Blog - Koo - Online Collaborative Learning

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/13/2019 Blog - Koo - Online Collaborative Learning

    1/6

    Sunday, November 14, 2010

    20101114 - Koo, Online Collaborative Learning...Koo, A.C. (2009). Online Collaborative Learning for Malaysian Schools: A CaseStudy on Geometry. Multimedia University, Malaysia.

    Total pages of ontent! 2"#.

    $er %&' resear& seemed to fous on!

    ) tudents* and Tea&ers* pereption of +C

    2) %ereived effetiveness of +C for tea&ing and learning -eometry

    ) tudents* fators and Tea&ers* fators affeting t&e pereived readiness for +C.

    My Interest:

    1) actor analysis

    !) Confirmatory factor analysis

    ") Structural e#uation modelling$

    Action:

    %o attem&t to do'nload entire (issertation$

    %o read the entire (issertation$

    Koo, A. C. (200"). actors affecting teachers &erceived readiness for onlinecollaborative learning: A case study in Malaysia$Educational Technology & Society, 11 (), 2//21".

    actors affecting teachers &erceived readiness for online collaborative learning: A case study in

    Malaysia

    Search This Blog

    ear&

    LinksMobile Learning portal [prototype]WAP Blog: Mobile Learning & Usability

    Blog Archive 2010 (144)

    3 e!e"ber (4)

    #o$e"ber (%)

    Mobile 'W''* pros & !ons

    Mobile P+one is "ore !on$enient t+an #oteboo,-o"p...

    rea/ing Bible on Mobile p+one in !+r!+

    2010112 -on!eptal3'+eoreti!al ra"e5or,(5i,ip...

    Usability ra"e5or, (6+a!,el)

    2010112 !on!epts & /e7intions o7 $alation res...

    2010112 $alation resear!+3"et+o/ (Patton)

    2010112 $alation *esear!+ (Wi,ipe/ia)

    2010112 $alation *esear!+ (Po5ell)

    2010112 $alati$e *esear!+ (Winsett8 #A'-9)

    2010112 '+e Planning$alation -y!le (6o!ial*e...

    2010112 $alation *esear!+(6o!ial*esear!+Met+...

    2010112 iagra" o!s rop as a ;alitati$e ...

    2010112 Pee, & ot+ergill8 Using o!s rops 7...

    Share 0 More 4e5t 6log7 valve8oemgmail.om 'as&:oard ign +ut

    ichael !ea"...#h$ Can%i%ate

    Page 1 of 6Michael Yeap...PhD Candidate: 20101114 - Koo, Online Collaboati!e "eaning...

    #0$1$2014http:$$%ichael&eap.blog'pot.co%$2010$11$20101114-(oo-online-collaboati!e.ht%l

  • 8/13/2019 Blog - Koo - Online Collaborative Learning

    2/6

  • 8/13/2019 Blog - Koo - Online Collaborative Learning

    3/6

    P 4 f 6Mi h l Y PhD C did 20101114 K O li C ll b i " i

  • 8/13/2019 Blog - Koo - Online Collaborative Learning

    4/6

    Comments: She describes mainly on frequency, i.e. percentage and number against total. Occasionally,

    she describes the mean.

    Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling

    Firstly, the internal consistency of the survey items was sought by running a reliability test using SPSSversion !. "he overall reliability of Cronbach#s alpha was estimated at !.$%&%, with $' cases and ()

    survey items. "his value has e*ceeded the minimum threshold for the internal reliability test, i.e. !.+

    -unnally, +$/.

    "he data was then analy0ed using / factor analysis, )/ confirmatory factor analysis or measurement

    model before proceed to the ne*t step, (/ Structural 1quation 2odeling S12/.

    Factor Analysis

    Comments: 1*tracted factors were:Factor Perceived positive effects of OC3

    Factor ) Perceived readiness

    Factor ( Collaborative intention or tendency

    Factor % -ew learning paradigm

    Factor & 4nsufficient access to technology

    Factor ' "ime constraint

    Confirmatory Factor Analysis

    4n total, )) out of () items were used to describe si* factors. Figure shows the measurement model and

    its related measurements such as standardi0ed regression weight numeric labels at the single arrow

    lines/, squared multiple correlation number labels at the top left or right corner of the bo*es or observed

    variables/ and correlations numeric labels at the double arrow lines/.

    Structural Model Analysis

    "he basic structural model was tested and modified until it was both theoretically meaningful and

    statistically well fitting. "hree correlation paths Figure ), paths with double arrows/ for the three factors

    -ew3earningParadigm, Collaborative4 and Perceived51ffect/ were established in order to get a better fitresult.

    Figure ) shows the final structural model with the respective estimated parameters which has the best fit

    result. "he estimation of the structural model yields a chi6square of (&'.(, df. 7 )!) and P 8 .!!. "able (

    shows the goodnessof6fit statistics for the structural model.

    Structural Equation Modeling

    "he analysis of the Structural 1quation 2odeling S12, "able % and its path diagram in Figure )/ shows

    the following results:

    9 "he indicator of time constraint had a significant negative effect P 8 .!!/ to predict teachers#perceived readiness for OC3 in their schools.

    Page 4 of 6Michael Yeap...PhD Candidate: 20101114 - Koo, Online Collaboati!e "eaning...

    #0$1$2014http:$$%ichael&eap.blog'pot.co%$2010$11$20101114-(oo-online-collaboati!e.ht%l

    P 5 f 6Mi h l Y PhD C did t 20101114 K O li C ll ti # i

  • 8/13/2019 Blog - Koo - Online Collaborative Learning

    5/6

    9 "he factor of insufficient access to technology had a marginally significant effect P 8 ./ in predicting

    teachers# perceived readiness for OC3 in their schools.

    9 "he factor of new learning paradigm which is due to the advent of the 4nternet and its impacts in

    education had a high value of standardi0ed regression weight the highest, i.e. !.%/ to predict positively the

    teachers# perceived readiness for OC3. ;ence, this factor could also be able to predict teachers# perceivedreadiness for OC3.

    Conclusion

    "he findings of this study show that many of the teachers were neither agreed nor disagreed on their

    perceived readiness for OC3 even though they were quite positively perceived the effects of OC3. "he

    teachers did not e*press their readiness strongly because of time constraint and insufficient access to

    computer and the 4nternet at schools. "hese two factors are the perceived impediments to the

    implementation of OC3 in schools.

    Other factors such as collaborative intention and perceived positive effects of OC3 did not affect teachers#

    perceived readiness for OC3 but these factors have positive relationship with the factor of new learning

    paradigm which emerged due to the advent of the 4nternet and the increase responsibility of learners in

    education. "his newly emerged factor has some positive influence on the teachers# perceived readiness

    for OC3. "his implies that teachers with more positive attitude or belief towards new learning paradigm are

    more ready to adopt OC3. 2any of the teachers also believe that the supports from school principal and

    training provider are the important conditions for them to practice OC3 in schools.Poste/ by Mi!+ael F69F at :0G AM

    Labels: !ollaborati$e learning8 elearning8 =oo

    No comments:

    Post a Comment

    Page 5 of 6Michael Yeap...PhD Candidate: 20101114 - Koo, Online Collao!ati"e #ea!ning...

    $0%1%2014http:%%&ichael'eap.log(pot.co&%2010%11%20101114-)oo-online-collao!ati"e.ht&l

  • 8/13/2019 Blog - Koo - Online Collaborative Learning

    6/6