Upload
dace-zoltners
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/29/2019 BOD Governance Training
1/27
Governance EducationDecember 2010
7/29/2019 BOD Governance Training
2/27
Agenda
Role of the board
Relationship to officers
Fiduciary duty reviewDuty of care cases
7/29/2019 BOD Governance Training
3/27
Role of the Board
By statute, a co-op must be governed by itsboard of directors which shall take all actionfor and on behalf of the corporation, except
those actions reserved or granted tomembers. MSA Section 308B.455
A director individually or collectively with
other directors does not have authority toact for or on behalf of the coop unlessauthorized by the board. MSA Section 308B.455
7/29/2019 BOD Governance Training
4/27
Role of the Board
A director may advocate interests ofmembers or member groups to theboard but the fiduciary duty of eachdirector is to represent the bestinterests of the co-op and all members
collectively. MSA Section 308B.455
7/29/2019 BOD Governance Training
5/27
Relationship to Officers
Co-op is required to have the following
officers but can appoint more:
President (or chair) :must be a member and a director
One or more vice- presidents (or vice-chairs):the firstvice-president must be a member and a director
Secretary (or records officer):need not be a member or adirector; can be combined with financial officer
Treasurer (financial officer):need not be a member or adirector. MSA 308B.475 subd. 1
Officers other than the General Manager(CEO) cannotbind the co-op unless authorized by the board
7/29/2019 BOD Governance Training
6/27
Relationship to Officers
A board may employ a general manager or
chief executive officer to manage the day-to-
day business of the co-op
If so employed, the CEO shall have the authority toimplement the functions, duties and obligations of theco-op except as restricted by the board, the bylaws orarticles. MSA 308B subd. 5
7/29/2019 BOD Governance Training
7/27
What This Means
Work as a whole and not as individuals orrepresentatives of a constituent
Select top management and plan for succession
Provide general direction regarding co-opstrategy and management operation of thebusiness
Oversee and guide managements performance
and co-op financial performance
Oversee compliance with laws
Advocate but collaborate
7/29/2019 BOD Governance Training
8/27
Fiduciary Obligations
Directors and Officers have threeprimary fiduciary duties:
Duty ofCare be competentDuty ofLoyalty put co-ops interest first,
deal fairly
Duty ofObedience follow the rules These are found in statute and case
law
7/29/2019 BOD Governance Training
9/27
Duty of Care
Requires directors and officers toact:
In good faith
In a manner the director reasonablybelieves to be in the best interest of theorganization and
With the care an ordinarily prudent personin a like position would exercise undersimilar circumstances Minnesota Statute 308A.455
Same duty as corporate and
nonprofit directors and
7/29/2019 BOD Governance Training
10/27
This Means
Attend Board and Committee Meetings
Be Informed: Industry, Operations,Governance
Review Materials before Meetings
Obtain Expert Opinions when Needed
7/29/2019 BOD Governance Training
11/27
This Means
Participate ask questions; weigh pros andcons, alternatives, cost benefit andachievement of mission, understand risks
and compliance programCan consider interests of employees,
customers, suppliers and creditors,
economy, members. MSA Section 308B.455subd. 4
Good governance is fundamentally about
rigorous dialogue
7/29/2019 BOD Governance Training
12/27
You Can Rely on Others
Reliance Doctrine
Director is entitled to rely on informationprovided by officers, employees, experts
and committees who are:Believed to be reliable or
Licensed professionals (for example, our
auditor) Unless actual knowledge that reliance is
unwarranted Minn. Stat. 308B.455 subd. 2
7/29/2019 BOD Governance Training
13/27
a s c ng n ooFaith?
Fact-based and changing concept
Determined by the courts
Nonfeasance Malfeasance
7/29/2019 BOD Governance Training
14/27
a s c ng n ooFaith?
Some key cases describe theevolution
Graham v. Allis Chalmers (1963) (antitrust) In re Caremark (1996) (antikickback)
Stone v. Ritter (2006) (anti money laundering)
In re Citigroup (2009) (derivative litigation)
7/29/2019 BOD Governance Training
15/27
as aws ere eryProtective
Graham v. Allis Chalmers (1963)(antitrust)
absent cause for suspicion, there is no
duty upon directors to install or operate acorporate system of espionage to ferretout wrongdoing which they have no
reason to suspect existsBoard can wait for red flags
7/29/2019 BOD Governance Training
16/27
ay e a asnEnough
In re Caremark (1996) (antikickback) while directors could be liable for failure to
monitor, only sustained or systematic failure of
the board to exercise oversight such as anutter failure to assure a reasonable informationand reporting system exists will establish thelack of good faith
Board must supervise and monitor
Not just policy but actual behavior
7/29/2019 BOD Governance Training
17/27
What is Bad Faith?
Stone v. Ritter (2006) (anti moneylaundering)
Approved and clarified CaremarkTo establish bad faith or
malfeasance, must show directors Knew they were not discharging their fiduciary
duty or
The directors demonstrated conscience
disregard for their responsibilities such as by
7/29/2019 BOD Governance Training
18/27
Today- Business Risks
In re Citigroup (2009) (derivativelitigation)
The mere fact that a company takes onbusiness risk and suffers lossesevencatastrophic losses does not evidencemisconduct
Oversight duties are not designed to subjectdirectors to personal liability for failure topredict the future and to properly evaluatebusiness risk
Citigroup had procedures and controls in place
7/29/2019 BOD Governance Training
19/27
If You Do This
You may get the benefit of thebusiness judgment rule
Process oriented presumption that youacted with due care
No after the fact judicial interference withyour decision you can be wrong!
But, irrationality is the outer limit of theBJR (waste/bad faith)
7/29/2019 BOD Governance Training
20/27
If You Do This
Application in co-ops is uncertain.One court refused to adopt BJR to co-ops and instead appears to endorse areasonableness standard. Willens v. Willens v.Wisconsin Ave. Coop.
Difference is on burden of proof and
rationalized based on inherent self-interest of member/directors
7/29/2019 BOD Governance Training
21/27
Some Other Protection
Co-op may indemnify directors.MSA 308B.471
But, must have acted in good faith and
received no improper personal benefitA few other requirements for criminal
matters
Article VIII, section 1 of MississippiMarket bylaws indemnify our boardmembers if they act consistent with their
duties
7/29/2019 BOD Governance Training
22/27
Some Other Protection
Co-op purchases insurance MM has D & O insurance with Executive Risk
Indemnity Inc: Combined Maximum aggregate
is $1,000,000 per year, with a $7,500deductible (paid by co-op) per claim
7/29/2019 BOD Governance Training
23/27
Duty of Loyalty
Requires undivided allegiance whenmaking decisions affecting organization
This Means
No self dealing (using your position forpersonal financial gain)
No dealing with the Co-op unless
disclosed and approved by disinteresteddirectors without you in the room andterms are fair when compared with thirdparty rates
7/29/2019 BOD Governance Training
24/27
Duty of Loyalty
Conflict of Interest PolicyComplete conflict of interest
disclosure each year and updatewhen necessaryMississippi Market board signs Code of
Conduct each year
Remember to report changes
7/29/2019 BOD Governance Training
25/27
Confidentiality
Keep information not disclosedpublicly confidential
This could include: Items discussed in executive session
Trade secrets, if any
Strategic plans
Business opportunities
7/29/2019 BOD Governance Training
26/27
Duty of Obedience
Must obey the Co-ops articles,bylaws, and applicable laws
Must be faithful to the organizationsmission and compliance program
Must not act in a manner inconsistent
with the organizations goals
7/29/2019 BOD Governance Training
27/27
Questions?