26
biodesign.stanford.edu/challenge

biodesign.stanford.edu/challenge Who (organizers): ssb.stanford.edu otl.stanford.edu bdn.stanford.edu

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: biodesign.stanford.edu/challenge Who (organizers): ssb.stanford.edu otl.stanford.edu bdn.stanford.edu

biodesign.stanford.edu/challenge

Page 2: biodesign.stanford.edu/challenge Who (organizers): ssb.stanford.edu otl.stanford.edu bdn.stanford.edu

Who (organizers):

ssb.stanford.edu

otl.stanford.edu

bdn.stanford.edu

Page 3: biodesign.stanford.edu/challenge Who (organizers): ssb.stanford.edu otl.stanford.edu bdn.stanford.edu

Medical DeviceInvention Challenges

Page 4: biodesign.stanford.edu/challenge Who (organizers): ssb.stanford.edu otl.stanford.edu bdn.stanford.edu

Invention Challenges - purpose:

To stimulate medical technologyinnovation at Stanford

using real-world problems

Participants experience the process of innovation & learn basic issues of

biomedical technology development

Page 5: biodesign.stanford.edu/challenge Who (organizers): ssb.stanford.edu otl.stanford.edu bdn.stanford.edu
Page 6: biodesign.stanford.edu/challenge Who (organizers): ssb.stanford.edu otl.stanford.edu bdn.stanford.edu

Invention Challenge #1: Can You Invent a Better Approach to Anastomosis?

Invention Challenge #1: Can You Invent a Better Approach to Anastomosis?

USPT0: 60/136707USPT0: 60/136707

Page 7: biodesign.stanford.edu/challenge Who (organizers): ssb.stanford.edu otl.stanford.edu bdn.stanford.edu

The Problem: Repair and replacement of the arthriticknee joint is difficult due to limited access and poor visualization. People who have total knee replacement must decrease theiractivity level and face re-operation as theprosthetic knee will degrade over time.

The Challenge: Invent a minimally invasive approach to diagnose or treat osteoarthritis of the kneejoint. Your invention should ultimately result in faster recovery time, easier and more costeffective rehabilitation and have the potentialto allow patients to return to greater activity.

Page 8: biodesign.stanford.edu/challenge Who (organizers): ssb.stanford.edu otl.stanford.edu bdn.stanford.edu

USPT0: 60/202276USPT0: 60/202276

Page 9: biodesign.stanford.edu/challenge Who (organizers): ssb.stanford.edu otl.stanford.edu bdn.stanford.edu
Page 10: biodesign.stanford.edu/challenge Who (organizers): ssb.stanford.edu otl.stanford.edu bdn.stanford.edu

Invention Challenge #4

“Medical Device for Biologic Detection or Monitoring”

Develop device for the detection and/or monitoring of biologic factors.

Your approach can be remote, implantable, wireless, interface with the Internet, etc.

The monitoring, sensing or detection activity should aid in the prevention, diagnosis or monitoring of a biologic condition.

Page 11: biodesign.stanford.edu/challenge Who (organizers): ssb.stanford.edu otl.stanford.edu bdn.stanford.edu

Examples…

• SenseWear Armband (BodyMedia)

• Sports Performance• Sensors gather data

for: movement, heat flow, galvanic skin response.

• www.bodymedia.com

Page 12: biodesign.stanford.edu/challenge Who (organizers): ssb.stanford.edu otl.stanford.edu bdn.stanford.edu

Examples…

• SmartAid (Battelle)• Wound care• Vital sign monitoring• Real-time

therapeutic delivery• www.battelle.org

Page 13: biodesign.stanford.edu/challenge Who (organizers): ssb.stanford.edu otl.stanford.edu bdn.stanford.edu

Examples…

• Breast Self Examiner (Parsons School of Design)

• In-home mammography system

• Self exam > transfer data to a communication device > info transmitted to MD

Page 14: biodesign.stanford.edu/challenge Who (organizers): ssb.stanford.edu otl.stanford.edu bdn.stanford.edu

Markets• Consumer collect, store, process, transmit,

present physiological & lifestyle data:– Calories burned– Activity level (metabolism)– Sleep states

• Clinical devices used in hospitals, clinics by healthcare providers

• Biological warfare detection/antiterrorism and military (battlefield medicine, detection)

Page 15: biodesign.stanford.edu/challenge Who (organizers): ssb.stanford.edu otl.stanford.edu bdn.stanford.edu

Resources

• Popular and scientific literature– Scientific American, Science, Nature,

New England Journal of Medicine

• Patent resources– US Patent & Trade Office www.uspto.gov– “Patent It Yourself”– OTL http://otl.stanford.edu (for inventors)

Page 16: biodesign.stanford.edu/challenge Who (organizers): ssb.stanford.edu otl.stanford.edu bdn.stanford.edu

Judges

Dennis Fernandez (Fernandez & Assoc.)

Peter Fitzgerald, MD, PhD (Chair, Cardiology, EE)

Raman Khanna (Diamondhead Ventures)

Jonathan Root, MD (U.S. Venture Partners)

Mark Zdeblick (Spring Ridge Ventures)

Page 17: biodesign.stanford.edu/challenge Who (organizers): ssb.stanford.edu otl.stanford.edu bdn.stanford.edu

Evaluation Criteria

•Innovation•Practicality•Ease of Use•Economic Impact•Likelihood of Commercialization

Page 18: biodesign.stanford.edu/challenge Who (organizers): ssb.stanford.edu otl.stanford.edu bdn.stanford.edu

Evaluation Criteria - INNOVATION

1. Is this a truly novel approach to the

problem?

2. Does the proposal show a thorough

understanding of related principles

and prior work?

3. How does the proposal compare

against known products. Cite specific

strengths & weaknesses

Page 19: biodesign.stanford.edu/challenge Who (organizers): ssb.stanford.edu otl.stanford.edu bdn.stanford.edu

Evaluation Criteria - PRACTICALITY

• Is the proposal reasonable in

terms of engineering and

manufacturing?

Page 20: biodesign.stanford.edu/challenge Who (organizers): ssb.stanford.edu otl.stanford.edu bdn.stanford.edu

Evaluation Criteria – EASE OF USE

• Would the intended user

(healthcare professional or

consumer) be able to use the

device?

Page 21: biodesign.stanford.edu/challenge Who (organizers): ssb.stanford.edu otl.stanford.edu bdn.stanford.edu

Evaluation Criteria – ECONOMIC IMPACT

• Is the expected cost for this

approach practical considering

the potential benefit/value and

comparable commercialized

products, if any?

Page 22: biodesign.stanford.edu/challenge Who (organizers): ssb.stanford.edu otl.stanford.edu bdn.stanford.edu

Evaluation Criteria

– COMMERCIALIZATION POTENTIAL

• Overall rating

- patenting

- potential for licensing and/or

start up

Page 23: biodesign.stanford.edu/challenge Who (organizers): ssb.stanford.edu otl.stanford.edu bdn.stanford.edu

• Wednesday, May 14– Challenge Submissions Due

• Week of May 26th

– Finalist Presentations to Panel

Important Dates

Page 24: biodesign.stanford.edu/challenge Who (organizers): ssb.stanford.edu otl.stanford.edu bdn.stanford.edu

• BME Distinguished Lecture Event

• Medical device projects exhibition

• Fairchild Auditorium (begins 2pm)

Award Presentation – June 2nd, 4:15pm

Page 25: biodesign.stanford.edu/challenge Who (organizers): ssb.stanford.edu otl.stanford.edu bdn.stanford.edu

biodesign.stanford.edu/challenge

Page 26: biodesign.stanford.edu/challenge Who (organizers): ssb.stanford.edu otl.stanford.edu bdn.stanford.edu

• Challenge Schedule

• How to Participate

• Forming Teams

• Submission Guidelines

• Evaluation Criteria & Judges

• Selection Process

• Working with OTL

• FAQ’s & Lessons Learned

For more info…http://biodesign.stanford.edu/challenge