25
BINDING IDS TO CONTENT A PROGRESS REPORT APRIL 2014 Chris Lennon President & CEO MediAnswers Chair of Open ID Project

Binding IDs to Content A Progress Report April 2014

  • Upload
    zoltan

  • View
    30

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Binding IDs to Content A Progress Report April 2014. Chris Lennon President & CEO MediAnswers Chair of Open ID Project. What Problem Are We Trying To Solve?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Binding IDs to Content A Progress Report April 2014

BINDING IDS TO CONTENT

A PROGRESS REPORTAPRIL 2014

Chris LennonPresident & CEO

MediAnswers

Chair of Open ID Project

Page 2: Binding IDs to Content A Progress Report April 2014

What Problem Are We Trying To Solve?

Page 3: Binding IDs to Content A Progress Report April 2014

Currently, there is no open method for embedding persistent content identifiers (e.g., watermarks, fingerprints, etc.) into content, so that it survives, no matter how that content gets to the consumer

Reta

il an

d Co

nsum

er

Prod

ucts

SKU UPC

DistributionBinding

Broa

dcas

t TV

and

Film

ID Registration Consumer

No

guar

ante

e of

su

rviv

abili

ty

DistributionBindingID Registration Consumer

Page 4: Binding IDs to Content A Progress Report April 2014

Content creators and distributors need an effective way of reliably binding content identifiers to audio/video content that will robustly and reliably transit an end-to-end media ecosystem

Existing identifiers, such as EIDR and Ad-ID, rely on binding an identifier to a file container, data streams within a file container, or structural metadata of the file itself, which can be destroyed during processing or delivery.

Research suggests that the only reliable approach is to bind the identifier within the audio/visual essence, so that it can survive throughout the end-to-end lifecycle.

Binding technologies exist – watermarks, fingerprints and wrappers – but today these are either proprietary, are not capable of surviving transit through the end-to-end ecosystem, or both.

Page 5: Binding IDs to Content A Progress Report April 2014

Content creators and distributors need an effective way of reliably binding content identifiers to audio/video content that will robustly and reliably transit an end-to-end media ecosystem

An open standard for ID-to-asset binding can enable a wide array of capabilities:

Increased speed, transparency and accountability

in video content and advertising measurement

Improved media workflow automation

within and between M&E entities

Enablement of new anti-piracy tools and methods

Reduced asset storage

and transmission costs

More complete long-tail content

monetization

On-the-fly media asset

assembly

More granular and comparable media

ratingsAccelerated digital content

locker adoption

Improved automated content recognition and detection

Simplified and less-costly media reconciliation

Better second-screen integration and improved multi-screen content

discovery

Fewer barriers to deploying cross-platform dynamic ad insertion

Page 6: Binding IDs to Content A Progress Report April 2014

• Where is this work being done?

Page 7: Binding IDs to Content A Progress Report April 2014

What Has Happened Up To Now?

• Meetings every other week since group formed in July of 2013

• Use Cases , and then Requirements created

• RFI issued Dec 15, 2013• RFI closed Jan 31, 2014• Face To Face Meeting Feb 11, 2014 (6

formal, 2 informal replies)

Page 8: Binding IDs to Content A Progress Report April 2014

Some Use Cases The Group Identified

Page 9: Binding IDs to Content A Progress Report April 2014

Cross Platform Measurement

Page 10: Binding IDs to Content A Progress Report April 2014

Second Screen Applications

Page 11: Binding IDs to Content A Progress Report April 2014

Audience Measurement

Page 12: Binding IDs to Content A Progress Report April 2014

4 Rs: Rights, Research, Royalties, Reconciliation

Page 13: Binding IDs to Content A Progress Report April 2014

Targeted Ad Insertion (Advanced Advertising)

Page 14: Binding IDs to Content A Progress Report April 2014

Requirements

• At the RFI’s core were a set of requirements. These came out of use cases discussed on the previous slides.

Page 15: Binding IDs to Content A Progress Report April 2014

Requirements

• Payload– Must be able to carry representations of

Ad-IDs and EIDRs

Page 16: Binding IDs to Content A Progress Report April 2014

Requirements

• Survivability Across Platforms– Must survive distribution to consumers across

all distribution platforms

Page 17: Binding IDs to Content A Progress Report April 2014

Requirements

• Recording And Playback– Must survive recording and playback at a

later time (DVRs)

Page 18: Binding IDs to Content A Progress Report April 2014

Requirements

• Granularity– Need to be able to detect the IDs during

short commercials, as well as longer programs.

Page 19: Binding IDs to Content A Progress Report April 2014

Requirements

• Synchronization Across Platforms– Must be able to retrieve IDs simultaneously across

different platforms (second screen)

Page 20: Binding IDs to Content A Progress Report April 2014

Requirements

• ID Replacement– Must be able to replace the ID if content is

repurposed within another program (e.g. SportsCenter)

Page 21: Binding IDs to Content A Progress Report April 2014

Requirements

• Quality– Must not degrade the quality of the

content for the consumer

Page 22: Binding IDs to Content A Progress Report April 2014

What Kind of Responses Did We Get?

• Most solutions focused on audio watermarking, although other solutions were presented (fingerprinting, XDS carriage, Time Reference Label, whistles, video watermarking)

Page 23: Binding IDs to Content A Progress Report April 2014

What Kind of Responses Did We Get?

• Although watermarking was dominant technology presented, there may be advantages to coupling this with fingerprinting or other technologies

• Example: audio watermark establishes that ad played, and fingerprinting verifies that entire ad played

Page 24: Binding IDs to Content A Progress Report April 2014

Next Steps• Group to focus on full report to SMPTE,

outlining suggested standardization work to achieve Open ID binding to essence.

Page 25: Binding IDs to Content A Progress Report April 2014

Thank You

Questions?

[email protected]