41
Biological proxies

Biological proxies

  • Upload
    kineta

  • View
    50

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Biological proxies. Plants as indicators of terrestrial environments. Tissue/organs: Support --> wood (tree rings) Photosynthetic --> leaf anatomy (stomata) Reproductive --> pollen, (cones) seeds Detritus --> charcoal. Dendroclimatology: basics. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Biological proxies

Biological proxies

Page 2: Biological proxies

Plants as indicators of terrestrial environments

Tissue/organs:Support --> wood (tree rings)

Photosynthetic --> leaf anatomy (stomata)

Reproductive --> pollen, (cones) seeds

Detritus --> charcoal

Page 3: Biological proxies

Dendroclimatology:basics

• Plants are responsive to variations in the ambient physical environment;

• Response is expressed by variations in growth, reproductive effort, etc.;

• Growth response is recorded in woody (nontropical) trees by variations in the thickness of annual rings;

• The environmental stimuli can be revealed by analyzing ring widths of living or fossil trees from sensitive sites.

Page 4: Biological proxies

Environment - site interactions

temperature-sensitive

annual ringsbark

drought-sensitive

complacent

Page 5: Biological proxies

Tree rings as proxies

Page 6: Biological proxies

Measuringtree ringwidths

Page 7: Biological proxies
Page 8: Biological proxies

Tree ring records, N. Eurasia (AD 0 - 2000)

Page 9: Biological proxies
Page 10: Biological proxies

Spatial patterns:

the megadrought of 1863 in

the USA

Page 11: Biological proxies

Reconstructing fire history from scars

and wounds

Page 12: Biological proxies

Fire history sites, SW USA

Page 13: Biological proxies

Constructing regional

fire histories

Page 14: Biological proxies

Tree rings and volcanismdust veil

‘frost ring’

e.g. LaMarche and Hirschboeck, 1984, Nature 307, 121-126

narrow/frost rings recorderuptions in spring/summer only?

Page 15: Biological proxies
Page 16: Biological proxies

Hemispheric analysesof tree ring density reveal

annual and spatial variations in climate

[Northern hemisphere; AD 1815-1817]

“The year without a summer”

Eruption ofTambora continues

Page 17: Biological proxies

Palynology: pollen proxies

• Plants produce morphologically distinctive pollen grains.

• Pollen “rain” is representative of the local plant community (apart from non-anemophilous spp.).

• Pollen grains are extremely resistant to decay in anoxic conditions (e.g. lake sediments, peat bogs, wetland soils).

• Pre-existing plant communities can be reconstructed by sampling fossil assemblages in these sedimentaryarchives.

• Palaeoclimates can be derived from the ecological ranges of the constituent species.

Page 18: Biological proxies

Pollen morphology I

Page 19: Biological proxies

Pollen morphology II

Page 20: Biological proxies

Pollen typesPinus

Tsuga

Poaceae

Achillea

Page 21: Biological proxies

Tsuga occidentalis range limits % isopolls

Species range, pollen rain and environment

-20 -10 0 10 20 30

Temperature (°C)

Ann.Jan.

July

Precipitation (mm)

Ann.Jan.

July

1 10 100 1000 10000

Page 22: Biological proxies

Relative pollen %

and summer

temperature (Yukon)

Page 23: Biological proxies

Pollen capture by lakes

EXTRA-LOCAL(20 TO SEVERAL

HUNDREDMETRES

FROM LAKE)

LOCAL(<20 METRES FROM LAKE)

0 100 200 300 1000

REGIONAL(UP TO SEVERAL HUNDREDKILOMETRES FROM LAKE)

LAKE DIAMETER (M)

% T

OTA

L P

OLLEN

100

0

Page 24: Biological proxies

Pollen representation (‘R-value’: Inuvik area)

“Over” “Equal” “Under”

alder 11.8 juniper 1.0 spruce 0.5sage 5.0 willow 0.6 larch 0.2grass 3.4 poplar 0.6 heaths 0.1birch 3.0sedge 2.2 R = 1;

pollen production =species abundance in vegetation

Page 25: Biological proxies

Pine pollen percentage vs. influx (Rogers Lake, Connecticut)

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

Rad

iocarb

on

yrs

BP

% of total Influx (‘000 grains/cm2/yr)

0 20 40 60 0 10 20

L

ate

H

olo

cen

e G

lacia

l

Pine needles(regionalpattern)

Page 26: Biological proxies

Plant macrofossilsas proxies

Page 27: Biological proxies

Stomatal patterns

Monocots (linear) Dicots (random)

Page 28: Biological proxies

Stomatal density and [CO2]

Page 29: Biological proxies

Reconstructed atmospheric CO2

levels from 300 Ma to PD

Page 30: Biological proxies
Page 31: Biological proxies

Charcoal influx

(mm2 cm-2 yr-1), Lake

Francis, Abitibi, Québec

http://www.consecol.or

g/vol2/iss2/art6

Local fires

Regional fires(background)

Page 32: Biological proxies

Insect proxies (e.g. Coleoptera [beetles])

1. Fossil extraction (washing [solvents include kerosene] & sieving). 2. Taxon ID: morphology, microsculpture & genitalia (X100)

head capsule

pronotum

elytra(singular=

elytron)

Page 33: Biological proxies

Beetles in UK

“Devensian”

deposits (=OIS 2/3)

A-C = thermophil

es

D-G = tundra /alpines

H = cosmopolit

anspecies

(after Coope)

barren = full glacial

Page 34: Biological proxies

Modern ranges of cold-tolerant beetles from UK Devensian deposits

Page 35: Biological proxies

Modern ranges of thermophile beetles from UK Devensian deposits

Page 36: Biological proxies

Devensian exotica(periglacial deposits)

“interglacial refuge”

Page 37: Biological proxies

Terr

est

rial sh

elly

invert

ebra

tes

Page 38: Biological proxies

Terrestrial vertebrates

Alan Griffiths; discoverer of

fossil bear bones, QCI, from ~15 ka BP

(map of LateGlacial

vertebrate fossil finds)

Photos: Vancouver Sun

Page 39: Biological proxies

Packrat middens

Neotoma cinerea

fossil extractionsampling a midden

midden site (Colorado)

Page 40: Biological proxies

Packrat middens:sample

sites

(BC)

Page 41: Biological proxies

Pinus edulis:distribution records in US SW from packrat middens