Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Bilateral Pulmonary Artery Banding for Resuscitation in High-Risk Single
Ventricle Neonates & Infants: Single Center Experience
KJ Guleserian, MD1, GM Barker, MD2, MS Sharma, MD1, J Macaluso, RN1, AW Nugent, MBBS2, JM Forbess MD1
1Division of Pediatric Cardiothoracic Surgery, 2Division of Pediatric Cardiology
Children’s Medical Center/UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
No Relationships to DiscloseNo Relationships to Disclose
BACKGROUND
• Operative mortality for the Norwood procedure
continues to improve for patients with HLHS or
other complex SV lesions with systemic outflow
tract obstruction.tract obstruction.
• As low as 10-20% in some centers.• Tweddell et al, Circulation 2002
• Karamichalis et al, Ann Thorac Surg 2010
BACKGROUND
• Mortality of 20-70% in “high-risk” patients with intact/restrictive atrial septum, pre-op shock, renal failure, small ascending aorta, prematurity, low birth-weight, ventricular dysfunction, significant AVVR, and/or extracardiac syndrome.and/or extracardiac syndrome.
• Gaynor et al, Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002
• Stasik et al, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006
• Lim et al, Pediatr Cardiol 2006
• Not only for first-stage palliation but also for those awaiting transplantation.
BACKGROUND
• Reduction in pulmonary blood flow by bPAB first reported for HLHS as an alternative to Norwood procedure in 1993.
• Gibbs et al, Br Heart J 1993
• Early success with hybrid palliation has led to its application for “high risk” HLHS and other SV lesions to optimize Qp:Qs imbalance and improve surgical outcomes.
• Galantowicz & Cheatham, Pediatr Cardiol 2005
• Pizzaro et al, Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008
PURPOSE
• To determine outcomes with bPAB and DS or PGE1
infusion in our “high-risk” neonates and infants
with HLHS or other complex SV lesions as a means
of resuscitation and stabilization to conventional of resuscitation and stabilization to conventional
Norwood palliation or primary transplantation.
• To identify risk factors for hospital death.
METHODS
• Retrospective review
• Children’s Medical Center Dallas
• January 2007-October 2011
• All patients with single ventricle (SV) < 3 months • All patients with single ventricle (SV) < 3 months
• bPAB & ductal stenting (DS) or PGE1 infusion
METHODS
• Echocardiographic, angiographic, operative and clinical data were reviewed.
• Hemodynamic, fluid balance and laboratory values were assessed immediately pre-bPAB and at 24 were assessed immediately pre-bPAB and at 24 hours and 4 days post-bPAB.
• End points included conventional Norwood, primary transplantation or hospital death.
Sebastian et al, J Card Surg 2010;25:596-600.
“High-Risk”
SV Patients
N=24
HLHS/ Unbalanced Tri. Atresia HLHS/
variant HLHS
N=18
Unbalanced
AVC
N=4
Tri. Atresia
w/ LVOTO
N=2
HLHS N=14
MS/AS 9
MS/AA 3
MA/AA 2
HLHS/variant HLHS (N=18, 75%)
Variant HLHS N=4
MA/AS/VSD w/ type B IAA 1
Heterotaxy w/ mesocardia,
primitive single ventricle, TAPVC,
RAA/vascular ring, interrupted
IVC/azyg. cont.
1
Dextrocardia w/ HLV, LVOT
hypoplasia & straddling TV
1
DORV/MA w/ AS 1
Other Complex SV
Unbalanced AVC N=4
RV dominant w/ RAA/vascular ring,
bilateral SVC, heterotaxy
1
RV dominant w/ CoA, TAPVC 1
RV dominant w/ Ao atresia,
hypoplastic Ao arch, ALCAPA, Scimitar
1
hypoplastic Ao arch, ALCAPA, Scimitar
syndrome, heterotaxy
LV dominant w/ CoA, hypoplastic Ao
arch, Trisomy 21
1
Tricuspid atresia/LVOTO N=2
Heterotaxy w/ mesocardia, D-TGA,
aortic atresia, RAA
1
D-TGA, CoA, hypoplastic Ao arch 1
RESULTS: DemographicsN=24
Gender (% male) 13 (54.2%)
Gestational age (wk) 38 (27-41)
Birth-weight (kg) 3.02 (0.9-4.1)
Age at bPAB (days) 8 (2-44)Age at bPAB (days) 8 (2-44)
Weight at bPAB (kg) 3.01 (1.5-4.4)
Prenatal diagnosis 11 (45.8%)
PDA stent 14 (58.3%)
PGE1 infusion 10 (41.7%)
RESULTS: High-risk CriteriaExtracardiac syndrome 7 (29.2%)
Heterotaxy 4 (16.7%)
Birth-weight < 2.5 kg 4 (16.7%)
Gestational age ≤ 36 wk 6 (25%)
IAS/RAS in HLHS/variant HLHS 9/18 (50%)
Metabolic acidosis (pH < 7.2) 7 (29.2%)
pH < 7.0 5 (20.1%)
AVVR (≥ moderate) 7 (29.2%)
Renal insufficiency/failure 6 (25%)
Poor ventricular fxn 5 (20.1%)
Cardiac arrest 3 (12.5%)
ECMO support 2 (8.3%)
CVA/seizures 2 (8.3%)
“High Risk” bPAB
N=24
HLHS/
variant HLHS
Unbalanced
AVC
Tri. Atresia
w/ LVOTOvariant HLHS
N=18
AVC
N=4
IAS
N=3*
w/ LVOTO
N=2
RAS
N=6
*Open atrial septostomy (N=1)
Transcather atrial septostomy (N=8)
Atrial stent placement (N=4)
“High Risk” bPAB
N=24
PDA Stent
N=14
PGE1
N=10N=14 N=10
N=1
Pre-bPAB
N=6
Post-bPAB
N=7
Simultaneous
RESULTS: Hemodynamic, Fluid Balance, Lab Data
* P < 0.05
** p < 0.01
*** p < 0.001
⌘Patients on pre/post ECMO support excluded
N=24
“High Risk”
N=1
Attempted 2V
N=7 N=9N=1
N=7
Hospital
Death
N=7
Conventional
Norwood
N=9
Listed for
TXPLT
N=1
Comprehensive
Stage 2
N=7
TXPLT
N=2
WL Death
RESULTS:Time Banded to Surgical Palliation or Transplant
Procedure Time Banded (days)
Norwood (N=7) 8 (4-78*)
CS2 (N=1) 118
Transplant (N=7) 89 (21-201)
*Trisomy 21, unbalanced AV canal/CoA, HAA � planned 2V
RESULTS: Hospital Deaths
• 9/24 (37.5%)
– Post bPAB arrest (N=3)
• Ascending Ao < 1.5mm (N=2, incl. ex 33 wk, 2.3 kg)
• Respiratory acidosis (N=1, ex 33 wk, 1.8 kg)
• 2/3 ECMO support• 2/3 ECMO support
– Absolute contraindication to transplant (N=3)
• Chronic renal failure (N=1)
• Scimitar/hypoplastic right lung (N=1)
• Uncontrolled sepsis (N=1, ex 27 wk, 900 gm)
RESULTS: Hospital Deaths
– Developed contraindication to transplant (N=2)
• UNOS status 7 = waitlist death = hospital death
• Recurrent sepsis w/ renal failure (N=1)
• Chronic lung disease (N=1, ex 35 wk, 1.6 kg)• Chronic lung disease (N=1, ex 35 wk, 1.6 kg)
– Palliative care per family (N=1)
RESULTS: Risk Factors for Hospital Death
Gestational age P=NS
Gestational age ≤ 36 wk P=NS
Birth-weight P=0.055
Birth-weight < 2.5 kg P< 0.0001
IAS/RAS P=NS
Age at bPAB P=NS
Age at Norwood, CS2 or transplant P=NSAge at Norwood, CS2 or transplant P=NS
Metabolic acidosis P=NS
≥ moderate AVVR P=NS
Poor ventricular function P=NS
Renal insufficiency/failure P=NS
Cardiac arrest P=NS
Neurologic deficit (CVA/seizures) P=NS
ECMO P=NS
Extracardiac syndrome P=NS
RESULTS: Risk Factors for Hospital Death
Gestational age P=NS
Gestational age ≤ 36 wk P=NS
Birth-weight P=0.055
Birth-weight < 2.5 kg P< 0.0001
IAS/RAS P=NS
Age at bPAB P=NS
Age at Norwood, CS2 or transplant P=NSAge at Norwood, CS2 or transplant P=NS
Metabolic acidosis P=NS
≥ moderate AVVR P=NS
Poor ventricular function P=NS
Renal insufficiency/failure P=NS
Cardiac arrest P=NS
Neurologic deficit (CVA/seizures) P=NS
ECMO P=NS
Extracardiac syndrome P=NS
RESULTS: Follow-up
• N=15 (62.5% survival)
• Median of 1.58 yrs (0.34-4.36)
• 6/7 (85.7%) of Norwood pts � BDG
– LPA plasty (N=2)– LPA plasty (N=2)
• 6/7 (85.7%) of transplanted pts are alive at median
follow-up 33.6 mos
– B PA plasty (N=3), RPA plasty (N=1) at transplant
– LPA plasty (N=1)
RESULTS: Late Deaths
• N=4 (4/15, 26.6%)
– Respiratory failure 3 mos post transplant (N=1)
• Right-sided PV stenosis, LPA stenosis
– Influenza B/PA thrombosis 1 mos post CS2 (N=1)– Influenza B/PA thrombosis 1 mos post CS2 (N=1)
– RSV bronchiolitis 2.5 yrs post BDG (N=1, Trisomy 21)
– Aspiration at home 2 mos post Norwood (N=1, mosaic
Turner’s) = inter-stage death
LIMITATIONS
• Retrospective
• Non-randomized
• Small number of patients
• Heterogeneous population• Heterogeneous population
• Limited follow-up
CONCLUSIONS
• bPAB and maintenance of ductal patency with
either DS or PGE1 is an effective means of
resuscitation for “high-risk” single ventricle
neonates and infants. neonates and infants.
• This strategy allows for reasonable survival to
either conventional Norwood palliation or primary
transplantation when appropriate.
CONCLUSIONS
• DS in the presence of a diminutive ascending aorta may compromise coronary perfusion and should be avoided.
• Branch PA intervention is more frequent in patients banded for longer periods of time.banded for longer periods of time.
• Early conventional Norwood is preferred when possible and thorough branch PA assessment made at transplantation.
CONCLUSIONS
• Birth-weight < 2.5 kg continues to be a significant
risk factor for hospital death.
N=24
“High Risk”
N=1
Attempted 2V
N=7 N=9N=1
N=9
Hospital
Death
N=7
Norwood/
DKS
N=9
Listed for
TXPLT
N=1
Comprehensive
Stage 2
N=7
TXPLT
N=2
WL Death
N=24
“High Risk”
N=1
Attempted 2V
N=7 N=9N=1
N=7
Hospital
Death
Figure 1
N=7
Norwood
N=9
Listed for
TXPLT
N=1
Comprehensive
Stage 2
N=7
TXPLT
N=2
WL Death
N=6
BDG
N=1
Inter-stage
Death
Sebastian et al, J Card Surg 2010;25:596-600.