Upload
zdan32
View
234
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos
1/28
1
C. Lanos, F. Collet
UEB - LGCGM, Equipe Matriaux Thermo-Rhologie
INSA-IUT, Rennes
France
Mechanical properties
of hempcrete
Biomaterials & Binders for Construction Hemp, Lime, WoodEuropean workshop in Darmstadt, 2122 !o"em#er 2$11
8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos
2/28
2
Hempcrete samples
Mechanical properties
Mix proportioning influences
Summary
8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos
3/28
Representative size
Hempcrete samples
Mineral binders
- Lime
- Portland cement
- Belite cement
- Plaster-
Hemp shiv
- With fibres
- Without fibres
Representative
size of sample ?
7 x D = 14 cm
300/m3 kg < apparent density < 800 kg/m3
0,3 < shiv+binder volume fraction
8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos
4/28
Production method
Hempcrete samples
Real mixers
Laboratory mixers
- Wet mix
- Dry mix
Hobart type mixer (20 litres)- mix of the paste
- add of aggregate
mixing duration following the used binder
( typically 2 min)
8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos
5/28
Uses of hempcrete
On site moulding
Precasting blocks
Spraying
Water content adjustment to ensure flow ability
8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos
6/28
Hempcrete samples
Samples sizesReal size sample : box
30 cm30 cm
16 cm
Usable for :
- sprayed concrete
- moulded concrete
Respect of loading direction
8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos
7/28
Hempcrete samples
Real size sample : wall
Prismatic samples 14x14x70 cm3
For flexural tests For compression test
Thickness = 17 cm Sample are take of the wall
Usable for :
- sprayed concrete
- moulded concrete
8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos
8/28
Cylindrical sample
D = 16 cm H = 32 cm 3 layers with compaction
Usable for :
- moulded concrete
- shiv binder validation
Hempcrete samples
8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos
9/28
Closed mould
6-28 days at room temperature (following the binder)
Removing of mould
drying at 23 C and 55 HR
Mass loss survey
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
t (j)
masse chantillon (kg)
lime
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
5500
6000
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
dmoulageHydraulic binder
Hempcrete samples
Curing conditions
Sample mass (g)
Sample mass (g)
8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos
10/28
Imposed displacement : 5 mm/min
progressive cyclic loading(example : 1,5 mm, 3 mm, 5 mm, 10 mm and 50 mm)
final strain > 15%
Mechanical properties
MethodSample surface are straightened (by sawing)
Load cell capacity : 50 kN
(INSTRON 400 kN with large rigidity)
Output:
stress : F/So
strain : h/hoservo-mechanical
testing systems
8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos
11/28
typical behaviour of hempcrete
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
,
0 0,05 0,1 0,15 0,2 0,25
def (m/m)
strain stress curves
Data analysis:- Maximum stress
- Compressive modulus
- Residual strength
- strain at maximum stress
Sample analysis
- Localization of compaction
- failure
0,3 < shiv+binder volume fraction < 0,55
Mechanical properties
Without compaction
Chamoin (2012)
c (MPa)
(m/m)
8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos
12/28
strain stress curves
Data analysis:
- Compaction effect- Compressive modulus
Mechanical properties
Homogeneous strains
Compaction of sample
With compaction: 0.1 to 2.9 MPa
0,6 < shiv+binder volume fraction < 0,8
NGuyen (2010)
c (MPa)
(%)
8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos
13/28
Repeatability
Mechanical properties
Lime hempcrete 700 kg/m3
Links with the sample density repeatability
c (MPa)
(m/m)
8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos
14/28
OutputFailure type (lime hempcrete 450 kg/m3)
Without fibers With fibers
Mechanical properties
Lime hempcrete
710 kg/m3cement hempcrete550 kg/m3
ANR Btonchanvre (2010)
8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos
15/28
Loading direction and compaction effects
Demi-prouvette horizontale Demi-prouvette verticale Bloc entier
Mechanical properties
Various loading direction
ANR Btonchanvre (2010)
8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos
16/28
Compression strength versus density
y = 3E-05x2,62
R2= 0,92
y = 0,0082x1,83
R2= 0,43
0
200
400
600
800
1000
200 300 400 500 600Masse volumique (kg m
-3)
Rsistancelacom
pression(kPa)
Matriau A (pr. entire)
Matriau A (demi-pr. horizontale)
Matriau A (demi-pr. verticale)
Matriau B (pr. entire)
Matriau B (demi-pr. horizontale)
Matriau B (demi-pr. verticale)
Matriau C (pr. entire)
Matriau C (demi-pr. horizontale)
Matriau C (demi-pr. verticale)
Courbe modle d'Elfordy et al. (2008) = 0(/0)2
density
Compressionstren
gth
Mechanical properties
Sprayed lime hempcrete
Moulded lime hempcrete
ANR Btonchanvre (2010)
8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos
17/28
Compression strength versus density
compacted lime hempcrete
Mechanical properties
Nguyen (2010)
density
Compressionstren
gth
8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos
18/28
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
0 0,02 0,04 0,06 0,08 0,1 0,12 0,14 0,16 0,18 0,2
Rc
def (m/m)
0
0,02
0,04
0,06
0,08
0,1
0,12
0,14
0 0,002 0,004 0,006 0,008 0,01 0,012 0,014 0,016 0,018 0,02
Rc (MPa)
def (m/m)
36 MPa
14 MPa
Distinction between :
- apparent modulus 10 150 MPa- elastic modulus 10 300 MPa
Moduli
Mechanical properties
c (MPa)
(m/m)
c (MPa)
8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos
19/28
Compression strength evolution
Mechanical properties
Crzo (2005)
8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos
20/28
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
1 10 100 1000
j
Rc cube (MPa)
Compression strength evolution
Mechanical properties
1/3plaster 2/3 lime hempcrete
Quick setting
Lime carbonation effect
8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos
21/28
Mix proportioning influences
Influence of binder content
Increase of
binder
content
Crzo (2005)
8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos
22/28
Mix proportioning influences
Influence of fibres type, carbonation, binder type
0,00
0,10
0,20
0,30
0,40
0,50
0,60
0,70
0,80
0,90
350,00 400,00 450,00 500,00
F1-NC
F1-C
F2-NC
F2-C
F3-NC
F3-C
F4-NC
F4-C
c (MPa)
(kg/m3)
Shiv without fibres
Shiv with fibres
Chamoin (2012)
Compression strength versus density
100 % lime
70 % plaster
30 % lime
C = carbonated
NC = non carbonated
8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos
23/28
0,00
0,10
0,20
0,30
0,40
0,50
0,60
0,70
0,80
0,90
0,00 20,00 40,00 60,00 80,00 100,00 120,00 140,00
Mix proportioning influences
Influence of fibres type, carbonation, binder type
F1-NC
F1-C
F2-NC
F2-C
F3-NC
F3-C
F4-NC
F4-C
c (MPa)
apparent (MPa)
Shiv without fibres
Shiv with fibres
Chamoin (2012)
Compression strength versus apparent modulus
C = carbonated
NC = non carbonated
8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos
24/28
8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos
25/28
0,0000
0,0050
0,0100
0,0150
0,0200
0,0250
0,0300
0,00 20,00 40,00 60,00 80,00 100,00 120,00 140,00
Mix proportioning influences
Influence of fibres type, carbonation, binder type
F1-NC
F1-C
F2-NC
F2-C
F3-NC
F3-C
F4-NC
F4-C
(c) (m/m)
Shiv without fibres
Shiv with fibres
Chamoin (2012)
strain at maximum compression strength versus apparent modulus
Carbonation effectC = carbonated
NC = non carbonated
apparent (MPa)
8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos
26/28
Conclusions
Hempcrete :
compressible material
low compression strength 0,2 3,5 MPa
better strengths after compaction
links between mechanical parameters:large influence of density
low elastic modulus < 300 MPa
large strain
Interesting post pick strengths
8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos
27/28
8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos
28/28