178

Bio Geo Publication

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

geology 2013

Citation preview

  • STANDARDS FOR BIO-GEO DATABASE

    Editors

    Nisha Mendiratta

    R Siva Kumar

    K S Rao

    Natural Resources Data Management System (NRDMS)Department of Science and Technology (DST)

    Ministry of Science and TechnologyGovernment of India

    V E R S I O N 1

  • Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology,Government of India, 2008

    ISBN 978-81-7993-151-6

    All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means with-out prior permission of Department of Science and Technology.

    Suggested format for citation

    Mendiratta N, Siva Kumar R, and Rao K S (eds). 2008Stardards for Bio-geo Database, Version 1New Delhi: TERI (The Energy and Resources Institute)

    Conceived and published byNatural Resources Data Management System (NRDMS) DivisionDepartment of Science and Technology (DST)Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of IndiaTechnology Bhavan, New Mehrauli RoadNew Delhi - 110 016Tel. 2656 7373 Email [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] 2651 9530 Web http://nrdms.gov.in

    Publishing services provided by TERI PressThe Energy and Resources Institute Tel. 2468 2100 or 4150 4900Darbari Seth Block Fax 2468 2144 or 2468 2145IHC Complex India +91 Delhi (0) 11Lodhi Road E-mail [email protected] Delhi 110 003/India Web www.teriin.org

    Photographs on cover (clockwise from left to right): landscape of Megadwatershed; hyacinth macaws; and amaranth crop

    Printed in India by Batra Art Press, New Delhi

  • C O N T E N T S

    Foreword ......... v

    Preface ......... vii

    Contr ibutors ......... ix

    Bionotes ......... xi

    S E C T I O N 1 An introduction to bio-geo data standards ......... 1

    Nisha Mendiratta

    S E C T I O N 2 Land use and land cover codes ......... 11

    T S Kachhwaha, S P S Kushwaha,

    R K Sood, R Thapa

    S E C T I O N 3 Soil resource codification ......... 27

    C S Walia and T S Kachhwaha

    S E C T I O N 4 Biological codes ......... 113

    K S Rao, J C Rana, R M Shar ma,Archana Singh

    Annexure 1 ......... 165

    List of insti tutions and subject exper ts

    Annexure 2 ......... 171

    Examples of integ ration of data for the Moolbar i watershed

  • F O R E W O R D

    The sustainable development of a nation is closely relatedto careful and balanced utilization of naturalresources. The Himalayan ecosystem, though fragile, hasbeen a valuable asset for India in this context. The Department of

    Science and Technology, through the Natural Resources Data

    Management System (NRDMS), has prepared a Bio-geo Database

    and Ecological Modelling for Himalayas.

    Research teams drawn from as many as eleven agencies and

    institutions have participated in the development of this valuable

    database. It is a collective effort catalysed by the Department of

    Science and Technology. This effort strives to provide a codification

    scheme based on nationally accepted standards. I do hope that

    this effort would be further fortified in the course of time.

    I congratulate all people involved and concerned.

    (T Ramasami)

    Secretary, Department of Science and Technology,

    Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of India

  • P R E F A C E

    India, which became a signatory to the Global BiodiversityInformation Facility as an associate member in 2001,is taking great str ides in collating, compiling, anddocumenting data on land use, soil, and biological standards.

    The data is being made available to the general public. While

    most efforts are focused on making the information accessible

    through developing meta-data standards, very few have

    attempted to develop a database based on the users perspective

    and use it in local-level planning. Though efforts had been made

    to reach a consensus by involving all stakeholders in the

    initiatives that took place three years ago, some of the users

    may not agree with these standards. As the evolution of

    standards is a continuous process, we await their comments

    for their improvement. Obviously, due to the fact that most

    databases addressed the issues at macro level and micro level,

    the databases are not available.

    The present efforts by the NRDMS (Natural Resources Data

    Management System) Division of the DST (Department of

    Science and Technology) in developing a coordinated

    programme on Bio-geo Database and Ecological Modelling for

    the Himalayas address the issues of micro-level database

    development and the use of such database for local development

    planning. The programme specifically addresses the issue of

    codification of data elements for such a database, which could

    become the starting point for national/international standards.

    While some codifications exist at land use and land cover level,

  • none exist in the domains of soil and biological elements. This

    document presents the efforts of the programme in developing the

    codes and a first version of the codes for public use.

    Any such effort needs the sustained support of programmes and

    participants. Through this unique coordinated sub-programme, we have

    taken the next step forward to develop the codification standards for

    bio-geo databases. We would like to thank all the participating institutes

    and the consultative team for their feedback and comments. Also,

    special thanks are due to the project investigators of the Bio-geo

    Database Programme, who have contributed in giving shape to this

    manuscript.

    We hope this attempt will ignite the scientific spirit among all

    stakeholders to look at the present effort and strengthen it or develop

    alternative viable approaches to codification, to enable the country to

    stand as a leader in the field.

    Nisha MendirattaR Siva Kumar

    K S Rao

    viii

    Preface

  • C O N T R I B U T O R S

    Ms Nisha MendirattaScientist E/Additional DirectorNatural Resources Data Management System DivisionDepartment of Science and TechnologyNew Delhi

    Dr R K SoodDirector and Jt Member SecretaryHimachal State Council of Science and Technology, Simla

    Dr T S KachhwahaScientist G and HeadForest Resources and Ecology DivisionUP Remote Sensing Applications CentreDepartment of Space, Lucknow

    Dr S P S Kushwaha/ProfessorScientist G and HeadForestry and Ecology DivisionIndian Institute of Remote Sensing, Dehra Dun

    Dr K S RaoReaderCentre for Interdisciplinary Studies ofMountain and Hill EnvironmentAcademic Research CentreUniversity of Delhi, Delhi

    Dr C S WaliaPr ScientistNational Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use PlanningNew Delhi

    Mr R ThapaScientistHimachal Pradesh Remote Sensing Application Centre, Simla

  • Dr J C RanaScientistNational Bureau of Plant Genetic ResourcesRegional StationPhagli, Simla

    Dr R M SharmaScientist, Zoological Survey of IndiaVijaynagarJabalpur 482 002

    Dr Archana SinghResearch AssociateNational Bureau of Plant Genetic ResourcesRegional StationPhagli, Simla

    x

    Contributors

  • B I O N O T E S

    Nisha Mendiratta

    Nisha Mendiratta is presently working as Scientist E/AdditionalDirector in the DST (Department of Science and Technology). Shegraduated in physics from Delhi University in 1987 and did herpostgraduation in agricultural physics from the IARI (Indian AgriculturalResearch Institute), New Delhi, in 1989, followed by a postgraduatediploma course in Satellite Remote Sensing and GIS at the IndianInstitute of Remote Sensing, Department of Space, Dehra Dun.

    She started her professional career in 1990 as Scientist B at the NRSA(National Remote Sensing Agency), Hyderabad, of the Department ofSpace. She carried out core research in the field of microwave remotesensing applications for soil moisture estimation. She then joined theIIRS (Indian Institute of Remote Sensing), Dehra Dun, as a faculty in1991 and carried out intensive research in crop characterization usingsatellite data. She joined the NCMRWF (National Centre for MediumRange Weather Forecasting) Programme of the DST as Senior ScientificOfficer in 1992 and worked for range weather forecasting and cropweather modelling. In 1998, she joined the NRDMS (Natural ResourcesData Management System) Division of the DST as Scientist and hasbeen working in the specialized domain of natural resourcesmanagement.

    She is the recipient of the meritorious PG fellowships at the IARI. Shehas several research papers/articles to her credit, which have been eitherpublished or presented at various national and international fora.

    R Siva Kumar

    Brigadier R Siva Kumar obtained his PhD from the Indian Institute ofTechnology, Delhi. He served in army headquarters as Director, MilitarySurvey, and has been involved in framing and implementation of policies.At present he is head of the NRDMS and CEO, NSDI (National SpatialData Infrastructure) of the DST, spearheading the NSDI movement.He has travelled abroad widely and has studied various national mappingorganizations and spatial data infrastructure in developed countries.He has served as a member of many expert groups and is currently theMember Secretary of National Spatial Data Committee.

  • Brigadier Siva Kumar has been the recipient of a number of honoursand awards. He was awarded the Dolezal Prize of the International Societyfor Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing in the Congress at Held, Vienna,in 1996. He was awarded the Tat Scholarships for Study Abroad and theNetherlands Government Fellowship. Papers presented by him have wonprizes from the National Research and Development Corporation.

    K S Rao

    Dr Kottapalli Sreenivasa Rao is presently Reader (Associate Professor)at the Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies of Mountain and HillEnvironment, University of Delhi. After completing his PhD in 1987 heworked briefly (1987/88) as Mulberry agronomist at the CentralSericulture Research and Training Institute, Berhampur (West Bengal).He joined the G B Pant Institute of Himalayan Environment andDevelopment, an autonomous Institute of the Ministry of Environmentand Forests, Government of India, in 1989 and served the institute invarious capacities till 2003. During his tenure at this institute, Dr Raoled an interdisciplinary team of scientists on various aspects of sustainabledevelopment of fragile mountain ecosystems. Dr Rao has travelledextensively in the Himalayas and collaborated with several internationalscientists on various aspects of mountain development.

    Dr Rao is currently involved in academic work related to bio-geo databaseand ecological modelling in the Himalayas and biodiversity assessmentin critical ecosystems in hill and mountain regions. He has so far published16 books and more than 150 research publications in both national andinternational scientific journals. He is a member of various academicscientific societies such as the National Academy of Sciences, Allahabad,and Fellow of the National Institute of Ecology. He was awarded VishishtVaigyanik Puraskar in 2005 by the Ministry of Environment and Forests,Government of India, for his extensive work on the Nanda Devi BiosphereReserve.

    xii

    Bionotes

  • SE C T I O N 1

    A N I N T R O D U C T I O NT O B I O - G E O D A T AS T A N D A R D S

  • Background

    The NRDMS (Natural Resources Data Management System), a scienceand technology programme of the Government of India, was launchedby the DST (Department of Science and Technology) to catalyse the evolution

    of methodologies and techniques for formulating development strategies in a

    scenario of large diversity of data sets, data users and data generating agencies.

    This programme aims at developing and demonstrating the use of spatial

    decision support tools for integrated planning and management of resources

    at the local level and caters to the following aspects.

    Develop district-level resource profiles on natural resources and other

    allied sectors based on the concepts of GIS (geographic information

    system).

    Provide software support for data management, modelling, and operation

    research.

    Demonstrate the use of resource profiles and GIS methodology in micro-

    level planning.

    Promote R&D (research and development) in spatial data management

    technology.

    Train scientists and potential users.

    Forge linkages with the users at different levels.

    Carry out documentation and dissemination of the NRDMS methodology.

    AN INTRODUCTION TO BIO-GEO

    DATA STANDARDS SEC

    TI

    ON

    1

    SE

    CT

    IO

    N

    1S

    EC

    TI

    ON

    1

    SE

    CT

    IO

    N

    1

    Nisha Mendiratta

  • 4Standards for bio-geo database

    Under the NRDMS, databases are the backbone to pursue and implement

    various R&D activities. These databases perform the following functions.

    Make data available to scientists Published data may be difficult to

    find or access, and collecting it from the literature is very time consuming.

    Moreover, not all data is actually published in an article. As much as

    possible, a particular type of information should be available in one single

    place (book, site, database).

    Make data available in computer-readable form Since the analysis

    of data involves computers, data in computer-readable form (rather than

    printed on paper) is necessary.

    The computer became the storage medium of choice as soon as it was

    accessible to ordinary scientists. Databases were distributed on tape, and later,

    on various kinds of disks. When universities and academic institutes were

    connected to the Internet or its precursors (national computer networks), it

    is easy to understand why the Internet became the medium of choice. Further,

    it is even easier to see why the World Wide Web (WWW, based on the Internet

    protocol HTTP) has been the standard method of communication and access

    for nearly all databases since the beginning of the 1990s.

    Need for updation of available standards

    The NRDMS Division has set up database centres in selected districts of the

    country for the development of databases and preparation of computer-based

    spatial resource profiles useful in formulation of district-level developmental

    programmes and schemes. State governments like those of Andhra Pradesh,

    Haryana, Karnataka, Uttar Pradesh, and West Bengal have been involved in

    setting up database centres in their respective states. Several R&D projects

    have also been carried out in areas like watershed management, groundwater

    budgeting, biomass utilization, drought assessment, and landslide control to

    demonstrate the utility of the NRDMS approach in micro-level planning.

    Special emphasis is laid on the training of potential users of this emerging

  • 5An introduction to bio-geo data standards

    technology. Accordingly, specialized training modules have been developed

    for the training of senior district-level officials and representatives of user

    departments.

    Multi-institutional stakeholders tend to collect the information and compile them

    in their own domain specifications, which makes it difficult to understand for

    other users. To ease the interoperability and free data flow across the common

    database users, a uniform terminology and organization of data are required. To

    achieve this codification of data elements, the National (Natural) Resources

    Management System of Department of Space had issued NRIS (National

    Resources Information System) standards in February 2000.

    International efforts

    It is of prime importance to include accurate geographical coordinates and altitude

    specifications (geo-references) of observed or collected biological species, as this

    allows biological information to be linked with other geophysical information.

    Realizing this, several international programmes have attempted to link the

    biological data sets to geographical locations. However, very few have actually

    tried to use them for any scientific analysis or for developmental planning. The

    attempts towards scientific analysis have mainly addressed the issues of such

    electronic biological archives providing novel avenues towards testing evolutionary

    and ecological theories across the worlds mountain ranges. Such studies use the

    separation of global from regional environmental conditions along elevational

    transects. It, thus, provides new perspectives for the comprehension of adaptation

    in mountain biota. Similarly, information on rock chemistry and mountain

    topography offers test conditions for edaphic drivers of biodiversity and species

    radiation and in an evolutionary context across a suit of geographical scales.

    The GMBA (Global Mountain Biodiversity Assessment), a cross-cutting network

    of DIVERSITAS (a UN programme on biodiversity management), is one such

    programme, which aims to encourage and synthesize research on high-elevation

    organismic diversity, its regional and global patterns, and its causes and functions.

  • 6Standards for bio-geo database

    It is considered that existing and emerging databases are promising tools for

    achieving such goals. The programme has seen that many research projects

    generate data sets that are relevant for the scientific community, governmental

    natural resource managers, policy-makers, and the public.

    The GBIF (Global Biodiversity Information Facility) has a mission to make the

    worlds primary data on biodiversity freely and universally available via the

    Internet. In cooperation with the GBIF, the GMBA encourages a global effort to

    mine geo-referenced archive databases on mountain organisms, build new

    biodiversity databases, and link them with geophysical databases. When building

    or analysing database information, it is essential to include geographical

    coordinates and altitude specifications (geo-reference) for observed or collected

    biological species, as this makes it possible to link biological and geophysical

    information, particularly climate data.

    The EUROMONT initiative is another of the many scientific projects that collect

    and use large geo-referenced mountain biodiversity data sets to answer specific

    questions in ecology, biogeography, and conservation biology. The GLORIA

    (Global Observation Research Initiative in Alpine Environments) project on

    monitoring the effects of global change on alpine plants, and MIREN (Mountain

    Invasion Research Network), a network on invasive species in mountains, are

    other examples. A thorough testing of biodiversity theories with comprehensive

    data at the global scale, as obtained through EUROMONT, GLORIA or MIREN

    would constitute a significant step in our understanding of mountain diversity

    patterns. Many data sets are associated with short-term projects, and are thus

    threatened by destruction at the end of the project. The new GMBA initiative for

    a GIS mountain biodiversity database specifically aims to collect such sets in

    order to prevent their destruction and initiate a first global assessment of the

    primary causes of mountain biodiversity patterns. It is pertinent to note that the

    Encyclopedia of Life1 is an umbrella initiative, which now encompasses all the global

    efforts to integrate knowledge about the biological wealth on this planet.

    1 http://eol.org

  • 7An introduction to bio-geo data standards

    Initiatives of the DST

    It has been felt that the nationally accepted standards with respect to the flora

    and fauna are not available and in persuasion of the same, the research team

    working under the NRDMSDSTs coordinated programme on Bio-geo

    Database and Ecological Modelling has attempted to prepare the standards

    (Version 1). The vertical upscaling of the existing codes from

    1: 50 000 to 1: 12 500 for land use and soil, along with the addition of biological

    codes for flora and fauna, has been attempted. This exercise has been pilot tested

    using actual field data (1: 12 500 scale) collected by the research groups working

    for the identified micro-watersheds Megad, Moolbari, and Mandhala

    representing higher, middle, and lower altitudinal zones of the Himalayan

    transects.

    Development of the current initiative

    An Expert Group was constituted by the DST to oversee the coordinated

    programme of Bio-geo Database. Several versions of this document had been

    prepared, discussed, and then revised based on suggestions of the group. The

    following salient points emerged during some of the meetings.

    During the meeting on 24 March 2003 at IIRS (Indian Institute of Remote

    Sensing), Dehra Dun, it was agreed to add new levels to existing codes.

    How the biological elements should be sampled was also discussed at this

    meeting.

    In the meeting held on 4 September 2003 at DST, representatives of the FSI

    (Forest Survey of India) suggested that FSI codifications be taken as the starting

    point for biological data codification. However, when the review committee

    looked at the outputs during the meeting on 29 October 2003, it was felt that

    the system was inadequate to address the concerns and it was recommended

    to develop a new system after consulting the existing international system in

    consultation with the BSI (Botanical Survey of India), ZSI (Zoological Survey

  • 8Standards for bio-geo database

    of India) and FSI. This document was circulated to all the national institutions

    dealing with biological resources (Annexure 1).

    The working research team submitted a draft version of biological standards

    for consideration by the Expert Group members during the meeting held

    on 16 January 2005, at IIT (Indian Institute of Technology) Roorkee.

    During the Expert Group meeting during 1921 April 2005 at IIT Delhi,

    based on the feedback from the SoI (Survey of India) and DoS (Department

    of Space) officials, this document was in principle approved for further

    development.

    A draft version of standards for land use, soil, and flora and fauna was

    presented during the meeting held during 910 November 2005 at the

    JNU (Jawaharlal Nehru University), New Delhi, and the same was sent for

    comments to all stakeholders in the country.

    The modified draft version of this document was presented during the

    NSDI (National Spatial Data Infrastructure) Workshop and also circulated

    during the Task Force meeting held during 1819 December 2005 and

    31 January 2006 at Hyderabad and New Delhi, respectively.

    Technical contents were also circulated to the Department of Space,

    National Bureau of Soil Science and Land Use Planning, National

    Botanical Research Institute, ZSI, BSI, FSI, Watershed Management

    Directorate, and the Department of Biotechnology.

    Based on the inputs received, the document was further revised

    during the meetings held during 2025 February 2006 at Almora, and

    during 1314 November 2006 at JNU, New Delhi, and 1415 June 2007

    at Kumaon University, Nainital.

  • 9An introduction to bio-geo data standards

    Scope of work

    The present effort is to provide a codification scheme using accession codes

    based on existing nationally accepted data standards and upscaling them to the

    international data standards. These are proposed to be dovetailed within the

    NSDI framework. The SDI (spatial data infrastructure) is defined as a collection

    of technologies, standards, policies, and human resources needed to acquire,

    process, maintain, distribute, and improve utilization of spatial data for the

    benefit of the economy and society. In India, like elsewhere, the SDI is being

    developed at different levels of the hierarchy to provide the required data/

    information for corresponding levels of decision-making. Of all the aspects in

    the SDI, database standards are highly talked about and several protocols exist.

    However, no efforts are made to define standard codes in terms of critical

    information that is required by decision-makers. The present document attempts

    to define a set of standard codes in the area of land use, soil, and biological

    elements that are part of data elements. Examples of integration of codes for

    the Moolbari watershed are given (See Annexure 2).

  • SE C T I O N 2

    LAND USE AND LANDCOVER CODES

  • Introduction

    Despite the high demand for information on environment and natural resources,

    many existing maps and digital databases are not specifically developed to meet

    the various user requirements. One of the main reasons for this gap, though

    generally underestimated, is the type of classification or legend used to describe

    basic information such as land cover and land use. Many of the existing

    classifications are generally not comparable with one another and are very often

    single-project-oriented or take a sectoral approach. Though many classification

    systems exist throughout the world, there is no single internationally accepted

    land cover or land use classification system.

    The implementation of land-use planning and land management requires

    cooperation among experts from the disciplines involved and integration of the

    respective results in order to identify and evaluate all biophysical, socio-economic

    and legal attributes of the land.

    Any codification scheme based on accession codes aims to contribute to the

    development of a common technical language in land resources planning and

    management. This helps in developing terms, so that methods and concepts used

    by the different sectors involved are understood by all partners in an identical

    way, independent from their backgrounds and professional experiences.

    Classification system for land use/land cover

    Land use/land cover thematic maps should be prepared adopting the

    classification system given in Table 1. For explanations on land use/land cover

    category, the following documents may also be referred to.

    LAND USE AND LANDCOVER CODES SE

    CT

    IO

    N

    2S

    EC

    TI

    ON

    2

    SE

    CT

    IO

    N

    2S

    EC

    TI

    ON

    2

    T S Kachhwaha, S P S Kushwaha , R K Sood, R Thapa

  • 14

    Standards for bio-geo database

    Manual of Nationwide Land Use/Land Cover Mapping using Satellite Imagery

    Part I and II (NRSA [National Remote Sensing Agency] 1989)

    Manual of Procedure for Wasteland Mapping (NRSA 1986)

    NRIS Node Design and Standard (NNRMS [National Natural Resources

    Management], ISRO [Indian Space Research Organization] 2000).

    It may be noted that under the category of forest, at level III, forest density such as

    (i) dense and (ii) open has to be indicated. In the density class, dense means 40%

    or more of the ground is covered by tree canopy, whereas open means more than

    10% and less than 40% of the ground is covered with the tree canopy. Up to 10%

    of canopy cover is regarded as degraded/underutilized forest. Scrubs are also to be

    categorized into open and dense, based on crown density of up to 40% and more

    than 40%, respectively. The name of the species in case of monoculture and the

    name of the dominant species in case of mixed forest should be given at level 4/

    level 5 classification of the forested area. The system of classification for notified

    and non-notified (revenue and others) forests would remain the same. However,

    the area estimates for non-notified forests are to be shown separately in the report.

    Also, the forest encroachments for agricultural or other purposes should be shown

    as per the actual land use, and the area under such categories is to be recorded

    under area statistics for

    the notified forestland.

    Forest boundaries

    should be taken from

    the forest department.

    Survey of India maps

    may also be consulted

    before finalizing forest

    boundaries.

    Similarly, in respect

    of agricultural land,Cultivated and vegetated area in Piedmont of Mandhala watershed

  • 15

    Land use and land cover codes

    boundaries of the

    command area as

    obtained from the

    respective command

    area development

    authorities should

    be depicted in the

    map indicating the

    geographical extent of

    the command area.

    Agricultural crops

    include crops during kharif (summer season cropping), rabi (winter season

    cropping) and zaid (both irrigated + unirrigated). The area under double crop

    includes crops cultivated during kharif as well as rabi seasons. Fallow is the

    vacant land that is without crop during kharif, rabi as well as zaid seasons.

    Current fallow is the vacant land without crop in the year of study only due to

    some temporary constraints, whereas permanent fallow is the agricultural land

    where no crop has been grown for a very long period of time.

    Data requirements

    For preparing the land use/land cover thematic maps, Resourcesat-1 LISS-IV

    (multispectral) or IKONOS colour images pertaining to three periods kharif,

    rabi, and summer seasons (preferably of the same agricultural year) are to be

    used. However, digital data can be used if digital classification is employed.

    Besides, other collateral data in the form of maps, charts, census records, reports,

    and especially large-scale topographical maps should be used.

    Methodology

    The land use/land cover thematic maps have to be prepared adopting either

    visual or digital interpretation techniques in conjunction with collateral data

    such as topographical maps and census records. If digital method is followed,

    Terrace cultivation in Megad watershed

  • 16

    Standards for bio-geo database

    the digital output is to be converted into a vector map of correspondence with

    other theme maps. The total number of classes would vary from area to area.

    The imagery has to be interpreted and ground checked for corrections. After

    field checking, the thematic map can be finalized.

    The thematic maps should be checked for quality before the same are finalized.

    This is essential to maintain high standards of map accuracy. The quality

    assurance checks would be carried out three times.

    1 Per-field interpretation stage

    2 Field verification before finalizing the contents of map

    3 After digitization of final map themes, field verification should be undertaken

    in all categories of mapping units occurring in the map sheet.

    The final output will have attribute codes as shown in Table 1.

    Moolbari watershed: a view of the diminishing forest cover due to agriculture

  • 17

    Land use and land cover codes

    Final output

    The final output would be thematic maps of land use/land cover and forest

    area in digital form. Hard copies of the maps could be taken out as part of the

    atlas by assigning different colours and hatching patterns. Yellow, green, and

    brown colour should be used for depicting different categories of agriculture,

    forest, and wasteland, respectively (See Map 1 in Annexure 2).

    01-00-00-00-00 Built-up

    01-01-00-00-00 Towns/cities (Urban area)

    01-01-01-00-00 Residential

    01-01-01-01-00 Colonies

    01-01-01-01-01 Single-storey

    01-01-01-01-02 Multi-storey

    01-01-01-02-00 Non-colonies

    01-01-01-02-01 Single-storey

    01-01-01-02-02 Multi-storey

    01-01-02-00-00 Industrial

    01-01-02-01-00 Salt pans

    01-01-03-00-00 Commercial

    01-01-03-01-00 Bus stands

    01-01-03-02-00 Rly yards

    01-01-03-03-00 Airport

    01-01-03-07-00 Market/mandi*

    01-01-04-00-00 Recreational

    01-01-04-01-00 Parks/gardens

    01-01-04-02-00 Playground

    01-01-04-03-00 Stadium

    01-01-05-00-00 Public and semi-public amenities

    01-01-05-01-00 Educational institutions

    LAND USE/L AND C OVER CL ASSIFIC ATION SYS TEM AND

    TABLE 1 ATTRIBUTE CODE (LUSE.LUT)

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

  • 18

    Standards for bio-geo database

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

    01-01-05-02-00 Cantonments

    01-01-05-03-00 Govt. institution*

    01-01-05-04-00 Health centre*

    01-01-05-05-00 Communication

    Institution*

    01-01-06-00-00 Mixed built-up land

    01-01-07-00-00 Open spaces/vacant land

    01-01-08-00-00 Others

    01-01-08-01-00 Reclaimed

    01-01-08-02-00 Slum areas

    01-02-00-00-00 Villages (rural area)

    01-02-01-00-00 Habitations/hamlets

    02-00-00-00-00 Agriculture

    02-01-00-00-00 Crop land

    02-01-01-00-00 Kharif

    02-01-02-00-00 Rabi

    02-01-03-00-00 Kharif+rabi (double cropped)

    02-01-04-00-00 Zaid crop (summer)

    02-01-05-00-00 Rabi + zaid (double cropped)

    02-01-06-00-00 Kharif+zaid (double cropped)

    02-01-07-00-00 Kharif+rabi+zaid (triple cropped)

    02-02-00-00-00 Fallow

    02-02-01-00-00 Current fallow

    02-02-02-00-00 Permanent fallow

    02-03-00-00-00 Plantations

    02-03-01-00-00 Tea

    02-03-03-00-00 Rubber

    02-03-06-00-00 Citrus

    02-03-07-00-00 Apple

    02-03-08-00-00 Almond

    02-03-09-00-00 Apricot

  • 19

    Land use and land cover codes

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

    02-03-10-00-00 Jamun

    02-03-11-00-00 Mango

    02-03-12-00-00 Papaya

    02-03-13-00-00 Pear

    02-03-14-00-00 Walnut

    02-03-15-00-00 Pomegranate

    02-03-16-00-00 Litchi

    02-03-17-00-00 Guava

    02-03-18-00-00 Banana

    02-03-19-00-00 Anjeer

    02-03-20-00-00 Ber

    02-03-21-00-00 Chiku

    02-03-22-00-00 Cherry

    02-03-23-00-00 Strawberry

    02-03-24-00-00 Peach

    02-03-25-00-00 Mixed

    03-00-00-00-00 Forest

    03-01-00-00-00 Evergreen/semi-evergreen

    03-01-01-00-00 Dense/closed

    03-01-01-01-00 >70%

    03-01-01-01-01 Chir pine

    03-01-01-01-02 Silver oak

    03-01-01-01-03 Deodar

    03-01-01-01-04 Bargad

    03-01-01-01-05 Bhimal, beul

    03-01-01-01-06 Kail

    03-01-01-01-07 Bhojpatra

    03-01-01-01-08 Peepal

    03-01-01-01-09 Eucalyptus

    03-01-01-01-10 Ashok

    03-01-01-01-11 Asan

    03-01-01-01-12 Jamun

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

  • 20

    Standards for bio-geo database

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

    03-01-01-01-13 Gurjan

    03-01-01-01-14 Dhamni

    03-01-01-01-15 Mixed sp.

    03-01-01-02-00 40%70%

    03-01-01-02-01 Chir pine

    03-01-01-02-02 Silver oak

    03-01-01-02-03 Deodar

    03-01-01-02-04 Bargad

    03-01-01-02-05 Bhimal, beul

    03-01-01-02-06 Kail

    03-01-01-02-07 Bhojpatra

    03-01-01-02-08 Peepal

    03-01-01-02-09 Eucalyptus

    03-01-01-02-10 Ashok

    03-01-01-02-11 Asan

    03-01-01-02-12 Jamun

    03-01-01-02-13 Gurjan

    03-01-01-02-14 Dhamni

    03-01-01-02-15 Mixed sp.

    03-01-02-00-00 Open

    03-01-02-01-00 10%40%

    03-01-02-01-01 Chir pine

    03-01-02-01-02 Silver oak

    03-01-02-01-03 Deodar

    03-01-02-01-04 Bargad

    03-01-02-01-05 Bhimal, beul

    03-01-02-01-06 Kail

    03-01-02-01-07 Bhojpatra

    03-01-02-01-08 Peepal

    03-01-02-01-09 Eucalyptus

    03-01-02-01-10 Ashok

    03-01-02-01-11 Asan

  • 21

    Land use and land cover codes

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

    03-01-02-01-12 Jamun

    03-01-02-01-13 Gurjan

    03-01-02-01-14 Dhamni

    03-01-02-01-15 Mixed sp.

    03-01-02-02-00 70%

    03-02-01-01-01 Sal

    03-02-01-01-02 Teak

    03-02-01-01-03 Shisham

    03-02-01-01-04 Babul, kikar

    03-02-01-01-05 Bhillar

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

  • 22

    Standards for bio-geo database

    03-02-01-01-06 Toon

    03-02-01-01-07 Karanj

    03-02-01-01-08 Poplar

    03-02-01-01-10 Kachnar

    03-02-01-01-09 Jhingan

    03-02-01-01-11 Khair

    03-02-01-01-12 Siris

    03-02-01-01-13 Mulberry

    03-02-01-01-14 Neem

    03-02-01-01-15 Semul

    03-02-01-01-16 Kadam

    03-02-01-01-17 Willow

    03-02-01-01-18 Oak

    03-02-01-01-19 Bamboo

    03-02-01-01-20 Mixed sp.

    03-02-01-02-00 40%70%

    03-02-01-02-01 Sal

    03-02-01-02-02 Teak

    03-02-01-02-03 Shisham

    03-02-01-02-04 Babul, kikar

    03-02-01-02-05 Bhillar

    03-02-01-02-06 Toon

    03-02-01-02-07 Karanj

    03-02-01-02-08 Poplar

    03-02-01-02-10 Kachnar

    03-02-01-02-09 Jhingan

    03-02-01-02-11 Khair

    03-02-01-02-12 Siris

    03-02-01-02-13 Mulberry

    03-02-01-02-14 Neem

    03-02-01-02-15 Semul

    03-02-01-02-16 Kadam

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

  • 23

    Land use and land cover codes

    03-02-01-02-17 Willow

    03-02-01-02-18 Oak

    03-02-01-02-19 Bamboo

    03-02-01-02-20 Mixed Sp.

    03-02-02-00-00 Open

    03-02-02-01-00 10%40%

    03-02-02-01-01 Sal

    03-02-02-01-02 Teak

    03-02-02-01-03 Shisham

    03-02-02-01-04 Babul, kikar

    03-02-02-01-05 Bhillar

    03-02-02-01-06 Toon

    03-02-02-01-07 Karanj

    03-02-02-01-08 Poplar

    03-02-02-01-10 Kachnar

    03-02-02-01-09 Jhingan

    03-02-02-01-11 Khair

    03-02-02-01-12 Siris

    03-02-02-01-13 Mulberry

    03-02-02-01-14 Neem

    03-02-02-01-15 Semul

    03-02-02-01-16 Kadam

    03-02-02-01-17 Willow

    03-02-02-01-18 Oak

    03-02-02-01-19 Bamboo

    03-02-02-01-20 Mixed sp.

    03-02-02-02-00

  • 24

    Standards for bio-geo database

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

    03-02-02-02-06 Toon

    03-02-02-02-07 Karanj

    03-02-02-02-08 Poplar

    03-02-02-02-10 Kachnar

    03-02-02-02-09 Jhingan

    03-02-02-02-11 Khair

    03-02-02-02-12 Siris

    03-02-02-02-13 Mulberry

    03-02-02-02-14 Neem

    03-02-02-02-15 Semul

    03-02-02-02-16 Kadam

    03-02-02-02-17 Willow

    03-02-02-02-18 Oak

    03-02-02-02-19 Bamboo

    03-02-02-02-20 Mixed sp.

    03-02-03-00-00 Scrub forest

    03-02-03-01-00 Dense

    03-02-03-02-00 Open

    03-02-04-00-00 Forest blank

    03-03-00-00-00 Forest plantations

    03-05-00-00-00 Shifting cultivation

    03-05-01-00-00 Old shifting cultivation

    03-05-02-00-00 Abandoned shifting cultivation

    03-05-03-00-00 Current shifting cultivation

    03-06-00-00-00 Crop land in forest/forest encroachments

    04-00-00-00-00 Wastelands

    04-01-00-00-00 Salt-affected land

    04-02-00-00-00 Gullied/ravinous land

    04-02-00-01-00 Sheet

    04-02-00-02-00 Rills

    04-03-00-00-00 Land with scrub

    04-03-00-01-00 Dense

  • 25

    Land use and land cover codes

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

    04-03-00-02-00 Open

    04-04-00-00-00 Land without scrub

    04-05-00-00-00 Sandy land

    04-06-00-00-00 Mining/industrial waste

    04-06-00-01-00 Mining waste

    04-06-00-02-00 Industrial waste

    04-07-00-00-00 Barren rocky/stony waste/sheet rock

    04-07-00-01-00 Barren rocky

    04-07-00-02-00 Stony waste

    04-07-00-03-00 Sheet rock

    04-08-00-00-00 Cold desert land

    05-00-00-00-00 Water bodies

    05-01-00-00-00 River

    05-01-01-00-00 Water channel area

    05-01-02-00-00 Sandy area

    05-01-04-00-00 River island

    05-01-05-00-00 River bed cultivation

    05-01-06-00-00 Flood plain

    05-02-00-00-00 Canal/diversion channel

    05-02-00-01-00 Major

    05-02-00-02-00 Minor

    05-03-00-00-00 Lakes

    05-04-00-00-00 Reservoirs/dams

    05-04-00-01-00 Hydroelectric

    05-04-00-02-00 Irrigation

    05-05-00-00-00 Tanks/village ponds

    05-06-00-00-00 Cooling pond/cooling reservoir

    05-07-00-00-00 Abandoned quarries with water

    06-00-00-00-00 Wetlands

    06-01-00-00-00 Inland wetlands

    06-01-01-00-00 Waterlogged

    06-01-02-00-00 Marshy/swampy

  • 26

    Standards for bio-geo database

    LU-CODE Descr-L1 Descr-L2 Descr-L3 Descr-L4/L5

    1:1M 1:25 000 1:50 000 1:25 000/12 500

    06-01-03-00-00 Ox-bow lakes

    07-00-00-00-00 Grassland/grazing land

    07-01-00-00-00 Dense

    07-02-00-00-00 Degraded

    08-00-00-00-00 Snow covered

    08-01-00-00-00 Perennial

    08-02-00-00-00 Glacial area

    08-02-00-01-00 Glacier

    08-02-00-02-00 Glaciated lakes

    08-02-00-03-00 Moraines

    08-02-00-03-01 Terminal

    08-02-00-03-02 Lateral

    08-02-00-03-03 Medial

    LU land use; Descr description; L level; 1:1 M 1:1 million

    The level 4 and level 5 details in Table 1 are suggestive, based on the Himalayan

    region case studies and could be updated by adding the details available in

    other regions for complete code standards for the country.

    Field name Field type Key field Remarks

    LU-code 10,10,C Y Feature code

    Descr-L1 30,30,C N Level I classes

    Descr-L2 30,30,C N Level II classes

    Descr-L3 30,30,C N Level III classes

    Descr-L4 30,30,C N Level IV classes

    Descr-L5 30,30,C N Level V classes

    LU land use; Descr description

    TABLE 2 STRUCTURE OF LUSE.LUT

    * Based on field information

    Note Hyphen sign (-) has been used in the feature codes in all the look-up tables as separator between the

    subclasses. This separator sign is used only to improve readability. This sign is not to be entered in the

    database tables.

  • SE C T I O N 3

    S O I L R E S O U R C EC O D I F I C AT I O N

  • SOIL RESOURCE CODIFICATION

    Introduction

    Soil is recognized as one of the most valuable life-supporting natural resources;

    on its proper use depends the social and economic development of a country.

    As an important component of the geosphere and biosphere systems, soils

    directly provide food, fuel, fibre and fodder for a variety of basic human and

    livestock needs. It is the most valuable resource because it takes several

    hundreds of years to develop a centimetre of soil layer.

    Soils vary widely in space and time and in their capacity to provide crops,

    forestry, and grasses, as no two soils are equally suitable for a land utilization

    type. There is evidence that our soils are undergoing degradation at an

    unacceptable rate with the risk of jeopardizing the food security of our future

    generations. The process of soil degradation is triggered by excessive pressure

    on land to meet the demands of a rapidly growing population for food, fibre,

    and fuel. It is therefore, important that we use this basic resource as per its

    capability to ensure sustained use for food and other needs.

    In order to make optimum use of our limited resources, we must have an in-

    depth knowledge about different soils, their characteristics, behaviour, kind

    and degree of problem, and their extent and distribution on the landscape.

    This is achieved through soil survey and mapping. The scale of mapping,

    however, depends upon the purpose and the kind of terrain.

    Soil surveys have been conducted by several organizations, even non-

    governmental organizations, using different base maps of various states to

    prepare an inventory of the soil resources, so that we can develop a rational

    land-use plan. However, the soil resource data generated by different sources

    did not maintain uniform standards, and therefore, could not be correlated,

    SE

    CT

    IO

    N

    3S

    EC

    TI

    ON

    3

    SE

    CT

    IO

    N

    3S

    EC

    TI

    ON

    3

    C S Walia and T S Kachhwaha

  • 30

    Standards for bio-geo database

    collated, and exchanged. As such, there is need to harmonize data coming

    from different sources and represent data in a clear and unambiguous manner

    understandable by all. This is achieved by arriving at a set of standards that

    are universal and which can be referred to by all data managers and resource

    specialists. The NRIS (National Resource Information System) has recognized

    the value of standards and embarked upon the development and establishment

    of a set of standards (NNRMS 2000). Accordingly, some standards have been

    worked out for soil resource database by the NBSS&LUP (National Bureau

    of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning), which is a nodal agency in this field.

    Soils in India are classified according to the United States Department of

    Agriculture Soil Taxonomy (USDA 1975). In this category, there are seven

    categories. From the highest to the lowest category, these are Order, Suborder,

    Greatgroup, Subgroup, Family, Series, and phases of series. One can derive

    more and more information as one proceeds from order to soil series and

    their phases. Soil taxonomy is a system for classifying soils and is designed for

    improving communication amongst soil scientists working in different places

    and amongst other uses of soils. It also serves as a correlation tool for soil

    surveys. As such, it cannot be used in isolation.

    Thus, the purpose of soil taxonomy is to delineate soil classes at various

    levels of generalization,

    permitting us to

    understand as truly as

    existing knowledge

    permits, the relationship

    amongst various soils and

    the factors responsible

    for their attributes. The

    system is designed for

    making and interpreting

    soil surveys, and as such,

    it is well suited forMandhala watershed: cultivation in coarse-loamy mixedhyperthermic Dystric Eutrudepts in piedmont

  • 31

    Soil resource codification

    general evaluations of the

    agricultural potential of the land

    or map unit. The specificity of the

    evaluation made is related to the

    categoric level at which the soil is

    classified. Soil taxonomy plays an

    important role in the soil survey

    programme. It forms the basis

    of soil correlation and for

    separating and defining mapping

    units in the soil resource mapping programme. Soils are mapped at

    subgroup association at 1:1 million scale, associations of soil families at state

    level (1:250 000) and association of soil series at district level (1:50 000).

    Mono-series with its phases are the mapping unit of large-scale (1:12 500) maps

    for micro-watersheds. So, a hierarchical approach is adopted in soil taxonomy,

    and as we move from the highest to the lowest category, increasing number of

    properties are incorporated. It is, therefore, essential that categoric level must be

    matched with cartographic accuracyonly then it is possible to make useful

    interpretations of soil data. It is obvious, therefore, that the Greatgroup category

    cannot be used for detailed soil survey. Hence, the coding scheme for soil layer

    has been started from soil order level to soil series and its phases. The coding

    structure (as explained in Appendix 1) of soil database was based upon Keys to

    Soil Taxonomy (1994), currently being followed by INARIS (Integrated National

    Agricultural Resource Information System) and NRIS. But the codification of

    soil database up to Subgroup level has been revised adopting Keys to Soil Taxonomy

    (1998) as a base so that each soil can find its current taxonomical identification

    for data integration and to maintain effective linkages with other national and

    international organizations. Soil codes pertaining to phases of soil series have

    also been proposed to store the soil database for larger-scale maps.

    NBSS&LUP in 2001 started a mission mode project INARIS Soil

    Resource Data under the NATP (National Agricultural Technology Project)

    Megad watershed: cultivation in coarse-loamy,mixed, frigid, Typic Cryofluvents

  • 32

    Standards for bio-geo database

    of the Indian Council of

    Agricultural Research with the

    objective to create a national-level

    soil resources database

    management, which focused on

    the following.

    Developing a systematic soil

    information system and

    practise shar ing of

    information on soil resources

    Acting as data bureau for development agencies, planners, and

    administration

    Developing data sharing/exchange facilities through a dedicated website

    Under the project, a spatial database has been created by digitizing

    the soil map of different states at 1:1 million scale, with soil boundaries showing

    the association of soil families. The project has been initiated with

    the identification and coding of fields. The fields for soil resources and

    associated information have been identified and grouped under state information,

    state, polygon, soil site, and physical and chemical characteristics. Codification

    of spatial elements was done as per NRIS but non-spatial elements were also

    coded to develop thematic maps and to develop querries at different themes and

    for terrain analysis. Certain data gaps were identified and have to be filled up

    through progressive soil survey. The project ended with the creation of a spatial

    database, development of querry file, data mining, and user feedback. The DST

    (Department of Science and Technology) has taken a major initiative to create a

    bio-geo database for some sample watersheds in Himachal Pradesh and

    Uttarakhand. The soil database will be generated at 1:12 500 scale using remote

    sensing data showing phases of soil series on the map. The soil map is to

    be digitized and soil will be codified as per the codes listed in Appendix 1.

    Moolbari watershed: terrace cultivation in Fine-loamy, mixed, thermic, Dystric Eutrudepts

  • 33

    Soil resource codification

    Non-spatial data will be coded to attach to the soil layer to generate the thematic

    maps and derived spatial data by integrating the two databases using GIS

    environment. Soil data will also be linked to the other data such as land use/land

    cover, climatic, hydrologic, socio-economic, and physiographic data to develop

    an integrated watershed development plan. The coding scheme with its description

    part at different scales for all the elements, followed by its structure, is given in

    tables 1 to 7. An example of soil resource codification, as followed in Moolbari

    watershed, district Simla, Himachal Pradesh, is given in Annexure 2 (Map 2).

    Soil.dat will contain profile descriptions for each soil class/SOIL-CODE. In this

    table, soil properties will be defined for individual soil horizon, which will be based

    on soil reports prepared under the Bio-geo Database programme. This table will

    be linked to the soil layer attribute table via SOIL-CODE as the key field.

    TABLE 1 STRUCTURE OF SOIL . LUTField name Field type Key field Remarks

    SOIL-CODE 32, 32,C Y 32-digit primary link CODE (Explained later)

    ASS1-CODE 32, 32, C Y Secondary link CODE (f irst association), same

    values as SOIL-CODE

    ASS2-CODE 32, 32,C Y Ter tiary link CODE (second association), same

    values as SOIL-CODE

    ORDER 15,15,C N Order description

    SB-ORDER 15,15,C N Sub-order description

    GR-GROUP 30,30,C N Greatgroup description

    SB-GROUP 30,30,C N Sub-group description

    FAMILY-TEX 30,30,C N Family level textural description

    FAMILY-MIN 30,30,C N Family level mineral description

    FAMILY-TEMP 30,30,C N Family level temperature region description

    SERIES 30,30,C N Series name

    SOIL SERIES PHASE 30,30,C N Series phases name

    Note Soil.lut should be created taking care to include all the occurrences along with their associated categories. For example;

    if category 01-01-01-01-01-01-01-01 has associations with 02-02-02-02-02-02-02-02 and 03-03-03-03-03-03-03-03,

    then the LUT should mandatorily contain three records pertaining to CODEs 01-01-01-01-01-01-01-01, 02-02-02-02-02-

    02-02-02 and 03-03-03-03-03-03-03-03

  • 34

    Standards for bio-geo database

    Coding scheme for soil layer (SOIL.LUT): Soil code will be AA-BB-CC-

    DD-EEFFGG-HH-IIJJKKLLMMNNPPQQ (32 digit). Detailed soil codes,

    along with description up to soil series phase level are given in Appendix 1.

    TABLE 2 STRUCTURE OF SOIL . DATField name Field type Key field Remarks

    SOIL-CODE 32,32,C Y 32-digit link CODE

    SOIL-DEPTH 10,10,N,0 N

    MIN-DEPTH 6,6,N,2 N

    MAX-DEPTH 6,6,N,2 N

    SAND-PER 5,5,N,2 N

    SILT-PER 5,5,N,2 N

    CLAY-PER 5,5,N,2 N

    TEXTURE 15,15,C N

    pH 5,5,N,2 N

    EC 5,5,N,2 N

    OC-PER 5,5,N,2 N

    AV-P205 5,5,N,2 N

    AV-K2O G,G,N,2 N

    EX-Ca 5,5,N,2 N

    EX-Mg 5,5,N,2 N

    EX-Na 5,5,N,2 N

    EX-K 5,5,N,2 N

    CEC G,G,N,2 N

    BASE-SATN-PER G,G,N,2 N

    ESP G,G,N,2 N

    LCC 5,5,C N Land capability class

    LCAP-CODE G,G,C N Translated land capability class core as per

    LANDCAP.LUT

    LlC 5,5,C N Land irrigability class

    LANDIR-CODE 2,2,C N Translated land irrigability class code as per

    LANDCAP.LUT

    PROD-POTEN 10,10,C N

    MAX-INFILTRA 5,5,N N

    HS-CODE 2,2,C N CODE for run-off potential as per HYDSOIL.LUT

    derived from Max-filtra

    SOILIR-CODE 2,2,C N Derived soil irrigability class codes as per

    SOIL1RR.LUT using criterion table given later

    LOCATION 50,30,C N

  • 35

    Soil resource codification

    ATTRIBUTE C ODES FOR L AND C APABILIT Y CL ASSES:

    TABLE 3 L A N D C A P. L U TLCAP-CODE Description

    Class Sub-class Unit

    01-00-00 I

    01-01-00 Erosion

    01-01-01 Intensity - 1

    01-01-02 Intensity - 2

    01-02-00 Wetness

    01-02-01 Intensity - 1

    01-02-02 Intensity - 2

    01-03-00 Climate

    01-03-01 Intensity - 1

    01-03-02 Intensity - 2

    01-04-00 Soil

    01-04-01 Intensity - 1

    01-04-02 Intensity - 2

    02-00-00 II

    02-01-00 Erosion

    02-01-01 Intensity - 1

    02-01-02 Intensity - 2

    02-02-00 Wetness

    02-02-01 Intensity - 1

    02-02-02 Intensity - 2

    02-03-00 Climate

    02-03-01 Intensity - 1

    02-03-02 Intensity - 2

    02-04-00 Soil

    02-04-01 Intensity - 1

    02-04-02 Intensity - 2

    03-00-00 III

    03-01-00 Erosion

    03-01-01 Intensity - 1

    03-01-02 Intensity - 2

    03-02-00 Wetness

    03-02-01 Intensity - 1

    03-02-02 Intensity - 2

    03-03-00 Climate

    03-03-01 Intensity - 1

  • 36

    Standards for bio-geo database

    LCAP-CODE Description

    Class Sub-class Unit

    03-03-02 Intensity - 2

    03-04-00 Soil

    03-04-01 Intensity - 1

    04-00-00 IV

    04-01-00 Erosion

    04-01-01 Intensity - 1

    04-01-02 Intensity - 2

    04-02-00 Wetness

    04-02-01 Intensity - 1

    04-02-02 Intensity - 2

    04-03-00 Climate

    04-03-01 Intensity - 1

    04-03-02 Intensity - 2

    04-04-00 Soil

    04-04-01 Intensity - 1

    04-04-02 Intensity - 2

    05-00-00 V

    05-01-00 Erosion

    05-01-01 Intensity - 1

    05-01-02 Intensity - 2

    05-02-00 Wetness

    05-02-01 Intensity - 1

    05-02-02 Intensity - 2

    05-03-00 Climate

    05-03-01 Intensity - 1

    05-03-02 Intensity - 2

    05-04-00 Soil

    05-04-01 Intensity - 1

    05-04-02 Intensity - 2

    06-00-00 VI

    06-01-00 Erosion

    06-01-01 Intensity - 1

    06-01-02 Intensity - 2

    06-02-00 Wetness

    06-02-01 Intensity - 1

    06-02-02 Intensity - 2

    06-03-00 Climate

    06-03-01 Intensity - 1

    06-03-02 Intensity - 2

  • 37

    Soil resource codification

    LCAP-CODE Description

    Class Sub-class Unit

    06-04-00 Soil

    06-04-01 Intensity - 1

    06-04-02 Intensity - 2

    07 -00-00 VII

    07-01-00 Erosion

    07-01-01 Intensity - 1

    07-01-02 Intensity - 2

    07 -02-00 Wetness

    07-02-01 Intensity - 1

    07 -02-02 Intensity - 2

    07 -03-00 Climate

    07 -02-00 Wetness

    07-02-01 Intensity - 1

    07 -02-02 Intensity - 2

    07 -03-00 Climate

    07-03-01 Intensity - 1

    07 -03-02 Intensity - 2

    07 -04-00 Soil

    07-04-01 Intensity - 1

    07 -04-02 Intensity - 2

    08-00-00 VIII

    08-01-00 Erosion

    08-01-01 Intensity - 1

    08-01-02 Intensity - 2

    08-02-00 Wetness

    08-02-01 Intensity - 1

    08-02-02 Intensity - 2

    08-03-00 Climate

    08-03-01 Intensity - 1

    08-03-02 Intensity - 2

    08-04-00 Soil

    08-04-01 Intensity - 1

    08-04-02 Intensity - 2

    98-98-98 Habitation mask *

    99-99-99 Water body mask **

    * Habitation mask polygons taken from layer settlea

    ** Water body mask polygons taken from layer drainp

  • 38

    Standards for bio-geo database

    STRUCTURE OF THE TABLE L ANDC AP.L UTField name Field type Key field

    LCAP-CODE G,G,C Y

    CLASS 15,15,C N

    SUB-CLASS 15,15,C N

    UNIT 15,15,C N

    STRUCTURE OF THE TABLE

    Field name Field type Key field Remarks

    WSP-CODE 2,2,C Y Feature Code

    PRIORIT Y 15,15,C N Code Description

    STRUCTURE OF THE TABLEField name Field type Key field Remarks

    HS-CODE 2,2,C Y Feature code

    RUNPOT 15,15,C N Run-off potential

    ATTRIBUTE TABLE FOR HYDROLOGIC AL SOIL UNIT S

    TABLE 5 HYDROSOL.L UTHS-CODE Runpot

    01 Low

    02 Moderately low

    03 Moderately high

    04 Highest

    98 Habitation mask*

    99 Water body mask**

    * Habitation mask polygons taken from layer settlea

    ** Water body mask polygons taken from layer drainp

    TABLE 4 WATERSHED PRIORIT IES FOR SOIL C ONSER VATION WSP.L UTWSP-CODE Priority

    01 Low

    02 Medium

    03 High

    04 Very high

    98 Habitation mask *

    99 Water body mask **

    * Habitation mask polygons taken from layer settlea

    ** Water body mask polygons taken from layer drainp

  • 39

    Soil resource codification

    STRUCTURE OF THE TABLE

    Field name Field type Key field Remarks

    LANDIR-CODE 2,2,C Y Feature code

    Description 100,25,C N Code description

    STRUCTURE OF THE TABLE

    Field name Field type Key field Remarks

    SOILiR-CODE 2,2,C Y Feature code

    Description 100,25,C N Code description

    TABLE 7 ATTRIBUTE TABLE FOR SOIL IRRIG ABILIT Y: SOILIRR.L UTSOILiR-CODE Description

    01 A None to slight limitations for sustained use under irrigation

    02 B Moderate soil limitations for sustained use under irrigation

    03 C Severe soil limitations for sustained use under irrigation

    04 D Very severe soil limitations for sustained use under irrigation

    05 E Not suited for irrigation

    98 Habitation mask *

    99 Water body mask **

    * Habitation mask polygons taken from layer settlea

    ** Water body mask polygons taken from layer drainp

    TABLE 6 ATTRIBUTE TABLE FOR L AND IRRIGABILIT Y: L ANDIRR.LUTLANDIR-CODE Description

    01 Few limitations for sustained use under irrigation

    02 Moderate limitations for sustained use under irrigation

    03 Severe limitations for sustained use under irrigation

    04 Very severe limitations, marginal for sustained use under irrigation

    05 Not suitable for sustained use under irrigation pending further investigations

    06 Not suited for use under irrigation, also not arable

    98 Habitation mask *

    99 Water body mask **

    * Habitation mask polygons taken from layer settlea

    ** Water body mask polygons taken from layer drainp

  • 40

    Standards for bio-geo database

    The standardized codes up to group level are given below.

    AA : Order (two digits)

    BB : Suborder (two digits)

    CC : Greatgroup (two digits)

    DD : Subgroup (two digits)

    EEFFGG : Soil family (six digits)

    HH : Soil series (two digits)

    I, J, K, L, M, N, P, Q : Phases of soil series (16 digits) surface

    texture (I), slope (J), erosion (K), surface

    stoniness (L), salinity (N), sodicity (N), and

    flooding (P)

    References

    NNRMS. 2000National (Natural) Resource Information System NRIS node design and standardsBangalore: ISRO (Indian Space Research Organization)

    USDA (United States Department of Agriculture). 1975Soil Survey Staff (1975) Soil Taxonomy: a basic system of the classification formaking and interpreting soil surveysWashington DC: USDA

    USDA (United States Department of Agriculture). 1994Soil Survey Staff (1994) Keys to Soil Taxonomy (6th edn)Washington DC: USDA Soil Conservation Service

    USDA (United States Department of Agriculture). 1998Soil Survey Staff (1998) Keys to Soil Taxonomy (8th edn)Washington DC: USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service

  • Appendix 1

    Coding scheme for soil layer (SOIL.LUT): AA-BB-CC-DD-EEFFGG-HH-

    IIJJKKLLMMNNPP (32 digits)

    LEVEL 1 SUBGROUP C ODES FOR SOIL S IN SOIL.L UTCode Order (AA) Suborder (BB) Greatgroup (CC) Subgroup (DD)

    01-01-01-01 Alfisols Aqualfs Plinthaqualfs Typic Plinthaqualfs

    01-01-02-02 Natraqualfs Vertic Natraqualfs

    01-01-02-03 Vermic Natraqualfs

    01-01-02-04 Albic Glossic Natraqualfs

    01-01-02-05 Albic Natraqualfs

    01-01-02-06 Glossic Natraqualfs

    01-01-02-07 Mollic Natraqualfs

    01-01-02-08 Typic Natraqualfs

    01-01-03-01 Duraqualfs Typic Duraqualfs

    01-01-04-01 Fragiaqualfs Aeric Fragiaqualfs

    01-01-04-02 Plinthic Fragiaqualfs

    01-01-04-03 Umbric Fragiaqualfs

    01-01-04-04 Typic Fragiaqualfs

    01-01-05-01 Kandiaqualfs Arenic Kandiaqualfs

    01-01-05-02 Grossarenic Kandiaqualfs

    01-01-05-03 Plinthic Kandiaqualfs

    01-01-05-04 Aeric Umbric Kandiaqualfs

    01-01-05-05 Umbric Kandiaqualfs

    01-01-05-06 Typic Kandiaqualfs

    01-01-06-01 Glossaqualfs Arenic Glossaqualfs

    01-01-06-02 Histic Glossaqualfs

    01-01-06-03 Grossarenic Glossaqualfs

    01-01-06-04 Aeric Glossaqualfs

    01-01-06-05 Fragic Glossaqualfs

    01-01-06-06 Mollic Glossaqualfs

    01-01-06-07 Typic Glossaqualfs

    01-01-07-01 Albaqualfs Aeric Vertic Albaqualfs

    01-01-07-02 Chromic Vertic Albaqualfs

    01-01-07-03 Vertic Albaqualfs

    01-01-07-04 Udollic Albaqualfs

  • 42

    Standards for bio-geo database

    Code Order (AA) Sub order (BB) Greatgroup (CC) Sub group (DD)

    01-01-07-05 Aeric Albaqualfs

    01-01-07-06 Aquandic Albaqualfs

    01-01-07-07 Mollic Albaqualfs

    01-01-07-08 Umbric Albaqualfs

    01-01-07-09 Typic Albaqualfs

    01-01-08-01 Cryaqualfs Typic Cryaqualfs

    01-01-09-01 Vermaqualfs Natric Vermaqualfs

    01-01-09-02 Typic Vermaqualfs

    01-01-10-01 Epiaqualfs Aeric Chromic Vertic

    Epiaqualfs

    01-01-10-02 Aeric Vertic Epiaqualfs

    01-01-10-03 Chromic Vertic Epiaqualfs

    01-01-10-04 Vertic Epiaqualfs

    01-01-10-05 Aquandic Epiaqualfs

    01-01-10-06 Arenic Epiaqualfs

    01-01-10-07 Grossarenic Epiaqualfs

    01-01-10-08 Aeric Umbric Epiaqualfs

    01-01-10-09 Udollic Epiaqualfs

    01-01-10-10 Aeric Epiaqualfs

    01-01-10-11 Mollic Epiaqualfs

    01-01-10-12 Umbric Epiaqualfs

    01-01-10-13 Typic Epiaqualfs

    01-01-11-01 Endoaqualfs Aquandic Endoaqualfs

    01-01-11-02 Arenic Endoaqnalfs

    01-01-11-03 Grossarenic Endoaqualfs

    01-01-11-04 Udollic Endoaqualfs

    01-01-11-05 Aeric Endoaqualfs

    01-01-11-06 Mollic Endoaqualfs

    01-01-11-07 Umbric Endoaqualfs

    01-01-11-08 Chromic Vertic Endoaqualfs

    01-01-11-09 Vertic Endoaqualfs

    01-01-11-10 Aeric Fragic Endoaqualfs

    01-01-11-11 Fragic Endoaqualfs

    01-01-11-12 Typic Endoaqualfs

    01-02-01-01 Cryalfs Palecryalfs Andic Palecryalfs

    01-02-01-01 Vitrandic Palecryalfs

    Code Order (AA) Suborder (BB) Greatgroup (CC) Subgroup (DD)

  • 43

    Soil resource codification

    01-02-01-02 Aquic Palecryalfs

    01-02-01-03 Oxyaquic Palecryalfs

    01-02-01-04 Xeric Palecryalfs

    01-02-01-05 Ustic Palecryalfs

    01-02-01-06 Mollic Palecryalfs

    01-02-01-07 Umbric Palecryalfs

    01-02-01-08 Typic Palecryalfs

    01-02-02-02 Glossocryalfs Lithic Glossocryalfs

    01-02-02-03 Vertic Glossocryalfs

    01-02-02-04 Andic Glossocryalfs

    01-02-02-05 Vitrandic Glossocryalfs

    01-02-02-06 Aquic Glossocryalfs

    01-02-02-07 Oxyaquic Glossocryalfs

    01-02-02-08 Fragic Glossocryalfs

    01-02-02-09 Xerollic Glossocryalfs

    01-02-02-10 Umbric Xerric Glossocryalfs

    01-02-02-01 Ustollic Glossocryalfs

    01-02-02-11 Xeric Glossocryalfs

    01-02-02-12 Ustic Glossocryalfs

    01-02-02-13 Mollic Glossocryalfs

    01-02-02-14 Umbric Glossocryalfs

    01-02-02-15 Eutric Glossocryalfs

    01-02-02-16 Typic Glossocryalfs

    01-02-03-01 Haplocryalfs Lithic Haplocryalfs

    01-02-03-02 Vertic Haplocryalfs

    01-02-03-03 Andic Haplocryalfs

    01-02-03-04 Vitrandic Haplocryalfs

    01-02-03-05 Aquic Haplocryalfs

    01-02-03-06 Oxyaquic Haplocryalfs

    01-02-03-07 Lamellic Haplocryalfs

    01-02-03-08 Psammentic Haplocryalfs

    01-02-03-09 Inceptic Haplocryalfs

    01-02-03-10 Xerollic Haplocryalfs

    01-02-03-11 Umbric Xeric Haplocryalfs

    01-02-03-12 Ustollic Haplocryalfs

    01-02-03-13 Xeric Haplocryalfs

    Code Order (AA) Suborder (BB) Greatgroup (CC) Subgroup (DD)

  • 44

    Standards for bio-geo database

    01-02-03-14 Ustic Haplocryalfs

    01-02-03-15 Mollic Haplocryalfs

    01-02-03-16 Umbric Haplocryalfs

    01-02-03-17 Eutric Haplocryalfs

    01-02-03-18 Typic Haplocryalfs

    01-03-01-01 Ustalfs Durustalfs Typic Durustalfs

    01-03-02-01 Plinthustalfs Typic Plinthustalfs

    01-03-03-01 Natrustalfs Vertic Natrustalfs

    01-03-03-02 Leptic Torrertic Natrustalfs

    01-03-03-03 Torrertic Natrustalfs

    01-03-03-04 Aquic Arenic Natrustalfs

    01-03-03-05 Aquertic Natrustalfs

    01-03-03-06 Aquic Natrustalfs

    01-03-03-07 Aridic Leptic Natrustalfs

    01-03-03-08 Arenic Natrustalfs

    01-03-03-09 Petrocalcic Natrustalfs

    01-03-03-10 Salidic Natrustalfs

    01-03-03-11 Mollic Natrustalfs

    01-03-03-12 Leptic Natrustalfs

    01-03-03-13 Haplargidic Natrustalfs

    01-03-03-14 Typic Natrustalfs

    01-03-04-01 Kandiustalfs Grossarenic Kandiustalfs

    01-03-04-02 Aquic Arenic Kandiustalfs

    01-03-04-03 Plinthic Kandiustalfs

    01-03-04-04 Aquic Kandiustalfs

    01-03-04-05 Arenic Aridic Kandiustalfs

    01-03-04-06 Arenic Kandiustalfs

    01-03-04-07 Aridic Kandiustalfs

    01-03-04-08 Udic Kandiustalfs

    01-03-04-09 Rhodic Kandiustalfs

    01-03-04-1 0 Typic Kandiustalfs

    01-03-05-01 Kanhaplustalfs Lithic Kanhaplustalfs

    01-03-05-02 Aquic Kanhaplustalfs

    01-03-05-03 Aridic Kanhaplustalfs

    01-03-05-04 Udic Kanhaplustalfs

    01-03-05-05 Rhodic Kanhaplustalfs

    Code Order (AA) Suborder (BB) Greatgroup (CC) Subgroup (DD)

  • 45

    Soil resource codification

    01-03-05-06 Typic Kanhaplustalfs

    01-03-06-01 Paleustalfs Aquertic Paleustalfs

    01-03-06-02 Oxyaquic Vertic aleustalfs

    01-03-06-03 Udertic Paleustalfs

    01-03-06-04 Vertic Paleustalfs

    01-03-06-05 Psammentic Paleustalfs

    01-03-06-06 Grossarenic Paleustalfs

    01-03-06-07 Aquic Arenic Paleustalfs

    01-03-06-08 Plinthic Paleustalfs

    01-03-06-09 Aquic Paleustalfs

    01-03-06-10 Oxyaquic Paleustalfs

    01-03-06-11 Petrocalcic Paleustalfs

    01-03-06-12 Arenic Aridic Paleustalfs

    01-03-06-13 Arenic Paleustalfs

    01-03-06-14 Calcidic Paleustalfs

    01-03-06-15 Aridic Paleustalfs

    01-03-06-16 Kandic Paleustalfs

    01-03-06-17 Rhodic Paleustalfs

    01-03-06-18 Ultic Paleustalfs

    01-03-06-19 Udic Paleustalfs

    01-03-06-20 Typic Paleustalfs

    01-03-07 -01 Rhodustalfs Lithic Rhodustalfs

    01-03-07 -02 Kanhaplic Rhodustalfs

    01-03-07 -03 Udic Rhodustalfs

    01-03-07-04 Typic Rhodustalfs

    01-03-08-01 Haplustalfs Lithic Haplustalfs

    01-03-08-02 Aquertic Haplustalfs

    01-03-08-03 Oxyaquic Vertic Haplustalfs

    01-03-08-04 Torrertic Haplustalfs

    01-03-08-05 Udertic Haplustalfs

    01-03-08-06 Vertic Haplustalfs

    01-03-08-07 Aquic Arenic Haplustalfs

    01-03-08-08 Aquultic Haplustalfs

    01-03-08-09 Aquic Haplustalfs

    01-03-08-10 Oxyaquic Haplustalfs

    01-03-08-11 Vitrandic Haplustalfs

    Code Order (AA) Suborder (BB) Greatgroup (CC) Subgroup (DD)

  • 46

    Standards for bio-geo database

    01-03-08-12 Lamellic Haplustalfs

    01-03-08-13 Psammentic Haplustalfs

    01-03-08-14 Arenic Aridic Haplustalfs

    01-03-08-15 Arenic Haplustalfs

    01-03-08-16 Calcidic Haplustalfs

    01-03-08-17 Aridic Haplustalfs

    01-03-08-18 Kanhaplic Haplustalfs

    01-03-08-19 Inceptic Haplustalfs

    01-03-08-20 Calcic Udic Haplustalfs

    01-03-08-21 Ultic Haplustalfs

    01-03-08-22 Calcic Haplustalfs

    01-03-08-23 Udic Haplustalfs

    01-03-08-24 Typic Haplustalfs

    01-04-01-01 Xeralfs Durixeralfs Natric Durixeralfs

    01-04-01-02 Vertic Durixeralfs

    01-04-01-03 Aquic Durixeralfs

    01-04-01-04 Abruptic Haplic Durixeralfs

    01-04-01-05 Abruptic Durixeralfs

    01-04-01-06 Haplic Durixeralfs

    01-04-01-07 Typic Durixeralfs

    01-04-02-01 Natrixeralfs Vertic Natrixeralfs

    01-04-02-02 Aquic Natrixeralfs

    01-04-02-03 Typic Natrixeralfs

    01-04-03-01 Fragixeralfs Andic Fragixeralfs

    01-04-03-02 Vitrandic Fragixeralfs

    01-04-03-03 Mollic Fragixeralfs

    01-04-03-04 Aquic Fragixeralfs

    01-04-03-05 Ochreptic Fragixeralfs

    01-04-03-06 Typic Fragixeralfs

    01-04-04-01 Plinthoxeralfs Typic Plinthoxeralfs

    01-04-05-01 Rhodoxeralfs Lithic Rhodoxeralfs

    01-04-05-02 Petrocalcic Rhodoxeralfs

    01-04-05-03 Calcic Rhodoxeralfs

    01-04-05-04 Inceptic Rhodoxeralfs

    01-04-05-05 Vertic Rhodoxeralfs

    01-04-05-06 Typic Rhodoxeralfs

    Code Order (AA) Suborder (BB) Greatgroup (CC) Subgroup (DD)

  • 47

    Soil resource codification

    01-04-06-01 Palexeralfs Vertic Palexeralfs

    01-04-06-02 Aquandic Palexeralfs

    01-04-06-03 Andic Palexeralfs

    01-04-06-04 Vitrandic Palexeralfs

    01-04-06-05 Aquic Palexeralfs

    01-04-06-06 Fragiaquic Palexeralfs

    01-04-06-07 Petrocalcic Palexeralfs

    01-04-06-08 Lamellic Palexeralfs

    01-04-06-09 Arenic Palexeralfs

    01-04-06-11 Psammentic Palexeralfs

    01-04-06-12 Natric Palexeralfs

    01-04-06-13 Fragic Palexeralfs

    01-04-06-14 Calcic Palexeralfs

    01-04-06-15 Plinthic Palexeralfs

    01-04-06-16 Ultic Palexeralfs

    01-04-06-17 Haplic Palexeralfs

    01-04-06-18 Mollic Palexeralfs

    01-04-06-19 Typic Palexeralfs

    01-04-07-01 Haploxeralfs Lithic Mollic Haploxeralfs

    01-04-07-02 Lithic Ruptic

    01-04-07 -03 Lithic Haploxeralfs

    01-04-07 -04 Vertic Haploxeralfs

    01-04-07-05 Aquandic Haploxeralfs

    01-04-07-06 Andic Haploxeralfs

    01-04-07-07 Vitrandic Haploxeralfs

    01-04-07-08 Aquultic Haploxeralfs

    01-04-07-09 Aquic Haploxeralfs

    01-04-07-10 Natric Haploxeralfs

    01-04-07-11 Psammentic Haploxeralfs

    01-04-07-12 Plinthic Haploxeralfs

    01-04-07-13 Calcic Haploxeralfs

    01-04-07-14 Ultic Haploxeralfs

    01-04-07-15 Mollic Haploxeralfs

    01-04-07-16 Typic Haploxeralfs

    01-05-01-01 Udalfs Natrudalfs Vertic Natrudalfs

    01-05-01-02 Glossic Natrudalfs

    Code Order (AA) Suborder (BB) Greatgroup (CC) Subgroup (DD)

  • 48

    Standards for bio-geo database

    01-05-01-03 Mollic Natrudalfs

    01-05-01-04 Typic Natrudalfs

    01-05-02-01 Ferrudalfs Aquic Ferrudalfs

    01-05-02-02 Typic Ferrudalfs

    01-05-03-01 Glossudalfs Fragic Glossudalfs

    01-05-03-02 Aquandic Glossudalfs

    01-05-03-03 Andic Glossudalfs

    01-05-03-04 Vitrandic Glossudalfs

    01-05-03-05 Oxyaquic Glossudalfs

    01-05-03-06 Arenic Glossudalfs

    01-05-03-07 Haplic Glossudalfs

    01-05-03-08 Typic Glossudalfs

    01-05-04-01 Fraglossudalfs Aquic Fraglossudalfs

    01-05-04-02 Oxyaquic Fraglossudalfs

    01-05-04-03 Typic Fraglossudalfs

    01-05-05-01 Fragiudalfs Umbreptic Fragiudalfs

    01-05-05-02 Mollic Fragiudalfs

    01-05-05-03 Glossaquic Fragiudalfs

    01-05-05-04 Aqueptic Fragiudalfs

    01-05-05-05 Albaquic Fragiudalfs

    01-05-05-06 Aquic Fragiudalfs

    01-05-05-07 Oxyaquic Fragiudalfs

    01-05-05-08 Glossic Fragiudalfs

    01-05-05-09 Ochreptic Fragiudalfs

    01-05-05-10 Typic Fragiudalfs

    01-05-06-01 Kandiudalfs Plinthaquic Kandiudalfs

    01-05-06 -02 Aquic Kandiudalfs

    01-05-06 -03 Oxyaquic Kandiudalfs

    01-05-06 -04 Arenic Plinthic Kandiudalfs

    01-05-06 -05 Grossarenic Plinthic

    Kandiudalfs

    01-05-06 -06 Arenic Kandiudalfs

    01-05-06 -07 Grossarenic Kandiudalfs

    01-05-06 -08 Plinthic Kandiudalfs

    01-05-06 -09 Rhodic Kandiudalfs

    01-05-06-10 Mollic Kandiudalfs

    Code Order (AA) Suborder (BB) Greatgroup (CC) Subgroup (DD)

  • 49

    Soil resource codification

    01-05-06-11 Typic Kandiudalfs

    01-05-07-01 Kanhapludalfs Lithic Kanhapludalfs

    01-05-07-02 Aquic Kanhapludalfs

    01-05-07-03 Oxyaquic Kanhapludalfs

    01-05-07-04 Rhodic Kanhapludalfs

    01-05-07-05 Typic Kanhapludalfs

    01-05-08-01 Paleudalfs Vertic Paleudalfs

    01-05-08-02 Anthraquic Paleudalfs

    01-05-08-03 Plinthquic Paleudalfs

    01-05-08-04 Glossaquic Paleudalfs

    01-05-08-05 Albaquic Paleudalfs

    01-05-08-06 Aquic Paleudalfs

    01-05-08-07 Oxyaquic Paleudalfs

    01-05-08-08 Arenic Plinthic Paleudalfs

    01-05-08-09 Grossarenic Plinthic

    Paleudalfs

    01-05-08-10 Psammentic Paleudalfs

    01-05-08-11 Arenic Paleudalfs

    01-05-08-12 Grossarenic Paleudalfs

    01-05-08-13 Plinthic Paleudalfs

    01-05-08-14 Glossic Paleudalfs

    01-05-08-15 Rhodic Paleudalfs

    01-05-08-16 Mollic Paleudalfs

    01-05-08-17 Typic Paleudalfs

    01-05-09-01 Rhodudalfs Typic Rhodudalfs

    01-05-10-01 Hapludalfs Lithic Hapludalfs

    01-05-10-02 Aquic Fragic Hapludalfs

    01-05-10-03 Aquertic Chromic

    Hapludalfs

    01-05-10-04 Aquertic Hapludalfs

    01-05-10-05 Oxyaquic Vertic Hapludalfs

    01-05-10-06 Chromic Vertic Hapludalfs

    01-05-10-07 Vertic Hapludalfs

    01-05-10-08 Andic Hapludalfs

    01-05-10-09 Vitrandic Hapludalfs

    01-05-10-10 Lamellic Hapludalfs

    Code Order (AA) Suborder (BB) Greatgroup (CC) Subgroup (DD)

  • 50

    Standards for bio-geo database

    01-05-10-11 Psammentic Hapludalfs

    01-05-10-12 Aquic Arenic Hapludalfs

    01-05-10-13 Arenic Hapludalfs

    01-05-10-14 Anthraquic Hapludalfs

    01-05-10-15 Albaquultic Hapludalfs

    01-05-10-16 Albaquic Hapludalfs

    01-05-10-17 Glossaquic Hapludalfs

    01-05-10-18 Aquultic Hapludalfs

    01-05-10-19 Aquollic Hapludalfs

    01-05-10-20 Aquic Hapludalfs

    01-05-10-21 Fragic Aquic Hapludalfs

    01-05-10-22 Oxyaquic Hapludalfs

    01-05-10-23 Fragic Hapludalfs

    01-05-10-24 Glossic Hapludalfs

    01-05-10-25 Inceptic Hapludalfs

    01-05-10-26 Ultic Hapludalfs

    01-05-10-27 Mollic Hapludalfs

    01-05-10-28 Typic Hapludalfs

    02-01-01-01 Andisols Aquands Cryaquands Lithic Cryaquands

    02-01-01-02 Pergelic Cryaquands

    02-01-01-03 Histic Cryaquands

    02-01-01-04 Thaptic Cryaquands

    02-01-01-05 Typic Cryaquands

    02-01-02-01 Placaquands Lithic Placaquands

    02-01-02-02 Duric Histic Placaquands

    02-01-02-03 Duric Placaquands

    02-01-02-04 Histic Placaquands

    02-01-02-05 Thaptic Placaquands

    02-01-02-06 Typic Placaquands

    02-01-03-01 Duraquands Histic Duraquands

    02-01-03-02 Acraquoxic Duraquands

    02-01-03-03 Thaptic Duraquands

    02-01-03-04 Typic Duraquands

    02-01-04-01 Vitraquands Lithic Vitraquands

    02-01-04-02 Duric Vitraquands

    02-01-04-03 Histic Vitraquands

    02-01-04-04 Thaptic Vitraquands

    Code Order (AA) Suborder (BB) Greatgroup (CC) Subgroup (DD)

  • 51

    Soil resource codification

    02-01-05-01 Melanaquands Lithic Melanaquands

    02-01-05-02 Acraquoxic Melanaquands

    02-01-05-03 Hydric Pachic

    Melanaquands

    02-01-05-04 Hydric Melanaquands

    02-01-05-05 Thaptic Melanaquands

    02-01-05-06 Typic Melanaquands

    02-01-06-01 Epiaquands Petroferric Epiaquands

    02-01-06-02 Duric Epiaquands

    02-01-06-03 Histic Epiaquands

    02-01-06-04 Alic Epiaquands

    02-01-06-05 Hydric Epiaquands

    02-01-06-06 Thaptic Epiaquands

    02-01-06-07 Typic Epiaquands

    02-01-07-01 Endoaquands Lithic Endoaquands

    02-01-07-02 Petroferric Endoaquands

    02-01-07-03 Duric Endoaquands

    02-01-07-04 Histic Endoaquands

    02-01-07-05 Alic Endoaquands

    02-01-07-06 Hydric Endoaquands

    02-01-07-07 Thaptic Endoaquands

    02-01-07-08 Typic Endoaquands

    02-02-01-01 Cryands Duricryands Typic Duricryands

    02-02-01-02 Aquic Duricryands

    02-02-02-01 Melanocryands Lithic Melanocryands

    02-02-02-02 Alic Melanocryands

    02-02-02-03 Vertic Melanocryands

    02-02-02-04 Typic Melanocryands

    02-02-03-01 Fluvicryands Lithic Fluvicryands

    02-02-03-02 Vitric Fluvicryands

    02-02-03-03 Typic Fluvicryands

    02-02-04-01 Hydrocryands Lithic Hydrocryands

    02-02-04-02 Placic Hydrocryands

    02-02-04-03 Aquic Hydrocryands

    02-02-04-04 Thaptic Hydrocryands

    02-02-04-05 Typic Hydrocryands

    02-02-05-01 Vitricryands Lithic Vitricryands

    Code Order (AA) Suborder (BB) Greatgroup (CC) Subgroup (DD)

  • 52

    Standards for bio-geo database

    02-02-05-02 Aquic Vitricryands

    02-02-05-03 Taptic Vitricryands

    02-02-05-05 Humic Xeric Vitricryands

    02-02-05-06 Xeric Vitricryands

    02-02-05-07 Ultic Vitricryands

    02-02-05-08 Alfic Vitricryands

    02-02-05-09 Humic Vitricryands

    02-02-05-10 Typic Vitricryands

    02-02-06-01 Haplocryands Lithic Haplocryands

    02-02-06-02 Alic Haplocryands

    02-02-06-03 Aquic Haplocryands

    02-02-06-04 Acrudoxic Haplocryands

    02-02-06-05 Vitric Haplocryands

    02-02-06-06 Thaptic Haplocryands

    02-02-06-07 Xeric Haplocryands

    02-02-06-08 Typic Haplocryands

    02-03-01-01 Torrands Vitritorrands Lithic Vitritorrands

    02-03-01-02 Petrocalcic Vitritorrands

    02-03-01-03 Duric Vitritorrands

    02-03-01-04 Aquic Vitritorrands

    02-03-01-05 Calcic Vitritorrands

    02-03-01-06 Typic Vitritorrands

    02-04-01-01 Xerands Vitrixerands Lithic Vitrixerands

    02-04-01-02 Aquic Vitrixerands

    02-04-01-03 Thaptic Vitrixerands

    02-04-01-04 Alfic Humic Vitrixerands

    02-04-01-05 Alfic Vitrixerands

    02-04-01-06 Ultic Vitrixerands

    02-04-01-07 Humic Vitrixerands

    02-04-01-08 Typic Vitrixerands

    02-04-02-01 Melanoxerands Pachic Melanoxerands

    02-04-02-02 Typic Melanoxerands

    02-04-03-01 Haploxerands Lithic Haploxerands

    02-04-03-02 Aquic Haploxerands

    02-04-03-03 Thaptic Haploxerands

    02-04-03-04 Calcic Haploxerands

    02-04-03-05 Ultic Haploxerands

    Code Order (AA) Suborder (BB) Greatgroup (CC) Subgroup (DD)

  • 53

    Soil resource codification

    02-04-03-06 Alfic Humic Haploxerands

    02-04-03-07 Alfic Haploxerands

    02-04-03-08 Humic Haploxerands

    02-04-03-09 Typic Haploxerands

    02-05-01-01 Vitrands Ustivitrands Lithic Ustivitrands

    02-05-01-02 Aquic Ustivitrands

    02-05-01-03 Thaptic Ustivitrands

    02-05-01-04 Calcic Ustivitrands

    02-05-01-05 Humic Ustivitrands

    02-05-01-06 Typic Ustivitrands

    02-05-02-01 Udivitrands Lithic Udivitrands

    02-05-02-02 Aquic Udivitrands

    02-05-02-03 Thaptic Udivitrands

    02-05-02-04 Ultic Udivitrands

    02-05-02-05 Alfic Udivitrands

    02-05-02-06 Humic Udivitrands

    02-05-02-07 Typic Udivitrands

    02-06-01-01 Ustands Durustands Aquic Durustands

    02-06-01-02 Thaptic Durustands

    02-06-01-03 Humic Durustands

    02-06-01-04 Typic Durustands

    02-06-02-01 Haplustands Lithic Haplustands

    02-06-02-02 Aquic Haplustands

    02-06-02-03 Dystric Vitric Haplustands

    02-06-02-04 Vitric Haplustands

    02-06-02-05 Pachic Haplustands

    02-06-02-06 Thaptic Haplustands

    02-06-02-07 Calcic Haplustands

    02-06-02-08 Dystric Haplustands

    02-06-02-09 Oxic Haplustands

    02-06-02-10 Ultic Haplustands

    02-06-02-11 Alfic Haplustands

    02-06-02-12 Humic Haplustands

    02-06-02-13 Typic Haplustands

    02-07-01-01 Udands Placudands Lithic Placudands

    02-07 -01-02 Aquic Placudands

    Code Order (AA) Suborder (BB) Greatgroup (CC) Subgroup (DD)

  • 54

    Standards for bio-geo database

    02-07 -01-03 Acrudoxic Hydric Placudands

    02-07 -01-04 Acrudoxic Placudands

    02-07 -01-05 Eutric Vitric Placudands

    02-07 -01-06 Vitric Placudands

    02-07 -01-07 Hydric Pachic Placudands

    02-07 -01-08 Pachic Placudands

    02-07 -01-09 Hydric Placudands

    02-07-01-10 Thaptic Placudands

    02-07-01-11 Eutric Placudands

    02-07-01-12 Typic Placudands

    02-07-02-01 Durudands Aquic Durudands

    02-07-02-02 Acrudoxic Durudands

    02-07-02-03 Hydric Pachic Durudands

    02-07-02-04 Thaptic Durudands

    02-07-02-05 Typic Durudands

    02-07-03-01 Melanudands Lithic Melanudands

    02-07-03-02 Anthraquic Melanudands

    02-07-03-03 Alic Aquic Melanudands

    02-07-03-04 Alic Pachic Melanudands

    02-07-03-05 Alic Thaptic Melanudands

    02-07-03-06 Alic Melanudands

    02-07-03-07 Aquic Melanudands

    02-07-03-08 Acrudoxic Vitric Melanudands

    02-07-03-09 Acrudoxic Hydric elanudands

    02-07-03-10 Acrudoxic Melanudands

    02-07-03-11 Pachic Vitric Melanudands

    02-07-03-12 Eutric Vitric Melanudands

    02-07-03-13 Vitric Melanudands

    02-07-03-14 Hydric Pachic Melanudands

    02-07-03-15 Pachic Melanudands

    02-07-03-16 Eutric Hydric Melanudands

    02-07-03-17 Hydric Melanudands

    02-07-03-18 Thaptic Melanudands

    02-07-03-19 Ultic Melanudands

    02-07-03-20 Typic Melanudands

    02-07-04-01 Fulvudands Hydric Lithic Fulvudands

    02-07-04-02 Lithic Fulvudands

    Code Order (AA) Suborder (BB) Greatgroup (CC) Subgroup (DD)

  • 55

    Soil resource codification

    02-07-04-03 Alic Fulvudands

    02-07-04-04 Aquic Fulvudands

    02-07-04-05 Acrudoxic Hydric Fulvudands

    02-07-04-06 Acrudoxic Ultic Fulvudands

    02-07-04-07 Acrudoxic Fulvudands

    02-07-04-08 Hydric Pachic Fulvudands

    02-07-04-09 Eutric Pachic Fulvudands

    02-07-04-10 Pachic Fulvudands

    02-07-04-11 Hydric Thaptic Fulvudands

    02-07-04-12 Hydric Fulvudands

    02-07-04-13 Thaptic Fulvudands

    02-07-04-14 Eutric Fulvudands

    02-07-04-15 Typic Fulvudands

    02-07-05-01 Hydrudands Lithic Hydrudands

    02-07-05-02 Aquic Hydrudands

    02-07-05-03 Acrudoxic Thaptic

    Hydrudands

    02-07-05-04 Acrudoxic Hydrudands

    02-07-05-05 Thaptic Hydrudands

    02-07-05-06 Eutric Hydrudands

    02-07-05-07 Ultic Hydrudands

    02-07-05-08 Typic Hydrudands

    02-07-06-01 Hapludands Lithic Hapludands

    02-07-06-02 Petroferric Hapludands

    02-07-06-03 Anthraquic Hapludands

    02-07-06-04 Aquic Duric Hapludands

    0