Upload
vonga
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Unofficial Translation
This translation is for the convenience of those unfamiliar with the Thai
language
Please refer to Thai text for the official version
--------------------------------------
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check 1/7
Notification of the Bank of Thailand
No. FPG. 42/2551
Re: Regulation on Supervision of Interest Rate Risk in the Banking Book of
Financial Institutions
_______________________________________
1. Rationale
Market risk means the risk of losses to financial institutions’ positions in the
trading book and banking book that may arise from market price volatility. Such
positions include those related to interest rate, exchange rate, equity instrument, and
commodity. Holding large amounts of instruments or market risk positions may cause
adverse impact on financial institutions’ income and capital adequacy, especially
when market price of such positions is highly volatile.
In order to ensure that supervision of financial institutions’ market risk is in
line with international standards and reflects the market risk efficiently, accurately,
and comprehensively, and that financial institutions have appropriate market risk
management, the Bank of Thailand has issued a Notification to prescribe the regulation on supervision of market risk of financial institutions to require financial
institutions with a significant level of trading book transactions to maintain capital
fund to support market risk from 1) positions related to interest rate and equity price in
the trading book and 2) all positions related to exchange rate and commodity price. There are three capital calculation methods, namely, 1) Standardized Approach 2) Simulation Approach and 3) Mixed Approach
In addition to trading book positions, financial institutions’ banking book
positions may be affected from change in interest rate such as held to maturity debt
security investments, loans, or deposits from the public, etc. When the interest rate
fluctuates, financial institutions’ income and/or shareholders’ equity value may be
affected as well. In order to oversee interest rate risk in the banking book efficiently and
to ensure that financial institutions manage interest rate risk incurred from assets,
liabilities and obligations in line with deposits, borrowings or money received from the
public, the Bank of Thailand hereby issues a Notification regarding Regulation on
Supervision of Interest Rate Risk in the Banking Book of Financial Institutions so that
financial institutions can apply the regulation in managing their interest rate risk and
maintaining appropriate capital fund in accordance with the risk level. This Notification
is in accordance with the Financial Institution Business Act B.E. 2551 (2008), whereas
the essence of the guideline remains unchanged.
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check 2/7
2. Statutory Power
By virtue of Section 63 and Section 71 of the Financial Institution Business Act
B.E. 2551 (2008), the Bank of Thailand hereby issues the guideline on managing interest rate
risk in the banking book and maintaining appropriate capital fund in accordance with the
risk level of financial institutions, for financial institutions to comply with.
3. Scope of Application
This Notification shall apply to all financial institutions according to the law
on financial institution business.
4. Repealed Notification and Circular
The Circular No. BOT.FPG. (21) C. 2141/2547 Re: Policy on Supervision of
Interest Rate Risk in the Banking Book for Financial Institutions dated 27 December
2004 and Related Reports
5. Content
5.1 In this Notification
“Banking Book” means positions of financial instruments or other transactions
not intended for trading purpose, or financial instruments which were intended, at the
onset, to be held for a long period of time or until maturity. “Interest rate risk in the banking book” means losses to earnings and/or
economic value of financial institutions as a result of change in interest rate which may
arise from both on- and off-balance sheet positions in the banking book. Details of types
and interest rate risk impacts are in Attachment 1. 5.2 Guideline for effective interest rate risk management
5.2.1 Effective interest rate risk management of financial institutions
shall consist of 4 basic elements in managing assets, liabilities and off-balance-sheet
items as follows:
(1) Oversight by the board of directors and senior management;
(2) Adequate risk management policies and procedures; (3) Appropriate risk measurement, monitoring, reporting, and
control;
(4) Effective internal controls related to risk management.
5.2.2 How financial institutions apply the 4 elements as mentioned in
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check 3/7
5.2.1(1)-(4) when managing their interest rate risk may vary, depending on the scope,
volume and complexity of the transactions, as well as the level of interest rate risk of
each financial institution. Therefore, the interest rate risk management guideline may be
diverse. For example, small financial institutions whose senior management closely
monitors the day-to-day operations may use a less complex risk management process. Meanwhile, financial institutions with more complex and diverse transactions may need
a more complex risk management process by reporting financial transactions to the
senior management for daily monitoring, having adequate internal controls that include
verification of information to be reported to the senior management in order to ensure
that financial institutions’ operations comply with the specified policies and risk limits.
5.3 Roles and Responsibilities of the Board of Directors and Senior
Management
5.3.1 The board of directors is responsible for approving business
strategies and risk management policies as well as ensures that the senior management
take necessary actions to measure, control, monitor and report on interest rate risk in consistent with the scope, volume and complexity of the financial institutions’
transactions. Moreover, the board of directors shall be informed with adequate and
appropriate information in a timely manner in order to assess the senior
management’s ability to manage interest rate risk to be in line with the specified
policies.
5.3.2 Senior management is responsible for monitoring the interest rate
risk management systems to be in consistent with the risk level and transactions of the
financial institutions as well as establishing risk limit, policies and procedures to
control interest rate risk. Moreover, senior management must allocate sufficient and
appropriate resources and personnel for management of the financial institutions’
interest rate risk.
5.3.3 Financial institutions should have a sub-committee or
individuals responsible for managing interest rate risk as well as ensuring segregation
of duties, responsibilities, and operating procedures of risk management function,
whose duties include risk measurement, controlling, monitoring, and reporting. Such
risk management function shall be independent from position-taking function in order
to avoid conflict of interests and shall directly report to the senior management and
board of directors of the financial institutions. Details of roles and responsibilities of the board of directors and senior
management are prescribed in Attachment 2
5.4 Appropriate Risk Management Policies and Procedures
5.4.1 Financial institutions must establish policies and procedures
related to interest rate risk management in writing and inform relevant parties to
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check 4/7
comply with, as well as keep such documents for inspection by the Bank of
Thailand’s examiners. Such policies and procedures shall cover various aspects as
prescribed in Attachment 3.
5.4.2 Financial institutions must review the interest rate risk
management policies on a regular basis, including adjusting the policies to be
consistent with the scope, volume and complexity of the financial institutions’
transactions and changing market conditions.
5.5 Guideline for Risk Measurement, Controlling and Monitoring
5.5.1 Guideline for Risk Measurement
(1) Financial institutions should establish systems that are able
to measure all material interest rate risk and assess the effects from interest rate
change on earnings1 and/or economic value of the financial institutions in an adequate
manner and in consistent with the scope, volume and complexity of the financial
institutions’ transactions. The Bank of Thailand intends to encourage financial
institutions to allocate staff and database systems in order to enhance or develop risk
measurement systems which are able to measure the effects on both earnings and
economic value of the financial institutions, as well as communicating key
assumptions of risk measurement so that they are clearly understood by the financial
institutions’ managment. (2) Financial institutions should have systems and tools to assess
impacts from interest rate change in consistent with the scope, volume and complexity
of the financial institutions’ transactions. Details of the systems and tools for interest
rate risk assessment are prescribed in Attachment 4. (3) Financial institutions whose repricing risk is a major interest
rate risk, with immaterial positions of embedded options2 and complex activities may
select the repricing gap method to assess the impact on earnings. Such method is the
minimum requirement prescribed by the Bank of Thailand. Details of the interest rate
risk measurement by the repricing gap method are prescribed in Attachment 5. (4) Financial institutions should consider the balance sheet
structure and option risk exposure as elementary factors in the consideration to establish
1 Net interest income, at present and expected in the future, including the effects on net income in the
case where the financial institution has materially significant proportion of non-interest income sensitive
to interest rate changes. 2 Embedded options shall mean rights embedded in the financial instruments such as loans or instruments
that allow one party to change the term or cash flow relevant to the contract or instrument . Examples are
loan prepayment without any penalty fee or any other fees, caps, floors and callable bonds, etc . The
embedded options make it difficult to estimate the returns and interest rate risk of such financial
instruments since the probability of exercising such options changes as the interest rate changes.
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check 5/7
the interest rate risk measurement systems that can measure interest rate risk effects on
the economic value. For example, financial institutions with significant portion of
embedded options or high proportion of fixed rate long-term assets, but with low
proportion of long-term liabilities. (5) Financial institutions with material exposures in interest rate
risk in foreign currency, as deemed by the financial institutions and are able to explain
to the Bank of Thailand’s examiners, must be able to measure the interest rate risk level
of each currency as well since yield curve of interest rate in each currency may differ. (6) Financial institutions should develop various database
systems in order to measure the interest rate risk for assets and liabilities with uncertain
repricing period or uncertain remaining maturity in accordance with actual behavior of
customers, especially financial institutions with significant level of exposures. For
example, saving and current accounts deposits that depositors may choose to withdraw
at any time (non-maturity deposits) or loans with the right to prepay with no cost since the position values and cash flow time band of these positions may change as market
interest rate changes. Financial institutions that wish to adjust the data to be in line with
customers’ behaviors shall comply with the stipulated guideline as prescribed in
Attachment 6 (7) Financial institutions must conduct a stress test on interest
rate risk, including the case of key assumption breakdowns. Financial institutions
should also take into account those results when establishing and reviewing the interest
rate risk policies and limits. The guideline on conducting stress testing is prescribed in
Attachment 7. 5.5.2 Guideline for Risk Controlling
Financial institutions must establish risk limit system and other related
procedures as well as ensuring strict implementation and regular review in order to
maintain risk within the level as specified by the financial institutions. Details of the
guideline for risk controlling are prescribed in Attachment 8.
5.5.3 Guideline for Risk Monitoring
(1) Financial institutions must obtain an information system that
provides adequate and accurate information for measuring, controlling, monitoring and
reporting interest rate risk. Such reports must be prepared regularly in a timely manner
and presented to the board of directors, other committees, senior management and
various business line managers as deemed appropriate. (2) Financial institutions must conduct validation testing of the
measures and assumptions used in their interest rate risk measurement systems regularly
to ensure that they can identify any possible shortcoming of the systems in order to
improve efficiency and reliability of the risk meansurement systems.
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check 6/7
Details of risk reporting and validation testing of tools and
assumptions are as prescribed in Attachment 9. 5.6 Internal Controls Related to Interest Rate Risk Management
Financial institutions must obtain an appropriate internal controls for their
interest rate risk management process and arrange to have a regular and independent
review of the risk management systems in order to evaluate and improve efficiency of
the interest rate risk management systems. Details of the guideline on internal control
and review are prescribed in Attachment 10. 5.7 Guideline on Maintaining Capital Fund
5.7.1 Financial institutions must consider and monitor their capital level
to ensure adequacy and ability to cushion for potential losses from change in interest
rate in their banking book positions.
5.7.2 The Bank of Thailand’s examiners may provide opinions, on a
case by case basis, to require financial institutions with high interest rate risk level
and/or inadequate capital relative to the interest rate risk level to increase their capital
and/or reduce the positions that incur interest rate risk or to undertake any actions to
reduce the interest rate risk exposure. 5.8 Submission of Data and Relevant Reports
5.8.1 Financial institutions shall prepare and submit the data for
measuring interest rate risk in the banking book in accordance with the format and
guideline prescribed by the Bank of Thailand in the Data Management System (DMS). The report shall be submitted within 21 days from the last day of each quarter. Guideline and explanation on data preparation are prescribed in Attachment 11.
5.8.2 Financial institutions with interest rate risk positions in any foreign
currency at a significant level as deemed by the financial institutions must prepare and
submit reports by each currency, in addition to the report in Thai baht. For immaterial
foreign currency positions, financial institutions shall prepare and submit the aggregate
report with other currencies.
5.8.3 Financial institutions that have adjusted data behaviors and already complied with the guideline on adjusting data behaviors shall submit the report by
referring to the adjusted data behaviors together with the assumptions underlying the
adjustments.
5.8.4 Financial institutions must retain documents and various details
supporting data preparation as prescribed by the Bank of Thailand as well as details on
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check 7/7
preparation of the reports internally used by the financial institutions for managing the
interest rate risk and submit such information upon request by the Bank of Thailand. 6. Effective Date
This Notification shall come into force the day following the date of its
publication in the Government Gazette. Announced on 3rd August 2008
(Mrs. Tarisa Watanagase) Governor
Bank of Thailand
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-1/1-
Attachment 1
Types and Impacts of Interest Rate Risk
Types of Interest Rate Risk
1. Repricing risk: arises from timing differences in the residual term (for the
case of fixed rate) and the next repricing (for the case of floating rate) of assets, liabilities
and off-balance-sheet items. Although timing differences may be the business fundamental
of financial institutions, they may cause damages to the financial institutions. For example,
a financial institution that uses short-term deposits to fund fixed rate long-term loans may
encounter a decline in its net interest income when interest rate increases since the funding
cost of deposit rates will increase while its earnings from loans remain fixed.
2. Yield curve risk: arises from change in the shape and slope of yield curve
which negatively impact income and economic value of financial institutions. For example,
the economic value of a financial institution having long position in a 10-year government
bond and short position in a 5-year government bond will decline, when the yield curve
becomes steeper (the increase in long-term interest rate is greater than that in short-term
interest rate) since the value of asset which is the 10-year bond declines more than the value
of liability which is the 5-year bond.
3. Basis risk: arises from change in market interest rate, making interest rates
of assets, liabilities and off-balance-sheet items to change disproportionately even though
the residual term or time to next repricing of assets, liabilities and off-balance-sheet items
is the same. For example, when short-term interest rate in the market changes, the deposit
rate, which is based on 1-month LIBOR, and the lending rate, which is based on 1-month
US government bond, may change differently.
4. Option risk: arises from change in interest rate which causes the volume or
period of cash flow from a financial instrument with embedded option to change in a way
that adversely impacts earnings or economic value of financial institutions. For example, a
financial institution purchasing a 30 – year debenture whose issuer can redeem before
maturity, with market interest rate at issuance of 10% and the face value interest rate of
10%. When market rate drops to 8%, the issuer may redeem the debenture, resulting in
change in cash flow that the financial institution expects to receive. This will negatively
affect the financial institution as its reinvestmen rate is lower. Or when a financial
institution is funding through non-maturity deposits which allow the depositors to
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-1/2-
withdraw at any time, interest rate change may lead to change in cash flow of the financial
institution and may adversely affect the financial institution.
Effects of Interest Rate Risk
Change in interest rates can have adverse effects on financial institutions both in the
forms of earnings and economic value. Hence, the interest rate risk effects may be analysed
in 2 perspectives as follows
1. Earnings Perspective means analysis of the effects of interest rate change
on accrual or reported earnings of financial institutions. This is a short-term impact analysis
which is generally used by many financial institutions as a decline in earnings resulting
from change in interest rate may affect stability of the financial institutions.
From the earnings perspective, most financial institutions mainly focus on the
impact analysis on net interest income (the difference between interest income and interest
expense) since they are directly affected by change in interest rate. Nonetheless, financial
institutions with high proportion of non-interest income or fee income should consider the
effects on net income as well (including the effects on net interest income, non-interest
income and operating expense) since some types of fee income correlate with transaction
volume of the financial institutions which may change when interest rate changes such as
loan servicing fees, etc.
2. Economic Value Perspective means analysis of the effects of change in
interest rate on the economic value of assets, liabilities and off-balance-sheet items of
financial institutions.
The economic value of all these items means the present value discounted by the
market interest rate of expected cash inflow from assets, minus expected cash outflow from
liabilities, plus the net expected cash flow of off-balance-sheet items. Therefore, the
economic value perspective of financial institutions reflects sensitivity of the financial
institutions’s net worth to interest rate fluctuations which is a more comprehensive view
than the earnings perspective since it analyzes long-term effects on the financial institutions,
whereas the earnings perspective considers short-term effects within 1-2 years.
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
- 2/1 -
Attachment 2
Roles and Responsibilities of the Board of Directors and Senior Management of
Financial Institutions
The board of directors of financial institutions3 has the roles and responsibilities to
manage interest rate risk as follows: 1. Obtain the knowledge and understand the sources of interest rate risk, risk
exposures and interest rate risk management of the financial institutions;
2. Approve the lines of authority related to interest rate risk management to
ensure balance of power and independence between business unit and risk management
unit which is responsible for identifying, measuring, monitoring and controlling risk;
3. Approve the business strategies related to interest rate risk, interest rate risk
management policies and internal controls including new transaction or product approval
policies;
4. Delegate and oversee that the senior management identify, measure, monitor
and control interest rate risk of the financial institutions in commensuration with the
scope, volume and complexity of the transactions and products as well as allocate
resources that are adequate and appropriate for interest rate risk management of the
financial institutions;
5. Approve the interest rate risk limit or risk level that is acceptable to the
financial institutions;
6. Have sufficient, appropriate and timely information in order to evaluate the
interest rate risk management capacity of the senior management to be in line with the
approved policies;
7. Periodically review the interest rate risk management policies of the financial
institutions as well as the business strategies that affect their interest rate risk exposure to
be in consistent with changing circumstances.
3 Or any designated committee in the case of foreign bank branch.
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-2/2-
Senior management has the roles and responsibilities to manage interest rate risk
as follows:
1. Oversee the preparation of business strategies and interest rate risk
management policies for approval by the financial institutions’ board of directors and to
apply the approved policies strictly and comprehensively within the financial institutions
as well as review the said policies to ensure that they are in consistent with changing
circumstances;
2. Establish appropriate lines of authority that are related to interest rate risk
management as well as clearly define the responsibilities of each subordinating unit;
3. Ensure that there are appropriate interest rate risk management systems that
include setting of procedures and methods to identify, measure, monitor, control and
report interest rate risk;
4. Oversee compliance of the interest rate risk management policies and internal
controls as well as effectively review the interest rate risk management systems;
5. Establish risk limit for approval by the board of directors of financial
institutions;
6. Have sufficient, appropriate and timely information in order to assess any
potential losses to the financial institutions caused by change in market risk factors and
other key risk factors both under a normal and crisis situation;
7. Approve new transactions or products of financial institutions as well as set
the objectives and procedures of the transactions to comply with the policies approved by
the financial institutions’ board of directors;
8. Regularly meet or consult with the financial institutions’ board of directors
and risk management staff regarding the risk management procedures and processes;
9. Ensure that staff acquire technical and financial knowledge and understand
related businesses, sufficiently for interest rate risk management and internal controls.
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-3/1-
Attachment 3
Appropriate Interest Risk Management Policies and Operating Procedures
Appropriate interest rate risk management policies should have the characteristics
and details covering various aspects as follows: 1. Clarity and consistency with the scope, volume and complexity of the financial
institutions’ transactions;
2. Specifying risk limits, operating procedures and approval process of various
transactions as well as practical guidance and approval for a transaction that exceeds the
risk limit;
3. Designating lines of authority in each unit with clear segregation from each
other by defining duties and responsibilities of risk-taking business units and risk
management unit as well as guideline and operating procedures that prevent conflict of
interest;
4. Setting clear operating procedures as well as strategies to generate profits and
prevent related risks, types of financial instruments that financial institutions are permitted
to hold and clear objectives for holding such financial instruments;
5. Establishing internal control processes for interest rate risk management
including authority, duties, and responsibilities of the units responsible for reviewing the
interest rate risk management;
6. Identifying a new transaction or product related to interest rate risk with details
covering the following aspects:
6.1 Product description and strategy for undertaking the transaction;
6.2 Resource allocation interest rate risk management of the new product and
transaction;
6.3 Risk analysis of the new product or transaction;
6.4 Procedure to measure, monitor and control risk of the new product or
transaction;
6.5 Consultation result among units related to the new product such as legal
unit, accounting unit, risk management unit and other units prior to commencing the new
product or transaction;
6.6 Monitoring and evaluating result after commencing the new transaction
for use in development of new product and risk management in the future;
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-3/2-
7. Financial institutions must conduct regular review of the interest rate risk
management policies as well as appropriately revise the policies to be in consistent with
the scope, volume and complexity of the transaction and changing market conditions.
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-4/1-
Attachment 4
Systems and Tools for Measuring Interest Rate Risk
1. Risk measurement systems of financial institutions should have the following
characteristics:
1.1 Capable of capturing all materially significant types of interest rate risk of
assets, liabilities and other off-balance-sheet items. 1.2 Consistent with the generally accepted financial concepts and/or techniques
for measuring risks. 1.3 Having clear and written details of assumptions, variables, as well as
methodologies or operating procedures of the systems.
2. Financial institutions may use different systems to measure or manage risks
for different transactions. For example, a financial institution may use the value at risk
method for the trading book positions and repricing gap method or simulation for the
banking book positions, etc. Nonetheless, the financial institution’s management must
understand the integrated view of interest rate risk arising from its various products and
business lines. 3. Tools used for assessing the effects of interest rate change are numerous,
ranging from a static repricing gap method which is a simple calculation and static
simulations which assess the effects of interest rate change from various scenarios using
information of existing positions of the financial institutions, to highly complicated
techniques such as dynamic modeling that is able to reflect the effects of new transaction
and product, possible changing behaviors of consumers in the future, change in business
strategies, and various decision making of the financial institutions as well as being able
to reflect the effects from embedded and explicit options.
In this regard, various tools for measuring interest rate risk are prescribed in
Attachment 4.1
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-4/2-
Attachment 4.1
Interest Rate Risk Measurement Tools and Techniques
Static Repricing Gap Approach
1. The simplest technique for assessing interest rate risk of financial institution is
static repricing gap which may be used to measure the effects of interest rate change on
earnings and economic value of the financial institutions. When it is used for assessing the
interest rate risk effects on earnings, it is called repricing gap analysis. This is the first
technique developed to assess interest rate risk of financial institutions and is widely
adopted by many financial institutions. Nonetheless, some financial institutions may
develop the said technique to be more accurate by applying the duration principle with
the repricing gap table in order to assess the effects of interest rate change on the
economic value. Such technique is called duration-based gap. 2. Static repricing gap technique is prepared by recording assets, liabilities and
off-balance-sheet items which are sensitive to interest rate in a time band table by the time
remaining before maturity (for fixed rate case) or by the time remaining before next
repricing (for floating rate case). In general, this may be called gap analysis, where the
gap size in each time band is calculated from assets deducted by liabilities, added to off-balance-sheet items within that time band. Then the gap in each time band is multiplied by
the assumed change in interest rate in order to estimate change in earnings resulting from
change in interest rate, which is an indicator of repricing risk exposure. The size of
interest rate change used in the analysis can be based on various factors e.g. historical
data, trend of interest rate change in the future and the decision making of the financial
institutions’ management, etc. 3. In designing the interest rate risk assessment systems, financial institutions
should ensure that details of rate-sensitive positions are commensurate with complexity of
the tools since accuracy of each type of interest rate risk assessment tool, for example, as repricing gap partly depends on the number of time bands, aggregation of positions or
cash flows within a too-wide time band will reduce assessment accuracy. In practice,
financial institutions must also evaluate the materiality of reduced accuracy resulting
from setting a time-band width in comparison with the assessment effort.
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-4/3-
4. For assets or liabilities with uncertain repricing period e.g. current account and
saving deposits as well as items whose actual residual term differs from the contractual term e.g. housing loans which allow prepayment without any penalty fee, interest or other
additional fees to the financial institutions, etc. Shall be recorded in the time band
corresponding with actual behaviors as much as possible. Such recording should depend
on the judgment, historical experience and statistical data of each financial institution
5. Negative repricing gap or liability-sensitive gap in each time band will occur
when the difference of interest rate-sensitive assets and liabilities plus the net position of
off-balance sheet items during each time band has a negative value, which implies that
increase in market interest rate tends to reduce net interest income of financial
institutions. Conversely, positive repricing gap or asset-sensitive gap implies that increase
in market interest rate tends to increase net interest income of financial institutions. 6. Although repricing gap analysis is a widely used approach to assess interest
rate risk exposure since it is simple, this general technique has limitations as follows.
6.1 It does not take into account the difference of remaining time before next repricing of each position in a particular time band. That is, every position in each time
band is assumed to mature or to be repriced simultaneously. Hence, if financial
institutions use too wide time band, the caculated risk level is likely to deviate. The
remedy is to set the time band of positions more finely. 6.2 It does not consider the difference of change in each type of interest rate
which may arise as market interest rate changes (basis risk). 6.3 It does not take into account the effects on earnings arising from option
risk e.g. the repayment period may differ from the contractual term as interest rate
changes, etc. 6.4 It does not reflect the effects of interest rate change on non-interest income
and expense which may be significant component of net income of financial institutions. 6.5 The technique using repricing gap analysis is a crude approach in assessing
the effects on net interest income of financial institutions that may arise from assumed
interest rate changes.
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-4/4-
Duration-based Gap Approach
1. Static repricing gap table may also be used to evaluate the effects on economic
value by defining sensitivity weights (duration-based weight) for each time band to
multiply with the gap and interest rate change in each time band to obtain duration
weighted gap. The sum of all time bands gives a rough estimate of change in economic
value of financial institutions that may arise from the assumed change in interest rate.
2. In general, the sensitivity weights in each time band can be estimated from
multiplying the average duration4 (which reflects the percentage change of economic
value of the position to small change in interest rate) of various positions within the same
time band with change in interest rate in each time band. In some cases, the weights may
differ for positions on the asset side and liability side within the same time band in order
to reflect the different coupon rates and remaining terms to maturity of those positions. Moreover, the assumptions on interest rate changes for each time band may differ in
order to reflect differences in interest rate volatility along the yield curve. 3. Financial institutions may calculate a more refine and accurate sensitivity
weight by calculating duration of each asset, liability and off-balance-sheet item. Such
approach will correct potential errors arising from aggregating positions or cash flows of
each time band when calculating average duration. Furthermore, financial institutions may
consider using effective duration instead of modified duration to better reflect non-linear
relationship between economic value change and change in interest rate. Simulation Approaches
1. Financial institutions holding significant proportion of positions with complex
financial instruments or risk sources other than repricing risk should use more
sophisticated risk measurement tools rather than the static repricing gap, such as
simulations, etc. Such techniques assess potential effects of interest rate change on
earnings and economic value in detail by simulating future trend and size of interest rate
change and the effects on cash flows.
4 Duration approach has been applied in 2 forms, namely, 1) Modified Duration is elasticity value which is
equal to normal duration divided by 1+r, where r is the level of market interest rate. Therefore such value will
represent the percentage change on economic value of a position to percentage change in interest rate under
the assumptions that a) change in such value has a linear relationship with change in interest rate and b) timing
of payments is fixed; and, 2) Effective Duration reflects relaxation of such assumptions, therefore it is an
estimated sensitivity of a position to change in interest rate in case there is an embedded options .
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-4/5-
2. Static simulations5 are techniques to assess the effects on interest rate risk
solely on cash flows of financial institutions’ existing positions. For assessing effects on
earnings, these techniques will estimate cash flows and earnings over a specific period
under simulation of more than one case of interest rate change. Generally, they include
changes of the slope and shape of yield curve, and changes in spread of various interest
rates. Assessing the effects on economic value under these techniques can be done by
estimating expected cash flows over the entire life of all positions held by the financial
institutions and discounted back to their present values.
3. Some types of static simulation may be enhanced further from the simple
analysis based on static repricing gap table by separating details of different positions,
both on- and off-balance sheet so that specific assumptions about interest and principal
payments as well as effects on non-interest income and expense can be incorporated in the
assessment. 4. Dynamic simulation is a more complex technique than the static simulation
method. The impact analysis on earnings and economic value is similar to the static
simulation method but with more detailed assumptions on future trends in interest rate
and changes in business activities of financial institutions from the present positions. Therefore, it can better reflect dynamic interaction of cash flows and and interest rates. The simulation may include the following assumptions.
4.1 Financial institutions’ strategies for changing future administered
interest rates such as savings interest rates, etc.; 4.2 Behavior of customers from positions with embedded options and/or
various explicit options such as withdrawal behavior of savings and current account with
unclear remaining time to maturity, loan prepayment, changes of cash flows from
embedded options, etc.; and
4.3 New transactions or products such as new loans or new types of transactions, etc.
5. Financial institutions having material positions in many foreign currencies and
being prepared in terms of personnel with expertise as well as having sufficiently
sophisticated interest rate risk measurement systems may choose to consolidate positions
of several currencies together under the risk assessment systems by making assumptions
on correlations between interest rates of different currencies. Financial institutions which
5 Duration gap described previously can be viewed as a very simple form of static EVE simulation .
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-4/6-
apply assumptions of correlations in aggregating the risk positions must regularly review
the validity of such assumptions as well as assess potential risk exposures in case where
the correlations diverge from the assumptions.
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-5/1-
Attachment 5
Guidelines for Measuring Interest Rate Risk by Repricing Gap Approach
Financial institutions that assess interest rate risk by the repricing gap method
shall comply with following minimum guidelines specified by the Bank of Thailand. There is no behavioral adjustment of items whose remaining maturity or terms to the next
repricing differ from the contractual terms such as loan prepayments, non-maturity
deposits and non-performing loans, etc. Procedures for Measuring Interest Rate Risk
Measuring interest rate risk impact on earnings by the repricing gap method can
be organized into 6 steps as follows: 1. Record assets, liabilities and off-balance-sheet positions in the banking book,
for which there is no behavioral adjustment of items without definite contractual maturity
and loan prepayments, in the repricing gap table where time bands must be divided into
quarters for the first 1-2 year at the minimum in accordance with the guidelines specified
by the Bank of Thailand below. 2. Calculate gap for each time band by netting positions of assets, liabilities and
net off-balance-sheet positions in each time band. 3. Calculate cumulative gap for each time band by adding gap of each time band
to gap of the previous time bands. 4. Assess impact on earnings from interest rate change under assumptions of
interest rate change such as 100-basis-point increase equally throughout the yield
curve(parallel shift in the yield curve) with in 1 year by multiplying 1) gap for each time
band and 2) interest rate change assumption e.g. 0.01 (100 basis points) and 3) proportion
of 1 year time remaining in effect (the midpoint of each time band to 1 year that continues
to be effected by interest rate risk) e.g. for 0-1 month time band, the midpoint is 0.5 month;
thus the proportion of 1 year that the gap in the 0-1 month band will be effected by
interest rate change is equal to (12-0.5)/12 or 0.958. 5. Assess the level of all interest rate risk in banking book, which is equal to the
sum of impacts on earnings arising from interest rate change during 1 year as derived
from Step 4 for all currencies.
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-5/2-
6. Compare the overall interest rate risk level in the banking book derived from
Step 5 with the projected future net interest income of financial institutions within the
next 1 year. Financial institutions may consider assessing interest rate risk in the form of
impact on economic value by using the duration-based gap method applying risk weights
according to the BIS6 guidelines during the initial period by following the procedures
below. 1. Record assets, liabilities and off-balance-sheet items in the repricing gap table
by time bankds as specified by the Bank of Thailand’s guidelines below.
2. Calculate gap for each time band by netting the positions of assets, liabilities
and net off-balance-sheet position in each time band.
3. Multiply the gap in each time band with duration-based weight of each time
band (Table 1) which reflects sensitivity of the position in each time band to change in
interest rate e.g. 100 basis point increase equally throughout the yield curve (parallel shift
in the yield curve).
4. Sum the results derived from netting impacts on economic value in each time
band to yield total impacts on economic value in all time bands for each currency.
5. Sum the impacts on economic value from the table by each currency to yield
aggregate impacts on economic value for all currencies.
6. Compare the aggregate net value of interest rate risk in the banking book
with capital fund of the financial institutions to evaluate the level of interest rate risk in
the banking book.
6 Refer to Principles for the Management and Supervision of Interest Rate, July 2004 of Bank for International
Settlements (BIS)
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-5/3-
Table 1
Weighted Gap
Weighted Gap
in Each Time
Band
Time Band Midpoint of
the Time
Band
Proxy of
Modified
Duration1/
Interest
Rate
Change
Risk Weight
0-1 month 0.5 month 0.04 year 100 bps 0.04%
more than 1-3 months 2 months 0.16 year 100 bps 0.16%
more than 3-6 months 4.5 months 0.36 year 100 bps 0.36%
more than 6-12 months 9 months 0.71 year 100 bps 0.71%
more than 1-2 years 1.5 years 1.38 years 100 bps 1.38%
more than 2-3 years 2.5 years 2.25 years 100 bps 2.25 %
more than 3-4 years 3.5 years 3.07 years 100 bps 3.07 %
more than 4-5 years 4.5 years 3.85 years 100 bps 3.85 %
more than 5-7 years 6 years 5.08 years 100 bps 5.08 %
more than 7-10 years 8.5 years 6.63 years 100 bps 6.63 %
more than 10-15 years 12.5 years 8.92 years 100 bps 8.92 %
more than 15-20 years 17.5 years 11.21 years 100 bps 11.21 %
more than 20 years 22.5 years 13.01 years 100 bps 13.01 % 1/ Modified duration of the gap in each time band is approximated from the midpoint of each time
band under the assumption that the rate of return is 5% according to the BIS guideline.
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-5/4-
General Guidelines for Making Entries
1. Items to be recorded in various time bands in the Repricing Gap Table are
assets, liabilities and off-balance-sheet items which are rate-sensitive, including both
interest rate bearing items and non- interest bearing items that are rate sensitive, namely,
financial instruments sold at a discount such as zero coupon bonds, etc. Non-rate sensitive
assets, liabilities and off-balance-sheet items shall be recorded under “Non-rate sensitive”
column.
2. On-balance-sheet items shall be recorded in the Repricing Gap Table using
their book values in baht as at the month end.
3. Off-balance-sheet derivatives shall be recorded by the two-leg approach,
namely, long and short positions, where the derivatives transactions are splitted to
positions of the underlying instruments first. Entries are then made by using 1) principal
value of the underlying in case there is underlying instrument (except option, see 21) or 2) principal amount of the notional underlying in case there is no underlying instrument
such as interest rate swap, FX forward/swap, cross currency swap, etc. Foreign exchange
contracts and interest rate swap contracts between two currencies shall be recorded
separately, one in each respective currency. Interest rate swaps in one currency shall be
recorded as 2 legs : long and short position in the same currency.
4. Financial institutions having material proportion of foreign interest rate
positions as deemed by the financial institutions and are able to justify and have
supporting documents to be presented to the Bank of Thailand’s examiners, shall prepare
the repricing gap table by each currency and record the equivalent amounts in baht using
the contractual exchange rates or, if not specified, the exchange rates on the reporting
date.
5. Interest bearing assets and liabilities shall be recorded in the repricing gap
table by interest rate type. They can be categorized into 2 types as follows.
5.1 Fixed rate items mean assets and liabilities with fixed interest rates. Items
with constant fixed rate throughout the contract such as fixed rate bonds, fixed deposits,
etc. shall be recorded in the time band according to the remaining time to maturity. For
cases where rates are fixed for a period and float in the next period, the entry shall be in
the time bands where floating rates will be in effect. For example, housing loans with
fixed interest rate during the first 3 years, after which the rate will be floating equal to
MLR shall be recorded in the 2-3 year time band.
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-5/5-
5.2 Floating rate items mean assets, liabilities whose interest rates can change.
They can be categorized into 2 types as follows:
(1) Variable rate items mean assets, liabilities whose interest rates
change at the discretion of the counterparty or with reference rates such as LIBOR. For
example, floating rate notes whose rates change with LIBOR, loans whose rates are based
on LIBOR, etc. These items shall be recorded in the time bands according to the time to
next repricing, assuming that the reference interest rate will be adjusted immediately after
the reporting date. If remaining maturity of the assets or liabilities is less than the time to
last repricing, the items shall be recorded by the remaining maturity. (2) Managed rate items mean assets and liabilities with floating
interest rates and no definite repricing dates, but interest rates are adjusted at the
discretion and strategy of each financial institution. For example, loans with interest rates
of MLR + spread, etc. These items shall be recorded in the time band according to the
remaining time until next projected repricing after changes in market rates or reference
rates, assuming that market rates or reference rates will be adjusted immediately after the
reporting date. In this respect, financial institutions should be able to justify the
assumptions related to the repricing period so that the Bank of Thailand can
examine. For example, if a financial institution historically adjusts its interest rates every
3 months, then the item shall be recorded in the 1-3 month time band. Alternatively, if the
financial institution adjusts its rates 1 month following the market interest rate movement,
the item shall be recorded in the 0-1 month time band, assuming that market interest rates
will change immediately after the reporting date.
6. Non-interest bearing assets and liabilities such as zero coupon bond shall be
recorded in the time band by the time remaining to maturity.
7. Assets and liabilities with installed payments (installment items) as opposed to
single payments at maturity should be recorded separately for each amount in the
appropriate time band in response to the period before next repricing of each amount. For
example, a loan with book value of 2 million baht will be repriced in the next 2 months
while there will be a repayment of 100,000 baht in the next 10 days; the entries will be
100,000 baht in the 0-1 month time band and THB 1,900,000 in the 1-2 month time band.
8. Internal deals shall not be recorded in the repricing gap table.
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-5/6-
Details for Recording Assets, Liabilities and Off-Balance-Sheet Items
Assets 1. Cash shall be recorded in the “Non-rate sensitive” column.
2. Interbank items e.g. interbank loans shall be recorded in the time band
according to the time remaining until next repricing for floating rate items and time
remaining until maturity for fixed rate items. 3. Purchase with resale agreements shall be recorded under the heading
prescribed in the Notification of Bank of Thailand Re: Preparation and
Announcement of Financial Statement of Financial Institutions in the time band
according to the time remaining until contractual maturity since they have fixed interest
rates. 4. Investments
4.1 Debt securities with floating rates shall be recorded in the time
band according to the time remaining until next repricing and debt securities with fixed
interest rates shall be recorded in the time band according to time remaining until
contractual maturity.
4.2 Common shares and other equity instruments whose attributes are
similar to equity securities shall be recorded in the “Non-rate sensitive” column. Preferred
shares whose attributes are similar to debt instruments with variable or fixed interest rates
shall be recorded in the time band according to the time remaining until contractual
maturity or next repricing dates, respectively.
4.3 Other securities such as: • Callable bond with clear information regarding redemption
period shall be recorded in the time band which the issuer is expected to redeem such
instrument, by considerting the reference to maturity, call price and current price which
the issuer will call when the price of the instrument is higher than or equal to the call
price. For instance, a 10-year bond whose issuer may call after 5 years, with market price
that reflects interest rate in the next 6 years is equivalent to 102 baht and call price is 101
baht. It is then highly probable that this bond will be called in the 6th year; hence, it shall
be recorded in the 5-7 year time band. In case where there is uncertainty of call period, it
shall be recorded in the time band according to the time remaining until contractual
maturity.
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-5/7-
• Convertible instruments shall be recorded as debt instruments,
that is, in the time band according to the next repricing. When such instruments start to
behave like equity instrument, they shall be recorded in the “Non-rate sensitive” column.
5. Loans
5.1 Gross amount excluded accrued interest receivables shall be recorded. 5.2 Generally, they shall be recorded in the time band according to the time
remaining until contractual maturity for fixed rate loans and in the time band according to
the time remaining until next repricing for floating rate loans. Loans with uncertain
repricing dates but rate change depends on the strategy of each financial institution
(managed rates) such as rates based on MLR, MOR and MRR shall be recorded in the
time band according to the remaining time before the financial institution expects to
adjust the next interest rates after change in market rates or reference rates, assuming that
the market interest rates or reference rates will adjust immediately after the reporting date.
5.3 Loans with interim repayment between the reporting date and the next
repricing date shall be recorded in an appropriate time band by separating repayment and
residual amounts. The residual amount (total loan minus repayment amount) shall be
recorded in the time band according to the next repricing, while the repayment amount
shall be recorded in the time band according to the contractual payment date. 5.4 Credit card loans, whose proportion to total loans of financial
institutions are significant, shall be divided into 2 time bands, namely, “Non-rate
sensitive” for outstanding balance which customers pay in full and in the time band
expected to be the next repricing for the outstanding balance, where outstanding balance
in each period depends on the portfolio behavior in the past.
6. Non-performing loans shall be recorded in the “Non-rate sensitive” column.
7. Accrued interest receivables shall be recorded in the “Non-rate sensitive”
column.
8. Allowance for doubtful debts shall be recorded in the “Non-rate sensitive” column.
9. Foreclosed assets shall be recorded in the “Non-rate sensitive” column.
10. Land, premises and equipment shall be recorded in the “Non-rate sensitive” column.
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-5/8-
11. Other assets, namely, deposits at the Bank of Thailand, advanced payments
such as prepaid insurance premiums or other non-rate sensitive items shall be recorded in
the “Non-rate sensitive” column.
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
12. Deposits
12.1 Current accounts shall be recorded in the “Non-rate sensitive” column
as financial institutions in Thailand do not give interest for current accounts, hence they
are not sensitive to interest rate change.
12.2 Saving accounts shall be recorded in the time band according to the time remaining before financial institutions expect to adjust the next interest rates after
change in market rates or reference rates, assuming that the market interest rates or
reference rates will adjust immediately after the reporting date. For instance, financial
institutions may enter in the 0-1 month or 1-3 month time band.
12.3 Fixed deposits shall be recorded in the time band according to the
time remaining until maturity.
13. Interbank items such as interbank borrowing shall be recorded in the time
band according to the time remaining until next repricing for floating rate items and until
maturity for fixed rate items. 14. Sale under repurchase agreements shall be recorded under the heading
prescribed in the Notification of the Bank of Thailand Re: Preparation and
Announcement of Financial Statement of Financial Institutions in the time band
according to the contractual maturity since they have fixed interest rates.
15. Other liabilities shall be recorded in the time band according to the time
until next repricing or time remaining until maturity. Items not sensitive to interest rate
change shall be recorded in the “Non-rate sensitive” column such as accrued expenses
which do not incur any interest: they shall be recorded in the “Non-rate sensitive” column.
16. Shareholders’ equity
16.1 Common shares shall be recorded in the “Non-rate sensitive” column. 16.2 Preferred shares with attributes similar to equity instruments shall be
recorded in the “Non-rate sensitive” column and those with attributes similar to debt
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-5/9-
instruments shall be recorded in the time band according to the time until next repricing.
16.3 Others such as paid-in capital and retained earnings, etc. shall be
recorded in the “Non-rate sensitive” column. Off-Balance-Sheet Items
17. Forward foreign exchange contracts shall be recorded with the notional
amount in 2 entries as follows: 1) Long position in the currency to receive in the future in
the repricing gap table of such currency; and, 2) Short position in the currency to pay in the
future in the repricing gap table of such currency in the time band according to the time
remaining until maturity of the forward contracts. For instance, a forward foreign exchange
contract which sells baht and buys US dollar, with the contractual amount of 1 million US
dollar in 5 month time, shall be recorded as a short position in the more than 3-6 month
time band of the baht table and long position in the more than 3-6 month time band of the
US dollar table with the equivalent amount in baht. 18. Futures and forward rate agreements (FRAs) shall be recorded with the
notional amounts as 2 entries as follows:
18.1 the first entry related to the underlying instrument shall be recorded in
the time band corresponding to the time remaining until delivery or the time period in
which rights can be exercised plus the time remaining of such underlying instrument (if
any); and
18.2 the second entry related to the said derivative shall be recorded in the
time band corresponding to the time remaining until delivery or the time period in which
rights can be exercised. Example: If a financial institution has a long forward bond, the entries will be: 1) long
position for the notional amount of the instrument to receive in the time band corresponding
to the time remaining until delivery of the forward contract plus the time remaining of the
bond; and, 2) short position for the contract notional amount in the time band corresponding
to the time remaining until delivery of the forward contract.
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-5/10-
Example: Sale of a 2 x 5 months FRA, the entries will be: 1) long position for the notional
amount in the 5 month time band; and, 2) short position for the notional amount in the 2
month time band. 19. Interest rate swaps shall be recorded as 2 entries according to the interest
received or paid and relevant remaining time. Received item shall be recorded as long
position and paid item as short position, in the time band according to the time remaining
until maturity for the portion with fixed interest rate and according to the time remaining
until next repricing for the floating rate portion. For example, an interest rate swaps which
a financial institution will receive floating rate and pay fixed interest rate, the entries shall
be 1) long position for receiving item in the time band according to the next repricing, and
2) short position for paying item in the time band according to the time remaining until
maturity of the swap contract. 20. Cross currency swaps shall be recorded in the same way as interest rate swaps,
where the long and short positions shall be entered in the repricing gap tables of relevant
currencies. 21. Options with interest rate and foreign currency as underlying shall be recorded
with delta equivalent value as follows: 1) for the case with no underlying instrument such
as interest rate or currency options, etc., the delta equivalent value equals to the product of
the principal value of the notional underlying multiplied by the delta value; and, 2) for the
case with underlying instrument such as bond options, etc., the delta equivalent value equals
to fair value of the underlying instrument multiplied by the delta value, where the delta
value can be derived from an options pricing model of each financial institution. Two legs
approach shall be employed in recording options in the time bands which is 1) at the time
the underlying contract takes effect and 2) at the time the underlying contract matures.
Example: In April, call options on a June Three-month Interest Rate Future is bought, the
entries will be long position for the time the underlying contract matures in 5 months, and
short position for the 2-month time band. For the currency options, the entries will be long
position in the repricing gap table for the currency to receive and short position in the
repricing gap table for in the currency to deliver.
22. Other obligations such as unused credit facilities, guarantee obligations, etc. shall be recorded with the notional amount in the “Non-rate sensitive” column.
Examples of measuring interest rate risk by Repricing Gap Approach are
prescribed on Attachment 5.1.
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-5/11-
Attachment 5.1
Examples of Interest Rate Risk Measurement by Repricing Gap Approach
Financial institutions using repricing gap method to measure interest rate risk in
accordance with the guideline specified by the Bank of Thailand may refer to the example
below, without making any behavioral adjustment for items with no definite residual
contractual terms, prepayments and NPLs. Assume that the positions of a financial
institution as of 30 December 2004 are as follows: 1) total assets is equal to 8,500 million
baht, 2) total capital is equal to 1,200 million baht and 3) exchange rate is 40 baht per one
US dollar. Step 1 Record assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet items in the repricing gap table in
various time bands. Assets
1. Cash of 500 million baht shall be recorded in the “Non-rate sensitive” column. 2. Interbank items: 5-day loan in the interbank market in the amount of 90
million baht shall be recorded according to the remaining time, which is, in the 0-1 month
time band. 3. Investments
3.1 There are 3 items of held to maturity debt instruments as follows: (1) 6-year special D series bond 42/6.00%/6/2 with the book value of
500 million baht, to mature on 5 March 2005, the entry shall be the residual term in the
more than 1-3 month time band;
(2) D series bond 45/4.625%/5 with the book value of 1,000 million
baht to mature on 21 June 2009 (residual term to maturity is 4.5 years), the entry shall be
in the more than 4-5 year time band;
(3) US dollar bond with 15-year residual term and the book value of 5 million US dollar or equivalent to 200 million baht and fixed interest rate shall be
recorded in the US dollar table with the amount of 200 million baht in the more than 10-
15 year time band.
3.2 Available for sales debt instruments in the banking book: AIS093B
debenture with the book value of 500 million baht to mature on 21 March 2009 and the
interest rate of 2.10% plus average 6-month fixed deposit rate of Bangkok Bank, Kasikorn
Bank, Siam Commercial Bank and Krung Thai Bank, where interest is paid on 21 March
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-5/12-
and 21 September every year, the entry shall be in the time band of next repricing on 21
Marrch 2005 in the more than 1-3 month time band. 3.3 Available for sales equity instrument: 2,000,000 shares of Land & House
with the book value of 9.5 baht per share shall be recorded in the “Non-rate sensitive”
column with the amount of 19 million baht. 3.4 Equity instrument held for investment: 2,000,000 shares of Banpu with
the book value of 120 baht per share shall be recorded in the “Non-rate sensitive” column
with the amount of 240 million baht.
4. Loans
4.1 Commercial loans
(1) Baht loans with outstanding balance of 1,000 million baht, 6-month
BIBOR and repricing every 6 months. The entry shall be 1,000 million baht in the more
than 3-6 months time band.
(2) US dollar loans with outstanding balance of 7.5 million US dollar
or equivalent of 300 million baht, fixed interest rate and 5-month remaining maturity. The
entry shall be in the US dollar table with 300 million baht in the more than 3-6 month time
band.
4.2 Housing loans
(1) Outstanding balance of 600 million baht, fixed interest rate of 4%
for 2 years, after which the rate will be MLR-0.5%, with monthly principal repayment of 5
million baht. The entry shall be 5 million baht in the 0-1 month time band, 10 million baht
in the more than 1-3 month time band, 15 million baht in the more than 3-6 month time
band, 30 million baht in the more than 6-12 month time band, 60 million baht in the more
than 1-2 year time band and 480 million baht in the more than 2-3 year time band. (2) The remaining 500 million baht with floating rate and to be
repriced within 1 month after change in market interest rate, assuming that the market rate
will change on the day following the report date, shall be recorded in the 0-1 month time
band. 4.3 Personal loans of 100 million baht with 2 year term and fixed interest rate
of 15% shall be recorded in the more than 1-2 year time band.
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-5/13-
4.4 Credit card loans of 400 million baht, 150 million baht of which
customers pay in full and 250 million baht is outstanding balance. The 250 million baht
shall be recorded in the more than 1-3 months time band since financial institutions must
inform the customers 30 days in advance befor charging late fees, whereas the 150 million
baht shall be recorded in the “Non-rate sensitive” column since it is the outstanding without
any interest.
4.5 Hire-purchase loans of 100 million baht to be due in 8 months, 150
million baht in 1.5 years, and 300 million baht in 3.5 years, the entries will be made
according to the remaining time to maturity since they have fixed interest rate throughout
the contractual terms. The amounts 100 million baht, 150 million baht and 300 million baht
shall be recorded in the more than 6-12 month, more than 1-2 year and more than 3-4 year
time band, respectively.
5. Non-performing loans of 400 million baht shall be recorded in the “Non-rate
sensitive” column. 6. Accrued interest receivables of 150 million baht shall be recorded in the “Non-
rate sensitive” column. 7. Allowance for doubtful debts of 200 million baht shall be recorded in the
“Non-rate sensitive” column. 8. Properties foreclosed of 300 million baht shall be recorded in the “Non-rate
sensitive” column. 9. Land, premises and equipment of 1,000 million baht shall be recorded in the
“Non-rate sensitive” column. 10. Other assets of 200 million baht shall be recorded in the “Non-rate sensitive”
column.
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity 11. Deposits
11.1 Current accounts of 500 million baht shall be recorded in the “Non-rate
sensitive” column. 11.2 Savings of 2,000 mllion with 1% interest rate shall be recorded in the 0-1-
month time band since financial institutions will adjust the deposit rate one month after
market rate changes, assuming that the market rate changes on the day following the
reporting date.
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-5/14-
11.3 Fixed deposits
(1) 500 million baht to mature in 3 months, 1,500 million bath in 1
year shall be recorded according to the remaining time to maturity respectively. (2) 12-month fixed deposits of 5 million US dollar or equivalent of
200 million baht with 2-month remaining maturity shall be recorded with 200 million baht
in the more than 1-3 month time band in the US dollar table. (3) 3-year fixed deposit of 7.5 million US dollar or equivalent of 300
million baht with 2.5-year remaining maturity shall be recorded with 300 million baht in
the more than 2-3 year time band in the US dollar table.
12. Interbank item: 5-day interbank borrowing of 900 million baht shall be
recorded in the 0-1 month time band.
13. Borrowing: debenture issuance of 1,000 million baht with 5% fixed interest rate
for 8 years and residual term of 2.8 years shall be recorded in the more than 2-3 year time
band. 14. Other liabilities which are not sensitive to interest rate change in the amount
of 49 million baht shall be recorded in the “Non-rate sensitive” column. 15. Shareholders’ equity of 1,551 million baht shall be recorded in the “Non-rate
sensitive” column.
Off-Balance-Sheet Items
16. Forward foreign exchange contracts of 7.5 million US dollar or equivalent
of 300 million US dollar to purchase baht and sell US dollar in the next 5 months shall be
recorded as a long position of 300 million baht in the more than 3-6 month time band of
the baht table and a short position of 300 million baht in the more than 3-6 month time
band of the US dollar table.
17. Interest rate swaps of 500 million baht to mature in 2 years, where
financial institutions pay fixed interest rate and receive floating rate which is repriced
every 3 months, shall be recorded as a long position of 500 million baht in the 1-3 month
time band and a short position of 500 million baht in the more than 1-2 years time band of
the baht table.
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-5/15-
18. 1-year cross currency interest rate THB/USD swap of 5 million US dollar or
equivalent of 200 million baht to mature in 11 months, where financial institutions pay
fixed interest rate in baht and receive floating rate in US dollar, the interest rate is adjusted
every 3 months and next repricing is in 2 months, and upon maturity, financial institutions
pay principal in baht and receive principal in US dollar. The entries shall be a short position
of 200 million baht in the more than 6-12 month (11 month) time band of the baht table, and
a long position of 200 million baht in the more than 1-3 month (2 months) time band of the
US dollar table.
19. Interest rate futures where financial institutions hold a long position in 6-month interest rate future contract of 100 million baht to be in effect in 4 months shall be
recorded as a short position of 100 million baht in the more than 3-6 month time band (4
months) and a long position of 100 million baht in the more than 6-12 month (4+6=10
months) time band of the baht table. 20. Forward rate agreements where financial institutions sell (2,18) forward rate
agreement on baht interest rates for 400 million baht shall be recorded as a long position of
400 million baht in the more than 1-2 year (18 months) time band and a short position of
400 million baht in the more than 1-3 month (2 months) time band of the THB table. 21. Put options where financial institutions long put, in other words, buy rights
to sell US dollar bond held by the financial institutions with delta equivalent value of 5
million US dollar or 200 million baht. At present, the bond has 15 years remaining maturity
and the rights must be exercised within 2 months, the entries shall be a long position of 200
million baht in the more than 1- 3 month (2 months) time band of the US dollar table and a
short position of 200 million baht in the more than 10-15 year (15 years) time band of the
US dollar table. 22. Call options where financial institutions long call or buy rights to buy 3-
month US Treasury Bill with delta equivalent value of 6.25 million US dollar or 250
million baht and the rights must be exercised within 3 months, the entries shall be a long
position of 250 million baht in the more than 3-6 month (3+3=6) time band and a short
position of 250 million baht in the more than 1-3 month (3 months) time band, both
positions are recorded in the US dollar table. 23. Other obligations such as unused overdraft facilities of 100 million baht
shall be recorded in the “Non-rate sensitive” column.
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-5/16-
Step 2 Calculate gap for each time band by netting assets and liabilities positions and net
position for off-balance-sheet items in each time band. For instance, in the 0-1 month time
band, RSA and RSL are 595 million baht and 2,900 million baht, repectively, resulting in
a gap before off-balance-sheet items of -2,305 million million and a net position of notional
amounts for off-balance-sheet items of 0 baht. Hence, the net gap is equal to 595-2,900+0 = -2,305. In other words, in the 0-1 month time band, financial institutons have a liability
sensitive position of 2,305 million baht, etc. Step 3 Calculate cumulative gap for each time band by adding gap of each time band to the
gap in the previous time bands. For instance, in the more than 3-6 month time band of the
baht table, the cumulative gap equals to the sum of gap in the more than 3-6 month time
band and that in the more than 1-3 month and 0-1 month time band, which is 1,215+860-2,305= -230 million baht. In other words, in the 0-6 month time band, financial institutions
have a liability sensitive position of 230 million baht and a ratio of cumulative gap to total
assets equal to 2.71 % (-230/8,500=0.0271). Step 4 Measure the effect on earnings from the interest rate change under the assumption
that interest rate increases by 100 basis points equally throughout the yield curve (parallel
shift in the yield curve) within 1 year by multiplying gap in each time band with 100 bps
and proportion of 1 year remaining in effect. For example, in the baht table, the effect on
net interest earnings of the 0-1 month time band is the product of the gap in such time band
which is -2,305 million baht multiplied by the proportion of 1 year remaining in effect
which is 11.5/12 = 0.958. Thus interest increase of 100 bps reduces interest income in the 0-1 month time band by 22.08 million baht (-2,305*0.958*1%). Step 5 Assess the interest rate risk level which is equal to the sum of the effects on net
interest income as a result of interest rate increase in 1 year period as derived from Step 4
of all currencies. For example, increase in interest rate by 100 bps causes the net interest
income in one year to reduce by 11 million baht from the baht table and increase by 1.15
million baht from the US dollar table. Hence, the net interest income of the financial
institutions reduces by 9.85 million baht.
Step 6 Compare interest rate risk level in all banking book positions derived in Step 5 with
the projected earnings of financial institutions. For example, assuming that financial
institutions’ projected earnings for the year 2005 is 200 million baht, the financial
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-5/17-
institutions’ interest income will decline by 4.93% of the projected earnings if interest rate
increases by 100 bps.
Measurement of interest rate risk effects on economic value by using duration
weight under the BIS guidelines can be done as follows:
Step 7 Multiply the net position in each time band with the duration-based weight which
reflects the sensitivity of the position in each time band to a parallel increase of interest rate
by 100 bps throughout the yield curve in order to derive the effects on economic value
(EVE) of the position in each time band. For example, in the baht table, the economic value
of the position in the 0-1 month time band will change by the amount of net position of -2,305 million baht multiplied by the duration-based weight of -0.04% which equals 0.92
million baht. Step 8 Sum the net results derived from netting the effects on the economic value of the
position in each time band in order to obtain total effects on economic value of the position
in every time band for each currency. For example, a parallel increase in interest rate by
100 bps throughout the yield curve will reduce the economic value of all baht positions of
the financial institutions by 33.30 million baht.
Step 9 Sum the effects on economic value from all currency tables to obtain the effects on
all currencies. For example, the effect on the economic value from the baht table is a decline
by 33.30 million baht and from the US dollar table is an increase by 5.93 million baht. Therefore, a parallel increase in interest rate by 100 bps throughout the yield curve will
reduce the economic value of financial institutions by 27.37 million baht. Step 10 Compare total effects on the economic value of the financial institutions with their
capital fund. For example, a financial institution has capital of 1,200 million baht; the
increase in interest rate by 100 bps will reduce the economic value of the financial
institution by 2.28% of its total capital.
-5/18-19- Bank ………………………………………………………..
Repricing Gap Table in THB for Period Ended 30 December 2004
Assets
0-1
Month
More than 1-3
Month
More
than
3-6
Months
More than 6-12
Months
More than 1-2
Year
More than 2-3
Year
More than 3-4
Year
More than 4-5
Year
More than 5-7
Year
More than 7-10 Year
More than
10-15 Year
More than 15-20 Year
More than 20
Year
Non-rate
sensitive
Total
Cash 500.00 500.00
Interbank items
90.00 50.00
Investments 1,000.00 1,000.00 259.00 2,259.00
Debt instruments 1,000.00 1,000.00 2,000.00
Held to maturity 500.00 1,000.00 1,500.00
Available for sales 500.00 500.00
Equity instruments 259.00 259.00
Available for sales 19.00 19.00
General investments 240.00 240.00
Other investments 0.00
Loans 505.00 260.00 1,015.00 130.00 310.00 480.00 300.00 500.00 3,500.00
Commercial loans 1,000.00 1,000.00
Consumer loans 0.00
Housing loans 505.00 10.00 15.00 30.00 60.00 480.00 1,100.00
Personal loans 100.00 100.00
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (03-08-08)-check Page 38 of 75
Credit card loans 250.00 150.00 400.00
Hire-purchase loans 100.00 150.00 300.00 550.00
Other credit advances 0.00
Non-performing loans 400.00 400.00
Accrued interest receivables 150.00 150.00
Allowance for doubtful debts (200.00) (200.00)
Net properties foreclosed 300.00 300.00
Net land premises and equipment 1,000.00 1,000.00
Other assets 200.00 200.00
Total Rate Sensitive Assets 595.00 1,260.00 1,015.00 130.00 310.00 480.00 300.00 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 00.00 0.00 5,090.00
-5/20-
0-1
Month
More than
1-3
Month
More than
3-6
Months
More than
6-12
Months
More than
1-2
Year
More than
2-3 Year
More than
3-4
Year
More than
4-5
Year
More than
5-7
Year
More than
7-10
Year
More than
10-15
Year
More than
15-20
Year
More than 20
Year
Non- rate
sensitive
Total
Liabilities & Shareholders’
Equity
Deposits 2,000.00 500.00 1,500.00 500.00 4,500.00
Current 500.00 500.00
Savings 2,000.00 2,000.00
Fixed 500 1,500.00 2,000.00
Others 0.00
Interbank items 900.00 900.00
Borrowings 1,000.00 1,000.00
Other liabilities 49.00 49.00
Shareholders’ equity 1,551.00 1,551.00
Total Rate Sensitive Liabilities 2,900.00 500.00 0.00 1,500.00 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,900.00
Off-balance-sheet item
FRA (400.00) 400.00 0.00
CCRS (200.00) (200.00)
Forward 300.00 300.00
Future (100.00) 100.00 0.00
IRS 500.00 (500.00) 0.00
Put option Call option 0.00
Other obligations 100.00
Total rate sensitive off-
balance-sheet items 0.00 100.00 200.00 (100.00) (100.00) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (03-08-08)-check Page 40 of 75
-5/21- Bank ………………………………………………………..
Repricing Gap Table in USD for Period Ended 30 December 2004
Assets 0-1
Month
More than
1-3
Month
More
than
3-6
Months
More than
6-12
Months
More than
1-2
Year
More than
2-3
Year
More than
3-4
Year
More than
4-5
Year
More than
5-7
Year
More than
7-10
Year
More than
10-15
Year
More than
15-20
Year
More than
20
Year
Non- rate
sensitive
Total
Cash 0.00
Interbank items 0.00
Investments 200.00 200.00
Debt instruments 200.00 200.00
Held to maturity 200.00 200.00
Available for sales 0.00
Equity instruments 0.00
Available for sales 0.00
General investments 0.00
Other investments 0.00
Loans 300.00 300.00
Commercial loans 300.00 300.00
Consumer loans 0.00
Housing loans 0.00
Personal loans 0.00
Credit card loans 0.00
Hire-purchase loans 0.00
Other credit advances 0.00
Non-performing loans 0.00
Accrued interest
receivables
0.00
Allowance for doubtful
debts
0.00
Net properties foreclosed 0.00
Net land premises and
equipment
0.00
Other assets 0.00
Total Rate Sensitive
Assets (RSA) 0.00 0.00 300.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 200.00 00.00 0.00 500.00
-5/22-
0-1
Month
More
than
1-3
Month
More
than
3-6
Months
More
than
6-12
Months
More
than
1-2
Year
More
than
2-3
Year
More
than
3-4
Year
More
than
4-5
Year
More
than
5-7
Year
More
than
7-10
Year
More
than
10-15
Year
More
than
15-20
Year
More
than
20
Year
Non- rate
sensitive
Total
Liabilities &
Shareholders’ Equity
Deposits 200.00 300.00 500.00
Current 0.00
Savings 0.00
Fixed 200.00 300.00 500.00
Others 0.00
Interbank items 0.00
Borrowings 0.00
Other liabilities 0.00
Shareholders’ equity Total Rate Sensitive
Liabilities (RSL) 0.00 200.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 300.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 500.00
Off-balance-sheet items
FRA CCRS 200.00 200.00
Forward (300.00) (300.00)
Future IRS 0.00
Put option 200.00 (200.00) 0.00
Call option (250.00) 250.00 0.00
Other obligations 0.00
Total rate sensitive off-
balance-sheet items 0.00 150.00 (50.00) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (200.00) 0.00 0.00 (100.00)
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (03-08-08)-check Page 42 of 75
-5/23- Bank ………………………………………………………..
Report of Interest Rate Risk Measurement in THB
For Period Ended 30 December 2004
Unit: million baht
0-1
Month
More
than
1-3
Month
More
than
3-6
Months
More
than
6-12
Months
More than
1-2 Year
More
than
2-3 Year
More than
3-4 Year
More than
4-5
Year
More
than 57
Year
More
than 7- 10
Year
More than
10-15
Year
More than
15-20
Year
More than
20
Year
Non
-rate
sens
itive
Total
1. Total assets 8,500.00
2. Total rate sensitive
assets (Total RSA) 595.00 1,260.00 1,015.00 130.00 310.00 480.00 300.00 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,090.00
3. Total rate sensitive
liabilities (Total RSL) 2,900.00 500.00 0.00 1,500.00 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,900.00
4. Gap (RSA-RSL) (2,305.00) 760.00 1,015.00 (1,370.00) 310.00 (520.00) 300.00 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 810.00
5. Net gap of nominal
amount of rate–
sensitive off-balance-sheet items
0.00 100.00 200.00 (100.00) (100.00) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 200.00
6. Periodic Gap (2,305.00) 860.00 1,215.00 (1,470.00) 210.00 (520.00) 300.00 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
7. Cumulative Gap (2,305.00) (1,445.00) (230.00) (1,700.00) (1,490.00) (2,010.00) (1,710.00) (710.00) (710.00) (710.00) (710.00) (710.00) (710.00)
8. Ratio of cumulative
gap to total assets (%) (27.12%) (17.00%) (2.71%) (20.00%) (17.53%) (23.65%) (20.12%) (8.35%) (8.35%) (8.35%) (8.35%) (8.35%) (8.35%)
9. Effects on net
interest income case
10. Proportion of 1-year
remaining in effect
0.985 0.833 0.625 0.250
11. Effects on net
interest income in
each time band if
interest rate
increases by 100 bps
(22.08) 7.16 7.59 (3.68)
12. Cumulative effects
on net interest
income in 1 year
(22.08) (14.92) (7.32) (11.00)
13. Effects on economic
value case
14. Duration-base
weight
-0.04% -0.16% -0.36% -0.71% -1.38% -2.25% -3.07% -3.85% -5.08% -6.63% -8.92% -11.21% -13.01%
14.1 Proxy of modified
duration
-0.04 -0.16 -0.36 -0.71 -1.38 -2.25 -3.07 -3.85 -5.08 -6.63 -8.92 -11.21 -13.01
14.2 Int. rate change
assumption (basis points) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
15. Effects on economic
value in each time
band
0.92 (1.38) (4.37) 10.44 (2.90) 11.70 (9.21) (38.50) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
16. Cumulative effects
on economic value
0.92 (0.45) (4.38) 5.61 2.71 14.41 5.20 (33.30) (33.30) (33.30) (33.30) (33.30) (33.30)
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (03-08-08)-check Page 44 of 75
-5/24-
Bank ………………………………………………………..
Report of Interest Rate Risk Measurement in USD
For Period Ended 30 December 2004
Unit: USD
0-1
Month
More
than 1-3
Month
More
than 3-6
Months
More
than
6-12
Months
More
than
1-2
Year
More
than
2-3
Year
More
than
3-4
Year
More
than
4-5
Year
More
than
5-7
Year
More
than
7-10
Year
More
than
10-15
Year
More
than
15-20
Year
More
than
20 Year
Nonrate
sensi
tive Total
1. Total assets 8,500.00
2. Total rate sensitive
assets (Total RSA) 0.00 0.00 300.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 200.00 0.00 0.00 500.00
3. Total rate sensitive
liabilities (Total
RSL)
0.00 200.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 300.0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 500.00
4. Gap (RSA-RSL) 0.00 (200.00) 300.00 0.00 0.00 (300.00) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 200.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5. Net gap of
nominal amount of
rate–sensitive off-
balance-sheet
items
0.00 150.00 (50.00) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (200.00) 0.00 0.00 (100.00)
6. Periodic Gap 0.00 (50.00) 250.00 0.00 0.00 (300.00) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
7. Cumulative Gap 0.00 (50.00) 200.00 200.00 200.00 (100.00) (100.00) (100.00) (100.00) (100.00) (100.00) (100.00) (100.00)
8. Ratio of
cumulative gap to
total assets (%)
0.00 (0.59%) 2.35% 2.35% 2.35% (1.18%) (1.18%) (1.18%) (1.18%) (1.18%) (1.18%) (1.18%) (1.18%)
9. Effects on net
interest income
case
10. Proportion of 1
year time
remaining in effect
0.958 0.833 0.625 0.250
11. Effects on net
interest income in
each time band if
interest rate
increases 100 bps
0.00 (0.42) 1.56 0.00
12. Cumulative effects
on net interest
income in 1 year
0.00 (0.42) 1.15 1.15
13. Effects on
economic value
case
14. Duration-base
weight
-0.04% -0.16% -0.36% -0.71% -1.38% -2.25% -3.07% -3.85% -5.08% -6.63% -8.92% -11.21% -13.01%
14.1 Proxy of modified
duration
-0.04 -0.16 -0.36 -0.71 -1.38 -2.25 -3.07 -3.85 -5.08 -6.63 -8.92 -11.21 -13.01
14.2 Int. rate change
assumption (basis points) 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
100.0
0
100.0 0 100.0 0 100.0 0 100.00
100.0 0 100.0 0 100.00 100.00
15. Effects on
economic value in
each time
band
0.00 0.08 (0.90) 0.00 0.00 6.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
16. Cumulative effects
on economic value
0.00 0.08 (0.82) (0.82) (0.82) 5.93 5.93 5.93 5.93 5.93 5.93 5.93 5.93
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-5/25-
Bank ………………………………………………….
Report of Interest Rate Risk Measurement in All Currencies
For Period Ended 30 December 2004
Unit: million baht
Currency Interest Rate changes by 100 Basis Points
Effects on Net Interest Income Effects on Economic Value
THB
US DOLLAR
JAPANESE YEN
POUND STERLING
EURO
HONG KONG DOLLAR RINGGIT
SINGAPORE DOLLAR OTHERS
(11.00)
1.15
(33.30)
5.93
Total effects from Interest Rate
changes (9.85) (27.37)
Percentage of projected Net Interest
Income in the next one year (4.93)
Percentage of current capital funds (2.28)
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-6/1-
Attachment 6
Guideline on Information Adjustment to Commensurate with Actual Behavior
Financial institutions that intend to adjust information to be in accordance with
customers’ behavior shall comply with the following guidelines: 1. Assumptions underlining behavioral adjustments on financial institutions’
transaction must be consistent, reasonable and in coherence with interest rate conditions.
2. Financial institutions should avoid using assumptions which are not referable
from past experience or are not feasible. Large financial institutions should analize the
assumptions based on statistical concepts. Financial institutions can use various
information in developing the assumptions as follows:
2.1 Statistical analysis of portfolio and customers’ behavior in response to
change in interest rate which may vary depending on market conditions or factors specific
to financial institutions such as customers’ characteristic, type of financial institutions,
etc. 2.2 Model developed by financial institutions or vendor such as prepayment
model. 2.3 Information from business units and the management regarding business
and pricing strategy as change in business or pricing strategy may affect the behavior of
cash flows of non-maturity items.
3. Sufficient time must be allocated for monitoring behavior of each activity
before making behavioral adjustments.
4. Financial institutions’ board of directors or other delegated committee and the
senior management should review key assumptions and assess the impact at least once a
year to ensure validity of such assumptions since change in market condition,
competition and strategy may affect validity of the assumptions.
5. Financial institutions must maintain supporting documents in developing the
assumptions and review of such assumptions in writing, and should have more than one
person acknowledge the development process of the assumptions.
6. Financial institutions should ensure that all significant positions and both on- and off-balance sheet cash flow are included in the measurement systems in a timely and
consistent manner. Such data include coupon rate, cash flow of financial instruments,
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-6/2-
time for interest rate adjustment and other important conditions specified in the contract. In case where data are adjusted differently from the contractual term, financial
institutions must establish a clear and appropriate method, procedure and reason in
writing for inspection, especially, adjustment of expected cash flow for expected
prepayment of customers or early redemption of securities’ issuers.
7. Financial institutions’ management and users of the information on interest rate
risk assessment should have good understanding of the underlined assumptions and use
the information with caution. Particularly, in case where the technique is complex, even
though the result is theoretically accurate, such information may not be adequate for risk
management if the assumptions or variables used in the calculation are not reasonable and
not in line with the situations. Therefore, financial institutions must prepare documents relating to the assumptions and any relevant variables in a clear and understandable
manner. Such documents shall be reviewed regularly and financial institutions shall
evaluate validity of the assumptions at least once a year.
Example of data adjustments to correspond to actual behaviors is prescribed on
Attachment 6.1
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-6/3-
Attachment 6.1
An Example of Data Adjustment to Correspond to Actual Behavior
Interest rate risk measurement is an assessment of risk based on on- and off-
balance-sheet items and taken into account the time remaining to contractual maturity or
until next repricing. Hence, in order for such risk measurement to be more accurate, the
outstanding balance of each item to be recorded in a time band of the repricing gap or
duration-based gap table should correspond to actual behaviors as much as possible. Financial institutions should therefore adjust the data to correspond with actual behaviors
of key items which tend to deviate from the contractual maturity dates especially non-maturity deposits (NMDs), which are savings and current accounts and mortgage loans, or
other types of loans whose borrowers have the right to prepay as well as non-performing
loans. In considering making behavioral adjustments to these items, financial institutions
should evaluate significance of the effects from these items, depending on specific
attributes of financial institutions or market conditions at each period. For example,
market with interest rate on a rising trend, or the case where financial institutions stipulate
that customers pay all penalty fees or part of the differences between contractual interest
rate and market interest rate for prepayment may not entice the customers to prepay the
loans. Hence, the said effects may not be significant.
An Example of Behavioral Adjustment of Non-Maturity Deposits (NMDs)
Factors that determine the Volume of NMDs
NMDs are key source of funds of financial institutions. The outstanding balance of
NMDs may vary in different scenarios, such as: • Funding needs and financial institutions’ ability to find other sources of
funds. For example, during high liquidity situations, financial institutions may adopt a
pricing strategy which discourages deposits. • Pricing strategies and customer base of financial institutions. For instance,
financial institutions may waive fees for customers who maintain the minimum deposit
balance or may specify tiered pricing strategies for each customer group.
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-6/4-
• Market strategies and strategies regarding deposit products: Financial
institutions may set targeted customer base by designing products specific for a group
such as products for a non-rate sensitive group and products for a rate sensitive group.
• Numbers and types of competitors in the market: Strategies of competitors
including commercial banks, mutual funds and insurance companies give customers more
options which may affect deposit volume of the financial institutions.
• Levels and trends of market interest rates have tremendous effects on
movement of deposits. The higher the difference between market rate and deposit rate, the
more movement of deposits.
• Product developments and changes in supervisory guidelines affect deposit
structures and customers’ behaviors. For instance, repeal of the deposit rate ceiling of the
Bank of Thailand on 25 February 2004. Thus, in analyzing NMDs, financial institutions
should account for new financial products in the market and supervisory guidelines to be
in effect since they may affect the customers’ behaviors.
The aforementioned factors demonstrate that volume of NMDs may change at
all times. Hence, adjusting NMD data to correspond to actual behaviors of the customers
should start from demographic analysis of targeted customers of financial institutions and
analysis of various aforementioned factors in order to assess their effects on customers’
behaviors and pricing. Sample tools which financial institutions may employ for such
analysis are as follows:
Method 1 Analysis of Non-core Deposits and Core Deposits
Step 1 Categorizing deposits into non-core and core deposits In analyzing and setting assumptions related to NMDs, it is necessary to
differentiate between 1) core balances which are long-term and stable deposits and 2) non-core balances which are short-term and temporary deposits. This can be accomplished by
analyzing the behavior of deposits by type, occupation and other demographic factors of
the customers based on historical statistical information. Examples of non-core deposits
are (1) seasonal deposits such as deposits of customers in agricultural sector which
increase or decrease seasonally or deposits of customers with fixed income or retirees
whose balances are usually highest at month-ends, (2) deposits whose behavior is similar
to working capital of busineses, etc.
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-6/5-
Core deposits which are deposits which stay with financial instituions for longer
term than non-core deposits should be separated into 2 groups, a rate sensitive group and
a non-rate sensitive group, by observing the customers’ past behaviors, deposit
information or employing statistical analytical tools, which will facilitate development of
assumptions related to NMDs. For examples, 1) analysis of effects of market interest rate
on deposits rate, where, in general, financial institutions will adjust deposit interest rate
subsequent to market rate change and in a smaller amount than the market rate change
and 2) Analysis of the effect of market interest rate on deposit volume from change in
spread (the difference between interest rate that financial instituions offer to customers
and yield from other sources). If financial institutions offer lower interest rate than the
alternatives, the customers may move their deposits elsewhere. Hence, if financial
institutions monitor the spread and administer opportunity cost of the customers, they will
be able to determine the effects on the NMDs volume.
Step 2 Developing assumptions and compiling assumptions used for measuring
interest rate risk Non-core deposits are short-term deposits and constantly fluctuate. Financial
institutions may assume that such deposits will remain for less than 6 months. Therefore,
they should be recorded in the less than 6-month time band of the repricing gap table or
distributed in shorter time bands depending on behaviors of the customers of financial
institutions which may differ for each financial institution.
For core deposits which are sensitive to change in market interest rates or in
competitors’ rate, if financial institutions do not adjust their NMD interest rates in
response to the market interest rate or the competitors’ rate, such deposits shall be
recorded in the short time bands of the repricing gap table where outflow of deposits is
expected since they are ready to leave the financial institutions, should other returns be
higher. Core deposits which are not rate sensitive will remain with financial institutions
even if the financial institutions do not adjust the NMD interest rate according to the
market rates or the competitors’ rate. Such is crucial to the interest rate risk measurement,
for which financial institutions may employ several methods as follows:
• Assign the entire amount as long-term deposits which are non-rate sensitive
and will remain at financial institutions forever without due date, assuming that financial
institutions’ operations are on-going and that the deposit volume reduces as a result of
demographics characteristics of the customers, for instance, death or relocation. Such
deposit amount will be equally replaced by new customers. Nonetheless, financial
institutions employing this method must prepare sensitivity analysis to assess effects on
earnings and liquidity if these deposits leave the financial institutions as well.
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-6/6-
• Distribute the deposits in different time bands based on the demographic
assumptions of the customers. • Assign the entire amount as long-term deposit which is not quite rate sensitive
but setting maximum maturity in assigning time band such as no longer than 10 years due
to difficulty in predicting customers’ behavior, competition, industry and supervisory
guidelines.
Financial institutions should consider assigning longer time bands in the repricing
gap or duration-based gap tables for these deposits during rate increase periods as compared
to rate decrease periods. Moreover, the persons setting assumptions related to NMDs should
consult the marketing managers who look after the customers for the benefit of developing
assumptions on residual terms of these deposits. Method 2 Impact Analysis of Pricing Spread on Components of NMDs by Net Income
Simulation
Normally, net income simulation has already included the effects from cap and
floor as well as effects from market rate change on deposit rate and outstanding balance
of NMDs. For instance, simulation may calculate the correlation where increase in market
rate by 200 bps will lead to increase in deposit rate of financial institutions by 75 bps;
whereas, decrease in market rate by 200 bps will lead to decrease in deposit rate by 125
bps. This demonstrates that different speed and size of change in interest rate differ
depending on the level and direction of change in market rate. In case where market
interest rate increases, deposit rate may be adjusted at a slower rate and at lesser degree
than the case where market rate decreases. In measuring the effect of pricing spread and
market interest rate on deposit volumes, simulation may indicates lesser change in the
deposit volume in the case where market rate is on a rising trend. Method 3 Replicating Portfolio Analysis
This analysis is based on viewing NMDs as a portfolio of many types of financial
instruments with different interest rates and maturities as a result of different pricing and
strategies for each customer group. In estimating maturities of NMDs under this method,
financial institutions must use statistical approaches to find which replicating portfolio
consists of various financial instruments with definite maturities and has interest rate
adjustment period similar to NMDs. For instance, financial institutions may find that
changes in the yield of replicating portfolio consisting of 3-month treasury bills and 2- year treasury notes are close to changes in the interest rates of NMDs. As such, financial
institutions can use the duration of the replicating portfolio in estimating the maturity of
the NMDs.
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-6/7-
An Example of Adjustments of Non-performing Loans
Non-performing loans (NPL) is another important item of financial institutions.
Adjusting such data may be performed by units responsible for monitoring NPLs such as
debt restructuring unit or collection unit in order to estimate groups of loans under their
responsibilities with regards to the probability, proportion and recovery period that such
NPLs will be performing in the future. Alternatively, adjustments may be based on
experiences or historical statistics. The portion of outstanding NPLs expected to recover
in the future shall be recorded in accordance with the general guidelines for recording
entries. For example, NPL of Company A has a probability that 50% of its outstanding
balance will be paid with the interest rate of MLR-2% within the next 18 months. The
entries will be 50% of the amount in the more than 1-2 years time band and another 50% in
the non-rate sensitive column.
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-7/1-
Attachment 7
Guideline for Stress Testing
1. In developing scenarios for stress testing, financial institutions should take
into account their strategies and positions as well as tailoring to type of risk relevant to
each financial institution. Possible scenarios of stressful conditions are:
1.1 Abrupt changes in various interest rates;
1.2 Changes in relationship among key market interest rates (Basis Risk); 1.3 Changes in slope and shape of yield curve (Yield Curve Risk); 1.4 Changes in liquidity of key financial markets;
1.5 Changes in volatility of various interest rates;
1.6 Key assumptions or parameter breakdowns such as assumptions for
illiquid financial instruments, non-maturity financial instruments and
change in business strategies, etc.
2. In conducting stress testing, financial institutions should specially consider
financial instruments or markets with high concentration since such positions may incur
difficulty in liquidating or hedging during stressed situations, as well as consider “worst
case scenario” which rarely occurs, in addition to more probable events. The management
and board of directors and/or other committees must periodically review both the process
and stress test results and must ensure that appropriate contingency plans are readily in
place.
3. In addition to conducting stress testing under the scenarios developed by
financial institutions in order to reflect the positions of each financial institution, the
Bank of Thailand may require financial institutions to conduct stress testing under the
scenario specified by the Bank of Thailand (supervisory scenario) in order to assess
overall impact of interest rate risk on the financial institution system under a single
scenario, for which the Bank of Thailand will advise financial institutions in due course.
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-8/1-
Attachment 8
Risk Limits and Control
1. Risk limits of financial institutions should have initial elements as follows:
1.1 Have been approved by the board of directors for aggregate
interest rate risk limit or by other designated committees for detailed limits;
1.2 Commensurate with the scope, volume and complexity of the
positions held by financial institutions as well as commensurate with the capital level;
1.3 Consistent with the techniques used in measuring interest rate risk
and should reflect potential effects of interest rate change on earnings and/or economic
value;
1.4 Ensure that positions that may exceed the risk limit receive
immediate management attention;
1.5 Able to control all interest rate risk exposures that are material to
financial institutions;
1.6 Able to compare potential gains against potential risks of
undertaking various transactions or products;
1.7 Able to monitor the actual risk level from various transactions
against predetermined risk limits;
1.8 Stipulating clear and concise practical guidance, specifying which
limits are never to be exceeded, which can tolerate temporary breach, for how long and
for what reason; every step must be documented in writing such as stating the reason to
exceed risk limits and authorized person, etc.; 1.9 Regularly review the limits so that they correspond with the
complexity of the financial institutuions’ risk measurement systems.
2. Financial institutions may consider establishing interest rate risk limits by
setting an aggregate interest rate risk limit and risk limit by type of interest rate risk that
are material or by individual portfolio or by type of transactions, etc.
3. Risk limits for measuring effects of interest rate change on earnings should
be set based on volatility of both net income and net interest income in order to fully assess
the interest rate risk of financial institutions, including the effects on the non-interest
income as well. In general, such risk limits will specify acceptable levels of earnings
volatility under specified interest rate scenarios.
4. Risk limits for effects of interest rate change on economic value should be
appropriately established to commensurate with the scope, volume and complexity of the
positions of financial institutions. Financial institutions holding long-term positions or
engaging in activities related to options or financial instruments with embedded options in
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-8/2-
high proportion should consider setting risk limits to address effects on economic value of
the financial institutions with more details.
5. Interest rate risk limits may be established from scenarios of exceptional
movements in market interest rates which simulate stress situations that rarely occur but
have severe impact by taking into account historical interest rate volatility and time
required for management to address such exposures. Risk limits should be based on
measures derived from the underlying statistical method such as techniques that yield
earnings at risk or economic value at risk, etc. Moreover, specified scenarios should take
account of the full range of possible sources of material interest rate risk that may occur to
the financial institutions. Hence, simple scenarios using parallel shift in interest rates may
be insufficient to comprehensively reflect all types of risks.
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-
-9/1- Attachment 9
Reporting of Risk and Validation Testing of the Tools and Assumptions Adopted
Reporting of Risk
The reporting form submitted to financial institutions’ board, other committee and
multi-level of management may vary. However, at a minimum, such reporting shall include
the following:
1. Executive summary and overall interest rate risk level as well as individual
type of significant interest rate risk
2. Reports presenting financial institutions’ compliance with the policy and
relevant risk limits
3. Key assumptions such as manageable interest rate policy, behaviors of non-
maturity deposits and information about debt prepayment, etc.
4. Results from stress testing, including testing breakdowns of major
assumptions and variables.
5. Summary of matters found from reviewing policies, procedures regarding
interest rate risk and adequacy of interest rate risk assessment systems, as well as any
matters found by internal and external auditors and other consultants.
Validation Testing of the Tools and Assumptions Adopted
Validation testing of tools and assumptions may be done as follows:
1. Reviewing validity of the techniques and computing formulas can be done
by comparing with the techniques accepted by academics or generally used in the financial
market; and/or
2. Compare the results from the systems/techniques used with actual events;
and/or
3. Compare the results from the systems/techniques with those from other
systems/techniques.
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-10/1-
Attachment 10
Internal Controls and Reviews of Related to Interest Rate Risk Management
Internal Controls Related to Interest Rate Risk Management
1. Financial institutions should have adequate internal controls for interest rate
risk management systems, commensurate with the scope, volume and complexity of the
transactions with an aim to ensure efficiency of the interest rate risk management systems
of financial institutions.
2. Internal controls of interest rate risk management systems should be an
integral part of the overall internal controls of financial institutions and must be strictly
enforced internally throughout the financial institutions.
3. Internal controls of interest rate risk management systems must be concise
and suitable for practical operations.
4. Internal controls of interest rate risk management must have clear control
activities such as policies and operating procedures for interest rate risk management such
as transaction approval procedures, monitoring of risk limits, reconciliations and reporting
of information as well as other procedures established by the financial institutions to
achieve interest rate risk management objectives.
5. Internal controls of interest rate risk management systems should include
continual reviews by independent units.
6. Financial institutions’ board of directors or other designated committees
must receive information on reviews and internal controls that is clear, adequate,
appropriate and timely. Reviews of Interest Rate Risk Management System
1. Financial institutions shall establish reviews on interest rate risk management
systems as an integral part of internal controls with an atim to assess effectiveness of the
risk management systems, personnel’s compliance with the established policies and
operating procedures. 2. Financial institutions shall arrange for reviews and assessments of the interest
rate risk management systems at least once a year, conducted by unit independent from
business units related to risk. For large financial institutions or those with complex
transactions, such unit should be independent from risk management units as well. Moreover, resources and tools appropriate for reviews must be available, whereby in the
initial stage, if reviews of interest rate risk management systems are not conducted by
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-10/2-
unit independent from the risk management unit, financial institutions shall assign
individuals or groups with experts to be responsible for the reviews and assessments. Documents demonstrating the reviews as well as close monitoring by the management
should be made readily available for the Bank of Thailand’s examiners.
3. Financial institutions must arrange to have the results of the reviews as
well as any recommendations reported to the senior management and board of directors
in an adequate and timely manner for consideration of further actions. Moreover, reports,
documents and evidences from the reviews from both internal and/or external units must
be kept and made available for the Bank of Thailand’s examiners.
4. The reviews and assessments of interest rate risk management systems
should be able to identify factors that may affect effectiveness of interest rate risk
management and internal controls such as change in personnel or technology, risk limit
structure and monitoring procedures for cases that breach risk limits.
5. In reviewing to assess interest rate risk management systems, financial
institutions should consider the following aspects, depending on the scope, volume and
complexity of financial institutions’ transactions.
Qualitative Aspect
5.1 Supervision of the board of directors and senior management of financial
institutions on interest rate risk management process
5.2 Compliance with interest rate risk management policy
5.3 Responsibilities of interest rate risk management unit towards
development and management of risk measurement, control and monitoring
5.4 Appropriateness of the interest rate risk measurement systems relative to
the scope, volume and complexity of transactions
5.5 Appropriateness and reliability of the underlying assumptions used in
assessing interest rate risk, clear supporting documentation, integrity of information used
in the calculation and analysis
5.6 Personnel with adequate expertise in interest rate risk management
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-10/3-
Quantitative Aspect
5.7 Volume of various financial products and their sensitivity to interest rate
changes
5.8 Effects on earnings and/or capital from change in level and/or shape of the
yield curve
5.9 Effects on earnings and/or capital from various significant interest rate risk
such as basis risk or option risk, etc.
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-11/1-
Attachment 11
Preparation of Information and Related Reports
For the purpose of the Bank of Thailand in supervising and assessing financial
institutions’ interest rate risk in the banking book, financial institutions shall prepare and
submit the required information in the data management system (DMS). Upon receipt of
such information, the Bank of Thailand wil compile into an assessment report of interest
rate risk in the banking book for of all currencies as prescribed in Attachment 11.1 and a
report of interest rate risk assessment for each currency as prescribed on Attachment 11.2. In this regard, financial institutions shall refer to the explanation for preparation of
information to be submited to the Bank of Thailand.
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-11/2-
Attachment 11.1
Report of Interest Rate Risk Measurement in All Currencies
For Period Ended on ……………………..
Unit: THB
Currency*
Interest Rate changes by …….. Basis Points
Effects on Net Interest
Income
Effects on Economic
Value
THB
US DOLLAR
JAPANESE YEN
POUND STERLING
EURO
HONG KONG DOLLAR
RINGGIT
SINGAPORE DOLLAR
OTHERS
Total Effects from Interest
Rate change
Percentage of Projected
Net Interest Income during
the upcoming one year
Percentage of current
capital fund
*For foreign currencies, financial institutions shall prepare and report significant currenry
separately.
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-11/3-
Explanation forReport Preparation
Report of Interest Rate Risk Measurement in All Currencies A. General Explanation
1. This is a summary report of the assessment of interest rate risk of positions
in the banking book of financial institutions for all currencies. It is to assess the effects on
net interest income and economic value from increase in interest rate in all currencies by
100 basis points or any change that the Bank of Thailand will further advise.
2. Financial institutions shall refer to the guideline on using repricing gap
method to assess interest rate risk as prescribed by the Bank of Thailand in Attachment 5
and example of the assessment of interest rate risk using repricing gap method in the
Attachment 5.1 of the Supervision Guideline on Interest Rate Risk in the Banking Book
of Financial Institutions.
3. Any inquiry regarding this report should be directed to Prudential Policy
Department, Financial Institutions Policy Group, the Bank of Thailand at Tel.: 0-2283-6821,
0-2356-7688, 0-2283-5805 and 0-2283-5804.
B. Definitions
This is a summary report of effects from change in interest rate on the banking book
positions for all currencies of financial institutions. Financial institutions shall report the
effects on net interest income and economic value from increase in interest rate by 100
basis points for every currency that financial institutions prepare in separate interest rate
risk measurement report by currency.
“Interest Rate Change by 100 Basis Points” means assumption that the interest rate
increases by 100 basis points thoughout the yield curve within 1 year. “The Effects on Net Interest Income” means the amount of net interest income of
the banking book positions that change when interest rate increases by 100 basis points.
“The Effects on Economic Value” means the economic value of the banking book
positions that change when interest rate increases by 100 basis points.
“Thai Baht” means banking book positions in Thai baht affected by change in
interest rate which financial institutions must report the effects on net interest income and
economic value using the calculated result of the effects from the Report of Interest Rate
Risk Measurement in Thai Baht.
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-11/4-
“US DOLLAR” means banking book positions in US dollar affected by change in
interest rate which financial institutions must report the effects on net interest income and
economic value using the calculated result of the effects from the Report of Interest Rate
Risk Measurement in US Dollar. The amount shall be reported in an equivalent value in
baht.
“JAPANESE YEN” means banking book positions in Japanese Yen affected by
change in interest rate which financial institutions must report the effects on net interest
income and economic value using the calculated result of the effects from the Report of
Interest Rate Risk Measurement in Japanese Yen. The amount shall be reported in an
equivalent value in baht. “POUND STERLING” means banking book positions in Pound Sterling affected
by change in interest rate which financial institutions must report the effects on net interest
income and economic value using the calculated result of the effects from the Report of
Interest Rate Risk Measurement in Pound Sterling. The amount shall be reported in an
equivalent value in baht. “EURO” means banking book positions in Euro affected by change in interest rate
which financial institutions must report the effects on net interest income and economic
value using the calculated result of the effects from the Report of Interest Rate Risk
Measurement in Euro. The amount shall be reported in an equivalent value in baht. “HONG KONG DOLLAR” means banking book positions in Hong Kong Dollar
affected by change in interest rate which financial institutions must report the effects on
net interest income and economic value using the calculated result of the effects from the
Report of Interest Rate Risk Measurement in Hong Kong Dollar. The amount shall be
reported in an equivalent value in baht. “RINGGIT” means banking book positions in Ringgit affected by change in interest
rate which financial institutions must report the effects on net interest income and economic
value using the calculated result of the effects from the Report of Interest Rate Risk
Measurement in Ringgit. The amount shall be reported in an equivalent value in baht. “SINGAPORE DOLLAR” means banking book positions in Singapore dollar
affected by change in interest rate which financial institutions must report the effects on
net interest income and economic value using the calculated result of the effects from the
Report of Interest Rate Risk Measurement in Singapore Dollar. The amount shall be
reported in an equivalent value in baht.
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-11/5-
“OTHERS” means the aggregate positions in the banking book other non-material
currencies that are affected by change in interest rate which financial institutions must
report the effects on net interest income and economic value using the calculated result of
the effects from the Report of Interest Rate Risk Measurement in Other Currencies. The
amount shall be reported in an equivalent value in baht.
“Total Effects from Interest Rate Change” means sum of the effects on net interest
income and economic value of the positions in all currencies from increase in interest rate
by 100 basis points. “Percentage of Projected Net Interest Income during the upcoming one year” means
proportion of total net interest income affected from increase in interest rate by 100 basis
points on the projected net interest income during the upcoming one year of financial
institutions. “Percentage of current capital fund” means proportion of total economic value
affected from increase in interest rate by 100 basis points to current capital fund of financial
institutions.
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-11/6-
Attachment 11.2
Bank ………………………………………………………..
Report of Interest Rate Risk Measurement in ……………………………………… Currency
For Period Ended …………………………………………. Unit: Baht
0-1
Month
More
than
1-3
Month
More
than
3-6
Months
More
than
6-12
Months
More
than
1-2
Year
More
than
2-3
Year
More
than
3-4
Year
More
than
4-5
Year
More
than
5-7
Year
More
than
7-10
Year
More
than
10-15
Year
More
than
15-20
Year
More
than
20
Year
Non-rate
sensitive
Total
1. Total assets
2. Total capital
funds
3. Cash 4. Interbank items 5. Net investments 6. Loans 7. Accrued interest
receivables
8. Allowance for
doubtful debts
9. Net properties
foreclosed
10. Net premises and
equipment
11. Other assets 12. Total Rate
Sensitive Assets
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
13. Deposits 14. Interbank items 15. Borrowings 16. Other Liabilities 17. Shareholders’
Equity
18. Total Rate
Sensitive
Liabilities (Total
RSL)
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-11/7-
0-1
Month
More
than
1-3
Month
More
than
3-6
Months
More
than
6-12
Months
More
than
1-2
Year
More
than
2-3
Year
More
than
3-4
Year
More
than
4-5
Year
More
than
5-7
Year
More
than
7-10
Year
More
than
10-15
Year
More
than
15-20
Year
More
than
20
Year
Non-rate
sensitive
Total
19. Net position
before off-
balancesheet
items (RSA-
RSL)
20. Net position of
nominal
amounts of
rate sensitive
off-balance
sheet items
20.1 Net position of
rate sensitive non-option
items
20.2 Net position of
rate sensitive options
21. Periodic gap 22. Cumulative gap 23. Ratio of
cumulative gap
to total assets
(%)
24. Effects on net
interest
income
25. Proportion of 1
year time
remaining in
effect
0.958 0.833 0.625 0.250
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
26. Assumption of
interest rate
change (basis
points)
100 100 100 100
27. Effects on net
interest income
in each time
band
28. Accumulative
effects on net
interest income
in 1 year period
29. Effects on
economic
value
30. Duration-based
weight
-0.04% -0.16% -0.36% -0.71% -
1.38%
-
2.25%
-
3.07%
-
3.85%
-
5.08%
-
6.63%
-
8.92%
-
11.21%
-
13.01%
30.1 Proxy of
modified duration
-0.04 -0.16 -0.36 -0.71 -1.38 -2.25 -3.07 -3.85 -5.08 -6.63 -8.92 -11.21 -13.01
30.2 Assumption
of interest rate change
(basis points)
100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
31. Effects on
economic value
in each time
band
32. Cumulative
effects on
economic value
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-11/8-
Explanation forReport Preparation
Report of Interest Rate Measurement in Each Currency A. General Explanation
1. This is a report of interest rate risk assessment on banking book positions in
baht and any currency material to financial institutions, by measuring the effects on net
interest income for each currency from change in increase in interest rate by 100 basis
points or any change that the Bank of Thailand will further advise.
2. Financial institutions shall refer to the guideline on using repricing gap
method to assess interest rate risk as prescribed by the Bank of Thailand in Attachment 5
and example of the assessment of interest rate risk using repricing gap method in the
Attachment 5.1 of the Supervision Guideline on Interest Rate Risk in the Banking Book
of Financial Institutions. 3. Financial institutions must prepare separate reports by currency for
positions in baht and positions in material currencies. The amount shall be reported in an
equivalent value in baht.
4. For non-material currencies, financial institutions shall prepare a report of
aggregate effects in the Report for Other currencies. The amount shall be reported in an
equivalent value in baht.
5. In converting foreign currency positions, financial institutions shall use
exchange rate as stipulated in the Notification of Bank of Thailand Re: Accounting for
Financial Institution as at the end of reporting month.
6. Any inquiry regarding this report should be directed to the Prudential Policy
Department, Financial Institutions Policy Group, the Bank of Thailand at Tel.: 0-2283-6821,
0-2283-5805 and 0-2283-5804.
B. Definitions
This is a report of interest rate risk measurement on banking book positions for each
currency. Financial institutions shall prepare and report the effects on net interest income
and economic value from increase in interest rate by 100 basis points. In this respect,
financial institutions must include all on- and off-balance-sheet items in various time bands
as well as demonstrating interest rate risk calculation.
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-11/9-
“Time band” means residual term until maturity for items with fixed interest rates
and residual term until next repricing date for floating rate items. “Non-rate Sensitive” means items that are not sensitive to change in interest rate.
Items to be reported are categorized as follows. Definitions shall be refered from
those for the Balance Sheet (BLS) Data Element: Balance Sheet Item of the Data
Management System (DMS).
1. “Total assets” means total assets of financial institutions.
2. “Total capital funds” means total capital funds of financial institutions.
3. “Cash” means banknotes, coins and petty cash held by financial institutions
and cash in collection. It shall be recorded in the specified time band.
4. “Interbank items” means deposits, certificates of deposit, loans, margin
loans and net balance debit/credit margin under repurchase agreements from the same
counterparty and the same transaction, including transferred loans not qualified under
accounting standards to other domestic financial institutions in accordance with the Interest
Act of financial institutions and other financial institutions abroad; excluding loans to
suspended financial institutions or those whose licenses are revoked, but including accrued
interest receivables less deferred income, allowance for doubtful debts and allowance for
value adjustment from debt restructuring. The amount shall be recorded in the specified
time band.
5. “Investments (net)” means all types of investments, both debt or equity instruments in the possession of financial institutions or whose rights are transferred but
with repurchasing agreements, as well as investments in transferred loans that are qualified
as purchase under the accounting standards. The recorded amount shall be in net value after
adding or subtracting any allowance for devaluation or diminution of securities in
accordance with the accounting standards, in the specified time band.
6. “Loans” means all types of lending to domestic non-financial institution
borrowers under the Interest Act of financial institutions and other financial institutions
abroad, including being a creditor due to having paid or ordered to pay for the benefits of
former trading partner, all types of payment obligations, hire-purchase or leasing, margin
loans, net debit/credit balance margin under repurchase agreements from the same
counterparty and the same transaction, and loans to suspended financial institutions or
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-11/10-
those whose licenses are revoked. The recorded amount shall deduct deferred income in
the specified time band.
Deferred income means income from debtor of hire-purchase or financial lease
contracts or discounted bills not yet recognized as income.
7. “Accrued interest receivables” means accrued interests from loans that
financial institutions record as income but not yet received, excluding accrued interest from
interbank and money market transactions. The amound shall be recorded in the specified
time band.
8. “Allowance for doubtful debts” means money reserved for loans expected
to be uncollectible under the regulations on asset classification and provision of the Bank
of Thailand, including allowance for value adjustment from debt restructuring. The amount
shall be recorded in the specified time band.
Allowance for value adjustment from debt restructuring means amount of
investment in debtors that exceeds the fair value of the debt in accordance with the
accounting standards.
9. “Properties foreclosed” means assets (excluding securities) possessed by
financial institutions due to debt repayment or purchase of assets mortgaged with financial
institutions which are disposed under the court orders, including possession of foreclosed
assets from financial lease or hire-purchase for business purposes or for employees which
are no longer in use, plus assets used in property financing business. The recorded amount
shall be in net value after deducting any allowance for devaluation or diminution of the
properties in the specified time band.
10. “Net land, building and equipment” means land, buildings and equipment
that financial institutions use in business operations or for benefits of staff or employees of
financial institutions. The amount shall be recorded in net value after deducting any
allowance for devaluation or diminution of the assets in the specified time band.
11. “Other assets” means other assets not listed above. The amount shall be
recorded in net value after deducting allowance for devaluation or diminution of the assets
in the specified time band.
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-11/11-
12. “Total rate-sensitive assets (RSA)” means aggregate amount of the rate
sensitive assets in each time band.
13. “Deposits” means money deposited at financial institutions or money
financial institutions receive from the public that must be repaid upon demand or at the end
of specified period. The amount shall be recorded in the specified time band.
14. “Interbank items” means deposits, borrowings, margin loans, net balance
debit/credit margin under repurchase agreements from the same counterparty and the same
transaction from other domestic financial institutions under the Interest Act of the financial
institutions and other financial institutions abroad. The amount shall be recorded in the
specified time band.
15. “Borrowings” means all types of borrowings including debenture, debt
instruments, margin borrowings, net balance debit/credit margin under repurchase
agreements from the same counterparty and the same transaction and sales of debt
unqualified as sales under the accounting standards. The amount shall be recorded in the
specified time band.
16. “Other liabilities” means other liabilities not listed in the aforementioned
items. The amount shall be recorded in the specified time band.
17. “Shareholders’ equity” for Thai financial institutions means the difference
between assets and liabilities of the financial institutions. For foreign bank branches, it shall
mean head office’s portion or of other branches of the same entity. The amount shall be
recorded in the specified time band.
18. “Total rate-sensitive liabilities (RSL)” means total amount of liabilities
which are sensitive to interest rate change in each time band.
19. “Net positions before off-balance-sheet items” means the difference
between rate-sensitive assets and rate-sensitive liabilities (RSA – RSL) in each time band.
20. “Net position of nominal amounts of rate-sensitive off-balance sheet items”
means sum of net positions of the nominal amounts of off-balance-sheet items that are
sensitive to interest rate change in each time band. The amount shall be recorded in the
specified time band (sum of item 20.1 and 20.2).
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-11/12-
20.1 “Net position of rate-sensitive non-option items” means net position
of the nominal amounts of non-option off-balance-sheet items that are sensitive to interest
rate change in each time band. The amount shall be recorded in the specified time band.
20.2 “Net position of rate-sensitive options” means net position of the
nominal amounts of off-balance-sheet items which are options and are sensitive to interest
rate change in each time band. The amount shall be recorded in the specified time band.
21. “Periodic gap” means sum of net positions before adding off-balance sheet
items in each time band and net positions of nominal amounts of off-balance sheet times in
each time band (sum of item 19 through 20).
22. “Cumulative gap” means sum of net positions in each time band and net
positions of the previous time bands.
23. “Ratio of cumulative gap to total assets (%)” means the ratio of cumulative
gap in each time band to total assets.
24. “Effects on net interest income case” means effects on net interest income
of financial institutions when interest rate changes.
25. “Proportion of 1 year time remaining in effect” means the proportion per
year of the residual term from midpoint of each time band to 1 year where the net position
in each time band is still affected from interest rate risk For example, for 0-1 month, the
midpoint is 0.5 month; hence, the proportion per year of the time band where the net
position in the 0-1 month time band will be affected from change in interest rate is equal
to (12-0.5)/12 or 0.958.
26. “Assumption of interest rate change (basis points or bps)” means changes in
interest rate in each time band within 1 year e.g. setting interest rate to increase by 100 bps
equally throughout the yield curve (parallel shift in the yield curve) within 1 year period.
27. “Effects on net interest income in each time band” means the amount of net
interest income which may be affected by change in interest rates e.g. under the assumption
that interest rate increases by 100 bps equally throughout the yield curve (parallel shift in
the yield curve) within 1 year period, to be calculated by multiplying (1) periodic gap in
each time band, (2) proportion of 1 year time remaining in effect, and (3) assumption of
interest rate change (multiplication of item 21, 25 and 26).
BOT Notification No 42-2551 (14 September 2017)-check
-11/13-
28. “Accumulative effects on net interest income in 1 year period” means sum
of the effects on net interest income in each time band and the previous time bands within
1 year time.
29. “Effects on economic value of equity or EVE” means the economic value
of financial institutions which may change when interest rate changes.
30. “Duration-based weight” means risk weight of each time band which
reflects the sensitivity of the position within each time band to interest rate change within
each time band, for which the risk weight equals the multiplication of proxy of modified
duration and change in interest rate e.g. 100 basis point increase equally throughout the
yield curve (parallel shift in the yield curve). Proxy of modified duration is estimated from
the midpoint of each time band under the assumption of 5% yield according to the BIS
guidelines.
31. “Effects on economic value of equity in each time band (EVE)” means
economic value of financial institutions calculated by multiplying periodic gap in each time
band with duration-based weight of each time band (multiplication of item 21 and 30).
32. “Cumulative effects on economic value” means sum of the effects on economic
value in each time band and the effects in all previous time bands.