

L0706797-01E Amber 250ml unpreserved A

NA

4.1C

y

Absent MCP-7471 T MCP-AG-

6010T,MCP-AS-6010T,MCP-BA-

6010T,MCP-BE-6010T,MCP-CD-

6010T,MCP-CR-6010T,MCP-CU-

60

1OT,MCP-FE-60 1OT, MCP-MN-

60

1OT,MCP-N1-601 OT MCP-PB-

60 1OT,MCP-SB-601OT MCP-SE-

6010T,MCP-TL-6010T,MCP-ZN-

6010T

L0706797-01F Amber

250m unpreserved A

NA

4.1C

y

Absent MCP-TCN9014-04,TS

L0706797-02A

Vial

MeOH

preserved A

NA

4.1C

y

Absent VPH-04

l0706797..02B

Vial water preserved A NA 4.1C

y

Absent

VPH-04

L0706797-02C

Vial

water

preserved

A

NA

4.1C

y

Absent

VPH-04

L0706797-02D

Amber 250ml unpreserved A

NA

4.1C

y

Absent EPH-04,MCP-8081..04,MCP-

8082-04,TPH-DRO-D

L0706797-02E

Amber 250ml unpreserved

A

NA 4.1C

y

Absent

MCP-7471T,MCP-AG-

60

1

OT

,MCP-AS-60

1

OT,

MCP-BA-

6010T,MCP-BE-6010T,MCP-CD-


6010T,MCP-FE-6010T,MCP-MN-

601 OT,MCP-NI-601 OT ,MCP-PB-

601 OT,MCP-SB-601 OT MCP-SE-

601 OT,MCP-TL-601 OT,MCP-ZN-

6010T

L0706797-02F

Amber 250ml unpreserved

A

NA 4.1C

y

Absent

MCP-TCN9014-04,TS

L0706797 -03A Vial MeOH preserved A

NA

4.1C

y

Absent VPH-04

L0706797-03B Vial water preserved

A

NA 4.1C

y

Absent

VPH-04

L0706797..03C Vial water preserved

A

NA 4.1C

y

Absent

VPH-04

L0706797-030 Amber

250m1 unpreserved A

NA

4.1C

y

Absent EPH-04,MCP-8081-04,MCP-

8082..Q4,TPH-DRO-D

Page 76 of83



Project Name:

Project Number:

Not Specified

12700960

Container

Information

Container

10

Container Type

L0706797-03E Amber 250ml unpreserved

L0706797-03F Amber 250ml unpreserved

L0706797-04A Vial MeOH preserved

L0706797-04B Vial water preserved

L0706797-04C Vial water preserved

L0706797-04D Amber 250ml unpreserved

L0706797-04E Amber 250ml unpreserved

L0706797-04F Amber 250ml unpreserved

L0706797-0SA Vial MeOH preserved

L0706797-0SB

Vial water preserved

L0706797-0SC

Vial water preserved

Page 77 of 83

Cooler pH Temp

A

NA 4.1C

A

NA

4.1C

A

NA

4.1C

A

NA 4.1C

A

NA 4.1C

A

NA 4.1C

A

NA

4.1C

A NA 4.1C

NA NA NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Pres Seal

y

Absent

y

Absent

y

Absent

y

Absent

y

Absent

y

Absent

y

Absent

y

Absent

y

Absent

y

Absent

y

Absent

05180713:48



Analysis

MCP-7471T,MCP-AG-

6010T,MCP-AS.6010T,MCP-BA-

60

1OT, MCP-8

E-60

1OT,MCP-CD-


6010T,MCP-FE-6010T,MCP-MN-

601 OT,

MCP-NI-601

OT

MCP-PB-

6010T,MCP-SB-6010T,MCP-SE-

6010T,MCP-Tl-6010T,MCP-ZN-

6010T

MCP-TCN9014-04,TS

VPH-04

VPH-04

VPH-04

EPH-04,MCP-8081-04,MCP-

8082-04, TPH-DRO-D

MCP-7471T,MCP-AG-

6010T,MCP-AS-6010T,MCP-BA-

601

OT

,MCP-BE-601 OT,MCP-CD-

601

OT

,MCP-CR-601 OT,MCP-CU-

60

1OT,MCP-FE-601

OT

MCP-M N-

60 1OT, MCP-N 1-601 OT MCP-PB-

6010T,MCP-SB-6010T,MCP-SE-

6010T,MCP-TL-6010T,MCP-ZN-

6010T

MCP-TCN9014-04,TS

HOLD

HOLD

HOLD



Project Name:

Not Specified

Project Number:

12700960

GLOSSARY

Acronyms

EPA

- Environmental Protection Agency.

Lab Number:

Report Date:

05180713:48

L0706797

05/18/07

LCS - Laboratory Control Sample: A sample matrix, free from the analytes of

interest, spiked with verified

known amounts

of

analytes or a material containing known and verified amounts

of

analytes.

LCSD-

Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate: Refer to LCS.

MS - Matrix Spike Sample: A sample prepared by adding a known mass

of

target analyte to a specified

amount

of

matrix sample for which an independent estimate

of

target analyte concentration is available.

Matrix Spike Sample Duplicate: Refer to MS.

SD

NA

NC

- Not Applicable.

- Not Calculated: Term is utilized when one or more

of

the results utilized in the calculation are

non-detect at the parameter's reporting unit.

NO - Not detected at the reported detection limit for the sample.

RDL - Reported Detection Limit: The value at which an instrument can accurately measure an analyte at a

specific concentration. The RDL includes any adjustments from dilutions, concentrations or moisture

content, where applicable.

RPD - Relative Percent Difference: The results from matrix and/or matrix spike duplicates are primarily

designed to assess the precision of analytical results in a given matrix and are expressed as

relative percent difference (RPD). Values which are less than five times the reporting limit for any

individual parameter are evaluated by utilizing the absolute difference between the values; although

the RPD value will be provided in the report.

Terms

Analytical Method: Both the document from which the method originates and the analytical reference method.

(Example: EPA

82608

is shown as 1

82608.)

The codes for the reference method documents are provided in the

References section

of

the Addendum.

Data Qualifiers

The following data qualifiers have been identified for use under the

CT

DEP Reasonable Confidence Protocols.

A- Spectra identified as "Aldol Condensation Product".

B - The analyte

was

detected above the reporting limit in the associated method blank. Flag

only

applies to

associated field samples that have detectable concentrations

of

the analyte.

E - Concentration

of

analyte exceeds the range

of

the calibration curve and/or linear range

of

the instrument.

J

-Estimated

value. The analyte

was

tentatively identified; the quantitation

is

an estimation. (Tentatively

identified compounds only.)

Report

Format Not

Specified

Page 78 of

83



05180713:48



Lab Number:

Report Date:

L0706797

05/18/07

REFERENCES

1 Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste: Physical/Chemical Methods. EPA SW-846. Third

Edition. Updates

1-

lilA, 1997.

30

Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. APHA-AWWA-WPCF.

18th Edition. 1992.

59 Method for the Determination of Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons (VPH). Massachusetts

Department of Environmental Protection, DENORS/BWSC. May 2004, Revision 1.1.

60 Quality Assurance and Quality Control Requirements and Performance Standards for SW-

846 Methods. MADEP BWSC. WSC-CAM-IIA (Revision 4 , WSC-CAM-V C (Revision 2),

WSC-CAM-IIIA (Revision 5). May 2004.

61

Method for the Determination of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (EPH). Massachusetts

Department of Environmental Protection, DENORS/BWSC. May 2004, Revision 1.1.

64

Quality Assurance and Quality Control Requirements and Performance Standards for SW-

846 Methods. MADEP BWSC. WSC-CAM-IIA (Revision 4), WSC-CAM-V C (Revision 2),

WSC-CAM-IIIA (Revision 5). August 2004.

LIMITATION OF LIABILITIES

Alpha Woods Hole Labs performs services with reasonable care and diligence normal to the analytical testing

laboratory industry. In the event

of

an error, the sole and exclusive responsibility

of

Alpha Woods Hole Labs

shall be to re-perform the work at it's own expense.

In

no event shall Alpha Woods Hole Labs be held liable

for any incidental, consequential

or

special damages, including but not limited to, damages

in

any way

connected with the use of, interpretation of, information or analysis provided by Alpha Woods Hole Labs.

We strongly urge our clients to comply with EPA protocol regarding sample volume, preservation, cooling,

containers, sampling procedures, holding time and splitting of samples in the field .

.

· · - · · · · · - · - - - - - -

Page 79

of83



~

c.;

,..._

g

"'

\

, f i ~ A

....... _.. _, 14••

WESTBORO. MAo

- - - · - -+- - -+-

A

PLEASEANSWERQUESTIONSABOVE_I_____ . -- , - I Conta;nerType : ' J :

Preservative

I

I

\S YOUR PROJECT

R e l i n q u l s ~ e d By: Date/Time

Received By: oate/Tk

MA

MCP or

CT RCP?

··-·

-·---· -··

.... ···

-- ---

(ORMN0:01-D1{rev.

I O . O C T - 0 ~ ) ,



~

'

r--

0

co

'

. 4 ~ ~ ~ -

CHAIN OF CUSTODY PAGE__l__o,_l__

WESTeORQ, MA RAYNHAM,MA

TEL:

5(8-898-9220

TEL:

505-822-9300

P:J.Z/0

Addres"' )Ni GtA,fT tT:_

f { J I I " " i ~ & HIV I ,M A _ E/

~

•

Phone:

m.

50f- r 3 - ; )

00 0

I ·

- -

·

: Fax l ) o ~ - r

1-

3-<J 0 (

I

..···

--

· - - - ·

IJ:i(Siandard

Emau:

C f'J1Ttrt l_J_/.T

ZZO:

Co

1'1

__

0

RUSH { o n l y c o n l n n e d l l p t ~ - I W i l m v e d l

Time:

ate Due:

1

0

These samples have

been

previously

analyzed by Alpha

·--- --·

utner

l"'rDJBCt :specific Requirements/Comments Detection Limits:

1

,_,_-1 t i -7

I :, ~ J T i . ~ ~ · ' t - - ~ ~ t W , l ~

,

= ~ = t · - = - 1 ~

j_ ...

I_

Are MCP Analytical Methods R

Are

CT

RCP (Reasonable Con

I .

-i· -

~

. -··

-·

+---- ······ +=- j

I :

.l

T .

.. '

t '

- ~ ~ ~

t====-·.-=- =-

_

1- ·f•

.

1 · · ·-· · H- 1- r 1 1 ,

c--.

: .

_

_·

-·--.

- -

·.-

s

-+-

PLEASE ANSWER QUESTIONS ABOVE

IS YOUR PROJECT ,

MA MCP

or

CT R C P ? ~ ·

b M N O : O ~ _ I ' '':.ocT: ) '

edBy:

Container

Type

Preservative

j ~ ~ ; g . J ~ ~ ~ ' r J ~ ~ ~ D a t e T i m

:z_

J

. - - · · .



Data

f i le :

\\Drgserv1\ee\chem\GCEXT\Petro10,t\070514arolist,b\0514B029.D

Inject ion Date:

1 4 - ~ A Y - 2 0 0 7

23:11

Instrument:

Petro10,i L-

..: ) '40

lo1Ci..i·

£1\

co

Cl1ent

Sample

ID:

..,.

(.j

t-iP6890 GC Data. FID2B.CH: 9.-s-f6 to 13.5i5

Min

1 -

0

co

'

;;

'

x

,.

6 . 1 ~

6.o-i

5.91

5 . 8 ~

5 . 7 ~

5 . ~

5 . 5 ~

5. 4

5 . 3 ~

5 . 2 ~

5 . 1 ~

5 . ~

4 . 9 ~

4 . 8 ~

4.

4 . 6 ~

4 . 5 ~

4 . 4 ~

4 . ~

4.2-:

4 . 1 ~

4.0-;

3 . 9 ~

3.8..:

3 . 7 ~

3 . 6 - ~

3 . 5 ~

3.4.;

3 , 3 ~

3 . 2 ~

3.1·=

3 . ~

2.

2 , 8 ~

2.71

2 . 6 ~

2 . 5 ~

2 . 4 ~

2 . 3 ~

2 . 2 ~

2.1:

2 .o-1

1 . ~

1 . 8 ~

1 . 7 ~

1 . 6 ~

1 . 5 ~

1 . 4 ~ .

I\

'

9.6

' '

11.6

'

1.8

'

12.0

1

1

.0

11

1

.2

'

11.4

Min.

'

0.6

to'.a

0.2 to'.4

:8

tO.o

t2.2

~

s

J

)

..

"

1-

-,

'

12.4

t2



~

'

r--

g

Data

File:

\ \ O ~ g s e r v 1 \ e e \ ~ h e m \ G C E X T \ P e t r o 1 0 , i \ 0 7 0 5 1 4 a r o l i s t . b \ 0 5 1 4 8 0 2 B . D

Injection Date: 14-MAY-2007 22:37

Instrument: Petroto, i

L ~ - , · . . 0 ~ ~ . . 0 . . ' \ -.o-,

Cl.lent

Sample

ID: T ·

4.6;

4,S:

4 , 4 ~

4 . ~

4 . 2 ~

4 . 1 ~

4 . 0 ~

3 . 9 ~

3.8

3 . 7 ~

3.6-:

3 . ~

3 . 4 ~

3 . ~

3 . 2 ~

3 . 1 ~

3 . 0 ~

2 . 9 ~

2 , 8 ~

2 . 7 ~

2 . 6 ~

2 . 5 ~

2 . 4 ~

2 . 3 ~

2 . 2 ~

,_

2 . 1 ~

2.01

1.

1 . 8 ~

1.

1 . 6 ~

1 . 5 ~

1 . 4 ~

1 . 3 ~

1 . 2 ~

1.1-:

t.O.:

0 . 9 ~

0 . 8 ~

0 . 7 ~

0 . 6 ~

0 . 5 ~

0,4...;

0 . 3 ~

0.2..:

0.1-

JUlllll})jWlJ

-

'

.1

5

..

'

I

0

HP6890 GC

Oata.

tiD28.CH:

9.109 to 20.024

Min

~ ~ ~ · ~ W

o . o ~

1'o

t'z ·

' '

'

. . '

' ' ..

' ' .. '

.

' '

. '

' '

13

14

15

16

17

Min

11





Client ID:

CREME SS-1

Phoenix

.D.: AJ36104

Parameter Result

RL

Units

Date Time

By

Reference

PCB-1242

ND 360 ug/Kg 07/30/07

JH

SW8082

PCB-1248

ND

360

ug/Kg

07/30/07

JH

SW8082

PCB-1254

ND 360 ug/Kg 07/30/07

JH

SW8082

PCB-1260

ND

360

ug/Kg

07/30/07

JH

SW8082

PCB-1262

ND

360 ug/Kg

07/30/07

JH

sw

8082

PCB-1268

ND

360 ug/Kg 07/30/07

JH

sw 8082

QAlQC

Surrogates

% DCBP (Surrogate Rec)

95 % 07/30/07

JH

SW8082

% TCMX (Surrogate Rec)

116 %

07/30/07

JH

SW8082

Comments:

*Asbestos analyzed by MA certified lab M-NJ337. No Asbestos was detected in this sample.

If

there are

any questions regarding this data, p lease call Phoenix Client Services a t extension 200.

ND=Not detected BDL=Below Detection

Limit RL=Reporting Limit

. @ ~

...

-

u g u t o : ~

2007

Page 2 of34



Environmen tal Laboratories,

Inc.

587 East Middle Turnpike

P.O.Box

370, Manchester CT 06040

Analysis Report

A u g u s t

08, 2007

Sample In format ion

Matrix: SOIL

Locat ion Code:

VHB-MA

Rush Request :

P.O.#:

10231

Tel.

(860) 645·1 102 Fax (860)

645-0823

FOR:

Attn:

Mr.

Mike Bastoni

Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,

Inc.

101

Walnut Stree t

P.O.

Box

9151

Watertown,

MA 02471-9151

Custody

In fo rmat ion

Collec ted by:

Received by: LB

Analyzed by: see

"By"

be low

D ate

07/25/07

07/27/07

Time

9:45

16:30

Laboratorx Data

SDG

J.D.:

GAJ36104

Phoenix J.D.: AJ36105

Clien t ID:

CREME

SS-2

P a r a m e t e r R e s u l t

R L

U n i t s

D a t e

T i m e

By R e f e r e n c e

Silver

< 0.33

0.33

mg/Kg

07/31107

EKT

SW6010

Arsenic 4.68

0.66

mg/Kg

07/31107

EKT

SW6010

Barium 43 0.33 mg/Kg 07/31107

EKT

SW6010

Beryllium < 0.27

0.27

mg/Kg

07/31107

EKT

SW6010

Cadmium

< 0.33 0.33 mg/Kg

07/31107

EKT

SW6010

Chromium

10.6 0.33 mg/Kg

07/31/07

EKT

SW6010

Mercury

- Soil

< 0.10 0.10 mg/kg 07/31/07

RS

SW-7471

Nickel 8.68

0.33

mg/Kg

07/31107

EKT

SW6010

Lead

52.3

0.33 mg/Kg 07/31107

EKT

SW6010

Antimony

< 3.32

3.32 mg/Kg 07/31107

EKT

SW6010

Selenium

< 1.66

1.66

mg/Kg

07/31107

EKT

SW6010

Thallium

<

3.32

3.32 mg/Kg 07/31/07

EKT

SW6010

Vanadium 21.1 0.33 mg/Kg 07/31/07

EKT

6010

Zinc 51.3

0.33 mg/Kg 07/31107

EKT

SW6010

Percent Solid 94 %

07/27/07

PU/IDB

E160.3

Mercury Digestion

Completed

07/31/07

D

SW7471

EPH Extraction

Completed

07/27/07

SUP/K

3545

Ext. Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Completed

08/03/07

JH

MADEP EPH-04

Soil Extraction for PCB

Completed

07/30/07

JCIE

SW3545

Total Metals Digest

Completed

07/27/07

AGP

SW846- 3050

P o l y c h l o r i n a t e d Bi32henyls

PCB-1016

ND

380

ug/Kg

08/01107

JH

SW8082

PCB-1221

ND

380

ug/Kg

08/01107

JH

SW8082

PCB-1232

ND

380 ug/Kg 08/01/07

JH

SW8082

PCB-1242

ND

380 ug/Kg 08/01107

JH

SW8082

Page 3 of34



Client

ID:

CREME SS-2

Phoenix .D.:

AJ36105

Parameter

Result RL

Units

Date Time By Reference

PCB-1248

ND

380

ug/Kg

08/01107

JH

sw 8082

PCB-1254

ND

380

ug/Kg

08/01107

JH

SW8082

PCB-1260

ND

380

ug Kg

08/01/07

JH

SW8082

PCB-1262 ND 380 ug Kg 08/01107

JH

SW8082

PCB-1268

ND

380 ug/Kg

08/01/07

JH

SW8082

QA/QC Surrogates

%

DCBP (Surrogate Rec) 82

%

08/01107

JH

sw

8082

% TCMX (Surrogate

Rec)

88

%

08/01107

JH

sw

8082

Comments:

If there are

any

questions regarding

this data.

please call

Phoenix

Client Services a t

extension

200.

ND=Not detected

BDL=Below

Detection

Limit

RL=Reporting Limit

Page 4 of34



E n v i r o n m e n t a l L a b o r a to r i e s . I n c .

587

East

Middle Turnpike

P.O.Box

370, Manchester CT 06040

Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823

Analysis Report

FOR: Attn: Mr. Mike Bastoni

Vanasse Hangen

Brustlin,

Inc.

101 Walnut Stree t

ugus t

08, 2007

Samp le

In fo rmat ion

Matrix: SOIL

Locat ion Code: VHB-MA

Ru s h Request :

P.O.#: 10231

P.O. Box 9151

Watertown,

MA 02471-9151

Custody In fo rmat ion

Collected by:

Received

by:

LB

Analyzed

by:

see "By" below

Date

07/25/07

07/27/07

Time

10:15

16:30

Laboratory

Data

SDG

.D.:

GAJ36104

Clien t ID: CREME

SS-3


Silver

< 0.36

Arsenic

5.89

Barium 28.5

Beryllium

<

0.29

Cadmium

<

0.36

Chromium 10.7

Mercury -Soil 0.11

Nickel 10.6

Lead 53.2

Antimony

< 3.63

Selenium

<

1.82

Thallium

<

3.63

Vanadium 22.4

Zinc 53.2

Percent Solid 97

Mercury Digestion

Completed

EPH Extraction Completed


Total Metals Digest

Asbestos

Completed

Completed

ND

R L

Uni t s

D a t e

0.36 mg/Kg

07/31107

0.73

mg/Kg

07/31/07

0.36

mg/Kg

07/31107

0.29 mg/Kg 07/31107

0.36 mg/Kg 07/31107

0.36 mg/Kg 07/31107

0.10

mg/kg

07/31107

0.36 mg/Kg 07/31107

0.36

mg/Kg

07/31107

3.63 mg/Kg

07/31107

1.82

mg/Kg

07/31107

3.63

mg/Kg

07/31107

0.36

mg/Kg

07/31107

0.36 mg/Kg

07/31107

%

07/27/07

07/31107

07/27/07

08/03/07

07/27/07

%

08/03/07

Page

5 of34

Phoenix .D.: AJ36106

T i m e

B y

R e f e r e n c e

EKT

SW6010

EKT

SW6010

EKT

SW6010

EKT

SW6010

EKT

SW6010

EKT

SW6010

RS

SW-7471

EKT

SW6010

EKT

SW6010

EKT

SW6010

EKT

SW6010

EKT

SW6010

EKT

6010

EKT

SW6010

PU/IDB

£160.3

D

SW7471

SUP/K

3545

JH

MADEP EPH-04

AGP

SW846- 3050

•

E600/M482020



Comments:

*Asbestos analyzed by MA certified lab #M-NJ337. No Asbestos was detected in this sample.

If there are

any

questions

regarding

this

data, please call

Phoenix

Client

Services

at extension

200.

ND=Not

detected

BDL=Below Detection Limit

RL=Reporting

Limit

?#

..

~

ugust 08, 2007

Page 6 of34



Environmenta l Laborator ies , Inc.

587

East

Middle Turnpike P.O.Box 370, Manchester

CT 06040

Analysis Report

August

08, 2007

Sample Information

Matrix: SOIL

Location

Code: VHB-MA

Rush

Request:

P.O.#:

10231

Client ID:

Parameter

Silver

Arsenic

Barium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Chromium

Mercury - Soil

Nickel

Lead

Antimony

Selenium

Thallium

Vanadium

Zinc

Percent Solid

Mercury Digestion

Total

Metals

Digest

Asbestos

CREME

SS-4

TeL (860) 645·1

102

Fax (860) 645-0823

FOR:

Attn:

Mr.

Mike Bastoni

Vanasse

Hangen Brustlin.

Inc.

101

Walnut Street

P.O. Box

9151

Watertown, MA 02471-9151

Custody Information

Collected by:

Received by: LB

Analyzed

by:

see

"By" below

Date

07/25/07

07/27/07

Time

9:35

16:30

Laboratory Data

s·Dc

J.D.: GAJ36104

Phoenix

J.D.: AJ36107

Result

<

0.37

6.49

45

<

0.29

< 0.37

14.5

0.11

14

85.1

<

3.67

<

1.84

<

3.67

47.5

95.8

92

Completed

Completed

ND

RL

Units

Date

0.37 mg/Kg 07/31107

0.73 mg/Kg 07/31107

0.37 mg/Kg

07/31/07

0.29

mg Kg

07/31107

0.37

mg Kg

07/31107

0.37

mg/Kg

07/31107

0.10 mglkg

07/31107

0.37

mg/Kg

07/31107

0.37 mg/Kg 07/31107

3.67

mg/Kg

07/31107

1.84

mg/Kg

07/31/07

3.67

mg/Kg

07/31107

0.37

mg/Kg

07/31107

0.37 mg/Kg

07/31/07

%

07/27/07

07/31107

07/27/07

%

08/03/07

Page 7

of34

Time

By

Reference

EKT

SW6010

EKT

SW6010

EKT

SW6010

EKT

SW6010

EKT

SW60l0

EKT

SW60l0

RS SW-7471

EKT

SW6010

EKT

SW6010

EKT

SW6010

EKT

SW6010

EKT

SW6010

EKT

6010

EKT

SW6010

PU/IDB

E160.3

D

SW7471

AGP

SW846-

3050

•

E600/M482020



Comments:

*Asbest os analyzed by MA certified lab #M-NJ337. No Asbestos was detected

in

this sample.

If

there are any questions regarding

this

data.

please

call Phoenix

Client

Services

at extension

200.

ND=Not detected

BDL=Below Detectio n


~ : . . , . ~ t & ~

August 08, 2007

Page 8 of34



E n v i r o n m e n t a l L a b o r a t o ri e s , I n c .

587 East Middle Turnpike

P.O.Box

370, Manchester

CT 06040

Tel.

(860) 645-1102

Fax

(860) 645-0823

Analysis Report


Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc.

101 Walnut Stree t

ugus t 08,

2007

P.O. Box 9151

Watertown, MA

02471-9151

SamQle

In fo rmat ion Custody In fo rmat ion

Date

Time

Matrix: SOIL

Collected by: 07/25/07 15:00

Locat ion

Code: VHB-MA

Received

by:

LB 07/27/07 16:30

Ru s h Request :

Analyzed

by:

see "By" below

P.O.#:

10231

Laboratory Data

SOC

J.D.:

GAJ36104


Clien t ID:

CREME

LGP-1

(0-1)


R L

Uni t s

D a t e T i m e

By

R e f e r e n c e

Silver < 0.37

0.37

mg/Kg

07/31107

EKT

SW6010

Arsenic 4.67

0.74

mg/Kg

07/31/07

EKT

SW6010

Barium 25.4

0.37

mg/Kg

07/31107

EKT

SW6010

Beryllium 0.594 0.3 mg/Kg 07/31107

EKT

SW6010

Cadmium

< 0.37

0.37 mg/Kg 07/31107

EKT

SW6010

Chromium

6.36

0.37 mg/Kg 07/31107

EKT

SW6010

Mercury - Soil

<

0.10 0.10 mg/kg 07/31/07

RS

SW-7471

Nickel 7.86

0.37

mg/Kg 07/31107

EKT

SW6010

Lead 58.7

0.37

mg/Kg

07/31/07

EKT

SW6010

Antimony

< 3.71

3.71

mg/Kg

07/31107

EKT

SW6010

Selenium

<

1.85

1.85

mg/Kg

07/31/07

EKT

SW6010

Thallium

<

3.71

3.71

mg Kg

07/31/07

EKT

SW6010

Vanadium

40.2

0.37

mg/Kg

07/31107

EKT

6010

Zinc 66.5

0.37

mg/Kg

07/31107

EKT

SW6010

Percent Solid

95

% 07/27/07

PU/IDB

El60.3

Mercury Digestion

Completed

07/31107

D

SW7471

EPH Extraction

Completed 07/27/07

SUP/K

3545


Completed 08/03/07

JH

MADEP EPH-04

Total Metals Digest

Completed

07/27/07

AGP

SW846- 3050

Page 9

of34



Comments:

If there are

any questions regarding

this

data, please call

Phoenix

Client Services

at

extension

200.

ND=Not

detected BDL=Below Detection

Limit

RL=Reporting

Limit

f?f f;

' " '

ugust 08, 2007

Page 10 of34



Environmental

Laboratories, Inc.

587

East Middle Turnpike. P.O.Box

370,

Manchester

CT

06040

Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823

Analysis Report


Vanasse Hangen Brustlin. Inc.

101

Walnut

Stree t

ugust

08, 2007

Samp le

In fo rmat ion

Matrix:

SOIL


Rush

Request :

P.O.#: 10231

P.O. Box 9151

Watertown. MA

02471-9151

Custody In fo rmat ion

Collec ted

by:

Received

by:

LB

Analyzed

by:

see "By"

be low

D at e

07/25/07

07/27/07

Time

15:00

16:30

Laboratory

Data

CREME

LGP-2 {0-1)

SDG

J.D.:

GAJ36104

Clien t ID:

P a r a m e t e r

Silver

Arsenic

Barium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Chromium

Mercury

- Soil

Nickel

Lead

Antimony

Selenium

Thallium

Vanadium

Zinc

Percent Solid

Mercury Digestion

EPH Extraction


R e s u l t

<

0.42

7.16

32.1

0.434

< 0.42

13.6

<

0.13

14.6

386

< 4.22

< 2.11

< 4.22

29.4

74.4

78

Completed

Completed

Completed

Soil Extraction

for PCB

Completed

Total Metals Digest

Completed

P o l y c h l o r i n a t e d B i p h e n y l s

PCB-1016

ND

PCB-1221

ND

PCB-1232

ND

PCB-1242

ND

R L Uni t s

0.42

mg/Kg

0.84

mg/Kg

0.42 mg/Kg

0.34 mg/Kg

0.42 mg/Kg

0.42 mg/Kg

0.13

mg/kg

0.42

mg/Kg

0.42 mg/Kg

4.22 mg/Kg

2.11

mg/Kg

4.22 mg/Kg

0.42 mg/Kg

0.42 mg/Kg

%

310

ug/Kg

310

ug/Kg

310 ug/Kg

310 ug/Kg

Page 11 of34


D a t e T i m e

B y

R e f e r e n c e

07/31107

EKT

SW6010

07/31107

EKT

SW6010

07/31/07

EKT

SW6010

07/31/07

EKT

SW6010

07/31107

EKT

SW6010

07/31107

EKT

SW6010

07/31107

RS

SW-7471

07/31107

EKT

SW6010

07/31107

EKT

SW6010

07/31107

EKT

SW6010

07/31107

EKT

SW6010

07/31107

EKT

SW6010

07/31107

EKT

6010

07/31107

EKT

SW6010

07/27/07

PU/IDB El60.3

07/31107

D

SW7471

07/27/07

SUP/K

3545

08/03/07

JH

MADEP EPH-04

07/27/07

SJC/E

SW3545

07/27/07

AGP

SW846- 3050

07/30/07

JH

sw 8082

07/30/07

JH

sw

8082

07/30/07

JH

SW8082

07/30/07

JH

SW8082



Client

ID:

CREME LGP-2 {0-1)

Phoenix

.D.: AJ36109

Parameter Result RL

Units

Date

Time By

Reference

PCB-1248

ND

310 ug/Kg

07/30/07

JH

SW8082

PCB-1254

ND 310

ug/Kg

07/30/07

JH

SW8082

PCB-1260

ND 310

ug Kg

07/30/07

JH

sw 8082

PCB-1262

ND

310 ug Kg 07/30/07

JH

sw 8082

PCB-1268

ND

310

ug Kg 07/30/07

JH

sw

8082

QNQC Surrogates

%

DCBP (Surrogate Rec)

106

%

07/30/07

JH

SW8082

% TCMX (Surrogate

Rec)

123

%

07/30/07

JH

SW8082

Comments:

I f

there are

any questions regarding this data. p lease call Phoenix Client Services

at

extension 200.

ND=Not

detected BDL=Below Detection Limit RL=Reporting Limit

£ ? ] ~ , , ~ . _

August 08, 2007

Page

12 of

34



E n v i r o n m e n t a l L a b o r a t o r i e s , Inc .

587 East Middle Turnpike P.O.Box 370, Manchester CT

06040

Tel.

(860)

645-1102 Fax

(860)

645-0823

Analysis Report


Vanasse

Hangen Brustlin,

Inc.

101 Walnut Street

ugus t 08, 2007

P.O.

Box

9151

Watertown,

MA 02471-9151

Samgle Informat ion

Custod:,:

Informat ion Date

Time

Matrix : SOIL

Collected by:

07/25/07

10:00

Location

Code:

VHB-MA

Received by:

LB

07/27/07

16:30

Rush Request:

Analyzed by:

see

"By"

below

P.O.#:

10231

Laborator_y

Data

SDG

.D.:

GAJ36104

Phoenix .D.:

AJ36110

Client ID:

CREME

VHB-101 (0-2)

P a r a m e t e r

Resu l t

R L

Uni t s

D a t e

T i m e

B y

Reference

Silver

<

0.33

0.33

mg/Kg 07131107

EKT

SW6010

Arsenic 7.04 0.66 mg/Kg 07/3 /07

EKT

SW6010

Barium

33.9

0.33

mg/Kg

07/31107

EKT

SW6010

Beryllium

<

0.27 0.27

mg/Kg

07/31107

EKT

SW6010

Cadmium

<

0.33 0.33 mg/Kg 07131107

EKT

SW6010

Chromium

15.6 0.33 mg/Kg 07131107

EKT

SW6010

Mercury

-

Soil

0.84 0.10

mglkg

07/3 107

RS

SW-7471

Nickel 11.8 0.33

mg Kg

07/31107

EKT

SW6010

Lead 81.6

0.33

mg/Kg 07/3 107

EKT

SW6010

Antimony <

3.32

3.32

mg Kg

07/3 107

EKT

SW6010

Selenium

<

1.66

1.66

mg Kg

07/3 /07

EKT

SW6010

Thallium

<

3.32

3.32

mg Kg

07/31107

EKT

SW6010

Vanadium

23.2

0.33

mg/Kg

07/31107

EKT

6010

Zinc 73.4

0.33

mg/Kg

07/3 107

EKT

SW6010

Percent Solid

93 %

07/27/07

PU/IDB

E160.3

Mercury Digestion Completed 07131107

D

SW7471

EPH Extraction

Completed

07/27/07

SUP/K

3545


Completed

08/03/07

JH

MADEP EPH-04

Total Metals Digest

Completed 07/27/07

AGP

SW846- 3050

Page 13

of34



Comments:

If

there are any questions regarding

this data, please

call Phoenix

Client

Services

at extension

200.

ND=Not

detected BDL=Below Detection Limit

RL=Reporting

Limit

Page

14 of34



Environmental Laboratories, Inc.


06040

Tel.

(860) 645-1102 Fax (860)

645-0823

Analysis Report

FOR: Attn: Mr. Mike

Bastoni

Vanasse

Hangen

Brustlin.

Inc.

101

Walnut

Street

ugus t

08, 2007

P.O. Box

9151

Watertown,

MA 02471-9151

Samg le

Informat ion

Custodx In fo rmat ion Date

Matrix : SOIL

Col lec ted

by: 07/25/07

Locat ion Code: VHB-MA Received

by:

LB

07/27107

Rush

Request :

Analyzed

by:

see

"By"

below

P.O.#:

10231

Time

14:00

16:30

Laboratory Data

SDG

I.D.:

GAJ36104

Phoenix I.D.:

AJ36111

Clien t ID:

CREME

VHB-102 (0-2)

P a r a m e t e r

R e s u l t

R L

Uni t s

D a t e T i m e

B y

R e f e r e n c e

Silver

3.24

0.35 mg/Kg

07/31107

EKT

SW6010

Arsenic

8.71

0.71 mg/Kg

07/31107

EKT

SW6010

Barium

187 0.35

mg/Kg

07/31107

EKT

SW6010

Beryllium <

0.28

0.28 mg/Kg 07/31/07

EKT

SW6010

Cadmium

0.996 0.35 mg/Kg 07/31/07

EKT

SW6010

Chromium Ill

0.35 mg/Kg 07/31/07

EKT

SW6010

Mercury - Soil

0.42 0.10

mgikg

07/31107

RS

SW-7471

Nickel

177

0.35 mg/Kg

07/31/07

EKT

SW6010

Lead

26600

355 mg/Kg

08/06/07

EK

SW6010

Antimony

14

3.55 mg/Kg

07/31107

EKT

SW6010

Selenium

< 1.77

1.77 mg/Kg

07/31107

EKT

SW6010

Thallium

< 3.55 3.55

mg/Kg

07/31107

EKT

SW6010

Vanadium

26.3 0.35

mg Kg

07/31107

EKT

6010

Zinc

551

3.55 mg Kg

08/01107

EK

SW60 0

Percent Solid

94

%

07/27/07

PU/IDB

E160.3

Mercury Digestion

Completed 07/31/07

D

SW7471

EPH Extraction Completed

07/27/07

SUP/K

3545


Completed 08/03/07

JH

MADEP EPH-04

Soil Extraction for PCB

Completed 07/27/07

SJC/E

SW3545

Total Metals Digest

Completed 07/27/07

AGP

SW846- 3050

P o l y c h l o r i n a t e d B i g h e n y l s

PCB-1016

ND

3800 ug Kg

08/01/07

JH

sw

8082

PCB-1221

ND

3800 ug Kg

08/01/07

JH

sw 8082

PCB-1232

ND

3800 ug/Kg

08/01107

JH

SW8082

PCB-1242

ND 3800

ug/Kg

08/01/07

JH

SW8082

Page 15

of34





Environmen tal Laboratories, Inc.

587

East

Middle Turnpike P.O.Box 370, Manchester CT

06040

Tel. (860) 645-1102

Fax

(860) 645-0823

Analysis Report


Vanasse

Hangen

Brustlin.

Inc.

A u g u s t 08, 2007

101 Walnut Stree t

P.O.

Box

9151

Watertown.

MA 02471-9151

Samg le I n f o rma t io n

Custody In fo rmat ion D ate

Time

Matr ix:

SOIL

Collec ted by: 07/25/07 10:30


Received by:

LB 07/27/07 16:30

Rush Request :

Analyzed by:

s ee

"By"

be low

P.O.#:

10231

Laboratorx Data

SDG

J.D.:

GAJ36104


Clien t ID:

CREME VHB-1 01 (15-17)

P a r a m e t e r R e s u l t R L

U n i t s

D a t e T i m e

By

R e f e r e n c e

Silver

< 0.36

0.36

mg/Kg

07/31107

EKT

SW6010

Arsenic 6.42 0.72

mg/Kg

07/31107

EKT

SW6010

Barium 30.4 0.36 mg/Kg 07/31107

EKT

SW6010

Beryllium

0.499

0.29

mg/Kg 07/31/07

EKT

SW6010

Cadmium

< 0.36

0.36

mg/Kg 07/31107

EKT

SW6010

Chromium

18.8

0.36

mg/Kg 07/31/07

EKT

SW6010

Mercury Soil

< 0.10 0.10 mg/kg 07/31107

RS

SW-7471

Nickel

15.2

0.36

mg/Kg

07/31107

EKT

SW6010

Lead 2.28 0.36

mg/Kg

07/31107

EKT

SW6010

Antimony

< 3.58

3.58

mg/Kg

07/31107

EKT

SW6010

Selenium

< 1.79

1.79

mg/Kg

07/31107

EKT

SW6010

Thallium

< 3.58 3.58 mg/Kg 07/31107

EKT

SW6010

Vanadium

24.1 0.36 mg/Kg 07/31107

EKT

6010

Zinc 35.4 0.36 mg/Kg 07/31107

EKT

SW6010

Percent Solid

93 % 07/27/07

PU/IDB

E160.3

Field Extraction

Completed

07/25/07

BP

SW5035

Mercury Digestion

Completed

07/31/07

D

SW7471

EPH

Extraction

Completed

07/27/07

SUP/K

3545


Completed

08/03/07

JH

MADEP EPH-04

Total Metals Digest

Completed

07/27/07

AGP

SW846- 3050

Vola t i l e s

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane

ND

220

ug/Kg

07/28/07

RIJ

SW8260

1,1, 1-Trichloroethane

ND

220

ug Kg

07/28/07

RIJ

SW8260

1,1 ,2,2-

Tetrachloroethane

ND 220

ug/Kg

07/28/07

R/J

SW8260

1,

1,2-Trichloroethane

ND 220 ug/Kg 07/28/07

R/J

SW8260

Page

17

of34



Client

ID:

CREME

VHB-101 (15-17)

Parameter Result

1, 1-Dichloroethane

1,1-Dichloroethene

1, 1-Dichloropropene

1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene

1 2,3-Trichloropropane



1,2-Dibrorno-3-chloropropane

1,2-Dichlorobenzene

1,2-

Dichloroethane

1,2-Dichloropropane

1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene

1,3-Dichlorobenzene

1 , 3 - D i c h l o r ~ p r o p a n e

1,4-Dichlorobenzene

2,2-Dichloropropane

2-Chlorotoluene

2-HeXanone

2-Isopropyl oluene

4-Chlorotoluene

4-Methyl-2-pentanone

Acetone

Acrylonitrile

Benzene

Bromobenzene

Bromochloromethane

Bromodichloromethane

Bromoform

Bromomethane

Carbon

Disulfide

Carbon tetrachloride

Chlorobenzene

Chloroethane

Chloroform

Chloromethane

cis-1

,2-

Dichloroethene

cis-1

,3-

Dichloropropene

Dibromochloromethane

Dibromoethane

Dibromomethane

Dichlorodifluoromethane

Ethylbenzene

Hexachlorobutadiene

Isopropylbenzene

m&p-Xylene

Methyl Ethyl Ketone

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

RL

220

220

220

220

220

220

220

220

220

220

220

220

220

220

220

220

220

1100

220

220

1100

4400

440

220

220

220

220

220

220

220

220

220

220

220

220

220

220

220

220

220

220

220

220

220

220

2600

Units

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug Kg

ug Kg

ug Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug Kg

ug Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

Page 18 of 34

Phoenix

.D.:

AJ36112

Date Time

By

Reference

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07.

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

R/J SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

R/J

SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ

SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

R/J SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260



Client ID: CREME VHB-101 (15-17) Phoenix .D.: AJ36112

Parameter Result

RL

Units

Date

Time

By

Reference

Methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE) ND

220

ug/Kg

07/28/07

R/J

SW8260

Methylene chloride ND

440

ug/Kg

07/28/07

R J

SW8260

n-Butylbenzene

ND

220

ug Kg

07/28/07

R J

SW8260

n-Propylbenzene

ND

220

ug/Kg

07/28/07

R/J

SW8260

Naphthalene ND

220

ug/Kg

07/28/07

R/J

SW8260

o-Xylene

ND 220 ug/Kg 07/28/07

R/J

SW8260

p- Isopropyltoluene

ND

220

ug Kg

07/28/07

R J

SW8260

sec-Butylbenzene

ND

220 ug/Kg 07/28/07

R J

SW8260

Styrene ND

220

ug/Kg

07/28/07

R/J

SW8260

tert-Butylbenzene ND

220

ug/Kg

07/28/07

R/J

SW8260

Tetrachloroethene

ND

220

ug Kg

07/28/07

R/J

SW8260

Tetrahydrofuran (1HF)

ND

440

ug/Kg

07/28/07

R/J

SW8260

Toluene ND

220

ug/Kg

07/28/07

R/J

SW8260

Total Xylenes ND 220 ug/Kg 07/28/07

R/J

SW8260

trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene

ND

220

ug/Kg

07/28/07

R/J

SW8260

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND

220

ug Kg

07/28/07

R/J

SW8260

trans-1 ,4-dichloro-2-butene

ND

440

ug/Kg

07/28/07

R J

SW8260

Trichloroethene

ND

220

ug/Kg

07/28/07

R J

SW8260

Trichlorofluoromethane

ND

220

ug/Kg

07/28/07

R J

SW8260

Trichlorotrifluoroethane ND 220 ug/Kg

07/28/07

R J

SW8260

Vinyl chloride ND 220 ug/Kg

07/28/07

R J

SW8260

QA/OC Surrogates

% 1,2-dichlorobenzene-d4

99

%

07/28/07

R/J

SW8260

%

Bromofluorobenzene

91 %

07/28/07

R/J

SW8260

% Dibromofluoromethane 93 %

07/28/07

R J

SW8260

% Toluene-dS 96 %

07/28/07

R/J

SW8260

Comments:

If there are

any questions

regarding this

data, please call Phoenix Client Services at extension

200.

ND=No t detected BDL=Below Detection


Page 19

of34





Client

ID: CREME VHB-102 (10-12)

Parameter

Result

1,1-Dichloroethane

1, 1-Dichloroethene


1 2,3-Trichlorobenzene


1 2,4-Trichlorobenzene

1,2,

4-Trimethylbenzene

1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane

1,2-Dichlorobenzene

1,2-Dichloroethane

1,2-Dichloropropane


1

3-

Dichlorobenzene

1,3-Dichloropropane

1,4-Dichlorobenzene

2.2-Dichloropropane

2-Chlorotoluene

2-Hexanone

2-Isopropyltoluene

4-Chlorotoluene


Acetone

Acrylonitrile

Benzene

Bromobenzene

Bromochloromethane


Bromoform

Bromomethane

Carbon Disulfide


Chlorobenzene

Chloroethane

Chloroform

Chloromethane

cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethene

cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene


Dibromoethane

Dibromomethane


Ethylbenzene

Hexachlorobutadiene

lsopropylbenzene

m&p-Xylene

Methyl Ethyl Ketone

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

ND

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

RL

250

250

250

250

250

250

250

250

250

250

250

250

250

250

250

250

250

1200

250

250

1200

4900

490

250

250

250

250

250

250

250

250

250

250

250

250

250

250

250

250

250

250

250

250

250

250

2900

Units

ug Kg

ug/Kg

ug Kg

ug Kg

ug Kg

ug/Kg

ug Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug Kg

ug Kg

ug Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug Kg

ug/Kg

ug Kg

ug Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug Kg

ug Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug Kg

ug Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug/Kg

ug Kg

ug Kg

ug Kg

Page 21 of 34

Phoenix 1.0.:

AJ36113

Date Time

By

Reference

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28107

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28107

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

07/28/07

RIJ SW8260

RIJ

SW8260

R/J SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ

SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ

SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

R/J SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ

SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

R/J SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ

SW8260

RIJ

SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ

SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ

SW8260

R/J SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ SW8260

RIJ

SW8260

RIJ

SW8260

RIJ SW8260



Client

ID:

CREME VHB-102 (10-12)

Phoenix J.D.:

AJ36113

Parameter Result

RL

Units

Date Time

By Reference

Methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE)

ND

250

ug/Kg

07/28/07

R/J

SW8260

Methylene chloride

ND

490

ug/Kg

07/28/07

R/J

SW8260

n-Butylbenzene

ND

250

ug/Kg

07/28/07

R/J

SW8260

n-Propylbenzene

ND 250 ug/Kg 07/28/07

R/J

SW8260

Naphthalene ND

250

ug Kg

07/28/07

R/J

SW8260

a-Xylene ND 250 ug Kg

07/28/07

R/J

SW8260

p-Isopropyltoluene

ND

250

ug/Kg

07/28/07

R/J

SW8260

sec-Butylbenzene

ND 250 ug/Kg

07/28/07

R/J

SW8260

Styrene ND

250

ug/Kg

07/28/07

R/J

SW8260

tert-Butylbenzene

ND

250

ug/Kg

07/28/07

R/J

SW8260

Tetrachloroethene

ND

250

ug/Kg

07/28/07

R/J

SW8260

Tetrahydrofuran (THF)

ND

490

ug Kg

07/28/07

RIJ

SW8260

Toluene ND 250 ug/Kg 07/28/07

R/J

SW8260

Total Xylenes

ND

250

ug/Kg 07/28/07

R/J

SW8260

trans-

I

,2-Dichloroethene

ND

250

ug/Kg

07/28/07

R/J

SW8260

trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene

ND

250

ug/Kg

07/28/07

R/J

SW8260

trans- I, 4-dichloro-2-butene

ND

490

ug Kg

07/28/07

R/J

SW8260

Trichloroethene

ND 250 ug/Kg 07/28/07

R/J

SW8260


ND

250

ug Kg 07/28/07

R/J

SW8260


ND

250

ug Kg 07/28/07

R/J

SW8260

Vinyl chloride

ND

250

ug/Kg 07/28/07

R/J

SW8260

QAJQC

Surrogates

%

1,2-dichlorobenzene-d4

99 % 07/28/07

R/J

SW8260

%

Bromofluorobenzene

92 % 07/28/07

R/J

SW8260

%

Dibromofluoromethane

104 %

07/28/07

R/J

SW8260

% Toluene-d8

95 %

07/28/07

R/J

SW8260

Comments:

If there are any

questions regarding

this data, please

call Phoenix

Client Services a t extension 200.

ND=Not

detected BDL=Below

Detection

Limit RL=Reporting

Limit

~ # . ~ j & - _ ,

August 08, 2007

Page 22

of34



DEP REQUIRED EPH DATA REPORTING FORMAT/INFORMATION

SAMPLE INFORMATION

Matrix

Aqueous XX

Soil

Sediment

Other:

Containers

XX

Satisfuctory

Broken

Leaking

Aqueous Preservatives

XXN/A pH<2 _pH>2

Comment:

Temperature

Received on Ice

Received at 4 degrees C XX

Other: See

Chain

Of Custody

Extraction Method

Water: 3510

EPH ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Method for Ranges: MADEP EPH-04

Client ID

Method for Target Analytes: MADEP-EPH-04

I Lab ID

EPH Surrogate Standards

Aromatic: o-terphenyl

Aliphatic: 1-chlorooctadecane

EPH Fractionation Surrogates

Aromatic: 2-Fluorobiphenyl

Aromatic: 2-Bromonaphthalene

Range/Target Analyte

Total TPH

(*I)

Diesel PAH

Target

Analytes

Naphthalene

2-Methyl Naphthalene

Phenanthrene

Acenaphthene

Other PAH Target

Analytes

Acenapthvlene

Anthracene

Benzo(a)anthracene

Benzo(a)pyrene



Chrvsene

Dibenzo(a,h )anthracene

Fluoranthene

Fluorene

lndeno(l ,2,3-cd)pyrene

Pyrene

Benzo(ghi)pervlene

C9-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons *1

Cl9-C36

Aliphatic Hydrocarbons *1

Cll-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons *1,2

Aliphatic

Surrogate%

Recovery

Aromatic Surrogate % Recovery

Sample Surrogate Acceptance Range

Fractionation Surrogate %Recovery

Fractionation Surrogate %Recovery

ractionation Surr. Acceptance Range

Date Collected

Date Received

Date Extracted:

Date Analyzed

Dilution Factor

%Moisture (soil)

RL

Units

3.30 mg/kg

0.33 mg/kg

0.33 mg/kg

0.33 mg/kg

0.33

mg/kg

0.33

mg/kg

0.33 mg/kg

0.33 mg/kg

0.33 mg/kg

0.33

mg/kg

0.33

mg/kg

0.33

mg/kg

0.33

mg/kg

0.33 mg/kg

0.33 mg/kg

0.33 mg/kg

0.33 m ~ k g

0.33

m ~ k g

3.30

ml')kg

3.30

3.30 mglkg

Soil: 3545

SS-1

SS-2

AJ36104 AJ36105

07/25/07 07125/07

07/27/07 07/27/07

07/27/07 07/27/07

08/01/07 08/01/07

9.0

6.0

51

16

<0.36 <0.34

<0.36

<0.34

2.9

1.3

<0.36 <0.34

1.3 0.45

1.2

0.87

2.6 1.4

2.9

1.4

3.9

2.4

0.7 0.41

3.8 1.9

2.2

1.1

6.4 3.2

0.4 <0.34

0.95 <0.34

5.9 2.7

2

1.1

<3.59

<3.43

<3.59

<3.43

51

16

53

61

76

80

40-140 40-140

94 92

79 63

40-140 40-140

*I Hydrocarbon range data exclude concentrations of any surrogate(s) and/or internal standards eluting in that range.

*2 C

ll-C22

Aromatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration

ofTarget

PAH Analytes eluting in that range.

SS-3

AJ36106

07/25/07

07/27/07

07/27/07

08/01/07

3.0

89

0.39

<0.33

4

<0.33

3.2

3.1

5.6

5.5

8.5

2.4

7

3.4

12

0.7

1.6

I I

4.9

<3.29

<3.29

89

44

80

40-140

92

63

40-140

Were all QA/QC procedures REQUIRED by the EPH method followed? XX Yes No

Were all performance/acceptance standards for the required QAIQC procedures achieved? XX Yes

Were any significant modifications made to the EPH method, as specified

in

Section 11.3?

~ * Y e s

*If above question was checked yes, samples were run via GC/MS, otherwise run by G C ~ F I D .

LGP-1 (0-1)

AJ36108

07/25/07

07/27/07

07/27/07

08/01/07

5.0

40

<0.35

<0.35

3.7

<0.35

0.93

1.6

3.1

3.1

5

1.1

4.4

1.9

7.5

0.45

0.41

5.6

1.6

<3.47

<3.47

40

58

81

40-140

79

76

40-140

No

XX No

I attest under the pains andpenalties o perju ry that, based upon my inquiry o hose individuals immediately responsiblefor obtaining the information,

the material contained in this report

is,

to thebel'st,__fmv knowledrze

and

belief, accurate

and

complete.

-ffif.. ...·r

Signature: - . ; - , - - = ~ - , - - - - - -

Printed Name: Johanna Harrington

Position:

Chemist

Date: 8/8/2007

LGP-2 (0-1)

AJ36109

07/25/07

07/27/07

07/27/07

08/01/07

22.0

27

<0.42

<0.42

2

<0.42

0.68

1.2

1.2

1.7

2.5

0.89

2.6

1.3

4

0.5

0.62

3.8

<4.23

<4.23

27

58

94

40-140

88

68

40-140



DEP REQUIRED EPH DATA

REPORTING

FORMAT/INFORMATION

SAMPLE

INFORMATION

Matrix

Aqueous

XX

Soil

Sediment

Other:

Containers

XX

Satisfactory

Broken Leaking

Aqueous Preservatives

XXNIA

___pH<2

___pH>2

Comment:

Temperature

Received on Ice Received at 4 degrees C

XX

Other: See

Chain Of

Custody

Extraction Method

Water: 3510

EPH ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Method for Ranges: MADEP EPH-04 Client lD

Method for Target Analytes: MADEP-EPH-04 LablD

EPH Surrogate Standards

Aromatic: o-terphenyl

Aliphatic: 1-chlorooctadecane

EPH Fractionation Surrogates

Aromatic: 2-Fluorobiphenyl

Aromatic: 2-Bromonaphthalene

Range/Target Analyte

Total TPH

(*I)

Diesel PAH

Target

Analytes

Naphthalene

2-Methyl Naphthalene

Phenanthrene

Acenaphthene

Other

PAH T a r ~ e t

Analytes

Acenapthvlene

Anthracene

Benzo(a)anthracene

Benzo(a)pyrene

Benzo(b)tluoranthene


Chrysene

Dibenzo( a,h )anthracene

Fluoranthene

Fluorene

lndeno(

I

,2.3-cd)pyrene

Pyrene

Benzo(ghi)perylene

C9-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons

*1

C19-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons

*

Cll-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons *1,2

Aliphatic Surrogate

%Recovery

Aromatic Surrogate % Recovery

Sample Surrogate Acceptance Range

Fractionation Surrogate% Recovery

Fractionation Surrogate% Recovery

ractionation Surr. Acceptance Range

Date Collected

Date Received

Date Extracted:

Date Analyzed

Dilution Factor

%Moisture

(soil)

RL

Units

3.30 mg/kg

0.33

mg/kg

0.33

mglkg

0.33 mg/kg

0.33

mg/kg

0.33

mg/kg

0.33

mg/kg

0.33 mg/kg

0.33 mg/kg

0.33

mg/kg

0.33

mg/kg

0.33

mg/kg

0.33

mg,kg

0.33 mglkg

0.33

mglkg

0.33 mg/kg

0.33 mg/kg

0.33

mg/kg

3.30

mg/kg

3.30

mg/kg

3.30 mg/kg

Soil: 3545

VHB-101 (0-2) VHB-102 (0-2)

AJ36110 AJ36111

07/25/07 07/25/07

07/27/07

07/27/07

07/27/07 07/27/07

08/01/07

08/01/07

7.0 6.0

27

50

<0.35

0.64

<0.35 <0.34

2.8 1.2

<0.35 <0.34

0.8 0.61

1.4

0.89

2.4 1.4

2.5 1.5

3

2.1

1.7 1.2

3.5 1.7

1.7

1.1

5.1

2.2

0.49

<0.34

1.3

0.82

4.5 1.9

2.2 1.5

<3.52 9.5

<3.52 120

27 .

18

54

71

77

86

40-140

40-140

92 94

50

69

40-140

40-140

*1 Hydrocarbon range data exclude concentrations of any surrogate(s) and/ or internal standards eluti ng in that range.

*2 C 11-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration

of

Target PAH Analytes eluting in that range.

l.:EKTIJ<

Were all QA/QC procedures REQUIRED by the EPH method followed?

XX

Yes _ N o

VHB-101 (15-17) VHB-102 (10-12

AJ36112 AJ36113

07/25/07 07/25/07

07/27/07 07/27/07

07/27/07 07/27/07

08/01/07 08/01/07

I I

7.0

9.0

4.1

5.5

<0.34

<0.35

<0.34

<0.35

<0.34 <0.35

<0.34

<0.35

<0.34

<0.35

<0.34 <0.35

<0.34 <0.35

<0.34

<0.35

<0.34 <0.35

<0.34

<0.35

<0.34

<0.35

<0.34 <0.35

<0.34

<0.35

<0.34 <0.35

<0.34 <0.35

<0.34

<0.35

<0.34 <0.35

<3.42 <3.54

<3.42

<3.54

4.1 5.5

58 66

88 82

40-140

40-140

78

89

65

66

40-140

40-140

Were all performance/acceptance standards for the required QA QC procedures achieved?

XX

Yes

_ N o

Were any significant modifications made to the EPH method, as specified in Section 11.3?

_ * Y e s XX

No

*If above question was checked yes, samples were run via GCIMS, otherwise run

by

GC-FID.

I attest under the pains and penalties o fperjury that, based upon my inquiry o f hose individuals immediately responsiblefor obtaining the information,

the material contained in this report is, to the best o fmv

knowled'i .e

and belief accurate and complete.

,,,..._ " I i i · - · ~

Signature: - ' : , . J - , - - - . . , . . , - ~ - - , - - - - - - -

Printed Name: Johanna Harrington

Position:

Chemist

Date: s ';s= t2 'o 'o7=---



Environmenta l

Laboratories,

Inc.

NY#11301


06040

Tel. (860) 645-1102

Fax (860) 645-0823

QA/QC

Report

August

08, 2007

OA/OC

Data

SDG J.D.:

GAJ36104

Dup LCS

LCSD LCS

MS

MSDup

Parameter

Blank RPD

%

% RPD Rec%

Rec%

RPD

QAIQC

Batch

80966, Sample No: AJ35832 (AJ36114, AJ36115. AJ36 16)

Mercury BDL

NC 101

92.4 8.9

95.7

96.1 0.4

QA QC

Batch 80906. Sample

No: AJ35880 (AJ36114, AJ36115,

AJ36116)

ICP

Metals-

Dissolved

Aluminum

BDL NC

86.6

92.2 6.3 94.8

98.7 4.0

Antimony

0.005 NC 86.4 90.8 5.0 90.6 93.8 3.5

Arsenic BDL

NC 84.4

89.3 5.6

87.8 91.2

3.8

Barium

BDL BDL

88.5

94.6 6.7 94.0

97.5 3.7

Beryllium

BDL NC 88.3 93.0

5.2

89.7 93.1

3.7

Boron

BDL 1.00 87.7

92.3 5.1

90.3 93.5

3.5

Cadmium

BDL NC

87.1

93.6 7.2 91.9

95.1 3.4

Calcium

BDL BDL

88.9

95.7 7.4 NC

NC NC

Chromium

BDL

NC

86.7

92.7 6.7 88.6

91.2 2.9

Cobalt

BDL

NC 86.6

92.5 6.6 90.2

94.8 5.0

Copper

0.001 3.00 87.2 95.1 8.7 94.9 97.9

3.1

Iron

BDL 3.20 87.3

93.1

6.4 90.0 92.4 2.6

Lead

BDL

NC 88.3 93.1 5.3 91.6 95.1 3.7

Magnesium BDL 2.20

90.2

95.4 5.6

NC

NC NC

Manganese

BDL NC 87.8 94.6 7.5 91.2 93.6 2.6

Molybdenum

BDL 3.70 88.1 93.5 5.9 89.6 92.9 3.6

Nickel

0.004

NC

86.7

93.0 7.0

90.5

94.1

3.9

Phosphorus

BDL BDL

85.8

89.8 4.6 83.3 84.7

1.7

Potassium

BDL BDL

96.4

96.5 0.1 92.4 97.2 5.1

Selenium

BDL

NC

76.6

79.9 4.2 81.6 86.2

5.5

Silver BDL

NC

87.7

93.6 6.5 100

98.0 2.0

Sodium BDL

1.20 94.1

96.2 2.2

NC NC NC

Thallium BDL

NC

86.5

92.0 6.2 94.9

99.0 4.2

Tin BDL

NC 86.4

92.5 6.8

90.8 94.1 3.6

Vanadium

BDL

NC 85.9

93.5 8.5 89.0 92.5

3.9

Zinc

0.002

BDL

85.2 91.7 7.3 89.8 93.0 3.5

QA QC

Batch 80930, Sample

No: AJ36089 (AJ36 04, AJ36105,

AJ36106,

AJ36107, AJ36108,

AJ36 09.

AJ36110,

AJ36 11,

AJ36112, AJ36113)

ICP Metals-

Soil

Aluminum

BDL NC NC NC

NC

NC

Page

I

of8



OA/OC Data

SDG I. D.: GAJ36104

Dup

LCS

LCSD LCS

MS

MSDup

Parameter

Blan k RPD

%

% RPD

Rec%

Rec% RPD

Antimony BDL

NC 80.4 88.7 9.8 64.1

66.6

3.8

Arsenic BDL 18.8

78.6

86.8 9.9

65.3 66.8 2.3

Barium

BDL 23.7 85.7 95.8 11.1 75.0 76.9 2.5

Beryllium BDL

NC

85.3 96.5 12.3 69.7 71.9 3.1

Boron

BDL NC 83.3 91.0 8.8 69.5

71.1 2.3

Cadmium

BDL

NC

88.0

94.7

7.3 74.0 75.3

1.7

Calcium

BDL 14.8 NC

NC

NC

NC

Chromium BDL

8.90 82.3 94.4 13.7 69.1

70.9 2.6

Cobalt

BDL 4.30

83.9

95.8 13.2

71.8 74.2

3.3

Copper

BDL NC

88.4

99.6 11.9

85.3 88.1 3.2

Iron

BDL

14.3

NC NC

NC NC

Lead

BDL

NC

85.4

92.5 8.0

80.6 81.6 1.2

Magnesium BDL

NC 116 107 8.1 NC

NC NC

Manganese BDL

4.60 86.9 98.5 12.5 83.0 98.1 16.7

Molybdenum

BDL

NC 82.6

92.6 11.4

69.6 71.1

2.1

Nickel

BDL 5.20 86.1 97.5 12.4 70.6

72.0 2.0

Phosphorus

0.7

3.40 81.8 90.1 9.7 62.0 72.9 16.2

Potassium BDL

NC 76.2 85.2 11.2 103 NC

NC

Selenium

BDL

NC

68.9 75.3 8.9 57.0

58.4 2.4

Silver

BDL

NC

91.4

95.1

4.0 87.0 76.9 12.3

Sodium

BDL 28.4

86.9

97.2 11.2 NC

NC NC

Thallium

BDL NC

90.8

96.5 6.1 77.4

79.1

2.2

Tin 2.54

NC 86.4 96.9 11.5 72.9 76.8 5.2

Vanadium

BDL

15.5

83.5

94.1 11.9

70.9 72.8 2.6

Zinc

BDL

18.5

88.2

96.0 8.5 34.4

>130 NC

QNQC

Batch 81079,

Sample No: AJ36104 (AJ36104, AJ36105, AJ36106, AJ36107, AJ36108, AJ36109, AJ36110, AJ36111,

AJ36112,

AJ36113)

Mercury - Soil

BDL NC

91.6

86.7 5.5 111 106 4.6

If

there are

any quest ions regarding this data , please call Phoenix Client Services a t extension 200.

RPD

- Relative

Percent

Difference

?#;

-

CS

-

Laboratory Control Sample

LCSD - Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate

MS - Matrix

Spike

MS

Dup

-

Matrix Spike

Duplicate

NC

-

No

Criteria

August 08, 2007

Page 2 of8




NY#11301


06040

Tel. (860) 645-1102

Fax (860) 645-0823

QA/QC

Report

August 08,

2007

OA/OC Data

SDG I.D.:

GAJ36104

LCS LCSD LCS MS

MSDup

Parameter

Blank

% % RPD

Rec%

Rec% RPD

QA QC

Batch

79895, Sample No: AJ31870 (AJ36104, AJ36105. AJ36106. AJ36108, AJ36109, AJ36110, AJ36111. AJ36112,

AJ36113)

MAEPH

Acenaphthene

ND

87 94 7.7 84

85

1.2

Anthracene

ND 74

74 0.0 89 90

1.1

Chrysene

ND 113 123

8.5 76 84

10.0

n-Eicosane (CZO)

ND

81 95 15.9 83

76 8.8

n-Nonadecane (C19)

ND

81 95 15.9 83

76 8.8

n-Octacosane (C28)

ND

81

95 15.9

83 76 8.8

n-Tetradecane (C14)

ND

71 69 2.9 52

54 3.8

Naphthalene

ND 48

48 0.0 53 55

3.7

Pyrehe

ND 81 91

11.6 103 91 12.4

%2-Bromonaphthalene (surr)

97

79 75 5.2 85 85

0.0

%2-Flurobiphenyl (surr)

111

110 111 0.9 110 107 2.8

%a-COD (surr)

58 45 51 12.5

66

62

6.3

%o-Terphenyl (surr)

86 44 48 8.7 81

86

6.0

QAIQC

Batch

81000,

Sample

No:

AJ35858

(AJ36112.

AJ36113)

Volatiles

1,

1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane

ND 116

118 1.7 85 88 3.5

1, 1,1-Trichloroethane

ND

116 120 3.4

96

96 0.0

1.1.2.2-Tetrachloroethane ND

108 109 0.9

79 80 1.3

1,

1,2-Trichloroethane

ND

112 116 3.5

89

90 1.1

1,

1-Dichloroethane

ND 112

115 2.6 90 89 1.1

1.1-Dichloroethene

ND 107

95

11.9

95

94

1.1


ND 103 110

6.6 99 101 2.0


ND

106 113 6.4 67 75 11.3


ND 113 128 12.4

76 87 13.5


ND

96 99 3.1 64 69 7.5


ND

102 105 2.9 84 87 3.5


ND 126

129 2.4

77

83 7.5

1,2-Dichlorobenzene

ND

103

103

0.0

73

76 4.0

1,2-Dichloroethane

ND

113 117 3.5 84 85

1.2

1,2-Dichloropropane

ND

109 115 5.4 89 90

1.1


ND 102 106 3.8 84

88

4.7

Page

3 of8



Parameter

1 3-Dichlorobenzene

1 3-Dichloropropane

1,4-Dichlorobenzene

2,2-Dichloropropane

2-Chlorotoluene

4-Chlorotoluene

Benzene

Bromobenzene

Bromochloromethane


Bromoform

Bromomethane


Chlorobenzene

Chloroethane

Chloroform

Chloromethane

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene


Dibromoethane

Dibromomethane


Ethylbenzene

Hexachlorobutadiene

Isopropylbenzene

m&p-Xylene

Methyl Ethyl Ketone

Methyl t-Butyl Ether (MTBE)

Methylene chloride

n-Butylbenzene

n-Propylbenzene

Naphthalene

o-Xylene

p-Isopropyltoluene

sec-Butylbenzene

Styrene

tert-Butylbenzene

Tetrachloroethene

Toluene

Tota l Xylenes


QA/QC

Data

Blank

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

LCS LCSD LCS

% % RPD

102 04 1.9

113 116 2.6

103

05

1.9

109

92

16.9

102 06 3.8

104 107 2.8

I l l 116 4.4

105

07

1.9

117 118 0.9

116 120 3.4

125

26

0.8

87 75 14.8

115 20 4.3

107 112 4.6

104 132 23.7

115 118 2.6

115 113 1.8

114

20

5.1

109 08 0.9

120

23

2.5

118 23 4.1

115 121 5.1

149 51 1.3

110 113 2.7

108 112 3.6

112 118 5.2

110 114 3.6

108 115 6.3

110 118 7.0

105 09 3.7

102

06

3.8

110

99

10.5

109 13 3.6

105 112 6.5

98 102 4.0

113 116 2.6

106 111 4.6

104 110 5.6

108 115 6.3

102 110 7.5

Page 4

of8

SDG

1.0.: GAJ36104

MS MSDup

Rec% Rec%

73

78

86 88

75 79

90 71

83

87

80 82

91 95

79 82

93 91

84 88

74 77

75

50

93

99

85

87

82 98

89

89

84 81

95 94

84 82

82 85

93

94

88 92

119 114

92 95

84

90

89 91

92 95

87 87

81 82

85 85

86

85

70

63

89

93

86 92

86 89

87 88

90

95

94

97

92

96

84

88

RPD

6.6

2.3

5.2

23.6

4.7

2.5

4.3

3.7

2.2

4.7

4.0

40.0

6.3

2.3

17.8

0.0

3.6

1.1

2.4

3.6

1.1

4.4

4.3

3.2

6.9

2.2

3.2

0.0

1.2

0.0

1.2

10.5

4.4

6.7

3.4

1.1

5.4

3.1

4.3

4.7



Parameter


Trichloroethene


Vinyl chloride

% 1,2-dichlorobenzene-d4

% Bromofluorobenzene

% Dibromofluoromethane

QA/QC Data

Blank

ND

ND

ND

ND

99

93

106

LCS LCSD LCS

% %

RPD

113 00 12.2

106 i l3 6.4

120 126 4.9

124 20 3.3

104 102 1.9

104

02

1.9

106

%Toluene-dB 100 100

104

00

1.9

0.0

QAJQC

Batch

81073, Sample

No:

AJ35916

(AJ36114,

AJ36115, AJ36116)

Volatiles

Organics

1, 1, 1,2-Tetrachloroethane

I, ,1-Trichloroethane

1,1 ,2,2-

Tetrachloroethane

1,1 ,2-Trichloroethane

1, 1-Dichloroethane

1, 1-Dichloroethene

1,1-Dichloropropene


1,2,3-Trichloropropane

1,2.4-Trichlorobenzene

1 2 4-Trimethylbenzene


1,2-Dichlorobenzene

1 2-Dichloroethane

I

,2-Dichloropropane


1,3-Dichlorobenzene

1,3-Dichloropropane

1,4-Dichlorobenzene

2,2-Dichloropropane

2-Chlorotoluene

4-Chlorotoluene

Benzene

Bromobenzene

Bromochloromethane


Bromoform

Bromomethane


Chlorobenzene

Chloroethane

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

109

114

102

109

>130

122

113

95

<70

102

i l2

96

106

i l2

113

113

ilO

ilO

105

93

ilO

i l2

i l6

107

105

i l l

104

85

i l3

112

104

Page

5 of8

101

07

88

85

02

107

i l2

89

<70

93

i l6

80

97

89

98

123

106

94

102

90

i l7

i l6

i l l

103

83

92

82

06

119

108

131

7.6

6.3

14.7

24.7

NC

13.1

0.9

6.5

NC

9.2

3.5

18.2

8.9

22.9

14.2

8.5

3.7

15.7

2.9

3.3

6.2

3.5

4.4

3.8

23.4

18.7

23.7

22.0

5.2

3.6

23.0

SDG J.D.: GAJ36104

MS

MSDup

Rec% Rec%

82 67

97 101

99

94

98

88

101 101

100 101

103

98

109

113

106

114

>130

126

114

93

<70

99

110

98

105

112

115

109

107

108

104

73

110

106

114

106

107

i l2

101

77

129

110

101

100

99

104

110

95

95

107

114

117

89

<70

93

116

76

99

96

101

120

105

98

105

74

i l4

113

112

103

85

97

87

85

119

110

i l7

RPD

20.1

4.0

5.2

10.8

0.0

1.0

3.0

1.0

4.7

2.7

10.9

18.2

NC

10.0

2.6

4.4

NC

6.3

5.3

25.3

5.9

15.4

13.0

9.6

1.9

9.7

1.0

1.4

3.6

6.4

1.8

2.9

22.9

14.4

14.9

9.9

8.1

0.0

14.7



Parameter

Chloroform

Chloromethane

cis-1.2-Dichloroethene

cis-1

,3-Dichloropropene


Dibromoethane

Dibromomethane


Ethylbenzene

Hexachlorobutadiene

Isopropylbenzene

m&p-Xylene

Methyl t-butyl ether

(MTBE)

Methylene chloride

n-Butylbenzene

n-Propylbenzene

Naphthalene

a-Xylene

p-lsopropyltoluene

sec-Butylbenzene

Styrene

tert-Butylbenzene

Tetrachloroethene

Toluene



Trichloroethene


Vinyl chloride

%

1,2-dichlorobenzene-d4

%

Bromofluorobenzene

%

Dibromofluoromethane

Toluene-dB

QA/QC Data

Blank

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

102

93

97

101

LCS

%

Ill

>130

112

105

108

107

107

>130

116

107

123

117

115

124

115

114

100

114

119

109

110

116

113

114

119

103

112

117

>130

98

103

93

100

Comment:

LFB

was

analyzed with this batch instead

of

MS/MSD.

QAJQC

Batch

80919,

Sample

No:

AJ35959

(AJ36114, AJ36115, AJ36116)

Polynuclear Aromatic HC

2-Methylnaphthalene

Acenaphthene

Acenaphthylene

Anthracene

Benz(a)anthracene

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

96

102

101

101

110

Page 6 of8

LCSD

LCS

% RPD

99

11.4

118

NC

95 16.4

85 21.1

92 16.0

84 24.1

86

21.8

>130

NC

122 5.0

07

0.0

>130 NC

120 2.5

94 20.1

94

27.5

23 6.7

26

10.0

85 16.2

112 1.8

30 8.8

119 8.8

04 5.6

127 9.1

120 6.0

i l l 2.7

03

14.4

81

23.9

110 1.8

115 1.7

125

NC

95 3.1

99 4.0

82 12.6

100 0.0

94

95

99

97

09

2.1

7.1

2.0

4.0

0.9

SDG J.D.: GAJ36104

MS MSDup

Rec%

Rec%

109

101

96

98

110 102

99

85

104 90

110

90

110 92

92

89

114 122

106 102

111 124

115 120

117 103

124 103

110 118

110 122

96

87

111 114

112 123

113 124

110 108

113 124

112 121

115 113

119 107

97 81

115 113

117 118

108 105

100 95

104 99

94 87

101 99

RPD

7.6

2.1

7.5

15.2

14.4

20.0

17.8

3.3

6.8

3.8

11.1

4.3

12.7

18.5

7.0

10.3

9.8

2.7

9.4

9.3

1.8

9.3

7.7

1.8

10.6

18.0

1.8

0.9

2.8

5.1

4.9

7.7

2.0



QA/QC

Data

SDG

I. D.:

GAJ36104

LCS LCSD LCS

MS

MSDup

Parameter

Blank

% % RPD

Rec% Rec%

RPD

Benw(a)pyrene

NO 100 99 1.0

Benzo(b)fluoranthene NO

I l l

108 2.7

Benzo(ghi)perylene

NO

112 108 3.6


NO

109

107 1.9

Chrysene

NO

I l l

109

1.8

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene

NO

120 116 3.4

Fluoranthene NO

117

111

5.3

Fluorene

NO

105

102 2.9

lndeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene

NO

115 111 3.5

Naphthalene

NO

92

92 0.0

Phenanthrene

NO

105 00 4.9

Pyrene

NO 114 09 4.5

% 2-Fluorobiphenyl

93

96

94 2.1

% Nitrobenzene-d5

97

90

114 23.5

%

Terphenyl-d14

119 110 106 3.7

Comment: A LCS and LCS Duplicate were performed instead of a matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate.

QAJQC

Batch 80927,

Sample

No: AJ36111

(AJ36104,

AJ36105,

AJ36109, AJ36111)

Polxchlorinated Bighenxls

PCB-1016

NO

96

95 1.0 115

90

24.4

PCB-1221

NO

PCB-1232

NO

PCB-1242

NO

PCB-1248

ND

PCB-1254

ND

PCB-1260

ND

87

84 3.5

• • NC

PCB-1262

ND

PCB-1268

ND

%

DCBP (Surrogate

Rec)

41

71

74 4.1

50 73 37.4

%

TCMX (Surrogate

Rec)

50

63

60 4.9

63

58 8.3

Comment:

*Due to the presence of PCBs in the sample, aroclor 1260 is not reported for the MS/MSD.

QAJQC

Batch

81407, Sample

No:

AJ37148

(aj36114,

aj36115,

aj36116)

MA-VPH

1,2,4-trimethylbenzene

ND

100

98

2.0

100 102 2.0

2-methylpentane

ND

100

102 2.0

74

92

21.7

Benzene ND

100 94 6.2 102 98 4.0

Ethylbenzene

NO

106

92

14.1 108 102

5.7

Iso-octane

NO

100

04 3.9 112 117 4.4

m&p-xylene ND

103

102

1.0 107 104 2.8

n-butylcyclohexane

130

120 8.0

n-nonane

(C9)

ND

84

80

4.9 126 122 3.2

n-pentane

(C5)

ND

112 114 1.8

Page

7

of8



OA/QC Data

SDG .D.: GAJ36104

LCS

LCSD

LCS MS MSDup

Parameter

Blank

% %

RPD Rec% Rec%

naphthalene

NO

114

108

5.4 88

92

a-xylene

NO

102 98 4.0 102 100

tert-butylmethyl

ether

(MTBE)

NO

96 94 2.1 84 80

Toluene NO

102

96

6.1

106

102

% 2,5-dibromotoluefle

93 94 90 4.3

121

123

If there

are

any questions

regarding

this data, please call Phoenix C lient Services at extension 200.

RPD

- Relative Percent Difference

LCS - Laboratory Control

Sample

LCSD -

Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate

MS -

Matrix

Spike

MS

Dup

-

Matrix Spike Duplicate

NC - No

Criteria

~ ~ , ~ ~ -

ugust 08, 2007

Page 8

of8

RPD

4.4

2.0

4.9

3.8

1.6



Title:

MADEP MCPResponse Action Analytical Report Certification Form

Laboratory

Name: Phoenix Environmental laboratories, Inc.

Project#:

Project Location:

CREME

MADEP RTN1:

This

Form

provides certifications for he following

data

set: [l ist laboratory Sample

ID

Number(s))

AJ36104,AJ36105,AJ36106,AJ36107,AJ36108,AJ36109,AJ36110,AJ36111,AJ36112,AJ36113,AJ36114,AJ36115,

AJ36116

Sample Matrices:

0

Groundwater

[0' Soil/Sediment

0

Drinking Water

DOther:

MCPSW-846

0s260B D 8151A

D

8330

[ 3"60108

[i2(7470Al1A

Methods

Used

i:its27oc D

8061A

DVPH

D 6020

D 9014M2

1

As specified

in MADEP

Compendium of

10

8082

D 80218

i1 EPH

D 7000S3

D 7196A

Analytical

Methods.

1 List Release Tracking Number (RTN}, i f

known

(check

all

that apply)

2M- SW-846 Method 9014 or

MADEP

Physiologically Available Cyanide (PAC) Metho

3 S - SW-846 Methods 7000 Series List

indiVidual

method

and

analyte

An affirmative response to questions A,

B,

C and D is required for "Presumptive Certainty" status

A Were all samples received by the laboratory

in

a condition consistent

~ Y e s

hat described on the Chain-of-Custody documentation for the data set?

D No

B Were all

QNQC

procedures required for the specified analytical method(s)

r;:;r'Yes

D No

included in this report followed, including the requirement to note and

.

discuss in a narrative QC data that did not meet appropriate performance

standards or guidelines?

c

Does the analytical data included in this report meet all the requirements for

"Presumptive Certainty", as described in Section 2.0 (a), (b), (c) and (d) of

l i tves

DNa

the MADEP document CAM VII

A,

"Quality Assurance and Quality Control

Guidelines for the c q u i s ~ i o n and Reporting

of

Analytical Data"?

D VPH and EPH Methods only:

Was

the VPH

or

EPH Method conducted

without significant modifications (see Section 11.3

of

respective Methods)

DYes ila'No

A

response to questions E and F below is required for "Presumptive Certainty" status

E Were all QC performance standards and recommendations for the specffied

methods achieved?

DYes

lB No

F Were results for all analyte-list compounds/elements for the specified

l 'fYes DNa

method(s) reported?

All

negative responses

must

be

addressed

in an

attached

Environmentaf

Laboratory

case

naffative.

I, the undersigned, attest under the pains and penalties ofperjury that, based upon my personal

inquiry of hose responsible

for

obtaining the information, the material contained in this analytical

report s, to the best

of my

knowledge and belief, accurate and complete.

1 Authorized

lf ..11+LfJ

.v

J < . . . / ~ IJM.PfJ

Date: Wednesday, August

as:

2007

ignature:

Printed Name: Kathleen Cressia

Position: QNQC Officer

Printed Name: Phyllis Shiller Position: laborato ry Director

CAM VII A, rev. 3.2

April2004

Page 1 of 1



Environmental

Laboratories, Inc.

587

East Middle Turnpike,

P.O.Box 370,

Manchester, CT

06040

Tel.

(860) 645-1102

Fax

(860) 645·0823

MCP Certification

Report

August

08, 2007

EPH Narration

Were all QA/QC perfor mance criteria specified in the MADEP document CAM achieved? Yes.

Instrument: Au-fid2 08/03/07-1 IAJ36114. AJ36115. AJ36116l

A six level calibrati on was performed. All RSDs were within limits.

The

continuing

calibration standards

were

within control limits.

SDG

I.D.: GAJ36104

SampleS 36114-36122 we re

not extracted using the

EPH

method. Only

one liter

of

sample was provided for

the

analysis

of

semi

volatiles and EPH.

The

semi-volatile SIM extract was exchanged, concentrated, and fractionated to yield extracts suitable for EPH

analysis. For samples 36114-36116, only the fractionation surrogate was added to this sample, therefore,

o-terphenyl

and o-COD

are not reported.

Printed Name

Position:

Date:

Johanna Harrington

Chemist

8/3/2007

All LCS recoveries were within 40- 140

with

the following exceptions: None .

All LCSD

recoveries were within

40

-140

with

the following exceptions: None.

All MS recoveries were within

40.

140 with the following exceptions: None.

All MSD recoveries were within 40 - 140 with the following exceptions: None.

A matrix effect is suspected when a MS/MSD recovery is outside of criteria. No further action is required if 80% ofLCS LCSD

compounds are within criteria.

I attest under the pains

and

penalties of

peljury

that, based

upon

my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for

obtaining the information,. the material contained

in

this report is, to the

best

of

my

knowledge and belief, accurate and complete.

Mercury

Narration

Were all QNQC performance criteria specified in the

MADEP

document

CAM

achieved? Yes.

Instrument:

Merlin 07131107-1 IAJ36104, AJ36105 AJ36106, AJ36107,

AJ36 08

AJ36109,

AJ36110 AJ36111 AJ36112 AJ36113, AJ36198, AJ36199)

The

method preparation blank contains all of the acids and reagents as the samples; the instrument blanks do not.

The initial calibration

met

all

criteria

includinga standard

run

at or below

the

reporting level.

All calibration verification standards (ICV, CCV) met criteria.

All calibrati on blankverification standards (ICB, CCB) met criteria.

The matrix

spike sample

is

used

to

identify spectral

interfernce

for

each batch

of

samples,

i f

within

85-115%.

no interference

is

observed and no furtheraction

is

taken.

Printed Name

RJck

Schweitzer

Position: Chemist

Date: 7/3112007

Page l o f8



Environmental Laboratories,

Inc.

587

East

Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370

1

Manchester, CT 06040

Tel.

(860) 645-1102

Fax

(860) 645-0823

MCP Certification Report

August 08, 2007

All LCS recoveries were within 80 - 120 with the following exceptions: None.

All

LCSD recoveries were within 80 R 120

with

the fol_lowing exceptions: None.

All MS recoveries were

within

80 - 120 with the following ex-ceptions: None.

All MSD recoveries were within 80 - 120 with

the

following exceptions: None.

SDG J.D.: GAJ36104

A

matrix

effect

is

suspected

when

a MSJMSD recovery

is

outside

of

criteria. No

further

action

is required

if

80%

of

LCS LCSD

compounds

are

within criteria.

I attestunder the pains

and

penalties ofpetjury that. based

upon my

inquiry of those individua1s imme diately responsible for

obtaining the information, the material contained in this

report

is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, accurate and complete.

ICP N arration

Wr;rre

all

QAIQC performance

criteria

specified in the MADEP document CAM achieved? Yes.

Instrument:

lcp7 08/06/07-1 (AJ3611ll


met

criteria.

The continuing calibration standards met criteria for all the elements reported. The linear range is defmed daily by the calibration

range.

The

continuing calibration blanks were less than the reporting level for the elements reported.

The ICSA and ICSAB were analyz ed at the

beginning and end

of

the

run

and

were within criteria.

Printed Name Emily Kolominskaya

Position: Chemist

Date: 8/6/2007

Instrument:

IeoS 07/27/07-1

CAJ36114.

AJ36115. AJ361 6\


met

criteria.

The continuing calibration standards met criteria for all the elements reported. The linear range is def"med daily

by

the calibration

range.

The continuing calibration blanks were less than the reporting level for the elements reported.

The ICSA and ICSAB were analyzed

at

the

beginning

and end of the run

and



Position: Chemist

Date: 7/27/2007

Instrument:

Iw8 07/31107-1 (AJ36104. AJ36 05. AJ36106. AJ36 07. AJ36 08. AJ36 09

AJ36110. AJ36lll. AJ361 2. AJ361 3. AJ36 98. AJ36 99)

The

initial

calibration met criteria.

The continuing calibration standards met criteria for all the elements reported. The linear range is def"med daily by the calibration

range.

The continuing calibration blanks were less than the reporting level for the elements reported.

The

ICSA

and

ICSAB were analyzed at

the

beginning

and

end of the

run and


Page2

of8



Environmental

Laboratories, Inc.

587 East Middle Turnpike. P.O.Box 370,

Manchester,

CT 06040

TeL (860) 645·1102

Fax

(860) 645-0828


August

08, 2007

Printed Name

Position:

Date:

Instrument:

Emily Kolominskaya

Chemist

7/31/2007

cpS 08/01/07-1 fAJ3611

ll

The initial calibration met criteria.

SDG

I.D.: GAJ36104

The continuing

calibration

standards

met

criteria

for all

the

elements

reported.

The linear range

is defmed

daily

by the

calibration

range.

The continuing calibration blanks were less than the reporting level for

the

elements reported.

The ICSA and ICSAB were analyzed at the

beginning

and

end

of the run and were

within criteria


Position: Chemist

Date: 8/1/2007

Instrument:

IeoS 08/03/07-1 (AJ3611 L AJ37997l

The

initial

ca1ibration

met

criteria.

The continuing calibration standards

met

criteria for all

the

elements reported. The

linear range

is def'med

daily by the

calibration

range.

The

continuing calibrationblanks were less

than the

reporting level for the elements reported.

The

ICSAand ICSAB were analyzed at the begimring

and end

of

the

run

and



Position: Chemist

Date: 8/3/2007

All LCS recoveries were

within

75 • 125 with

the

following exceptions: Selenium

All LCSD recoveries were within 75 • 125 with

the


All MS recoveries were within 75 • 125 with the following exceptions: Antimony, Arsenic, Beryllium, Boron, Cadmium, Ch romium,

Cobalt, Molybdenum, Nickel, Phosphorus, Selenium, Tin,

VanadiUm,

Zinc

All MSD recoveries were within 75 - 125 with the following exceptions: Antimony, Arsenic, Beryllium, Boron, Chromium, Cobalt,

Molybdenum, Nickel, Phosphorus, Selenium, Vanadium, Zinc

A

matrix

effect is suspected when a MS/MSD recovery is outside of criteria. No further action is required if 80% ofLCS LCSD

compounds

are

within

criteria.

I attest under the pains

and

penalties of perjury

that,

based upon my inquiry of those individuals immedi ately responsible for

obtaining

the

information, the material contained

in this

report

is, to

the best of my knowledge

and

belief, accurate

and

complete.

PAHSIM

Narration

Were all QA/QC performance criteria .specified in the MADEP document

CAM

achieved? Yes.

Page3of8



Environmental

Laboratories, Inc.

587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06040

Tel.

{860} 645-1102

Fax

{860} 645·0623

MCP

Certification Report

August 08, 2007

Instrument: Chem04 07131/07-1 CAJ36114 AJ36115 AJ36116l

SDG

J.D.: GAJ36104

The client requested

P

AH/base

neutral

compou nds only. Phoeni x utilized a method

that

contained a shortened list of base

neutral

only compounds, CCCs, SPCCs

and

surrogates.

In order

to

achieve the the requested detection levels, the samples were analyzed by selective

ion

monitoring (SIM) mode.

The DDT breakdown

and

pentachlorophenol

&

benzidine peak tailing were not evaluated in

the

DFTPP tune.

Initial Calibration(Chem04/SIM_0731}:

All

base

neutra1 SPCCs, CCCs

and >90%

of

arget

compounds

met criteria The

following

base

neutral

compounds

had

%RSDs

>SO%: none

Continuing Calibration:

All SPCCs, CCCs

and

>90% of

target

compounds met criteria. The following compoun ds

had

%Ds >20%:

Printed Name

Position:

Date:

Keith Aloisa

Chemist

7/31/2007

QC Comments: QC Batch 80919 07/27/07 CAJ36114. AJ36115. AJ361 16l

A LCS

and

LCS Duplicate were

performed

instead of a matrix spike

and

matrix spike duplicate.

All LCS recoveries were within 20 130

with

the following exceptions: None .

All LCSD recoveries were

within

20 - 130

with

the


All MS recoveries were within 20 - 130 with the following exceptions: Non e.

All MSD recoveries were within 20 - 130 with the following exceptions: Non e.

A matrix effect is suspected when a MS/MSD recovery is outside of criteria. No further action is required

if

80% ofLCSJLCSD

compounds

are

within criteria.

I attest

under

the pains

and

penalties of

perjury

that, based upon my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for

obtaining

the information, the

material contained in this report

is, to the best

of my

knowledge

and

belief, accurate and complete.

PCB Narration

Were all QA/QC performan ce criteria specified in the MADEP document CAM achieved? Yes.

Instrument:

Au-ecd8 OWJ/07-1 CAJ36105l

8082 Narration:

The initial calibration RSD for the

compound list

was less than 20%.

The continuing calibration standards were within acceptance criteria.

Printed Name Johanna Harrington

Position: Chemist

Date: 7/31/2007

Page4of8




587 East

Middle

Turnpike, P.O.Box

370,

Manchester, CT

06040

Tel.

(860) 645-1102

Fax

(860)

645-0828


August

08, 2007

SDG

I.D.:

GAJ36104

Instrument:

Au-ecd8 08/01107-1 IAJ36 11 AJ36784l

8082 NBITation:

The initial calibrati on RSD for the compound list was less than 20%.

The continuing calibration standards were within acceptance criteria.

Printed Name Johanna Harrington

Position: Chemist

Date:

8/1/2007

QC Comments: QC Batch 80927 07127107 (AJ36104. AJ36105. AJ36109. AJ36111l

*Due to the presence of PCBs in the sample, aroclor 1260 is

not

reported for the MS MSD.


All LCSD recoveries were within 30 - 130

with

the


All MS recoveries were within 30 - 130 with the foJlowing exceptions: None.

All MSD recoveries were with in

30-

130 with the following exceptions: None.

A

matrix

effect is suspected when a MSJMSD recovery is outside of criteria.

No further

action is

required if

80% ofLCS/LCSD

compounds

are

within criteria.

I atte13t under the pains

and

penalties of perjury that, based

upon

my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for

obtaining the information, the material contained in this report

is,

to the best ?f my knowledge

and

belief, accurate arid complete.

SVOASIM Narration

Were all QNQC performance criteria specified in the MADEP document CAM achieved? Yes.

QC Comments:

OC Batch 80919 07/27107 (AJ36114 AJ361 5. AJ36116)

A LCS and LCS Duplicate were performed

instead of

a

matrix

spike

and matrix

spike duplicate.

Page5of8



Environmental

Laboratories,

Inc.

587

East

Middle

Turnpike, P.O.Box 370,

Manchester,

CT 06040

Tel.

(860) 645-1102

Fax

(860) 645-0823


August

08, 2007

SDG J.D.: GAJ36104


All LCSD recoveries were within 20 -130 with

the


All

MS recoveries were

within

20 - 130 with

the

following exceptions:

None.

All MSD recoveries were

within

20 - 180

with


A

matrix effect

is

suspected

when

a MS MSD recovery is

outside o f criteria.

No

further action

is

required

if

80%

of

LCS/LCSD

compounds are

within

criteria.

I attest under the pains and penalties

of

perjury that, based upon.my inquiry

of

those individuals immediately responsible for

obtaining the information, the material contained in this report is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, accurate and complete.

VOA Narration

Were all QNQC performance

criteria

specified in the MADEP

document

CAM achieved? Yes.

Instrument:

Chem03 07127/07-1 IAJ3 6112. AJ36113. AJ36198. AJ36199l

Initial Calibration

Verificati on (chem03/1110):

All SPCCs, CCCs and >80%

of

target compounds met criteria.

The fo11owing compounds

had

%RSDs >30%: None

Continuing Calibration Verification:

All SPCCs, CCCs

and >80%

of target compounds met criteria. Internal

standards

were within the 50%-200% deviation

from the

initial

calibration.

The following compounds had% Deviations >30%:

Printed Name

Positio.n:

Date:

Johanna Harrington

Chemist

7/27/2007

Instrument:

ChemOS 07127/07-1 IAJ36114. AJ36115.

AJ361 6)

This instrument is

set

up

with

a dual auto sampler Gabe1ed R and 8)

R

.Side

Initial CalibratiDn (062007)

' All SPCCs, CCCs

and

>80% of target compounds met criteria.

Continuing

Calibration Verification:

All

SPCCs, CCCs

and

>80%

of

target

compounds

met

criteria.

Internal standards

were

within

the

50%-200%

deviation from

the

initial calibration.

The

following compounds had % Deviations >30%:

S-Side

Initial Calibration (062007)

All SPCCs, CCCs and >80%

of

target compounds met criteria.

Page6of8



Environmental

Laboratories, Inc.

587 East

Middle Tum.pike,

P.O.Box 370,

Manchester,

CT 06040

Tel.

(860) 645-1102

Fax

(860) 645-0823


August 08, 2007

SDG J.D.:

GAJ36104

Continuing Calibration Verification:

All SPCCs, CCCs ap_d >80%

of target

compounds

met

criteria. Internal standards were within

the

50%-200% deviation from

the

initial

calibration.

The following compounds had% Deviations >30%: Chloroethane, Acetone, Acrylonitrile, Tetrahydrofuran (THF) Bromomethane,

Naphthalene, 1,2,3-Tricblorobenzene

Printed Name Raman Makol

Position: Chemist

Date:

7/27/2007

All LCS recoveries were within 70-130

with the

following exceptions: l,l-Dichlo roethane,l,2,3 -Trichloropropane, Chloromethane,

Dichlorodifluoromethane, Vmy1 chloride

All LCSD recoveries were

within

70 - 130 with

the

following exceptions: 1,2,3-Trichloropropane, Chloroethane,

Dichlorodifluoromethane, Isopropylbenzene

All

MS

recoveries were with in 70 w 130 with the following exceptions: 1,1-Dichloroethane, 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene, 1,2,3-

Trichloropropane, 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene

All MSD recoveries were within 70 - 130 with

the

following exceptions: 1,1-Dichloroethane, 1,2,3-Trichloropropane , 1,2,4-

Trichlorobenzene, Bromo methane, Naphthalene, trans-1,3-Dichloropropene

A

matr ix effect is suspected when a MS/MSD recovery is outs ide of

criteria

No

further

action is

required i f

80%

of

LCS/LCSD

compounds

are

within

criteria.

I attest

under the

pains and penalties

of

perjury

that,

based upon my inquiry

of


obtaining the information, the material contained

in

this report is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, accurat e and complete.

VPH Narration

Were all

QNQC

performance c riteria specified

in

the MADEP document

CAM

achieved? Yes.

Instrument:

Pid-fid 08/03/07-1 (AJ361l4,

AJ36ll5,

AJ36ll6l

A five level calibra tion was performed. All RSDs were within limits.

The continu ing calibration standards were within control limits.

Printed Name Raman Makol

Position:

Date:

Chemist

8/3/2007

Page 7of8



Environmental

Laboratories,

Inc.

587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06040

Tel.

(860) 645-1102

Fax

(860) 645-0823

MCP

Certification Report

August 08, 2007

SDG I.D.: GAJ36104

All LCS

recoveries were

within 70 - 130 with the following exceptions: None.

All LCSD recoveries were within 70 - 130 with the following exceptions: None.

All MS recoveries were within 70 - 130 with the following exceptions: None.

All MSD recoveries wer e

within

70 - 130

with


A

matrix

effect

is

suspected

when

a MS/MSD recovery

is

outside

of

criteria.

No

further

action is

required

if

80%

of

LCS/LCSD

compounds are within criteria.

I attest

under the

pains and penalties

ofpetjury

that, based upon my inquiry

of


obtaining the information, the material contained in this report is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, ac_curate and o m p l e t e ~

Page8of8



•,:'.

D L J f l l J l \ T T V ~

CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD

-£

1 1V Dl \ ' . lA

587

East Middle Turnpike, P.O.

Box 370,

Manchester,

CT

06040

Environmental L a b o r a t o r i e s ~ Inc. E m a i l : s e ~ i c e @ p h o e n i x l a b s . c a m

Fax (860)

64S..Qa

23

Chen Services (860) 645·8726

Customer:

V C

\ Project:

- - - ' ~ · ~ r ~ . _ , , _ _ , . . . = " " - ~ - - ; - - - - , - - - - - - -

Address: /Of

w

.

,

..

v-1-

z;-, . . ; :>

'

Pro

1

, Report

to:

M'

': ; &:>•'"" }

0

,., ,

p

" " " ' ~ , . . , ~ "

N\A Oa'-f-r I lnvoiceto Ol ln M« -<'L'olf F:

Client Sample -lnfonnation -Identification

Sampler's

Signature

M 6----==-

Date

7/"•(tY":

Matrix Code:

DW=drinklng water

GW=groundwater

Phoenix

Sa(flpje#

WW=wastewater S=soil/solid O=other

SL=sludge

A=air

Customer Sample

Identification

Sample

Matrix

Analysis

Request

,

3G

I ( )L/

?>- (

?;

7/).t) ifOOO II>< I <I')( I IX

-?-,to

o<:

s ~ - =<'

'l''15lYIX' lx'

2.G tOG

5 - ?

l&li>ll

Ixi

x

X

?in

i)r

$

>

-t.f

'1:1$11

lx

X

3 ~ 0 8 '

IL-.M-1 (0 -1 )

l fOO

'XIX

3 l J t ( ) ~ ~ ~ l

,17 1). ~ v

l-7

15<><111 ><J{

lx

11'

30> II c;--- I

v

1+6 -11,; 1 (

th J )

/0000

.

XIX

:Sio/11

lvl113-to.< { o - ~ )

fl.r.v

c

'ilx

lx

?,(,I I ? ~ Iv ti/1- j_c> I (t->-17)

j_O)t

I X I ) ( ~

r::>,G/1 '?,lvHg

-1o:l

(

~ ~ - P ) I \M

-¥

l , ~ . r , c .

I

lx

)(

Rellnauished_b_y:

I _

Accepted bY:

I

O_ate:

I

Time: IIuma_round;

I ¥ ~ ~

leW>

~ , ~ ~ 7 r · o ,

I a : ~

--.

r-

Q ) " '-

/&,

,3<)

0

3Days

·

C/

Standard

£

MA

D RCP cart. ~ MCP

D

GW Protect.

rB

GW

D GA Mobility 1EJ GW

D GB Mobility

~ S f ]

GW

D SW Proteot 1KJ S,1

0

Res.

Vol.

[k]

S-2

0 Ind. Vol.

fi(]

$-3

:omments, Special Requirements or Regulations: ~ Other

<? v > - r ' ~ f • - e J

{v-ea<;.t_ I.At;e ;;;pO

1--o

/1

i

< - . - ~ >

•

< .l-,.h: ~ G

r

--

+

r :

t

I [;.)I q, (/'(_ <;

f-\ "' " s-

•

• S ~ R C H A R G E D

Res.

Criteria 0 MW

.,.APPLIES

D Other 0 Othe

f<.

b

c k

;or• J-e c 1l ,

{

.;",'\

""1'1) ( ,0 -Jb J s t a ~ w h e r e s a m p l e s w e r e c o l l e c t e d :

:..Jkt;.j....,.,..-t:tY



\ J ~ P l O E N I X .

CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD

587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O. Box 370, Manchester, CT 06040

Environmental

Laboratories, Inc.

Email: [email protected] Fax (860) 645-0823

Client.Services (860) 645-8726

c ~ _ . . . , _

Customer: V \J.J?

Address:

f t? l

t.....

a. I"'

-1- < ; ~ 4

M

'l .

Report to: l ~ 1$4 '£1-ql"\'

Col"

k,.

1-o

... " VIA- 0

~ 4

"7

(

Invoice

to:

O.e _ L _ " - f _ _ ~ ~ S

• . /

f ,

Client Sample Information Identification

Sampler's

Signature

Matrix Code:

ALAR. _

........--

.....

Date "ii/.1?/o

Analysis

Request

u v v ~ a r i n k i n g water WW=wastewater S=soll/solid O=other

=<>li•rln"' A=alr

Phoenix Customer Sample

I

ample I Date I Time

I

~ f t ( J } j . C /

Matrix

Sampled

S a m p l e d V ~ :jt

?), , i

1'-'i I I 4-R- I

D

l6w 1-'/-<Giwt-II'YIYIYIY

--:slof I (

I

( + / 3 - I O ~ IMO

~ V k - 1

ilx:

·::; l.r.o

I i ~ T £'I

.?.-

1

_.ILL/..._ Ii'""' II

' f

lv I 1< LJ<:

f

I··.

., .

l=

'"

1-

.

I;

I''

Pro

Pho

Fax

I

Date:

j_ .

Time:. I urnaround:

ICT/Rt IMA

7/017/0.+ /fbQ{J

Day•

0 RCPCert. E'lJ M.C

- a ~

I bv:

i _ ~ ~

oU y.

+·

- " ' - . f - " " - - - ' f - - - ' - - ' ; . . : : _ ~ " " " ~ ·

n

2 Days•

0

GW

Protect.

C?W

/ . . ; ~ ) ' . ";> /

~

.:

?.j)

0

3

Days•

UGA Mobility

: ~ ·

<>W

sta d d 0

GB Mobility

GW

1 1 ...

Othn

ar D. SW Protect. S-1

JComments, Special Require.r,lients

or

Regulations: 9 er 0 Res. Vol. S-2

1

.,,. .. '· 0 Ind. Vol.

~ S ~ 3

' { I

c/

) I · § u l i ¢ ~ A R G E 0 Res. Criteria D MW

r ~ . . e '-

.S '<Jil

w ~ t o ( ' ? " ' L.e

c,

;>APPLIES

0 Other D Othe

·1 17

/ - .

.,.o:···T

. - - - ~ .

·.., . J r " ~ · f j._p;-e_ · _

\ . / ' - 1 ' ' ( ; . ~ CcA ' ' S t ~ t e w h e l ' l s a l l ) p l e s w e r • . • ~ - ~ e ~ ~ . :

0#

. .

., i

.

....

.,

'



Report Date:

12-Nov-0714:16

Tetra Tech Rizzo

One Grant

Street - P.O.

Box 9005

Framingham, MA

01701

Attn:

Paula Rotenberg

Laboratoa ID

Client Samule ID

SA70267-0l

VHB-1 02-1 (0-10")

SA70267-02 VHB-1 02-2 (0-7")

SA70267-03 VHB-102-3 (0-10")

SA70267-04

VHB-1 02-4 (0-9")

SA70267-05 VHB-102-5 (0-12")

SA70267-06 VHB-102-6 (0-5")

SA70267-07 VHB-102-7 (0-7")

SA70267-08 VHB-1 02-8 (0-11 ")

SA70267-09 Dup-102607

SPECTRUM ANAL

'TICAL,

INC

Featuring

HANIBAL TECHNOLOGY

Laboratory Report

Ill

Final Report

D

Re-Issued Report

D

Revised Report

Project:

CEA

Beverly-

Beverly, MA

Project 12700961

Matrix Date Samnled

Date Received

Soil

26-0ct-07 11:55

29-0ct-07 14:10

Soil 26-0ct-07 12:10

29-0ct-07 14:10

Soil

26-0ct-07 12:25

29-0ct-07 14:10

Soil

26-0ct-07 12:35

29-0ct-07 14:10

Soil

26-0ct-07 12:55

29-0ct-0714:10

Soil

26-0ct-07

13:25

29-0ct-07

14:10

Soil

26-0ct-0713:15

29-0ct-07 14:10

Soil

26-0ct-07 13:05 29-0ct-0714:10

Soil

26-0ct-07 08:00

29-0ct-07

14:10

I attest that the information contained within the report has been reviewed for accuracy and checked agains t the quality control

requirements for each method. These results relate only to the sample(s) as received.

All applicable NELAC requirements have been met.

Please note that this report contains 11 pages

of

analytical dat a plus Chain

of

Custody document(s).

This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval from Spectrum Analytical, Inc.

Massachusetts Certifi cation# M-MA

138/MAlllO

Connecticut# PH-0777

Florida# E87600/E87936

Maine#

MA

138

Authorized by:

New

Hampshire#

2538/2972

New

Jersey#

MA0111MA012

New

York#

11393/11840

Rhode Island # 98

Hanibal C. Tayeh, Ph.D.

President/Laboratory Director

USDA# S-51435

Vermont# VT-11393

Technical Reviewer's Initial:

.e

Spectrum Analytical, Inc. is a NELAC accredit ed laboratory organi:=ation and meets NELA C testing standards. Use of he NELAC

logo however does not insure that Spectrum is currently accredited or the specific method

or

analyte indicated. Please refer to our

"Quality" web page at www.spectrum-analytical.comfor a foil listing ofour current certificaUons and ields o faccreditation. States in

which Spectrum Analytical, Inc. holds NELAC certification are New York, New Hampshire, New Jersey and Florida.

All

analytical

work for Volatile Organic and Air analysis are transferred to and conducted at our 830 Silver Street location (NH-2972, NY-11840,

FL-£87936 and NJ-MAOJ2).

Headquarters:

II Almgren D r i ~ · c & 830 Silver Street • Agawam, MA 01001 • 1-800-789-9115 • 413-789-9018 • FAX 413-789-4076

FL Dil•ision:

8180 Woodland Center Boulevard • Tampa, FL 33614 • 1-888-497-5270 • 813-888-9507 • FAX 800-480-6435

www.spectrum-analytical.com

Pagel

of



CASE

NARRATIVE:

The samples were received@ 14.8 degrees Celsius, please refer to the Chain of Custody for details specific to temperature upon

receipt. An infrared thennometer with a tolerance o f + / ~ 2.0 degrees Celsius was used immediately upon receipt of the samples.

MADEP has published a list of analytical methods (CAM) whic h provides a series of recommended protocols for the acquisition,

analysis and reporting of analytical data in support ofMCP decisions. "Presumptive Certainty" can be established only for those

methods published by the MADEP in the MCP CAM. The compounds and/or elements reported were specifically requested by the

client on the Chain

of

Custody and in some cases

may

not

include the full analyte list as defmed

in

the method.

According to WSC-CAM 5/2004 Rev.4, Table I I A-1, recovery for some VOC analytes have been deemed potentially difficult.

Although they

may

still be within the recommended 70% -130% recovery range, a range has been set based

on

historical control limits.

See below for

any

non-conformances

and

issues relating to quality control samples

and/or

sample analysis/matrix.

SW846 60108

Spikes:

7110417-MS1 Source: SA70267-05

The spike recovery was outside ofQC acceptance limits for the MS,

MSD

and/or PS due to analyte concentration at 4 times or

greater the spike concentration. The QC batch was accepted based on LCS and/or LCSD recoveries within the acceptance limits.

Lead

7110417-MSDI Source: SA70267-05

The spike recovery was outside of QC acceptance limits for the MS,

MSD

and/or PS due to analyte concentration at 4 times

or

greater the spike concentration. The QC batch was accepted based on LCS and/or LCSD recoveries within the acceptance limits.

Lead

71 10417-PS1 Source: SA70267-05

The spike recovery was outside

ofQC

acceptance limits for the MS, MSD and/or PS due to analyte concentration at 4 times

or

greater the spike concentration. The QC batch was accepted based

on

LCS and/or LCSD recoveries within the acceptance limits.

Lead

This laboratory report is not valid without an a uthorized signature on the cover page.

* Reportable Detection Limit BRL = Below Reporting Limit

Page2ofll



Samgle Identification

Client Project # Collection Dateff ime

VHB-102-1 (0-10")

Matrix

Received

SA70267-0I

12700961 Soil 26-0ct-07 11:55

29-0ct-07

CAS No.

Analyte(s)

Result Flag Units *RDL

Dilution

Method Ref. Prepared

Analyzed Batch Analyst

Semivolatile Organic Compounds by

GC

Polychlorinated BiQhenyls

by

SW846 8082

Prepared by method SW846 3545A

12674-11-2

PCB 1016

BRL

IJQ/kg dry 36.3 SW846 8082 02-Nov-07 07-Nov-07 7110256 SM

11104-28-2

PCB 1221

BRL

IJQ/kg

dry 36.3

11141-16-5

PCB 1232

BRL

IJQ/kg

dry 36.3

53469-21-9

PCB 1242

BRL

IJQ/kg dry 36.3

12672-29-6 PCB 1248 BRL

IJQ/kg dry

36.3

11097-69-1 PCB

1254

170

IJQ/kg dry 36.3

11096-82-5 PCB

1260

48.9

IJQ/kg dry 36.3

37324-23-5 PCB

1262

BRL

IJQ/kg

dry 36.3

111Q0-14-4

PCB

1268

BRL

IJQ/kg

dry

36.3

Surrogate recoveries:

10386-84-2

4,4-DB-Octafluorobipheny/ (Sr)

35

30-150%

2051-24-3

Decachforobiphenyl (Sr) 120

30-150%

Total Metals by EPA 6000nooo Series Methods

7439-92-1

Lead

297

mg/kgdry

1.82

SW846 60108

06-Nov-07 08-Nov-07 7110417

TBG

General Chemistry Parameters

%Solids

76.9

% SM2540 G Mod. 05-Nov-07 05-Nov-07 7110310

DBM

Samule Identification

Client Project #

Matrix Collection Datef f ime

VHB-102-2 (0-7")

Received

SA70267-02

12700961

Soil

26-0ct-07 12:10

29-0ct-()7

CAS No.

Analyte(s) Result Flag Units *RDL

Dilution

Metho d Ref. Prepared


Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC

Polychlorinated

BiQhenyls

by SW846 8082


12674-"11-2

PCB 1016

BRL

IJQ/kg dry

34.7 SW846 8082 02-Nov-07

07-Nov-07 7110256

SM

11104-28-2

PCB

1221

BRL

IJQ/kg

dry

34.7

11141-16-5

PCB 1232

BRL IJQ/kg dry 34.7

53469-21-9

PCB 1242

BRL

IJQ/kg

dry

34.7

12672-29-6

PCB

1248

BRL IJQ/kg

dry

34.7

11097-69-1 PCB

1254

BRL IJQ/kg dry

34.7

11096-82-5 PCB 1260 BRL IJQ/kg dry

34.7

37324-23-5

PCB 1262 BRL

IJQ/kg

dry 34.7

11100-14-4 PCB

1268

BRL

IJQ/kg

dry 34.7


10386-84-2

4,4-DB-Octafluorobiphenyl (Sr) 35

30-150%

2051-24-3

Decachlorobiphenyl (Sr) 70

30-150%

Total Metals by EPA 60oonooo Series Methods

7439-92-1

Lead

113

mg/kg dry

1.53

SW846 60108 0 6 - N o v ~ 0 7 0 8 ~ N o v - 0 7 7110417 TBG

General Chemistry

Parameters

%Solids

88.7

% SM2540 G Mod. 05-Nov-07 05-Nov-07 7110310

DBM

This laboratory report is not valid without an authorized signature on the cover page.

*

Reportable Detection Limit BRL

=Below

Reporting Limit

Page3ofll




Client Project#

Matrix Collection Dateffi me

VHB-102-3 (0-10")

Received

SA70267-03

12700961 Soil

26-0ct-07

12:25

29-0ct-07

CAS

No. Analyte(s) Result Flag Units *RDL

Dilution

Meth od Ref. Prepared


Semivolatile

Organic

Compounds by

GC

P o l ~ c h l o r i n a t e d

B i r ; h e n ~ l s

SW846 8082


12674-11-2

PCB 1016

BRL

IJQ/kg dry 31.0

SW846 8082 02-Nov-07 07-Nov-07 7110256

SM

11104-28-2

PCB

1221 BRL

IJQ/kg dry 31.0

11141-16-5 PCB 1232

BRL

)JQ/kg dry 31.0

53469-21-9 PCB 1242 BRL

jJQ/kg

dry 31.0

12672-29-6

PCB

1248

BRL

jJQ/kg dry 31.0

11097-69-1

PCB 1254

94.4

)Jg/kg dry 31.0

11096-82-5

PCB 1260

BRL

)Jg/kg dry 31.0

37324-23-5

PCB 1262

BRL

)JQ/kg dry 31.0

11100-14-4

PCB 1268

BRL

)Jg/kg dry 31.0


10386-84-2

4,4-DB-Octafluorobipheny/ (Sr) 35

30-150%

2051-24-3

Decach/orobiphenyl (Sr) 60

30-150%

Total Metals by EPA

60oonooo

Series Methods

7439-92-1

Lead

56.9

mg/kg dry 1.60

SW846 60108 06-Nov-07 08-Nov-07 7110417

TBG

General

Chemistry

Parameters

%Solids

89.0

%

SM2540 G Mod.

05-Nov-07

05-Nov-07 7110310

DBM

Samole Identification

Client Project #

Matrix Collection Dateffi me Received

VHB-102-4 (0-9")

12700961 Soil

26-0ct-07 12:35

29-0ct-07

SA70267-04

CAS

No. Analyte(s) Result Flag

Units

*RDL

Dilution

Meth od Ref. Prepared

Analyzed Batch

Analyst


P o l ~ c h l o r i n a t e d BiQhenyls

SW846

8082


12674-11-2

PCB 1016

BRL

)Jglkg dry

34.5

SW846 8082

02-Nov-07

07-Nov-07 7110256

SM

11104-28-2

PCB 1221 BRL

jJQ/kg

dry 34.5

11141-16-5

PCB 1232

BRL IJQ/kg dry

34.5

53469-21-9

PCB 1242

BRL IJQ/kg dry

34.5

12672-29-6

PCB 1248

BRL IJQ/kg dry

34.5

11097-69-1

PCB 1254

60.2 IJQ/kg

dry

34.5

11096-82-5

PCB 1260

41.3

IJQ/kg dry

34.5

37324-23-5

PCB 1262

BRL

IJQ/kg dry 34.5

11100-14-4

PCB 1268

BRL

IJQ/kg

dry 34.5

· · · ~ ~ ~ ~ ~


10386-84-2 4,

4-DB-Octaf/uorobipheny/ (Sr) 30

30-150%

2051-24-3

Decach/orobiphenyl (Sr)

70 30-150%

Total Metals by EPA

6000/7000

Series Methods

7439-92-1

Lead

501

mg/kg dry 1.64

SWB46 60108 06-Nov-07 08-Nov-07 7110417 TBG

General

Chemistry

Parameters

%Solids

83.7

% SM2540 G Mod.

05-Nov-07 05-Nov-07 7110310

DBM


* Reportable Detection Limit

BRL

=

Below Reporting Limit

Page4ofll



Samg:le Identification

Client Project#

VHB"102-5 (0-12")

Matrix

Collection

Dateffime

Received

SA70267-05

12700961

Soil

26-0ct-07 12:55

29-0ct-07

CAS

No. Analyte(s)

Result Flag

Units

•RDL

Dilution



Semivolatile Organic Co mpounds by GC

Polychlorinated BiQhenyls by

SW846 8082


12674-11-2

PCB 1016

BRL

IJQ/kg

dry

35.3 SWB46 8082 02-Nov-07 07-Nov-07 7110256

SM

11104-28-2 PCB 1221

BRL

JQ/kg dry 35.3

11141-16-5 PCB 1232

BRL

j.Jg/kg dry 35.3

53469-21-9

PCB

1242

BRL

Jg/kg dry 35.3

12672-29-6 PCB 1248

BRL

Jg/kg dry 35.3

11097-69-1

PCB

1254

256

JQ/kg

dry

35.3

11096-82-5

PCB 1260

101

Jg/kg dry 35.3

37324-23-5

PCB 1262

BRL

Jglk.g dry 35.3

11100-14-4

PCB 1268

BRL

Jglkg dry

35.3


10386-84-2

4,4:.08-0ctafluorobipheny/ (Sr)

40

30-150%

2051-24-3

Decachforobiphenyl (Sr) 125

30-150%

Total Metals by EPA

6000nooo

Series Methods

7439-92-1

Lead

929

mglkg dry 7.97

5

SWB46 60108

06-Nov-07 09-Nov-07 7110417

LR

General Chemistry

Parameters

%Solids

79.0

% SM2540 G Mod. 05-Nov-07 05-Nov-07 7110310 DBM


Client Project #

VHB-102-6 (0-5")

Matrix Collection Dateffime Received

SA70267-06

12700961 Soil

26-0ct-()7 13:25 29-0ct-()7

CAS No. Analyte(s) Resul t Flag Units

•RDL

Dilution


Analyzed Batch

Analyst


Polychlorinated BiQheny:ls

by: SW846 8082

Prepared by method

SW846

3545A

12674-11-2

PCB 1016

BRL

JQ/kg

dry 35.0

SW846 8082 02-Nov-07

07-Nov-07 7110256

SM

11104-28-2

PCB

1221

BRL

Jg/kg dry 35.0

11141-16-5

PCB 1232

BRL

Jg/kg dry 35.0

53469-21-9

PCB 1242

BRL

Jg/kg dry 35.0

12672-29-6

PCB 1248

BRL

Jg/kg dry 35.0

11097-69-1

PCB

1254

161

Jg/kg dry 35.0

11096-82-5

PCB 1260

BRL

Jg/kg dry 35.0

37324-23-5

PCB 1262

BRL JQ/kg dry

35.0

11100-14-4

PCB 1268

BRL

Jg/kg dry 35.0


10386-84-2

4,4-DB-Octaf/uorobipheny/ (Sr)

35

30-150%

2051-24-3


30-150%

Total Metals by EPA

600017000

Series Methods

7439-92-1

Lead

66.2

mglkg dry 1.66

SWB46 60108

06-Nov-07 09-Nov-07 7110417

TBG


%Solids

83.9

% SM2540 G Mod. 05-Nov-07 05-Nov-07 7110310

DBM


* Reportable Detection Limit BRL =Below Reporting Limit

Page5ofll




Client Project#

VHB-102-7 (0-7")

SA70267-07

12700961

CAS

No. Analyte(s) Result Flag Units "RDL


P o l ~ c h l o r i n a t e d B i g h e n ~ l s SW846 8082


12674·11-2

PCB

1016

BRL

Jg/kg dry 34.0

11104-28-2 PCB 1221

BRL

Jg/kg

dry 34.0

11141-16-5 PCB 1232

BRL

Jg/kg

dry 34.0

53469-21-9 PCB

1242

BRL -19/kg dry

34.0

12672-29-6

PCB 1248

BRL

IJg/kg

dry 34.0

11097-69-1

PCB

1254

47.5

IJg/kg

dry 34.0

11096-82-5

PCB 1260

BRL

IJg/kg dry

34.0

37324-23-5

PCB 1262

BRL

IJg/kg

dry

34.0

11100-14-4

PCB

1268

BRL IJQ/kg dry 34.0

- - - - - - - - - - - - -


10386--84-2

4,4-DB-Octaf/uorobiphenyl (Sr)

40

2051-24-3 Decachlorobiphenyl (Sr) 80

Total Metals by EPA 6000/7000 Series Methods

7439-92-1

Lead

Gi neral Chemistry Parameters

%Solids


VHB-102-8 (0-11")

SA70267-08

CAS No. Analyte(s)


P o l ~ c h l o r i n a t e d

B i g h e n ~ l s

by SW846 8082

Prepared by

method

SW846 3545A

12674-11-2 PCB 1016

11104-28-2

PCB

1221

11141-16-5 PCB

1232

53469-21-9

PCB

1242

12672-29-6 PCB

1248

11097-69-1

PCB 1254

11096-82-5 PCB 1260

37324-23-5

PCB 1262

11100-14-4 PCB 1268


108

85.1

Result

BRL

BRL

BRL

BRL

BRL

BRL

BRL

BRL

BRL

10386-84-2

4,4-DB-Octafluorobipheny/ (Sr) 35

2051-24-3


Total Metals by EPA 6000/7000 Series Methods

7439-92-1

Lead 72.4

General Chemistry

Parameters

%Solids

84.6

30-150%

30-150%

mg/kg dry 1.67

%

Client Project #

12700961

Flag Units

*RDL

IJQ/kg dry

34.5

IJg/kg

dry 34.5

IJg/kg dry 34.5

IJg/kg

dry 34.5

IJQ/kg dry 34.5

IJQ/kg dry 34.5

IJQ/kg dry 34.5

IJg/kg dry

34.5

IJg/kg

dry 34.5

30-150%

30-150%

mg/kg dry 1.55

%

Matrix

Collection DatefTime

Received

Soil

26-0ct-07 13:15

29-0ct-07

Dilution

Method Ref.

Prepared Analyzed Batch Analyst

SW846 8082 02-Nov-07 07-Nov-07 7110256

SM

SW846

60108

06-Nov-07 09-Nov-07 7110417 TBG

SM2540 G Mod. 05-Nov-07 05-Nov-07 7110310 DBM

Matrix

Collection Datef fime Received

Soil

26-0cHl7 13:05

29-0ct-07

Dilution Method Ref.

Prepared


SW846 8082 02-Nov-07 07-Nov-07 7110256 SM

SW846 601 OB 06-Nov-07 09-Nov-07 7110417 TBG

SM2540 G Mod. 05-Nov-07 0 5 - N o v ~ 0 7 7110310 DBM



Page6ofll



Sample Identification

Dup-102607

SA70267-09

CAS

No.

Analyte(s)


Polychlorinated Biphenyls by SW846 8082


12674-11-2

PCB

1016

11104-28-2

PCB 1221

11141-16-5

PCB

1232

53469-21-9

PCB

1242

12672-29-6

PCB

1248

11097-69-1 PCB 1254

11096-82-5

PCB

1260

37324·23-5

PCB

1262

11100·14-4 PCB 1268

- - - - - - -

Su Togate recoveries:

10386-84-2

4,4-DB-Octaf/uorobiphenyl

(Sr)

2051-24-3

Decachlorobiphenyl (Sr)

Result

BRL

BRL

BRL

BRL

BRL

63.8

53.2

BRL

BRL

30

85

Total Metals

by

EPA

60oonooo

Series Methods

7439-92-1 Lead

723


%Solids

82.4

Client Project #

12700961

Matrix

Soil

Flag

Units

*RDL

Dilution

f.Ig/kg

dry

35.5

IJg/kg

dry 35.5

f.Ig/kg

dry

35.5

f.Ig/kg dry

35.5

f.Ig/kg dry

35.5

j.Jg/kg dry 35.5

j.Jg/kg dry 35.5

IJg/kg dry

35.5

j.Jg/kg dry

35.5

30-150%

30-150%

mg/kg dry 1.71

%

Collection Dateffime

26-0ct-07 08:00

Received

29-0ct-07

Method Ref.

Prepared Analyzed Batch Analyst

SW846 8082 02-Nov-07 07-Nov-07 7110256 SM

SW846

60108

06-Nov-07 09-Nov-07 7110417 TBG

SM2540 G Mod. 05-Nov-07 05-Nov-07 7110310 OBM



Page 7

of

II



Semivolatile Organic Compounds

by

GC- Quality Control

Spike Source

o/oREC

RPD

Analyte(s) Result Flag

Units

'RDL

Level Result

%REC

Limits

RPD

Limit

Batch

7110256-

SW846 3545A

Blank (7110256-BLK1)

Prepared: 02-Nov-07 Analyzed: 06-Nov-07

PCB 1016

BRL J.Jg/kg wet 28.6

PCB 1221

BRL

tJg/kg wet 28.6

PCB 1232

BRL

tJQ/kg wet 28.6

PCB 1242 BRL JJQ/kg wet 28.6

PCB 1248 BRL JJQ/kg wet 28.6

PCB 1254 BRL

tJg/kg wet

28.6

PCB 1260 BRL

tJg/kg wet

28.6

PCB 1262 BRL ]Jglkg

wet

28.6

PCB 1268 BRL ]Jg/kg

wet

28.6

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Surrogate: 4,4-DB-Octafluorobipheny/ (Sr) 11.4 ]Jg/kg

wet

28.6

40

30-150

Surrogate: Decach/orobiphenyl (Sr)

31.4 ]JQ/kg

wet

28.6

110

30-150

LCS (7110256-8511


PCB 1016 414 ]lg/kg wet 28.6 357 116 40-140

PCB 1260

441

]lg/kg wet 28.6 357 124 40-140

Surrogate: , 4 - D B ~ O c t a f l u o r o b i p h e n y l (Sr)

10.0

]lg/kg wet

28.6

35

30-150

Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl (Sr)

31.4 ]lg/kg

wet

28.6

110

30-150

LCS Du( (7110256-8501)


PCB 1016 419 JJQ/kg wet 28.6

357 117

40-140

30

PCB 1260

447 J.Jg/kg

wet 28.6

357 125

40-140

30

Surrogate: 4,4-DB-Octanuorobipheny/ (Sr) 10.0 JJQ/kg wet

28.6 35

30-150

Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl (Sr) 28.6

]lQ/kg wet

28.6 .

100

30-150

DU( IiCate f7110256-DUP1) Sourc e: SA70476-01


PCB 1016

BRL

)Jg/kg dry 34.7

BRL 40

PCB 1221

BRL

j.Jg/kg dry 34.7

BRL 40

PCB 1232

BRL

j.JQ/kg

dry 34.7

BRL

40

PCB 1242

BRL

)Jg/kg dry 34.7

BRL

40

PCB 1248

BRL j.Jg/kg

dry 34.7

BRL 40

PCB 1254

BRL

j.JQ/kg dry

34.7

BRL

40

PCB 1260

BRL

j.JQ/kg dry 34.7

BRL

40

PCB 1262

BRL IJQ/kg

dry 34.7

BRL

40

PCB 1268

BRL

IJQ/kg dry

34.7

BRL 40

Surrogate: 4,4-DB-Octanuorobiphenyl (Sr) 15.6

IJQ/kg dry

34.7

45

30-150

Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl (Sr)

31.2

IJQ/kg

dry

34.7 90 30-150

Matrix S( ike (7110256-MS11

Source: SA70476-01


PCB 1016

511

IJQ/kg dry

33.5 418 BRL 122 40-140

PCB 1260

527

tJQ/kg dry 33.5

418 BRL

126

40-140

Surrogate: 4,4-DB-Octanuorobipheny/ (Sr) 13.4

tJg/kg

dry 33.5

40

30-150

Surrogate: Decachforobiphenyl (Sr) 38.5

IJQ/kg dry

33.5

115

30-150

Matrix S ; ike Due f7110256-MSD11 Sourc e: SA70476-01


PCB 1016

449

]Jg/kg dry 31.0

387 BRL 116

40-140

5

50

PCB 126Q

426

]Jg/kg dry 31.0

387

BRL 110

40-140 14 50

Surrogate: 4,4-DB-Octafluorobiphenyl (Sr)

10.8 ]Jg/kg dry

30.9

35

30-150

Surrogate: Decach/orobiphenyl (Sr)

29.4 JJglkg dry 30.9 95 30-150

This laboratory report is not valid without an authorized signature on

the

cover page.

* Reportable Detection Limit

BRL =Below

Reporting

Limit

Page8of l l



Total Metals by EPA 6000/7000 Series Methods - Quality Control

Spike Source %REC

RPD

Analyte(s) Result

Flag

Units

'RDL

Level Result

%REC Limits

RPD

Limit

Batch

7110417-

SW846

30508

Blank (7110417-BLK1}


Lead BRL mg/kg wet 1.44

Ou( licate (7110417-DUP1J Source:

SA70267-01

Prepared:

06-Nov-07 Analyzed:

08-Nov-07

Lead

342

mglkg dry 1.78

297

14

20

Matrix S( ike (7110417-M$1} Source: SA70267-05

Prepared:

06-Nov-07 Analyzed: 08-Nov-07

lead

933

QM4X

mg/kg dry 1.82 151 929 3

75-125

Matrix

S ; ike Du( (7110417 -M$01}

Source:

SA70267-05

Prepared:

06-Nov-07 Analyzed: 08-Nov-07

Lead

769

QM4X

mg/kg dry

1.74

145 929

-110

75-125

19

35

PostSeike

(7110417-PS1}

Source:

SA70267-05


Lead

3670

QM4X

mglkg

dry

1.77

146 929 1860 80-120

Refer ence (7110417-SRM1)


Lead 42.0 mg/kg wet 1.50 45.4

92

81.8-118.1

Reference f7110417-5RM2}


Lead

41.0 mglkg wet

1.50

44.6

92

81.8-118.1

General Chemistry Parameters - Quality Control

Spike Source o/oREC

RPD

Analyte(s) Result Flag

Units 'RDL

Level Result %REC Limits

RPD

Limit

Batch 7110310- General Preparation

Duelicate f7110310-DUP1) Sourc e: SA70267-01

Prepared

&

Analyzed: 05-Nov-07

%Solids 76.0 % 76.9 20


*

Reportable Detection Limit

BRL = Below Reporting Limit

Page9ofll



Notes

and

Definitions

QM4X

The spike recovery was outside ofQC acceptance limits for the MS, MSD and/or PS due to analyte concentration at 4

times

or

greater the spike concentration. The

QC

batch was accepted based on LCS and/or

LCSD

recoveries within the

acceptance limits.

BRL Below Reporting Limit- Analyte NOT DETECTED at or above the reporting limit

dry Sample results reported

on

a dry weight basis

NR Not Reported

RPD Relative Percent Difference

A plus sign(+) in the Method Reference colwnn indicates the method is not accredited

by

NELAC.

Labora tory Control Sample (LCS1: A known matrix spiked with compound(s) representative of he target analytes, which is used to

document laboratory performance.

Matrix Duplicate: An intra-laboratory split sample

which

is used to document the precision

of

a

method in

a given sample matrix.

Matrix Spike: An aliquot of a sample spiked with a known concentration of arget analyte(s). The spiking occurs prior to sample

preparation and analysis. A matrix spike

is

used to document the bias

of

a method in a given sample matrix.

Method Blank:

An

analyte-free matrix to which all reagents are added in the same volumes

or

proportions as

used

in sample

processing. The method blank should be carried through the complete sample preparation and analytical procedure. The method

blank is used to document contamination resulting from the analytical process.

Method Detectio n Limit (MDL): The minimum concentration of a substance that can be measured and reported with 99%

confidence that the analyte concentration is greater than zero and is determined from analysis

of

a sample in a given matrix type

containing the analyte.

Reportable Detection Limit <RDU: The lowest concentration that can be reliably achieved within specified limits

of

precision and

accuracy during routine laboratory operating conditions. For many analytes the RDL analyte concentration

is

selected as the lowest

non-zero standard in the calibration curve. While the RDL is approximately 5 to 10 times the MDL, the RDL for each sample takes

into account the sample volume/weight, extract/digestate volume, cleanup procedures and,

if

applicable, dry weight correction.

Sample RDLs are highly matrix-dependent.

Surrogate:

An

organic compound

which

is similar

to

the target analyte(s) in chemical composition

and

behavior in the analytical

process, but which is not normally found in environmental samples. These compounds are spiked into all blanks, standards, and

samples prior to analysis. Percent recoveries are calculated for each surrogate.

Validated by:

Hanibal

C.

Tayeh, Ph.D.

Nicole

Brown


*

Reportable Detection Limit

BRL = Below Reporting Limit

Page 10 of

II



MADEP MCP ANALYTICAL METHOD REPORT CERTIFICATION

FORM

Laboratory Name: Spectrum Ana1ytical, Inc. -Agawam, MA Project#: 12700961

Project Location: CEA Beverly- Beverly, MA

MADEPRTN':

This form provides certifications for the following data set:

SA70267-0l

through

SA70267-09

Sample matrices:

Soil

0

82608

0

8151A

0

8330 fi1l

60108 0

7470A/IA

MCPSW-846

0

8270C

0

8081A

Methods Used

0

VPH

0

6020

0

9014M'

fi1l

8082

0

80218

0

EPH

0

70005'

0

7196A

I List

Release Tracking Number (RTN),

ifknown

2 M SW-846 Method 9014 or MADEP

Physiologically Available

Cyanide (PAC) Method

3 S- SW-846 Methods 7000 Series List

individual method

and analyte

An

affirmative response to questions A, B, C

and

Dis required or "Presumptive Certainty" status

A

Were all samples received by the laboratory

in

a condition consistent with that described

on

the

fi1l Yes

0

No

Chain

of

Custody documentation for the data set?

Were all QA/QC procedures required for the specified analytica1 method(s) included in this report

B

followed, including the requirement to note and discuss in a narrative QC data that did not meet

fi1l Yes

0

No

appropriate performance standards or guidelines?

Does the data included in this report

meet

all the analytical requirements for "Presumptive

c

Certainty", as described in Section 2.0 (a), (b), (c) and (d) of the MADEP document CAM VII A,

"Quality Assurance and Quality Control Guidelines for the Acquisition and Reporting of

fi1l

Yes

0

No

Analytical Data"?

D

VPH and

EPH

methods only: Was the VPH or EPH method conducted without significant

DYes

0

No

modifications (see Section 11.3 ofrespective methods)?

A

response to questions E

and F

below is required or "Presumptive Certainty" status

E

Were

a11

analytical QC performance standards and recommendations for the specified methods

fi1l

Yes

0

No

achieved?

F

Were results for all analyte-Iist compounds/elements for the specified method(s) reported?

0

Yes

fi1l

No

All

negative responses are addressed in a case narrative on the cover page

of

his report.

I,

the undersigned, attest

under

the

pains

and

penalties of perjury

that,

based upon my personal

inquiry

of

those

responsible for

obtaining

the information, the material

contained

in this analytical report is, to the best of my

knowledge

and

belief,

accurate

and

complete.

t}Vtdzj__

Hanibal C. Tayeh, Ph.D.

President/Laboratory Dir ector

Date:

11/12/2007 2:16:53PM

This laboratory report is not valid without an authorizedsignature on the cover page.

* Reportable Detection

Limit

BRL =

Below

Reporting Limit

Page II of 11





Appendix F

Human Health

Risk Assessment

of

Potentia/Indoor and Outdoor

Inhalation Exposure to Landfill

Gas

Emissions From

the

Former

Brimbat

A venue

Landfill

Relative

to Future Development of

the

Site

prepared by Tetra Tech EC, Inc. September 2008



HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT

OF POTENTIAL INDOOR AND OUTDOOR

INHALATION EXPOSURE TO

LANDFILL GAS EMISSIONS FROM

THE FORMER BRIMBAL AVENUE LANDFILL

RELATIVE

TO

FUTURE DEVELOPMENT

OF

THE SITE

September 2008

Prepared

for

Tetra Tech Rizzo

CEA

Group, Inc.

Prepared by

Tetra Tech EC, Inc.

133 Federal St., Gth

Floor

Boston,

MA

0211 0



HUMAN

HEALTH RISK

ASSESSMENT

OF

POTENTIAL INDOOR AND OUTDOOR

INHALATION EXPOSURE TO

LANDFILL GAS EMISSIONS

FROM

THE FORMER BRIMBAL A VENUE LANDFILL

RELATIVE TO FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE

Revision

I

September

2008

Prepared for

Tetra Tech Rizzo

CEA

Group,

Inc.

Prepared by

Tetra

Tech

EC

133

Federal

St., 6

1

h Floor

Boston,

MA

02110

Date

09/30/08

Prepared By

T. Ambrose/

M. Newton Lima

Approved By

R. Marnicio



TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION AND GENERAL APPROACH ....................................................................

1-1

2.0 RISK ASSESSMENT .................................................................................................................. 2-1

2.1

Hazard Identification ................. : ....................................................................................

2-1

2.1.1 Nature of the Site and the Proposed Development Activity ............................... 2-1

2.1.2 Description of the Areas oflnterest at the Site .................................................. 2-2

2.1.3 Evaluation of the Available LFG Composition Data ......................................... 2-2

2.2 Exposure Assessment ......................................................................................................

2-4

2.2.1 Inhalation Exposure Areas (lEAs) ...................................................................... 2-4

2.2.2 Conceptual Site Model for Air Exposure ........................................................... 2-4

2.2.3 Characterization

of

the Potentially Exposed Populations .................................. 2-5

2.3

Dose-Response Assessment ............................................................................................ 2-6

2.4 Risk Characterization ...................................................................................................... 2-7

2.4.1 Indoor Air Risk Assessment.. .............................................................................

2-7

2.4.2 Outdoor Air Risk Assessment .......................................................................... 2-10

2.4.3 Quantitative Cumulative Inhalation Pathway Risk Assessment ...................... 2-17

2.4.4 Qualitative Cumulative Inhalation Pathway Assessments for the Off-Site

Residents and the Commercial I Retail Customers .......................................... 2-18

2.4.5 Qualitative Odor Threshold Evaluation for Hydrogen Sulfide (H

2

S) .............. 2-19

2.5 Uncertainty Analysis ..................................................................................................... 2-19

2.5.1 LFG Composition ............................................................................................ 2-19

2.5.2 LFG Generation and Emission Rate ................................................................. 2-20

2.5.3 Atmospheric Mixing and Dispersion Modeling Using a Box Model... ............ 2-20

2.5.4 Exposure Frequency and Exposure Duration, and Daily Exposure Time ........ 2-21

2.5.5 Vapor Intrusion Modeling Input Parameters .................................................... 2-21

2.5.6 Exposure Parameters ........................................................................................ 2-22

2.5.7 Toxicity Criteria ............................................................................................... 2-22

3.0 SUMMARY AND FINDINGS ....................................................................................................

3-1

4.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................. 4-l

FIGURES

Figure 1. Site Location Map

Figure

2.

Proposed Layout for Site Development

Figure 3. Soil Gas Sampling Locations

Figure 4. Sizes and Orientations

of

the Boxes Assumed for the Outdoor Air Mixing and Dispersion

Analysis



TABLES

Table

l.

Summary of Landfill Gas Sampling Results for 2008

Table 2. Calculation of the Average Soil Gas Concentrations for the Detected LFG Constituents by

Inhalation Exposure Area

Table 3. Conceptual Site Model for the Potential Inhalation Exposures Associated with Development

at the North Shore Commons Site

Table 4. Inhalation Toxicity Values for the Detected Landfill Gas Constituents Associated with

Cancer and Non-Cancer Health Effect Endpoints

Table 5. Site-Specific Subsurface Soil and Site Parameters that Were Used to Project Vapor Diffusion

and Intrusion Into Indoor Air for the Cumulative Inhalation Pathway Risk Calculations (Same

for All Scenarios)

Table 6. Scenario-Specific Building Dimensions and Receptor Exposure Parameters Used in the

Cumulative Inhalation Pathway Risk Calculations

Table.7. Summary of the Results of he Indoor Air Risk Assessment for the North Shore Commons

Site

Table 8. Summary of the Results of he Indoor Air Risk Assessment for the Receptors Associated with

Future Development

Table 9. Summary of the LandGEM Modeling Results for LFG and Hydrogen Sulfide Generation

Rates Over Time for the Former Brimbal Avenue Landfill

Table

10.

Average Annual Wind Speed and Direction Data for the Beverly Cove Meteorological

Station, Beverly, MA (2000-2007)

Table II. Airborne Mixing and Dispersion Calculations for the Concentrations of Landfill Gas

Constituents in the Outdoor Air at the Eastern Inhalation Exposure Area

Table 12. Airborne Mixing and Dispersion Calculations for the Concentrations of Landfill Gas

Constituents

in

the Outdoor Air at the Western Inhalation Exposure Area

Table 13. Airborne Mixing and Dispersion Calculations for the Concentrations of Landfill Gas

Constituents in

the Outdoor Air at the Site-Wide Inhalation Exposure Area

Table 14. Calculation of the Cancer and Non-Cancer Inhalation Risk Estimates Relative to Outdoor

Exposure for Each Inhalation Exposure Area

Table 15.

Summary of the Results

of

he Outdoor Air Risk Assessment for Each Inhalation Exposure

Area (Applicable to All Receptors Exposed to Outdoor Air)

Table 16. Combined Results of the Indoor and Outdoor Air Inhalation Risk Assessments for the North

Shore Commons Site for Each Inhalation Exposure Area

Table

17.

Summary of the Hydrogen Sulfide Sampling Results and Relevant Odor Thresholds and

Occupational Safety Criteria for Hydrogen Sulfide

11



APPENDICES

Appendix A Site Visit Photographic Log (August 15, 2008)

Appendix B Test America Laboratory Report for the Soil Gas Probe Samples (August

18,

2008)

Appendix C LandGEM Output for the Modeling of Landfill Gas Generation at the Former Brimbal

Avenue Landfilll in Beverly, MA

Appendix D Selected Illustrative Johnson and Ettinger Model Calculation Worksheets for Potential

Landfill Gas Vapor Intrusion and Inhalation Risk Assessment

Appendix E Compilation ofthe Indoor Air Vapor Intrusion Risk Calculation Results by Inhalation

Exposure Area

iii



ATe

ATN

ATSDR

bgs

c

CAA

CalEPA

em

CMR

coc

CSM

DL

DTSC

ED

EF

ELCR

foe

g

Griffin Engineering

H

2

S

HEAST

m

hr

HHRA

HVAC

lEA

m

IRIS

IUR

J&E

L

LandGEM

LEL

LFG

m

m'

m'

mg

MassDEP

MCP

Mg

MH

NMOC

NSPS

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

averaging time for carcinogenic risk

averaging time for non-carcinogenic risk

Agency for Toxic Substance and Disease Registry

below ground surface

Centigrade degrees

Clean Air Act

California EPA

centimeter

Code of Massachusetts Regulations

chemicals of concern

conceptual site model

detection limit

Department of Toxic Substances Control

exposure duration

exposure frequency

Excess Lifetime Cancer Risk

fraction of organic carbon

gram

Griffin Engineering Group, LLC

Hydrogen sulfide

Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables

Hazard Index

hour

Human Health Risk Assessment

heating, ventilating, and air conditioning


inch

Integrated Risk Information System

Inhalation Unit Risk

Johnson and Ettinger

liter

Landfill Gas Emissions Model

Lower Explosive Limit

landfill gas

meter

square meters

cubic meters

milligram

Massachusetts Department of

Environmental Protection

Massachusetts Contingency Plan

Megagram

mixing height

Non-Methane Organic Compound

New Source Performance Standards

IV



OHM

ORNL

PEL

ppb

ppm

PPRTV

RfC

RL

s

ug

USEPA

URF

uses

voc

yr

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS- Cont'd

Oil or Hazardous Material

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Permissible Exposure Limit

parts per billion

parts per million

Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value

reference concentration

reporting limit

second

microgram

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Unit

Risk Factor

Unified Soil Classification System

volatile organic compound

year

v



1.0 INTRODUCTION AND GENERAL APPROACH

CEA Group, Inc., located in Cambridge, Massachusetts, is considering the development of the Former

Brimbal Avenue Landfill

in

Beverly, Massachusetts, which

is

referred to

in

this assessment as the North

Shore Commons Site. This Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA) was conducted to evaluate the

potential risks to receptors that could be exposed to landfill gas (LFG) emissions by inhaling its

constituents either outdoors or indoors within the buildings associated with future development

of

the site.

Two primary inhalation exposure possibilities exist with respect to development at the site: l) as the

result

of

vapor migration from the subsurface soil or waste up into the indoor air

of

structures that may be

built as part

of

the development; and 2) in the outdoor air following the release ofLFG and its mixing and

dispersion

in

the air at the site.

The potential exposures and risks due to the inhalation

of

volatile vapors emitted from the inactive landfill

were evaluated by first developing a conservative estimate of the generation and emission rate of the

LFG. This LFG emission rate was then combined with measurements of

on-site soil gas collected

in

the

area that is currently being considered for development. Together, this information provides a reasonable

estimate

of

the amount and composition

of

the LFG emissions that may lead to potential future exposures.

The LFG releases could migrate and enter into the indoor spaces

of

the new structures that may be

constructed on-site. The general design and construction characteristics

of the potential structures were

projected based on knowledge of the site and the features of similar structures in this area. The

dimensions

of

the indoor air spaces most likely to be impacted by vapor intrusion were estimated from

typical building sizes depicted in one of the proposed development plans. A vapor intrusion model was

applied to estimate the concentrations of the LFG contaminants that may be created in the indoor air of

the future structures.

The LFG emissions at other locations at the site would be released and mixed with the ambient air that

blows across the surface of the property. This mixing and dispersion process would dilute the

concentration of any LFG constituents emitted. The conceptual mixing and dispersion and the dimensions

of

the air volume into which the LFG emissions would

be

released were established based on the

proposed development plans and the detected soil gas constituent distributions. A mixing and dispersion

model was applied to estimate the outdoor concentrations of the released LFG contaminants within the

potential breathing zone

of

the people that are likely to be present on-site given the proposed

development. The level

of

risk associated with breathing this outdoor air was also estimated using

exposure parameters tailored to the future site users.

The representative concentrations

of

each constituent found to be present in the soil gas were entered into

the models for calculating the indoor and outdoor air exposure point concentrations. These concentrations

were combined with exposure parameters associated with the potential site future users and with

chemical-specific toxicity values for the constituents detected in the soil gas to develop estimates

of

the

potential inhalation risks posed to the people associated with the future development. These estimates of

the inhalation cancer and non-cancer risk were compared to the established Massachusetts Contingency

Plan (MCP) target risk thresholds to determine whether or not the proposed development poses a

"significant risk" to human health.

This risk assessment also includes qualitative assessments of the potential on-site exposure to hydrogen

sulfide (H

2

S) gas and the potential for exposure to released LFG constituents in the soil gas or ambient air

that may have migrated off-site.

1-1



2.0 RISK ASSESSMENT

This risk assessment of the potential inhalation exposures to a set

of

site-specific receptors was performed

in accordance with the risk characterization protocols established by the Massachusetts Department of

Environmental Protection (MassDEP) for the MCP program. Human health risk characterizations

performed under the MCP are conducted to determine whether conditions at a site pose a risk of harm to

health. The MCP provides three options for defining a level

of

"no significant risk":

• Method l uses published numeric standards for more than l 00 common chemicals in soil and

groundwater;

• Method 2 allows for some adjustments in these standards to reflect site-specific conditions; and

• Method 3 allows for the potential risks to be estimated on the basis of a site-specific exposure

parameters and site conditions.

A MassDEP Method

3

risk characterization is a cumulative risk assessment that considers all

of

the

exposure pathways associated with a receptor and a land use with respect to the chemicals

of

concern

(COCs). A Method 3 risk characterization consists of five steps (MassDEP 1996):

l.

Hazard Identification

2. Exposure Assessment

3. Dose-Response Assessment

4. Risk Characterization

5. Uncertainty Analysis

The subsections that follow present each of these components of the focused assessment of the potential

inhalation risks to a set of potential future groups expected to access or use the site or facilities of the

proposed development at the North Shore Commons Site.

2.1 Hazard Identification

The hazard identification step describes the chemical constituents that may be present in an area or

associated with the location

of

an exposure scenario.

It

identifies those chemicals that may be

of

concern

from a human health risk perspective given the concentration in which they are present and the nature of

the adverse effects that may be associated with exposures. To identifY these constituents, an

understanding

of

the current land use and the proposed future development was established. Thereafter,

the area of the site where the proposed development is to occur was defined. Finally, the composition of

the LFG that may be generated and migrate into the indoor air via diffusion through the foundations of

future buildings or into the ambient outdoor air where this development may be performed was identified.

These aspects

of

the assessment are discussed further below.

2.1.1 Nature of the Site and the Proposed Development Activity

The North Shore Commons Site

is

comprised

of

just over 6 acres and

is

located off

of

Route 128 on

Brimbal Avenue, next to the Northridge Homes Cooperative, Inc. in Beverly,

MA.

The general location

of the site is presented in Figure

l.

The landfill material is covered by soil, but there is no cap

or

landfill

gas vents installed at this time. The proposed future activities to take place at the site would be expected

to result in some level

of

exposure to the LFG released from the soil and waste beneath and within the site

boundary.

Historical activities performed at the North Shore Commons Site included the installation of

a 24-inch

drainage culvert through the site in 1946. Prior to this date, the site was undeveloped and contained a free-

2-l



flowing stream. The Town of Beverly began using the site as a landfill between 1946 and 1947, and

continued dumping at the site until approximately 1961. During that time, the landfill accepted primarily

municipal household waste and some construction debris. The site has been inactive as a landfill since

1961, and the there are no municipal records of any other development

or

activities since that time.

2.1.2 Description of the Areas

of

Interest at the Site

Figure 2 depicts one proposed plan for the development

of

the site. The northwestern portion

of

the site is

the area designated for the development of a Day Care Center under this proposal. The remaining

southeastern portion of the site

is

the area designated for the development of commercial, retail, and/or

residential facilities under the proposal shown. The overall site has an approximate length (northwest

southeast) of 650 feet (or 198.1 meters [m]) and an approximate width (northeast-southwest) of 400 feet

(or 121.9

m).

The site

is

relatively flat, ranging in elevation from

78

feet to 86 feet across the area with

changes in grade near the outer boundaries adjacent to the roads and a few low-lying areas near the

drain line.

In

order to obtain the site-specific information needed to conduct the risk assessment, a site walk and

reconnaissance of the property were conducted on August 15, 2008. The site visit and reconnaissance was

performed by Ron Marnicio

of

Tetra Tech EC, Inc. on August

15,

2008. The entire site was examined and

also the surrounding properties and usages. Twenty-nine photographs taken during the site visit are

presented in Appendix A. The photographs identified below highlight the following specific features of

the site:

I. Photograph l:

2. Photograph

17:

3. Photograph

9:

4. Photograph

13:

5.

Photograph

2:

6. Photograph 7:

General Location of the Proposed Development Area

View to the South across the Western Portion of the Site

View to the South across the Eastern Portion of

he Site

View to the South showing the Nearest Off-Site Residence

View showing the Property Advertisement Sign Posted On-Site

View across Brimbal Avenue showing the existing Commercial/Retail

Establishments

Soil borings made on-site show the soil to be coarse to medium sand, with some fine sand and surficial

organic soil and traces of silt, gravel, clay and debris at depth. The site

is

generally flat and vegetated with

scrub brush and small trees except where the vegetation was removed to provide access for well

placement or the soil borings, or the groundwater or soil gas sampling. Along the eastern edge

of

the site,

near Brimbal A venue, there is a section of exposed pavement that

is

a remnant of a former building

foundation slab. A drain line runs under the site and through a culvert under the Route 128 Access Road

on the northwestern edge of the site.

2.1.3 Evaluation of the Available LFG Composition Data

Soil gas samples were collected at a depth of between 3 and 8 feet below the ground surface by Griffin

Engineering Group, LLC (Griffin Engineering) on December 19, 2007 and August 4, 2008. The 2007

sampling occurred within three sample locations (GP-5, GP-6, and GP-14) and the 2008 sampling

occurred at eight additional locations (GP-6R, GP-11, GP-12, GP-14, GP-20, GP-21, GP-25, and GP-26)

(see Figure

3).

A natural gas leak was detected under the street in the vicinity of sample GP-14 as the

result of uncharacteristically high levels of methane being detected in the soil gas being sampled at this

end of the site. Consequently, the LFG toxic constituent results for this sample were highly suspect and

the results of this sample were eliminated from further consideration and use in this risk assessment.

In

addition, the sample extraction structures at GP-5 and GP-6 were both destroyed subsequent to the 2007

2-2



sampling event, so additional data collection at these locations was not possible in 2008. For these

reasons, only the 2008 sampling data (with the exception

of

sample GP-14) were used to establish the

characteristics

of

the LFG emissions for the risk assessment. The results for H

2

S from the 2007 sample

collected at GP-6 were, however, used in the qualitative assessment

of

this constituent. Table I presents

the soil gas sample data. The locations of these seven sampling points that were spread across the site are

shown

in

Figure

3.

It is

common that the composition

of

the waste disposed in various parts

of

a landfill varies, and that the

composition

of

the LFG generated at a location depends a great deal on the nature

of

the waste disposed

there (among other factors like age and moisture content). For this risk assessment, a characterization

of

the composition of the LFG that would be released from the site during completion of the proposed

development was necessary. However, this gas does not now exist and cannot, therefore, be measured

directly.

In

addition, the LFG is likely to change over time as soil gas migration shifts in response to

ongoing waste decay, landfill settlement, and the overlying disturbances associated with the new

development and its construction.

The concentrations of a total of 49 volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were quantified by Test America

in

each soil gas sample using Method T0-15 (see -Appendix B for the full data reports).

Of

these

49 VOCs, only 17 were detected

in

at least one

of

the seven samples. In addition, samples were also

analyzed for a set

of

common sulfide compounds.

Of

these, only one common sulfide (H

2

S) was detected

in any of the seven samples.

After evaluating the concentration patterns detected in the soil gas samples, it was seen that the samples in

the western portion

of

the site were somewhat distinct

in

composition from the eastern side. This was

especially true for the soil gas constituents

of

tetrachloroethene, trichloroethene, chloroform,

chlorobenzene, and dichlorodifluoromethane as they were only detected on the western side of the site.

Similarly, methylene chloride and 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene were only detected on the eastern side

of

the

site see Table I), As such, the data from GP-6R, GP-20 and GP-26 were considered collectively to

characterize a Western Inhalation Exposure Area (lEA), and the data from GP-11, GP-12, GP-21 and GP-

25

were grouped together to characterize

an

Eastern lEA. Figure 4 shows the line dividing the site into

these two lEAs. Separate risk calculations were performed for the Western and Eastern lEAs, as well as

for a Site-Wide lEA, whose soil gas characteristics were based on the analytical results for all seven

of

the 2008 samples.

Average concentrations for each detected VOC in the soil gas samples from each lEA were calculated for

use in the risk assessments. When a particular compound was not detected in a particular sample in the

set, one half

of

the maximum detection limit (DL) indicated for that compound by the laboratory was used

as the concentration for the purpose of calculating the average LFG constituent concentration. This

process is in accordance with the MassDEP

Guidance

for

Disposal Site Risk Characterization

(MassDEP

1996). Table 2 summarizes these analytical results for the three exposure areas. It should be noted that

bolded entries

in

the sample results columns indicate a detected concentration

of

that constituent

in

that

sample. The maximum measured concentrations were not considered to

be

characteristic of the LFG

constituent concentrations

in

the soil gas across the entire site or across an lEA. Use

of

all the maximum

detected concentrations

in

the risk assessment would be overly conservative with respect to the risks

posed by actual conditions that might be expected at the site.

2-3



2.2

Exposure Assessment

This exposure assessment identifies the potential exposure areas, the potentially exposed populations and

the potential routes

of

inhalation exposure for the people associated with the proposed development at the

North Shore Commons Site.

2.2.1 Inhalation Exposure Areas (lEAs)

As described above, the site displayed some soil gas contamination patterns that justified evaluating

potential exposures to soil gas separately

in

the western and eastern portions

of

the site. The proposed

development plan depicted

in

Figure 2 shows a possible Day Care facility

in

the Western lEA and

possible CommerciaVRetail and Residential use in the Eastern lEA. However, this risk assessment

evaluated all

of

these potential uses relative to each

of

the identified lEAs. As such, it

is

not predicated on

any particular development proposal.

2.2.2 Conceptual Site Model for Air Exposure

A conceptual site model (CSM) illustrates the exposure pathway relationships between the potential

sources

of

the VOCs associated with the subsurface conditions at the site and the potential inhalation

exposures

of

these compounds to future users or occupants

of

the site. A complete exposure pathway

is

comprised

of

the following elements:

• A source and mechanism of chemical release to the environment (i.e., releases of LFG from the

subsurface waste material);

• An environmental transport medium for the released chemical (i.e., the ambient air where mixing

and dispersion

of

the released LFG constituents would occur or the indoor air where migrating

soil gas vapors penetrating through cracks

in

the floor

of

the proposed new

s t r u ~ t u r e s

would mix

with ventilated air within the buildings);

• A point

of

potential coritact by people with the contaminated medium (i.e., the breathing zones

within the lEAs); and

• A route of intake or exposure (i.e., inhalation of the dispersed LFG constituents by a person at

the site).

Table 3 presents a simplified tabular CSM for the North Shore Commons Site assummg a future

development scenario.

It

should be noted that the site is currently inactive.

The LFG that is generated within the emplaced waste could migrate up and into the indoor air

of

the

future buildings as well as into the ambient air. The processes of diffusion and convection could result in

the subsurface contaminants being transported into the ground level indoor air spaces of a potential new

slab-on-grade commerciaVretail or residential structure. The concentration

of

the

LFG

contaminants

in

the indoor air also is shown to be affected by the ventilation and mixing

of

the intruding soil gas with

relatively fresh ambient (outside) air. Any future occupants

of

these structures also would be exposed to

this indoor air. Soil gas also could migrate into the indoor air spaces through preferential migration

pathways, such as storm water or sewer lines, underground utility corridors or building foundations. Soil

gas can also be released into the open air and naturally dispersed. A future site user would be exposed to

these contaminants at some level in the ambient outdoor air.

2-4



2.2.3 Characterization of the Potentially Exposed Populations

The proposed development of the North Shore Commons Site creates the opportunity for a variety of

receptors to be exposed to the LFG emissions via the inhalation route of exposure. These receptors are

described below.

• Commercial/Retail Worker - This individual would work on-site inside a new slab-on-grade

building to be constructed as part of the proposed development. The Commercial/Retail Worker

is assumed to be an adult from 18 to 45 years of age who would work

at

the site 5 days per week

for 8 hours per day over 50 weeks

of

the year. This receptor is expected to be exposed to indoor

air for 7 hours per day and outdoor ambient air for I hour per day (e.g., during breaks).

• Day Care Worker/Toddler- These individuals would be present on-site spending time both inside

and outside a Day Care facility to be constructed as part

of

the proposed development. The Day

Care Worker would be an adult from 18

to

45 years of age and the Toddler enrolled at the Day

Care would be between l and 5 years of age. Both the Day Care Worker and Toddler are

expected to be present

at

the site 5 days per week for 8 hours per day over 50 weeks

of

the year.

Both of these receptors are expected

to

be exposed

to

indoor air for 6 hours per day and outdoor

air

for 2 hours per day.

• Maintenance Worker - This individual would work on-site primarily inside a building to be

constructed as part of the proposed development. The Maintenance Worker is assumed to be an

adult from

18

to 45 years of age who is present at the site 5 days per week for 8 hours per day

over 50 weeks

of

the year, This receptor is expected to be exposed to indoor

air

for 7 hours per

day and outdoor ambient air for

I

hour per day.

• Landscape Worker - This individual would work on-site primarily outdoors. The Landscape

Worker is assumed to be an adult from 18 to 45 years of age who is present at the site 5 days per

week for 8 hours per day over 50 weeks of the year. This receptor is expected to be exposed to

indoor air for only I hour per day and outdoor ambient

air

for 7 hours per day.

• Construction Worker- This individual would work on-site and outdoors on projects related to the

proposed development. The Construction Worker is assumed to be an adult

at

22 years of age

who accesses the site 5 days per week for 8 hours per day over 26 weeks

of

the year. This

receptor is expected to be exposed to outdoor air for the entire 8-hour workday.

• Utility Worker - This individual would work on-site and outdoors on facilities related

to

the

proposed development. The Utility Worker is assumed to be an adult at 22 years of age who

accesses the site 5 days per week for 8 hours per day for I week of the year. This receptor is

expected to be exposed to outdoor air for the entire 8-hour workday.

• On-Site Adult/Child Resident - These individuals would be present on-site both inside and

outside of a new slab-on-grade residential building constructed as part of the proposed

development. The On-Site Resident could be an Adult from

15

to 30 years of age

or

a Child from

I to 8 years of age. Both the Adult and the Child Resident are expected to be present on-site

7 days per week for 24 hours per day over 52 weeks

of

the year. These receptors are expected to

be exposed to indoor air for 20 hours per day and outdoor air for 4 hours per day.

• Off-Site Adult/Child Resident - These individuals would not be present on-site, but would be

residing adjacent to the site. The Off-Site Resident would be an Adult from 15 to 30 years of age

2-5



or a Child from I to 8 years

of

age. Both the Adult and the Child Resident are expected to be

present at the off-site location 7 days per week for 24 hours per day over 52 weeks

of

the year.

These receptors are expected to be exposed to outdoor air for only 4 hours per day.

• Commercial/Retail Customer - This receptor would temporarily be present at a new slab-on

grade retail structure to be constructed as part

of

the proposed development. The Customer could

be either

an

Adult or a Child. The Commercial/Retail Customer

is

assumed to access the site once

per day 5 days per week for

0.5

hour per day over 50 weeks

of

the year. These receptors are

expected to be exposed to indoor air for 1/4 hour per day and outdoor air for 1/4 hour per day.

• Trespasser - This member

of

the public may enter the site now or after development despite

physical barriers or prohibitions to not

do

so.

An

On-Site Trespasser

is

likely to be "passing

through" to a surrounding area adjacent to the site. The Trespasser

is

assumed to

be

an adolescent

teenager from 8 to 15 years of age who may be present at the site about once a day (during the

seven warmer months

of

the year) for about two hours per incursion. The trespasser

is

expected to

be outdoors and would, therefore, only be exposed to the outdoor air encountered at the site.

2.3 Dose-Response Assessment

The relationship between the level

of

exposure and the likelihood and/or severity

of

an adverse health

effect can be determined

by

analyzing the toxicity

of

a LFG constituent. Section 7

2.1 of

the

Guidance for


(MassDEP 1996) indicates:

"A Reference Concentration

(RfC,

in units

of

mg/m

3

) is the inhalation exposure concentration

(with uncertainty spanning perhaps an order

of

magnitude or greater) to which daily exposure

of

a

human population, including sensitive populations,

is

likely to be free

of

appreciable effects. The

Massachusetts Contingency Plan requires that primary consideration be given to information

developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (31 0 CMR 40.0993(5)(a))."

Similarly, Section 7.2.2

of

the

Guidance

for


(MassDEP 1996)

indicates:

"The ability of a chemical to increase the incidence of cancer in a target population is described by

one

of

two measures: the cancer slope factor or the unit risk. The Unit Risk is the upper 95%

Confidence Limit

of

the mean incremental lifetime cancer risk estimated to result from lifetime

exposure to

an

agent

if it

is in the air at a concentration of I J.Lg/m

3

.

The inhalation toxicity values applied in this risk assessment are presented in Table

4.

The following is a

list

of

sources for both

RfC

and Inhalation Unit Risk (IUR) values

in

the order

of

preference for use

in

this risk assessment:

I. MassDEP' s Shortforms for Human Health Risk Assessment default v0207 workbook,

February 2007;

2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (USEP A 2008) Integrated Risk Information System

(IRIS);

3. USEPA's Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Values (PPRTVs); and

4. Other Toxicity Values. When information is not available in IRIS or PPRTV, the following

sources were reviewed to determine whether comparable values exist that are appropriate for

quantitative risk assessment:

2-6



a.

Agency for Toxic Substance and Disease Registry (ATSDR 2008) - ATSDR has produced

Toxicological Profiles for over 275 hazardous substances.

b. California EPA (CaiEPA 2008)- These values are reviewed by toxicologists for the State of

California, and address both cancer and non-cancer health effects.

c. Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) National Regional Database of Preliminary

Remediation Goals - This database was developed under an interagency agreement with the

USEPA and includes toxicity information use utilized by USEPA Regions III, VI, and IX.

d. Other USEPA source documents and USEPA Technical Support.

2.4 Risk Characterization

The risk characterization step combines the hazard identification, exposure assessment, and dose-response

assessment components to develop a quantitative estimate of the chronic risk of harm to human health.

For this risk assessment, cancer and/or non-cancer risks were estimated separately for the potential

inhalation exposures of the identified receptors. Incremental chemical-specific contributions to risk were

then summed to generate cumulative Excess Lifetime Cancer Risk (ELCR) estimates and/or cumulative

non-cancer Hazard Indices (HI) estimates for exposure to indoor and outdoor air. These results for indoor

air exposure and for outdoor air exposure were then added together (when the receptor was assumed

"to

be

exposed to both media) and the sums were compared to the MassDEP Cumulative Receptor Risk Limits

(31 0 CMR 40.0933(6)) to assess whether a condition of "no significant risk" would exist for the proposed

development. A condition of "no significant risk" of harm to human health exists for a potentially

exposed individual if:

• the Cumulative Receptor Non-Cancer Risk calculated for that individual (i.e., the HI)

is

less than

or

equal to the Cumulative Receptor Non-Cancer Risk Limit of 1.0; and

• the Cumulative Receptor Cancer Risk calculated for that individual (i.e., the ELCR)

is

less than

or equal to the Cumulative Cancer Risk Limit of I x Io·'.

Section 7 4.1 of the MassDEP

Guidance

for

Disposal Site

Risk

Characterization

states that the potential

for non-cancer health effects

is

measured by the HI. The HI ratio compares the exposure concentration

of

the "Oil or Hazardous Material" (OHM) within the air to the allowable level or the RfC (Reference

Concentration toxicity value). This ratio

is

calculated using the following equation:

HI; =OHM I RfC, =CAMEAt I RfC,

Section 7.4.2 of the MassDEP

Guidance

for


states that the potential

for cancer health effects is measured by the ELCR. The ELCR value represents the probability of

developing cancer over a lifetime due to a specified exposure concentration of OHM within the air. The

IUR toxicity value is a measure of cancer potency and

is

used to estimate the ELCR by the following

equation:

ELCR,

=

OHM x IUR;

=

CAidEAi

x IUR;

The following sections discuss the indoor and outdoor air risk characterizations, as well as the models

used to perform the assessments.

2.4.1 Indoor Air Risk Assessment

The LFG generated in the subsurface may potentially migrate up into the indoor air of a new structure that

may be constructed as part of the proposed development. An assessment of the potential inhalation risks

2-7



associated with the volatile constituents measured in the soil gas vapor was conducted with respect to

their potential migration into such buildings. The indoor air risk assessment included the performance of a

series of area-specific cumulative risk calculations that were performed using the average soil gas

concentrations measured in each

lEA

and other site-specific and default parameters applicable to the site

and the potential receptors that may use the site in the future. Projections were made of the level

of

inhalation risk associated with vapor intrusion into a hypothetical future Day Care facility, a Commercial/

Retail establishment, or a Residential structure that may be constructed within each lEA.

The site-specific evaluation was a cumulative multi-constituent inhalation pathway risk assessment that

included the following components:

• Using the average calculated soil gas concentrations for each detected VOC within the three

defined lEAs (i.e., the Eastern, Western and Site-Wide lEAs);

• Modeling the upward migration of each detected VOC (accounting for diffusion and convection)

into a hypothetical slab-on-grade Day Care, CommerciaVRetail, or Residential building (using the

vapor intrusion model and the default soil parameters used by MassDEP to calculated the MCP

GW-2 Method I Groundwater Standards);

• Using the projected indoor

air

VOC concentrations as the exposure point concentratio-ns for the

receptors associated with the hypothetical development scenarios (i.e., an Adult and Child

Resident, a Day Care Worker, a Day Care Toddler, and a Commercial/Retail Worker) by

considering indoor air mixing and ventilation with fresh outdoor air

at

each structure;

• Calculating the inhalation-related exposure to each detected/modeled VOC;

• Applying the appropriate inhalation toxicity values for cancer and/or non-cancer health effect

endpoints for each

VOC

detected in each lEA;

• Summing the constituent-specific contributions to the cumulative

ELCR

and/or the cumulative

non-cancer

HI

for each receptor

to

calculate the corresponding cumulative risk estimates for each

lEA; and

• Comparing these estimates

to

threshold limits for cancer risk (i.e., an ELCR of l.OE-5) and/or

non-cancer risk (i.e., a HI of I) to assess the suitability of the current conditions in each lEA for

potential development

of

the types identified with respect to possible vapor intrusion.

The USEPA Johnson and Ettinger (J&E) Vapor Intrusion Model (USEPA 2004) was used to calculate the

projected indoor air concentrations associated with the average soil gas VOC concentrations for each

lEA. The vapor intrusion and inhalation risk calculations were performed for each of the f0ur hypothetical

receptors (i.e., a resident, an adult worker at a day care, a toddler at a daycare, and a commerciallretail

worker). The calculations were performed using a combination

of

site-specific information, default

MassDEP parameters used for the determination of the MCP GW-2 Method I Standards and default J&E

model assumptions. Table 5 presents the site-specific input parameters that were assumed for the vapor

intrusion analysis.

Other input parameters to the vapor intrusion modeling

or

receptor-specific exposure parameters used in

the risk calculations varied across the four hypothetical future use scenarios. These scenario-specific

assumptions were used to more accurately reflect the conditions and lengths of times that each receptor

associated with that scenario could be exposed to LFG emissions. The length and width of the potential

future Day Care and Commerciai Retail buildings were estimated based on the potential site configuration

shown in Figure

2.

The length and width of the potential future Residential building was taken as the

2-8



default assumption used in the calculation of the MCP GW-2 Method I Standards. Table 6 presents the

input parameters whose values differed for the various scenarios to account for variations in the possible

building dimensions, the people likely to use or occupy the buildings, and the amount of time the person

would potentially be exposed to soil gas contaminants intruding into the indoor air.

Using the site-specific soil gas concentrations, soil properties, and building characteristics, the vapor

intrusion modeling was performed using the J&E Model for each

of

the three lEAs for:

I. each of the VOCs detected in the soil gas in that lEA (i.e., for 10 VOCs in the Eastern lEA, 13

VOCs in the Western lEA, and 15 VOCs in the Site-Wide lEA); and

2. the residential, commercial/retail, and day care exposure scenarios.

These combinations represent 570 different J&E modeling runs (i.e., 3 lEAs x 5 future use scenarios x I 0,

13, or 15 VOCs per lEA, respectively). Appendix D presents a selection of these J&E Model calculation

worksheets [SG-ADV Version 3.1; 02/04] that were used to calculate the chemical-specific indoor air

inhalation risks. For illustration, the worksheets for the following cases are presented in Appendix

D:

• Set D-1: Residential (Adult) Scenario for tetrachloroethene for the Site-Wide lEA

• Set D-2: Residential (Child) Scenario for tetrachloroethene for the Site-Wide lEA

• Set D-3: Commercial/Retail Scenario for tetrachloroethene for the Site-Wide lEA

• Set D-4: Day Care (Adult) Scenario for tetrachloroethene for the Site-Wide lEA

• Set D-5: Day Care (Toddler) Scenario for tetrachloroethene for the Site-Wide lEA

• Set D-6: Day Care (Toddler) Scenario for tetrachloroethene for the Western lEA

Results of the Indoor Air Risk Assessment

The MCP requires cumulative cancer and non-cancer risks to be calculated for a receptor

for

the full set

of chemicals and exposure routes associated with each complete exposure pathway. A cumulative ELCR

.of I.OE-05 or less indicates a condition of "no significant risk" of harm to human health based

on

the

projected cancer health effect endpoint. A cumulative HI of 1.0 or less indicates a condition of "no

significant risk"

of

harm to human health based

on

projected non-cancer health effect endpoints.

Accordingly, cumulative ELCRs and/or His were calculated for the hypothetical On-Site Resident (Adult and

Child), Commercial/Retail Worker, Adult Day Care Worker, and the Day Care Toddler by summing the

individual risks contributions projected for each LFG constituent detected in each lEA.

Appendix E contains the tabulated J&E vapor intrusion modeling results for each soil gas constituent in

each lEA and the resulting location-, chemical-, and receptor-specific contributions to the cumulative

ELCR and cumulative non-cancer

HI

for each evaluated receptor. Table 7 presents the cumulative ELCRs

and His that were calculated for each lEA and receptor by summing the constituent-specific contributions

to risk. The results are summarized in Table 8.

As indicated in Table 8, there were no potential non-cancer health risks relative to indoor air exposure for

any receptor within any lEA exceeding the MCP-specified cumulative HI

of

I. However, the on-site

Lifetime (Adult and Child) Resident exceeds the MCP cancer risk threshold of I.OE-5 in the Site-Wide and

Western lEAs, but not in the . Eastern lEA. These exceedances are primarily due to exposure to

tetrachloroethene, which was detected at one location in the Western lEA (and hence

is

also a part of he Site

Wide lEA), but was not detected in the Eastern lEA.

The cumulative cancer and non-cancer results indicate that commercial/retail and day care redevelopment

would not be of concern in any of the lEAs given the results of the cumulative inhalation pathway risk

2-9



assessment. In addition, the results of the cumulative inhalation pathway risk assessment indicate that

residential development also would not be

of

concern

in

the Eastern lEA, but may not be suitable for the

Western lEA given the current conditions at the site. It is important to note that there is no residential

development proposed for the Western lEA under the plan depicted in Figure

2.

2.4.2 Outdoor Air Risk Assessment

The sections that follow consider the following aspects

of

the exposure and risk assessment with respect

to the outdoor air at the site: the emission rate of LFG; the spatial distribution of the LFG constituents; the

dilution of the emitted LFG constituents as they mix and disperse in the ambient air, and an estimate of

the concentration

of

the LFG constituents

in

the outdoor air

of

the exposure area.

LFG Emission Rate - LandGEM

The mass flux or volumetric flow of the LFG generated within the material disposed in a landfill is site

specific and varies both spatially and temporally. The amount

of

LFG produced depends on the

characteristics

of

both the waste and the site, including the waste type, age, temperature, moisture,

avenues for gas migration, and the local barometric pressure.

For this analysis, direct measurement (e.g., by using flux box measurements)

of

the amount or flux

of

LFG generated at the site may not yield quantitative results that would be representative of the proposed

development scenario. As was noted, the landfill has been inactive for some time and has a layer

of

soil

over the emplaced waste material and, as such, LFG flow rates and subsurface pressure gradients may

change when the proposed development occurs. In addition, site conditions affecting LFG generation

rates are not the same now as they will be in the future, such as moisture content, compaction and

channels for gas collection and preferential migration.

In light of these factors, LFG generation and emission rates were estimated by Griffin Engineering using

LandGEM (Landfill Gas Emissions Model). LandGEM is a USEPA screening model, routinely used to

quantij'y emissions from the anaerobic decomposition of landfilled waste in municipal solid waste

landfills

.

The model estimates gas generation based on a first-order decomposition rate equation. The

modeling defaults in LandGEM are based on empirical data from a large number of U.S. landfills. A

modeling run was performed using LandGEM Version 3.02 (the most recent version) incorporating both

site-specific data and inputs supplemented with reasonable default values. Due to its relatively small size

and age, the landfill

is

neither subject to the Clean Air Act (CAA) nor the

New

Source Performance

Standards (NSPSs) for municipal solid waste landfills. As such, the modeling performed for this

assessment used the USEPA inventory default values for certain primary ·modeling inputs, in accordance

with LandGEM protocol, as these values were appropriate with respect to the characteristics

of

this

landfill. For these reasons, the LandGEM output is expected to provide a conservative estimate (i.e.,

reflecting greater LFG emissions than may actually occur) of the LFG generation rate for use in this risk

assessment.

The following site-specific inputs were applied in the LandGEM modeling performed by Griffin

Engineering.

• Year Landfill Started Accepting Waste

• Year Landfill Stopped Accepting Waste

• Current quantity of Waste-In-Place (as of 1962)

• Annual Waste Acceptance Quantities 1948-1961

• Cumulative Waste-In-Place

2-10

1948

1961

155,909 Mg

(see Results in Appendix C)

12,250 short tons/year or 11,136 Mg/year

155,909 Mg 2008



In addition, the following set of default inputs were applied in the modeling in consideration to the overall

characteristics of the Former Brimbal Avenue Landfill:

• Methane Generation Rate Parameter (k)

• Potential Methane Generation Capacity (L

0

)

• Non-Methane Organic Compound (NMOC) Concentration

• Methane Content

0.040 year·

1

100 m

3

/Mg

600 ppm (as hexane)

50% by volume

Chemical-specific properties were used for the default gas/pollutant in the model. The projected pollutant

concentrations in the LFG estimated by LandGEM were developed using USEPA's AP-42 emission

factor specifications and were corrected for air infiltration. The summary input, output, and all results of

the LandGEM modeling run are presented in Appendix C. The results estimated Total LFG, Methane,

NMOC, and H

2

S quantities. The primary results that are most applicable

to

this risk assessment are

summarized in Table 9. The LFG generation rate for 2008 was used for this risk assessment. This was a

conservative selection as the generation rates are projected to continue to decrease over time.

Representative Exposure Point Concentration for Chronic Outdoor Air Exposure

The emissions from the LFG are expected to be released into and through the soil gas and potentially on

and into the ambient air above the site. Once in the ambient air, the constituents will experience some

degree of dilution as they mix with the outdoor air and disperse due to wind and other forces.

A conservative estimate

of

this degree

of

mixing and dispersion may be obtained by applying a "box

model" approach to the evaluation of the LFG emissions. The box model approach considers the LFG

emissions being released into and mixing within a box-shaped volume of air, which is also ventilated by

wind carrying generally cleaner air into the box. The height

of

the box

is

estimated to be the minimum

height

of

the layer

of

air that would be naturally mixed. This mixing

is

generally caused by the wind

interacting with the roughness of the surface of he ground and protrusions that extend up from the ground

into the air. In this case, these protrusions include the new structures, vegetation, and the receptors. As

such, this height was based on the shorter

of

these protrusions and was conservatively taken to be the

breathing zone height

ofthe

site users.

Application of a box model to a slightly contoured surface adds some uncertainty to the conceptual

analysis of air mixing and dispersion relative to the case

of

a hypothetical flat "box." However, a number

of considerations and factors supported the justification to use the box model approach for this

assessment.

• Winds blowing over a grassy landscaped area or parking are (i.e., the approximate conditions

of

the flat portions of the site following development) tend to be in a laminar flow regime near the

surface

of

the ground. This flow regime is characterized by air flow lines that run approximately

parallel to the surface

of

the ground. When the undulations or changes in elevation of the ground

are not large in a relative sense, the flow lines rise or dip in response to the change in topography

while maintaining the laminar flow regime. When the topographic changes are more abrupt, a

deviation from the laminar flow regime can occur (i.e., separation) and vertical or turbulent

eddies of air flow can result. Separation would be expected to occur somewhat more readily for a

given change in topography when the elevation is falling off. In this situation, the momentum of

the air tends to make the streamline continue

on

a path that takes it farther fron{ the surface of the

ground. This spreading

of

the flow lines results in a widening mixing zone or "box" on the

downhill side

of

a hump. This occurrence would result in a "box" that was shorter at its inlet (or

upwind side) and taller at its outlet (or downwind side). If the separation gets even greater,

2-11



turbulent eddy flow can result. Conversely, if the wind is blowing up a slight grade, the "box"

could be shorter

on

the downwind side. A flat

"box"

approach typically provides a conservative

estimate

of

the near-ground air concentrations for sites that are not steeply sloped and relatively

flat. The layout of the proposed development reflect a fairly flat topography which slants slightly

to the south with relatively continuous contours.

• As one assumption

of

the

box

model is that the air is well mixed within the

box

(by small scale

eddies near the ground or turbulent flow around solid features in the box (e.g., vehicles, buildings

and trees), some vertical mixing due to separation at topographic changes would make this

complete mixing assumption more representative

of

actual conditions.

In consideration of these factors, application of a flat-bottomed "box" with a conservatively specified

constant height was expected to provide a suitable estimate

of

the ambient air concentration near the

ground at the site.

Weather Underground publishes detailed information on historical wind speed and direction for

established weather stations on its website (www.weatherunderground.com). The nearest weather station

listed on this website to the Town of Beverly is the Beverly Cove Station. Table I 0 presents a summary

of

the annual wind speed and direction data reported for

the

period 2000 through 2007. Data pre-dating

2000 were not available. Table 10 indicates that wind over a long-term average blow across the site from

the southeast toward the northwest. The average annual wind speed was calculated to be 0.54 m/s (see

Table I 0). These wind speeds were used as inputs for the

lEA box

modeling (see below).

The following three factors are most significant with regard to impacting the estimated concentrations of

the LFG constituents in the air within the

box

(and, accordingly,

at

the location

of

potential inhalation

exposures):

I.

The dimensions of the box.

2. LFG emissions into the box via the soil gas.

3. The dilution of the air in the box by the wind bringing generally cleaner air into the box.

These factors can be related to the concentration of any particular LFG constituent mathematically using

the principal of conservation of mass. For this assessment, a steady-state evaluation that assumed that

there is no further build-up

of

LFG constituent concentrations in the air within the box over time was

appropriate, as this assumption provides an estimate of the highest concentration that would be generated

at the point of exposure. Assuming steady-state conditions, the influx of a LFG constituent must equal the

outflow of that LFG constituent from the box. Mathematically, this development is written

in

terms of a

"box" located in the proposed development area and coinciding with the footprint of one of the lEAs, as

defined in Figure 4 and described below.

Influx Contributions (from the south and east given the annual average wind is out of the southeast)

LFG Constituent Influx with the Wind from the South (INws):

Where:

INwsi

Vs

WIEA

Influx ofLFG constituent

"i"

in the wind blowing from the south [ug/s];

Average speed

of

the wind blowing from

the

south [m/s];

Width

of the lEA

perpendicular to the flow

of

wind from

the

south [m];

2-12



MHIEA

CINWSi

Mixing Height of

the

air within

the

lEA [m];

and

Concentration ofLFG constituent "i" in the wind blowing from

the

south [ug/m

3

] .

LFG Constituent Influx with the Wind from the East (INWE):

Where:

INWEi

VE

LIEA

MHIEA

CINWEi


"i"

in the wind blowing from the east [ug/s];

Average speed of

the

wind blowing from

the

east [m/s];

Length

of the lEA


of

wind from the east [m];

Mixing

Height

of

the

air within

the

lEA [m];

and

Concentration of LFG constituent "i" in

the

wind blowing from

the

east [ ug/m

3

] .

LFG Constituent Influx from the LFG influx from

the

subsurface

of

the

lEA ( Nv):

Where:

IN

vi

Q

CINVi

Influx

of

LFG constituent

"i"

from

the

LFG influx from the subsurface

of

the

lEA

[ ug/s];

Flux ofLFG released per

unit

area within the

lEA

[m

3

/m

2

-s];

Concentration

of

LFG constituent

"i"

in the LFG emissions being released into the

lEA

[ug/m

3

] ;

Length of the lEA [m];

and

Width of

the

lEA

[m].

Outflow Contributions (to

the

north

and

west given the observed annual average wind direction

LFG Constituent Outflow

with the Wind

to

the

North (OUTWN):

Where:

OUTWNi

VN

WIEA

MHIEA

CBOXi

Outflow

ofLFG constituent "i" in

the

wind blowing to

the

north [ug/s];

Average speed of the wind blowing

to

the north [m/s];

Width

of

the

lEA


of

wind to the north [m];

Mixing Height of the air within the lEA [m]; and

Concentration

of

LFG constituent

"i"

in the box representing the

lEA

[ ug/m

3

] .

LFG Constituent Outflow with the Wind

to the

West (OUTww):

Where:

OUTwwi

Vw

=

LIEA

MHIEA

Csoxi

Outflow

ofLFG

constituent

"i"

in the wind blowing to the west [ug/s];

Average speed

of

the

wind blowing to the

west

[m/s];

Length of

the

lEA perpendicular to the flow of wind to the

west

[m];

Mixing

Height

of

the

air within

the

lEA [ m];

and

Concentration of LFG constituent "i" in the box representing

the

lEA [ ug/m

3

] .

2-13



Setting the sum of the inflow terms to the sum of the outflow terms yields the following expression:

Solving this expression for CBox;, the concentration of LFG constituent "i" in the box representing the

lEA, results in the following relationship:

[v, X W EA X C lNWSi

l

r ] [ Q X C lNVi X L EA

+ t .VE

X LIHA X

c NWEi +

MH lEA

CBOXi

The concentration of the air in the box is indicated to be affected by contributions of the LFG constituents

from the soil gas below the site and potentially by the influx

of

LFG constituents into the box from

upwind areas. Initial applications of the box model indicated that given the size of the lEA, the speed of

the wind, and the relatively low projected LFG emission rate, both sources of constituent contributions

could be important.

As presented previously in Table 9, the LandGEM model estimated a Total LFG quantity of6.29 m

3

/m

2

-

year (or 2.0 E-07 m

3

/m

2

-s) for the year 2008.

As

noted earlier, this value was used for this conservative

assessment as the generation rate in

any future year

is

projected to be lower and, accordingly, associated

with less potential inhalation risk. This value

is

the input parameter

"Q"

in the box model relationships. It

was assumed that the LFG emission rate or flux (Q) was the same across all locations on the landfill.

The three lEAs were assessed separately and in a certain sequence due to differences in the soil gas

concentrations, model inputs (such as the length and width

of

the box), and the potential contributions

of

LFG constituents from upwind areas. The Eastern lEA was evaluated first, as the outputs from that

analysis (CBoXIEAi) were then used as an input to the analysis performed for the Western lEA (i.e., the

concentration of LFG constituent "i" in the wind blowing out of the box of the Eastern lEA was assumed

to blow into the box of the Western lEA). The three analyses are presented in the sequence in which they

were performed.

The Box Model for the Eastern Inhalation Exposure Area

This "box" includes the southeastern portion of the site. As shown in Figure 4, this box has an

approximate length (the dimension in the southeast to northwest wind direction) of 565 feet (or 172.2 m)

and an approximate width (the dimension in the southwest to northeast direction) of325 feet (or 99.1 m).

The maximum mixing layer height was conservatively assumed to be 6 feet (1.83

m)

to represent the

height of the breathing zone of the on-site receptors. As the actual mixing zone would be expected to be

taller· (due to the influences of the taller buildings and trees associated with the development protruding

higher above the ground and increasing the turbulence and circulation), this assumption should not lead to

an underestimate of risk. The Eastern lEA box model dimensions were:

2-14



EASTERN

lEA

LIEA =

172.2

·m

Since this box extends to the southeastern boundary

of

the site (i.e., the upwind side),

no

contribution

of

LFG constituents was assumed to come with the wind inflow from the upwind directions.

Mathematically, this translates into the following:

c Nws; = c NWEi = o

Calculating the concentration

of

the LFG constituents

in

the lEA was then accomplished using the

following simplified relationship:

Csox; = ((Q X

CrNV;

X w,EA X Luu;)

+

MH Jid_

(VNx

W1EA)

+ (Vwx L1EA)

The calculated LFG constituent concentrations within the lEA

(CBoxi)

are presented in Table

II

for the

Eastern lEA. CBoxi was then used as the estimate

of

CJNWsi and

CINWEi

for the Western lEA analysis, since

the Western lEA is located conceptually downwind

of

the Eastern lEA and would, therefore,

be

influenced by the LFG concentrations coming out of the box for the Eastern lEA.

The Box Model for the Western Inhalation Exposure Area

This box includes the northwestern portion

of

the site. As shown

in

Figure

4,

the Western lEA has

an

approximate length (in the southeast to northwest wind direction) of 325 feet (99.1

m)

and an

approximate width (in the southwest to northeast direction)

of 235

feet (71.6

m).

The maximum mixing

layer height was again conservatively assumed to be 6 feet (1.8 m) to represent the height

of

the breathing

zone of the on-site receptors. As discussed above, the actual mixing height is likely to

be

greater than 6

feet, which would cause the resulting outdoor air concentration to be lower that what was projected for

this assessment. The Western lEA box model dimensions were:

WESTERN

lEA

WIEA =

71.6 m

2-15





Results of the Outdoor Air Risk Assessment

The MCP requires cumulative cancer and non-cancer risks to be calculated due to multiple chemicals and

exposure routes. A cumulative HI and ELCR were calculated for each EA. The development of he results

is

shown in Table 14, and the results are summarized in Table 15. No risk estimates for exposure to the outdoor

air exceeded the MassDEP cumulative risk thresholds.

2.4.3 Quantitative Cumulative Inhalation Pathway Risk Assessment

This section summarizes the quantitative aggregation of the indoor and outdoor risk results for each

receptor that was quantitatively evaluated in this assessment (a qualitative assessment of the potential

inhalation risks to Off-Site Residents and potential future CommerciaVRetail Customers

is

discussed in

Section 2.4.4 below). Each receptor associated with the potential site development (with the exception of

the Construction Worker, the Utility Worker, and the Trespasser who are assumed to spend all of their

time outdoors) was assumed to spend some portion of their time at the site exposed to both indoor air and

the outdoor air. Therefore, the total exposure for each receptor was quantified by:

• calculating the fraction of time that each receptor spends indoors and multiplying that fraction by

the projected ELCR and/or HI calculated for that receptor for each lEA in the indoor air risk

assessment (which implicitly assumes a full day of inhalation exposure according to that specific

exposure scenario);

• calculating the fraction of time that each receptor spends outdoors and multiplying that fraction

by the projected ELCR and/or

HI

calculated for that receptor for each lEA in the outdoor air risk

assessment; and

• summing the two components of the inhalation risk to develop a combined cumulative ELCR

and/or

HI

for each receptor for each EA.

The ELCRs for the Adult and Child On-Site Residents were combined to estimate an ELCR for potential

Lifetime exposure. These steps were completed for each receptor for which a quantitative evaluation was

to performed, and the results are presented

in

Table

16.

A cumulative ELCR of l.OE-05

or

less indicates that a condition of "no significant risk" of harm to

human health exists based on the projected level of cancer health effects. The combined cumulative

ELCRs for all but the Lifetime On-Site Resident were below this threshold. The combined cumulative

ELCR for the Lifetime On-Site Resident exceeded this threshold in the Site-Wide lEA (ELCR of 1.26E-

05) and the Western lEA (ELCR of 2.77E-05). These ELCRs were driven by the LFG constituent

tetrachloroethene, which was not detected

in

the samples collected in the Eastern EA.

It

should be

recalled that the Site-Wide lEA includes both the Western and Eastern lEAs. The risk associated with the

Site-Wide lEA

is

primarily associated with the projected exposure to LFG in the Western IgA, since the

combined cumulative ELCR for the Eastern lEA (ELCR of 5.50E-07)

is

well below the risk threshold of

l.OE-05.

A cumulative

HI

of 1.0 or less indicates that a condition of "no significant risk" of harm to human health

exists based on the projected level non-cancer health effects. The highest HI calculated for this assessment

(1.26E-02 for the Child On-Site Resident in the Site-Wide lEA) is almost two orders of magnitude lower

than the threshold value. Therefore, it can be concluded that there

is

"no significant risk" to any of the

assessed receptors with respect to non-cancer health effect endpoints relative to proposed development.

2-17



2.4.4 Qualitative Cumulative Inhalation Pathway Assessments for the Off-Site Residents

and the Commercial/ Retail Customers

Supplementing the quantitative assessment discussed above, qualitative assessments of the human health

risks attributable to inhalation exposure to hypothetical Off-Site Adult and Child Residents and a

potential Commercial/Retail Customer also were performed.

On July 15, 2008, methane was detected at sampling location GP-20 at a concentration of 17.4% of the

Lower Explosive Limit (LEL) (Griffin Engineering 2008). This location was approximately 30 feet from

a residential structure on the northern edge of the Northridge Homes Cooperative property (located

adjacent to the southwestern corner of the site). This 2.5 story structure is Building K of that complex.

A crushed stone trench exists along the property line between GP-20 and Building

K.

It is believed that

the trench may have been installed

in

the past for gas venting purposes. On July 22, 2008 (at the request

of

the MassDEP Solid Waste Section), Griffin Engineering conducted additional methane sampling

within and around Building

K.

Soil gas samples were collected on both sides of the crushed stone trench

to determine if it was acting as an effective barrier to gas migration toward the off-site residential

complex. Thirteen soil gas samples were collected

in

the vicinity

of

the crushed stone trench. Eight

of

the

samples were collected on the Northridge Homes Cooperative side ofthe trench and five were collected

on the side toward the site and the former landfill. Field screening of the soil gas detected methane in the

subsurface at concentrations exceeding 25%

of

the LEL at two locations on the landfill side

of

the trench.

Methane was detected at a maximum concentration of only 0.2% of the LEL on the residential side of the

trench. These results indicate that the crushed stone trench was effectively venting the LFG to the ambient

air at this time. Additional sampling in the basement laundry room

of

Building K revealed

no

methane.

Utility penetrations into Building K also were examined by Griffin Engineering. Natural gas, electricity

and telephone services were all found to be installed on the outside of the building foundation wall and to

penetrate the building wall above grade. As such, these services cannot provide a preferential pathway for

potential LFG migration into the building. The water and sewer services for Building K enter the building

through the lowest slab level. Air quality testing near the sewer cleanout, the water main shut-offvalve, in

the hallway in the lowest level of the building, and in the laundry room of Building K provided no

evidence of LFG intrusion into Building

K.

Based on these observations, there was no evidence that LFG

is migrating into Building K.

While the sampling on either side

of

the crushed stone trench,

in

the basement

of

Building K, and near the

utility penetrations of the walls of Building K did not quantifY the levels of specific toxic VOCs (i.e., the

samples were field screened and only analyzed for methane), the lack

of

methane at any significant level

on the residential side

of

the trench and no indication

of

methane

in

Building K (the residence closest to

the former landfill) supports the position that other toxic LFG constituents also are not migrating to and

into this building. As such, a condition

of

"no significant risk"

is

indicated to exist relative to the potential

inhalation

of

LFG constituents in indoor air by an Off-Site Resident. As the projected outdoor air

inhalation risks for the On-Site Resident were well below the MassDEP threshold levels, the outdoor air

inhalation risks at an off-site residence (like Building

K)

should be even less. While the Off-Site Resident

would have the same exposure parameters as the On-Site Resident, the outdoor air concentrations

of

the

LFG constituents should be less than are projected for the on-site locations due to the fact that the existing

off-site residential locations are generally upwind of the site or farther from the landfill source material

(which allows for greater mixing and dispersion of the LFG emissions). Taken together, the inhalation

risks to the Off-Site Resident resulting from indoor and outdoor exposures are indicated to be very small

and pose "no significant risk" to the Off-Site Residents (adult or child).

2-18



Because the human health risks relative to both cancer and non-cancer health effects were found to not be

significant for the Commercial/Retail Worker, it can be inferred that LFG constituents at the site would

also not pose a significant risk to the Commercial/Retail Customer (who will spend less time on-site, both

indoors and outdoors, than the Commercial/Retail Worker).

2.4.5 Qualitative Odor Threshold Evaluation for Hydrogen Sulfide (H

2

S)

H

2

S is a colorless, flammable gas that is easily identified by a "rotten egg" odor. H

2

S can cause eye, nose

and throat irritation at concentrations less than I 0 ppm, with higher concentrations causing significant

health issues and even death. Olfactory fatigue (which is when a person looses the ability to smell a

particular compound) occurs at high concentrations and/or with continuous exposure to lower

concentrations of H

2

S in air. This can lead individuals to believe that there is no danger present, even as

concentrations increase to potentially more toxic levels. Table

17

summarizes the soil gas H

2

S data

collected at the site and the odor thresholds and occupational health limits for airborne H

2

S

from several

pertinent sources.

H

2

S was detected at GP-6

in

December, 2007 and at GP-6R

in

August, 2008. There were also detections

at two locations on the landfill side of a gravel trench along the western boundary of the site during the

same sampling event near Building

K

discussed above, although was

no

H

2

S

detected inside Building

K.

The detected concentrations were above all three odor thresholds listed

in

Table 17, but below the lowest

occupational health limit

of

I0 ppm. These detections confirm the presence

of

H

2

S in the Western lEA at

levels that should be easily smelled by the average person. No sampling for H

2

S was performed

in

the

Eastern lEA. As such, it cannot be determined whether H

2

S may pose an odor problem or a potential

health concern in that part

of

the site. It has been shown that H

2

S may have detrimental health effects on

children at levels as low as 0.6 ppm (Simonton and Spears 2007).

2.5 Uncertainty Analysis

Risk assessments are subject to a number

of

uncertainties which necessitate the making

of

assumptions

for quantitative analysis. For risk assessments, these assumptions are typically based on "best estimate"

values

of

the uncertain parameters or, more typically, on conservative assumptions selected specifically

so

that the estimated exposures or risks will not be underestimated. The following discussion examines

the primary uncertainties associated with this risk assessment and their implications relative to this risk

assessment.

2.5.1 LFG

Composition

The composition of the LFG that may be emitted in the future was estimated based on a set of

measurements

of

the soil gas at seven locations throughout the site. As noted previously, the analytical

results from a couple

of

samples had to be discounted and not used

in

the risk assessment (e.g., due to

natural gas infiltration from a pipeline leak and destruction of the sampling port). Consequently, the LFG

composition was based on a relatively small number

of

measurements.

An

analysis

of

this data was

performed and

it

was seen that the soil gas appeared to

be

characteristically different

in

the eastern and

western portions of the site with respect to the set

of

constituents that was detected and their

concentrations. This finding supported the decision to establish separate exposure areas for the risk

assessment. However, splitting the relatively small data set left each

of

the two lEAs with only three or

four samples on which to base the LFG constituent compositions. While the calculated average LFG

constituent concentrations for each lEA are considered to be representative for use

in

this risk assessment,

some uncertainty associated with this characterization exists. For example, tetrachloroethene (the risk

2-19



driver for the indoor air risk assessments for the Western lEA) was only detected at one

of

three locations

in the Western lEA and was not detected at all

in

the Eastern lEA.

No soil gas samples from the Eastern lEA were analyzed for H

2

S.

Based on the sampling performed

in

the Western lEA, possible odor concerns might

be

anticipated for the entire site if no mitigation steps are

taken.

2.5.2 LFG Generation and Emission Rate

The LFG generation and assumed emission rates were estimated by Griffin Engineering using the

industry standard LandGEM model that was developed by USEPA. This model was selected for use due

to its demonstrated applicability to municipal landfills of the size and age of the Former Brimbal Avenue

Landfill. The default modeling inputs

in

LandGEM were based on empirical data from a large number

of

similar U.S. landfills. While there is variability

in

the exact nature

of

municipal wastes and the amount

of

LFG they can generate, the LandGEM model is reported to provide an accurate prediction of the LFG

generation. Site-specific waste-in-place histories were used

in

the modeling, and other input parameters

were tailored to site-specific values whenever the site documentation allowed. LandGEM

is

expected to

provide a conservative estimate

of

the LFG generation and emission rate (i.e., reflecting greater LFG

emissions than may actually occur). The LandGEM predictions

of

LFG generation were seen to be

decreasing with time due to the fact that waste placement ended some time ago. As a conservative

measure, the current LFG emission rate (i.e., the highest value projected with respect to the future

composting scenario) was used in the risk assessment. Over the next 20 years the LFG generation rate is

projected to drop by approximately 55% (see Table 9) which would result

in

a commensurate drop

in

the

projected exposure point concentrations and inhalation risks.

2.5.3 Atmospheric Mixing and Dispersion Modeling Using a Box Model

The mixing and wind-borne dispersion of LFG emissions in the outdoor air at a future developed site will

be influenced by a number

of

site-specific aspects

of

the proposed development, the local meteorology,

and the type and exact location of the activities associated with the development. Many of these factors

have not been specified at this time. As such, a detailed modeling

of

the potential mixing and dispersion

of

released LFG constituents at the landfill could not be supported.

For this assessment, a conservative steady-state evaluation was conducted which assumed

no

build-up

of

LFG constituent concentrations in the air within the box over time (i.e., established the maximum

concentration expected within the box). The mixing height parameter limits the amount of air into which

the LFG emissions can mix and dilute by placing a top on the box. The smaller the mixing height, the

more conservative the analysis will be in terms

of

not providing too much dilution volume for the LFG

constituents to mix within. As such, the smallest representative and plausible mixing height

of

6 feet

(1.83 m) was selected for each

of

the lEA box model simulations. This value

is

reflective

of

the minimal

height

of

the potential future intrusions into the box by structures, landscaping, vegetation, and vehicles

that would serve to divert and mix the air flow within the box. This height also is consistent with the

thickness

of

the breathing zone

of

a typical adult. Increasing the height

of

the box to account for the

proposed buildings would increase the dilution

of

the LFG constituents within the air, thus lowering the

exposure point concentrations and the corresponding ELCR and HI projections. A reduction in height

(especially for the Western lEA to account for the presence of children) would decrease the dilution, and

increase the ELCR and HI projections somewhat. The assumed mixing height value

is

reasonably

conservative and appropriate given the uncertainties associated with the nature and details

of

the future

development that have been considered at this time.

2-20



Wind speed inputs into the box model calculations were selected based on long term average

meteorological data from the Weather Underground website. This data was selected because it was

collected at a nearby analogous location and had the required published meteorological information. The

seacoast areas along the north shore

of

Boston experience similar local wind and meteorological patterns.

Observing that the predominant wind directions annually for this area are from the southeast, applications

of the box models were set-up to account for the inflow influence of the "upwind" portions of the site.

This approach assumes the greatest inflow of LFG constituents into the lEA, as winds blowing from the

northwest would pass over little or no emplaced waste and pick up minimal LFG emissions. As such, the

wind data was used to set-up the box models in a conservative fashion such that an underestimate

of

the

resulting risks was very unlikely.

The portions

of

the site that were defined as the Eastern and Western lEAs (and also the Site-Wide lEA)

are not perfectly rectangular, as is assumed in the box modeling. The lengths and widths assumed for the

boxes used

in

the mixing and dispersion analyses for each lEA were selected to maintain an equivalent

overall area for that lEA and

in

consideration

of

the relative amount

of

emplaced waste that was indicated

to

be

beneath the rectangular lEA and the actual lEA boundary. This approximation is not expected to

introduce significant uncertainty into the results

of

the outdoor air risk assessment.

2.5.4 Exposure Frequency and Exposure Duration, and Daily Exposure Time

The ELCR and HI values calculated using the MCP exposure relationship do not explicitly account for a

receptor-specific Exposure Frequency (EF), Exposure Duration (ED), or exposure during only a portion

of

a given day. This exposure relationship implicitly reflects a scenario

of

continuous exposure through

the underlying development

of

the toxicity values and the averaging times associated with the inhalation

exposure relationship. The anticipated exposures

of the identified site receptors under the proposed future

development scenario will not be exposed to the released LFG constituents continuously. For most

of

the

groups that would be expected to access the future site, the exposure scenarios reflect less than

24 hour/day exposure. Alternate formulations of the ELCR and HI relationships allow these exposure

factors to be explicitly considered through the multiplicative reduction factors (i.e., EF /365 for the HI

and

EFxED 125,550

for the ELCR). These exposure-related adjustments for the non-residential receptors

would only serve to reduce the projected risks for the various on-site workers, the Day Care Toddlers, and

the Trespasser.

As

the risks to these receptors were already less than the MassDEP thresholds, the

exposure-related adjustments would only lead to even lower projected risks that would also reflect "no

significant risk."

The fractions

of

time each receptor was assumed to

be

indoors (and exposed to the indoor air) and

outdoors (and exposed to the ambient air) were explicitly accounted for in the combined cumulative risk

projections for each receptor.

2.5.5 Vapor Intrusion Modeling Input Parameters

The assumed building characteristics and soil properties used

in

the J&E Modeling for the indoor air risk

assessment were conservative MassDEP defaults (i.e., the values used to establish the MCP Method I

GW-2 Standards) or characteristics established by site-specific measurement or observation. Site-specific

commerciaVretail and day care building dimensions reflective of the proposed development plan depicted

in Figure

2.

As such, the projected risks are likely to be higher than would actually result from

development

of

the site.

Actual future structures may have larger footprints, taller internal spaces, or thicker slabs and foundations

than were assumed for this assessment. All

of

these differences would lead to lower projected indoor air

2-21



concentrations and lower projected inhalation risks. In addition, many modern commerciaVretail

buildings are designed to maintain a positive pressure differential with respect to tbe outside air.

An

effective positive pressure design would essentially eliminate vapor intrusion concerns.

2.5.6 Exposure Parameters

The assumed exposure parameters used

in

this inhalation risk assessment were either based on site

specific considerations or were the conservative regulatory defaults.

As

such, risks are not likely to have

been underestimated.

2.5.7 Toxicity Criteria

This risk assessment incorporated the currently published MassDEP ShortForm and federal toxicity

values in accordance with the hierarchy of preferred sources established by MassDEP. No published, peer

reviewed chronic inhalation toxicity criteria or chemical parameters were identified for 4-ethyltoluene or

1,2-dichloro-1, 1 2,2-tetrafluoroethane, and no appropriate surrogates were identified. The lack

of

suitable

inhalation toxicity values for these two constituents would lead to a slight underestimation of the

inhalation risk. Given the level of conservatism included in the other toxicity values and throughout the

assessment, tbis underestimation

is

not significant with respect to the results

of

tbe risk assessment.

2-22



3.0 SUMMARY AND FINDINGS

The Town of Beverly is considering a proposal to allow development on a portion of the Former Brimbal

Avenue Landfill in Beverly, MA known as the North Shore Commons Site following the closure of the

former landfill. This human health risk assessment was conducted to evaluate the inhalation risks to

potential future commercial/retail, day care, residential, and other users

of

the site assuming the site

is

developed. The risk assessment focused on potential inhalation exposures to LFG constituents that could

be encountered either inside the proposed new buildings or outside the buildings in the near-field

ambient air.

Analytical data from on-site and off-site sampling performed in 2007 and 2008 were compiled and

evaluated with regard to spatial trends. Based on differences in the detected sets

of

soil gas contaminants,

the overall site was broken down into a Western Inhalation Exposure Area (where a Day Care facility

is

proposed to be built), an Eastern Inhalation Exposure Area (where Commercial/Retail and Residential

facilities are proposed to be built), and a Site-Wide Inhalation Exposure Area (i.e., the whole site). The

soil gas characteristics for each Inhalation Exposure Area were used in

combination with conservative

indoor air vapor intrusion modeling and outdoor air atmospheric mixing and dispersion modeling to

estimate the concentrations

of

the LFG constituents that may be present

in

the air at potential future

exposure points associated with site development. These concentrations were then combined with current

peer-reviewed inhalation toxicity values to project the potential cancer and non-cancer risks for the

persons that may access and use this area in the future (as the site is currently vacant).

The findings

of

the risk assessment were as follows:

• The analyses indicated that there

is

"no significant risk"

of

harm to human health for any

of

the

evaluated receptors

in

any portion of the site with the exception of a potential future resident with

lifelong exposure to the released LFGs in the western portion of the site. The projected ELCR for

this scenario exceeded the MassDEP threshold of 1.0 E-5, due to potential vapor intrusion into

the indoor air

of

a hypothetical new slab-on-grade residence in this area. The LFG constituent

tetrachloroethene was the principal risk driver. No inhalation risk concerns were identified for the

other receptors in the Western Inhalation Exposure Area, or for any of the evaluated receptors in

the Eastern Inhalation Exposure Area. The tetrachloroethene in the western portion

of

the site

also caused the projected cancer risk for a potential future resident with lifelong Site-Wide

exposure to exceed the MassDEP threshold. The tetrachloroethene was only detected in the soil

gas at one location in the Western Inhalation Exposure Area. No inhalation risk issues were

identified relative to exposure to the outdoor air under any

of

the evaluated scenarios.

• Regarding the potential significance

of

H

2

S relative to development, no sampling was performed

for H

2

S

in

the Eastern Inhalation Exposure Area, and only 2

of

3 samples collected in the Western

Inhalation Exposure Area were analyzed for H

2

S. The detection ofH

2

S in the Western Inhalation

Exposure Area (at a maximum concentration

of

4.2 ppm) exceeded a number

of

published odor

thresholds (which ranged between 0.13 ppm and

8.1

ppm). As such, it is likely that people would

be able to smell H

2

S in the Western Inhalation Exposure Area if no mitigative steps are taken. It

could not be determined whether H

2

S may pose an odor problem or a potential health concern in

the eastern part

of

the site since the H

2

S levels

in

the soil gas

in

this area have not been

quantified.

• While the off-site sampling associated with Building K

of

the neighboring residential complex

did not quantifY the levels of specific toxic VOCs, the lack of methane at any significant level on

3-1



the residential side

of

the off-site interceptor trench and no indication

of

methane in Building K

(the residence closest to the former landfill) supports the position that other toxic LFG

constituents also are not migrating to and into this building. As such, a condition of "no

significant risk" is indicated to exist relative to the potential inhalation of LFG constituents by an

Off-Site Resident.

The uncertainty analysis indicated that there

is

a moderate to high level

of

confidence

in

these findings.

3-2



4.0 REFERENCES

ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry). 2008. Available online at http://www.

atsdr.cdc.gov/mrls.html

CaiEPA (California EPA). 2008. Office

of

Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. Available online at

http:l/www.oehha.ca.gov/risklchemicalDBI/index.asp.

Griffin Engineering (Griffin Engineering Group, LLC). 2008. Letter from Robert

H.

Griffin,

P.E.

to Mr.

John Carrigan, Solid Waste Section. MassDEP, "Notification

of

Exceedance

of

25% LEL at Property

Line", Brimbal Avenue Property, Beverly, MA. July 23.

MassDEP (Massachusetts Department

of

Environmental Protection). 1996 Guidance for Disposal Site

Risk Characterization. Interim Final Policy #WSC/ORS-95-141, March.

Simonton, Scott and Morgan Spears. 2007. Human Health Effects from Exposure to Low

Level Concentrations

of

Hydrogen Sulfide. Occupational Health and Safety. Available online at

http:l/www.ohsonline.com/articles/50654/.

USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2004. Johnson and Ettinger Model Spreadsheets for

Estimating Subsurface Vapor Intrusion into Buildings, Version 3.1, February. USEPA Version.

USEP

A.

2008. Integrated Risk Information System. Available online at http:l/cfpub.epa.gov/

ncealiris/index.cfm.

4-1



FIGURES



I

)

Fi

Site Lo

North Shore

Beve



' - 'V I_AUV MJ ·Beverly, MA

~

Figure

2

Proposed Layout for

Site Development

North Shore Commons Site

Beverly,

MA



_.,""

\

\ \ \- - , " ~ - '

==-

·

==fM

l#ib:

1

d J L _pwrJr' _ '

~

\

ETRA TECH

EC,INC.

jO

0

t,

',

I

I

l

,. -

I

\

...

I

I

'

I

'

I

'

l

I

/

'

'

'

I

/

'

I

J

/

I

r

·

I

0

CP

- 17

I

I

i

/

(0£S

TROY[f))

'

'

/

J

I

i

I

I

\

I

\

·,

'.

I

I

\

l

\

'

I

I

'

\

'

\

I

\

\

I

'

I

\ \

I

I

I

I

I

I

\

\

. --

.,

~

~ · ·

.J_,

I

\

I

\

\

I

j;P.- 16

\

0 ( o . . ~ T R 0 Y f ) )

\

I \ \

I \ '

\ ' ,

I -

\

NOR'lHl<tO GI: Hct.I ES COOI'ERATI"E, INC.

IE)

l oct. Hill PAt£ I

i t l i 0 ~ 1 0 ' L ~

LE

G

EN

D

GP-228__

EX. GAS PRO

BE

CP

-

16

0

RIZ

- 1 ®

C81•

GAS

PROB

E DESTR O

YE

D

CROUNWAITR MOI\ITOR ING WRL

DR AI

N MANHOLE

CA TCH BASIN

\

I

"""""

T I ' T A ' «

1 0 2

......

,,

0 ',,,

~ , . - , - - - - - - - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

'

_

G) LGP-2

{

,.. ___

\ I

"-----',;1

"---- --- ---

c:y'CP-2.3



_,..

~

TETRA TECH EC,

INC.

\

~

t,

I

70

"'

/ e .

~

--

1

111/'

-• l __-- -<

"

/

\

\ / , . ~ ~ - - "

/

'

'\ , ' '

/ \, · : = = = : : = = = : . ~ ~ ~

~ ' ]

/ 0 CP- 17 ' ' - t ~ , ; ; , J ~ t

' ' • ,:;V

_,,._

.

'

(lfl7HOY D)

\ ---'J<"'}F

itr ' ' ·

l

' : \ <>r\ ' '

\ I \

\ ' '

- - - - - - - ~ - - - / I I '

' - - - 'CP-8 \ ' • , . ,_

~ ~ ~ J (OESTROYfD

I

0

I '

...

'

'

'

'

.. ' '

',

' \ I '

'

---

'•,

'

'

\

' - , . UH

N1£A \

',

' ........ ____

_

' 1M,770 *S. F \ '

,

I

Exposure

Area

l \

~ . . .

-....

' - - - VHB

-

104

' '

--e -- -- ---

-----

,-. ' , .,_

. : ~ . . . c : P

'' ', - -

8 MW- t

'IHB-101

', 0

', '..;;:::........ ti) \.,

'

'\

'

' I H B ~ } f } . J

'

1

_0 UJP-2 ' , , ,

' ,

I ( • - -

-,

',,

\.

\_

,/

'

____

,

• ,·.-;,

NOR'lHlitOGI: Ha.4ES COOI'ERA

I ~ ~ INC

.

lEI

IOI:t.

1W. PMi£

I

fUI<ItliGl1>\.

. . . . . Z2

LEGEND

GP-22

0

EX.

GAS

PROB

E

CP-

16

0

RTZ

- 1

fiJ<

CBT•

GAS

PROBE OESTR O

CROUNWATER MONITO

DRA

IN MAN HO

LE

CA TCH BASIN

Approximate

Site-Wide lEA Box

'



TABLES



Table 1. Summary of Landfill Gas Sampling Results for 2008

>In

I

·Area

Date

GP-20

1RI GP-12

I ~

I GP-

........ " uo"

Western

Inhalation Eastern Inhalation

Detection

Exposure Area Exposure Area

Limit

Gases- ASTM D1946-% (v/v)

Carbon Dioxide 13 3.8 16

11

7.4 9.7 9.6

2.1

.....

...... . - . 2 ___

2.1

....1? ..

12

13

N i " _ ' : ' ~ c "

74 72 77

72 75 70 75

Methane 8.4 7.6 0.027

13 NO 6.0 0.2

Carbon Monoxide

NO

ND

NO NO NO NO

NO

T0-15- ppb (v/v)

Acetone 10

16 .••

19

NO NO

20 27

19

..3.0

.28

.. 1.4

I No

.

__ 7._6_ 3.1

.. .. - - ~ 2

.

.....

··_.4.8

Benzyl C l , . ~ ; . ~ ~ · ·

25

NO NO

NO

NO NO NO NO


2.0

NO NO NO NO NO NO

NO

Bromoform 2.0 NO NO NO NO

NO NO NO

Bromomethane

4.0

NO NO NO

NO NO

NO NO

2-Butanone (MEK) 10

NO NO NO

NO NO

NO NO

...

q ? ~ h ' : n

i 10

NO NO NO NO

NO NO NO

Carbon Tetrachloride

2.0

NO

.... ~ ~ .

NO

NO NO NO NO

Chlorobenzene 2.0 2.2 : ND

NO NO

NO

NO

. ...... 2Q

.....

N.D

...

N[)

NO NO

NO

NO

.....

.. Nb

\.Alouo ucu oao oc

4.0

NO NO NO

NO NO

Chloroform 2.0 8.1

:, .......

·• 1\11'1

NO NO NO

NO

Chloromethane

. 4.q ..

NO

_ND_

_N[)_.

NO

ND_

........

\10

NO

..

1 2 ~ b i t i r c i m o m e t h a n e (EDB)

2.0

NO NO NO

NO NO NO NO

1 2-Dichlorobenzene

2.0

NO NO NO NO NO NO

NO

1,3-L

2.0

ND NO NO NO

NO

NO NO

1A-Dichlorobenzene

6.0

NO

NO

NO NO NO NO NO


2.0 4;0•

I ~ L I (

•.

.-.;-21

NO NO NO

ND

1,1·

2.0

NO

ND

NO NO

NO NO NO

1 2-Dichloroethane

2.0

NO NO NO NO

~ ~ i

NO

Nb

cis-1

,2-Dichloroethene

2.0 7.2

. - } _ ~

ND ·,

•·••·

5.1

NO

'

••

< ? .

2.0

NO NO

.NO

NO NO NO NO

1

1-

•ucuoc"c

2.0 NO NO NO NO NO NO

NO

1 2-Dichloropropane

3.0

NO NO NO NO

NO NO NO

cis-1

... P e ~ e

....

3.0

NO NO

.. _ND

__

. ND_

NO NO

u a . .

o

:>-Uivo

2.0

~ ; ~ .. -.

•• • ~ g

...... ~ - - -

NO

ND

NO NO

1 2-Dichloro-1,1 2,2-tetrafluoroethane

2.0

·-··· 21

..

4.6

2.0

7.t_ .

iNo ·.

.. _7;8

6.8.< .

•

',:::6 .·

3;1

4-Ethyltoluene

2.0

1 ~ ~ · · ·

\is>···

'f'ib

. 6.3

2.3

·-··

. NO ·

No

Hexachlorobutadiene

4.0

NO NO

NO NO NO NO

2-Hexanone ' . ' ' '

10 NO

NO NO NO NO NO

NO

Methylene Chloride

2.0

ND NO NO

... Nb

2;5

. .

NO NO

4-Methyi-2-Pentanone (MIBK)

10

NO

~ - ~ , - - , •

1 .• ~

NO NO NO NO

2.0

1_ _

- ~ ' 2

'

, - JP

~ p

.2.7>

. 3 , ~

......

_ 2 , ~

1,1

,2,2-T cuavo uuo ucu oao

'

2.0

NO NO NO NO

NO NO NO

Tetrachloroethene

2.0

NO· .

.••..... ~ ~ - )

: .280··<

NO NO

NO

NO

Tolue111l

...

. ..

. ..... 2

9.

1 . . . . 1.9_·

_

1 1 2 ','

_1_5_

..... ·:

r 21 ___ ·-.

13

1 2,4-To ovo nuo

uuco

"c '

"

5.0

NO NO NO NO

NO

flib


2.0

NO NO NO

NO ND NO NO

1,1

,2-Trichloroethane

2.0

NO

NO NO ND

NO NO

. f\1[)

I

.. .. . . ; iTCE)

2.0

ND

··ND

-0

ND

NO

NO NO



Table 1. Summary of

Landfill

Gas Sampling Results for 2008

Site-Wide Inhalation Exposure Area

Sample Date

8/4/2008

Sample Location

GP-6R I GP-20 I GP-26 GP-11RI GP-12 I GP-21 GP-

Minimum

Detection

Limit

Western Inhalation

Exposure Area

Eastern Inhalation

Exposure Area

Trichlorofluoromethane 2.0 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

· - - ~ - • - ~ . , ? : . T E i . ' e ~ < : > r . < : > : ~ . , ? . , ? . : f i f i J . < : > r . < : > ' - ~ ? . ~ . ' - .................. .:_9______ ND ND ND ND ND ....

:J. ?....

.

.ti ?

1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 3.0

····No-··- ---·-No····

·····Ni5"-- ·-··g-;g·•·-

···s:a····

NO ND

1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 3.0

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

· - - ~ l ~ t t ~ ~ ~ ~ - ; ; -

····-······-·-··-··--······-········

·· · · · · · · J ~ · - · · · - · 1 · · - - ~ ~ - - - -

· · · - - ~ - - - ·

· · · · N ~ - : - - - - - ~ 5 · · · · · · - - ~ K - · - · · - - - ~ f - - · - · · · - - - ~ ,

Xvlenes (total) 4.0 I< H .· 12 6,2 · 17 13 <. 9.7 7.6

Sulfides- EPA

15/16- ppm

(v/v)

NS

NS NS NS NS

Hydrogen

sulfide

0.05

4;2

· · ND

... ~ E ~ . < : l ~ Y . I ~ _ U . f 9 . < ; . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...Q,Q?. ....... _f':I_Q

____

................. ':1.1?. ...........................................

···-··-·

Methyl mercaptan 0.05 ND ND

Ethyl mercaptan 0.05 ND

ND

___ i ' I . ~ . ~ Y . I

~ J . I f i _ c j _ t ; _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

.. . ..

_9

•.Q?.

..........

:J. ?.... ·--·-·-··-··- .... ':l.i?.

.... ······-···-· ......................... ·······-·

Carbon disulfide 0.025 ND

ND

Dimethyl disulfide 0.025 ND ND

Notes:

Bold indicates a

detection

NO Not Detected

NS Not Sampled

ppm parts per

million

ppb parts per billion





Table 3. Conceptual Site Model for the Potential Inhalation Exposures Associated with Development at th

Receptor Age Exposure Medium Exposure Route

Commercial/ Retail

Worker

Adult Indoor Air Inhalation

18-45 years Outdoor Air

Inhalation

Day Care

Worker

Adult Indoor Air Inhalation

18-45 years Outdoor Air Inhalation

Day Care Toddler

Child

Indoor Air

Inhalation

1-5 years

Outdoor Air Inhalation

Maintenance

Worker Adult Indoor Air Inhalation

18-45 years Outdoor Air

Inhalation

Landscape Worker Adult Indoor Air Inhalation


Construction Worker Adult

Outdoor Air

Inhalation

22 years

Utility

Worker

Adult


22 years

On-Site Resident Adult Indoor Air Inhalation

_ 1 8 ~ 4 5 _ y e a r s


-----------------

-- - - - - -------------------

--

-- - - - - - - - - - - - - --

Child

Indoor Air

Inhalation

1-8 years


Off-Site Resident Adult Indoor Air Inhalation

18-45

y e ~ ~ s _

_


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

-----

-- -

. ---·---·--·--------- ------ - - - -

Child

Indoor Air

Inhalation


Commercial/ Retail Customer

Adult

Indoor Air

Inhalation

_ 1 _ ~ - : i 5 _ } ' E ' C i r 1 J


. -

---

--

-- -

-----

-- -- - ---------

----------

Child

Indoor Air

Inhalation

1-8 vears

Outdoor Air

Inhalation

Trespasser

Adolescent Outdoor Air Inhalation

8-15 years

Notes.

Quantitative analysis means

that

cancer and non-cancer risk levels were projected for this receptor.

Qualitative analysis means that. the risk to this

receptor

was evaluated in comparison to the risks of

another

receptor for which

quantitatively assessed that

was similarly exposed to higher levels of contamination for a longer

frequency

or duration of expos



Table

4. Inhalation

Toxicity Values

for

the

Detected Landfill Gas Constituents Associated with

Cancer and No

CAS

Inhalation

Detected LFG Constituent

Number

Unit Risk

(f g/mar'

Acetone 67-64-1 NA

Benzene 71-43-2 7.8E-06

Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 NA

Chloroform 67-66-3 2.3E-05

Dichlorodifluoromethane 75-71-8 NTV

cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethene 156-59-2

NA

1 2-Dichloro-1, 1 2,2-tetrafluoroethane

76-14-2 NTV

Ethyl benzene 100-41-4 NA

4-Ethyltoluene 622-96-8

NTV

Methylene Chloride 75-09-2

4.7E-07

Styrene

100-42-5 5.7E-07

Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 127-18-4 5.5E-05

Toluene 108-88-3

INAD

Trichloroethene (TCE)

79-01-6 1.7E-06

1 2,4-Trimethylbenzene 95-63-6

NA

Vinyl chloride 75-01-4

8.8E-06

Xylenes (total)

1330-20-7

INAD

Hydrogen Sulfide

7783-06-4 INAD

NOTES.

ATSDR

IRIS

Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (minimal risk levels).

U.S.

EPA

Integrated Risk Information System. Accessed August 22, 2008.

http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris/index.cfm

Reference.

SOURCE Concentration

(mg/m•)

IRIS 8.00E-01

MassDEP 3.00E-02

IRIS 2.00E-02

MassDEP 6.60E-01

NTV 2.00E-01

IRIS 3.50E-02

NTV NTV

IRIS 1.00E+OO

NTV NTV

IRIS 1.06E+OO

MassDEP 1.00E+OO

MassDEP 4.60E+OO

IRIS

5.00E+OO

MassDEP 1.80E-01

IRIS

6.00E-03

MassDEP 1.00E-01

IRIS

1.00E-01

IRIS 2.00E-03

MassDEP

MassDEP

Shortfonms for Human Health Risk

Assessment

Under the MCP. Updated February 2007.

http://www.mass.gov/dep/service/compliance/riskasmt.htm

INAD

NA

NTV

ORNL

PPRTV

Per the U.S. EPA, data are inadequate for an assessment of human carcinogenic potential.

This compound is not considered a carcinogen by the U.S

EPA

No

Inhalation RfC and/or

IUR

available.

Oak Ridge National Laboratory National Regional Database of Preliminary Remediation Goals.

http://epa-prgs.ornl.gov/chemicals/index.shtml

USEPA

Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value. February 28, 2008.

SOURC

MassD

MassD

MassD

MassD

ORNL

MassD

NTV

MassD

NTV

ATSD

MassD

MassD

MassD

MassD

PPRT

MassD

MassD

IRIS



Table 5.

Site-Specific Subsurface Soil and Site Parameters that Were Used to

Project Vapor Diffusion and Intrusion Into Indoor Air for the Cumulative

Inhalation Pathway Risk Calculations

(Same for All Scenarios)

Input Parameter

Default Value

Depth Below Grade to Bottom of Enclosed Space Floor

111

15

em (5.9 inches)

Soil Gas Depth Below Grade

1

'1

133.5 em (52.6 inches)

Average Soil Temperature

131

JO"C

Thickness of Soil Stratum A

1

'1

133.5 em (52.6 inches)

Stratum A SCS Soil Type 1'

1

S (Sand)

Stratum A Soil Dry Bulk Density 1

3

1

1.5

g/cm

3

Stratum A Soil Total Porosity 1

3

1

0.43 (unitless)

Stratum A Soil Water-Filled Porosity 1

3

1

0.06 cm

3

I cm

3

Soil Stratum for Estimating Soil Vapor Permeabilityl'l

Stratum A

Enclosed Space Floor Thickness

111

15 em (5.9 inches)

Soil-Building Pressure Differential [J]

40 g/cm,s

Enclosed Space Floor Height

13

1

244 em (96.1 inches)

Floor-Wall Seam Crack Width

[JJ

0.1 em (0.039 inches)

Average Vapor Flow Rate into Building

131

5 Llmin

NOTES:

[I] Consistent with a future slab-on-grade structure.

[2] Consistent with the depth

of

the soil gas samples collected at the site.

[3] Soil parameter values used

in

the vapor intrusion modeling for the MassDEP MCP

GW-2 Method I Standards.

[4] Site-specific assumption.



Table

6.

Scenario-Specific Building Dimensions and Receptor Exposure Parameters

Used in the

Cumulative Inhalation Pathway Risk Calculations

Receptor

Input Parameter

Adult Child Commercial Day Care

Day Care

Resident Resident

I

Retail Worker

Toddler

Enclosed Space

961

em

961 em

2724.9 em

3773.4 em 3773.4 em

Floor Length (32 ft) (32 ft) (89 ft) (124ft)

(124ft)

Enclosed Space

961

em 961 em 1886.7 em 2305.1 em 2305.1 em

Floor Width

(32 ft)

(32 ft) (62 ft) (76ft) (76 ft)

Averaging Time

70 yrs

70 yrs

70yrs

70 yrs 70 yrs

(Cancer)

Averaging Time 30yrs

7 yrs

25 yrs 25 yrs

4 yrs

(Non-Cancer)

Indoor Air Exchange 0.45 I hr 0.45 I hr 1.0 I hr 0.45 I

hr

0.45 I hr

Rate

Exposure Duration 30 yrs

7 yrs

25

yrs

25 yrs

4yrs

Exposure Frequency 365 dayslyr 365 dayslyr

250 dayslyr

250 dayslyr 250 dayslyr



Table

7.

Summary of the Results of the Indoor Air Risk Assessment for the North Shore Commons Site

Site-Wide Inhalation Exposure Area Eastern Inhalat ion Exposure Area W

Projected Projected Cumulative Projected Projected

Cumulative Non-Cancer Hazard Cumulative Cumulative Non- C

Receptors

Excess Lifetime Index Excess Lifet ime Cancer Hazard Ex

Cancer Risk Cancer Risk

Index

C

Commercial/ Retail Worker 8.66E-07 1.29E-03 3.52E-08 1.21E-03

Adult

Day

Care Worker 1.19E-06 1.79E-03 4.82E-08 1.68E-03

Day

Care Toddler

1.91 E-07

1.79E-03

7.70E-09

1.68E-03

On-Site Resident- Adult

1.51E-05

1.50E-02

6.57E-07

1.40E-02

On-Site Resident - Child 1.50E-02 1.40E-02

On-Site Resident - Lifetime

1.74E-05

3.49E-02 7.48E-07 3.26E-02

Notes.

Bold

indicates an exceedance of the MassDEP excess lifetime cancer risk threshold of 1.0 E-05.



Table 8.

Summary

of

the Results

of

the

Indoor Air

Risk Assessment for the Receptors Associated with Future

Development

No.

of

Risk lEA Where Risk Receptor

for

Whom

Calculated

Health Effect Type

Threshold Thresholds Were Risk Thresholds Cumulative

Exceedances Exceeded Were Exceeded

Risk

{#)

Cancer 2 Site-Wide On-Site Lifetime

1.51 E-05

Resident

Western On-Site Lifetime 3.31 E-05

Resident

Non-Cancer

0 None None

None



Table 9.

Summary

of

the LandGEM Modeling Results for LFG and Hydrogen Sulfide

Generation Rates over Time for the Former Brimbal Avenue Landfill

Year Total LFG Generation Hydrogen Sulfide Generation

(m /year)

(m' m"-

year)

1

(m /year)

(m'/m -yearf

1

2008 152,000 6.29 0.1368 5.66E-06

2018 101,900 4.22 0.09169 3.80E-06

2028

68,290

2.83

0.06146 2.54E-06

2038

45,780.

1.90 0.0412 1.71E-06

2048

30,680

1.27

0.02762 1.14E-06

2058 20,570

0.85

0.01851 7.66E-07

2068 13,790 0.57

0.01241

5.14E-07

2078 9,242 0.38 0.008318 3.44E-07

NOTE:

[I]

The value

of

cubic meters

ofthe

Total LFG

or

Hydrogen Sulfide generated per

square meter

of

emplaced waste is based on a waste footprint of24,156 square meters

or 6 acres (i.e., the estimated footprint

of

the emplaced waste at the site).



Table 10. Average

Annual Wind

Speed and

Direction

Data

for the

Beverly Cove

Meteorological

Station, Bever

Monitoring

Year

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 8

Year

Averag

(mph) (mph)

(mph) (mph) (mph)

(mp.h) (mph) (mph)

(mph)

~ ~ n n u a l

Average Wind

Speed

2.0

1.9

0.5

1.4

1.1

0.8 0.8

1.1

1.2

Predominant Wind

Direction .

SE

SE ESE ESE E

ENE SSE ssw

SE

- - - -

-----

SOURCE: Weather Underground, Historical Weather for the Beverly Cove Weather Station, Beverly, MA. Accessed August 20, 2008

(http://www. wunderground .com/weatherstation/WXDailyH story.asp?l D=KMASTONE 1&day=20&year=2008&month=8&graphspan=ye

[1)

CONVERSION FACTOR:

1 mph = 0.44704 m/s



Table 11. Airborne Mixing and Dispersion Calculations for the Concentrations of Landfill Gas Constituents in


Influx with wind from the South

Influx with wind from the East

Influx from the Vents

Outflow with wind to North

Outflow with wind to East

Cone of LFG in the lEA or UA

DEFINITIONS

INwsi

IN

wEi

IN vi

OUTwNi=

OUTwwi=

CBOXi

Vs and

VN

VE

and Vw

WIEA

LIEA

MHIEA

Q

CINWSi

CINWEi

CINVi

ll'{ys;

=

Vs x"Tf;EAXMJ-kAJCCINws.

Il'{yEi = v;,x4EAXMJ-kAJCCINwE

IN V; = Q

X

CINVi

X

LIEA

X

WIEA

OUJ;N;

=v;;xw;dM fEAxCsox

OUJ:'w, = ~ x 4 E J C M I - f E A X C e o x ,

[

l

[

l

[

QxCINViXL

1

EAXWm

Vs XWIEA X c NWSi + VEX

LIEA

XCINWEi + = - - - - ' = . c . ~ = - ~

MHIE4

CBOX i = [( L )]

Vsx

WIEA) + (VEx IliA


"i"

in the wind blowing from the south [ug/s]

Influx ofLFG constituent "i" in the wind blowing from the east [ug/s]

Influx ofLFG constituent "i" from the LFG influx from within the footprint area of the bo

Outflow

ofLFG

constituent

"i"

in the wind blowing to the north [ug/s]

Outflow

ofLFG

constituent "i"

in

the wind blowing to the west [ug/s]

Concentration ofLFG constituent

"i"

in the box [ug/m

3

]

Average speed

of

the wind blowing from the south or to the north [rnls]

Average speed

of

the wind blowing from the east or to the west [rnls]

Width

of

he box [m]

Length of he box [m]

Mixing Height

of

the air

in

the box [m]

Flux ofLFG released per unit area within the footprint of he box [ m 3 / m 2 ~ s ]

Concentration of LFG constituent

"i"

in the clean wind blowing from the south into the b

Concentration

of

LFG constituent "i" in the clean wind blowing from the east into the box

Concentration

ofLFG

constituent

"i"

in the LFG emissions entering into the box [ug/m

3

]



Table 11. Airborne Mixing and

Dispersion Calculations

for

the

Concentrations of

Landfill

Gas Constituents in


V

8

and VN

VE and

Vw

WIEA

.

LIEA

MHIEA

(m/s) (m/s)

(m)

(m) (m)

IEastern lEA

Box Model

Parameters 0.54 0.54

-99.1

172.2 1.83

Eastern lEA

Cuoxi

CINWSi

CtNWEi CINVi

Detected

Volatile

Organic

Compounds

(uglm )

(ug/m ) (uglm )

(ug/m)

Acetone 5.74E-04

0.00 0.00

45.2

Benzene 7.64E-04

0.00

0.00

60.1

Chlorobenzene 1.17E-04 0.00

0.00

9.2

Chloroform 1.24E-04

0.00 0.00 9.8


1.26E-04

0.00 0.00

9.9


1.40E-04

0.00 0.00 11.0

1 2-Dichloro-1, 1 2,2-tetrafluoroethane 9.23E-04 0.00

0.00

72.7

Ethyl benzene 3.07E-04 0.00

0.00

24.2

4-Ethyltoluene

2.15E-04

0.00 0.00

16.9

Methylene Chloride 9.36E-05 0.00 0.00 7.4

Styrene 1.43E-04 0.00 0.00 11.3

Tetrachloroethene (PCE)

1.72E-04 0.00

0.00

13.6

Toluene

7.66E-04

0.00 0.00

60.3

Trichloroethene (TCE) 1.36E-04 0.00 0.00 10.7


4.01E-04 0.00

0.00

31.6

Vinyl chloride

2.70E-04

0.00 0.00

21.2

Xylenes (total)

6.55E-04 0.00

0.00

51.6



Table

12.

Airborne Mixing and Dispersion Calculations for the Concentrations of Landfill Gas Constituents in




Influx from

the Vents


Outflow with wind to East

Cone of LFG in the lEA or UA

DEFINITIONS

INwsi

IN wEi

IN vi

OUTwNi=

OUTwwi=

CBOXi

V

5

and

VN

VE

and

Vw

WIEA

LIE A

MHIEA

Q

CINWSi

CINWEi

CtNVi

- - - - -

--- · -----

l. Vws;

=V,xw;EAxMfk;xGNws.

IJ¥ve; ="V;,x4eAxlVllfeAxGNwE.

INv; = QxCINVi xLIEA xWIEA

OU'f,Ni

= J i ; y x w ; E ) C M ~ E A x C B O X

OUTww; = VExLIEAxMHIEAxCsox;;

[v:

W C

l

[

C

l

[

QxCINviXLIEAxWIE

s X lEA X

INWSi +

VEX LJEA X

INWEi +

C

- MHIEA

BOX/i -

[(V

8

xW

11

') + (VEXL

1

EA )]


"i"

in the wind blow ing from the south [ug/s]

Influx ofLFG constituent "i" in the wind blow ing from the east [ug/s]

Influx

ofLFG

constituent "i" from the LFG influx from within the footprint area of he bo

Outflow ofLFG constituent ' 'i" in the wind blowing to the north [ug/s]

Outflow

ofLFG

constituent "i" in the wind blowi ng to the west [ug/s]

Concentration

ofLFG

constituent "i" in the box [ug/m

3

]

Average speed of he wind blowing from the south or to the north [m/s]

Average speed of the wind blowing from the east or to the west [m/s]

Width of the box [m1

Length of the box [m1

Mixing Height of the air in the box [m1

Flux

ofLFG

released per unit area within the footprint of he box [m3/m2-s1

Concentration

ofLFG

constituent "i" in the clean wind blowing from the south into the b

( A s s u m e d ~ output of the Eastern lEA) [ug/m31

Concentration

of

LFG c:onstituent

"i"

in the clean wind blowing from the east into the box

( A s s u m e d ~ output of the Eastern lEA) [ug/m31

Concentration of LFG constituent "i" in the LFG emissions entering into the box [ ug/m

3

]



Table 12. Airborne Mixing and Dispersion Calculations for the Concentrations

of

Landfill Gas Constituents in


Vs and VN

VEand

Vw

WIEA

LIEA MHn:A

(m/s)

(m/s) (m) (m) (m)

Western lEA Box Model Parameters

0.54 0.54 71.6 99.1 1.83

Western lEA

Caoxi

CINWSi

CINWEi

CINVi

Detected Volatile Organic Compounds

(ug/m ) (ug/m )

(ug/m)

(ug/m )

Acetone

8.74E-04 5.74E-04 5.74E-04 35.7

Benzene

1.17E-03 7.64E-04 7.64E-04 47.9

Chlorobenzene 1.97E-04 1.17E-04

1.17E-04 9.5

Chloroform 2.95E-04

1.24E-04 1.24E-04 20.3

Dichlorodifluoromethane 5.00E-04 1.26E-04 1.26E-04

44.6

cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethene 3.64E-04 1.40E-04 1.40E-04 26.7

1 2-Dichloro-1, 1 2,2-tetrafluoroethane 1.85E-03 9.23E-04

9.23E-04 .110.7

Ethyl benzene 4.97E-04

3.07E-04 3.07E-04 22.6

4-Ethyltoluene 3.17E-04 2.15E-04 2.15E-04

12.2

Methylene Chloride 1.52E-04 9.36E-05 9.36E-05 6.9

Styrene 2.65E-04 1.43E-04 1.43E-04 14.5


5.56E-03

1.72E-04 1.72E-04 641.8

Toluene 1.24E-03 7.66E-04 7.66E-04

56.6


3.32E-04

1.36E-04 1.36E-04 23.3

1 2,4-Trimethylbenzene 6.08E-04 4.01E-04 4.01 E-04

24.6

Vinyl chloride 9.50E-04 2.70E-04

2.70E-04 81.1

Xylenes (total)

1.08E-03 6.55E-04 6.55E-04

51.2



Table 13. Airborne Mixing and Dispersion Calculations for the Concentrations of Landfill Gas Constituents in




Influx from the Vents


Outlaw with wind to East

Cone

of

LFG in the lEA or UA

DEFINITIONS

INwsi

IN wEi

INvi

OUTwNi=

OUTwwi=

Cooxi

Vs

and VN

VEand Vw

WIEA

LIEA

MHIEA

Q

CINWSi

CINWEi

CINVi

ll¥¥s;

="Vs,x'if;EAxMfkrGNws.

Il¥¥E;

= ~ x 4 E A x M f - k , ; c G N w E .

IN Vi =

Q

X CJNVi X

LIEA

X WIEA

OUJ;Ni = ~ X ~ E ) C M l f E A x C s o x

OU;l;v;

=

x 4 E J C M I - k r C s o x ,

[

l

[

l

[

QxCINVixL,EAxW,EA]

~ , x W , E A

xC Nwst

+ VExL,EA xC,NwEt + MH,EA

CBOX/i =

(V L

)]

[

V,x WlliA)

+ EX

lEA

Influx

ofLFG

constituent

"i"

in the wind blowing from the south [ug/s]

Influx ofLFG constituent "i" in the wind blowing from the east [ug/s]

Influx ofLFG constituent "i" from the LFG influx from within the footprint area

of

the box [ug/

Outflow ofLFG constituent

"'i"

in the wind blowing to the north [ug/s]

Outflow ofLFG constituent

"i"

in the wind blowing to the west [ug/s]

Concentration

of

LFG constituent "i" in the box [ug/m

3

]

Average speed of he wind blowing from the south or to the north [rn/s]

Average speed

of

he wind blowing from the east or

to

the west [rn/s]

Width

of

he box [m]

Length

of

the box [m]

Mixing Height

of

the air in the box [m]

Flux ofLFG released per unit area within the footprint

of

the box [rn3/rn2-s]

Concentration ofLFG constituent "i" in

the

clean wind blowing from

the

south into the box (As

Concentration ofLFG constituent "i" in the clean wind bloWing from the east into the box(= 0)

Concentration ofLFG constituent "i" in the LPG emissions entering into the box [ug/m

3

]

Page 1

of

2



Table 13. Airborne Mixing and Dispersion Calculations for the Concentrations

of

Landfill Gas Constituents

in


Vs and

VN

VEand

Vw

WIEA LIEA

MHIEA

(m/s)

(m/s) (m) (m) (m)

Site-Wide lEA Box Model Parameters 0.54 0.54

121.9

198.1 1.83

Site-Wide lEA

Cnoxi

CINWSi

CINWEi

CINVi


(ug/m ) (ug/m') (ug/m ') (ug/m )

Acetone 6.27E-04 0.00

0.00

41.1

Benzene 8.37E-04

0.00 0.00 54.9

Chlorobenzene 1.43E-04

0.00 0.00 9.4

Chloroform 2.18E-04 0.00

0.00

14.3


3.77E-04 0.00

0.00

24.8


2.71E-04

0.00 0.00 17.8

1 2-Dichloro-1, 1 2,2-tetrafluoroethane

1.36E'03

0.00

0.00

89.0

Ethyl benzene 3.58E-04 0.00

0.00

23.5

4-Ethyltoluene

2.27E-04

0.00 0.00 14.9

Methylene Chloride 1.10E-04 0.00

0.00

7.2

Styrene

1.93E-04

0.00 0.00 12.7


4.31 E-03 0.00

0.00

282.8

Toluene 8.95E-04 0.00

0.00 58.7


2.46E-04

0.00

0.00

16.1

1 2,4-Trimethylbenzene 4.36E-04

0.00 0.00 28.6

Vinyl chloride 7.15E-04 0.00

0.00

46.9

Xylenes (total)

7.84E-04

0.00

0.00

51.4

Page 2

of

2



Table 14.

Calculation

of

the Cancer and Non-Cancer

Inhalation Risk

Estimates

Relative to Outdoor Exposure f

Exposure Point

Non-Cancer

Health Effect Endpoint


Concentration

Incremental Non

-CBOXi

RfC

RfC Cancer Hazard

Index

(ug/m3) (ug/m3)

Source

Site-Wide Inhalation Exposure Area

Acetone 6.27E-04

Benzene 8.37E-04


Chloroform 2.18E-04

Dichlorodifluoromethane 3.77E-04


2.71E-04

1 2-Dichloro-1, 1 2,2-tetrafluoroethane 1.36E-03

Ethyl benzene

3.58E-04

4-Ethyltoluene 2.27E-04

Methylene Chloride

1.10E-04

Styrene 1.93E-04

Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 4.31E-03

Toluene

8.95E-04

Trichloroethene (TCE) 2.46E-04


4.36E-04

Vinyl chloride 7.15E-04

Xvlenes (total)

7.84E-04

Hvdroqen sulfide

4.51E-05

TOTAL

NOTES:

All values

are based on

chronic exposure.

X-

Signifies inadequate or unavailable inhalation toxicity value

RfC - Reference Concentration

IUR-


IRIS= Integrated Risk Information System

8.00E+02

3.00E+01

2.00E+01

6.60E+02

2.00E+02

3.50E+01

X

1.00E+03

X

1.06E+03

1.00E+03

4.60E+03

5.00E+03

1.80E+02

6.00E+OO

1.00E+02

1.00E+02

2.00E+OO

ATSDR =Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (Minimal Risk Levels)

PPRTV

=

Provisional

Peer Reviewed

Toxicity Value

MassDEP

MassDEP

MassDEP

MassDEP

ORNL

MassDEP

X

MassDEP

X

ATSDR

MassDEP

MassDEP

MassDEP

MassDEP

PPRTV

MassDEP

MassDEP

IRIS

MassDEP = MassDEP Shortforms for

Human

Health Risk Assessment Under the

MCP.

Updated February

2007.

ORNL

= Oak

Ridge National Laboratory National Regional Database of Preliminary Remediation

Goals.

7.84E-07

2.79E-05

7.13E-06

3.30E-07

X

X

X

3.58E-07

X

1.04E-07

1.93E-07

X

1.79E-07

1.37E-06

7.27E-05

7.15E-06

7.84E-06

2.26E-05

1.49E-04

Ca

IUR

(ug/m3)

X

7.80E-0

X

2.30E-0

X

X

X

X

X

4.70E-0

5.70E-0

5.50E-0

X

1.70E-0

X

8.80E,0

X

X



.

Table 14.

Calculation of the Cancer and Non-Cancer Inhalation

Risk

Estimates

Relative to

Outdoor

Exposure f

Exposure Point

Non-Cancer

Health

Effect

Endpoint


Concentration

Incremental Non

-CBOXi

RfC RfC

Cancer

Hazard

Index

(ug/m3) (ug/m3)

Source

Eastern Inhalation Exposure Area

Acetone 5.74E-04

Benzene 7.64E-04

Chlorobenzene

1.17E-04

Chloroform 1.24E-04



1.40E-04


Ethyl benzene 3.07E-04

4-Ethyltoluene 2.15E-04

Methylene Chloride

9.36E-05

Styrene

1.43E-04

Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 1.72E-04

Toluene 7.66E-04


1.36E-04


4.01E-04

Vinyl chloride 2.70E-04

Xylenes (total)

6.55E-04

Hydrogen sulfide

-

TOTAL

NOTES.

All values are based on chronic exposure.

X-

Signifies inadequate

or

unavailable inhalation toxicity value


IUR-


IRIS=

Integrated Risk Information System

8.00E+02

3.00E+01

2.00E+01

6.60E+02

2.00E+02

3.50E+01

X

1.00E+03

X

1.06E+03

1.00E+03

4.60E+03

5.00E+03

1.80E+02

6.00E+OO

1.00E+02

1.00E+02

2.00E+OO

ATSDR

=Agency

for Toxic Substances

and

Disease Registry (Minimal Risk Levels)

PPRTV =Prov isiona l Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value

MassDEP

MassDEP

MassDEP

MassDEP

ORNL

MassDEP

X

MassDEP

X

ATSDR

MassDEP

MassDEP

MassDEP

MassDEP

PPRTV

MassDEP

MassDEP

IRIS

MassDEP = MassDEP Shortforms for Human Health Risk Assessment Under the MCP. Updated February 2007.

ORNL = Oak Ridge National Laboratory National Regional Database of Preliminary Remediation Goals.

7.18E-07

2.55E-05

5.85E-06

1.88E-07

X

X

X

3.07E-07

X

8.84E-08

1.43E-07

X

1.53E-07

7.58E-07

6.69E-05

2.70E-06

6.55E-06

-

1.10E-04

Ca

IUR

(ug/m3)

X

7.80E-0

X

2.30E-0

X

X

X

X

X

4.70E-0

5.70E-0

5.50E-0

X

1.70E-0

X

B.BOE-0

.

X

X



Table 14.

Calculation

of the Cancer and Non-Cancer

Inhalation Risk

Estimates Relative to

Outdoor

Exposure

f

Exposure Point

Non-Cancer

Health Effect Endpoint


Concentration

Incremental Non

-CBOXi

RfC

RfC Cancer Hazard

Index

(ug/m3) (ug/m3)

Source

Western Inhalation Exposure Area

Acetone 8.74E-04

Benzene 1.17E-03


Chloroform

2.95E-04



3.64E-04


Ethyl benzene

4.97E-04

4-Ethyltoluene

3. 17E-04

Methylene Chloride

1.52E-04

Styrene

2.65E-04


5.56E-03

Toluene

1.24E-03

Trichloroethene (TCE) 3.32E-04


6.08E-04

Vinyl chloride

9.50E-04

Xylenes (total)

1.08E-03

HvdroQen sulfide

2.48E-05

TOTAL

NOTES.

All

values

are

based

on

chronic exposure.

X.- Signifies inadequate or unavailable inhalation toxicity value


IUR-


IRIS = Integrated Risk Information System

8.00E+02

3.00E+01

2.00E+01

6.60E+02

2.00E+02

3.50E+01

X

1.00E+03

X

1.06E+03

1.00E+03

4.60E+03

5.00E+03

1.80E+02

6.00E+OO

1.00E+02

1.00E+02

2.00E+OO

ATSDR

=Agency

for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (Minimal Risk Levels)

PPRTV

=

Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value

MassDEP

MassDEP

MassDEP

MassDEP

ORNL

MassDEP

X

MassDEP

X

ATSDR

MassDEP

MassDEP

MassDEP

MassDEP

PPRTV

MassDEP

MassDEP

IRIS

MassDEP = MassDEP Shortforms for Human Health Risk Assessment Under the MCP. Updated February 2007.

ORNL

=

Oak Ridge National Laboratory National Regional Database of Preliminary Remediation Goals.

1.09E-06

3.88E-05

9.85E-06

4.46E-07

X

X

X

4.97E-07

X

1.43E-07

2.65E-07

X

2.48E-07

1.84E-06

1.01 E-04

9.50E-06

1

OBE-05

-

1.75E-04

Ca

IUR

(ug/m3)

X

7.80E-0

X

2.30E-0

X

X

X

X

X

4.70E-0

5.70E-0

5.50E-0

X

1.70E-0

X

8.80E-0

X

X



Table 15.

Summary

of

the Results

of

the Outdoor

Air

Risk Assessment

for

Each Inhalation Exposure Area

(ApJ licable to All Receptors Exposed to

Outdoor

Air)


Site-Wide

Eastern

Western

Cumulative HI

1.49E-04 l.IOE-4 1.75E-04

Cumulative ELCR 2.49E-07 1.86E-08 3.22E-07





Table 17. Summary

of the

Hydrogen

Sulfide

Sampling Results

and Relevant Odor

Thresholds

and

Occupational Safety Criteria for Hydrogen Sulfide

Data Summary

CAS Number

7783-06-4

Minimum Detected Concentration (ppm)

0.9

Maximum Detected Concentration (ppm)

4.2 ppm

Location

of

Maximum Detected Concentration GP-6R

Frequency

of

Detection

2/5

Odor

Thresholds

ERDC Odor Threshold [1]

0.13 ppm

ATSDR Odor Threshold [2]

0.5 ppb

CaiEPNOEHHA Odor Threshold [3]

8.1

ppb

Relevant

Occupational

Safety Criteria

NIOSH REL [4]

10 ppm

OSHA PEL - Construction Industry [5]

10 ppm

ACGIH TLV (8-hr Time Weighted Average) [1]

10 ppm

ACGIH STEL [1]

15 ppm

OSHA PEL- General Industry [5]

20ppm

OSHA Maximum Peak (10 min exposure) [4]

50 ppm

NIOSH IDLH Level [4]

100 ppm

NOTES:

ACGIH =American Conference

of

Government Industrial Hygenists

IDLH = Immediately Dangerous to Life and Health

PEL= Permissible Exposure Limit (10 minute maximum peak)

REL = Reasonable Exposure Limit

STEL

=Short

Term Exposure Limit (above TLV)

TLV = Threshold Limit Value

[1] Source: Economic Research and Development Center (ERDC), USAGE

[2] Source: ATSDR Website (http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/mhmi/mmg114.html)

[3] CaiEPA OEHHA.

[4] Source: NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards (online).

[5] Source: OSHA Website (www.osha.gov)



APPENDIX A

Site Visit

Photographic

Log

August 15, 2008



Location Key to the Photographic Log

Site: North Shore Commons Site, Brimbal Avenue, Beverly, MA

Numbers correspond to photograph numbers

in

the photographic log . Arrows denote direction

in

which the ph

taken. Created 9/2/2008 .



-- - - - - - - -

-

Photograph 1:

View to the west from Brimbal Avenue across

the site,

w1th

the temporary access road into the site visible

on

the left.

t 'P ·ro

6.5

i

\CRES

-----

\/ILL B l

- I I O rrO

SlJirf

Photograph

2:

View to the south at the northeastern edge of

the site along Brimbal Avenue, showing the property

advertisement sign.

SITE VISIT PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG

Solid Waste Assessment

Risk

Assessment

North Shore Commons Site, Brimbal Avenue, Beverly, MA



Photograph 3: View to the southwest from Brimbal Avenue

across the site toward the Northridge Homes Cooperative, with the

section of exposed pavement to the left.

Photograph

4:

Close-up view of the section of exposed

pavement along Brimbal Avenue on the eastern edge of the

site.



Risk

Assessment

North Shore Commons Site, Brimbal Avenue, Beverly,

MA



Photograph 5: View to the south across the site, showing

the topography and ground cover and the northeastern

portion of the Northndge Homes Cooperative.

Photograph

6: View to the east across Brimbal Avenue

from the eastern edge of the site, toward the North Shore

Regional Dialysis Center.


Solid Waste Assessment Risk Assessment




Photograph

7:

View to the southeast across Brimbal Avenue

from the eastern edge

of

the site, toward the gas stations across

from the southeast corner

of

the site.

Photograph

8:

View

of

the ground surface

in

the

northeastern portion

of

the

s1te

that was cleared and that

had accumulated rainwater.






Photograph

9:

View to the south across the eastern half

of

the site, snowing the current ground cover and the open

area

of

the Northridge Homes Cooperative in the

b-aGkQFOH-nfi-. -

Photograph

10:

View to the southwest across the site,

showing the current ground cover and the unit

of

the Northridge

Homes Cooperative closest to the site.


Solid

Waste Assessment Risk Assessment




Photograph 11:

View to the northwest across Sohier Road,

at the ous1ness across the street.

Photograph

12:

View to the west across Sohier Road, at the

business across the street.






Photograph 13:

View to the south from the southwestern

corner of the site, showing the unit of the Northridge

Homes Cooperative closest to the site.

Photograph 14: View to the northeast from the center of the

site, toward the Italian American Club

on

Brimbal Avenue.



Risk

Assessment




- - -

---- -- -

-

Photograph

15: View to the west from the northeastern corner

of the site along the Sohier Road

I

Brimbal Avenue access road

that borders the site

on

the north, showing the change in

elevation and fence.

Photograph 16: View to the south from the northeastern corner

of the site along Brimbal Avenue that borders the site on the east,

showing the fence that blocks portions of the site.






Photograph 17: View to the south from the Schier Road I

Brimbal Avenue access road across the central portion of

the site, showing the topography and current ground cover.

Photograph 18:

View to the southeast from the Schier Road

I

Brimbal Avenue access road across the central portion of the

site, showing the fence and the current ground cover.



Risk

Assessment




Photograph 19: View to the northeast from the northwestern

corner of the site, showing the fencing above the drainage

culvert running beneath the Sohier Road I Brimbal Avenue

access road.

Photograph 20: View to the east from the northwestern

corner of the site, showing the property advertisement sign.


Solid





Photograph

21: View to the southeast from the northwestern

corner of the site across the central portion of the site,

showing the topography and current ground cover.

Photograph 22: View to the southeast from the western edge

of the site, showing the unit of the Northridge Homes

Cooperative closest to the site.






Photograph 23: View toward the northeast from the

southwestern corner of the site, showing the topography and

current ground cover

in

this area.

Photograph 24: View toward the east from just south of the

southwestern corner of the site, showing the trench next to

the

unit of the Northridge Homes Cooperative.



Risk

Assessment




Photograph

25: View toward the southeast across Sohier

Road, showing the sign for the Northridge Homes Cooperative.

Photograph 26: View toward the northwest from the

southwestern corner of the site, showing the CPI facility across

Sohier Road.



Risk

Assessment




Photograph

27: View toward the northwest from the

northwestern corner

of

the site, looking across the grass island

in the traffic intersection.

Photograph

28:

View toward the northeast from the

northeastern corner of the site, looking across the grass island in

the traffic intersection with the Italian American Club in the

background.


Solid





Photograph 29:

View toward the north along Brimbal Avenue

from the southeastern corner of the site.


Solid





APPENDIXB

Test America Laboratory

Report

for the Soil Gas Probe Samples

August 18, 2008



TestAmerica

THE LEADER IN

ENVIRONMENTAL

TESTING

August 18, 2008

Client:

Griffin Engineering Group Beverly

100 Cummings Center Suite 222G

Beverly, MA 01915

Attn: Peter Flink

1721 South Grand Avenue Santa Ana, CA 92705 • 714-25 8-861 0• Fax 714-258-0921

LABORATORY REPORT

Work Order:

Project Name:

Project Number:

Date Received:

LRH0043

Brimbal Ave

[none]

08/05/08

The results listed within this Laboratory Report pertain on ly to the samples tested in the laboratory. The analyses contained in this report were

performed

in

accordance with the applicable certifications as

noted

This Laboratory Report is confidential

and

is intended or the sole use

o f

TestAmerica

and

its client. This report shafl not be reproduced, e xcept in full, without written permission rom TestAmerica.

TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. certifies that the analytical results contai ned herein apply on ly to the specific samp/e(s) analyzed.

The Chain(s) ofCziStody, 2 pages, are included

and

are an integral part of his report. This entire report was reviewed

and

approved or

release.

If

you have any questions relating to this analytical report, please contact your Laboratory Project Manager at 714-258-8610.

Analyses included in this report were performed by the laboratory shown at the top

of

this report unless otherwise indicated.

Approved By:

Marisol Tabirara

Project Manager

NELAP Certification # E87652

1

of

53

LRH



Test

America

Tfii;: LEADE:R IN ENVIRONME:NTAL TESTING


100 Cummings Center Suite 2220

Beverly,

MA

01915

Peter Flink

SAMPLE

IDENTIFICATION

GP-21

GP-25

GP-14

GP-26

GP-20

GP-6R

GP-IIR

GP-12

1721 South Grand Avenue Santa Ana, CA 92705 • 714-258-8610 • Fax 714-258-0921

Work Order:

LRH0043

Project:

Brimbal Ave

Project Number:

[none]

LAB

NUMBER COLLECTION

LRH0043-0I

08/04/08 09: 16

LRH0043-02 08/04/08 09:35

LRH0043-03 08/04/08 09:30

LRH0043-04 08/04/08 10:00

LRH0043-05

08/04/08 10:05

LRH0043-06 08/04/08 10:38

LRH0043-07 08/04/08 I 0:25

LRH0043-08

08/04/08 I0: 18

2

o f

53

MATRIX

Air

Air

Air

Air

Air

Air

Air

Air

Received: 08/05/08 10:00

Reported: 08/18/0817:18

CONTAINER TYPE

Passivated Canister

Passivated Canister

Passivated Canister

Passivated Canister

Passivated Canister

Passivated Canister

Passivated Canister

Passivated Canister

LRH



TestAmerica

THE

LE:ADE:R IN

ENVIRONMENTAl TESTING

721

South Grand Avenue Santa Ana, CA 92705

*

714-258-8610 • Fax 714-258-0921



Beverly, MA 01915

Peter Flink

Department: , Sample Control

Method:

QC Batch:

Identification and Definition of Problem:

Work Order: LRH0043

Project: Brimbal Ave

Project Number: [none]

CORRECTIVE ACTION

REPORT

Date: 08/05/2008

Matrix:

Sample

#01

was not analyzed for EPA

1,5/16.

Determination of the Cause of the Problem:

The Tedlar bag that contained the sample was flat when received at the laboratory.

Corrective Action Taken:

Client was notitied of he anomaly on August 5, 2008.

3

of

53

Received: 08/05/08 10:00

Reported: 08/18/08

17:

18

LRH



TestAmerica

THE LEADER

IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING

1721 South Grand Avenue Santa Ana, CA 92705 • 714-258-8610 • Fax_714-258-0921



Beverly,

MA

01915

Peter Flink

Work Order:

Project

Project Number:

LRH0043

Brimbal Ave

{none]

Received: 08/05/08 I 0:00

Reported: 08/18/08 17:18

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Analyte

Sample ID: LRH0043-0I (GP-21

-Air)

Data

Result Qualifiers

EPA TOIS (Med-level)- Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS

Acetone

Benzene

Benzyl chloride


Bromoform

Bromomethane

2-Butanone

(MEK)

Carbon disulfide


Chi oro benzene


Chloroethane

Chloroform

Chloromethane

1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)

1,2-Dichlorobcnzene

1,3-Dichlorobenzene

I, 4-Dichlorobenzene


I,

1-Dichloroethane

1,2-Dichloroethane


trans-I ,2-Dich\oroethene

I, I- Dichloroethene

I 2-Dich\oropropane

cis-I 3-Dichloropropene

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene

J

2-Dichloro-1,1,2,2-tetraftuoroethane

Ethyl benzene

4-Ethy\to\uene

Hexachlorobutadiene

2-Hexanone

Methylene chloride

4-Methy\-2-pentanone (MIBK)

Styrene

I, I 2,2-Tetrachloroethane

Tetrachloroethene

Toluene

I 2,4-Trichlorobenzene

1,1, -Trichloroethane

1,1,2-Trichloroethane

Trichloroethene

27

32

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

5,1

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

14

4.6

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

3.3 JA

ND

ND

21

ND

ND

ND

ND

Units

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

RL

10

3.0

10

2.0

2.0

4.0

10

10

2.0

2.0

2.0

4.0

2.0

4.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

3.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

4.0

10

2.0

10

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

5.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

4

o f 53

Date

Dilution Analyzed

Instrument

QC

Analyst Batch

Sampled: 08/04/08 09:16

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

08/06/08 13:34

08/06/08 13:34

08/06/08 13:34

08/06/08 13 :34

08/06/08 13:34

08/06/08 13:34

08/06/08 13:34

08/06/08 13:34

08/06/08 13:34

08/06/08 13:34

08/06/08 13:34

08/06/08 13:34

08/06/08 13:34

08/06/08 13:34

08/06/08 13:34

08/06/08 13:34

08/06/08 13:34

08/06/08 13:34

08/06/08 13:34

08/06/08 13:34

08/06/08 13

:34

08/06/08 13:34

08/06/08 13:34

08/06/08 13:34

08/06/08 13:34

08/06/08 13:34

08/06/08 13:34

08/06/08 13:34

08/06/08 13:34

08/06/08 13:34

08/06/08 13:34

08/06/08 13:34

08/06/08 13:34

08/06/08 13:34

08/06/08 13:34

08/06/08 13:34

08/06/08 13:34

08/06/08 13:34

08/06/08 13:34

08/06/08 13:34

08/06/08 13 :34

08/06/08 13:34

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

8H07011

8H070ll

8H07011

8H0701l

8H07011

8H07011

8H070\l

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H070ll

8H07011

8H070ll

8H07011

8H070ll

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H0701l

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H070\l

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H070ll

LR I0



TestAmerica

THE LEADE:R

IN

ENVIRONMENTAl TE'STING

1721 South Grand Avenue Santa Ana, CA 92705 * 714-258-8610 • Fax 714-258-0921


l 00 Cummings Center Suite

2220

Beverly, MA 01915

Peter Flink

Analyte

Result

Sample ID: LRH0043-0l (GP-21

-Air)-

cont.

Work Order: LRH0043



ANALYTICAL REPORT

Data

Qualifiers Units

RL

Dilution

EPA T015 (Med-level)- Volatile

Organic

Compounds

by GC/MS-

coot

Trichlorofluoromethane NO ppbv 2.0

1.0

I, 1,2-Trichloro-1 ,2,2-trifluoroethane

NO

ppbv 2.0

1.0

I 2, 4-T rimethylbenzene NO

ppbv

3.0

1.0


NO ppbv

3.0

1.0

Vinyl acetate NO

ppbv

10

1.0

Vinyl chloride 21 ppbv 3.0

1.0

Xylenes, total 9.7 ppbv

2.0

1.0

5

o f 53

Received: 08/05/08 I 0:00

Reported: 08/18/08 17:18

Date

QC

Analyzed

Instrument Analyst

Batch

Sampled: 08/04/08 09:16

08106/08 13:34 MSA

AA

8H07011

08/06/08 13:34

MSA

AA

&H07011

08106/08 13:34 MSA AA

8H07011

08/06/08 13:34

MSA AA

8H07011

08/06/08 13;34

MSA

AA

8H07011

08/06/08 13:34

MSA

AA

8H07011

08/06/08 13:34

MSA

AA 8H07011

LRH



Test

America

THE: Lf:ADE:R IN ENVIRONMf:NTAL TE:STING


100

Cummings Center Suite

2220

Beverly,

MA

01915

Peter Flink


Work Order:

Project:

Project Number:

LRH0043

BrimbalAve

[none]

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Received: 08/05/08 10:00

Reported: 08/18/0817:18

Analytc

Data

Result Qualifiers Units

RL

Date

Dilution Analyzed

Instrument

QC

Analyst Batch

Sample ID: LRH0043-02 (GP-25- Air)

EPA TOtS (Med-level)- Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS

Acetone

Benzene

Benzyl chloride

Bromodich\oromethane

Bromoform

Bromomethane

2-Butanone (MEK)

Carbon disulfide


Chioro benzene


Chloroethane

Chlorofonn

Chloromethane


1,2-Dichlorobenzene

I 3-Dichlorobenzene

1,4-Dich\orobenzene


1,1-Dich\oroethane.

I 2-Dich\oroethane

cis- ,2-Dichloroethene

trans- ,2-Dichloi-oethene

I, 1-Dichloroethene

1,2-Dichloropropane


trans- ,3-Dichloropropene

1,2-Dichloro-1, 1,2,2-tetrafluoroetbane

Ethyl

benzene

4-Ethyltoluene

Hexachlorobutadiene

2-Hexanone

Methylene chloride

4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)

Styrene

I, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

T etrach1oroethene

Toluene



I,

1,2-Trichloroethane

Trich1oroethene

19

4.8

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

4.6

3.1

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

2.6 JA

NO

NO

13

NO

NO

NO

NO

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

10

3.0

10

2.0

2.0

4.0

10

10

2.0

2.0

2.0

4.0

2.0

4.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

_2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

3.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

4.0

10

2.0

lO

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

5.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

6

o f

53

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

Sampled: 08/04/08 09:35

08/06/08 14:14

08/06/08 14:14

08/06/08 14:14

08/06/08 14:14

08/06/08 14:14

08/06/0814:14

08/06/0814:14

08/06/0814:14

08/06/08 14:14

08/06/08 14:14

08/06/08 14:14

08/06/08 14:14

08/06/08 14:14

08/06/08 14:14

08/06/ 08 14: 14

08/06/08 14:14

08/06/08 14:14

08/06/ 08 14: 14

08/06/08 14:14

08/06/ 08 14: 14

08/06/08 14:

14

08/06/08 14: 14

08/06/08 14: 14

08/06/08 14: 14

08/06/08 14:14

08/06/08

14:

14

08/06/08

14:

14

08/06/08 14:

14

08/06/08 14: 14

08/06/08 14:14

08/06/08 14:14

08/06/08

14: 14

08/06/08 14:14

08/06/08 14:14

08/06/08 14:14

08/06/08 14:14

08/06/08 14:14

08/06/08 14:14

08/06/0814:14

08/06/0814:14

08/06/0814:14

08/06/08 14:14

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H070ll

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H0701l

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H070ll

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H0701l

8H0701 I

8H07011

8H07011

LRH



TestAmerica

THE LEADER IN EONVIRONMENTAL TESTING



100 Cummings_

e n t e r

Suite

2220

Beverly, MA 01915

Peter Flink

Analyte

Result

Sample ID: LRH0043-02

(GP-25- Air)-

cont.

Work Order: LRH0043

Project

Brimhal Ave

Project Number: [noneJ

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Data

Qualifiers

Units

RL

Dilution

EPA TOtS (Med-level)- Volatile Organi c Compounds by GC/MS- cont.

Trichlorofluoromethane NO

ppbv 2.0

1.0

I, I 2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane NO ppbv

2.0 1.0


NO

ppbv 3.0 1.0

l , 3 , 5 ~ T r i m e t h y l b e n z e n e

ND

ppbv

3.0 1.0

Vinyl acetate

NO

ppbv 10 1.0

Vinyl chloride 6.2 ppbv 3.0

1.0

Xylenes, total 7.6

ppbv 2.0 1.0

7

o f 53

Date

Analyzed

Received: 08/05/08 10:00

Reported: 08/18/0817:18

QC

Instrument

Analyst

Batch

Sampled: 08/04/08 09:35

08/06/08 14:

14

MSA AA

8H0701l

08/06/08 14:

14 MSA

AA 8H07011

08/06/08 14:

14

MSA

AA 8H07011

08/06/08 14:14

MSA

AA

8H07011

08/06/08 14:14

MSA

AA 8H07011

08/06/08 14:14

MSA

AA

8H07011

08/06/0814:14

MSA AA 8H07011

LRH



TestAmerica

THE LEADER

IN ENVIRONMENTAL

HoSTING

1721 South Grand Avenue Santa Ana, CA 92705 • 714-258-8610" Fax 714-258-0921



Beverly, MA

01915

Peter Flink

Work Order:

Project:

Project Number:

LRH0043

Brimbal Ave

[none]

Received:

08/05/08 10:00

Reported:

08/18/08 17:18

ANALYTICAL

REPORT

Analyte

Sample

10:

LRH0043-03

(GP-14-

Air)

Data

Result Qualifiers

EPA TO IS (Med-level)- Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS

Acetone

Benzene

Benzyl chloride


Bromoform

Bromomethane

2-Butanone

(MEK)

Carbon disulfide


Chlorobenzene

Dibromocbloromethane

Chloroethane

Chloroform

Chloromethane


1,2-Dichlorobenzene

I 3-Dich\orobenzene

1,4-Dichlorobenzene


1,1-Dichloroethane

I 2-Dichloroethane

cis-1,2-Dich\oroethene

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene

I, 1-Dich\oroethene

1,2-Dich\oropropane

cis- 3-Dich\oropropene

trans-\ 3-Dich\oropropene

I 2-Dich\oro-1, 1 2,2-tetrafluoroethane

Ethylbenzene

4-Etbyltoluene

Hexachlorobutadiene

2-Hexanone

Methylene chloride

4-Methy\-2-pentanone

(MIBK)

Styrene

1,

I 2,2-Tetrachloroethane

T etrachloroethene

Toluene

1,2,4-Trich\orobenzene

I, I, 1-Trichloroethane

I, 1,2-Trich\oroethane

Trichloroethene

NO

250

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

..

2.0

NO

NO

NO

NO

4.2 JA

NO

NO

30

NO

NO

NO

NO

Units

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

Jlpbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

RL

0

3.0

10

2.0

2.0

4.0

10

10

2.0

2.0

2.0

4.0

2.0

4.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

3.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

4.0

10

2.0

10

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

5.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

8

o f

53

Date

Dilution Analyzed

Instrument

QC

Analyst Batch

Sampled: 08/04/08 09:30

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

10

1.0

10

1.0

10

1.0

10

10

1.0

10

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

10

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

10

1.0

10

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

10

1.0

10

08/06/08 15:04

08/06/08 15:04

08/06/08 15:04

08/06/08 15:04

08/06/08 15:04

08/06/08 15:04

08/06/08 15:04

08/06/08 IS :04

08/06/08 15:04

08/06/08 15:04

08/06/08 15:04

08/06/08 15:04

08/06/08 15:04

08/06/08 15:04

08/06/08 15:04

08/06/08 15:04

08/06/08 15:04

08/06/08 15:04

08/06/08 15:04

08/06/08 15:04

08/06/08 15:04

08/06/08 15:04

08/06/08 15:04

08/06/08 15:04

08/06/08 15:04

08/06/08 15:04

08/06/0815:04

08/06/08 15:04

08/06/08 15:04

08/06/08 15:04

08/06/08 15:04

08/06/08 15:04

08/06/08 15:04

08/06/08 15:04

08/06/08 15:04

08/06/08 15:04

08/06/08 15:04

08/06/08 15:04

08/06/08 15:04

08/06/08 15:04

08/06/08 15:04

08/06/08 15:04

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H070ll

8H070.11

8H07011

8H0701 I

8H07011

8H0701 I

8H0701l

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H070ll

8H07011

8H07011

8H0701\

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H0701l

8H0701 I

8H07011

8H0701l

8H070ll

8H07011

8H07011

8H070ll

8H0701\

8H07011

8H0701\

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

LRH0



TestAmerica

THI': LI':ADI':R IN

ENVIRONMENTAL

TESTING

1721

South Grand Avenue Santa Ana, CA 92705 • 714-258-8610 • Fax 714-258-0921



Beverly, MA 01915

Peter Flink

.

Analyte

Result

Sample ID: LRH0043-03 (GP-14- Air)- cont.

Work Order:

Project:

Project Number:

LRH0043

Brimbal Ave

[none]

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Data

Qualifiers

Units

RL

Dilution

EPA T015 (Med-level)- Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS- cont.

T richlorofluoromethane ND ppbv 2.0 1.0

I, 1 2·Tricbloro-1 ,2,2-trifluoroethane

ND ppbv

2.0

1.0

1,2,4-Trimethy\benzene

ND

ppbv 3.0 1.0

1,3,5-Trimethy\benzene

ND

ppbv

3.0

1.0

Vinyl acetate

ND

ppbv 10

1.0

Vinyl chloride

NO

ppbv 3.0

1.0

Xylenes, total 14 ppbv

2.0

1.0

9

o f 53

.

Received: 08/05/08 10:00

Reported: 08118/08 17:18

Date QC

Analyzed

Instrument

Anaiyst

Batch

Sampled: 08/04/08 09:30

08/06/08 15:04 MSA

AA

8H07011

08/06/08

15

:04

MSA

AA

8H0701\

08/06/08 15:04 MSA

AA

8H07011

08106/08 15:04

MSA

AA

8H07011

08/06/08 15:04 MSA AA 8H07011

08/06/08 15:04

MSA AA

8H07011

08/06/08 15:04

MSA AA

8H07011

LRH



TestAmerica

THE LEADER IN ENVJRONMEN'fAL

TESTING

1721 South Grand Avenue Santa Ana, CA 92705 • 714-258-8610 • F ax 714-258-0921


100 Cummings Center Suite

2220

Beverly, MA 01915

Peter Flink

Work Order:

Project:

Project Number:

LRH0043

Brimbal Ave

[none]

Received: 08105108 I 0:00

Reported: 08118108 17:18

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Analyte

Sample

ID: LRH0043-04 (GP-26-

Air)

Data

Result Qualifiers

EPA T015 (Med-level)- Volatile

Organic

Compounds by GC/MS

Acetone

Benzene

Benzyl chloride


Bromoform

Bromomethane

2-Butanone

(MEK)

Carbon disulfide


Chlorobenzene


Chloroethane

Chloroform

Chloromethane


I 2-Dichlorobenzene

1,3-Dichlorobenzene

I 4-Dichlorobenzene

Dichlorodiftuoromethane

I,

1-Dichloroethane

1,2-Dichloroethane

ds-1,2-Dichloroethene


I,

1-Dichloroethene

1,2-Dichloropropane



1,2-Dichloro-1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroetbane

Ethylbenzene

4-Ethyltoluene

Hexachlorobutadiene

2-Hexanone

Methylene chloride


Styrene


Tetrachloroethene

Toluene


I, I, -Trichloroethane

I, 1,2-Trichloroethane

Trichloroetbene

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

ND

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

21

NO

NO

11

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

42

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

280

12

NO

NO

NO

9,0

Units

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

pphv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

"""

pbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

RL

20

5.9

20

3.9

3.9

7.8

20

20

3.9

3.9

3.9

7.8

3.9

7.8

3.9

3.9

3.9

3.9

3.9

3.9

3.9

3.9

3.9

3.9

5.9

3.9

3.9

3.9

3.9

3.9

7.8

20

3.9

20

3.9

3.9

3.9

3.9

9.8

3.9

3.9

3.9

10

o f

53

Date

Dilution Analyzed

Instrument

QC

Analyst Batch

Sampled:

0810410810:00

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

08106/08 15:39

08/06/08 15;39

08/06/08 15:39

08/06/08 15:39

08/06/08 15:39

08/06/08 15:39

08/06/0815:39

08/06/08 15:39

08/06/0815:39

08/06/08 15:39

08/06/08 15:39

08/06/08 15:39

08106/08 15:39

08/06/08 15;39

08/06/08 15:39

08/06/08 15:39

08/06/08 15:39

08/06/08 15:39

08/06/08 15:39

08/06/08 15:39

08/06/08 15:39

08/06/08 15:39

08/06/0815:39

08/06/08 15:39

08/06/08 15:39

08/06/08 15:39

08/06/08 15:39

08/06/08 15:39

08106/08 15:39

08/06/08 15:39

08/06/08 15:39

08/06/08 15:39

08/06/08 15:39

08/06/08 15:39

08/06/08 15:39

08/06/08 15:39

08/06/0815:39

08/06/08 15:39

08/06/0815:39

08/06/08 15:39

08/06/08 15:39

08/06/08 15:39

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

8H07011

8H07011

8H070ll

8H07011

8H070ll

8H070ll

8H07011

8H070ll

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H070ll

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H070ll

8H07011

8H070ll

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

LRH



TestAmerica

THE LEADER

IN

ENVIRONMENTAL

TESTING

1721 South Grand Avenue Santa Ana, CA 92705 • 714-258-8610 *Fax 714-258..-0921

Griffin E n g ~ e e r i n g Group Beverly


Beverly,

MA

01915

Peter Flink

Analyte

Result


(GP-26-

Air)- cont.

Work Order: LRH0043



ANALYTICAL

REPORT

Data

Qualifiers Units

RL

Dilution

EPA

TOtS

(Med-level)- Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS- cont

Trichlorofluoromethane NO ppbv 3.9

2.0

I,

1,2-T richloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane

NO

ppbv

3.9 2.0

I ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene NO

pplw 5.9 2.0

1,3,5-T

rimethylbenzene NO

ppbv

5.9 2.0

Vinyl acetate NO

ppbv 20 2.0

Vinyl chloride

NO

ppbv

5.9 2.0

Xylenes, total 6.2

ppbv

3.9

2.0

11 o f 53

Received: 08105108 I 0:00

Reported: 0811810817: 8

Date QC

Analyzed Instrument Analyst

Batch

Sampled: 08104108 10:00

08106/08 15:39

MSA AA

8H07011

08/06/08 15:39 MSA AA

8H07011

08/06/0815:39

MSA AA

8H07011

08/06/08 15:39

MSA

AA

8H07011

08/06/08 15:39 MSA AA

8H07011

08/06/08 15:39

MSA AA

8H07011

08/06/08 15:39

MSA

AA 8H0701l

LRH



TestAmerica

THE LEADER IN E N V I R O N M ~ N T A L TESTING




2220

Beverly, MA 01915

Peter Flink

Work Order:

Project:

Project Number:

LRH0043

Brimbal Ave

[none]

Received: 08/05/08 10:00

Reported: 08/18/08 17:18

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Analyte


(GP-20-

Air)

Data

Result Qualifiers

EPA

TOIS

(Med-level)- Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS

Acetone

Benzene

Benzyl chloride


Bromofonn

Bromomethane

2-Butanone (MEK)

Carbon disulfide


Chlorobenzene


Chloroethane

Chloroform

Chloromethane

1 2-Dibromoethane (EDB )

1,2-Dichlorobenzene

1 , 3 ~ D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e

I, ~ D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e

Dichlorodifluoromethanc

1,1-Dichloroethane

1,2-Dichloroethane

cis- 2-Dichloroethene

trans- ,2-Dichloroethene

I, 1-Dichloroethene

1,2-Dichloropropane

cis- I 3-Dich\oropropene

trans- 3-Dichloropropene

I 2-Dichloro-1, 1,2,2-tetrafluoroethane

Ethylbenzeoe

4-Ethy\toluene

Hexach1orobutadiene

2-Hexanone

Methylene

chloride


Styrene


T etrachloroethene

Toluene

1,2,4-Trich\orobenzene

I, l,l-Trichloroethane

1, 1,2-Trichloroethane

Trichloroethene

19

14

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

2.4

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

65

2.6

NO

NO

NO

NO

4.0 JA

NO

NO

14

NO

NO

NO

NO

Units

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

·

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

RL

10

3.0

10

2.0

2.0

4.0

10

10

2.0

2.0

2.0

4.0

2.0

4.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

3.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

4.0

10

2.0

10

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

5.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

12

o f

53

Date

Dilution Analyzed

Instrument

QC

Analyst Batch

Sampled: 08/04/08 10:05

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

08/07/08

05:28

08/07/08 05:28

08/07/08

05:28

08/07/08 05:28

08107/08 05:28

08/07/08 05:28

08/07/08 05:28

08/07/08 05:28

08/07/08 05:28

08/07/08 05:28

08/07/08 05:28

08/07/08 05:28

08/07/08

05:28

08/07/08 05:28

08/07/08 05:28

08107/08 05:28

08107/08 05:28

08/07/08'05:28

08/07/08 05:28

08/07/08 05:28

08/07/08

05:28

08/07/08 05:28

08/07/08

05:28

08/07/08

05:28

08/07/08 05:28

08107/08

05:28

08/07/08 05:28

08107/08 05:28

08107/08 05:28

08/07/08 05:28

08107/08

05:28

08/07/08 05:28

08/07/08 05:28

08/07/08 05:28

08/07/08 05:28

08107/08

05:28

08/07/08 05:28

08107/08

05:28

08107/08 05:28

08/07/08 05:28

08107/08 05:28

08107/08 05:28

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H070l2

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

LRH



TestAmerica

THE LEADER

IN ENVIRONMENTAL

TESTING




2220

Beverly, MA 01915

Peter Flink

Analyte

Result


(GP-20- A;r)-

cont.

Work Order: LRH0043



ANALYTICAL REPORT

Data

Qualifiers

Units

RL

Dilution

EPA

T015

(Med-level)- Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS- cont.


NO

ppbv 2.0

1.0

I, 1,2-T richloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane

NO

ppbv 2.0

1.0

1,2,4-Trimethy\benzcne NO ppbv

3.0

1.0

1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene NO

ppbv 3.0

1.0

Vinyl acetate NO

ppbv

10

1.0

Vinyl chloride

44

ppbv

3.0 1.0

Xylenes, to tal 12

ppbv

2.0

1.0

13

o f

53

Received: 08/05/08 10:00

Reported: 08/18/08 17:18

Date QC

Analyzed

Instrument

Analyst

Batch

Sampled: 08/04/08 I 0:05

08/07/08 05:28 MSA

AA

8H07012

08/07/08 05:28

MSA

AA

8H07012

08107/08 05:28 MSA

AA

8H07012

08/07/08 05:28

MSA

AA

8H07012

08107/08 05:2 8 MSA

AA

8H07012

08107/08 05:2 8

MSA AA

8H07012

08/07/08 05:28

MSA AA

8H07012

LRH0



TestAmerica

Tf-<E LE:ADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL T£STING



IOO

Cummings Center Suite 2220

Beverly, MA 01915

Peter Flink

Work Order:

Project

Project Number:

LRH0043

BrimbalAve

[none]

Received: 08/05108 I 0:00

Reported: 08/1810817:18

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Analyte

Sample ID: LRH0043-06 (GP-6R- Air)

Data

Result Qualifiers

EPA TOtS (Med-level)- Volatile Organi c Compounds by GC/MS

Acetone

Benzene

Benzyl chloride


Bromoform

Bromomethane

2-Butanone (MEK)

Carbon disulfide


Chlorobenzene

Dibromoch\oromethane

Chloroethane

Chloroform

Chloromethane


1,2-Dichlorobenzene

1 3-Dichlorobenzene

1 4-Dichlorobenzene

DichlorodiOuoromethane

I,

1-Dichloroethane

1,2-Dichloroethane

cis-1,2-Dichloroethenc

trans-I 2-Dichloroethene

I, 1-Dichloroethene

1,2-Dichloropropane



I ,2-Dichloro-1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethane

Ethylbenzene

4-IUhyltoluene

Hexachlorobutadiene

2-Hexanone

Methylene chloride


Styrene

I, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroet hane

T etrachloroethene

Toluene



I, 1 2-Trichloroethane

Trichloroethene

16

28

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

2.2

NO

NO

8.1

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

4.0

NO

NO

7.2

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

3.5

7.1

2.2

NO

NO

NO

NO

4.2 JA

NO

NO

19

NO

NO

NO

NO

Units

ppbv

ppbv

ppb'

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

RL

10

3.0

10

2.0

2.0

4.0

10

10

2.0

2.0

2.0

4.0

2.0

4.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

3.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

4.0

10

2.0

10

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

5.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

14

o f 53

Date

Dilution Analyzed

Instrument

QC

Analyst Batch

Sampled: 08/04/08 0:38

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

08/07/0806:11

08/07/0806:11

08/07/08 06: II

08/07/0806:11

08/07/08 06: I I

08/07/08 06:

II

08/07/08 06:

II

08/07/08 06: II

08/07/08 06: II

08/07/0806:11

08/07/08 06:11

08/07/08 06:11

08/07/0806:11

08/07/08 06:11

08/07/08 06:11

08/07/0806:11

08/07/0806:11

08/07/0806:11

08/07/08 06:

II

08/07/0806:11

08/07/08 06: II

08/07/08 06: II

08/07/0806:11

08/07/0806:11

08/07/0806:11

08/07/0806:11

08/07/08 06:ll

08/07/08 06:11

08/07/0806:11

08/07/0806:11

08/07/08 06:11

08/07/08 06:11

08/07/0806:11

08/07/0806:11

08/07/08 06:11

08/07/0806:11

08/07/08 06: II

08/07/08 06: II

08/07/0806:11

08/07/08 06: II

08/07/0806:11

08/07/0806:11

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

'MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H070l2

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

LRH



Test

America

THE

LEADE'fl N

ENVIRONME'NTAL

tESTING



I00 Cummings Center Suite 222G

Beverly, MA 01915

Peter Flink

Analyte

Result

Sample ID: LRH0043-06 (GP-6R-

Ak)-

cont.

Work Order:

LRH0043

Project:

Brimbal Ave

Project Number; [none]

ANALYTICAL

REPORT

Data

Qualifiers

Units

RL

Dilution

EPA

T015 (Med-Jevel)- Volatile

Organic

Compounds

by

GC/MS- cont.

Trichlorofluoromethane ND

ppbv 2.0

1.0

I, I 2-Trichloro-1 ,2,2-trifluoroethane

ND ppbv

2.0

1.0

1,2,4-Trimelhylbenzene ND

ppbv 3.0

1.0


ND

ppbv 3.0 1.0

Vinyl acetate ND

ppbv 10

1.0

Vinyl chloride

48

ppbv

3.0

1.0

Xylenes, total 17

ppbv 2.0 1.0

15

of

53

Received: 08/05/08 10:00

Reported: 08/18/08 17:18

Date

QC

Analyzed

Instrument

Analyst

Batch

Sampled: 08/04/08 10:38

08/07/0806:11 MSA

AA

8H07012

08/07/0806:11

MSA

AA

8H07012

08/07/0806:11

MSA

AA

8H07012

08/07/08 06:11

MSA AA

8H07012

08/07/08 06:11

MSA AA

8H07012

08/07/08 06:11

MSA AA

8H07012

08/07/08 06:11 MSA

AA

8H07012

LRH



Test

America

THE: LE:ADE:R IN

ENVIRONMENTAl TESTING


I00 Cwnmings Center Suite 2220

Beverly,

MA

01915

Peter Flink


Work Order:

Project:

Project Number:

LRH0043

Brimbal Ave

[none]

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Received: 08/05/08

IO:Oo'

Reported: 08/18/08 17:18

Analyte

Data


RL

Date

Dilution Analyzed

Instrument

QC

Analyst Batch

Sample ID: LRH0043-07 (GP-llR- Air)

EPA

T O t ~

(Med-level)- Volatile

Organic

Compounds by GC/MS

Acetone

Benzene

Benzyl chloride


Bromoform

Bromomethane

2-Butanone (MEK)

Carbon disulfide


Chlorobenzene


Chloroethane

Chloroform

Chloromethane


1,2-J:: ichlorobenzene

1,3-Dichlorobenzene

I 4-Dichloroberu:ene


1,1-Dichloroethane

I 2-Dichloroethane



I, 1-Dichloroethene

1,2-Dichloropropane

cis- ,3-Dichloropropene

trans- ,3-Dich oropropene

1.2-Diehloro-1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethane

Ethyl benzene

4-Ethyltoluene

Hexachlorobutadiene

2-Hexanone

Methylene chloride

4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK)

Styrene


T etrachloroeth ene

Toluene

1,2,4-Trichloroben;zene


I, 1,2-TrichloroethMe

Trichloroethene

ND RL2

7,6 RL2

ND

RL2

ND RL2

ND

RL2

ND

RL2

ND RL2

NO RL2

NO RL2

ND RL2

NO RL2

ND RL2

ND RL2

ND ·RL2

ND RL2

ND RL2

ND RL2

ND

RL2

ND RL2

ND

RL2

ND RL2

ND RL2

ND

RL2

NO

RL2

ND RL2

ND RL2

NO RL2

21 RL2

7.8 RL2

6.3 RL2

ND

RL2

ND RL2

ND RL2

ND RL2

ND RL2

ND RL2

ND RL2

15 RL2

ND

RL2

ND RL2

ND

RL2

ND RL2

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

20

6.0

20

4.0

4.0

8.0

20

20

4.0

4.0

4.0

8.0

4.0

8.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

6.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

8.0

20

4.0

20

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

10

4.0

4.0

4.0

16

o f 53

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

Sampled: 08/04/08 I 0:25

08/0.7/08 06:56

08/07/08

06:56

08/07/08

06:56

08107/08 Q6:56

08/07/08

06:56

08/07/08 06:56

08107/08 06:56

08/07/08 06:56

08/07/08 06:56

08/07/08 06:56

08/07/08 06:56

08/07/08 06:56

08/07/08 06:56

08/07/08 06:56

08/07/08 06:56

08/07/08 06:56

08/07/08 06:56

08/07/08 06:56

08/07/08 06:56

08/07/08

06:56

08/07/08

06:56

08107/08

06:56

08/07/08

06:56

08107/08 06:56

08/07/08 06:56

08107/08

06:56

08107/08 06:5 6

08/07/08 06:56

08/07/08 06:56

08/07/08 06:56

08/07/08 06:56

08/07/08 06:56

08/07/08 06:56

08/07/08 06:56

08/07/08 06:56

08/07/08 06:56

08/07/08 06:56

08/07/08 06:56

08/07/08 06:56

08/07/08 06:56

08/07/08 06:56

08/07/08 06:56

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

LRH0



TestAmerica

THE LEADER

IN ENVIRONMENTAL T ~ S T I N G


Work Order: LRH0043

Received:

08105108

10:00

Reported: 08118108 17:18



Beverly, MA 01915


Peter Flink

Project Ntunber: [none]

ANALYTICAL

REPORT

Data

Analyte


RL

Sample ID: LRH0043-07 (GP-IIR-

Air)-

cont.

EPA

T015 M e d ~ l e v e l )

~ V o l a t i l e Organic

Compounds

by GC/MS- cont.


ND

RL2

ppbv

4.0

1,1 ,2-Trichloro-1 ,2,2-trifluoroethane ND

RL2

ppbv 4.0

1,2,4-

Trimethylbenzene

9.9

RL2

ppbv

6.0

1,3,5-Trimethy\benzene ND RL2

ppbv

6.0

Vinyl acetate

ND

RL2

ppbv

20

Vinyl chloride NO RL2

ppbv 6.0

Xylenes, total 17 RL2

ppbv 4.0

17

o f 53

Date

Dilution Analyzed

Instrument

QC

Analyst Batch

Sampled: 08/04/08 10:25

2.0 08/07/08 06:56

MSA AA

8H07012

2.0 08/07/08 06:56

MSA AA

8H070l2

2.0 08/07/08 06:56

MSA

AA

8H07012

2.0 08/07/08 06:56

MSA AA

8H07012

2.0 08/07/0 8 06:56

MSA

AA

8H07012

2.0 08/07/08 06:56

MSA

AA

8H07012

2.0

08/07/08 06:56

MSA

AA

8H07012

LRH



Test

America

THE LEADER

IN ENVIRONMENoAL

TE:SOING

1721 South Grand Aven ue Santa Ana, CA 92705 • 714-258-8610 • Fa x 714-258-0921



Beverly, MA 01915

Peter Flink

Work Order:

Project:

Project Number:

LRH0043

Brimbal Ave

[none]

Received: 08/05/08 10:00

Reported: 08/18108 17:18

ANALYTICAL

REPORT

Analyte

Sample

10:

LRH0043-08

(GP-12-

Air)

Data

Result Qualifiers

EPA TO IS (Med-level)- Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS

Acetone

Benzene

Benzyl chloride


Bromoform

Bromomethane

2-Butanone

(MEK)

Carbon disulfide


Chlorobenzene


Cbloroethane

Chloroform

Chloromethane


1,2-Dich\orobenzene

I 3-Dicblorobenzene

I 4 ~ D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e

Dichlorodi fluoromethane

I,

1-Dichloroethane

1 . 2 ~ D i c h l o r o e t h a n e



I, 1- Dichloroethene

1,2-Dichloropropane



I 2-Dichloro-1, I 2,2-tetrafluoroethane

Ethylbenzene

4-Ethyltoluene,

Hexachlorobutadiene

2-Hexanone

Methylene chloride

4-Methy1-2-pentanone (MIBK)

Styrene

I, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

T etrachloroethene

Toluene


I, 1, 1-Trichloroethane


Trichloroethene

20

31

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

63

23

ND

ND

2.5

ND

2.7

ND

ND

15

ND

ND

ND

ND

Units

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

pplw

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

RL

10

3.0

10

2.0

2.0

4.0

10

10

2.0

2.0

2.0

4.0

2.0

4.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

3.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

4.0

10

2.0

10

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

5.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

18

o f 53

Date

Dilution Analyzed

Instrument

QC

Analyst Batch

Sampled: 08104/08 10:18

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

08/07/08 15:46

08/07/08 15:46

08/07/08 15:46

08107/08 15:46

08107/08 15:46

08/07/08 15:46

08107/0815:46

08/07/08 15:46

08/07/08 15:46

08/07/08 15:46

08/07/08 15:46

08/07/08 15:46

08/07/08 15:46

08/07/08 15:46

08/07/08 15:46

08/07/08 15:46

08/07/08 15:46

08/07/08 15:46

08/07/08 15:46

08/07/08 15:46

08/07/08 15:46

08/07/08 15:46

08/07/08 15:46

08/07/08 15:46

08/07/08 15:46

08/07/08 15:46

08107/08 15:46

08/07/08 15:46

08107/08 15:46

08/07/08 15:46

08107/08 15:46

08107/0815:46

08/07/08 15:46

08/07/0815:46

08/07/08 15:46

08/07/08 15:46

08/07/08 15:46

08/07/08 15:46

08/07/08 15:46

08/07/08 15:46

08107/08 15:46

08/07/08 15:46

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

. MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

LRH



TestAmerica

THE

LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL

TE:STING

1721 South Grand Avenue Santa Ana, CA 92705 • 714-258-8610

·Fax

714-258-0921



2220

Beverly, MA 01915

Peter Flink

Analyte

Result

SampleiD:

LRH0043-08

(GP-12- Air)- cont.

Work Order: LRH0043

Project Brimbal Ave


ANALYTICAL REPORT

Data

Qualifiers

Units

RL

Dilution

EPA

TOlS

(Med-level)- Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS- cont.

Trichlorofluoromethane NO ppbv

2.0 1.0

I, I 2-Trichloro-1 ,2,2-trifluoroethane

NO ppbv

2.0 1.0

I ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene

5.8 ppbv 3.0

1.0


NO ppbv 3.0 1.0

Vinyl acetate NO ppbv

10 1.0

Vinyl chloride

NO

ppbv

3.0 1.0

Xylenes, total 13

ppbv

2.0 1.0

19

o f

53

Received: 08/05/08 10:00

Reported: 08/18/08 17:18

Date

QC

Analyzed

Instrument Analyst Batch

Sampled: 08/04/08 10:18

08/07/08 15:46

MSA

AA

8H08008

08/07/08 15:46

MSA AA 8H08008

08/07/08 15:46 MSA

AA

8H08008

08107/08 15:46

MSA

AA 8H08008

08/07/08 15:46 MSA AA 8H08008

08107/08 15:46

MSA AA

8H08008

08/07/08 15:46

MSA

AA

8H08008

LRH



TestAmerica

Tfl O

LEADf:R IN ENVIRONMENTAL

TESTING


100


Beverly, MA 01915

Peter Flink

Data


Work Order:

Project:

Project Number:

LRH0043

BrimbalAve

[none]

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Received:

Reported:

08/05/08 10:00

08118/0817:18

Analyte


RL

Date

Dilution Analyzed

Instrument

QC

Analyst Batch

Sample

ID: LRH0043-0l (GP-21 - Ak)

ASTM 01946

F i x e d

Gases

Carlron d i o ~ i d e

Carbon monoxide

Methane

Oxygen

Nitrogen

9.7

NO

6.0

l2

70

o/o(v/v) 0.020

%(v/v)

0.0020

o/<>(v/v) 0.00040

o/o(v/v)

0.40

%(v/v) 2.0

20 o f 53

Sampled:

08/04/08 09:16

2.0

08/06/08 10:24 GC8 El 8H07006

2.0 08/06/08 I 0:24

GC8 El

8H07006

2.0 08106/08 10:24

GC8 EI

8H07006

2.0 08106/08 10:24

GC8 El 8H07006

2.0

08/06/08 10:24

GC8

El

8H07006

LRH0



TestAmerica

THE LEADER IN

ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING



Beverly, MA 01915

Peter Flink

1721 South Grand Avenue Santa Ana, CA 92705 • 714-256-8610 *Fax 714-258-0921

Work Order: LRH0043 Received: 08/05/08 10:00

Reported: 08/18/08 17:18

Project Brimbal Ave


ANALYTICAL REPORT

Data Date

Analyte


RL

Dilution Analyzed

Instrument

QC

Analyst Batch


(GP-25-

Air)

ASTM 01946- Fixed Gases

Carbon dioxide

Carbon monoxide

Methane

Oxygen

Nitrogen

9,6

o/o(v/v)

NO o/o(v/v)

0.23

%(v/v)

13

o/o(v/v)

75

%(v/v)

Sampled: 08/04/08 09:35

0.021 2.1 08/06/08 10:37 GC8

El

8H07006

0.0021

2.1 08/06/08 10:37

GC8

El

8H07006

0.00041 2.1 08/06/08 10:37

GC8

El 8H07006

0.41

2.1 08/06/08 10:37 GC8 El

8H07006

2.1

2.1 08/06/08 10:37

GC8

El

8H07006

21

o f 53 LRH



TestAmerica

THE LEADER

IN

E'NVIRONMENTAL TESTING


100

Cummings Center Suite 222G

Beverly, MA 01915

Peter Flink

Data

1721 South Gr and Avenue Santa Ana, CA 92705 • 714-258 -8610 • Fax 714-258-0921


Reported: 08/18/0817:18

Project Brimbal Ave


ANALYTICAL REPORT

Date

Analyte


RL

Dilution Analyzed

Instrument

QC

Analyst Batch

Sample ID: LRH0043-03 (GP-14- Air)

ASTM D1946- Fixed Gases

Carbon dioxide

Carbon monoxide

Methane

Oxygen

Nitrogen

II

NO

25

1.3

60

%(v/v)

0.021

%(v/v)

0.0021

%(v/v)

0.00041

o/<>(v/v)

0.41

o/<>(v/v)

2.1

22

o f

53

Sampled: 08/04/08 09:30

2.1 08/06/08 10:50

GC8

El 8H07006

2.1 08/06 /08 10:50

GC8

El

8H07006

2.1

08/06/08 10:50 GCS

El 8H07006

2.1 08106/08 10:50 GC8 El

8H07006

2.1 08106/08 10:50

GC8

El

8H07006

LRH



TestAmerica

THE

LEADER

IN

ENVIRONMENTAL

TESTING


100 Cwnmings Center Suite 2220

Beverly, MA 01915

Peter Flink

1721 South Grand Avenue Santa Ana, CA 9270 5 * 714-258-8610 • Fax 714-258-0921

Work Order:

LRH0043 Received: 08/05/08 10:00

Reported: 0811810817:18

Project:

Brimbal Ave


ANALYTICAL REPORT

Data

Date

Analyte

Result Qualifie rs Units

RL

Dilution Analyzed

Instrument

QC

Analyst Batch

Sample ID:

LRH0043-04 (GP-26-

Air)

ASTM Dl946- Fixed Gases

Carbon

dioxide

Carbon monoxide

Methane

Oxygen

Nitrogen

EPA 15/16- Sulfur Compounds

Carbon disulfide

Carbonyl sulfide

Dimethyl disulfide

Dimethyl sulfide

Hydrogen sulfide

Ethyl mercaptan

Methyl mercaptan

16

NO

0.027

77

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

o/o(v/v)

0.020

%(v/v)

0.0020

%(v/v) 0.00039

'Yo(v/v)

0.39

%(v/v)

2.0

ppmv 0.025

ppmv 0.050

ppmv 0.025

PP'"'

0.050

ppmv

0.050

ppmv

0.050

ppmv 0.050

23 o f 53

Sampled:

08104108

10:00

2.0 08/06/08 II :04

GCS

EI

8H07006

2.0 08/06/08 II :04 GCS

EI

8H07006

2.0 08/06/08 II :04

GCS EI

8H07006

2.0 08/06/08 II :04 GCS

EI

8H07006

2.0 08/06/08

II

04 GCS EI

8H07006

1.0 08/06/08 07:44 GC1 TO 8H06002

1.0

08106/08 07:4 4 GC7

TO

8H06002

1.0 08106/08 07: 44

GC1

TO

8H06002

1.0

08106/08 07:44 GC7

TO

8H06002

1.0 08/06/08 07:44 GC1

TO

8H06002

1.0 08/06/08 07:44 GC7 TO

81-106002

1.0 08/06/08 07:44

GC7

TO

8H06002

LRH



TestAmerica

THE LEADER

IN ENVIRONMENTAL

TE'STING



Beverly,

MA

01915

Peter Flink

1721 South Grand Avenue Santa Ana, CA 92705 714-258-8610 • Fax 714-258-0921

Data

Work Order:

Project:

Project Number:

LRH0043

Brimbal Ave

[none]

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Received:

Reported:

Date

08/05/08 10:00

08118/0817:18

Analyte


RL

Dilution Analyzed

Instrument

QC

Analyst Batch

Sample

ID: LRH0043-05 (GP-20- Air)


Carbon dioxide

Carbon monoxide

Methane

Oxygen

Nitrogen

3.8 o/o(v/v)

NO o/o(v/v)

7.6 %(v/v)

14

%(v/v)

72

%(v/v)

Sampled:

08/04/08 10:05

0.020

2.0 08106/08 II: 17 GC8 EI

8H07006

0.0020 2.0 08106/08 II: 17

GC8

EI

8H07006

0.00041 2.0

08/06/0811:17

GC8 EI 8H07006

0.41 2.0 08/06/08 II: 17

GC8 EI 8H07006

2.0 2.0

08/06/08 11:17

GC8

EI 8H07006

24

o f 53

LRH0



TestAmerica

THE:

LE:ADE:R

IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING



I

00

Cwnmings Center Suite

2220

Beverly, MA 01915

Peter Flink

Analyte


(GP-6R-

Air)

ASTM D1946- Fixed Gases

Carbon dioxide

Carbon monoxide

Methane

Oxygen

Nitrogen

EPA

15/16-Sulfur

Compounds

Carbon disulfide

Carbonyl sulfide

Dimethyl disulfide

Dimethyl sulfide

Hydrogen sulfide

Ethyl mercaptan

Methyl mercaptan

Work Order:

Project:

Project Number:

LRH0043

Brimbal Ave

[none]

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Data

Result Qualifiers

Units

RL

Date

Dilution Analyzed

Received: 08/05/08 10:00

Reported: 08/18/0817:18

Instrument

QC

Analyst Batch

Sampled: 08/04/08 10:38

13

%(v/v) 0.020

2.0

08/06/08

II

:34

GCS El

8H07006

ND o/o(v/v) 0.0020 2.0 08106/08 II :34 GC8

El

8H07006

8.4 %(v/v)

0.00040

2.0 08/06/08 II :34

GCS El

8H07006

2.1

o/n(v/v)

0.40 2.0 08/06/08 II :34

GC&

El

8H07006

74

o/o{v/v)

2.0 2.0 08/06/08 11:34

GCS

El 8H07006

ND

ppm'

0.025 1.0 08/06/08 08:09

GC7

TD

8H06002

ND

ppmv 0.050

1.0 08/06/08 08:09

GC7

TD

8H06002

ND

ppm'

0.025

1.0

08/06/08 08:09

GC7

TD

8H06002

ND

ppmv 0.050

1.0 08/06/08 08:09 GC7

TD

8H06002

4.2

ppmv 0.25 5.0 08/06/08 08:32 GC7

TD

8H06002

ND

ppmv 0.050

1.0 08/06/08 08:09

GC7

TD

8H06002

ND

ppmv

0.050

1.0 08/06/08 08:09

GC?

TD

8H06002

25

of

53

LRH



TestAmerica

THE tEADEiliN ENVIRONMENTAl TESTING



Beverly, MA 01915

Peter Flink

1721 South Grand Ave,nue Santa Ana, CA 92705 714-258-8610* Fax 714-258-0921

Data

Work Order:

Project:

Project

Number:

LRH0043

Brimbal Ave

[none}

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Received: 08/05/08 10:00

Reported:

08/18/08 17:18

Analyte


RL

Date

Dilution Analyzed

Instrument

QC

Analyst Batch


(GP-IIR-

Air)


Carbon dioxide

Carbon monoxide

Methane

Oxygen

Nitrogen

11 %(v/v)

NO

%(v/v)

13 %(v/v)

2.1

%(v/v)

72

"%(v/v)

Sampled: 08/04/08 10:25

0.020 2.0 08/06/08 II :50 GCS

EI

8H07006

0.0020

2.0

08/06/08 11:50

GC8

EI

8H07006

0.00040 2.0 08/06/08 ll:SO GC8

EI

8H07006

0.40

2.0 08106/08 II

:50

GC8 El

SH07006

2.0 2.0 08106/08

II

:50 GC8

El

8H07006

26

o f 53

LRH



TestAmerica

THE LEAOE:R

IN

ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING


I 00 Cummings Center Suite

2220

Beverly,

MA

0 915

Peter Flink


*Fax

714-258-0921

Work Order: LRH0043

Received: 08/05/08 I 0:00

Reported: 08/18/08 17: 18

Project Brimbal Ave


ANALYTICAL REPORT

Data

Date

Analyte


RL

Dilution Analyzed

Instrument

QC

Analyst Batch

Sample

ID: LRH0043-08

(GP-12-

Air)

ASTM

01946- Fixed Gases

Carbon

dioxide

Carbon monoxide

Methane

Oxygen

Nitrogen

7,4

%(v/v)

NO %(v/v)

NO o/o(v/v)

15

o/o(v/v)

75

o/o(v/v)

Sampled: 08/04/0810:18

0.022

2.2 08106/08 12:03

GC8 EI 8H07006

0.0022

2.2

08106/08 12:03

GC8

EI 8H07006

0.00044

2.2 08/06/08 12:03

GC8

EI 8H07006

0.44 2.2 08106/08 12:03

GC8

EI 8H07006

2.2 2.2

08/06/08 12:03

GC8

EI

SH07006

27

o f

53

LRH



TestAmerica

THE:

UocADE:R

IN E:NVIRONM ;NTAL

TESTING

1721 South Grand Avenue Santa Ana, CA 92705 714-258-8610* Fax 714-258-0921



Beverly, MA 01915

Peter Flink

Analyte Result

Sample 10: 8H07011-BLKI (Blank- Air)

Work Order:

Project:

Project Number:

LRH0043

Brimbal Ave

[none]

PROJECT QUALITY CONTROL DATA

Data

Qualifier

Units

Blank

Date

RL

Dilution Analyzed


Acetone

Benzene

Benzyl chloride


Bromofonn

Bromomethane

2-Butanone (MEK)

Carbon disulfide


Chlorobenzene


Chloroethane

Chlorofom1

Chloromethane


1,2-Dichlorobenzene

1,3-Dichlorobenzene

1,4-Dichlorobenzene


I,

1-Dichloroethane

1,2-Dichloroethane


trans-\ ,2-Dichloroethene

1,

1-Dichloroethene

I 2-Dichloropropane



I 2-Dichloro-1, 1,2,2 -tetrafluoroethane

Ethyl benzene

4-Ethyltoluene

Hexachlorobutadiene

2-Hexanone

Methylene chloride


Styrene

l, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

T etrachloroethene

NO

ND

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

lO

3.0

lO

2.0

2.0

4.0

lO

lO

2.0

2.0

2.0

4.0

2.0

4.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

3.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

4.0

lO

2.0

lO

2.0

2.0

2.0

28

o f 53

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

LOO

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

08/06/08 II :47

08/06/08 ll:47

08/06/08

11

:4 7

08/06/08 I I 4 7

08/06/08 II :4 7

08/06/08 II :4 7

08/06/08 11:47

08/06/08

ll:47

08/06/08 11:47

08/06/08 11:47

08/06/08 11:47

08/06/08 11:47

08/06/08 11:47

08/06/08 11:47

08/06/08 11:47

08/06/08 11:47

08/06/08 11:47

08/06/08 11:47

08/06/08 11:47

08/06/08 11:47

08/06/08 11:47

08/06/08 11:47

08/06/08 11:47

08/06/08 II 4 7

08/06/08 I I 47

08/06/08 11:47

08/06/08 11:47

08/06/08 11:47

08/06/08 ll:47

08/06/08 11:47

08/06/08 11:47

08/06/08 11:47

08/06/08 11:47

08/06/08 11:47

08/06/08 11:47

08/06/08 11:47

08/06/08 11:47

Received:

08105108

10:00

Reported: 08118108 17:18

Instrument Analyst

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

QC

Batch

8H070ll

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H070ll

8H07011

8H07011

8H070ll

8H07011

8H070ll

8H07011

8H0701\

8H070ll

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H070ll

8H07011

8H07011

8H070ll

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H070ll

LRH0



Test

America

TH : L ':AOE:R IN ENVIRONMENTAL T ':ST NG

1721 South Grand Avenue Santa Ana, CA 92705 • 714-258-8610 ~ F a x 714-258-0921



Beverly,

MA

01915_

Peter Flink

Work Order:

Project:

Project Number:

LRH0043

Brimba Ave

[none]

PROJECT

QUALITY CONTROL DATA

Blank- Cont.

Date

Analyte Result

Data

Qualifier

Units RL

Dilution Analyzed

Sample ID: 8H07011-BLK1

(Blank- Air)-

cont.

EPA

TO

IS (Med-level)- Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS

Toluene

I 2,4-Trich\orobenzene

l, I, 1-Trichloroethane


Trichloroethene


I, I 2-T richloro-1 ,2,2-trifluoroethane

I ,2,4-Trimethylb enzene


Vinyl acetate

Vinyl chloride

Xylenes, total

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Sample ID: 8H07012-BLK1

(Blank-

Air)

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

EPA

T015

(Med-level)- Volatile Organic

Compounds

by

GC/MS

Acetone

Benzene

Benzyl chloride


Bromoform

Bromomethane

2-Butanone (MEK)

Carbon disulfide


Chi oro benzene


Chloroethane

Chloroform

Chloromethane

1,2-Dibromoethane (E DB)

I 2-Dichlorobenzene

I ,3-Dichlorobenzene

1,4-Dichlorobenzene


1,1-Dichloroethane

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

2.0

5.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

3.0

3.0

10

3.0

2.0

10

3.0

10

2.0

2.0

4.0

10

10

2.0

2.0

2.0

4.0

2.0

4.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

29

o f 53

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

08/06/08 II :47

08/06/08 I I 47

08/06/08 II :4 7

08/06/08 11:47

08/06/08 11:47

08106/08 11:47

08106/08 11:47

08106/08

I I

4 7

08106/08 11:47

08106/08 l1:47

08106/08 11:47

08106/08 I I 47

08/07/08 2:53

08/07/08 2:53

08/07/08 2:53

08/07/08 2:53

08/07/08 2:53

08107/08 2:53

08.(07/08 2:53

08107/08 2:53

08107/08 2:53

08107/08 2:53

08/07/08 2:53

08/07/08 2:53

08/07/08 2:53

08/07/08 2:53

08/07/08 2:53

08107/08 2:53

08107/08 2:53

08107/08 2:53

08107/08 2:53

08/07/08 2:53

Received: 08/05/08 10:00

Reported: 08/18/08 17:18

Instrument

Analyst

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

QC

Batch

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H070ll

8H07011

8H07011

8H070ll

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07011

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H070\2

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

LRH0



Test

America

Tf.lE lEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL tESTING



I 00 Cummi ngs Center Suite 2220

Beverly,

MA

01915

Peter Flink

Analyte

.

Result

Sample ID: 8H07012-BLKI

(Blank- Air)-

cont.

Work Order:

Project:

Project Number:

LRH0043

BrimbalAve

[none]


Data

Qualifier

Blank-

Cont.

Units

RL

Date

Dilution Analyzed

EPA

TO

IS (Med-level)- Volatile Organic Compounds

by

GC/MS

1,2-Dichloroethane

cis-\ 2-Dich\oroethene


I, 1-Dichloroethene

1,2-Dich\oropropane

cis- 3-Dichloropropene

trans- I

3-Dichloropropene

I 2-Dichloro-1, I 2,2-tetrafluoroethane

Ethyl

benzene

4-Ethy\toluene

Hexachlorobutadiene

2-Hexanone

Methylene

chloride


Styrene

I,

1,2,2-

Tetrachloroethane

T etrachloroethene

Toluene

1,2,4-

Trichlorobenzene

I, I, -Trichloroethane


Trich1oroethene


1,

1 2-T richloro-1 ,2,2-trifluoroethane



Vinyl

acetate

Vinyl chloride

Xylenes, total


(Blank-

Air)

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

EPA

T015

(Med-level)- Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS

Acetone

Benzene

Benzyl chloride

NO

NO

NO

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

3.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

4.0

10

2.0

10

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

5.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

3.0

3.0

10

3.0

2.0

10

3.0

10

30

o f

53

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

08/07/08 2:53

08/07/08 2:53

08/07/08 2:53

08/07/08 2:53

08/07/08 2:53

08/07/08 2:53

08/07/08 2:53

08/07/08 2:53

08/07/08 2:53

08/07/08 2:53

08/07/08 2:53

08/07/08 2:53

08/07/08 2:53

08/07/08 2:53

08/07/08 2:53

08/07/08 2:53

08/07/08 2:53

08/07/08 2:53

08/07/08 2:53

08/07/08 2:53

08/07/08 2:53

08/07/08 2:53

08/07/08 2:53

08/07/08 2:53

08/07/08 2:53

08/07/08 2:53

08/07/08 2:53

08/07/08 2:53

08/07/08 2:53

08/07/08 14:16

08/07/08 14:16

08/07/08 14:16

Received:

Reported:

08/05/08 10:00

08/18/08 17: 18

Instrument

Analyst

QC

Batch

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H07012

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

LRH0



TestAmerica

THE

LEADER

IN ENVIRONMENTAL

IE'ST NG

1721 South Grand Avenue Santa Ana, CA 92705 • 714-258-8610 ~ F a x 714-258-0921



Beverly, MA

01915

Peter Flink

Analyte Result

Sample ID: 8H08008-BLK1 (Blank- Air)- cont.

Work Order:

Project:

Project Number:

LRH0043

Brimbal Ave

[none]


Blank- Cont.

Date

ata

Qualifier

Units

RL

Dilution Analyzed

EPA TO

IS

(Med-level)-

Volatile Organic Compounds by

GC/MS

Bromodicbloromethane

Bromoform

Bromometbane

2-Butanone (MEK)

Carbon disulfide


Chlorobenzene

Dibromochtoromethane

Chloroethane

Chloroform

Chloromethane


I ,2-Dichlorobenzene

1 3·Dichlorobenzene

1,4-Dichlorobenzene


1, 1-Dichloroethane

1,2-Dich\oroethane


trans-

I

,2-Dich\oroethene

I,

1-Dichloroethene

1,2-Dich\oropropane

cis- 3-Dichloropropene


I

2-Dich

oro-\, I

2,2-tetrafluoroethane

Ethyl benzene

4-Ethyltolucne

HexaChiorobutadiene

2-Hexanone

Methylene chloride


(MIBK)

Styrene

l, 1 2,2-Tetrachloroethane

T etrach\oroethene

Toluene

I 2,4-T rich oro benzene

I, I, - Trichloroethan e

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

NO

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

2.0

2.0

4.0

10

10

2.0

2.0

2.0

4.0

2.0

4.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

3.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

4.0

10

2.0

10

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

5.0

2.0

31

o f 53

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

08/07/08 14:16

08/07/08 14:16

08/07/08 14:16

08/07/08 14:16

08/07/08 14:16

08/07/08 14:16

08/07/08 14:16

08/07/08 14:16

08/07/08 14:16

08/07/08 14:16

08/07/08 14:16

08/07/08 14:16

08/07/08 14:16

08/07108 14:16

08/07/08 14:16

08107108

14:16

08/07/08 14:16

08/07/08 14:16

08/07/08 14:16

08107108

14:16

08/07/08 14:16

08/07/08 14:16

08107108

14:16

08/07108 14:16

08/07/08 14:16

08107108

14:16

08/07/08 14:16

08/07108 14:16

08/07/08 14:16

08/07/08 14:16

08/07/08 14:16

08/07/08 14:16

08/07/08 14:16

08/07108 14:16

08/07/08 14:16

08/07/08 14:16

08/07/08 14:16

Received: 08/05/08 10:00

Reported: 08/18/08 17:18

Instrument Analyst

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

QC

Batch

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

LRH



Test

America

THE LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAl TESTING




Beverly, MA 01915

Peter Flink

Analyte

Result

Sample ID: 8H08008-BLK1 (Blank-

Air)-

cont.

Work Order:

Project:

Project Number:

LRH0043

Brimbal Ave

[none]


Blank-

Cont.

Dateata

Qualifier

Units RL Dilution Analyzed

EPA

T015

(Med-level)- Volatile

Organic

Compounds by GC/MS

1,1,2-Trichloroethane

Trichloroethene


I, 1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane

1,2,4-T imethylbenzene


Vinyl acetate

Vinyl chloride

Xylenes, total

Analyte

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Result

Sample ID: 8H06002-BLKI (Blank- Air)

EPA

15/16- Sulfur

Compounds

Carbon disulfide

Carbonyl sulfide

Dimethyl disulfide

Dimethyl sulfide

Hydrogen sulfide

Ethyl mercaptan

Methyl mercaptan

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND


(Blank-

Air)

ASTM

D1946-

Fixed Gases

Carbon dioxide

Carbon monoxide

Methane

Oxygen

Nitrogen

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Data

Qualifier

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

3.0

3.0

10

3.0

2.0

Blank - Cont.

Units

ppmv

ppmv

ppmv

ppmv

ppmv

ppmv

ppmv

o/o(v/v)

o/o(v/v)

o/o(v/v)

o/o(v/v)

o/o(v/v)

RL

0.025

0.050

0.025

0.050

0.050

0.050

0.050

0.010

0.0010

0.00020

0.20

1.0

32

of

53

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

08/07/08 14:16

08107/08 14:16

08107/08 14:16

08/07/08 14:16

08107/08 14:16

08107/08 14:16

08/07/08 14:16

08/07/08 14:16

08/07/08 14:16

Date

Dilution Analyzed

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

08/06/08 7:20

08/06/08 7:20

08/06/08 7:20

08/06/08 7:20

08/06/08 7:20

08/06/08 7:20

08/06/08 7:20

08/06/08 7:30

08/06/08 7:30

08/06/08 7:30

08/06/08 7:30

08/06/08 7:30

Received: 08/05/08 I 0:00

Repor ted: 08118/08 17:

18

Instrument

Analyst

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

AA

Instrument

Analyst

GC7

GC7

GC7

GC7

GC7

GC7

GC7

GCS

GCS

GC8

GC8

GCS

TD

TD

TD

TD

TD

TD

TD

El

El

El

El

El

QC

Batch

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

8H08008

QC

Batch

8H06002

8H06002

8H06002

8H06002

8H06002

8H06002

8H06002

8H07006

8H07006

8H07006

8H07006

8H07006

LRH



TestAmerica

THE LEADER

IN ENVIRONMENTAL

TE'STING


I 00 Cummings Center Suite 222G

Beverly, MA 01915

Peter Flink

1721 South Grand Avenue Santa Ana, CA 9270 5 * 714-258-8610 • Fax 714-258-0921


Reported: 08/18/0817:18


Project Nwnber: [none]


Analyte Result

Sample ID: 8H07006-BLK1 (B lank- Air)- cont.

ASTM

01946- Fixed

Gases

Blank - Cont.

Data

Qualifier Units

RL

33

of

53

Date QC

Dilution Analyzed Instrument Analyst Batch

LRH





TestAmerica

THE LE:ADEfl IN ENVIRONMENTAL

TESTING

1721 South Grand Avenue Santa Ana, CA 92705 * 714-258-861 0 • Fax 714-258-0921


100 Cununings Center Suite 2220

Beverly, MA 01915

Peter Flink

Analyte

Sample ID: 8H08008-BSI (LCS- Air)

Result

Work Order:

Project:

Project Number:

LRH0043

BrimbalAve

[none]


Data

Qualifiers Units

LCS

-Cont.

RL

Spike

Dilution Cone

%

Rec

EPA

TO

IS {Med-level)- Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS

Acetone


Bromomethane

Carbon

disulfide

Chlorofonn

1,3-Dichlorobenzene

1,2-Dich\oroethane



Ethylbenzene

4-Ethyltoluene

Styrene

1,

1,2-Trichloroethane


I, I 2-Trichloro-1 ,2,2-trifluoroetbane

Vinyl chloride

Analyte

Sample ID: 8H06002-BSI

(LCS-

Air)

EPA 15/16-

Sulfur Compounds

Carbon disulfide

Carbonyl

sulfide

Dimethyl

disulfide

Dimethyl

sulfide

Hydrogen sulfide

Ethyl mercaptan

Methyl mercaptan

62.6

su

66.1

51.4

50.3

51.8

47.8

50.1

47.7

56.1

57.9

54.8

40.8

44.7

53.9

53.3

Result

0.912

1.04

0.258

0.976

0.802

0.797

0.817

ME

Data

Qualifiers

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

Units

ppm'

ppmv

ppmv

ppmv

ppmv

ppmv

ppmv

10

2.0

4.0

10

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

3.0

LCS- Cont.

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

53.0

50.0

118%

102%

50.0 132%

50.0 103%

50.0

53.0

53.0

52.5

50.0

52.5

54.5

50.0

50.0

53.0

50.0

50.0

101%

98%

90%

95%

95%

107%

106%

110%

82%

84%

108%

107%

RL

Spike

Dilution Cone % Rec

0.025

0.050

0.025

0.050

0.050

0.050

0.050

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

35 o f

53

0.950 96%

1.03

101%

0.300 86%

0.985 99%

0.980 82%

0.890 90%

0.930 88%

Target

Range

70 - 130

70-

130

70-130

70-

130

70-

130

70- 130

70- 130

70- 130

70- 130

70- 130

70-130

70- 130

70-130

70-

130

70-

130

70-

130

Target

Range

70- 120

75- 140

70-

130

70- 130

60 - 130

70- 130

75-

130

Received: 08/05/08 10:00

Reported: 08118/08 17:18

Instrument

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

MSA

Instrument

GC7

GC7

GC7

GC7

GC7

GC7

GC7

Date

Analyzed

QC

Batch

08/07/08 12:38 8H08008

08/07/08 12:38 8H08008

08107/08 12:38 8H08008

08/07/08 12:38 8H08008

08/07/08 12:38 8H08008

08/07/08 12:38 8H08008

08/07/08 12:38 8H08008

08/07/08 12:38 8H08008

08/07/08 12:38 8H08008

08/07/08 12:38 8H08008

08/07/08 12:38 8H08008

08/07/08 12:38 8H08008

08/07/0812:38 8H08008

08/07/08 12:38 8H08008

08/07/08 12:38 8H08008

08/07/08 12:38 8H08008

Date

Analyzed

QC

Batch

08/06/08 06:21 8H06002

08/06/08 06:21 8H06002

08/06/08 06:21 8H06002

08/06/08 06:21 8H06002

08/06/08 06:21 8H06002

08/06/08 06:21 8H06002

08/06/08 06:21 8H06002

LRH



Test

America

THE lEAOE:R IN ENVIRONME:NTAL

TESTING




2220

Beverly, MA 01915

Peter Flink

Analyte

Sample ID: 8H07006-BSI (LCS- Air)

ASTM

01946-

Fixed Gases

Carbon dioxide

Carbon monoxide

Methane

Oxygen

Nitrogen

Result

1.05

0.0483

0.0293

5.17

20.6

Work Order: LRH0043

Project Brimbal Ave

Project Number; [none]

PROJECT


LCS-

Cont.

Data

Spike Target

Qualifiers Units RL

Dilution Cone

%

Rec

Range

o/o(v/v)

0.010

1.00

0.998 105% 75 -

125

%(v/v)

0.0010 1.00

0.0455 106%

70 -

130

%(v/v)

0.00020 1.00 0.0280 105% 75- 135

%(v/v)

0.20

1.00 4.98

104%

70 -

130

o/o(v/v)

1.0

1.00 20.0

103% 70-130

36 o f 53

Received: 08/05/08 10:00

Reported: 08118/08

17:18

Instrument

GC8

ocs

GC8

GC8

GC8

Date

Analyzed

08/06/08 06;57

08/06/08 06:57

08106/08 06:5 7

08/06/08 06:57

08/06/08 06:57

QC

Batch

8H07006

SH07006

8H07006

8H07006

8H07006

LRH



Test

America

THE LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL

rESTING

1721 South Grand Avenue Santa Ana, CA 92705 • 714-258-8610 Fax-714-258-0921



Beverly,

MA

01915

Peter Flink

Work Order:

Project:

Project Number:

LRH0043

Brimbal Ave

[none]

PROJECT


LCS Dup

Spike

Received: 08/05/08 10:00

Reported: 08118/08 17:18

Target

Analyte Result

Data

Qualifiers

Units

RL

Dilution Cone % Rec Range RPD Limit

Date

Analyzed

QC

Batch

Sample ID: 8H07011-BSDI (LCS Dup- Air)

EPA TOlS (Med-level)- Volatile

Organic Compounds

by GC/MS

Acetone


Bromomethane

Carbon disulfide

Chloroform

1 3-Dichlorobenzene

I 2-Dichloroethane

troos-1 ,2-Dicliloroethene


Ethyl benzene

4-Ethyltoluene

Styrene

I, I 2-Trichloroethane


I, 1,2-T richloro-1 ,2,2-trifluoroethane

Vinyl chloride

60.8

50.6

57.1

55.3

50.5

49.0

46.0

52.2

47.8

51.6

57.4

49.0

40.5

49.2

56.5

51.2

Sample ID: 8H07012-BSDI (LCS

Dup-

Air)

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

pP,v

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

EPA

TOtS

(Med-level)- Volatile Organic

Compounds by

GC/MS

Acetone


Bromomethane

Carbon disulfide

Chlorofonn

1,3-Dichlorobenzene

I 2-Dichloroethane

trans-

2 ~ D i c h l o r o e t h e n e


Ethylbenzene

4-Ethyltoluene

Styrene



1, I 2-T richloro-1 ,2,2-trifluoroethane

Vinyl chloride

59.8

52.3

55.5

52.3

48.2

47.1

47.8

50.7

48.2

52.7

58.7

49.9

39.8

47.7

53.7

49.9

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

10

2.0

4.0

10

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

3.0

10

2.0

4.0

10

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

3.0

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

37 o f

53

53_0

50.0

50.0

50.0

50.0

53.0

53.0

52.5

50.0

52.5

54.5

50.0

50.0

53.0

50.0

50.0

53.0

50.0

50.0

50.0

50.0

53.0

53.0

52.5

50.0

52.5

54.5

50.0

50.0

53.0

50.0

50.0

115%

70-130

101% 70- 130

114% 70-

130

111%

70-130

101% 70-130

92% 70- 130

87%

99%

96%

98%

70- 130

70-130

70-

130

70-

130

105% 70- 130

98% 70- 130

81%

70-130

93%

70-130

113% 70- 130

102%

70-

130

5

3

II

0.2

0.6

0.8

4

7

3

7

113% 70- 130 4

105% 70- 130 0.09

I l l% 70-130 24

105%

70- 130

0.2

96%

70

- 130 0.8

89%

70-130

2

90%

70-130

4

97% 70- 130

96%

70-

130

100% 70- 130

108% 70- 130

100% 70- 130

80% 70- 130

90%

70-

130

107% 70- 130

100% 70- 130

0.2

0.6

2

2

0.7

0.9

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

08/06/08 10:53 8H07011

08106/08 10:53 8H07011

08/06/08 10:53 8H070 II

08/06/08 10:53 8H070 I I

08/06/08 10:53 8H07011

08/06/08 10:53 8H07011

08106/08 10:53 8H070

11

08/06/08 10:53 8H070ll

08/06/0810:53 8H07011

08/06/08 10:53 8H07011

08/06/08 10:53 8H07011

08/06/08 10:53 8H07011

08/06/08 10:53 8H07011

08/06/08 10:53 8H07011

08106/08 10:53 8H07011

08106/08 10:53 8H07011

08/07/08 02:14 8H07012

08/07/0802:14 8H07012

08/07/08 02:14 8H07012

08/07/08 02:14 8H07012

08/07/08 02:14 8H07012

08107/0802:14 8H07012

08/07/0802:14 8H07012

08/07/0802:14 8H07012

08107/0802:14 8H07012

08/07/08 02:14 8H07012

08/07/08 02:14 8H07012

08/07/0802:14 8H07012

08/07/08 02:14 8H07012

08/07/0802:14 8H07012

08/07/08 02:14 8H070 \2

08/07/08 02:14 8H07012

LRH



Test

America

THE LEADER

IN ENVIRONMENTAL

TE:$TING


100


Beverly, MA 01915

Peter Flink


Work

Order:

Project:

Project Number:

LRH0043

Brimbal Ave

[none]

Received: 08/05/08 10:00

Reported: 08118/08 17:18

PROJECT


Analyte Result

Sample

ID:

8H08008-BSDI (LCS

Dup- Ak)

Data

Qualifiers

Units


Acetone


Bromomethane

Carbon disulfide

Chloroform

1,3-Dichlorobenzene

1,2-Dich\oroethane



Ethylbenzene

4-Ethyltoluene

Styrene



I, I ,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane

Vinyl chloride

Analyte

52.1

50.9

63.7

53.6

48.7

49.3

46.1

Sl.l

47.3

52.5

55.5

49.6

39.5

47.7

55.0

50.6

Result

Sample ID: 8H06002-BSDI (LCS

Dup-

Air)

EPA 15/16- Sulfur Compounds

Carbon

disulfide

Carbonyl sulfide

Dimethyl disulfide

Dimethyl sulfide

Hydrogen sulfide

Ethyl mercaptan

Methyl mercaptan

0.905

1.01

0.256

0.966

0.757

0.737

0.797

Data

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppb\'

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

ppbv

Qualifiers Units

ppmv

ppmv

ppmv

ppmv

ppmv

ppmv

ppmv

LCS Dup- Cont.

Spike

Target

RL

Dilution Cone

%

Rec Range RPD Limit

Date

Analyzed

QC

Batch

10

2.0

4.0

10

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

3.0

1.00

1.00

l.OO

1.00

1.00

l.OO

1.00

1.00

l.OO

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

LCS Dup - Cont.

53.0

50.0

50.0

50.0

50.0

53.0

53.0

52.5

50.0

52.5

54.5

50.0

50.0

53.0

50.0

50.0

Spike

98%

70.

130

102%

70- 130

127%

70-

130

107%

70-130

97% 70- 130

93%

87%

97%

95%

70- 130

70-

130

70 -

130

70 -

130

100% 70 - 130

102% 70 - 130

99%

70-

130

79% 70- 130

90% 70-130

110%

70-130

101%

70-

130

Target

18

0.4

4

4

3

4

2

7

4

10

3

6

2

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

08/07/08 13:14 8H08008

08/07/08 13:14 8H08008

08107/08 13:14 8H08008

08107/08 13:14 8H08008

08/07/08 13:14 8H08008

08/07/08 13:14 8H08008

08107/0813:14 8H08008

08107/08 13:14 8H08008

08107/08 13:14 8H08008

08107/08 13:14 8H08008

08107/08 13:14 8H08008

08107/08 13:14 8H08008

08/07/08 13:14 8H08008

08/07/0813:14 8H08008

08/07/08 13:14 8H08008

08/07/08 13:14 8H08008

RL

Dilution Cone

%

Rec Range RPD Limit

Date

Analyzed

QC

Batch

0.025

0.050

0.025

0.050

0.050

0.050

0.050

l.OO

1.00

1.00

l.OO

1.00

l.OO

1.00

38 o f 53

0.950 95%

1.03 98%

0.300 85%

0.985 98%

0.980 77%

0.890 83%

0.930 86%

70- 120

75-

140

70 - 130

70 - 130

60 -

130

70- 130

75- 130

0.7

3

6

8

2

25

08106/08 07:00 8H06002

25

· 08/06/08 07:00 8H06002

30

30

25

30

25

08/06/08 07:00 8H06002

08/06/08 07:00 8H06002

08/06/08 07:00 8H06002

08/06/08 07:00 8H06002

08/06/08 07:00 8H06002

LRHQ



Test

America

THE LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING




Beverly,

MA

0 915

Peter Flink

Work Order: LRH0043

Project: Brimhal Ave



LCS Dup - Cont.

Data

Spike

Target

Received: 08/05/08 10:00

Reported: 08/18/0817:18

Date

Analyte Result Qualifiers Units RL Dilution . Cone

%

Rec Range RPD Limit Analyzed

QC

Batch

Sample ID: 8H07006-BSDI (LCS Dup- Air)

ASTM

01946-

Fixed Gases

Carbon dioxide

LOS

%(v/v) 0.010 1.00

0.998

105%

75 -

125 03

20

08/06/08 07:10 8H07006

Carbon

monoxide 0.0483

%{v/v)

0.0010 1.00 0.0455

106% 70- 130

0.003

30

08/06/08 07:

10

8H07006

Methane 0.0293

o/o{v/v)

0.00020 1.00 0.0280

105%

75 - 135

0.06

20 08106/08

07:10

8H07006

Oxygen

5.17

o/o(v/v)

0.20

1.00

4.98

104% 70 - \30

0.04

30 08106/08 07:

to

8H07006

Nitrogen 20.6 o/o(v/v)

1.0

1.00

20.0

103% 70 - 130

0 30 08106/08 07:

to

8H07006

39

o f 53 LRH0



TestAmerica

THE LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TE:STINO


~ F a x

714-258-0921



Beverly, MA01915

Peter Flink

Work Order: LRH0043



DATA QUALIFIERS AND DEFINITIONS

Internal Standard recovery

was

outside ofmethod limits. Matrix interference was conftrmed

by

reanalysis.

JA The analyte was positively identified but the quantitation

is

an estimate.

Received: 08/05/08 I 0:00

Reported: 08/18/0817:18

ME The percent recovery of he analyte is outside the control limits but within marginal exceedance limits, per NELAC

requirements.

RL2 Reporting limit raised due to high concentrations of hydrocarbons.

ND Not detected. at the reporting limit (or method detection limit i f hown)

40 o f

53

LRH



~ -

:;;.

I

0

0

"'

ii'

M

M

M

g:

d>

d:

"'

"'

"'

fl

"'

"'

aJ

1'-

ci

z

~

Cl

:I:

0.

~

Ul

t l

..

Ei

::::

TastAmerica Los Angeles

1721

Soult\

Grand A'Ve

Saota

Ana, CA 92705

Phone

7\4-2513-8510

Fax

71"·258..0921

Canister Samples Chain of Custody Record

Tes/Amstka

UII Milfon"&s..

/M.

sssumes

no

liablilywith

s p J J e l

to

llle

co ltldion end

stt/pmMl oll lese ssm,plet.

· ~ ·

Special

lnstructionsiQC Requirements &Comments:

;zf<

~ ~ J ) f z . - j )

l

..

''It)· ')(



'""

"'

•

0

0

..

M o

~

~

l l

a.

ii

"'

B

M

ill

"'

~

ci

z

:

0

:r:

IJ._

;

TestAmerica Los Angeles

1721 SQ->lltl

Grand Ave

Sanla An9.

CA

92705

Phone: J'1425S-a610 F a : ~ ~ :

71.4·'258...()921

Canister Samples Chain

of

Custody Record

Te$fAmerfeai..BbOilllm'fM. tnc. <ti S:SI.ItrteS .rwlia'Jih1y wilh rrJJptJCl to lh$ C O I ~ i t m t m d shlpm&nt tJI these sefi'1P(es.

~

~ W . : J ) p f >



TestAmerica

, . . ···-·-·-··- · ·-···r··- .

~ " - ·

r i t l b \ l e t i > t L ~ o # 4 ~ ~

CANISTER FIELD DATA RECORD

VFR ID: t tF

ILJ l

CLIENT: _

_ , _ 6 " - ' ~ ' - - - - ' - " . L = : : ' - f _ : _ F _ : : : I : = = : : : - N

__

:_c_tJ_G_·

-

CANISTER

SERIAL#: __I.- .3=-.::0::_S:::__O=..·

-=------

Duration of comp. : ' - Hrs. I mins.

DATE CLEANED: ----,:0,.,·_ l - ' - - ' " 2 . . . ~ ' - - _ , l ~ O , _ " i : S " - " " ' F____

FJow setting: ~ " . ( , -:-Lf/•7mVmin

CLIENT

SAMPLE

#: -;i(},""t-'---'l..:::c\L----,----:-:-----

SITE

LOCATION:

l " ~ " - ( t - " \ M - ' - ' - ' ~ - ' ' / t ' - - - . . . . : : . . . l l f T . . . . . : : . . I / ' ( _ _ . = ~ - ~ ~

READING

INITIAL VACUUM CHECK

I

NITIAL FIELD VACUUM

q(C.,

I

INAL FIELD

READING

II\0

Initials: ~

LABORATORY CANISTER PRESSURIZATION

I

. NITIAL VACUUM { l n c h e ~ H g

r S I ~

{circle unit used))

I

.FINAL P R E S S U R E f s l ~

I

Pressurization Gas:

~

COMPOSITE

TIME

COMMENTS:

IHOURSl

15Min.

30Min.

1

2

4

6.

8

10

12

24

J

FLOW RATE RANGE

(ml/min)

316-333

158-166.7

79.2-83.3

39.6-41.7

19.8

20.8

13.2 13.9

9.9-10.4

7.92 8.3

6.6-6.9

3.5-4.0

N;\COI\OOCS\TestAmerica DOCs\TestAmerica- CANISTER FIElD

DATA

RECORD-

2Q080201.doc

t

43 of 53

LRH



•7,

T E % : t A r n ~ ~ Q

CANISTER

FIELD DATA RECORD

CLIENT:

----'-6"'-''

' - - - - ' - - " I = - . . . . f . . : . . F . . : : : : : L = : . . . . . N

__

_c_N_G_.

-

VFR ID:

tiFQ Z.S

CANISTER

SERIAL

#:

_.._\

2,_......:;3t<.O.L::::.YL_-==------

Duration of comp. : ?..... Hrs.

I

mins.

DATECLEANED:

6f.Z. . ' -LOoF

CLIENT

SAMPLE

#: , < 9 : : . o f ' - - - ~ ) : . " " ~ ' - - - - : - - - c - - - - -

SITE

LOCATION:

6f1W\6lf'rC tf\VL

Flow setting: 0<i.{,

:-L(f.7ml min

Initials:

~

READING


INITIAL FIELD VACUUM

36

I

INAL FIELD

READING

- ~ LABORATORY CANISTER PRESSURIZATION

INITIAL VACUUM (Inches Hg I ~ c i r c l e unit used))

I

I

o- s-1

I

'i

.r /o 'i

I

M

.FINAL PRESSURE P S ; A ) )

I

2\ .

7C

I

J,

I

"'

'-

Pressurization Gas:

: ] y

COMPOSITE

FLOW RATE RANGE

TIME

COMMENTS:

IHOURS\

(ml/min)

15 Min.

316-333

30Min.

158 166.7

1

79.2 83.3

2

39.6 41.7

4

19.8-20.8

6

13.2

13.9

8

9.9-10.4

10

7.92-8.3

12 6.6-6.9

24 3.5-4.0

N:\COI\DOCS\TestAmerica DOCs\TestAmerica ·CANISTER FIELD DATA RECORD. 20080201

.doc

I

44 o f 53

LRH



.,... . __

t_

K_

-

l ~ : : : : : > l f " d

Ill::: t t ;U

CANISTER

FIELD DATA

RECORD

::,

CLIENT:

_

_ , . . 6 , _ , ~

' . . . - . : . . : : I = - ' - - - F - ' - - F - - = = I = - t V

__

_/'J_G_.

-

VFR ID:

t tF\

L\

0

CANISTER

SERIAL #:

--'0""-'-\_,_,\_'-\__,_,.(o,__--,-

DATE CLEANED: --;OO"i· - l - ' - : - ' : ' Z . . ~ L _ , l " ' 0 " - ' 1 5 - " " " F____

CLIENT SAMPLE#: - - - - 3 1 ( 9 ' 7 ~ ' - - - ' 1 _ , ' - { f - - - - - - - -

SITE LOCATION: _flJ '(l.;ul l " - _ _ : : u f , " - ' f A L = - l ( T i - - 1 / ( _ _ " " " - - - - ~ ~

Duration of camp. :

L-

Hrs. I mins.

Flow setting: ~ " . ( . , -:-LfJ.7mllmin

Initials: ~

READING


I

NITIAL FIELD

VACUUM

I

INAL FIELD READING

<?

,,


INITIAL VACUUM (Inches f - f g r ~ ~ ( c i r c l e untl used))

\.__/,(

Pressurization Gas:

~

COMMENTS:

I , .

"c

I

I Z(.Cj( I

I

COMPOSITE

TIME

IHOURS\

15 Min.

30Min.

1

2

4

6

8

10

12

24

1/1

I

FLOW RATE RANGE

(mVmin)

316-333

158-166.7

79.2-83.3

.

39.6-41.7

19.8-20.8

13.2-13.9

9.9

11l.4

7.92 8.3

6.6

6.9

3.5 4.0

N:\001\DOCS\TestAmerica

DOCs\TestAmeric-a

~ C A N I S T E R FIELD DATA R E C O R D ~ 20080201,doc I

45 o f

53

LRH



CANISTER FIELD

DATA RECORD

CLIENT:

--'-"6'--'',

- - - - - - ' - - ' = I = ·

_,_f_F-"I"--N

_

_N_G_.

-

CANISTER

SERIAL#: A . _ , _ - _ 3 - ' - - L . _ c - = - = - - - - - -

DATE

CLEANED: _ _ _ , 0 " " - - / _ , _ , Z . . ~ L - ' l " " 0 " - - ' 1 $ ' = . : . F

____

CLIENT

SAMPLE #: _ _,G"-'f_-_,'Z.,_(p=-------:------

SITELOCATION: ilJC"\Mf#-G k

READING


I

NITIAL FIELD

VACUUM

tooo

VFR ID:

tfF

0

8;'=\

Duration of comp. : ?-- Hrs./ mins.

Flow setting: 7>"L(, -:-L(f.7ml/min

Initials: ~

I

INAL FIELD

READING

B

•


1

INITIAL VACUUM (Inches

Hg / f s ~

(circle

untt

used))

I

I L

I

t

.r ~ ' l

I

M

. FINAL PRESSURE

<{siAl) ~

I

z.:Z.1'/- I

J

I

.(;

' - - .1\

Pressurization Gas:

~

COMPOSITE

FLOW RATE RANGE

TIME

COMMENTS:

(HOURS)

(m lmln)

15

Min.

316-333

30Min.

158-166.7

1

79.2-83.3

2

39.6-41.7

4

19.8-20.8

6

13.2-13.9

8

9.9-10.4

10

7.92

8.3

12

6.6-6.9

.

24

3.5

4.0

N:\COI\DOCS\TestAmerica DOCs\TestAmerica- CANISTER FIELD

DATA

RECORD - 20080201.doc t

46

of 53

LRH



5

CANISTER FIELD

DATA

RECORD

CLIENT:

--'-"6"--''

' - - - - - ' - - ' = I = - - ' - - f - - ' - - - F _ : : I ~ t v

_ _

_N_G_.

-

CANISTER

SERIAL

#:

_(\-"--{o=-£_-"--'{_=-.@,=-----::=-----

DATE

CLEANED: ~ - - ' 0 " " - - - / _ , _ , L ~ ' - - _ , l ' - " 0 " - - ' 1 5 - = . : F

____

VFR ID:

ttf=O

\0

Duration of comp. :

{ ._

Hrs. I mins.

Flow

setting:

7,"{.(.,

>Lf/.7ml/min

CLIENT SAMPLE#:

- - - , , G _ I ' _ ~ _ ' L O - - - : : - - : - - - - - - -

SITE

LOCATION: _

_ , _ f " ' - " \ M J b - ' - - " " ' - ' j \ 0 - ' - - _ ~ : _ _ _ _ . : _

___

Initials:

~

READING


I

NITIAL FIELD VACUUM

({)6)'

I

INAL FIELD READING

I

i}ct[o(



Hg/e

circle unit used))

2(. ~

COMPOSITE

FLOW RATE RANGE

TIME

COMMENTS:

(HOURS)

(mllmin)

15

Min.

316-333

.

30Min.

158-166.7

1

79.2-83.3

2

39.6-41.7

4

19.8-20.8

6

13.2-13.9

8

9.9 10.4

10 7.92 8.3

12

6.6 6.9

24 3.5-4.0

N:\COI\DOCS\TestAmetica DOCs\TestAmerica ~ C A N I S T E R FIELD

DATA

RECORD- 20080201.doc

47 o f 53 LRH



G

T ~ A m e r l c q

CANISTER FIElD DATA RECORD

CLIENT:

- " " " 6 " - - ' ~

' - - - - - ' - " I = . . - F - ' - F - = I = ' - - - - N

__

E_N_G_.

-

VFR ID:

t iF0 :S'"]

CANISTER

SERIAL

#: _q--'""5-"-'L.=-3.....,_"3,,__---:::=----

DATECLEANED: 0 t

Z . . L l Q ~ F

Duration of camp. : ' - Hrs. I mins.

Flow setting: ~ " . ( . -:-L(f.7mllmin

CLIENT

SAMPLE

#:

. ~ C 9 l l f . . : : : - _ , ( o " - ' f ( _ _ = - : - - c - : - - - - - -

SITE LOCATION:

6i:..IN\.

A A . .

A J'f

READING


I

NITIAL FIELD

VACUUM

IO'S¥

I

INAL FIELD

READING

1 2 ~ 1 '

Initials: ~

I

30

I

1"/Lf

/o

'6

Co

I

'F}

4\ {) <(



H g / f s l ~ ( c i r c l e

unit used))

I

f/.o<>

~

's

. FINAL PRESSURE 1¥s1A0

I

2 f-77

:

.J;

-

Pressurization Gas:

1

COMPOSITE

COMMENTS:

(f

TIMES\

HOURS

15Min.

30Min.

1

2

4

6

8

10

12

24

I

~ \ ( V \ .

I

~ j ) j

I

M

I

&

FLOW RATE RANGE

(mVmin)

316-333

158

166.7

79.2 83.3

39.6 41.7

19.8 20.8

13.2 13.9

9.9 10.4

7.92-8.3

6.6-6.9

3.5-4.0

N:\COI\DOCS\Tes America DOCs\TestAmerica ~ C A N I S T E R

FIELD DATA

R ;CORD - 20080201.doc

I

48

o f 53

LRH0



CANISTER

FIELD DATA

RECORD

CLIENT: _

_,_,6"-''

- - - - ' - " ' I " " - ' - F _ : _ F _ : : : : I = : ; _ N

__

__N_G_.

-

CANISTER

SERIAL #:

_ _ , 0 : : . _ _ ' : \ _ . _ \ - ' - ' { . , " " - = L j + - - - ~ - - - - -

DATE

CLEANED: _ ___,0="· I-:--'-2__7-L.-\li"0"--'15"-'='-'F

___

CLIENT

SAMPLE

#: -J..,42rf-- f _ t ~ - - ' \ - " \

rf._.'------::-:--.---

SITE LOCATION: _ _ , j b . l l l ( t _ e : : : l ' l l / t l l c : . . : J . f z a # G L ~ _ , f ± _ : _ _ U ( _ = - - ~ -

READING


I

NITIAL FIELD

VACUUM

\02\

I

FINAL FIELD

READING

VFR ID:

t tF

l \

' l ._

Duration of comp. : ( ._ Hrs./ mins.

Flow setting: 7> Df,.(p -:-L(/.7mVmin

Initials: ~


J

.INITIAL VACUUM (Inches Hg ~ ~ (circle unit used))

I

I

I

I 'b

I

Pressurization Gas:

~

COMPOSITE

FLOW RATE RANGE

TIME

COMMENTS: IHOURS\

{mVmln)

15

Min.

316-333

30Min.

158-166.7

1 79.2-83.3

2

39.6-41.7

4

19.8-20.8

6 13.2-13.9

8 9.9 10.4

10

7.92

8.3

12

6.6 6.9

24

3.5

4.0

I

N;\COI\DOCS\TestAmerlca OOGs\TestAmerica- CANISTER FlELO

DATA

RECORD- 20080201.doc j

49 o f 53 LRH



CANISTER FIELD DATA RECORD

CLIENT:

--'-6"-'' -.'--'-"I=-'-f-'-F_:::I=.:._N

_ _

__f\)_G_.

-

CANISTER SERIAL #: _ __,l__,lw3,_'-t--"--'2_=--==-----

DATECLEANED:

0/Z.:LlO"b"F

CLIENT SAMPLE#:

___,(b ;.)"-(J_----'\'-'1.,...'------------

SITE O C A T I O N : - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ -

READING


I

NITIAL FIELD VACUUM

JD r'f

I INAL FIELD READING

VFR ID:

t iF

\

0 \

Duration of comp. : £ _ Hrs. I mins.

Flow setting: 2,0f,.(., -:-'-{f.7mVmin

Initials: ~



Hg

~ ~ (circle unfi used))

. FINAL PRESSURE fs0>

I Z(, D? I .f; I

Pressurization Gas:

__My

COMPOSITE

FLOW

RATE RANGE

TIME

COMMENTS:

(HOURS)

(ml/min)

15 Min.

316-333

30

Min.

158-166.7

1

79.2-83.3

2 39.6 41.7

4

19.8-20.8

6

13.2-13.9

8

9.9-10.4

10

7.92-8.3

12

6.6 6.9

24

3.5 4.0

I

N;\001\00CS\TestAmerit:a DOCs\TestAmerlca- CANISTER FIELD

DATA

RECORD- 20080201.doc j

50 o f 53

LRH



CANISTER QC

CERTIFICATION

TestAmerioo

1[' .

:::--

·-··

r- P T

If"

.

' f ' : ~ l l l i . t . . S . ~ ~ k ~ ~

Certification Type: J l w O ~ -

\ L ' b " - ~ · . L I ' Y \ ~ .

. c : L ~. - - - - - - - ~

'

ate Cleaned/Batch

Date

of

QC

Data File Number

vls

q3D-33

.......--

Dl.\ I -\l.a

\/'""

1\34

d.

6Co3d.49

l·2ti-0'3 f

CANISTER ID NUMBERS

v- q·3oso

v OLl\lpY

g · ~ d - - L \ 0

¥ 9ted-:J

B

Cf31S5

The above canisters w ~ r e cleaned as.a batch. This certifies this batch containsno

target analyte concentratiO.n·greater than or equal to the method criteria for the

· ~ c e r t i f i c a t i o n Tvofi'

indicate'd above.

*

"INDICATES THE CAN OR CANS WHICH WERE SCREENED.

Reviewed By:

N:\CQI\DOCS\TestAmerica009S\Can QC Cert 20Ci70712.doc

Date:

51 of 53

LRH0



Data

Fi le : \\LAPC046\MSA CC\chem\MSA.i\080730.B\MB07301.D

Report Date:

30-Jul-2008-10:25

Data f i l e

:

Lab

Smp Id:

Inj Date

Operator

Smp In fo

Mise

In fo

Comment

TestAmerica Los Angeles

AIR TOXICS - T0-14AIT0-15 MEDIUM LEVEL

\\LAPC046\MSA

CC\chem\MSA.i\080730.B\MB0730l.D

BLANK

- Client Smp

ID: 93233

30-JUL-2008 09:58

DLK Ins t

ID:

MSA.i

. BLANK,93233,,SCREEN BLANK

1,1,500,500,3,,BLANK,BLANK.SUB,O,

Method

\\LAPC046\MSA

CC\CHEM\MSA.I\080730.B\T014A.m

Meth Date

30-Jul-2008

OB:39 kammererd

Quant

Type: ISTD

Cal Date 30-JUL-2008 03:53 Cal

Fi le :

IC07295.D

Als bo t t l e : 15

QC Sample:

BLANK

Dil

Factor :

1.00000

Page

1

In teg ra to r :

HP

RTE

Subt ract ion

Fi le : \\LAPC046\MSA CC

Target

Version: 4.04

Compound

Subl i s t :

BLANK.SUB

Process ing

Host:

LAPC046

Concent ra t ion Formula: Amt * DF * (FinalPres

I

In i tPres)*(CalVol

I

SmpVol)

Name

DF

Final Pres

In i tP re s

Cal

Vol

SmpVol

Compounds

= = = = = ~ ~ = ~ = = = = ~ = ~ = = = = = = = = = =

•

64 Bromochloromethane

$

70

1,2-Dichloroethane-d4

•

77

1,4-Difluoroben%ene

$

89

Toluene-de

.

02

Chlorobenzene-dS

$

122

4-Bromo.fluorobenzene

Value

1.000

1 . 000

1.000

500.000

500.000

Descr ip t ion

Dilut ion Factor

Final Pres

In i tPres

CalVol

SmpVol

QUANT

SIG

MASS RT EXP RT

REt. RT

49

10.311

10.353

(1.000)

65

1 1 . 3 3 ~

11 .363

(0.937)

114 12 087 12 112

{1.000)

100

14 685

14.709

(1.215)

117

17 346 .17.361

1.000)

95 1.9.582 19.598

{1.129)

52

o f

53

CONCENTRATIONS

ON-COLUMN

FINAL

RESPONSE

( ppbv)_

{

ppbv)

"'""'"'"'"'"'"'

1743374 50.0000

801869 53 7201 53 72

2513688

50.0000

1350319

51 5680

51 57

2006782

50 0000

1774461 52 4509 52 45

LRH



0

0

;.,

t.

m-

+

,_

-

-

-

,...

-

-

>-<

-

-

-

-

-

-

,_

-

-

-

0 0

.r

:"

?

- B r o ~ o c h l o r o M e t h a n e

-1,2-Diohloroethane-d4

<11

..330)

1,4-Ditluorobenzene

Toruene-d8

Chlorobenzene-d5

4-Bromofluorobenzene

53 o f 53

(10 . 311)

(12

.079)

0 0

<144686)

0

,

c

•

3

.,

,

<

0 3

..

;;

3

;·

::-

"

;;

"'

t

"'

;

' '

-

>

l J

(17.337>

(19.583)

LRH0



APPENDIXC

Land GEM

Output

for

the

Modeling of Landfill Gas Generation

at

the Former Brimbal

Avenue Landfill

in Beverly,

MA





Appendix C.xls

10/2/2008

USER

INPUTS

Landfill

Name or Identifier:

~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~

1:

PROVIDE LANDFILL CHARACTERISTICS

Clear ALL

Non-Parameter

I

Inputs/Selections

Landfill

Open Year 1948

Landfill

Closure Year 1961

Have

Model

Calculate

Closure

Year?

CYes

.ENo

Waste Design Capacity

short tons

...,

Restore Default Model

2: DETERMINE MODEL PARAMETERS

Parameters

Methane Generation Rate, k

(year·

1

)

I Inventory Conventional - 0.04

... J

Potential

Methane Generation Capacity, L

0

(m

3

/Mg)

I

Inventory Conventional - 100

3

NMOC

Concentration

(ppmv as

hexane)

I Inventory No or Unknown Co-disposal - 600

...

j

Methane Content(%

by volume)

I

CAA

- 50% by \,{)lume ...

3:

SELECT GASES/POLLUTANTS

Gas

I Pollutant

#1

User-specified pollutant parameters are

currently

being used by model.

I Total landfill gas

...I

Edit Existing or

Add

Gas

I

Pollutant

#2

New

Pollutant

I Methane

...

]

Parameters

Gas

I

Pollutant

#3

I NMOC

...

I

Restore

Default

Pollutant

Gas

I

Pollutant #4

Parameters

I

Hydrogen sulfide

_

..

I

Description/Comments:

USER

INPUTS-

1



Appendix C.xls

4: ENTER WASTE ACCEPTANCE RATES

Input Units:

I short tons/year

..-I

Input Units Calculated Units

Year

(short tons/year) (Mg/year)

1948

12,250 11,136

1949

12,250

11,136

1950

12,250

11 ,136

1951

12,250 11,136

1952 12 ,250 11,136

1953 12,250 11,136

1954

12,250

11,136

1955

12,250

11 ,136

1956 12,250 11,136

1957 12,250

11 ,136

1958

12,250

11,136

1959 12,250 11,136

1960

12,250

11,136

1961

12,250

11,136

1962

1963

1964

1965

1966

1967

1968

1969

1970

1971

1972

1973

1974

1975

1976

1977

1978

1979

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

USER INPUTS - 2

10/2/2008



Appendix C.xls

4:

ENTER WASTE ACCEPTANCE RATES

Input Units:

j short tons/year .. j

Input Units Calculated Units

Year

(short tons/year) (Mglyear)

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

2027

USER

INPUTS - 3

10/2/2008





Appendix C.xls

I

Enter New Com ound

A.

Hazardous air pollutants (HAP) listed

in

Title Ill of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments.

B. Considered volatile organic compounds (VOC}, as defined by U.S. EPA

in

40 CFR 51 .100(s).

C. Source tests did not indicate whether this compound was the para- or ortho- isomer. The

para- isomer

is

a Title Ill-listed HAP.

Source: Tables 2.

4-1

and 2.4-2 of Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, AP-42, Volume

1: Stationary Point and Area Sources, 5th ed. , Chapter 2.4 Municipal Solid Waste Landfills . U.S.

EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards . Research Triangle Park, NC. November

1998. http ://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch02/final/c02s04 .p

df

POLLUTANTS- 2

Return to

USER INPUTS



Appendix C.xls

10/2/2008

INPUT REVIEW

Landfill

Name or Identifier:

LANDFILL CHARACTERISTICS

Landfill Open Year

Landfill Closure Year (with 80-year limit)

Actual Closure Year (without limit)

Have Model Calculate Closure Year?


MODEL PARAMETERS


Potential Methane Generation Capacity,

La

NMOC Concentration

Methane Content

GASES I POLLUTANTS SELECTED

Gas I Pollutant #1:

Gas I

Pollutant #2:

Gas I Pollutant #3:

Gas

I

Pollutant #4:

Total landfill gas

Methane

NMOC

Hydrogen sulfide


1948

1961

1961

No

0.040

100

600

50

-------------------------------------

short tons

year-

1

m

3

/Mg

ppmv as hexane

%by volume

INPUT

REVIEW-

1



Appendix C.xls

10/2/2008

WASTE ACCEPTANCE RATES

Year (Mg/year)

(short tons/year)

1948

11 '136

12,250

1949

11 '136

12,250

1950

11

'136

12,250

1951

11 '136

12,250

1952

11

' 136

12,250

1953

11

'136 12,250

1954

11

'136

12,250

1955

11 '136

12,250

1956

11 ' 136

12,250

1957

11 '136

12,250

1958

11 '136

12,250

1959

11 '136

12,250

1960

11 '136

12,250

1961

11 '136

12,250

1962

0

0

1963

0

0

1964

0

0

1965 0

0

1966

0

0

1967

0

0

1968 0

0

1969

0

0

1970 0

0

1971

0

0

1972 0 0

1973 0

0

1974

0

0

1975

0

0

1976

0

0

1977

0

0

1978

0

0

1979

0

0

1980

0

0

1981

0

0

1982 0 0

1983

0

0

1984

0

0

1985

0

0

1986

0

0

1987

0

0

1988

0

0

1989

0

0

1990 0

0

INPUT

REVIEW-

2



Appendix C.xls

10/2/2008


Year

(Mg year)

(short tons/year)

1991

0

0

1992

0

0

1993

0

0

1994

0

0

1995

0

0

1996 0 0

1997

0

0

1998

0

0

1999

0

0

2000 0

0

2001

0

0

2002 0

0

2003

0

0

2004

0

0

2005

0

0

2006 0

0

2007 0

0

2008

0

0

2009

0

0

2010

0

0

2011

0

0

2012

0

0

2013

0

0

2014

0

0

2015 0 0

2016

0

0

2017

0

0

2018

0

0

2019

0

0

2020

0

0

2021

0

0

2022

0

0

2023

0

0

2024

0

0

2025 0 0

2026

0

0

2027

0

0

INPUT

REVIEW-

3



Appendix C.xls

10/2/2008

METHANE

Landfill Name or Identifier:

First-Order Decomposition Rate Equation :

Where,

n 1 M)

cH4

=

L L kLo i

e lctsj

i=l j=O.l

} Q

Mi = mass of waste accepted in the i th year

(Mg)cH

4

= annual methane generation

in

the year of the calculation (m

3

year)

i = 1-year time increment

n =(year

of

the calculation) - (initial year o f waste acceptance)

j = 0.1-year time increment

tii = age of the jthsection of waste mass M accepted in the ith year

(decimal years , e.g ., 3.2 years)

k =methane generation rate (year ·

1

)

L

0

=potential methane generation capacity (m

3

/Mg)

When Model Calculates Closure Year ..

Final Non-Zero Acceptance Entered =

Waste Design Capacity =

Closure Year (with 80-year limit) =

Actual Closure Year (without limit)=

Model Waste Acceptance Limit =

Model Parameters from User Inputs :

11,136 megagrams in

1961

megagrams

1961

1961

80 years

METHANE-

1

k

= 0.040 year·

1

Lo

= 100 m

3

/Mg



Appendix C.xls

10 /2/2008

User Waste

User Waste-In

Waste Waste-In-

Year

Acceptance

Place Acceptance

Place

Inputs

(Mg year) (Mg)

(Mg year)

(Mg)

1948

11 ' 136

0

11 '136

0

1949

11 ' 136 11 '136

11

' 136

11 '136

1950

11 ' 136

22,273

11 ' 136

22,273

1951

11 ' 136

33,409

11 ' 136

33,409

1952

11 ' 136

44,545

11 ' 136

44,545

1953

11

' 136

55,682

11 ' 136

55,682

1954

11 ' 136

66 ,818

11

' 136

66,818

1955

11

' 136 77,955

11

' 136 77,955

1956

11

' 136

89,

091

11 ' 136

89,

091

1957

11

' 136

100,227

11

' 136

100,227

1958

11 ' 136

111

,364

11

' 136

111

,364

1959

11

'136

122,500

11

'136

122,500

1960

11 '136

133,636

11 '136

133,636

1961

11 '136

144,773

11 ' 136

144,773

1962 0 155,909

0

155,909

1963

0

155,909

0

155,909

1964

0

155,909

0

155,909

1965

0

155,909

0

155,909

1966

0

155,909

0 155,909

1967

0

155,909

0

155,909

1968

0

155,909

0

155,909

1969 0 155,909 0 155,909

1970

0

155,909

0

155,909

1971

0

155,909

0

155,909

1972

0

155,909

0

155,909

1973 0 155,909

0

155,909

1974

0

155,909

0

155,909

1975

0

155,909

0

155,909

1976 0 155,909

0

155,909

1977

0

155,909

0

155,909

1978

0

155,909

0

155,909

1979

0

155,909

0

155,909

1980

0 155,909

0

155,909

1981

0

155,909

0

155,909

1982

0

155,909

0

155,909

1983 0 155,909 0 155,909

1984

0

155,909

0

155,909

1985

0

155,909

0

155,909

1986

0

155,909

0

155,909

1987

0

155,909

0

155,909

1988

0 155,909

0

155,909

1989

0

155,909

0

155,909

1990

0 155,909

0

155,909

1991

0 155,909

0

155,909

1992

0

155,909

0

155,909

1993

0

155,909

0

155,909

1994

0

155,909

0

155,909

1995

0

155,909

0

155,909

1996

0 155,909

0

155,909

1997

0

155,909

0

155,909

1998 0 155,909 0 155,909

1999

0

155,909

0

155,909

2000

0 155,909

0

155,909

2001

0

155,909

0

155,909

2002

0

155,909

0

155,909

2003

0 155,909

0

155,909

2004

0

155,909

0

155,909

2005

0

155,909

0

155,909

2006 0 155,909

0

155,909

2007

0

155,909

0

155,909

METHANE - 2



Append ix C.xls 10/2/2008

User Waste

User Waste-In Waste

Waste-In-

Year

Acceptance

Place Acceptance

Place

Inputs

(Mg year) (Mg) (Mg year) (Mg)

2008 0

155,909

0

155,909

2009 0

155,909

0

155,909

2010 0

155,909

0

155,909

2011 0

155,909

0

155,909

2012

0

155,909

0

155,909

2013 0

155,909

0

155,909

2014 0

155,909

0

155,909

2015 0 155,909 0 155,909

2016 0

155,909

0

155,909

2017 0

155,909

0 155,909

2018 0

155,909

0

155,909

2019

0

155,909

0

155,909

2020

0

155,909

0

155,909

2021

0

155,909

0 155,909

2022

0

155,909

0

155,909

2023 0

155,909

0

155,909

2024

0

155,909

0

155,909

2025

0

155,909

0

155,909

2026 0

155,909

0

155,909

2027

0

155,909

0

155,909

ME

TH

ANE

- 3







Appendix C.xls

GRAPHS


(/)

c

0

·;;;

(/)

·e

w

---------------------------------------

Megagrams Per Year

1 400E+03

.,--

------------------------------------------------------,

1.200E+03 +------- ...-- 1

1.000E+03

8.000E+02

6.000E+02

4.000E+02

2.000E+02

O.OOOE+OO ~ ~ ' f i ' f f l ' ~ " f i ' f " ' ' t ' l ' l ' ' l " ' ' ' ~

; ; ; ; ; ; ; : ; ; ; ; ; ; ; r ~ m ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ~ ~ ~ ~ i i T i i i i i T i i i ~

~ ~ ~

~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~

Year

-Total andfill gas

- Methane

- NMOC

- Hydrogen sulfide

(/)

c

0

·;;;

(/)

·e

w

Cubic Meters Per Year

8.000E+05

6.000E+05

4.000E+05

O.OOOE+OO

~

m " I " M " T m ' m m m T T ' I ~ T m T m m T T ' I ' i " ' m " T T T ~ ; : ; ; ; ; : ; : ; ; = ~ = ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ F F i i i ' ' l ' i ' i i i ' i ~

~

~

~

~

~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~

~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~

~

~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Year

-Total andfill gas

- Methane

- NMOC

- Hydrogen sulfide

(/)

c

0

·;;;

(/)

·e

w

User-specified Unit (units shown

in

legend below)

7.000E+01

6.000E+01

5.000E+01

4.000E+01

3.000E+01

2.000E+01

1.000E+01

O.OOOE+OO

' ' i ' m " ' i ' " " ' " l " " ' ' ' ' ' " ' " ' ' " " ' ' l ' l ' ' l " ' ' ' ' ' " m , . , . , . , . , ' m ' I ' I ' ' I " ' " ' ' ' T ~ ; ; ; : : : ;

= = ~ ~ ~ = ~ ~ T r m i m i ' i i ' ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~

~

~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~

~

~

Year

-Total andfill gas (av ftA3/min)

- Methane (av ft"3/min)

- NMOC (av ft"3/min)

- Hydrogen sulfide (av ft"3/min)

GRAPHS-

1

10/2/2008



Appendix C.xls

10/2/2008

INVENTORY Landfill Name or Identifier:

---------------------------------------

Enter year of emissions inventory:

Gas I Pollutant

Emission Rate

(Mg year) (m

3

/year)

(av

ft

3

min) (ft

3

year)

(short tons/yea

T ( ) t C ) I I ? . f 1 9 . ~ U 9(3S

Methane

Carbon dioxide

NMOC

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.

OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.

OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

......

.

.

OOOOE+OO

. ....

O.

OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

...........•.....•...•.......•....•...•.•....••..•......

O.

OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.

OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

.

..................................................

1,1,1-Trichloroethane (methyl chloroform)-

HAP

1,1 2,2-Tetrachloroethane- HAPNOC

1,1-Dichloroethane (ethylidene dichloride)- HAPNOC

P i < : : b l ( ) r ( ) ~

b ~ r 1 ~ ( y i f 1 y l i 9 . ~ r 1 ~

< : : h l s > ~ i q ~ ) t i / \ P Y 9 g

1 P i < : : h l s > ~ ( ) ~ h < I r 1 ~ ( ~ t h . y l ~ l l ~ q i < : ; b l g ~ i g ~ ) ~ .ljJ.\F JYOg .....

1 2-Dichloropropane (propylene dichloride) - HAPNOC

2-Propanol (isopropyl alcoho l)- VOC

Acetone

Acrylonitrile - HAP/VOC

~ e n z e n e - No or Unknown 9 . i ~ p ( ) ~ C ) I - HAPNOC

Benzer1e C ( ) - q i ~ p ( ) ~ a l Hf\P.fY()(:

Bromodichloromethane - VOC

.....

····· ...........

Butane-

VOC

Carbon disulfide - HAP/VOC

Carbon monoxide

Carbon tetrachloride - HAP/VOC

9 < = . t

f 1 y l

? ~ l ~ g

ti.

f.\f.'./Y.'Qg ..........................................

Chlorobenzene - HAPNOC

Chlorodifluoromethane

Chloroethane (ethyl chloride) - HAPNOC

Chloroform - HAPNOC

Chloromethane -

VOC

p i g b l < ? ~ c : > ~ ~ r 1 ? ~ r 1 ~ ( 1 j , £ 1 , p f()rpar?. s o ~ ~ r t y Q C )


Dichlorofluoromethane - VOC

Q i < : ; h i < ? E ( ) ~

( ~ ~ h Y I ~ f 1 ~ < : : h l s > r i g ~

O.OOOE+OO

O.

OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

OOOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O

OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.

OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

.......... ···· I·····

O.OOOE+OO

O.

OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.

OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

. • ..

i ····

.

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.

OOOE+OO

O.

OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.

OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.

OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.

OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

.......... - ······- ·--·

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.

OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.

OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

OOOOE+OO

O

OOOE+OO

O

OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

OOOOE+OO

O

OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.

OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O

OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO O

OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO O.OOOE+OO O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO O.

OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO O.OOOE+OO


O.OOOE+OO

~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ ~ - - - - - - - - -

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

OOOOE+OO

....

O.OOOE+OO O.

OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO O.

OOOE+OO

.. .. . . . .

O.OOOE+OO O.OOOE+OO O.OOOE+OO O.OOOE+OO

........

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO O.OOOE+OO OOOOE+OO

Dimethyl sulfide (methyl sul fide)- VOC O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO O.OOOE+OO

Ethane

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO O.OOOE+OO O.OOOE+OO O

OOOE+OO

Ethanol - VOC O.OOOE+OO O.OOOE+OO O.OOOE+OO O.OOOE+OO O

OOOE+OO

Ethyl mercapt_.f1 _eth.anethiol)-

VOC

... .. ........... ........................ ..... . .9.:900E+OO

O.

OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO O.

OOOE+OO

OOOOE+OO

§ h . Y ~ ~ r 1 ~ ~ r 1 ~ l j \ P . / Y O g

.

Ethylene dibromide- HAP/VOC

Fluorotrichloromethane - VOC

Hexane - HAPNOC

Hydrogen sulfide

t \ - 1 ~ ~ < : ; u r y ( ()t<ll) -

HAP

_

M e t h . y l ~ t h . y l ~ ~ t ( ) f 1 ~ HAPNOC

Methyl

i S < : ) ~ l j t y l ~ ~ t ( ) l l ~

- HAP/VOC

~ h . Y I

. ~ < : : C 1 P C 1 r 1 ....=

\ Q9

Pentane

- VOC

Perchloroethylene (tetrachloroethylene)- HAP

Propane - VOC

l ? l < : : b l c : > ~ c : > ~ t h . ... \ Qg

T c : > l l j ~ r 1 ~ c : >

..

...

l:l

1 ~ r 1 c : > ' ' l l ... < : l i ~ p c : > ~ =ti \P.JY9C: ...

Toluene - Co-disposal - HAP/VOC

Trichloroethylene (trichloroethene)- HAP/VOC

Vinyl

chloride - HAPNOC

Xylenes - HAPNOC

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.

OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

-----------

-----------

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.

OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.

OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

...... -----------------

O.

OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.

OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.

OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.

OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO


••·•• •· ••· • · • · ••n•- ••••••••••••••••- •••••••••••- •••••••

O.

OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO O.

OOOE+OO

O.

OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO O.OOOE+OO O.

OOOE+OO

O.

OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO O.

OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO


0.888:::::

88 O.

OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

•

········································································································································································································-················································

+

···················

·

····

·

········································

, ............................................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............. .

O.OOOE+OO O.

OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO


O.OOOE+OO O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO O.OOOE+OO O.

OOOE+OO

O.

OOOE+OO O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO O.

OOOE+OO

O.

OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO O.OOOE+OO . O.

OOOE+OO

INVENTORY- 1

·········-··········-··-····

O.OOOE+OO O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO OOOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O

OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO OOOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO OOOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O

OOOE+OO

. . . . . . .

O.OOOE+OO

OOOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.

OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O

OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.

OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.

OOOE+OO

O.

OOOE+OO

···

I ··········

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.

OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.

OOOE+OO

------------------------------------·····

...

O.OOOE+OO

O

OOOE+OO

O

OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

OOOOE+OO

OOOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

OOOOE+OO

O

OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.OOOE+OO

O.

OOOE+OO



Appendix C.xls

&EPA

LandGEM

Landfill Gas Emissions Model

Version 3.02

U.S. Enviromnental Protection Agency

Office ofResearch and Development

National Risk Management Research Laboratory (NRMRL)

and

Clean Air Technology Center (CATC)

Research Triangle Park, North Carolina

Summary Report


Date: Thursday, October 02, 2008


About LandGEM:

First-Order Decomposition Rate Equation :

n

1

[M

·J

cH4 =

L L

kLa

l

e -ktjj

i=l

j=O.l

1

Q

Where,

O

cH

4

=annual

methane generation

in

the year of the calculation (m

3

/year)

i = 1-year time increment

Mi =mass

of

waste accepted in the i

1

h year (Mg)

10/2/2008

n = (year

of

the calculation)- (initial year of waste acceptance)

j = 0.1-year time increment

tii = age of the

j

1

h section of waste mass Mi accepted in the i

1

h year

(decimal years, e.g ., 3.2 years)

k = methane qeneration rate (vear -

1

)

La = potential methane generation capacity (m

3

/Mg)

LandGEM is based on a first-order decomposition rate equation for quantifying emissions from the decomposition of landfilled waste in

municipal solid waste (MSW) landfills. The software provides a relatively simple approach to estimating landfill gas emissions. Model defaults

are based on empirical data from U.S. landfills. Field test data can also be used in place of model defaults when available. Further guidance on

EPA test methods, Clean Air Act (CAA) regulations, and other guidance regarding landfill gas emissions and control technology requirements

can

be

found at http://www.epa.gov/ttnatw01/landfill/landflpg.html.

LandGEM is considered a screening too l - the better the input data, the better the estimates. Often , there are limitations with the available data

regarding waste quantity and composition, variation in design and operating practices over time, and changes occurring over time that impact

the emissions potential. Changes to landfill operation , such as operating under wet conditions through leachate recirculation or other liquid

additions, will result

in

generating more gas at a faster rate . Defaults for estimating emissions for this type

of

operation are being developed to

include

in

LandGEM along with defaults for conventiallandfills (no leachate or liquid additions) for developing emission inventories and

determining CAA applicability. Refer to the Web site identified above for future updates.

REPORT-

1



Appendix C.xls

Input Review

LANDFILL CHARACTERISTICS

Landfill Open Year

Landfill Closure Year (with 80-year limit)

Actual Closure Year (without limit)

Have Model Calculate Closure Year?


MODEL PARAMETERS


Potential Methane Generation Capacity, La

NMOC Concentration

Methane Content

GASES I POLLUTANTS SELECTED

Gas I Pollutant #1:

Gas I Pollutant #2:

Total landfill gas

Methane

Gas I Pollutant #3: NMOC

Gas

I

Pollutant #4: Hydrogen sulfide


Year

Waste Accepted

(Mglyear) (short tons/year)

1948

11 I 136 12,250

1949

11

1136 12,250

1950 111136 12,250

1951

111136 12 ,250

1952 11 1136 12 ,250

1953

111136

12,250

1954

111136 12,250

1955 11 I 136 12,250

1956

11 1136

12

,250

1957

111136

12

,250

1958 11 I 136

12

,250

1959

11 1136

12

,250

1960

111136 12 ,250

1961

111136 12 ,250

1962

0 0

1963

0

0

1964 0

0

1965 0

0

1966 0

0

1967

0 0

1968

0 0

1969

0 0

1970

0

0

1971

0

0

1972 0

0

1973 0

0

1974 0

0

1975 0

0

1976

0

0

1977 0

0

1978 0

0

1979 0

0

1980 0 0

1981

0

0

1982 0

0

1983

0 0

1984

0 0

1985

0

0

1986 0

0

1987

0

0

1948

1961

1961

No

0.040

100

600

50

short tons

year

-

1

m

3

/Mg

ppmv as hexane

%by

volume

Waste-In-Place

(Mg) (short tons)

0

0

111136

12,250

22,273

24,500

33,409

36,750

44,545

49,000

55,682

61,250

66,818

73,500

77,955

85,750

89,091

98,000

100,227

110,250

111,364

122,500

122,500 134,750

133,636 147,000

144,773

159,250

155,909

171,500

155,909

171,500

155,909

171,500

155,909 171,500

155,909 171,500

155,909 171,500

155,909 171 ,500

155,909

171

,500

155,909

171

,500

155,909

171

,500

155,909

171

,500

155,909

171,500

155,909 171,500

155,909 171 ,500

155,909

171

,500

155,909

171,500

155,909 171,500

155,909 171,500

155,909

171

,500

155,909

171

,500

155,909 171,500

155,909 171,500

155,909

171,500

155,909

171

,500

155,909 171,500

155,909

171 ,500

REPORT-2

101212008



Appendix C.xls 10/2/2008

WASTE ACCEPTANCE RATES (Continued)

Year

Waste Accepted

Waste-In-Place

(Mg year)

(short tons/year)

(Mg)

(short tons)

1988 0 0

155,909

171 ,500

1989 0 0 155,909 171,500

1990

0 0

155,909

171,500

1991

0 0

155,909

171

,500

1992 0

0

155,909 171,500

1993

0 0

155,909

171,500

1994

0 0

155,909

171,500

1995

0 0

155,909

171

,500

1996 0 0 155,909 171,500

1997 0

0

155,909

171,500

1998 0 0

155,909

171,500

1999 0

0

155,909

171,500

2000

0 0

155,909

171,500

2001

0

0

155,909 171,500

2002

0 0

155,909

171,500

2003

0 0

155,909

171

,500

2004 0 0

155,909

171,500

2005

0 0

155,909

171 ,500

2006 0

0

155,909 171,500

2007

0 0

155,909

171,500

2008 0

0

155,909 171,500

2009 0 0

155,909

171,500

2010

0 0

155,909

171,500

2011

0 0 155,909 171,500

2012 0

0

155,909

171,500

2013

0 0

155,909

171,500

2014 0

0

155,909

171

,500

2015 0 0

155,909

171

,500

2016 0

0

155,909 171,500

2017

0 0

155,909

171,500

2018 0 0

155,909

171,500

2019 0

0

155,909

171

,500

2020 0

0

155,909

171,500

2021

0 0 155,909

171

,500

2022 0 0 155,909 171,500

2023 0

0

155,909

171

,500

2024 0

0

155,909 171 ,500

2025 0

0

155,909

171

,500

2026 0 0 155,909 171,500

2027 0 0 155,909 171,500

REPORT-3



Appendix C.xls

10/2/2008

Pollutant Parameters

G

I P II t t D

f

It P

s

o

u an

e au

arame ers:

User-specified Pollutant Parameters:

Concentration Concentration

Compound

(ppmv)

Molecular Weight

(ppmv) Molecular Weight

Total landfill gas 0.00

1/)

Methane

)

16 .04

1/)

co

Carbon dioxide

44.01

( )

NMOC

4,000

86 .18

1,1,

1-

Trichloroethane

(methyl chloroform)-

HAP 0.48 133.41 0.00

1,1,2,2-

Tetrachloroethane -

HAPNOC

1.1

167.85

0.00

1, 1-Dichloroethane

(ethylidene dichloride)-

HAPNOC

2.4 98.97 0.00

1, 1-Dichloroethene

(vinylidene chloride)-

HAPNOC

0.20 96 .94 0.00

1 2-Dichloroethane

(ethylene dichloride)-

HAPNOC

0.41 98 .96

0.00

1 2-Dichloropropane

(propylene dichloride)-

HAPNOC

0.18 112.99 0.02

2-Propanol (isopropyl

alcohol) - VOC

50

60.11

Acetone

7.0 58.08

0.

01

Acrylonitrile -

HAPNOC

6.3 53.06

Benzene - No or

Unknown Co-disposal-

HAPNOC

1.9

78.11

0.09

Benzene - Co-disposal -

1/)

HAPNOC

11

78.

11

1:

Bromodichloromethane -

co

:§

voc

3.1 163.83 0.00

0

Butane-

VOC

5.0 58.12

a.

Carbon disulfide -

HAPNOC

0.58 76.13

0.

01

Carbon monoxide

140 28.01

0.00

Carbon tetrachloride -

HAPNOC

4.0E-03

153.84 0.00

Carbonyl sulfide -

HAPNOC

0.49 60 .07 0.90

Chlorobenzene -

HAPNOC

0.25 112.56

0.00

Chlorodifluoromethane 1.3 86.47

Chloroethane (ethyl

chloride) -

HAPNOC

1.3

64 .52 0.00

Chloroform -

HAPNOC

0.03 119.39 0.00

Chloromethane - VOC 1.2 50.49 0.00

Dichlorobenzene - (HAP

for para isomerNOC)

0.

21

147 0.

01


16 120.91 0.02

.........

..

.....

..........

...

.. ..

.

..

.........

.. ..

.......

..

Dichlorofluoromethane -

voc

2.6

102.92

Dichloromethane

(methylene chloride) -

HAP 14 84.94 0.00

Dimethyl sulfide (methyl

sulfide) - VOC

7.8

62.13 0.05

Ethane 890 30.07

Ethanol - VOC

27

46.08

REPORT-4




Pollutant Parameters (Continued)

G I P II t t D f It P

s

o u an

e

au

arame ers:

User-specified Pollutant Parameters:

Concentration

Concentration

Compound (ppmv) Molecular Weight

(ppmv)

Molecular Weight

Ethyl mercaptan

(ethanethiol)- VOC 2.3

62.13 0.03

Ethylbenzene -

HAPNOC

4.6

106.16 0.08

Ethylene dibromide-

HAPNOC

1.0E-03 187.88

Fluorotrichloromethane -

voc

0.76 137.38 0.00

Hexane - HAPNOC 6.6

86.18

Hydrogen sulfide 36

34.08 0.90

Mercury (total)- HAP

2.9E-04 200.61

Methyl ethyl ketone -

HAPNOC 7.1

72.11 0.01

Methyl isobutyl ketone -

HAPNOC

1.9 100.16

Methyl mercaptan - VOC

2.5 48.11 0.05

Pentane - VOC 3.3 72.15

Perchloroethylene

(tetrachloroethylene) -

HAP

3.7 165.83 0.00

Propane - VOC

11

44.09

t-1 ,2-Dichloroethene-

voc

2.8 96 .94 0.00

Toluene - No or

Unknown Co-disposal -

HAPNOC

39

92.13 0.07

Toluene- Co-disposal -

HAPNOC

170 92.13 0.07

Trichloroethylene

1/)

(trichloroethene)-

E

HAPNOC

ctS

2.8 131.40 0.00

:;

Vinyl chloride -

0

HAPNOC

7.3 62 .50 0.19

ll..

Xylenes -

HAPNOC

12

106.16 0.24

REPORT-

5



Appendix C.xls

10/2/2008

REPORT-

6



Appendix C.xls

Graphs

VI

1::

0

·u;

VI

.E

w

VI

1::

0

·u;

VI

.E

w

VI

1::

0

·u;

VI

.E

w

Megagrams Per Year

1.400E+03

1.200E+03

1

OOOE+03

8 OOOE+02

6.000E+02

4.000E+02

2.000E+02

OOOOE+OO

~

~

~ ~ ~ ~

~

~ ~

~ ~ w

* ~ ~ ~

~

~ ~

~ ~

~

~

~ ~

~

~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~

~

Year

- - T o t a l

landfill gas

Methane

NMOC

Hydrogen sulfide

Cubic Meters Per Year

1.200E+06

1.000E+06

8.000E+05

6 OOOE+05

4.000E+05

2

OOOE+05

O.OOOE+OO

~ $ $ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Year

- - T o t a l

landfill gas Methane NMOC

Hydrogen sulfide

User-specified Unit (units shown in legend below)

7.000E+01

6 OOOE+01

5.000E+01

4 OOOE+01

3.000E+01

2.000E+01

1.000E+01

O.OOOE+OO

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~

~ ~

~

~ w * ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Year

- -T o ta l landfill gas (av ft"3/min) Methane (av ft"3 /min)

NMOC (av ft"3/m in) Hydrogen sulfide (av ft"3/min)

REPORT- 7

10/2/2008



Append ix C .xls

10/2/2008

Results

Year

Total landfill gas

Methane

(Mg year) (m

3

/year) (av ft"31min) (Mg year) (m

3

/year)

(av ft"31min)

1948

0 0 0 0

0 0

1949

1.093E+02

8.751 E+04

5.880E+OO 2.919E+01

4.375E+04 2.

940E+OO

1950 2.143E+02 1.716E+05 1.153E+01 5.724E+01

8.579E+04 5.764E+OO

1951

3.152E+02 2.524E+05 1.696E+01 8.418E+01

1.262E+05 8.478E+OO

1952

4.121 E+02

3.300E+05

2.217E+01

1.101E+02

1.650E+05 1.109E+01

1953 5.052E+02 4.045E+05 2.718E+01 1.349E+02

2.023E+05 1.359E+01

1954 5.947E+02 4.762E+05 3.200E+01 1.588E+02 2.381E+05 1.600E+01

1955 6.806E+02 5.450E+05 3.662E+01 1.818E+02

2.725E+05 1.831 E+01

1956

7.632E+02

6.112E+05

4.106E+01

2.039E+02

3.056E+05 2.053E+01

1957 8.426E+02 6.747E+05 4.533E+01 2.251 E+02

3.374E+05 2.267E+01

1958

9.188E+02 7.358E+05 4.944E+01 2.454E+02

3.679E+05

2.472E+01

1959 9.921 E+02 7.944E+05 5.338E+01 2.650E+02

3.972E+05 2.669E+01

1960

1.062E+03 8.508E+05 5.716E+01

2.838E+02

4.254E+05

2.858E+01

1961 1.130E+03 9.049E+05 6.080E+01 3.019E+02

4.525E+05 3.040E+01

1962

1.195E+03 9.569E+05 6.430E+01

3.192E+02

4.785E+05

3.215E+01

1963

1.148E+03 9.194E+05 6.178E+01 3.067E+02

4.597E+05 3.089E+01

1964 1.103E+03 8.834E+05

5.935E+01

2.947E+02

4.417E+05

2.968E+01

1965

1.060E+03 8.487E+05 5.703E+01 2.831 E+02

4.244E+05 2.851 E+01

1966 1.018E+03 8.155E+05 5.479E+01 2.720E+02

4.077E+05

2.740E+01

1967

9.784E+02 7.835E+05 5.264E+01

2.613E+02

3.917E+05

2.632E+01

1968

9.401 E+02 7.528E+05 5.058E+01 2.

511

E+02

3.764E+05 2.529E+01

1969 9.032E+02 7.232E+05 4.859E+01 2.413E+02 3.616E+05 2.430E+01

1970 8.678E+02 6.949E+05 4.669E+01 2.318E+02

3.474E+05 2.334E+01

1971

8.338E+02 6.676E+05 4.486E+01

2.227E+02

3.338E+05

2.243E+01

1972 8.011 E+02 6.415E+05 4.310E+01 2.140E+02

3.207E+05 2.155E+01

1973

7.697E+02 6.163E+05 4.141E+01 2.056E+02

3.082E+05

2.070E+01

1974 7.395E+02 5.921 E+05 3.979E+01 1.975E+02

2.961E+05

1.989E+01

1975 7.105E+02 5.689E+05 3.823E+01 1.898E+02

2.845E+05 1.911 E+01

1976

6.826E+02

5.466E+05

3.673E+01

1.823E+02

2.733E+05

1.836E+01

1977 6.559E+02 5.252E+05 3.529E+01 1.752E+02

2.626E+05

1.764E+01

1978 6.301 E+02 5.046E+05 3.390E+01 1.683E+02

2.523E+05 1.695E+01

1979

6.054E+02 4.848E+05 3.257E+01 1.617E+02

2.424E+05 1.629E+01

1980

5.817E+02

4.658E+05

3.130E+01

1.554E+02

2.329E+05

1.565E+01

1981 5.589E+02 4.475E+05 3.007E+01 1.493E+02

2.238E+05

1.503E+01

1982 5.370E+02 4.300E+05 2.889E+01 1.434E+02

2.150E+05 1.445E+01

1983 5.159E+02 4.131 E+05 2.776E+01 1.378E+02

2.066E+05 1.388E+01

1984

4.957E+02 3.969E+05 2.667E+01 1.324E+02

1.985E+05 1.333E+01

1985 4.763E+02 3.814E+05 2.562E+01 1.272E+02 1.907E+05 1.281 E+01

1986

4.576E+02 3.664E+05 2.462E+01 1.222E+02

1.832E+05

1.231 E+01

1987

4.396E+02 3.520E+05 2.365E+01

1.174E+02 1.760E+05 1.183E+01

1988

4.224E+02

3.382E+05

2.273E+01

1.128E+02

1.691 E+05

1.136E+01

1989

4.058E+02

3.250E+05

2.183E+01

1.084E+02

1.625E+05

1.092E+01

1990

3.899E+02

3.122E+05 2.098E+01 1.042E+02

1.561 E+05 1.049E+01

1991 3.746E+02 3.000E+05 2.016E+01 1.001 E+02

1.500E+05 1.008E+01

1992

3.599E+02 2.882E+05 1.937E+01 9.614E+01

1.441 E+05 9.

683E+OO

1993 3.458E+02 2.769E+05 1.861 E+01 9.238E+01

1.385E+05 9.303E+OO

1994

3.323E+02 2.661 E+05 1.788E+01 8.875E+01

1.330E+05 8.

938E+OO

1995

3.192E+02

2.556E+05

1.718E+01

8.527E+01

1.278E+05

8.588E+OO

1996

3.067E+02

2.456E+05 1.650E+01 8.193E+01

1.228E+05

8.251E+OO

1997 2.947E+02 2.360E+05 1.586E+01 7.872E+01

1.180E+05 7.928E+OO

REPORT-

8



Append ix C.xls

10/2/2008

Results (Continued)

Year

Total landfill gas

Methane

(Mg year)

m

3

year)

(av

ft11.3fmin)

(Mglyear)

m

3

/year)

(av

ft11.3fmin)

1998

2.

831

E+02

2.267E+05

1.523E+01

7.563E+01

1.134E+05

7.617E+OO

1999

2.720E+02

2.178E+05 1.464E+01 7.266E+01

1.089E+05 7.318E+OO

2000 2.614E+02 2.093E+05 1.406E+01 6.982E+01

1.046E+05 7.031E+OO

2001 2.

511

E+02

2.011 E+05 1.351 E+01 6.708E+01

1.005E+05 6.

756E+OO

2002 2.413E+02 1.932E+05 1.298E+01 6.445E+01

9.660E+04

6.491 E+OO

2003 2.318E+02

1.856E+05

1.247E+01

6.192E+01

9.281E+04 6.236E+OO

2004 2.227E+02 1.783E+05 1.198E+01 5.949E+01 8.917E+04 5.992E+OO

2005 2.140E+02 1.714E+05 1.151 E+01

5.716E+01

8.568E+04 5.

757E+OO

2006

2.056E+02

1.646E+05 1.106E+01 5.492E+01

8.232E+04 5.531E+OO

2007 1.975E+02 1.582E+05 1.063E+01

5.277E+01

7.909E+04

5.314E+OO

2008

1.898E+02

1.520E+05 1.021 E+01 5.070E+01

7.599E+04 5.106E+OO

2009 1.824E+02 1.460E+05 9.811 E+OO

4.871 E+01

7.301 E+04

4.906E+OO

2010

1.752E+02

1.403E+05 9.426E+OO 4.680E+01

7.015E+04 4.713E+OO

2011 1.683E+02 1.348E+05 9.057E+OO

4.496E+01

6.740E+04

4.528E+OO

2012

1.617E+02

1.295E+05 8.702E+OO 4.320E+01

6.475E+04 4.351 E+OO

2013 1.554E+02 1.244E+05

8.360E+OO 4.151E+01

6.222E+04

4.

180E+OO

2014 1.493E+02 1.196E+05 8.033E+OO

3.988E+01 5.978E+04 4.

016E+OO

2015

1.434E+02

1.149E+05 7.718E+OO 3.832E+01

5.743E+04 3.859E+OO

2016 1.378E+02

1.1

04E+05 7.415E+OO

3.681 E+01

5.518E+04

3.708E+OO

2017

1.324E+02

1.060E+05 7.124E+OO 3.537E+01

5.302E+04 3.562E+OO

2018 1.272E+02 1.019E+05

6.845E+OO 3.398E+01

5.094E+04

3.422E+OO

2019 1.222E+02 9.788E+04 6.577E+OO 3.265E+01 4.894E+04 3.288E+OO

2020 1.174E+02 9.404E+04

6.319E+OO 3.137E+01

4.702E+04 3.159E+OO

2021

1.128E+02

9.036E+04 6.071E+OO 3.014E+01

4.518E+04 3.

035E+OO

2022 1.084E +02 8.681 E+04 5.833E+OO

2.896E+01

4.341E+04

2.

916E+OO

2023

1.042E+02

8.

341

E+04 5.604E+OO 2.782E+01

4.170E+04 2.802E+OO

2024

1.001 E+02

8.014E+04 5.384E+OO

2.673E+01

4.007E+04

2.692E+OO

2025 9.615E+01 7.700E+04

5.173E+OO 2.568E+01

3.850E+04 2.587E+OO

2026

9.238E+01

7.398E+04 4.970E+OO 2.468E+01

3.699E+04 2.485E+OO

2027 8.876E+01 7.108E+04 4.776E+OO

2.

371

E+01

3.554E+04

2.388E+OO

2028 8.528E+01

6.829E+04 4.588E+OO 2.278E+01

3.414E+04

2.294E+OO

2029

8.194E+01

6.561 E+04 4.408E+OO 2.189E+01

3.281E+04 2.204E+OO

2030

7.872E+01

6.304E+04 4.236E+OO 2.103E+01

3.152E+04 2.118E+OO

2031 7.564E+01 6.057E+04 4.069E+OO

2.020E+01

3.028E+04

2.035E+OO

2032 7.267E+01 5.819E+04 3.910E+OO

1.941E+01

2.910E+04

1.955E+OO

2033 6.982E+01 5.591 E+04

3.757E+OO 1.865E+01

2.796E+04

1.878E+OO

2034 6.708E+01

5.372E+04 3.609E+OO 1.792E+01

2.686E+04

1.805E+OO

2035 6.445E+01 5.161 E+04 3.468E+OO 1.722E+01 2.581 E+04 1.734E+OO

2036

6.193E+01

4.959E+04 3.332E+OO 1.654E+01

2.479E+04 1.

666E+OO

2037

5.950E+01

4.764E+04 3.201 E+OO 1.589E+01

2.382E+04 1.601 E+OO

2038

5.717E+01

4.578E+04 3.076E+OO 1.527E+01

2.289E+04 1.538E+OO

2039

5.492E+01

4.398E+04 2.955E+OO 1.467E+01

2.199E+04 1.478E+OO

2040

5.277E+01

4.226E+04 2.839E+OO

1.410E+01

2.113E+04

1.420E+OO

2041 5.070E+01 4.060E+04 2.728E+OO

1.354E+01

2.030E+04

1.364E+OO

2042 4.871 E+01 3.901 E+04

2.621E+OO 1.301 E+01

1.950E+04 1.

310E+OO

2043 4.680E+01

3.748E+04 2.518E+OO 1.250E+01

1.874E+04 1.259E+OO

2044 4.497E+01

3.601 E+04 2.419E+OO 1.201 E+01

1.800E+04 1.210E+OO

2045

4.320E+01

3.460E+04 2.325E+OO

1.154E+01

1.730E+04

1.

162E+OO

2046

4.151 E+01

3.324E+04

2.233E+OO 1.109E+01

1.662E+04 1.117E+OO

2047 3.988E+01 3.194E+04

2.146E+OO 1.065E+01

1.597E+04

1.073E+OO

2048 3.832E+01

3.068E+04 2.062E+OO 1.024E+01

1.534E+04 1.031 E+OO

REPORT-9



Appendix C.xls

10/2/2008

Results (Continued)

Year

Total landfill gas

Methane

(Mg year)

m

3

/year)

(av ftA3fmin)

(Mg/year)

(m

3

year)

j v ftA3fmin)

2049 3.682E+01 2.948E+04 1.981 E+OO 9.834E+OO

1.474E+04

9.904E-01

2050 3.537E+01

2.833E+04

1.903E+OO

9.449E+OO

1.416E+04 9.516E-01

2051 3.399E+01 2.721 E+04

1.829E+OO

9.078E+OO

1.361 E+04 9.143E-01

2052 3.265E+01 2.615E+04 1.757E+OO

8.722E+OO

1.307E+04 8.784E-01

2053 3.137E+01

2.512E+04

1.688E+OO

8.380E+OO

1.256E+04 8.440E-01

2054 3.014E+01 2.414E+04 1.622E+OO

8.051 E+OO 1.207E+04

8.109E-01

2055 2.896E+01 2.319E+04 1.558E+OO 7.736E+OO 1.160E+04 7.791 E-01

2056

2.783E+01

2.228E+04 1.497E+OO

7.432E+OO 1.114E+04

7.485E-01

2057 2.673E+01 2.141E+04 1.438E+OO

7.141

E+OO

1.070E+04 7.192E-01

2058

2.569E+01

2.057E+04 1.382E+OO 6.861E+OO

1.028E+04

6.910E-01

2059 2.468E+01 1.976E+04 1.328E+OO

6.592E+OO

9.881E+03 6.639E-01

2060

2.371 E+01

1.899E+04 1.276E+OO 6.334E+OO

9.493E+03 6.379E-01

2061 2.278E+01 1.824E+04 1.226E+OO

6.085E+OO

9.121E+03 6.129E-01

2062

2.189E+01

1.753E+04 1.178E+OO 5.847E+OO

8.764E+03 5.888E-01

2063

2.103E+01 1.684E+04 1.131E+OO

5.617E+OO

8.420E+03 5.657E-01

2064 2.021 E+01 1.618E+04 1.087E+OO 5.397E+OO

8.090E+03 5.436E-01

2065

1.941 E+01 1.555E+04

1.044E+OO 5.185E+OO

7.773E+03 5.222E-01

2066 1.865E+01 1.494E+04 1.004E+OO 4 .982E+OO

7.468E+03

5.018E-01

2067

1.792E+01

1.435E+04 9.642E-01 4.787E+OO

7.175E+03 4.821 E-01

2068 1.722E+01 1.379E+04 9.264E-01

4.599E+OO

6.894E+03 4.632E-01

2069 1.654E+01 1.325E+04 8.900E-01 4.419E+OO

6.623E+03 4.450E-01

2070 1.589E+01 1.273E+04 8.551 E-01

4.245E+OO

6.364E+03 4.276E-01

2071 1.527E+01 1.223E+04 8.216E-01 4.079E+OO

6.114E+03 4.108E-01

2072

1.467E+01 1.175E+04 7.894E-01

3.919E+OO

5.874E+03 3.947E-01

2073 1.410E+01 1.129E+04 7.584E-01 3.765E+OO

5.644E+03 3.792E-01

2074 1.354E+01 1.085E+04 7.287E-01

3.618E+OO

5.423E+03 3.644E-01

2075

1.301 E+01

1.042E+04 7.001 E-01 3.476E+OO

5.210E+03 3.501 E-01

2076 1.250E+01 1.001 E+04 6.727E-01

3.340E+OO 5.006E+03

3.363E-01

2077 1.201 E+01 9.619 E+03 6.463E-01

3.209E+OO

4.810E+03 3.232E-01

2078

1.154E+01

9.242E+03 6.210E-01 3.083E+OO

4.621E+03 3.105E-01

2079 1.109E+01 8.880E+03 5.966E-01

2.962E+OO

4.440E+03

2.983E-01

2080

1.065E+01 8.531 E+03 5.732E-01

2.846E+OO

4.266E+03 2.866E-01

2081

1.024E+01

8.197E+03 5.507E-01 2.734E+OO

4.098E+03 2.754E-01

2082 9.835E+OO 7.875 E+03 5.

291

E-01 2.627E+OO

3.938E+03 2.646E-01

2083

9.449E+OO

7.567E+03 5.084E-01 2.524E+OO

3.783E+03 2.542E-01

2084 9.079E+OO 7.270E+03 4.885E-01 2.425E+OO

3.635E+03 2.442E-01

2085 8.723E+OO 6.985 E+03 4.693E-01

2.330E+OO 3.492E+03 2.347E-01

2086 8.381

E+OO

6.711 E+03 4.509E-

01

2.239E+OO 3.355E+03 2.255E-

01

2087 8.052E+OO 6.448 E+03

4.332E-01 2.151 E+OO

3.224E+03 2.166E-01

2088 7.736E+OO 6.195E+03 4.162E-01 2.067E+OO

3.098E+03 2.081 E-01

REPORT-

10




Results (Continued)

Year

NMOC

Hydrogen sulfide

(Mg/year)

m

3

year)

(av ft/\3/min)

(Mg year)

m

3

/year)

(av ft/\3/min)

1948

0

0

0

0

0

0

1949 1.882E-

01

5.250E+01 3.528E-03

1.116E-04 7.876E-02 5.292E-06

1950 3.690E-

01

1.030E+02 6.917E-03

2.189E-04

1.544E-01

1.038E-05

1951 5.428E-01 1.514E+02 1.017E-02 3.219E-04

2.271 E-01 1.526E-05

1952 7.097E-01 1.980E+02 1.330E-02

4.210E-04

2.970E-01

1.995E-05

1953

8.700E-01

2.427E+02

1.631 E-02

5.161 E-04

3.641 E-01 2.446E-05

1954 1.

024E+OO

2.857E+02 1.920E-02 6.075E-04 4.286E-01 2.880E-05

1955 1.172E+OO 3.270E+02

2.197E-02 6.953E-04

4.905E-01 3.296E-05

1956 1.314E+OO 3.667E+02 2.464E-02

7.797E-04

5.500E-01

3.696E-05

1957 1.451 E+OO 4.048E+02 2.720E-02

8.607E-04

6.072E-01 4.080E-05

1958

1.582E+OO

4.415E+02 2.966E-02 9.386E-04

6.622E-01 4.449E-05

1959 1.709E+OO 4.766E+02

3.203E-02 1.013E-03

7.150E-01 4.804E-05

1960 1.

830E+OO

5.105E+02 3.430E-02

1.085E-03 7.657E-01 5.145E-05

1961 1.946E+OO 5.430E+02

3.648E-02 1.154E-03

8.144E-01

5.472E-05

1962

2.058E+OO

5.742E+02 3.858E-02

1.221 E-03 8.613E-01 5.787E-05

1963

1.977E+OO 5.517E+02

3.707E-02 1.173E-03

8.275E-01 5.560E-05

1964 1.900E+OO 5.300E+02 3.561 E-02

1.127E-03

7.950E-01

5.342E-05

1965

1.825E+OO

5.092E+02 3.422E-02 1.083E-03

7.639E-01 5.132E-05

1966 1.754E+OO 4.893E+02

3.287E-02 1.040E-03

7.339E-01

4.931 E-05

1967

1.685E+OO

4.701 E+02 3.159E-02

9.995E-04 7.051 E-01 4.738E-05

1968

1.619E+OO 4.517E+02

3.035E-02 9.603E-04

6.775E-01

4.552E-05

1969

1.

555E+OO

4.339E+02 2.916E-02 9.227E-04 6.509E-01 4.374E-05

1970 1.494E+OO 4.169E+02

2.801E-02 8.865E-04

6.254E-01 4.202E-05

1971

1.436E+OO

4.006E+02 2.692E-02

8.517E-04

6.009E-01

4.037E-05

1972

1.380E+OO 3.849E+02

2.586E-02 8.183E-04

5.773E-01

3.879E-05

1973

1.325E+OO

3.698E+02 2.485E-02 7.862E-04

5.547E-01 3.727E-05

1974 1.

274E+OO

3.553E+02 2.387E-02

7.554E-04

5.329E-01

3.581 E-05

1975

1.224E+OO

3.414E+02 2.294E-02 7.258E-04

5.120E-01 3.440E-05

1976

1.

176E+OO

3.280E+02 2.204E-02

6.973E-04 4.920E-01 3.305E-05

1977 1.130E+OO 3.151 E+02

2.117E-02 6.700E-04

4.727E-01

3.176E-05

1978

1.085E+OO 3.028E+02

2.034E-02 6.437E-04

4.541 E-01 3.051 E-05

1979

1.043E+OO

2.909E+02 1.954E-02 6.185E-04

4.363E-01 2.932E-05

1980 1.002E+OO 2.795E+02 1.878E-02

5.942E-04

4.192E-01

2.817E-05

1981 9.625E-01 2.685E+02 1.804E-02

5.709E-04

4.028E-01

2.706E-05

1982 9.248E-01 2.580E+02

1.733E-02 5.485E-04

3.870E-01

2.600E-05

1983 8.885E-01 2.479E+02

1.665E-02 5.270E-04

3.718E-01

2.498E-05

1984

8.537E-01 2.382E+02

1.600E-02 5.064E-04

3.572E-01

2.400E-05

1985 8.202E-01 2.288E+02 1.537E-02 4.865E-04 3.432E-01 2.306E-05

1986

7.880E-01

2.198E+02 1.477E-02 4.674E-04

3.298E-01 2.216E-05

1987

7.571 E-01

2.112E+02 1.419E-02

4.491 E-04 3.168E-01 2.129E-05

1988 7.274E-01 2.029E+02 1.364E-02

4.315E-04

3.044E-01

2.045E-05

1989 6.989E-01 1.950E+02 1.310E-02

4.146E-04

2.925E-01

1.965E-05

1990 6.715E-01 1.873E+02

1.259E-02 3.983E-04

2.810E-01

1.888E-05

1991 6.452E-01 1.800E+02

1.209E-02 3.827E-04

2.700E-01

1.814E-05

1992 6.199E-01 1.729E+02

1.162E-02 3.677E-04

2.594E-01 1.743E-05

1993

5.956E-01

1.662E+02 1.116E-02 3.533E-04

2.492E-01 1.675E-05

1994

5.722E-01

1.596E+02 1.073E-02 3.394E-04

2.395E-01

1.609E-05

1995 5.498E-01 1.534E+02

1.031 E-02 3.261E-04

2.

301

E-01

1.546E-05

1996 5.282E-01 1.474E+02

9.902E-03 3.133E-04

2.210E-01

1.485E-05

1997 5.075E-01 1.416E+02

9.513E-03 3.010E-04

2.124E-01

1.427E-05

REPORT-

11



Appendix C.xls

10/2/2008

Results (Continued)

Year

NMOC

Hydrogen sulfide

(Mg year)

(m

3

/year)

(av ftAJfmin)

(Mg year)

(m

3

year)

(av

ftAJfmin)

1998 4.876E-01 1.360E+02 9.140E-03

2.892E-04 2.041 E-01 1.371 E-05

1999

4.685E-01 1.307E+02

8.782E-03

2.779E-04

1.961

E-01

1.317E-05

2000 4.501 E-01 1.256E+02 8.438E-03 2.670E-04

1.884E-01 1.266E-05

2001 4.325E-01

1.207E+02

8.107E-03

2.565E-04

1.810E-01 1.216E-05

2002 4.155E-01 1.159E+02 7.789E-03 2.465E-04

1.739E-01 1.168E-05

2003 3.992E-01 1.114E+02 7.483E-03

2.368E-04

1.671 E-01 1.123E-05

2004 3.836E-01 1.070E+02 7.190E-03 2.275E-04 1.605E-

01

1.078E-05

2005 3.685E-01 1.028E+02 6.908E-03

2.186E-04

1.542E-01

1.036E-05

2006 3.541

E-01

9.878E+01

6.637E-03

2.100E-04

1.482E-01 9.956E-06

2007 3.402E-01 9.491 E+01 6.377E-03 2.018E-04

1.424E-01 9.565E-06

2008 3.269E-01

9.119E+01

6.127E-03

1.939E-04

1.368E-01

9.190E-06

2009 3.140E-01 8.761 E+01 5.887E-03 1.863E-04

1.314E-01 8.830E-06

2010 3.017E-01

8.418E+01

5.656E-03

1.790E-04

1.263E-01

8.484E-06

2011 2.899E-01 8.088E+01 5.434E-03 1.720E-04

1.213E-01 8.151 E-06

2012

2.785E-01

7.

771 E+01

5.221 E-03

1.652E-04

1.166E-01

7.

831

E-06

2013 2.676E-01 7.466E+01 5.016E-03

1.587E-04 1.120E-01 7.524E-06

2014

2.

571 E-01

7.173E+01 4.820E-03 1.525E-04

1.076E-01 7.229E-06

2015 2.470E-01 6.892E+01 4.631 E-03

1.465E-04

1.034E-01

6.946E-06

2016 2.373E-01 6.622E+01 4.449E-03 1.408E-04

9.932E-02 6.674E-06

2017 2.280E-01 6.362E+01 4.275E-03

1.353E-04

9.543E-02 6.412E-06

2018 2.191 E-01 6.113E+01 4.107E-03 1.300E-04

9.169E-02 6.160E-06

2019 2.105E-01

5.873E+01 3.946E-03 1.249E-04

8.809E-02 5.919E-06

2020 2.023E-01 5.643E+01 3.791 E-03 1.200E-04

8.464E-02

5.687E-06

2021 1.943E-01

5.421 E+01 3.643E-03 1.153E-04

8.132E-02 5.464E-06

2022

1.867E-01

5.209E+01 3.500E-03 1.107E-04

7.813E-02 5.250E-06

2023 1.794E-01 5.004E+01 3.363E-03

1.064E-04

7.507E-02 5.044E-06

2024

1.724E-01

4.808E+01 3.231 E-03 1.022E-04

7.212E-02 4.846E-06

2025 1.656E-01 4.620E+01 3.1 04E-03

9.823E-05 6.930E-02 4.656E-06

2026 1.

591

E-01 4.439E+01

2.982E-03 9.437E-05

6.658E-02

4.473E-06

2027

1.529E-01

4.265E+01 2.865E-03 9.067E-05

6.397E-02 4.298E-06

2028 1.469E-01 4.097E+01 2.753E-03

8.712E-05 6.146E-02 4.129E-06

2029 1.411 E-01 3.937E+01 2.645E-03

8.370E-05

5.905E-02

3.968E-06

2030 1.356E-01

3.782E+01

2.541 E-03

8.042E-05

5.673E-02

3.812E-06

2031

1.303E-01

3.634E+01 2.442E-03 7.727E-05

5.451 E-02 3.663E-06

2032

1.252E-01

3.492E+01 2.346E-03 7.424E-05

5.237E-02 3.519E-06

2033 1.202E-01 3.355E+01 2.254E-03 7.133E-05

5.032E-02 3.381 E-06

2034 1.155E-01 3.223E+01 2.166E-03 6.853E-05

4.835E-02 3.248E-06

2035 1.110E-01 3.097E+01 2.081 E-03 6.584E-05 4.645E-02 3.121E-06

2036 1.066E-01 2.975E+01 1.999E-03

6.326E-05 4.463E-02 2.999E-06

2037 1.025E-01 2.859E+01 1.921 E-03

6.078E-05

4.288E-02

2.881 E-06

2038

9.845E-02 2.747E+01

1.845E-03 5.840E-05

4.120E-02

2.768E-06

2039 9.459E-02

2.639E+01 1.773E-03 5.611 E-05

3.958E-02

2.660E-06

2040 9.088E-02

2.535E+01 1.704E-03 5.391E-05

3.803E-02 2.555E-06

2041 8.732E-02

2.436E+01 1.637E-03 5.179E-05

3.654E-02 2.455E-06

2042

8.389E-02

2.340E+01 1.573E-03 4.976E-05

3.511 E-02 2.359E-06

2043 8.060E-02 2.249E+01 1.511 E-03 4.781E-05

3.373E-02 2.266E-06

2044 7.744E-02 2.160E+01 1.452E-03

4.594E-05

3.241 E-02

2.177E-06

2045 7.441E-02 2.076E+01

1.395E-03 4.414E-05

3.114E-02

2.092E-06

2046 7.149E-02 1.994E+01

1.340E-03 4.

241 E-05

2.992E-02 2.010E-06

2047 6.868E-02

1.916E+01 1.287E-03 4.074E-05

2.874E-02 1.

931

E-06

2048

6.599E-02

1.841 E+01 1.237E-03 3.914E-05

2.762E-02 1.855E-06

REPORT - 12



Appendix C.xls

10 /2/2008

Results (Continued)

Year

NMOC

Hydrogen sulfide

(Mglyear)

m

3

/year) (av ft"31min) (Mglyear) m

3

/year) (av ft"31min)

2049

6.340E-02

1.769E+01 1.188E-03 3.761E-05 2.653E-02

1.783E-06

2050

6.092E-02 1.700E+01

1.142E-03 3.614E-05 2.549E-02

1.713E-06

2051 5.853E-02

1.633E+01

1.097E-03 3.472E-05

2.449E-02

1.646E-06

2052

5.623E-02

1.569E+01 1.054E-03 3.336E-05 2.353E-02

1.581 E-06

2053

5.403E-02 1.507E+01

1.013E-03 3.205E-05

2.

261

E-02

1.519E-06

2054 5.

191

E-02

1.448E+01 9.731 E-04 3.079E-05 2.172E-02

1.460E-06

2055 4.988E-02 1.

391

E+01 9.349E-04 2.959E-05 2.087E-02 1.402E-06

2056 4.792E-02

1.337E+01 8.982E-04 2.842E-05 2.005E-02

1.347E-06

2057

4.604E-02 1.284E+01

8.630E-04 2.731 E-05 1.927E-02 1.295E-06

2058

4.424E-02 1.234E+01

8.292E-04 2.624E-05

1.851 E-02

1.244E-06

2059

4.250E-02 1.186E+01

7.967E-04 2.

521

E-05 1.779E-02

1.195E-06

2060

4.083E-02 1.139E+01

7.654E-04 2.422E-05

1.709E-02

1.148E-06

2061

3.923E-02 1.095E+01

7.354E-04 2.327E-05 1.642E-02

1.103E-06

2062 3.770E-02

1.052E+01 7.066E-04 2.236E-05 1.577E-02

1.060E-06

2063

3.622E-02 1.010E+01

6.789E-04 2.148E-05 1.516E-02

1.018E-06

2064 3.480E-02

9.708E+OO 6.523E-04 2.064E-05 1.456E-02

9.784E-07

2065

3.343E-02 9.327E+OO

6.267E-04 1.983E-05 1.399E-02

9.400E-07

2066

3.212E-02

8.961

E+OO

6.021 E-04 1.905E-05 1.344E-02

9.032E-07

2067

3.086E-02 8.610E+OO

5.785E-04 1.

831

E-05 1.291 E-02

8.678E-07

2068

2.965E-02 8.272E+OO

5.558E-04 1.759E-05 1.241 E-02

8.337E-07

2069 2.849E-02

7.948E+OO 5.340E-04 1.690E-05 1.192E-02

8.010E-07

2070

2.737E-02 7.636E+OO

5.131 E-04 1.624E-05 1.145E-02

7.696E-07

2071 2.630E-02

7.337E+OO 4.930E-04 1.560E-05 1.101E-02

7.395E-07

2072

2.527E-02 7.049E+OO

4.736E-04 1.499E-05 1.057E-02

7.105E-07

2073

2.428E-02 6.773E+OO 4.

551

E-04 1.440E-05 1.016E-02

6.826E-07

2074

2.333E-02

6.

507E+OO

4.372E-04 1.384E-05 9.

761

E-03

6.558E-07

2075

2.

241

E-02 6.252E+OO

4.

201

E-04 1.329E-05

9.378E-03

6.301 E-07

2076 2.153E-02

6.007E+OO 4.036E-04 1.277E-05 9.010E-03

6.054E-07

2077

2.069E-02 5.771

E+OO 3.878E-04 1.227E-05 8.657E-03

5.817E-07

2078

1.988E-02 5.545E+OO

3.726E-04 1.179E-05

8.318E-03

5.589E-07

2079 1.910E-02

5.328E+OO 3.580E-04 1.133E-05 7.992E-03

5.370E-07

2080

1.835E-02 5.119E+OO

3.439E-04 1.088E-05 7.678E-03

5.159E-07

2081

1.763E-02 4.918E+OO

3.304E-04 1.046E-05 7.377E-03

4.957E-07

2082

1.694E-02 4.725E+OO

3.175E-04 1.005E-05

7.088E-03

4.762E-07

2083

1.627E-02 4.540E+OO 3.050E-04 9.653E-06 6.81 OE-03

4.576E-07

2084

1.564E-02 4.362E+OO 2.

931

E-04 9.274E-06 6.543E-03

4.396E-07

2085

1.502E-02

4.

191 E+OO

2.816E-04 8.

911

E-06 6.286E-03

4.224E-07

2086 1.443E-02 4.027E+OO 2.705E-04 8.561 E-06 6.040E-03 4.058E-07

2087

1.387E-02

3.869E+OO 2.599E-04 8.226E-06 5.803E-03

3.899E-07

2088

1.332E-02 3.717E+OO

2.497E-04 7.903E-06

5.576E-03

3.746E-07

REPORT - 13



APPENDIXD

Selected Illustrative Johnson and Ettinger Model Calculation

Worksheets for

Potential Landfill Gas

Vapor

Intrusion and Inhalation Risk Assessment

• Set D-1: Residential (Adult) Scenario for Tetrachloroethene

for the

Site-Wide lEA

• Set D-2: Residential (Child) Scenario for Tetrachloroethene for the Site-Wide lEA

• Set D-3: Commercial/Retail Scenario

for

Tetrachloroethene

for the

Site-Wide

lEA

• Set D-4: Day Care (Adult) Scenario for Tetrachloroethene for the Site-Wide lEA

• Set D-5: Day Care (Toddler) Scenario

for

Tetrachloroethene for

the

Site-Wide lEA

• Set D-6: Day Care (Toddler) Scenario

for

Tetrachloroethene for the Western lEA



SG-ADV

Version

3.1;

02/0

r Reset to l

l_ Defaults _;

I

~ R E

I

I

~ R E

I

I

~ R E

I

I END I

DATA ENTRY SHEET

SoiiG

c,

Data

trati

. ,uu ' - ' v u o o ~ u o n o u . u o o ...,.,..,..

ENTER

ENTER

ENTER

Soil

Soil

Chemical

'"

'"

AS No.

cone., OR cone.,

(numbers only,

c.

c,

no dashesl

( ~ - t g / m 3 )

room•J

Chemical

127184 2.83E+02

I

Tetrachloroethylene

ENTER ENTER

ENTER

ENTER

ENTER

ENTER ENTER

Depth

Totals must

add

uo to value of

Ls

(cell

F24)

Soil

below grade

Soil

gas

Thickness Thickness stratum A U

to bottom

sampling

Average Thickness of soil of soil

scs

of enclosed

depth

soil of soil stratum B, stratum C,

soil type

space floor, below grade, temperature, stratum A, (Enter value or 0)

(Enter value or 0) (used to estimate

OR p

'•

L,

T,

h,

ho ho

soil vapor

(om) (om)

("C)

(em) (om) (em) permeability)

15

133.5

10

133.5

'

ENTER

ENTER

ENTER

ENTER

ENTER

ENTER ENTER

ENTER

Stratum A Stratum A

Stratum A Stratum A Stratum B Stratum B

Stratum

8 Stratum 8

scs

soil

dry

soil

total

soil water-filled

scs

soil

dry

soil

total

soil water-filled

soil

type

bulk

density,

porosity, porosity,

soil type

bulk density, porosity, porosity,

C_L-;;-.;kup Soil\,

'

o'

' '

LookuPSoi J

'

o'

'

'

~

Po

Po

- ~ · a - ~ " : ~ ~ e - ~ _ _ )

(g/em3)

(tJnitless)

(cm

3

/cm

3

)

l._ Parameters

(g/cm_'_)

__

. . u . ~ j t l e s s )

(cm

3

/cm

3

)

, _ _

o,06 - - ~ ~ ~

ENTER

Enclosed

ENTER ENTER

Enclosed

ENTER

Enclosed

ENTER ENTER ENTER

space Soil-bldg. space space Enclosed Floor-wall Indoor

floor pressure floor floor space

seam

crack air exchange

thickness, differential, length,

width,

height,

width, rate,

l.:raei<.

AP le We He w ER

(em) (g/cm-s

2

) (em) (em) {em) {em) (1/h)

I 15 I .. ·- 40 I

961

I

961

I

244

I

0.1

I

0.45

I

ENTER ENTER ENTER ENTER

Averaging

Averaging

time for time for

Exposure

Exposure

carcinogens, noncarclnogens, duration, frequency,

ATe

ATNc

ED EF

(yrs) (yrs) (yrs) (daystyr)

I

1o ·-·

-·T-

3o

- ~ C l · - - · ·

I

365

I

1 of 4

Av

flow

Leave b

I



CHEMICAL

PROPERTIES SHEET

Henry's

Henry's

Enthalpy of

law constant law constant vaporization at Normal Unit

Diffusivity DiffuSivity at reference reference

the

normal

boiling Critical Molecular risk

in

air,

in

water,

temperature, temperature,

boiling

point,

point, temperature, weight,

factor,

D,

Dw

H T,

t..Hv.b Ta

Tc

MW URF

(cm

2

/s) (cm

2

/s) (atm-m

3

/mol)

tc>

(cal/mol)

(K)

(oK)

(g/mol)

( lg/m3r1

1

1.2oE-o2

1

8 . 2 o E ' ~ o s l 1.84E-o2

1

2s

1

8.288

1

394.40

1

62o.2o

1

165.83

1

s.sE-os

2 of4



INTERMEDIATE CALCULATIONS SHEET

Stratum A Stratum 8 Stratum C Stratum A Stratum A Stratum A Stratum A

Source-

soil

soil

soil

effective

soil soil soil

Exposure building air-filled air-filled air-filled total fluid intrinsic relative air effective vapor

duration,

separation, porosity, porosity, porosity, saturation,

permeability, permeability, permeability,

pe

'C Lr

9aA

8a

8

Sac

Ste k1 k,ll kv

(sec) (Qm)

_____ (cm

3

/cm

3

)_

(cm

3

/cm

3

) _ ( ~ _ m (cm

3

/cm

3

) _(cm

2

) (cm

2

)

(cm

2

)

I 9.46E+08 I 118.5_ I 0.370 I ERROR I__ _ERROR I 0.019 I 9.92E-08 I 0.987 I 9.79E-08 I

Area of

enclosed

space

below

grade,

A,

(cm

2

)

Stratum Stratum S

Crack- Crack Enthalpy of Henry's law Henry's law Vapor A B

to-total depth vaporization at constant at constant at viscosity at effective effective e

area below ave. soil ave. soil ave. soil ave. soil diffusion diffusion d

ratio, grade, temperature, temperature, temperature, temperature, coefficient, coefficient, co

11 Z c r a c ~ D.Hv.TS

Hrs H'rs

J..ITS

DeltA

DeUS

(unitless) (em) (cal/mQ.IL_ (atm-m

3

/mol) (unitless) (g/cm-s) (cm

2

/s) (cm

2

/s)

U ~ 4 ~ + 0 5 I 4.16E-04 I 15----,--- j l , § _ ; ~ _ I 7.81E-03 ----1 3.36E-01 I 1.75E-04 I 1.42E-02 I O.OOE+OO I O

Exponent of Infinite

Average Crack equivalent source

Infinite

Convection Source vapor effective foundation indoor

source

path vapor Crack flow rate diffusion Area

of

Peclet attenuation

bldg.

length, cone., radius, into bldg., coefficient,

crack,

number, coefficient,

cone.,

L, Csource

f e r a e ~

Osoil

Dcrack

Acrack

exp(Pe

1

)

a

Cbuildin l

(em)

(J..Ig/m3)

(em)

_ ( ~ 1 1 ) 3 / s )

(cm

2

/s) (cm

2

)

(unitless) (unitless)

(J..Ig/m3)

{J

1

1s

1

2.a3E+o2

r

o.1o

1

a.33E+o1 t

1 . 4 2 E ~ 0 2 _ _ _

t 3.84E+o2

1

2.53E+99 t 1.est::-cr:f t 4.77E-o1

1

s

I END I

3

of4



Appendix D-1

RESULTS SHEET

INCREMENTAL RISK CALCULATIONS:

Incremental

risk from

vapor

intrusion to

indoor

air,

Hazard

quotient

from vapor

intrusion to

indoor

air,

carcinogen noncarcinogen

{unitless) (unitless)

I 1.1E-05 I 1.0E-04 -1

MESSAGE AND ERROR SUMMARY BELOW: (DO NOT USE RESULTS lF ERRORS ARE PRESENT)

I E N b := l

4of4



SG-ADV

version

3.1; 0210·

l _ ~ : ~ : ~ ~ : f ]

I ~ R E I

I

~ R E

I

I

~ R E

I

I

END

I

DATA

ENTRY SHEET

Soil Gas G

1lration·

Data

' " ~ ~ · ·

ENTER ENTER ENTER

Soil Soil

Chemical

'"

'"

AS No.

cone., OR

cone.,

(numbers only,

c,

c,

no dashes)

( lgfm

3

)

IPPm' I

Chemical

127184 2.83E+02

I I

T

t r a c h l o r o ~ t ~ y l e n e

ENTER ENTER ENTER

ENTER

ENTER

ENTER

ENTER

Depth

Totals must add up to value of

Ls

{cell F24l Soil

below grade Soil

gas

Thickness

Thickness

stratum A

Us

to bottom

sampling

Average Thickness of

soil

of so'i

scs

of enclosed

depth

soil of soil stratum

B,

stratum C, soil type s

space floor,

below grade,

temperature, stratum A, (Enter value or 0) {Enter value or 0) (used

to

estimate OR pe

L,

L.

T,

h,

h,

h,

soil vapor

(om) (om)

(OC)

)em) (em) (em)

I . permeability)

15

133.5

10

133.5

'

ENTER

ENTER

ENTER

ENTER

ENTER ENTER ENTER ENTER

Stratum A Stratum A

Stratum A

Stratum A

Stratum B

Stratum

B Stratum B Stratum B

S

scs

soil

dry

soil

total

soil

water-filled scs

soil dry

soil

total

soil water-filled

soil type

bulk density, porosity,

porosity, soil

type

bulk density,

porosity,

porosity,

c

ookup Soil

' I

'

o'

' '

1

~ . ~ ~ ~ s - ~ ~ ~ - ,

1

'

o'

' '

c- -

•

Po

Parameters j

(g/cm3)

(unitless)

(cm

3

/cm

3

)

~ , _ Parameters

1

(g/cm

3

)

(unitless)

(cm

3

/cm

3

)

_

0.06

ENTER

Enclosed

ENTER ENTER

Enclosed

ENTER

Enclosed

ENTER ENTER ENTER

space Soil-bldg.

space space Enclosed

Floor-wall

Indoor

floor pressure floor floor space seam crack air exchange

thickness, differential,

length,

width, height, width,

rate,

lorack 6.P

La Wa Hs

w

ER

(em) (g/cm-s

2

) (em) (em) (em) (em)___

(1/h)

.---=--,----;u;----,---961

t 961 t

244

t

0.1

t

~ ~

ENTER

ENTER

ENTER ENTER

Averaging Averaging

time for time for Exposure Exposure

carcinogens, noncarcinogens, duration, frequency,

ATe ATNc

ED

EF

(yrs) (yrs)

_(yr§)

(days/yr)

1 7 0 1 t 365 I

1 of4

Av

flow

Leave b

I



CHEMICAL PROPERTIES SHEET

Henry's Henry's

Enthalpy of

law constant law

constant

vaporization at

Normal

Unit

Diffusivity

Oiffusivity at reference

reference

the normal

boiling Critical

Molecular

risk

in

air,

in water,

temperature,

temperature,

boiling point,

point,

temperature,

weight,

factor,

D,

Dw

H

T,

D.Hv,b

T,

To

MW

URF

(cm

2

/s)

{cm

2

/s) {atm-m

3

/mo1)

('C)

(cal/mol)

('K)

i'K)

(g/mol)

(J.tg/m3r,

I 7.20E-02 . n•-1 8.20E-0§_[_1.84E-02 I 25

r·

8,288 I 394.40 I 620.20 I 165.83 r · s ~ S E - 0 5

2

of4




Stratum

A Stratum B

Stratum

C

Stratum

A

Stratum

A

Stratum

A

Stratum

A

Source- soil soil soil effective soil soil soil

Exposure building air-filled air-filled air-filled total fluid intrinsic relative air effective vapor

duration, separation, porosity, porosity, porosity, saturation, permeability, permeability,

permeability, pe

t Lr 9aA

9a

8

Sac Ste

k; k'R kv

(sec)

(em)

(cm

3

/cm

3

) (cm

3

/cm

3

) (cm

3

/cm

3

) (cm

3

/cm

3

) (cm

2

) (cm

2

) (cm

2

)

I

2.21E+08

I

118.5

[ --6.370 I ERROR I ERROR I 0.019 I 9.92E-08 I 0.987 I 9.79E-08 I

Area of

enclosed

space

below

grade,

A,

(cm

2

)

Stratum

Stratum S

Crack- Crack Enthalpy

of

Henry's law Henry's law

Vapor

A B




i1 Zcrack 6.Hv.TS Hrs H'rs

J.l.TS

DeliA

De

11

a

(unitless) (em) {cal/mol) (atm-m

3


2

/s) {cm

2

/s)

1 9.24E•os 1

••

1sE-o• 1 15

r

9,553 1 7.s1E-o3 1 3.3sE-o1 1 1.75E-o4 1 1.42E-02 1

o.ooE•oo 1· o


Average

Crack

equivalent source

Infinite

Convection Source

vapor

effective

foundation indoor

source

path vapor Crack

flow rate

diffusion Area of

Peclet

attenuation bldg.

length, cone., radius, into bldg., coefficient, crack, number, coefficient, cone.,

L,

Csource

rcrack

Osoil

ocrack

Acrack

exp(Pe

1

)

a

Cbuildin l

(em)

(J.Lg/m3)

(em)

(cm

3

/s) (cm

2

/s) (cm

2

)


(J.Lg/m3) (J

I 15 I 2.83E+02 I 0.10 I 8.33E+01 I 1.42E-02 I 3.84E+02 I 2.53E+9g I 1.69E-03 I 4.77E-01 I 5

I END I

3

of

4



Appendix D-2

RESULTS SHEET


Incremental

risk from

vapor

intrusion

to

indoor air,

Hazard

quotient

from vapor

intrusion

to

indoor air,



I 2.6E-06 I 1.0E-04 I

MESSAGE

AND ERROR SUMMARY BELOW:

(DO

NOT

USE RESULTS F ERRORS

ARE PRESENT

I END I

4

of4






Henry's

Henry's

Enthalpy

of

law constant

law constant

vaporization at

Normal

Unit

Diffusivity Diffusivity at reference

reference the normal boiling Critical Molecular

risk

in

air,

in

water,

temperature,

temperature, boiling point, point,

temperature,

weight,

factor,

D,

Dw

H

T, L\Hv,b T,

To

MW URF

(cm

2

/s) (cm

2

/s)

(atm-m

3

/mol)

("C)

(ca lmol)

tK)

(oK)

(g/mol)

{J.Ig/m3)",

I 7.20E-02 ___ L8.20E-06 I 1.84E-02 I 25. I 8,288 I 394.40 I 620.20 I 165.83 I 5.5E-05

2of4



Stratum A

source- soil

Exposure building air-filled

duration, separation, porosity,

Stratum 8

soil

air-filled

porosity,

Stratum C

soil

air-filled

porosity,


Stratum A

Stratum A

Stratum A

Stratum A

effective soil soil soil

total fluid

intrinsic relative air effective vapor

saturation, permeability, permeability,

permeability,

pe

t Lr

SaA

9.,

8

Sac Ste k; km kv

{sec) {em)

(cm

3

/cm

3

) (cm

3

/cm

3

) (cm

3

/cm

3

)

{cm

3

/cm

3

)

J ~ f l ~ )

(cm

2

) {cm

2

)

I 7.BBE+OB I 118.5 I 0.370 I ERROR I ERROR I 0.019 I 9.92E ,Q8. I 0.987 I 9.79E-08 I _9

Area of

enclosed

space

below

grade,

A,

{cm

2

)

Stratum Stratum S

Crack- Crack Enthalpy of Henry's law Henry's law Vapor A 8



ratio, grade, temperature, temperature. temperature, temperature, coefficierit, coefficient, coe

f]

Z c r a c ~

ll.Hv.TS Hrs H'rs J.lTS D"

11

A o"rrs

(unitless) (em) {cal/mol) {atm-m

3

/mo1L___

(unitless) (gfcm-s)___ (cm

2

/s) (cm

2

/s)

___

I 5.14E+06 I 1.79E-04 I

15

I 9,553 I 7.81E-03 I 3.36E-01 I 1.75E-04 I 1.42E-02 I _ O ~ O O E + O O I O.

Exponent of

Infinite

Average Crack

equivalent

source

Infinite

Convection

Source vapor effective foundation indoor source

path

vapor

Crack

flow rate

diffusion

Area of Peclet attenuation bldg.

length,

cone.,

radius,

into bldg.,

coefficient,

crack, number, coefficient,

cone.,

L,

Csource

f e r a e ~

Osorr

o c r a c ~

A c r a c ~

exp(Pe

1

)

a

Cbuildinl

(em)

{J.lg m3)

(em)

{em%)

(cm

2

/s)

(cm

2

)

{unitless) {unilless)

("glm')

( ~

1· 15 1

2.a3E+o2

1

o.1o

1

s _ . _ ~ ~ E + o 1

1 1.42E-o2 L _9.22E+o2 1

2.69E+41-

1

2 . 1 1 _ ~ ; - o 4

1

5.ssE-o2 --r

5

I END I

3 of4



RESULTS SHEET


Incremental Hazard

risk from

quotient

vapor from

vapor

intrusion

to

intrusion

to

indoor air,

indoor

air,


(unitless) {unitless)

I B.OE-07 I 8.9E-06 I

MESSAGE AND ERROR SUMMARY BELOW: (DO NOT

USE

RESULTS IF ERRORS ARE PRESEND

I END I

Appendix D-3

4

of

4



SG-ADV

Version

3.1;

0210·

Reset to

l

-,

D e f a ~ ~ : _ _ j

I ~ R E I

I

~ R E

I

I

~ R E

I

I END I

DATA ENTRY SHEET

Soil

Gas

Concentration

Data

-·· -- -

.-

.. - · · ~

---

ENTER

ENTER ENTER

Soil

Soil

Chemical

'"

'"

AS No.

cone.,

OR

cone.,

(numbers only,

c.

c.

no dashes)

().tgfm

3

)

..iEE_m_y)_ Chemical

127184

2.83E+02

I I

Tetrachloroethylene

ENTER ENTER

ENTER

ENTER

ENTER

ENTER

ENTER

Depth Totals must add up to value of ls (cEi l F24) Soil

below grade

Soil

gas Thickness Thickness stratum A Us

to bottom sampling

Average

Thickness of

so'i

of soil

scs

s

of enclosed

depth

soil of soil

stratum B,

stratum C,

soil

type

s

space floor,

below grade,

temperature, stratum A,

(Enter value or 0)

(Enter value or 0) (used

to

estimate

OR pe

L, L,

T,

h, h, h,

soil vapor

(om)

<oml

("C)

(om)

<oml <oml

oermeabilitvl

15

133.5

10

133.5 s

ENTER ENTER ENTER ENTER ENTER ENTER ENTER ENTER

Stratum A Stratum A Stratum A Stratum A Stratum 8 Stratum 8 Stratum 8 Stratum 8 S

SCS soil dry soil total soil water-filled SCS soil dry soil total soil water-filled

soil type bulk density, porosity, porosity, bulk density, porosity, porosity,

- - L ~ - ; ; k - u P S o i t

.. \ PbA nA

ewA

Pbs n

8

ew

8

L

Parameters ) (g/cm

3

) (unitless) (cm

3

/cm

3

) (g/cm

3

) (unitless) (cm

3

/cm

3

) P

I I

1.5

I

.ML __ _I

o.oo I

~ - - - -

I I . -1

ENTER

Enclosed

ENTER ENTER

Enclosed

ENTER

Enclosed

ENTER ENTER ENTER



thickness, differential, length, width, height, width. rate,

lcra<tc boP La Wa Ha w ER

(em)

(g/cm-s

2

) (em) (em) (em)

(em)

(1/h)

I_ 15 I 40 I --3773A___ I 2305.1 I 244

o.t

I 0.45 I

ENTER ENTER ENTER

ENTER

Averaging Averaging

time for

time

for Exposure Exposure


ATe

ATNc ED EF

(yrs) (yrs) (yrs) (days/yr)

I

10

I -2 5 I

25

I

250 --1

1 of 4

Ave

flow

Leave b

I




Henry's Henry's Enthalpy of

law

constant

law constant

vaporization at

Normal

Unit

Diffusivity Diffusivity

at

reference reference

the normal

boiling Critical

Molecular

risk

in air,

in water,

temperature,

temperature, boiling

point, point, temperature,

weight, factor,

o. Ow

H

Te D.Hv,b

T,

Tc

MW

URF

(cm

2

/s)

(cm

2

/s) (atm-m

3

/mol)

('C)

(cal/mol)

(oK)

('K)

{g/mol)

( lg/m3r1

t 7.20E-02 I 8 . 2 0 E ~ b 6 - J 1.84E-02 I 25 I 8.288 I 394.40 I 620.20 I 165.83 I 5.5E-05

2 of 4




Stratum

A Stratum B

Stratum

C

Stratum

A

Stratum

A

Stratum

A

Stratum

A

Source- soil

soil soil

effective

soil soil

soil

Exposure building . air-filled air-filled air-filled total fluid intrinsic relative air effective vapor

duration,

separation,

porosity, porosity, porosity,

saturation, permeability, permeability, permeability,

pe

t

Lr

GaA

9a

9

Gac Ste

k;

. krQ kv

~ ___

q[l)__ _ i ~ l ~ ~ . r J " l ~ ) .

(cm

3

/cm

3

)

(cm

3

/cm

3

)

(cm

3

/cm

3

)

(em') {cm

2

)

(cm

2

)

1 7.88E•o8 l_m.L_I __ o,37o 1 ERRoR 1 ERROR

r·--

o.o19 1 9.92E-o8 1 o.987 1 9.79E-o8 1

Area of

enclosed

space

below

grade,

As

(cm

2

)

Stratum Stratum S

Crack- Crack

Enthalpy

of

Henry's law Henry's law

Vapor A B


area

below ave. soil ave.

soil

ave.

soil

ave. soil

diffusion diffusion d


'1 Zcrack t..Hv.TS

Hrs H'rs f.l.TS DeffA

Deft8

(unitless) (em) (99 lllJ.OI)__ {atm-m

3

/mol) {unitless) (gfcm-s) (cm

2

/s) (cm

2

/s)

1

8.7oE•os

1 1.40E-o4 1

15

1 9 553 1 7.81E-o3 r 3.36E-01 1 1.16E-o1 1 1.42E-o2 1 o.ooE•oo 1 o



Infinite

Convection Source vapor effective foundation indoor

source

path vapor Crack

flow

rate diffusion Area of

Peclet

attenuation

bldg.

length, cone.,

radius, into bldg., coefficient,

crack, number,

coefficient,

cone.,

Lp

Csource

rcrack

Osoit Dcrack Acrack

exp{Pe

1

)

a

CbuildinSI

(em) (llg/m

3

)

(em)

(cm

3

/s) (cm

2

/s) (cm

2

) (unitless) (unitless)

(llg/m

3

)

{f

I 15 I 2.83E+02 I 0.10 I 8.33E+Q.1 ___ I 1.42E-02 I 1.22E+o3' ·1 2.70E+31 I 2.91E-04 I 8.23E-02 I 5

I END I

3

of4



RESULTS

SHEET


Incremental Hazard

risk from quotient

vapor from vapor

intrusion to intrusion to

indoor air, indoor

air,



I

1.1E-06

I

1.2E-05

I

MESSAGE AND ERROR

SUMMARY

BELOW: (DO NOT USE RESULTS

IF

ERRORS ARE

PRESENT

I END I

Appendix D-4

4of4



SG-ADV

Version 3.1; 0210

o = ~ ~ ~ : ~

I ~ R E I

I ~ R E I

I

~ R E

I

I END I

DATA ENTRY SHEET

Soil Gas Concentration

Dati

ENTER ENTER

ENTER

Soil

Soil

Chemical

'"

'"

AS No. cone.,

OR

cone.,

(numbers only,

c,

c.

no dashes)

(1-l-g/mJ)

loomv Chemical

127184 2.83E+02

I

Tetrachloroethylene

ENTER ENTER

ENTER

ENTER

ENTER

ENTER

ENTER

Depth Totals must add

up to

value of

Ls

(cell F24)

Soil

below grade Soil gas

Thickness Thickness stratum

A

U

to bottom sampling

Average Thickness

of s o ~

of

soil

scs

of enclosed depth

soil of soil stratum 8, stratum C, soil type

space floor, below grade,

temperature, stratum A, (Enter value or 0) (Enter value or 0) (used

to

estimate OR

p

L,

'·

T,

h, h, h,

soil vapor

<em>

loml

(oC)

(om\

lcml loml

oermeabilitvl

15

133.5

10

133.5

s

ENTER ENTER

ENTER

ENTER

ENTER

ENTER ENTER

ENTER

Stratum A Stratum A

Stratum A

Stratum

A Stratum 8

Stratum

8 Stratum 8 Stratum B

scs

soil

dry

soil total soil water-filled

scs

soil

dry

soil

total

soil water-filled

soil type

bulk

density,

porosity,

porosity, soil type bulk density, porosity, porosity,

C } ; ~ ~ ~ ~ J

'

o'

e.'

(-lookupsoli---,

'

o'

e."

1,-

o

Po

(g/cm

3

)

(unitless)

(cm

3

/cm

3

)

Parameters

(g/cm

3

)

(unitless)

(cm

3

/cm

3

)

, ~

,---------

o.4a

1

o.os--

ENTER

Enclosed

ENTER

ENTER

Enclosed

ENTER

Enclosed

ENTER

ENTER ENTER



thickness, differential, length, width, height, width, rate,

l o r o c ~ < . AP Le

Ws He w ER

{em)

(g/cm-s

2

) (em) (em) (em) (em) (1/h)

15

40 3773.4 I 2305.1 I 244 I o.1 - - - - - ~ o.45 I

ENTER ENTER

ENTER ENTER

Averaging Averaging

lime for time for Exposure Exposure


ATe

ATNc ED EF

(yrs) (yrs) (yrs) (dayslyr)

I 10 I 4 ___4 I 250 I

1 of4

Av

flow

Leave b

I




Henry's Henry's Enthalpy

of

law constant

law constant vaporization at Normal

Unit

Diffusivity

Diffusivity

at

reference

reference

the normal boiling Critical Molecular

risk

in

air,

in

water, temperature,

temperature, boiling point,

point,

temperature,

weight,

factor,

D,

Dw

H

T,

t..Hv.b

T,

To

MW

URF

(cm

2

/s)

(cm

2

/s)

(atm-m

3

/mol) ('C)

(cal/mol)

{oK)

('K)

(g/mol)

(Jlg/m3r1

1

7.2oE-o2

-

r

s.2o O_,_Qa_L 1.s•E-o2 1 25 1 s.2ss 1 394.4o 1

52o.2o

1

165.ao·r 5.5E-os

2 of 4




Stratum A

Stratum

B

Stratum C Stratum A Stratum A Stratum A Stratum A

Source- soil

soil soil

effective soil soil soil

Exposure

building

air-filled air-filled air-filled total fluid intrinsic

relative

air effective vapor

duration,

separation,

porosity, porosity, porosity, saturation,

permeability, permeability,

permeability, pe

't l r 9/ 9a

8

Sac

Ste k1 kJ]:l kv

(sec} (em)

_(cm

3

icm

3

)

{cm

3

/cm

3

)

(cmJcm

3

) (cm

3

/cm

3

) (cm

2

)___

(cm

2

) (cm

2

)

I 1.26E+08 "I 118.5 I 0.370 I

ERROR

I ERR,DR I 0.019 I

9 . 9 2 E - O ~ _ L _ _

0.987 I 9.79E-08 I 1

Area of

enclosed

space

below

grade,

Crack-

to-total

area

ratio,

Crack

Enthalpy of

depth

vaporization at

below

ave. soil

grade,

temperature,

Henry's law

Henry's law

Vapor

constant

at constant at viscosity at

ave. soil ave. soil ave. soil

temperature, temperature, temperature,

Stratum Stratum

S

A B

effective effective

e

diffusion diffusion d

coefficient, coefficient, co

As 11 Zcrack

LI.Hv,Ts

Hrs H'rs lrs DenA De

11

s

(cm

2

) (unitless) (em) (cal/mol) (atm-m

3


2

/s) (cm

2

/s) (

1

a.?OE+oa

1 1.4oE-o4 1

15-

] 9.553 1 7.81E-o3 1 3.3aE-o1 1 1.75E-o4 1 1.42E-o2 1 o.ooE+oo -r-o.o



Infinite

Convection Source

vapor

effective foundation indoor

source

path vapor Crack flow rate diffusion Area of Peclet attenuation

bldg.

length, cone.. radius, into bldg., coefficient. crack, number, coefficient, cone.,

Lp

Csource rcrack

·

Osoil ocrack Acrack

exp(Pe

1

)

a

CbulldinQ

(em)

(J.Lg/m

3

)

(em) 3 ~ r T 1 _

/ s ) (cm

2

/s) (cm

2

)

{u(1itless)

{unitless)

( lg/m3)

(J

1 15 1 2.a3E+o2

r--

o.1o 1 a.33E+o1 1 1.42E-o2 - - - - ~ 1 22E+o3 1 2.7oE+31 1 2.91 E ~ D 4 1 a.23E-o2 1 5

I

END

I

3 of4



Appendix

D-5

RESULTS SHEET


Incremental

risk from

vapor

intrusion to

indoor

air,

Hazard

quotient

from vapor

intrusion

to

indoor

air,



I 1.8E-07 I 1.2E-05 I

MESSAGE AND ERROR SUMMARY BELOW:

(00

NOT USE RESULTS

IF

ERRORS ARE PRESENT

I END I

4

of4



SG-ADV

version 3.1;

0210·

[

.

-- Reset to

l

Defaults

I

~ R E

I

I ~ R E I

I ~ R E I

r<-NDl

ENTER

Chemical

CAS No.

(numbers

only,

no dashes)

127184

ENTER

Depth

below grade

to bottom

of enclosed

space floor,

L,

(em)

15

ENTER

Stratum A

scs

soil type

( Lookup Soil -J

l

Parameters _

DATA ENTRY SHEET

Soil Gas Co

, ......,

tration

Oat;

'

ENTER

ENTER

Soil

Soil

'"

'"

one.,

OR cone.,

c,

c,

(J.Iglm3)

(ppm')

Chemical

6.42E+02

I

I

Tetrachloroethylene

ENTER

ENTER ENTER ENTER ENTER ENTER

Totals must add up to value of Ls {cell F24l Soil

Soil

gas

Thickness Thickness stratum A U

sampling

Average Thickness of soil

of

soil scs

depth

soil

of

soil

stratum B, stratum C,

soil type

below grade,

temperature, stratum A, (Enter value or 0) (Enter value or 0)

(used

to estimate OR pe

L,

T,

h,

h, h,

soil vapor

om)

("C)

(om) (om) (om)

permeability)

133.5

10 133.5 s

ENTER

ENTER ENTER ENTER ENTER ENTER ENTER

Stratum A

Stratum A Stratum A Stratum B Stratum B Stratum B Stratum B S

soil

dry

soil total soil

water-filled SCS

soil

dry

soil total soil

water-filled

bulk density,

porosity, porosity, soil type bulk density, porosity, porosity,

'

o

(g/cm

3

)

nA

e./ (

.

L - - ; ; ; ~ p s ; l -

Pbs n

8

Gw

8

,--

(unitless) (cm3/cm3) '- __

: ~ ~ m e t e r s

___)

(g/cm3)

{unitless) (cm3/cm3)

, ----,-----«----.-o.43 I o.oe

----r·

I I I

-

ENTER

Enclosed

ENTER

ENTER

Enclosed

ENTER

Enclosed

ENTER

ENTER ENTER


floor pressure floor floor space seam crack air excllange

thickness, differential,

length,

width, height, width,

rate,

Lorack 6.P

Ls

We Hs w

ER

(em) (gtcm-s

2

) (em) (em) (em)

{em

_{_1fb)

15 40 3ii3A--- - - - ~ - - - - - - - 2305.1 I 244 0.1 I o.4s I

ENTER ENTER

ENTER ENTER

Averaging Averaging

time for time for Exposure Exposure


ATe

ATNc ED EF

(yrs) (yrs)

{yrs)

(days/yr)

l7o

4

41 zso

I

1 of4

Av

flow

Leave b




Henry's

Henry's

Enthalpy of

raw constant

law constant vaporization at Normal

·unit

Diffusivity

Diffusivity

at

reference reference

the

normal

boiling

Critical

Molecular

risk

in

air,

in water,

temperature, temperature,

boiling

point, point, temperature,

weight, factor,

o,

Ow

H

T,

.6.Hv.b

Ta

Tc

MW

URF

(cm

2

/s)

(cm

2

/s)

(atm-m

3

/mol)

('C)

(cal/mol)

CKJ

(oK)

{g/mol)

( lglm3r1

I 7.20E-02 I 8.20E-06 T--1.84E-02 I 25 I 8.288 I 394.40 I 620.20 I 165.83 I S.SE-05 I

2of4




Stratum A Stratum B Stratum C Stratum A Stratum A Stratum A Stratum A F

Source-

soil

soil soil effective

soil soil soil

Exposure building air-filled air-filled air-filled total fluid intrinsic

relative

air effective vapor

duration,

separation, porosity, porosity, porosity,

saturation, permeability, permeability, permeability,

pe

• Lr

e,.A 8aB 8a

c

Ste k;

k,Q

kv

(sec)

(em) (cm

3

/cm

3

) (cm

3

/cm

3

) (cm

3

/cm

3

) (cm

3

/cm

3

) (cm

2

) (cm

2

) (cm

2

)

1

1.26E+os ·c 11a.s

1 o.37o 1

ERRoR r ERRoR

1

o.o1s

1 9 . 9 2 E ~ o - a - · - ] o.aa7 1

9.7sE-oa

1 1

Area of

enclosed

space

below

grade,

Aa

(cm

2

)

Stratum Stratum S

Crack- Crack Enthalpy

of

Henry's

Jaw

Henry's

Jaw

Vapor A B

to-total depth vaporization at constant at constant at viscosity at effective effective ef

area below ave. soil ave. soil ave. soil ave. soil diffusion diffusion di

ratio, grade, temperature, temperature, temperature, temperature, coefficient. coefficient, coe

T[ Zcrack ll.Hv,TS

Hrs H'rs Prs oefiA

oeffB

(unitless)

(em)

(cat/mol) . (atm-m

3


2

/s) (cm

2

/s) (c

I 8.70E+06 I 1.40E-04 I

15

I 9.553 I 7.81E·03 I 3.36E-01 I 1.75E-04 I 1.42E-02 I O.OOE+OO

t

O.O


Average Crack equivalent

source Infinite

Convection Source vapor effective foundation

indoor source

path vapor

Crack

flow rate diffusion

Area of

Peclet

attenuation bldg.

length, cone.,

radius,

into bldg.,

coefficient, crack, number, coefficient, cone.,

f

L,

Csource

r c r a c ~

Osoil

oorack

Acrack

exp{Pe

1

)

a

C b u i l d l ~

(em) ( ) l g l ~ ~ ) _

___

(em)

(cm

3

/s)

(cm

2

/s) (cm

2

)


{J.tg/m3) (p

15 t 6.42E+02 t 0.10 I a.33E+01 .t 1.42E-02 t 1.22E+03 t 2.70E+31 t 2.91E-04 t 1.87E-01 I 5

I END I

3 of4





Appendix E

Compilation

of

the Indoor Air Vapor Intrusion

Risk Calculation

Results

by Inhalation Exposure

Area





Corporate Headquarters

One Grant Street

Framingham, MA 01701 -9005

www.tetratechrizzo.com













































Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and Limited

Subsurface Investigation Report

579 G. A. R. Highway (Route 6)

Swansea, Massachusetts

Submitted to:

R. K. Associactes, Inc.

September 6, 2007



























































































































































































































































































































































































