31
Biomechanics of Locomotion D. Gordon E. Robertson, PhD, FCSB Biomechanics, Laboratory, School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada

Biomechanics of Locomotion D. Gordon E. Robertson, PhD, FCSB Biomechanics, Laboratory, School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada D

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Biomechanics of Locomotion

Biomechanics of Locomotion

D. Gordon E. Robertson, PhD, FCSB

Biomechanics, Laboratory,

School of Human Kinetics,

University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada

D. Gordon E. Robertson, PhD, FCSB

Biomechanics, Laboratory,

School of Human Kinetics,

University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada

Quantitative Domains

• Temporal– phases (stance/swing) and events (foot-

strike, toe-off), stride rate

• Electromyography– muscle activation patterns

• Kinematic (motion description)– stride length, velocity, ranges of motion,

acceleration

• Kinetic (causes of motion)– ground reaction forces, pressure patterns,

joint forces, moments of force, work, energy and power

Temporal Analysis

• Stride time (s)

• Stride rate = 1/time (/s)

• Stride cadence = 120 × rate (b/min)

• Instrumentation– Photocells and timers

– Videography (1 frame = 1/30 second)

– Metronome

Donovan Bailey sets world record (9.835) despite slowest reaction time (0.174) of finalists

Electromyography

Delsys electrodes Mega system

Noraxon systemBortec system

EMG of normal walking

gait initiation

rectus femoris

vastus lateralis

tibialis anterior

gastrocnemius

biceps femoris

heel switch

strides

EMG of normal walking

rectus femoris

vastus lateralis

tibialis anterior

gastrocnemius

biceps femoris

heel switch

rectus femoris contracts twice per cycle, once in early stance and once in late stance

EMG of normal walking

rectus femoris

vastus lateralis

tibialis anterior

gastrocnemius

biceps femoris

heel switch

biceps femoris has one longer contraction in late swing and early stance, synchronous with one burst of rectus femoris

EMG of normal walking

rectus femoris

vastus lateralis

tibialis anterior

gastrocnemius

biceps femoris

heel switch

tibialis anterior has two bursts of activity one in mid-swing and one during early stance. It is very active at initiation.

EMG of normal walking

rectus femoris

vastus lateralis

tibialis anterior

gastrocnemius

biceps femoris

heel switch

gastrocnemius has one long contraction throughout stance.

It is asynchronous with tibialis anterior.

Kinematic Analysis

• Linear position– Ruler, tape measure, optical

• Linear velocity– radar gun, photo-optical timer

• Linear acceleration– Accelerometry, videography

miniature accelerometers

radar gun

Motion Capture

• Cinefilm, video or infrared video

• Subject is filmed and locations of joint centres are digitized

Panasonic videocamera

Basler charge-coupled device (CCD) camera

Vicon infra-red camera

Gait Characteristics - Walking

stride length step length

left foot

swing phase,left foot

right foot

stance phase,left foot

single-support

left toe-off

one gait cycle

time

double-supportleft foot-strike

right foot-strikeright toe-off

a

b

walking

Gait Characteristics – Running/Sprinting

stride length step length

left foot

swing phase,left foot

right foot

stance phase,left foot

left toe-off

one gait cycle

timeleft foot-strike right foot-strikeright toe-off

a

b

running/sprinting

flight phase

Motion Capture(e.g., SIMI or Vicon)

3D motiondata

EMG data

F-Scandata

Force platformdata

Videodata

Passive Infrared Motion Capture (e.g., Vicon or M.A.C.)

Infrared video cameras

Kistler force platforms

M.A.C.system

Active Infrared Motion Capture

• NDI’s Optotrak

Infrared video cameras

Infrared emitting diodes

Gait and Movement Analysis Laboratory

• Motion capture system for marker trajectories

• Force platforms for ground reactions

• Electromyography for muscle activity

• Pressure mapping systems for in-shoe pressure patterns

3D Geometric Model(Visual3D)

from stick-figures to geometrical solids of revolution with known inertial properties

from markers to joint centres and stick-figure of body

Kinetic Analysis

Causes of motion

• Forces and moments of force

• Work, energy and power

• Impulse and momentum

• Inverse Dynamics derives forces and moments from kinematics and body segment parameters (mass, centre of gravity, and moment of inertia)

Normal Walking Example

• Female subject

• Speed was 1.77 m/s (fast)

• IFS = ipsilateral foot-strike

• ITO = ipsilateral toe-off

• CFS = contralateral foot-strike

• CTO = contralateral toe-off

Results

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2Time (s)

-200

-100

0

100

-100

0

100

-10

0

10

P

ow

er

(W)

Mo

me

nt

(N.m

)

A

ng

. V

el.

(ra

d/s

)

Trial: 2SFN3Ang. velocityMomentPower

CFS ITO IFS CTO CFS ITO

Dorsiflexion

Plantar flexion

Dorsiflexors

Plantar flexors

Concentric

Eccentric

• Angular velocity tells whether joint is flexing or extending

• Moment of force records whether flexors or extensors are performing work

• Power quantifies whether work done was positive or negative

Ankle angular velocity, moment of force and power

• Dorsiflexors produce dorsiflexion during swing

• Plantar flexors control dorsiflexion

• Large burst of power by plantar flexors for push-off 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2

Time (s)

-200

-100

0

100

-100

0

100

-10

0

10

P

ow

er

(W)

Mo

me

nt

(N.m

)

A

ng

. V

el.

(ra

d/s

)

Trial: 2SFN3Ang. velocityMomentPower

CFS ITO IFS CTO CFS ITO

Dorsiflexion

Plantar flexion

Dorsiflexors

Plantar flexors

Concentric

Eccentric

Knee angular velocity, moment of force and power

• Negative work by knee extensors to control flexion at push-off

• another to cushion weight-acceptance

• Negative work by knee flexors to control knee extension prior to foot-strike

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2Time (s)

-200

-100

0

100

-100

0

100

-10

0

10

P

ow

er

(W)

M

om

en

t (N

.m)

A

ng

. V

el.

(ra

d/s

)

Trial: 2SFN3Ang. velocityMomentPower

CFS ITO IFS CTO CFS ITO

Extension

Flexion

Extensors

Flexors

Concentric

Eccentric

Hip angular velocity, moment of force and power

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2Time (s)

-200

-100

0

100

-100

0

100

-10

0

10

P

ow

er

(W)

Mo

me

nt

(N.m

)

A

ng

. V

el.

(ra

d/s

)

Trial: 2SFN3Ang. velocityMomentPower

CFS ITO IFS CTO CFS ITO

Flexion

Extension

Flexors

Extensors

Concentric

Eccentric

• Positive work by hip flexors to swing thigh & flex knee

• Positive work by hip extensors to extend hip in early stance

• Negative work by hip flexors to control extension

Solid-Ankle, Cushioned Heel (SACH) Prostheses

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4

Time (s)

-200.

-100.

0.

100.

-100.

0.

100.

-10.

0.

10.

Po

we

r (W

)

Mo

me

nt

(N.m

)

An

gu

lar

ve

l. (

/s)

Ankle angular velocity, moment of force and power of SACH foot prosthesis

• No power produced during push-off

Trial: WB24MH-SAng. velocityNet momentPower

ITO IFS CTO CFS ITO

Dorsiflexing

Plantar flexing

Dorsiflexor

Plantar flexor

Concentric

Eccentric

• Power dissipation during weight acceptance and push-off

FlexFoot Prostheses(energy-storing)

Recent models

Original model

Ankle angular velocity, moment of force and power of FlexFoot prosthesis

• Some energy returned during push-off

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2

Time (s)

-500.

-250.

0.

250.

-100.

0.

100.

-10.

0.

10.

Po

we

r (W

)

M

om

en

t (N

.m)

A

ng

ula

r v

el.

(/s

)

Trial: WB13MH-FAng. velocityNet momentPower

ITO IFS CTO CFS ITO

Dorsiflexing

Plantar flexing

Dorsiflexor

Plantar flexor

Concentric

Eccentric

Above-knee Prostheses

Running Prostheses