Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Blackstone-MillvilleRegional School District
2012-2013 Proposed Budget
March 14th, 2012
FY12 Budget
FY12 Budget - $20,455,470
Current E & D - $759,933
Anticipated Enrollment
Millville Elementary – 243 Students
JFK Elementary – 386 Students
AFM Elementary – 215 Students
M.S. – 473 Students
H.S. – 529 Students
Total – Projected Enrollment - 1846
PROJECTED CLASS SIZESMillville Elementary
Projected Class Size Total StudentsK – 20 – 22 students 40-441st 18 students 362nd 20 students 403rd 20 students 404th 25 students 50 5th 17.5 students 35
PROJECTED CLASS SIZEJFK Elementary
Projected Class Size Total Students
K – 21 students 88
1st – 22 students 90
2nd – 24 students 96
3rd – 23 students 112
PROJECTED CLASSESAFM Elementary
Projected Class Size Total Students
4th – 24 students 96
5th – 24 students 120
PROJECTED CLASS SIZESFWHMS
Projected Class Sizes Total Students
6th – 22.2 156
7th – 23 139
8th – 25 178
PROJECTED CLASS ENROLLMENT BMRHS
9th grade ---134 students
10th grade --- 115 students
11th grade --- 141 students
12th grade --- 139 students
District MCAS Performance from 2008-2011
22%
15%
24%
33%
22%
25%
40%
34%
29% 30%
13%
35%
30%
13%
24%
11%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
Advanced Proficient Needs Improvement Warning
MCAS Grading Scale
% o
f To
tal S
tude
nts
2008-1174 students
2009-1131 students
2010-1110 students
2011-1084 students
Millville Elementary SchoolMCAS Performance from 2006-
2011Math Scores – Advance grouping increased from 8% to 25%
Proficient – increased 34% to 42%
Needs Improvement – decreased 46% to 28%
Warning – 12% to 6%
Millville Elementary SchoolMCAS Performance from 2006-
2011ELA – an increase was noted in years 2006 to 2010. A drop occurred in 2011
Advanced – decreased 18% to 14%
Proficient – decreased 57% to 47%
Needs Improvement – increased 19% to 34%
Warning – stable 6% to 5%
Millville Elementary (Grades 3-5)
MCAS Performance-Mathematics
8
46
12
3736
12
9
35
32
13
6
25
42
28
6
34
15
33
35
23
20
31
41
22
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Advanced Proficient Needs Improvement Warning
MCAS Grading Scale
% o
f T
ota
l Stu
den
ts
2006-158 students2007-151 students2008-159 students2009-155 students2010-141 students2011-120 students
Millville Elementary (Grades 3-5) MCAS Performance-English Language Arts
8
46
36
1011
4143
57
53
33
7
15
50
31
4
18
57
19
6
14
47
34
5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Advanced Proficient Needs Improvement Warning
MCAS Grading Scale
% o
f T
ota
l Stu
den
ts
2006-158 students2007-151 students2008-159 students2009-155 students2010-141 students2011-120 students
Millville Elementary School (Grade 5) MCAS Performance in Science
39
35
7
17
32
47
3
14
52
32
2
22
31
43
4
19
44
37
0
24
50
18
8
19
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Advanced Proficient Needs Improvement Warning
MCAS Grading Scale
% o
f T
ota
l Stu
den
ts
2006-54 students2007-59 students2008-50 students2009-54 students2010-57 students2011-38 students
John F. Kennedy ElementaryMCAS Performance from 2006-
2011Math scores
An increase was noted between the years of 2006 to 2008. Currently the trend is decreasing.
Advanced – 3% to 16% (2008 – 28%) Proficient – increased 45% to 63% Needs Improvement – decreased 38% to
19% Warning – decreased 14% to 3%
John F. Kennedy ElementaryMCAS Performance from 2006-
2011ELA
Advanced – decreased 12% to 9%
Proficient – increased 44% to 57%
Needs Improvement – decreased 35% to 29%
Warning – decreased 8% to 6%
John F. Kennedy (Grade 3) MCAS Performance Mathematics
3
45
38
14
21
50
19
10
28
41
22
9
20
38
27
16
46
31
6
16
63
19
3
18
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Advanced Proficient NeedsImprovement
Warning
MCAS Grading Scale
% o
f Tot
al S
tude
nts
2006-137 students2007-155 students2008-171 students2009-150 students2010-158 students2011-115 students
John F. Kennedy (Grade 3) MCAS Performance in English Language Arts
12
44
35
810
56
33
1
12
49
29
1010
53
27
1012
50
32
69
57
29
6
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Advanced Proficient Needs Improvement Warning
MCAS Grading Scale
% o
f Tot
al S
tude
nts
2006-137 students2007-155 students2008-171 students2009-150 students2010-158 students2011-115 students
Math
Advanced - increased 17% to 19%
Proficient – increased 25% to 35%
Needs Improvement – decreased 42% to 31%
Warning – stable 16% to 15%
A.F. Maloney ElementaryMCAS Performance from 2006-
2011
A.F. Maloney ElementaryMCAS Performance from 2006-
2011ELA – the scores showed an increase during the years 2006 to 2009
Advanced – 11% to 12%
Proficient – 41% to 42% (high 54% in 2009)
Needs Improvement – decreased 41% to 31%
Warning – increased 7% to 15%
A.F. Maloney MCAS Performance (Grades 4 & 5) Mathematics
17
25
42
1617
3436
13
19
33
36
12
20
39
33
8
33 32
12
19
35
31
15
22
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Advanced Proficient Needs Improvement Warning
MCAS Grading Scale
% o
f T
ota
l Stu
den
ts
2006-269 students2007-217 students2008-190 students2009-234 students2010-225 students2011-208 students
A.F. Maloney MCAS Performance (Grades 4 & 5)English Language Arts
11
41 41
710
46
36
86
48
38
8
12
54
28
6
10
51
29
1012
42
31
15
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Advanced Proficient Needs Improvement Warning
MCAS Grading Scale
% o
f T
ota
l Stu
den
ts
2006-269 students2007-217 students2008-190 students2009-234 students2010-225 students2011-208 students
A.F. Maloney MCAS Performance (Grade 5) in Science
17
39 38
6
24
45
27
5
21
39
35
5
14
50
31
4
13
61
23
3
9
42
35
14
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Advanced Proficient Needs Improvement Warning
MCAS Grading Scale
% o
f T
ota
l Stu
den
ts
2006-137 students2007-132 students2008- 82 students2009-112 students2010-119 students2011- 98 students
Math – a slight increase has been noted
Advanced – increased 13% to 24%
Proficient – increased 30% to 38%
Needs Improvement – decreased 34% to 25%
Warning – decreased – 23% to 13%
F.W. Hartnett Middle SchoolMCAS Performance from 2006-
2011
F.W. Hartnett Middle SchoolMCAS Performance from 2006-
2011ELA – slight increase
Advanced – increased 6% to 11%
Proficient – increased 61% to 67%
Needs improvement – decreased 26% to 18%
Warning – decreased 7% to 3%
F. W. Hartnett Middle School (Grades 6-8)MCAS Performance in Mathematics
13
30
34
23
17
33
25 25
16
33
30
2121
31 32
1617
33 33
17
24
38
25
13
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Advanced Proficient Needs Improvement Warning
MCAS Grading Scale
% o
f T
ota
l Stu
den
ts
2006-561 students2007-548 students2008-570 students2009-521 students2010-501 students2011-476 students
F.W. Hartnett Middle School (Grades 6-8) MCAS Performance in English Language Arts
6
61
26
7
62
27
58
61
24
79
64
23
47
66
22
5
11
67
18
36
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Advanced Proficient Needs Improvement Warning
MCAS Grading Scale
% o
f T
ota
l Stu
den
ts
2006-561 students2007-548 students2008-570 students2009-521 students2010-501 students2011-476 students
F. W. Hartnett Middle School (Grade 8 only) MCAS Performance in Science/Technology
3
3942
16
5
46
42
7
1
4542
13
3
34
45
18
1
27
55
17
2
36
50
12
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Advanced Proficient Needs Improvement Warning
MCAS Grading Scale
% o
f T
ota
l Stu
den
ts
2006-195 students2007-169 students2008-179 students2009-192 students2010-193 students2011-136 students
Math –improvement from 2006 to 2009, currently a decrease is being noted
Advanced – 46% to 43% (2009-52%)
Proficient – 37% to 37%
Needs Improvement – increased 13% to 15%
Warning – 4% to 4%
BMR High SchoolMCAS Performance from 2006-2011
BMR High SchoolMCAS Performance from 2006-2011
ELA –
Advanced – increased 18% to 40%
Proficient – decreased 61% to 53%
Needs Improvement – decreased 18% to 5%
Warning – decreased – 3% to 2%
BMR High School (Grade 10) MCAS Performance in Mathematics
46
37
13
4
40
36
19
5
4038
17
6
52
28
17
4
45
27
20
8
43
37
15
4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Advanced Proficient Needs Improvement Warning
MCAS Grading Scale
% o
f T
ota
l Stu
den
ts
2006-144 students2007-170 students2008-144 students2009-111 students2010-130 students2011-142 students
BMR High School (Grade 10) MCAS Performance in English Language Arts
61
18
3
21
58
17
4
16
65
16
3
39
50
10
1
35
46
12
7
40
53
52
18
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Advanced Proficient Needs Improvement Warning
MCAS Grading Scale
% o
f T
ota
l Stu
den
ts
2006-144 students2007-170 students2008-144 students2009-111 students2010-130 students2011-142 students
BMR High School (Grade 10) MCAS Performance in Science (Bio & Physics)
4
3739
20
7
55
35
37
41 41
11
38 38
14 14
21
64
13
2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Advanced Proficient Needs Improvement Warning
MCAS Grading Scale
% o
f T
ota
l Stu
den
ts
2007-315 students2008-124 students2009-148 students2010-21 students*2011-140 students
BMRSD Budget BreakdownBudget consists of 1000+ line items:– For presentation purposes, it’s unwieldy and complicated.– To simplify, each line item can be categorized in one of three
categories:
Total Salaries Direct: Includes all salaries that directly touch
students including teachers, subs, principals, assistant principals, librarians, nurses, and administration.
Total Student Services: Includes all salaries that relate to student
services.
Total Overhead: Includes all other expenses including supplies, heat,
electric, plowing, repairs, maintenance, contracts, textbooks, athletics, etc.
Categorization makes budget easier to understand.
Fiscal Year 2013 ConsiderationsInflation in 2011 averaged 3.16% though began to drop in Dec of last year. – If we assume a rate of inflation of 3%, then we can make
reasonable assumptions that fuel, electricity, repairs, maintenance, etc. will all increase in the neighborhood of 3%.
Union contracts, negotiated in previous years, will take effect in 2013. Rate increases averaged .5% to 1.5%Support Staff has not been voted upon as of this date.The School Committee understands the importance of being respectful and aware of the fiscal situation of our communities, however, it is the responsibility of the District to provide our students with a quality education. To offer this caliber
Source of Revenue Amount
Chapter 70 $ 10,511,449
Transportation Reimbursement $ 285,211
Blackstone's Assessment
Minimum Contribution $ 6,154,609
Exclusionary Costs $ 1,072,317
Total Blackstone's Assessment $ 7,226,926
Millville's Assessment
Minimum Contribution $ 1,739,899
Exclusionary Costs $ 443,969
Total Millville's Assessment $ 2,183,868
Additional
Apply Medicaid Funds $ 60,000
Apply Misc Funds $ 2,600
Apply Pre-School Funds $ 30,000
Apply Athletic Reserve Funds $ 5,000
Apply Interest Earned $ 5,000
Music & Athletic Fees $ 45,000
Apply E & D Funds $ 450,000
Circuit Breaker Funds (SPED) $ 170,000
Total Additional $ 767,600
Total Sources of Revenue $ 20,975,054
BMRSD Sources of Revenue
Level Funded Budget
Given that our Sources of Revenue=$20,975,054 we have worked to submit a budget that does NOT exceed our expect sources of revenue.
BMRSD Budget ComparisonFY12 vs. FY13
Major Budget Categories
FY 2012
% of FY12
Budget FY 2013
% of FY13
Budget Difference
% Increase
From FY12 vs.
FY13
Total Salaries Direct $
9,095,145 44.46% $ 9,203,339 43.94% $ 108,194 1.19%
Total Student Services $
2,293,085 11.21% $
2,354,927 11.24% $ 61,842 2.70%
Total Overhead $
9,067,240 44.33% $9,416,788 44.82% $ 349,548 3.86%
Grand total $ 20,455,470 100.00%
$ 20,975,054 100.00% $ 519,584 2.54%
Source of Major Increases/Decreases
by CategoryTotal Salaries Direct: Increase of $108.2k ●Addition of Principal at BMR $50k increase ●Increase in Athletic Coaches $13.5k increase ●Increase in Salary of Subs at all schools $61.5k ●Raises of $61.9k
Total Student Services: Increase of $61.8k ●Net increase of Student Services Teachers $27.6k ●Increase of Student Services Clerical $37.8 ●Net increase of Student Services Aides $40.4k
Total Overhead: Increase of $349k ●Increase of workbooks $22.4k
●Increase of textbooks $16.7k ●Increase in transportation of $120.9k ●Increase in small equipment hardware of $74.9k ●Net increase of benefits, retirement, prof development $228.8k ●Net decrease in tuition of $106.6k
Grant HistoryTotal Awards
FY08 - $637,643.00
FY09 - $720,502.00
FY10 - $1,083,086.00
FY11 - $1,551,378.00
FY12 - $1,067,047.00
FY13 - $715,000.00 (anticipated)
Possible Staff Reductions in FY13 Budget
2 Elementary Professional Staff
2 Middle School Professional Staff
2 High School Professional Staff
2 Special Education Professional Staff
4 Support Personnel
Staff Reductions in FY12
3 Para-Professional1 Counselor.5 School Adjustment Counselor.5 ESL teacher2 Reading teachers1 Kindergarten teacher1 Music teacher.5 FCS1 Library Para-Professional1 Technology Director
Additional Budget Eliminations
Proposed 1 to 1 iPad program – High School ($85,000)
Contract Repair and Service – ($235,000)
Special Education – ($278,602)
Regular Education ( supplies, materials, etc.) – ($270,795)
Proposed FY13 Budget
$20,975,056
