32
Biological scaling theory and effects on populations By Van Savage Department of Systems Biology Harvard Medical School Santa Fe CSSS, 200

Biological scaling theory and effects on populations By Van Savage Department of Systems Biology Harvard Medical School Santa Fe CSSS, 2007

  • View
    216

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Biological scaling theory and effects on populations By Van Savage Department of Systems Biology Harvard Medical School Santa Fe CSSS, 2007

Biological scaling theoryand effects on populations

ByVan Savage

Department of Systems BiologyHarvard Medical School

Santa Fe CSSS, 2007

Page 2: Biological scaling theory and effects on populations By Van Savage Department of Systems Biology Harvard Medical School Santa Fe CSSS, 2007

Outline

1. Theory for dependence of biological rates, times, and lengths on body size

2. Dependence for biological rates on body temperature

3. Scaling or population growth

4. Scaling of species interactions (predator-prey)

5. Conclusions

Page 3: Biological scaling theory and effects on populations By Van Savage Department of Systems Biology Harvard Medical School Santa Fe CSSS, 2007

Savage, et al., Func. Eco., 2004

B = 0B 3 / 4M

Page 4: Biological scaling theory and effects on populations By Van Savage Department of Systems Biology Harvard Medical School Santa Fe CSSS, 2007

Rates at the cellular, individual, and population level for manydifferent taxa scale like this. Many times and lengths also scale.

Savage et al., Func. Eco., 2004; Peters, Ecol. Implications of Body Size, (1983)

3/4-power scaling

Num

ber

of R

ates

with

Exp

onen

t

Scaling Exponent

Page 5: Biological scaling theory and effects on populations By Van Savage Department of Systems Biology Harvard Medical School Santa Fe CSSS, 2007

Theory for body mass scaling

Page 6: Biological scaling theory and effects on populations By Van Savage Department of Systems Biology Harvard Medical School Santa Fe CSSS, 2007

Theory has three assumptions

i. Branching, hierarchical network that is space filling to feed all cells

vz

vr z

r

r

hCapillaries

M increases

ii. Minimization of energy to pump blood from the heart to the capillaries

iii. Capillaries are invariant in size

West et al. Science (1997)

Page 7: Biological scaling theory and effects on populations By Van Savage Department of Systems Biology Harvard Medical School Santa Fe CSSS, 2007

Hierarchical, Branching Network

Level 0

Level 1

Level 2

Level 2

n = 2

Page 8: Biological scaling theory and effects on populations By Van Savage Department of Systems Biology Harvard Medical School Santa Fe CSSS, 2007

i. Space filling

Page 9: Biological scaling theory and effects on populations By Van Savage Department of Systems Biology Harvard Medical School Santa Fe CSSS, 2007

Space filling

Page 10: Biological scaling theory and effects on populations By Van Savage Department of Systems Biology Harvard Medical School Santa Fe CSSS, 2007

Space filling

Page 11: Biological scaling theory and effects on populations By Van Savage Department of Systems Biology Harvard Medical School Santa Fe CSSS, 2007

Space Filling

+

+ + +

NkClk3 = Nk+1Clk+1

3

γ=lk+1

lk=NkNk+1

⎝ ⎜

⎠ ⎟

1/ 3

= n−1/ 3

Page 12: Biological scaling theory and effects on populations By Van Savage Department of Systems Biology Harvard Medical School Santa Fe CSSS, 2007

I T

T

R

Reflection at junctions (Important for larger vessels, pulsatile flow)

β =rk+1

rk= n−1/ 2

Area Preserving

ii. Minimize energy loss (selection)

β =rk+1

rk= n−1/ 3

Area Increasing

Dissipation (Important for small vessels, Poiseuille flow)

Page 13: Biological scaling theory and effects on populations By Van Savage Department of Systems Biology Harvard Medical School Santa Fe CSSS, 2007

Body Size Changes Network Size

Terminal units are invariant.

Aorta

Capillaries

level

Level 0

Level 1

Page 14: Biological scaling theory and effects on populations By Van Savage Department of Systems Biology Harvard Medical School Santa Fe CSSS, 2007

Metabolic Rate, B, and Body Mass, M

M ∝ bV = knlevels

∑ π k2r kl ∝ TN 4 / 3

TV ∝ B4 / 3

Follows fromEnergy Min.

Use scale factorsto relate each levelto terminal units.

Invariance ofterminal unitsB=NTBT

B∝ 3 / 4M

Blood volume

Number ofTerminal units

Volume of Terminal units

Mass Met Rate

West et al. Science (1997)

Page 15: Biological scaling theory and effects on populations By Van Savage Department of Systems Biology Harvard Medical School Santa Fe CSSS, 2007

Theory has three assumptions

• Branching, hierarchical network that is space filling to feed all cells->relates vessel lengths across levels of cardiovascular system

• Minimization of energy to send vital resources to the terminal units (pump blood from the heart to the capillaries)->relates vessel radii across levels of cardiovascular system and connects blood volume to body size

• Capillaries are invariant in size->sets overall scale for cardiovascular system

Together these determine the scaling for the network.

Page 16: Biological scaling theory and effects on populations By Van Savage Department of Systems Biology Harvard Medical School Santa Fe CSSS, 2007

Theory for body temperature: biochemical reaction kinetics

Changes energy of impact and frequency of collisions,

Page 17: Biological scaling theory and effects on populations By Van Savage Department of Systems Biology Harvard Medical School Santa Fe CSSS, 2007

Characteristic Biological Rates and Times

15 orders of magnitude collapses to 1 order of magnitude variation! Zeroeth-order model for quantifying differences between organisms and identifying other relevant parameters.B

0

B =B

M= 0B −1/ 4M −E / kTe

BIOt ∝ 1/ 4M E / kTe€

Gillooly, Charnov, West, Savage, and Brown Nature (2002).

B = 0B 3 / 4M −E / kTe

Page 18: Biological scaling theory and effects on populations By Van Savage Department of Systems Biology Harvard Medical School Santa Fe CSSS, 2007

Temperature Dependence of Metabolic Rate

Similar slopes reflect similar activation energies and shared biochemistry through evolution. M and T explain dominant variation.

Gillooly, Brown, West, Savage, and Charnov Science (2001)

Page 19: Biological scaling theory and effects on populations By Van Savage Department of Systems Biology Harvard Medical School Santa Fe CSSS, 2007

Mass and Temperature Dependence of Lifespan

Gillooly, West, Brown, Savage, and Charnov Science (2001)

Page 20: Biological scaling theory and effects on populations By Van Savage Department of Systems Biology Harvard Medical School Santa Fe CSSS, 2007

An AnacreontickBusy, curious, thirsty Fly,

Gently drink, and drink as I;Freely welcome to my Cup,

Could'st thou sip, and sip it up;Make the most of Life you may,

Life is short and wears away.

Just alike, both mine and thine,Hasten quick to their Decline;

Thine's a Summer, mine's no more,Though repeated to threescore;

Threescore Summers when they're gone,Will appear as short as one.

By William Oldys

Page 21: Biological scaling theory and effects on populations By Van Savage Department of Systems Biology Harvard Medical School Santa Fe CSSS, 2007

Population Level

Page 22: Biological scaling theory and effects on populations By Van Savage Department of Systems Biology Harvard Medical School Santa Fe CSSS, 2007

Population Growth: From Individuals To Populations

dN

dt= rN or

N(t) = 0N rte

-per absolute time, not per generation

Savage et al. Am. Nat. 2004

Page 23: Biological scaling theory and effects on populations By Van Savage Department of Systems Biology Harvard Medical School Santa Fe CSSS, 2007

Euler’s Equation (for positive growth)

B(t) = B(t − x)l(x)b(x)dx0

1 = −rxe0

∫ l(x)b(x)dx->

N(t) is population size at time tr is rate of increase, fundamental variableB(t) is number of births at time tl(x) is probability of survivorship up to age xb(x) is fecundity rate at age x

-Survivorship and fecundity are also important,and can make that explicit!

Savage et al. Am. Nat. 2004

Page 24: Biological scaling theory and effects on populations By Van Savage Department of Systems Biology Harvard Medical School Santa Fe CSSS, 2007

Discrete Generations

Organisms reproduce once in their lifetime

x

NB(x)

.

G

NB(G)NB(x) is cumulative number of offspring at age x

G is the generation time and is the average age at which an organism has offspring

r =1

Gln[l(G) BN (G)]∝ −1/ 4M −E / kTe

Univoltine insects follow this exactlyMany other unicells, insects, and zooplankton are a good approximation to this Savage et al., Am. Nat., 2004.

Empirical M dependence:Fenchel (1973), Southwood et al. (1974), May (1976), Blueweiss et al. (1978) Empirical T dependence:Monod (1942), Birch (1948), Hinshelwood (1966), Droop(1968), Eppley (1972)

Page 25: Biological scaling theory and effects on populations By Van Savage Department of Systems Biology Harvard Medical School Santa Fe CSSS, 2007

Intrinsic Rate of Increase

Savage et al. Am. Nat. 2004

Page 26: Biological scaling theory and effects on populations By Van Savage Department of Systems Biology Harvard Medical School Santa Fe CSSS, 2007

Z ∝ r ∝ −1α ∝ −1/ 4M −E / kTe

l(α ) = −Zαe ∝ 0M 0TSize and temperature do not affect the percentage of offspring that survive to the age of first reproduction.

Savage et al., Am. Nat, 2004

Overlapping Generations

l(x) = l(α ) −Z (x−α )ex

b(x), l(x)

l()

b()MortalityRate

Age at 1st Reproduction

Page 27: Biological scaling theory and effects on populations By Van Savage Department of Systems Biology Harvard Medical School Santa Fe CSSS, 2007

Time to First Reproduction, Measure of Development

Gillooly, Charnov, West, Savage, and Brown Nature (2002).

Zooplankton

y = -0.11x + 7.2

r2 = 0.74n = 103

0

4

8

0 20 40

Tc/(1+(Tc/273))

ln (t/M

1/4)

Page 28: Biological scaling theory and effects on populations By Van Savage Department of Systems Biology Harvard Medical School Santa Fe CSSS, 2007

Savage et al. Am. Nat. 2004

Little Variation Across Broad Assortment of Organisms

Page 29: Biological scaling theory and effects on populations By Van Savage Department of Systems Biology Harvard Medical School Santa Fe CSSS, 2007

Savage et al. Am. Nat. 2004Data from Pauly (1980)

Mortality Rates in the Field

Page 30: Biological scaling theory and effects on populations By Van Savage Department of Systems Biology Harvard Medical School Santa Fe CSSS, 2007

Scaling of Population Size

Assume fixed amount of resources P

At steady state, dN/dt=0, population is at carrying capacityfor environment, K(M,T)

P ∝ B(M,T)K(M,T)

K(M,T)∝1

B(M,T)∝ −3 / 4M E / kTe

With energy equivalence, Damuth, Bio. J. Lin. Soc. (1987), this holds for multiple populations in a shared environment

Savage et al. Am. Nat. 2004

Page 31: Biological scaling theory and effects on populations By Van Savage Department of Systems Biology Harvard Medical School Santa Fe CSSS, 2007

Physics [Science] is mathematical not because we

know so much about the physical world, but because we know so little; it is only its mathematical properties that we can discover.  ~Bertrand

Russell

Page 32: Biological scaling theory and effects on populations By Van Savage Department of Systems Biology Harvard Medical School Santa Fe CSSS, 2007

Conclusions1. Power laws are common in biology (and elsewhere)

2. Dynamical model based on distribution of resourcesmakes many predictions that match data.

3. Temperature also affects biological rates and timesand can include this effect

4. Can build up from one level to the next to understandpopulation growth (but ants…)

5. Species interactions and competition can begin to be incorporated into both scaling and models of effects of climate change on biological systems.