BrickJournal 8 Volume 1

BrickFest 2

007 Report!

All About the Market Street:

ReviewsAlternate Builds

Modular Building

Also:InstructionsAND MORE!

Models:HMS EdinburghPokemon

Contents From the Editor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

EventsBrickFest 2007 Report: Some Assembly Required . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 BrickFest 2007 Report: BrickFest Returns to Portland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Creating the Children’s City . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Looking at LEGO Art with the Reverend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Build or Build Not, There is no Try (A Yoda Build Event) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 PeopleConstructing a Park . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Building Brickfilms with Blunty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Building a Perfect Minifig Wordl with Barbara Werth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 Building Outside the Box . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 Female AFOLS: Jessi Pastor, Saskia von Doesburg, Ann V. McKee, Janey Cook . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32

Special Reports: Previews and ReviewsA Look Behind the Market Street . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 Market Street Reviews . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 Furnishing the Market Street . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 More Than the Market Street (Alternates) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 Buillding modules for the Market Street in LEGO Digital Designer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 Power Functions Motor Comparison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56Power Functions Spotlight . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60

BuildingMinifig Customization 101: Custom Cloth Accessories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 You Can Build it: Commodore VIC-20 Keyboard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 You Can Build it: Droid Starfighter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73Brick Separator. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 WWYB Winner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76New Destroyer Makes Waves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 To Build a Building . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84Constructing a Big Rig . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 Gotta Build Them All . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91

CommunityComunidade 0937 (Portugal) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 ABSTechnology: A Short History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 Reviews: Not Quite LEGO (NQC) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .103 Castle Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .106 Star Wars AT-ST Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .111 Last Word . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .116 AFOLs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Back Inside Cover

Volume #1Issue 8

19

12

42

98

80

3BrickJournal • Issue 8, Volume 1 • Summer 20072 BrickJournal • Issue 8, Volume 1 • Summer 2007

Event:BrickFest 2007

Wow…what a ride!

BrickFest 2007 has come and gone, and in a whirlwind of three days. I have seen how adults can act like children, and children act like there’s magic in the air.

A little background: I’ve been building with LEGO for 37 years, off and on--mostly on. I thought that with 23,000 elements, I had a good sized collection. (That thought actually got shot to ribbons by joining LUGNET.) I’ve been a member of the LEGO Club since 1993. I’d been to LEGOLAND California twice, and a number of LEGO retail stores including the first one at the Mall of America. I’d even seen the really huge model of the U.S. Capitol building.

But a convention for “adult” LEGO builders? In my backyard?

This I had to see.

In essence: this was the first AFOL convention for me and my wife. Deena came along for the ride, and the following is a chronicle of what we experienced in the organized chaos that was BrickFest 2007.

Four weeks prior:I discover that I am going to be able to attend all three days of the convention. A quick change to our hotel reservations, and an e-mail to Matt Chiles to let him know what I can bring to the Classic Space Fly-In. Then I take all my Space models and assemble them, just to make sure all the parts are there. Amazingly, considering that much of my LEGO was stored where others could get to it and then it got moved some 2,000 miles, they are intact. Only one element was broken; the part holding the antenna on the #6834 Celestial Sled snapped. A quick trip to Colene’s shop on Bricklink got that resolved in short order. (Thanks again, Colene!) I then find a Shop at Home mailing box, and load the Space models into it. This is quickly dubbed the Box O’ Space models.

Two weeks prior: I send an e-mail off to Steve Witt at LEGO; I’ve decided to enter the first ever Brickmaster Build-Off. I am going to build to Minifig scale version of set #540, the Swiss Villa. Except when I get done, it is more of a cross of the Swiss Villa and the # 356 Italian Villa. I spend the weekend working on the MOC; I decide to name it the “Cruella d’Villa” as a result. It has to be less than 1,000 elements…and it was. I set it on top of my all in one printer.

One week prior:My bride loves to ski, so we’re up in Bend, OR at Mt. Bachelor. After she’s done skiing (I don’t ski at all—I went snow tubing), we are back at our hotel. I spend part of the afternoon and evening building the #8272 Snowmobile. (It seems appropriate.) Deena admits she’s looking forward to next weekend as much as I am. We still aren’t quite sure what to expect, but have a few ideas.

Thursday, 3/29:It’s time to load the car with as much as we can. We are leaving early tomorrow; Deena has a Chamber of Commerce Greeters meeting (which serves breakfast and loves guests!) so I am going to go with her, then we are leaving directly for BrickFest...which means we are leaving at 7:00 AM. That is why I’m loading suitcases, the Box O’ Space models and some baseplates, and anything else I can get in the trunk tonight, so as to get as much sleep as I can. If BrickFest is like any other convention I’ve been to, sleep will be limited.

Friday, 3/30: We arrive (finally) at the Portland Convention Center. Grabbing the Box O’ Space models and the Cruella d’Villa, we head off for Hall “A.” What we find when we get there is interesting. Lego is flying all over the place: A model of a statue is going up. All kinds of houses, spacecraft, castles and trains are being erected. People are laughing, joking, and generally having all sorts of fun. After getting checked in, finding the Classic

*Some Assembly RequiredArticle and Photography By Matthew Crandall


Space Fly-In Table is easy—it is near the front, next to a fantastically detailed model of the Portland Convention Center created by Jeremy Rear.

Jeremy’s model of the Convention Center.

Several people are working to get baseplates and Monorail track down. Deena and I build the models I am supplying, then we start to get things built and add to the general craziness. Matt Chiles, in his brown hat, finally shows up—he’d been doing a session. Wolf Read is assembling something like half the monorail on one side of the table. These two are folks you need to meet. I also met René Hoffmeister (webmaster of LUGNET); he was kind enough to look something up for me on LUGNET so I can finish my MOC card. Thanks again, René! Something that amazes me is the number of Star Trek T-shirts I see…for a LEGO convention, at least I think it is quite a few. (I could have worn one of mine; I certainly have enough of them!)

After Several hours of building, taking in two seminars (Creating a Town Layout and “Talk Me Into Bley”), buying some parts for a Bionicle that was missing a few elements (you gotta love garage sales—but it’s better if all the right elements are there!) and looking at everything, it’s auction time. I bid on several items, but only win one of them: A Bionicle clock that will grace my office space. I pay for my clock, and realize it is time to check in at the Red Lion. After we’ve unpacked, we grabbed some munchies at Windows (The lounge on the sixth floor), then back for the opening session and keynote address. This is the only time I felt like I’ve barged in on family…everyone seems to know everyone else. (That feeling didn’t last long, I might add.) I don’t win any of the door prizes, but hey—the stuff I really want to win is coming up, so I’m okay with that.

Event:BrickFest 2007

For 2007, BrickFest headed west and landed back in Portland, Oregon; the site of the BrickFest PDX in 2004. Once again the LEGO fan faithful gathered at the Portland Convention Center to show off their latest creations and discuss things all brick.

Over 200 LEGO fans displayed some of their current works. Coming across the country were quite a few builders and clubs, as well as members of the LEGO fan community from Europe. A large contingent from The LEGO Group made the trek from Enfield, Connecticut and also from Europe to be in attendance. Not even the passing afternoon downpour on Saturday was able to dampen the spirits of all who attended.

The models were impressive, as expected. Some of best builders and clubs from all across the country spent hours preparing and finishing off their elaborate displays, gearing up for Sunday’s public exhibition hours. A collection of work there was to be seen! From Space to Town, Bionicle to Technic, Mindstorms, Castle, and so on – it was all here. You could spend hours looking at the creations finding more and more to appreciate with every new display you took in.

A beautifully made train station and skyscraper graced the far end of the hall. The town layout was well represented with ten city blocks replete with the typical tongue-in-cheek humor. Space and Castle themes once again outdid themselves with some impressive displays. The “Classic Space Fly-In” was a highlight of the space display. Every set and theme from Classic Space, beginning with the first Classic sets in 1978, through the last Insectoids sets of 1999 were on display.

Castle themes occupied equally impressive table space. Fighting armored dragons, processions, elaborate castles, a pristine white church and more were here. Raiding Vikings started on one end of the display then moved into the Castles and then moved into yet another period theme - Pirates! Galleons and pirate port, a battle of 3-masted ships on the high seas, small vignettes and more were on display. It was eye candy for LEGO fans everywhere.

As you moved to the far wall of the exhibition space, Technic cranes rose above tables. Covering the spaces below were scores of related creations such as Mindstorms, NXT ‘bots and The Great Ball Contraption, to vehicles of all sorts, the displays held almost everything.

Then on to the Bionicle section. One had no choice but to


BrickFest Returns to PortlandArticle by Todd KuboPhotography by Dan Sabath


Event:LEGO Art Show

SPACE Gallery, Lazaretská 9, Bratislava, Slovakia18 April - 10 June, 2007I had never been inside an art gallery before, much less had my own work displayed in one. So it was with great surprise back in January that I received an invitation from a gallery in Bratislava, Slovakia to participate in an exhibit about the use of LEGO in contemporary art. I was flattered of course, but unless they could pay my way over to Europe, it seemed unlikely I could attend. I was then even more surprised when a couple of months later they contacted me again to say they had arranged to use some grant money to cover the cost of my travel. So I packed up a version of “The Last Supper” and “The Garden of Eden” and got on a plane to Slovakia.

I was not the only artist to attend. John Cake and Darren Neave (a.k.a. The Little Artists) from the UK had brought with them a few of their miniature LEGO recreations of well-known works of modern art (along with minifig versions of the respective artists). A talented Slovakian artist named Stano Masar had some of his LEGO work on display. And although not able to attend in person, the infamous fake LEGO box art of Polish artist Zbigniew Libera was on display; featuring the stacked piles of skeleton minifigs in Nazi concentration camps.

Since it was impossible to travel with it intact, much of my first day in Bratislava was spent working at a feverish pace to reconstruct the lavishly-decorated Garden of Eden

Looking at LEGO Art with the ReverendArticle by Brendan Powell Smith Photography by Brendan Powell Smith except where noted

The Brick Testament on display. Photo provided by Diana Majdakova courtesy of SPACE Gallery

The Reverend Brendan Powell Smith. Photo provided by Diana Majdakova courtesy of SPACE Gallery


Event:Yoda Build

The LEGO Outlet in Discover Mills Mall, Lawrenceville, Georgia, hosted a Yoda Build Event from April 27 – 29, 2007. Mall visitors and their families were invited to help LEGO Master Builder Dan Steiniger construct an eight-foot tall model of the diminutive Jedi Master.

Dan was assisted by staff from the LEGO Outlet and Caron Grandon, Marketing Coordinator for LEGO Brand Retail. The store also invited volunteers to help out with the event, from setting up and shutting down each day to helping the many families that came to participate. Scott Lyttle, one of the LEGO Outlet employees, helped Dan build Yoda. Scott recounts how he was selected and how Yoda was built:

I’ve been a LEGO Brand Retail employee since the Discover Mills LEGO outlet opened in 2001. In March 2007, store manager Linda

Build, or Build Not - There Is No Try!Building a Larger than Life YodaArticle by Joe Meno, with Scott Lyttle

Photography by Joe Meno

Yoda ready to build


Bryson informed me there would be an eight-foot tall Yoda build event with a master builder. I recalled the Yoda event from Star Wars Celebration, and wondered if it would be similar. Linda requested that I be the assistant to Master builder Dan. I was a little nervous if I would pass muster with a Master Builder--I mean, getting to work with a Master Builder? In the eyes of any LEGO fan, you can’t get much better!

As the materials for the Yoda build came in, I started to get excited. Several containers of tan, brown and green 2x4 and 2x8 bricks arrived, along with instruction sheets, and the two-foot tall Yoda base model. I was able to figure out how the Yoda build was to be done. The two foot model is made of 2x4 bricks. For each 2x4 brick on the model, event attendees would have to increase the volume of a 2x4 brick by four times. Each 2x4 brick would become a “maxi-brick”, with dimensions of 8x16 studs and four bricks high, using three rings of 2x4 bricks and 2x8 bricks laid across the top. This would create an 8 foot-tall Yoda.

Visitors built the bricks at building tables around Yoda. Each table had instructions and bins of bricks in the colors needed for Yoda. For most, it was an opportunity to build and also play. Children were not the only ones building, either – their parents and grandparents also joined in the fun! Scott also enjoyed himself:

Getting to know Dan over the three days, and already knowing master builders Erik Varszegi and Steve Gerling (some of Dan’s co-workers), I’m starting to think that being a Master Builder not only requires amazing skill with LEGO bricks, but also a great sense of humor and whimsy. Dan was rather funny...when children built one of the Yoda “maxi bricks” and turned it in to us, they got a slip that could be exchanged for a Yoda build certificate. Every once in a while, Dan would take the brick, hand the slip to a child and say, “it will have your name on it, and in you’re case, it’s going to say ‘Trouble’ right on it!” Almost every time, the child’s parents grinned or laughted at that comment.

Dan would also test maxi-bricks for balance – by juggling them! It was a pretty funny sight to see him juggle on his ladder and approve the ‘balanced’ bricks.

It wasn’t all building though, as Dan interrupted from time to time to give away LEGO sets and items. But in order to win, people had to answer questions from

Building maxibricks

Dan balancing bricks

Dan and Scott working on Yoda

19BrickJournal • Issue 8, Volume 1 • Summer 2007

People:Guy Bagley

1. How long have you been at LEGOLAND Windsor? Has your position always been the same and what is the best part about working for the park?

I trained at university as an industrial model maker. My work was all contract work but I made models of new buildings for architects and also made models and special effects for film and television. I was contacted by an architect in the Windsor area who asked if I could work on a model. It was for a new development in Windsor and had to show the landscape with all the proposed new buildings and installations…

I started initially at what is now known as LEGOLAND Windsor in the summer of 1992. I was employed on a short term contract to make a model of the terrain the park was to be built on - this model was made in materials other than LEGO. The work on the models took about eight weeks to complete, and the project at this time was called ‘LEGO WORLD’

Constructing a Park:An Interview with Guy Bagley, LEGO Master Builder, LEGOLAND WindsorBrickJournal is happy to present this inteview with one of the model builders at a LEGOLAND park!

Interview by Melody KrützfeldtPhotography by Melody Krützfeldt and Guy Bagley

Guy Bagley in his element


After making the landscape model I was contacted by the park concept team and was offered an interview for a job building models in LEGO. The interview was very informal, but involved being given a box of mixed LEGO elements, I was then given a choice of three items to design and build! We were given pens, paper and one hour.

I built a parrot. The interview team liked the model and the drawings/designs that supported the model and I was offered a job.

I was one of about 30 model makers working in a studio in central Windsor. We, along with a similar team in Billund, Denmark, then spent the next three to four years researching miniland buildings, and designing and building models for the rides and getting everything ready for the Windsor park opening in 1996.

In 1996, after LEGOLAND Windsor opened. I was moved to work on the LEGOLAND California project. I was then moved to production supervisor/cluster manager on a lot of the Californian miniland models.

Each cluster/area in miniland was given a ‘manager’ to oversee the production but to also ensure that all the models were at the correct scale and size. But each area also required power, water, and control cables to be designed so when the models were installed everything could be connected and wired-up to allow the animations to work…

In 1999 California opened so I returned to the Windsor park. The studio in central Windsor was to close as the lease for the building was up for renewal. It was decided to move the staff up to the main site to work on the park. In 1999 I was promoted to ‘chief model maker’ looking after the day to day operations of the park, and the models in it, - and I now manage the team of model makers and the animators/engineers who make the models move.

In 2000 I was also invited to join the group of LEGO master builders. As a result I went to the worldwide launch of the ‘make and create’ range.

The best part about working in the park is that every day is different! You can be doing repairs to models one minute and then be designing new builds later in the same day. It’s great to be out and about in the park on a sunny day hearing the visitors having a good time.

2. How many other Model Makers do you work with? Have you seen many come and go since you have been there?I currently work with seven model makers and six animators. When we were based down in central Windsor I was part of a team of 30 modelmakers. In 1999 it was decided to split this big team up and some staff went to the park in Denmark, some went to set up the park Model shop in California, while others moved to other parts of the LEGO company. I went to the Windsor park; since then the team has not changed a great deal, model makers generally stay here - they don’t leave - I think we have only had one model maker leave our employment in the last five years!

3. How different is the park today from when you first started?The park has changed a lot over the years. When we opened there was no dragon coaster, no adventurers area, and a lot fewer attractions and rides. The park has also matured, the trees and landscape has changed, and also the park has also spread into the expansion zones that were designed in from the start. We have also noticed that the age of our visitors is getting younger.

4. What would you consider to be your best model within the park? And what is the most difficult model you have built so far?I think this is probably the hardest question to answer- best model in the park…. all of them!

I suppose the most challenging model was the Empire State Building in miniland in Carlsbad. Apart from the fact it’s huge and I made it single-handedly, the model needed to be designed with the fibre optic lighting and also with a steel structure through the centre of it, as California is prone to earthquakes and I did not want it to fall over!

It’s also the same model that was made for the Toys “R” Us store in New York’s Times Square.

5. How have the park and your work changed since Merlin Entertainment took over?Since Merlin has taken over our day-to-day work has not really changed, it’s business as usual. We have, however, been involved with lots of ideas and designs for possible new models and locations. We built the new miniland London area for Windsor, we also

Bagley by his office

A large-scale model by Bagley - a Virgin Airlines plane nose

Another large-scale model by Bagley - a Virgin train


In Her Words:Barbara Werth

The radiator didn’t yet look like the one we had in the basement; some bricks had to be added. Now I could repair that radiator just like the mechanic did in the morning. No one could imagine that these bricks were nothing more than just bricks. That happened when I was six years old. With the same enthousiasm I build my recent MOCs, the only difference is, people know what they’re supposed to be.

I am Barbara Werth and I’m 33 years old. Since I left my Dark Ages in 2000 and I came back into the “brick”, most of my life is inspired by LEGO. My childhood LEGO addiction began with the Snack Bar (#675), which is still my favorite set. At the age of 12 I thought that growing up meant all toys had no meaning anymore, so I sold some LEGO sets and my grandmother finished off the rest of the collection by giving it away to some unknown cousins. A mistake I will never forgive. This started a long period without LEGO. I even went years without thinking about about it.

To leave my Dark Ages nothing more was necessary than a Star WarsTM Gungan Sub. While doing groceries I stumbled over this set. It was cheap, it was there, so I bought it and thus began my adult LEGO addiction. While building, I got that old feeling back: rummaging through a box. I got more and more interested in old and new LEGO sets from different themes but especially Town and Train.

Two years ago I wanted to see my favorite band Runrig live in concert in Germany, but I had no tickets. A friend said, “You have minifigs and you have a DVD of their last concert, build it yourself!” I did it and my first MOC was born. In the end this same friend managed to get two tickets to the real concert.

Often I reread one of my favorite children’s books, “The Letter for The King” by Tonke Dragt, and I did so one and a half years ago. This book is about a squire expecting to receive a knighthood, but circumstances hold him back from that to happen and he gets involved in a big adventure. I decided to build a picture story from the book and I began with the scene around a chapel in the first chapter. I published it on the forum www.1000steine.de . The most beautiful part of that MOC is, I got an e-mail from Casper van Nimwegen, also a big AFOL and great builder from the Netherlands, who loves the book as much as I do. It soon became very clear, why everything has to do with LEGO. I fell in love with him and I moved to the Netherlands.

I found out that I also love building houses and creating town scenes. Living in the Netherlands with all the cute, little houses is very inspiring. With some people of the Dutch LEGO community Lowlug ( www.lowlug.nl ), I was in some model shows in the Netherlands, showing in a big display my own street.

Despite the fact I build little houses, my favorite MOCs I made were the “repainting” of two works of the painters Karl Spitzweg and Rembrandt van Rijn. The Poor Poet of Spitzweg was painted in 1839. In this picture nothing special happens. You can see an obviously poor man, sitting in bed and writing his poems. The water is running through the roof and the oven is cold. The Anatomy Lesson of Dr. Nicolaes Tulp gives a snapshot of medical studies; the professor is showing the anatomy of a human being to the students more or less attentively listening. For the time of Rembrandt 1632 it was a scandal, as such paintings were more reverential to the subject - all the students

Making a Perfect Minifig World With Barbara WerthArticle and Photography by Barbara Werth

The Anatomy Lesson of Dr.Nicolas Tulp, as done by Werth

http://www.1000steine.de

http://www.lowlug.nl


People:Nnenn

Building Outside the Box

LEGO Ambassador Felix Greco comments on building techniques and interviews a non-traditional builder surrounded by controversy.

Article by Felix Greco Photography by nnenn

I first ran across the word purism in 1996 when I discovered other adult LEGO builders on the internet. At that time, a LEGO purist was someone who built only with LEGO brand plates and blocks. These purists generally shunned any element that appeared that strayed from this form. More recently, the word purist is used within the AFOL community to describe those builders that will use only LEGO manufactured parts; clones such as Mega Blocks and Tyco are not used and original LEGO pieces remain unmodified. In my experience, most AFOLs define themselves as purists but the definition is often accompanied with a small amount of tweaking. For example, stickers often accompany official sets, but many view their use in original creations as a modification. In a recent discussion at the clas-sic-space forum (http://www.classic-space.com/plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?47040 ) I asked users to create a spectrum of their own building philosophy and describe which practices they viewed as off limits and why. The result was that for each participant a grey area existed that was acknowl-edged as far from purism but still “permissible”. Examples included cutting hoses, use of engraved bricks, and removing print (Brasso). Each builder had a very well defined area they would and would not explore.

This discussion raised many good points but I was left with the question, why do builders impose limits on themselves? Or more to the point, what prevents builders from exceeding their own limita-tions? More often than not, builders will mention the quality of LEGO over its competitors as a reason for not incorporating clone brands. Additionally, modification is often frowned upon because reusing a modified piece may not be possible or may limit the builder’s palette in the future. The answer to the above questions is likely complex and would make for a lively debate (or follow-up article). In the classic-space forum discussion, many raised the point that the fun of building with LEGO is finding solutions; how can a specific angle be achieved or how can the right combination of pieces be used to create a specific illusion. In this context, the use of clone products or brick modification would be seen as cheating. Or, because children often mix clones with their LEGO collection and have little compunction about modification, these practices are seen as juvenile.

Use of clone brands and piece modification has always been a hot topic for builders. But the recent in-troduction of a new builder has spurred a lot more conversation than usual. Online, he’s simply known as nnenn. Because of possible conflicts with his professional career, he asked that his real name be withheld for this article. Nnenn has made many builders reevaluate the use of clones and piece modi-fication. While he primarily uses LEGO pieces in his creations, he has no compunction about using a Mega Blocks piece if it fits. He sometimes details with tape and stickers. If necessary, he cuts pieces in order to achieve the look he desires.

BJ: Why do you build?nnenn: I build for the same reason I make art: to satisfy my creative drive and feel the joy this process brings. My final creations usually surprise me, as I rarely start with some precon-ceived idea. But I’m not much of a player; after I finish a model, there is little enjoyment left... so I take a few pictures, give it to my 6-year-old demolition agent, and start something new.

BJ: How long have you been building as an adult? And as a follow up, how much has the online AFOL community influenced your build-ing?nnenn: I dug out my bag of 1970s LEGO several years ago for my son to play with. I used them more than he did, but infrequently. About two years ago I found myself building with seri-ousness and sustained effort. Then I (serendipi-tously) discovered the online AFOL community and gave myself permission to pursue toy as hobby. This, combined with increasing frustra-tion over my limited collection, led me to drop about a grand on various sets (childhood wish fulfillment felt pretty good I might add.) As my building progressed, I would occasionally lurk through the forums out of curiosity (read psy-chological suspicion) but not really for specific technique or style: I wasn’t at that level and it did not occur to me. The influence of the AFOL online community came more as inspiration and motivation. Nowadays my creations incorporate every new technique I stumble upon but my subjects remain at my whim.

BJ: What do you feel distinguishes you as a builder?nnenn: My subject matter, SNOT work, and polish can all be seen elsewhere; less common are my unofficial materials like tape, tubes, stickers, clones, and modified pieces.

BJ: Do you have a building philosophy? If so what is it? nnenn: I want my creations to look like miniatures of what they represent: more like models, less like toys. I avoid studs because they are visual identifiers synonymous with “toy,” aesthetically monotonous, and interfere with de-sign. Studs can be useful on occasion, but never as a one-sided coating applied to every creation. I do not enjoy the sculpted look, though I can appreciate it. Although organic shapes can be achieved with rectangular bricks, the “jaggies” are always there. I prefer to use each piece to its unique, best possible potential: if I need a wedge shape, I’ll try to use a wedge piece first.

Outrageous blasphemy! Anathema! An abomination!

I can hear the reactions already. Indeed, the reaction to nnenn has been mixed by most in the space community. Though some are aghast at his technique, almost all recognize him as an outstanding builder. One of the reasons for this is the exceptional quality of nnenn’s creations. While the immedi-ate reaction by some was that his nontraditional techniques were undesirable, he has quickly won over many fans. In addition to being a unique artist, nnenn is very prolific. Just about every week, he is able to produce a new and exciting creation that is outside the norm. The following is an exchange I had with nnenn in order to learn more about him:

BrickJournal: What is your professional background? nnenn: I am currently a professor of art at a state university. I’ve worked as a graphic designer, free-lance illustrator, and gallery artist. Decades ago, I was that “best drawer” kid.

http://www.classic-space.com/plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?47040

BJ: Is your interest in lego building purely sci-ence fiction (space) related? Are you attracted to any other themes or ideas? Also, what is it about science fiction building that appeals to you?nnenn: Actually, I don’t read science-fiction, follow space events, or think much about it; I endure an occasional movie for the eye-candy. My interest is mostly in the visuals: for me, sci-ence-fiction has greater opportunity for unique formal expression than other themes. An unex-plored universe seems the ultimate fertile field ready for the imaginative: almost anything can be depicted. Other building areas tend to channel creativity into personal variations on established tropes of their genre. Note: I could create pure, non-representational arrangements, but the disconnect from human experience is too alien (no pun intended) and would get the confused response modern art tends to gather.

BJ: When I had asked how the AFOL commu-nity affected your building, I had a hypothesis in mind: Because you already have a high degree of artistic ability, my guess is that you are not subject to the same mores/anathema as most AFOLs because you independently evolved your building style. Would you say that is cor-rect? I, for example, have fostered my building style with years of feedback from other AFOLs. Hence, I tend to build more like them. nnenn: Yes, I think you’re mostly right. Design-ing something by committee is a two-edged sword; it immediately eliminates the extremes, both positive and negative. An amateur builder that takes feedback will eventually match the community’s quality or style; but conversely, a building savant, visionary (or uniqueness in general) will only be stifled in the same environ-ment. I’m mostly the former, but occasionally feel like the latter. Also, my background as an artist has trained me to pull away from the mainstream, so I sometimes purposefully lean towards creations that may be not as universal.

The controversy surrounding nnenn resulted in a heated debate at the classic-space forum. Mostly due to this debate, a new forum called the Mutant Hive was created at CSF. According to the forum directive, “The Mutant Hive exists as a forum for MOCs that contain: Clones (non Lego Elements), Cut bricks (Lego elements altered), Crafts (using non building materials for attaching elements) or any Combo of these.” The directive adds “Do not come in here to complain about the elements used here. This is what the forum is for.”—an indication of the dis-agreement nnenn’s creations have encountered.

BJ: How do you feel about the recent contro-versy at CSF in which your name came up quite a bit? Is the creation of the new Mutant Hive a

good idea, an attempt to marginalize you... or something else in your opinion?nnenn: Well, the controversy is petty. And right now the “Mutant Hive” seems to be an after-thought and an unwanted compromise thrown up to appease a resistant majority. In chat I have been the target of quite a bit of derogatory com-ments from a certain established group. I’m not exactly sure why my building style elicits such personal meanness, but I have my theories.

BJ: Why do you believe builders impose limita-tions on themselves? My guess is that most people are just trying to ‘fit in’ by doing what is commonly acceptable. But, ‘commonly accept-able’ is just the style of long time builders and contributors like the CSF moderators. Those guys are personal friends so I’m not going to attack them, but I don’t think they realize how influential everything they say and do is to space builders as a whole.nnenn: Remember what I said about conven-tion and exclusivity? Both can be great human failings and will often control the unwary mind. A great deal of my teaching is spent trying to create critical-thinkers of students, that otherwise will behave and make decisions “because that’s the way it’s been done.” Great leaders, however, are aware of this and strive to allow for better unities and positive changes. I don’t think CSF has these type of leaders. A few years hindsight will tell us that the clone/mods issue didn’t need all this attention. I don’t think either one of us seriously imagine CSF breaking down into a “bubblegum, string, and kitbashing” site. Per-haps some foolishly do, and is the reason why they get so upset about it. Or perhaps someone simply has their underwear on too tight... we’re talking about toys and fun for god’s sake, not human-rights decisions. The word “chill” comes to mind.

I believe most AFOLs would give the ad-vice “build as you please.” And yet, even in mentioning that I was writing an article about a builder who used clones and modified pieces, friends of mine were cynical and had harsh things to say. Nnenn’s work will undoubtedly continue to create debate among many.

As I reviewed nnenn’s creations and got to know more about him I found myself introspec-tive about my own creations. Why won’t I use clones? Why won’t I modify pieces? After ten years of building as an adult, its hard for me to break old habits. But the fact that I’m asking myself these questions is a testament to the pow-erful effect a good builder can have on others.

You can see nnenn’s models at:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/nnenn/

BJ: What techniques/parts are permissible versus off-limits to you?nnenn: I use any technique, modification, clone, or material that does not “close” future building op-portunities. So gluing a model together is a no-go, but gluing individual parts to create some original, reusable piece is just fine.

BJ: You said you build studless because it identifies your models as toys. So, why use LEGO which is a very toy-like medium (as opposed to clay, glue and plastic, etc.)?nnenn: Clay, glue, plastic, etc. are sticky, messy, require more time, preparation, clean-up, and are either too heavy, fragile, or fickle. Lego is clean, instant, and reusable. After I finish a model, there is little enjoyment left, so the bricks return to my collection: the only thing I want left from old models are photos. To the modeling community my creations may look toyish, but I’m not interested in their ultra-realism. I prefer a depiction akin to good concept art: something sufficient enough to help sus-pend disbelief and take the imagination for a ride.


http://www.flickr.com/photos/nnenn/


Name: Janey “Red Brick” aka Janey CookAge: 38Country: Ontario, CanadaYour hobbies: LEGO, Painting, Sculpting, Beading, Educational Advocate, Promotion of the Arts, Writing, Hiking, Camping and Deck HoppingBrickshelf Folder: http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?m=bccook

When did you start building? I am an artist by trade and proud parent of two teen boys currently residing in the northern limits of Southern Ontario, Canada. I was born and raised near Windsor, Ontario and for as long as I can recall creative arts has always been a primary focus in my life. I started to build so young that I don’t have any tangible memories of it although I fondly recall pouring over the catalogues and making lists for Santa and then joyfully receiving basic building sets and the “Homemaker Family” set. My parents were cognitively aware of what building toys (such as Meccano) provided in a sense of development for children and were generous on promoting and purchasing building toys for both my older sister (my only sibling) and I. I spent my childhood creating with various mediums, from cut and pasting, sketching, painting to playing with various building toys. LEGO was by far, my most favorite toy, followed up by the perennial favorites such as the slinky, silly putty, etch a sketch, hand held video games and numerous fashion dolls with a plethora of accessories. Make believe and pretend was a primary focus of my play and LEGO allowed me to create little worlds that I could make exactly how I wanted the world to be. As a young girl I was mesmerized by scaled miniatures and tiny treasures one could hide in secret places and that still holds a level of intrigue for me. As a youngster my favorite LEGO theme was the Homemaker series which appealed to me because I could design furniture and homes with endless details to portray the worlds I wanted to create. When Minifigs entered my collection, I started to build apartment buildings, homes, shopping malls and countless theme parks for them to “visit”. Eventually I hit my early teens and put away my bricks to pursue my interests in education, the arts and dating. Twenty years, and two children later, I rediscovered the enjoyment of building and the intoxication of the addiction. That addiction not only led to a house brimming with containers of sorted bricks waiting to be transformed into one of the many things left to build on my “to do” list, as well as the LEGO brick tattoo I proudly bear on my right shoulder.

Present: Why are you an AFOL? Anything that allows anyone to explore their creativity is something I want to embrace. I proudly suffer the “Peter Pan” syndrome... “I will never, and must never, grow up!” and although it’s a total Cliché LEGO appeals to my inner child that refuses to conform to the realities of adulthood.

Photos on this page by Calum Tsang

Janey

How many hours do you spend building with LEGO? On average I spend a number of hours a week building with LEGO, and when there is a deadline for a display show I have been known to sit on the floor building for hours at end forgetting to stop to eat until I get to the point that my back gives out and my legs fall asleep, much to my children’s amusement. Many more hours a week are spent perusing online LEGO forums and surfing through various other fans online picture folders and trying to attend as many LEGO events as my finances and time allows.

What are your favorite building themes (both what LEGO produce and what you like to build yourself?) I tend to be “Jill of all themes, and Master of none”. I have been known to build in all scales from micro to maxifig and have included almost all the popular themes. Exploring many themes became a personal goal when I found the online community, I wanted to experience it all. I believe that some of themes I have worked on fit more into my natural interests and artistic endeavors so if forced to stay with one theme, it would have to be sculpture and mosaics. Although I do have a hard time resisting anything that resembles a traditional Doll house and tend to be recognized for the many red brick houses I have built. Therefore the sets that most appeal to me are the old Homemaker, some of the Belville, but mostly I purchase creator and mosaic sets or just basic bulk tubs.

What do you like most about LEGO and their products? The quality of the product, the tactile joy of running your hands through a bin of your favorite colored bricks, the ability for it to be something different each and every time you sit down to start a new project and the near limitless possibilities.

Five parts you would love LEGO to produce: I am actually very satisfied with the parts that LEGO already provides. If I was forced at gunpoint to pick, I guess I would choose more windows and doors in different styles and colors and perhaps more varieties of foliage or flowers.

What is it like to be as a female in the AFOL world, which is dominated mostly by men? I have mixed feeling about this. In many ways I feel comfortable with the fact that I just happen to be interested in something that is dominated by men since this has been an ongoing theme in my life. I’m the type of girl that would rather go target shooting or do a house renovation than go to the mall shopping for shoes or to get my nails done. The community on a whole has been never openly or unfairly judged my ability to build due to my gender, although it has created some interesting dynamics at times. Perhaps women that build, that tend to be more demure may have a problem feeling they fit in but since that is not my nature I choose to let very little of that influence me. When push comes to shove, I build for myself first anything after that is purely a bonus. If the community can embrace that, that is wonderful, but if they can not, that will not discourage me. Having said that, I have been fortunate to make some remarkable friends from this hobby that goes beyond our shared building interests.

What would you suggest to LEGO to make their products more popular for girls? I think that LEGO has always fallen into a “pink and aqua” mentality, which may hold a small market share but overall 39BrickJournal • Issue 8, Volume 1 • Summer 200738 BrickJournal • Issue 8, Volume 1 • Summer 2007

Janey


Exclusive:Market Street

The newest fan-designed LEGO set to come from LEGO Factory is Market Street. With over 1200 pieces, the set is not only an impressive companion to the already-released Café Corner, it’s also the first set to use a new theme, called ‘Modular Houses’. This new series will let aspiring house designers create and purchase their own and other users’ house modules on www.LEGOFactory.com.

The Market Street set designer Eric Brok, a Dutchman, has been building for about ten years. His initial interest was in the Technic theme, but later expanded to include almost everything. It was only a matter of time after he joined the Dutch LEGO club, De Bouwsteen, that he would begin building not only models, but a great reputation.

Eric designed large-scale models, from a model of a brewery plant to a tugboat and even a functional amusement park ride. He has also traveled to LEGO conventions in the United States and Europe, including MINDFest and BrickFest in the US and LEGO World in the Netherlands. This all culminated in Eric being selected as one of the first LEGO Ambassadors…and later to designing this set.

BrickJournal interviewed Eric about the Market Street.

BJ: Since this was a fan-based design, you had to work with some LEGO designers. Who did you work with?Eric Brok: When I developed the LEGO Market Street model, I worked with the LEGO Creator design team in Billund, a great bunch of people. They were hospitable, helpful and fun. In particular I worked closely with Jamie Berard, who had just designed the Cafe Corner set (#10182).

BJ: What was the goal of the set and your design?EB: As a LEGO Factory set, Market Street was to showcase a fan design, thus promoting the Design-it-yourself vision of LEGO Factory. The modularity of the resulting model also may inspire people to design their own floor modules (or furniture sets) in Factory, without having to build an entire house.

BJ: That’s a great idea, but also challenging. How did you decide to work with modularity?EB: For the Market Street model I concentrated on modularity within a single set. So I chose a simple 16 x 16 square footprint for each floor. This way, the floors can be turned around as well as stacked in different ways.

After I sketched out the main building, I absolutely wanted to add a simple side structure to it, if only to supply a second base and roof. This way, floor modules from the main building could be rearranged over two bases. I chose simple arcades with a flat roof. And that’s what made the set a Market Street.

BJ: Tell us about how you made the roof – it’s a clever building solution!EB: A typical feature of the building is the stepped front top. I used this style before, not just because it is common in old Dutch cities. I never liked the look of classic LEGO roof building, where the slope bricks produce a roof with jagged underside. So I used the stepped front to hide the roof bricks from sight.

However, I didn’t want the model to look exclusively Dutch/Belgian. So I did a second roof in international style, slopes at front, like in Cafe Corner.

A Look Behind Market StreetInterview by Tormod Askildsen and Joe MenoPhotography courtesy of the LEGO Group


Building:Market Street Interiors

2nd Floor/Penthouse:Living areaFirst of all, you’ll need to look at your options and the building you are working with. I started with a quick plan and layout of what would go where and what was needed on each level. I began with the 2nd floor; the penthouse. On this level I needed a bedroom, a bathroom and a study area. Unfortunately, the poor ole’ minifig doesn’t have a lot of room to move around, but then again the design of the building allows for you to use your imagination rather than sticking to a ‘real-life’ scale.

The room is an open-plan. This leaves room for more space and fewer walls, which is great in a compact living area. The bed is small, but the minifig can actually fit on it. The bed has a quilt cover, bed ends and a pillow. Near the bed are shelves with a jar and a plant on it. Underneath the shelves is a suitcase for those worldly travels. There is also a desk with a computer and a swivel chair. The flooring is birchwood in colour, to give it more of a homely feel and to take away the ‘stud’ look. The stair case has ‘wooden’ rails to add more support to the room. There is also a shower and a set of drawers with a lamp on top. The bathroom is in the corner with a small shower and toilet. The bathroom floor is tiled and a doormat leads to the balcony door.

Rather than build an alternate model for the Market Street set, I have decided to build an interior for each floor without moving any of the exterior around. This was sort of like renovating just the insides of a building, and moving in with your own furniture.

The exterior is compact in size and design and so is the interior. In many cases there is not a great deal of room to plan anything too extravagant. But, you will be surprised by just what can fit into a tiny space. It is compact living at its best. You can actually find ‘tiny’ houses on the internet. Some of the houses are very small and the living area we have here is no exception. Many of them are not only tiny in size but also compact within all parts of the house. For example:

http://www.tumbleweedhouses.com/ - I found this website after building the interiors to the Market Street set.

Furnishing the Market StreetArticle and photography by Melody Krützfeldt


1st Floor:Living areaAfter the 2nd floor, this was much easier. You start to get a feel of the size and accessibility of things.

This floor contains:Kitchen: cupboards, stove, oven, overhead refrigerator and a sinkDining area: round table, chairs, drawers and flower potBedroom: bunk beds, wardrobe, lampLounge room: TV unit with fish ornament, couch, lamp and stand

I also covered the staircase with a ‘carpet runner’ to give it a bit more style. Due to the openness of this level, it was easier to build inside, without having to take too much apart (in order to place everything in), usually lifting the staircase helps as you have more room to build around.

Of course you can select many colours and styles to add inside for your own interiors, but this is just an example of what can be done with what you have.

Building:Market Street Alternates

If you looked at the pile of pieces from this set and said to yourself, “I want to build a castle!” … you’d be out of luck. If you said, “I want to build a space ship!”, you’d be sadly mistaken. And if you happened to say, “I want to build something Galidor!”, well, that’s a whole different story, and we have a special place for people like you. However, if you looked at the pieces and said, “I want to build something for a town, city, village, province, etc” then you are in luck – we can do that!!

Finding use for these pieces and letting the creativity run wild was extremely difficult with this set. While I was able to think of some great ideas, given the pieces included, I found that the set lacked the essential pieces needed to make the creations that my mind was coming up with. In the end, it seems I was forced to rethink ways to make something else in the Town theme but make it different enough from a typical street-side market.

The result – a Carnival! Now some may say, “Hey that’s not fair! You just made another Town model.” But all I can say in reply is, “Well, life’s not fair; it’s not a carnival either, but it is bizarre!” What’s more bizarre are the new methods I had to come up with to connect pieces so that my ideas would work out properly. This was a tough build simply because I like to use rounded parts and there are very, very few of those in this set. There was also a lack of pieces that would give me the ability to build on angles and other sides of the brick (i.e. SNOT).

This alternate is just like the classic carnivals you remember going to when you were a kid. Capturing the feel of a hometown carnival was not easy as most people will instantly think of ferris wheels, go-karts, and funnel cakes. Actually, I wanted funnel cakes in my build, but as I still haven’t found the LEGO equivalent of powdered sugar I was forced to abandon that idea. But I found myself able to create some of the classic scenes – testing your aim by knocking over milk bottles with bean bags, racing your character across the board to win prizes, and a vegetable toss. What? Your hometown carnivals didn’t have vegetable tosses?! Kids in my neighborhood saved up their uneaten vegetables all year just for this booth!


More Than the Market StreetArticle by Joe EvangelistaPhotography by Joe Meno


When looking at the pieces I knew I would have to build something on an angle. And what better to build than a big slide?! I was surprised I still had so many tiles to make this slide in a proper color pattern. Using a simple click-hinge piece to angle the main slide, the rest was built from some stairs and some 1x4 bricks to make scaffolding in the back. I can almost imagine a small kid sitting at the top of the platform holding on for dear life because of the very steep angle of descent they would soon be facing. In reality the slide should be at a lower angle, but this slide proves that there’s nothing more fun than sending little plastic figures to their doom ala “Slidez”.

Ah, the Tunnel of Love. What carnival wouldn’t be complete without one? Unfortunately the organization running this carnival couldn’t afford the traditional Tunnel of Love. They were able to find a similar, less pricey alternative – the Tunnel of Broken Love.

With a heart split in half made from black whips, a lonely one-seater boat, and a very short ride – this carnival module was fairly simple to build but even more fun to watch other people’s reaction as I explained it! Though I’m not sure if I’d want a ride attendant helping me in and out of the boat… seems like adding insult to injury!

With some of the leftover pieces I was able to build two overhangs – one as a general entrance to the carnival, and a second as a link between the main carnival and the Tunnel of Broken Love. Both are fairly simple but help to bring the set together to give the small town feeling. The general entrance has the big iron gates and a lion’s head on the other side, whereas the second overhang is simply a hanging garden over some pillars that adorn the walkway.

I was actually quite happy with the way this alternate build turned out. As you can see from the overall picture there are many different structures that can be created from the pieces. Each one is self-contained and can easily be rearranged to fit various layouts. What started by just starring at the pieces turned into a fairly cohesive model by finishing time. Sadly, by the time you read this the alternate set will long have been demolished. But it will live on in the minds and dreams of all those who come across a tunnel of love. Trust me, you’ll laugh.

Building:Market Street Modules

The Market Street set is a new set that follows in the footsteps of the Café Corner: it’s a large town-themed set that has a nice general appeal. In building it with another reviewer, I had a great time!

The set has a large piece count, and is a full evening’s work to build it. The result is a set of building modules that can be arranged a number of ways to make different looks. The instructions are nicely done, and easy to follow. What’s fun about this set is that it has a set of models to build, so the builder doesn’t get too tired building without having something to show for his or her work. For me and the other reviewer I worked with, it was basically building a model then handing off the instructions for the next one.

The construction starts out a little delicate, but the models become surprisingly sturdy as more bricks are placed. The modules fit into each other, so it’s easy to arrange as desired. One very nice touch was the inclusion of a flat roof module – there’s a roofed penthouse as a module, and this roof makes it easy to change things around and have everything covered.

One question that did pop into my head as I built was, “why are the stairs centered?” It’s a unique way of doing things, but it limits the interior possibilities. There’s no room for a dining room table, for example. There is logic to this – the center hole and stairway allows each module to meet consistently from floor to floor. Seeing this work as I built made things a little clearer, and also impressed me the attention to detail that was placed in the set.

Another nice detail is the balconies that can be removed from the modules. I initially wondered about this feature when I saw the box art but again, building this made things much more clear. This also plants a seed of an idea for module building – parts that can be attached or removed depending on placement.

Taking it to the Street: Building Modules in LEGO Digital DesignerArticle and Photography by Joe Meno

Building:Power Functions

Power Functions is the new electric building system by the LEGO company to be released this year in TECHNIC and Creator sets. The Power Functions family is composed of remote control (RC) elements, motors and a brand new type of electrical plug and wire. Let us introduce the family members.

The battery box powers the system. A green light indicates that the power is on. The orange control switch can be pushed to either side driving a motor in either direction. In the middle position the power is turned off. The plug is of female type and throughout the whole system, female plugs are the feeding plugs just like the domestic AC plugs are. The battery box need to be filled with 6 AA batteries.

The motors are internally highly geared down, turning slowly and delivering high torque. See the technical measure-ments in the second part of this presen-tation. They receive power through an incorporated cable. There are two types of motors : a “regular” one and an XL one.The motor fits both studded and stud-less elements as shown in the illustra-tion below. It is 6studs long and 3studs wide and tall. The XL motor is studless only and its diameter is 5 studs wide.

The RC handset and receiver work together, the handset sends IR signals to the receiver. The RC system has four channels and you will find channel se-lectors on both the remote and receiver. They need to be set on the same chan-nel to communicate

Just like the motors, the receiver is powered through a cable. As the bat-tery box, the outputs plugs are of the female type.

Motor

RC handset

Battery box

RC receiver

XL motor

Article and Photos by Philo & Didier Enjary

The receiver has two outputs, red and blue coded, corresponding to the two control buttons on the handset. This way you can independently control up to 8 different functions in your models.

Power Functions wiring


Commodore 64 KeyboardDesign and Instructions by Arvo

This model was shown in BrickJournal 7 in Arvo’s gallery. As a model, it is outstanding in detail, and one of our staff wanted some instructions. Arvo was more than happy to make them available for BrickJournal. A complete bill of materials is at the end of the instructions.

Enjoy!


You Can Build it:Commodore 64

Front Panel

1 2

3 4 5 6

7 8

9

11 12

You probably know this strange part. With its two studs, there is no doubt this is a LEGO part, but what it is intended for ? Is it a deep sea diver flip-per? or a dinosaur foot? No, its original use is as a brick remover!

In some configurations, parts are pretty hard to remove. Kids will use their teeth and scratch the surface of bricks and plates. Adults are no less danger-ous as they use metal tools leaving the worst traces in the plastic.

Brick separator use is quite simple, you stack it on the part to remove, and then you push down the handle so the part is pulled up.

You can also use the brick separator from the top like this :

Taking apart two identical small plates is another specific situation you can solve combining the previous uses with two brick separators.

The brick separator works very well on small parts but you have to be cautious with larger plates (4x8) and you may even damage the largest ones (6x10).

A less known use of the brick separator is as a tile remover. The way the brick separator works on tile is different. It does not draw out the parts from the top with the help of studs but it lifts the tile off with help of the groove.The last thing to not about the brick separator is that while it works on plates, bricks, tiles (including tiles with grille), it does not work on jumper plates due to their offseted stud. Now you can dismantle it!

Link : http://www.philohome.com/remover/remover9.htm

Building:Brick Separator

Article by Didier Enjary based on an original idea by Philippe “Philo” Hurbain

Saving your teeth and nails

74 BrickJournal • Issue 8, Volume 1 • Summer 2007


Building:WWYB

First I want to thank everyone who entered our fist W.W.Y.B. contest. The contestants were from all over the globe and the judging was tough. The winners for the first W.W.Y.B. contest here in BrickJournal are..... Third place goes to Geoffrey Baxter’s “Trade federation quad droid” from Wyoming U.S.A., second place goes to Dr.Vincent Cheung for “Ben & Jim” from Hong Kong, and the big winner is Sean Rayson of Alberta, Canada for his Rhino. As promised (not actually promised, just mentioned) we are posting building instructions for his creation. He’s also going to get a free copy of set #7657 AT-ST (just because we’re nice). For those just tuning in. Last issue we challenged our readers to build an alternative model using the pieces from the #7657 AT-ST and email them in.

Next issue’s W.W.Y.B. will be to see who comes up with the best alternate model with pieces from the #7092 Skeleton’s Prison Carriage. Once again the winner will get his creation posted along with building instructions for his creation along with a free copy of the set (because we’re nice). Second and third place get pictures of their creations posted too,....Hey! Just like this issue! Please join in, all you need is a copy of set #7092. Simply email a photo of your creation (or questions) to: [email protected] before July 20, 2007!

Good luck!

What would you build?Here are the results from last issue’s contest!Article and instructions by Steve DeCraemer

1. 2. 3.

4. 5. 6.


Building:HMS Edinburgh

HMS Edinburgh(HM Royal Navy Type 42 Destroyer)

SPECIFICATIONS:

Actual shipLength: 141.1m (462ft)Beam: 14.9m (49ft)Displacement: 4,675 tonnesLaunched: 1986Berthed: Portsmouth, EnglandWeapons: Sea Dart air-to-air missile in twin launcher, Vickers 4.5” Dual purpose gun, 2x Vulcan Phalanx CIWS, 2x Triple 21inch torpedo tubes, 2 20mm cannon, 2x heavy machine guns, Westland Lyxn helicopter

MOCLength: 3.15m (10ft 4inches)Beam: 33cm (13inches)Weight: 33kg (72lbs)Time to build: 2 yearsElements: Approximately 30,000

The building of HMS Edinburgh stemmed from a long time interest I have had in naval vessels; ever since I was a child in fact. I have always built ships out of LEGO to minifig scale (I use roughly 1:45 scale as being fairly accurate, but anything from 1:42 up to 1:48 is acceptable) and used to build oil tankers and freighters of around 1.5m (5ft) long when I was a kid. I started building minifig scale naval ships around 10 years ago, starting with an American Oliver Hazard Perry class frigate (a little smaller than Edinburgh), but wasn’t satisfied with the shape, so that got dismantled part-way through construction. I next tried another American ship, a Spruance class destroyer, but soon realized I had bitten off more than I could chew since a Spruance would be more than a meter (3ft) longer than HMS Edinburgh and considerably bulkier. Even choosing a smaller ship like the Edinburgh was still quite a building challenge.

New Destroyer Makes WavesArticle and Photography by Ed Diment


I finally settled on the Edinburgh around four years ago. My first attempt went reasonably well, but I lacked sufficient reference materials and made one fundamental mistake: I built the hull in one piece. Having a hull over 3m (10ft) in length made the model quite unmanageable. This is something I know Malle Hawking realized early on when he built the Harry S. Truman – BrickJournal Issue #5. So, that meant starting again, this time with a ship built in three parts.

I chose HMS Edinburgh because I have always liked the shape of the type 42 destroyer. It has a low slender profile that makes it look fast and aggressive, and since it’s powered by Rolls Royce Olympus engines (the same used on Concorde) it is fast. The main problem is that the ship has lots of curves and strange angles to try and reproduce, which also means a more interesting shape than more modern stealth technology ships. I concluded that the only way to go would be to build each of the main elements before I even moved on to the hull.

The main elements built first included: the 4.5” dual purpose gun, the Sea Dart missiles, the radar domes, the main (air search) radar, the masts, the funnel, the Vulcan Phalanx and the Lynx helicopter. I discovered the Lowell/Bram sphere around this time, which was a god-send for doing the radar domes and making them look so much better than my first prototypes. For anyone who hasn’t come across these, I highly recommend discovering them if you need to make anything ball shaped. (http://lego.bldesign.org/sphere/)

continued on next page

Closeup of main gun


Building:IFI2

The auditorium is packed. People are murmuring to each other, waiting anxiously to see what is actually going to happen. And there she is, the minister herself! We didn’t have to wait much longer for the big news - the budget has finally been approved and the long awaited new building of the Department of Informatics at the University of Oslo, so called IFI2, will become reality!

The talk was quite short, not offering many details on the project itself. Afterwards, I went down to see the miniature model and, I can’t say I felt very enlightened about what it was going to look like. A wild idea started brewing inside of me.

I tried not thinking about it too much, but I knew that little ideas, that tickled and nagged and refused to go away, should never be ignored (yes, I do love the movie “Babe”). I shared the idea with my co-workers and friends - the amount of support was extraordinary, mostly between “you’re completely crazy” and “oh grow up”. That was exactly what I had to hear - it finally gave me the courage to go to Terje Knudsen, the project’s User Coordinator at the Department, and ask directly, “Do you think that the Department might be interested in having a LEGO version of the new building?” The next morning the two of us were sitting in a cab on the way to the office of the architects who designed the building, Lund Hagem Arkitekter AS. The architects were thrilled by the idea! But none of us had a clear picture on how big the model should be. Minifig scale was clearly out of the question, so my initial idea was to have it relatively small, maybe 50-100cm long. The decision was quite unanimous - it was to be in a 1:100 scale, giving it the approximate length of (sigh!) 2m. OK, a bit more than I planned, but hey, that meant the possibility for more details, more challenges, and last but not least, more LEGO! And since I was not the one paying for the bricks, how could I say no? I was given a few kilograms of drawings with a “good luck” note attached.

The next few months were spent planning how to transform the design into a LEGO construction, as well as how to get hold of all the pieces I needed. This was to be by far my biggest LEGO project ever (considering that by that time I had only built train models, this was not hard), so I had to be careful. And the fact that all I had were drawings and nothing real to look at didn’t quite help either. The initial calculations had shown that a bit more than 10,000 pieces ought to be enough (Hey, the last guy I know that used a phrase like that became the richest man in the world! We’ll see whether it still works.) Could I have been more wrong? This ended up being merely a quarter of the final amount of pieces needed. Another question popped up, and that was how in world I would move a two meter by one meter model to the Department. The solution was to make it modular; having the modules on a total of 18 baseplates (ten 48x48, seven 32x32 and one 16x32).

To Build a BuildingArticle and photography by Matija Pužar

The completed Department of Infomatics

85BrickJournal • Issue 8, Volume 1 • Summer 2007

I was just ready to place the first order and, while checking about some budget details with Terje, I suddenly found out that the window pattern of the whole façade had slightly changed. Back to the drawing board (in my case, MLCad). Luckily I had not been that eager to draw the whole building before building it, but just the pattern, so not a lot of work had been lost. However, the new design, with narrow vertical windows, left only one possible solution - SNOT all the way, with a lot of black and transparent plates in different sizes. And the width of the windows coincidentally matched almost perfectly the height of LEGO plates!

After I managed to study a few kilos of new architectural drawings, the first of many kilos of LEGO (approximately 20,000 pieces) had finally arrived, marking the official start of the building process, and half of my bedroom officially not usable for anything else.

The following period of time went between building and waiting for new orders (as I was continuously finding out that I needed extra special pieces), and always keeping the architects up to date. They were constantly bombarded with questions about details not shown on drawings (producing megabytes of mails with new PDFs attached), meanings of specific types of lines used in them, as well as colours to be used. Colours were a bit hard for me to guess out of plain black and white drawings, and it was quite an essential issue when placing orders. The outside of the building, as well as the landscape, was done as best as I could according to the drawings, while the interior (small offices, toilets, stairs, etc.) was only done inside the lowest two floors, where there is glass all around and it can actually be seen. The whole building process has been carefully documented and put into the IFI2 gallery on Brickshelf. One curiosity is that by 2010, when the real building will be finished, the present

Above and right: Construction on the model in progress


Building:Demag 2800

My name is Pedro Agnelo, I’m 24 and live in Coimbra, Portugal. My passion for LEGO began at the tender age of 1, playing with my first set, a 2705. But the real “addiction” would only began in 1987 when my father gave me an 8040 Technic Universal Builders set. From that day on I stuck to Technic and I kept on building and collecting until the age of 13, when I entered my “Dark Ages” that wouldn’t end until April 2006 at the age of 23. I rediscovered the pleasure of playing with LEGO by mere chance in a casual talk with my girlfriend (who still regrets it). I started by reorganizing my collection and only after that began building and buying new sets.

I came in touch with the whole AFOL scene after emailing some guy who had a blog, Luís Baixinho (whom I later became friends with) and he sent me some links. Of course I followed them and after some search I was stunned with the immensity of the beautiful constructions by other adults worldwide.

The decision to build the crane actually evolved from another model I built. I started by building a truck, and every truck needs a trailer, but a simple trailer wouldn’t cut it so I added a crane. That crane was too small… so I decided to build a proper crane. Plus at that time, most Technic fans were or had already built cranes or some sort of other big machines.

The real Demag 2800 has two versions, the CC, which is a crawler crane and the TC, a truck crane; other than that they’re almost exactly the same. The main reason to choose this model was (other than the looks) the sheer size of the thing. It has a maximum boom length of 192 meters, a lifting capacity of 600 metric tons, two huge diesel engines (one on the superstructure) and an 18 meter long carrier with eight axles.

I began by gathering information, both on real models and LEGO models. I’ve always liked to create things from scratch, so I tried to find out what everyone else was doing and go in the opposite direction (if I only knew…). As I always liked big machines, it was decided almost for sure my first post dark age creation would be a crane; a big one, I just didn’t know how big. I found out that telescopic booms were very hard to build big and functional so I went for lattice boom. Then it hit me… I’ll build a big lattice boom truck crane that actually works!

The scale was the next issue, although I already knew I’d be limited by the wheel size. I had recently bought a set that had 62.4x20 wheels and I liked their design, so I did the math and came up with a nice round number for the scale: 1 to 20. That was really nice as the Technic men were the same scale/size.

When I began the project I committed to build a functional model rather than a static one because “playability” is what I like best about Technic.

So I started building in early May 2006. The chassis came first, then the cabin and so on, until I had to build the slewing mechanism – the part that elevates the frame of the crane . This took me at least one and a half months to get right as I could only build on weekends and holidays. This was the first of many times I regretted choosing such a scale. But by then I found out there was a huge hollow gear wheel that would do exactly what I needed. After a lot of trial and error and different schemes, work carried on and the superstructure was nearly finished by late June. Then one day I accidentally dropped the whole thing on the floor! I thought about quitting but decided to carry on. Actually the accident helped to make some major changes to the turntable and carrier structure. The end result for the slewing mechanism was a cross with rollers on all 4 ends attached to an old-style inverted Technic turntable and the drive located on the superstructure. From this moment on (September 2006) I just had to build the boom, derrick, jib and some other small things like the hook block and outriggers, which were rather simple except maybe for the jib’s final section whose sections vary in two different axles; it took one whole day!

This would seem to be the end of the project, not being for the fact that it was built in “rainbow” colour scheme. From mid November 2006 to January 2007 I just played with the crane, did some test lifts and some small modifications, and mainly bought lots of parts.

The model made its debut in Coimbra, on the 24th of March 2007 at Coimbra 0937, the first public show by our club,

The Demag TC 2800 mobile crane (real one)

The Demag TC 2800 mobile crane (LEGO model)

Constructing a Big RigGetting back into the LEGO hobby after a Dark Ages usually means building a small model.

Not in this case.

Article and photography by Pedro Agnelo

Working on the slewing mechanism

Comunidade0937 (“0937 Community” in English). Being one of the main attractions, it reached an impressive 5.40 metres high and almost collapsed during set up due to lack of counterweight. mea culpa, I forgot… it was the first time it was set up like this.

In conclusion I’m really pleased with the final outcome for various reasons, like learning new techniques, discovering new parts and how to use them, but above all, the creative process itself and the feeling of accomplishment. Right now I’ve finished a new creation closer to the Model Team line rather than Technic, and already started on another MOC. I also want to dedicate more time to community projects like the creation of the wiki0937, a LEGO wiki in Portuguese or the setting of Rail Racers contest rules, and of course, take part in as many exhibitions and meetings as possible.

Brickshelf galleries:

http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=204219 (mocs)

http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?m=pedroagnelo (main)

http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=204468 (demag)

The model in numbers

Number of parts used approximately 10,000Heaviest load lifted 6 kg in SSL setup (derrick and main boom)Total time building 11 months

Number of parts modified two 2x3 plates and all the pulleys (centre bored out), everything else but the thread is pure original LEGO parts

Maximum boom length 5.40 metres in SWSL setup (derrick, main boom and fly jib)


Working on the lattice

Building:Pokemon

Everybody knows about “Pocket Monsters” or “Pokemon” these days. It is one of the most popular video games amongst children across the world, and has been translated into anime, toys, and more.

The reason I started to build Pokemon characters out of LEGO bricks relates to my job. I am a game creator and my main work is to create game plans and scenarios.

At the time I began building them, I was a member of the scenario team for a game called “Pokemon Colosseum” for Nintendo Game Cube. There were lots of little Pokemon figures on my desk, and I thought it would be fun to add some LEGO Pokemons to the display. My team members liked my LEGO Pokemons, so I kept adding them.

So they should not disturb my workspace, I made them relatively small, about five centimeters tall, which is 1/10 scale of the size in the game, and somehow I have used the same scale for my other LEGO Pokemons.

My first LEGO Pokemons were Treecko, Torchic, and Mudkip which are the characters in “Pokemon Ruby and Sapphire,” the newest Pokemon game at that time, and the most famous character of all, Pikachu. Since Pikachu is so popular, even people who don’t play Pokemon games know it, it was the most well responded to.

As all Pokemon characters have their distinct designs, I carefully observe character materials and visualize LEGO parts that would match the character when I build one. How should I show unique features of the character? Is my selection of colors correct?

Gotta Build Them All!Article and Photography byAzumu Kawasaki


Azumu’s Gallery

Pikachu


Review:King’s Castle Siege 7094

LEGO Castle is back! I’m not going to say, “In all its old glory,” but it definitely has made its return. And maybe it will earn new glory. Let’s have a look at the new King’s Castle Siege (set #7094).

The box is huge and adequately filled with lots of material. There are 973 pieces to be precise, as well as two thick instruction books and a small sticker sheet. Even those LEGO enthusiasts who don’t collect models but rather build their own creations should consider getting this set. It provides you with a heap of bricks, most of them light grey and very useful.

“There lived a king in Thule, Right faithful, to the grave. He loved a golden goblet His dying sweetheart gave.”

-The King of Thule Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, translated by John Frederick Nims

The second resemblance is this castle’s modularity. Each section, including the gate, the towers flanking the gate, the sidewalls and the rear wall, with its high tower, is built separately. They can be combined in different ways; be it as an elongated town wall or assembled in smaller portions. Like in the old days, Technic 1×2 bricks with Technic pins are used to attach the individual wall sections to each other. Some hinges in the sidewalls would have enhanced the possibilities. But they do include some extra Technic bricks to allow different combinations.

Set Number: 7094Set Name: King’s Castle SiegeTheme: CastlePiece Count: 973Minifigure: 5 minifigs, 4 skeletonsInstructions: 2 bookletsStickers (Y/N): Yes Year Released: 2007Price: $99.99

The Return of the CastleReview by Johannes ‘Jojo’ Koehler

The most reasonable combination, though, is attaching them as the photo on the box shows it. Finally we see a completely closed castle again! No holes, no weaknesses through low wall sections. Except for the gate in the rear, there is no way to


secure or lock it. There is plenty of space within the walls; it’s enough for the dragon to alight. Also there are many secluded rooms inside the towers to barrack the troops. Though there is quite a clever mechanism used to hoist the drawbridge manually and lock it in this position, a solution using some real winch would have been nicer. They spared that for the Skeleton Tower (set #7093), though. Also, I don’t like the portcullis

walls - we have seen this before. Admittedly it’s only a minor resemblance, maybe it’s wishful thinking.

Naturally this model has all the (more or less nifty) features we can expect from a LEGO castle these days. Besides the already discussed drawbridge and portcullis and the prison door there is a throne room and three catapults; two small ones on top of the towers by the gate and a bigger one on the left sidewall.

which is the usual one-piece lattice that slides through the one-piece arch (part #30272), as seen in the Knights’ Kingdom castles from 2000 and 2004. Needless to say it is operated manually as well, without any cord to hoist it up. The overall arrangement with the two rounded towers flanking the gate makes up for it, though. Another feature that’s not executed very well is the door of the prison cell. This prison is located in the corner tower at the back. And there’s not a real door but only two fences you have to take away in order to get into that cell.

This last one is a one-piece catapult arm built with Technic parts and cooking pots but without rubber bands.

Also, the right sidewall offers a predetermined breaking point for the enemies to attack. The defenders can reach the battlement by a stair inside.

That leads us to the minifigs. You may have noticed I didn’t mention the figs and accessories before, but they are well worth mentioning. The castle is good, but the figs are the actual eye-catcher. Let’s start with the enemies. I’m really glad LEGO offered neither a preconceived storyline nor names for the protagonists but left that to the imagination of the builder. So I call the skeletons “Skeletons”.

However, the castle as a whole looks fine. Not quite perfect, though. There’s a rather huge gap in the left rear corner of the castle next to the large tower. Maybe it’s meant to be the entry lane for the dragon to land. Only a small turret that’s clipped to the side of the rear-tower extends into this gap a bit. Be that as it may, this castle, as different as it is from previous sets, reminds me of the legendary yellow castle (set #375/6075) in a way. A drawbridge in the front, a second door under a large tower in the back, sloped buttresses alongside the

I know the kids will be going nuts about these Skeletons. The morbid charm of an undead army is ever so fascinating. I wish I could say I like them, but I don’t. First of all, I’d have liked it


As a Star Wars fan I’ve been looking forward to a nicely detailed LEGO AT-ST since the first year of the license agreement. This set is it! Measur-ing over 16.5” (42cm) tall and containing 1068 pieces, the UCS AT-ST is impressive.LEGO has been relatively consistent in the last few years with numbering the content bags for easier construction. The first part of the instructions uses bags numbered one, the second part of the instructions uses bags numbered two and so on. Unfortunately this set does not use the numbered bag system. You have to build this one the old fashioned way, by opening all of the bags and dumping all of the pieces out and going blind searching for the next piece. That’s unfortunate here because despite a few pieces this set is mostly compiled of grey and dark grey

bricks. Since it is sometimes difficult to tell the difference between dark grey and black in the instruction manuals, make sure to take advantage of LEGO’s handy step inventory window. I’m not sure what the official name for it is, but it’s the window at the top of each step that

shows you what pieces are added during that particular step. It’s usefulness is very well demonstrated with this set. If this is your first build, pay close attention to this window to make sure you don’t miss anything. Backtracking through two books and step after step of grey bricks can be pretty frustrating.That’s right, it’s also another set that has two books worth of instructions. This set does take a while to build, but it’s well worth it. Even though the bags aren’t numbered, the instructions are divided into three main sections. The first section consists of the two legs. Everything is here including the Joint Shield and the Fence Cutting Blade on the toe. The legs are a highly accurate replica of the machine in the movies. The second section is the Drive Engine and Gyro System also known as, “the thing that connects the two legs and the head.” It’s impressive how the LEGO Group didn’t leave out even the smallest detail of this awesome piece of Imperial machinery. The third and final section consists of the head of the AT-ST. There is some ingenious SNOT technique used here. For those of you who don’t know, SNOT stands for Studs Not On Top and is a non-traditional LEGO building technique. Here the armor of the head is constructed with an ingenious and unique technique. The base holds four Technic axles held vertically at angles which the side armors plates are connected to using technic beams and rubber bands. The front and the back armor plates are attached using traditional and click-hinges. All of the weapons are here; the Twin Blaster Cannons, the Light Blaster Cannon and the Concussion-Grenade Launcher. I wish there was enough room inside for a detailed cockpit. All of the other Ultimate Collector’s vehicles have really cool detailed cockpits. I think the challenge here was not to make the head too heavy, otherwise the model wouldn’t balance on it’s own. I remember trying to build my own AT-ST using just the schematics from the Star Wars books and I never came up with a version that didn’t have to be supported by other means than the legs. Keeping the head light is key to keeping the AT-ST upright. However, it still would have been nice to see some controls, monitors and seats inside.The only other thing I found lacking in this set was the ability to pose it in different stances. The legs are incredibly sturdy but they are locked in that one position. The head can swivel from side to side but not very far before it runs into the Joint Guard. Even though you can’t pose it in a cool battle position, it still looks amazing next to the other UCS models on the display shelf.Unlike the other System (mini-fig scale) versions of the AT-ST, the proportions of this one are correct. The head on the current System version (7657 AT-ST) is about the same size as the legs. In order for the set to look right, the height of the legs should

It’s always 2 books nowadays.

I don’t see a black wedge plate!

Hello! I’d like to order a pizza...

Maybe it’s dark grey. Look for a dark grey one!

Gavin, no! If you can’t get a piece to fit, you should never force it. Find an adult or someone with more patience

to help you.

Yay! We’re done!

No, Gavin. That’s just one leg. We’re only 1/4 of the way done.


As a Star Wars fan I’ve been looking forward to a nicely detailed LEGO AT-ST since the first year of the license agreement. This set is it! Measur-ing over 16.5” (42cm) tall and containing 1068 pieces, the UCS AT-ST is impressive.LEGO has been relatively consistent in the last few years with numbering the content bags for easier construction. The first part of the instructions uses bags numbered one, the second part of the instructions uses bags numbered two and so on. Unfortunately this set does not use the numbered bag system. You have to build this one the old fashioned way, by opening all of the bags and dumping all of the pieces out and going blind searching for the next piece. That’s unfortunate here because despite a few pieces this set is mostly compiled of grey and dark grey

bricks. Since it is sometimes difficult to tell the difference between dark grey and black in the instruction manuals, make sure to take advantage of LEGO’s handy step inventory window. I’m not sure what the official name for it is, but it’s the window at the top of each step that

shows you what pieces are added during that particular step. It’s usefulness is very well demonstrated with this set. If this is your first build, pay close attention to this window to make sure you don’t miss anything. Backtracking through two books and step after step of grey bricks can be pretty frustrating.That’s right, it’s also another set that has two books worth of instructions. This set does take a while to build, but it’s well worth it. Even though the bags aren’t numbered, the instructions are divided into three main sections. The first section consists of the two legs. Everything is here including the Joint Shield and the Fence Cutting Blade on the toe. The legs are a highly accurate replica of the machine in the movies. The second section is the Drive Engine and Gyro System also known as, “the thing that connects the two legs and the head.” It’s impressive how the LEGO Group didn’t leave out even the smallest detail of this awesome piece of Imperial machinery. The third and final section consists of the head of the AT-ST. There is some ingenious SNOT technique used here. For those of you who don’t know, SNOT stands for Studs Not On Top and is a non-traditional LEGO building technique. Here the armor of the head is constructed with an ingenious and unique technique. The base holds four Technic axles held vertically at angles which the side armors plates are connected to using technic beams and rubber bands. The front and the back armor plates are attached using traditional and click-hinges. All of the weapons are here; the Twin Blaster Cannons, the Light Blaster Cannon and the Concussion-Grenade Launcher. I wish there was enough room inside for a detailed cockpit. All of the other Ultimate Collector’s vehicles have really cool detailed cockpits. I think the challenge here was not to make the head too heavy, otherwise the model wouldn’t balance on it’s own. I remember trying to build my own AT-ST using just the schematics from the Star Wars books and I never came up with a version that didn’t have to be supported by other means than the legs. Keeping the head light is key to keeping the AT-ST upright. However, it still would have been nice to see some controls, monitors and seats inside.The only other thing I found lacking in this set was the ability to pose it in different stances. The legs are incredibly sturdy but they are locked in that one position. The head can swivel from side to side but not very far before it runs into the Joint Guard. Even though you can’t pose it in a cool battle position, it still looks amazing next to the other UCS models on the display shelf.Unlike the other System (mini-fig scale) versions of the AT-ST, the proportions of this one are correct. The head on the current System version (7657 AT-ST) is about the same size as the legs. In order for the set to look right, the height of the legs should

It’s always 2 books nowadays.

I don’t see a black wedge plate!

Hello! I’d like to order a pizza...

Maybe it’s dark grey. Look for a dark grey one!

Gavin, no! If you can’t get a piece to fit, you should never force it. Find an adult or someone with more patience

to help you.

Yay! We’re done!

No, Gavin. That’s just one leg. We’re only 1/4 of the way done.

Documents

BrickJournal 8 Volume 1