BJP-2004-Kingdon-85-6

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/28/2019 BJP-2004-Kingdon-85-6

    1/5

    10.1192/bjp.184.1.85-aAccess the most recent version at DOI:2004, 184:85-86.BJP

    D. Kingdonbehavioural therapy for psychosisCognitive

    Referenceshttp://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/184/1/85.2#BIBLThis article cites 0 articles, 0 of which you can access for free at:

    permissionsReprints/

    [email protected] toTo obtain reprints or permission to reproduce material from this paper, please

    to this article atYou can respond http://bjp.rcpsych.org/cgi/eletter-submit/184/1/85

    from

    Downloaded

    The Royal College of PsychiatristsPublished by

    on March 15, 2013http://bjp.rcpsych.org/

    http://bjp.rcpsych.org/site/subscriptions/go to:The British Journal of PsychiatryTo subscribe to

    http://bjp.rcpsych.org/http://bjp.rcpsych.org/
  • 7/28/2019 BJP-2004-Kingdon-85-6

    2/5

    In defence of the case reportIn defence of the case report

    During his ten years as Editor, GregDuring his ten years as Editor, Greg

    Wilkinson worked hard to produce a mod-Wilkinson worked hard to produce a mod-

    ern, polished journal with an impressiveern, polished journal with an impressive

    international reputation. In his valedictoryinternational reputation. In his valedictory

    editorial (Wilkinson, 2003) he sets out theeditorial (Wilkinson, 2003) he sets out the

    goals he has pursued. Almost by definition,goals he has pursued. Almost by definition,an editor cannot receive universal approba-an editor cannot receive universal approba-

    tion. However, while I suspect thattion. However, while I suspect that

    academic/research colleagues will haveacademic/research colleagues will have

    been happy with his stewardship, manybeen happy with his stewardship, many

    clinicians are likely to have some reserva-clinicians are likely to have some reserva-

    tions. The reason for this will be found intions. The reason for this will be found in

    three lines in the middle of his final editor-three lines in the middle of his final editor-

    ial: I hastened the demise of the case re-ial: I hastened the demise of the case re-

    port, to exclude what I see as psychiatricport, to exclude what I see as psychiatric

    trivia. I published original research . . ..trivia. I published original research . . ..

    This is a cameo of the polarity thatThis is a cameo of the polarity that

    exists between academic, research-orientedexists between academic, research-oriented

    psychiatrists and those clinicians whopsychiatrists and those clinicians whoprovide the bulk of the service in theprovide the bulk of the service in the

    National Health Service. They confirm theNational Health Service. They confirm the

    contemporary ethos that the only worth-contemporary ethos that the only worth-

    while form of study is that of groups. Thewhile form of study is that of groups. The

    nomothetic approach takes precedencenomothetic approach takes precedence

    while the detailed study of an individualwhile the detailed study of an individual

    patient is marginalised as trivia.patient is marginalised as trivia.

    Psychiatry is not unique in having beenPsychiatry is not unique in having been

    seduced by the scientific process. Unfortu-seduced by the scientific process. Unfortu-

    nately, it is doubtful how much the practicenately, it is doubtful how much the practice

    of our discipline has gained from this devel-of our discipline has gained from this devel-

    opment (Shooter, 2003; Wilkinson, 2003).opment (Shooter, 2003; Wilkinson, 2003).

    This is not surprising. Psychiatry is a disci-This is not surprising. Psychiatry is a disci-pline in which the information is soft andpline in which the information is soft and

    much of it subjective. In contrast, the scien-much of it subjective. In contrast, the scien-

    tific approach insists that any parameter oftific approach insists that any parameter of

    illness that cannot be measured in terms ofillness that cannot be measured in terms of

    hard data is suspect.hard data is suspect.

    As academic psychiatrists have becomeAs academic psychiatrists have become

    more influential within the profession andmore influential within the profession and

    training is more university based, researchtraining is more university based, research

    and related activity are seen as the acmeand related activity are seen as the acme

    of psychiatric work. Working closely withof psychiatric work. Working closely with

    patients and creating enduring therapeuticpatients and creating enduring therapeutic

    relationships is not valued and is sometimesrelationships is not valued and is sometimes

    seen as drudgery. This is a damning para-seen as drudgery. This is a damning para-dox. Is it surprising that it is hard to recruitdox. Is it surprising that it is hard to recruit

    into psychiatry a specialty that is dismis-into psychiatry a specialty that is dismis-

    sive of the very core of its professionalsive of the very core of its professional

    ethic?ethic?

    Psychiatry needs to return to its corePsychiatry needs to return to its core

    values (Simms, 2003). It needs to placevalues (Simms, 2003). It needs to place

    the care and treatment of the individualthe care and treatment of the individual

    patient centre-stage. Students, young doc-patient centre-stage. Students, young doc-

    tors and psychiatric trainees must see attors and psychiatric trainees must see atfirst hand the fascination and reward offirst hand the fascination and reward of

    working with patients, and see that theworking with patients, and see that the

    work is attractive and satisfying. A part ofwork is attractive and satisfying. A part of

    this process must be the rehabilitation ofthis process must be the rehabilitation of

    the detailed case report.the detailed case report.

    Shooter, M. (2003)Shooter, M. (2003) On Pushto, principles and passion:On Pushto, principles and passion:

    just what is an advance in psychiatric treatment?just what is an advance in psychiatric treatment?

    Advances in PsychiatricTreatmentAdvances in PsychiatricTreatment,, 99, 239^240., 239^240.

    Simms, A. (2003)Simms, A. (2003) Back to basics: on not neglectingBack to basics: on not neglecting

    the elementary in continuing professional development.the elementary in continuing professional development.

    Advances in PsychiatricTreatmentAdvances in PsychiatricTreatment,, 99,1^2.,1^2.

    Wilkinson, G. (2 003)Wilkinson, G. (20 03) Fare thee well ^ the Editors lastFare thee well ^ the Editors last

    words.words. British Journal of PsychiatryBritish Journal of Psychiatry,, 182182, 465^466., 465^466.

    D. D. R.WilliamsD. D. R.Williams Departmentof Old AgeDepartment of Old Age

    Psychiatry, Cefn Coed Hospital,Waunarlwydd Road,Psychiatry,Cefn Coed Hospital,Waunarlwydd Road,

    Cockett, Swansea SA2 0GH,UKCockett, Swansea SA2 0GH,UK

    In defence of specialist mentalIn defence of specialist mental

    health care trustshealth care trusts

    Psychological medicine is an interestingPsychological medicine is an interesting

    way to describe an attractive field (Lloydway to describe an attractive field (Lloyd

    & Mayou, 2003). The patients are gener-& Mayou, 2003). The patients are gener-

    ally interesting and engaging, the work isally interesting and engaging, the work is

    usually consensual and professionally re-usually consensual and professionally re-warding. However, when mental healthwarding. However, when mental health

    services are attached to general hospitals,services are attached to general hospitals,

    liaison psychiatry is merely one of an arrayliaison psychiatry is merely one of an array

    of specialties competing for funds. Com-of specialties competing for funds. Com-

    missioners may find that more acute,missioners may find that more acute,

    high-profile services that are better sup-high-profile services that are better sup-

    ported by the public take priority when itported by the public take priority when it

    comes to the annual funding round.comes to the annual funding round.

    A failure to secure sufficient funds inA failure to secure sufficient funds in

    this situation can lead to psychiatric wardsthis situation can lead to psychiatric wards

    and facilities appearing neglected and shab-and facilities appearing neglected and shab-

    by compared with general medical wards inby compared with general medical wards in

    the same hospital. When coupled with athe same hospital. When coupled with astaff that is liable to feel undervalued, thestaff that is liable to feel undervalued, the

    quality of care can suffer and the stigmaquality of care can suffer and the stigma

    of mental illness is compounded.of mental illness is compounded.

    The appearance of specialist trusts inThe appearance of specialist trusts in

    many different areas of medicine shouldmany different areas of medicine should

    allow the strategic, systematic developmentallow the strategic, systematic development

    of a comprehensive range of specialist ser-of a comprehensive range of specialist ser-

    vices. Lloyd & Mayou should welcomevices. Lloyd & Mayou should welcomethe opportunity to develop their field inthe opportunity to develop their field in

    such a focused setting along with othersuch a focused setting along with other

    psychiatrists with different interests. Bypsychiatrists with different interests. By

    seeking to make itself [liaison psychiatry]seeking to make itself [liaison psychiatry]

    more acceptable to medical colleagues theymore acceptable to medical colleagues they

    could be distancing themselves from thecould be distancing themselves from the

    psychotic patients [historically] housed inpsychotic patients [historically] housed in

    large asylums. These are the very patientslarge asylums. These are the very patients

    that suffer the greatest amount of stigmathat suffer the greatest amount of stigma

    and social exclusion, that form the bulk ofand social exclusion, that form the bulk of

    most psychiatrists case-loads and that aremost psychiatrists case-loads and that are

    the least visible to general hospitals.the least visible to general hospitals.

    All psychiatrists should have the oppor-All psychiatrists should have the oppor-tunity to develop their skills by caring fortunity to develop their skills by caring for

    this group of patients as part of their train-this group of patients as part of their train-

    ing. It would be a pity if the views of Lloyding. It would be a pity if the views of Lloyd

    & Mayou were taken to their logical& Mayou were taken to their logical

    conclusion and psychological medicineconclusion and psychological medicine

    divorced itself from mainstream psychiatrydivorced itself from mainstream psychiatry

    and sought to become recognised as aand sought to become recognised as a

    sub-specialty with our esteemed colleaguessub-specialty with our esteemed colleagues

    at the Royal College of Physicians.at the Royal College of Physicians.

    G. G. Lloyd & R. A. Mayou (2003)G. G. Lloyd & R. A. Mayou (2003) Liaison psychiatryLiaison psychiatry

    or psychological medicine?or psychological medicine? British Journal of PsychiatryBritish Journal of Psychiatry,,

    183183, 5^7., 5^7.

    A. SharmaA. Sharma Community ForensicTeam, SouthCommunity ForensicTeam, South

    London and Maudsley NHS Trust,108 Landor Road,London and Maudsley NHS Trust,108 Landor Road,

    London SW9 9NT,UKLondon SW9 9 NT, UK

    Mental incapacity and medicalMental incapacity and medical

    ethicsethics

    With reference to the editorial by Sarkar &With reference to the editorial by Sarkar &

    Adshead (2003), we are pleased to see thisAdshead (2003), we are pleased to see this

    area of discussion being raised. However,area of discussion being raised. However,

    we wish to make a couple of additionalwe wish to make a couple of additional

    points relating to capacity.points relating to capacity.We appreciate that a psychiatrists abilityWe appreciate that a psychiatrists ability

    to override a competent refusal raises parti-to override a competent refusal raises parti-

    cular ethical dilemmas and it is right thatcular ethical dilemmas and it is right that

    this should be highlighted for attention.this should be highlighted for attention.

    However, we felt that other points in theHowever, we felt that other points in the

    section Psychiatry as a special case could,section Psychiatry as a special case could,

    and do, apply to many non-psychiatricand do, apply to many non-psychiatric

    patients, particularly those with acutepatients, particularly those with acute

    medical illness.medical illness.

    The authors assert that The most sig-The authors assert that The most sig-

    nificant difference between medicine andnificant difference between medicine and

    psychiatry lies in the relative incapacity ofpsychiatry lies in the relative incapacity of

    psychiatric patients to make decisions forpsychiatric patients to make decisions forthemselves. Although it is true that somethemselves. Although it is true that some

    8 48 4

    B R I T I S H J O U R N A L O F P S Y C H I A T RYB R I T I S H J O U R N A L O F P S Y C H I A T RY ( 2 0 0 4 ) , 1 8 4 , 8 4 ^ 8 7( 2 0 0 4 ) , 1 8 4 , 8 4 8 7

    CorrespondenceCorrespondence

    EDITED BY STANLEY ZAMMITEDITED BY STANLEY ZAMMIT

    ContentsContents && Indefence ofthe casereportIndefence ofthe casereport && In defence of specialistmental health careIn defence of specialist mentalhealth care

    truststrusts && Mentalincapacity and medical ethicsMentalincapacity and medical ethics && Debate on neurosurgeryDebate on neurosurgery && Cognitive ^Cognitive ^

    behavioural therapy for psychosisbehavioural therapy for psychosis && Personality assessmentPersonality assessment && Management ofManagement of

    post-concussion syndromepost-concussion syndrome

  • 7/28/2019 BJP-2004-Kingdon-85-6

    3/5

    C O R R E S P O N D E N C EC O R R E S P O N D E N C E

    of the most severely affected patients haveof the most severely affected patients have

    impaired decision-making skills, theyimpaired decision-making skills, they

    form a minority (Grisso & Appelbaum,form a minority (Grisso & Appelbaum,

    1995). Most psychiatric patients (includ-1995). Most psychiatric patients (includ-

    ing in-patients)ing in-patients) are perfectly capable ofare perfectly capable of

    making decisions regarding treatment andmaking decisions regarding treatment and

    other areas of their lives. It does not helpother areas of their lives. It does not helpthe cause of reducing stigma for our pa-the cause of reducing stigma for our pa-

    tients to suggest that they cannot make suchtients to suggest that they cannot make such

    decisions.decisions.

    Just as not all psychiatric patients lackJust as not all psychiatric patients lack

    capacity, not all medical patients havecapacity, not all medical patients have

    capacity. This particularly applies to in-capacity. This particularly applies to in-

    patients in whom factors such as cognitivepatients in whom factors such as cognitive

    impairment and delirium can affect theimpairment and delirium can affect the

    ability to make decisions. A recent surveyability to make decisions. A recent survey

    of medical in-patients found that mental in-of medical in-patients found that mental in-

    capacity was a very common problem, andcapacity was a very common problem, and

    one that was frequently overlooked byone that was frequently overlooked by

    medical staff (further details available frommedical staff (further details available fromV.R. upon request). These patients are par-V.R. upon request). These patients are par-

    ticularly vulnerable to medical paternalismticularly vulnerable to medical paternalism

    if this problem is not recognised andif this problem is not recognised and

    appropriately managed.appropriately managed.

    We agree with Sarkar & Adsheads callWe agree with Sarkar & Adsheads call

    for a code of ethics for British psychiatry,for a code of ethics for British psychiatry,

    and hope that it will address this difficultand hope that it will address this difficult

    area of incapacity. Incidentally, we are alsoarea of incapacity. Incidentally, we are also

    watching with interest the progress of thewatching with interest the progress of the

    draft Mental Incapacity Bill. However, wedraft Mental Incapacity Bill. However, we

    suggest that this area requires careful scru-suggest that this area requires careful scru-

    tiny not because psychiatry is a special casetiny not because psychiatry is a special case

    but because these issues affect all health carebut because these issues affect all health careprofessionals. In this way we could help toprofessionals. In this way we could help to

    lead the way for our non-psychiatric collea-lead the way for our non-psychiatric collea-

    gues rather than concentrating on ourgues rather than concentrating on our

    differences.differences.

    Grisso,T. & Appelbaum, P. S. (1995)Grisso,T. & Appelbaum, P. S. (1995) The MacArthurThe MacArthur

    Treatment Competence Study. III: Abilities of patients toTreatment Competence Study. III: Abilities of patients to

    consent to psychiatric medical treatments.consent to psychiatric medical treatments. Law andLaw and

    Human BehaviorHuman Behavior,, 1919, 149^174., 149^174.

    Sarkar, S. P. & Adshead,G. (2 003)Sarkar, S. P. & Adshead,G. (2 003) Protectingaltruism:Protectingaltruism:

    a call for a code of ethics in British psychiatry.a call for a code of ethics in British psychiatry. BritishBritish

    Journal of PsychiatryJournal of Psychiatry,, 183183, 95^97., 95^97.

    S. A. HudsonS. A. Hudson Maudsley Hospital, Denmark Hill,Maudsley Hospital, Denmark Hill,London SE5 8AZ,UKLondon SE5 8AZ,UK

    V. RaymontV. Raymont Institute of Psychiatry,London, UKInstitute of Psychiatry,London, UK

    Debate on neurosurgeryDebate on neurosurgery

    The debate on the future of neurosurgeryThe debate on the future of neurosurgery

    for psychiatric disorders (R. Persaud/for psychiatric disorders (R. Persaud/

    D. Crossley & C. Freeman, 2003) is curiousD. Crossley & C. Freeman, 2003) is curious

    in many ways. Much of the criticism ofin many ways. Much of the criticism of

    neurosurgery still relies upon its historicalneurosurgery still relies upon its historical

    excesses (Pressman, 1998) rather than theexcesses (Pressman, 1998) rather than the

    contemporary caution. The lack ofcontemporary caution. The lack of

    evidence argument sets up an unrealisticevidence argument sets up an unrealisticstandard that most surgical treatments arestandard that most surgical treatments are

    unable to meet. The progress in psychiatricunable to meet. The progress in psychiatric

    treatments argument fails to recognise thattreatments argument fails to recognise that

    recent drug treatments are but incrementalrecent drug treatments are but incremental

    advances over drugs that have been aroundadvances over drugs that have been around

    for some decades, and there are manyfor some decades, and there are many

    patients who continue to suffer chronicallypatients who continue to suffer chronically

    from depression, obsessivecompulsive dis-from depression, obsessivecompulsive dis-order and other illnesses. For those of usorder and other illnesses. For those of us

    who practise in tertiary referral centres,who practise in tertiary referral centres,

    encounters with their suffering are frequentencounters with their suffering are frequent

    and heart-wrenching. Do we wish to takeand heart-wrenching. Do we wish to take

    away all their hope?away all their hope?

    I am not arguing for a return to theI am not arguing for a return to the

    past. Modern neuroscience is fast remov-past. Modern neuroscience is fast remov-

    ing, in a practical sense, the distinctioning, in a practical sense, the distinction

    between brain and mind. It is now quitebetween brain and mind. It is now quite

    acceptable to consider neural transplants,acceptable to consider neural transplants,

    gene therapy and neural prosthetics asgene therapy and neural prosthetics as

    neuropsychiatric treatments. Is this not theneuropsychiatric treatments. Is this not the

    right era to revisit surgical interventionsright era to revisit surgical interventionson the brain? We are already excited abouton the brain? We are already excited about

    developments such as vagus nerve stimula-developments such as vagus nerve stimula-

    tion and deep brain stimulation for psychi-tion and deep brain stimulation for psychi-

    atric disorders (Malhi & Sachdev, 2002).atric disorders (Malhi & Sachdev, 2002).

    We are quite comfortable with ablativeWe are quite comfortable with ablative

    surgery for epilepsy when there issurgery for epilepsy when there is

    functional disturbance, even in the absencefunctional disturbance, even in the absence

    of structural abnormality. The neuro-of structural abnormality. The neuro-

    anatomical models of psychiatric disordersanatomical models of psychiatric disorders

    are becoming increasingly sophisticatedare becoming increasingly sophisticated

    (Mayberg, 2001). Should we not be work-(Mayberg, 2001). Should we not be work-

    ing towards a new era of direct brain inter-ing towards a new era of direct brain inter-

    vention, with surgery being an importantvention, with surgery being an importantaspect of this strategy? This surgery mayaspect of this strategy? This surgery may

    or may not be ablative, or follow an initialor may not be ablative, or follow an initial

    period of brain stimulation, or be guided byperiod of brain stimulation, or be guided by

    sophisticated functional imaging. If deepsophisticated functional imaging. If deep

    brain stimulation, for example, is demon-brain stimulation, for example, is demon-

    strated to produce a therapeutic responsestrated to produce a therapeutic response

    without adverse effects, but only tempora-without adverse effects, but only tempora-

    rily, would there not be an argument to pro-rily, would there not be an argument to pro-

    ceed with focal ablation? The brain is, afterceed with focal ablation? The brain is, after

    all, not inviolable, and the evidence is con-all, not inviolable, and the evidence is con-

    vincing that focal and targeted brain lesionsvincing that focal and targeted brain lesions

    can spare both intellect and personality.can spare both intellect and personality.

    The answer to the question, shouldThe answer to the question, shouldneurosurgery for mental disorder be al-neurosurgery for mental disorder be al-

    lowed to die out? is surely, Definitelylowed to die out? is surely, Definitely

    not. Let us, however, move towards anot. Let us, however, move towards a

    new neurosurgery that is bold but not mis-new neurosurgery that is bold but not mis-

    informed, and that keeps abreast of theinformed, and that keeps abreast of the

    developments in our understanding of braindevelopments in our understanding of brain

    function.function.

    Malhi, G. S. & S achdev, P. (2 002)Malhi, G. S. & S achdev, P. (2 002) Novel physicalNovel physical

    treatments for the management of neuropsychiatrictreatments for the management of neuropsychiatric

    disorders.disorders.Journal of Psychosomatic ResearchJournal of Psychosomatic Research,, 5353,,

    709^719.709^719.

    Mayberg, H. (2001)Mayberg, H. (2001) Depression and frontal^Depression and frontal^

    subcortical circuits: focus on prefrontal ^ limbicsubcortical circuits: focus on prefrontal ^ limbic

    interactions. Ininteractions. In Frontal^Subcortical Circuits in PsychiatricFrontal^Subcortical Circuits in Psychiatric

    and Neurological Disordersand Neurological Disorders (eds D.G. Lichter & J.(eds D.G. Lichter & J.

    Cummings), pp.177^206. NewYork: Guilford Press.Cummings), pp.177^206. NewYork: Guilford Press.

    Persaud, R./ Crossley, D. & Freeman, C. (20 03)Persaud, R./ Crossley, D. & Freeman, C. (20 03)

    Should neurosurgery for mental disorder be allowedShould neurosurgery for mental disorder be allowed

    to die out? (debate).to die out? (debate). British Journal of PsychiatryBritish Journal of Psychiatry,, 183183,,

    195^196.195^196.

    Pressman, J. D. (1998)Pressman, J. D. (1998) Last Resort: Psychosurgery andLast Resort: Psychosurgery and

    the Limits of Medicinethe Limits of Medicine.Cambridge: Cambridge University.Cambridge: Cambridge University

    Press.Press.

    P. SachdevP. Sachdev Neuropsychiatric Institute,The PrinceNeuropsychiatric Institute,The Prince

    of Wales Hospital, Barker Street, Randwick,NSWof Wales Hospital, Barker Street, Randwick,NSW

    2031, Australia2031, Australia

    Cognitive ^ behavioural therapyCognitive ^ behavioural therapy

    for psychosisfor psychosis

    Like a magician pulling a rabbit from hisLike a magician pulling a rabbit from hishat, Turkington draws a positive resulthat, Turkington draws a positive result

    for cognitive therapy for schizophreniafor cognitive therapy for schizophrenia

    from the literature only for McKennafrom the literature only for McKenna

    to put it back in again (Turkington/to put it back in again (Turkington/

    McKenna, 2003). Does it exist or not?McKenna, 2003). Does it exist or not?

    McKennas arguments and table look con-McKennas arguments and table look con-

    vincing as, by excluding any study thatvincing as, by excluding any study that

    does not have an active control, he reducesdoes not have an active control, he reduces

    the number of studies he considers. Butthe number of studies he considers. But

    would he do the same for studies of anti-would he do the same for studies of anti-

    psychotic medications? Or does he assumepsychotic medications? Or does he assume

    that patients, and raters evaluating pa-that patients, and raters evaluating pa-

    tients, can detect no difference betweentients, can detect no difference betweentaking, for example, placebo and haloperi-taking, for example, placebo and haloperi-

    dol, or even haloperidol and olanzapine?dol, or even haloperidol and olanzapine?

    In which case why are we giving them soIn which case why are we giving them so

    much of the latter?much of the latter?

    But even focusing only on the studiesBut even focusing only on the studies

    that he finds acceptable, he dismisses onethat he finds acceptable, he dismisses one

    (SoCRATES; Lewis(SoCRATES; Lewis et alet al, 2002) for having, 2002) for having

    a positive effect over active control on audi-a positive effect over active control on audi-

    tory hallucinations (oh, for a drug that hadtory hallucinations (oh, for a drug that had

    such an effect over and above those cur-such an effect over and above those cur-

    rently available!) and another (Senskyrently available!) and another (Sensky etet

    alal, 2000) where a differential benefit of, 2000) where a differential benefit of

    cognitivebehavioral therapy over befriend-cognitivebehavioral therapy over befriend-ing only became apparent 9 months aftering only became apparent 9 months after

    therapy ended. He completely omits othertherapy ended. He completely omits other

    widely cited studies with active placeboswidely cited studies with active placebos

    and positive effects (e.g. Druryand positive effects (e.g. Drury et alet al, 1996)., 1996).

    He then does an unusual meta-analyticHe then does an unusual meta-analytic

    exercise in dismissing two small pilot studiesexercise in dismissing two small pilot studies

    by weighing them against each other andby weighing them against each other and

    finding them to cancel out. Other meta-finding them to cancel out. Other meta-

    analyses (e.g. Pillinganalyses (e.g. Pilling et alet al, 2002) using more, 2002) using more

    conventional methodology have concludedconventional methodology have concluded

    differently and, fortunately, so has thedifferently and, fortunately, so has the

    National Institute for Clinical Excellence.National Institute for Clinical Excellence.

    The rabbit exists and is multiplyingThe rabbit exists and is multiplyingrapidly (e.g. Durhamrapidly (e.g. Durham et alet al, 2003)., 2003).

    8 58 5

  • 7/28/2019 BJP-2004-Kingdon-85-6

    4/5

    C O R R E S P O N D E N C EC O R R E S P O N D E N C E

    Declaration of interestDeclaration of interest

    D.K. has published books and gives work-D.K. has published books and gives work-

    shops on cognitivebehavioural therapyshops on cognitivebehavioural therapy

    for schizophrenia.for schizophrenia.

    Drury,V., Birchwood, M., Cochrane, R.,Drury,V., Birchwood, M., Cochrane, R., et alet al(1996)(1996)

    Cognitive therapy and recovery from acute psychosis: aCognitive therapy and recovery from acute psychosis: a

    controlled trial. II.Impact on recovery time.controlled trial. II. Impact on recovery time. BritishBritish

    Journal of PsychiatryJournal of Psychiatry,, 169169, 602^607., 602^607.

    Durham, R. C., Guthrie, M., Morton, R. V.,Durham, R. C., Guthrie, M., Morton, R. V., et alet al

    (2003)(2003) Tayside^ Fife clinical trial of cognitive Tayside^ Fife clinical trial of cognitive

    behavioural therapy for medication-resistant psychoticbehavioural therapy for medication-resistant psychotic

    symptoms: results to 3-month follow-up.symptoms: results to 3-month follow-up. British JournalBritish Journal

    of Psychiatryof Psychiatry,, 182182, 303^311., 303^311.

    Lewis, S., Terrier, N., Haddock, G.,Lewis, S., Terrier, N.,Haddock, G., et alet al (2002)(2002)

    Randomised controlled trial of cognitive ^ behaviouralRandomised controlled trial of cognitive ^ behavioural

    therapy in early schizophrenia: acute-phase outcomes.therapy in e arly schizophrenia: acute-phase outcomes.

    British Journal of PsychiatryBritish Journal of Psychiatry,, 181181 (suppl. 43), s91^ s97.(suppl. 43), s91^ s97.

    Pilling, S., Bebbington, P., Kuipers, E.,Pilling, S., Bebbington, P., Kuipers, E., et alet al (2002)(2002)

    Psychological treatmentsin schizophrenia:I. Meta-Psychological treatments in schizophrenia:I.Meta-analysis of family intervention and cognitive behaviouranalysis of family intervention and cognitive behaviour

    therapy.therapy. Psychological MedicinePsychological Medicine,, 3232, 763^782., 763^782.

    Sensky,T.,Turkington, D.,Kingdon, D.,Sensky,T.,Turkington, D.,Kingdon, D., et alet al(2000)(2000) AA

    randomized controlled trial of cognitive^ behaviouralrandomized controlled trial of cognitive^ behavioural

    therapy for persistent symptoms in schizophreniatherapy for persistent symptoms in schizophrenia

    resistant to medication.resistant to medication. Archives of General PsychiatryArchives of General Psychiatry,, 5757,,

    165^172.165^172.

    Turkington, D./McKenna, P. J. (2003)Turkington, D./McKenna, P. J. (2003) Is cognitive Is cognitive

    behavioural therapy a worthwhile treatment forbehavioural therapy a worthwhile treatment for

    psychosis? (debate).psychosis? (debate). British Journal of PsychiatryBritish Journal of Psychiatry,, 182182,,

    477^479.477^479.

    D. KingdonD. Kingdon University of Southampton, RoyalUniversity of Southampton,Royal

    South Hants Hospital, Southampton SO14 0YG,UK.South Hants Hospital, Southampton SO14 0YG,UK.

    E-mail: dgkE-mail: dgk@@soton.ac.uksoton.ac.uk

    Authors reply:Authors reply: Actually, the study ofActually, the study of

    DurhamDurham et alet al (2003) which was carried out(2003) which was carried out

    under blind conditions failed to find a signif-under blind conditions failed to find a signif-

    icant advantage for cognitive therapy overicant advantage for cognitive therapy over

    active placebo. The authors state that Re-active placebo. The authors state that Re-

    peated measures analyses of variance werepeated measures analyses of variance were

    first conducted with three levels of treatmentfirst conducted with three levels of treatment

    (CBT(CBT vv. SPT. SPT vv. TAU) and three time points. TAU) and three time points

    (baseline, post-treatment, follow-up). There(baseline, post-treatment, follow-up). There

    were significant effects for time for allwere significant effects for time for allvariables except the GAS but no significantvariables except the GAS but no significant

    timetime66treatment interaction effects or con-treatment interaction effects or con-

    trasts for any of the measures. This wastrasts for any of the measures. This was

    for Changes in severity from baseline,for Changes in severity from baseline,

    with an essentially similar finding forwith an essentially similar finding for

    Clinically significant improvement.Clinically significant improvement.

    Durham, R. C., Guthrie, M., Morton, R. V.,Durham, R. C., Guthrie, M., Morton, R. V., et alet al

    (2003)(2003) Tayside^ Fife clinical trial of cognitive Tayside^ Fife clinical trial of cognitive

    behavioural therapy for medication-resistant psychoticbehavioural therapy for medication-resistant psychotic

    symptoms. Results to 3-month follow-up.symptoms. Results to 3-month follow-up. British JournalBritish Journal

    of Psychiatryof Psychiatry,, 182182, 303^311., 303^311.

    P. J. McKennaP. J. McKenna Fulbourn Hospital,CambridgeFulbourn Hospital, Cambridge

    CB1 5EF. E-mail: peter.mckennaCB1 5EF. E-mail: peter.mckenna@@virgin.netvirgin.net

    Personality assessmentPersonality assessment

    In their description of the StandardisedIn their description of the Standardised

    Assessment of Personality AbbreviatedAssessment of Personality Abbreviated

    Scale (SAPAS) MoranScale (SAPAS) Moran et alet al (2003) write(2003) write

    that, to the best of their knowledge, onlythat, to the best of their knowledge, only

    two other interviewer-administered screenstwo other interviewer-administered screens

    for personality disorder have been pub-for personality disorder have been pub-

    lished. I would like to draw attention to alished. I would like to draw attention to a

    third, the Personality Structure Question-third, the Personality Structure Question-

    naire (PSQ) (Pollocknaire (PSQ) (Pollock et alet al, 2001), which, 2001), which

    consists of eight bipolar items scored 15consists of eight bipolar items scored 15

    and is similarly quick to administer and toand is similarly quick to administer and to

    score. The scores of four clinical and fourscore. The scores of four clinical and four

    non-clinical samples are reported in the pa-non-clinical samples are reported in the pa-

    per. Two samples of patients meeting diag-per. Two samples of patients meeting diag-

    nostic criteria for borderline personalitynostic criteria for borderline personality

    disorder had mean scores of over 30,disorder had mean scores of over 30,

    whereas the non-clinical samples scored be-whereas the non-clinical samples scored be-

    tween 19.7 and 23.3. Scores on the PSQtween 19.7 and 23.3. Scores on the PSQ

    were shown to correlate with a number ofwere shown to correlate with a number of

    measures of multiplicity, dissociation andmeasures of multiplicity, dissociation and

    identity disturbance.identity disturbance.

    Most of the items on the questionnaireMost of the items on the questionnaire

    describe the respondents awareness of adescribe the respondents awareness of a

    discontinuous sense of self. This reflectsdiscontinuous sense of self. This reflects

    the multiple self states model of borderlinethe multiple self states model of borderline

    personality disorder (Ryle, 1997personality disorder (Ryle, 1997aa), in), in

    which alternations in the operation ofwhich alternations in the operation of

    recognisable, discrete self states, each withrecognisable, discrete self states, each with

    a characteristic mood, sense of self anda characteristic mood, sense of self and

    mode of relating to others, are seen tomode of relating to others, are seen to

    account for much of the experience andaccount for much of the experience and

    confusion of patients and of those treatingconfusion of patients and of those treating

    them. The PSQ is similar to the SAPAS inthem. The PSQ is similar to the SAPAS in

    being a screening, not a diagnostic instru-being a screening, not a diagnostic instru-

    ment. It differs in that it focuses on the spe-ment. It differs in that it focuses on the spe-

    cific feature of self state instability typicalcific feature of self state instability typical

    of Cluster B disorders. This can be anof Cluster B disorders. This can be an

    advantage in that these patients presentadvantage in that these patients present

    the greatest difficulty to clinicians. Bythe greatest difficulty to clinicians. By

    drawing attention to this characteristic thedrawing attention to this characteristic the

    PSQ can initiate further enquiry leading toPSQ can initiate further enquiry leading to

    the detailed description of an individualsthe detailed description of an individuals

    self states and state switches, which canself states and state switches, which can

    provide a basis for management andprovide a basis for management and

    treatment directed towards personalitytreatment directed towards personality

    integration (Ryle 1997integration (Ryle 1997bb).).

    Moran, P., Leese , M., Lee, T.,Moran, P., Leese, M., Lee, T., et alet al(2003)(2003)

    Standardised Assessment of Personality AbbreviatedStandardised Assessment of Personality Abbreviated

    Scale (SAPAS): preliminary validation of a brief screenScale (SAPAS): preliminary validation of a brief screen

    for personality disorder.for personality disorder. British Journal of PsychiatryBritish Journal of Psychiatry,, 183183,,

    228^232.228^232.

    Pollock, P., Broadbent, M., Clarke, S.,Pollock, P., Broadbent, M., Clarke, S., et alet al(2001)(2001)

    The Personality Structure Questionnaire (PSQ): aThe Personality Structure Questionnaire (PSQ): a

    measure of the multiple self states model of identitymeasure of the multiple self states model of identity

    disturbance in cognitive analytic therapy.disturbance in cognitive analytic therapy. ClinicalClinical

    Psychology and PsychotherapyPsychology and Psychotherapy,, 88, 59^72., 59^72.

    Ryle, A. (1997Ryle, A. (1997aa)) The structure and development ofThe structure and development of

    borderline personality disorder: a proposed model.borderline personality disorder: a proposed model.

    British Journal of PsychiatryBritish Journal of Psychiatry,, 170170, 82^87., 82^87.

    Ryle, A. (1997Ryle, A. (1997bb)) Cognitive Analytic Therapy andCognitive AnalyticTherapy and

    Borderline Personality Disorder: the Model and theBorderline Personality Disorder: the Model and the

    MethodMethod. Chichester: J.Wiley & Sons.. Chichester:J.Wiley & Sons.

    A. RyleA. Ryle South London and Maudsley NHS Trust,South London and Maudsley NHS Trust,

    Co-ordinated Psychological Treatments ServiceCo-ordinated Psychological Treatments Service

    (CPTS),The Munro Centre, Snowsfields,London(CPTS), The Munro Centre, Snowsfields, London

    SE1 3SS,UKSE1 3SS, UK

    Management of post-concussionManagement of post-concussion

    syndromesyndrome

    In his editorial King (2003) gave an excel-In his editorial King (2003) gave an excel-

    lent overview of the post-concussion syn-lent overview of the post-concussion syn-

    drome, an area of neuropsychology anddrome, an area of neuropsychology and

    psychiatry that is fraught with difficultypsychiatry that is fraught with difficulty

    and controversy. King pointed out that bothand controversy. King pointed out that both

    biological and psychological factors are atbiological and psychological factors are at

    play in post-concussion syndrome. Of greatplay in post-concussion syndrome. Of greatimportance was his integration of time sinceimportance was his integration of time since

    injury into a model and outlining windowsinjury into a model and outlining windows

    of vulnerability for the development ofof vulnerability for the development of

    symptoms. It is likely that most clinicianssymptoms. It is likely that most clinicians

    treating patients with post-concussion syn-treating patients with post-concussion syn-

    drome will find this model of real valuedrome will find this model of real value

    for understanding and possibly preventingfor understanding and possibly preventing

    some of the difficulties resulting from thesome of the difficulties resulting from the

    syndrome.syndrome.

    King rightly pointed out the need forKing rightly pointed out the need for

    studies investigating treatment and man-studies investigating treatment and man-

    agement of post-concussion syndrome.agement of post-concussion syndrome.

    New and future research findings nowNew and future research findings nowneed to be incorporated into Kings mod-need to be incorporated into Kings mod-

    el. For example, Ponsfordel. For example, Ponsford et alet al (2002)(2002)

    in a randomised controlled trial foundin a randomised controlled trial found

    that the provision 1 week post-injury ofthat the provision 1 week post-injury of

    an information booklet to patients whoan information booklet to patients who

    suffered a mild head injury reduced anxi-suffered a mild head injury reduced anxi-

    ety and reporting of ongoing problems atety and reporting of ongoing problems at

    3 months post-injury. Against a back-3 months post-injury. Against a back-

    ground of windows of vulnerability forground of windows of vulnerability for

    the development and maintenance ofthe development and maintenance of

    symptoms, providing written informationsymptoms, providing written information

    to patients in addition to the early inter-to patients in addition to the early inter-

    ventions reviewed by King can further im-ventions reviewed by King can further im-prove outcome in post-concussionprove outcome in post-concussion

    syndrome.syndrome.

    A recent example identifying a poten-A recent example identifying a poten-

    tial lack of evidence for an interventiontial lack of evidence for an intervention

    perhaps also needs mentioning. De Kruijkperhaps also needs mentioning. De Kruijk

    et alet al (2002) investigated the effect of bed(2002) investigated the effect of bed

    rest on outcome following mild traumaticrest on outcome following mild traumatic

    brain injury. Bed rest has been recom-brain injury. Bed rest has been recom-

    mended as an intervention to improvemended as an intervention to improve

    outcome following head injury; however,outcome following head injury; however,

    the effectiveness of this intervention hasthe effectiveness of this intervention has

    not been investigated. De Kruijk andnot been investigated. De Kruijk and

    colleagues did not find significantcolleagues did not find significantdifferences in outcome between theirdifferences in outcome between their

    8 68 6

  • 7/28/2019 BJP-2004-Kingdon-85-6

    5/5

    C O R R E S P O N D E N C EC O R R E S P O N D E N C E

    bed rest and no bed rest groups at 3bed rest and no bed rest groups at 3

    months post injury. However, they con-months post injury. However, they con-

    cluded that bed rest might have somecluded that bed rest might have some

    palliative effect during the initial weekspalliative effect during the initial weeks

    following injury.following injury.

    New and future research findings onNew and future research findings on

    management, integrated into Kings model,management, integrated into Kings model,can potentially enhance the prevention ofcan potentially enhance the prevention of

    chronic symptomatology developing inchronic symptomatology developing in

    post-concussion syndrome. This might alsopost-concussion syndrome. This might also

    inform our understanding of cases whereinform our understanding of cases where

    post-concussion symptoms persist beyondpost-concussion symptoms persist beyond

    1 year following injury.1 year following injury.

    De Kruijk, J. R., Leffers, P., Meerhof, S.,De Kruijk, J. R., Leffers, P., Meerhof, S., et alet al (2002)(2002)

    Effectiveness of bed rest after mild traumatic brainEffectiveness of bed rest after mild traumatic braininjury: a randomised trial of no versus six days of bedinjury: a randomised trial of no versus six days of bed

    rest.rest.Journalof Neurology, Neurosurgery and PsychiatryJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry,, 7373,,

    167^172.167^172.

    King, N. S. (2003)King, N. S. (2003) Post-concussion syndrome: clarityPost-concussion syndrome: clarity

    amid the controversy?amid the controversy? British Journal of PsychiatryBritish Journal of Psychiatry,, 183183,,

    276^278.276^278.

    Ponsford, J.,Willmott, C., Rothwell, A.,Ponsford, J.,Willmott, C., Rothwell, A., et alet al (2002)(2002)

    Impact of e arly intervention on outcome following mildImpact of early intervention on outcome following mild

    head injury in adults.head injury in adults.Journal of Neurology, NeurosurgeryJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery

    and Psychiatryand Psychiatry,, 7373, 330^332., 330^332.

    B. R. CoetzerB. R. Coetzer North Wales Brain Injury Service,North Wales Brain Injury Service,

    Colwyn Bay Hospital,Hesketh Road,Colwyn BayColwyn B ay Hospital, Hesketh Road, Colwyn Bay

    LL29 8AY, UKLL29 8AY,UK

    One hundred years agoOne hundred years ago

    Review ofReview of Hypnotism, its History,Hypnotism, its History,

    Practice, and TheoryPractice, and Theory..

    By J. Milne Bramwell, MB,CM, Edin., author ofBy J. Milne Bramwell, MB,CM, Edin., author of

    numerous articles on the Practice and Theorynumerous articles on the Practice and Theory

    of Hypnotism. London: Grant Richards. 1903.of Hypnotism. London: Grant Richards. 1903.

    Pp. 477. Price18s. net.Pp. 477. Price18s. net.

    The author of this book, we are told byThe author of this book, we are told by

    the publisher, has devoted the last 12the publisher, has devoted the last 12

    years to hypnotic practice and researchyears to hypnotic practice and research

    and his personal observations of the practi-and his personal observations of the practi-

    cal work done in France, Germany, Swe-cal work done in France, Germany, Swe-

    den, Holland, Switzerland, and Belgiumden, Holland, Switzerland, and Belgium

    should also make the volume a valuable ad-should also make the volume a valuable ad-

    dition to the science of a subject which isdition to the science of a subject which is

    exciting much interest at the present time.exciting much interest at the present time.

    In the introductory chapter the author tellsIn the introductory chapter the author tells

    us that in the course of the volume he pro-us that in the course of the volume he pro-

    poses to refer not only to his own hypnoticposes to refer not only to his own hypnotic

    12 years practice and research but also to12 years practice and research but also to

    give such a general account of the subjectgive such a general account of the subject

    as can be brought within reasonable com-as can be brought within reasonable com-

    pass. Examining Dr. Bramwells book inpass. Examining Dr. Bramwells book in

    the light of his own account of his inten-the light of his own account of his inten-

    tions we doubt if he has fulfilled the pro-tions we doubt if he has fulfilled the pro-

    mises made. One chapter is devoted to themises made. One chapter is devoted to the

    early history of hypnotism; it is short andearly history of hypnotism; it is short and

    very incomplete; for example, the accountvery incomplete; for example, the account

    given of Mesmer is fragmentary. The workgiven of Mesmer is fragmentary. The work

    of Elliotson, of Esdaile, and of Braid isof Elliotson, of Esdaile, and of Braid is

    more fully treated. The section on the latermore fully treated. The section on the later

    History of Hypnotism contains an accountHistory of Hypnotism contains an account

    of the practice of Dr. A. A. Liebeault ofof the practice of Dr. A. A. Liebeault of

    Nancy. A section follows entitled HistoryNancy. A section follows entitled History

    of My Own Practice. The remaining partof My Own Practice. The remaining part

    of the book is devoted to dissertations onof the book is devoted to dissertations on

    the methods of inducing and terminatingthe methods of inducing and terminating

    hypnosis, susceptibility to hypnosis andhypnosis, susceptibility to hypnosis and

    the causes which influence it, the experi-the causes which influence it, the experi-

    mental phenomena of hypnosis, and themental phenomena of hypnosis, and the

    management of hypnotic experiments andmanagement of hypnotic experiments and

    an account of the different stages of hyp-an account of the different stages of hyp-

    nosis. The therapeutic use of hypnotismnosis. The therapeutic use of hypnotism

    is dealt with in chapters on hypnotism inis dealt with in chapters on hypnotism in

    medicine and surgery and in one on themedicine and surgery and in one on the

    management of medical and surgical cases.management of medical and surgical cases.

    This is followed by a disquisition on hypno-This is followed by a disquisition on hypno-

    tic theories which occupies 150 pages, ortic theories which occupies 150 pages, or

    nearly a third of the whole work. A chapternearly a third of the whole work. A chapter

    is devoted to the so-called dangers of hyp-is devoted to the so-called dangers of hyp-

    notism and this is followed by a summary,notism and this is followed by a summary,

    conclusion, and list of references. Of theconclusion, and list of references. Of the

    two appendices one is the late Dr. William-two appendices one is the late Dr. William-

    sons account of the origin of Braids worksons account of the origin of Braids work

    and the other is a note on spiritualism,and the other is a note on spiritualism,

    clairvoyance, and telepathy.clairvoyance, and telepathy.

    The general effect produced by thisThe general effect produced by this

    book is a feeling of wonder that such abook is a feeling of wonder that such a

    subject, with all its suggestions of mysterysubject, with all its suggestions of mystery

    and occultism bred of our imperfectand occultism bred of our imperfect

    knowledge, can have led to the productionknowledge, can have led to the production

    of so unstimulating a book. Doubtless Dr.of so unstimulating a book. Doubtless Dr.

    Bramwell was particularly right to treatBramwell was particularly right to treat

    his subject very seriously, but he might havehis subject very seriously, but he might have

    taken more steps to arouse and to hold ourtaken more steps to arouse and to hold our

    interest. The work would gain much if itinterest. The work would gain much if it

    were rearranged and rewritten so that thewere rearranged and rewritten so that the

    history of the subject and the theories ofhistory of the subject and the theories of

    its various exponents were placed together.its various exponents were placed together.

    For example, the life of Esdaile is given inFor example, the life of Esdaile is given in

    one place, while his theories will be foundone place, while his theories will be found

    in another. The authors views naturallyin another. The authors views naturally

    pervade the book, but while lessons frompervade the book, but while lessons from

    personal experience are of the utmost valuepersonal experience are of the utmost value

    in all medical treatises, an author shouldin all medical treatises, an author should

    beware lest the actors of the past should ap-beware lest the actors of the past should ap-

    pear merely as puppets in his play. Dr.pear merely as puppets in his play. Dr.

    Bramwell is, we are sure, unaware howBramwell is, we are sure, unaware how

    strongly the impression is produced thatstrongly the impression is produced that

    views contrary to his own are erroneousviews contrary to his own are erroneous

    and misleading.and misleading.

    REFERENCEREFERENCE

    LancetLancet, 2 January1904, 30., 2 January1904, 30.

    Researched by Henry Rollin, Emeritus ConsultantResearched by Henry Rollin, Emeritus Consultant

    Psychiatrist, Horton Hospital, Epsom, Surrey.Psychiatrist, Horton Hospital,Epsom, Surrey.

    CorrigendumCorrigendum

    Disintegration of the components of lan-Disintegration of the components of lan-

    guage as the path to a revision of Bleulersguage as the path to a revision of Bleulers

    and Schneiders concepts of schizophrenia.and Schneiders concepts of schizophrenia.

    Linguistic disturbances compared withLinguistic disturbances compared with

    first-rank symptoms in acute psychosis.first-rank symptoms in acute psychosis.

    BJPBJP,, 182182, 233240. Summary (p.233),, 233240. Summary (p. 233),

    Results should read: Strong positive corre-Results should read: Strong positive corre-

    lations were found between the CLANGlations were found between the CLANG

    factor poverty and first-rank delusions offactor poverty and first-rank delusions of

    control and between semantic/phonemiccontrol and between semantic/phonemic

    paraphasias and verbal auditory hallu-paraphasias and verbal auditory hallu-

    cinations. Language disturbances werecinations. Language disturbances were

    superior to nuclear symptoms in discrimi-superior to nuclear symptoms in discrimi-

    nating ICD10 schizophrenia from othernating ICD10 schizophrenia from other

    psychoses.psychoses.

    8 78 7