Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
BioSAXS Instrumentation and Sample Environment at BM29
Petra Pernot
15th September 2014 HERCULES Specialised Course
Non-atomic resolution scattering in biology and soft matter ESRF, Grenoble
SAXS synchrotron based in the World = at all X-ray sources
ALS Berkley SIBYLS
SLAC Stanford BL4-2
APS Chicago bioCAT
BL4-2
SIBYLS
Diamond I22
Soleil SWING
PETRA III P12
BNL NSLS II
Campinas LNLS SAXS-2
SPRING 8 BL45XU, BL40B2
Shanghai SSRF
Australian synchrotron SAXS/WAXS
SLS cSAXS
Beijing BSRF
ESRF: ID02, ID13, BM26, BM29
P12
MAX-IV
BL40B2
- optics and experimental set-up - automated data collection and analysis - future developments
X-ray source
Small Angle X- ray Scattering
1D scattering curve
model independent parameters
shape, MM, interaction,…
ab-initio model
low resolution structure
BioSAXS Instrumentation and Sample Environment at BM29
Outline
2D detector
macromolecules in solution
-
Part of ESRF Upgrade: bioSAXS went from ID14-3 to BM29
Improvements state-of-art dedicated optics: - tunability: 7-15keV; - flux: double multilayer monochromator; - focusing at detector plane: torrodial mirror
BM29 opened to users: June 2012
ID30 MASSIF
ID29 MAD
Structural Biology village
CRYO BENCH
SAMPLE PREP LAB
shutter
slits
slits
MB absorbers
mirror
monochromator
primary slits WB absorbers
Optics hutch
Monochromator: double multilayer - 2 identical coatings Ru/B4C with 3 nm period
Focusing: 1.1m long Rh coated cylindrical-torioid mirror reflecting vertically upwards at a glancing angle of 4 mrad
XBPMs
white beam 4 4 mm2 monochromatic beam E = 11 keV
beam just after torroid
needs to be slit down
Scatterless/free slits, pinholes Goal = to minimize parasitic scattering: sandwich/hybrid metal - single crystal blades
metal
a
Snapshots close to beamstop parasitic slit scattering
pinhole for cleaning “small beams”
= 100 mm diameter hole
S1 S2
PINHOLE
high q domain
high q domain: window very small, contrast only at the interface
low q domain: window very large, structure factor: interactions in the system
low q domain
What does “q-range” mean? scattered intensity
= structure of the sample
d0=2/q0
LARGE SMALL distances
observation “window”
scattered signal observed if the contrast inside
intermediary q domain
intermediary q domain: window of order of “elementary bricks” of the system, form factor: size, shape, … of 1 particle
2/q0
Experimental hutch
E = 7 keV E = 15 keV
qmin 0.019 nm-1 0.041 nm-1
qmax 2.5 nm-1 5.3 nm-1
qmin and qmax defined by the experimental setup: - = (0.82 – 1.77)Å, E = (7 – 15) keV; - detector size: distance from direct beam spot to detector edge ~ 20 cm; - sample-to-detector distance 2.87 m; - beam stop diameter ~ 3 mm.
q-range available
robot
flight tube slit box
detector
sample in capillary
First results = 2D data - detector set offset to increase the maximal angular (q)-range
- intermodulus gaps, hot pixels and beamstop shadow masked out.
- each pixel data scaled for intensity measured in diode incorporated in beamstop (transmitted intensity) and data collection time;
DIODE
X-rays
2D to 1D angle converted to q = 4sinQ/ calibrated beamline parameters needed
Pt LIII edge = 11.564 keV
I TRANSMITED
E [keV]
radial averaging = all pixels with equal angle are averaged);
1D
2
log I
q sample-to-detector distance
ring radius
= NPIXELS
172 mm
q = 4 sinQ/
- sample-to detector distance powder diffraction of Silver Behenate AgC22H43O2
d001 = 58.38 Å
d002 = 29.17 Å
d003 = 19.44 Å
d004 = 14.58 Å
- energy (energy scan with a metal foil – ex. Pt)
- beam position [X0, Y0]: direct beam spot recorded (strongly attenuated, beamstop out)
Data error handling and buffer subtraction
q [nm-1] I stddev 1.068008e-03 5.801401e-04 9.280474e-05 1.373153e-03 6.069934e-04 8.641766e-05 1.678298e-03 6.839557e-04 8.325125e-05 1.983443e-03 7.532046e-04 8.176428e-05 ….. …… ……
data file
Gauss
Poisson statistics
log I
q
data
Gauss error
Poisson error
ring
ring
i
GN
II
2
ring
ring
i
PN
I
2
log I
q
standard measurement protocol BUFFER - SAMPLE - BUFFER
SUBTRACTED curve (sample – buffer)
- intensity scaled by sample concentration
protein signals < 0.5% background level
Data quality check for particle interactions, radiation damage
repulsive particle interactions
ideal solution of particles
raw data
q
log I
attractive particle interactions
log I
q
consecutive frames
1 s each
q
usually looks as
aggregation
visible on-line
subtracted data
Sample requirements about 100 mL of stock solution needed which shows
• monodispersity (purity > 95%, no aggregation, 1 oligomeric state) - check by MALS, DLS, SEC, Analytical Ultra Centrifugation - stable day after? after freezing? - measure concentration (absorbance A280; A260 to detect nucleic acids) • no interaction between particles - reached by working at infinite dilution… - in practice: scattering pattern independent of concentration or extrapolation to c=0 - radiation damage: add free radical scavenger
Buffer should match the sample (dialyze) - salt < 1M, glycerol < 10% - if detergent and micelles created (membrane proteins): each concentration
needs its own buffer, or go for HPLC run
GEL FILTRATION
* 3 conc. 0.2-10mg/ml * 30-50ml per conc. * matching buffer
Lyzosyme 40mg/mL with NaCl concentrations
courtesy of Françoise Bonneté
droplets denerated by microfluidic chip f 300mm
no salt
200 mM
500 mM
750 mM
I
q [nm-1]
Particle mass determination
- from QR ratio (independent on particle concentration and folding)
2
0
PART
APARTPART
c
NIM
Orthaber et al (2000) J. Appl. Cryst. 33, 218-225.
partial specific volume of the macromolecule [cm3/g] protein = 0.735 , DNA/RNA = 0.54, lipids = 1.02,…
I
q
H2O in capillary
empty capillary
H2O only
I(0) at 20C = 20.33 normalization coeff. set that I(0) for a protein in kDa units
Rambo & Tainer (2013) Nature 496, 477-481.
k
c
RPART
e
QM
1
dqqqI
IV PART
C
0
g
C
RR
VQ
2
SAS invariant
integral converges for folded and unfolded particles
paramaters k and c empirically determined and specific to the class of macromolecular particle (protein-only, RNA, complex,…)
e…Euler’s number
- through intensity calibration of water (absolute)
PART
STANSTAN
STAN
PART
PARTc
Mc
I
IM
0
0 BSA measurement
- through measurement of protein standard (relative)
EDNA
SAMPLE
CHANGER/HPLC
Beamline GUI
Automated data collection and analysis
BsxCuBE
DATABASE
ISPyB: sample tracking and data flow
EXPERIMENTAL
parameters
Samples stored in: 96 well plates (up to 3), PCR tubes Thermo-regulation - storage: 4-40ºC, - exposure cell: 4-60ºC Sample loading and cleaning: 30’ In user operation from September 2010
Sample Changer for bio-SAXS
Sample Changer for bio-SAXS
ROBOT
GUI Fill – Recuperate - Clean –Mix - Transfer
Flow
Sample Volume • minimum 15 μL per exposure (in the tube, i.e. about 5 mL in the capillary) • 30 μL recommended (be able to use flow mode) • minimum 3 concentrations required per construct (1-20 mg/mL) • 1 mL of buffer for dilution/background subtractions Users recommended to bring total volume of 100 μL of stock (ideally > 10 mg/mL) solution per construct Exposure Time • standard time 10 x 1 second (= 10 s) • easily modifiable in case if needed (signal-to-noise or radiation damage issues) Beamtime required: ~ 20 sample (with the buffer) data collections per 1 hour
Data collection on BM29 a) STATIC mode = concentration series using sample changer
HPLC on-line
temperature control
(1 ÷ 8C)
thermally insulated tubing
Biophysical characterization
UV-vis spectrometer, RALS and Refractive index modules
final purification step on-line
HPLC on-line SAXS - automatic generation of 1D files - merged buffer - subtractions frames with data - merged file for each peak (using I(0) and Rg)
4 way valve = fast switching between SC/HPLC modes
Sample • minimum 50 μL per injection • 100 μL recommended • concentration ~ 5 mg/mL + 0.5 L buffer per injection and equilibration Users recommended to bring own columns and total volume of 100 μL of stock solution per run + 1 L of buffer Exposure Time • Standard time 1 second per frame (max.5s) x column elution S200 column ~ 1h, Increase column ~ 10 minutes Beamtime required: column equilibration and elution Switch between STATIC and HPLC modes quick and easy, column can be equilibrated when recording data with SC
Data collection on BM29 b) HPLC mode = SEC on-line
# of frames in 1000s
Comparison Sample Changer / HPLC use
# of samples
Most user groups combine sample changer and HPLC experiments
Sample Changer
HPLC
Data collection GUI: BsxCuBE
- data collection parameters: directory, prefix, run, n of frames, exposure; - radiation damage check option, collect using SC/HPLC switch; - transmission/filters setting and energy/wavelength setting
robot tab
operation collect user log
- energy/wavelength setting: ML angle, Pilatus threshold; - transmission/filters setting - check beam option
Data collection GUI: BsxCuBE
2D tab
- beamline ‘easy’ operation: slit, beamstop, capillary alignment, vacuum/air setting and opening/closing shutters manualy
Operation beamline
Data collection GUI: BsxCuBE
- beamline parameters: mask, pixel size, beam center,…;
-1D tab displays curves: radial integration, normalization, typically 10 frames of 1s
- ring current, vacuum state in experimental hutch
Collect using robot script
Automated use of Sample Changer with samples and buffers loaded in various micro-plates or tubes in sequence buffer-sample-buffer-... - sample positioning, volume to load, flow during exposure, transmission, kinetics measurements (waiting time), sample temperature, etc.
Bio-SAXS ISPyB: data and sample tracking
Model visualisation
Bio-SAXS ISPyB: HPLC mode
Strength and downside of SAXS measurement done in solution with little preparation (relative)
• data orientationally averaged (impossible to distinguish enantiomorphs),
scattering curve has only a small number of independent points estimated by number of Shannon channels:
usually 10-15
1st data point (lowest-resolution value describes the overall scatterer size)
, however (between two adjacent point measured in scattering curve)
SAXS data are over-sampled
effective information content is higher than predicted from
and accurate shapes can be derived from scattering curve WHEN additional constraints are imposed to the reconstruction.
MAXMINMAX
S
DqqN
)(
MAX
MIND
q
MAXD
q
SN
• Small angle X-ray scattering is now a powerful tool for determining molecular envelopes that can be combined with high-resolution structures
• The combination of high-resolution techniques with low or medium resolution approaches leads to quasi-atomic models.
• The method is complementary to EM: can be used for smaller macromolecules
EM: search volume
Crystallography: atomic models
NMR: binding site mapping and orientations
Biochemistry and FRET: interface mapping
Bioinformatics: secondary structure prediction
SANS
Complementary techniques
SAX/NS complementarity • Neutron small angle scattering provides additional information for
macromolecular complexes that are made of several types of molecules such as proteins, nucleic acids or lipids. Contrast variation experiments obtained by exchanging the solvent for deuterated or partially deuterated solvent enhances the signal from one component
• SAXS and SANS are therefore tools of major importance in tackling systems biology: joint access possible – ESRF and ILL SAS experiments during one trip to Grenoble
SAXS SANS
volume small < 50 ml larger ~ 300 ml
concentration > 0.1 mg/ml > 1 mg/ml
measuring time short ~ s longer ~ mh
radiation damage yes no
contrast variation no yes
sensitive to salts, denaturants
yes no
SANS camera D22 at the ILL
Future plans Enlarge the types of samples amenable to SAXS to those that can be purified only in limited yields: nanolitre range or to those that are soluble only at c < 1 mg/ml.
APPLICATIONS: - use of micro-screening plates for rapid, large-scale macromolecular screening: studies of protein-protein interactions or complex formation, protein crystallisation process; 96
384
1534 wells
a) b)
Slow nucleation: droplets trapped in wells arrays - measurement in each well to observe nucleation event
100mm 100mm
Fast nucleation: distance in “serpentine” ~ time (nucleation and growth with time scale down to 10ms
- droplet microfluidic chips for mapping protein phase diagrams: a) droplets generated and stored off-line b) droplets generated, mixed and analysed on-line
LTP of Sébastien Teychené and Françoise Bonneté
liquid flow X-rays
Redesign Sample Exposure Unit
Page 35
requirements
- multicolor light source
(photo-activated/sensitive
proteins)
- on-line DLS, UV/Vis and
fluorescent detector at 90
- Wide Angle Scattering
capillary pod
SEU
light
REDESIGN SEU SAXS (WAXS), UV/Vis spectrometer, fluorescence detector, DLS, Raman,…
under various illumination, temperature,… •
Page 36
photo-activated/sensitive proteins
LED source + optical fiber
(bottom or/and on-axis camera)
dark
light
light camera /
Raman probe
UV lamp
tunable LED
fluorescence
detector
UV-Vis
probe
X-ray
SAXS
WAXS
adapted from S. Haas, T.S. Plivelic & C. Dicko,
J. Phys. Chem. B 2014, 118, 226-2273.
capillary
holder
Page 37 l BM29 news l 1st July 2014 l Petra Pernot
fast valve
supports (x2)
light port n1
SEU
light port n 2
light port n 3
colour
tuneable
lighting
New SEU preliminary drawing: Frank Felisaz + Florent Cipriani EMBL
New
Modified items
bellows
bellows
X-rays
WAXS:
- SEU-to-valve
distance shortened;
- bellows offsets down
New SEU preliminary drawing - Frank Felisaz + Florent Cipriani
Page 38
Light ports for DLS, absorption spectrometry, fluorescence, Raman,...
100
DLS port n1
DLS port n2
UV-VIS lamp
UV-VIS probe
fluorescence
detector
X-rays
probed volume
thanks to whom
BioSAXS beamline exists in its current shape
• Technicians: Mario Lentini, John Surr, Franck Felisaz, Julien Huet, Hugo Caserotto, Fabien Dobias;
• Software developers: Staffan Ohlsson, Jerome Kiefer, Alejandro De Maria Antolinos, Alexandre Gobbo, Matias Guijarro, Antonia Beteva, Vicente Rey-Bakaikoa, Olof Svensson;
• Instrument support division: Dean Gibson, Philippe Retout;
• Engineers/scientists: Pascal Theveneau, Werner Schmid, Ray Barrett, Muriel Mattenet, Christian Morawe, François Torrecillas, Adam Round, Florent Cipriani, Louiza Zerrad, Martha Brennish. EMBL
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS