Upload
lediep
View
222
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Biofilter Design Principles – Wayne Edgeloe Town Planning Management Engineering
Brendan Oversby
Senior Sustainability Consultant
TME Town Planning Management Engineering Pty Ltd
2 Documents
Vegetation Guidelines for stormwater biofilters in the South West of Western Australia
Full research and practical guide
Vegetation Guidelines for stormwater biofilters in
the South West of Western Australia – Practice Note
Summary document – focus on ‘how to’
Town Planning Management Engineering
Bioretention Systems- Main Components
• Inlet Zone and Structures, Sediment Trap
• Extended Detention Zone
• Vegetation – above ground function • Vegetation – below ground function • Filter Media
• Transition Layer
• Underdrainage
Biofilter research outcomes and implications for practical design
23rd – 24th September 2014 Perth Emily Payne, Belinda Hatt, Tim Fletcher, Perran Cook, Tracey Pham
UNSATURATED ZONE
TREATED STORMWATER
100mm Sub-surface Collection Pipe on 0% grade
DRAINAGE LAYER
Ove
rflo
w
Untreated Stormwater
Line
r
150 Gravel
300
300–500
50
200–500
Filter Media
Coarse Sand
Detention
TRANSITION LAYER
Collection pipe
SUBMERGED ZONE & CARBON SOURCE
Biofilter configurations
Infiltration
Role of the submerged zone • Support vegetation & function during drought
• Enhance N removal
• Greater species performance consistency
• Prolonged retention
www.huffingtonpost
Biofilter key components
Filter media Sand transition layer/s Gravel drainage layer
Plant roots
Vegetation
Microbes
Roles of plants in water treatment
Nutrient uptake
Conversion into organic forms
Return via litter
Provide carbon to drive microbial activity
Oxygenate the rhizosphere
Slow and disperse flow
Stabilise the media
Evapotranspiration loss
Maintain infiltration
uptake
Microbial community
Exudates
O2
Microbial community
Exudates
Additional benefits of biofilter vegetation Aesthetics
Green spaces
Human health
Microclimate
Economic
Biodiversity
Sporobolus virginicus
Cyperus gymnocaulis
Carex tereticaulis Poa
poiformis
Austrodanthonia caespitosa
Velvetene
Juncus kraussii
Melaleuca incana
Astartea scoparia
Gahnia trifida
Hypocalymma angustifolium
Buffalo
Dianella revoluta
Poa sieberiana
Soil only (+ moss)
Poa labilldieri Gahnia
sieberiana
Carex appressa
Allocasurina littoralis
Dianella tasmanica
Juncus pallidus
Hakea laurina
Leptospermum continentale
Buffalo
Sporobolus virginicus
Cyperus gymnocaulis
Carex tereticaulis Poa
poiformis
Austrodanthonia caespitosa
Velvetene
Juncus kraussii
Melaleuca incana
Astartea scoparia
Gahnia trifida
Hypocalymma angustifolium
Dianella revoluta
Poa sieberiana
Soil only
Poa labilldieri Gahnia
sieberiana
Carex appressa
Allocasurina littoralis
Dianella tasmanica
Juncus pallidus
Hakea laurina
Leptospermum continentale
Removing nitrogen from stormwater
NH4+, NO3
-
Urban stormwater runoff
PLANTS
FILTER MEDIA and SOIL ORGANIC MATTER
MICROBES DNRA
N2O, N2
Denitrification
Nitrification
Leaching
Microbial exudation or death
Mineralisation
Bio
filte
r
Root exudation, litter or plant death
Uptake/ Assimilation
Organic Nitrogen
PON DON
Decomposition
Uptake/Assimilation
150 mm
100 mm gravel drainage
200 mm sand transition
300 mm loamy sand filter media
200 mm perspex ponding zone
Non-saturated
Non-saturated
Saturated zone + C source
Satu
rate
d zo
ne &
C
sour
ce
Total Nitrogen (TN)
Non
-veg
etat
ed
cont
rols
During wet conditions – • All plant species perform relatively well –
significantly more effect than non-veg • May be low nutrient media • Saturated zone reduces species variation
Total Nitrogen (TN) Following drying – Poorer removal Greater variation between species Benefit of saturated zone clear
• Most nitrate is assimilated • Denitrification minimal at this stage
Division of incoming nitrate (early biofilter life)
Relationships in wet conditions • Root characteristics – high total length, surface area,
mass and length of fine roots
• High total biomass
• Key process - plant nitrogen uptake
Total root length across species
Performance vs. Root surface area
Effective = High root surface area
Relationships in dry conditions
• Drying changed relationships with plant characteristics from the wet
• Water conservation critical
• Advantage to species with lower growth and biomass
• Lawn grass performance was promising but clogging and experimental limitations problematic
Slower growth an advantage in dry
Performance vs. Relative Growth Rate
• Select species with extensive and fine roots, relatively high growth, and high total plant mass
• Effective species differentiated by high total root length
Effective species – Extensive root systems
Carex tere.
Buffalo
Carex app. Melaleuca
Leptospermum
Juncus kraussii
Melaleuca Carex app.
• Generally exclude species with thick roots or minimal root systems, particularly small and slow-growing shrubs/trees
Dianella revoluta
Poorer performers – minimal root systems
Gahnia trifida Sporobolus
Dianella
Hypocalymma
Austrodanthonia
• Some species perform relatively well in both wet and dry (e.g. Carex spp., Juncus pallidus and Melaleuca incana)
…or consistently poorly (e.g. Hypocalymma, Hakea and Gahnia spp.)
• Plant species with quite differing appearance can have similar performance and key morphological traits -> variety in form may provide long-term functional capacity
Plant species selection guidelines • Similarity in broad plant type or general
appearance is a poor guide e.g. Carex vs.Gahnia
Carex -> effective
Gahnia -> poor
• Minimise surface layer drying -
• Relatively dense planting - maximise uptake and microbial processing capacity, but beware excessive drying
WET DRY
Lawn grasses - Distinct morphology –
suggests alternate mechanisms
- Promising but need to consider:
- Clogging potential
- Maintenance issues – mowing effectively harvests and removes N but media consolidation potential
- Evapotranspiration loss on large scale
Velvetene Buffalo
Total Phosphorus • Effective removal in wet irrespective of design
• Reduced performance following drying
• Not sensitive to species – media important
Confirming the role of plants in maintaining permeability
Hypothesis: growth of roots…
Hatt, B. E., Fletcher, T. D., & Deletic, A. (2009). Hydrologic and pollutant removal performance of biofiltration systems at the field scale. Journal of Hydrology, 365(3-4), 310-321.
Permeability increased by the presence of plants…
0
300
600
900
1 2 3 4 5 6 7Site Number
Ksa
t (m
m/h
r)
Cover
BareVegetated
Harry Virahsawmy: [email protected]
Virasawhmy, H., Stewardson, M., Vietz, G., & Fletcher, T. D. (in press). Factors that affect the hydraulic performance of raingardens: Implications for design and maintenance. Water Science and Technology.
… using a dye-tracer
With plants (preferential flow, high Ks)
Without plants (uniform flows, low Ks)
Water balance of rain-gardens…
Catchment area: 321 m2
Raingarden area: 10 m2
1m
• Rainfall • Inflow • Water level • Surrounding soil
moisture • Climate
Perrine Hamel: [email protected]
Results – Water balance
z
3% evapotranspiration
87%
10%
Soil profile Loamy sand Clay
Hamel, P., Fletcher, T. D., Walsh, C. J., Beringer, J., & Plessis, E. (in press). Water balance of infiltration systems in relation to their operating environment. Water Science and Technology.
Conclusions
● Nitrogen removal is sensitive to plant species selection
● Include a diversity of plant species
● Low nutrient media critical
● Including a saturated zone supports plants & function across dry periods, allows denitrification, and buffers against poor plant choice
● Importance of an extensive root system BUT must be able to survive dry periods and sandy media
● Plants help maintain permeability – include some thicker rooted species (Virahsawmy et al., in press)
● Rule of thumb - % ET loss approx. = % catchment area (Hamel et al., in press)
Part B - Selection Criteria
• South West Botanical Province • Sandy Loam • Readily available as nursery tubestock • Tolerate Regular – Temporary Inundation
Attributes 1. Root Type 2. Habit 3. Inundation Tolerance 4. Drought Tolerance 5. Height 6. Nutrient Removal 7. IBRA region 8. Growth rates 9. Flower colour 10. Salinity Tolerance 11. pH Tolerance
Interim Biogeographic Regionalisation for Australia
1. Avon Wheatbelt 2. Esperance Plains 3. Geraldton Sandplains 4. Jarrah Forrest 5. Mallee 6. Swan Coastal plain 7. Warren
Site Location: Armadale Constraints • Roadside verge height restrictions
<1.5m • Range of hydrozones • No irrigation • Late in season • Acid- Neutral • Doris likes Yellow flowers
Opportunities • Local Reference site
Selection Criteria
• Swan Coastal Plain Region • Height <1.5m • Mix of High - Moderate Nutrient
removers • Fast - Moderate Growth rate • Species that can tolerate RT
Inundation • Include some yellow flowers for Doris • Use species list from Local reference
site
Species List • 27 species • 6 proven
performers • 9 species with
yellow flowers
FAMILY - GENUS SPECIESCOMMON
NAME
Root Length
(cm)
Root Type Coarse (C)
Fine(F)
( sedges and
rushes: Clumping = C, Spreading = S)
TOLERANCE - REGULAR(R)
TEMPORARY (T) DRY (D)
Drou toler
(Y/
Cyperaceae Baumea junceaBare twig sedge
30 F Sedge -S RTD N
Cyperaceae Baumea rubiginosaSoft twig sedge
F Sedge -S RT N
Cyperaceae Carex tereticaulis 60 CF Sedge - C RTD N
Cyperaceae Cyperus gymnocaulosSpiny flat sedge
25 C Sedge - C RT N
Juncaceae Juncus kraussii Sea Rush 25 F Rush -C RT N
Juncaceae Juncus subsecundus Finger Rush F Rush -C RTD Y
Cyperaceae Baumea preissii F Sedge - S RT N
Cyperaceae Baumea vaginalisSheath twig sedge
F Sedge - S RT N
Cyperaceae Bolboschoenus caldwelliiSea Club sedge
Sedge - S RT N
Cyperaceae Carex fascicularis Tassel sedge 60 F Sedge - S RT N
Cyperaceae Carex inversa Knob sedge F Sedge - S RT
Haemodoraceae Conostylis aculeataSpiny cotton heads
Herb RTD Y
Asteraceae Cotula cotuloidesSmooth cotula
Herb RTD Y
Goodeniaceae Dampiera trigonaAngled stem dampiera
Herb RT N
Goodeniaceae Dampieria linearisCommon Dampiera
Herb RTD Y
Asteraceae Hyalosperma cotula Herb RTD Y
Cyperaceae Isolepis cernua Sedge -C RT N
Juncaceae Juncus pauciflorusLoose Flower rush
F Rush - C RTD Y
Cyperaceae Lepidosperma longitudinalePithy Sword Sedge
Sedge - S RT N
Restionaceae Meeboldina scariosa Velvet rush Rush-C RT N
Restionaceae Meeboldina coangustatus Rush -C RT N
Myrtaceae Melaleuca seriata F Shrub RTD Y
Primulaceae Samolus repensCreeping Brookweed
Herb RTD Y
Primulaceae Samolus junceus Herb RT N
Goodeniaceae Scaevola lanceolata Herb RT N
Hemerocallidaceae Tricoryne elatior Yellow lily Herb RTD Y
Myrtaceae Verticordia plumosaPlumed Featherflowe
Shrub RTD Y
Assess the Site • Is a biofilter the best option? • Check: Location, access, safety, ownership….. Liaise with key stakeholders Budget Climate Hydrology Existing Soil Services
What are your objectives FIRST: Water quality
Other attributes Biodiversity Landscaping Improved hydraulic capacity Water conservation Reduced maintenance for downstream systems
Town Planning Management Engineering
Direct watering and reduced downstream flows
Queens Gardens Bunbury
Establishing the plants
When to plant Ordering plants Plant quality Irrigation Site Prep Planting techniques – tubestock Mulch – organic/stones/nothing ??