Upload
bobin
View
218
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/31/2019 Breathalyzer Methods and Facts
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/breathalyzer-methods-and-facts 1/2
halyzer Methods and Facts
www.craigmedical.com/Breathalyzer_FAQ.htm[5/8/2012 7:07:56 AM]
Click to Enlarge.
Quality Medical & Forensic
Diagnostics Since 1984 ...
May 8, 2012
Electronic Alcohol Breath Analyzers (Breathalyzers)
• Scientific Method and Technology
• Specificity and Accuracy Expectations
SCIENTIFIC METHOD AND TECHNOLOGY
When consumed, alcohol is immediately absorbed into the blood capillary structure of each successive body
tissue and organ it is directly exposed to. Alcohol's rapid rate of absorption begins in the soft tissues of the
mouth, continues through the esophagus, into the stomach and finally, the small intestine. Alcohol is somewhat
unique in that as it enters the blood stream, it 's chemical structure is not metabolized but remains unaltered and
intact. Consequently, alcohol becomes a separate and definable component of blood flow. As blood flows into and
through the alveoli (air sacs) in the membranes of the lungs, carbon dioxide molecules are exchanged for oxygen
molecules. Because alcohol will readily evaporate from a solution and is highly volatile, alcohol molecules are
released w ith t he carbon dioxide molecules during this gas exchange. Therefore the concentration of alcohol
molecules in the alveolar air of expelled breath is related to the concentration of the alcohol in the blood. As the
alcohol in the alveolar air is exhaled, it can be detected by a breath alcohol testing device.
Because of t his m olecular exchange in t he lung tissue, the correlation
between alcohol concentrations in the blood stream and the expelled breath
can be established by measuring the exchange rate, or evaporation rate of
alcohol in solution. This rate is then expressed as a constant ratio of blood
alcohol concentration (BAC) to breath alcohol concentration. Using this
constant or fixed ratio wit h a measured breath alcohol content, equivalent
blood alcohol content can readily be calculated. The ratio of breath alcohol to
blood alcohol is 2,100:1. This means that by volume, 2,100 mill i l iters (ml) of
alveolar air wil l contain the same am ount of alcohol as 1 ml of blood. If a
person's BAC measures 0.08, it means that there are 0.08 grams of alcohol
per 100 m l of blood.
Electronic m easuring devices have been developed to measure breath alcohol
concentration using a fu el cell gas sensor that is specific to alcohol
molecules. The fuel cell sensor has t wo platinum electrodes wit h a porous
acid-electrolyte material sandwiched between them. As exhaled air flows past
one side of the fuel cell, the platinum oxidizes any alcohol molecules in the
air to produce acetic acid, protons and electrons.
The formula for reactive oxidation of the alcohol (ethanol) molecule can be
chemically stated. If hydrogen atoms are caused to be stripped by reaction
from the right carbon of ethanol in the presence of oxygen, t he end product
is acetic acid, the m ain component in vinegar. The molecular structure of
acetic acid is then expr essed as O = H3C - C - O - H where C is carbon, H is
hydrogen, O is oxygen, the hyphen is a single chemical bond between the atom s and t he = symbol is a double
bond between the atoms. When ethanol is oxidized to acetic acid, two free protons and two free electrons are
released from the ethanol molecule.
These tw o electrons flow th rough a wire fr om the platinum electrode in the fuel cell sensor to an electrical-
current meter and then to the plat inum electrode on the other side of the cell. The two protons move through the lower port ion of the fuel cell and combine with oxygen and the electrons on the other side to form water.
The more alcohol from the breath sample that is oxidized, the greater is the number of free electrons that are
produced resulting in the greater amount of the electrical current that is produced. A microprocessor measures
this electrical current to extrapolate total breath alcohol content then calculates the equivalent BAC using the
constant ratio discussed pr eviously.
SPECI FICI TY AND ACCURACY EXPECTATIONS
As stated above, t he basic t echnology of these type devices is essentially similar. A gas specific microchip sensor
is used to m easure t he amount of a specific target gas (or hydrocarbon) contained in a specific volume of air
(exhaled breath) by det ermining the electrical charge produced by the chem ical reaction converting eth anol to
acetic acid. Model quality and cost are differentiated by the sensor technology employed, processor type,
internal circuit board, features, options and other structural components.
...Wholesale Direct Prices on Home Health Diagnostic Test Kits... Alcohol and Drug of Abuse Screening, Pregnancy and Fertility Testing,
7/31/2019 Breathalyzer Methods and Facts
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/breathalyzer-methods-and-facts 2/2
halyzer Methods and Facts
www.craigmedical.com/Breathalyzer_FAQ.htm[5/8/2012 7:07:56 AM]
A micro processor chip on the sensor calculates the percentage of the target gas contained in the amount of
breath sample analyzed for that specific quantity of breath sample. This percentage (Breath Alcohol Content) is
then converted into equivalent Blood Alcohol Content (BAC) using standardized logarithms and displayed using
various met hods; digital, analog, pr eset LEDs, audible beeps etc.
In all cases, exposing the sensor to any type of smoke or oxygen ion generator will produce false positive test
results and inaccurate readings. This includes residual smoke in the lungs of a smoker and ambient smoke that
may be present in t he im mediate area. Do not use an alcohol breath analyzer near any type of ion generator
including popular air cleaners and central hvac electronic filtration systems. Smokers must wait a minim um 8 -10
minutes after smoking to use a breathalyzer to insure that all residual smoke is absent from the lungs.
Generally, electronic breath analyzers are in dividually pre -calibrated d uring t he final production and assembly process. Calibration is accomplished using a laboratory simulator device (e.g. GUTH34C ), flow meter and control
sample sets of specific alcohol concentrat ion solutions. Once the sensor is preset and calibrated, re- calibration
should not be necessary under normal use as each new test procedure is preceded by a microchip recycle and
zero balancing. Accuracy rates are d etermined in t he laborator y by simultaneously obtaining a breath sample
reading from the electronic device and a drawn blood sample. The device reading is then compared the gas mass
spectrometry reading from the blood sample.
Scientifically, because there are many independent variables present at any given point in time when a test is
given, no conclusions can be drawn, or correlations made between successive test procedures. Each test result is
independent of other test results and is specific to the conditions present and the sample analyzed at the exact
moment the test was given. Some of these test specific variables include volume of breath sample, presence and
amount of other gases in the sample, concentration of alcohol molecules in the mouth, presence and amount of
other gases detected in the immediate environment and others. Example: the amount of breath sample will
probably vary each time a test is performed resulting in a different reading for each test because of the gas to
total volume logarithm. Therefore, each test result can only be interpreted independently and exclusively of other
test results and correlation between tests should not be attempted nor is intended with these type of devices.
This fact results in a common misconception and false assumption by users of these devices that they can "test
the tester" by repeatedly blowing into the unit to see if test results are the same each t im e, or more erroneously
assuming what the test results should be for any given test event.
Obviously, accuracy expectations must also be related to the purchase cost of a particular model breathalyzer.
Higher priced models use higher quality components and therefore can be expected to provide more accurate test
results. Lower cost models are not intended to provide laboratory accuracy or specificity and are more qualitative
and utilitarian in function providing dependable results within the scope for which they were intended to be used
(exam ple: personal versus evidentiary).
In conclusion, users of electronic alcohol breath analysis devices should not expect accuracy rates equivalent to
precisely controlled laboratory results using flow meter or gas mass spectrometry equipment. Unexpected
readings are almost always the result of user error, failure to follow device instructions, contamination of the
sample by smoke or other environmental variable, failure to provide a sufficient breath sample or contamination
of the gas sensor through misuse, abuse or absence of recommended cleaning maintenance. Test results obtained under the many possible variables of field use are generally assumed to be approximate to actual and
not correlated consecutively.
Copyright © 1997-2011
all rights reserved