Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
www.wjpps.com Vol 7, Issue 3, 2018.
411
Nidhi et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
BIOISOSTERISM: A STRATEGY OF MOLECULAR MODIFICATION
Nidhi Kala1* and Sokindra Kumar
1
R V Northland Institute, Dadri, Greater Noida, G B Nagar, Uttar Pradesh, India.
ABSTRACT
Bioisosterism is a unique strategy of molecular modification of lead
compound to improve its pharmacodynamic & pharmacokinetic
properties. The aim of bioisosterism is to boost the physical, biological
& pharmacological properties as well as rectify the toxicity of lead
molecule. The present review highlight the vital role of in Structural
activity relationship of lead molecule. Bioisosterism has played a
central role in the development of drug molecules almost from the
outset of the pharmaceutical industry. The promise of bioisosterism is
that the properties of a compound can be fine-tuned without affecting
its underlying biological activity. This promise is not however without its challenges.
Successfully applying bioisosterism to achieve the desired molecular outcome is difficult
because of the fundamental problem that chemical structure is an unreliable indicator of
biological activity. Small changes in a molecule can have a profound impact on a
compound’s activity, specificity and toxicity, whilst completely different chemotypes may
have near identical biological activity profiles. More rigorous and reproducible methods for
suggesting relevant, non-obvious and yet synthetically intuitive bioisosteres would have wide
applicability.
KEYWORDS: Isosterism, Bioisosterism, SAR, Retroisosterism.
INTRODUCTION
Bioisosterism is a strategy of medicinal chemistry for the rational drug design as well as
molecular modification and optimization process aiming to improve pharmacodynamic and
pharmacokinetic properties of lead compounds.[4]
The lead is a prototype compound that has
the desired biological or pharmacological activity.[5]
WORLD JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
SJIF Impact Factor 7.421
Volume 7, Issue 3, 411-427 Review Article ISSN 2278 – 4357
Article Received on
07 Jan. 2018,
Revised on 27 Jan. 2018,
Accepted on 17 Feb. 2018
DOI: 10.20959/wjpps20183-11131
*Corresponding Author
Nidhi Kala
R V Northland Institute,
Dadri, Greater Noida, G B
Nagar, Uttar Pradesh, India.
www.wjpps.com Vol 7, Issue 3, 2018.
412
Nidhi et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Medicinal chemists have expanded and adapted the original concept to the analysis of
biological activity. The following definition has been proposed: "Bioisosteres are groups or
molecules which have chemical and physical properties producing broadly similar biological
properties". This definition might be reformed the concept of bioisosteres which may
produced the opposite biological effects, and these effects are frequently a reflection of some
action on the same biological process or at the same receptor site.[10]
Historical Development
The concept of bioisosterism derives from Langmuir's in 1919, ―Co molecules are thus
isosteric if they contain the same number and arrangement of electrons. The co molecules of
isosteres must, therefore, contain the same number of atoms. The essential differences
between isosteres are confined to charges on the nuclei of the constituent atoms‖.[9]
O-2
x F- x Ne x Na
+ x Mg
+2
ClO4- x SO4
-2 x PO4
-3
N=N x C=O
CO2 x NO2
N=N=N x N=C=O
In 1925, Grimm’s formulated the Hydride Displacement Law, an empiric rule which states
that the addition of a hydrogen atom with a pair of electrons (i.e. hydride) to an atom,
produces a pseudoatom presenting the same physical properties as those present in the
column immediately behind on the Periodic Table of the Elements for the initial atom (Table
1), showing that any atom belonging to groups 4A, 5A, 6A, 7A on the Periodic Table change
their properties by adding a hydride, becoming isoelectronic pseudoatoms.[21]
Table 1: Grimm’s Hydride Displacement Law.
Atomic Number 6 7 8 9 10 11
Elements C N O F Ne Na
Pseudoatoms - CH NH OH FH -
- - CH2 NH2 OH2 FH2+
- - - CH3 NH3 OH3+
- - - - CH4 NH4+
In 1932, Erlenmeyer et al. proposed a broadening of the term isosterism, defining isosteres
as elements, molecules or ions which present the same number of electrons at the valence
level. His contribution includes the proposition that elements of the same column on the
www.wjpps.com Vol 7, Issue 3, 2018.
413
Nidhi et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Periodic Table are isosteres among themselves (e.g. C x Si x Ge) and the creation of a
concept of rings electronically equivalent, later broadened to the term ring bioisosterism.[27]
Hinsberg applied the concept of isosterism to entire molecules. He developed the concept of
"ring equivalents" groups that can be exchanged for one another in aromatic ring systems
without drastic changes in physicochemical properties relative to the parent structure.
Benzene, thiophene and pyridine illustrate this concept is shown as Figure 1.[5]
A -CH=CH- group in benzene is replaced by the divalent sulfur, -S-, in thiophene and a -
CH=CH- is replaced by the trivalent -N= to give pyridine. The physical properties of benzene
and thiophene are very similar. For example, the boiling point of benzene is 81.1°C and that
of thiophene is 84.4°C (at 760 mm Hg). Pyridine, however, deviates with a boiling range of
115-116°C. Hinsberg therefore concluded that divalent sulfur (-S- or thioether) must
resemble -C=C- in shape and these groups were considered to be isosteric which shown in
figure 1.[5,9]
The coining of the term bioisosterism goes back to the pioneer work of Friedman and
Thornber during the early 50s. Friedman in 1951, recognizing the usefulness of the concept
isosterism to design bioactive molecules, defined bioisosters as compounds which fit the
definitions of isosteres and which exercise their biological activity of bioreceptor, whether
through agonist or antagonist actions. However, Friedman introduced the term bioisosterism
to describe the phenomenon observed between substances structurally related which
presented similar or antagonistic biological properties. Later, Thornber in 1979, proposed a
broadening of the term bioisosteres, defining them as subunits or groups or molecules which
possess physicochemical properties of similar biological effects.[26]
N
N
N(CH3)2
N
S
N(CH3)2
Tripelennamine Methaphenilene
Figure 1: Bioisosteric substitution of thiophene for benzene and benzene for pyridine.
www.wjpps.com Vol 7, Issue 3, 2018.
414
Nidhi et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
CLASSIFICATION OF BIOISOSTERES
In 1970, Alfred Burger classified and subdivided bioisosteres into two broad categories:
Classic and Non-Classic.[10,15,25]
Classical Bioisosteres are those which have similar steric and electronic features and have
the same number of atoms as the substituent moiety for which they are used as a replacement.
Nonclassical Bioisosteres are those which do not follow the strict steric and electronic
definition of classical isosteres and they do not have the same number of atoms as the
substituent moiety for which they are used as a replacement. These isosteres are capable of
maintaining similar biological activity by mimicking the spatial arrangement, electronic
properties, or some other physicochemical property of the molecule or functional group that
is critical for the retention of biological activity.[9]
Bioisosterism
Classic Non-Classic
Mono, Di, Tri, Tetravalent Functional Groups
Atoms or groups Non-Cyclic or Cyclic
Ring equivalent Retroisosterism
Burger’s definition significantly broadened this concept, now denominating those atoms or
molecular subunits or functional groups of the same valence and rings equivalents as classic
bioisosteres (Table 2), while non-classic bioisosteres were those which practically did not fit
the definitions of the first class (Table 3).
Table 2: Classic Bioisostere Groups and Atoms.
Monovalent Divalent Trivalent Tetravalent Ring Equivalent
-OH, -NH2, -CH3, -OR -CH2 =CH- =C=
-F -CI, -Br, - I, -SH, -PH2 -O- =N- =Si= N
-Si3, -SR -S- =P- =N+=
S
-Se- =As- =P+=
O
-Te- =Sb- =As
+=
=Sb+=
www.wjpps.com Vol 7, Issue 3, 2018.
415
Nidhi et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Table 3: Non-Classic Bioisosteres.
-CO- -COOH -SO2NH2 -H -CONH- -COOR -CONH2
-CO2- -SO3 -PO(OH)NH2 -F -NHCO- -ROCO- -CSNH2
-SO2- -tetrazole
-SO2NR- -SO2NHR -SO2NH2
-OH -CH2OH
-catechol
-CON- -3-hydroxyisoxazole -benzimidazole
-CH(CN)- -2-hydroxychromones -NHCONH2 C4H4S
R-S-R -NH-CS-NH2 -C5H4N
(R-O-R’) =N- -C6H5
R-N-(CN)- C(CN)=R’ -NH-C(=CHNO2)-NH2
-NH-C(=CHCN)-NH2 -C4H4NH
-halides
-CF3
-CN
-N(CN)2
-C(CN)3
CLASSICAL BIOISOSTERISM
Monovalent atoms or groups: Substitution of a hydrogen atom by a fluorine atom is one of
the most common example of classical monovalent bioisosteric replacement. The
incorporation of fluorine into a drug allows simultaneous modulation of electronic, lipophilic
and steric parameters, all can influence both the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic
properties of drug. Bioisosteric replacement of H in uracil by F gives 5-fluorouracil (anti-
cancer drug).[13,2]
Replacement of hydrogen with fluorine is one of the most common
example of monovalent isosteric replacements. Sterically H and F are quite similar with their
vander walls radii being 1.2 and 1.35A° respectively. F is most electronegative. H
replacement with F alter the biological activity as fluorine exerts strong field and inductive
effects. The strong inductive effect of F results in covalent linkage with thymidylate
synthetase, an enzyme involved in DNA synthesis.
HN
HNO
O
H
HN
HNO
O
F
Uracil 5-fluorouracil
Figure 2: Monovalent isosteric replacement of Uracil.
www.wjpps.com Vol 7, Issue 3, 2018.
416
Nidhi et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
In the antibiotic chloramphenicol, both the chlorine atoms of the dichloroacetic moiety and of
the p-nitrophenyl group yielded productive isosteric replacements (Table 4).[9]
X
HO OH
HN
O
Y
H
H
Table 4: Isosteric replacements in the amphenicol moiety.
COMPOUND X Y
Chloramphenicol -NO2 -CH-Cl2
Thiamphenicol CH3-SO2- -CH-Cl2
Cetophenicol CH3-CO- -CH-Cl2
Azidamiphenicol -NO2 -CH-N3
In 1997, Penning and coworkers suggested two classic bioisosteric monovalent group
replacements, represented by replacing the methyl group (CH3), by the amine group (NH2)
and replace the fluorine atom (F) with the CH3 group. In this research, found new anti-
inflammatory drugs acting through the selective inhibition of prostaglandin-H synthase-2
(PGHS-2) or cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), & investigated the effect of isosteric modifications
on the structure of lead compound SC-58125 (A), to improve its pharmacokinetic properties.
Both isosteric replacements, suggested allow introducing into the structure of the new
bioisosteric of SC-58125, vulnerable soft metabolic sites taking advantage of the effect of the
first passage through reactions of conjugation with glucuronic acid and the benzylic
hydroxylation catalyzed by CYP450, respectively (Figure 3).[12]
N N
CF
S
H3C
F
OO
N N
CF
S
H2N
OO
H3C
SC-58125 Celecoxib
PGHS-2 selectivity PGHS-2 selectivity
SI (COX-2/COX-1) = > 1000 SI (COX-2/COX-1) = 375
t1/2 = 211 h t1/2 = 8 to 12 h
Figure 3: Celecoxib: bioisosteric replacement of -CH3 group by -NH2 group.
www.wjpps.com Vol 7, Issue 3, 2018.
417
Nidhi et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Divalent atoms or groups: A first series of frequently interchanged divalent atoms or groups
is represented by O, S, NH and CH2 and many interesting examples are found in the
literature.
Bioisosteric replacement of carbonyl oxygen in hypoxanthine by S gives 6-mercaptopurine, a
potent anticancer antimetabolite.[13,1]
HN
NN
HN
O
HN
NN
HN
S
Hypoxanthine 6-mercaptopurine
Figure 4: Divalent isosteric replacement of Hypoxanthine.
The bioisosteric replacement of oxygen by sulfur in chlorpromazine to give the oxygen
isostere. This compound has 1/10 the soporific activity of the parent molecule.[3]
N
S
N
N
O
N
Cl Cl
Chlorpromazine Oxygen isostere of Chlorpromazine
Figure 5: Divalent isosteric replacement of Chlorpromazine.
Clonidine (A) (anti-hypertensive drug), having the greater selectivity for I1 imidazoline
receptors and less selectivity on α2-adrenoceptors and in the search for new anti-hypertensive
drugs Schann and coworkers in 2001 designed Rilmenidine (B), by the molecular
modifications in the structure of the lead compound. These modifications were based on
classical bioisosterism of divalent groups, by replacement of the divalent oxygen atom (O)
present in the oxazoline ring, by the methylene group (CH2), in the structure of new pyrroline
www.wjpps.com Vol 7, Issue 3, 2018.
418
Nidhi et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
derivative (C); and between replacement of monovalent groups illustrated by the substitution
of hydrogen atoms (H) in C-4 and C-5 of derivative by the methyl group (CH3), originating
the cis/trans-4,5-dimethyl homologue (D). The binding tests with I1R and α2-adrenoceptors
evidence that the modifications occurring in the structure of rilmenidine, allow the attainment
of derivatives with affinities comparable to lead compound, although with a superior
selectivity for I1R and illustrated an example of the success of classic bioisosterism.[8]
HN
HN
N
Cl
Cl
HNO
N
Clonodine (A) Rilmenidine (B)
HN
N
HN
N
H3C
H3C
cis/trans (D) Pyrroline derivative (C)
Figure 6: Clonidine as an example of divalent bioisosterism.
Trivalent atoms or groups: The substitution of —CH= by —N= in aromatic rings has been
one of the most successful applications of classical isosterism. This type of interchanges are
found in proceeding from desipramine to nortriptyline and protriptyline or among the
antihistaminics, when comparing ethylenediamine derived compounds with the diaryl-
propylamines.[9]
www.wjpps.com Vol 7, Issue 3, 2018.
419
Nidhi et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
N
N
H
CH3
N
H
CH3
Desipramine Nortriptyline
CH
N
H
CH3
Protriptyline
Figure 7: Example of trivalent bioisosterism shown in aromatic ring.
Tetravalent atoms or groups: A tetravalent bioisosteric replacement study was done with a
series of α-Tocopherol has been shown in figure 8 to scavenge lipoperoxyl and superoxide
radicals and to accumulate in heart tissue. This is thought to be part of its mechanism of
action for reducing cardiac damage due to myocardial infarction. All of the biosiosteric
analogues were found to produce similar biological activity.[5]
HO
O
X
X= C14H29
X= N(CH3)3
X= P(CH3)3
X= S(CH3)3
α-Tocopherol
Figure 8: Tetravalent bioisosterism in α-Tocopherol.
www.wjpps.com Vol 7, Issue 3, 2018.
420
Nidhi et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
A well known tetra substituted atom is the replacement of quaternary ammonium ion in
acetyle choline by phosphonium and arsenoium. The bioisosteres so obtained are less potent
and enhanced toxicity, hence there is no further encouragement in the synthesis of direct
acting parasympathomimetic shown in figure 9. As the size of onium ion increased, the
pharmacological activity was decreased.[28]
O
N+
O
O
P+
O
O
As+
O
Acetyl Choline Phasphonium Aresonium
Figure 9: Tetravalent bioisosterism in Acetyl Choline.
Ring Equivalent: The substitution of —CH= by —N= or —CH=CH— by —S— in aromatic
rings has been one of the most successful applications of classical isosterism. Early examples
are found in the sulphonamide antibacterials with the development of sulphapyridine,
sulphapyrimidine, sulphathiazole, etc shown in table 5.[9]
H2N S
O
N
O
H
R
Table 5: Isosteric replacements in the Sulfonamides.
COMPOUND R
Sulfapyridine
N
Sulfapyrazine
N
N
Sulfathiazole
N
S
Sulfamethoxazole O
N
CH3
www.wjpps.com Vol 7, Issue 3, 2018.
421
Nidhi et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Ring bioisosterism is Undoubtedly the most frequent relationship in drugs of different
therapeutic classes. The application of ring bioisosterism was also successfully explored by
Binder and coworkers in developing new NSAIDs of the oxican group.[22]
OH
NH
N
CH3SOO
O
N
OH
NH
NCH3S
OO
O
NS
Piroxican Tenoxican
Figure 10: Ring bioisosterism in NSAIDs.
NON-CLASSICAL BIOISOSTERISM
The majority example of non-classical bioisosteres includes the functional group
replacements in any moiety to improve its pharmacodynamics & pharmacokinetic. There are
many functional groups that contain necessary electronic and steric requirements for
biological properties. However, these functional groups can possess unwanted secondary
effects such as insufficient metabolic stability or toxicity.[5]
The term non-classical isosterism
refers to the concept in which functional groups that have similar physicochemical properties
may be interchangeable, resulting in similar biological properties. Furthermore, a non-
classical isostere may or may not have the same steric or electronic characteristics, nor even
the number of atoms, as the substituent for which it is used as a replacement.[7]
The landmark of the recognition of the importance of the bioisosterism of functional groups
is the discovery of the antibacterial properties of sulfanilamide. Sulfanilamide, an active
metabolite of Prontosil,[24]
revolutionized chemotherapy during the 30s and the later
elucidation of its mechanism of molecular action allowed evidence of the similarity of its
structure with p-aminobenzoic acid (PABA). These similarities, based on electronic and
conformational aspects, as well as the physicochemical properties such as pKa and logP,
denote an authentic bioisosteric relationship existing between the sulfonamide (SO2NH2) and
carboxylic acid functionalities (COOH) are shown in figure 11.[21]
www.wjpps.com Vol 7, Issue 3, 2018.
422
Nidhi et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
H2N S
O
NH2
OH2N C
O
OH
p-aminobenzoic acid (PABA) sulfonamide
Figure 11: Bioisosteric replacement of carboxylic acid in PABA by sulfonamide
functional group.
The tetrazole group mimics the carboxylate group, principally in terms of its physicochemical
properties related to acidity, although the former be more stable and lipophilic. These
differences allows this bioisostere to present a greater possibility of overcoming the blood-
brain-barrier, with the type of tropism favorable to the desired activity. An illustrative
example is described in the synthesis of a tetrazole bioisostere of γ-aminobutyric acid
(GABA), which presents important selective inhibitory properties of GABA-transaminase
(GABA-T) presenting a potential pharmacotherapeutic application as an anticonvulsant
agent.[19,21]
HO
NH2
O
NH2
NN
N
NH
GABA Tetrazole bioisostere of GABA
Figure 12: Replacement of carboxylic acid functional group by tetrazole in GABA.
Non-classic bioisosteric relationship can also exist in neurotransmitters like glutamate and
AMPA (2-amino-3-(3-hydroxy-5-methyl-isoxazol-4-yl)propanoic acid).[4]
HO OH
O O
NH2
OH
O
NH2
O
N
CH3
OH
Glutamic acid AMPA(2-amino-3-(3-hydroxy-5-methyl-
isoxazol-4- yl)propanoic acid)
Figure 13: Non-classic bioisosteric replacement of Glutamic acid.
www.wjpps.com Vol 7, Issue 3, 2018.
423
Nidhi et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Derivatives possessing a hydroxamic acid instead of a carboxylic acid function have been
developed as carboxylate bioisosteres. Among other examples, compounds with anti-allergic
properties presenting this function have been synthesized.[25]
Hydroxamic derivative designed
by modification in indomethacin, has proved to be metabolically stable.[20]
N
HOOC
Cl
O
CH3
O
OH
N
HOOC
Cl
O
CH3
O
N
H
OH
Indomethacin Hydroxamic derivative of
Indomethacin
Figure 14: Carboxylic functional group replaced by hydroxamic acid in Indomethacin.
Quinuclidine (B), designed by modifications in the natural alkaloid structure arecoline (A), is
an important non-selective muscarinics (M1 and M2) receptors agonist with marginal actions
on nicotinic receptors. However, the low selectivity associated with low therapeutic index
and inadequate bioavailability, have annulled its use for treating Alzheimer’s disease. In an
effort to optimize the pharmacotherapeutics profile of quinuclidine, Orlek and coworkers
proposed the exchange of the methyl ester group, present in quinuclidine, with the 3-methyl-
1,2,4-oxadiazole group in the structure of compound C shown in figure 15,[14]
being able to
identify electrostatic similarities between the methyl-oxadiazole and methyl ester groups, as
well as in the profile of muscarinic agonist activity of these derivatives. However, the
metabolic stability of methyl-oxadiazole bioisostere (C) was greater than to that found for the
quinuclidine lead compound (B), conferring to compound C a better oral bioavailability.
N
OCH3
O
CH3
N
OCH3
O
N
N
NO
CH3
Arecoline (A) Quinuclidine (B) 3-methyl-1,2,4-oxadiazole
(Bioisostere of Quinuclidine)
Figure 15: Bioisosteric replacement of ester functional group.
www.wjpps.com Vol 7, Issue 3, 2018.
424
Nidhi et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Nonetheless, bioisosteric replacement of the ester with oxazole and other heteroaromatics
may not be universally effective, as demonstrated in the design and synthesis of a series of
highly selective and potent phenylalanine derived CCR2 antagonists as anti-inflammatory
agents. While compound A was highly effective in blocking both the binding and the
functional activity of a number of CCR3 agonists, compound B lacks all CCR affinity which
suggests a more subtle role for the ester moiety that the heterocycles were unable to mimic.[6]
NH
O
O
O
CH3
NO
NH
O
NO
N
O
A B
Figure 16: Bioisosteric replacement of the ester with oxazole.
Retroisosterism: Retroisosterism is based on the inversion of a determined functional group
present in the lead compound structure, producing an isostere with the same function. This
bioisosteric strategy aims to optimize the pharmacotherapeutic properties of the original lead
compound, thus aiding in optimizing the profile of interaction with the bioreceptor in
designing drugs with half-lives more adequate for therapeutic use and may even be used in
the attempt to avoid the formation of potentially toxic metabolic intermediates.
R O
R
O
R
O R
O
Retroisosterism
In 1998, Lages and coworkers described the existing retroisosteric relationship between the
methylsulfonylamine and methylsulfonamide functions present in the structures of new
selective COX-2 inhibitor lead compounds A and B. This type of retroisosteric relationship
confers metabolic susceptibility and distinct pKa values between compounds A and B, while
the greatest activity found for the methylsulfonamide derivative A may be explained
considering the profile of interaction of this group with the Arg513 and Ser353 amino acid
residues present at the catalytic site of COX-2, favored in A when compared to the B
retroisostere.[11]
www.wjpps.com Vol 7, Issue 3, 2018.
425
Nidhi et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
O
O
N
S H
H3C
OO
O
O
S
N
H3C
H
O
O
Retroisosterism
Methylsulfonylamine derivative (A) Methylsulfonamide derivative (B)
Figure 17: Retroisosteric relationship between the methylsulfonylamine and
methylsulfonamide functions.
CONCLUSION
Among these numerous examples which used in the strategy of bioisosterism for designing
new pharmacotherapeutically attractive substances, there is a significant predominance on
non-classic bioisosterism, distributed in distinct therapeutic categories, be they selective
receptor antagonist or agonist drugs, enzymatic inhibitors or anti-metabolites. The use of
classic bioisosterism for the structural design of new drugs, while less numerous, has also
been carried out successfully. The correct use of bioisosterism demands physical, chemical,
electronic and conformational parameters involved in the planned bioisosteric substitution,
carefully analyzed so as to predict, although theoretically, any eventual alterations in terms of
the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties which the new bioisosteric substance
presents.
REFERENCES
1. Avendaño C, Menéndez JC. Medicinal chemistry of anticancer drugs, Elsevier ScienceP
2008.
2. Campos J, Saniger E, Marchal JA, Aiello S, Suarez I, Boulaiz H, Aranega A, Gallo MA,
Espinosa A. Current medicinal chemistry, 2005; 12: 1423.
3. Randy H. Remington: The Science and Practice of Pharmacy (ed.), 21th ed., New York;
Lippincott Williams and Wilkins: 2005.
4. Lima LM, Barreiro EJ. Bioisosterism: A useful strategy for molecular modification and
drug design. Curr. Med. Chem., 2005; 12: 23-49.
www.wjpps.com Vol 7, Issue 3, 2018.
426
Nidhi et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
5. Patidar AK. Bioisosteres and bioisosteric replacement: A useful strategy for structural
modification of lead compound in drug design and in drug discovery. Inter. J. Pharma. R.
& D. 2005.
6. Chen X, Wang W. Ann. Rep. Med. Chem., 2003; 38: 333.
7. Herr RS. 5-Substituted-1H-tetrazoles as Carboxylic Acid Isosteres: Medicinal Chemistry
and Synthetic Methods. Bio. & Med. Chem., 2002; 10: 3379–3393.
8. Schann S, Bruban V, Pompermayer K, Feldman J, Pfeiffer J, Renard P, Scalbert E,
Bousquet P, Ehrhardt JD. J. Med. Chem., 2001; 44: 1588.
9. Wermuth CG. Wermuth’s The Practice of Medicinal Chemistry, 2nd
ed., London,
Acedemic Press, 2000; 189-214.
10. Abraham DJ. Burger’s Medicinal Chemistry & Drug Discovery, 6th
ed., Wiley inter
science, 1998; 1: 689-694.
11. Lages AS, Silva da KCM, Miranda ALP, Fraga CAM, Barreiro EJ. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett., 1998; 8: 183.
12. Penning TD, Talley JJ, Bertenshaw SR, Carter JS, Collins PW, Docter S, Graneto MJ,
Lee LF, Malecha JW, Miyashiro JM, Rogers RS, Rogier DJ, Yu SS, Anderson GD,
Burton EG, Cogburn JN, Gregory SA, Koboldt CM, Perkins WE, Seibert K, Veenhuizen
AW, Zhang YY, Isakson PC. J. Med. Chem., 1997; 40: 1347.
13. Patani GA, Lavoie EJ. Chemical reviews, 1996; 96: 3147.
14. Orlek BS, Blaney FE, Brown F, Clark MSG, Hadley MS, Hatcher J, Riley GJ, Rosenberg
HE, Wadsworth HJ, Wyman P. J. Med. Chem., 1991; 34: 2726.
15. Burger, A. Prog. Drug Res., 1991; 37: 287.
16. Swapna GVT, Jagannadh B, Gurjar MK, Kunwar AC. Biochemical and Biophysical
Research Communications., 1989; 164: 1086.
17. Korolkovas A. Essentials of Medicinal Chemistry, 2nd
ed.; Wiley: NY, EUA, 1988; 80.
18. Kees KL, Mussere JH, Chang J, Skowronek M, Lewis AJ. J. Med. Chem., 1986; 29:
2239.
19. Almquist RG, Chao WR, Jennings-White C. J. Med. Chem., 1985; 28: 1067.
20. Casey FH. Ann. Rept. Med. Chem., 1982; 17: 203.
21. Korolkovas A, Burckhalter JH. Quimica Farmaceutica. 1982; Rio de Janeiro, R.J. Editora
Guanabara Dois, 62.
22. Wiseman EH, Lombardino JSS, Lednicer D. Chronicles of Drug Discovery., 1982; Vol.
1, 1st ed.; NY, EUA., Wiley.
23. Krogsgaard-Larsen P, Christensen AV. Ann. Rept. Med. Chem., 1980; 15: 41.
www.wjpps.com Vol 7, Issue 3, 2018.
427
Nidhi et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
24. Gingell R, Bridges JW. Biochemical Journal., 1971; 24: 125.
25. Burger A. Medicinal Chemistry, 3rd
ed.; Wiley: NY, EUA, 1970; 127.
26. Friedman HL. Influence of Isosteric Replacements upon Biological Activity; National
Academy of Science., 1951; 295.
27. Erlenmeyer H, Leo M. Helv. Chim. Acta., 1932; 15: 1171.
28. Hunt R, Renshaw R. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 1925; 25:
315.