Breakdown of CSFS 2009 Results

8/6/2019 Breakdown of CSFS 2009 Results

1/23

Summary of 2009 Fast Stream Recruitment Report

Total: All Fast Stream Schemes (*excluding In-Service Fast Stream Competition)

VacanciesApplications by

first preference

Ratio of

applications to

vacancies

Recommended for

appointment

Overall success rate

(recommended as %

of applicants)

Declined

appointment

Grand Total 585 14,911 25.5 629 4.2% 57

Graduate Fast Stream


first preference

Ratio of

applications to

vacancies

Recommended for

appointment


(recommended as %

of applicants)

Declined

appointment

279 9,813 35.2 341 3.5% 44

6 489 81.5 4 0.8% 0

48 2,017 42.0 38 1.9% 2

18 236 13.1 20 8.5% 0

351 12,555 35.8 403 3.2% 46

Other Fast Stream Schemes


first preference

Ratio of

applications to

vacancies

Recommended for

appointment


(recommended as %

of applicants)

Declined

appointment

185 1,188 6.4 176 14.8% 7

28 665 23.8 29 4.4% 2

21 503 24.0 21 4.2% 2

234 2,356 10.1 226 9.6% 11

In-Service Fast Stream Competition*

CandidatesRecommended for

appointment


(recommended as %

of applicants)

Declined

appointment

136 70 51.5% 0

Science / Engineering

Economists

1For the Central Departments option, more Fast Streamers are recruited than are needed to fill the vacancies declared by departments. This enables us to meet

unforeseen dem and. Any Fast Streamers unass igned by the end of the year are ass igned first the following year.

Statisticians

Total

Technology in Business

Total

Diplomatic Service

Central Departments1

Houses of Parliament


2/23

Fast Stream Recruitment Report 2009

In-Service Fast Stream CompetitionGender

Number % of total Number % of total Number % of total

Candidates 66 48.5% 67 49.3% 3 2.2% 136

Attended Fast Stream Assessment Centre 51 45.5% 58 51.8% 3 2.7% 112

29 41.4% 39 55.7% 2 2.9% 70

Ethnic origin


107 78.7% 22 16.2% 7 5.1% 136

86 76.8% 19 17.0% 7 6.3% 112

57 81.4% 9 12.9% 4 5.7% 70

Disability


124 91.2% 9 6.6% 3 2.2% 136

101 90.2% 8 7.1% 3 2.7% 112

62 88.6% 6 8.6% 2 2.9% 70

Male FemaleTotal

Attended Fast Stream Assessment Centre

Recommended for Appointment

Non-Respondents

Non-Respondents

Disabled Non-Respondents


Total

Non-Disabled

Total

Candidates

Candidates



White Ethnic Minority


3/23

Fast Stream Recruitment Report 2009 Analysis by Gender

Section A breakdown of total field of candidates remaining at each stage

The number of candidates invited to E-tray might be higher than the number who pass the online test: disabled candidates

may seek exemption from the online test and proceed straight to E-tray.

All Fast Stream Schemes

Total

Number % of total Number % of total Number % of total Number

Applications 8,333 55.9% 6,489 43.5% 89 0.6% 14,911

Recommended for Appointment 357 56.8% 269 42.8% 3 0.5% 629

Individual Schemes


Total


6,816 54.3% 5,662 45.1% 77 0.6% 12,555

Sift Stages

Completed Online Test 5,749 55.3% 4,602 44.3% 49 0.5% 10,400

Passed Online Test 1,772 55.8% 1,376 43.4% 26 0.8% 3,174Invited to E-tray 1,932 55.9% 1,497 43.3% 28 0.8% 3,457

Attended E-tray 1,788 56.3% 1,360 42.8% 26 0.8% 3,174

Passed E-tray 591 53.4% 506 45.8% 9 0.8% 1,106

Interview Stages

Invited to Fast Stream Assessment Centre 590 53.4% 505 45.7% 9 0.8% 1,104

Attended Fast Stream Assessment Centre 552 53.1% 479 46.1% 9 0.9% 1,040


Economists

Total


Applications 794 66.8% 390 32.8% 4 0.3% 1,188

Sift Stages

Application Assessment 703 66.7% 348 33.0% 3 0.3% 1,054

Interview Stages

Invited to Economic Assessment Centre 445 64.5% 242 35.1% 3 0.4% 690

Attended Economic Assessment Centre 354 63.6% 202 36.3% 1 0.2% 557

Passed Economic Assessment Centre 178 65.4% 94 34.6% 0 0.0% 272

Invited to Fast Stream Assessment Centre 175 65.5% 92 34.5% 0 0.0% 267



Applications

Fe male Non-re sponde nts

Male Female Non-respondents

Male

Non-respondentsMale Female


4/23

Statisticians

Total


Applications 350 52.6% 311 46.8% 4 0.6% 665

Sift Stages

Completed Online Test 283 55.0% 230 44.7% 2 0.4% 515

Passed Online Test 177 59.6% 119 40.1% 1 0.3% 297

Application Assessment 187 59.7% 125 39.9% 1 0.3% 313

Passed Application Assessment 118 55.9% 92 43.6% 1 0.5% 211

Interview Stages

Invited to Statistical Assessment Centre 118 56.2% 91 43.3% 1 0.5% 210

Attended Statistical Assessment Centre 91 61.1% 58 38.9% 0 0.0% 149

Passed Statitical Assessment Centre 44 58.7% 31 41.3% 0 0.0% 75

Completed E-Tray 42 61.8% 26 38.2% 0 0.0% 68

Passed E-Tray 42 61.8% 26 38.2% 0 0.0% 68





Total


Applications 373 74.2% 126 25.0% 4 0.8% 503

Sift Stages

Completed On-Line Test 294 74.1% 102 25.7% 1 0.3% 397

Passed On-Line Test 144 81.4% 33 18.6% 0 0.0% 177

Completed E-Tray 91 81.3% 21 18.8% 0 0.0% 112

Passed E-Tray 79 80.6% 19 19.4% 0 0.0% 98

Interview Stages



Passed Fast Stream Assessment Centre 29 80.6% 7 19.4% 0 0.0% 36

Invited to TiB Assessment Centre 29 80.6% 7 19.4% 0 0.0% 36

Attended TiB Assessment Centre 25 80.6% 6 19.4% 0 0.0% 31


Male Female Non-respondents

Non-respondentsMale Female


5/23

Section B performance by gender at each stage

The number of candidates invited to E-tray might be higher than the number who pass the online test: disabled candidatesmay seek exemption from the online test and proceed straight to E-tray.


Number

Success rate

(as % of

male

applicants)

Number

Success rate

(as % of

female

applicants)

Number

Success rate

(as % of non-

respondent

applicants)

Number

Success rate

(as % of total

applicants)

Applications 8,333 - 6,489 - 89 - 14,911 -

Recommended for Appointment 357 4.3% 269 4.1% 3 3.4% 629 4.2%

Individual Schemes


Number

Success rate

(as % of

male

applicants)

Number

Success rate

(as % of

female

applicants)

Number

Success rate

(as % of non-

respondent

applicants)

Number

Success rate

(as % of total

applicants)

6,816 - 5,662 - 77 - 12,555 -

Sift Stages

Completed Online Test 5,749 84.3% 4,602 81.3% 49 63.6% 10,400 82.8%Passed Online Test 1,772 26.0% 1,376 24.3% 26 33.8% 3,174 25.3%

Invited to E-tray 1,932 28.3% 1,497 26.4% 28 36.4% 3,457 27.5%

Attended E-tray 1,788 26.2% 1,360 24.0% 26 33.8% 3,174 25.3%

Passed E-tray 591 8.7% 506 8.9% 9 11.7% 1,106 8.8%

Interview Stages

Invited to Fast Stream Assessment Centre 590 8.7% 505 8.9% 9 11.7% 1,104 8.8%

Attended Fast Stream Assessment Centre 552 8.1% 479 8.5% 9 11.7% 1,040 8.3%


Economists

Number

Success rate

(as % of

male

applicants)

Number

Success rate

(as % of

female

applicants)

Number

Success rate

(as % of non-

respondent

applicants)

Number

Success rate

(as % of total

applicants)

Applications 794 - 390 - 4 - 1,188 -

Sift Stages

Application Assessment 703 88.5% 348 89.2% 3 75.0% 1,054 88.7%

Interview Stages

Invited to Economic Assessment Centre 445 56.0% 242 62.1% 3 75.0% 690 58.1%

Attended Economic Assessment Centre 354 44.6% 202 51.8% 1 25.0% 557 46.9%

Passed Economic Assessment Centre 178 22.4% 94 24.1% 0 0.0% 272 22.9%

175 22.0% 92 23.6% 0 0.0% 267 22.5%

170 21.4% 90 23.1% 0 0.0% 260 21.9%


Applications

TotalNon-Respondents

Invited to Fast St ream Assessment Centre


Male Female

Male Female Total

Male Female Total

Non-Respondents

Non-Respondents


6/23

Statisticians

Number

Success rate

(as % of

male

applicants)

Number

Success rate

(as % of

female

applicants)

Number

Success rate

(as % of non-

respondent

applicants)

Number

Success rate

(as % of total

applicants)

Applications 350 - 311 - 4 - 665 -

Sift Stages

Completed Online Test 283 80.9% 230 74.0% 2 50.0% 515 77.4%

Passed Online Test 177 50.6% 119 38.3% 1 25.0% 297 44.7%

Application Assessment 187 53.4% 125 40.2% 1 25.0% 313 47.1%

Passed Application Assessment 118 33.7% 92 29.6% 1 25.0% 211 31.7%

Interview Stages

Invited to Statistical Assessment Centre 118 33.7% 91 29.3% 1 25.0% 210 31.6%

Attended Statistical Assessment Centre 91 26.0% 58 18.6% 0 0.0% 149 22.4%

Passed Statitical Assessment Centre 44 12.6% 31 10.0% 0 0.0% 75 11.3%

Completed E-Tray 42 12.0% 26 8.4% 0 0.0% 68 10.2%

Passed E-Tray 42 12.0% 26 8.4% 0 0.0% 68 10.2%

Invited to Fast Stream Assessment Centre 42 12.0% 26 8.4% 0 0.0% 68 10.2%

Attended Fast Stream Assessment Centre 39 11.1% 23 7.4% 0 0.0% 62 9.3%



Number

Success rate

(as % of

male

applicants)

Number

Success rate

(as % of

female

applicants)

Number

Success rate

(as % of non-

respondent

applicants)

Number

Success rate

(as % of total

applicants)

Applications 373 - 126 - 4 - 503 -

Sift Stages

Completed On-Line test 294 78.8% 102 81.0% 1 25.0% 397 78.9%

Passed On-Line Test 144 38.6% 33 26.2% 0 0.0% 177 35.2%

Completed E-Tray 91 24.4% 21 16.7% 0 0.0% 112 22.3%

Passed E-Tray 79 21.2% 19 15.1% 0 0.0% 98 19.5%

Interview Stages



Passed Fast Stream Assessment Centre 29 7.8% 7 5.6% 0 0.0% 36 7.2%

Invited to TiB Assessment Centre 29 7.8% 7 5.6% 0 0.0% 36 7.2%

Attended TiB Assessment Centre 25 6.7% 6 4.8% 0 0.0% 31 6.2%


Male Female Non-Respondents Total

TotalNon-RespondentsMale Female


7/23

Fast Stream Recruitment Report 2009 Analysis by Ethnicity

Section A

breakdown of total field of candidates remaining at each stage




Total


Applications 11,932 80.0% 2,724 18.3% 255 1.7% 14,911


Individual Schemes


Total


Applications 10,371 82.6% 1,967 15.7% 217 1.7% 12,555

Sift Stages

Completed Online Test 8,704 83.7% 1,532 14.7% 164 1.6% 10,400

Passed Online Test 2,781 87.6% 333 10.5% 60 1.9% 3,174

Invited to E-tray 3,001 86.8% 382 11.1% 74 2.1% 3,457

Attended E-tray 2,760 87.0% 347 10.9% 67 2.1% 3,174

Passed E-tray 968 87.5% 108 9.8% 30 2.7% 1,106

Interview Stages




Economists

Total


Applications 774 65.2% 399 33.6% 15 1.3% 1,188

Sift Stages

Application Assessment 700 66.4% 343 32.5% 11 1.0% 1,054

Interview Stages



Passed Economic Assessment Centre 218 80.1% 53 19.5% 1 0.4% 272Invited to Fast Stream Assessment Centre 216 80.9% 50 18.7% 1 0.4% 267



White Ethnic M inority Non-responde nts

Non-respondents

White Ethnic M inority Non-responde nts



8/23

Statisticians

Total


Applications 465 69.9% 189 28.4% 11 1.7% 665

Sift Stages





Interview Stages




Completed E-Tray 61 89.7% 6 8.8% 1 1.5% 68

Passed E-Tray 61 89.7% 6 8.8% 1 1.5% 68





Total


Applications 322 64.0% 169 33.6% 12 2.4% 503

Sift Stages



Completed E-Tray 82 73.2% 27 24.1% 3 2.7% 112

Passed E-Tray 74 75.5% 21 21.4% 3 3.1% 98

Interview Stages

Invited to Fast Stream Assessment Centre 73 75.3% 21 21.6% 3 3.1% 97Attended Fast Stream Assessment Centre 59 74.7% 17 21.5% 3 3.8% 79





Ethnic MinorityWhite Non-respondents

White Ethnic M inority Non-respondents


9/23

Section B performance by ethnic origin at each stage




Number

Success rate

(as % of

white

applicants)

Number

Success rate

(as % of ethnic

minority

applicants)

Number

Success rate

(as % of non-

respondent

applicants)

Number

Success rate

(as % of total

applicants)

Applications 11,932 - 2,724 - 255 - 14,911 -


Individual Schemes


Number

Success rate

(as % of

white

applicants)

Number

Success rate

(% of ethnic

minority

applicants)

Number

Success rate

(as % of non-

respondent

applicants)

Number

Success rate

(as % of total

applicants)

10,371 - 1,967 - 217 - 12,555 -

Sift Stages

Completed Online Test 8,704 83.9% 1,532 77.9% 164 75.6% 10,400 82.8%

Passed Online Test 2,781 26.8% 333 16.9% 60 27.6% 3,174 25.3%

Invited to E-tray 3,001 28.9% 382 19.4% 74 34.1% 3,457 27.5%

Attended E-tray 2,760 26.6% 347 17.6% 67 30.9% 3,174 25.3%

Passed E-tray 968 9.3% 108 5.5% 30 13.8% 1,106 8.8%

Interview Stages




Economists

Number

Success rate

(as % of

white

applicants)

Number

Success rate

(as % of ethnic

minority

applicants)

Number

Success rate

(as % of non-

respondent

applicants)

Number

Success rate

(as % of total

applicants)

Applications 774 - 399 - 15 - 1,188 -

Sift Stages

Application Assessment 700 90.4% 343 86.0% 11 73.3% 1,054 88.7%

Interview Stages



Passed Economic Assessment Centre 218 28.2% 53 13.3% 1 6.7% 272 22.9%

216 27.9% 50 12.5% 1 6.7% 267 22.5%210 27.1% 49 12.3% 1 6.7% 260 21.9%


Total




Applications

Non-respondents

Invited to Fast Stream Assessment Centre

Total


Non-respondents

Non-respondents Total


10/23

Statisticians

Number

Success rate

(as % of

white

applicants)

Number

Success rate

(as % of ethnic

minority

applicants)

Number

Success rate

(as % of non-

respondent

applicants)

NumberSuccess rate(as % of total

applicants)

Applications 465 - 189 - 11 - 665 -

Sift Stages





Interview Stages


Attended Statistical Assessment Centre 121 26.0% 26 13.8% 2 18.2% 149 22.4%Passed Statitical Assessment Centre 67 14.4% 7 3.7% 1 9.1% 75 11.3%

Completed E-Tray 61 13.1% 6 3.2% 1 9.1% 68 10.2%

Passed E-Tray 61 13.1% 6 3.2% 1 9.1% 68 10.2%





NumberSuccess rate(as % of

white

applicants)

NumberSuccess rate(as % of ethnic

minority

applicants)

NumberSuccess rate(as % of non-

respondent

applicants)


applicants)

Applications 322 - 169 - 12 - 503 -

Sift Stages

Completed On-Line test 257 79.8% 130 76.9% 10 83.3% 397 78.9%


Completed E-Tray 82 25.5% 27 16.0% 3 25.0% 112 22.3%

Passed E-Tray 74 23.0% 21 12.4% 3 25.0% 98 19.5%

Interview Stages







White

White TotalEthnic M inority Non-re sponde nts

TotalNon-respondentsEthnic Minority


11/23

Fast Stream Recruitment Report 2009 Analysis by Disability

Section A

breakdown of total field of candidates remaining at each stage




Total


Applications 14,091 94.5% 697 4.7% 123 0.8% 14,911


Individual Schemes


Total


Applications 11,853 94.4% 592 4.7% 110 0.9% 12,555

Sift Stages

Completed Online Test 10,137 97.5% 179 1.7% 84 0.8% 10,400

Passed Online Test 3,108 97.9% 34 1.1% 32 1.0% 3,174

Invited to E-tray 3,028 87.6% 398 11.5% 31 0.9% 3,457

Attended E-tray 2,799 88.2% 345 10.9% 30 0.9% 3,174

Passed E-tray 897 81.1% 199 18.0% 10 0.9% 1,106

Interview Stages




Economists

Total


Applications 1,136 95.6% 47 4.0% 5 0.4% 1,188

Sift Stages

Application Assessment 1,009 95.7% 42 4.0% 3 0.3% 1,054

Interview Stages



Passed Economic Assessment Centre 258 94.9% 14 5.1% 0 0.0% 272




Non-respondentsDisabledNon-Disabled

DisabledNon-Disabled Non-respondents

DisabledNon-Disabled Non-respondents


12/23

Statisticians

Total


Applications 627 94.3% 33 5.0% 5 0.8% 665

Sift Stages





Interview Stages




Completed E-Tray 61 89.7% 6 8.8% 1 1.5% 68

Passed E-Tray 61 89.7% 6 8.8% 1 1.5% 68





Total


Applications 475 94.4% 25 5.0% 3 0.6% 503

Sift Stages



Completed E-Tray 103 92.0% 9 8.0% 0 0.0% 112

Passed E-Tray 89 90.8% 9 9.2% 0 0.0% 98

Interview Stages







Non-Disabled Disabled Non-respondents

Disabled Non-respondentsNon-Disabled


13/23

Section B performance of disabled/non-disabled at each stage




Number

Success rate

(as % of non-

disabled

applicants)

Number

Success rate

(as % of

disabled

applicants)

Number

Success rate

(as % of non-

respondent

applicants)

Number

Success rate

(as % of total

applicants)

Applications 14,091 - 697 - 123 - 14,911 -


Individual Schemes


Number

Success rate

(as % of non-

disabled

applicants)

Number

Success rate

(as % of

disabled

applicants)

Number

Success rate

(as % of non-

respondent

applicants)

Number

Success rate

(as % of total

applicants)

Applications 11,853 - 592 - 110 - 12,555 -

Sift Stages

Completed Online Test 10,137 85.5% 179 30.2% 84 76.4% 10,400 82.8%

Passed Online Test 3,108 26.2% 34 5.7% 32 29.1% 3,174 25.3%

Invited to E-tray 3,028 25.5% 398 67.2% 31 28.2% 3,457 27.5%

Attended E-tray 2,799 23.6% 345 58.3% 30 27.3% 3,174 25.3%

Passed E-tray 897 7.6% 199 33.6% 10 9.1% 1,106 8.8%

Interview Stages




Economists

Number

Success rate

(as % of non-

disabled

applicants)

Number

Success rate

(as % of

disabled

applicants)

Number

Success rate

(as % of non-

respondent

applicants)

Number

Success rate

(as % of total

applicants)

Applications 1,136 - 47 - 5 - 1,188 -

Sift Stages

Application Assessment 1,009 88.8% 42 89.4% 3 60.0% 1,054 88.7%

Interview Stages



Passed Economic Assessment Centre 258 22.7% 14 29.8% 0 0.0% 272 22.9%Invited to Fast Stream Assessment Centre 253 22.3% 14 29.8% 0 0.0% 267 22.5%



Non-Disabled Non-respondents Total

Total

Total

Non-respondents

DisabledNon-Disabled

DisabledNon-Disabled

Non-respondents

Disabled


14/23

Statisticians

Number

Success rate

(as % of non-

disabled

applicants)

Number

Success rate

(as % of

disabled

applicants)

Number

Success rate

(as % of non-

respondent

applicants)


applicants)

Applications 627 - 33 - 5 - 665 -

Sift Stages





Interview Stages


Attended Statistical Assessment Centre 138 22.0% 10 30.3% 1 20.0% 149 22.4%

Passed Statitical Assessment Centre 68 10.8% 6 18.2% 1 20.0% 75 11.3%

Completed E-Tray 61 9.7% 6 18.2% 1 20.0% 68 10.2%

Passed E-Tray 61 9.7% 6 18.2% 1 20.0% 68 10.2%





Number

Success rate

(as % of non-

disabled

applicants)

Number

Success rate

(as % of

disabled

applicants)

Number

Success rate

(as % of non-

respondent

applicants)

Number

Success rate

(as % of total

applicants)

Applications 475 - 25 - 3 - 503 -

Sift Stages

Completed On-Line Test 385 81.1% 11 44.0% 1 33.3% 397 78.9%


Completed E-Tray 103 21.7% 9 36.0% 0 0.0% 112 22.3%

Passed E-Tray 89 18.7% 9 36.0% 0 0.0% 98 19.5%

Interview Stages







Non-Disabled Disabled Non-respondents Total

DisabledNon-Disabled Non-respondents Total


15/23

Fast Stream Recruitment Report Analysis by University of First Degree

ApplicantsSuccessful

Candidates ApplicantsSuccessful




Candidates

University of Aberdeen 80 1 10 4 3 1 94 5 5.3%

University of Abertay 9 2 11 0 0.0%

Anglia Ruskin University 16 1 1 18 0 0.0%

Aston University 59 7 5 8 79 0 0.0%

University of Bath 145 2 26 9 6 1 4 1 181 13 7.2%

Bath Spa University 10 10 0 0.0%

University of Bedfordshire 11 2 1 14 0 0.0%

University of Birmingham 309 6 26 1 13 2 10 1 358 10 2.8%

Birmingham City University 20 8 1 28 1 3.6%

University College Birmingham 3 3 0 0.0%

Bishop Grosseteste UniversityCollege

1 1 0 0.0%

University of Bolton 9 1 2 3 15 0 0.0%

Bournemouth University 18 3 21 0 0.0%

The Arts University College at

Bournemouth1 1 0 0.0%

University of Bradford 24 7 1 2 34 0 0.0%

University of Brighton 42 5 3 50 0 0.0%

University of Bristol 343 15 28 6 13 1 6 1 390 23 5.9%

Brunel University 84 2 21 3 8 8 1 121 6 5.0%

Buckinghamshire New University 6 2 1 9 0 0.0%

University of Cambridge 706 51 33 8 18 2 4 761 61 8.0%

Canterbury Christ Church University 21 1 1 23 0 0.0%

Cardiff University 219 14 1 15 1 7 255 2 0.8%

University of Central Lancashire 36 3 1 8 1 1 48 2 4.2%

Central School of Speech and Drama 3 3 0 0.0%

University of Chester 17 2 1 20 0 0.0%

University of Chichester 4 1 5 0 0.0%

City University 49 1 10 3 7 69 1 1.4%

Conservatoi re for Dance and Drama 1 1 0 0.0%

Coventry University 40 9 2 1 52 0 0.0%

University for the Creative Arts 2 2 0 0.0%

University of Cumbria 2 2 0 0.0%

De Montfort University 41 1 1 2 2 46 1 2.2%

University of Derby 16 1 3 3 22 1 4.5%

University of Dundee 41 7 2 3 53 0 0.0%

Durham University 588 33 20 6 24 2 14 1 646 42 6.5%

University of East Anglia 138 5 13 2 4 5 160 7 4.4%

University of East London 27 3 3 3 36 0 0.0%

Edge Hill University 4 1 5 0 0.0%

University of Edinburgh 318 19 24 4 13 12 367 23 6.3%

University of Essex 83 19 2 13 5 120 2 1.7%

University

GFS Economists Statisticians TiB Total OverallSuccess

Rate


16/23


CandidatesApplicants

Successful


Successful


Successful


Successful

Candidates

University of Exeter 238 2 20 1 5 2 265 3 1.1%

University College Falmouth 3 3 0 0.0%

University of Glamorgan 23 4 2 29 0 0.0%

University of Glasgow 187 3 17 4 9 4 217 7 3.2%

Glasgow Caledonian University 21 2 5 3 31 0 0.0%

University of Gloucestershire 9 9 0 0.0%

University of Greenwich 46 7 5 7 65 0 0.0%

Heriot-Watt University 19 9 1 5 2 35 1 2.9%

University of Hertfordshire 44 6 1 9 5 64 1 1.6%

University of Huddersfield 23 3 2 28 0 0.0%

University of Hull 87 1 6 1 4 6 103 2 1.9%

Keele University 98 2 4 4 4 110 2 1.8%

University of Kent 198 4 12 1 12 6 228 5 2.2%

Kingston University 86 13 5 6 110 0 0.0%

Lancaster University 166 4 6 6 7 185 4 2.2%

University of Leeds 415 12 14 5 12 1 14 455 18 4.0%

Leeds Metropolitan University 30 1 2 4 1 36 2 5.6%

Leeds Trinity University College 7 1 8 0 0.0%

University of Leicester 134 2 14 2 7 5 160 4 2.5%

University of Lincoln 29 1 30 0 0.0%

University of Liverpool 198 6 8 2 8 6 220 8 3.6%

Liverpool Hope University 8 1 9 0 0.0%

Liverpool John Moores University 50 1 3 5 59 0 0.0%

London Metropolitan University 76 12 13 6 107 0 0.0%

University of London

Birkbeck College 23 1 5 2 3 1 32 3 9.4%

Courtauld Institute of Art 5 5 0 0.0%

Goldsmiths College 44 3 3 50 0 0.0%

Heythrop College 13 1 14 0 0.0%

Imperial College London 85 5 8 1 8 2 101 8 7.9%

King's College London 230 7 1 11 1 13 255 8 3.1%

London Business School 1 1 0 0.0%

London School of Economics and

Political Science

Queen Mary 138 2 13 11 10 172 2 1.2%

Royal Holloway 121 4 15 4 2 1 8 146 9 6.2%

Royal Veterinary College 2 2 0 0.0%

School of Oriental and African

Studies

University College London 315 14 26 3 8 1 12 361 18 5.0%

Unspecified 31 1 6 37 1 2.7%

University of the Arts, London 10 10 0 0.0%

11 10 1 2 209 22 10.5%

4.1%4971120376

University

GFS Economists

157 10 40

Statisticians TiB Total OverallSuccess

Rate


17/23



Successful


Successful


Successful


Successful

Candidates

Loughborough University 87 14 1 2 2 105 1 1.0%

University of Manchester 428 11 39 8 12 1 7 486 20 4.1%

Manchester Metropolitan University 64 6 2 3 75 0 0.0%

University College of St. Mark & St .

John2 2 0 0.0%

Middlesex University 43 4 4 4 1 55 1 1.8%

Napier University 10 10 0 0.0%

University of Newcastle Upon Tyne 229 7 2 12 4 252 2 0.8%

Newman University College 1 1 0 0.0%

Northampton 8 1 1 1 11 0 0.0%

Northumbria University 76 1 1 14 1 4 95 2 2.1%

Norwich University College of the

Arts1 1 0 0.0%

University of Nottingham 496 18 39 12 15 14 1 564 31 5.5%

Nottingham Trent University 85 3 1 89 0 0.0%

Open University 47 3 5 1 10 1 4 66 5 7.6%

Open University in Wales 1 1 0 0.0%

Oxford University 831 83 45 18 16 1 8 2 900 104 11.6%

Oxford Brookes University 61 1 4 1 6 8 79 2 2.5%

University of Plymouth 70 2 6 3 81 0 0.0%

University of Portsmouth 60 5 1 7 3 75 1 1.3%

Queen Margaret University 4 4 0 0.0%

Queen's University Belfast 84 3 8 5 9 106 3 2.8%

Ravensbourne College of Design &

Communication2 2 0 0.0%

University of Reading 162 2 13 12 5 192 2 1.0%

Robert Gordon University 3 1 4 0 0.0%

Roehampton University 14 14 0 0.0%

Royal Agricultural College 1 1 0 0.0%

Royal College of Music 1 1 0 0.0%

Royal Northern College of Music 3 1 4 0 0.0%

University of Salford 29 1 1 3 34 0 0.0%

University of Sheffield 368 7 37 7 11 14 2 430 16 3.7%

Sheffield Hallam University 50 1 1 3 55 0 0.0%

South Bank University 23 4 8 35 0 0.0%

University of Southampton 190 2 14 2 8 1 10 1 222 6 2.7%

Southampton Solent University 19 1 20 0 0.0%

University of St Andrews 186 10 9 6 12 213 10 4.7%

St. Mary's University College 3 3 0 0.0%

Staffordshire University 14 3 3 1 21 0 0.0%

Stirling University 31 15 2 2 50 0 0.0%

University of Strathclyde 83 13 2 9 1 106 2 1.9%

University Campus Suffolk 1 1 0 0.0%

University

GFS Economists Statisticians OverallSuccess

Rate

TiB Total


18/23



Successful


Successful


Successful


Successful

Candidates

University of Sunderland 8 1 2 11 0 0.0%

University of Surrey 47 2 19 9 1 3 78 3 3.8%

University of Sussex 139 4 25 2 11 1 6 181 7 3.9%

University of Teesside 9 9 0 0.0%

Thames Valley University 10 1 11 0 0.0%

Trinity Laban Conservatoire of Music

& Dance2 2 0 0.0%

UHI Millennium Institute 1 1 0 0.0%

University of Ulster 42 1 2 4 1 49 1 2.0%

University of Wales

Aberystwyth 103 2 7 1 5 1 116 3 2.6%

Bangor 31 3 1 2 36 1 2.8%

Swansea 7 2 3 1 13 0 0.0%

Unspecified 111 11 3 2 127 0 0.0%

University of Warwick 343 11 48 13 15 2 11 1 417 27 6.5%

University of the West of England 72 2 11 1 5 5 93 3 3.2%

University of the West of Scotland 5 1 1 1 8 0 0.0%

University of Westminster 82 11 8 3 104 0 0.0%

University of Winchester 8 1 9 0 0.0%

University of Wolverhampton 34 1 4 39 0 0.0%

University of Worcester 4 4 0 0.0%

Writtle College 2 2 0 0.0%

University of York 304 12 29 2 19 1 6 2 358 17 4.7%

York St. John University 2 1 3 0 0.0%

Overseas 275 6 152 15 47 2 24 498 23 4.6%

Not stated 52 2 20 1 7 5 1 84 4 4.8%

Grand Total 12,555 403 1,188 176 665 29 503 21 14,911 629 4.2%

University

GFS Economists Statisticians TiB Total OverallSuccess

Rate


19/23

Fast Stream Recruitment Report Analysis by Degree Type



Successful


Successful


Successful


Successful

Candidates

Allied Medicine 40 1 0 3 1 44 1 2.3%

Architecture 31 1 1 3 35 1 2.9%

Biological Sciences 668 16 3 1 44 3 30 745 20 2.7%

Business 631 3 34 1 50 2 49 4 764 10 1.3%

Creative Arts 224 4 2 1 14 1 241 5 2.1%

Economics 627 21 984 134 101 4 26 2 1,738 161 9.3%

Education 40 3 1 44 0 0.0%

Engineering 286 9 4 1 18 50 2 358 12 3.4%

Financial 84 16 12 4 116 0 0.0%

Humanities 3,881 173 15 4 21 1 60 4 3,977 182 4.6%

Languages 1,093 39 3 2 3 12 2 1,111 43 3.9%

Librarian 6 6 0 0.0%

Mathematical Science 344 9 14 1 218 13 23 599 23 3.8%

Medicine & Dentistry 29 2 1 1 31 2 6.5%

Multi Discipline 631 22 31 10 18 1 19 1 699 34 4.9%

Physical Sciences 646 11 5 2 48 1 45 2 744 16 2.2%

Social Science 3,151 92 75 20 115 4 66 1 3,407 117 3.4%

Technology 134 1 9 98 2 242 2 0.8%

Veterinary Sciences 9 1 10 0 0.0%

Total 12,555 403 1,188 176 665 29 503 21 14,911 629 4.2%

Degree Type

Total Overall

Success

Rate

GFS Economists Statisticians TiB


20/23

Diversity Trends in the whole Fast Stream

(i.e. all Fast Stream schemes combined)Gender

Number % of total Number % of total Number % of total Number % of total Number % of total Number % of total

2009 585 8,333 55.9% 6,489 43.5% 89 0.6% 14,911 357 56.8% 269 42.8% 3 0.5% 629

2008 552 7,981 55.1% 6,444 44.5% 69 0.5% 14,494 292 51.2% 275 48.2% 3 0.5% 570

2007 427 7,343 53.9% 6,229 45.7% 47 0.3% 13,619 208 54.7% 171 45.0% 1 0.3% 380

2006 469 7,637 54.8% 6,246 44.8% 62 0.4% 13,945 233 48.9% 240 50.4% 3 0.6% 476

2005 497 7,376 56.9% 5,508 42.5% 73 0.6% 12,957 280 55.6% 220 43.7% 4 0.8% 504

2004 507 5,255 61.1% 3,343 38.9% .. .. *8,598 273 58.5% 194 41.5% .. .. 467

2003 546 10,676 53.3% 9,356 46.7% .. .. 20,032 256 50.2% 254 49.8% .. .. 510

2002 509 7,181 50.1% 7,147 49.9% .. .. 14,328 197 47.9% 214 52.1% .. .. 411

2001 512 6,175 52.4% 5,602 47.6% .. .. 11,777 204 48.5% 217 51.5% .. .. 421

2000 560 7,487 52.0% 6,922 48.0% .. .. 14,409 223 52.3% 203 47.7% .. .. 426

1999 445 5,220 53.2% 4,594 46.8% .. .. 9,814 153 50.0% 153 50.0% .. .. 306

1998 367 4,931 54.6% 4,106 45.4% .. .. 9,037 144 61.3% 91 38.7% .. .. 235

Ethnic Origin


2009 585 11,932 80.0% 2,724 18.3% 255 1.7% 14,911 550 87.4% 67 10.7% 12 1.9% 629

2008 552 12,092 83.4% 2,159 14.9% 243 1.7% 14,494 505 88.6% 53 9.3% 12 2.1% 570

2007 427 11,625 85.4% 1,838 13.5% 156 1.1% 13,619 339 89.2% 36 9.5% 5 1.3% 380

2006 469 11,849 85.0% 1,912 13.7% 184 1.3% 13,945 416 87.4% 53 11.1% 7 1.5% 476

2005 497 10,857 83.8% 1,937 14.9% 163 1.3% 12,957 461 91.5% 36 7.1% 7 1.4% 504

2004 507 7,140 83.0% 1,259 14.6% 199 2.3% *8,598 428 91.6% 25 5.4% 14 3.0% 467

2003 546 15,702 78.4% 3,275 16.3% 1,055 5.3% 20,032 455 89.2% 40 7.8% 15 2.9% 510

2002 509 11,671 81.5% 2,432 17.0% 225 1.6% 14,328 363 88.3% 40 9.7% 8 2.0% 411

2001 512 9,683 82.2% 1,941 16.5% 153 1.3% 11,777 383 90.9% 32 7.6% 6 1.4% 421

2000 560 12,076 83.8% 2,154 15.0% 179 1.2% 14,409 392 92.0% 29 6.8% 5 1.2% 426

1999 445 8,412 85.7% 1,296 13.2% 106 1.1% 9,814 287 93.8% 18 5.9% 1 0.3% 306

1998 367 7,884 87.2% 1,098 12.2% 55 0.6% 9,037 226 96.2% 8 3.4% 1 0.4% 235

Total Total

TotalEthnic Minority Non-respondent

Competition Vacancies Male Female

Competition Vacancies WhiteWhite

Non-respondent Non-respondentMale Female

Ethnic Minority Non-respondent

Applications

Applications

Total




21/23

* The fall in 2004 reflects the introduction of online self-assessment, which has proved an effective mechanism for discouraging unrealistic applications. Since then,

an application is deemed to have been submitted only if the applicant has completed the self-assessment and proceeds to take the online tests.

University of First Degree

Number % of total Number % of total Number % of total Number % of total

2009 585 13,250 88.9% 1,661 11.1% 14,911 464 73.8% 165 26.2% 629

2008 552 12,714 87.7% 1,780 12.3% 14,494 404 70.9% 166 29.1% 570

2007 427 11,945 87.7% 1,674 12.3% 13,619 261 68.7% 119 31.3% 380

2006 469 12,216 87.6% 1,729 12.4% 13,945 328 68.9% 148 31.1% 476

2005 497 11,353 87.6% 1,604 12.4% 12,957 354 70.2% 150 29.8% 504

2004 507 7,216 83.9% 1,382 16.1% *8,598 300 64.2% 167 35.8% 467

2003 546 18,214 90.9% 1,818 9.1% 20,032 328 64.3% 182 35.7% 510

2002 509 13,122 91.6% 1,206 8.4% 14,328 298 72.5% 113 27.5% 411

2001 512 10,846 92.1% 931 7.9% 11,777 303 72.0% 118 28.0% 421

2000 560 13,289 92.2% 1,120 7.8% 14,409 289 67.8% 137 32.2% 426

1999 445 8,880 90.5% 934 9.5% 9,814 214 69.9% 92 30.1% 306

1998 367 8,142 90.1% 895 9.9% 9,037 154 65.5% 81 34.5% 235

Non-Oxbridge OxbridgeCompetition Vacancies

Applications

Total


TotalOxbridgeNon-Oxbridge

Disability

Number % of t otal Number % of total Number % of total Number % of total Number % of tot al Number % of total

2009 585 14,091 94.5% 697 4.7% 123 0.8% 14,911 532 84.6% 92 14.6% 5 0.8% 629

2008 552 13,633 94.1% 738 5.1% 123 0.8% 14,494 490 86.0% 72 12.6% 8 1.4% 570

2007 427 13,132 96.4% 486 3.6% 1 0.0% 13,619 347 91.3% 33 8.7% 0 0.0% 380

2006 469 13,502 96.8% 356 2.6% 87 0.6% 13,945 438 92.0% 35 7.4% 3 0.6% 476

2005 497 12,546 96.8% 323 2.5% 88 0.7% 12,957 466 92.5% 34 6.7% 4 0.8% 504

2004 507 8,324 96.8% 274 3.2% .. .. *8,598 433 92.7% 34 7.3% .. .. 467

2003 546 19,550 97.6% 482 2.4% .. .. 20,032 492 96.5% 18 3.5% .. .. 510

2002 509 14,061 98.1% 267 1.9% .. .. 14,328 395 96.1% 16 3.9% .. .. 411

2001 512 11,510 97.7% 267 2.3% .. .. 11,777 409 97.1% 12 2.9% .. .. 421

2000 560 14,210 98.6% 199 1.4% .. .. 14,409 418 98.1% 8 1.9% .. .. 426

1999 445 9,627 98.1% 187 1.9% .. .. 9,814 299 97.7% 7 2.3% .. .. 306

1998 367 8,875 98.2% 162 1.8% .. .. 9,037 223 94.9% 12 5.1% .. .. 235

Total

Recommende d for Appointment

Competition Vacancies Non-Disabled Disabled Non-respondent Non-respondentNon-Disabled Disabled

Applications

Total


22/23

Diversity Trends in the Graduate Fast Stream onlyGender

Number % of total Number % of total Number % of total Number % of t ot al Number % of total Number % of t ot al

2009 351 6,816 54.3% 5,662 45.1% 77 0.6% 12,555 205 50.9% 195 48.4% 3 0.7% 403

2008 313 5,307 53.1% 4,650 46.5% 43 0.4% 10,000 176 46.8% 198 52.7% 2 0.5% 376

2007 211 4,804 52.1% 4,383 47.5% 32 0.3% 9,219 129 51.8% 119 47.8% 1 0.4% 249

2006 219 5,004 52.9% 4,414 46.7% 38 0.4% 9,456 136 41.7% 188 57.7% 2 0.6% 326

2005 273 4,523 55.3% 3,607 44.1% 49 0.6% 8,179 185 55.1% 148 44.0% 3 0.9% 336

2004 255 3,934 59.9% 2,630 40.1% .. .. *6,564 167 55.5% 134 44.5% .. .. 301

2003 304 9,204 52.1% 8,455 47.9% .. .. 17,659 162 45.0% 198 55.0% .. .. 360

2002 251 5,473 49.2% 5,659 50.8% .. .. 11,132 111 43.4% 145 56.6% .. .. 256

2001 272 4,786 51.4% 4,530 48.6% .. .. 9,316 138 45.8% 163 54.2% .. .. 301

2000 254 5,720 51.0% 5,491 49.0% .. .. 11,211 139 50.7% 135 49.3% .. .. 274

1999 189 3,798 52.3% 3,461 47.7% .. .. 7,259 81 45.3% 98 54.7% .. .. 179

1998 180 3,575 54.2% 3,020 45.8% .. .. 6,595 76 55.9% 60 44.1% .. .. 136

Ethnic Origin

Number % of total Number % of total Number % of total Number % of t ot al Number % of total Number % of t ot al

2009 351 10,371 82.6% 1,967 15.7% 217 1.7% 12,555 364 90.3% 29 7.2% 10 2.5% 403

2008 313 8,436 84.4% 1,412 14.1% 152 1.5% 10,000 341 90.7% 25 6.6% 10 2.7% 376

2007 211 7,920 85.9% 1,184 12.8% 115 1.2% 9,219 230 92.4% 14 5.6% 5 2.0% 249

2006 219 8,105 85.7% 1,227 13.0% 124 1.3% 9,456 297 91.1% 24 7.4% 5 1.5% 326

2005 273 6,974 85.3% 1,100 13.4% 105 1.3% 8,179 318 94.6% 12 3.6% 6 1.8% 336

2004 255 5,600 85.3% 808 12.3% 156 2.4% *6,564 284 94.4% 8 2.7% 9 3.0% 301

2003 304 13,862 78.5% 2,811 15.9% 986 5.6% 17,659 333 92.5% 16 4.4% 11 3.1% 360

2002 251 9,235 83.0% 1,752 15.7% 145 1.3% 11,132 236 92.2% 19 7.4% 1 0.4% 256

2001 272 7,808 83.8% 1,389 14.9% 119 1.3% 9,316 278 92.3% 18 6.0% 5 1.7% 301

2000 254 9,510 84.8% 1,558 13.9% 143 1.3% 11,211 252 92.0% 17 6.2% 5 1.8% 274

1999 189 6,293 86.6% 875 12.1% 91 1.3% 7,259 174 97.2% 4 2.2% 1 0.6% 1791998 180 5,836 88.5% 721 10.9% 38 0.6% 6,595 131 96.3% 4 2.9% 1 0.8% 136

Non-respondent


Non-respondent Male Female

Vacancies White Ethnic Minority

Competition Vacancies Male Female

Non-respondentCompetition Non-respondent

Applications

Total

Applications

Total


Total


Total


23/23

* The fall in 2004 reflects the introduction of online self-assessment, which has proved an effective mechanism for discouraging unrealistic applications. Since then,

an application is deemed to have been submitted only if the applicant has completed the self-assessment and proceeds to take the online tests.

University of First Degree

Number % of total Number % of total Number % of total Number % of total

2009 351 11,018 87.8% 1,537 12.2% 12,555 269 66.7% 134 33.3% 403

2008 313 8,627 86.3% 1,373 13.7% 10,000 239 63.6% 137 36.4% 376

2007 211 7,951 86.2% 1,268 13.8% 9,219 150 60.2% 99 39.8% 249

2006 219 8,159 86.3% 1,297 13.7% 9,456 199 61.0% 127 39.0% 326

2005 273 6,998 85.6% 1,181 14.4% 8,179 212 63.1% 124 36.9% 336

2004 255 5,327 81.2% 1,237 18.8% *6,564 163 54.2% 138 45.8% 301

2003 304 15,979 90.5% 1,680 9.5% 17,659 208 57.8% 152 42.2% 360

2002 251 10,079 90.5% 1,053 9.5% 11,132 165 64.5% 91 35.5% 256

2001 272 8,471 90.9% 845 9.1% 9,316 204 67.8% 97 32.2% 301

2000 254 10,221 91.2% 990 8.8% 11,211 163 59.5% 111 40.5% 274

1999 189 6,427 88.5% 832 11.5% 7,259 108 60.3% 71 39.7% 179

1998 180 5,801 88.0% 794 12.0% 6,595 69 50.7% 67 49.3% 136

Competition Vacancies Non-Oxbridge Oxbridge Non-Oxbridge Oxbridge

Applications Recommended for Appointment

Total Total

Disability


2009 351 11,853 94.4% 592 4.7% 110 0.9% 12,555 324 80.4% 75 18.6% 4 1.0% 403

2008 313 9,409 94.1% 510 5.1% 81 0.8% 10,000 311 82.7% 61 16.2% 4 1.1% 376

2007 211 8,879 96.3% 340 3.7% 0 0.0% 9,219 219 88.0% 30 12.0% 0 0.0% 249

2006 219 9,160 96.9% 241 2.5% 55 0.6% 9,456 292 89.6% 32 9.8% 2 0.6% 326

2005 273 7,913 96.7% 215 2.6% 51 0.6% 8,179 303 90.2% 30 8.9% 3 0.9% 336

2004 255 6,332 96.5% 232 3.5% .. .. *6,564 274 91.0% 27 9.0% .. .. 301

2003 304 17,233 97.6% 426 2.4% .. .. 17,659 346 96.1% 14 3.9% .. .. 360

2002 251 10,919 98.1% 213 1.9% .. .. 11,132 244 95.3% 12 4.7% .. .. 256

2001 272 9,117 97.9% 199 2.1% .. .. 9,316 289 96.0% 12 4.0% .. .. 301

2000 254 11,042 98.5% 169 1.5% .. .. 11,211 268 97.8% 6 2.2% .. .. 274

1999 189 7,119 98.1% 140 1.9% .. .. 7,259 172 96.1% 7 3.9% .. .. 179

1998 180 6,474 98.2% 121 7.8% .. .. 6,595 133 94.9% 3 5.1% .. .. 136

Non-respondentCompetition Vacancies Non-Disabled Disabled Non-respondentNon-Disabled Disabled

Applications Recommended for Appointment

Total Total

Documents

Breakdown of CSFS 2009 Results