Upload
rahul-vatsyayan
View
3.827
Download
5
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Brand Audit
Presented By:Rahul Vatsayan (08DM031)
Rajan Jha (08DM032)Kushan Kumar(08DM018)
INTRODUCTION
Brand Audit Behavioral and Psychological nature of Brand Equity
Provides a look on current Brand Equity status
Provides an insight into marketing and advertising efforts and future requirements
Levis Strauss Established in 1853 by Levi Strauss
A premium brand in apparel segment operating globally
Headquartered at San Fransisco with total Employee Base of 10,000+
Levis Product & Brand Portfolio
DENIM PANTS NON-DENIM PANTS
SHIRTS JACKETS OTHER
LEVI’S DOCKERS DOCKERS LEVI’S SIGNATURE
LEVI’S 501 LEVI’S SIGNATURE
LEVI’S SIGNATURE
LEVI’S ENGINEERED JEANSOTHER
PRODUCT PORTFOLIO
Bran
d P
ortf
olio
EXTERNAL MARKETING ENVIRONMENT
Demographic Environment Focuses more on mature generation Does not position itself as a brand for fashion statement
Social Environment
Classification of Customers (%)
Liberated Youngsters 13
Modern Customers 18
Behind the times 20
Rebellious Youngsters 22
Orthodox Customers 27
EXTERNAL MARKETING ENVIRONMENT
Technological Environment Levis focuses on internet advertising
Levis has enhanced its distribution network through Electronic Data Interchange (EDI)
Levis Value Delivery Network Enables coordinated supply of fabric to retailers and suppliers
Focus on achieving global scope efficiency through decentralization and centralization
SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS
Levis is approaching to saturation in the Jeans Market
Development of markets distribution and sales technology has caused loss of market share
Levis biggest challenege is to cater changing consumer tastes and competition in lower and high end brands
Levis has come up with new engineered jeans and Levis 501 in response to above challenges
COMPETITOR ANALYSIS
5 Force Analysis
PRODUCT LIFECYCLE
1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 20100
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
PRODUCT LIFE CYCLE: LEVI STRAUSS & CO. Ltd
TOTAL SALES
YEAR
TOTA
L SAL
ES ()
$MILL
ION
)
Data Source : www.levis.com
PRODUCT LIFECYCLE ANALYSIS
MARKET PENETRATION
Aggressive Sales Promotion
EMI Based Pricing Increased Advertising Spending Increased exclusive stores
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
Product Innovation
Big Pocket Jeans New Engineered Jeans 501
MARKET DEVELOPMENT
Enhanced Distribution Channels
DIVERSIFICATION
Footwear and Accessories
PRODUCT
PRESENT NEW
M
A
R
K
E
T
PRE
SEN
TN
EW
Levis Distribution Channel Management
Retail Outlet Status 500 outlets at prime locations in India Current Space: 1 million sq feet 3000 shades and design Accessories includes : Footwear/ Eye gear/ Caps/ Belts/ Wallets/ Carry
bags
Marketing Channels Focus on retail relationship
Segments Identified Trend Initiators Trend Influencer Early adopters Traditional Value driven
Selective but Intensive distribution level for distribution
Levis Pricing
LEVI'S REDLOOP, ( Trend Initiators) > Rs 8000 onwardsLEVI'S VINTAGE
PREMIUM SPECIAL EDITION (Trend Influencers) 5500 – 8000
LEVI TYPE 1, PURE BLUE, (Early Adopters) 3000 - 5500ENGINEERED JEANS, SILVER TAB
RED TAB (Traditional) 1500 - 3000
LEVI STRAUSS SIGNATURE (Value Driven) < 1200
Levis Pricing: Recent Development
Plans to focus on lower and high end by vacating the middle price segment
Premium segment will see a price rise of 15% in average pricing
Local brands entry and low growth compelled levis to vacate the middle price segment (Spykar, Killer, Wrangler)
Levis Promotion
The “TWIST” Campaign
The “ ODYSSEY” Campaign
CSR Activity with Levis Strauss Foundation
SWOT Analysis
STRENGTHS HistoryBrand nameFinance and access to international capitalManagementExpertise in the jeans industry (R&D)Distribution channels & global sourcing
WEAKNESSES High costs of brand protectionLack of control over quality (licensing)Lack of control over distribution decisions (retailers pressure to stop selling on the web)
OPPORTUNITIES: Arising of new market segmentsTechnological development lower production and coordination activitiesLow manufacturing and production costs in international marketsDevelopment in other industries such as electronic (MP3 PLAYER) could pose new opportunities for complementing new LEVI’S productsTotal market for casual wear is growing
THREATS Saturation of the jeans marketCompetition from products of the higher end of the market Economic downturns in some countriesFast changes in the consumer tastesLocal regulations on the advertisements in countries like India, chinaLack of protection of property rights Increase in the local competition
SWOT Analysis
Research Methodology
Research objectives
-Accessing the strength of brand equity(awareness/preference, effects of price)
- Core loyalty
- Profiling the brand users
- Brand image ownership (attributes, subjective considerations, emotions associated with the brand)
- Brand attitude
Study Results
DESCRIBING SURVEY RESPONDENTS
AVERAGE AGE 24.29
OCCUPATION
STUDENT 57
JOB 35
OWNED BUSINESS 08
USER TYPE
CONSERVATIVE 50
OUTGOING 23.52
CUTTING EDGE 38.23
AVERAGE INCOME 21,308.83
BRAND AWARENESS & SALIENCE
20 30 40 50 60 70 800
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
5046
3834
26
20
12
BRAND AWARENESS Vs. Top of Mind Recall
LEVIS
SPYKAR
WRANGLER
TOMR FOR LEVI’S IS 38
TOMR FOR SPYKAR IS 26
TOMR FOR WRANGLER IS 20
BRAND PREFERENCE
6227
11
BRAND PREFERENCE
SPYKARWRANGLERLEE
Results suggest: perceived alternatives to Levi'sSpyKar, wrangler, lee are the preferred alternatives
Profiling: Brand Usage
8
4639
7
BRAND USAGE
ALWAYSSOMETIMESON SPL. OCCASIONSNEVER
LEVI’S can be considered as a ‘young brand’ as average age of users is 2550% of the users are ‘outgoing’ customersUsers have enough purchasing power as average income is nearly 20,000Levi’s is considered as clothing for special occasions which represents its equity
Price Elasticity
72
28
upside elasticity
yesno
3862
downside elasticity
yesno
Results
Levi’s possesses a higher upside elasticity as compared to downside elasticityPerceived equity of the brand is representedDifference between upside and downside elasticity is positive (72-62=10)Sales do not drop much if price is increased
Choice & Brand Equity
36.67
22.82
25.17
18.26
CUSTOMER TRADE-OFF
BRAND NAMEDESIGNPRICEFABRIC QUALITY/FIT
RESULTS
Brand name plays the most important role in customer buying process‘Part worth’ of each of the variables is clearly explained
Brand Image Ownership
32.35
35.295.88
29.41
CUSTOMER ASSOCIATION WITH LEVI'S
TRENDY DENIMWEARGOOD PRODUCT QUALITYECONOMICALHIGH-END DEN-IMWEAR
RESULTS:Customers consider Levi's as a brand with good product quality majorly(35.29)These enables us to paint a good picture of how customers ‘see’ Levi's as a brand.
Brand Attitude
Importance of benefits/benefit claims to customers: (% of respondents)
Benefits essential Desirable Not required
Brand name 52.94 44.11 5.88
Design/style 47.058 44.11 11.76
Price 41.17 47.058 14.70
Product quality 61.76 35.29 5.88
Comparative Analysis : Brand Name
BRANDS DELIVERS BENEFIT
OKAY JOB DOES NOT DELIVER
LEVI’S 50 29.41 20.58
SPYKAR 47.05 41.17 14.70
WRANGLER 26.47 50 26.48
LEE 47.05 29.41 23.52
RESULTS:Levi’s is the leader in delivering the brand name benefit20.58% of respondents feel Levi's does not deliver benefit Only 14.70% of respondents feel that SpyKar does not deliver benefit at all
Comparative Analysis :Design/Style
BRAND DELIVERS BENEFIT OKAY JOB DOES NOT DELIVER
LEVI’S 61.76 14.70 26.47
SPYKAR 23.52 52.94 26.47
WRANGLER 32.35 44.11 20.58
LEE 32.35 32.35 38.23
RESULTS:Levi’s again emerges to be a leader in delivering the design/style benefitOnly 20.58% of respondents say wrangler does not deliver the benefit at all as compared to levi’s 26.47%
Comparative Analysis: Price Benefit
BRAND DELIVERS BENEFIT OKAY JOB DOES NOT DELIVER
LEVI’S 47.05 29.41 23.52
SPYKAR 41.17 38.23 20.58
WRANGLER 26.47 41.17 32.35
LEE 29.41 32.35 41.17
LEVI’S is facing tough competition in this category as only 20.58% of respondents feel SpyKar does not deliver benefit as compared to 23.52% .
Comparative Analysis: Product Quality
BRAND DELIVERS BENEFIT OKAY JOB DOES NOT DELIVER
LEVI’S 52.94 20.58 29.41
SPYKAR 50 32.35 20.58
WRANGLER 29.41 41.17 32.35
LEE 35.29 26.47 41.17
Thank You