2
The implementation and use of qual- ity assurance measures vary in scien- tific fields, and third parties often have different opinions on how this work should be done. Bringing to- gether people from a wide variety of disciplines and backgrounds from all over the world has therefore certain risks, especially when speakers are asked beforehand to be provocative, and when participants are forced to sit together and discuss engaging but sensitive topics. This, however, did not distract the participants at the joint EURACHEM/EQALM work- shop on proficiency testing (PT) held in Borås, Sweden, 24–26 Sept. 2000. The quality of the presentations was uniformly excellent and the working groups all presented their findings in an entertaining and informative man- ner, with lively debates. This special issue contains selected presentations from the workshop and is intended to give a broad overview of the current status, problems and future direc- tions of PT in analytical chemistry, microbiology and laboratory medi- cine. EURACHEM has requested the workshop be followed up within 21/2 years. No firm plans have been made, but we agree that the next event should be equally border- crossing and build on the momentum and goodwill generated by the dele- gates. PT providers are currently faced with many difficult topics, e.g. incor- poration of measurement uncertainty, the use of reference values versus consensus values, and whether or not to accredit their service. The first two topics are perhaps still treated more theoretically than practically. Accreditation of PT providers is, however, reality in several countries and many delegates were in favour of this, which was slightly surprising given some of the reservations ex- pressed by both EUROLAB and EA. It was also evident that there are more similarities than differences be- tween PT in analytical chemistry and external quality assurance (EQA) in laboratory medicine, and that both disciplines face common problems. Microbiology, on the other hand, is faced with specific technical and sta- tistical challenges that require partic- Accred Qual Assur (2001) 6:138–139 © Springer-Verlag 2001 EDITORIAL Ulf Örnemark Nick Boley Jean-Claude Libeer Bridging cultural gaps in quality assurance Fig. 1 The Chairman and keynote speak- ers at the joint EURACHEM/EQALM workshop on proficiency testing. From left to right, Nick Boley, Chair Workshop, (LGC); Manfred Golze (BAM); Keith Jewell (CCFRA); Jytte Molin Christensen (AMI); Adriaan van der Veen (NMi-VSL); Alan Squirrell (ILAC); Leopoldo Cortez (EA); Jean-Claude Libeer, Chair EQALM, (IPH) and Paul De Bièvre (IRMM). Photo: Ulf Örnemark, Chair Scientific/or- ganising committee

Bridging cultural gaps in quality assurance

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Bridging cultural gaps in quality assurance

The implementation and use of qual-ity assurance measures vary in scien-tific fields, and third parties oftenhave different opinions on how thiswork should be done. Bringing to-gether people from a wide variety ofdisciplines and backgrounds from allover the world has therefore certainrisks, especially when speakers areasked beforehand to be provocative,and when participants are forced tosit together and discuss engaging butsensitive topics. This, however, didnot distract the participants at thejoint EURACHEM/EQALM work-shop on proficiency testing (PT) heldin Borås, Sweden, 24–26 Sept. 2000.The quality of the presentations wasuniformly excellent and the workinggroups all presented their findings inan entertaining and informative man-ner, with lively debates. This specialissue contains selected presentationsfrom the workshop and is intended togive a broad overview of the currentstatus, problems and future direc-tions of PT in analytical chemistry,

microbiology and laboratory medi-cine. EURACHEM has requested theworkshop be followed up within21/2 years. No firm plans have beenmade, but we agree that the nextevent should be equally border-crossing and build on the momentumand goodwill generated by the dele-gates.

PT providers are currently facedwith many difficult topics, e.g. incor-poration of measurement uncertainty,the use of reference values versusconsensus values, and whether or notto accredit their service. The firsttwo topics are perhaps still treated

more theoretically than practically.Accreditation of PT providers is,however, reality in several countriesand many delegates were in favourof this, which was slightly surprisinggiven some of the reservations ex-pressed by both EUROLAB and EA.It was also evident that there aremore similarities than differences be-tween PT in analytical chemistry andexternal quality assurance (EQA) inlaboratory medicine, and that bothdisciplines face common problems.Microbiology, on the other hand, isfaced with specific technical and sta-tistical challenges that require partic-

Accred Qual Assur (2001) 6:138–139© Springer-Verlag 2001 EDITORIAL

Ulf ÖrnemarkNick BoleyJean-Claude Libeer

Bridging cultural gaps in quality assurance

Fig. 1 The Chairman and keynote speak-ers at the joint EURACHEM/EQALMworkshop on proficiency testing. From leftto right, Nick Boley, Chair Workshop,(LGC); Manfred Golze (BAM); KeithJewell (CCFRA); Jytte Molin Christensen(AMI); Adriaan van der Veen (NMi-VSL);Alan Squirrell (ILAC); Leopoldo Cortez(EA); Jean-Claude Libeer, Chair EQALM,(IPH) and Paul De Bièvre (IRMM).Photo: Ulf Örnemark, Chair Scientific/or-ganising committee

Page 2: Bridging cultural gaps in quality assurance

139

ular attention. This was made abun-dantly clear by both Keith Jewelland the working group who made thesubject accessible to the many non-microbiologists in the audience.

Interlaboratory comparisons inpursuit of analytical quality havebeen used for more than a century,and their importance has becomeeven more obvious in recent years.PT by interlaboratory comparison isa simple tool with many possibili-

ties. It does not matter whether wecall our services PT or EQA, or ifthe services have complementary ob-jectives. What is more important isto clearly define the specific objec-tives of each comparison and makesure all those concerned understandthem so that the reputation of PT asa key quality tool is preserved. Thismay require more focus on the edu-cational aspect, e.g. as with EQA inlaboratory medicine that not only

evaluates laboratory performance butalso clearly stresses aspects such astraining and help. This approach caninspire PT in other disciplines.

U. ÖrnemarkSP Swedish National Testing and Research Institute, P.O. Box 857, 501 15 Boras, Swedene-mail: [email protected]: +46-33-165275, Fax: +46-33-123749