Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Biomass burning in Southeast Asia
from field studies to satellite data analysis
And the SPRINTARS model
Haruo Tsuruta, Eiji Oikawa, Syugo Watanabe, Toshiro Inoue,
Makiko Hashimoto,Teruyuki Nakajima (AORI, Univ. of Tokyo)
Jinchula Chotpitayasunon & Boossarasiri Thana
(Chulalongkorn University, Thailand) Daisuke Goto, Nobuo Sugimoto (NIES)
Toshihiko Takemura (RIAM, Kyusyu University)
Koichiro Sera (CRC, Iwate Medical University)
Shigeto Sudo, Seiichiro Yonemura (NIAES)
Yuichiro Shirasuna, Koichiro Hirano
(Yokohama Environment Research Institute)
Pradeep Khatri & Tamio Takamura (CeRES, Chiba University)
Masanori Yabuki (RISH, Kyoto University)
S. Katagiri, Tadahiro Hayasaka (CAOS, Tohoku University) Wataru Takeuchi (IIT, Univ. of Tokyo)
Impacts of biomass burning on local/regional/global environment
Collaborative study with Southeast and South Asia
Malaysian Meteorological Department (MMD): 1994- (NASA: SHADOS program: with MMD) Indonesia: BMG, BAU, 1995- Drs. Nul Hayati, Murdiyarso, Saharjo India: NPL, NRSA, 1995- Drs. Mitra, Gupta, Badarinath, and Vadrevu Singapore: National Environment Agency 1996- Thailand: (DOA, JGSEE), Chulalongkorn Univ. 2006-
An intensive field study through one year is needed to understand a comprehensive picture on the effect of human activity Including LULC and BB on atmospheric environment.
Enhancement of tropospheric ozone influenced by the trans-boundary air pollution over KL, Malaysia
(Yonemura et al, JGR, 2002)
Fig. 8 Methyl bromide and CO concentrations by aircraft and ground measurements over/in Sumatra in 1997-1998
(Sudo, Yonemura, and Tsuruta, 2002)
Objectives of our study in Phimai, a SKYNET station
1. Chemical characterization of atmospheric
aerosols at Phimai in rainy and dry seasons
2. AOT and single scattering albedo ( SSAo)
from optical measurements by skyradiometer
3. Single scattering albedo (SSAc) calculated from
chemical compositions
4. Comparison of chemical/optical properties
between the field study, and the SPRINTARS model
and the CALIOP data
Phimai
Hedo
Hefei
Minami
-TorishimaMiyako
Mandalgovi
DunhuangYinchuan/
Shapatou
Gosan
Anmyon
Nagqu
Osaka
Shirahama
Huanshang
Taishang
Sri-Samrong
Nepal
Hanimaadhoo
ABC
SKYNET
AERONET
ADEC, CEOP
ABC-EAREX
Ochi-Ishi
Gwangju
Hateruma
Wan-Li
Lu-LinHok Tsui
Xianghe
Kampur
Pune
Bac Giang
Mukdahan
Bangkok
Qira
Aksu
Dalanzadgad
Beijing
Taipei
Chao-Jou
Ussuriysk
Kao-Hsiung
Sapporo
Chichijima
Tsukuba
Tokyo
Chiba
Kanazawa
Toyama
Tateyama
Fukue
Om Koi
Amami
Phimai
Hedo
Hefei
Minami
-TorishimaMiyako
Mandalgovi
DunhuangYinchuan/
Shapatou
Gosan
Anmyon
Nagqu
Osaka
Shirahama
Huanshang
Taishang
Sri-Samrong
Nepal
Hanimaadhoo
ABC
SKYNET
AERONET
ADEC, CEOP
ABC-EAREX
Ochi-Ishi
Gwangju
Hateruma
Wan-Li
Lu-LinHok Tsui
Xianghe
Kampur
Pune
Bac Giang
Mukdahan
Bangkok
Qira
Aksu
Dalanzadgad
Beijing
Taipei
Chao-Jou
Ussuriysk
Kao-Hsiung
Sapporo
Chichijima
Tsukuba
Tokyo
Chiba
Kanazawa
Toyama
Tateyama
Fukue
Om Koi
Amami
P
A
Monitoring stations for atmospheric aerosols by ABC, AERONET, and SKYNET in Asia. The station of Sri-Samrong and Amami-Oshima has moved to Phimai (since 2004) and Cape Hedo (since June 2005), respectively.
II. Atmospheric Aerosols at the Observatory of Atmospheric Research
at Phimai (15.18°N, 102.57°E )
Sampling period
1. June 2006-Feb. 2007
2. July 2007-July 2008
A series of a half day sampling in the
daytime and nighttime for three days
was made twice in every month.
Phimai
Measurements and analysis
Surface aerosol measurements
Sampling sites: Phimai, Thailand (15.18N,102.57E)
Sampling period: Jul. 2007-Aug. 2008
Aerosol sampler: Multi-nozzle cascade impact
sampler with PM1.0, PM2.5 and PM10 impactor
Chemical analysis: Mass concentration
EC/OC (by optical/thermal analyser)
Water soluble ions (by IC)
Trace elements (by PIXE)
Optical measurements by Skyradiometer
Data analysis for: Aerosol optical thickness (AOT)
Single scattering albedo (SSA)
Angstrom exponent (AE)
Trace gases: CO and O3
Backward trajectory analysis: HYSPLIT MODEL by NOAA
Satellite data analysis: Hot spots of fires by MODIS (by Dr. Takeuchi) Vertical distribution of aerosols/clouds by CALIOP
Vertical profile of aerosols: LIDAR by NIES
Verical profiles of meteorological data (T,RH,WD,WS) Radio sonde at Ubon Ratchathani 200km east of Phimai
Surface data: Phimai Observatory:meteorological data(RH, T, WD, WS) Soil chemical properties
Backward trajectories by NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL
(W1) 00 UT 10 Oct. 2007 (D1) 00 UT 15 Oct. 2007 (D3) 00UT 20 Mar. 2008
Definition of wind pattern: Dry season: D1: northeasterly monsoon from East Asia or South China Sea D2: Transition stage of D1 and D3 D3: From South China Sea Rainy season: W1, W2: southwesterly monsoon from Indian Ocean
0
1
2
3
4
5
J-0
7
A-0
7
S-0
7
O-0
7
N-0
7
D-0
7
J-0
8
F-0
8
M-0
8
A-0
8
M-0
8
J-0
8
win
d di
rect
ion
date (month-year)
NNE-NE
ENE-E
S
SW
W1 D1 D2 D3 W2
Conclusion 1 : Chemical properties in Dry season,
Analysing the ratio of nss-SO4/EC, D1: Major source: Air pollutants from east Asia by NE monsoon, D3: Major source: Biomass burning from Indochina D2: Transition stage between D1 and D3 Aerosols from severe biomass burning was frequently trapped in the lower boundary layer
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
W1 D1 D2 D3 W2
me
an c
on
cen
trat
ion
(u
g m
-3)
wet and dry periods
K(BB)
soil dust
(NH4)2SO4
OC
EC
PM2.5measurement(obs.)
Time series of chemical composition in PM2.5
By the surface measurements
Fossil fuel mixed Biomass
Combustion (D1 & D3) burning
From East Asia in
Indochina
Dust from west Asia
0
2
4
6
8
10
0 5 10 15 20
EC
(ug
m-3)
nss-SO4 (ug m-3)
D1
D2
D3
W1
W2
AMAMI (W1)
MALAYSIA
Jambi (x 0.1)
D1
EC/nss-SO4 (2.5um>d)
D3
1/11
A
Scatter diagram between nss-SO4 and BC in PM2.5 from surface measurements (Phimai, Amami, Malaysia, Indonesia (Jambi))
0
2
4
6
8
10
0 5 10 15 20
nss-SO4 (ug m-3)
BC
(ug m
-3)
D1
D2
D3
W1
W2
D3
D1
SPRINTARS MODEL
(BC/nss-SO4)
Scatter diagram between
nss-SO4 and BC(EC)
in PM2.5
Surface measurements
SPRINTARS model
Large difference in
BC(EC)/SO4 between
D1 and D3 is well
correlated between
surface measurements
and SPRINTARS.
D1: fossil fuel combustion
from East Asia
D3: biomass burning
0
2
4
6
8
10
0 5 10 15 20
EC
(ug
m-3)
nss-SO4 (ug m-3)
D1
D2
D3
W1
W2
AMAMI (W1)
MALAYSIA
Jambi(x0.1)
D1
EC/nss-SO4 (2.5um>d)
D3
1/11
A
Biomass burning
Fossil fuel combustion
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
8/1
9/1
10
/1
11
/11
2/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
8/1
9/1
10
/1
11
/11
2/1
Nu
mb
er
of
wild
fire
Time of day (month/day, 2007-2008)
Thailand
D1 D2 D3
Dry season in 2007-2008
Number of wildfires from MODIS FireMAP During 2007-2008 (database from Prof. Takeuchi)
0
1
2
3
4
5
W1 D1 D2 D3 W2
wet and dry periods
mean c
oncentr
ati
on (
ug m
-3)
Obs.
S.model(O)
S.model(T)
EC (BC)(PM2.5)
1. Spatial distribution of mean BC(EC) concentration in W1, DI(D1+D2), DII(D3)
by SPRINTARS. Comparison of BC(EC) and OC between surface measurement
and SPRINTARS in wet and dry periods is in good agreement.
x
O(n)= 18 11 21 11 10
T(n)=105 48 103 50 60
W1
D1+D2
D3
0
5
10
15
20
W1 D1 D2 D3 W2
wet and dry periods
mean c
oncentr
ati
on (
ug m
-3)
Obs.
S.model(O)
S.model(T)
Dust partic les(total: 10>d)
4. Dusts: Large difference between the measurement and
the model in the dry periods(SPRINTARS << Measurements)
W1
D1+D2
D3
X
Conclusion 2 : Soil/mineral dusts D1: direct transport from east Asia, hardly from inner desert areas D2: re-suspension of soil dusts in Indochina D3: re-suspension of local soil dusts caused by thermal plume due to biomass burning in Indochina Wet season: Long range transport from west, possibly from the desert regions in west Asia
0
5
10
15
W1 D1 D2 D3 W2
mean
concentr
atio
n (ug
m-3)
wet and dry periods
Sea Salt
soil dust
NO3
OC
EC
Coarse mode (obs.)
(10um >d> 2.5um)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
W1 D1 D2 D3 W2
mean
concentr
atio
n (ug
m-3)
wet and dry periods
K(BB)
soil dust
(NH4)2SO4
OC
EC
fine mode (obs.)
(2.5um >d)
Mean chemical composition for fine and coarse particles
in the wet and dry seasons
Coarse Particles PM2.5
y = 0.0495x - 0.0008
R2 = 0.9123
y = 0.0461x - 0.0002
R2 = 0.6815
0.000
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.010
0.012
0.014
0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14
Ti
Zr
D1
D2
D3
W1
W2
線形 (D2)
線形 (W2)
10>d>2.5
D2
W2
Zr has not been detected in atmospheric aerosols at Amami in spring time,
And at Phimai in the D1 period when the surface wind was from east Asia.
In contrast, Zr was detected in D2 and D3 periods, and it strongly suggests that,
In the D1 period, soil was not dried well and biomass burning was not active.
In the D2 and D3 periods, however, soil became well dried and biomass burning
very active, and local soil dust and re-suspended dust by biomass burning
could strongly affect atmospheric aerosols at Phimai, in addition to that from east
Asia in D2.
y = 2.29x + 0.028
R2 = 0.68
y = 0.18x + 0.055
R2 = 0.52
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5
K, T
i (u
g m
-3)
Fe (ug m-3)
■ K/Fe (1.0>d)
■ K/Fe(10>d>2.5)
+ Ti/Fe y = 0.10x - 0.001(1.0>d) R2 = 0.94
○Ti/Fe y = 0.093x + 0.001(10>d>2.5) R2 = 0.98
Phimai : daily mean data
Jul. 2007-Jun. 2008
Relationship for K/Fe and Ti/Fe in coarse particles and PM2.5
(July 2007- June 2008)
K: soil particles in coarse particles
biomass burning and bio-fuels in fine particles
20 June 2008
25.2 N 19.1 N 13.0 N 6.9 N 0.8 N
Phimai
Height (km) 10 5 0 Fig. 7 Vertical profile of Aerosol type along the orbits, day, 18 June 2008
37.3 N 31.2 N 25.1 N 19.0 N 12.9 N 6.8 N
Phimai
0 5 10 km Height
Fig. 8 Vertical profile of aerosol type along the orbit, night, 18 June 2008
Fig. 10 Backward trajectory analysis of air masses arrived at Phimai on 17-20 June 2008, for a week By NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL
17 June 18 June 19 June 20 June 210m, 1km, 2km
20 June 2,3,4km
00-00-05 18-07-53 23-04-28 21-25-38 19-46-43 Fig. 9 Global and vertical aerosol distribution by SPRINTARS MODEL
18 June 2008
Conclusion 3: Optical properties SSA: Clear seasonal variation with the minimum inD2 AOT: Highest in D3 possibly due to biomass burning AOT and PM2.5 : Positive correlation in D2 , and in D3, however, AOT was much higher than in D2. A possible reason might be multi layers of aerosols, as shown in CALIOP data, due to biomass burning in Indochina or transport of polluted air masses from the west.
0.70
0.75
0.80
0.85
0.90
0.95
1.00
J-07
A-07
S-0
7
O-07
N-07
D-07
J-08
F-08
M-08
A-08
M-08
J-08
SSA
day (1 Jul. 2007-31 Jun. 2008)
SSA(SKYNET500)
SSA(AERONET440)
SSA(AERONET676)
SSAex(chem)
SSAhalf(chem)
SSAin(chem)
9-11Jan. 5-7 Mar.
C D
SSAo by skyradiometer and SSAc by surface chemical compositions, assuming external (ex), half internal (half), and internal mixture (in). SSAc is only calculated for several cases, because the size distribution of atmospheric aerosols are used at Amami, not Phimai.
Cirrus effect
0
2
4
6
8
10
J J J A A A S S S O O O N N N D D D J J J F F F M M M A A A M M M J J J
sampling date (Jul. 2007-Jun. 2008)
Daily E
C c
oncentr
ati
on (
ug m
-3)
10>d>2.5
2.5>d>1.0
1.0>d
EC
11 Jan.
8
9
10
J J J A A A S S S O O O N N N D D D J J J F F F M M M A A A M M M J J J
W1 (SW) W2(SW)D1(NNE-E) D2 (NNE-E) D3 (S)
Wind direction
Time series of EC concentration and wind direction
× ×
(1) 06 h UT, 11 Jan. 2008 (2) 18 h UT, 11 Jan. 2008
Phimai
A thick aerosol layer between 0-2 km over Phimai In the daytime and nighttime
Phimai
Fig. 14 Total attenuation backscatter from CALIOP
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
0 5 10 15 20 25
Temp (℃)
Alt
itude (km
)
Phimai
Fig. 11 Time series of Aerosol Optical Thickness (AOT, 500nm)
and WD
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
J-07
A-07
S-07
O-07
N-07
D-07
J-08
F-08
M-08
A-08
M-08
J-08
Date (month-year)
daily m
ean A
OT
WD
NEESSW
W1 D1 D2 D3 W2
12 Feb.
11 Jan .
24 Mar .
AOT
B
A
AOT>0.80: 10-17 Feb. 15-24 Mar.
Fig. 17
24 Mar. 2008
06h UT
No surface
measurement
H
(km)
15
10
5
0
Mie Lidar extinction coefficient over Phimai in March 2008
Soil dust
Spherical particles
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
PM2.5 (ug m-3)
AO
T (
0.5
um
)
19-21 Mar.
3-4 Apr.6-7 Mar.
8 Feb.
28-30 Nov.
9-11 Jan.
5 Mar.
W1, W2
20-22 Feb.
Scatter diagram between PM2.5 and AOT by skyradiometer
in the days when both data were simultaneously measured.
AOT could be positively correlated with PM2.5 near the surface.
More comprehensive study among field measurements,
satellite data analysis, and model simulation
should be performed in future.
Thank you very much for your attention!!