Upload
bbennett
View
923
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Presentation given at TSU Thurgood Marshall School of Law regarding Board of Law Examiners hearings and Barratry cases
Citation preview
“How Not to Lose Your Bar Card: New Barratry Laws”Presented By Bob Bennett
•Issues before the Board of Law Examiners •Issues before the Chief Disciplinary Council’s Office•Interim Suspension•Question and Answers!
Bob Bennett & Associates515 Louisiana Suite 200,Houston Tx, 77002 713-225-6000
www.bennettlawfirm.com [email protected] www.avvo.com
YOUTUBE Legally Connected…
1. TSU Undergraduate Application
2. TSU Law School Application
https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tsu.edu%2Fpdffiles%2Facademics%2Flaw%2Fadmissions%2Fapp3.pdf
3. Board of Law Examiners Declaration of Intent
http://www.ble.state.tx.us/applications/declaration/ble-1%20_10-2010_.pdf
4. Board of Law Examiners In State Application
http://www.ble.state.tx.us/applications/instate/ble-2_Instate_11-2010.pdf
http://em.tsu.edu/admissions/forms/Application_for_Admission.pdf
TSU Law School Application• Have you ever been convicted of a felony? Yes/No If Yes, Please Explain.
TSU Law School Application
Board of Law Examiners Declaration of Intent
• Are you presently, or have you been within the last ten (10) years, a party to any civil suit or proceeding (including any matters in which you were the subject of a proceeding for commitment based on incompetency, mental health, or substance abuse)? Yes/No
Board of Law Examiners Declaration of Intent
• Have you ever been convicted of an offense, placed on probation, or granted deferred adjudication or any type of pretrial diversion? You must report any such offenses involving alcohol or drugs. You must report any failure to appear conviction resulting from any offense. You must report any conviction for failure to maintain financial responsibility (legally required auto insurance). You may exclude only Class C misdemeanor traffic violations
• Have you, within the last ten (10) years, been arrested, cited or ticketed for, or charged with any violation of the law? You must report any offenses involving alcohol or drugs. You must report any failure to appear charge or warrant resulting from any such offense. You must report any such failure to maintain financial responsibility (legally required auto insurance), arrest, citation, ticket, or charge. You may exclude only Class C misdemeanor traffic violations
• If you answered “YES” to Question 9(b) or (c), attach a completed Criminal History Form for each arrest, charge, citation, or ticket.
Board of Law Examiners Declaration of Intent• NOTE: Expunged and Sealed Offenses: Matters expunged pursuant to
Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 55.02, or pursuant to another State’s statute with the same force and effect, need not be disclosed. While expunged or sealed offenses, arrests, tickets, or citations need not be disclosed, it is your responsibility to ensure the offense, arrest, ticket, or citation has, in fact, been expunged or sealed. It is recommended that you obtain a copy of the Court Order expunging or sealing the record in question. Failure to reveal an offense, arrest, ticket, or citation that is not in fact expunged or sealed, raises questions related to truthfulness in addition to questions regarding the offense itself.
• NOTE: Orders of Non-Disclosure: Pursuant to the Govt. Code §552.142 (b), if you have criminal matters that are the subject of an order of non-disclosure you are not required to reveal those criminal matters on this form. However, a criminal matter that is the subject of an order of non-disclosure may become a character and fitness issue. Pursuant to other sections of the Government Code 411.081(d), 411.081(i)(5), 411.083(b), 411.084(a), 411.087(a), and 411.100, the Texas Board of Law Examiners is entitled to access criminal history record information that is the subject of an order of non-disclosure. If the Board of Law Examiners discovers a criminal matter that is the subject of an order of non-disclosure, even if you properly did not reveal that matter, the Board of Law Examiners may ask you to provide information about that criminal matter.
Board of Law Examiners Declaration of Intent• Have you, within the last ten (10) years, been charged with fraud, or
alleged to have committed fraud, in any criminal or civil proceeding?• Have you, within the last ten (10) years, abused or been addicted to, or
treated for the use or abuse of alcohol or any other substance, to include any court-ordered treatment?
• If you have received mental health counseling or have been hospitalized for mental health reasons and do not know the diagnosis which was made, you should contact the health care provider responsible for your care and inquire as to whether you were diagnosed with bi-polar disorder, schizophrenia, paranoia, or any other psychotic disorder. In answering the following questions, you are entitled to rely on the diagnosis of your treating health care provider. You do not need to report any counseling, treatment, or hospitalization, which was for a diagnosis other than those included in the following questions.
• Within the last ten (10) years, have you been diagnosed with, or have you been treated for, bi-polar disorder, schizophrenia, paranoia, or any other psychotic disorder?
Board of Law Examiners Declaration of Intent• Have you, since attaining the age of eighteen or within the last ten (10)
years, whichever period is shorter, been admitted to a hospital or other facility for the treatment of bi-polar disorder, schizophrenia, paranoia, or any other psychotic disorder?
• Have you ever been ordered by a court to pay child support?• Have you ever been held in contempt or sanctioned by a court?• Do you have any student loan debts that are ninety (90) days or more
past due?• Do you have any other debts that are ninety (90) days or more past due
(including tax debts owed pursuant to federal or other law)?• Have you, within the last ten (10) years, failed to timely file any applicable
state or federal income tax return and/or report required by law?
Board of Law Examiners In State Application• Since the date of filing my Declaration of Intention to Study Law, I
_______________________ (enter “HAVE” or “HAVE NOT”) been formally charged with any violation of law, excluding cases which have been dismissed for reasons other than technical defects in the charging instrument; cases in which I have been found not guilty; minor traffic violations; cases in which the record of arrest or conviction has been expunged by court order; pardoned offenses; and Class C misdemeanors
• Since the date of filing my Declaration of Intention to Study Law, I _______________________ (enter “HAVE” or “HAVE NOT”) been diagnosed with or treated or hospitalized for bi-polar disorder, paranoia, schizophrenia, or any other psychotic disorder.
• Since the date of filing my Declaration of Intention to Study Law, I ______________________ (enter “HAVE” or “HAVE NOT”) been charged with fraud, or alleged to have committed fraud, in any legal proceeding.
Board of Law Examiners In State Application
• Since the date of filing my Declaration of Intention to Study Law, I _______________________ (enter “HAVE” or “HAVE NOT”) been involved in civil litigation or bankruptcy proceedings.
• Since the date of filing my Declaration of Intention to Study Law, I _________________ (enter “Have” or “Have Not”) been disciplined in any way for any matter by any college, university, law school or other institution of higher learning, or by any professor, administrator, employee or entity representing any college, university, law school or other institution of higher learning, or been allowed to withdraw from such an institution to avoid such discipline, whether or not the record of such action was retained in any file. (Discipline includes, without limitation, a letter or other written notice of reprimand or warning, suspension, expulsion, adjustment of grade, assignment of community service, any form of probation, or any other adverse action). (Entity includes, without limitation, residential facilities or other facilities owned or managed by a college, university, law school or other institution of higher learning.)
Board of Law Examiners In State Application• Since the date of filing my Declaration of Intention to Study Law, I
________________________ (enter “HAVE” or “HAVE NOT”) been held in contempt or sanctioned by a court. If you entered “HAVE,” attach a Continuation Form on which you explain your response. In addition to your Continuation Form, provide legible copies of the court orders).
• Since the date of filing my Declaration of Intention to Study Law, I ________________________ (enter “HAVE” or “HAVE NOT”) failed to timely file applicable state or federal income tax returns) and/or reports) required by law.
• Since the date of filing my Declaration of Intention to Study Law, I ________________________ (enter “HAVE” or “HAVE NOT”) collected federal withholding, Social Security, or Medicare taxes from the wages of employees and failed to forward such monies to the IRS. If you entered “HAVE,” attach a Continuation Form on which you explain your response.
• Since the date of filing my Declaration of Intention to Study Law, I ________________________ (enter “HAVE” or “HAVE NOT”) failed to pay all taxes owed pursuant to state or federal law at the time such taxes were due. If you answered “HAVE,” attach a narrative statement on a Continuation Form.
• Since the date of filing my Declaration of Intention to Study Law, I ________________________ (enter “HAVE” or “HAVE NOT”) abused or been addicted to or treated for the use of alcohol or any other substance, to include any court-ordered treatment.
BOARD OF LAW EXAMINERS DEFINITIONS OF GOOD MORAL CHARACTER & FITNESS REQUIREMENT
• Rule IV: • (b) Good moral character is a functional assessment of character and fitness of a
prospective lawyer. The purpose of requiring an Applicant to possess present good moral character is to exclude from the practice of law those persons possessing character traits that are likely to result in injury to future clients, in the obstruction of the administration of justice, or in a violation of the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct. These character traits usually involve either dishonesty or lack of trustworthiness in carrying out responsibilities. There may be other character traits that are relevant in the admission process, but such traits must have a rational connection with the Applicant’s present fitness or capacity to practice law and accordingly must relate to the legitimate interests of Texas in protecting prospective clients in safeguarding the system of justice within Texas. (emphasis added).
• (c) Fitness, as used in these Rules, is the assessment of mental and emotional health
as it affects the competence of a prospective lawyer. The purpose of requiring an Applicant to possess this fitness is to exclude from the practice of law any person having a mental or emotional illness or condition which would be likely to prevent the person from carrying out duties to clients, courts or the profession. A person may be of good moral character, but may be incapacitated from proper discharge of his or her duties as a lawyer by such illness or condition. The fitness required is present fitness, and prior mental or emotional illness or conditions are relevant only so far as they indicate the existence of a present lack of fitness. (emphasis added)
BLE Predetermination Letter
BLE Response to Predetermination Letter
BLE Notice of Hearing
BLE Explanation of Hearing
•Dismissal: PDL dismissed and license approved
•Probated License: Conditional Approval with probation of up to 2 years. Must apply to terminate probation and receive regular license. Violation of probation can be grounds to deny license altogether.
•Denial: Determination that you do not possess
good moral character or fitness and your application for a law license is denied.
BLE Alternative Outcomes
BLE Approval Letter
BARRATRYWhat is it?
Why is it bad?Is it serious?
• A person commits an offense if the person: is an attorney, chiropractor, physician, surgeon, or private investigator and with the intent to obtain professional employment for the person or for another, provides or knowingly permits to be provided to an individual who has not sought the person’s employment, legal representation, advice, or care a written communication or a solicitation, including a solicitation in person or by telephone.
Barratry: What is it?
Or Ambulance Chasing
“Ambulance chasing” conjures images of attorneys soliciting vulnerable clients during times of despair setting the stage for actions that evolve into nuisance or frivolous lawsuits. This criminal practice, known as barratry, is the generation of profit for legal services by an attorney who stirs up a dispute and encourages lawsuits in order to file a groundless claim. Texas barratry laws largely apply to personal injury cases, but with disputes increasing over wills, trusts and other estate-related actions, is probate the new barratry growth area?
• Most attorneys are familiar with barratry and know that illegal solicitation is a third degree felony in Texas. However, Texas attorneys may not know that the legal profession’s resistance to barratry has a long history. References to barratry reach as far back as Greek and Roman times when the predecessors of modern-day attorneys were required to “demonstrate a ‘personal connection’ to a litigant before speaking on his behalf” and continue throughout the history of the Middle Ages in England. During the thirteenth century in England, Inns of Court trained affluent young men to practice law as a public service. Since these wealthy young men did not need an income, they practiced law for the betterment of their community and were prohibited from charging fees at all.
Barratry: Why is it bad?
Today, most lawyers are not in a position to work for free. Thus, barratry is even more of a threat to the well-being and integrity of the legal profession due to the widespread networks of unethical lawyers and non-lawyers who work in concert to take clients away from honest, hard working lawyers and victimize clients by paying unnecessary expenses and fees for illegal solicitation.
• Section 38.12 Barratry and Solicitation of Professional Employment – General 3rd Degree Felony• • LADIES AND GENTLEMEN OF THE JURY:• The defendant, [name of defendant], is charged by [indictment or information] with the offense of [state offense], alleged
to have been committed on or about [date], in [name of county] County, Texas. The defendant has pleaded not guilty.•• A person commits the offense of barratry and solicitation of professional employment if, with intent to obtain an economic
benefit, the person:• • [knowingly institutes a suit or claim that the person has not been authorized to pursue]; • • or• • [solicits employment, either in person or by telephone, for himself or for another];• • or• • [pays, gives, or advances or offers to pay, give, or advance to a prospective client money or anything of value to obtain
employment as a professional from the prospective client];• • or• • [pays or gives or offers to pay or give a person money or anything of value to solicit employment];• • or• • [pays or gives or offers to pay or give a family member of a prospective client money or anything of value to solicit
employment]; • • or•
[accepts or agrees to accept money or anything of value to solicit employment];
Barratry: Is it Serious?
• The Texas Disciplinary Rules only mention barratry in section 8.04(a)(9): a lawyer shall not “engage in conduct that constitutes barratry as defined by the law of this state.” Texas’s barratry statute is Section 38.12 of the Texas Penal Code.
Not Just Criminal…
But your license is in jeopardy too.
• (c) A person who was solicited by conduct violating the laws of this state or the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas regarding barratry by attorneys or other persons, but who did not enter into a contract as a result of that conduct, may file a civil action against any person who committed barratry.(d) A person who prevails in an action under Subsection (c) shall recover from each person who engaged in barratry:(1) a penalty in the amount of $10,000; (2) actual damages caused by the prohibited conduct; and (3) reasonable and necessary attorney’s fees.
New Barratry Law
Open Season on Lawyers?
The Case of Perry Mason
Perry Mason
• Perfect Lawyer• Always elicited tearful
confession at the last minute. Just when things were looking bleak for his client, a spectator in the court would excitedly confess in dramatic fashion
• Homeless Houston man• Hung out outside Criminal
Courts Bldg.• Talked to lots of people• Referred a Defendant to an
attorney• Attorney reciprocated by
providing food and shoes• Both Mason and attorney
indicted for Barratry• Mason referred client and
received economic benefit• Charges ultimately dismissed
• First Generation early 1990’s• More recently reformed• Starring Wendy Baker, Harris County Asst.
D.A.• Aggressively seeking to prosecute “runners”
and attorneys engaging in barratry• First media-worthy case involves prominent
community activist( Johnnie Binder, Jr)• Other recent case involves a single alleged
act of barratry, but has led to 5 indictments, one deportation and one interim suspension proceeding
Houston Barratry Task Force
Barratry Cases in Houston
• Single count of alleged solicitation (Mokaram Law Firm)
• “runner”, two lawyers, two support staff charged and indicted
• Lawyer’s bonds set at $100,000. Others $50,000.
• State Bar tried to Immediately Suspend Lawyer’s license
• Brilliant Defense lawyers prevented suspension
• Criminal charges still pending• Accrued more than $200,000
in defense costs, civil and criminal
• Criminal charges still pending
• Referral for compensation scheme
• High profile community activist “runner”
• Both lawyers and “runner” arrested(
• $5,000 bond each• Public emergence of
Barratry Task Force• Case will be used for
publicity
Older Barratry Cases
• Jet Blue Crash (Benton Mussel white, Jr)
• 2 lawyers allegedly engaged in 56 separate acts of barratry
• Used runners, provided money to runners to finance case running activities
• Initially interim suspension proceeding but State Bar abandoned
• Ultimately minor sanction
• USAir Crash (Benton mussel white, jr. and john O'Quinn)
• 4 lawyers allegedly engaged in 50+ separate acts of barratry
• Used runners, provided money to runners to finance case running activities
• No interim suspension proceedings, even though 1 lawyer in common with Jet Blue allegations
• 1 lawyer agreed to short suspension
• Other 3 lawyers tried the case as won defense jury verdict
More Older Barratry Cases
• One high profile personal injury attorney( Jeffrey Stern)
• Been charged by the State Bar 5 times in 10 years for Barratry
• Multiple times the State Bar dropped the charges
• Twice the cases were tried to a jury which rendered defense verdicts
• No interim suspension action ever filed
• No criminal charges ever filed for Barratry
• Currently under indictment for solicitation of capital murder
• More recent solicitation case• Hospital patients at Hermann
Memorial Hospital complained about receiving unsolicited phone calls from a lawyers office
• Upon investigation, it was determined that a phone number belonging to an attorney had made 1,009 phone calls to the hospital in a three month period
• Lawyer blamed an independent investigator sharing his offices.
• Lawyer ultimately agreed to a 6 month probated suspension
Good Luck! For further information about us:-
Bob Bennett & Associates 515 Louisiana Ave, Suite 200Houston Tx 77002713-225-6000
Log on our website!
www.bennettlawfirm.comwww.avvo.com