3
The following are my thoughts on the Eric Garner case: When I watched the vid e o that showed Garner being subdued and ultimately killed by the cops, I had a di fferent take than many people. Most articles I've read or analysis I've seen ab out the case choose to focus on the one cop who put Garner in a choke hold and e ventually suf focated him on the ground. It's understandable to focus on that, b ut I believe it's secondary to the main problem with the situation, which is thi s: Why are all the other cops helping the cop who subdues Gar ner, even after he aring Garner continue to cry out that he can't breathe? First of all, I would b et a lot of them thought he was exaggerating that in order to get the cop off of  him, but then that leads to another question, which is why wouldn't they give h im the benefit of the doubt? If a man you're arresting is saying he can't breat he, it wouldn't hurt you to ease up on the choke hold, you're already surrounded  by about five or more other cops, and the guy isn't armed so you know he's not a danger to anyone and certainly isn't gonna escape. Furthermore, if this were an obese white guy, would all these white cops have do ne the same thing? Probably not, but the question is why not? The answer isn't because they necessarily hate black people, it's because of how they view black men. They're so used to seeing them in jail and arresting them that they see al l black men as the same and it dehumanizes them. Plus, the cops become desensit ized to the sight of black men dying and black men com mitting crimes. This is d angerous because once that happens they no longer view their subjects as people,  but merely as objects tha t must be arrested or at least profiled. That also me ans they aren't gonna listen to the black men they're profiling or attempting to  arrest at any given time, regardless of whether or not they're innocent or at l east non-violent. That was clear in Garner's case.  My belief is that these cops don't hate black people, they hate criminals and p eople they perceive as criminals, and in certain areas such as this area of NY, the vast majority of criminals happen to be black (as former NY city mayor Rudy Giuliani poin ted out a nd based his policing system off of). That attitude itsel f is wrong because as a cop you shouldn't hate criminals (easier said than done,  I know, especially when they try to kill you on a daily basis), you should alwa ys err on the side of saving lives, even the lives of criminals you might end up  arresting, a nd treat every person with re spect and dignit y. But it's the reaso n so many cops have that attitude that's the problem. There really is a "cop mentality" or "cop culture" within police departments thr oughout the US, but especially in big cities with high poverty and crime rates t hat are predominantly black. This culture causes cops to adopt the mindset that  they always have to protect each other and that they're always right no matter what, and that the person who's suspected of committing a crime is always guilty  no matter what. It also leads to an "us vs them" mentali ty that results in pol ice (often working with DAs and local politicians who make the laws) making sure  they're never held accountable, and because of this there are cover-ups when a policeman doe s something wrong or even criminal. There's plenty of evidence to back up this assertion, just google "police cover-up" and you'll get tons of art icles proving it. In fact, a cover-up occurred in Ferguson be fore most of the c ountry ever heard abou t that city. So there was already a ton of corruption an d a sense of being above the law by the police force there before the incident w ith Officer Wilson occurred. Even though the protests were misguided on that ca se, one can see why the black people in Ferguson had an underlying anger towards  the cops and a reason not to believe Wilson was acting in self-defense. But this is a bigger issue than an issue of the police vs black people or any ci vilians. It's a human psychology issue. This is what happens when one smaller group of people (in this case the cops) is in a position of power and authority and are tasked with controlling another, much larger group of people on a daily basis who they rarely interact with in their day to day lives off the job, and d on't understand because their cultures are so different (poor black men in this

Black Lives Matter, The Lives of Perceived Criminals Who Happen to Be Black Don't, And That's the Problem

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Black Lives Matter, The Lives of Perceived Criminals Who Happen to Be Black Don't, And That's the Problem

7/26/2019 Black Lives Matter, The Lives of Perceived Criminals Who Happen to Be Black Don't, And That's the Problem

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/black-lives-matter-the-lives-of-perceived-criminals-who-happen-to-be-black 1/3

The following are my thoughts on the Eric Garner case: When I watched the video that showed Garner being subdued and ultimately killed by the cops, I had a different take than many people. Most articles I've read or analysis I've seen about the case choose to focus on the one cop who put Garner in a choke hold and eventually suffocated him on the ground. It's understandable to focus on that, but I believe it's secondary to the main problem with the situation, which is this: Why are all the other cops helping the cop who subdues Garner, even after hearing Garner continue to cry out that he can't breathe? First of all, I would bet a lot of them thought he was exaggerating that in order to get the cop off of him, but then that leads to another question, which is why wouldn't they give him the benefit of the doubt? If a man you're arresting is saying he can't breathe, it wouldn't hurt you to ease up on the choke hold, you're already surrounded by about five or more other cops, and the guy isn't armed so you know he's nota danger to anyone and certainly isn't gonna escape.

Furthermore, if this were an obese white guy, would all these white cops have done the same thing? Probably not, but the question is why not? The answer isn'tbecause they necessarily hate black people, it's because of how they view blackmen. They're so used to seeing them in jail and arresting them that they see all black men as the same and it dehumanizes them. Plus, the cops become desensitized to the sight of black men dying and black men committing crimes. This is dangerous because once that happens they no longer view their subjects as people, but merely as objects that must be arrested or at least profiled. That also means they aren't gonna listen to the black men they're profiling or attempting to

 arrest at any given time, regardless of whether or not they're innocent or at least non-violent. That was clear in Garner's case.

 My belief is that these cops don't hate black people, they hate criminals and people they perceive as criminals, and in certain areas such as this area of NY,the vast majority of criminals happen to be black (as former NY city mayor RudyGiuliani pointed out and based his policing system off of). That attitude itself is wrong because as a cop you shouldn't hate criminals (easier said than done, I know, especially when they try to kill you on a daily basis), you should always err on the side of saving lives, even the lives of criminals you might end up arresting, and treat every person with respect and dignity. But it's the reason so many cops have that attitude that's the problem.

There really is a "cop mentality" or "cop culture" within police departments throughout the US, but especially in big cities with high poverty and crime rates that are predominantly black. This culture causes cops to adopt the mindset that they always have to protect each other and that they're always right no matterwhat, and that the person who's suspected of committing a crime is always guilty no matter what. It also leads to an "us vs them" mentality that results in police (often working with DAs and local politicians who make the laws) making sure they're never held accountable, and because of this there are cover-ups when apoliceman does something wrong or even criminal. There's plenty of evidence toback up this assertion, just google "police cover-up" and you'll get tons of articles proving it. In fact, a cover-up occurred in Ferguson before most of the country ever heard about that city. So there was already a ton of corruption and a sense of being above the law by the police force there before the incident w

ith Officer Wilson occurred. Even though the protests were misguided on that case, one can see why the black people in Ferguson had an underlying anger towards the cops and a reason not to believe Wilson was acting in self-defense.

But this is a bigger issue than an issue of the police vs black people or any civilians. It's a human psychology issue. This is what happens when one smallergroup of people (in this case the cops) is in a position of power and authorityand are tasked with controlling another, much larger group of people on a dailybasis who they rarely interact with in their day to day lives off the job, and don't understand because their cultures are so different (poor black men in this

Page 2: Black Lives Matter, The Lives of Perceived Criminals Who Happen to Be Black Don't, And That's the Problem

7/26/2019 Black Lives Matter, The Lives of Perceived Criminals Who Happen to Be Black Don't, And That's the Problem

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/black-lives-matter-the-lives-of-perceived-criminals-who-happen-to-be-black 2/3

case). When individuals within the smaller, dominating group have to do this for many years and have many violent situations they have to deal with on a dailybasis, it desensitizes them to not only the group of people they're regularly arresting or fighting, but to the very act of killing or at least oppressing people with force. You can take the cops and black men out of the equation and replace them with american soldiers in Afghanistan who committed the atrocities at Abu Ghraib, or prison officers in a Mexican prison who beat and abuse the inmates(also google "prison abuse by guards", the stories are endless), or even workers at psychiatric hospitals or wards abusing their patients because they're so tired of dealing with their problems (google "workers at psych ward abuse patients", you'll see what I mean). Is it any wonder, or should anyone then be surprisedwhen we're presented with evidence that cops are treating black men more like animals than human beings?

This is a human problem more so than just a cop problem, although there is alsothe problem of cop culture, but in effect that is also a human problem that is rooted in evolutionary biology and goes all the way back to our earliest ancestors. The tribes our ancestors belonged to developed an "us vs them" mentality because loyalty to their own tribe helped them survive in the wild longer, and that mindset evolved at the same time our brains did, thus wiring our brains to fear or dislike people who don't look, act, or think the same way we do. There arecountless examples of this primal way of thinking going on in this country and around the world between people of different races, religions, countries, and more. So it's not unique to cops. But it is also playing out on both sides of the

 fight in inner cities right now, where black people view all cops with suspicion and as a group that should be fought against at all times, and likewise the cops policing those areas tend to view all black men with suspicion and as a group that should be fought. This mentality answers the following question: why did all of the cops feel they couldn't speak out against their fellow cops and tell the cop with the choke hold to ease up? When you're all part of the same tribe and the person you're arresting is part of another tribe, he loses his humanity and becomes just another soldier in the tribal war who must be taken down.

The root of the problem that nobody in the media will ever have the guts to talk about is that there is an epidemic of black crime in the inner cities of this country, and the cops have to deal with it on a regular basis. It's not just abo

ut black on black crime, as many conservatives will point out, it's about blackmen committing crime in general. There are many cases where a crime is committed and there is no direct victim such as selling drugs, robbing stores, etc. This is a problem, and there are many reasons for it which I've already written about (I'm finishing editing my latest post on this and will update this entry with a link to it here) such as the breakdown of the black family, lack of school choice in inner cities, and gov't programs that make people dependent on the gov't instead of their families and the community (which isn't confined to black communities).

This has created a separate problem throughout America in which police departments that are often majority white perceive all black men as potential criminals b

ecause not only have they personally arrested so many of them already, but they're constantly being told stories about them by their fellow police friends who also are used to arresting black men on a regular basis. Liberal will say this is a racist stereotype that needs to die, and I agree, but every stereotype has some basis in reality, otherwise it wouldn't become a stereotype. So we as a nation and black people themselves have to address the fundamental question of whythere's a disproportionate amount of violence and crime in black communities compared to all other ethnic groups in America. We have to have an honest conversation about it, because it's feeding into the stereotype I just described, and it's fueling the mutual animus between cops and the black community in inner citie

Page 3: Black Lives Matter, The Lives of Perceived Criminals Who Happen to Be Black Don't, And That's the Problem

7/26/2019 Black Lives Matter, The Lives of Perceived Criminals Who Happen to Be Black Don't, And That's the Problem

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/black-lives-matter-the-lives-of-perceived-criminals-who-happen-to-be-black 3/3

s all across this country.

So is there a racial disparity between the way cops treat whites vs blacks? I would argue there is in some areas of the country. You're more likely to get pulled over in those areas if you're a black man than if you're a white man, that's just stating the obvious. But it's ignorant to just chalk it up to racism because a)that's usually not the case and b)that shuts down the debate and doesn't get us anywhere in terms of addressing the roots of the problem as I've previously discussed here. We have to have people in the media and politicians who are willing to speak the hard truths, such as the fact that one reason cops are lesslikely to pull a white guy over even if he's acting as suspicious as a black guy is because whites in those high crime areas I talked about simply are much less likely to be involved in a crime, that's what the statistics show. Due to this difference in the statistics between the races, there's a certain amount of profiling that goes on, but some of that is just common sense. If you're a cop onpatrol over a period of three weeks and you get called to a certain neighborhood ten times, and 9/10 or 10/10 times the guy or guys you end up arresting are guilty of a crime and are black, the next time you get a call to go into that neighborhood, you're gonna be on the lookout for black guys doing something illegal.That might not be politically correct to say out loud, but often it's the casethat reality is harsh and just isn't politically correct at all.

Finally, what conclusions can we draw from all this, and are there any practical

 solutions to this problem? The real solutions need to address the cultural, societal, and moral issues within the black community and within society at largethat I talked about in my other diary entry. But there are temporary practicalideas that can reduce some of the violence until those broader changes come about. One would be body cameras, which won't really solve the problem but will bring more exposure to it and thus possibly lead to a change in the behavior of both groups. Beyond that, this is one case where I believe racial quotas could help (but only quotas that are tailored to specific areas to meet the unique racial make up of those areas), and that there should be more black cops patrolling areas that are predominantly black. Why were all the cops who subdued Garner white? Even if none of them were racist, it doesn't look good. Having more black cops arresting black men instead of white cops would start to take the issue ofcop racism out of the equation and could do a lot to help heal some of the racia

l tensions around the country. At the very least it would kill the narrative that these problems are simply the result of racist white cops intentionally killing black men and keeping black people down, which just isn't true. Finally, the laws involving police investigations and accountability need to change, as this article clearly points out.

If we focus on the root of the problems in the black community while making these necessary changes to our laws and police units, I believe we can at least begin to change the attitudes of both police and black people in the inner cities of our country. More importantly, we can make progress in the racial unity of this country and help us understand the groups of people we don't interact with, so we can start to see things through their eyes. When this happens we'll be a lot less likely to judge them and a lot more eager to help them, and they'll be mo

re likely to accept our help instead of viewing us with suspicion and anger.