Bloom's Ppt Final 2 9-9-08

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/30/2019 Bloom's Ppt Final 2 9-9-08

    1/22

    FRAMINGHAM STATE COLLEGE

    SANTIAGO, PANAMA

    March 23-27 2009

    BLOOMS TAXONOMY PRESENTATION

    MODIFIED BY YESSENIA GONZALEZ M.A.

    From Original presentation

    by Dr. Larry Creedon

    RESEARCH AND EVALUATION COURSE

  • 7/30/2019 Bloom's Ppt Final 2 9-9-08

    2/22

    Benjamin Bloom andColleagues

    Six CategoryCognitive Taxonomy

    Revisited andExpanded

  • 7/30/2019 Bloom's Ppt Final 2 9-9-08

    3/22

    Four Considerations:

    Recall the six categories of Bloomstaxonomy

    Allude to the original purpose and structureof the taxonomy

    Comment on the application of thetaxonomy to education and schools today.

    Propose applications a synthesis for the

    taxonomy beyond that intended by Bloomand his colleagues, or recommended incurrent revisions of the taxonomy.

  • 7/30/2019 Bloom's Ppt Final 2 9-9-08

    4/22

    WHAT IS BLOOMS TAXONOMY?

    According to Mary Forehand from the

    University of Georgia, Bloom's Taxonomy is

    a multi-tiered model of classifying thinkingaccording to six cognitive levels of

    complexity.

  • 7/30/2019 Bloom's Ppt Final 2 9-9-08

    5/22

    The Six Categories of the Taxonomy

    Knowledge.

    Comprehension

    Application

    Analysis

    Synthesis

    Evaluation

  • 7/30/2019 Bloom's Ppt Final 2 9-9-08

    6/22

    Original Purpose of BloomsTaxonomy.

    To create a taxonomy for learning

    objectives for college level students.

  • 7/30/2019 Bloom's Ppt Final 2 9-9-08

    7/22

    WHAT IS ITS GOAL?

    The major idea of the taxonomy is that

    what educators want students to know

    (encompassed in statements ofeducationalobjectives) can be arranged in a hierarchy

    from less to more complex

    A goal of Bloom's Taxonomy is to motivate

    educators to focus on all three domains,

    creating a more holistic form of education.

    http://teach.valdosta.edu/whuitt/col/plan/behobj.htmlhttp://teach.valdosta.edu/whuitt/col/plan/behobj.htmlhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holismhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holismhttp://teach.valdosta.edu/whuitt/col/plan/behobj.htmlhttp://teach.valdosta.edu/whuitt/col/plan/behobj.html
  • 7/30/2019 Bloom's Ppt Final 2 9-9-08

    8/22

  • 7/30/2019 Bloom's Ppt Final 2 9-9-08

    9/22

    Source: http://www.odu.edu/educ/llschult/blooms_taxonomy.htm

    Revisited Blooms Taxonomy

    http://www.odu.edu/educ/llschult/blooms_taxonomy.htmhttp://www.odu.edu/educ/llschult/blooms_taxonomy.htm
  • 7/30/2019 Bloom's Ppt Final 2 9-9-08

    10/22

    Higher-Order vs. Lower-Order skills

  • 7/30/2019 Bloom's Ppt Final 2 9-9-08

    11/22

    Knowledge:

    Data, cogn i t ive inpu t .

    Is Knowledge the sameas information?

  • 7/30/2019 Bloom's Ppt Final 2 9-9-08

    12/22

    Comprehension: UnderstandingWhatever that means?

    Translation: Putting a communication into otherlanguage, other terms or another form of

    communication. Interpretation: Where comprehension may require

    a reordering of fresh ideas into a newconfiguration

    Extrapolation: Making estimates, predictions or

    inferences based on the understanding of trends,tendencies or conditions described in the originalcommunication

  • 7/30/2019 Bloom's Ppt Final 2 9-9-08

    13/22

    Application:

    Understanding requ ires app l icat ion

  • 7/30/2019 Bloom's Ppt Final 2 9-9-08

    14/22

    Analysis: Compare and contrast

    Analysis is the ability to:

    Breakdown a communication into its parts

    identifying or classifying its elements. Make explicit the relationship among

    elements of a communication.

    Recognize the organizational principles of acommunication

  • 7/30/2019 Bloom's Ppt Final 2 9-9-08

    15/22

    Synthesis: Now commonly

    referred to as creativi ty

    The category within the cognitive domain

    which most clearly provides for creative

    behavior on the part of the learner.

  • 7/30/2019 Bloom's Ppt Final 2 9-9-08

    16/22

    Synthesisto Benjamin Bloom and his colleagues

    in their 1956 six category cognitive taxonomy was

    defIned as: [Bloom p. 162].

    the cognitive domain which most clearly

    provides for creative behavior on the part of the

    learnerIn synthesis the student must draw upon

    elements from many sources and put these

    together into a pattern not clearly there before.

  • 7/30/2019 Bloom's Ppt Final 2 9-9-08

    17/22

    Evaluation: Value judgmentsabout ideas, works, solutions,methods and mater ials

    Piet Hein:

    The road to wisdom is plain and simple toexpress,

    To err and err and err again, But less and

    less and less

    CHECK VIDEO

    http://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt/index.php?title=Bloom%27s_Taxonomyhttp://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt/index.php?title=Bloom%27s_Taxonomy
  • 7/30/2019 Bloom's Ppt Final 2 9-9-08

    18/22

    Expanding Blooms TaxonomyBeyond Its Original Intent

    Application is not limited to the cognitive structuring of learning objectives Amongthe Applications, It works as a guide for:

    Practitioners working with learners at all levels in assisting them in:

    1. Understanding the structure of knowledge

    2. Developing critical thinking skills

    3. Understanding the specific purpose of a learning experience

    4. Curriculum developers to structure learning experiences consistent with acognitive structure.

    5. Determining when and under what circumstances a particular instructionalstrategy or tactic is appropriate

    6. Facilitating the purposeful activity of learners in group and team situations

    7. Learners to follow in conducting research on a given topic.

    8. Developing competence based assessment and evaluative instruments

    9. Structuring the agenda of faculty meetings and professional developmentactivities.

    10. Add your own initiatives for using the taxonomy

  • 7/30/2019 Bloom's Ppt Final 2 9-9-08

    19/22

    Blooms Taxonomy Today

    The Internet cites several instances where

    Blooms Taxonomy has been revised andupdated. Go to: GoogleBlooms

    Taxonomy Revisited.

  • 7/30/2019 Bloom's Ppt Final 2 9-9-08

    20/22

    Conclusion

    Blooms taxonomy was first developed to

    respond to a then current need.

    It never caught on at the college level It is seldom adequately applied at the

    public school level

    It is more applicable now then whenoriginally proposed

  • 7/30/2019 Bloom's Ppt Final 2 9-9-08

    21/22

    For more information, revise

    Complete Creedon Monograph:

    Blooms Taxonomy Revisited.

    For Creedons complete monograph go toweb site: www.larrycreedon.wordpress.com

    under Learning Theory.

    http://www.larrycreedon.wordpress.com/http://www.larrycreedon.wordpress.com/
  • 7/30/2019 Bloom's Ppt Final 2 9-9-08

    22/22

    Ipse dixit

    Lawrence P. Creedon, Ed.D.

    New England Philosophy of EducationAssociation Annual meeting, October 4, 2008.

    [email protected]

    www.larrycreedon.wordpress.com

    (703) 731 8114

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://www.larrycreedon.wordpress.com/http://www.larrycreedon.wordpress.com/http://www.larrycreedon.wordpress.com/http://www.larrycreedon.wordpress.com/mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]