15
Does Altruism Differ Between Isogenic and Unrelated Fruit Flies? Cigdem Demirez Soham Bhatia Bio318Y March.20.2012 http://www.littlebrownbooks.net/sedaris/

Bio318 Final Presentationn

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Bio318 Final Presentationn

Does Altruism Differ Between Isogenic and Unrelated Fruit

Flies?

Cigdem DemirezSoham BhatiaBio318YMarch.20.2012http://www.littlebrownbooks.net/sedaris/

Page 2: Bio318 Final Presentationn

Altruism, Kin Selection and Indirect Fitness

• no study on Drosophila•Altruism = sacrificial1

•Kin selection: favour relatives2

•Indirect fitness: benefits self through relatives3

1- Kropotkin, Peter. (1902). Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution.2- Darwin, Charles. (1859). Origin of Species. 3- Hamilton, W.D. (1964). The Genetic Evolution of Social Behaviour. J. of Theo. Bio. 7 (1): 1-16.

http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-14703082/stock-photo-male-common-fruit-fly-drosophila-melanogaster

Page 3: Bio318 Final Presentationn

Drosophila melanogaster

Amsel, Sheri. www.exploringnature.org

•Wild type -Isogeny: +; BB; +BB

•Sexually Dimorphic -easy to differentiate sexes•Short life cycle: -20 to 30 days4 -can study many generations

Page 4: Bio318 Final Presentationn

Hypothesis: Fruit flies will show greater altruism in sharing food, if at all, towards genetically identical individuals (isogenic) than towards unrelated individuals.

Prediction: If Drosophila are altruistic, a pair of isogenic flies will statistically differ less in time spent at food source in comparison to an unrelated pair.

Do fruit flies share more with genetically identical versus unrelated flies, if at all?

Page 5: Bio318 Final Presentationn

Experimental Protocol1- Rear Flies

2- Experimental trials: 5 groups• pair of: isogenic males isogenic females unrelated males unrelated females•Control: single males & females 3- Record Measurements • time spent at food source within 5 minutes

Page 6: Bio318 Final Presentationn

1- Rearing Flies

Isogenic M Strain and C Strain

9 families each5

•Sucrose based food•21 ºC•12h light/dark cycle•Relatively humid

5-Simon, A.F. et. al. (2012). A simple assay to study social behaviour in Drosophila: measurement of social space within a group. Genes Brain and Behaviour. 11(2): 243-252.

Page 7: Bio318 Final Presentationn

2- Experimental Trials

Isogenic Group: n=30 pairs of - males - females

• 15 pairs for each strain Unrelated Group: n=30 pairs of - males - femalesControl Group: n=30 single - males - females

Page 8: Bio318 Final Presentationn

3- Measurement

•Food deprive for 24 h•Pair similar flies•Measure time spent at food source by each fly•5 minute trials•Time of day: 11 a.m. - 3 p.m.•Assumptions - each fly equally interested to feed

Page 9: Bio318 Final Presentationn

Analyzing Variables

•Independent variable: Categorical: -level of relatedness -gender•Response variable: Continuous: time spent at food source•Statistical Test:

non-parametric: Mann-Whitney U test

Page 10: Bio318 Final Presentationn

No difference in sharing between genetically identical and

unrelated flies

i u0

20

40

60

80

100

120

male female

Avg

Diff

eren

ce i

n Ti

me

Page 11: Bio318 Final Presentationn

Male Female

Isogenic vs UnrelatedU = 538 P = 0.207

U = 538P = 0.193

Isogenic vs ControlU = 470 P = 0.476

U = 499P = 0.312

Unrelated vs ControlU = 380 P = 0.225

U = 407P = 0.312

All p-values > α (0.05)All U-values > Ucrit (317)

No significance in Values

Page 12: Bio318 Final Presentationn

Conclusion: No difference in sharing between genetically identical and unrelated flies

Hypothesis: Fruit flies will show greater altruism in sharing food, if at all, towards genetically identical individuals (isogenic) than towards unrelated individuals.

Prediction: If Drosophila are altruistic, a pair of isogenic flies will statistically differ less in time spent at food source in comparison to an unrelated pair.

Page 13: Bio318 Final Presentationn

Why did our predictions fail?

1- No knowledge of the degree to how genetically unrelated strains are2- Variation in attraction to food 3- Spatial factor

Page 14: Bio318 Final Presentationn

Alternative Hypotheses

1- Flies do not have the sharing behaviour because they are genetically adapted to being exposed to ample food resources

2- Drosophila were not eating to conserve food

6- Kent, C. et. al. (2009). The Drosophila foraging gene mediates adult plasticity and gene-environment interactions in behaviour, metabolites and gene expression in response to food deprivation

Page 15: Bio318 Final Presentationn

Conclusions

Drosophila not shown to share more with genetically identical flies than unrelated

flies

http://images.ask.com/fr?q=fruit+fly+in+lab&desturi=httpbwidth