Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos

  • Upload
    zdan32

  • View
    234

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos

    1/28

    1

    C. Lanos, F. Collet

    UEB - LGCGM, Equipe Matriaux Thermo-Rhologie

    INSA-IUT, Rennes

    France

    Mechanical properties

    of hempcrete

    Biomaterials & Binders for Construction Hemp, Lime, WoodEuropean workshop in Darmstadt, 2122 !o"em#er 2$11

  • 8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos

    2/28

    2

    Hempcrete samples

    Mechanical properties

    Mix proportioning influences

    Summary

  • 8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos

    3/28

    Representative size

    Hempcrete samples

    Mineral binders

    - Lime

    - Portland cement

    - Belite cement

    - Plaster-

    Hemp shiv

    - With fibres

    - Without fibres

    Representative

    size of sample ?

    7 x D = 14 cm

    300/m3 kg < apparent density < 800 kg/m3

    0,3 < shiv+binder volume fraction

  • 8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos

    4/28

    Production method

    Hempcrete samples

    Real mixers

    Laboratory mixers

    - Wet mix

    - Dry mix

    Hobart type mixer (20 litres)- mix of the paste

    - add of aggregate

    mixing duration following the used binder

    ( typically 2 min)

  • 8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos

    5/28

    Uses of hempcrete

    On site moulding

    Precasting blocks

    Spraying

    Water content adjustment to ensure flow ability

  • 8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos

    6/28

    Hempcrete samples

    Samples sizesReal size sample : box

    30 cm30 cm

    16 cm

    Usable for :

    - sprayed concrete

    - moulded concrete

    Respect of loading direction

  • 8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos

    7/28

    Hempcrete samples

    Real size sample : wall

    Prismatic samples 14x14x70 cm3

    For flexural tests For compression test

    Thickness = 17 cm Sample are take of the wall

    Usable for :

    - sprayed concrete

    - moulded concrete

  • 8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos

    8/28

    Cylindrical sample

    D = 16 cm H = 32 cm 3 layers with compaction

    Usable for :

    - moulded concrete

    - shiv binder validation

    Hempcrete samples

  • 8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos

    9/28

    Closed mould

    6-28 days at room temperature (following the binder)

    Removing of mould

    drying at 23 C and 55 HR

    Mass loss survey

    0

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    6000

    7000

    8000

    9000

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60

    t (j)

    masse chantillon (kg)

    lime

    2000

    2500

    3000

    3500

    4000

    4500

    5000

    5500

    6000

    0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

    dmoulageHydraulic binder

    Hempcrete samples

    Curing conditions

    Sample mass (g)

    Sample mass (g)

  • 8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos

    10/28

    Imposed displacement : 5 mm/min

    progressive cyclic loading(example : 1,5 mm, 3 mm, 5 mm, 10 mm and 50 mm)

    final strain > 15%

    Mechanical properties

    MethodSample surface are straightened (by sawing)

    Load cell capacity : 50 kN

    (INSTRON 400 kN with large rigidity)

    Output:

    stress : F/So

    strain : h/hoservo-mechanical

    testing systems

  • 8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos

    11/28

    typical behaviour of hempcrete

    0

    0,1

    0,2

    0,3

    0,4

    0,5

    0,6

    0,7

    ,

    0 0,05 0,1 0,15 0,2 0,25

    def (m/m)

    strain stress curves

    Data analysis:- Maximum stress

    - Compressive modulus

    - Residual strength

    - strain at maximum stress

    Sample analysis

    - Localization of compaction

    - failure

    0,3 < shiv+binder volume fraction < 0,55

    Mechanical properties

    Without compaction

    Chamoin (2012)

    c (MPa)

    (m/m)

  • 8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos

    12/28

    strain stress curves

    Data analysis:

    - Compaction effect- Compressive modulus

    Mechanical properties

    Homogeneous strains

    Compaction of sample

    With compaction: 0.1 to 2.9 MPa

    0,6 < shiv+binder volume fraction < 0,8

    NGuyen (2010)

    c (MPa)

    (%)

  • 8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos

    13/28

    Repeatability

    Mechanical properties

    Lime hempcrete 700 kg/m3

    Links with the sample density repeatability

    c (MPa)

    (m/m)

  • 8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos

    14/28

    OutputFailure type (lime hempcrete 450 kg/m3)

    Without fibers With fibers

    Mechanical properties

    Lime hempcrete

    710 kg/m3cement hempcrete550 kg/m3

    ANR Btonchanvre (2010)

  • 8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos

    15/28

    Loading direction and compaction effects

    Demi-prouvette horizontale Demi-prouvette verticale Bloc entier

    Mechanical properties

    Various loading direction

    ANR Btonchanvre (2010)

  • 8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos

    16/28

    Compression strength versus density

    y = 3E-05x2,62

    R2= 0,92

    y = 0,0082x1,83

    R2= 0,43

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    200 300 400 500 600Masse volumique (kg m

    -3)

    Rsistancelacom

    pression(kPa)

    Matriau A (pr. entire)

    Matriau A (demi-pr. horizontale)

    Matriau A (demi-pr. verticale)

    Matriau B (pr. entire)

    Matriau B (demi-pr. horizontale)

    Matriau B (demi-pr. verticale)

    Matriau C (pr. entire)

    Matriau C (demi-pr. horizontale)

    Matriau C (demi-pr. verticale)

    Courbe modle d'Elfordy et al. (2008) = 0(/0)2

    density

    Compressionstren

    gth

    Mechanical properties

    Sprayed lime hempcrete

    Moulded lime hempcrete

    ANR Btonchanvre (2010)

  • 8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos

    17/28

    Compression strength versus density

    compacted lime hempcrete

    Mechanical properties

    Nguyen (2010)

    density

    Compressionstren

    gth

  • 8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos

    18/28

    0

    0,05

    0,1

    0,15

    0,2

    0,25

    0,3

    0 0,02 0,04 0,06 0,08 0,1 0,12 0,14 0,16 0,18 0,2

    Rc

    def (m/m)

    0

    0,02

    0,04

    0,06

    0,08

    0,1

    0,12

    0,14

    0 0,002 0,004 0,006 0,008 0,01 0,012 0,014 0,016 0,018 0,02

    Rc (MPa)

    def (m/m)

    36 MPa

    14 MPa

    Distinction between :

    - apparent modulus 10 150 MPa- elastic modulus 10 300 MPa

    Moduli

    Mechanical properties

    c (MPa)

    (m/m)

    c (MPa)

  • 8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos

    19/28

    Compression strength evolution

    Mechanical properties

    Crzo (2005)

  • 8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos

    20/28

    0

    0,1

    0,2

    0,3

    0,4

    0,5

    0,6

    1 10 100 1000

    j

    Rc cube (MPa)

    Compression strength evolution

    Mechanical properties

    1/3plaster 2/3 lime hempcrete

    Quick setting

    Lime carbonation effect

  • 8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos

    21/28

    Mix proportioning influences

    Influence of binder content

    Increase of

    binder

    content

    Crzo (2005)

  • 8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos

    22/28

    Mix proportioning influences

    Influence of fibres type, carbonation, binder type

    0,00

    0,10

    0,20

    0,30

    0,40

    0,50

    0,60

    0,70

    0,80

    0,90

    350,00 400,00 450,00 500,00

    F1-NC

    F1-C

    F2-NC

    F2-C

    F3-NC

    F3-C

    F4-NC

    F4-C

    c (MPa)

    (kg/m3)

    Shiv without fibres

    Shiv with fibres

    Chamoin (2012)

    Compression strength versus density

    100 % lime

    70 % plaster

    30 % lime

    C = carbonated

    NC = non carbonated

  • 8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos

    23/28

    0,00

    0,10

    0,20

    0,30

    0,40

    0,50

    0,60

    0,70

    0,80

    0,90

    0,00 20,00 40,00 60,00 80,00 100,00 120,00 140,00

    Mix proportioning influences

    Influence of fibres type, carbonation, binder type

    F1-NC

    F1-C

    F2-NC

    F2-C

    F3-NC

    F3-C

    F4-NC

    F4-C

    c (MPa)

    apparent (MPa)

    Shiv without fibres

    Shiv with fibres

    Chamoin (2012)

    Compression strength versus apparent modulus

    C = carbonated

    NC = non carbonated

  • 8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos

    24/28

  • 8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos

    25/28

    0,0000

    0,0050

    0,0100

    0,0150

    0,0200

    0,0250

    0,0300

    0,00 20,00 40,00 60,00 80,00 100,00 120,00 140,00

    Mix proportioning influences

    Influence of fibres type, carbonation, binder type

    F1-NC

    F1-C

    F2-NC

    F2-C

    F3-NC

    F3-C

    F4-NC

    F4-C

    (c) (m/m)

    Shiv without fibres

    Shiv with fibres

    Chamoin (2012)

    strain at maximum compression strength versus apparent modulus

    Carbonation effectC = carbonated

    NC = non carbonated

    apparent (MPa)

  • 8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos

    26/28

    Conclusions

    Hempcrete :

    compressible material

    low compression strength 0,2 3,5 MPa

    better strengths after compaction

    links between mechanical parameters:large influence of density

    low elastic modulus < 300 MPa

    large strain

    Interesting post pick strengths

  • 8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos

    27/28

  • 8/10/2019 Biomaterials and Binders - Lanos

    28/28