1

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Achinstein, B., Ogawa, R. T., & Speiglman, A. (2004). Are we creating separate

and unequal tracks of teachers? The effects of state policy, local

conditions, and teacher characteristics on new teacher socialization.

American Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 557-603.

Adler, M. (1982). The Paideia Proposal: An Educational Manifesto. New York:

Touchstone.

Aiken, W. M. (1942). Adventure in American Education Volume I: The Story of

the Eight Year Study, With Conclusions and Recommendations,

Available from http://www.8yearstudy.org/

Anderson, L. M. (1985). What are students doing when they do all that seatwork?

In C. W. Fisher & D. C. Berliner (Eds.), Perspective on Instructional Time

(pp. 189-202). New York: Longman.

Apple, M. (1985). Old humanists and new curricula: Politics and culture in "The

Paideia Proposal". Curriculum Inquiry, 15(1), 91-106.

Archbald, D. A., & Porter, A. C. (1994). Curriculum control and teachers'

perceptions of autonomy and satisfaction. Educational Evaluation and

Policy Analysis, 16(1), 21-39.

Arzi, H. J., & White, R. T. (2008). Change in teachers' knowledge of subject

matter: A 17-year longitudinal study. Science Education, 92(2), 221-251.

Atkin, J. M., & House, E. R. (1981). The federal role in curriculum development,

1950-80. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 3(5), 5-36.

Baildon, M., & Damico, J. (2008). Negotiating epistemological challenges in

thinking and practice: A case study of a literacy and inquiry tool as a

mediator of professional conversation. Teaching and Teacher Education:

An International Journal of Research and Studies, 24(6), 1645-1657.

2

Bakhtin, M. M. (1986a). From notes made in 1970-71 (V. W. McGee, Trans.). In

C. Emerson & M. Holquist (Eds.), Speech Genres and Other Late Essays

(pp. 132-158). Austin: University of Texas Press.

Bakhtin, M. M. (1986c). Toward a methodology for the human sciences (V. W.

McGee, Trans.). In C. Emerson & M. Holquist (Eds.), Speech Genres and

Other Late Essays (pp. 159-172). Austin: University of Texas Press.

Baki, A., & Guveli, E. (2008). Evaluation of a web based mathematics teaching

material on the subject of functions. Computers & Education, 51(2), 854-

863.

Ball, D. L., & Sharon, F.-N. (1988). Using textbooks and teachers' guides: A

dilemma for beginning teachers and teacher educators. Curriculum

Inquiry, 18(4), 401-423.

Banchero, S. (2006, November 16). Chicago pupils lag in U.S. science test; Less

than 10% of kids are deemed proficient. Chicago Tribune. Retrieved

October 16, 2008, from

http://archives.chicagotribune.com/2006/nov/16/science/chi-

0611160129nov16

Banks, J. A. (2005). Approaches to multicultural curriculum reform. In J. A.

Banks & C. A. M. Banks (Eds.), Multicultural Education: Issues and

Perspectives (5th ed., pp. 242-264). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Bannister, D., & Salmon, P. (1975). A personal construct view of education. New

York University Education Quarterly, 6(4), 28-31.

Basadur, M., Graen, G., & Wakabayashi, M. (1990). Identifying individual

differences in creative problem solving style. Journal of Creative

Behavior, 24(2), 111-191.

Baum, S., Renzulli, J., & Hérbert, T. (1995). Reversing underachievement:

Creative productivity as a systematic intervention. Gifted Child Quarterly,

39(4), 224-235.

3

Baumgartner, E., & Zabin, C. J. (2008). A case study of project-based instruction

in the ninth grade: A semester-long study of intertidal biodiversity.

Environmental Education Research, 14(2), 97-114.

Bejar, I. I., & Doyle, K. O., Jr. (1978). Relationship of curriculum area and course

format with student ratings of instruction. American Educational Research

Journal, 15(4), 483-487.

Benbow, C. P., Lubinski, D., Shea, D. L., & Eftekhari-Sanjani, H. (2000). Sex

differences in mathematical reasoning ability: Their status 20 years later.

Psychological Science, 11(6), 474-480.

Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality: A

Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.

Bidwell, C. E., Frank, K. A., & Quiroz, P. A. (1997). Teacher types, workplace

controls, and the organization of schools. Sociology of Education, 70(4),

285-307.

Binder, A. J. (2000). Why do some curricular challenges work while others do

not? The case of three Afrocentric challenges. Sociology of Education,

73(2), 69-91.

Blase, J. J. (1987). Dimensions of effective school leadership: The teacher's

perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 24(4), 589-610.

Bloome, D., & Clark, C. (2006). Discourse-In-Use. In J. Green, G. Camilli & P.

B. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of Complementary Methods in Education

Research (pp. 227-241). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Bogdan, R., & Taylor, S. J. (1975). Introduction to Qualitative Research

Methods: A Phenomenological Approach to the Social Sciences. New

York: John Wiley & Sons.

Boyd, W. L. (1978). The changing politics of curriculum policy-making for

American schools. Review of Educational Research, 48(4), 577-628.

4

Brody, L., & Stanley, J. C. (2005). Youths who reason exceptionally well

mathematically and/or verbally: Using the MVT-D4 model to develop

their talents. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of

Giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 20-37). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Brown, D. S. (1993). Descriptions of two novice secondary teachers' planning.

Curriculum Inquiry, 23(1), 63-84.

Butt, T. (2004). Understanding, explanation, and personal constructs. Personal

Construct Theory & Practice, 1(1), 21-27.

Cantrell, S. C., & Callaway, P. (2008). High and low implementers of content

literacy instruction: Portraits of teacher efficacy. Teaching and Teacher

Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 24(7),

1739-1750.

Carlson, D. L. (1988). Curriculum planning and the state: The dynamics of

control in education. In L. E. Beyer & M. W. Apple (Eds.), The

Curriculum: Problems, Politics, and Possibilities (pp. 98-115). Albany,

NY: State University of New York Press.

Carney, F. M. (1981). Another look at Triad: Practical considerations in

implementing the model. G/C/T(17), 40-43.

Cherryholmes, C. H. (1988a). Construct validity and the discourses of research.

American Journal of Education, 96, 421-457.

Cherryholmes, C. H. (1988b). Power and Criticism: Poststructural Investigations

in Education. New York: Teachers College Press.

Clay, T. W., Fox, J. B., Grunbaum, D., & Jumars, P. A. (2008). How plankton

swim: An interdisciplinary approach for using mathematics & physics to

understand the biology of the natural world. American Biology Teacher,

70(6), 363-370.

5

Clune, W. H. (1993). The best path to systemic educational policy:

Standard/centralized or differentiated/decentralized? Educational

Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(3), 233-254.

Coenders, F., Terlouw, C., & Dijkstra, S. (2008). Assessing teachers' beliefs to

facilitate the transition to a new chemistry curriculum: What do the

teachers want? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19(4), 317-335.

Cornbleth, C. (2008). Climates of opinion and curriculum practices. Journal of

Curriculum Studies, 40(2), 143-168.

Coughlan, R. J. (1969). The factorial structure of teacher work values. American

Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 169-189.

Craig, C. J. (2006). Why is dissemination so difficult? The nature of teacher

knowledge and the spread of curriculum reform. American Educational

Research Journal, 43(2), 257-293.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New

York: Harper Perennial.

Cuban, L. (1993). How Teachers Taught: Constancy and Change in American

Classrooms, 1890-1990. New York: Teachers' College Press.

Cuban, L. (2004). The Blackboard and the Bottom Line: Why Schools Can't Be

Businesses. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Dappen, L., Isernhagen, J., & Anderson, S. (2008). A statewide writing

assessment model: Student proficiency and future implications. Assessing

Writing, 13(1), 45-60.

Darling-Hammond, L. (1994). National standards and assessments: Will they

improve education? American Journal of Education, 102(4), 478-510.

Davis, G. A. (2006). Gifted Children, Gifted Education: A Handbook for

Teachers and Parents. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.

6

Day, H. L., & Matthews, D. M. (2008). Do large-scale exams adequately assess

inquiry? An evaluation of the alignment of the inquiry behaviors in New

York state's "living environment Regents examination" to the NYS inquiry

standard. American Biology Teacher, 70(6), 336-341.

Delpit, L. (1995). Other People's Children: Cultural Conflict in the Classroom.

New York: The New Press.

Derrida, J. (1978). Structure, sign, and play in the discourse of the human sciences

(A. Bass, Trans.). In Writing and Difference (pp. 287-294). Chicago:

University of Chicago Press.

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. New York: Free Press.

Diaz-Gemmati, G. M. (1999). "And Justice For All": Using writing and literature

to confront racism. In S. W. Freedman, E. R. Simons, J. Shalhope & A.

Casareno (Eds.), Inside City Schools: Investigating Literacy in

Multicultural Classrooms (pp. 57-76). New York: Teachers College Press.

Donovan, C. A., & Smolkin, L. B. (2001). Genre and other factors influencing

teachers' book selections for science instruction. Reading Research

Quarterly, 36(4), 412-440.

Duax, T. (1989). Preliminary report on the educational effectiveness of a

Montessori school in the public sector. The NAMTA Journal, 14(2), 56-32.

Edgar, D. E., & Warren, R. L. (1969). Power and autonomy in teacher

socialization. Sociology of Education, 42(4), 386-399.

Eisner, E. (1992). Objectivity in educational research. Curriculum Inquiry, 22(1),

9-15.

Eisner, E. (1994). The Educational Imagination: On the Design and Evaluation of

School Programs (3rd ed.). New York: MacMillan College Publishing

Company.

7

Eisner, E. (2004). Multiple intelligences: Its tensions and possibilities. Teachers

College Record, 106(1), 31-39.

Ely, M., Anzul, M., Friedman, T., Garner, D., & Steinmetz, A. M. (1991). Doing

Qualitative Research: Circles Within Circles. London: The Falmer Press.

Ely, M., Vinz, R., Downing, M., & Anzul, M. (1997). On Writing Qualitative

Research: Living by Words. London: Falmer Press.

Engel v. Vitale, 370 U. S. 421 (1962).

Enns, R. (1993). Experiencing the fourth wall: A narrative of graduate teacher

education in curriculum. Curriculum Inquiry, 23(1), 37-61.

Fazio, X., & Melville, W. (2008). Science teacher development through

collaborative action research. Teacher Development, 12(3), 193-209.

Feinberg, B. (2007). The Lucy Calkins project: Parsing a self-proclaimed literary

guru. Education Next(Summer 2007), 27-31.

Feldman, M. (1995). Strategies for Interpreting Qualitative Data. Thousand

Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Firestone, W. A., & Pennell, J. R. (1993). Teacher commitment, working

conditions, and differential incentive policies. Review of Educational

Research, 63(4), 489-525.

Fishkin, A. S., Cramond, B., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (1999). Investigating

Creativity in Youth: Research and Methods. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press,

Inc.

Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on

Language (A. M. S. Smith, Trans.). New York: Pantheon Books.

8

Frank, D. J., Schofer, E., & Torres, J. C. (1994). Rethinking history: Change in

the university curriculum, 1910-90. Sociology of Education, 67(4), 231-

242.

Fraser, J. W. (2001). The School in the United States: A Documentary History.

Boston: McGraw-Hill.

Freire, P. (1995). Pedagogy of the Oppressed (20th ed.). New York: Continuum.

Fuchs, L. S., Deno, S. L., & Mirkin, P. K. (1984). The effects of frequent

curriculum-based measurement and evaluation on pedagogy, student

achievement, and student awareness of learning. American Educational

Research Journal, 21(2), 449-460.

Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., & Stecker, P. M. (1991). Effects of

curriculum-based measurement and consultation on teacher planning and

student achievement in mathematics operations. American Educational

Research Journal, 28(3), 617-641.

Fullan, M. (1993). Change Forces: Probing the Depths of Educational Reform.

London: Falmer Press.

Fullan, M. (1999). Change Forces: The Sequel. London: Falmer Press.

Fullan, M. (2007). The New Meaning of Educational Change (4th ed.). New

York: Teachers College Press.

Gallagher, S. A., Stepien, W. J., & Rosenthal, H. (1992). The effects of problem-

based learning on problem solving. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(4), 195-

200.

Gardner, S. A. (2003). The unrecognized exceptionality: Teaching gifted

adolescents with depression. The English Journal, 92(4), 28-32.

9

Ginsburg, M. B. (1986). Reproduction, contradictions, and conceptions of

curriculum in preservice teacher education. Curriculum Inquiry, 16(3),

283-309.

Grossman, P., & Stodolsky, S. (1995). Content as context: The role of school

subjects in secondary school teaching. Educational Researcher, 24(8), 5-

23.

Grossman, P., & Thompson, C. (2008). Learning from curriculum materials:

Scaffolds for new teachers? Teaching and Teacher Education: An

International Journal of Research and Studies, 24(8), 2014-2026.

Gubbins, E. J. (1995). Research Related to the Enrichment Triad Model. Storrs,

CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University

of Connecticut.

Hammersley, M., & Gomm, R. (1997). Bias in social research., Sociological

Research Online (Vol. 2, Available from

http://www.socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/2/1/2.html

Harper, C. A., de Jong, E. J., & Platt, E. J. (2008). Marginalizing English as a

second language teacher expertise: The exclusionary consequence of "No

Child Left Behind". Language Policy, 7(3), 267-284.

Harris, C. R. (1990). The Hollingworth longitudinal study: Follow-up, findings,

and implications. Roeper Review, 12(3), 216-222.

Harrison-Jones, L. (2007). No Child Left Behind and implications for Black

students. The Journal of Negro Education, 76(3), 346-358.

Hart, A. W. (1990). Impacts of the school social unit on teacher authority during

work redesign. American Educational Research Journal, 27(3), 503-532.

Heubert, J. P., & Hauser, R. M. (Eds.). (1999). High Stakes: Testing for Tracking,

Promotion, and Graduation. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

10

Hoekman, K., McCormick, J., & Gross, M. U. M. (1999). The optimal context for

gifted students: A preliminary exploration of motivational and affective

considerations. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43(3), 170-193.

Hume, A., & Coll, R. (2008). Student experiences of carrying out a practical

science investigation under direction. International Journal of Science

Education, 30(9), 1201-1228.

Hutchinson, S. A. (1990). Education and grounded theory. In R. R. Sherman & R.

B. Webb (Eds.), Qualitative Research in Education: Focus and Methods

(pp. 123-134). London: The Falmer Press.

Illinois ex rel. McCollum v. Board of Ed. of School Dist. No. 71, Champaign Cty.,

333 U. S. 203 (1948).

Ingersoll, R. M. (1996). Teachers' decision-making power and school conflict.

Sociology of Education, 69(2), 159-176.

Isaksen, S. G., Puccio, G. J., & Treffinger, D. J. (1993). An ecological approach

to creativity research: Profiling for creative problem solving. Journal of

Creative Behavior, 27(149-170).

Jackson, P. (1992). Conceptions of Curriculum and Curriculum Specialists. In P.

Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Curriculum (pp. 3-40). New

York: Macmillan.

Jetton, T. L., Cancienne, M. B., & Greever, B. (2008). The evolving roles of

faculty learning communities: A university/high school literacy

partnership. Theory Into Practice, 47(4), 327-335.

Kanold, T., Toncheff, M., & Douglas, C. (2008). Two high school districts recite

the ABCs of professional learning communities. Journal of Staff

Development, 29(3), 22-24.

Kauffman, D., Johnson, S. M., Kardos, S. M., Liu, E., & Peske, H. G. (2002).

Lost at sea: New teachers experiences with curriculum and assessment.

The Teachers College Record, 104(2), 273-300.

11

Kelly, G. (1955). The Psychology of Personal Constructs (Vol. 1). New York:

W.W. Norton.

Kelly, G. (1963). Theory of Personality: The Psychology of Personal Constructs.

New York: W. W. Norton.

Kinder, D., & Bursuck, W. (1993). History strategy instruction: Problem-solution-

effect analysis, timeline, and vocabulary instruction. Exceptional

Children, 59(4), 324-335.

Klein, A. G. (2002). A Forgotten Voice: A Biography of Leta Stetter

Hollingsworth. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.

Kliebard, H. (1975). Reappraisal: The Tyler rationale. In W. Pinar (Ed.),

Curriculum Theorizing: The Reconceptualists (pp. 70-83). Berkeley, CA:

McCutchan.

Kliebard, H. (2004). The Struggle for the American Curriculum, 1893-1958. New

York: Routledge Falmer.

Koffler, S. L. (1987). Assessing the impact of a state's decision to move from

minimum competency testing toward higher level testing for graduation.

Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9(4), 325-336.

Kohn, A. (2000). The Case Against Standardized Testing: Raising the Scores,

Ruining the Schools Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Kohn, A. (2004). What Does It Mean to Be Well Educated?: And More Essays on

Standards, Grading and Other Follies. Boston: Beacon Press.

Krause, C. S. (1984). Enrichment Through Creative Arts. Reston, VA: ERIC

Clearinghouse on Handicapped and Gifted Children.

Kuhn, G. (2008). A quantitative methodology for determining the critical

benchmarks for project 2061 strand maps. Journal of Computers in

Mathematics and Science Teaching, 27(3), 299-324.

12

Lamm, N., & Greer, R. D. (1991). A systematic replication and a comparative

analysis of CABAS. Journal of Behavioral Education, 1(4), 1053-0819.

Landberg, M. (2008, April 4, 2008). State lags in students' writing skills; Three-

quarters of eighth-graders in California score at or below basic level, says

a national study. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved October 16, 2008, from

http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=1456696091&sid=5&Fmt=3&client

Id=9269&RQT=309&VName=PQD

Lawler, E. (1986). High involvement management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Leander, K. M., & Osborne, M. D. (2008). Complex positioning: Teachers as

agents of curricular and pedagogical reform. Journal of Curriculum

Studies, 40(1), 23-46.

Lee v. Weisman, 505 U. S. 577 (1992).

Lee, V. E., Smerdon, B. A., Alfeld-Liro, C., & Brown, S. L. (2000). Inside large

and small high schools: Curriculum and social relations. Educational

Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22(2), 147-171.

Leithwood, K., Menzies, T., & Jantzi, D. (1994). Earning teachers' commitment

to curriculum reform. Peabody Journal of Education, 69(4), 38-61.

Lemke, M., & Gonzales, P. (2006). Findings from the condition of education

2006: U.S. student and adult performance on international assessments of

educational achievement. Boston: Trends in International Mathematics

and Science Study (TIMSS).

Lévinas, E. (2006). Humanism of the Other. (N. Poller, Trans.). Chicago:

University of Illinois Press.

Liu, X., & Fulmer, G. (2008). Alignment between the science curriculum and

assessment in selected NY state Regents exams. Journal of Science

Education and Technology, 17(4), 373-383.

13

Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2006). Study of Mathematically Precocious

Youth after 35 Years: Uncovering antecedents for the development of

math-science expertise. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(4), 316-

345.

Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., Shea, D. L., Eftekhari-Sanjani, H., & Halvorson, M.

B. J. (2001). Men and women at promise for scientific excellence:

Similarity not dissimilarity. Psychological Science, 12(4), 309-317.

MacGillivray, L., Ardell, A. L., Curwen, M. S., & Palma, J. (2004). Colonized

teachers: examining the implementation of a scripted reading program.

Teaching Education, 15(2), 131 - 144.

Markowitz, D. G., Dupr, J., M., Holt, S., Chen, S.-R., & Wischnowski, M. (2008).

BEGIN Partnership: Using problem-based learning to teach genetics &

bioethics. The American Biology Teacher, 70(7), 421-425.

Marks, H. M., & Louis, K. S. (1997). Does teacher empowerment affect the

classroom? The implications of teacher empowerment for instructional

practice and student academic performance. Educational Evaluation and

Policy Analysis, 19(3), 245-275.

Martins, A. M., Vera-Licona, P., & Laubenbacher, R. (2008). "Model your genes

the mathematical way"--A mathematical biology workshop for secondary

school teachers. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications: An

International Journal of the IMA, 27(2), 91-101.

McCaslin, M., & Good, T. L. (1992). Compliant cognition: The misalliance of

management and instructional goals in current school reform. Educational

Researcher, 21(3), 4-17.

McIntosh, R. D. (2008). Teaching art + math. SchoolArts: The Art Education

Magazine for Teachers, 107(8), 64.

McNeil, L. M. (1986). Contradictions of Control: School Structure and School

Knowledge. New York: Routledge.

14

Mendaglio, S. (Ed.). (2008). Dabrowski's Theory of Positive Disintegration.

Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.

Meyer, R. J. (2002). Captives of the script: Killing us softly with phonics.

Language Arts, 79(6), 452-461.

Michie, G. (1999). Holler if You Hear Me: The Education of a Teacher and His

Students. New York: Teachers College Press.

Miller, D. G., & Kastberg, S. M. (1995). Of blue collars and ivory towers:

Women from blue-collar backgrounds in higher education. Roeper

Review, 18(1), 27-33.

Mishler, E. G. (1990). Validation in inquiry-guided research: The role of

exemplars in narrative studies. Harvard Educational Review, 60(4), 415-

442.

Morgan, C., McDavid, J. A., & Beedle, J. (2008). Mississippi's articulation

process: A work in progress. Community College Journal of Research and

Practice, 32(2), 135-143.

Morson, G. S., & Emerson, C. (1990). Mikhail Bakhtin: Creation of a Prosaics.

Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Murdoch, S. (2007). IQ: Smart History of a Failed Idea. Hoboken, NJ: John

Wiley & Sons.

Myers, M. (1996). Changing Our Minds: Negotiating English and Literacy.

Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

Nir, A. E., & Bogler, R. (2008). The antecedents of teacher satisfaction with

professional development programs. Teaching and Teacher Education: An

International Journal of Research and Studies, 24(2), 377-386.

The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, PL 107-110, (2001).

15

Ogawa, R. T., Sandholtz, J. H., Martinez-Flores, M., & Scribner, S. P. (2003).

The substantive and symbolic consequences of a district's standards-based

curriculum. American Educational Research Journal, 40(1), 147-176.

Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2000). The transition from childhood giftedness to adult

creative productiveness: Psychological characteristics and social supports.

Roeper Review, 23(2), 65-71.

Osisioma, I. U., & Moscovici, H. (2008). Profiling the beliefs of the forgotten

teachers: An analysis of intern teachers' frameworks for urban science

teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19(3), 285-311.

Parnes, S. J., & Noller, R. B. (1972). Applied creativity: The creative studies

project: Part II- results of the two-year-program. Journal of Creative

Behavior, 6, 164-186.

Persell, C. H. (2005). Social class and educational equality. In J. A. Banks & C.

A. M. Banks (Eds.), Multicultural Education: Issues and Perspectives (5th

ed., pp. 87-109). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Piaget, J. (1950). The Psychology of Intelligence. New York: Harcourt.

Pinar, W. (Ed.). (1975). Curriculum Theorizing: The Reconceptualists. Berkeley,

CA: McCutchan Publishing Corporation.

Pinar, W., Reynolds, W., Slattery, P., & Taubman, P. (1995). Understanding

Curriculum: An Introduction to the Study of Historical and Contemporary

Curriculum Discourses (Vol. 17). New York: Peter Lang.

Porter, A. C., & Smithson, J. L. (2001). Are content standards being implemented

in the classroom? A methodology and some tentative answers. In S. H.

Fuhrman (Ed.), From the Capitol to the classroom: Standards-based

reform in the states—One hundredth yearbook of the National Society for

the Study of Education, Part II (pp. 60-80). Chicago: University of

Chicago Press.

16

Powell, R. R. (1996). Constructing a personal practical philosophy for classroom

curriculum: Case studies of second-career beginning teachers. Curriculum

Inquiry, 26(2), 147-173.

Pradl, G. (1996). Literature for Democracy: Reading as a Social Act. Portsmouth,

NJ: Heinemann.

Project CONN-CEPT. (2008). Retrieved December 17, 2008, from

http://www.nagc.org/index2.aspx?id=1070&terms=parallel+curriculum+m

odel

Puccio, G. (1999). Creative problem solving preferences: Their identification and

implications. Creativity & Innovation Management, 8(3), 171-179.

Puccio, G., & Murdock, M. C. (Eds.). (1999). Creativity Assessment: Readings

and Resources. Buffalo, NY: Creative Education Foundation.

Purpel, D., & Ryan, K. (1975). Moral education: Where sages fear to tread. Phi

Delta Kappan, 56(10), 659-662.

Purpel, D., & Ryan, K. (1976). It comes with the territory: The inevitability of

moral education in the schools. In D. Purpel & K. Ryan (Eds.), Moral

Education...It Comes with the Territory (pp. 267-275). Berkeley, CA:

McCutchan Publishing Corporation.

Reid, W. (1978). Thinking About the Curriculum. London: Routledge & Keegan

Paul.

Reis, S. M., & Fogarty, E. A. (2006). Savoring reading schoolwide. Educational

Leadership, 64(2), 32-36.

Renzulli, J. (1978). What makes giftedness? Re-examining a definition. Phi Delta

Kappan, 60, 180-184, 261.

17

Renzulli, J. (1982). What makes a problem real: Stalking the illusive meaning of

qualitative differences in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 26(4),

147-156.

Renzulli, J. (1984). Technical report of research studies related to the revolving

door identification model. 2nd edition and addendum. Research Report

Series.

Renzulli, J. (1992). A general theory for the development of creative productivity

through the pursuit of ideal acts of learning. In J. VanTassel-Baska (Ed.),

Curriculum for Gifted and Talented Students (pp. 170-182). Thousand

Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Renzulli, J., & Reis, S. (1994). Research related to the Schoolwide Enrichment

Triad Model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38(1), 7-20.

Resnick, D. P., & Resnick, L. B. (1985). Standards, curriculum, and performance:

A historical and comparative perspective. Educational Researcher, 14(4),

5-20.

Roach, A. T., Niebling, B. C., & Kurz, A. (2008). Evaluating the alignment

among curriculum, instruction, and assessments: Implications and

applications for research and practice. Psychology in the Schools, 45(2),

158-176.

Robinson, E. L. (2008). Evaluation of Academic Achievement at Nine Paideia

Schools. Waco, TX: Baylor University.

RRoller, C. M. (2005). No Child Left Behind: A survey of its impact on IRA

members. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

Rosenblatt, L. (1994). The Reader, The Text, The Poem: The Transactional

Theory of the Literary Work (2nd ed.). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois

UP.

Rosenblatt, L. (1995). Literature as Exploration (5th ed.). New York: The

Modern Language Association.

18

Rubin, L. (1994). Muddy curriculum waters. Peabody Journal of Education,

69(4), 21-37.

Schofield, J. W. (2005). The colorblind perspective in school: Causes and

consequences. In J. A. Banks & C. A. M. Banks (Eds.), Multicultural

Education: Issues and Perspectives (pp. 265-314). Hoboken, NJ: John

Wiley & Sons.

School Dist. of Abington Township v. Schempp, 374 U. S. 203 (1963).

Shor, I., & Freire, P. (1987). A Pedagogy for Liberation: Dialogues on

Transforming Education. New York: Bergin & Garvey.

Silverman, L. (1997). The construct of asynchronous development. Peabody

Journal of Education, 72(3/4), 36-58.

Siorenta, A., & Jimoyiannis, A. (2008). Physics instruction in secondary schools:

An investigation of teachers' beliefs towards physics laboratory and ICT.

Research in Science & Technological Education, 26(2), 185-202.

Slattery, P. (1995). Curriculum Development in the Postmodern Era (Vol. 1).

New York: Garland Publishing, Inc.

Sloan, K. (2008). The expanding educational services sector: Neoliberalism and

the corporatization of curriculum at the local level in the US. Journal of

Curriculum Studies, 40(5), 555-578.

Smylie, M. A. (1992). Teacher participation in school decision making: Assessing

willingness to participate. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,

14(1), 53-67.

Stephens, D., Pearson, P. D., Gilrane, C., Roe, M., Stallman, A. C., Shelton, J., et

al. (1995). Assessment and decision making in schools: A cross-site

analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(3), 478-499.

Stone v. Graham, 449 U. S. 39 (1980) (per curiam).

19

Tannen, D. (Ed.). (1993). Framing in Discourse. New York: Oxford University

Press.

Tarr, J. E., Chávez, Ó., R. E., R., & Reys, B. J. (2006). From the written to the

enacted curricula: The intermediary role of middle school mathematics

teachers in shaping students’ opportunity to learn. School Science and

Mathematics, 106, 191-201.

Tatto, M. T. (1996). Examining values and beliefs about teaching diverse

students: Understanding the challenges for teacher education. Educational

Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 18(2), 155-180.

Taylor, L. A. (1995). Undiscovered Edisons: Fostering the Talents of Vocational-

Technical Students. Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the

Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.

Todorov, T. (1990). Genres in Discourse (C. Porter, Trans.). Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press.

Tomlinson, C. A., & Callahan, C. M. (1992). Contributions of gifted education to

general education in a time of change. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(4), 183-

189.

Tomlinson, C. A., Kaplan, S. N., Renzulli, J., Purcell, J., Leppien, J., & Burns, D.

(2002). The Parallel Curriculum: A Design to Develop High Potential and

Challenge High-Ability Learners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Torrance, P. (1993). The Beyonders in a thirty year longitudinal study of creative

achievement. Roeper Review, 15(3), 131-195.

Treffinger, D. J., & Isaksen, S. G. (2005). Creative Problem Solving: The history,

development, and implications for gifted education and talent

development. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(4), 342-353.

Tsai, D.-M. (1999). An enrichment model: A study of developing a pilot program

for gifted students. Gifted Education International, 14(1), 66-78.

20

Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering Towards Utopia: A Century of Public

School Reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Tyler, R. (1949). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. Chicago:

University of Chicago Press.

Tyree, A. K., Jr. (1993). Examining the evidence: Have states reduced local

control of curriculum? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(1),

34-50.

van Driel, J. H., Bulte, A. M. W., & Verloop, N. (2008). Using the curriculum

emphasis concept to investigate teachers' curricular beliefs in the context

of educational reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(1), 107-122.

Venville, G., Sheffield, R., Rennie, L. J., & Wallace, J. (2008). The writing on the

wall: Classroom context, curriculum implementation, and student learning

in integrated, community-based science projects. Journal of Research in

Science Teaching, 45(8), 857-880.

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological

processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Weinstein, G., & Fantini, M. (1970). Toward a Humanistic Education: A

Curriculum of Affect. New York: Praeger.

Westbury, I., & Hsu, C.-S. (1996). Structures of curriculum governance and

classroom practice in mathematics. Educational Evaluation and Policy

Analysis, 18(2), 123-139.

White, P. A. (1992). Teacher empowerment under "ideal" school-site autonomy.

Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(1), 69-82.

Wilde, S. (1990). Teacher autonomy and nonsexist curriculum: Case studies from

two rural schools. Curriculum Inquiry, 20(1), 41-62.

21

Wood, G. (2004). A view from the field: NCLB's effects on classrooms and

schools. In D. Meier & G. Wood (Eds.), Many Children Left Behind: How

the No Child Left Behind Act is Damaging Our Children and Our Schools

(pp. 33-50). Boston: Beacon Press.

Yin, R. K. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks,

CA: Sage Publications.

Young, J. H. (1979). Teacher participation in curriculum decision making: An

organizational dilemma. Curriculum Inquiry, 9(2), 113-127.

Young, J. H. (1985). Participation in curriculum development: An inquiry into the

responses of teachers. Curriculum Inquiry, 15(4), 387-414.

Zellermayer, M. (1997). When we talk about collaborative curriculum-making,

what are we talking about? Curriculum Inquiry, 27(2), 187-214.