BNA Daily Labor Report: "NUHW Members Ratify CPMC Contract, Restoring Concessions Agreed to by SEIU-UHW." March 21, 2013

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/29/2019 BNA Daily Labor Report: "NUHW Members Ratify CPMC Contract, Restoring Concessions Agreed to by SEIU-UHW."

    1/2

    Health Care Employees

    NUHW Members Ratify CPMC Contract,Restoring Concessions Agreed to by UHW

    M

    embers of the National Union of HealthcareWorkers-California Nurses Association March

    13 ratified their first contract with Sutters Cali-fornia Pacific Medical Center for three of its hospitals inSan Francisco, which restores concessions the formerunion representative agreed to accept, an NUHW offi-cial told BNA March 21.

    In addition, employees represented by United Health-care Workers-West, an affiliate of the Service Employ-ees International Union, at a fourth CPMC hospital willreceive the more favorable terms NUHW negotiatedunder a me too, agreement in UHWs contract,NUHW Secretary-Treasurer John Borsos told BNA.

    Borsos said the new contract, which covers some 750service workers and licensed vocational nurses, in-cludes an organizing agreement with a code of con-duct that will be followed if NUHW attempts to orga-

    nize any of some 3,000 nonunion employees at CPMCfacilities, including the one that is represented by UHW.He said CPMC agreed not to actively interfere in an

    organizing drive, and would not conduct captive audi-ence or one-on-one meetings. In addition, there wouldnot be a long, drawn-out process to get to an election,Borsos added.

    The UHW-CPMC agreement was approved by 98 per-cent of the members who voted, Borsos said.

    In 2010, UHW, which represented workers at CP-MCs four hospitals, agreed to contracts that included anumber of concessions, according to Borsos. He saidthe concessions weakened seniority and made it moredifficult for per diem workers to convert to positionswith benefits.

    Employees at Three Hospitals Oust UHW for NUHW. In aMay 2011 representation election, workers at CPMCsCalifornia, Davies, and Pacific campuses voted forNUHW, rejecting continued representation by UHW,while employees at St. Lukes Hospital voted to retainUHW (93 DLR A-2, 5/13/11).

    The UHW contracts with all four CPMC hospitals ex-pired in December of last year. UHW negotiated a newcontract with St. Lukes, and NUHW continued to nego-tiate to replace the prior UHW contract at the threeother CPMC facilities.

    Borsos said the new contract reverses the conces-sions that UHW made in the 2010 contract.

    Under terms of the newly ratified NUHW contract,which will run through Dec. 31, 2013, employees willreceive a 2 percent wage increase retroactive to Dec. 31,2012, when the prior contract expired. Borsos said thisis in addition to a 3 percent increase workers receivedlast March under terms of the UHW contract that was

    still in effect.He added that previously, the average salary in thebargaining unit was approximately $28 an hour.

    CPMC currently plans to build a new hospital thatwill combine the California and Pacific facilities in 2017or later, Borsos said. The new contract protects currentemployees, who will receive a job at the same rate ofpay and hours going forward when the new hospital isbuilt, he added.

    Me Too Provision in St. Lukes Contract. The contractUHW negotiated with St. Lukes late last year includeda me too provision stating that if CPMC agreed withanother union at any of the locations of CPMC to aneconomic term more favorable to the employees thanthat contained within this agreement, the employershall immediately notify the union and extend thatmore favorable economic term to the members of thisbargaining unit.

    The contract language listed examples of economicterms that included: raises; bonuses; terms of paid timeoff and extended sick leave usage and accrual; healthinsurance premium shares, copays, and deductibles;differentials; and premium pay.

    Borsos said the NUHW contract is more favorable ina number of areas including health care premiums, timeoff, and reporting pay, which will benefit the St. Lukesemployees.

    Under the NUHW agreement, employees will con-tinue to receive fully employer-paid health insurance,Borsos said. He said the St. Lukes contract called foremployees to pay 21 percent in premium contributions.

    The NUHW agreement provides employees who re-port to work but are sent home through no fault of theirown 8 hours of reporting pay, Borsos said. UHW hadagreed to cut reporting pay to 4 hours in the St. Lukescontract, he said.

    NUHW also did not agree to any changes in paid timeoff and extended leave, which UHW did, Borsos said.While both the NUHW and the UHW contracts loweredthe cap on the number of PTO hours that could becashed out from 400 to 320, employees would stop ac-

    NUMBER 0 A-13 MARCH 21, 2013

    COPYRIGHT 2013 BY THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS, INC. ISSN 0418-2693

    Daily LaborReport

  • 7/29/2019 BNA Daily Labor Report: "NUHW Members Ratify CPMC Contract, Restoring Concessions Agreed to by SEIU-UHW."

    2/2

    cruing hours after 320 under the UHW contract, whichNUHW did not agree to, he said. Also, UHW agreed tocap the accrual of extended sick leave to 720 hours,while NUHW did not agree to any cap, he said.

    UHW spokesman Sean Wherley told BNA March 21that the me too language is only triggered if the unionrequests it. He said UHW can review what anotherunion got and decide whether it likes it or not, headded.

    Wherley said he was not familiar with specific terms

    of the St. Lukes contract so could not respond to

    NUHWs characterization.

    A spokesman for CPMC told BNA March 20 that the

    company would not go into a discussion of aspects of

    the contracts, which includes the me too clause.

    BY MICHELLE AMBER

    2

    To request permission to reuse or share this document, please contact [email protected]. In your request, be sure to include the following in-formation: (1) your name, company, mailing address, email and telephone number; (2) name of the document and/or a link to the document PDF; (3)reason for request (what you want to do with the document); and (4) the approximate number of copies to be made or URL address (if posting to awebsite).

    3-21-13 COPYRIGHT 2013 BY THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS, INC. DLR ISSN 0418-2693

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]