Upload
kathryn-senior
View
216
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
monocytes, if stimulated directly with an injec-
tion of hormones, might mature into dendritic
cells in their own bodies.
Early resultsPreliminary results with 21 patients with ad-
vanced cancers have shown promise. The trial
demonstrated that GM-CSF alone had no im-
pact on dendritic cells, but that the two hor-
mones together, especially at higher doses of
IL-4, triggered monocyte maturation into den-
dritic cells; dendritic cell-counts increased by
100-fold. Several patients showed a positive
tumour response with some loss of tumour
mass or reduction in growth rate, although
only one patient showed ‘clinically significant
and sustained tumour regression’, according to
the researchers.
There is a long way to go before this therapy
becomes optimized, although the benefits
to patients are obvious if it proves to be
efficacious, ideally with injections that can be
carried out at home and with minimal side ef-
fects. The researchers hope to begin further
testing of their hormone combination later in
2000 and are likely to focus on prostate cancer.
References1 Roth, M.D. et al. (2000) Granulocyte
macrophage colony-stimulating factor and
interleukin-4 enhance the number and
antigen-presenting activity of circulating
CD141 and CD831 cells in cancer patients.
Cancer Res. 60, 1934–1942
2 Belldegrun, A. (1999) Presentation of renal
tumor antigens by human dendritic cells
activates tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes
against autologous tumors: implications for
live kidney cancer vaccines. Clin. Cancer Res. 5,
445–454
3 Kiertscher, S.M. and Roth, M.D. (1996) Human
CD141 leukocytes acquire the phenotype and
function of antigen-presenting dendritic cells
when cultured in GM-CSF and IL-4. J. Leukocyte
Biol. 59, 208–218
PSTT Vol. 3, No. 6 June 2000 update news
1461-5347/00/$ – see front matter ©2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. PII: S1461-5347(00)00271-6 191
At the end of March this year, the Neurological
Device Panel Advisory Committee (NDPAC) of
the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
granted marketing clearance to Activa
Parkinson’s Control Therapy, an electronic sys-
tem developed by Medtronic (Minneapolis, MN,
USA) to reduce the disabling motor symptoms
seen in advanced Parkinson’s disease. The vote
of the nine members of the committee was
unanimous, which makes FDA approval likely.
The NDPAC recommendation is, however, con-
tingent on certain conditions; a three-year,
long-term clinical follow-up must be planned,
and the product will require better instructions
for its use by physicians, as well as some label
changes. Despite this, Joseph McGrath of
Medtronic is optimistic. ‘After a recom-
mendation like this, we would normally expect
to receive full FDA approval within 3–6 months,’
he says.
Bilateral deep brain stimulationActiva aims to treat all four major motor symp-
toms associated with the disease, and the side
effects caused by drug therapy. Jerrold Vitek
(Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta,
GA, USA), one of the clinical neurologists cur-
rently testing Activa and who attended the
NDPAC meeting, says that the device is a big
step forward. ‘Most Parkinson’s patients’ re-
sponse to drug therapy becomes erratic and
they develop complications of excessive and
uncontrolled movement within 5–10 years.
Until recently, the only treatment option avail-
able at that stage was lesioning surgery,’ he ex-
plains. It has been known for a long time that
lesions in the subthalamic nucleus and the in-
ternal segment of the globus pallidus can re-
lieve symptoms such as stiffness, slowness or
lack of movement, shaking and poor balance.
However, lesioning surgery was only performed
on one side of the brain because lesions made
on both sides produced an increased incidence
of side effects and its benefits for symptoms
such as gait and balance were unpredictable.
‘Although gait and balance could be improved
more consistently with bilateral lesions, the
associated side effects are irreversible, and this
became a major disincentive to performing this
procedure,’ says Vitek.
The deep brain stimulation provided by
Activa mimics the effects of surgery; in addi-
tion, it has the advantage of being not only
reversible but also adjustable. The device is
implanted after administration of local anaes-
thetic and patients are fully conscious through-
out. Electrodes are inserted in the brain and
positioned in either the subthalamic nucleus or
the internal segment of the globus pallidus, and
then connected to a small signal generator. The
pulses are adjusted to achieve the greatest re-
duction in unwanted motor symptoms. The
generator, which is a similar size to a cardiac
pacemaker, can then be implanted under the
skin at the collarbone (Fig. 1). ‘Further, non-
invasive adjustment is then possible, and the
maximum effect is usually achieved within a
month after implantation,’ says Vitek.
Evaluation will continueEven if the FDA approves Activa this year, some
important questions about its use remain.
Bilateral brain stimulation for advancedParkinson’s diseaseKathryn Senior, tel: 144 118 942 1639, e-mail: [email protected]
Previous trials were not randomized and the
choice of brain site for the electrode was
biased. It was thought that implanting in the
globus pallidus was more effective for involun-
tary movement, whereas implanting in the sub-
thalamic nucleus was better for gait and bal-
ance-related problems. ‘The observations
suggested that both sites worked for a variety
of symptoms,’ says Vitek. Vitek and colleagues
are currently in the middle of a randomized,
double-blinded study to try to resolve this
question. Although the trial will not finish until
the year 2004, Vitek hopes that the statisticians
working with the data will be able to reveal
some interim findings within the next year.
Ryan Uitti (Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA)
says that the device should have a significant
impact on some of the most disabling problems
seen in advanced-stage Parkinson’s disease.
However, he warns that ‘deciding which pa-
tients are most likely to benefit from Activa will
also be a challenge’. It is still unclear whether or
not the device can slow the progression of
motor symptoms if implanted at an earlier
stage of the disease. ‘It is something that
should be investigated, but this may be diffi-
cult to do,’ adds Uitti. Vitek agrees and reports
that a recent survey revealed that approxi-
mately 30% of patients who suffer from
Parkinson’s disease, and whose drug therapy
was still effective, would be prepared to take
the risk of trialing Activa. ‘They were aware that
there were no promises that the treatment
would change the natural history of their dis-
ease, but they were prepared to take the
chance,’ he says.
Uitti also points out that the cost of the
treatment could pose a problem. ‘There is
significant cost for each device (US$12 000);
the cost of implanting two devices and follow-
up care must be added to that for the final
treatment bill, so this can be substantial,’ he
says. McGrath says that the device has been
priced in consultation with Medicare and other
independent healthcare funders in the USA.
‘There is a significant unmet need for Activa
and, so far, indications are that the cost will not
be a problem in this country,’ he adds. McGrath
cites the example of a precursor device to
Activa, which was granted FDA approval three
years ago for essential tremor and tremor in
Parkinson’s. ‘This device was priced at a similar
level but had been accepted by healthcare pay-
ers in all 50 states in the USA within 18 months.
There is no reason to expect less for Activa,’ he
concludes.
update news PSTT Vol. 3, No. 6 June 2000
192
Figure 1. The Activa system providesbilateral deep brain stimulation via twoimplanted electrodes. The signal generatoris implanted under the skin in the patient’schest and can be adjusted non-invasively.
In the July issue of Drug Discovery Today…
Editorial – Navigating the technology mazeby Jon Miller
Update – latest news and views
Strategies for discovering drugs from previously unexplored natural productsAlan Harvey
Drug discovery and vaccine development using mixture-based synthetic combinatorial librariesRichard A. Houghten, Darcy B. Wilson and Clemencia Pinilla
Diversity screening versus focussed screening in drug discoveryMartin J. Valler and Darren Green
Monitor – new bioactive molecules, combinatorial chemistry, invited profile