Bozeman Community Transportation Safety Plan · Bozeman Community Transportation Safety Plan ... CTSP Goal Next Steps 3 . MT Comprehensive Highway Safety Plan Developed through coordinated,

Transportation leadership you can trust.

presented to

presented by

Cambridge Systematics, Inc.

Bozeman Community Transportation

Safety Plan

Bozeman Transportation Safety

Advisory Committee – Meeting 1

October 16, 2012

Audrey Wennink

2

Project Team

Montana Department of Transportation

» Carol Strizich

» Pam Langve-Davis

Consultant Team from Cambridge Systematics, Inc.

» Audrey Wennink – Senior Analyst

» Sam Lawton – Project Manager

Agenda

Welcome and Introductions

Community Transportation Safety Planning (CTSP) Process Overview

Transportation Safety Advisory Committee (TSAC) Role & Responsibilities

TSAC Membership Discussion

Bozeman Crash Data Overview

Community Safety Issues Discussion

CTSP Vision

CTSP Goal

Next Steps

3

MT Comprehensive Highway Safety Plan

Developed through

coordinated,

comprehensive, data-

driven process

Designed to reduce

fatal and injury crashes

on MT roadways

12 Emphasis Areas

including urban area

crashes

4

Community Transportation Safety Plans

Target fatal and injury crashes based on locally identified

safety problems

Devise safety strategies that can be implemented at the local

level

Customize strategies based on local priorities, organizational

structures, programs, leadership

5

6

Purpose of Transportation Safety Plan

The Bozeman community seeks to develop a

multimodal Community Transportation Safety Plan

to document the area’s transportation safety issues

and identify a comprehensive set of strategies to

reduce the number and severity of traffic crashes.

Plan Development Process

7

Establish TSAC

Review Crash Data

Establish CTSP Goal

Identify Emphasis Areas

EA 1 EA 2 EA 3

Safety Strategies

Performance Measures

CTSP

Implementation

Implementation Responsibilities

8

Work Plan and Timeline (proposed)

Kickoff Meeting October 16, 2012

Select Emphasis Areas November

Identify Current Strategies/Plan Safety Summit

December

Safety Summit January

Draft Plan February

Final Plan March

//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/02/BozemanMainStreetEast2011.jpg

9

Transportation Safety Advisory Committee

(TSAC)

TSAC Draft Mission Statement

To provide guidance on the development of the

Community Transportation Safety Plan and

participate in and provide direction on plan

implementation.

10

TSAC Roles and Responsibilities

Attend committee meetings and the Transportation Safety

Summit

Review available data; identify data needs

Identify vision and goal

Determine priority safety emphasis areas

Review and finalize strategies, action steps, and performance measures

Identify lead agencies, organizations, and individuals to facilitate implementation

Approve and submit final plan to Bozeman for adoption

Support implementation of the Community Transportation Safety Plan

11

“ The 4 E’s of Safety”

Engineering

Education

Emergency Response

Enforcement

Potential TSAC Membership

School District

Administrators

Montana State University

Bozeman Public Works

Montana Department of

Transportation

Bozeman Police

Department

MT Highway Patrol

Buckle Up MT – Bozeman

Coordinator

Gallatin County DUI Task

Force

Safe Routes to School

Coordinator

Bozeman Deaconess

Hospital

HRDC/Streamline/Galavan

Others?

12

Crash Data

Crash Data Analysis Process

Behavior, e.g.

» Distracted

» Speeding

» Impaired

» Safety Belt Use

Infrastructure/Crash Types, e.g.

» Intersections

» Road departure

Demographics, e.g.

» Under 25

» 65 and older 14

Bozeman Crash Severity (2006-2010)

15

Source: MDT-Safety Management System, 2012

9 40 214

603

2,780

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

FA

TA

L

INC

APA

CIT

AT

ING

IN

JUR

Y

NO

N IN

CA

PA

CIT

AT

ING

INJU

RY

OT

HER

IN

JUR

Y

PR

OPER

TY

DA

MA

GE O

NLY

Crashes by Severity

BOZEMAN

Bozeman Crash Severity (2009-2011)

16


154

162

176

7 6 4

1 2 1 0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

2009 2010 2011

Non-severe Injury Crashes

Incapacitating Injury Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Behavior

Bozeman Injuries by Safety Device Use

(2006-2010)

18


0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

NO

NE U

SED

/ U

SED

IMPR

OPER

LY

PR

OPER

USE

HELM

ET

USE

D

REST

RA

INT

USE

UN

KN

OW

N

BOZEMAN COMPARISON COMMUNITIES

Bozeman Drivers by Impairment – All Crashes

(2006-2010)

19


0.0%

0.5%

1.0%

1.5%

2.0%

2.5%

3.0%

3.5%

4.0%

YES

(ALC

OH

OL

PR

ESE

NT

)

YES

(DR

UG

S

PR

ESE

NT

)

YES

(ALC

OH

OL

AN

D D

RU

GS

PR

ESE

NT

)

NO

T R

EPO

RT

ED

UN

KN

OW

N

NO

T S

TA

TED

Drivers by Impairment *


Bozeman Driver Contributing Circumstances

All Crashes – 2006-2010

20


0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

OT

HER

*(D

RIV

ER

)

DR

UG

S

ALC

OH

OL

FA

ILED

TO

YIE

LD

RIG

HT

OF W

AY

DIS

REG

AR

DED

TR

AFFIC

SIG

NS

EX

CEED

ED

ST

AT

ED

SPEED

LIM

IT

TO

O F

AST

FO

R C

ON

DIT

ION

S

MA

DE A

N IM

PR

OPER

TU

RN

WR

ON

G S

IDE O

R W

RO

NG

WA

Y

FO

LLO

WED

TO

O C

LO

SELY

IMPR

OPER

LA

NE C

HA

NG

E

IMPR

OPER

BA

CK

ING

OPER

AT

ION

IMPR

OPER

PA

SSIN

G

IMPR

OPER

SIG

NA

LS

IMPR

OPER

PA

RK

ING

FELL A

SLEEP, FA

INT

ED

ET

C.

LIC

. R

EST

. N

OT

CO

MPLIE

D

INA

TT

EN

TIV

E D

RIV

ING

CELL P

HO

NE

CA

RELESS

DR

IVIN

G


Demographics

Bozeman Drivers by Gender – All Crashes

(2006-2010)

22


0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

MA

LE

FEM

ALE

NO

T S

TA

TED


Bozeman Drivers by Age - All Crashes

(2006-2010)

23


0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

0 -

14 Y

RS

15 -

19 Y

RS

20 -

24 Y

RS

25 -

29 Y

RS

30 -

34 Y

RS

35 -

39 Y

RS

40 -

44 Y

RS

45 -

49 Y

RS

50 -

54 Y

RS

55 -

59 Y

RS

60 -

64 Y

RS

65 -

69 Y

RS

70 -

74 Y

RS

75+

YR

S

NO

T S

TA

TED


Crash Type

Bozeman Vehicles in a Crash by First Harmful

Event (2006-2010)

25

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

7.0%

OV

ER

TU

RN

FIR

E/E

XPLO

SIO

N

IMM

ER

SIO

N

JAC

KK

NIF

E

OT

HER

NO

NC

OLLIS

ION

PED

EST

RIA

N

PED

ALC

YC

LE

RA

ILW

AY

TR

AIN

MV

IN

TR

AN

SPO

RT

MV

IN

TR

AN

SPO

RT

ON

…

PA

RK

ED

MV

MV

AT

RR

XIN

G

WIL

D A

NIM

AL

DO

MEST

IC A

NIM

AL

OT

HER

OB

J. N

OT

FIX

ED

IMPA

CT

AT

TEN

UA

TO

R

BR

IDG

E/P

IER

/AB

UT

MEN

T

BR

IDG

E P

AR

APET

EN

D

BR

IDG

E R

AIL

GU

AR

DR

AIL

FA

CE

GU

AR

DR

AIL

EN

D

MED

IAN

BA

RR

IER

HW

Y. T

RA

FFIC

SIG

N P

OST

OV

ER

HEA

D S

IGN

SU

PPO

RT

LU

MIN

AIR

E/L

IGH

T S

UPPO

RT

UT

ILIT

Y P

OLE

OT

HER

PO

ST

CU

LV

ER

T

CU

RB

DIT

CH

EM

BA

NK

MEN

T

FEN

CE

MA

IL B

OX

TR

EE

OT

HER

FIX

ED

OB

JEC

T

RO

CK

OR

BO

ULD

ER

UN

KN

OW

N

Vehicle by First Harmful Event BOZEMAN COMPARISON COMMUNITIES


Other Factors

Bozeman Vehicle Type – All Crashes

(2006-2010)

27


0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

PA

SSEN

GER

CA

R

PIC

KU

P

VA

N

MIN

I V

AN

SUV

MO

TO

RH

OM

E

MO

TO

RC

YC

LE

BIC

YC

LE

TR

UC

K-T

RA

CT

OR

BU

S

SCH

OO

L B

US

AM

BU

LA

NC

E

CO

NST

RU

CT

ION

EQ

UIP

MEN

T

OT

HER

UN

KN

OW

N

NO

T S

TA

TED


Bozeman Crashes by Time of Day

(2006-2010)

28


0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%

12:0

0 M

- 1

2:5

9A

M

1:0

0

- 1:5

9

2:0

0

- 2:5

9

3:0

0

- 3:5

9

4:0

0

- 4:5

9

5:0

0

- 5:5

9

6:0

0

- 6:5

9

7:0

0

- 7:5

9

8:0

0

- 8:5

9

9:0

0

- 9:5

9

10:0

0 -

10:5

9

11:0

0 -

11:5

9

12:0

0 N

- 1

2:5

9PM

1:0

0

- 1:5

9

2:0

0

- 2:5

9

3:0

0

- 3:5

9

4:0

0

- 4:5

9

5:0

0

- 5:5

9

6:0

0

- 6:5

9

7:0

0

- 7:5

9

8:0

0

- 8:5

9

9:0

0

- 9:5

9

10:0

0 -

10:5

9

11:0

0 -

11:5

9

NO

T S

TA

TED


Bozeman Crashes by Day of Week

(2006-2010)

29


0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

SUN

DA

Y

MO

ND

AY

TU

ESD

AY

WED

NESD

AY

TH

UR

SD

AY

FR

IDA

Y

SAT

UR

DA

Y


Bozeman Crashes by Road Condition

(2006-2010)

30

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

DR

Y

WET

SNO

W O

R S

LU

SH ICE

SAN

D,M

UD

,DIR

T,O

IL

DEB

RIS

LO

OSE

GR

AV

EL

OT

HER

NO

T S

TA

TED



Bozeman Crashes by Relationship to Junction

(2006-2010)

31

32.6%

58.3%

8.0%

0.1% 1.1% 0.0%

39.1%

54.2%

5.3% 0.2% 1.2% 0.0%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

NO

N JU

NC

TIO

N

INT

ER

SEC

TIO

N

DR

IVEW

AY

RR

X-I

NG

RELA

TED

INT

ER

CH

AN

GE

NO

T S

TA

TED



Initial Findings

Safety Belt Use

Young Drivers

Distracted/Inattentive Driving

Intersection Crashes

32

Safety Vision

Bozeman Vision

Where does Bozeman want to be in the future regarding

transportation safety?

Example Vision Statements

» Bozeman will have the safest transportation system of any

community in MT

» Bozeman will establish a culture of safety on its roadways

» Vision Zero

34

Bozeman Safety Vision

All travelers arrive safely at their destination

35

CTSP Goal

Bozeman Five-Year Annual Averages (2006-2010)

Fatal Crashes Incapacitating

Injury Crashes

Non-Severe

Injury Crashes

PDO

Crashes

Total Crashes

2 8 163 556 666

37

Fatalities Incapacitating

Injuries

Non-Severe

Injuries

2 9 189

Annual Crashes

Annual Fatalities/Injuries


38

Examples - Traffic Safety Goals

Butte

To reduce motor vehicle

crashes by 20 percent by

2017, from an annual

average of 671 crashes

to an annual average of

537 crashes.

Shelby/Toole County

Reduce annual average

severe crashes within

Toole County by one

third from 2010 to

2015, resulting in an

average of no more

than four severe injury

crashes per year. Cheyenne, WY

Reduce fatal and serious injury crashes by 10 percent

from 2008 to 2020 (Reduction of 3.5 fatal and serious injury crashes per

year)

39

CTSP Goals - Sample Approaches

20 percent reduction in severe injuries (fatalities +

incapacitating injuries)

Reduction in a specific number of severe injuries

Percent reduction in total crashes

One death is one too many – zero fatalities

Reduce fatal and incapacitating injuries by half by 2030 (MT

CHSP)

Bozeman Safety Goal

Reduce fatalities and injuries by 25% by 2018

40

Next Steps

Next TSAC Meeting

Additional data analysis

Determine Emphasis Areas for Plan

Finalize Goal

42

Example:

Butte-Silver Bow - All Crashes by Emphasis Area

43

1094

226

1281

704

229

42

1814

28

21

70

814

96

1013

1

254

3

923

229

1099

559

179

67

1433

16

9

45

648

125

719

4

217

1

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000

Run-Off-The-Road

Alcohol/Drug-Related

Young Driver Involved

Older Driver Involved

Large Truck Involved

Motorcycle Involved

Intersection/Intersection-Related

Pedestrian Involved

Bicycle Involved

Asleep/Fainted/etc. Related

Speed-Related

Animal Related

Inattentive Driving Related

Train Involved

Unbelted

Native American (Fatalities Only)

All Crashes 2006-2010

All Crashes 2001-2005


Example: Butte-Silver Bow Fatal/Incapacitating

Crashes by Emphasis Area

44

106

41

32

20

15

18

46

4

4

14

59

0

43

0

100

3

98

36

32

21

6

22

25

8

1

11

35

2

20

0

77

1

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

Run-Off-The-Road

Alcohol/Drug-Related

Young Driver Involved

Older Driver Involved

Large Truck Involved

Motorcycle Involved

Intersection/Intersection-Related

Pedestrian Involved

Bicycle Involved

Asleep/Fainted/etc. Related

Speed-Related

Animal Related

Inattentive Driving Related

Train Involved

Unbelted

Native American (Fatalities Only)

2006-2010

2001-2005

Note: Unbelted and Native American data represent number of people, not crashes


Next Steps

Select dates & locations for next two meetings

» Develop agenda and materials

Select potential dates & location for Safety Summit (January)

Identify other potential TSAC members

Homework:

» What are Bozeman’s most significant transportation safety

issues?

» What programs are currently in place?

» What more should or could be done?

» Think about Plan Goal for finalization at next meeting

45

Open Discussion

Documents

Bozeman Community Transportation Safety Plan · Bozeman Community Transportation Safety Plan ... CTSP Goal Next Steps 3 . MT Comprehensive Highway Safety Plan Developed through coordinated,