22
Bioinformatics Ayesha M.Khan Spring 2013

Bioinformatics

  • Upload
    lolita

  • View
    19

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Bioinformatics. Ayesha M.Khan Spring 2013. Phylogenetic Basics. One central field in biology is to infer the relation between species. Do they possess a common ancestor? When did they separate from each other? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Bioinformatics

Bioinformatics

Ayesha M.KhanSpring 2013

Page 2: Bioinformatics

2

Phylogenetic BasicsOne central field in biology is to infer the relation between species. Do they possess a common ancestor? When did they separate from each other?

Phylogenetics is the study of evolutionary relationships among and within species.

Phylogenetics is the field of systematics that focuses on evolutionary relationships between organisms or genes/proteins (phylogeny).Systematics: an attempt to understand the interrelationships of living things

Page 3: Bioinformatics

3

Phylogenetic Basics (contd.)

•The actual pattern of evolutionary history is thephylogeny or evolutionary tree which we try to estimate.

• A tree is a mathematical structure which is used to model the actual evolutionary history of a group of sequences or organisms.

Page 4: Bioinformatics

4

Phylogenetic Basics (contd.)•Homologues are similar sequences in two different organisms that have been derived from a common ancestor sequence.

• Orthologues are similar sequences in two different organisms that have arisen due to a speciation event. Orthologs typically retain identical or similar functionality throughout evolution.

• Paralogues are similar sequences within a single organism that have arisen due to a gene duplication event. They tend to have differing functions.

• Xenologues are similar sequences that do not share the same evolutionary origin, but rather have arisen out of horizontal transfer events through symbiosis, viruses, etc.

Page 5: Bioinformatics

Early globin gene

mouse

ß-chain gene-chain gene

cattle ß human ß mouse ßhuman cattle

Orthologs () Orthologs (ß)Paralogs (cattle)

Homologs

Gene Duplication

Orthologs – diverged after speciation – tend to have similar function

Paralogs – diverged after gene duplication – some functional divergence occurs

For linking similar genes between species, or performing “annotation transfer”, identify orthologs

Page 6: Bioinformatics

6

Molecular phylogeneticsWhy focus on molecular phylogenies in contrast to phylogenies which are based on characteristics like wings, feathers, etc, i.e. morphological characters?

With molecular phylogenetics, the differences between organisms are measured on the proteins and RNA coded in the DNA, i.e. on amino acid and nucleotide sequences.

Page 7: Bioinformatics

7

Molecular phylogenetics (contd.)

Also, molecular phylogenetics is more precise than its counterpart based on external features and behavior and can also distinguish small organism like bacteria or even viruses.the DNA must be inherited and connects all speciesthe molecular phylogenetics can be based on mathematical and statistical methods and is even model-based as mutations can be modeled, remote homologies can be detectedthe distance is not only based on one feature but on many genes.

Page 8: Bioinformatics

8

Molecular Phylogeny AnalysisMolecular phylogeny methods allow, from a given set of aligned sequences, the suggestion of phylogenetic trees (inferred trees) which aim at reconstructing the history of successive divergence which took place during the evolution, between the considered sequences and their common ancestor. These trees may not be the same as the true tree.

• Reconstruction of phylogenetic trees is a statistical problem, and a reconstructed tree is an estimate of a true tree with a given topology and given branch length;• In practice, phylogenetic analyses usually generate phylogenetic trees with accurate parts and imprecise parts.

Page 9: Bioinformatics

9

Key features of molecular phylogenetic trees

Page 10: Bioinformatics

10

Molecular Phylogeny Analysis (contd.)Sequences reflect relationshipsAfter working with sequences for a while, one develops an intuitive understanding that for a given gene, closely related organisms have similar sequences and more distantly related organisms have more dissimilar sequences. These differences can be quantified.Given a set of gene sequences, it should be possible to reconstruct the evolutionary relationships among genes and among organisms.

Page 11: Bioinformatics

11

Example: Pseudomonas aeruginosa- one of the top three causes of opportunistic infections, noted for its antimicrobial resistance and resistance to detergents.

Page 12: Bioinformatics

12

Phylogenetic tree construction

Consider the set of sequences to analyse

Align "properly" these sequences

Apply phylogenetic making tree methods

Evaluate statistically the obtained phylogenetic tree

Page 13: Bioinformatics

13

Choose set of related sequences

Obtain multiple alignment

Is there a strong similarity?

Maximum parsimony(strong)

Distance methods(weak)Maximum

likelihood (very weak)

Yes

NoNo

Page 14: Bioinformatics

14

Phylogenetic tree construction methodsThree categories of methods exist:distance-based, maximum parsimony, and maximum likelihood.

•Distance methods: evolutionary distances are computed for all sequences and build tree where distance between sequences “matches” these distances•Maximum parsimony (MP): choose tree that minimizes number of changes required to explain data•Maximum likelihood (ML): Creates all possible trees containing the set of organisms considered and then find the tree which gives the highest likelihood of the observed data

Page 15: Bioinformatics

15

Neighbor-joining (distance-based)

Maximum parsimony

Maximum likelihood

Very fast Slow Very slow

Easily trapped in local optima

Assumptions fail when evolution is rapid

Highly dependent on assumed evolution model

Good for generating tentative tree, or choosing among multiple trees

Best option when tractable (<30 taxa, strong conservation)

Good for very small data sets and for testing trees built using other methods

Comparison of different tree-construction methods

Page 16: Bioinformatics

Case Study I : Phylogenetic Trees

Get a multiple sequence alignment

C1 C2 C3 S1 A A GS2 A A AS3 G G AS4 A G A

Construct a Tree using any suitable method(Parsimony, ML, etc..)

16

Page 17: Bioinformatics

17

Evaluation• For example, how confident are we

that two sequences are in the same clade ?

• What is the probability distribution of our confidence of the branches ?

• Bootstrap can provide a way of determining this (first thought of by Felsenstein, 1985)

Page 18: Bioinformatics

18

Bootstrap: basic idea•Originally, from some list of data, one computes an object.•Create an artificial list by randomly drawing elements from that list.

-Some elements will be picked more than once. •Compute a new object.•Repeat 100-1000 times and look at the distribution of these objects.

Page 19: Bioinformatics

19

Page 20: Bioinformatics

20

• Original object O (a tree) is computed from a “list of data” (sequences)• Construct a new list, with the same number of elements, from the original list by randomly picking elements from the list. Any one element from the list can be picked any number of times.• Compute new object, call it On• Repeat the process many times (typically 100-1000).• The elements {O1 , O2 , ……} are assumed to be taken from a statistical distribution, so one can compute averages, variances, etc.

Page 21: Bioinformatics

21

A model for the bootstrap

The numbers at the branches are confidence values based on Felsenstein’s bootstrap method. B=200 bootstrap replications

•Basically, we are calculating the proportion of bootstrap trees agreeing with the original tree.•‘Agreeing’ refers to the topology of the trees

Page 22: Bioinformatics

22