BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    1/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    2/61

    2 | Fauquier County Mixed-Use Library Study 

    !"#$% '( )'*!%*!+

    I. STAKEHOLDERS " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " 3

    II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " 5

      A. SITE CONCEPTS " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " 7

    III. SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY  " " " " " " " " " " " " " 10

    IV. VISION AND GOALS " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " 12

    V. SITE ZONING ANALYSIS " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "

    15

      A. WATERLOO SITE  " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " 16

      B. ALEXANDRIA PIKE SITE  " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " 18

    VI. EXISTING SITE ASSESSMENT " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " 20

    VII. SITE PARKING ANALYSIS " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " 23

      A. SCHOOL YEAR   " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " 29

      B. SUMMERTIME   " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " 30

    VIII. SITE CONCEPTS

      A. SITE CONCEPT I " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " 32

      B SITE CONCEPT 2  " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " 34

      C. SITE CONCEPT 3  " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " 36

    ,-"+% . ,-"+% .

    IX. PREFERRED SITE CONCEPT  " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " 38

    X. STORMWATER MGMT CONCEPT  " " " " " " " " " " " " " 42

    XI. ALEXANDRIA PIKE STUDY

    A. STUDY " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " 45

      B. STREETSCAPE " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " 47

    XII. LIBRARY STUDY " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "

    48

      A. PROGRAMMING ANALYSIS  " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " 50

      B. BLOCK PLANNING STUDY" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " 54

      C. DESIGN POTENTIAL " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " 56

    XIII. OFFICE STUDY

      A. CORE LAYOUT " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " 58

      B DESIGN POTENTIAL " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " 59

    XIV. BUDGET PRICING " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " 60

    XV. RECOMMENDATIONS " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " 6

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    3/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    4/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    5/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    6/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    7/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    8/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    9/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    10/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    11/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    12/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    13/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    14/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    15/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    16/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    17/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    18/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    19/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    20/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    21/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    22/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    23/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    24/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    25/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    26/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    27/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    28/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    29/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    30/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    31/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    32/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    33/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    34/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    35/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    36/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    37/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    38/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    39/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    40/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    41/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    42/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    43/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    44/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    45/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    46/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    47/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    48/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    49/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    50/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    51/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    52/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    53/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    54/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    55/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    56/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    57/61

    57 | Fauquier County Mixed-Use Library Study 

    !"""# %&' ())"*+ ,-./0 1 /+,"23 4(-+3-"56

       I   l   l    t    t   i     d     i       l    f  

          l      d    h      t     t    d 

       T   h    fi     l   d     i    t    b    d   t      i     d    f  t      i  t        i  t     t

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    58/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    59/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    60/61

  • 8/20/2019 BKV_Draft Fauquier Library Feasibility Report

    61/61

    !"# %&'())&*+,-.(*/

    BKV Group would like to thank Fauquier County administrators

    and the board of supervisors, the Town of Warrenton staff, the

    Mayor and members of the Town Council, members of the Library

    Board and SGF Bros for the opportunity to partner with you

     through this successful master plan process.

    The master plan was an exemplary process of how multiple

    municipalities, government agencies, officials, and private entities

    can partner together where mutual interest align for a unified

    purpose, in this case the relocation of Warrenton Library and

    redevelopment of an underutilized site at a gateway location into

     the Downtown.

    RECOMMENDATIONS

    As part of the public process the Town Council, County Board of

    Supervisor and the Library Board should take the opportunity to

    review the completed master plan and provide recommendations to proceed with the proposed development.

    Likewise, the private entity and the owner of the property, SGF

    Bros has a major role in determining whether or not to proceed

    with the proposed development. SGF Bros should provide a

    formal notification of intent to proceed with the proposed public-

    private development as well.

    NEXT STEPS

    The next steps should include the commission of a Phase 1

    Environmental Study Assessment. This is typical for any landacquisition or redevelopment and is important for identification of

    any contaminants on-site that will need to be abated as par t of the

    redevelopment process.

     We recommend commissioning a site development plan and

    initiating the special exception process. This is an important early

    step as the preferred development concept will require several

    variances for site plan approval. This process will work better if

     the “unknowns” per taining to the special exception process are

    defined prior to any formal development commitments among

    public and private entities.

    The site development plan will require topographical and existing

    site development survey It is important at this stage to accurately

    Based on a straightforward reading of the zoning ordinance, the

    required parking for the 36,000 GSF of office building is 120

    spaces, or 1 per 300 GSF. The Library will require 84 spaces based

    on staffing and the proposed seat capacity for the facility. The tota

    parking requirement is 204 spaces on-site, and we will be seeking

     to reduce the required parking to 180 spaces.

    The second variance is related to building height. However, the

    proposed height for the office building is below the maximum

    height restriction allowed within the zoning ordinance under a

    special exception process.

    The third variance is related to the required 25 feet development

    buffer between CBD-zoned properties and adjacent residentially

    zoned properties. The proposed development reduces the

    development buffer from 25 feet to 15 feet in order to increase

     the pedestrian streetscape depth along Alexandria Pike from 15

    feet to 25 feet. Development within the encroachment will be

    limited to parking and landscaping elements.

    Upon approval of the special exception, formal commitments

    among public and private entities should be ratified based on

    mutually defined development scopes and land ownership

    determinations. The public and private entities will need to clearly

    define cross easements for access, utility easements, maintenance

    responsibilities, shared amenities and responsibilities.