Upload
chapa
View
37
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Global experience in monitoring the Paris Declaration, and agreements on monitoring Busan commitments. Brenda Killen Aid Quality and Architecture Division Development Co-operation Directorate, OECD. “We’ll always have Paris”. Lessons from Paris…. HLF 4: an evidence-based process . - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Global experience in monitoring the Paris Declaration, and agreements on monitoring Busan commitments
Brenda KillenAid Quality and Architecture DivisionDevelopment Co-operation Directorate, OECD
LESSONS FROM PARIS…
“We’ll always have Paris”
HLF 4: an evidence-based process
• Monitoring the implementation of the Paris Declaration and AAA– Surveys (2006, 2008, 2011): 78 countries
in 2011 (incl. 12 countries looking at Fragile States Principles)
• Evaluating the Paris Declaration (independent process)– 22 countries and 18 donors/agencies
• Additional sources of information
3
Quick overview on PD evidence:
1. Operational Development Strategies
2a. Reliable Public Financial Management (PFM) systems
3. Aid flows are aligned on national priorities
4. Strengthen capacity by co-ordinated support
5a. Use of country PFM systems
6. Strengthen capacity by avoiding Parallel PIUs
7. Aid is more predictable
8. Aid is untied
9. Use of common arrangements or procedures
10a. Joint missions
10b. Joint country analytic work
11. Results-oriented frameworks
12. Mutual accountability
2010 Target2005 Baseline
75%
50%
54%
38%
19%
40%
7%
52%
38%
48%
22%
85%
565
71%
66%
40%
66%
100%
44%
1 696
42%
43%
20%
41%
44%
46%
1158
43%
48%
22%
44%
50%
50%
>87%
49%
87%
51%
89%
(32 baseline countries)
What have we learned?
1. Survey helped to maintain interest2. Survey stimulated dialogue at
country level3. Ownership from participants4. Regional approach was useful5. Scope for more locally-owned
analysis6. Survey only tells part of the story
Increased interest in the survey
20062008 2011
% of global core aid covered by the Survey (est.)
34 partner countries36% of global aid
55 partner countries58% of global aid
76 partner countries76% of global aid
MONITORING BUSAN PARTNERSHIP…
“I think this is the beginning of a beautiful friendship”
A country focussed – globally light approach
COUNTRY LEVEL FRAMEWORKS
Own indicators and targets
Lead by the countryResults made public
INTERNATIONAL LEVEL FRAMEWORK
Selective indicators and targets, measured globally or
aggregating country-level information
Monitor progress on a rolling basis
Managed by the Global Partnership
+
Why a global monitoring framework?
SUPPORTS ACCOUNTABILIT
Y
STIMULATE BROAD-BASED
DIALOGUE AND
LEARNING
SERVE AS A REFERENCE POINT FOR COUNTRY
LEVEL FRAMEWORKS
Approach to global monitoring
• Global progress reports produced to inform ministerial-level meetings
• No more centrally managed surveys – use of existing sources of data when and as they become available
• Data collection at country level to be grounded in existing national monitoring processes
• Continued support through a Global Help Desk Facility
• Overall assessment of progress to draw on indicators and complementary qualitative evidence
• Periodic reviews of global indicators and underpinning methodology through the Steering Committee
Thematic Indicator1 Development co-operation is focused on
results that meet developing countries’ priorities
Extent of use of country results frameworks by co-operation providers (specific criteria to be finalised).
2 Civil society operates within an environment which maximises its engagement in and contribution to development
Enabling Environment Index
3 Engagement and contribution of the private sector to development
Measure to be identified
4 Transparency: information on development co-operation is publicly available
Measure of state of implementation of the common standard by co-operation providers
5 Development co-operation is more predictable
a) annual: proportion of aid disbursed within the fiscal year within which it was scheduled by co-operation providers;
b) medium-term: proportion of aid covered by indicative forward spending plans provided at the country level
6 Aid is on budgets which are subject to parliamentary scrutiny
% of aid scheduled for disbursement that is recorded in the annual budgets approved by the legislatures of developing countries.
7 Mutual accountability among development co-operation actors is strengthened through inclusive reviews
% of countries that undertake inclusive mutual assessments of progress in implementing agreed commitments.
8 Gender equality and women’s empowerment
% of countries with systems that track and make public allocations for gender equality and women’s empowerment.
9 Effective institutions: developing countries’ systems are strengthened and used
(a) Quality of developing country PFM systems; and (b) Use of country PFM and procurement systems.
10
Aid is untied % of aid that is fully untied.
Global indicators5 new indicator
s
Thematic Indicator1 Development co-operation is focused on
results that meet developing countries’ priorities
Extent of use of country results frameworks by co-operation providers (specific criteria to be finalised).
2 Civil society operates within an environment which maximises its engagement in and contribution to development
Enabling Environment Index
3 Engagement and contribution of the private sector to development
Measure to be identified
4 Transparency: information on development co-operation is publicly available
Measure of state of implementation of the common standard by co-operation providers
5 Development co-operation is more predictable
a) annual: proportion of aid disbursed within the fiscal year within which it was scheduled by co-operation providers;
b) medium-term: proportion of aid covered by indicative forward spending plans provided at the country level
6 Aid is on budgets which are subject to parliamentary scrutiny
% of aid scheduled for disbursement that is recorded in the annual budgets approved by the legislatures of developing countries.
7 Mutual accountability among development co-operation actors is strengthened through inclusive reviews
% of countries that undertake inclusive mutual assessments of progress in implementing agreed commitments.
8 Gender equality and women’s empowerment
% of countries with systems that track and make public allocations for gender equality and women’s empowerment.
9 Effective institutions: developing countries’ systems are strengthened and used
(a) Quality of developing country PFM systems; and (b) Use of country PFM and procurement systems.
10
Aid is untied % of aid that is fully untied.
Global Indicators: Info to be provided by countries
Country level monitoring
• Essential for realising the Busan commitments as delivery is at the country level.
• Led by developing countries according their specific demands
• Existence of country level monitoring reinforces global monitoring.
• Could be coordinated regionally
Linkages between global and country level
GlobalIndicators
Country level
indicators
Country level data needed for global
level
Gives a reference onhow others are doing
Country results could
be reported at the Global Partnership
Regional organisations key for
support and accountability
Joint OECD/UNDP could provide
support for menu of indicators
Thank you !