202
BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO PUBLIC ACT NO. 511 OF 1988, SECTION 12(2) AND PUBLIC ACT NO. 88 OF 1997, SECTION 804 March 2000 Prepared By: Updated June 2000 Office of Community Corrections

BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE

PURSUANT TO

PUBLIC ACT NO. 511 OF 1988, SECTION 12(2)

AND

PUBLIC ACT NO. 88 OF 1997, SECTION 804

March 2000 Prepared By:Updated June 2000 Office of Community Corrections

Page 2: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART 1: MEASURING THE IMPACT OF PUBLIC ACT 511

PART 2: JAIL UTILIZATION: CALENDAR YEARS 1998 AND 1999

PART 3 PROGRAM UTILIZATION DURING FY 1999 AND OCT.-DEC. OF FY 2000

PART 4: LOCAL COMPREHENSIVE PLANS AND AWARDS OF FUNDS

PART 4A: Implementation of Local Comprehensive PlansTable 4A-1: FY 2000 Status

PART 4B: Award of Community Corrections Plans and Services FundsTable 4B-1: FY 2000 Comprehensive Plans and Services byCounty/CCAB

PART 4C: Probation Residential ServicesTable 4C-1 FY ‘98, FY ‘99, and FY 2000 Summary -- Award of Fundsand Utilization

PART 4D Facility Expansion Programs

PART 5: DATA SYSTEMS STATUS

APPENDICES

Appendix A - Statewide and County-Specific Felony Dispositions,1993 - May 1999

Appendix B - Statewide and County-Specific Prison Commitment Data by SGLCategory, 1993 - May 1999

Appendix C - Statewide and County-Specific Felony Sentencing Data by SGLCategory and Sentence Type, January - May 1999

Appendix D - Jail Utilization Data - Calendar Years 1998 and 1999

Appendix E - Individuals Determined P.A. 511 Eligible During Fiscal Year 1999

Appendix F - Individuals Determined P.A. 511 Eligible During October 1999-December 1999

Appendix G - New CCAB Program Enrollments FY99 –All Funding Sources vs. Community Corrections Funding

Appendix H - New CCAB Program Enrollments Oct 99 thru Dec 99 –All Funding Sources vs. Community Corrections Funding

Page 3: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

PART 1

MEASURING THE IMPACT OF PUBLIC ACT 511

Page 4: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

PART 1

MEASURING THE IMPACT OF PUBLIC ACT 511

INTRODUCTION

As explained in section 8.4 of the Community Corrections Act ( Public Act 511), the purpose of theAct is to encourage the participation in community corrections programs of offenders who wouldlikely be sentenced to imprisonment in a state correctional facility or jail, given they do not have acriminal record that indicates a pattern of violent offenses, have not demonstrated a pattern of violentbehavior, and would not increase the risk to public safety.

In section 12, the Act requires that the Office of Community Corrections report biannually as to theeffectiveness of community corrections programs and comprehensive plans funded under the Act;and it requires that the report include an explanation of how the rate of commitment of prisoners tothe state prison system has been affected.

PRISON COMMITMENTS

The annual prison intakes and returns increased from 1994 to 1998, but are down for 1999. Table1 shows the total intakes and returns from 1994 though 1999 with data from the CMIS data base.The prison intake and returns in the table include new court commitments, probation violators(technical and new sentence), parole violators with new sentences, and escapees with new sentencesand parole violators with technical violations. The trends over the last six years indicate:

� The annual increases are not the result of new court commitments.

The new court commitments continue to decline each year. New court commitments accountedfor almost 4,400 intakes for 1999, and this is the lowest number since 1994. Other departmentalanalysis indicates that only about 1/3 of these offenders were sentenced under the newlegislative guidelines. The new guidelines only effected a portion of the new courtcommitments in 1999.

� The largest proportion of intakes and returns were from offenders on probation or parole.

In 1999, these two groups accounted for almost 7,600 intakes and returns. Offenders onprobation or parole include 63% of the total for the year.

� The data on prison intakes and returns continue to support the state board priorities and policies.

Page 5: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Table 1

Prison Intakes and Returns

Fiscal Year

Type of Intake and Return 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999*

New Court Commitments 5,680 5,160 5,090 5,151 4,948 4,414 Probation violators 1,932 2,617 3,046 3,154 3,131 3,136 Parole violators - New sentence 1,233 890 1,033 1,288 1,345 1,254 Parole violators - technical viol. 1,964 1,916 2,577 2,668 3,109 3,186

Total – Intake and Returns [2] 10,809 10,583 11,746 12,261 12,533 11,990 Total – Intake Only[1] 8,845 8,667 9,169 9,593 9,424 8,804

Probation and Parole 5,129 5,423 6,656 7,110 7,585 7,576

Percentage: new commitments tototal

53% 49% 43% 42% 39% 37%

intake and returns

[1] Prison intake includes new court commitments, probation violators (technical and new sentence),parole violators with new sentences, and escapers with new sentences.

[2] Prison intake and returns include new court commitments, probation violators (technical and newsentence), parole violators with new sentences, and escapers with new sentences, and paroleviolators that are technical violations.

* Preliminary data

Page 6: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Figure 1

The data on prison intakes and returns show that the focus of treatment programs needs to be onreducing recidivism. The emphasis must go beyond simply diverting offenders into alternatives, andalso impact the longer term goal of reducing recidivism. Research on treatment programs that areeffective in reducing recidivism indicate that programs are more effective for offenders with higherrisk of recidivism. Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convictedof previous felonies indicate a higher risk. Offenders already on probation and parole with violationsalso fall into the higher risk classification.

The priorities for FY2000 and review of FY2001 proposals emphasize an increased focus on higherrisk of recidivism cases.

The priorities also emphasize strengthening education, employability, and job retention programsand cognitively based programming.

Page 7: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

SUMMARY OF COURT DISPOSITION DATA

This report provides data from the court disposition data base that are indicators of the degree towhich community based policies, sanctions and services have had an impact on the prisoncommitment rate and the overall pattern of felony dispositions in Michigan. The data reveals that:

� The vast majority (more than 75%) of felons continue to be sentenced to community-basedsanctions.

Approximately one out of three felons continue to be sentenced to straight probation.

Approximately one out of four continue to receive split sentences ( jail and probation) �indicative of the continued use of combinations of jail and other forms of supervision as analternative to prison.

� Michigan’s prison commitment rate decreased on an annual basis from 1993 to 1995, from25% to 22%. In 1996 it edged up and remained at 23%, with the exception of 1998 whenit returned to 22%.

� The total number of offenders sentenced to prison in 1993 totaled approximately 9,400.Since then that level has stayed in the eight thousands, with the exception of 1997 when itclimbed to approximately 9,100.

� The number of sentenced offenders with SGL minimum minimum scores of 0 account forapproximately 45% of the total number of offenders in 1998; the prison commitment rate forthis group was has been 6% since 1996.

� Offenders with prior felony convictions are most likely to be eligible for participation in PA511 funded programs, and data show from 1992 through 1995 the approximate prisoncommitment rate for these offenders decreased from 49% tp 37%. Although the rateincreased somewhat during 1996 and 1997, it has since returned to approximately 37%.

Overall Prison Commitment Rate.

Figure 2 illustrates the change in the overall prison commitment rate when only the most seriousdisposition for each offender is considered (dispositions where the offender was in prison at the timeof conviction and convictions on escape charges are excluded).

Page 8: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Figure 2

Overall Prison Commitment Rate and Number of Prior Felony Convictions.

Changes in prison commitment rates have not been uniform for all groups of offenders. For instance,as shown in Figure 2, the decrease has been greater for offenders with prior felonies. While thedecrease was greatest from 1992 to 1995, most recent data show the prison commitment rate forfelons with one prior has continued to decrease.

Page 9: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Figure 3

Page 10: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Discussion: Prior Felony Convictions and Targeting for PA 511 Eligibility.

The decrease in prison commitments can be attributed to a variety and combination of factors:changes in probation agents’ sentencing recommendations, increased availability of community-based sanctions and services, changes in public opinion and in the philosophy of various participantsin the criminal justice system, etc. Some, but certainly not all, of these factors are the result ofPublic Act 511--both through the discussion and public education functions of the CommunityCorrections Advisory Boards and through programs made available by funding from the Departmentof Corrections/Office of Community Corrections.

From its beginning, OCC has placed a strong emphasis on the use of historical data for establishingtarget populations and determining offender eligibility for participation in OCC-funded programs.In order to avoid net-widening, it is important to determine that an offender would historically havereceived a prison or jail sentence. One item of available data which has frequently been used byCCABs to establish eligibility is whether an offender has prior felony convictions. Thus, it isimportant to note that, those offender groups most likely to be eligible for participation in PA511 funded programs--i.e., those offenders with prior felony convictions---showed the greatestdecrease in prison commitment rates. The greatest change for this group occurred in the first partof the 1990's as policies and programs were developed and implemented pursuant to localcomprehensive corrections plans and P.A. 511 objectives and priorities.

Appendices: County-specific Felony Conviction Data.

Appendix A presents overall felony disposition data. Appendix B presents a detailed breakdown ofprison commitment data by SGL category. Appendix C only displays data from a single year, but itcombines disposition data with SGL category. Appendices A and B provide sentencing data forcalendar years 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, and January through May of 1999. Appendix Cpresents most-recently-available felony disposition data, and covers January through May of 1999.

The tables in these appendices present both statewide totals and data for each county. The originaldata source is the MDOC Court Disposition data base. From this data base, an offender data baseis extracted which reflects only the single most serious disposition for each offender during eachreporting period. Individuals are identified by Social Security Number (SSN) where available,otherwise by State Police Identification (SID) number or name where necessary. After excludingrecords for Offenders In-Prison, Escapees, and Offenders on Delayed Sentence, at the time ofoffense, the most significant record/disposition for each offender is chosen. Factors utilized to selectthe most significant record/disposition include:

1. Disposition type (prison, jail, probation, other).

2. Mandatory over non-mandatory sentence.

3. Longest length of maximum term allowed.

Page 11: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

PART 2

JAIL UTILIZATION

CALENDAR YEARS

1998 AND 1999

Page 12: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

JAIL UTILIZATIONCALENDAR YEARS 1998 AND 1999

For the calendar year of 1999, 76 of Michigan’s 81 counties with jails electronically transmitted jailutilization and inmate profile data to the State. Collectively the county inputs comprise the JailPopulation Information System (JPIS).

One of the stated purposes of JPIS is to provide information to support coherent policy making.Using this data, the State and CCABs can track jail utilization, study utilization trends, examinecharacteristics of offenders being sent to jail, and evaluate specific factors affecting jail utilization.Results of such analyses permit formulation of objectives to improve utilization (such as reductionin jail crowding, changing the profiles of the inmate population and reducing in the average lengthof stay for different types of groups of inmates) and enable the assessment of the impacts andeffectiveness of policies, practice, procedures or programming, which have been established toaddress objectives.

This part of the biannual report is designed to supply a report which summarizes primary categoriesof the JPIS data, together with an overview of the report.

The summary report covering data reported during calendar years 1998 and 1999, on both a state-wide and county basis, is shown in Appendix D. The report indicates: average daily populations bytype of offenders utilizing the jails, average lengths of stay, and the numbers of the releases uponwhich lengths of stay are based.

The explanation sheet, immediately below, explains how the report fields are derived. An overviewof the summary report follows the explanation sheet.

Page 13: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

JPIS Report Data Explanation Sheet

REPORT CONTENT

County versus Statewide Sections

To show occupancy levels at jails, the “BoardedIn” figures in county sections of the report includeoffenders boarded in from other jails as well asState and Federal boarders; and “Boarded Out”offenders are listed separately. In the Statewidesection, (“All Electronically Reporting Counties”)the counts from “Boarded Out” are not shownseparately, rather they are included in theSentenced Felon and Sentenced Misdemeanantcounts. Attendantly, the “Boarded Out” counts areexcluded from the Statewide “Boarded In” figures,so they are not “double counted.”

COMPUTATION DETAIL

Average Daily Population (ADP)

ADP figures are computed by summing (categoryby category) the number of days each reportedoffender has spent in jail during each reportedmonth, and then dividing those sums by the totalnumber of days in the reported months.

Percentage of Average Daily Population (% of ADP)

In the report that is a part of the cover letter forthis mailing, figures in the column “% of ADP”are computed as a percent of the total number ofhoused offenders under the county’sresponsibility, including those boarded out in otherjails. In the “Audit Report” (sent only to the jailsfor data verification), the monthly ADPpercentages are computed as a percent of thenumber of offenders housed in the jail. (Thoseboarded out are accounted for separately at the endof the report.)

The Average Length of Stay (ALOS)

ALOS figures are computed by summing (categoryby category) the lengths of stay of offendersreleased in the period which the averages coverand then dividing those sums by the number ofoffenders released in those respective categoriesduring the same time period.

Releases (Rels)

The Rels column displays the numbers of releasedoffenders included in each Average Length of Stay(ALOS) computation.

Note:

In both ADP and ALOS computations, the dayssummed only include records for which admit andrelease times indicate the offenders stayedovernight in jail.

DATA CATEGORIESLegal Status

SentencedIf an offender’s record has a sentence date, theoffender is counted as Sentenced.

UnsentencedUnsentenced includes Convicted and Pretrial.

Convicted:If an offender’s record has a convictiondate but no sentence date -- or if theconvictions-count field is not zero -- theoffender is counted as Convicted.

Pretrial: If an offender’s record has no sentencedate and no conviction date and theconvictions-count field is zero, theoffender is counted as Pretrial.

Crime ClassThe categories Felony, Misdemeanor, Federal,and Civil are termed Crime Classes. In reportswith divisions for only Felons andMisdemeanants, Federal offenders are includedwith Felons and Civil offenders are included withMisdemeanants. In audit reports prior to this(prior to October, 1999), this category reflectedthe offenders’ Crime Class at time of Arrest.This report reflects Crime Class at Time ofConvection, as will similar reports, hereafter.

ADMISSION STATUSAdmission Status is a nine-option designation jailsassociate with each offender:

1. Regular Inmate, 2. Weekender, 3. Inmate onTemporary Hold, 4. Boarder from DOC, 5.Boarder for Feds, 6. Inmate to be Boarded Out, 7.Boarder from another County, 8. Inmate returnedon Writs, and 9. Inmate on Temporary Hold foranother county.

Reports total offenders by Crime Class, except forthose that are categorized as Boarded In or Other. Boarded In:

This category represents the combined total foroffenders designated: Boarder from anotherCounty, Boarder from DOC, and Boarder forFeds

Other:This category represents the combined total foroffenders designated: Inmate on TemporaryHold, Inmate returned on Writs, and Inmate onTemporary Hold for another county.

Page 14: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

OVERVIEW

The JPIS summary report shows the composition of the jail population in terms of felons andmisdemeanants, sentenced and unsentenced status, as well as the number of inmates boarded out andboarded in the county jail. This report shows two years of data for the counties that have beenreporting the entire period, otherwise the months covered in each year are listed on the report. Thejail population is listed by the major categories of inmates housed in the county jail and inmatesboarded out. For each inmate grouping, it lists the average daily population (ADP), the percentageof the average daily population represented by the total ADP reported, the average length of stay (atrelease), and the number of releases.

The data for calendar years1998 and 1999 show the following:

� The 76 counties reporting accounted for an average of 16, 058 of the jail beds in the state, duringthe period from January through December of 1999. As of December, 1999, these countiesaccounted for about 97% of the total jail beds in Michigan. Since not every county is includedin the report and some of the reporting counties did not contribute data every month, thesummary data from the report does not fully represent state figures or state totals; however itdoes provide a reasonable and useful representation of a mix of counties including urban,metropolitan and rural counties.

� The average daily population of the reporting jails was about 15,153, 94% of their rated capacity.

� Of the jails reporting electronically - - and not including offenders in an “other” classificationsuch has “held on writ” or those who were boarded -- the following can be seen regardingoffenders housed during January through December 1999. The number of housed felonsaveraged 8,763.5 and the number of housed misdemeanants averaged 4,960.8, and thus the felonto misdemeanant ratio was 64% to 36%. The ratio of housed offenders that were sentenced tothose that were unsentenced was 48% to 52%.

� Of the inmates released during 1999 (not including inmates in boarded in status), there wereabout 16 thousand sentenced felons, 43 thousand sentenced misdemeanants 54 thousandunsentenced felons and 120 thousand unsentenced misdemeanants. The average length of stayfor sentenced felons was almost 3.5 times longer than for the sentenced misdemeanants ( about78 days compared to 22 days). The average length of stay for unsentenced felons was 29 dayscompared to 5 days for unsentenced misdemeanants.

Page 15: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

PART 3

PROGRAM UTILIZATION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1999 ANDOCTOBER THRU DECEMBER OF FY 2000

Page 16: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

PART 3

PROGRAM UTILIZATION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1999 AND OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1999

SUMMARY

Part 2 of this report presented data/information regarding jail utilization during 1998 and 1999. Part3 presents related information on individuals screened and determined eligible for participation inP.A. 511 programs and enrollments in community corrections programs during Fiscal Year 1999and the first quarter of Fiscal Year 2000. Counts of individuals eligible represent an unduplicatedcount of offenders; the number of enrollments is greater than the number determined eligiblebecause an offender can be enrolled in multiple programs.

October 1998 through September 1999 eligible offender data and program enrollment data submittedby local jurisdictions indicate the following:

� Over 24,600 individuals were determined to be eligible to participate in P.A. 511 programsduring FY ‘99, as displayed in the summary table which follows. Sentenced felons were 64%of the total eligible to participate and 6.5% were unsentenced felons; 27.2% were sentencedmisdemeanants and 2.4% were unsentenced misdemeanants. The data shows that thiscomposition of eligible individuals was nearly unchanged from the previous fiscal year.

� There were almost 31,600 reported program enrollments during FY99; nearly 25,900 of theenrollments were in programs funded in whole or in part by state community corrections funds.This indicates a slight decrease in reported enrollments from FY98 when about 33,700 werereported.

� Felons account for the majority of enrollments in treatment programs and residential programs.Misdemeanants, meanwhile, were most often enrolled in community service programs. This isas expected considering community service programs are utilized extensively to reduce themisdemeanant population in the jails in order to increase the availability of jail beds for felons.In addition to the frequent use of substance abuse programs for sentenced felons, alternativefunding sources were also utilized to extend these programs to a smaller but sizeable number ofmisdemeanants.

� Pretrial service programs have been implemented in several jurisdictions to expand utilizationof conditional release options and decrease length of stay in jail of pretrial detainees. This servesas another means to increase the availability of jail beds for sentenced felons.

The attached tables present data on individuals determined eligible for P.A. 511 and programenrollments statewide. For data for each local Community Corrections Advisory Board jurisdiction,see: Appendix C for Statewide and County-Specific Felony Sentencing Data By SGL Category andSentence Type; Appendix D for Jail Utilization Data - Calendar Years 1998 and 1999; Appendix Efor Individuals Determined P.A. 511 Eligible During Fiscal Year 1999; Appendix F for IndividualsDetermined P.A. 511 Eligible During October 1999-December 1999; Appendix G for New CCABProgram Enrollments FY99 – All Funding Sources vs. Community Corrections Funding; andAppendix H for New CCAB Program Enrollments Oct 99 thru Dec 99 – All Funding Sources vs.Community Corrections Funding.

Page 17: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Offenders Determined PA-511 EligibleSummaries of FY 99 and Oct-Dec 99

FY 99

Unsentenced Sentenced Totals

Felony 1,600 15,755 17,355 70%

Misdemeanor 580 6,698 7,278 30%

Totals 2,180 22,453 24,633100%

9% 91% 100%

Oct-Dec 99

Unsentenced Sentenced Totals

Felony 413 2,939 3,352 70%

Misdemeanor 193 1,263 1,456 30%

Totals 606 4,202 4,808100%

13% 87% 100%

Tables based upon CCIS Offender data with available Crime Class and Legal Status.Civil infractions included as misdemeanors; federal as felonies.

Page 18: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

State Summary

Enrollments by Crime Class & Legal Status

Fiscal Year 1999 - All Funding Sources

Sentenced Unsentenced

Program New Enrollments Felony Misdemeanor Felony Misdemeanor

24 Hour Structured 3,073 2,875 113 77 8

Case Management 4,394 3,703 616 49 26

Community Service 8,056 4,227 3,688 63 78

Education 636 182 135 186 133

Employment & Training 929 722 168 30 9

Intensive Supervision 3,849 1,329 1,954 326 240

Mental Health 421 252 143 24 2

Pre-Trial Services 2,250 836 73 1,154 187

Substance Abuse 5,746 3,625 1,744 272 105

Other 2,225 2,027 183 12 3

Totals 31,579 19,778 8,817 2,193 791

34,088 total enrollments (see Appendix G); above table based upon 31,579 records where program code, crime class & legal status were all available.May include enrollment of an individual in more than one program.

Page 19: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

State Summary

Enrollments by Crime Class & Legal Status

Fiscal Year 1999 - Community Corrections Funding

Sentenced Unsentenced

Program New Enrollments Felony Misdemeanor Felony Misdemeanor

24 Hour Structured 2,619 2,460 75 76 8

Case Management 4,311 3,625 614 46 26

Community Service 7,599 4,028 3,437 61 73

Education 411 80 66 147 118

Employment & Training 742 649 58 27 8

Intensive Supervision 3,540 1,202 1,839 289 210

Mental Health 332 221 87 23 1

Pre-Trial Services 2,188 833 71 1,119 165

Substance Abuse 2,007 1,410 494 67 36

Other 2,139 1,977 150 10 2

Totals 25,888 16,485 6,891 1,865 647

28,226 total enrollments (see Appendix G); above table based upon 25,888 records where program code, crime class & legal status were all available.May include enrollment of an individual in more than one program.

Page 20: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

State Summary

Enrollments by Crime Class & Legal Status

Oct-Dec 1999 - All Funding Sources

Sentenced Unsentenced

Program New Enrollments Felony Misdemeanor Felony Misdemeanor

24 Hour Structured 547 496 22 27 2

Case Management 1,156 995 136 15 10

Community Service 1,466 768 661 16 21

Education 244 50 34 84 76

Employment & Training 183 136 44 1 2

Intensive Supervision 841 224 397 113 107

Mental Health 66 37 16 10 3

Pre-Trial Services 1,188 222 5 612 349

Substance Abuse 1,029 570 328 89 42

Other 393 352 38 2 1

Totals 7,113 3,850 1,681 969 613

7,270 total enrollments (see Appendix H); above table based upon 7,113 records where program code, crime class & legal status were all available.May include enrollment of an individual in more than one program.

Page 21: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

State Summary

Enrollments by Crime Class & Legal Status

Oct-Dec 1999 - Community Corrections Funding

Sentenced Unsentenced

Program New Enrollments Felony Misdemeanor Felony Misdemeanor

24 Hour Structured 499 456 14 27 2

Case Management 1,152 992 135 15 10

Community Service 1,370 737 601 13 19

Education 172 17 14 74 67

Employment & Training 136 125 10 1

Intensive Supervision 733 206 373 91 63

Mental Health 51 36 8 7

Pre-Trial Services 877 222 5 600 50

Substance Abuse 346 276 47 16 7

Other 390 352 36 1 1

Totals 5,726 3,419 1,243 845 219

5,879 total C.C. enrollments (see Appendix H); above table based upon 5,726 records where program code, crime class & legal status were all available.May include enrollment of an individual in more than one program.

Page 22: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

PART 4

LOCAL COMPREHENSIVE PLANS

AND

AWARDS OF FUNDS

Page 23: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

PART 4A

IMPLEMENTATION OF LOCAL COMPREHENSIVE PLANS

Page 24: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

PART 4A-1

LOCAL COMPREHENSIVE CORRECTIONS PLANS

BY CCAB/COUNTY

FY 2000 STATUS

Table 4A-1 presents the status of each county’s participation in the implementation of theCommunity Corrections Act, the award of FY 2000 Community Corrections Plans and Services andProbation Residential Services Funds to date and pertinent data/information regarding prisoncommitment rates, jail utilization, FY 2000 objectives, etc. Information includes issues which havesurfaced during the year and plan modifications or actions which have been or are being taken toimprove impact or performance.

Specific sanctions and services supported by community corrections funds vary from community tocommunity depending upon local needs and priorities. While the variations exist, programs/serviceswhich are common throughout the state include: community service programs; substance abuseassessment and treatment; employment related services; and jail based offender screening services.

Page 25: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

COMPREHENSIVE CORRECTIONS PLANSFISCAL YEAR 1999-2000

AWARD OF FUNDS

TABLE 4A-1

CCAB

FY 2000 AWARD OF FUNDS

FY 2000 STATUS ISSUES AND/OR NOTESCOMPREHENSIVE

PLANS ANDSERVICES

PROBATION

RESIDENTIAL SERVICES

Barry/Allegan 157,644 78,690 The overall prison commitment rate in Barry Countywas 45% in 1994 but decreased to 19% by 1997 and1998. County data indicates the FY 99 rate was 13%and YTD FY 2000 it is 19%. The Allegan Countyprison commitment rate was 29% in 1998; 27% in1999 and 29% YTD FY 2000. Dispositions haveincreased each year 25% to 30% for the last fouryears in Allegan. The Barry County jail continues tooperate well under capacity while the AlleganCounty jail is operating at or over capacity with thenumber of beds rented to other jurisdictionssignificantly reduced. PRS utilization for the twocounties combined is under expected level(authorized daily population 5; actual dailypopulation 2). Previous underutilization ofcommunity service in Allegan has been addressedand program enrollments are at or above expectedlevels. Barry County has completed design andimplementation of a computer based educationalprogram. Use of the program in the jail has begun.

Population and disposition increases in AlleganCounty have resulted in increased jail crowding.Policies and procedures to promote increased use ofsentencing alternatives need to be strengthened bythe CCAB.

The overall prison commitment rate remains abovestatewide averages in Allegan county.

PRS utilization is below expected levels.

Page 26: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

CCAB

FY 2000 AWARD OF FUNDS

FY 2000 STATUS ISSUES AND/OR NOTESCOMPREHENSIVEPLANS ANDSERVICES

PROBATION RESIDENTIAL

SERVICES

Bay 145,320 78,690 The overall prison commitment rate declining: 30%for calendar year 1998 , 28% for FY 1999, and 20%YTD FY 2000. The jail continues to operate underthe rated capacity and boards in offenders from otherjurisdictions (approximately 12%). CCAB hasdeveloped new procedures for obtaining substanceabuse assessments from a local provider with reviewby the CDR and utilizing community based fundingsources for treatment where appropriate. Newprocedures have resulted in increased programparticipation in outpatient and residential substanceabuse services and increased utilization ofcommunity based funding resources. Computerbased educational program just getting underwayafter early delays in implementation schedule due toequipment procurement/installation and teachertraining. Implementation of cognitive basedprogramming to take place during 3rd and 4th quarters.

Low utilization of ODCP grant for monitoring andtesting; program was established primarily formonitoring/testing probation violators.

County is reviewing targeting and eligibility issueswith intent to re-focus resources on higher riskoffenders while developing community based andfee based support of services for lower riskoffenders.

Berrien 153,640 236,070 The prison commitment rate decreased from 38% in1997, to 29% in 1998 , to 23% in FY 1999, and to20% YTD FY 2000. Jail crowding has become anissue again in FY 2000. The ALOS of sentencedfelons increased from 57 days to 82 days during1999. CJRP claims have increased. The pretrialpopulation of unsentenced felons has also increasedfrom 7% of the ADP in 1999 to 29% of the ADP inFY 2000. FOC offenders generally occupyapproximately 10 beds in the jail and the JPMreviews cases to facilitate alternative resolutions.PRS utilization has continued to increase. TheCCAB is currently maintaining an FY 2000 ADP ator over 18. Utilization of electronic monitoring hasincreased during FY 2000.

The CCAB is in the process of reviewingcharacteristics of the pretrial population todetermine appropriate alternatives and/or revisionsin policies and procedures to address the populationincrease in the jail..

Support for developing a PRS facility in the countyhas increased. The CCAB is facilitatingdevelopment of a specific implementation plantargeting program start up for FY 2001.

Page 27: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

CCAB

FY 2000 AWARD OF FUNDS

FY 2000 STATUS ISSUES AND/OR NOTESCOMPREHENSIVEPLANS ANDSERVICES

PROBATION RESIDENTIAL

SERVICES

Branch County established a CCAB in the early 90’s; CCABwas disbanded in 1993. During FY 97 Countyofficials expressed interest in re-establishing theCCAB. OCC provided information to Countyregarding alternative sanctions and services andprocess for modifying previous comprehensive planand the preparation and submittal of a proposal andapplication for funds. The prison commitment ratewas 17.5% (21 of 120) in 1996 and 12% (16 of 132)during 1997 and 16% (16 of 101) during January-September 1998.

OCC will continue to offer assistance upon requestto County regarding preparation and submittal ofupdated County plan.

Calhoun 211,700 330,498 Downward trend in overall prison commitment rateand rates for various SGL and offense categories.Overall prison commitment rate of 19% during 1998compares to 22% for 1997, 26% for 1996, and 27%for 1995. Rate for felony offenders with SGLMin/Min of 0 decreased from 11% in 1995 to 7%during 1996 and 1997 to 4% during 1998.Commitment rate for offenders with SGL Min/Min12 remained above the state rate: 72% in 1995; 64%in 1996; and 66% during 1997 and 54% during1998. Jail has rated design capacity of 600; 1998ADP was 569, 159 were boarders. Utilization ofresidential services and day reporting now at or nearcapacity (utilization during FY 98 and 99 lower thanexpected).

During first five months of FY 2000, the CCABplaced emphases on reorganization; a new CCABmanager was hired; the CCAB office and supportservices were relocated; and a new residentialservices provider began operations in the formerMDOC correction center. Jail population strategiesimplemented or under development to reduceintake or length of stay of Calhoun County inmatesand expedite enrollment/placement of inmates innonincarcerative programming and supervision.The NEEDS assessment instrument has beenimplemented to assist in the identification ofoffenders who may be eligible for P.A. 511services.

Cass 75,140 The overall prison commitment rate was 20% in FY1999 and 21% YTD FY 2000. Rate for Min/Max of18 remains low - 3% in FY 1999 and 2% YTD FY2000. Jail continues to operate at capacity whileboarding in inmates from other jurisdictions.Sheriff’s Employment placement program continuingto expand. County will be implementing substanceabuse cognitive change program during remainder ofFY 2000.

County interested in developing in jail computerassisted educational program. Plans for FY 2001will be developed in conjunction with schooldistrict. Current GED program has difficultyaddressing low level learners.

Page 28: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

CCAB

FY 2000 AWARD OF FUNDS

FY 2000 STATUS ISSUES AND/OR NOTESCOMPREHENSIVEPLANS ANDSERVICES

PROBATION RESIDENTIAL

SERVICES

Central UP (1) 78,217 Prison commitment rates continue to be low: lessthan 10% during 1997 and 1998. Jail population hasincreased in both jails but overcrowding has notoccurred. Community corrections funds utilizedprimarily for community service program. Electronicmonitoring use has increased for pretrial offendersThe CCAB and Circuit Court Probation continue tomake use of a wide range of local programming.

Prison Commitment, jail utilization and programutilization objectives are being achieved.Additionally, the CCAB has taken on the County’svehicle immobilization program to increase revenuefor the community service program.

Clare/Gladwin Clare County prison commitment rate below staterate. Gladwin prison commitment rates below staterates.

CCAB formed but limited activity since 1991.

Clinton 77,000 The overall prison commitment rate declined from32% in 1998, to 30% in 1999 and 28% YTD FY2000. Min/Max of 18 prison commitment rateincreased from 8% (6 of 70) in 1998 to 15% (8 of 54)in FY 1999 and 12% (5 of 39) YTD FY 2000. Thejail continues to be utilized at capacity withapproximately half of the inmates being boarded infrom other jurisdictions. County is continuing toincrease use of structured sentencing and use ofavailable alternatives including PRS and electronicmonitoring.

The prison commitment rate for SGL Min/Max 18has increased due in part to departures from thesentencing guidelines; increased emphasis needs tobe placed on utilization of jail and other availablelocal sentencing alternatives for this population.Moreover, targeting and eligibility should beupdated to increase use community correctionsresources for higher risk offenders.

Page 29: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

CCAB

FY 2000 AWARD OF FUNDS

FY 2000 STATUS ISSUES AND/OR NOTESCOMPREHENSIVEPLANS ANDSERVICES

PROBATION RESIDENTIAL

SERVICES

Eastern UP (2) 127,000 Overall prison commitment rates for the regionbelow state rates: 17% in 1995; 12% in 1996; 22%in 1997 23% in 1998 and 11% in 1999. 1999 ratesfor Man/Del <50 grams 0%. OUIL III’s 12%. SGLMin/Min 12 are 0%. ADP of jails at or near rateddesign capacity. Policy and program plan providesfor conditional release for pretrial detainees andearned release for sentenced inmates to assureavailability of jail beds for sentenced felons. Theregion relies on the utilization of a wide variety oflocal resources for provision of substance abusetreatment, employment, and educational services.There has been an increase in utilization of theelectronic monitoring and community serviceprograms.

Policy and program plan continues emphases on:maintaining low commitment rates; and reducingadmissions to and length of stay in jail of pretrialdetainees and misdemeanants.

Limited space for housing female offenders.

Chippewa County was awarded FY 98 LocalFacility Expansion Program funds to increase jailbeds. The new beds are anticipated to come on lineby December 31, 2000.

Eaton 149,565 62,952 The overall prison commitment rate historically hasbeen under the state average: 16% in 1998; 18% inFY 1999; and 18% YTD FY 2000. To date FY 2000the county has sent 1 out of 87 offenders with SGLMin/Max of 18 or less to prison. The jail continuesto operate under the rated capacity and the countyrent beds to other jurisdictions. County is revisingapproach to employment services and has initiatedjoint planning with Michigan Works to accessemployment services in the future. The countyapplied for and received a drug court grant to addressthe OUIL III population. A structured sentencingapproach will be utilized with jail time limited to 90days or less followed by treatment and otherappropriate alternatives. The county is planning toutilize a risk/needs assessment tool inimplementation of new drug court program and inconjunction with other P.A. 511 programs. PRSutilization is at expected levels.

Utilization of existing employment and cognitiveprograms is lower than expected during FY 2000due to staff vacancies and jail construction/spaceissues. The CCAB is in the process of contractingand re-structuring services.

Page 30: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

CCAB

FY 2000 AWARD OF FUNDS

FY 2000 STATUS ISSUES AND/OR NOTESCOMPREHENSIVEPLANS ANDSERVICES

PROBATION RESIDENTIAL

SERVICES

Genesee 434,000 1,133,136 The October 1999-February 2000 FY 2000 overallprison commitment rate reported by the County was34%. This compares to 40% in 1996, 33% in 1997,and 38% in 1998. The October 1999-February 2000prison commitment rates for several prioritypopulation groups are higher than expectations: SGLMin/Max 18 or less - 13%; straddle cells - 67%;probation violators - 34%. Factors which contributeto this somewhat unusual pattern include but are notlimited to: long established practice of divertingmany lower level felons from felony prosecutionthrough practice of charging these individuals underlocal ordinances or misdemeanor charges; jailcrowding; a high degree of consistency betweenagent recommendations and sentences imposed.

The jail has historically been crowded and countycontinues to monitor and upgrade policies, practicesand programming to improve populationmanagement. 100 bed work release facility (financedin part with Local Facility Expansion Program funds)opened in January 2000.

Programming options have been expanded, e.g. injail substance abuse treatment has been implemented;education programming through Invest Learning isbeing expended; and modifications in targetpopulations for day reporting and other programshave been or are being implemented.

The overall prison commitment rates and rates forSGL Min/Max 18 or less and probation violatorscontinue to be higher than expectations.

Utilization of probation residential services isextensive while utilization of day reporting remainslower than expected. County needs to re-examinetarget populations and program specific eligibilitycriteria for the residential services and dayreporting programs and reaffirm priorities forplacement, length of stay and linkages between theresidential and day reporting programs. Increasedemphasis needs to be on controlling the ADP in theresidential program through prioritizing intake(higher risk of recidivism cases) and reducinglength of stay in residence through enrollment inday reporting.

County should also re-examine all targetingpolicies and program specific eligibility criteriawith the intent to refocus community correctionsresources on higher risk offenders while developingother community based and/or fee based supportfor services for lower risk of recidivism offenders.

Page 31: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

CCAB

FY 2000 AWARD OF FUNDS

FY 2000 STATUS ISSUES AND/OR NOTESCOMPREHENSIVEPLANS ANDSERVICES

PROBATION RESIDENTIAL

SERVICES

Gratiot Overall prison commitment rate was 33% in 1995,27% in 1996 and 1997 and 29% during 1998.Commitment rate for offenders with SGL Min/Max18 was 14% in 1997 and 8% in 1998; rate for SGLMin/Min 0 was 15% in 1997 and 4% for 1998. Highreliance on incarceration (jail and prison) for felonyoffenders; 0% sentenced to straight probation in 1998as compared to 33% for the state. Jail has rateddesign capacity of 70. County boards inmates inother jurisdictions. Jail crowding and need to boardout inmates virtually assured considering sentencingpractices.

CCAB not active during FY 99; no expenditures ofawarded funds. OCC continued to meet withvarious county officials to re-assess approach anddetermine county’s interest revising CCAB plan.Circuit Court interested in focusing on substanceabuse treatment options.

No FY 2000 proposal/application for fundssubmitted by County.

Hillsdale Prison commitment rate of 49% was the highestamong Michigan’s counties during 1998. It is logicalthen that the rates would be high for virtually all SGLand offense categories. Lower guideline offendershave historically accounted for the majority ofdispositions in the County (e.g., more than 58% ofthe dispositions are for offenders with SGL min/minof 0; this compares to 48% for the state; the 1998prison commitment rate of 33% for this group ismore than 5 times the state rate). The rate ofincarceration for felony offenders (99%) is thehighest among Michigan counties and the availabledata suggests the use of incarceration has increasedsince November, 1996. While the rate ofincarceration has not changed since November of1996, length of stay of jail inmates has increased andthe ADP of inmates from Hillsdale has increased.

No CCAB. There were several meetings duringFY 97 and early FY 98 with county officialsregarding creation of a CCAB and development ofa local plan. Lack of follow up by County; OCCwill continue to work with the County.

Given the sentencing patterns within the County, ithas been expected that the new sentencingguidelines will have major impacts on local system.Actual impacts will be reviewed as 1999 and 2000felony disposition data becomes available.

Page 32: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

CCAB

FY 2000 AWARD OF FUNDS

FY 2000 STATUS ISSUES AND/OR NOTESCOMPREHENSIVEPLANS ANDSERVICES

PROBATION RESIDENTIAL

SERVICES

Huron 66,812 Overall prison commitment rate of 21% in 1995,15% in 1996, 22% in 1997, 23% in 1998, and 16%October 1999 to February 2000. Rated designcapacity of the jail is 65; County continues to boardsinmates from other jurisdictions (19% of the jail’spopulation at mid year). County established a pilotproject in FY 98 for OUIL offenders with multiplepriors: prosecuted as misdemeanants, focus onsanctions and treatment within the community--shortterm residential followed by release to day reportingand outpatient. Objectives were to minimizesentences as OUIL IIIs and pay costs through thirdparty billings and offender fees. During FY 2000there have been four OUIL 3rds all have been keptlocally.

The county is currently evaluating theeffectiveness of the Residential Substance AbuseTreatment Program. At mid-year two of the fourOUIL 3rds that had received residential substancetreatment were enrolled in substance abusetreatment again. Award of funds for substanceabuse treatment utilized to finance gaps betweencosts and revenues generated from third partybilling and other sources.

The in-jail substance abuse program has exceededutilization expectations. Day reporting programcontinues to generate sufficient revenue fromoffender fees to be self supporting.

InghamCounty/Lansing

286,275 550,830 The overall prison commitment rate declined from26% in 1997 and 1998, to 22% in FY 1999 and YTDFY 2000 18%. YTD FY 2000 rate for straddle celloffenders is 22% and the OUIL III rate 17%. TheCounty continues to rent beds to the State, jailovercrowding has decreased; no emergency earlyreleases have occurred YTD FY 2000.Recommendations resulting from the systemmapping process are being pursued including re-structuring of the county funded pretrial servicesprogram and use of automated case managementtechnology. Local siting issues resolved and countyis proceeding with plan to expand PRS capacitywithin the county. Current PRS utilization is 34 outof an authorized daily population of 35.

The jail has not completed installation of a new jailmanagement software, limiting the availability ofcurrent jail data for analysis.

The county is working with Family Court todevelop strategies for reducing the average dailypopulation of FOC inmates. The county ispursuing options to utilize Michigan Worksservices to assist in addressing the FOC and othersub-populations in the jail.

Underutilized capacity in employment, dayreporting, and outpatient aftercare programs.

Page 33: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

CCAB

FY 2000 AWARD OF FUNDS

FY 2000 STATUS ISSUES AND/OR NOTESCOMPREHENSIVEPLANS ANDSERVICES

PROBATION RESIDENTIAL

SERVICES

Isabella 84,818 The overall prison commitment rate increased from9% in 1998, to 16% in FY 1999, and 19% YTD FY2000. The jail continues to operate at capacity withapproximately 50% of beds rented out to otherjurisdictions. The county has implemented cognitivechange program in jail as planned and is utilizing arisk/ need assessment tool to assist in determiningeligibility for appropriate programming. Programutilization in intensive supervision/electronicmonitoring has increased significantly from the lowlevel of utilization experienced during FY 1999.County is requesting budget increase for cognitivechange aftercare program phase.

The county hired a new CCAB manager during FY2000. To date the new manager has implementednew cognitive programs, use of risk/needsassessment, and strategies for additional fee basedrevenues to support CCAB efforts.

Jackson 190,128 283,284 The prison commitment rate October 1999 throughFebruary 2000 was 28%, 42% in 1998, 38% in 1997and 29% in 1996. The SGL Min/Max � 18 prisoncommitment rate decreased from 22% in 1998 to 5%in 1999 (10/210); the average PRV of the 10sentenced to prison was 41. In 1999 74% of thestraddle cell offenders were sentenced to prison; theaverage PRV of the straddle cell offenders sentencedto prison in 1999 was 55. In 1998 37% of theprobation violators were sentenced to prison, in 199932% were sentenced to prison. The ADP ofresidential services Oct. through February 2000 was17 an increase of 65% over the previous year.Although the jail continues to be crowded the ADPthrough Feb. 2000 was 193, the rated design capacityis 192. There were no overcrowding emergenciesdeclared.

The recommendations by the committeesestablished within the County to examine options toreduce jail crowding and prison admissions havebegun to have some effect. There have been noovercrowding emergencies declared and prisonadmissions are declining.

Genesis I a new residential program developed inJackson has become operational; experiencingnormal startup and growth issues.

Page 34: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

CCAB

FY 2000 AWARD OF FUNDS

FY 2000 STATUS ISSUES AND/OR NOTESCOMPREHENSIVEPLANS ANDSERVICES

PROBATION RESIDENTIAL

SERVICES

Kalamazoo 399,765 1,412,550 Overall prison commitment rate was 25% in 1996,21% in 1997, and 20% in 1998. Rate for SGLMin/Max 18 or less was 7.3% in 1996, 4.4% in 1997,3% in 1998 and 0% YTD FY 2000. The jail remainscrowded with 2 overcrowding emergencies declaredYTD FY 2000; pretrial population decreased from51% during 1999 to 40% YTD FY 2000. County isreviewing a draft jail study recommendations andoptions to further reduce the pretrial population.Through March PRS utilization is at expected levels.Drug court utilization is lower than expected.

During the first half of FY 2000 the county hasbeen dealing with a number of administrative issuesincluding changes in CCAB management, changesin funding source and movement of the drug courtunder the administration of Circuit Court, andrelocation of CCAB offices.

Increased attention of other objectives,implementation of cognitive change programmingand expanded use of risk/need assessment, will bepursued during the remainder of the FY 2000.

Page 35: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

CCAB

FY 2000 AWARD OF FUNDS

FY 2000 STATUS ISSUES AND/OR NOTESCOMPREHENSIVEPLANS ANDSERVICES

PROBATION RESIDENTIAL

SERVICES

Kent 739,800 1,416,420 The overall prison commitment rate declined from26% in 1998, to 21% in 1999, and 22% YTD 2000.Total overall number of dispositions have decreasedby approximately 15% to 20%; the percent ofoffenders with SGL Min/Max of 18 or less(intermediate sanction cell/lock out) range has nearlydoubled. Despite the increase in the proportionatesize of the population, the prison commitment ratefor SGLs Min/Max18 or less is 4.7% YTD FY 2000compared to 5.1% in CY 1998 and 3.9% in FY 1999.Also, the number of felony probation violators whoare re-sentenced has increased significantly (nearlydoubled) but the percent of violators being sent toprison has decreased from 42% at mid-year FY 1999to 27% at mid-year FY 2000. The OUIL III prisoncommitment rate has been reduced from 40% in1995, to 30% in 1998, 27% in FY 1999. YTD FY2000 rate is 34%. The jail continues to operate incongruence with the jail bed allocation plan.

PRS utilization has increased to the authorized levels. The agreement between Alternative Directions andJellema House to provide substance abuseresidential treatment programming in available spaceat Alternative Directions has expanded the capacityof a needed alternative sentencing resource andcontributed to the increased use of PRS.

Impact of the jail split sentence agreement (policyto utilize split sentences for offenders receivingsentences of 90 days or longer) continues to beunder expected levels due in part to number ofprobation violators receiving jail sentences withprobation revoked. Therefore, split sentences havenot increased as planned and comprised 13% ofdispositions in FY 1999, and 11% of dispositionsYTD FY 2000. Conversely, the percent of straightjail sentences has not declined but increased from22% in FY 1999 to 30% in YTD FY 2000.

The County continues to review characteristics ofthe probation violators being sent to prison and jailand review strategies to increase use of CCABresources to address this population.

Page 36: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

CCAB

FY 2000 AWARD OF FUNDS

FY 2000 STATUS ISSUES AND/OR NOTESCOMPREHENSIVEPLANS ANDSERVICES

PROBATION RESIDENTIAL

SERVICES

Lake 35,049 The overall prison commitment rate October 1999 -March 2000 was 13%, OUIL III 23%, SGLMin/Min 12 12% probation violators 33%. LakeCounty jail renovation project will increase the rateddesign capacity to 47. The jail is operating at lessthan 50% of the current 36 bed capacity. The ADPof felons has been low over the past several years. Agoal of the county has been to reduce themisdemeanant population; the ADP ofmisdemeanants declined from 90% in 1997 to 75%in 1998, 51% in 1999 and currently 50%. The countyutilizes a variety of local programs to augmentCCAB funded programming including a cognitivechange program for felons with multiple priorslocated at the Mason County Jail. Overall programutilization is at projections thus far this year. Policyand program plan being fully implemented.

Efforts continue to reduce the ADP and length ofstay in jail of pretrial detainees, misdemeanants,and lower guideline felons and use of Cognitivechange program in conjunction with MasonCounty.

Lenawee Overall prison commitment rate among highest ofMichigan counties: 47% in 1995; 47% in 1996; 42%during 1997 and 48% in 1998. Offenders with lowerSGL guidelines account for the majority of theCounty’s felony dispositions and an unusually largeproportion of the County’s prison commitments.Only 6% of felons were sentenced to straightprobation during 1998; statewide 33% of felons aresentenced to straight probation. Rated designcapacity of jail is 156; ADP was 165 in 1997 170 in1998 and 1999.

OCC had several meetings with County officialsduring FY 96, FY’ 97 and FY 98 relative toreactivating the CCAB, updating the County’scomprehensive plan, and preparing a proposal andapplication for funds. Limited follow up byCounty.

Given past sentencing practices, the new statutoryguidelines are expected to have significantimplications for and impacts on the County

Page 37: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

CCAB

FY 2000 AWARD OF FUNDS

FY 2000 STATUS ISSUES AND/OR NOTESCOMPREHENSIVEPLANS ANDSERVICES

PROBATION RESIDENTIAL

SERVICES

Livingston Prison commitment rate was 23% in 1994, 18%during 1995, 40% in 1996, 28% during 1997 and24% during 1998. High prison commitment rates forlow guidelines offenders (1996, 1997, and 1998 ratesfor SGL Min/Min of 0 and SGL Min/Max of 18 aredouble the state rates) and OUIL III rate was 80% in1996, 64% in 1997 and 67% 1998. The rated designcapacity of the Livingston County jail increased from61 to 205 in September 1996. Jail was utilized tocapacity shortly after the expansion.

CCAB established. Plan submitted to OCC inlatter part of March 2000; to be presented to StateCommunity Corrections Board for review onApril 20, 2000.

Macomb 579,326 440,664 Historically, the county has had low prisoncommitment rates - 17% in 1997 and 1998; 15% in1996; 16% in 1995; and 18% in 1994. Felonydispositions increased from roughly 2000 in 1995and 1996 to approximately 2600 in 1998. Countyhistorically rented jail beds to the State and otherjurisdictions; boarding in temporarily terminated inFebruary 1998. 200 minimum security beds havebeen added to jail. The jail is now being operated at86% of rated design capacity with an ADP of 47boarders at the end of February 2000. Wide range ofprogramming options utilized within the County.

County continues to place priority on utilizingcommunity-based sanctions and services.Expansion of the jail population managementpolicies and procedures has enabled the county toaddress the issues and reduce the number ofinmates being jailed solely due to the inability topay fines. Program utilization below expectationfor community service and day reporting.

Page 38: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

CCAB

FY 2000 AWARD OF FUNDS

FY 2000 STATUS ISSUES AND/OR NOTESCOMPREHENSIVEPLANS ANDSERVICES

PROBATION RESIDENTIAL

SERVICES

Marquette 89,420 31,476 Overall prison commitment rate was 15% in 1996,16% in 1997, 11% in 1998 and 19% (11 of 59)during October 1999 - February 2000. Of the 11 sentto prison, 2 were scored under the new SGL’s. 6 ofthe 59 dispositions were straddle cell offenses, 1 wassentenced to prison. The jail’s RDC is 80 with autilization rate historically of 90% or 72 offenders,for Jan - Feb 2000 the ADP has been 80. Theunsentenced felon population has increased from28% to 37%.

County utilizes OCC funding primarily to support ajail-based case management function with emphasison earned and early release options. Coordinationand collaboration with the substance abusecoordinating agency and service providers haveserved to maintain access to assessment, treatmentservices and cost sharing among agencies.

The unsentenced felony population continues toincrease, while the Unsentenced Felon Program isnot being utilized to reduce the ADP and decreasethe ALOS. Rather than release to EMS or DayReport with programming, offender stays in jail,receives credit for time served at sentencing andthen released. Emphases being placed onredevelopment of release-to options for UNSoffenders with condition that at the time of sentenceoffenders receive day-for-day credit duringprogram enrollment.

Mason 52,650 The prison commitment rate for the first five monthsof FY 2000 was 38% 21 of 55 offenders. Thiscompares to rates of 16% in 1997 and 1998. Theincrease is attributed to an inordinate number ofCSC and other presumptive prison offenses duringthe 5 month period. Jail overcrowding has beenabated with the increase of 80 beds. The current jailrated design capacity is110 beds. 52 of the additionaljail beds were funded in part with a LFEP andRegional Jail Program funds. The expansion hasfacilitated the implementation of a 90 day in jailcognitive change program to serve multiple counties.

The focus of the County’s comprehensive plancontinues to be on reducing prison admissionsthrough increasing the use of jail beds forsentenced felons, reducing jail beds used bypretrial detainees, and reducing length of stay forsentenced inmates. New jail beds are on line for useby the county and other jurisdictions; the regionaljail cognitive change treatment program has beenimplemented and will be monitored/evaluated forreplication in other jurisdictions.

Page 39: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

CCAB

FY 2000 AWARD OF FUNDS

FY 2000 STATUS ISSUES AND/OR NOTESCOMPREHENSIVEPLANS ANDSERVICES

PROBATION RESIDENTIAL

SERVICES

Mecosta 63,090 Prison commitment rate was 24% in 1995, 22% in1996, and 19% in 1997, and 22% 1998, and FY 2000YTD through February. Rate for SGL Min/Max 18was 8% in 1997 and 4.2% in 1998; Min/Min 0 was10% in 1997 and 4% in 1998. Very few (6% or less)felons sentenced to straight probation; jail utilizedextensively. The jail has a rated capacity of 66.During the first five months of FY 2000, felonsaccounted for 59% of inmate.

The day reporting and pretrial services program arecurrently operating at 25% capacity. Efforts underway to increase use through revision of eligibilitycriteria policies and procedures. A revised benchbook is also being developed to inform users ofsanctions and services available.

Midland 127,724 62,952 Overall prison commitment rate during calender year1999 was 26%. Dispositions decreased from 376 incalendar year 1998 to 277 in 1999. The number ofsentenced to prison also decreased from 93 in 1998to 72 in 1999. October 1999 through January 2000the overall prison commitment rate was 33%,straddle cell commitment rate 56%, presumptiveprison commitment rate 89% and probation/paroleviolators 40%. Jail crowding continues; October1999 through January 2000 ADP was 105.5 with12.04 boarded out. Program utilization is nearcapacity, most of the out of jail programs are overutilized while the in jail programs are under utilized.

The jail committee is constantly exploring optionsto reduce length of stay of jail inmates. Changingthe mix of programming options, to further impactprison admissions and jail utilization, is continuallyunder consideration.

County received T. A. award from NIC to conductan assessment of the criminal justice system. Theassessment report has been completed and is to bepresented to the County shortly. County alsoexploring options to increase jail capacity.

Increased emphasis is being placed on needassessment and use of data/information derivedfrom the assessments to guide treatment planningand case management functions.

Page 40: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

CCAB

FY 2000 AWARD OF FUNDS

FY 2000 STATUS ISSUES AND/OR NOTESCOMPREHENSIVEPLANS ANDSERVICES

PROBATION RESIDENTIAL

SERVICES

Monroe 178,100 314,760 Overall prison commitment rate increased from 29%in 1993, 30% in 1994 and 1995 to 34% in 1996 thendecreased to 30% in 1997, 27% during 1998, 24.5%in 1999.

High proportion of probation violators continue to besentenced to prison. County was awarded MinimumSecurity Facilities funds to add 56 beds in the jailthrough double bunking; beds now in service.County also awarded Local Facility ExpansionProgram funds to finance a portion of the cost of anew 160 bed minimum security facility. Constructionis underway with completion expected by July, 2000.

Range of programming options has increased. Probation residential services have been expanded;facility formerly used by the MDOC for CommunityResidential Programs now used for PRS.Employment training and educational servicesaccessed through Michigan Works. The countyprovided District Court services: pretrial services;fast track arraignment; day reporting; domesticviolence prevention; conflict resolution;alcohol/substance abuse education; shoplifterseducation, and problem solving workshops.

Overall program participation is increasing andincreased emphasis is being placed on programquality.

It is evident that prison commitment rates includingrates for probation violators can be further reducedby strengthening operational policies andprocedures which determine how and when thevarious community-based sanctions and servicesare utilized.

Montcalm/Ionia 140,000 The overall prison commitment rate is 11% YTD FY2000. Jail populations have been increasing duringFY 2000. The Montcalm County jail is operating ator under capacity and the Ionia jail is at or overcapacity. Utilization of community correctionsprogramming to reduce length of stay of jail inmateshas increased; program enrollments have increased inday reporting eliminating previous underutilization.Progress has been made in the participation ofDistrict Court in Ionia. CCAB is exploring optionsfor fee based additional revenue to support expandedprogramming.

Jail crowding remains an issue in Ionia where dayreporting is not utilized and District Courtparticipation although improved is still low.

Limited progress has been made in developing aspecific strategy for use of community basedemployment services.

Page 41: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

CCAB

FY 2000 AWARD OF FUNDS

FY 2000 STATUS ISSUES AND/OR NOTESCOMPREHENSIVEPLANS ANDSERVICES

PROBATION RESIDENTIAL

SERVICES

Muskegon 233,942 566,568 Overall prison commitment rate decreased from 50%in 1994 to 38% in 1997 to 33% in 1998. Rate forSGL Min/Min 0 decreased from 29% in 1994 to 19%in 1997 to 15% in 1998 (still 2 ½ times the staterate). Local Facility Expansion Program funds wereawarded to County to assist with a 148 bedexpansion project completed in April 1999.

Program utilization, particularly PRS was lower thanexpected in 1999 but increased during FY 2000YTD.

Modification in targeting/eligibility criteria andsentencing recommendation and probation violationprocessing can produce increased programutilization, increased utilization of combinations ofjail and other community based programming andreductions in ADP and length of stay in jail fortargeted offenders. It is also evident thatmodifications in the use of the various communitybased sanctions and services could contribute tofurther reduction in prison commitment rates.

County is working toward implementation ofpolicies and procedures to facilitate offenderparticipation in the 90-day cognitive basedsubstance abuse treatment program in MasonCounty and follow up treatment in Muskegon.

NorthernMichigan (3)

153,000 47,214 FY 2000 prison commitment rate for the regionthrough February 2000 was 26.6%. Jail crowding inOtsego County; Cheboygan and Crawford countieshave available bed space for rent. Jail committeescontinue to meet with the CCAB working tostandardize policies and procedures throughout theregion.. NEEDS assessment tool is being used toprovide improved recommendations for alternativesat the presentence phase. Increased emphasis beingplaced within sentencing recommendations andresponses to probation violations on short terms injail with release to programming.

Cheboygan County awarded FY 98 Local FacilityExpansion Program funds; 47 beds placed in servicein 1999.

Cheboygan jail expansion has eliminated need toboard inmates in other counties. Utilization ofother sanctions (electronic monitoring, etc.) asmeans to reduce length of stay among jail inmatescontinue to be explored. Needs assessment tool isbeing utilized at pretrial. Implementation of a pilotcognitive restructuring program in CheboyganCounty is being considered.

A transition house is being established inCheboygan County.

Page 42: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

CCAB

FY 2000 AWARD OF FUNDS

FY 2000 STATUS ISSUES AND/OR NOTESCOMPREHENSIVEPLANS ANDSERVICES

PROBATION RESIDENTIAL

SERVICES

NorthwestMichigan (4)

365,654 110,166 The overall prison commitment rate remains higherthat the state average; YTD 2000 is 25%. The ratefor offenders with SGLs Min/Max of 12 or less is7% (6 of 82) YTD FY 2000. The regional OUIL IIIrate is 25% YTD 2000. Jail space remains availableregion wide; only two counties are operating at orover capacity (Wexford and Missaukee). PRSutilization is slightly under authorized level YTD FY2000. Other program enrollments are either near orover expected levels. Pretrial utilization hasincreased; pretrial policies were established in lateFY 1998 but the option had not been previouslyutilized. Felony enrollments comprised 26% of thepopulation in FY 1999 and 27% YTD FY 2000. TheCCAB has made progress in implementing cognitivechange and risk/need assessment pilots. Training hasbeen provided in both areas with cognitive programstart up and risk/needs assessment use scheduled forthe third and fourth quarters. Jail construction isexpected to completed in Charlevoix by June 2000;County is working on an improved jail managementplan.

Prison commitment rates, targeting and eligibilityremain issues in NWMCOG. The prisoncommitment rate remains higher than the stateaverage due to departures on offenders fallingwithin the SGL Min/Max18 or less. (Of the 6offenders sent to prison with SGL Min/Max lessthan 12 , four offenders had no prior felonies, oneoffender had one prior, and one offender had fourpriors. Three of these six departures came fromBenzie/Manistee where the Min/Max 12 or lessprison commitment rate has been historically high.)

Completion of the risk/needs pilot this year shouldlead to updated targeting and eligibility policies andprocedures for FY 2001 which facilitate addressinghigher risk of recidivism offenders with P.A. 511and community based resources.

Newago No CCAB. Prison commitment rate less than 20%.Rated design capacity of jail is 212; 1999 ADP of154. Approximately 51% of inmates are boardersfrom other jurisdictions.

Page 43: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

CCAB

FY 2000 AWARD OF FUNDS

FY 2000 STATUS ISSUES AND/OR NOTESCOMPREHENSIVEPLANS ANDSERVICES

PROBATION RESIDENTIAL

SERVICES

Oakland 1,447,131 1,416,420 YTD FY 2000 overall prison commitment rate asreported by the county is 18%. This compares to16% in 1996 and 17% in 1997 and 1998. Rates foroffenders with SGL Min/Max of 12 or less, Min/Minof 12, OUIL III less than state rates. Rated designcapacity of jail system is 1,665. Prior to 1998County was routinely boarding more than 100inmates per day in the jurisdictions. Since that time,County has and continues to implement strategies toreduce crowding; strategies have been having theintended effect and County’s practice of boarding outoffenders has been virtually eliminated.

Wide range of programming options used withinCounty. County has expanded and intensifiedpretrial program to further expedite conditionalreleases from jail. County is utilizing a risk/needsinstrument to strengthen case planning and casemanagement functions. The data/informationderived from the assessments is being utilized withinpretrial and is also shared with probation personnelto aid in the prep of the PSI and sentencingrecommendations.

County has committed to and is in the process ofupdating eligibility criteria. The net effect will be areduction in the exclusions and an increasedcapability to focus on priority population groups.

County’s ability to maintain relatively low prisoncommitment rates, address jail population issues,and meet program utilization objectives can beattributed to multiple factors including but notlimited to: wide range of programming options;sentencing recommendation and probation violationprocessing guidelines which have beentailored/customized to support the County’sobjectives and characteristics; and a broad base ofsupport among criminal justice practitioners andlocal governments.

The anticipated modifications/updates in eligibilitycriteria in conjunction with the use ofdata/information derived from the risk/needsassessment are expected to strengthen the emphasison priorities which have been adopted by the StateCommunity Corrections Board and increasecapabilities to achieve recidivism reduction throughimproving treatment effect.

Oceana County developed comprehensive plan during 1994,but elected not to apply for program funds. Prisoncommitment rate 6% in 1995, 14% in 1996, 25%during 1997 and 14% during in 1998. Renting bedsto other jurisdictions. No FY 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, or2000 application.

Inquiries during early FY 2000 suggested renewedinterest in County in updating plan and submittinga proposal and application for funds during FY2000 or 2001 funds. No further follow up fromCounty.

Page 44: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

CCAB

FY 2000 AWARD OF FUNDS

FY 2000 STATUS ISSUES AND/OR NOTESCOMPREHENSIVEPLANS ANDSERVICES

PROBATION RESIDENTIAL

SERVICES

Osceola 49,500 Overall prison commitment rate was 9.5% in 1995,20% in 1996, 31% 1997, and 21% in 1998, 17.6%1999. The jail capacity increased to 77 during 1998.The county is boarding inmates in from othercounties. Jail workcrew has yet to be activated,Pretrial, day reporting, and community service workprograms in full operations.

Prison commitment rate objectives being met. Policy and program plan has been updated. Targetpopulations, program design, policies andoperational procedures updated.

Ottawa 213,070 94,428 Overall prison commitment rate Oct. throughFebruary 2000 was 13%. This is a continuation of thehistorical pattern (overall rate was 14% in 1996, 17%in 1997, and 12% in 1998; rates for virtually all SGLcategories have been below the state rates). Jailannex completed in May 1999 increasing bed spaceby 162 beds. Programs utilized at 90% or more ofcapacity Emphasis placed on felony probationviolators; during the first two months of CY 2000there were 28 probation violators with 2 being sent toprison.

Impact of new sentencing guidelines has not beendetermined due to the small number ofcommitments. Updated probation violationresponse guide and processes have beenimplemented. Evaluation of Domestic AssaultIntervention Program in process.

Saginaw 283,583 786,900 Overall prison commitment rate was 26% during1997, and 29% in 1998. County reports an FY 2000rate of 21% through February and a rate of 42.5% forthose with guidelines in the straddle cell. The jailwas expanded in 1995, January 1998, and March1999; current rated design capacity is 513. Jailcrowding has been alleviated and county is rentingbeds to other jurisdictions. Profiles of inmates havechanged with sentenced felons accounting for 34%and sentenced misdemeanants accounting for 20% ofthe inmate population. The pretrial populationaccounts for 36% of the YTD CY 2000 ADP ascompared to 47% in 1998. Planned changes inpretrial policies and procedures have beenimplemented and are having the intended effect onthe jail population.

Progress continues to be made with respect topolicies, procedures, and program design pertainingto the monitoring and supervision of pretrialdetainees and sentenced offenders.

Increased attention should be directed at increasingaccess to programming/treatment options through:strengthening linkages with various communityorganizations such as local school districts,Michigan Works, substance abuse treatmentproviders, and other local organizations; and newinitiatives such as cognitive behavioral andincreased education/employment programming.

Page 45: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

CCAB

FY 2000 AWARD OF FUNDS

FY 2000 STATUS ISSUES AND/OR NOTESCOMPREHENSIVEPLANS ANDSERVICES

PROBATION RESIDENTIAL

SERVICES

Sanilac 61,825 FY 2000 prison commitments through February2000 of 16% compares to 19% in 1997 and 17% in1998. 6 of the 11 FY 2000 referrals to prison werefor new offenses while on probation. Prisoncommitments for OUIL IIIs were 28%, SGLMin/Min 0 0% and Man/Del < 50 0%.

The county jail has a rated capacity of 119; at mid-year the ADP was 86.2 with 26.1 being boarders .Program utilization at or near projections.

Local objectives are being met. The County hasexpanded program options and implementedpolicies/procedures to provide earned releaseoptions for all offenders including those boarded infrom other jurisdictions.

Shiawassee Prison commitment rate increased from 24% in 1995to 28% in 1996 to 39% in 1997 then decreased to31% in 1998. Commitment rates for SGL Min/Min0, SGL Min/Max 12, OUIL III, and SGL Min/Min12 above state rates.

CCAB has been activated with intended purpose ofdeveloping a local comprehensive plan. It isexpected that a local plan will be presented to theState Community Corrections Board during July orAugust of FY 2000.

Page 46: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

CCAB

FY 2000 AWARD OF FUNDS

FY 2000 STATUS ISSUES AND/OR NOTESCOMPREHENSIVEPLANS ANDSERVICES

PROBATION RESIDENTIAL

SERVICES

St. Clair 180,600 629,520 Overall prison commitment rate was 23% in 1997,25% in 1998, 19.1% for 1999, and 17.3% in the 1st

quarter of FY 2000. The prison commitment rate fortargeted OUIL III offenders has declined from 30%in 1998 to 20.5% currently. Straddle cell offendersin 1999 under the new sentencing guidelines arepredominantly sentenced to community placement(70%). The St. Clair County jail remainsovercrowded; 30 minimum-security beds in Lapeerleased by St. Clair County are fully utilized;additional beds are required from other jails. Theaverage daily population of boarded out prisonersdeclined in the first quarter of FY 2000. Reductionsin length of stay for targeted jail inmates has alsobeen achieved.

County Board approved partnership between theSheriff and Huron House Inc., (PRC provider) tolease 27 work-pass beds at the PRC facility. This hasexpanded local jail capacity, improved communityprogramming, and contributed to cost reductions.CCAMIS tracking system is now operating in anetwork environment and the JICS jail classificationsystem is now available through the network in theCommunity Corrections Office. Probationresidential, community placement, pretrial services,in jail rehabilitation program, and jail populationmonitoring programs/functions are fully utilized ormeeting expectations.

As a consequence of the legislative sentencingguidelines the volume of felony and OUIL courtfilings have declined and probation violationdispositions are increasing. Technical probationviolator dispositions now account forapproximately 20% of the felony dispositions;incarceration is increasingly utilized for thesecases.

County continues to address the jail crowdingthrough PONI process. County has completedPhase II of this program and is moving forward toimplement specific recommendations provided inthe Phase I report. The St. Clair County Board ofCommissioners has formally established a CriminalJustice Taskforce with a mission to formulaterecommendations to address jail overcrowdingbased on a review of system decision points(System Mapping).

Goal remains to make JICS/CCAMIS dataavailable to jail managers/inmate programmingstaff, Community Corrections office, pretrialservices, and probation. Completion of this projecttargeted for the end of FY 2000.

Page 47: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

CCAB

FY 2000 AWARD OF FUNDS

FY 2000 STATUS ISSUES AND/OR NOTESCOMPREHENSIVEPLANS ANDSERVICES

PROBATION RESIDENTIAL

SERVICES

St. Joseph 83,300 660,996 The overall prison commitment rate was 25% in1998 , 21% in 1999, and 23% YTD in FY 2000. Therate for offenders with SGLs Min/Max 18 or less was4% in FY 1999 and 2% YTD FY 2000. During FY2000 the number of offenders boarded in from otherjurisdictions has increased. Day reporting,implemented during late FY 1999 has increasedenrollments during FY 2000. Enrollments in theself-supporting work release program establishedwithin the probation residential facility have beenmaintained at expected levels and have reduced thispopulation significantly in the jail. The county hasimplemented cognitive programming within theprobation residential facility as planned. PRSutilization is slightly under authorized level YTD FY2000; (authorized level 42, actual 39); length of stayis higher than expected.

Limited progress has been made in implementingreductions in length of stay at the PRS. Dayreporting services are now available for supervisionof offenders terminated with a shorter length ofstay, therefore, CCAB policy should be developedto address length of stay and resource efficiencyissues.

Condition stipulated with the award of FY 2000funds to develop criteria for release of pretrialoffenders to supervision by the day reportingprogram has been met.

ThirteenthCircuit (5)

173,837 141,642 The prison commitment rate declined from 35% in1998 to 33% in FY 1999, to 28% YTD FY 2000. The rate for Min/Max of 18 or less has also declined;12% in 1998 10% in FY 1999, and is 7% YTD 2000.The rate for OUIL IIIs was 44% in 1997, 33% in1998, 37% in 1999, and 14% YTD FY 2000. TheGrand Traverse and Antrim County jails areoperating under the rated capacity. The LeelanauCounty jail remains crowded with offenders boardedout to other jurisdictions. The CCAB developedeligibility criteria for the Transition House to meetcontract condition. Program enrollments includingPRS utilization are at expected levels. The CCAB isexploring implementation of cognitive basedapproaches within substance abuse residentialtreatment.

The prison commitment rates for SGL Min/Max18or less remains higher than expected and representsdepartures on intermediate sanctions celloffenders. The CCAB should review the basis fordepartures and strengthen targeting policies andoperational procedures increase utilization ofcommunity based resources for this population.

Page 48: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

CCAB

FY 2000 AWARD OF FUNDS

FY 2000 STATUS ISSUES AND/OR NOTESCOMPREHENSIVEPLANS ANDSERVICES

PROBATION RESIDENTIAL

SERVICES

Thirty-FourthCircuit (6)

150,000 47,214 The prison commitment rate was 20% in 1997, 15%in 1999 and 14% YTD FY 2000. The OUIL III ratewas 15% in CY 1999 and 9% YTD CY 2000. Theoverall number of dispositions was 27% less in 1999than in 1998. Policy and program plan has had theeffect of reducing jail populations, primarily throughuse of earned release policies and programming.Programs include community service, substanceabuse treatment, sex offender counseling, dayreporting, and probation residential services. Twoof the county jails continue to operate below therated design capacity and Roscommon County rentsbeds to other jurisdictions. The Ogemaw County jailremains crowded. The CCAB hired a newcoordinator in the Fall of 1999.

Additional capacity exists in day reporting and thecommunity service placement program. TheCCAB needs to further review and update jailpopulation monitor policies and procedures.

Thumb Area (7) 155,130 The overall regional prison commitment rate was24% October 1999 through February 2000, straddlecell commitments were 30%, OUIL III’s 19% withall of the offenders having multiple offenses beyondthe third, and Man/Del<50 5%. Lapeer County’soverall prison commitment rate was 24% straddlecell commitments were 22% OUIL III’s 20% andMan/Del < 50 0%. Tuscola County’s overall prisoncommitment rate was 27%, straddle cell were 39%,OUIL III’s 18% and Man/Del<50 17%. 70% of thejails’ populations were felons with 77% beingsentenced. Both Counties were awarded FY 96Minimum Security Facility funds; Lapeer rents 30beds to St. Clair County. Tuscola County jail isboarding in inmates from other jurisdictions.The CSC program is being restructured with theintent to increase utilization. Other programs runningat or below projections.

Commitment rates are at or about State averages,both jails have increased capacity with the abilityto rent beds to other jurisdictions.

Program utilization historically low, someimprovements made over the previous year. Recentchange in administrative staff.

JPIS data submission for Lapeer County can not beprovided electronically; County hand collects andsubmits data via snapshot basis.

Page 49: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

CCAB

FY 2000 AWARD OF FUNDS

FY 2000 STATUS ISSUES AND/OR NOTESCOMPREHENSIVEPLANS ANDSERVICES

PROBATION RESIDENTIAL

SERVICES

Tri-County (8) 114,400 FY 2000 prison commitment rate is 8.83% (3 of 34).Of the 34 dispositions, 9 were OUIL 3rd offendersthat received jail sentences of 12 months or less.Program completion is at 84% for the communityservice work program. Total jail bed capacity withinthe region is 86; ADP during 1999 was 41.2, or47.9% of capacity.

Prison commitment, jail utilization and programutilization objectives are being achieved.

Houghton County is proceeding with plans toconstruct a new 70 bed jail. The existing jail andwork camp would be closed centralizing housing inthe new facility.

Twenty-SixthCircuit

118,400 62,952 The overall prison commitment rate and rates forpriority population groups remain well under stateaverages; the YTD FY 2000 overall prisoncommitment rate is 9% (11 of 125) and the OUIL IIIrate was 0%. Jails in the four county continue tooperate at or under capacity and rent beds to otherjurisdiction; however the Alpena County jailpopulation has been increasing. The CSC programis operating at capacity while additional capacityexists in the substance abuse outpatient aftercareprogram. PRS utilization is at expected level.

The CCAB has indicated increases in sentencelengths are occurring for felony threshold casesnow being sentenced in District Court in Alpena.The CCAB will be working with District Court toaddress the issue and developing alternativesentencing strategies.

Van Buren 106,259 47,214 The CCAB was re-activated and programsimplemented during the later half of 1999. YTD2000 the overall prison commitment rate has been13%; the OUIL III rate was 13%; and the Min/Maxof 18 or less rate 4%. The jail continues to operateat or under capacity and the weekend population hasbeen reduced due to program enrollments in thecommunity service/weekend work crew program. Implementation of a cognitive change program in thejail is progressing; staff have just completed trainingand services will be initiated during the third quarter.PRS utilization is significantly higher than bedallocation level. County is progressing is design ofjail addition.

PRS planned length of stay is currently 120;policies and available alternatives should beexplored to reduce length of stay and reserve PRSresources for highest risk of recidivism offenders.

Page 50: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

CCAB

FY 2000 AWARD OF FUNDS

FY 2000 STATUS ISSUES AND/OR NOTESCOMPREHENSIVEPLANS ANDSERVICES

PROBATION RESIDENTIAL

SERVICES

Washtenaw/Ann Arbor

354,600 440,664 County reports an FY 2000 overall prisoncommitment rate through February 2000 of 18%.This compares to rates of 26% in 1997 and 18% in1998. 65 FY 2000 YTD straddle cell cases; 57%(37) were sentenced to prison. 7 presumptive prisonoffenses were kept locally.

The rated design capacity of the jail was increased to332; FY 2000 ADP of 305 through February.

Unsentenced inmates increased from 1998 to 1999,with the sentenced population decreasing slightlyfrom 1998 to 1999.

Program utilization is either over utilized(PRS) orunder utilized (Day Report, Cognitive Behavior)dependant on the program.

FY 98 Local Facility Expansion funds wereawarded to County to establish new ProbationResidential beds. County continues to exploreoptions for the development and operation of thefacility and program.

Page 51: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

CCAB

FY 2000 AWARD OF FUNDS

FY 2000 STATUS ISSUES AND/OR NOTESCOMPREHENSIVEPLANS ANDSERVICES

PROBATION RESIDENTIAL

SERVICES

Wayne 3,203,600 3,399,408 YTD FY 2000 overall prison commitment rate of13% per county data; county also reports a rate of14% for the end of FY 99; the rate was 32% in 1992,27% in 1993, 24% in 1994, 21% in 1995, 22% in1996, 23% during 1997, 19% in 1998. Rates forSGL and offense categories below state rates.

Preliminary data suggests the County’s prisoncommitment rate for offenders with guidelines in thestraddle cells is approximately 31%, 14 percentagepoints below the state as a whole. The preliminarydata also suggests the county rate for sentencingstraddle cell offenders to probation (34%) is nearly 3times the rate for the state as a whole (12%). Jail usehas continued much as it has for the past year: moresentenced offenders - especially felons being housedin jail; fewer pretrial offenders - especiallymisdemeanors. Average length of stay for alloffenders down. AJRs continue to fluctuate. PVs injail still major concern. Jail Population Controlpolicies in place. These policies include PSIRecommendation Guidelines and PV ProcessingGuidelines which still require monitoring protocols.Technical Assistance request to OCC. Overallprogram utilization is still lower than the goal of90%, at an average of 78%. Quality Assurance Plandeveloped and instituted; first test site (ProbationDetention Program) completed.

While progress continues to be made, several issueshave not been fully resolved and new issues surfaceas new or improved data/information becomesavailable. These issues include but are not limitedto overall program utilization and positiveterminations being lower than expected. Issues ofprogram utilization revolve around: awareness ofprogram availability, practice and procedure toeffectively match detainees and offenders with anappropriate response; and concerns about programquality.

A key objective over the past few years has been toreduce the number of probation violators in jail andto eliminate releases from the jail to programsthrough use of the Administrative Jail Releaseprocess. It has been and continues to be expectedthat this objective and a corresponding increase inthe use of the detention program and otherprograms would be met through: probationviolation processing; increased use of show causeprocesses and reductions in the reliance onwarrants; and changes in operational practices andprocedures. The objectives have not as yet beenmet, but the potentials remain; system mapping andrelated procedures will be utilized during theremainder of the fiscal year to guide furthermodifications/refinements in process andprocedures.

Page 52: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

CCAB

FY 2000 AWARD OF FUNDS

FY 2000 STATUS ISSUES AND/OR NOTESCOMPREHENSIVEPLANS ANDSERVICES

PROBATION RESIDENTIAL

SERVICES

West Central UP(10)

274,000 47,214 Prison commitment rate for the region was 19% (21of 106) for October 1999 to January 2000. Rates forlow guidelines and other priority population groupshistorically below state rates. Total jail bed capacityfor the six counties is 250; ADP during 1999 was171, or 68% of total capacity. Program completionis at 86.5% for the community service work program.The jail bed expansion project in Delta County,funded in part through an award of LFEP funds, wascompleted in February and bed utilization began inlate March 2000. The 41 bed expansion increased theRDC of the jail to 87.

Of the six jails in the region, Gogebic Countycontinues to house offenders above the RDC at119.5%.

Efforts continue among counties to reduce jail timeserved by targeted sentenced felons andmisdemeanants through earned release and otheralternatives to incarceration options.

Utilization of probation residential services haveincreased from the authorized ADP of 3 to 4.92 permonth during FY 2000.

TOTALS 12,364,014 14,931,492

(1) Alger and Schoolcraft Counties

(2) Chippewa, Luce, Mackinac Counties(3) Cheboygan, Crawford, Otsego Counties

(4) Benzie, Charlevoix, Emmet, Kalkaska, Manistee, Missaukee, Wexford Counties(5) Antrim, Grand Traverse, Leelanau Counties

(6) Arenac, Ogemaw, Roscommon Counties(7) Lapeer, Tuscola Counties

(8) Baraga, Houghton, Keweenaw Counties(9) Alcona, Alpena, Montmorency, Presque Isle Counties

(10) Delta, Dickinson, Gogebic, Iron, Menominee, Ontonagon Counties

h:\wpdata\tables\fy 2000 award chart.wpdupdated: April 24, 2000

Page 53: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

PART 4B

AWARD OF COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS PLANS AND SERVICES FUNDS

Page 54: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS PLANS AND SERVICES FUNDS

FY 2000 Appropriation $13,033,000FY 2000 Award of Funds $12,364,014*

*Additional awards will be made during the 3rd and 4th quarters of FY 2000.These include amendments to current awards and awards of funds to initiateprogramming in additional counties.

FY 2000 Community Corrections Plans and Services funds were awarded to support community-based programs in 72 counties (44 county, city/county, or multi-county CCABs).

The Plans and Services funds are utilized within local jurisdictions to support a wide range ofprogramming options for eligible detainees and offenders. The distribution of funds among programcategories is presented below.

Resource Commitment by Program Category:

Community Service $1,544,684Education 163,233Employment/Training 360,180Intensive Supervision 2,036,185Mental Health 312,302Pretrial 1,323,867Substance Abuse 1,693,53224 Hour Structured Supervision 41,643Case Management 2,133,886CCAB Administration 2,641,402Other 113,100

Total $12,364,014

It is expected that the commitment of funds among program categories will change over time asincreased efforts are made throughout the state to increase treatment effect.

More specifically it is expected there will, during FY 2000 and beyond, be a shifting of resourcecommitments to increase emphases on cognitive/behavior based and other programming for higher

Page 55: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

risk and need cases. This is in accord with the priorities adopted in February 1999 and principlesand factors which research has shown contribute to improved treatment effect and reduction inrecidivism.

Some of the shifting or reallocation of resources was made during the FY 2000 award of fundsprocess as local jurisdictions moved forward with the development and implementation of newapproaches to substance abuse treatment, education and employment programming, and theimplementation of process and practices which are designed to improve: case planning and sanctionand service matching in accord with principles of risk, need, and responsivity; case management; andmonitoring and evaluating treatment effect and impacts on criminal behavior.

Resource Commitment by Local Jurisdiction

The sanctions and services supported by FY 2000 Comprehensive Plans and Services funds withineach local jurisdiction are identified on the attached Table entitled “FY 2000 Comprehensive Plansand Services - Budget Amounts for Program Services.”

Page 56: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

TABLE 4B-1

FY 2000 COMPREHENSIVE PLANS AND SERVICES FUNDS

BY CCAB/COUNTY

Page 57: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk
Page 58: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

PART 4C

PROBATION RESIDENTIAL SERVICES

Page 59: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

PROBATION RESIDENTIAL SERVICES

FY 2000 Appropriation $14,934,600FY 2000 Award to Funds $14,931,492

FY 2000 funds were awarded to support residential services pursuant to 29 local comprehensivecorrections plans. This compares to 13 in FY ‘94, 18 in FY ‘95 and FY ‘96, 27 in FY ‘97, and 28in FY ‘98 and FY ‘99. The FY 2000 awards respond to utilization patterns among local jurisdictionsand create greater capabilities for local jurisdictions to purchase residential services for eligiblefelony offenders from a wider range of providers. The FY 2000 Appropriations support an averagedaily population of 949.

During FY ‘99, emphases continued to be on: utilizing residential services as part of a continuumof sanctions and services (e.g., short-term residential substance abuse treatment services followedby outpatient treatment as appropriate, residential services followed by day reporting); reducing thelength of stay in residence; and increasing the utilization of short term residential services forprobation violators.

The attached chart and table provide an analysis of utilization of probation residential services duringFY 2000. Thus far there has been a departure from prior year trends; previous trends indicate anincrease in utilization during the first quarter with a subsequent decrease in January, and a continuedincrease through May, with a decrease in ADP during the summer months. However, during FY2000 there has been a greater increase in utilization during the first quarter and an increase asopposed to decrease in January.

The increase in utilization corresponds with expectations. With the enactment of the new statutoryguidelines, it was expected that greater numbers of felons would be sentenced to local sanctions andservices. Additionally, it was expected that there would be greater utilization of residential and otherservices as a means to reduce length of stay in jail or admissions to jail. It is further expected thatutilization patterns of prior years will continue through the end of the year and that the appropriationwill be fully utilized.

Page 60: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

TABLE and CHART 4C-1

FY ‘98, FY ‘99, AND FY 2000

SUMMARY -- AWARD OF FUNDS AND UTILIZATION

Page 61: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk
Page 62: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk
Page 63: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

PART 4-D

FACILITY EXPANSION PROGRAMS

Page 64: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

PART 4-D

FACILITY EXPANSION PROGRAMSSUMMARY

Since FY 1996, $13.0 million has been appropriated to assist local jurisdictions to reduce prisoncommitments or maintain low prison commitment rates by increasing local bed space capacities.

FY ‘96 appropriations included $4.0 million for the Minimum Security Facilities program.

FY ‘98 appropriations included $7.0 million for the Local Facility Expansion Program.

FY ‘99 appropriations included $2.0 million for the Regional Jail Program.

60 proposals and applications have been submitted by local jurisdictions for the use of the funds.

• 27 for the Minimum Security Facilities program.

• 26 for the Local Facility Expansion Program.

• 7 for the Regional Jail Program.

$10,881,335 has been awarded to provide state financial participation for 34 projects in 29 counties.The projects when completed will increase local bed space capacities by a minimum of 1,593 beds.

• $3,995,455 was awarded per the Minimum Security Facilities program to increasecapacities by 601 beds.

• $6,293,880 has been awarded per the Local Facility Expansion Program to increasecapacities by 918 beds.

• $592,000 was awarded per the Regional Jail Program to increase capacities by 74beds.

Four (4) counties received awards from a combination of the appropriations.

• 3 counties received awards from the MSF and LFEP appropriations.

• 1 county received awards from LFEP and RJP appropriations.

Page 65: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

MSF only

LFEP only

RJP only

MSF and LFEP

LFEP and RJP

OVERVIEW OF AWARD OF FUNDS

FY 1996 MINIMUM SECURITY FACILITIESFY 1998 LOCAL FACILITY EXPANSION PROGRAM

FY 1999 REGIONAL JAIL PROGRAM

Page 66: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

MINIMUM SECURITY FACILITIES

The Fiscal Year 1996 Appropriations for corrections programs included $4.0 million to expandlocal capabilities to house felony offenders. Pursuant to the provisions of the Appropriations Act,the funds were to be utilized for single county or multi-county projects which documented how anexpansion of local bed space would impact prison admissions.

Twenty-seven (27) local jurisdictions submitted proposals and applications for use of the MinimumSecurity Facilities funds.

Of the $4.0 million appropriated, $3,995,445 was awarded to support 14 projects in 13 counties.Those funds provided support to increase capacities by a minimum of 601 bed space, 490 jail bedsand 111 Probation Residential beds.

The majority of the projects were additions to existing jail facilities and several were renovationsof existing space within the buildings. The project in Lapeer County was a joint venture with St.Clair County, which provided for a 30 bed addition to Lapeer’s new jail facility for use by St. ClairCounty.

As of March 31, 2000, all of the projects have been completed.

Through March 31, 2000 the counties have reported expenditures totaling $15,829,382 of which$3,971,351 has been reimbursed of the $3,995,445 awarded. Additional reimbursements of $20,792are expected to be made which will increase the total reimbursement to $3,992,143.

Project Description and Status

Barry County 22 bed addition to the existing jail (MSF funds were utilized to finance aportion of the cost for 20 of the beds). Project was completed inNovember 1998. County began using the new beds in December 1998.

Dickinson County 24 bed addition (MSF funds utilized to finance a portion of the cost for 20of the beds) to the existing jail. The project was completed in mid June1997. Bed use began in July 1997.

Emmet County Renovation of the basement of the jail to add 14 beds was completed inearly August 1997. Use of beds began in late August 1997.

Lapeer County 30 bed addition to a new jail was completed in summer of 1998. Use ofbeds began in July, 1998. This is a joint venture with St. Clair County.

Page 67: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Macomb County 200 bed addition (MSF funds were utilized to finance a portion of the costfor 44 of the beds) to the existing jail. Construction was completed inDecember 1998. Use of beds began in late January 1999.

Manistee County 20 bed addition to the existing jail. Construction began in March 1997and completed in January 1998. Use of beds began in mid February 1998.

Monroe County The County double bunked 56 existing cells within the jail and renovatedthe first floor area for programming and office use. Renovations werecompleted in late December 1997. Use of the beds began in January 1998.

Ottawa County 162 bed addition (MSF funds utilized to finance a portion of the cost for66 of the beds) to the existing jail. Construction was completed inNovember 1998. Bed use began in December 1998.

Roscommon Co. 40 bed addition (MSF funds utilized to finance a portion of the cost for 24of the beds) to the existing jail. Construction of the housing areas wascompleted in early September 1997, allowing the county to utilize the newjail beds. Total project completed in November 1997.

Saginaw County 40 bed renovation to the existing jail. Renovations began in May 1997,project was completed in mid January 1998. Use of the beds began inFebruary 1998.

Tuscola County 24 bed addition to the existing jail. Construction began in April 1997,completed mid January 1998, use of the beds began in February 1998.

Wayne County 48 bed renovation to the Division II jail, 32 beds have been in use sinceOctober 1996, the remaining 16 beds were brought on line in August 1997.Renovations to the new program areas and additional security needscompleted during late summer of 1998.

111 bed expansion of probation residential beds (100 beds for men, 11beds for women).

Renovations of a building, completed in August 1998, provide a 100 bedProbation Detention Center for men. Use of the beds began in September1998.

Renovations for 11 bed expansion of probation residential beds forwomen. Project began in July 1999 and was completed in December1999. Use of beds began in January 2000.

Washtenaw Co. 84 bed addition to the existing jail. Construction began in early August1997 and completed in December 1998. Bed use began in April 1999.

Page 68: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

MINIMUM SECURITY FACILITIES

FISCAL SUMMARY

Through March 31, 2000

Appropriation $4,000,000.00

COUNTY DURATION OFCONTRACT BEDS CONTRACT

AMOUNT PAYMENTS BALANCE OFCONTRACT

BARRY * 06/1/96 - 12/31/98 20 $160,000 $158,999 $1,001

DICKINSON * 06/1/96 - 09/30/97 20 $160,000 $160,000 $0

EMMET * 06/1/96 - 09/30/97 14 $112,000 $111,828 $172

LAPEER * 06/1/96 - 05/31/98 30 $240,000 $237,910 $2,090

MACOMB * 08/1/96 - 03/31/99 44 $352,000 $352,000 $0

MANISTEE * 06/1/96 - 06/30/98 20 $160,000 $160,000 $0

MONROE 06/1/96 - 01/31/98 56 $111,330 $100,197 $11,133

OTTAWA * 08/1/96 - 12/31/98 66 $528,000 $528,000 $0

ROSCOMMON * 06/1/96 - 12/31/97 24 $192,000 $191,960 $40

SAGINAW * 08/1/96 - 12/31/97 40 $320,000 $320,000 $0

TUSCOLA * 06/1/96 - 03/31/98 24 $192,000 $192,000 $0

WASHTENAW * 08/1/96 - 12/31/98 84 $672,000 $672,000 $0

WAYNE-JAIL * 06/1/96 - 03/31/98 48 $234,115 $234,115 $0

WAYNE-PRS 08/1/96 - 12/31/99 111 $562,000 $552,341 $9,659

TOTAL 601 $3,995,445 $3,971,350 $24,095

Balance of Work Project Account $4,555.00

� Final billings have been processed, contracts closed.

Page 69: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

LOCAL FACILITY EXPANSION PROGRAM

The Fiscal Year 1998 Appropriations for corrections programs included $7.0 million to expand localcapabilities to house felony offenders ($4.0 was included within the initial appropriation and $3.0was added during the year via Legislative transfer). Pursuant to the provisions of the AppropriationsAct, the funds are to be utilized for single county or multi-county projects which document how anexpansion of local bed space will impact on prison admissions.

26 local jurisdictions submitted proposals and applications for use of the Local Facility ExpansionProgram funds. Project proposals provided for a 1,510 increase in beds totaling $10,983,180.

To date $6,293,880 has been awarded for projects in 18 counties (918 new beds-798 jail beds and120 Probation Residential beds).

Through March 31, 2000: 8 projects have been completed and are in use opening 530 new bedswithin the jails; 3 of the projects are under construction with expected completion by December2000; 6 of the projects are in various stages of site selection, finalizing plans, or completing bidprocesses; and 1 has been canceled.

The Gogebic County Jail expansion project was canceled by the Gogebic County Board ofCommissioners due to the lack of local funding for construction and future operational costs. Thecounty was awarded $80,000.

Reported expenditures through March 31, 2000 totaled $14,737,536.92 of which $2,787,135.52 hasbeen reimbursed to the counties.

Project Status

8 projects completed through March 2000:

Cheboygan County 56 bed two phase renovation project began in late July 1998. Phase I wascompleted in December of 1998 adding 38 beds to the existing jail. PhaseII added 18 beds for females was completed in July 1999. The increase inhousing has eliminated the need for the County to board offenders in otherjurisdictions; the Average Daily Population (ADP) remains below theRated Design Capacity (RDC) of 77.

Delta County 41 bed addition to the jail began in late April of 1999. Project wascompleted and approved for temporary occupancy in late February 2000pending completion of sprinkler system in basement. Utilization of thebeds began in March 2000.

Page 70: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Genesee County An existing building has been converted into a 100 bed Work ReleaseFacility. Renovations and addition began in July 1999 and completed inmid January 2000. The renovated facility provides housing for workrelease offenders that were being housed at the main jail.

Kent County County owned building next to the main jail was renovated to replace a 102bed Work Release Center and increase bed availability. The RDC of theWork Release Center was originally planned for 142 beds; CJSUauthorized an RDC of 150. Renovations began in August of 1999 and werecompleted in December 1999. County began utilization of the new centerin January 2000.

Mason County 52 bed addition to the jail began in early August 1998, and completed inearly January 2000. Utilization of the new beds began in January 2000.

Muskegon County 148 bed renovation project began in late October 1998. County renovatedthe lower floor of County Building. Project was completed in early April1999. The increase in housing has eliminated the need to house offendersout of county.

Saginaw County 63 bed addition to the jail began in late July 1998. Project was completedin early March 1999.

St. Joseph County 16 bed renovation project of the jail began in June 1998 and was completedin late December 1999. The RDC of the of the new housing area wasoriginally planned for 16 beds, CJSU authorized 22 beds, increasing theRDC of the jail to 165. Utilization of the beds began in February 2000.

3 are under construction:

Charlevoix County 64 bed addition to the jail began in April 1999, completion expected byJune 2000.

Chippewa County 64 bed addition to the jail began in August of 1999. Project is more than60% complete with a projection for utilization by December 31, 2000.

Monroe County Site development for the 160 bed facility began in October of 1999. Theinstallation of the underground utilities, footings, and concrete floors werecompleted to accommodate the erection of the buildings. County expectsproject to be completed by July 2000.

Page 71: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

6 are in developmental stages:

� 6 projects that are in various stages of confirming site selection, finalizing plans, orhaving bidding documents prepared and approved for the final bid process at theCounty level and/or approved by County Jail Services Unit.

Grand Traverse County Kalamazoo CountyHuron County Oakland CountyIngham County Washtenaw County

and 1 has been canceled:

� The 10 bed expansion project of the Gogebic County Jail was canceled by theGogebic County Board of Commissioners due to the lack of local funding forconstruction and future operational costs.

Page 72: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

LOCAL FACILITY EXPANSION PROGRAM

FISCAL SUMMARY

Through March 31, 2000

Appropriation $7,000,000.00

COUNTY DURATION OFCONTRACT BEDS CONTRACT

AMOUNT PAYMENTS BALANCE OFCONTRACT

CHARLEVOIX 07-15-98 - 06-30-00 42 $336,000 $173,819 $162,181

CHEBOYGAN 07-15-98 - 10-31-99 47 $376,000 $376,000 $0

CHIPPEWA 06-30-98 - 12-31-00 20 $160,000 $67,658 $92,342

DELTA 06-30-98 - 12-31-99 20 $160,000 $128,000 $32,000

GENESEE 06-30-98 - 03-31-00 50 $400,000 $320,000 $80,000

GOGEBIC * 06-30-98 - 09-30-99 10 $0 $0 $0

GR TRAVERSE 07-15-98 - 06-30-00 70 $300,000 $0 $300,000

HURON 06-30-98 - 12-31-00 15 $120,000 $0 $120,000

INGHAM 06-30-98 - 06-30-00 80 $640,000 $0 $640,000

KALAMAZOO 06-30-98 - 09-30-00 50 $400,000 $0 $400,000

KENT 07-15-98 - 03-31-00 40 $319,880 $255,904 $63,976

MASON 07-15-98 - 03-31-00 52 $416,000 $366,926 $49,074

MONROE 06-30-98 - 12-31-00 80 $640,000 $98,289 $541,711

MUSKEGON 06-30-98 - 09-30-99 148 $442,000 $442,000 $0

OAKLAND 07-15-98 - 06-30-01 75 $600,000 $0 $600,000

SAGINAW 07-15-98 - 09-30-99 63 $504,000 $504,000 $0

ST JOSEPH 09-01-98 - 12-31-99 16 $80,000 $54,539 $25,461

WASHTENAW 06-30-98 - 09-30-00 40 $320,000 $0 $320,000

TOTAL 918 $6,213,880 $2,787,135 $3,426,745

Balance of Project Account $ 786,120.00* County was awarded $80,000 pursuant to a proposed jail expansion project; project has since

been canceled by the County board of Commissioners.

Page 73: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

REGIONAL JAIL PROGRAM

The FY 1999 Appropriations for corrections programs included $2.0 million for the Regional JailProgram.

Unlike the Minimum Security Facilities and the Local Facility Expansion Programs which allowedfor single or multi-county projects, the Regional Jail Program is restricted to multi-county projects.

Applications for funds were to clearly identify and document how and when the expansion in jail bedspace would either reduce prison commitment rates of targeted felony offenders or maintain prisoncommitment rates below the state average among the participating counties.

Seven (7) local jurisdictions submitted proposals and applications for use of the Regional JailProgram funds. Project proposal provided for a 452 bed increase and requests for funds totaling$3,616,000.

Of the 7 proposals, 4 requested funds to expand housing capacities at existing jails, while 3 wereplanning the construction of new facilities. Estimated project costs for the 7 projects totaled$30,540,697.

$592,000.00 was awarded for 2 projects which would increase bed capacities by a minimum of 74beds.

Project Status

Mason County

• Construction has been completed. Program implementation and utilization of thebeds began in February 2000.

• The county is providing a structured 90 day in-jail Regional Substance AbuseProgram for sentenced felony offenders who would normally be sentenced to prisonor lengthy jail term.

• Neighboring counties through inter-county agreements refer eligible offenders withhistories of substance abuse and treatment needs for housing at the Mason CountyJail. Follow up treatment is provided in the county of residence following releaseform the Mason County facility.

• Currently Lake and Oceana County are participating. Plans are being formulatedwith Manistee, Wexford, Muskegon and other Counties.

Page 74: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Van Buren County

• County will provide housing for sentenced offenders from Berrien Countyspecifically those within the straddle cells. This will allow for improved jailutilization and a reduction in prison commitments for Berrien County whilemaintaining Van Buren’s low prison commitment rate.

Programs will be offered for all sentenced offenders to include extensive treatmentfor substance abuse, education, life skills, and employment coordinated within thelocal jurisdictions supervision and follow-up.

• Construction blueprints of the project have been finalized and submitted to theMichigan Department of Consumer and Industry Services, Office of Fire Safety andCounty Jail Services Unit for review. Pending their approval, the County projectsconstruction of the 50 bed addition to the existing jail to start in May of 2000.

REGIONAL JAIL PROGRAM PROJECTS

FISCAL SUMMARY

Through March 31, 2000

COUNTY CONTRACTDURATION

# OFBEDS CONTRACT

AMOUNT

PAYMENTS CONTRACTBALANCE

Mason 07-20-99 - 09-30-00 24 $192,000.00 $192,000.00 $0.00

Van Buren 08-23-99 - 09-30-01 50 $400,000.00 $0.00 $400,000.00

TOTALS 74 $592,000.00 $192,000.00 $400,000.00

Page 75: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

PART 5

DATA SYSTEMS STATUS

Page 76: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

PART 5

DATA SYSTEMS STATUS

The Office of Community Corrections is responsible for the development of two informationsystems: the Jail Population Information System (JPIS) and the Community Corrections InformationSystem (CCIS). This report summarizes the status of each system.

JAIL POPULATION INFORMATION SYSTEM (JPIS)

OVERVIEW:

The Michigan Jail Population Information System is the product of a cooperative effort among theMichigan Department of Corrections Office of Community Corrections and County Jail ServicesUnit and Michigan Sheriff’s Association, with assistance from Michigan State University and theNational Institute of Corrections.

Following is a condensed segment on mission and objectives for the JPIS system, as defined by thisgroup, and as included in the overview section of the JPIS user manual. Text that has been shortenedfor the sake of brevity is marked by ellipsis points (...).

MISSION

The mission of the statewide Jail Population Information System is to provide an informationreporting system that enables coherent policy making. The primary concern is the ability to monitorand evaluate jail population characteristics for use in statewide policy planning. The statewidedatabase system must be sufficiently flexible to enable the system to be compatible with existing jailmanagement and MIS systems. The major data categories required for this information system arerelated to: inmate profiles, inmate classification, inmate programs, the number of inmateadmissions, and the length of the stay.

GOALS/OBJECTIVES

1. To assist state and local decision makers in correctional policy and planning by providingdata/information on: selected offender target groups for population management; security andcustody levels for use in determining facility design and capacity; and, local detentionoperations for enforcement and revision of existing standards.

2. To assist state and local decision makers in the development and approval of comprehensivecommunity corrections plans by providing comparable information on sanctions andservices...

3. To identify the impacts of current and proposed state statutes on the utilization of jailconfinement space through analysis of shifts in the number and types of offenders confined.

Page 77: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

4. To provide policy decision makers with relevant information and data for more efficient useof confinement facilities on a statewide basis.

5. To provide information/data to identify the availability of community corrections programsand services in local jurisdictions and assist in the prioritization of initiatives by OCC.

6. To provide policy relevant information/data to the Legislature, legislative agencies,Department of Corrections... (and various other state and local agencies.)

7. To describe the utilization of local jails to identify trends in the offender profileinformation....

8. To develop reports from selected individual and aggregate data elements....

Several key points in the preceding overview and in other JPIS documentation are worthy ofadditional emphasis and clarification.

Not a “Local” System:

First and foremost, JPIS is a means to gather a subset of the information which already resides onindividual jail management systems in individual counties. There is no “JPIS System” per se thatexists in any county. Each county periodically runs an extract process which assembles, from thelocal jail management system, a JPIS record(s) for any person who spent any time in general housingduring the extract period.

Measures Incarcerations:

JPIS is intended to gather information about individual incarcerative periods in order to plan foroptimum jail utilization and to assess the impact of policy decisions on jail populations. It was notintended to identify or track specific individuals.

The JPIS record itself is composed of a series of data items which were initially agreed upon by across-section of county and state parties. The primary approach taken was to try to promote theadoption, enhancement and proper use of local systems, which in turn would provide thefoundation to extract the optimum amount of usable data for JPIS. As was stated in theoverview, it was never intended that JPIS would contain all the information contained at eachindividual reporting site.

HISTORICAL:

The JPIS system was originally developed to run on the DOC mainframe. Counties were intendedto send files by modem for mainframe processing. This worked well for a few counties, but thecommunication software was often difficult to configure locally and prone to problems wheneverroutine system changes occurred. In addition, the mainframe query tool--though reasonablypowerful--made data usage cumbersome.When DOC mainframe applications were moved to centralized state sites, the JPIS system wasmoved in-house to OCC. A bulletin board (BBS) was set up to accept electronically transmitted filesusing modems and conventional communication software. The edit process was rewritten to run ona networked PC, with error reports posted back to the BBS for download by the counties.

Page 78: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

JPIS IMPACT

OCC staff has always stressed that the JPIS file should be viewed as a logical by-product ofa well-managed local data system. This locally-centered approach has had a substantial impact onthe utilization of local jail management systems.

The JPIS requirement for standardized classification of offenders has been a major factor in theadoption of objective inmate classification processes and procedures among Michigan jails.Additionally, many counties have implemented new jail management systems, while others havemade dramatic changes in their JMS system. Obviously, there have been other forces driving someof these changes, such as liability concerns and sharper political focus--but JPIS has very measurablyadvanced local usage of both jail management software and offender classification.

STATUS:

Before data can be utilized or improved, it must first be acquired. Counties submit JPIS dataelectronically or through paper reports. OCC has placed the emphasis on acquiring the dataelectronically: the data is more complete and detailed, and creates the ability to use the data torespond to ad hoc questions and issues. Until the capability is established to transmit completedata electronically, counties submit the jail utilization and offender profile data via paper reports. With specific reference to the electronic submission of JPIS data, acquisition of useableelectronic data has been and continues to be dependent upon several factors:

3) The jail must have an automated jail management system, including classification.

Virtually every county now has an automated jail management system (JMS), with manycounties working on, or having completed upgrade projects which incorporate JPISreporting capabilities and better classification procedures.

4) An extract process must be implemented to transform local elements into JPIS format.

In addition to over a dozen JMS vendors, a sizeable number of counties run custom in-house systems--each gathering data differently to meet local needs. Most softwarevendors serving multiple counties have now written extract processes to generate JPISfiles. OCC staff continue to work with the handful of counties that have not yetcompleted the local system enhancements to facilitate electronic submission of JPIS data.

5) Data must be consistent and pass initial edit checks.

Staff must be consistent about data entry in order to reach and maintain an accuracy levelwhere 5% or less of their JPIS records contain any edit errors. Depending upon staffing,past practices and specifics of the JMS, time frames can vary widely for this step. OCCtries to assist in whatever way possible.

6) Data analysis drives refinement of local systems, and begins to provide policy data: OCC is now focusing efforts on generating reports from JPIS data, and subsequentlyworking with the counties to verify that the data included in JPIS files does in factrepresent actual local conditions.

Page 79: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

PLANS & FOCUS

Most counties throughout the state have reached the point at which they are capable of gatheringand submitting electronic jail data, although the specific capabilities vary across the individualcounties and across the various data systems employed. It is, however, a very dynamicenvironment, with frequent changes in local personnel, upgrades to hardware software, andoccasional system crashes. The continuing challenge is to assist counties with any situations thatadversely affect existing data collection and submission, while trying to assure the advancementof capabilities at those counties which are still struggling to establish and stabilize their datasubmissions. As the number of counties transmitting regular JPIS data has grown, efforts havebeen redirected, as much as possible, toward increasing the level of data analysis, reportgeneration and local feedback. Although recent problems with several vendors have requiredimmediate attention, the focus will continue to be on increasing the analysis and usage of JPISdata on a variety of fronts.

JPIS DATA REPORTING:Although each county is unique, and any given county can encounter occasional difficulties, thefollowing summation and detail attempt to give an accurate summary of reporting on JPIS data:

NUMBER OF COUNTIES: 83

NUMBER OF JAILS: 81

TYPES OF DATA SUBMISSION BY JAILS

Transmitting Electronically: 75 (93%) 9 counties have fallen substantially behind in submitting data electronically.

Not Transmitting Electronically: 6 (7%)(See individual status reports)

Initial test files sent: 5 Transmitting only paper reports: 1

This county is working ondeveloping electronic submissionaccording to an accepted work plan

Page 80: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Recent Status and Activity:

Progress continues in securing accurate, timely jail data from the 81 counties with jails. Thispositive movement has been occurring in the midst of substantial problems at two major jail softwarevendors. Sheriff’s Jail Linkage System, the software provider for a large number of small-to-midsizejails, dissolved its relationship with its primary software subcontractor. This caused uncertaintiesabout support at existing customer sites and delayed progress at sites undergoing softwareconversions. In addition, a jail software upgrade by New World Systems introduced a JPIS fileformat problem that prevented New World clients from submitting useable data for several monthswhile fixes were being implemented. In spite of the resultant impact of these problems on small andmidsize counties, data submission was restored at most sites, while several additional counties, suchas Kent, Genesee, Bay and Jackson made advances and are now sending regular production data.

The following counties are transmitting data electronically (some individual notes follow):

Alcona1

Alger1

Allegan1

Alpena1

Antrim1

BaragaBayBenzie2

Berrien1

Branch1

Calhoun2

Cass2

Charlevoix1

CheboyganChippewa1

Clare2

Clinton1

CrawfordDelta1

Dickinson2

Eaton2

EmmetGeneseeGladwin1

Gogebic1

Grand TraverseGratiot1

Hillsdale1

HoughtonHuron

Ingham1

Iosco1

Iron1

Isabella2

JacksonKalamazooKalkaskaKentKeweenaw1

Lake1

Lapeer2

Leelanau2

Lenewee1

Livingston1

Mackinac

MacombManistee2

MarquetteMason2

Mecosta2

Menominee1

Midland2

Missaukee1

Montcalm1

Montmorency1

Muskegon1

Newaygo1

Oakland2

Ogemaw1

Ontonagon1

Osceola1

OtsegoOttawa1

Presque Isle1

Roscommon1

Saginaw2

St. Clair2

St. Joseph1

Sanilac1

Schoolcraft1

Tuscola1

Van Buren1

Washtenaw1

Wayne1

________________1 Positive response to latest audit survey - data reported satisfactorily reflects jail utilization.2 Response to latest audit survey indicates some follow up required.

Recent Additions to Above List, or Problem Resolutions:Allegan After vendor fix, submitted missing months and is again submitting regularly.Bay Began production data submission with October 99 file.Genesee Sending regular production data, with data spanning April 99 to present.Jackson County has progressed from test status to full production transmission.Kent County now sending regular JPIS files in spite of complex extraction process.Macomb Resolved record selection problem and resubmitted all 98 and 99 data.Wayne Recently sent several catchup files promptly after completing major system changes.

Page 81: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Current Issues with Transmitting Counties:

County JailSoftware

Notes/Status

Benzie Accucomp(from LES )

County has struggled to maintain data flow due to system problems and hasfallen substantially behind due to uncertainty about change to new jailsoftware. County recently began using Accucomp jail software, but mustwork with new vendor to resolve a lingering problem with offense coding.County also in contact with Wexford county, the other Accucomp client.

Cass CLUES After a problem with the monthly record selection process was noted countybegan retransmitting some 99 data. Transmissions currently on hold whilecounty awaits response from vendor to remaining extraction issue.

Clare Lockdown(replacementin process)

County had severe problems generating data files with their aging datasystem. Recent upgrades should alleviate most problems, but some on-sitework with county is still anticipated to determine what back data can beextracted. June 30 is the target for full restoration of normal data flow.

Crawford FSG(wasNwWd)

After extended problems related to a system crash and personnel upheavals,county has made switch to FSG jail software, and restored transmissions.

Gogebic JAMIS County has struggled periodically with file generation and transmittal andis currently behind. OCC will continue to assist as time permits.

Huron FSG County normally sends regularly, but recent problems with corruptedextract files have prevented some updates until missing months can be filledin. Issue should be resolved shortly and presents no real problem.

Kalamazoo GEAC Somewhat erratic transmissions and error resolution moving slowly.

Shiawassee OSSI Shiawassee has a newly established Community Corrections Advisory Board andtheir new vendor, OSSI, recently began submitting test files after developing aJPIS extract capability.

Montmorency FSG After experiencing problems with file creation and transmittal, county isundergoing a full system upgrade, along with some vendor-supplied training.Restoration of transmissions has taken longer than expected; OCC will continueto make assistance available to county.

** “LES” represents the original jail management product distributed by Sheriff’s Jail Linkage System, or any similarvariant provided subsequently by other parties. Several LES counties have vendor changes in process.

Page 82: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Counties Still in Test Mode or Without Submissions for Extended Period of Time.

County Jail Software Notes/Status

Arenac LES ** Fell substantially behind during local personnel changes and problems related tovendor’s legal problems. Arenac staff attended OCC training session, but someon-site work still required. Some permanent data loss still expected, due toincomplete data entry during problem period.

Barry LES ** After a severe hardware crash, substantial jail data was permanently lost, andcounty lost ability to create JPIS extract files. Vendor’s legal entanglementsmade software rights and support obligations unclear. In December, county sentfirst test file from upgraded local system, but not clear at this point how muchprior data may be salvaged. OCC staff will assist the county in salvaging useabledata from the missing time frame and move toward restoration of regular dataflow by the end of July.

Ionia New World After prolonged stoppage, county resumed transmission with a couple of test files,and is currently sending prior 99 data. County continues to discuss with theirvendor the best way to correct their offense coding table, which still adverselyaffects JPIS extracts. County is expected to be current by end of July.

Monroe LES ** Monroe county reports that they are nearing operational status with their new JailManagement vendor, but that JPIS extract capability is not expected to be addedbefore mid-year. OCC will continue to provide technical assistance the vendorand/or the county to facilitate development. County continues to submit summaryreports on paper in the interim.

Oceana JAMIS After an extended period without electronic data submission, county againsubmitted test data, which had an high error level. Planned on-site assistance hasnot yet been arranged, but is now targeted for the May/June time frame. Althougherror reduction will take some work, no large obstacles are foreseen to gettingcounty back on board with regular submissions. Some prior recovery expected.

Wexford Accucomp County has been submitting regular JPIS data, but due to unresolved offensecoding issue with vendor, data is not yet being run into the normal productiondata base. Recent adoption of Accucomp by Benzie county should aid resolution.

* Note that Luce and Oscoda counties do not have jails.

** “LES” represents the original jail management product distributed by Sheriff’s Jail Linkage System, or any similar variant provided subsequently by other parties. Several LES counties have vendor changes in process.

Page 83: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

USES OF JPIS DATA:

As increasing numbers of counties transmit jail utilization and offender profile data on a regular basis, thefocus is on improving and/or maintaining data quality (complete, accurate and timely data) and utilizing datafor monitoring patterns and trends within and among counties, issue identification and resolution, andevaluation. This is reflected in FY 99 work activities and in FY 2000 work plans of OCC staff.

The monthly edit error reports returned to the counties include summaries, based upon the incoming file, ofadmissions, releases, and unreleased inmates by reported security class. These reports enhance capabilitiesto review each monthly submission for accuracy.

Section 2 of this biannual report reflects the planned use of JPIS data, including a quarterly report and aspecial ad hoc report based upon questions about length of stay for sentenced felons. A management reporton jail utilization is included in the Appendix D for JPIS and is produced quarterly.

Detailed reports were mailed to each sheriff’s department and CCAB during 1998, 1999, and early 2000,based upon accumulated JPIS master data. These provided breakdowns by categories such as admit/release,length-of-stay, and average daily population. The latest reports utilized the data available for 1998 andincluded the accumulated data through December 1999. In addition, an audit response sheet was includedthat requested feedback on how well the different reports represented the jail population. These reportsprovide one of the primary tools for on-site review of JPIS statistics with the counties to isolate and correctdata problems not readily identified by the routine file edit process. As any additional data problems areidentified and resolved, the quality and confidence in the reports will increase.

Page 84: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS INFORMATION SYSTEM (CCIS)

OVERVIEW:

Local jurisdictions submit offender profile and program utilization data to OCC monthly. The data may besubmitted either on floppy disk or by e-mail. In recent months, e-mail submission of data files has doubled,so that now about half of the CCABs submit by this method.

The data represents an extract from the data available locally for program planning and case managementpurposes. OCC uses the information to monitor profiles of detainees or offenders determined eligible toparticipate in programs and the placement of offenders in programs according to each CCAB’s eligibilitycriteria. Two types of data are required: (1) characteristics of offenders who have been determined P.A. 511eligible and enrolled in programs; and (2) program participation details.

CCIS DATA BASE:

The CCIS data requirements are currently much more minimal than the JPIS requirements. As felonyoffenders are increasingly sentenced to shorter periods of incarceration and to more community-basedsanctions, additional data reporting requirements may become necessary in order to improve monitoring ofoffender profiles and the use of the several community-based sanctions and services by profile(s) of offenders.

CCIS data is currently being reviewed to ensure the data is complete and accurate and that the data can be usedfor expanded analysis. This involves improvements in the internal review and use of the data and an increasein the frequency of feedback to local CCABs. The focus is on facilitating the improvement of data qualityand promoting the ongoing use of the data by OCC and local jurisdictions to monitor patterns and trends inprogram utilization and enrollee profiles.

Page 85: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Felony Offenders 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996', 1997, 1998 and Jan - May 1999

Jan - May 1999199819981997199719961996199519951994199419931993Disposition:RateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotal

Appendix A Statewide and County-Specific Felony Dispositions

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 1

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 86: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Felony Offenders 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996', 1997, 1998 and Jan - May 1999

Jan - May 1999199819981997199719961996199519951994199419931993Disposition:RateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotal

0.233,9380.228,9450.239,1200.238,8130.228,5580.248,7940.259,398PRISONMichigan0.305,1340.3312,9700.3413,4310.3312,7050.3513,4410.3512,6770.3312,276PROBATIONMichigan0.264,4580.2610,1750.259,7920.2710,1220.259,3570.248,8170.249,020SPLITMichigan0.142,3250.135,1460.124,5780.124,4890.124,5860.124,3800.114,195JAILMichigan0.061,0140.072,6070.052,1440.052,0610.062,2360.051,9970.062,092OTHERMichigan

16,86939,84339,06538,190 38,178 36,665 36,981TOTAL

0.0710.26100.2070.3070.0720.1430.225PRISONALCONA0.2130.1350.2690.3580.3080.2960.266PROBATIONALCONA0.5070.44170.43150.3070.48130.4390.5212SPLITALCONA0.0710.0520.0930.0410.1130.1020.000JAILALCONA0.1420.1350.0310.0000.0410.0510.000OTHERALCONA

14393523 27 21 23TOTAL

0.0000.1540.1130.0410.1020.2130.000PRISONALGER0.0000.0000.0720.0410.2450.0000.041PROBATIONALGER0.7590.42110.48130.58150.4390.5780.6416SPLITALGER0.1720.1950.1540.1230.1430.1420.287JAILALGER0.0810.2360.1950.2360.1020.0710.041OTHERALGER

12262726 21 14 25TOTAL

0.29330.29890.31660.26460.25360.25360.2747PRISONALLEGAN0.0340.06180.0490.0240.0350.0690.0611PROBATIONALLEGAN0.56640.491490.561200.631120.55800.52760.5392SPLITALLEGAN0.10120.15460.08170.08150.16240.11160.1322JAILALLEGAN0.0220.0140.0010.0120.0110.0110.000OTHERALLEGAN

115306213179 146 138 172TOTAL

0.3280.1290.26170.19140.15130.12100.119PRISONALPENA0.2050.32230.26170.33240.33290.31260.4033PROBATIONALPENA0.3690.47340.43280.39280.44390.51430.4235SPLITALPENA0.1230.0750.0320.0430.0650.0540.054JAILALPENA0.0000.0320.0210.0430.0220.0220.022OTHERALPENA

25736572 88 85 83TOTAL

0.48130.31230.30280.41230.42270.37250.2817PRISONANTRIM0.0000.0540.0110.0530.0640.0430.074PROBATIONANTRIM0.37100.59440.61560.43240.39250.50340.6439SPLITANTRIM0.1540.0430.0870.0950.0850.0750.000JAILANTRIM0.0000.0110.0000.0210.0530.0110.021OTHERANTRIM

27759256 64 68 61TOTAL

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 2

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 87: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Felony Offenders 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996', 1997, 1998 and Jan - May 1999

Jan - May 1999199819981997199719961996199519951994199419931993Disposition:RateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotal

0.0920.1240.1650.1670.1360.1870.136PRISONARENAC0.0920.0930.39120.26110.21100.2080.3416PROBATIONARENAC0.64140.65220.42130.49210.54260.48190.3818SPLITARENAC0.1430.1240.0310.0730.0840.1350.157JAILARENAC0.0510.0310.0000.0210.0420.0310.000OTHERARENAC

22343143 48 40 47TOTAL

0.1710.1730.1310.1410.1820.3140.676PRISONBARAGA0.0000.1120.0000.0000.1820.1520.000PROBATIONBARAGA0.6740.2240.6350.5740.4550.5470.111SPLITBARAGA0.1710.1120.2520.1410.0910.0000.222JAILBARAGA0.0000.3970.0000.1410.0910.0000.000OTHERBARAGA

61887 11 13 9TOTAL

0.18140.19320.19330.16330.18330.46560.5668PRISONBARRY0.0320.0120.10170.05110.07130.0340.022PROBATIONBARRY0.69540.641050.581030.681410.641150.48590.4150SPLITBARRY0.0110.0460.08150.08160.10180.0220.022JAILBARRY0.0970.12200.06100.0360.0110.0220.000OTHERBARRY

78165178207 180 123 122TOTAL

0.28480.301130.25830.24680.371090.35920.40121PRISONBAY0.15260.15580.27880.27740.21610.26680.1545PROBATIONBAY0.44760.421600.401300.411150.391150.35920.40121SPLITBAY0.10180.08290.05150.0380.0130.0120.000JAILBAY0.0360.05170.03110.05140.0380.0380.0412OTHERBAY

174377327279 296 262 299TOTAL

0.3830.3380.30100.50110.1030.3850.174PRISONBENZIE0.0000.2560.0930.0510.0720.0810.215PROBATIONBENZIE0.2520.1330.45150.4190.52150.5470.4210SPLITBENZIE0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0310.0000.000JAILBENZIE0.3830.2970.1550.0510.2880.0000.215OTHERBENZIE

8243322 29 13 24TOTAL

0.311180.292240.372930.302420.251780.221810.29218PRISONBERRIEN0.23860.191440.201550.221770.302090.292460.26194PROBATIONBERRIEN0.431620.463570.372940.433550.412910.453740.40301SPLITBERRIEN0.03130.04340.05360.04300.03180.03240.0214JAILBERRIEN0.0120.02140.01110.02160.0190.02150.0326OTHERBERRIEN

381773789820 705 840 753TOTAL

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 3

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 88: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Felony Offenders 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996', 1997, 1998 and Jan - May 1999

Jan - May 1999199819981997199719961996199519951994199419931993Disposition:RateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotal

0.19100.17240.12160.18220.23270.16170.2120PRISONBRANCH0.1160.0680.0790.0230.0780.0550.077PROBATIONBRANCH0.48260.57810.51670.63780.53630.63680.5653SPLITBRANCH0.22120.16230.27360.14170.15180.14150.1514JAILBRANCH0.0000.0450.0340.0230.0220.0330.011OTHERBRANCH

54141132123 118 108 95TOTAL

0.21880.191860.222170.262230.271890.251610.29184PRISONCALHOUN0.12500.141380.191880.272260.312120.372400.23145PROBATIONCALHOUN0.331370.403900.323160.242050.211470.271750.38240SPLITCALHOUN0.311290.252470.262520.221890.211430.11690.0960JAILCALHOUN0.0160.01130.0040.0170.0030.0190.014OTHERCALHOUN

410974977850 694 654 633TOTAL

0.25290.25570.19280.22380.25370.27470.1827PRISONCASS0.11130.08170.07110.0590.0460.06100.1623PROBATIONCASS0.36430.41930.47700.47810.54790.591020.5379SPLITCASS0.26310.26580.26380.25430.16240.09150.1218JAILCASS0.0220.0010.0110.0110.0000.0000.011OTHERCASS

118226148172 146 174 148TOTAL

0.34120.27160.18140.36230.24220.20110.3218PRISONCHARLEVOIX0.1140.0000.0430.0320.0330.0630.095PROBATIONCHARLEVOIX0.31110.46270.63500.50320.56500.63340.4626SPLITCHARLEVOIX0.2070.22130.0970.0850.1090.0630.116JAILCHARLEVOIX0.0310.0530.0860.0320.0760.0630.042OTHERCHARLEVOIX

35598064 90 54 57TOTAL

0.20100.13120.14120.14100.19200.24180.2313PRISONCHEBOYGAN0.0630.0980.1190.1070.0550.0540.053PROBATIONCHEBOYGAN0.48240.50460.54460.45320.49510.39300.3922SPLITCHEBOYGAN0.24120.24220.19160.24170.24250.26200.3017JAILCHEBOYGAN0.0210.0440.0220.0750.0440.0540.021OTHERCHEBOYGAN

50928571 105 76 56TOTAL

0.1130.15100.14100.12110.17120.24130.1612PRISONCHIPPEWA0.1130.0320.0110.0660.0960.0740.043PROBATIONCHIPPEWA0.46130.57370.45310.44420.56390.54290.6246SPLITCHIPPEWA0.2980.22140.32220.34320.14100.0630.1511JAILCHIPPEWA0.0410.0320.0750.0440.0430.0950.032OTHERCHIPPEWA

28656995 70 54 74TOTAL

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 4

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 89: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Felony Offenders 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996', 1997, 1998 and Jan - May 1999

Jan - May 1999199819981997199719961996199519951994199419931993Disposition:RateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotal

0.1050.21150.22220.0980.13130.15120.1410PRISONCLARE0.21110.0640.17170.17150.15150.1190.054PROBATIONCLARE0.56290.46330.39390.53460.49480.62510.6044SPLITCLARE0.0000.0750.0660.0650.0880.0540.086JAILCLARE0.1370.21150.15150.14120.14140.0760.129OTHERCLARE

52729986 98 82 73TOTAL

0.34160.32420.35520.34430.21240.24350.3036PRISONCLINTON0.0210.08100.0690.0230.0220.0460.034PROBATIONCLINTON0.49230.45590.50750.49610.53610.41590.4656SPLITCLINTON0.0940.08110.0580.08100.17200.27390.1721JAILCLINTON0.0630.0790.0350.0680.0890.0340.045OTHERCLINTON

47131149125 116 143 122TOTAL

0.1640.22180.18120.26190.33210.2090.269PRISONCRAWFORD0.2870.0650.0320.1290.1490.0520.248PROBATIONCRAWFORD0.52130.57470.62400.55410.50320.70310.3813SPLITCRAWFORD0.0000.12100.17110.0540.0320.0520.093JAILCRAWFORD0.0410.0430.0000.0110.0000.0000.031OTHERCRAWFORD

25836574 64 44 34TOTAL

0.1350.26230.1190.20180.13130.15120.3621PRISONDELTA0.1040.0440.0760.0330.0660.0220.021PROBATIONDELTA0.28110.53470.67560.66610.65650.62510.5331SPLITDELTA0.35140.13120.12100.11100.14140.21170.053JAILDELTA0.1560.0330.0220.0000.0220.0000.032OTHERDELTA

40898392 100 82 58TOTAL

0.1350.18180.17150.0970.14110.1380.054PRISONDICKINSON0.0000.0660.0650.0430.0540.0960.118PROBATIONDICKINSON0.59230.36360.32290.45340.54440.70450.6348SPLITDICKINSON0.2390.22220.23210.17130.19150.0640.2015JAILDICKINSON0.0520.17170.22200.25190.0970.0210.011OTHERDICKINSON

39999076 81 64 76TOTAL

0.22390.16550.17560.21670.15420.17550.1658PRISONEATON0.10180.09320.08250.12390.07200.04130.0827PROBATIONEATON0.50890.491710.471510.381220.461330.471470.46165SPLITEATON0.11200.15540.17540.17560.18530.24750.2277JAILEATON0.07130.11400.11360.13410.14400.08250.0829OTHEREATON

179352322325 288 315 356TOTAL

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 5

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 90: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Felony Offenders 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996', 1997, 1998 and Jan - May 1999

Jan - May 1999199819981997199719961996199519951994199419931993Disposition:RateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotal

0.22100.26330.19180.17170.25240.13100.2621PRISONEMMET0.0210.12160.17160.11110.12120.19150.1613PROBATIONEMMET0.74340.58750.61590.63620.54520.56450.4838SPLITEMMET0.0210.0340.0110.0330.0550.0650.054JAILEMMET0.0000.0110.0220.0550.0440.0650.054OTHEREMMET

461299698 97 80 80TOTAL

0.412860.386620.335610.405930.396380.396030.38591PRISONGENESEE0.292050.356090.325470.284070.274450.274100.29444PROBATIONGENESEE0.231640.203420.284720.263790.274370.284230.25388SPLITGENESEE0.05380.05880.05810.04520.03450.02260.0459JAILGENESEE0.02130.02410.02310.03420.04610.05690.0463OTHERGENESEE

7061,7421,6921,473 1,626 1,531 1,545TOTAL

0.24100.21220.17130.1090.22200.21180.119PRISONGLADWIN0.1980.0770.13100.0980.14130.0540.087PROBATIONGLADWIN0.43180.52550.57430.65600.58520.69590.7361SPLITGLADWIN0.0000.0220.0110.0660.0000.0220.043JAILGLADWIN0.1460.18190.1290.11100.0650.0220.054OTHERGLADWIN

421057693 90 85 84TOTAL

0.2920.1540.0000.2020.1520.2220.183PRISONGOGEBIC0.0000.0410.0810.0000.0000.1110.000PROBATIONGOGEBIC0.4330.73190.92110.8080.77100.6760.7112SPLITGOGEBIC0.2920.0820.0000.0000.0810.0000.122JAILGOGEBIC0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000OTHERGOGEBIC

7261210 13 9 17TOTAL

0.40330.40800.33620.33580.30570.36530.2447PRISONGRAND TRAVERSE0.0110.0370.0230.0230.07140.0580.036PROBATIONGRAND TRAVERSE0.52430.531080.631190.54970.49930.52770.64126SPLITGRAND TRAVERSE0.0650.0250.0350.09160.11210.0690.0918JAILGRAND TRAVERSE0.0000.0120.0000.0240.0240.0000.000OTHERGRAND TRAVERSE

82202189178 189 147 197TOTAL

0.3090.29270.27260.27310.33430.22220.3025PRISONGRATIOT0.0720.0000.0220.09100.0560.0880.054PROBATIONGRATIOT0.50150.59550.56540.63720.49640.52520.4739SPLITGRATIOT0.1340.0980.0990.0110.10130.16160.1613JAILGRATIOT0.0000.0330.0550.0110.0450.0220.022OTHERGRATIOT

309396115 131 100 83TOTAL

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 6

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 91: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Felony Offenders 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996', 1997, 1998 and Jan - May 1999

Jan - May 1999199819981997199719961996199519951994199419931993Disposition:RateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotal

0.55260.49730.36460.40470.33520.32440.3245PRISONHILLSDALE0.0000.0000.0220.0220.0110.0680.068PROBATIONHILLSDALE0.34160.39580.54700.57670.641000.61850.6186SPLITHILLSDALE0.0940.11160.08100.0220.0340.0120.012JAILHILLSDALE0.0210.0230.0110.0000.0000.0000.000OTHERHILLSDALE

47150129118 157 139 141TOTAL

0.3350.23150.2190.1150.23130.0950.074PRISONHOUGHTON0.0710.0850.0000.0630.0740.0630.021PROBATIONHOUGHTON0.4060.45290.58250.49230.48270.63340.6739SPLITHOUGHTON0.2030.15100.1460.28130.18100.19100.2414JAILHOUGHTON0.0000.0960.0730.0630.0420.0420.000OTHERHOUGHTON

15654347 56 54 58TOTAL

0.1230.23130.22120.15100.21170.17120.216PRISONHURON0.0000.0000.0740.0320.0110.1070.072PROBATIONHURON0.60150.53300.52280.62400.61490.57390.5215SPLITHURON0.2050.23130.1790.17110.13100.1280.072JAILHURON0.0820.0210.0210.0320.0430.0430.144OTHERHURON

25575465 80 69 29TOTAL

0.23880.262640.262960.252680.242590.252900.26298PRISONINGHAM0.11410.171730.141570.272890.111160.091060.14161PROBATIONINGHAM0.391450.373800.434870.313300.444770.455190.41473SPLITINGHAM0.16600.141410.151760.141470.151660.131510.15179JAILINGHAM0.11420.07680.02240.04450.07780.07770.0555OTHERINGHAM

3761,0261,1401,079 1,096 1,143 1,166TOTAL

0.18120.17340.18340.21360.17300.11170.1525PRISONIONIA0.21140.18360.23430.21370.21380.29430.2136PROBATIONIONIA0.21140.28560.30550.28490.34610.30440.3254SPLITIONIA0.25170.23450.18330.20340.14250.21310.2136JAILIONIA0.16110.13260.11200.10170.13240.09140.1220OTHERIONIA

68197185173 178 149 171TOTAL

0.39170.38450.32310.28230.22200.40320.3126PRISONIOSCO0.0730.0560.0660.0540.0660.14110.087PROBATIONIOSCO0.39170.44530.52500.57470.60560.43340.5345SPLITIOSCO0.1150.08100.0660.0870.12110.0320.087JAILIOSCO0.0520.0560.0440.0220.0000.0110.000OTHERIOSCO

441209783 93 80 85TOTAL

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 7

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 92: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Felony Offenders 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996', 1997, 1998 and Jan - May 1999

Jan - May 1999199819981997199719961996199519951994199419931993Disposition:RateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotal

0.2770.2090.20100.2270.1050.2170.155PRISONIRON0.0820.0210.1260.0930.0210.0000.000PROBATIONIRON0.3180.36160.53260.47150.55270.56190.7023SPLITIRON0.1540.30130.1470.1960.24120.1550.062JAILIRON0.1950.1150.0000.0310.0840.0930.093OTHERIRON

26444932 49 34 33TOTAL

0.13160.09230.11340.14330.09190.10200.1126PRISONISABELLA0.12150.16400.17510.11270.11230.19380.1945PROBATIONISABELLA0.43540.37910.491490.471100.43900.35720.4299SPLITISABELLA0.10130.13310.15440.14330.16330.16320.1432JAILISABELLA0.22280.25620.08250.14320.21440.20410.1434OTHERISABELLA

126247303235 209 203 236TOTAL

0.361160.423050.382720.291680.321980.332310.27206PRISONJACKSON0.09300.08550.06460.08460.06360.06410.1186PROBATIONJACKSON0.401270.332390.402860.432530.422620.412870.47363SPLITJACKSON0.09280.10730.08550.12700.14860.161080.1186JAILJACKSON0.06200.08590.07520.08450.06380.04250.0431OTHERJACKSON

321731711582 620 692 772TOTAL

0.211240.202750.212850.253730.202580.212670.23295PRISONKALAMAZOO0.402380.425780.517100.456730.496370.435620.38484PROBATIONKALAMAZOO0.11680.111550.131830.152250.162140.222870.27338SPLITKALAMAZOO0.211260.202830.141950.132010.121610.081090.0679JAILKALAMAZOO0.07410.07970.01120.02270.03360.06750.0674OTHERKALAMAZOO

5971,3881,3851,499 1,306 1,300 1,270TOTAL

0.31100.30310.30240.1380.26190.25140.2317PRISONKALKASKA0.0310.0880.0650.17110.0640.18100.1612PROBATIONKALKASKA0.66210.55570.57450.66420.64460.53300.4734SPLITKALKASKA0.0000.0770.0540.0530.0430.0530.118JAILKALKASKA0.0000.0110.0110.0000.0000.0000.032OTHERKALKASKA

321047964 72 57 73TOTAL

0.263000.267690.247530.236850.256570.277090.29787PRISONKENT0.293350.329770.341,0790.339720.308070.307880.26704PROBATIONKENT0.172000.134050.144420.144190.164220.154000.22591SPLITKENT0.212460.195800.196030.236730.236060.236190.18489JAILKENT0.08930.092810.092800.082260.061550.051370.06157OTHERKENT

1,1743,0123,1572,975 2,647 2,653 2,728TOTAL

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 8

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 93: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Felony Offenders 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996', 1997, 1998 and Jan - May 1999

Jan - May 1999199819981997199719961996199519951994199419931993Disposition:RateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotal

00.0000.1710.3310.0000.0001.001PRISONKEWEENAW00.0000.1710.0000.0000.5010.000PROBATIONKEWEENAW00.5010.1710.3311.0020.5010.000SPLITKEWEENAW00.5010.3320.0000.0000.0000.000JAILKEWEENAW00.0000.1710.3310.0000.0000.000OTHERKEWEENAW0263 2 2 1TOTAL

0.2330.1260.23150.24180.32150.24110.104PRISONLAKE0.1520.0840.0530.0110.0210.0210.052PROBATIONLAKE0.3850.65340.63410.67500.64300.69310.7832SPLITLAKE0.2330.1260.0850.0860.0210.0420.052JAILLAKE0.0000.0420.0210.0000.0000.0000.021OTHERLAKE

13526575 47 45 41TOTAL

0.25270.24450.22430.21420.17380.19380.2446PRISONLAPEER0.12130.14250.08160.06110.10220.09180.0815PROBATIONLAPEER0.50540.44820.51990.48950.37820.42860.3567SPLITLAPEER0.12130.17310.18360.23460.35780.29600.3160JAILLAPEER0.0110.0120.0110.0120.0120.0120.023OTHERLAPEER

108185195196 222 204 191TOTAL

0.2160.2080.1960.33140.29120.30130.3012PRISONLEELANAU0.0310.0310.0000.0000.0210.0520.031PROBATIONLEELANAU0.62180.73290.72230.65280.60250.66290.6024SPLITLEELANAU0.1030.0310.0930.0210.0730.0000.052JAILLEELANAU0.0310.0310.0000.0000.0210.0000.031OTHERLEELANAU

29403243 42 44 40TOTAL

0.46480.481480.42960.461120.471000.491010.3976PRISONLENAWEE0.0660.06170.07160.07160.06120.09190.1121PROBATIONLENAWEE0.38400.411270.451020.461110.45950.41840.4792SPLITLENAWEE0.0220.0270.0480.0010.0120.0120.024JAILLENAWEE0.0990.0390.0250.0130.0120.0000.012OTHERLENAWEE

105308227243 211 206 195TOTAL

0.25490.241000.281140.401360.18740.23790.2996PRISONLIVINGSTON0.13260.18770.17700.18600.251040.29990.1962PROBATIONLIVINGSTON0.31600.331380.341370.29980.361500.291000.33108SPLITLIVINGSTON0.16310.15620.12470.09300.14600.09320.0619JAILLIVINGSTON0.14280.10400.08340.05180.08330.10360.1341OTHERLIVINGSTON

194417402342 421 346 326TOTAL

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 9

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 94: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Felony Offenders 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996', 1997, 1998 and Jan - May 1999

Jan - May 1999199819981997199719961996199519951994199419931993Disposition:RateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotal

0.1410.3150.1730.0710.3060.1320.628PRISONLUCE0.0000.0000.1120.2130.0000.1320.081PROBATIONLUCE0.5740.4470.61110.6490.60120.67100.314SPLITLUCE0.2920.1930.1120.0710.0510.0710.000JAILLUCE0.0000.0610.0000.0000.0510.0000.000OTHERLUCE

7161814 20 15 13TOTAL

0.0610.30140.35180.1780.1340.2470.358PRISONMACKINAC0.1320.0730.0630.0630.1650.0720.000PROBATIONMACKINAC0.3150.35160.31160.51240.41130.41120.4310SPLITMACKINAC0.1930.1570.1890.0940.2270.2470.225JAILMACKINAC0.3150.1360.1050.1780.0930.0310.000OTHERMACKINAC

16465147 32 29 23TOTAL

0.181980.174370.174290.153190.163300.183770.20375PRISONMACOMB0.343670.391,0090.431,0890.428770.418350.469720.41758PROBATIONMACOMB0.202180.194920.205170.214340.214270.194100.20371SPLITMACOMB0.171880.174300.143600.112380.112200.091870.10181JAILMACOMB0.111180.092250.061630.112200.112150.091890.08146OTHERMACOMB

1,0892,5932,5582,088 2,027 2,135 1,831TOTAL

0.28100.34260.32270.41310.38250.28190.2214PRISONMANISTEE0.1760.0860.0540.0110.0960.1070.1912PROBATIONMANISTEE0.33120.53410.52440.45340.45300.54360.4529SPLITMANISTEE0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0110.021JAILMANISTEE0.2280.0540.1190.1290.0850.0640.138OTHERMANISTEE

36778475 66 67 64TOTAL

0.1870.11120.16190.15180.10140.13180.1416PRISONMARQUETTE0.1140.25270.23270.18210.20280.24330.3337PROBATIONMARQUETTE0.39150.52560.47550.52620.40550.28380.4247SPLITMARQUETTE0.26100.0890.09110.0330.15210.13180.0910JAILMARQUETTE0.0520.0440.0340.13160.14200.21280.022OTHERMARQUETTE

38108116120 138 135 112TOTAL

0.28160.16180.16140.23220.38450.27240.2222PRISONMASON0.0320.0110.0330.0000.0000.0220.011PROBATIONMASON0.64370.75870.79680.73690.60700.67600.7677SPLITMASON0.0530.09100.0110.0220.0110.0330.000JAILMASON0.0000.0000.0000.0220.0110.0110.011OTHERMASON

581168695 117 90 101TOTAL

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 10

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 95: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Felony Offenders 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996', 1997, 1998 and Jan - May 1999

Jan - May 1999199819981997199719961996199519951994199419931993Disposition:RateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotal

0.20100.22280.19230.21320.24350.18230.2323PRISONMECOSTA0.1260.0680.0340.0570.0570.0450.088PROBATIONMECOSTA0.44220.48610.57680.57870.50740.60770.5352SPLITMECOSTA0.0630.08100.0780.10150.0570.08100.1111JAILMECOSTA0.1890.15190.13160.08120.16240.11140.055OTHERMECOSTA

50126119153 147 129 99TOTAL

0.0810.17100.2490.23100.1560.1060.138PRISONMENOMINEE0.0000.0000.0310.0520.0310.0530.000PROBATIONMENOMINEE0.3850.42250.46170.42180.50200.53330.4326SPLITMENOMINEE0.4660.33200.27100.1670.2080.32200.4326JAILMENOMINEE0.0810.0850.0000.1460.1350.0000.021OTHERMENOMINEE

13603743 40 62 61TOTAL

0.18150.24820.22730.25700.23610.23560.2154PRISONMIDLAND0.19160.10350.09310.15420.13340.14340.1129PROBATIONMIDLAND0.55460.501730.531740.361040.461240.441080.55145SPLITMIDLAND0.0220.06200.05170.09250.10260.08200.0617JAILMIDLAND0.0650.10340.11360.15440.09230.11260.0718OTHERMIDLAND

84344331285 268 244 263TOTAL

0.1630.20120.26140.22110.2480.0630.3211PRISONMISSAUKEE0.1120.0740.0840.0840.0310.1360.000PROBATIONMISSAUKEE0.74140.62370.60320.51250.67220.71340.5017SPLITMISSAUKEE0.0000.0530.0210.0840.0620.0000.124JAILMISSAUKEE0.0000.0740.0420.1050.0000.1050.062OTHERMISSAUKEE

19605349 33 48 34TOTAL

0.30640.271580.301650.341860.301500.301320.29135PRISONMONROE0.10210.14850.16880.04230.04220.03120.0419PROBATIONMONROE0.501070.482830.462520.532910.552700.592580.60276SPLITMONROE0.06130.04210.03190.02130.04190.03150.0417JAILMONROE0.0490.07430.05280.07360.06310.04190.0316OTHERMONROE

214590552549 492 436 463TOTAL

0.20170.20430.20350.18420.15320.10190.1324PRISONMONTCALM0.19160.15330.17290.22510.15310.15270.1019PROBATIONMONTCALM0.33270.40860.39680.441020.511070.561030.57105SPLITMONTCALM0.22180.16350.17290.10230.12250.12220.1121JAILMONTCALM0.0650.09190.07130.06140.06130.08140.0815OTHERMONTCALM

83216174232 208 185 184TOTAL

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 11

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 96: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Felony Offenders 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996', 1997, 1998 and Jan - May 1999

Jan - May 1999199819981997199719961996199519951994199419931993Disposition:RateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotal

0.1020.1440.1850.2260.2790.0730.103PRISONMONTMORENCY0.0510.2570.2980.2670.2480.36150.175PROBATIONMONTMORENCY0.70140.46130.43120.44120.48160.52220.6619SPLITMONTMORENCY0.1530.1130.0720.0720.0000.0520.072JAILMONTMORENCY0.0000.0410.0410.0000.0000.0000.000OTHERMONTMORENCY

20282827 33 42 29TOTAL

0.341610.333680.383930.414020.413570.504500.43384PRISONMUSKEGON0.13630.161810.222260.232270.151290.121070.13112PROBATIONMUSKEGON0.401880.363950.303120.262570.322820.302640.33293SPLITMUSKEGON0.09410.09990.05480.03320.05470.01130.0325JAILMUSKEGON0.05220.06620.05510.07640.07640.07600.0982OTHERMUSKEGON

4751,1051,030982 879 894 896TOTAL

0.16110.14200.17230.19280.17280.17230.1421PRISONNEWAYGO0.0000.0110.0110.0120.0110.0000.012PROBATIONNEWAYGO0.58390.40570.60810.52770.49790.49670.5992SPLITNEWAYGO0.21140.36520.23310.28420.32520.34460.2538JAILNEWAYGO0.0430.10140.0000.0000.0110.0000.012OTHERNEWAYGO

67144136149 161 136 155TOTAL

0.173870.179830.179070.168060.157420.168280.191,010PRISONOAKLAND0.255790.281,6290.291,5380.321,6540.3316130.301,5370.311,681PROBATIONOAKLAND0.245630.221,2550.221,1830.221,1070.209740.178750.15821SPLITOAKLAND0.266000.221,2650.201,0830.199610.209950.241,2000.231,250JAILOAKLAND0.092150.126670.126570.115720.125710.136610.13697OTHEROAKLAND

2,3445,7995,3685,100 4,895 5,101 5,459TOTAL

0.2290.14120.25220.15140.0640.0750.1310PRISONOCEANA0.0000.0220.0330.0220.0850.0750.086PROBATIONOCEANA0.54220.64560.61540.47450.39240.53360.2821SPLITOCEANA0.1560.16140.0980.35330.45280.32220.5038JAILOCEANA0.1040.0330.0110.0110.0210.0000.011OTHEROCEANA

41878895 62 68 76TOTAL

0.2590.16130.28190.1080.21120.18130.2116PRISONOGEMAW0.0830.0860.0960.14110.0740.0860.011PROBATIONOGEMAW0.47170.62490.54370.53410.57330.39280.5442SPLITOGEMAW0.1970.1190.1070.21160.1690.33240.2318JAILOGEMAW0.0000.0320.0000.0110.0000.0110.011OTHEROGEMAW

36796977 58 72 78TOTAL

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 12

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 97: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Felony Offenders 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996', 1997, 1998 and Jan - May 1999

Jan - May 1999199819981997199719961996199519951994199419931993Disposition:RateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotal

0.0000.2130.2520.0000.2130.6470.213PRISONONTONAGON0.0000.0710.1310.1410.0710.0000.142PROBATIONONTONAGON0.8350.6490.6350.7150.5070.3640.507SPLITONTONAGON0.1710.0710.0000.1410.0710.0000.142JAILONTONAGON0.0000.0000.0000.0000.1420.0000.000OTHERONTONAGON

61487 14 11 14TOTAL

0.2080.21190.31290.20230.22200.1060.1311PRISONOSCEOLA0.0000.0220.0220.0110.0220.0210.098PROBATIONOSCEOLA0.75300.67620.52490.66770.61570.68430.6456SPLITOSCEOLA0.0000.0220.0980.09100.11100.1170.1311JAILOSCEOLA0.0520.0870.0660.0450.0440.1060.022OTHEROSCEOLA

409294116 93 63 88TOTAL

0.5020.4590.3970.4440.3650.3140.225PRISONOSCODA0.0000.1020.1730.2220.0000.0810.000PROBATIONOSCODA0.5020.4590.3970.2220.5780.5470.7016SPLITOSCODA0.0000.0000.0610.0000.0710.0810.092JAILOSCODA0.0000.0000.0000.1110.0000.0000.000OTHEROSCODA

420189 14 13 23TOTAL

0.30140.20160.16110.27160.26210.29220.2116PRISONOTSEGO0.0630.0320.0960.17100.15120.0540.1310PROBATIONOTSEGO0.60280.71570.66450.50300.48390.56420.5644SPLITOTSEGO0.0210.0540.0750.0530.1080.0970.065JAILOTSEGO0.0210.0110.0110.0210.0220.0000.043OTHEROTSEGO

47806860 82 75 78TOTAL

0.12370.121040.171370.14980.191340.181030.1889PRISONOTTAWA0.321000.352960.372960.402860.281960.362040.37182PROBATIONOTTAWA0.25780.151290.201590.231620.281970.251400.26128SPLITOTTAWA0.25790.272270.211690.211490.211460.181020.1890JAILOTTAWA0.06180.09780.05390.03250.04280.04220.016OTHEROTTAWA

312834800720 701 571 495TOTAL

0.3260.1040.1670.1360.22110.1040.114PRISONPRESQUE ISLE0.0510.0730.23100.1880.27130.24100.5019PROBATIONPRESQUE ISLE0.3260.61250.27120.53240.37180.44180.3915SPLITPRESQUE ISLE0.3260.1560.27120.1150.1260.2080.000JAILPRESQUE ISLE0.0000.0730.0730.0420.0210.0210.000OTHERPRESQUE ISLE

19414445 49 41 38TOTAL

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 13

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 98: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Felony Offenders 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996', 1997, 1998 and Jan - May 1999

Jan - May 1999199819981997199719961996199519951994199419931993Disposition:RateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotal

0.1860.22290.18240.19240.16190.11110.1618PRISONROSCOMMON0.1860.11140.10130.09110.12150.12120.1720PROBATIONROSCOMMON0.64210.60790.62810.69880.69830.65640.5969SPLITROSCOMMON0.0000.0560.0570.0220.0340.0990.078JAILROSCOMMON0.0000.0340.0450.0220.0000.0220.011OTHERROSCOMMON

33132130127 121 98 116TOTAL

0.311650.293870.263270.252750.253000.323340.29308PRISONSAGINAW0.351870.364860.405060.384300.445230.444630.45485PROBATIONSAGINAW0.12640.152080.172200.202200.131500.121310.0880SPLITSAGINAW0.14730.131760.141730.141540.131490.07790.0771JAILSAGINAW0.08420.07890.04450.04410.05550.05480.11122OTHERSAGINAW

5311,3461,2711,120 1,177 1,055 1,066TOTAL

0.18630.251890.231780.221440.221390.221350.21111PRISONST. CLAIR0.14470.141040.181350.191260.251590.241460.29154PROBATIONST. CLAIR0.381290.372860.362730.382470.311980.382380.36190SPLITST. CLAIR0.19640.151160.151160.191250.221410.161000.1477JAILST. CLAIR0.12410.10740.08590.02110.0140.0010.013OTHERST. CLAIR

344769761653 641 620 535TOTAL

0.21230.25500.18350.25500.23450.18280.2848PRISONST. JOSEPH0.0110.0010.0240.0350.0230.0350.023PROBATIONST. JOSEPH0.48520.46930.571080.43860.45890.43680.3663SPLITST. JOSEPH0.30320.29590.22420.29570.29580.35560.3357JAILST. JOSEPH0.0000.0010.0120.0000.0230.0110.012OTHERST. JOSEPH

108204191198 198 158 173TOTAL

0.1690.17240.19250.15210.18200.13200.1621PRISONSANILAC0.0210.0120.0230.0570.0440.0230.056PROBATIONSANILAC0.74420.701000.67890.62890.62700.61960.6890SPLITSANILAC0.0740.10140.11150.08120.12140.17270.1114JAILSANILAC0.0210.0120.0000.10140.0450.08120.011OTHERSANILAC

57142132143 113 158 132TOTAL

0.1010.0000.0720.0920.2050.1820.203PRISONSCHOOLCRAFT0.0000.0410.0000.0000.0820.0000.071PROBATIONSCHOOLCRAFT0.6060.70160.69200.74170.3280.5560.609SPLITSCHOOLCRAFT0.0000.0920.0720.1740.2050.2730.132JAILSCHOOLCRAFT0.3030.1740.1750.0000.2050.0000.000OTHERSCHOOLCRAFT

10232923 25 11 15TOTAL

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 14

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 99: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Felony Offenders 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996', 1997, 1998 and Jan - May 1999

Jan - May 1999199819981997199719961996199519951994199419931993Disposition:RateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotalRateTotal

0.39260.31560.39630.29570.24350.32510.2936PRISONSHIAWASSEE0.0110.0470.09140.06110.0340.10160.1316PROBATIONSHIAWASSEE0.55370.601090.48770.581130.55810.44710.4354SPLITSHIAWASSEE0.0320.0230.0230.0590.17250.13200.1620JAILSHIAWASSEE0.0110.0470.0230.0240.0230.0120.000OTHERSHIAWASSEE

67182160194 148 160 126TOTAL

0.24160.25300.30410.23360.25300.19190.2021PRISONTUSCOLA0.0530.0340.0790.0580.12140.12120.088PROBATIONTUSCOLA0.50330.52630.49660.44700.50600.53520.5659SPLITTUSCOLA0.20130.11140.13180.27420.13150.14140.1617JAILTUSCOLA0.0210.09110.0110.0120.0110.0110.011OTHERTUSCOLA

66122135158 120 98 106TOTAL

0.18300.11420.15490.20650.19570.21550.1952PRISONVAN BUREN0.26440.301110.22730.16520.11330.12320.1129PROBATIONVAN BUREN0.35600.391430.461540.23750.27810.28740.3597SPLITVAN BUREN0.21360.19700.17580.401320.411200.391050.3595JAILVAN BUREN0.0110.0140.0130.0390.0140.0120.001OTHERVAN BUREN

171370337333 295 268 274TOTAL

0.20670.181710.262530.312700.262270.302360.35278PRISONWASHTENAW0.451550.494660.403830.322830.282500.292330.33264PROBATIONWASHTENAW0.14480.141360.141300.171500.252250.241890.17138SPLITWASHTENAW0.20690.151420.121140.11980.131170.131020.0861JAILWASHTENAW0.0120.03320.08750.09780.08700.05400.0649OTHERWASHTENAW

341947955879 889 800 790TOTAL

0.228610.191,5490.231,9350.222,0470.2121860.242,3100.272,632PRISONWAYNE0.602,3030.655,2820.655,5070.565,2880.6265270.615,8690.575,695PROBATIONWAYNE0.114340.107940.064790.151,4530.088280.076700.07735SPLITWAYNE0.031090.032250.032570.044110.055100.065630.06565JAILWAYNE0.031230.032420.032520.022040.044370.032450.03290OTHERWAYNE

3,8308,0928,4309,403 10,488 9,657 9,917TOTAL

0.2080.31320.31270.20230.22210.26210.1716PRISONWEXFORD0.0210.0770.0870.0440.0550.14110.087PROBATIONWEXFORD0.73300.59610.55480.61690.61580.49400.6358SPLITWEXFORD0.0000.0330.0330.0560.0660.0540.033JAILWEXFORD0.0520.0110.0220.11120.0550.0650.098OTHERWEXFORD

411048711495 81 92TOTAL

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 15

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 100: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Total Felony Offenders, Prison Commitments and Commitment Rates for 1993, 1994,1995, 1996' , 1997, 1998, and Jan - May 1999.

Jan-May 1999RatePris99Tot99RatePris98Tot98RatePris97Tot97RatePris96Tot96RatePris95Tot95RatePris94Tot94RatePris93Tot93SGLgroup

Appendix BStatewide and County-Specific Prison Commitment

Data by SGL Category

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 1

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 101: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Total Felony Offenders, Prison Commitments and Commitment Rates for 1993, 1994,1995, 1996' , 1997, 1998, and Jan - May 1999.

Jan-May 1999RatePris99Tot99RatePris98Tot98RatePris97Tot97RatePris96Tot96RatePris95Tot95RatePris94Tot94RatePris93Tot93SGLgroup

0.064557,3870.061,01817,7330.061,08518,0980.061,17618,2050.071,22418,6970.071,33018,3070.071,29117,671SGL Min 0Michigan0.322598190.294111,4150.334371,3440.313831,2340.313971,2800.354331,2340.364421,237SGL Min 1-11Michigan0.455901,2970.451,5373,4100.491,6763,4310.451,5863,5340.451,7123,8170.501,8143,6130.522,0994,062SGL Min 12Michigan0.745166940.761,2501,6510.761,2711,6800.761,3471,7720.711,2821,8080.771,3841,8040.801,5481,932SGL Min 13-24Michigan0.926386900.931,4261,5360.931,5521,6630.921,5681,6970.921,6291,7770.921,7751,9230.941,9252,045SGL Min 25+Michigan0.161177130.153002,0680.183902,1870.143072,2270.142872,0470.193872,0650.184052,300Retail FraudMichigan0.262459250.276002,2440.285942,1150.285832,0760.264971,9200.234231,8100.254211,692OUIL3Michigan0.237593,3270.252,3879,7340.252,1128,5320.251,8577,4290.221,5226,7980.211,2435,8880.211,2616,023Other SGL NAMichigan0.353591,0170.3116520.203150.386160.248340.245210.32619SGL UnknownMichigan

0.14170.061160.153200.091110.000130.000130.00011SGL Min 0ALCONA0.00200.00200.0001 000.0002SGL Min 1-11ALCONA0.0030.50121.00220.0010.00011.00111.0011SGL Min 12ALCONA

01.001101.00220.00011.00221.0033SGL Min 13-24ALCONA01.00221.00221.00221.00220.00011.0011SGL Min 25+ALCONA000.0010 00 00 00Retail FraudALCONA

0.0010.40250.0020.0020.00050.00010.0001OUIL3ALCONA00.233130.0060.50240.00040.00030.0004Other SGL NAALCONA

0.001000.001 00 00 00SGL UnknownALCONA

0.0090.061160.00110.00170.000110.00070.00018SGL Min 0ALGER000.33130 000.0001 00SGL Min 1-11ALGER

0.0010.501200.0010.50120.00010.0001SGL Min 12ALGER0.0010.0010.0010.0020.33131.00110.0004SGL Min 13-24ALGER0.00100.0010 00 00 00SGL Min 25+ALGER

0000 00 00 00Retail FraudALGER00.0010.0020.0010.00020.00010.0001OUIL3ALGER00.33260.22290.20150.00030.67230.0001Other SGL NAALGER0000 00 00 00SGL UnknownALGER

0.074570.0681410.066940.0771020.097810.097820.06696SGL Min 0ALLEGAN0.20150.425120.33260.20150.33260.00050.5747SGL Min 1-11ALLEGAN0.83560.678120.4510220.477150.436140.628130.441227SGL Min 12ALLEGAN1.00111.00660.808100.88780.808100.78790.82911SGL Min 13-24ALLEGAN1.00551.0010101.00440.9211120.71571.00881.0088SGL Min 25+ALLEGAN

00.0020.50120.5012 000.0002 00Retail FraudALLEGAN0.0020.4611240.397180.172120.57470.33390.31413OUIL3ALLEGAN0.4416360.4141990.4928570.4310230.194210.303100.40410Other SGL NAALLEGAN0.3313000 00 00 00SGL UnknownALLEGAN

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 2

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 102: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Total Felony Offenders, Prison Commitments and Commitment Rates for 1993, 1994,1995, 1996' , 1997, 1998, and Jan - May 1999.

Jan-May 1999RatePris99Tot99RatePris98Tot98RatePris97Tot97RatePris96Tot96RatePris95Tot95RatePris94Tot94RatePris93Tot93SGLgroup

0.00110.031380.052370.083360.021460.000540.00047SGL Min 0ALPENA1.00110.0050.50240.0060.22290.00030.1716SGL Min 1-11ALPENA0.0050.295170.71570.556110.00080.00040.21314SGL Min 12ALPENA1.00330.0021.00440.0050.57470.43370.0001SGL Min 13-24ALPENA1.00111.00220.33131.00221.00440.67460.7534SGL Min 25+ALPENA

000.00100.0001 000.0001Retail FraudALPENA1.00220.0010.33130.40250.25140.00030.2514OUIL3ALPENA0.50120.13180.33260.14170.11190.38380.1716Other SGL NAALPENA

0000 00 00 00SGL UnknownALPENA

0.56590.052380.137520.217330.259360.156410.00035SGL Min 0ANTRIM0.33131.00110.0021.00220.67230.86670.2514SGL Min 1-11ANTRIM

00.50120.647110.75680.71570.67230.8667SGL Min 12ANTRIM1.00111.00220.67231.00221.00221.00221.0033SGL Min 13-24ANTRIM1.00111.00441.00441.00111.00331.00441.0066SGL Min 25+ANTRIM

00.00100 00 00 00Retail FraudANTRIM00.365140.385131.00220.50480.75340.3313OUIL3ANTRIM

0.56590.628130.43370.38380.40250.29270.0003Other SGL NAANTRIM0.004000 00 00 00SGL UnknownANTRIM

0.0080.00100.071150.00240.051220.051200.10329SGL Min 0ARENAC0.0010.00200.3313 000.00010.0002SGL Min 1-11ARENAC1.00110.5012000.50240.50240.0001SGL Min 12ARENAC

01.00221.00111.0011 001.00111.0011SGL Min 13-24ARENAC1.00111.00111.00111.00551.0033 000.5012SGL Min 25+ARENAC

00000.00011.0011 00Retail FraudARENAC0.0010.00100.0010.00011.00110.5012OUIL3ARENAC0.00100.00160.142140.0090.000170.081120.00010Other SGL NAARENAC

0000 00 00 00SGL UnknownARENAC

0.0030.0060.0020.0030.25140.00070.4025SGL Min 0BARAGA0.0010000.00010.0001 00SGL Min 1-11BARAGA1.00110.0010.0020.5012 000.67231.0011SGL Min 12BARAGA

00.50120.50120 00 00 00SGL Min 13-24BARAGA01.0011001.00111.00111.0022SGL Min 25+BARAGA0000 00 001.0011Retail FraudBARAGA

0.0010.00300.0020.0001 00 00OUIL3BARAGA00.20150.00200.00041.0011 00Other SGL NABARAGA0000 00 00 00SGL UnknownBARAGA

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 3

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 103: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Total Felony Offenders, Prison Commitments and Commitment Rates for 1993, 1994,1995, 1996' , 1997, 1998, and Jan - May 1999.

Jan-May 1999RatePris99Tot99RatePris98Tot98RatePris97Tot97RatePris96Tot96RatePris95Tot95RatePris94Tot94RatePris93Tot93SGLgroup

0.00370.011750.00790.011910.097820.2817600.382668SGL Min 0BARRY0.0040.25140.25280.20150.40251.00440.7534SGL Min 1-11BARRY0.20150.29270.203150.274150.44490.699131.0077SGL Min 12BARRY1.00330.67460.71570.83560.60350.60351.001010SGL Min 13-24BARRY1.00111.00331.00881.00441.00990.80451.0088SGL Min 25+BARRY0.0020.0010.0010.25140.00010.33130.0001Retail FraudBARRY0.11190.183170.254160.132150.000100.506120.7568OUIL3BARRY0.436140.3518520.2611430.2215670.148590.5712210.50816Other SGL NABARRY0.672300.0010 00 00 00SGL UnknownBARRY

0.097750.11191670.09131460.08111390.21381790.20301510.1829158SGL Min 0BAY0.50480.25280.091110.406150.38380.455110.46613SGL Min 1-11BAY0.385130.6021350.4416360.5415280.5015300.4312280.662335SGL Min 12BAY1.0011110.8917190.7818230.5910170.7613170.8815170.941718SGL Min 13-24BAY0.80450.9110111.0017171.00770.9211120.88781.001515SGL Min 25+BAY0.17160.112180.38380.233130.38380.40250.2927Retail FraudBAY0.273110.417170.182110.213140.404100.303100.4337OUIL3BAY0.2812430.34351020.1813740.2813460.6922320.5618320.572646Other SGL NABAY0.501200.0010 00 00 00SGL UnknownBAY

0.29270.447160.184220.385130.000160.25140.12217SGL Min 0BENZIE000.0010.67231.0011 00 00SGL Min 1-11BENZIE000.50241.00110.00041.00110.0001SGL Min 12BENZIE

1.00110000.3313 001.0011SGL Min 13-24BENZIE00.0011.001100.5012 00 00SGL Min 25+BENZIE00000.0001 00 00Retail FraudBENZIE00.0010.67230.50240.00020.00040.5012OUIL3BENZIE00.17160.50121.0011 000.75340.0003Other SGL NABENZIE0000 00 00 00SGL UnknownBENZIE

0.17342020.12473840.16593770.10414280.08283380.05224430.0730404SGL Min 0BERRIEN0.428190.6315240.7019270.6716240.509180.296210.45920SGL Min 1-11BERRIEN0.7016230.8562730.8973820.7862790.7450680.7551680.837590SGL Min 12BERRIEN1.0012120.9431330.9340430.9434360.8122270.9327290.973839SGL Min 13-24BERRIEN1.0013131.0017171.0030300.9737381.0032321.0030300.973132SGL Min 25+BERRIEN0.678120.5814240.7414190.377190.244170.4611240.40410Retail FraudBERRIEN0.43370.358230.609150.6815220.294140.7112170.44716OUIL3BERRIEN0.2210460.15301950.25491960.17301740.15291900.11222080.1724142Other SGL NABERRIEN0.3014470000.0001 00 00SGL UnknownBERRIEN

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 4

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 104: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Total Felony Offenders, Prison Commitments and Commitment Rates for 1993, 1994,1995, 1996' , 1997, 1998, and Jan - May 1999.

Jan-May 1999RatePris99Tot99RatePris98Tot98RatePris97Tot97RatePris96Tot96RatePris95Tot95RatePris94Tot94RatePris93Tot93SGLgroup

0.031330.00590.00720.043780.075690.032630.02153SGL Min 0BRANCH0.25140.25280.14170.505100.00050.14170.3326SGL Min 1-11BRANCH0.50120.477150.506120.75680.6310160.50480.5659SGL Min 12BRANCH0.50121.00661.00331.00220.75340.50360.6723SGL Min 13-24BRANCH1.00221.00551.00441.00111.00551.00221.0077SGL Min 25+BRANCH

00.0010.00100.00020.00050.2514Retail FraudBRANCH00.11190.091110.0070.33130.13180.5012OUIL3BRANCH

0.17160.083380.051220.295170.213140.44490.09111Other SGL NABRANCH0.6035000 00 00 00SGL UnknownBRANCH

0.06111940.04194980.07345050.07314320.11403740.10393760.1036346SGL Min 0CALHOUN0.388210.2914480.2912420.3512340.406150.357200.44716SGL Min 1-11CALHOUN0.6021350.5445830.6653800.6456880.7253740.7145630.765572SGL Min 12CALHOUN0.7311150.8529340.7723300.8931350.7021300.9222240.803746SGL Min 13-24CALHOUN1.00880.9222240.9431330.9735360.9536380.9729300.953638SGL Min 25+CALHOUN0.11190.208410.1810560.2413540.257280.103300.10221Retail FraudCALHOUN0.273110.5415280.307230.447160.29270.506120.27311OUIL3CALHOUN0.2120970.16342170.23472070.25381550.19241280.1010990.10883Other SGL NACALHOUN0.255200.0010.0010 00 00 00SGL UnknownCALHOUN

0.063500.00760.021610.043770.011710.0221020.00088SGL Min 0CASS0.20150.29270.101100.0060.14170.25140.2015SGL Min 1-11CASS0.67460.5013260.647110.3810260.132150.6111180.60915SGL Min 12CASS1.00331.00990.909100.8511130.9415160.9212131.0055SGL Min 13-24CASS1.00881.0018181.00551.00881.00771.00991.0033SGL Min 25+CASS

00.0010.0010.0020.00060.17160.0005Retail FraudCASS0.00180.134320.122170.182110.33260.25280.0003OUIL3CASS0.3810260.1911570.093330.144290.509180.649140.38924Other SGL NACASS0.002000 00 00 00SGL UnknownCASS

0.213140.062340.021430.072290.158520.031310.06233SGL Min 0CHARLEVOIX0.33131.00220.33131.00330.50120.67231.0044SGL Min 1-11CHARLEVOIX1.00330.0010.75340.80451.00221.00220.8045SGL Min 12CHARLEVOIX

01.00111.00441.00331.00221.00111.0055SGL Min 13-24CHARLEVOIX1.00221.00441.00111.00221.00441.00331.0011SGL Min 25+CHARLEVOIX

0000.0030.0001 00 00Retail FraudCHARLEVOIX0.33130.50120.172120.71570.081120.000100.2514OUIL3CHARLEVOIX0.11190.406150.152130.334120.274150.50240.2015Other SGL NACHARLEVOIX1.0011000 00 00 00SGL UnknownCHARLEVOIX

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 5

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 105: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Total Felony Offenders, Prison Commitments and Commitment Rates for 1993, 1994,1995, 1996' , 1997, 1998, and Jan - May 1999.

Jan-May 1999RatePris99Tot99RatePris98Tot98RatePris97Tot97RatePris96Tot96RatePris95Tot95RatePris94Tot94RatePris93Tot93SGLgroup

0.041230.00360.00410.00310.042500.072300.07229SGL Min 0CHEBOYGAN0.331300.0030.0010.25140.50120.0002SGL Min 1-11CHEBOYGAN0.33130.50360.404100.40250.448180.404101.0022SGL Min 12CHEBOYGAN

00.0010.75340.67230.40250.33130.6035SGL Min 13-24CHEBOYGAN1.00330.75681.00111.00550.67230.80451.0055SGL Min 25+CHEBOYGAN

00.00100.002 00 00 00Retail FraudCHEBOYGAN0.40250.0080.061160.00120.202100.00080.0008OUIL3CHEBOYGAN0.152130.103310.303100.081120.203150.336180.2015Other SGL NACHEBOYGAN

00.00100 00 00 00SGL UnknownCHEBOYGAN

0.00170.00400.021450.00610.021440.123250.02142SGL Min 0CHIPPEWA0.0010.0030.0010.50121.00110.50120.2015SGL Min 1-11CHIPPEWA0.0010.0010.75340.44490.14170.67690.5659SGL Min 12CHIPPEWA

01.00661.00330.67231.00551.00111.0033SGL Min 13-24CHIPPEWA00.67231.00221.00221.00221.00111.0022SGL Min 25+CHIPPEWA

1.001100.0010.0011.00110.00030.0002Retail FraudCHIPPEWA1.00110.0010.50120.0050.00010.20150.0003OUIL3CHIPPEWA0.17160.182110.00110.172120.11190.00080.0008Other SGL NACHIPPEWA0.001000 00 00 00SGL UnknownCHIPPEWA

0.00240.083390.115440.052410.063510.021450.07346SGL Min 0CLARE0.50120.0020.0040.25140.00020.33130.2514SGL Min 1-11CLARE0.0010.75341.00550.0021.00550.29270.4025SGL Min 12CLARE0.0021.00331.00330.75341.00111.00441.0011SGL Min 13-24CLARE1.00111.00330.835601.00111.00331.0033SGL Min 25+CLARE

00.001000.0001 00 00Retail FraudCLARE0.43370.0010.182110.11190.00040.33130.0002OUIL3CLARE0.00100.163190.082260.041260.093330.000170.00012Other SGL NACLARE0.005000 00 00 00SGL UnknownCLARE

0.204200.085650.1712690.085610.096670.054740.06463SGL Min 0CLINTON0.0030.17160.29270.0020.40251.00330.2514SGL Min 1-11CLINTON0.50120.7512160.89890.909100.505100.556110.67812SGL Min 12CLINTON1.00220.67461.00661.00991.00330.86671.0099SGL Min 13-24CLINTON1.00221.00441.00661.00661.00220.909101.0088SGL Min 25+CLINTON

00.00100.002 000.25140.0001Retail FraudCLINTON0.67460.334120.678120.75680.334120.225230.2229OUIL3CLINTON0.33390.5712210.2510400.308270.122170.091110.25416Other SGL NACLINTON0.003000 00 00 00SGL UnknownCLINTON

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 6

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 106: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Total Felony Offenders, Prison Commitments and Commitment Rates for 1993, 1994,1995, 1996' , 1997, 1998, and Jan - May 1999.

Jan-May 1999RatePris99Tot99RatePris98Tot98RatePris97Tot97RatePris96Tot96RatePris95Tot95RatePris94Tot94RatePris93Tot93SGLgroup

0.172120.063510.031300.072290.134320.041280.00013SGL Min 0CRAWFORD000.0031.00110.33130.0001 00SGL Min 1-11CRAWFORD

0.50121.00110.75341.00550.75341.00330.5012SGL Min 12CRAWFORD000.50121.00221.00331.00111.0022SGL Min 13-24CRAWFORD

1.00111.002201.00441.0011 001.0022SGL Min 25+CRAWFORD00.0010.50120.0020.0001 00 00Retail FraudCRAWFORD

0.0020.50360.0060.071140.00040.00020.0001OUIL3CRAWFORD0.0080.419220.336180.244170.569160.44490.29414Other SGL NACRAWFORD

0000 00 00 00SGL UnknownCRAWFORD

0.00250.042450.021510.00490.000530.000510.11436SGL Min 0DELTA0.0010.33390.0010.0020.00020.00021.0011SGL Min 1-11DELTA1.00110.67230.75340.33390.29271.00330.8045SGL Min 12DELTA

01.00330.67231.00441.00441.0011 00SGL Min 13-24DELTA1.00221.006601.00331.00441.0011 00SGL Min 25+DELTA0.0040.50120.0011.00110.20150.25140.5012Retail FraudDELTA0.20150.425120.11190.60350.081130.356170.90910OUIL3DELTA0.50120.11190.152130.214190.081120.00030.5024Other SGL NADELTA

000.0010 00 00 00SGL UnknownDELTA

0.132160.021560.052440.021480.000410.000360.00045SGL Min 0DICKINSON1.00110.50360.0010.0020.00030.50120.0004SGL Min 1-11DICKINSON0.33130.60350.20150.25140.38380.50240.2514SGL Min 12DICKINSON

01.00331.00441.00111.00441.00221.0011SGL Min 13-24DICKINSON1.00111.00441.00441.00111.00111.00111.0011SGL Min 25+DICKINSON0.0010.0010.0020.0020.00020.00020.0002Retail FraudDICKINSON0.0090.00100.00100.101100.25280.17160.0003OUIL3DICKINSON0.0070.294140.204200.25280.071140.091110.06116Other SGL NADICKINSON0.001000 00 00 00SGL UnknownDICKINSON

0.042500.0221100.0221070.10131280.0451170.0571390.058159SGL Min 0EATON0.0060.132160.17161.00330.101100.334120.42512SGL Min 1-11EATON0.538150.244170.4812250.707100.5011220.5310190.50612SGL Min 12EATON0.738110.7213180.78790.9212130.89890.9313140.831012SGL Min 13-24EATON0.89890.8012151.0014141.00990.9211121.00991.001414SGL Min 25+EATON0.0070.00470.062330.031390.051200.164250.10442Retail FraudEATON0.294140.187400.194210.216280.041230.113280.10331OUIL3EATON0.137560.1715890.13141070.1716950.054730.075690.11874Other SGL NAEATON0.182110000.0002 00 00SGL UnknownEATON

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 7

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 107: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Total Felony Offenders, Prison Commitments and Commitment Rates for 1993, 1994,1995, 1996' , 1997, 1998, and Jan - May 1999.

Jan-May 1999RatePris99Tot99RatePris98Tot98RatePris97Tot97RatePris96Tot96RatePris95Tot95RatePris94Tot94RatePris93Tot93SGLgroup

0.00220.096670.00560.064710.085630.053610.16956SGL Min 0EMMET0.0030.67460.303100.0011.00111.0011 00SGL Min 1-11EMMET1.00330.50121.00550.33131.00220.33130.8667SGL Min 12EMMET1.00221.00551.00441.00221.00221.00331.0022SGL Min 13-24EMMET1.00221.00551.00111.00331.0044 001.0022SGL Min 25+EMMET

00.0010.00300.00020.00010.0005Retail FraudEMMET0.33130.385130.33260.57470.404100.33260.0002OUIL3EMMET0.202100.237300.273110.273110.466130.00050.3326Other SGL NAEMMET0.001000 00 00 00SGL UnknownEMMET

0.14352580.08485770.06345810.10575680.11817100.13897110.16110704SGL Min 0GENESEE0.505100.4210240.318260.5013260.4218430.369250.622337SGL Min 1-11GENESEE0.5822380.55801460.39591510.56821460.581041780.58921600.4888185SGL Min 12GENESEE0.8329350.7149690.7862790.8362750.9170770.8362750.837388SGL Min 13-24GENESEE0.9535370.9577810.9882840.9885870.9289970.9690940.917886SGL Min 25+GENESEE0.6111180.6018300.4318420.5623410.4317400.5929490.431944Retail FraudGENESEE0.328250.3628770.3021710.3219600.4723490.3323700.392462OUIL3GENESEE0.511332620.483527370.422776580.542524700.552364320.602093470.52175338Other SGL NAGENESEE0.358230.00100 00 001.0011SGL UnknownGENESEE

0.00150.00470.00290.021460.031380.031290.02145SGL Min 0GLADWIN0.0010.0020.0010.001 000.20150.0001SGL Min 1-11GLADWIN1.00110.44490.25280.33260.57470.132150.1417SGL Min 12GLADWIN0.25140.80450.251400.50120.33130.3313SGL Min 13-24GLADWIN1.00331.00111.00221.00221.00111.00331.0022SGL Min 25+GLADWIN

0000 00 00 00Retail FraudGLADWIN0.60350.63580.38380.152130.295170.132150.09111OUIL3GLADWIN0.152130.248330.215240.082250.328250.538150.20315Other SGL NAGLADWIN

0000 00 00 00SGL UnknownGLADWIN

0.0030.00190.00110.0050.101100.20150.0009SGL Min 0GOGEBIC0.50120.501200.003 00 000.0001SGL Min 1-11GOGEBIC0.0010.501200 000.00020.5012SGL Min 12GOGEBIC1.00111.001101.0011 00 000.0001SGL Min 13-24GOGEBIC

01.001101.00111.0011 001.0011SGL Min 25+GOGEBIC0000 000.0001 00Retail FraudGOGEBIC00.0010.0010 00 00 00OUIL3GOGEBIC00000.00021.00110.3313Other SGL NAGOGEBIC0000 00 00 00SGL UnknownGOGEBIC

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 8

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 108: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Total Felony Offenders, Prison Commitments and Commitment Rates for 1993, 1994,1995, 1996' , 1997, 1998, and Jan - May 1999.

Jan-May 1999RatePris99Tot99RatePris98Tot98RatePris97Tot97RatePris96Tot96RatePris95Tot95RatePris94Tot94RatePris93Tot93SGLgroup

0.187400.1514960.0891060.1716950.10111050.1914720.1012119SGL Min 0GRAND TRAVERSE0.60350.88780.60350.40250.606100.00010.7568SGL Min 1-11GRAND TRAVERSE0.63580.7112170.808100.60350.759120.909100.62813SGL Min 12GRAND TRAVERSE1.00331.0016161.00660.8713151.00331.0010101.0077SGL Min 13-24GRAND TRAVERSE1.00661.0010101.00991.00221.00331.00661.0055SGL Min 25+GRAND TRAVERSE0.0010.00400.33260.00040.33130.0008Retail FraudGRAND TRAVERSE0.63580.319290.5215290.368220.5010200.269350.23626OUIL3GRAND TRAVERSE0.44490.5512220.5012240.4312280.4715320.404100.27311Other SGL NAGRAND TRAVERSE0.002000 00 00 00SGL UnknownGRAND TRAVERSE

0.081120.042450.158540.107680.085590.074540.13645SGL Min 0GRATIOT0.67230.20150.17160.60350.56590.25280.3313SGL Min 1-11GRATIOT0.67230.75681.00110.707100.8511130.505100.6769SGL Min 12GRATIOT1.00111.00331.00441.00220.75341.00331.0022SGL Min 13-24GRATIOT1.00111.00111.005501.00331.00441.0033SGL Min 25+GRATIOT

00.0010.25140.0020.33130.00030.5012Retail FraudGRATIOT0.0030.507140.233130.447160.326190.182110.38513OUIL3GRATIOT0.50240.447160.33390.425120.439210.33260.1716Other SGL NAGRATIOT0.003000 000.0001 00SGL UnknownGRATIOT

0.318260.3328840.1814770.139690.1414990.1312960.04382SGL Min 0HILLSDALE0.50121.00440.75341.00440.50481.00440.5747SGL Min 1-11HILLSDALE1.00660.9211120.88780.909100.9211120.8612140.631219SGL Min 12HILLSDALE1.00220.83561.00221.0010101.00881.00551.0099SGL Min 13-24HILLSDALE1.00221.00221.00771.00551.00991.00661.0099SGL Min 25+HILLSDALE

00.25140.0010.33130.0002 000.0004Retail FraudHILLSDALE1.00440.808100.50480.78790.71570.63580.7879OUIL3HILLSDALE0.50240.5014280.419220.25280.081120.00060.5012Other SGL NAHILLSDALE1.0011000 00 00 00SGL UnknownHILLSDALE

0.0050.103310.133230.00220.041270.031350.00034SGL Min 0HOUGHTON0.33130.33130.50120.0020.33260.00010.0005SGL Min 1-11HOUGHTON1.00110.33130.20150.0050.43370.00030.3326SGL Min 12HOUGHTON1.00111.00220.33130.33131.00220.3313 00SGL Min 13-24HOUGHTON

01.00330.67231.0033 001.00111.0011SGL Min 25+HOUGHTON00.00300.001 000.00010.0001Retail FraudHOUGHTON

0.50120.11190.0030.0031.00220.00040.0003OUIL3HOUGHTON0.33130.364110.25140.13180.253120.33260.1318Other SGL NAHOUGHTON

0000 00 00 00SGL UnknownHOUGHTON

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 9

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 109: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Total Felony Offenders, Prison Commitments and Commitment Rates for 1993, 1994,1995, 1996' , 1997, 1998, and Jan - May 1999.

Jan-May 1999RatePris99Tot99RatePris98Tot98RatePris97Tot97RatePris96Tot96RatePris95Tot95RatePris94Tot94RatePris93Tot93SGLgroup

0.00110.092230.113270.00290.052380.093330.08112SGL Min 0HURON0.0010.00200.33130.00010.0001 00SGL Min 1-11HURON0.0020.38381.00110.67230.505100.00080.5012SGL Min 12HURON

00.67231.00110.50240.50240.50241.0011SGL Min 13-24HURON01.00111.00221.00220.75341.00550.7534SGL Min 25+HURON000.0010.0010.00010.00010.0001Retail FraudHURON

0.0020.20150.29270.25140.00070.0001 00OUIL3HURON0.43370.274150.203150.112190.335150.132160.0009Other SGL NAHURON0.002000 00 00 00SGL UnknownHURON

0.08131650.06254430.06305090.05275350.07405480.06355460.0318518SGL Min 0INGHAM0.277260.2410410.4019480.3514400.2912410.3112390.311548SGL Min 1-11INGHAM0.4019480.48611270.52701340.56661170.50681350.58851470.5479147SGL Min 12INGHAM0.6414220.8557670.8163780.7853680.8442500.7361830.826478SGL Min 13-24INGHAM0.8618211.0053530.9552550.9655570.9350540.8968760.967275SGL Min 25+INGHAM0.11190.3112390.158530.2715550.177410.062320.18738Retail FraudINGHAM0.153200.128650.2413550.3219600.2114670.136460.251353OUIL3INGHAM0.2313560.20381890.20412080.13191470.16261600.12201720.1429207Other SGL NAINGHAM0.0090.00200 000.50120.5012SGL UnknownINGHAM

0.041280.087830.097750.1311870.066940.043800.08680SGL Min 0IONIA1.00110.60350.14170.25140.17160.00050.2015SGL Min 1-11IONIA0.20150.172120.336180.336180.203150.364110.41717SGL Min 12IONIA0.43370.25140.556110.33260.89890.50360.6035SGL Min 13-24IONIA1.00110.80450.75341.00661.00441.00441.0077SGL Min 25+IONIA

00.0050.0020.0040.00010.00020.0003Retail FraudIONIA0.20150.266230.255200.294140.255200.101100.06118OUIL3IONIA0.194210.1811600.136480.186340.103290.062310.00036Other SGL NAIONIA

0000 00 00 00SGL UnknownIONIA

0.133230.1914740.1610630.105510.042520.178480.191158SGL Min 0IOSCO0.67230.909100.40250.0020.33130.67231.0011SGL Min 1-11IOSCO0.67230.808100.67230.80450.606101.00660.8356SGL Min 12IOSCO1.00220.80450.88781.00220.86671.00441.0022SGL Min 13-24IOSCO1.00221.00331.00441.0022 001.00331.0011SGL Min 25+IOSCO0.0010.33131.00111.0011 000.0001 00Retail FraudIOSCO1.00330.40250.75340.50360.44490.56590.6358OUIL3IOSCO0.40250.404100.22290.436140.081120.67460.1119Other SGL NAIOSCO0.5012000 00 00 00SGL UnknownIOSCO

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 10

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 110: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Total Felony Offenders, Prison Commitments and Commitment Rates for 1993, 1994,1995, 1996' , 1997, 1998, and Jan - May 1999.

Jan-May 1999RatePris99Tot99RatePris98Tot98RatePris97Tot97RatePris96Tot96RatePris95Tot95RatePris94Tot94RatePris93Tot93SGLgroup

0.00110.082250.031310.051190.000350.143210.06117SGL Min 0IRON0.672300.50120.0010.5012 000.0001SGL Min 1-11IRON1.00220.29271.00220.25140.33130.00010.3313SGL Min 12IRON0.0011.00111.00110.50120.0001 00 00SGL Min 13-24IRON

01.00221.00220 00 001.0011SGL Min 25+IRON000.00200.0001 000.0001Retail FraudIRON

0.0020.33130.33130.50121.00220.29270.3313OUIL3IRON0.43370.17160.33260.75340.20150.40250.1417Other SGL NAIRON

0000 00 00 00SGL UnknownIRON

0.042450.021650.064710.032770.032640.032750.022104SGL Min 0ISABELLA0.0040.0090.0030.14170.00020.00070.00011SGL Min 1-11ISABELLA0.50120.13180.50480.505100.556110.11190.1716SGL Min 12ISABELLA1.00110.50120.50120.364110.43370.606100.5659SGL Min 13-24ISABELLA

01.00330.50241.00331.00110.75341.001010SGL Min 25+ISABELLA0.0010.25140.00120.13180.00040.13180.08112Retail FraudISABELLA0.336180.153200.327220.174230.092220.122170.06116OUIL3ISABELLA0.136480.10131360.09161810.1413960.055980.075730.09668Other SGL NAISABELLA0.007000 00 00 00SGL UnknownISABELLA

0.19261370.24763130.19573060.17392270.14362580.15463000.1140379SGL Min 0JACKSON0.6710150.5614250.5815260.3911280.399230.4517380.481225SGL Min 1-11JACKSON0.6319300.6855810.7749640.6134560.5737650.7153750.634470SGL Min 12JACKSON0.9417180.8330360.7926330.9519200.7625330.8426310.852934SGL Min 13-24JACKSON0.9415160.9224260.9520211.0017170.9325270.9433350.972930SGL Min 25+JACKSON0.274150.4320460.4420450.189500.2610390.209450.14536Retail FraudJACKSON0.3713350.5336680.5437690.2413550.3218570.3215470.342161OUIL3JACKSON0.2311470.37501360.33481460.20261290.32381180.26321210.1926137Other SGL NAJACKSON0.131800.0010 00 00 00SGL UnknownJACKSON

0.0242050.04215810.05305790.07527050.04286570.05326810.0528604SGL Min 0KALAMAZOO0.267270.2211490.237310.3518520.3923590.1910520.201049SGL Min 1-11KALAMAZOO0.2814500.45521150.43681590.45691550.35461310.41471140.4464147SGL Min 12KALAMAZOO0.7723300.7035500.6239630.7762810.5628500.7635460.654468SGL Min 13-24KALAMAZOO0.7911140.9536380.8821240.8939440.8933370.8148590.915055SGL Min 25+KALAMAZOO0.072290.064670.1310790.2019970.1514950.2116780.252288Retail FraudKALAMAZOO0.3212370.1915790.2119910.3128900.3123740.2721780.242083OUIL3KALAMAZOO0.24391650.251014090.25913590.31862750.31632020.30581920.3257176Other SGL NAKALAMAZOO0.3012400000.0001 00 00SGL UnknownKALAMAZOO

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 11

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 111: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Total Felony Offenders, Prison Commitments and Commitment Rates for 1993, 1994,1995, 1996' , 1997, 1998, and Jan - May 1999.

Jan-May 1999RatePris99Tot99RatePris98Tot98RatePris97Tot97RatePris96Tot96RatePris95Tot95RatePris94Tot94RatePris93Tot93SGLgroup

0.11190.042460.062360.00400.083400.145370.05241SGL Min 0KALKASKA1.00220.0010.0010.50120.50120.3313 00SGL Min 1-11KALKASKA1.00110.86670.50480.33130.00010.40250.55611SGL Min 12KALKASKA1.00221.00441.00220.67231.0066 001.0066SGL Min 13-24KALKASKA1.00221.0010101.00881.00111.00551.00221.0011SGL Min 25+KALKASKA

0000 00 00 00Retail FraudKALKASKA0.25280.182110.334120.14170.00090.00030.0003OUIL3KALKASKA0.0080.287250.334120.25280.38380.57470.18211Other SGL NAKALKASKA

00001.0011 00 00SGL UnknownKALKASKA

0.03145000.05581,2740.06901,5460.05701,3980.05631,2770.07941,3240.06891,383SGL Min 0KENT0.3932830.36722000.36742070.29521810.29481680.32501580.3856147SGL Min 1-11KENT0.45531180.541643060.601732880.501392770.561502670.541542840.63198315SGL Min 12KENT0.7757740.791181500.801211510.781251600.801301620.841391660.85156184SGL Min 13-24KENT0.9447500.941201270.931051130.901141260.911021120.981251270.96122127SGL Min 25+KENT0.1410700.14302080.20472380.11262470.14342480.14312230.1730181Retail FraudKENT0.3316490.30441470.34451340.36531460.40541360.43511180.3961156OUIL3KENT0.29561960.271625950.20984790.241054390.28762750.26652460.3275234Other SGL NAKENT0.4415340.20150.0011.00110.00020.00070.0001SGL UnknownKENT

000.0030.0010.00010.0002 00SGL Min 0KEWEENAW000.0010 00 00 00SGL Min 1-11KEWEENAW00.00100.5012 00 00 00SGL Min 12KEWEENAW0000 00 001.0011SGL Min 13-24KEWEENAW0000 00 00 00SGL Min 25+KEWEENAW0000 00 00 00Retail FraudKEWEENAW00000.0001 00 00OUIL3KEWEENAW00.0010.50120 00 00 00Other SGL NAKEWEENAW0000 00 00 00SGL UnknownKEWEENAW

0.0060.00120.072300.062360.164250.041230.00024SGL Min 0LAKE01.00220.75340.0030.00030.00010.0001SGL Min 1-11LAKE

1.001100.71570.38381.00330.00050.0003SGL Min 12LAKE001.00110.67231.00220.75341.0011SGL Min 13-24LAKE

1.00111.00221.00111.00221.00331.0044 00SGL Min 25+LAKE000.0010.001 00 000.0001Retail FraudLAKE

0.0010.00110.17160.707100.20150.00010.2514OUIL3LAKE0.33130.082250.132150.172120.33260.43370.2927Other SGL NALAKE0.001000 00 00 00SGL UnknownLAKE

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 12

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 112: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Total Felony Offenders, Prison Commitments and Commitment Rates for 1993, 1994,1995, 1996' , 1997, 1998, and Jan - May 1999.

Jan-May 1999RatePris99Tot99RatePris98Tot98RatePris97Tot97RatePris96Tot96RatePris95Tot95RatePris94Tot94RatePris93Tot93SGLgroup

0.00370.117650.087880.076840.0561220.0111060.06585SGL Min 0LAPEER0.60350.14170.33260.20150.364110.253120.58712SGL Min 1-11LAPEER0.86670.506120.649140.606100.56590.8315180.611118SGL Min 12LAPEER0.78791.00770.83560.9110110.88780.9211120.8667SGL Min 13-24LAPEER1.00331.00660.9313141.00441.00881.00221.001010SGL Min 25+LAPEER0.3313000.3313 000.33130.2015Retail FraudLAPEER0.204200.3211340.225230.166370.176350.041240.06233OUIL3LAPEER0.133230.137540.052440.198420.072290.154270.19421Other SGL NALAPEER0.001000 00 00 00SGL UnknownLAPEER

0.102200.123260.051200.237300.072270.277260.06118SGL Min 0LEELANAU0.67230.0031.00110.33131.00220.00030.5024SGL Min 1-11LEELANAU1.00220.501201.00221.00220.67230.7534SGL Min 12LEELANAU

0001.00111.00111.00221.0033SGL Min 13-24LEELANAU01.00111.001101.0022 001.0011SGL Min 25+LEELANAU0000 00 000.0001Retail FraudLEELANAU

0.0010.33260.20150.33130.60350.40250.5024OUIL3LEELANAU0.0030.50120.40250.50240.00030.00050.0005Other SGL NALEELANAU

0000 00 00 00SGL UnknownLEELANAU

0.189500.35671890.30421410.31421340.33421260.29351220.1923122SGL Min 0LENAWEE0.44490.404100.38380.455110.678120.678120.7568SGL Min 1-11LENAWEE0.9212130.8523270.9518190.7423310.7825320.8122270.711724SGL Min 12LENAWEE1.00550.9415160.88780.7311151.00661.0012121.0055SGL Min 13-24LENAWEE1.00881.00551.00661.0012121.00441.0011111.001111SGL Min 25+LENAWEE0.50240.547130.505100.45511 000.40250.4025Retail FraudLENAWEE0.50360.63580.606100.50120.89890.5012 00OUIL3LENAWEE0.50480.5320380.369250.4813270.327220.6710150.601220Other SGL NALENAWEE0.50121.002200 00 00 00SGL UnknownLENAWEE

0.043830.11252270.12242040.15241590.04102380.0591850.1014137SGL Min 0LIVINGSTON0.385130.406150.6111180.5211210.365140.364110.36411SGL Min 1-11LIVINGSTON0.303100.327220.337210.5913220.4510220.5811190.541528SGL Min 12LIVINGSTON0.67460.707100.8310120.9222240.8016200.8612140.801215SGL Min 13-24LIVINGSTON1.00661.00990.9622230.8618210.8012150.9415160.911011SGL Min 25+LIVINGSTON0.20150.143220.00140.202100.244170.061160.29517Retail FraudLIVINGSTON0.5815260.6731460.6432500.8039490.3812320.6716240.631930OUIL3LIVINGSTON0.2910340.1812660.148590.197360.053570.1811610.221777Other SGL NALIVINGSTON0.1821100.00100.3326 00 00SGL UnknownLIVINGSTON

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 13

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 113: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Total Felony Offenders, Prison Commitments and Commitment Rates for 1993, 1994,1995, 1996' , 1997, 1998, and Jan - May 1999.

Jan-May 1999RatePris99Tot99RatePris98Tot98RatePris97Tot97RatePris96Tot96RatePris95Tot95RatePris94Tot94RatePris93Tot93SGLgroup

0.0020.25140.11190.0040.101100.142140.4025SGL Min 0LUCE0000.0011.0011 001.0011SGL Min 1-11LUCE00.501200.0020.00030.00010.0001SGL Min 12LUCE

1.00110.501200.0011.0022 001.0011SGL Min 13-24LUCE01.001100 00 001.0011SGL Min 25+LUCE0000 00 00 00Retail FraudLUCE00.0050.0020.0020.5012 000.5012OUIL3LUCE

0.0010.50120.29270.25140.5012 001.0022Other SGL NALUCE0.003000 00 00 00SGL UnknownLUCE

0.081120.00260.041270.052370.000220.081120.00010SGL Min 0MACKINAC0.00100.0041.00110.50120.00010.5012SGL Min 1-11MACKINAC0.0010.60351.00111.00221.00110.50120.8045SGL Min 12MACKINAC

01.00111.00661.00110.67231.0011 00SGL Min 13-24MACKINAC01.00221.00221.0011 001.0022 00SGL Min 25+MACKINAC0001.0011 000.0001 00Retail FraudMACKINAC

0.0011.00551.00770.0010.00020.22290.5024OUIL3MACKINAC0.0010.43370.25140.0030.00020.00010.5012Other SGL NAMACKINAC

0000 00 00 00SGL UnknownMACKINAC

0.0283930.03331,0250.03351,0520.03268990.04338490.05509690.0430741SGL Min 0MACOMB0.4819400.3023760.2822790.2214630.3824640.4125610.391744SGL Min 1-11MACOMB0.4834710.40731810.40771920.33571710.43791850.46932010.6196158SGL Min 12MACOMB0.6524370.7045640.6854800.6952750.5639700.7866850.867081SGL Min 13-24MACOMB0.8828320.9064710.8851580.8452620.9863640.9070780.975860SGL Min 25+MACOMB0.1614900.16322030.21432050.13251860.15261790.19301620.1431229Retail FraudMACOMB0.145360.109870.1614890.2020990.14151050.10101030.121083OUIL3MACOMB0.13312460.181588840.161328020.14735330.10515100.07334760.1462434Other SGL NAMACOMB0.24351440.0021.001100.0001 001.0011SGL UnknownMACOMB

0.255200.2311480.2010510.4021520.198430.104410.10441SGL Min 0MANISTEE1.00111.00330.67230.50120.67231.00220.0001SGL Min 1-11MANISTEE0.50120.67231.00111.00331.00330.67460.7534SGL Min 12MANISTEE0.50121.00330.0011.00221.00221.00221.0011SGL Min 13-24MANISTEE1.001101.007701.00221.00331.0044SGL Min 25+MANISTEE

000.00100.0001 00 00Retail FraudMANISTEE0.0030.29270.38380.101100.67460.25280.0005OUIL3MANISTEE0.20150.385130.334120.50360.67460.40250.2528Other SGL NAMANISTEE0.002000 00 00 00SGL UnknownMANISTEE

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 14

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 114: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Total Felony Offenders, Prison Commitments and Commitment Rates for 1993, 1994,1995, 1996' , 1997, 1998, and Jan - May 1999.

Jan-May 1999RatePris99Tot99RatePris98Tot98RatePris97Tot97RatePris96Tot96RatePris95Tot95RatePris94Tot94RatePris93Tot93SGLgroup

0.00220.00640.021510.032620.021570.000570.00061SGL Min 0MARQUETTE1.00110.0050.17160.0010.00090.00050.5024SGL Min 1-11MARQUETTE1.00110.13180.649140.22290.172120.25140.2528SGL Min 12MARQUETTE0.50241.00330.50240.78790.57470.67690.60610SGL Min 13-24MARQUETTE1.00111.00440.63581.00220.67461.00991.0044SGL Min 25+MARQUETTE

0000.0020.00010.00040.0006Retail FraudMARQUETTE0.33130.0050.00100.0090.000100.000120.0008OUIL3MARQUETTE0.17160.214190.041230.195260.083360.062350.18211Other SGL NAMARQUETTE

0000 00 00 00SGL UnknownMARQUETTE

0.195270.084520.126490.094460.1912620.063510.04255SGL Min 0MASON0.0010.0020.0030.50240.33130.50120.0002SGL Min 1-11MASON0.40250.14170.50240.25280.505100.647110.42512SGL Min 12MASON0.50120.50240.0020.80450.89890.71570.7157SGL Min 13-24MASON1.00111.00111.00330.71571.00990.80451.0022SGL Min 25+MASON0.0010.0050.0050.0020.33131.00110.0004Retail FraudMASON0.0040.182110.20150.20150.385130.50120.0006OUIL3MASON0.386160.248340.132150.224180.50480.182110.62813Other SGL NAMASON1.0011000 00 00 00SGL UnknownMASON

0.163190.042520.104410.032680.074590.042560.07344SGL Min 0MECOSTA0.501200.33130.40250.17160.25280.09111SGL Min 1-11MECOSTA0.25140.89890.83560.75680.466130.385130.30310SGL Min 12MECOSTA1.00111.00550.67230.57471.00880.75681.0044SGL Min 13-24MECOSTA1.00111.00330.67230.67231.00770.75341.0066SGL Min 25+MECOSTA

00.0010.20150.25140.17160.3313 00Retail FraudMECOSTA0.67230.33390.172120.273110.273110.202100.4337OUIL3MECOSTA0.051190.157470.136460.2612470.145370.072270.18317Other SGL NAMECOSTA0.001000 00 00 00SGL UnknownMECOSTA

0.0070.031370.00190.00210.000240.021510.00041SGL Min 0MENOMINEE00.33130.50240.001 000.00030.0001SGL Min 1-11MENOMINEE00.0011.00110.75340.29270.33130.2514SGL Min 12MENOMINEE

0.50120.67231.00220.0010.67230.00010.7157SGL Min 13-24MENOMINEE01.00221.00221.00441.00111.00441.0011SGL Min 25+MENOMINEE00.0020.0010 00 00 00Retail FraudMENOMINEE

0.0010.25140.0030.20150.5012 000.0001OUIL3MENOMINEE0.0020.38380.40250.29270.0003 000.1716Other SGL NAMENOMINEE0.001000 00 00 00SGL UnknownMENOMINEE

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 15

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 115: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Total Felony Offenders, Prison Commitments and Commitment Rates for 1993, 1994,1995, 1996' , 1997, 1998, and Jan - May 1999.

Jan-May 1999RatePris99Tot99RatePris98Tot98RatePris97Tot97RatePris96Tot96RatePris95Tot95RatePris94Tot94RatePris93Tot93SGLgroup

0.00290.09111250.0671250.12121030.0551090.077990.068138SGL Min 0MIDLAND0.0050.33260.25140.22290.33260.33130.30310SGL Min 1-11MIDLAND0.50480.5011220.4810210.436140.7710130.417170.631016SGL Min 12MIDLAND1.00220.505101.00770.678120.56590.738110.4025SGL Min 13-24MIDLAND1.00110.89890.9110110.89891.0011110.8511131.0099SGL Min 25+MIDLAND0.20150.092220.193160.122170.225230.336180.18211Retail FraudMIDLAND0.33260.308270.2511440.5615270.297240.287250.39718OUIL3MIDLAND0.225230.28351230.23241030.1817940.2216730.169580.231356Other SGL NAMIDLAND0.005000 00 00 00SGL UnknownMIDLAND

0.00100.00280.072290.041260.061180.000330.00018SGL Min 0MISSAUKEE00.0010.40250.2514 00 000.5012SGL Min 1-11MISSAUKEE

0.50120.50480.60350.33260.00010.00040.7534SGL Min 12MISSAUKEE1.00111.00111.004401.00221.00221.0011SGL Min 13-24MISSAUKEE1.00111.00111.00111.00331.00221.00111.0055SGL Min 25+MISSAUKEE

00000.0001 00 00Retail FraudMISSAUKEE0.0020.404100.25140.33260.40250.00030.0001OUIL3MISSAUKEE0.0020.22290.20150.50240.25140.00050.3313Other SGL NAMISSAUKEE0.0010.00200 00 00 00SGL UnknownMISSAUKEE

0.117640.10222310.06122120.22512360.16392490.17382210.1740229SGL Min 0MONROE0.364110.386160.183170.477150.4810210.707100.40410SGL Min 1-11MONROE0.699130.5325470.7221290.6025420.6123380.6322350.642336SGL Min 12MONROE1.00220.8421251.00770.6813190.9415160.8012150.882124SGL Min 13-24MONROE1.00661.0014140.8310121.0016160.9314151.0020201.002020SGL Min 25+MONROE0.57470.103310.3412350.3613360.299310.4513290.40820Retail FraudMONROE0.385130.3414410.3414410.267270.285180.397180.25520OUIL3MONROE0.2514550.29531850.43861990.34531560.34351040.1513880.1414103Other SGL NAMONROE0.301343000.5012 00 000.0001SGL UnknownMONROE

0.041270.033890.032660.0221020.0441060.0111120.02299SGL Min 0MONTCALM0.29270.0030.0060.38380.334120.25140.1417SGL Min 1-11MONTCALM0.0040.335150.40250.335150.25280.647110.47715SGL Min 12MONTCALM0.33130.425120.808100.455110.83560.50480.6746SGL Min 13-24MONTCALM1.00551.0012120.88781.00551.00990.67231.0099SGL Min 25+MONTCALM0.0010.50120.0010.3313 000.0002 00Retail FraudMONTCALM0.67460.33390.425120.5213250.081130.00070.00010OUIL3MONTCALM0.154270.1914740.1711660.138630.137540.114380.03138Other SGL NAMONTCALM0.003000 00 00 00SGL UnknownMONTCALM

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 16

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 116: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Total Felony Offenders, Prison Commitments and Commitment Rates for 1993, 1994,1995, 1996' , 1997, 1998, and Jan - May 1999.

Jan-May 1999RatePris99Tot99RatePris98Tot98RatePris97Tot97RatePris96Tot96RatePris95Tot95RatePris94Tot94RatePris93Tot93SGLgroup

0.0070.061180.202100.00110.000130.031340.05119SGL Min 0MONTMORENCY0.00100.33130.0010.33130.5012 00SGL Min 1-11MONTMORENCY0.0021.00110.33131.00110.50241.00110.0003SGL Min 12MONTMORENCY0.0010.00100.50121.00110.00011.0011SGL Min 13-24MONTMORENCY0.0011.00111.00111.00221.0022 000.5012SGL Min 25+MONTMORENCY

000.0010 00 00 00Retail FraudMONTMORENCY0.33130.50120.0060.25140.29270.00030.0001OUIL3MONTMORENCY0.20150.0050.0040.17160.33130.00010.0003Other SGL NAMONTMORENCY

0000 00 00 00SGL UnknownMONTMORENCY

0.14261890.15744910.19904620.241084430.241064370.291244240.25100399SGL Min 0MUSKEGON0.7110140.7031440.5927460.5919320.6922320.8329350.661929SGL Min 1-11MUSKEGON0.7135490.64681060.9474790.8478930.8166810.90931030.7582110SGL Min 12MUSKEGON0.9120220.8947530.8829330.9644460.9842430.9236390.953638SGL Min 13-24MUSKEGON0.8315180.9843441.0036361.0034341.0024241.0046460.984445SGL Min 25+MUSKEGON0.237300.2614530.4332750.3720540.3621590.5631550.532751Retail FraudMUSKEGON0.369250.4431700.3719510.4738810.4831640.4731660.352982OUIL3MUSKEGON0.25271060.25602430.35862480.30601980.32451390.48601250.3347142Other SGL NAMUSKEGON0.5512220.00101.0011 000.0001 00SGL UnknownMUSKEGON

0.00310.085650.032690.043730.043850.011760.01195SGL Min 0NEWAYGO0.0020.0070.0010.33260.00020.50120.1716SGL Min 1-11NEWAYGO1.00220.50480.303100.417170.478170.172120.33618SGL Min 12NEWAYGO1.00330.50240.80450.75340.60350.60350.6035SGL Min 13-24NEWAYGO1.00331.00440.8310121.00991.0012121.0012120.8989SGL Min 25+NEWAYGO

00.0020.0010.003 001.00111.0011Retail FraudNEWAYGO0.101100.00110.132150.122170.000140.202100.1119OUIL3NEWAYGO0.071150.135400.092230.102200.082260.061180.00012Other SGL NANEWAYGO1.00110.00300 00 00 00SGL UnknownNEWAYGO

0.03351,0790.03692,6200.02612,6380.03752,5450.03712,4230.03902,5830.041002,658SGL Min 0OAKLAND0.21311470.22562600.31662150.30541800.28451630.25542140.3559171SGL Min 1-11OAKLAND0.38571520.411774350.391674250.341384080.361433990.371664470.43212491SGL Min 12OAKLAND0.7358800.821822210.801682110.761321730.661342020.741682280.81160198SGL Min 13-24OAKLAND0.9465690.891381550.911681840.951421500.891241390.891601800.92214232SGL Min 25+OAKLAND0.08192280.10757290.10707110.07507600.09546310.10676640.12111895Retail FraudOAKLAND0.28351230.27873240.21602900.21612840.22612830.13342580.1536235OUIL3OAKLAND0.18703880.191971,0500.211476930.261535970.171076400.17875220.20116575Other SGL NAOAKLAND0.2217780.40250.0010.33130.203150.40250.5024SGL UnknownOAKLAND

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 17

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 117: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Total Felony Offenders, Prison Commitments and Commitment Rates for 1993, 1994,1995, 1996' , 1997, 1998, and Jan - May 1999.

Jan-May 1999RatePris99Tot99RatePris98Tot98RatePris97Tot97RatePris96Tot96RatePris95Tot95RatePris94Tot94RatePris93Tot93SGLgroup

0.224180.042450.103300.073450.000330.000370.02147SGL Min 0OCEANA0.501200.0030.43370.00020.00020.0005SGL Min 1-11OCEANA

00.57470.587120.303100.11190.425120.7534SGL Min 12OCEANA000.67461.00330.33130.00011.0022SGL Min 13-24OCEANA

0.50120.67231.00441.00111.0011 001.0022SGL Min 25+OCEANA0.0010.0010.00200.00010.0002 00Retail FraudOCEANA0.11190.081120.00170.0080.00090.000120.00013OUIL3OCEANA0.25280.163190.294140.051210.25140.00020.6723Other SGL NAOCEANA0.001000 00 00 00SGL UnknownOCEANA

0.071150.062340.134300.042480.093340.074550.02147SGL Min 0OGEMAW0.0011.001101.00111.00110.7534 00SGL Min 1-11OGEMAW1.00220.0011.00550.67230.50480.60350.6358SGL Min 12OGEMAW1.00220.0011.001101.00110.67231.0033SGL Min 13-24OGEMAW

00.80451.00441.00111.0033 001.0066SGL Min 25+OGEMAW00.0010.0010.0020.0002 000.0001Retail FraudOGEMAW

0.50240.101100.25280.0010.0001 000.5012OUIL3OGEMAW0.182110.195260.153200.102210.00080.20150.00011Other SGL NAOGEMAW0.001000 00 00 00SGL UnknownOGEMAW

0.0050.0090.0030.0040.14170.00040.09111SGL Min 0ONTONAGON0000.001 00 000.0001SGL Min 1-11ONTONAGON000.0010.0010.33131.0011 00SGL Min 12ONTONAGON01.00111.00220 00 001.0011SGL Min 13-24ONTONAGON01.0011001.00111.00441.0011SGL Min 25+ONTONAGON0000 00 00 00Retail FraudONTONAGON

0.0010.0010.0010.0010.0001 00 00OUIL3ONTONAGON00.50120.00100.00021.0022 00Other SGL NAONTONAGON0000 00 00 00SGL UnknownONTONAGON

0.00140.095560.104410.118710.042470.000440.06463SGL Min 0OSCEOLA1.00110.25140.672300.75341.00111.0011SGL Min 1-11OSCEOLA1.00330.505100.385130.606100.364110.25140.2514SGL Min 12OSCEOLA

01.00110.60351.00220.33130.5012 00SGL Min 13-24OSCEOLA0.0010.0020.50120.75340.50121.00110.3313SGL Min 25+OSCEOLA

0000.0010.00010.00010.0001Retail FraudOSCEOLA0.14170.38380.6511170.132150.404100.00020.25312OUIL3OSCEOLA0.213140.364110.233130.152130.335150.25280.3313Other SGL NAOSCEOLA

0000 00 000.0001SGL UnknownOSCEOLA

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 18

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 118: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Total Felony Offenders, Prison Commitments and Commitment Rates for 1993, 1994,1995, 1996' , 1997, 1998, and Jan - May 1999.

Jan-May 1999RatePris99Tot99RatePris98Tot98RatePris97Tot97RatePris96Tot96RatePris95Tot95RatePris94Tot94RatePris93Tot93SGLgroup

0.50120.22290.273110.33130.00070.00070.14214SGL Min 0OSCODA01.001100.6723 00 001.0011SGL Min 1-11OSCODA000.67231.00111.0011 000.6723SGL Min 12OSCODA

1.00110001.00111.0022 00SGL Min 13-24OSCODA00001.00111.0011 00SGL Min 25+OSCODA0000 00 00 00Retail FraudOSCODA0000 00 000.0001OUIL3OSCODA

0.0010.606100.50240.0020.50240.33130.0004Other SGL NAOSCODA0000 00 00 00SGL UnknownOSCODA

0.113280.115440.062350.00310.135400.208410.08338SGL Min 0OTSEGO0.50120.17160.50121.00220.50120.50120.6723SGL Min 1-11OTSEGO1.00220.33130.25141.00550.50481.00440.4025SGL Min 12OTSEGO1.00221.00551.00330.75340.50121.00110.5012SGL Min 13-24OTSEGO0.804501.00441.00221.00221.00221.0044SGL Min 25+OTSEGO

000.0030.0010.00010.00060.0004Retail FraudOTSEGO0.50120.25280.0060.33260.22290.385130.12217OUIL3OTSEGO0.0050.142140.00110.22290.336180.17160.4025Other SGL NAOTSEGO1.0011000 00 00 00SGL UnknownOTSEGO

0.0241710.03144590.0294240.04154220.07304210.05193560.027305SGL Min 0OTTAWA0.061170.214190.164250.214190.314130.397180.24521SGL Min 1-11OTTAWA0.365140.3813340.6726390.4415340.5121410.5316300.572035SGL Min 12OTTAWA0.78790.8618210.9019210.8016200.6117280.8916180.881517SGL Min 13-24OTTAWA1.00770.8814160.8917190.8916180.8917191.0027270.941516SGL Min 25+OTTAWA0.071150.021500.106610.126510.106580.083400.10329Retail FraudOTTAWA0.196320.107730.2621800.2115700.3725670.198430.251144OUIL3OTTAWA0.156410.20331610.27351310.1311860.2614540.187390.461328Other SGL NAOTTAWA0.0060.00100 00 00 00SGL UnknownOTTAWA

0.0040.00180.132150.041260.133230.000270.00018SGL Min 0PRESQUE ISLE00.002001.00110.00010.0002SGL Min 1-11PRESQUE ISLE

0.0030.50240.50120.33131.0033 000.3326SGL Min 12PRESQUE ISLE00.0010.0051.00110.00010.50120.6723SGL Min 13-24PRESQUE ISLE00.672301.00111.00221.0022 00SGL Min 25+PRESQUE ISLE00000.0001 00 00Retail FraudPRESQUE ISLE

0.50240.0040.17160.40250.11190.25140.0002OUIL3PRESQUE ISLE0.33260.0090.193160.0090.11190.00050.0007Other SGL NAPRESQUE ISLE1.0022000 00 00 00SGL UnknownPRESQUE ISLE

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 19

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 119: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Total Felony Offenders, Prison Commitments and Commitment Rates for 1993, 1994,1995, 1996' , 1997, 1998, and Jan - May 1999.

Jan-May 1999RatePris99Tot99RatePris98Tot98RatePris97Tot97RatePris96Tot96RatePris95Tot95RatePris94Tot94RatePris93Tot93SGLgroup

0.0090.031360.032580.053570.000720.021600.00065SGL Min 0ROSCOMMON0.50120.50120.50240.33130.00010.00010.2514SGL Min 1-11ROSCOMMON0.60350.63580.538150.67690.40250.404100.50714SGL Min 12ROSCOMMON

01.00331.00331.00441.00330.00010.8667SGL Min 13-24ROSCOMMON1.00110.80450.75340.75341.00440.67230.5012SGL Min 25+ROSCOMMON0.0020.00110.0080.091110.00020.00050.0005Retail FraudROSCOMMON0.0050.071150.091110.29270.091110.0004 00OUIL3ROSCOMMON0.17160.2714520.195270.134320.399230.294140.16319Other SGL NAROSCOMMON0.003000 00 00 00SGL UnknownROSCOMMON

0.11211940.10545420.11625900.08435170.08415060.10444520.0522440SGL Min 0SAGINAW0.436140.4010250.3414410.206300.164250.5014280.421126SGL Min 1-11SAGINAW0.5920340.6462970.58621060.5351960.57661160.62621000.565394SGL Min 12SAGINAW0.9313140.8330360.8035440.7545600.7533440.8146570.834554SGL Min 13-24SAGINAW0.8916180.9736371.0027270.9444470.9541430.9153581.005252SGL Min 25+SAGINAW0.2611420.13161270.16221360.12151280.13191420.1414980.181585Retail FraudSAGINAW0.00130.2917580.3919490.208410.2710370.144290.28725OUIL3SAGINAW0.38681790.381624240.31862770.31632010.33862640.41952310.36103290Other SGL NASAGINAW0.43102300.0010 001.0022 00SGL UnknownSAGINAW

0.07111530.10302860.06193370.06162530.08222700.06152490.0614235SGL Min 0ST. CLAIR0.29270.3912310.338240.477150.447160.5610180.1318SGL Min 1-11ST. CLAIR0.447160.4925510.5130590.4114340.5018360.4419430.481633SGL Min 12ST. CLAIR0.75680.6416250.9327290.8319230.8511130.6515230.631524SGL Min 13-24ST. CLAIR1.00551.0019190.9519201.0013130.9018200.8511130.761317SGL Min 25+ST. CLAIR0.071150.174230.00220.134300.103290.285180.21314Retail FraudST. CLAIR0.228360.2623870.3227840.3024790.3018600.2018910.271556OUIL3ST. CLAIR0.2221950.24592460.26481860.23472060.21421970.25421650.2334148Other SGL NAST. CLAIR0.22291.001100 00 00 00SGL UnknownST. CLAIR

0.021430.011840.022910.054740.0661040.032760.09885SGL Min 0ST. JOSEPH0.25140.051190.202100.334120.22290.25280.08112SGL Min 1-11ST. JOSEPH0.315160.439210.295170.235220.5016320.388210.451022SGL Min 12ST. JOSEPH0.75340.8511130.63580.7112170.67460.63580.7879SGL Min 13-24ST. JOSEPH1.00331.0011111.00551.0012120.83560.83560.931314SGL Min 25+ST. JOSEPH0.0020.0010.0030.0010.0002 00 00Retail FraudST. JOSEPH0.101100.214190.365140.051220.265190.112190.30620OUIL3ST. JOSEPH0.359260.3613360.2611430.3212380.357200.204200.27311Other SGL NAST. JOSEPH

0000 00 00 00SGL UnknownST. JOSEPH

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 20

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 120: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Total Felony Offenders, Prison Commitments and Commitment Rates for 1993, 1994,1995, 1996' , 1997, 1998, and Jan - May 1999.

Jan-May 1999RatePris99Tot99RatePris98Tot98RatePris97Tot97RatePris96Tot96RatePris95Tot95RatePris94Tot94RatePris93Tot93SGLgroup

0.00130.052370.145370.052420.052400.032800.07456SGL Min 0SANILAC0.0020.0020.50120.0020.25140.33260.4025SGL Min 1-11SANILAC

00.707100.57470.0050.50120.38380.40410SGL Min 12SANILAC0.0011.00220.50240.67230.83560.80450.7534SGL Min 13-24SANILAC1.00660.80450.67231.00111.00551.00220.7534SGL Min 25+SANILAC

000.0010.002 000.00010.3313Retail FraudSANILAC0.172120.224180.428190.4810210.133230.144290.00021OUIL3SANILAC0.051210.075680.053590.096670.093330.113270.14429Other SGL NASANILAC0.002000 00 00 00SGL UnknownSANILAC

0.0070.00140.00200.081130.000150.00060.00010SGL Min 0SCHOOLCRAFT00.0020.0010.0010.00011.0011 00SGL Min 1-11SCHOOLCRAFT

0.0010.0030.33130.33130.00010.0003 00SGL Min 12SCHOOLCRAFT00.0010.50120.001 00 001.0022SGL Min 13-24SCHOOLCRAFT000.00101.00221.00111.0011SGL Min 25+SCHOOLCRAFT0000 00 00 00Retail FraudSCHOOLCRAFT00.00100.0010.6723 00 00OUIL3SCHOOLCRAFT

0.0010.0020.0020.0040.3313 000.0002Other SGL NASCHOOLCRAFT1.0011000 00 00 00SGL UnknownSCHOOLCRAFT

0.277260.119820.1510670.11111040.065810.109890.10769SGL Min 0SHIAWASSEE0.0021.00110.75340.60350.33390.67690.0002SGL Min 1-11SHIAWASSEE0.60350.509180.7014200.6511170.57470.8310120.57814SGL Min 12SHIAWASSEE0.50120.83560.86671.00221.00550.71571.0088SGL Min 13-24SHIAWASSEE1.00220.83561.0011111.00991.00881.00881.0044SGL Min 25+SHIAWASSEE

00.0020.0010.303100.00070.60350.0001Retail FraudSHIAWASSEE0.303100.285180.307230.439210.335150.385130.23313OUIL3SHIAWASSEE0.507140.4522490.4412270.359260.315160.295170.40615Other SGL NASHIAWASSEE0.5036000 00 00 00SGL UnknownSHIAWASSEE

0.051190.104400.127570.054750.021520.042540.00057SGL Min 0TUSCOLA0.20150.0010.50120.20150.6723 000.3838SGL Min 1-11TUSCOLA0.20150.547130.71570.40250.50240.647110.64711SGL Min 12TUSCOLA

00.67230.67230.75340.50241.00331.0066SGL Min 13-24TUSCOLA0.86671.00881.00771.00771.00771.00441.0033SGL Min 25+TUSCOLA

00.00100.002 00 00 00Retail FraudTUSCOLA0.0080.113270.256240.235220.368220.00090.00013OUIL3TUSCOLA0.306200.216290.3713350.3714380.298280.183170.2528Other SGL NATUSCOLA0.5012000 00 00 00SGL UnknownTUSCOLA

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 21

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 121: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Total Felony Offenders, Prison Commitments and Commitment Rates for 1993, 1994,1995, 1996' , 1997, 1998, and Jan - May 1999.

Jan-May 1999RatePris99Tot99RatePris98Tot98RatePris97Tot97RatePris96Tot96RatePris95Tot95RatePris94Tot94RatePris93Tot93SGLgroup

0.043820.0231810.0471830.06142170.07121750.0581460.034151SGL Min 0VAN BUREN0.182110.224180.172120.303100.265190.505100.25416SGL Min 1-11VAN BUREN0.202100.277260.4211260.5811190.4513290.369250.551731SGL Min 12VAN BUREN0.40250.44490.606100.56590.6911160.6111180.551120SGL Min 13-24VAN BUREN0.7311150.71570.71570.9211120.829110.9110110.82911SGL Min 25+VAN BUREN1.00110.20150.0050.0060.00050.071150.0006Retail FraudVAN BUREN0.386160.144290.166370.399230.205250.256240.21419OUIL3VAN BUREN0.113280.1514940.2112570.3212370.132150.265190.16319Other SGL NAVAN BUREN0.0030.00100 00 000.0001SGL UnknownVAN BUREN

0.0451300.0153590.03113680.09313560.09384190.08314000.0833398SGL Min 0WASHTENAW0.255200.187390.3111350.307230.228370.2710370.521733SGL Min 1-11WASHTENAW0.3010330.27281040.4540890.5752910.45581280.54611130.7783108SGL Min 12WASHTENAW0.5610180.6534520.7547630.8146570.7539520.8845510.845667SGL Min 13-24WASHTENAW1.0010100.9537390.9542440.8931350.8734390.8246560.953840SGL Min 25+WASHTENAW0.091110.074580.2515590.2718670.139690.2111530.271659Retail FraudWASHTENAW0.132160.2311470.3017560.4414320.2710370.4812250.621321OUIL3WASHTENAW0.2520790.18452480.29702410.33712180.29311080.3120650.352263Other SGL NAWASHTENAW0.174240.00100 00 000.0001SGL UnknownWASHTENAW

0.05881,8740.031033,9430.041644,1150.041874,5350.042285,1570.063014,6880.083424,334SGL Min 0WAYNE0.28491770.14312140.26521980.16342130.20542660.35782260.3288279SGL Min 1-11WAYNE0.381313430.302608580.373389110.343711,1050.344371,2900.444801,0910.435931,374SGL Min 12WAYNE0.701191710.662824290.682924320.703525000.623746040.713745280.76450596SGL Min 13-24WAYNE0.932102250.914524950.945726100.906026700.906717450.926847420.94782836SGL Min 25+WAYNE0.2214640.17251450.24451900.10151570.15291960.28822950.2479323Retail FraudWAYNE0.15151010.15312090.17291710.10232290.10202000.17372210.1729173OUIL3WAYNE0.10495060.203551,7760.254411,7980.234611,9860.183712,0250.152741,8630.132681,996Other SGL NAWAYNE0.501863690.4310230.40250.25280.40250.00030.1716SGL UnknownWAYNE

0.113280.084520.00430.011670.085660.084490.07458SGL Min 0WEXFORD0.0010.17160.60350.50360.33130.40250.0003SGL Min 1-11WEXFORD1.00220.78790.88780.50480.83560.50240.6035SGL Min 12WEXFORD

00.75341.00331.00441.00330.83560.7534SGL Min 13-24WEXFORD1.00111.00771.00331.00551.00441.00331.0055SGL Min 25+WEXFORD

000.0010.0030.0002 00 00Retail FraudWEXFORD1.00220.547130.707100.44490.00020.60350.0006OUIL3WEXFORD0.0040.233130.294140.172120.33390.22290.09111Other SGL NAWEXFORD0.003000 00 00 00SGL UnknownWEXFORD

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 22

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 122: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Michigan Felony Sentences for Jan. - May 1999

Appendix CStatewide and County-Specific Felony Sentencing

Data By SGL Category and Sentence Type

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 1

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 123: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Michigan Felony Sentences for Jan. - May 1999

PercentMICHIGANT o t a l sMICHIGAN

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition1008.212.829.7436.2SGL Min 07,3876079492,1963,180455SGL Min 01001.72230.414.331.6SGL Min 1-1181914180249117259SGL Min 1-111001.99.321.921.445.5SGL Min 121,29724121284278590SGL Min 121000.95.211.87.874.4SGL Min 13-246946368254516SGL Min 13-241000.10.94.32.292.5SGL Min 25+690163015638SGL Min 25+10012.331.818.520.916.4Retail Fraud71388227132149117Retail Fraud1000.99.352.810.626.5OUIL392588648898245OUIL31006.516.524.529.722.8Other SGL NA3,327216548816988759Other SGL NA1004.916.917.825.135.3SGL Unknown1,01750172181255359SGL Unknown100613.826.430.423.3Total16,8691,0142,3254,4585,1343,938Total

PercentALCONAT o t a l sALCONA

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition10014.3042.928.614.3SGL Min 0710321SGL Min 01000010000SGL Min 1-11200200SGL Min 1-1110033.333.3033.30SGL Min 12311010SGL Min 12

000000SGL Min 13-24000000SGL Min 13-24000000SGL Min 25+000000SGL Min 25+000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud

1000010000OUIL3100100OUIL3000000Other SGL NA000000Other SGL NA

1000010000SGL Unknown100100SGL Unknown10014.37.15021.47.1Total1421731Total

PercentALGERT o t a l sALGER

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition10011.111.177.800SGL Min 0911700SGL Min 0

000000SGL Min 1-11000000SGL Min 1-111000100000SGL Min 12101000SGL Min 121000010000SGL Min 13-24100100SGL Min 13-241000010000SGL Min 25+100100SGL Min 25+

000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud000000OUIL3000000OUIL3000000Other SGL NA000000Other SGL NA000000SGL Unknown000000SGL Unknown

1008.316.77500Total1212900Total

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 2

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 124: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Michigan Felony Sentences for Jan. - May 1999

PercentALLEGANT o t a l sALLEGAN

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition1001.83.584.23.57SGL Min 057124824SGL Min 010004040020SGL Min 1-11502201SGL Min 1-111000016.7083.3SGL Min 12600105SGL Min 121000000100SGL Min 13-24100001SGL Min 13-241000000100SGL Min 25+500005SGL Min 25+

000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud1000010000OUIL3200200OUIL31002.819.427.85.644.4Other SGL NA361710216Other SGL NA100033.333.3033.3SGL Unknown301101SGL Unknown1001.710.455.73.528.7Total11521264433Total

PercentALPENAT o t a l sALPENA

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition10009.154.536.40SGL Min 01101640SGL Min 01000000100SGL Min 1-11100001SGL Min 1-111000406000SGL Min 12502300SGL Min 121000000100SGL Min 13-24300003SGL Min 13-241000000100SGL Min 25+100001SGL Min 25+

000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud1000000100OUIL3200002OUIL31000005050Other SGL NA200011Other SGL NA

000000SGL Unknown000000SGL Unknown100012362032Total2503958Total

PercentANTRIMT o t a l sANTRIM

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition100011.133.3055.6SGL Min 0901305SGL Min 0100033.333.3033.3SGL Min 1-11301101SGL Min 1-11

000000SGL Min 12000000SGL Min 121000000100SGL Min 13-24100001SGL Min 13-241000000100SGL Min 25+100001SGL Min 25+

000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud000000OUIL3000000OUIL3

100022.222.2055.6Other SGL NA902205Other SGL NA1000010000SGL Unknown400400SGL Unknown100014.837048.1Total270410013Total

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 3

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 125: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Michigan Felony Sentences for Jan. - May 1999

PercentARENACT o t a l sARENAC

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition10012.512.562.512.50SGL Min 0811510SGL Min 01000010000SGL Min 1-11100100SGL Min 1-111000000100SGL Min 12100001SGL Min 12

000000SGL Min 13-24000000SGL Min 13-241000000100SGL Min 25+100001SGL Min 25+

000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud1000100000OUIL3101000OUIL310001080100Other SGL NA1001810Other SGL NA

000000SGL Unknown000000SGL Unknown1004.513.663.69.19.1Total22131422Total

PercentBARAGAT o t a l sBARAGA

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition1000010000SGL Min 0300300SGL Min 01000100000SGL Min 1-11101000SGL Min 1-111000000100SGL Min 12100001SGL Min 12

000000SGL Min 13-24000000SGL Min 13-24000000SGL Min 25+000000SGL Min 25+000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud

1000010000OUIL3100100OUIL3000000Other SGL NA000000Other SGL NA000000SGL Unknown000000SGL Unknown

100016.766.7016.7Total601401Total

PercentBARRYT o t a l sBARRY

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition10018.92.775.72.70SGL Min 037712810SGL Min 01000010000SGL Min 1-11400400SGL Min 1-111000080020SGL Min 12500401SGL Min 121000000100SGL Min 13-24300003SGL Min 13-241000000100SGL Min 25+100001SGL Min 25+1000010000Retail Fraud200200Retail Fraud1000088.9011.1OUIL3900801OUIL310000507.142.9Other SGL NA1400716Other SGL NA1000033.3066.7SGL Unknown300102SGL Unknown10091.369.22.617.9Total787154214Total

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 4

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 126: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Michigan Felony Sentences for Jan. - May 1999

PercentBAYT o t a l sBAY

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition1002.714.750.722.79.3SGL Min 07521138177SGL Min 0100012.537.5050SGL Min 1-11801304SGL Min 1-111000061.5038.5SGL Min 121300805SGL Min 121000000100SGL Min 13-2411000011SGL Min 13-241000020080SGL Min 25+500104SGL Min 25+100016.733.333.316.7Retail Fraud601221Retail Fraud1000054.518.227.3OUIL31100623OUIL31009.311.639.511.627.9Other SGL NA434517512Other SGL NA1000050050SGL Unknown200101SGL Unknown1003.410.343.714.927.6Total174618762648Total

PercentBENZIET o t a l sBENZIE

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition10042.9028.6028.6SGL Min 0730202SGL Min 0

000000SGL Min 1-11000000SGL Min 1-11000000SGL Min 12000000SGL Min 12

1000000100SGL Min 13-24100001SGL Min 13-24000000SGL Min 25+000000SGL Min 25+000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud000000OUIL3000000OUIL3000000Other SGL NA000000Other SGL NA000000SGL Unknown000000SGL Unknown

10037.5025037.5Total830203Total

PercentBERRIENT o t a l sBERRIEN

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition10001.555.426.216.8SGL Min 0202031125334SGL Min 01000042.115.842.1SGL Min 1-111900838SGL Min 1-111000021.78.769.6SGL Min 1223005216SGL Min 121000000100SGL Min 13-2412000012SGL Min 13-241000000100SGL Min 25+13000013SGL Min 25+1000016.716.766.7Retail Fraud1200228Retail Fraud1000057.1042.9OUIL3700403OUIL31004.310.945.717.421.7Other SGL NA462521810Other SGL NA100010.621.338.329.8SGL Unknown4705101814SGL Unknown1000.53.442.522.631Total38121316286118Total

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 6

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 127: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Michigan Felony Sentences for Jan. - May 1999

PercentBRANCHT o t a l sBRANCH

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition100021.260.615.23SGL Min 033072051SGL Min 010002550025SGL Min 1-11401201SGL Min 1-111000500050SGL Min 12201001SGL Min 121000050050SGL Min 13-24200101SGL Min 13-241000000100SGL Min 25+200002SGL Min 25+

000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud000000OUIL3000000OUIL3

100016.75016.716.7Other SGL NA601311Other SGL NA1000400060SGL Unknown502003SGL Unknown100022.248.111.118.5Total5401226610Total

PercentCALHOUNT o t a l sCALHOUN

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition100133.545.913.95.7SGL Min 0194265892711SGL Min 0100047.69.54.838.1SGL Min 1-1121010218SGL Min 1-111002.9208.68.660SGL Min 1235173321SGL Min 12100013.3013.373.3SGL Min 13-2415020211SGL Min 13-241000000100SGL Min 25+800008SGL Min 25+100066.722.2011.1Retail Fraud906201Retail Fraud100036.436.4027.3OUIL31104403OUIL31003.13229.914.420.6Other SGL NA97331291420Other SGL NA100020401525SGL Unknown2004835SGL Unknown1001.531.533.412.221.5Total41061291375088Total

PercentCASST o t a l sCASS

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition10042444226SGL Min 05021222113SGL Min 010006020020SGL Min 1-11503101SGL Min 1-111000033.3066.7SGL Min 12600204SGL Min 121000000100SGL Min 13-24300003SGL Min 13-241000000100SGL Min 25+800008SGL Min 25+

000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud100011.188.900OUIL318021600OUIL3100046.27.77.738.5Other SGL NA260122210Other SGL NA1000100000SGL Unknown202000SGL Unknown1001.726.336.41124.6Total118231431329Total

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 7

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 128: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Michigan Felony Sentences for Jan. - May 1999

PercentCHARLEVOIXT o t a l sCHARLEVOIX

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition100021.4507.121.4SGL Min 01403713SGL Min 0100033.333.3033.3SGL Min 1-11301101SGL Min 1-111000000100SGL Min 12300003SGL Min 12

000000SGL Min 13-24000000SGL Min 13-241000000100SGL Min 25+200002SGL Min 25+

000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud10033.30033.333.3OUIL3310011OUIL3100033.333.322.211.1Other SGL NA903321Other SGL NA1000000100SGL Unknown100001SGL Unknown1002.92031.411.434.3Total351711412Total

PercentCHEBOYGANT o t a l sCHEBOYGAN

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition100017.469.68.74.3SGL Min 023041621SGL Min 0100033.333.3033.3SGL Min 1-11301101SGL Min 1-11100033.333.3033.3SGL Min 12301101SGL Min 12

000000SGL Min 13-24000000SGL Min 13-241000000100SGL Min 25+300003SGL Min 25+

000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud1000600040OUIL3503002OUIL31007.723.146.27.715.4Other SGL NA1313612Other SGL NA

000000SGL Unknown000000SGL Unknown10022448620Total5011224310Total

PercentCHIPPEWAT o t a l sCHIPPEWA

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition1005.923.564.75.90SGL Min 017141110SGL Min 01000100000SGL Min 1-11101000SGL Min 1-111000010000SGL Min 12100100SGL Min 12

000000SGL Min 13-24000000SGL Min 13-24000000SGL Min 25+000000SGL Min 25+

1000000100Retail Fraud100001Retail Fraud1000000100OUIL3100001OUIL310005016.716.716.7Other SGL NA603111Other SGL NA1000001000SGL Unknown100010SGL Unknown1003.628.646.410.710.7Total28181333Total

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 8

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 129: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Michigan Felony Sentences for Jan. - May 1999

PercentCLARET o t a l sCLARE

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition10016.7066.716.70SGL Min 024401640SGL Min 01000050050SGL Min 1-11200101SGL Min 1-111001000000SGL Min 12110000SGL Min 121000010000SGL Min 13-24200200SGL Min 13-241000000100SGL Min 25+100001SGL Min 25+

000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud1000057.1042.9OUIL3700403OUIL310010050400Other SGL NA1010540Other SGL NA10020020600SGL Unknown510130SGL Unknown10013.5055.821.29.6Total527029115Total

PercentCLINTONT o t a l sCLINTON

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition100151055020SGL Min 020321104SGL Min 0100033.366.700SGL Min 1-11301200SGL Min 1-111000005050SGL Min 12200011SGL Min 121000000100SGL Min 13-24200002SGL Min 13-241000000100SGL Min 25+200002SGL Min 25+

000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud1000033.3066.7OUIL3600204OUIL3100011.155.6033.3Other SGL NA901503Other SGL NA1000010000SGL Unknown300300SGL Unknown1006.48.548.92.134Total473423116Total

PercentCRAWFORDT o t a l sCRAWFORD

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition1000058.32516.7SGL Min 01200732SGL Min 0

000000SGL Min 1-11000000SGL Min 1-111000050050SGL Min 12200101SGL Min 12

000000SGL Min 13-24000000SGL Min 13-241000000100SGL Min 25+100001SGL Min 25+

000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud1000010000OUIL3200200OUIL310012.5037.5500Other SGL NA810340Other SGL NA

000000SGL Unknown000000SGL Unknown10040522816Total25101374Total

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 9

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 130: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Michigan Felony Sentences for Jan. - May 1999

PercentDELTAT o t a l sDELTA

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition100202836160SGL Min 02557940SGL Min 01000100000SGL Min 1-11101000SGL Min 1-111000000100SGL Min 12100001SGL Min 12

000000SGL Min 13-24000000SGL Min 13-241000000100SGL Min 25+200002SGL Min 25+10025502500Retail Fraud412100Retail Fraud10006020020OUIL3503101OUIL31000500050Other SGL NA201001Other SGL NA

000000SGL Unknown000000SGL Unknown100153527.51012.5Total406141145Total

PercentDICKINSONT o t a l sDICKINSON

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition1006.312.568.8012.5SGL Min 016121102SGL Min 01000000100SGL Min 1-11100001SGL Min 1-11100066.70033.3SGL Min 12302001SGL Min 12

000000SGL Min 13-24000000SGL Min 13-241000000100SGL Min 25+100001SGL Min 25+1000010000Retail Fraud100100Retail Fraud100011.188.900OUIL3901800OUIL3100057.142.900Other SGL NA704300Other SGL NA1001000000SGL Unknown110000SGL Unknown1005.123.159012.8Total39292305Total

PercentEATONT o t a l sEATON

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition10010866124SGL Min 050543362SGL Min 0100016.783.300SGL Min 1-11601500SGL Min 1-1110006.740053.3SGL Min 121501608SGL Min 121000018.29.172.7SGL Min 13-241100218SGL Min 13-241000011.1088.9SGL Min 25+900108SGL Min 25+100057.142.900Retail Fraud704300Retail Fraud1000071.4028.6OUIL314001004OUIL310012.514.344.616.112.5Other SGL NA56782597Other SGL NA1009.118.236.418.218.2SGL Unknown1112422SGL Unknown1007.311.249.710.121.8Total1791320891839Total

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 10

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 131: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Michigan Felony Sentences for Jan. - May 1999

PercentEMMETT o t a l sEMMET

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition10004.590.94.50SGL Min 022012010SGL Min 01000010000SGL Min 1-11300300SGL Min 1-111000000100SGL Min 12300003SGL Min 121000000100SGL Min 13-24200002SGL Min 13-241000000100SGL Min 25+200002SGL Min 25+

000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud1000066.7033.3OUIL3300201OUIL31000080020Other SGL NA1000802Other SGL NA1000010000SGL Unknown100100SGL Unknown10002.273.92.221.7Total460134110Total

PercentGENESEET o t a l sGENESEE

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition1003.91.634.946.113.6SGL Min 02581049011935SGL Min 010000203050SGL Min 1-111000235SGL Min 1-111000026.315.857.9SGL Min 12380010622SGL Min 12100008.68.682.9SGL Min 13-2435003329SGL Min 13-24100002.72.794.6SGL Min 25+37001135SGL Min 25+100011.15.622.261.1Retail Fraud18021411Retail Fraud10000561232OUIL325001438OUIL31000.811.515.321.850.8Other SGL NA2622304057133Other SGL NA1004.38.71339.134.8SGL Unknown2312398SGL Unknown1001.85.423.22940.5Total7061338164205286Total

PercentGLADWINT o t a l sGLADWIN

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition1000053.346.70SGL Min 01500870SGL Min 01000010000SGL Min 1-11100100SGL Min 1-111000000100SGL Min 12100001SGL Min 121000075025SGL Min 13-24400301SGL Min 13-241000000100SGL Min 25+300003SGL Min 25+

000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud1000040060OUIL3500203OUIL310046.2030.87.715.4Other SGL NA1360412Other SGL NA

000000SGL Unknown000000SGL Unknown10014.3042.91923.8Total426018810Total

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 11

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 132: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Michigan Felony Sentences for Jan. - May 1999

PercentGOGEBICT o t a l sGOGEBIC

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition1000010000SGL Min 0300300SGL Min 01000500050SGL Min 1-11201001SGL Min 1-111000100000SGL Min 12101000SGL Min 121000000100SGL Min 13-24100001SGL Min 13-24

000000SGL Min 25+000000SGL Min 25+000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud000000OUIL3000000OUIL3000000Other SGL NA000000Other SGL NA000000SGL Unknown000000SGL Unknown

100028.642.9028.6Total702302Total

PercentGRAND TRAVERSET o t a l sGRAND TRAVERSE

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition10007.572.52.517.5SGL Min 040032917SGL Min 01000040060SGL Min 1-11500203SGL Min 1-111000037.5062.5SGL Min 12800305SGL Min 121000000100SGL Min 13-24300003SGL Min 13-241000000100SGL Min 25+600006SGL Min 25+1000010000Retail Fraud100100Retail Fraud1000037.5062.5OUIL3800305OUIL31000055.6044.4Other SGL NA900504Other SGL NA1000100000SGL Unknown202000SGL Unknown10006.152.41.240.2Total820543133Total

PercentGRATIOTT o t a l sGRATIOT

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition100016.77508.3SGL Min 01202901SGL Min 01000033.3066.7SGL Min 1-11300102SGL Min 1-111000033.3066.7SGL Min 12300102SGL Min 121000000100SGL Min 13-24100001SGL Min 13-241000000100SGL Min 25+100001SGL Min 25+

000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud1000010000OUIL3300300OUIL310002502550Other SGL NA401012Other SGL NA100033.333.333.30SGL Unknown301110SGL Unknown100013.3506.730Total30041529Total

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 12

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 133: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Michigan Felony Sentences for Jan. - May 1999

PercentHILLSDALET o t a l sHILLSDALE

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition1003.811.553.8030.8SGL Min 026131408SGL Min 01000050050SGL Min 1-11200101SGL Min 1-111000000100SGL Min 12600006SGL Min 121000000100SGL Min 13-24200002SGL Min 13-241000000100SGL Min 25+200002SGL Min 25+

000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud1000000100OUIL3400004OUIL310002525050Other SGL NA401102Other SGL NA1000000100SGL Unknown100001SGL Unknown1002.18.534055.3Total471416026Total

PercentHOUGHTONT o t a l sHOUGHTON

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition1000208000SGL Min 0501400SGL Min 0100033.3033.333.3SGL Min 1-11301011SGL Min 1-111000000100SGL Min 12100001SGL Min 121000000100SGL Min 13-24100001SGL Min 13-24

000000SGL Min 25+000000SGL Min 25+000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud

1000050050OUIL3200101OUIL3100033.333.3033.3Other SGL NA301101Other SGL NA

000000SGL Unknown000000SGL Unknown100020406.733.3Total1503615Total

PercentHURONT o t a l sHURON

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition10018.227.354.500SGL Min 01123600SGL Min 01000010000SGL Min 1-11100100SGL Min 1-111000505000SGL Min 12201100SGL Min 12

000000SGL Min 13-24000000SGL Min 13-24000000SGL Min 25+000000SGL Min 25+000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud

1000010000OUIL3200200OUIL3100014.342.9042.9Other SGL NA701303Other SGL NA1000010000SGL Unknown200200SGL Unknown10082060012Total25251503Total

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 13

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 134: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Michigan Felony Sentences for Jan. - May 1999

PercentINGHAMT o t a l sINGHAM

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition1001718.24313.97.9SGL Min 01652830712313SGL Min 0100026.942.33.826.9SGL Min 1-1126071117SGL Min 1-111004.210.439.66.339.6SGL Min 12482519319SGL Min 121004.54.522.74.563.6SGL Min 13-2422115114SGL Min 13-2410004.89.5085.7SGL Min 25+21012018SGL Min 25+100055.633.3011.1Retail Fraud905301Retail Fraud10002060515OUIL320041213OUIL310016.112.532.116.123.2Other SGL NA569718913Other SGL NA10022.2044.433.30SGL Unknown920430SGL Unknown10011.21638.610.923.4Total37642601454188Total

PercentIONIAT o t a l sIONIA

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition10032.121.417.9253.6SGL Min 02896571SGL Min 01000000100SGL Min 1-11100001SGL Min 1-11100020204020SGL Min 12501121SGL Min 1210014.314.314.314.342.9SGL Min 13-24711113SGL Min 13-241000000100SGL Min 25+100001SGL Min 25+

000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud1000080020OUIL3500401OUIL31004.842.914.31919Other SGL NA2119344Other SGL NA

000000SGL Unknown000000SGL Unknown10016.22520.620.617.6Total681117141412Total

PercentIOSCOT o t a l sIOSCO

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition1004.321.756.54.313SGL Min 023151313SGL Min 010000033.366.7SGL Min 1-11300012SGL Min 1-1110033.300066.7SGL Min 12310002SGL Min 121000000100SGL Min 13-24200002SGL Min 13-241000000100SGL Min 25+200002SGL Min 25+1000001000Retail Fraud100010Retail Fraud1000000100OUIL3300003OUIL31000060040Other SGL NA500302Other SGL NA1000050050SGL Unknown200101SGL Unknown1004.511.438.66.838.6Total442517317Total

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 14

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 135: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Michigan Felony Sentences for Jan. - May 1999PercentIRONT o t a l sIRON

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition10027.318.236.418.20SGL Min 01132420SGL Min 01000033.3066.7SGL Min 1-11300102SGL Min 1-111000000100SGL Min 12200002SGL Min 121000010000SGL Min 13-24100100SGL Min 13-24

000000SGL Min 25+000000SGL Min 25+000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud

1000010000OUIL3200200OUIL310028.628.60042.9Other SGL NA722003Other SGL NA

000000SGL Unknown000000SGL Unknown10019.215.430.87.726.9Total2654827Total

PercentISABELLAT o t a l sISABELLA

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition10015.617.848.913.34.4SGL Min 045782262SGL Min 01000257500SGL Min 1-11401300SGL Min 1-111000050050SGL Min 12200101SGL Min 121000000100SGL Min 13-24100001SGL Min 13-24

000000SGL Min 25+000000SGL Min 25+1000001000Retail Fraud100010Retail Fraud1005.6055.65.633.3OUIL318101016OUIL310039.66.331.310.412.5Other SGL NA481931556Other SGL NA10014.314.342.928.60SGL Unknown711320SGL Unknown10022.210.342.911.912.7Total1262813541516Total

PercentJACKSONT o t a l sJACKSON

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition1007.311.751.110.919SGL Min 01371016701526SGL Min 010013.313.306.766.7SGL Min 1-1115220110SGL Min 1-111003.36.7206.763.3SGL Min 1230126219SGL Min 12100005.6094.4SGL Min 13-2418001017SGL Min 13-24100006.3093.8SGL Min 25+16001015SGL Min 25+1006.76.753.36.726.7Retail Fraud1511814Retail Fraud1002.92.951.45.737.1OUIL3351118213OUIL31006.410.640.419.123.4Other SGL NA473519911Other SGL NA1002512.550012.5SGL Unknown821401SGL Unknown1006.28.739.69.336.1Total321202812730116Total

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 15

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 136: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Michigan Felony Sentences for Jan. - May 1999

PercentKALAMAZOOT o t a l sKALAMAZOO

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition1008.8218.859.52SGL Min 02051843181224SGL Min 0100029.625.918.525.9SGL Min 1-112708757SGL Min 1-1110002264428SGL Min 125001132214SGL Min 12100013.33.36.776.7SGL Min 13-2430041223SGL Min 13-241000014.37.178.6SGL Min 25+14002111SGL Min 25+10020.724.13.444.86.9Retail Fraud29671132Retail Fraud100010.821.635.132.4OUIL3370481312OUIL31009.721.210.335.223.6Other SGL NA1651635175839Other SGL NA1002.5602.5530SGL Unknown401241212SGL Unknown1006.921.111.439.920.8Total5974112668238124Total

PercentKALKASKAT o t a l sKALKASKA

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition1000077.811.111.1SGL Min 0900711SGL Min 01000000100SGL Min 1-11200002SGL Min 1-111000000100SGL Min 12100001SGL Min 121000000100SGL Min 13-24200002SGL Min 13-241000000100SGL Min 25+200002SGL Min 25+

000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud1000075025OUIL3800602OUIL31000010000Other SGL NA800800Other SGL NA

000000SGL Unknown000000SGL Unknown1000065.63.131.3Total320021110Total

PercentKENTT o t a l sKENT

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition10011.425.417.4432.8SGL Min 0500571278721514SGL Min 01003.630.116.910.838.6SGL Min 1-118332514932SGL Min 1-111001.711.92219.544.9SGL Min 12118214262353SGL Min 121001.46.89.55.477SGL Min 13-2474157457SGL Min 13-24100004294SGL Min 25+50002147SGL Min 25+10011.441.412.92014.3Retail Fraud7082991410Retail Fraud10004.153.110.232.7OUIL3490226516OUIL310010.218.414.328.628.6Other SGL NA1962036285656Other SGL NA1005.923.52.923.544.1SGL Unknown34281815SGL Unknown1007.9211728.525.6Total1,17493246200335300Total

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 16

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 137: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Michigan Felony Sentences for Jan. - May 1999

PercentKEWEENAWT o t a l sKEWEENAW

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition000000SGL Min 0000000SGL Min 0000000SGL Min 1-11000000SGL Min 1-11000000SGL Min 12000000SGL Min 12000000SGL Min 13-24000000SGL Min 13-24000000SGL Min 25+000000SGL Min 25+000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud000000OUIL3000000OUIL3000000Other SGL NA000000Other SGL NA000000SGL Unknown000000SGL Unknown000000Total000000Total

PercentLAKET o t a l sLAKE

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition1000066.733.30SGL Min 0600420SGL Min 0

000000SGL Min 1-11000000SGL Min 1-111000000100SGL Min 12100001SGL Min 12

000000SGL Min 13-24000000SGL Min 13-241000000100SGL Min 25+100001SGL Min 25+

000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud1000100000OUIL3101000OUIL3100066.70033.3Other SGL NA302001Other SGL NA1000010000SGL Unknown100100SGL Unknown100023.138.515.423.1Total1303523Total

PercentLAPEERT o t a l sLAPEER

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition1002.713.554.129.70SGL Min 0371520110SGL Min 01000040060SGL Min 1-11500203SGL Min 1-111000014.3085.7SGL Min 12700106SGL Min 12100011.111.1077.8SGL Min 13-24901107SGL Min 13-241000000100SGL Min 25+300003SGL Min 25+100033.333.3033.3Retail Fraud301101Retail Fraud10001560520OUIL320031214OUIL310001369.64.313Other SGL NA23031613Other SGL NA1000010000SGL Unknown100100SGL Unknown1000.912501225Total108113541327Total

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 17

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 138: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Michigan Felony Sentences for Jan. - May 1999

PercentLEELANAUT o t a l sLEELANAU

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition10051070510SGL Min 020121412SGL Min 01000033.3066.7SGL Min 1-11300102SGL Min 1-111000000100SGL Min 12200002SGL Min 12

000000SGL Min 13-24000000SGL Min 13-24000000SGL Min 25+000000SGL Min 25+000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud

1000010000OUIL3100100OUIL3100033.366.700Other SGL NA301200Other SGL NA

000000SGL Unknown000000SGL Unknown1003.410.362.13.420.7Total29131816Total

PercentLENAWEET o t a l sLENAWEE

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition10014258818SGL Min 050712949SGL Min 010011.1033.311.144.4SGL Min 1-11910314SGL Min 1-11100007.7092.3SGL Min 1213001012SGL Min 121000000100SGL Min 13-24500005SGL Min 13-241000000100SGL Min 25+800008SGL Min 25+10025025050Retail Fraud410102Retail Fraud1000050050OUIL3600303OUIL3100012.52512.550Other SGL NA801214Other SGL NA1000050050SGL Unknown200101SGL Unknown1008.61.938.15.745.7Total1059240648Total

PercentLIVINGSTONT o t a l sLIVINGSTON

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition10027.720.538.69.63.6SGL Min 08323173283SGL Min 0100015.438.57.738.5SGL Min 1-111302515SGL Min 1-11100010303030SGL Min 121001333SGL Min 1210016.7016.7066.7SGL Min 13-24610104SGL Min 13-241000000100SGL Min 25+600006SGL Min 25+100204002020Retail Fraud512011Retail Fraud10003.830.87.757.7OUIL326018215OUIL31005.917.620.626.529.4Other SGL NA34267910Other SGL NA1009.118.236.418.218.2SGL Unknown1112422SGL Unknown10014.41630.913.425.3Total1942831602649Total

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 18

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 139: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Michigan Felony Sentences for Jan. - May 1999

PercentLUCET o t a l sLUCE

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition1000505000SGL Min 0201100SGL Min 0

000000SGL Min 1-11000000SGL Min 1-11000000SGL Min 12000000SGL Min 12

1000000100SGL Min 13-24100001SGL Min 13-24000000SGL Min 25+000000SGL Min 25+000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud000000OUIL3000000OUIL3

1000100000Other SGL NA101000Other SGL NA1000010000SGL Unknown300300SGL Unknown100028.657.1014.3Total702401Total

PercentMACKINACT o t a l sMACKINAC

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition10033.3041.716.78.3SGL Min 01240521SGL Min 01000100000SGL Min 1-11101000SGL Min 1-111000100000SGL Min 12101000SGL Min 12

000000SGL Min 13-24000000SGL Min 13-24000000SGL Min 25+000000SGL Min 25+000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud

1000100000OUIL3101000OUIL31001000000Other SGL NA110000Other SGL NA

000000SGL Unknown000000SGL Unknown10031.318.831.312.56.3Total1653521Total

PercentMACOMBT o t a l sMACOMB

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition100156.925.250.92SGL Min 03935927992008SGL Min 01002.512.522.51547.5SGL Min 1-1140159619SGL Min 1-111001.44.228.218.347.9SGL Min 127113201334SGL Min 121002.72.718.910.864.9SGL Min 13-2437117424SGL Min 13-2410003.19.4087.5SGL Min 25+32013028SGL Min 25+10021.128.916.717.815.6Retail Fraud901926151614Retail Fraud100030.638.916.713.9OUIL3360111465OUIL310011.428.512.63512.6Other SGL NA2462870318631Other SGL NA1006.330.613.92524.3SGL Unknown144944203635SGL Unknown10010.817.32033.718.2Total1,089118188218367198Total

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 19

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 140: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Michigan Felony Sentences for Jan. - May 1999

PercentMANISTEET o t a l sMANISTEE

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition100300351025SGL Min 02060725SGL Min 01000000100SGL Min 1-11100001SGL Min 1-111000050050SGL Min 12200101SGL Min 121000005050SGL Min 13-24200011SGL Min 13-241000000100SGL Min 25+100001SGL Min 25+

000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud1000066.733.30OUIL3300210OUIL3100400202020Other SGL NA520111Other SGL NA1000050500SGL Unknown200110SGL Unknown10022.2033.316.727.8Total368012610Total

PercentMARQUETTET o t a l sMARQUETTE

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition1009.131.840.918.20SGL Min 02227940SGL Min 01000000100SGL Min 1-11100001SGL Min 1-111000000100SGL Min 12100001SGL Min 121000500050SGL Min 13-24402002SGL Min 13-241000000100SGL Min 25+100001SGL Min 25+

000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud1000066.7033.3OUIL3300201OUIL3100016.766.7016.7Other SGL NA601401Other SGL NA

000000SGL Unknown000000SGL Unknown1005.326.339.510.518.4Total382101547Total

PercentMASONT o t a l sMASON

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition10007.470.43.718.5SGL Min 027021915SGL Min 01000010000SGL Min 1-11100100SGL Min 1-111000060040SGL Min 12500302SGL Min 121000050050SGL Min 13-24200101SGL Min 13-241000000100SGL Min 25+100001SGL Min 25+1000010000Retail Fraud100100Retail Fraud1000075250OUIL3400310OUIL310006.356.3037.5Other SGL NA1601906Other SGL NA1000000100SGL Unknown100001SGL Unknown10005.263.83.427.6Total580337216Total

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 20

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 141: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Michigan Felony Sentences for Jan. - May 1999

PercentMECOSTAT o t a l sMECOSTA

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition10015.85.357.95.315.8SGL Min 019311113SGL Min 01000500050SGL Min 1-11201001SGL Min 1-111000075025SGL Min 12400301SGL Min 121000000100SGL Min 13-24100001SGL Min 13-241000000100SGL Min 25+100001SGL Min 25+

000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud1000033.3066.7OUIL3300102OUIL310026.35.336.826.35.3Other SGL NA1951751Other SGL NA1001000000SGL Unknown110000SGL Unknown100186441220Total509322610Total

PercentMENOMINEET o t a l sMENOMINEE

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition10014.385.7000SGL Min 0716000SGL Min 0

000000SGL Min 1-11000000SGL Min 1-11000000SGL Min 12000000SGL Min 12

1000050050SGL Min 13-24200101SGL Min 13-24000000SGL Min 25+000000SGL Min 25+000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud

1000010000OUIL3100100OUIL31000010000Other SGL NA200200Other SGL NA1000010000SGL Unknown100100SGL Unknown1007.746.238.507.7Total1316501Total

PercentMIDLANDT o t a l sMIDLAND

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition1003.4075.920.70SGL Min 029102260SGL Min 01000080200SGL Min 1-11500410SGL Min 1-111000037.512.550SGL Min 12800314SGL Min 121000000100SGL Min 13-24200002SGL Min 13-241000000100SGL Min 25+100001SGL Min 25+100402002020Retail Fraud521011Retail Fraud1000066.7033.3OUIL3600402OUIL31004.3047.826.121.7Other SGL NA23101165Other SGL NA100202040200SGL Unknown511210SGL Unknown10062.454.81917.9Total8452461615Total

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 21

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 142: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Michigan Felony Sentences for Jan. - May 1999

PercentMISSAUKEET o t a l sMISSAUKEE

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition1000080200SGL Min 01000820SGL Min 0

000000SGL Min 1-11000000SGL Min 1-111000050050SGL Min 12200101SGL Min 121000000100SGL Min 13-24100001SGL Min 13-241000000100SGL Min 25+100001SGL Min 25+

000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud1000010000OUIL3200200OUIL31000010000Other SGL NA200200Other SGL NA1000010000SGL Unknown100100SGL Unknown1000073.710.515.8Total19001423Total

PercentMONROET o t a l sMONROE

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition1004.76.364.114.110.9SGL Min 064344197SGL Min 01009.127.327.3036.4SGL Min 1-111113304SGL Min 1-1110007.723.1069.2SGL Min 121301309SGL Min 121000000100SGL Min 13-24200002SGL Min 13-241000000100SGL Min 25+600006SGL Min 25+1000042.9057.1Retail Fraud700304Retail Fraud1000061.5038.5OUIL31300805OUIL31007.35.547.314.525.5Other SGL NA554326814Other SGL NA1002.34.753.59.330.2SGL Unknown431223413SGL Unknown1004.26.1509.829.9Total2149131072164Total

PercentMONTCALMT o t a l sMONTCALM

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition1007.422.23729.63.7SGL Min 027261081SGL Min 0100057.114.3028.6SGL Min 1-11704102SGL Min 1-111000075250SGL Min 12400310SGL Min 12100033.333.3033.3SGL Min 13-24301101SGL Min 13-241000000100SGL Min 25+500005SGL Min 25+1000100000Retail Fraud101000Retail Fraud100016.716.7066.7OUIL3601104OUIL310011.118.529.625.914.8Other SGL NA2735874Other SGL NA1000010000SGL Unknown300300SGL Unknown100621.732.519.320.5Total83518271617Total

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 22

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 143: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Michigan Felony Sentences for Jan. - May 1999

PercentMONTMORENCYT o t a l sMONTMORENCY

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition1000085.714.30SGL Min 0700610SGL Min 01000100000SGL Min 1-11101000SGL Min 1-111000505000SGL Min 12201100SGL Min 121000010000SGL Min 13-24100100SGL Min 13-241000010000SGL Min 25+100100SGL Min 25+

000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud100033.333.3033.3OUIL3301101OUIL31000080020Other SGL NA500401Other SGL NA

000000SGL Unknown000000SGL Unknown10001570510Total20031412Total

PercentMUSKEGONT o t a l sMUSKEGON

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition1003.710.153.41913.8SGL Min 01897191013626SGL Min 01000028.6071.4SGL Min 1-1114004010SGL Min 1-111008.2212.26.171.4SGL Min 1249416335SGL Min 1210004.54.5090.9SGL Min 13-2422011020SGL Min 13-2410005.611.1083.3SGL Min 25+18012015SGL Min 25+100103026.71023.3Retail Fraud3039837Retail Fraud1000852436OUIL325021319OUIL31006.64.746.21725.5Other SGL NA10675491827Other SGL NA1004.513.618.29.154.5SGL Unknown22134212SGL Unknown1004.68.639.613.333.9Total475224118863161Total

PercentNEWAYGOT o t a l sNEWAYGO

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition1009.722.667.700SGL Min 031372100SGL Min 01000505000SGL Min 1-11201100SGL Min 1-111000000100SGL Min 12200002SGL Min 121000000100SGL Min 13-24300003SGL Min 13-241000000100SGL Min 25+300003SGL Min 25+

000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud10004050010OUIL31004501OUIL3100013.38006.7Other SGL NA15021201Other SGL NA1000000100SGL Unknown100001SGL Unknown1004.520.958.2016.4Total6731439011Total

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 23

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 144: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Michigan Felony Sentences for Jan. - May 1999

PercentOAKLANDT o t a l sOAKLAND

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition10014.225.122.634.83.2SGL Min 01,07915327124437635SGL Min 01002.738.1344.121.1SGL Min 1-1114745650631SGL Min 1-111001.324.325.711.237.5SGL Min 12152237391757SGL Min 121001.38.811.36.372.5SGL Min 13-2480179558SGL Min 13-2410002.92.9094.2SGL Min 25+69022065SGL Min 25+1001444.315.817.58.3Retail Fraud22832101364019Retail Fraud100010.656.94.128.5OUIL312301370535OUIL31004.425.523.228.918Other SGL NA38817999011270Other SGL NA1007.717.929.523.121.8SGL Unknown78614231817SGL Unknown1009.225.62424.716.5Total2,344215600563579387Total

PercentOCEANAT o t a l sOCEANA

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition10011.15.661.1022.2SGL Min 018211104SGL Min 01000050050SGL Min 1-11200101SGL Min 1-11

000000SGL Min 12000000SGL Min 12000000SGL Min 13-24000000SGL Min 13-24

1000050050SGL Min 25+200101SGL Min 25+1000100000Retail Fraud101000Retail Fraud100022.266.7011.1OUIL3902601OUIL310012.52537.5025Other SGL NA812302Other SGL NA1001000000SGL Unknown110000SGL Unknown1009.814.653.7022Total41462209Total

PercentOGEMAWT o t a l sOGEMAW

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition10002066.76.76.7SGL Min 015031011SGL Min 01000010000SGL Min 1-11100100SGL Min 1-111000000100SGL Min 12200002SGL Min 121000000100SGL Min 13-24200002SGL Min 13-24

000000SGL Min 25+000000SGL Min 25+000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud

10002525050OUIL3401102OUIL3100018.245.518.218.2Other SGL NA1102522Other SGL NA1000100000SGL Unknown101000SGL Unknown100019.447.28.325Total36071739Total

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 24

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 145: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Michigan Felony Sentences for Jan. - May 1999

PercentONTONAGONT o t a l sONTONAGON

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition1000208000SGL Min 0501400SGL Min 0

000000SGL Min 1-11000000SGL Min 1-11000000SGL Min 12000000SGL Min 12000000SGL Min 13-24000000SGL Min 13-24000000SGL Min 25+000000SGL Min 25+000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud

1000010000OUIL3100100OUIL3000000Other SGL NA000000Other SGL NA000000SGL Unknown000000SGL Unknown

100016.783.300Total601500Total

PercentOSCEOLAT o t a l sOSCEOLA

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition1007.1092.900SGL Min 014101300SGL Min 01000000100SGL Min 1-11100001SGL Min 1-111000000100SGL Min 12300003SGL Min 12

000000SGL Min 13-24000000SGL Min 13-241001000000SGL Min 25+110000SGL Min 25+

000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud1000085.7014.3OUIL3700601OUIL31000078.6021.4Other SGL NA14001103Other SGL NA

000000SGL Unknown000000SGL Unknown1005075020Total40203008Total

PercentOSCODAT o t a l sOSCODA

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition1000050050SGL Min 0200101SGL Min 0

000000SGL Min 1-11000000SGL Min 1-11000000SGL Min 12000000SGL Min 12

1000000100SGL Min 13-24100001SGL Min 13-24000000SGL Min 25+000000SGL Min 25+000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud000000OUIL3000000OUIL3

1000010000Other SGL NA100100Other SGL NA000000SGL Unknown000000SGL Unknown

1000050050Total400202Total

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 25

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 146: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Michigan Felony Sentences for Jan. - May 1999

PercentOTSEGOT o t a l sOTSEGO

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition1003.6082.13.610.7SGL Min 028102313SGL Min 01000050050SGL Min 1-11200101SGL Min 1-111000000100SGL Min 12200002SGL Min 121000000100SGL Min 13-24200002SGL Min 13-241000020080SGL Min 25+500104SGL Min 25+

000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud1000050050OUIL3200101OUIL310002040400Other SGL NA501220Other SGL NA1000000100SGL Unknown100001SGL Unknown1002.12.159.66.429.8Total471128314Total

PercentOTTAWAT o t a l sOTTAWA

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition1008.227.521.140.92.3SGL Min 0171144736704SGL Min 0100047.135.311.85.9SGL Min 1-111708621SGL Min 1-1110014.321.414.314.335.7SGL Min 121423225SGL Min 12100011.111.1077.8SGL Min 13-24901107SGL Min 13-241000000100SGL Min 25+700007SGL Min 25+1006.726.726.733.36.7Retail Fraud1514451Retail Fraud10009.468.83.118.8OUIL332032216OUIL31002.429.39.843.914.6Other SGL NA411124186Other SGL NA100016.75033.30SGL Unknown601320SGL Unknown1005.825.32532.111.9Total31218797810037Total

PercentPRESQUE ISLET o t a l sPRESQUE ISLE

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition1000752500SGL Min 0403100SGL Min 0

000000SGL Min 1-11000000SGL Min 1-111000010000SGL Min 12300300SGL Min 12

000000SGL Min 13-24000000SGL Min 13-24000000SGL Min 25+000000SGL Min 25+000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud

10002525050OUIL3401102OUIL3100033.316.716.733.3Other SGL NA602112Other SGL NA1000000100SGL Unknown200002SGL Unknown100031.631.65.331.6Total1906616Total

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 26

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 147: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Michigan Felony Sentences for Jan. - May 1999

PercentROSCOMMONT o t a l sROSCOMMON

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition1000088.911.10SGL Min 0900810SGL Min 01000050050SGL Min 1-11200101SGL Min 1-1110000202060SGL Min 12500113SGL Min 12

000000SGL Min 13-24000000SGL Min 13-241000000100SGL Min 25+100001SGL Min 25+1000001000Retail Fraud200020Retail Fraud1000010000OUIL3500500OUIL31000083.3016.7Other SGL NA600501Other SGL NA1000033.366.70SGL Unknown300120SGL Unknown1000063.618.218.2Total33002166Total

PercentSAGINAWT o t a l sSAGINAW

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition1008.29.812.958.210.8SGL Min 019416192511321SGL Min 01007.114.335.7042.9SGL Min 1-111412506SGL Min 1-111005.95.911.817.658.8SGL Min 1234224620SGL Min 121000007.192.9SGL Min 13-2414000113SGL Min 13-24100005.65.688.9SGL Min 25+18001116SGL Min 25+10016.714.39.533.326.2Retail Fraud427641411Retail Fraud1007.715.446.230.80OUIL31312640OUIL31006.120.710.624.638Other SGL NA1791137194468Other SGL NA10017.421.7017.443.5SGL Unknown23450410SGL Unknown1007.913.712.135.231.1Total531427364187165Total

PercentST. CLAIRT o t a l sST. CLAIR

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition10013.11547.117.67.2SGL Min 01532023722711SGL Min 0100042.914.314.328.6SGL Min 1-11703112SGL Min 1-111006.30252543.8SGL Min 121610447SGL Min 12100012.512.5075SGL Min 13-24801106SGL Min 13-241000000100SGL Min 25+500005SGL Min 25+10013.353.326.706.7Retail Fraud1528401Retail Fraud10011.18.355.62.822.2OUIL336432018OUIL310014.722.127.413.722.1Other SGL NA951421261321Other SGL NA100055.611.111.122.2SGL Unknown905112SGL Unknown10011.918.637.513.718.3Total34441641294763Total

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 27

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 148: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Michigan Felony Sentences for Jan. - May 1999

PercentST. JOSEPHT o t a l sST. JOSEPH

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition100032.662.82.32.3SGL Min 0430142711SGL Min 010002550025SGL Min 1-11401201SGL Min 1-11100068.80031.3SGL Min 1216011005SGL Min 121000250075SGL Min 13-24401003SGL Min 13-241000000100SGL Min 25+300003SGL Min 25+1000100000Retail Fraud202000Retail Fraud1000090010OUIL31000901OUIL3100011.553.8034.6Other SGL NA26031409Other SGL NA

000000SGL Unknown000000SGL Unknown100029.648.10.921.3Total10803252123Total

PercentSANILACT o t a l sSANILAC

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition1007.7092.300SGL Min 013101200SGL Min 01000010000SGL Min 1-11200200SGL Min 1-11

000000SGL Min 12000000SGL Min 121000010000SGL Min 13-24100100SGL Min 13-241000000100SGL Min 25+600006SGL Min 25+

000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud100016.766.7016.7OUIL31202802OUIL310004.885.74.84.8Other SGL NA21011811Other SGL NA1000505000SGL Unknown201100SGL Unknown1001.8773.71.815.8Total57144219Total

PercentSCHOOLCRAFTT o t a l sSCHOOLCRAFT

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition10028.6071.400SGL Min 0720500SGL Min 0

000000SGL Min 1-11000000SGL Min 1-111001000000SGL Min 12110000SGL Min 12

000000SGL Min 13-24000000SGL Min 13-24000000SGL Min 25+000000SGL Min 25+000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud000000OUIL3000000OUIL3

1000010000Other SGL NA100100Other SGL NA1000000100SGL Unknown100001SGL Unknown10030060010Total1030601Total

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 28

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 149: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Michigan Felony Sentences for Jan. - May 1999

PercentSHIAWASSEET o t a l sSHIAWASSEE

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition10003.869.2026.9SGL Min 026011807SGL Min 01000010000SGL Min 1-11200200SGL Min 1-111000040060SGL Min 12500203SGL Min 121000050050SGL Min 13-24200101SGL Min 13-241000000100SGL Min 25+200002SGL Min 25+

000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud1000070030OUIL31000703OUIL31007.17.128.67.150Other SGL NA1411417Other SGL NA1000050050SGL Unknown600303SGL Unknown1001.5355.21.538.8Total671237126Total

PercentTUSCOLAT o t a l sTUSCOLA

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition1005.321.163.25.35.3SGL Min 019141211SGL Min 010002060020SGL Min 1-11501301SGL Min 1-1110002060020SGL Min 12501301SGL Min 12

000000SGL Min 13-24000000SGL Min 13-24100014.30085.7SGL Min 25+701006SGL Min 25+

000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud1000010000OUIL3800800OUIL3100030301030Other SGL NA2006626Other SGL NA1000050050SGL Unknown200101SGL Unknown1001.519.7504.524.2Total6611333316Total

PercentVAN BURENT o t a l sVAN BUREN

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition1001.229.330.535.43.7SGL Min 08212425293SGL Min 0100027.354.5018.2SGL Min 1-111103602SGL Min 1-1110003050020SGL Min 121003502SGL Min 121000060040SGL Min 13-24500302SGL Min 13-2410000206.773.3SGL Min 25+15003111SGL Min 25+1000000100Retail Fraud100001Retail Fraud100018.837.56.337.5OUIL31603616OUIL3100010.739.339.310.7Other SGL NA280311113Other SGL NA1000033.366.70SGL Unknown300120SGL Unknown1000.621.135.125.717.5Total171136604430Total

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 29

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 150: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Michigan Felony Sentences for Jan. - May 1999

PercentWASHTENAWT o t a l sWASHTENAW

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition1001.512.316.266.23.8SGL Min 013021621865SGL Min 0100020104525SGL Min 1-112004295SGL Min 1-11100018.29.142.430.3SGL Min 12330631410SGL Min 1210005.616.722.255.6SGL Min 13-2418013410SGL Min 13-241000000100SGL Min 25+10000010SGL Min 25+100036.49.145.59.1Retail Fraud1104151Retail Fraud10002543.818.812.5OUIL31604732OUIL3100032.912.729.125.3Other SGL NA79026102320Other SGL NA100033.34.245.816.7SGL Unknown24081114SGL Unknown1000.620.214.145.519.6Total3412694815567Total

PercentWAYNET o t a l sWAYNE

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition1004.41.78.580.64.7SGL Min 01,87483321601,51188SGL Min 01000.67.927.136.727.7SGL Min 1-11177114486549SGL Min 1-111000.62.615.543.138.2SGL Min 123432953148131SGL Min 1210003.512.314.669.6SGL Min 13-24171062125119SGL Min 13-24100002.24.493.3SGL Min 25+22500510210SGL Min 25+1006.36.328.137.521.9Retail Fraud6444182414Retail Fraud1000240.642.614.9OUIL310102414315OUIL310042.412.871.19.7Other SGL NA50620126536049Other SGL NA1003.58.16.231.750.4SGL Unknown369133023117186SGL Unknown1003.22.811.360.122.5Total3,8301231094342,303861Total

PercentWEXFORDT o t a l sWEXFORD

TotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-DispositionTotalOtherJailSplitProb.PrisonSGL-Disposition1007.1078.63.610.7SGL Min 028202213SGL Min 01000010000SGL Min 1-11100100SGL Min 1-111000000100SGL Min 12200002SGL Min 12

000000SGL Min 13-24000000SGL Min 13-241000000100SGL Min 25+100001SGL Min 25+

000000Retail Fraud000000Retail Fraud1000000100OUIL3200002OUIL31000010000Other SGL NA400400Other SGL NA1000010000SGL Unknown300300SGL Unknown1004.9073.22.419.5Total41203018Total

1999 Database per 4/28/2000 Page 30

OCC/MDOC offender database uses the single most serious court disposition received by each offender during the reporting period.

Page 151: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

*No Reporting 1998/99 : Ionia,Monroe,Oceana,Shiawassee, Wexford.

*No Reporting 1999: Arenac. No Jails: Luce,Oscoda. No Reporting 1998: Baraga,Bay,Jackson,Kalamazoo,Kent.

Appendix D Jail Utilization Data - Calendar Years 1998 and 1999

Report from electronically reported JPIS data Printed 06/15/00, Page 1 of 23

Page 152: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

*No Reporting 1998/99 : Ionia,Monroe,Oceana,Shiawassee, Wexford.

*No Reporting 1999: Arenac. No Jails: Luce,Oscoda. No Reporting 1998: Baraga,Bay,Jackson,Kalamazoo,Kent.

Dec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98All Electroncially Reporting Counties*RelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused

54,45729.233.9%5,133.553,13529.233.2%4,398.3Unsentenced Felons[A]120,5675.013.3%2,020.3108,1404.911.6%1,533.1Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]

16,01377.824.0%3,630.015,95180.527.9%3,700.5Sentenced Felons[C+G]43,37522.119.4%2,940.541,09422.820.1%2,663.7Sentenced Misdemeanants[D+H]

8,27425.14.3%650.59,48522.14.8%637Boarded In[E-G-H]9,62211.05.1%778.19,19110.92.4%315.3Other[F]

252,30818.715,152.9236,99619.513,247.9Total Housed94.4%16,058.098.6%13,433.0 & Total/Housed %of Beds# of Beds

Dec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98ALCONARelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused

422.81.3%0.3543.11.3%0.3Unsentenced Felons[A]1801.13.9%0.91961.02.6%0.6Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]

2272.526.7%6.218139.323.7%5.5Sentenced Felons[C]8713.418.5%4.36515.612.9%3.0Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

10239.149.1%11.415233.958.2%13.5Boarded In[E]56.00.4%0.11115.51.3%0.3Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

43816.223.249618.523.2Total Population74.8%31.074.8%31.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds74.8%74.8%Housed %of Beds

Dec-99thruJan-99Nov-98thruMay-98ALGERRelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused

1870.620.5%2.52338.827.8%4.7Unsentenced Felons[A]1462.99.8%1.28712.118.3%3.1Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]

1259.618.0%2.21530.018.9%3.2Sentenced Felons[C]4518.316.4%2.03425.816.6%2.8Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

66.30.8%0.1Boarded In[E]8223.134.4%4.24011.718.3%3.1Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

30916.712.219918.816.9Total Population48.8%25.067.6%25.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds48.8%67.6%Housed %of Beds

Dec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98ALLEGANRelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused 81911.917.6%28.285914.620.5%34.7Unsentenced Felons[A]

2,8503.217.1%27.42,5672.913.4%22.6Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]169109.833.3%53.4144139.030.6%51.8Sentenced Felons[C]31244.324.2%38.824842.118.5%31.3Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

6640.02.9%4.715258.311.9%20.1Boarded In[E]23915.35.0%8.025011.15.1%8.7Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

4,45512.9160.54,22014.7169.2Total Population92.8%173.097.8%173.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds92.8%97.8%Housed %of Beds

Report from electronically reported JPIS data Printed 06/15/00, Page 2 of 23

Page 153: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

*No Reporting 1998/99 : Ionia,Monroe,Oceana,Shiawassee, Wexford.

*No Reporting 1999: Arenac. No Jails: Luce,Oscoda. No Reporting 1998: Baraga,Bay,Jackson,Kalamazoo,Kent.

Dec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98ALPENARelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused 14812.87.8%3.81436.19.1%4.5Unsentenced Felons[A]7142.19.0%4.46661.77.7%3.8Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]

4776.119.0%9.336107.919.0%9.4Sentenced Felons[C]25426.234.4%16.823525.436.2%17.9Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

7099.229.9%14.66542.126.5%13.1Boarded In[E]32.0194.00.6%0.3Other[F]

Boarded Out349.00.8%0.4Sentenced Felons[G]

Sentenced Misd.[H]1,23616.648.91,14912.949.4Total Population

70.9%69.071.6%69.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds70.9%71.0%Housed %of Beds

Nov-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98ANTRIMRelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused

738.15.0%1.8854.83.2%1.1Unsentenced Felons[A]6531.37.8%2.86501.69.1%3.1Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]

5482.429.7%10.76466.335.9%12.2Sentenced Felons[C]36119.457.5%20.732620.551.8%17.6Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

Boarded In[E]114.0Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

1,14211.336.01,12511.034.0Total Population64.3%56.060.7%56.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds64.3%60.7%Housed %of Beds

thruAug-98thruJan-98ARENACRelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused

4101.84.5%1.3Unsentenced Felons[A]1928.46.6%1.9Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]

1315.03.5%1.0Sentenced Felons[C]1440.38.7%2.5Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

Boarded In[E]7207.076.7%22.0Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

7589.028.7Total Population75.5%38.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds75.5%Housed %of Beds

Oct-99thruMar-99thruBARAGARelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused

1268.813.9%2.1Unsentenced Felons[A]1052.813.9%2.1Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]

1152.721.2%3.2Sentenced Felons[C]5433.545.7%6.9Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

76.71.3%0.2Boarded In[E]2111.14.0%0.6Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

21018.115.1Total Population58.1%26.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds58.1%Housed %of Beds

Report from electronically reported JPIS data Printed 06/15/00, Page 3 of 23

Page 154: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

*No Reporting 1998/99 : Ionia,Monroe,Oceana,Shiawassee, Wexford.

*No Reporting 1999: Arenac. No Jails: Luce,Oscoda. No Reporting 1998: Baraga,Bay,Jackson,Kalamazoo,Kent.

Nov-99thruNov-99Feb-98thruJan-98BARRYRelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused

2317.513.5%3.6363.27.5%1.1Unsentenced Felons[A]1321.425.9%6.91501.019.9%2.9Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]

9135.728.2%7.5984.835.6%5.2Sentenced Felons[C]1645.328.6%7.6833.529.5%4.3Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

Boarded In[E]103.03.8%1.0172.97.5%1.1Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

19013.526.62206.114.6Total Population28.3%94.020.0%73.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds28.3%20.0%Housed %of Beds

Dec-99thruOct-99thruBAYRelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused 16425.229.9%59.5Unsentenced Felons[A]7576.127.4%54.5Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]

35119.014.8%29.4Sentenced Felons[C]11636.819.9%39.5Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

1741.46.3%12.6Boarded In[E]4510.21.7%3.3Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

1,13416.2198.8Total Population96.0%207.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds96.0%Housed %of Beds

Apr-99thruJan-99Oct-98thruJan-98BENZIERelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused

58.414.6%16.61439.112.9%6.8Unsentenced Felons[A]142.231.2%35.4385.538.2%20.2Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]

195.03.6%4.14.2%2.2Sentenced Felons[C]422.84.8%5.5920.37.8%4.1Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]629.829.6%33.61131.528.7%15.2Boarded In[E]

105.516.2%18.41613.18.3%4.4Other[F]Boarded Out

Sentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

4012.3113.68817.052.9Total Population241.7%47.0112.6%47.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds241.7%112.6%Housed %of Beds

Dec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98BERRIENRelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused 7737.86.6%24.27818.55.1%17.3Unsentenced Felons[A]

2,8284.59.3%34.32,8305.111.9%40.2Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]43582.126.9%98.850857.725.0%84.3Sentenced Felons[C]

1,75529.240.0%146.62,20222.940.4%136.3Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]313.70.0%0.132.3Boarded In[E]

91226.117.1%62.989722.717.5%59.1Other[F]Boarded Out

Sentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

6,70619.3366.97,22116.8337.2Total Population107.6%341.098.9%341.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds107.6%98.9%Housed %of Beds

Report from electronically reported JPIS data Printed 06/15/00, Page 4 of 23

Page 155: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

*No Reporting 1998/99 : Ionia,Monroe,Oceana,Shiawassee, Wexford.

*No Reporting 1999: Arenac. No Jails: Luce,Oscoda. No Reporting 1998: Baraga,Bay,Jackson,Kalamazoo,Kent.

Dec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98BRANCHRelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused 18216.86.9%5.222028.111.2%12.6Unsentenced Felons[A]

1,5312.312.2%9.21,9354.115.2%17.1Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]10671.721.9%16.58683.715.4%17.4Sentenced Felons[C]73325.658.8%44.348351.153.7%60.6Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

230.50.1%0.14638.54.3%4.9Boarded In[E]180.6421.00.2%0.2Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

2,59312.775.32,81217.0112.8Total Population54.6%138.081.7%138.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds54.6%81.7%Housed %of Beds

Dec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98CALHOUNRelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused

1,15914.99.8%47.01,38515.39.7%54.9Unsentenced Felons[A]5,4013.310.0%48.05,8162.88.3%47.4Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]

53979.918.5%89.262178.124.5%139.0Sentenced Felons[C]2,17529.934.4%165.42,22027.328.7%163.4Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]1,36136.627.0%129.91,75932.528.2%160.3Boarded In[E]

1393.90.3%1.42944.10.6%3.4Other[F]Boarded Out

Sentenced Felons[G]115.0Sentenced Misd.[H]

10,77518.0480.912,09516.9568.4Total Population80.1%600.094.7%600.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds80.1%94.7%Housed %of Beds

Aug-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98CASSRelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused 21915.48.4%8.937513.211.6%15.4Unsentenced Felons[A]7171.33.7%3.91,0962.66.4%8.4Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]18995.153.6%57.130778.748.1%63.6Sentenced Felons[C]37114.620.1%21.471411.617.6%23.3Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]23015.613.5%14.444917.715.2%20.1Boarded In[E]

354.80.6%0.6637.81.1%1.4Other[F]Boarded Out

11.0Sentenced Felons[G]317.30.2%0.217.0Sentenced Misd.[H]

1,76517.8106.53,00516.2132.2Total Population91.8%116.0114.0%116.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds91.6%114.0%Housed %of Beds

Nov-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98CHARLEVOIXRelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused

9012.110.1%2.21027.78.6%2.5Unsentenced Felons[A]6790.910.6%2.36741.410.3%3.0Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]

4656.930.7%6.76774.036.6%10.7Sentenced Felons[C]24912.841.7%9.123116.437.3%10.9Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

2025.56.9%1.52034.96.5%1.9Boarded In[E]220.5292.70.7%0.2Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

1,1067.221.81,12310.029.2Total Population87.2%25.0116.8%25.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds87.2%116.8%Housed %of Beds

Report from electronically reported JPIS data Printed 06/15/00, Page 5 of 23

Page 156: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

*No Reporting 1998/99 : Ionia,Monroe,Oceana,Shiawassee, Wexford.

*No Reporting 1999: Arenac. No Jails: Luce,Oscoda. No Reporting 1998: Baraga,Bay,Jackson,Kalamazoo,Kent.

Dec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98CHEBOYGANRelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused 16417.211.0%5.116441.619.8%7.9Unsentenced Felons[A]6284.016.1%7.562026.012.5%5.0Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]10553.229.9%13.94966.525.8%10.3Sentenced Felons[C]35815.429.7%13.817620.428.0%11.2Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

7220.711.6%5.4Boarded In[E]11.0Other[F]

Boarded Out350.30.6%0.313152.58.8%3.5Sentenced Felons[G]663.21.1%0.52226.45.3%2.1Sentenced Misd.[H]

1,33713.846.51,04431.040.0Total Population76.2%61.0190.5%21.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds74.9%163.8%Housed %of Beds

Dec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98CHIPPEWARelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused 1517.97.3%3.219014.415.3%6.8Unsentenced Felons[A]

1,0002.214.6%6.49982.714.0%6.2Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]7574.026.8%11.75451.423.9%10.6Sentenced Felons[C]

43918.851.3%22.429425.846.7%20.7Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]Boarded In[E]

1Other[F]Boarded Out

Sentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

1,66510.343.71,53710.344.3Total Population85.7%51.086.9%51.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds85.7%86.9%Housed %of Beds

Jun-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98CLARERelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused

9319.98.3%9.315421.911.0%7.9Unsentenced Felons[A]6818.125.6%28.69595.221.8%15.6Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]

4285.51.1%1.220207.913.9%10.0Sentenced Felons[C]1571.52.6%2.911035.016.6%11.9Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

70016.157.1%63.842716.329.4%21.1Boarded In[E]1368.45.4%6.04584.17.1%5.1Other[F]

Boarded Out148.00.1%0.1Sentenced Felons[G]22.5Sentenced Misd.[H]

1,62913.5111.82,13111.871.7Total Population141.5%79.0119.5%60.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds141.5%119.3%Housed %of Beds

Dec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98CLINTONRelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused 1375.11.4%2.21495.91.1%1.8Unsentenced Felons[A]8910.92.1%3.39390.91.8%2.9Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]12585.617.6%27.116167.417.2%27.9Sentenced Felons[C]74816.924.7%38.183916.522.4%36.4Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]49164.853.8%82.854364.257.2%92.9Boarded In[E]

861.70.3%0.4841.40.2%0.4Other[F]Boarded Out

0.1%0.1Sentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

2,47822.9154.02,71522.6162.3Total Population86.5%178.091.2%178.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds86.5%91.2%Housed %of Beds

Report from electronically reported JPIS data Printed 06/15/00, Page 6 of 23

Page 157: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

*No Reporting 1998/99 : Ionia,Monroe,Oceana,Shiawassee, Wexford.

*No Reporting 1999: Arenac. No Jails: Luce,Oscoda. No Reporting 1998: Baraga,Bay,Jackson,Kalamazoo,Kent.

Sep-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98CRAWFORDRelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused 10921.832.9%10.316519.723.9%8.5Unsentenced Felons[A]1945.616.3%5.12506.312.1%4.3Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]

2369.525.2%7.936114.226.1%9.3Sentenced Felons[C]1432.15.4%1.71641.93.7%1.3Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]4028.713.7%4.312331.530.3%10.8Boarded In[E]

1343.36.1%1.92061.43.9%1.4Other[F]Boarded Out

Sentenced Felons[G]123.00.3%0.1Sentenced Misd.[H]

51513.831.379617.335.6Total Population61.4%51.069.8%51.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds61.2%69.8%Housed %of Beds

Dec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98DELTARelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused 14225.221.9%9.514217.518.3%6.7Unsentenced Felons[A]9873.822.8%9.96022.816.1%5.9Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]

4995.629.5%12.861102.034.6%12.7Sentenced Felons[C]24819.324.0%10.418416.429.7%10.9Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

359.71.2%0.5821.11.4%0.5Boarded In[E]195.50.7%0.3181.2Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

1,44811.843.41,01513.436.7Total Population92.3%47.076.5%48.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds92.3%76.5%Housed %of Beds

Dec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98DICKINSONRelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused 1122.56.0%1.510712.811.0%2.9Unsentenced Felons[A]6791.19.6%2.45321.48.4%2.2Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]

7450.837.3%9.36959.941.1%10.8Sentenced Felons[C]32812.947.0%11.73819.639.2%10.3Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

Boarded In[E]29.0231.50.4%0.1Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

1,1957.624.91,0919.126.3Total Population36.6%68.038.7%68.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds36.6%38.7%Housed %of Beds

Dec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98EATONRelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused 66115.316.6%31.274015.115.4%29.4Unsentenced Felons[A]

2,1672.89.5%17.91,8752.37.1%13.5Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]33570.532.4%61.028166.128.3%54.2Sentenced Felons[C]92316.122.7%42.778013.614.7%28.2Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]43622.715.9%29.91,16419.932.9%63.0Boarded In[E]2945.92.9%5.52952.91.5%2.9Other[F]

Boarded Out1Sentenced Felons[G]

Sentenced Misd.[H]4,81613.8188.25,13613.4191.2Total Population

84.0%224.085.4%224.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds84.0%85.4%Housed %of Beds

Report from electronically reported JPIS data Printed 06/15/00, Page 7 of 23

Page 158: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

*No Reporting 1998/99 : Ionia,Monroe,Oceana,Shiawassee, Wexford.

*No Reporting 1999: Arenac. No Jails: Luce,Oscoda. No Reporting 1998: Baraga,Bay,Jackson,Kalamazoo,Kent.

Dec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98EMMETRelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused

9324.314.0%6.09926.414.7%7.1Unsentenced Felons[A]7666.533.0%14.25974.316.2%7.8Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]

4364.515.6%6.77188.131.1%15.0Sentenced Felons[C]24924.033.0%14.225719.934.0%16.4Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

1020.61.4%0.62712.01.5%0.7Boarded In[E]607.83.0%1.3567.92.5%1.2Other[F]

Boarded Out17.0Sentenced Felons[G]3Sentenced Misd.[H]

1,22113.743.01,11115.648.2Total Population79.6%54.098.4%49.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds79.6%98.4%Housed %of Beds

Dec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruOct-98GENESEERelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused

3,16123.738.3%217.965222.736.4%184.4Unsentenced Felons[A]4,5533.79.1%51.79943.87.8%39.4Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]1,06968.333.6%191.324861.138.5%194.9Sentenced Felons[C]1,37320.615.1%85.722525.411.9%60.3Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

2110.80.2%1.3110.00.0%0.1Boarded In[E]9039.43.7%21.33735.85.3%26.8Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

11,08018.2569.22,49316.7505.9Total Population98.1%580.087.2%580.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds98.1%87.2%Housed %of Beds

Oct-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98GLADWINRelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused 13017.814.0%6.319814.912.6%8.3Unsentenced Felons[A]8128.644.4%20.09358.234.4%22.7Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]

13175.89.6%4.348107.923.1%15.2Sentenced Felons[C]8167.64.2%1.911113.96.5%4.3Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

Boarded In[E]13531.627.8%12.517932.823.4%15.4Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

1,09815.645.01,37116.765.9Total Population62.5%72.091.5%72.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds62.5%91.5%Housed %of Beds

Mar-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98GOGEBICRelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused

1160.423.1%6.27228.530.8%7.6Unsentenced Felons[A]784.523.9%6.43452.715.4%3.8Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]

5196.832.1%8.62881.126.7%6.6Sentenced Felons[C]825.620.1%5.44631.819.8%4.9Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

36.30.4%0.1Boarded In[E]60.80.4%0.12611.21.6%0.4Other[F]

Boarded Out1248.00.4%0.12.8%0.7Sentenced Felons[G]

364.72.4%0.6Sentenced Misd.[H]10922.526.852313.824.7Total Population

111.7%24.0102.9%24.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds111.3%97.5%Housed %of Beds

Report from electronically reported JPIS data Printed 06/15/00, Page 8 of 23

Page 159: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

*No Reporting 1998/99 : Ionia,Monroe,Oceana,Shiawassee, Wexford.

*No Reporting 1999: Arenac. No Jails: Luce,Oscoda. No Reporting 1998: Baraga,Bay,Jackson,Kalamazoo,Kent.

Dec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98GRAND TRAVERSERelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused 3446.44.5%6.73424.12.7%4.0Unsentenced Felons[A]

2,3711.26.6%9.72,2170.84.2%6.2Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]22273.130.1%44.423580.035.7%52.5Sentenced Felons[C]

1,11425.152.1%76.71,08226.352.6%77.2Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]7034.34.8%7.06833.23.8%5.6Boarded In[E]

1407.41.9%2.81263.71.0%1.4Other[F]Boarded Out

Sentenced Felons[G]1Sentenced Misd.[H]

4,26212.4147.34,07013.1146.9Total Population92.6%159.092.4%159.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds92.6%92.4%Housed %of Beds

Dec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98GRATIOTRelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused 1187.34.7%2.6895.82.9%1.7Unsentenced Felons[A]7831.45.9%3.37771.56.1%3.6Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]

8555.523.4%13.110386.834.1%20.0Sentenced Felons[C]83716.365.1%36.468017.454.7%32.1Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

Boarded In[E]1Other[F]

Boarded Out1198.00.9%0.51147.00.3%0.2Sentenced Felons[G]

1137.61.9%1.1Sentenced Misd.[H]1,82511.355.91,66113.858.7Total Population

79.9%70.083.9%70.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds79.1%82.0%Housed %of Beds

Dec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98HILLSDALERelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused 19810.614.5%6.42416.710.5%4.8Unsentenced Felons[A]

1,2092.710.0%4.41,0434.110.9%5.0Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]8858.427.0%11.99061.233.1%15.2Sentenced Felons[C]

6429.539.1%17.254611.434.9%16.0Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]4323.07.3%3.27024.610.7%4.9Boarded In[E]1313.72.0%0.93Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

2,1938.144.01,9939.745.9Total Population65.7%67.068.5%67.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds65.7%68.5%Housed %of Beds

Dec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98HOUGHTONRelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused

5410.86.9%1.7717.85.8%1.8Unsentenced Felons[A]4120.75.3%1.33920.73.2%1.0Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]

4570.631.4%7.75378.335.7%11.1Sentenced Felons[C]23322.854.3%13.323619.846.9%14.6Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

1610.92.0%0.510010.98.4%2.6Boarded In[E]70.931.3Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

76712.424.585512.631.1Total Population45.4%54.057.6%54.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds45.4%57.6%Housed %of Beds

Report from electronically reported JPIS data Printed 06/15/00, Page 9 of 23

Page 160: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

*No Reporting 1998/99 : Ionia,Monroe,Oceana,Shiawassee, Wexford.

*No Reporting 1999: Arenac. No Jails: Luce,Oscoda. No Reporting 1998: Baraga,Bay,Jackson,Kalamazoo,Kent.

Aug-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98HURONRelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused

579.25.2%2.6898.04.2%2.2Unsentenced Felons[A]7111.512.9%6.51,0231.011.4%5.9Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]

3486.221.7%10.94771.619.8%10.3Sentenced Felons[C]26714.932.4%16.342915.634.9%18.1Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

6759.227.4%13.89864.129.7%15.4Boarded In[E]510.00.4%0.23Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

1,14110.950.31,68910.751.9Total Population77.4%65.079.8%65.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds77.4%79.8%Housed %of Beds

Dec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98INGHAMRelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused

1,21826.419.4%97.91,31127.016.6%94.4Unsentenced Felons[A]4,6737.925.9%130.74,3846.514.6%83.0Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]

86255.719.2%96.992356.826.0%147.6Sentenced Felons[C]3,74115.226.8%135.33,68219.332.0%181.7Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

36137.06.7%34.038940.78.2%46.6Boarded In[E]39711.62.1%10.835317.62.5%14.4Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

11,25217.0505.611,04219.0567.7Total Population91.6%552.0105.9%536.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds91.6%105.9%Housed %of Beds

thruthruIONIARelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused

Unsentenced Felons[A]Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]Sentenced Felons[C]Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]Boarded In[E]Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

Total Population# of Beds & Total %of Beds

Housed %of BedsDec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98IOSCO

RelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused 1657.44.6%2.416323.313.6%7.3Unsentenced Felons[A]8731.25.8%3.05722.98.0%4.3Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]

9675.732.2%16.77666.131.6%17.0Sentenced Felons[C]58617.553.6%27.833018.332.3%17.4Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

2026.23.9%2.0539.80.9%0.5Boarded In[E]24013.513.6%7.3Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

1,74011.751.91,38614.453.8Total Population82.4%63.085.4%63.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds82.4%85.4%Housed %of Beds

Report from electronically reported JPIS data Printed 06/15/00, Page 10 of 23

Page 161: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

*No Reporting 1998/99 : Ionia,Monroe,Oceana,Shiawassee, Wexford.

*No Reporting 1999: Arenac. No Jails: Luce,Oscoda. No Reporting 1998: Baraga,Bay,Jackson,Kalamazoo,Kent.

Dec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98IRONRelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused

4432.810.0%3.25923.015.6%4.5Unsentenced Felons[A]1917.110.6%3.42334.211.1%3.2Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]

4477.835.6%11.426143.529.5%8.5Sentenced Felons[C]29815.138.1%12.216624.439.2%11.3Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

35.757.60.3%0.1Boarded In[E]8164.15.6%1.8193.24.2%1.2Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

58820.532.050820.128.8Total Population66.7%48.090.0%32.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds66.7%90.0%Housed %of Beds

Dec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98ISABELLARelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused 28813.16.8%11.532710.76.0%10.0Unsentenced Felons[A]

2,2112.28.7%14.82,0522.48.6%14.4Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]12594.216.2%27.69991.413.9%23.4Sentenced Felons[C]49631.223.2%39.547928.421.8%36.5Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

1,81815.544.7%76.01,86416.149.2%82.6Boarded In[E]3550.70.5%0.82790.90.5%0.9Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]

1Sentenced Misd.[H]5,29412.2170.25,10012.0167.8Total Population

121.6%140.0119.9%140.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds121.6%119.9%Housed %of Beds

Dec-99thruOct-99thruJACKSONRelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused 37914.638.4%69.0Unsentenced Felons[A]2964.513.0%23.4Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]

7641.827.2%48.8Sentenced Felons[C]9726.018.9%34.0Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]1418.11.1%1.9Boarded In[E]752.11.4%2.6Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

93713.8179.7Total Population93.6%192.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds93.6%Housed %of Beds

Nov-99thruJan-99thruKALAMAZOORelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused

1,85230.421.0%140.5Unsentenced Felons[A]2,06714.112.7%84.6Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]

Sentenced Felons[C]Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

10849.82.5%16.7Boarded In[E]1,04913.763.8%425.8Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

5,07620.7667.6Total Population204.2%327.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds204.2%Housed %of Beds

Report from electronically reported JPIS data Printed 06/15/00, Page 11 of 23

Page 162: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

*No Reporting 1998/99 : Ionia,Monroe,Oceana,Shiawassee, Wexford.

*No Reporting 1999: Arenac. No Jails: Luce,Oscoda. No Reporting 1998: Baraga,Bay,Jackson,Kalamazoo,Kent.

Dec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98KALKASKARelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused

819.98.8%3.28914.27.1%2.9Unsentenced Felons[A]6772.211.3%4.16271.26.8%2.8Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]

4983.424.5%8.96082.528.8%11.8Sentenced Felons[C]31523.853.8%19.629028.654.1%22.2Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

139.21.1%0.42131.02.9%1.2Boarded In[E]461.50.5%0.2311.50.2%0.1Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

1,18111.936.41,11814.341.0Total Population61.7%59.069.5%59.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds61.7%69.5%Housed %of Beds

Dec-99thruNov-99thruKENTRelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused 98325.037.1%413.2Unsentenced Felons[A]

2,9072.311.0%122.1Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]186103.728.2%314.1Sentenced Felons[C]60120.318.3%204.4Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

0.1%1.0Boarded In[E]5.4%59.9Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

4,67713.41,114.7Total Population94.9%1,174.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds94.9%Housed %of Beds

Sep-99thruMar-99Oct-98thruJan-98KEWEENAWRelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused

1Unsentenced Felons[A]92.337.5%0.6180.4Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]

2237.564.5%2.0Sentenced Felons[C]513.262.5%1.0731.129.0%0.9Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

14.0Boarded In[E]1510.86.5%0.2Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

155.81.63422.33.1Total Population26.7%6.051.7%6.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds26.7%51.7%Housed %of Beds

Sep-99thruMar-99Dec-98thruJan-98LAKERelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused

4721.327.5%4.26315.915.4%3.5Unsentenced Felons[A]1766.235.9%5.57988.367.4%15.3Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]

9105.916.3%2.599.34.8%1.1Sentenced Felons[C]2617.415.7%2.44611.77.0%1.6Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

711.72.6%0.4409.94.4%1.0Boarded In[E]212.92.0%0.3282.40.9%0.2Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

28612.715.39848.822.7Total Population40.3%38.059.7%38.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds40.3%59.7%Housed %of Beds

Report from electronically reported JPIS data Printed 06/15/00, Page 12 of 23

Page 163: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

*No Reporting 1998/99 : Ionia,Monroe,Oceana,Shiawassee, Wexford.

*No Reporting 1999: Arenac. No Jails: Luce,Oscoda. No Reporting 1998: Baraga,Bay,Jackson,Kalamazoo,Kent.

Aug-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruOct-98LAPEERRelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused 29514.216.0%15.39714.314.2%14.7Unsentenced Felons[A]

1,1792.010.8%10.33341.48.8%9.1Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]10181.125.1%24.05243.332.4%33.6Sentenced Felons[C]37319.124.5%23.417313.127.0%28.0Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]10241.216.1%15.42430.412.1%12.5Boarded In[E]3274.67.5%7.21362.55.5%5.7Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

2,37711.695.68169.1103.6Total Population77.7%123.084.2%123.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds77.7%84.2%Housed %of Beds

Dec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98LEELANAURelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused

627.96.7%1.69015.012.4%3.0Unsentenced Felons[A]3111.35.5%1.33731.35.8%1.4Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]

4140.121.0%5.03755.220.7%5.0Sentenced Felons[C]2027.516.4%3.91999.321.5%5.2Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

234.51.3%0.323.5Boarded In[E]430.70.4%0.1534.31.7%0.4Other[F]

Boarded Out26118.629.8%7.12278.423.6%5.7Sentenced Felons[G]2565.818.9%4.53250.314.5%3.5Sentenced Misd.[H]

73312.223.880811.524.2Total Population119.0%20.0121.0%20.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds

61.0%75.0%Housed %of BedsDec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98LENAWEE

RelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused 45510.37.1%12.049317.112.6%21.5Unsentenced Felons[A]

1,2793.16.0%10.21,1842.86.4%10.9Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]52743.936.4%61.946141.132.7%55.7Sentenced Felons[C]

1,56316.443.2%73.51,31319.540.1%68.2Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]17425.46.7%11.421719.47.8%13.2Boarded In[E]1592.40.6%1.11581.20.4%0.6Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

4,15715.0170.13,82615.9170.1Total Population109.0%156.0109.0%156.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds109.0%109.0%Housed %of Beds

Dec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98LIVINGSTONRelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused 58812.110.6%15.852913.413.9%21.7Unsentenced Felons[A]

2,0732.610.1%15.12,0682.710.4%16.2Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]37155.834.4%51.539455.635.4%55.4Sentenced Felons[C]

1,02922.039.7%59.31,01823.139.8%62.3Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]3018.40.7%1.0136.70.5%0.8Boarded In[E]2711.90.5%0.8230.90.1%0.1Other[F]

Boarded Out1680.42.8%4.2Sentenced Felons[G]1348.51.2%1.8Sentenced Misd.[H]

4,14714.2149.54,04514.4156.5Total Population72.9%205.076.3%205.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds70.0%76.3%Housed %of Beds

Report from electronically reported JPIS data Printed 06/15/00, Page 13 of 23

Page 164: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

*No Reporting 1998/99 : Ionia,Monroe,Oceana,Shiawassee, Wexford.

*No Reporting 1999: Arenac. No Jails: Luce,Oscoda. No Reporting 1998: Baraga,Bay,Jackson,Kalamazoo,Kent.

thruthruLUCERelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused

Unsentenced Felons[A]Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]Sentenced Felons[C]Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]Boarded In[E]Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

Total Population# of Beds & Total %of Beds

Housed %of BedsAug-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98MACKINAC

RelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused 4616.514.3%3.66717.616.6%3.6Unsentenced Felons[A]

1931.47.1%1.82623.211.1%2.4Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]3169.534.1%8.64645.630.9%6.7Sentenced Felons[C]9611.419.0%4.814613.924.4%5.3Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

7109.313.1%3.31548.211.5%2.5Boarded In[E]1Other[F]

Boarded Out2201.09.1%2.3337.73.7%0.8Sentenced Felons[G]1328.03.2%0.828.51.8%0.4Sentenced Misd.[H]

37715.325.254112.921.7Total Population90.0%28.077.5%28.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds78.9%73.2%Housed %of Beds

Dec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98MACOMBRelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused

6,36426.733.2%437.56,50925.933.6%472.6Unsentenced Felons[A]10,3173.68.2%108.110,0103.57.3%102.5Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]

1,87984.631.8%419.92,12484.434.8%490.2Sentenced Felons[C]3,44735.726.5%349.03,62133.424.3%342.7Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

367.70.3%4.12127.50.0%0.3Boarded In[E]22.0Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

22,01022.21,318.622,26822.61,408.3Total Population93.0%1,418.0115.6%1,218.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds93.0%115.6%Housed %of Beds

Dec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98MANISTEERelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused 15322.425.6%9.917918.821.3%9.5Unsentenced Felons[A]6062.312.2%4.75651.76.7%3.0Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]

6661.430.3%11.76977.132.1%14.3Sentenced Felons[C]16020.827.2%10.520622.634.6%15.4Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

1930.24.7%1.83023.54.5%2.0Boarded In[E]190.6432.60.7%0.3Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

1,02312.538.61,09213.844.5Total Population74.2%52.089.0%50.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds74.2%89.0%Housed %of Beds

Report from electronically reported JPIS data Printed 06/15/00, Page 14 of 23

Page 165: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

*No Reporting 1998/99 : Ionia,Monroe,Oceana,Shiawassee, Wexford.

*No Reporting 1999: Arenac. No Jails: Luce,Oscoda. No Reporting 1998: Baraga,Bay,Jackson,Kalamazoo,Kent.

Dec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98MARQUETTERelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused 17319.113.9%10.119014.312.7%9.2Unsentenced Felons[A]9161.35.7%4.19301.76.6%4.8Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]11093.435.3%25.610492.536.4%26.3Sentenced Felons[C]54016.734.2%24.848417.332.3%23.3Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

5254.09.5%6.93946.49.3%6.7Boarded In[E]739.11.4%1.0826.52.6%1.9Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

1,86414.672.51,82913.572.2Total Population90.6%80.090.3%80.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds90.6%90.3%Housed %of Beds

Dec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98MASONRelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused 15013.515.9%6.014512.612.8%5.0Unsentenced Felons[A]2872.55.6%2.12363.35.9%2.3Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]22038.454.9%20.719536.854.1%21.2Sentenced Felons[C]4085.917.8%6.73956.417.6%6.9Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

1448.52.1%0.82127.85.6%2.2Boarded In[E]374.13.7%1.4358.74.1%1.6Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

1,11612.937.71,02712.939.2Total Population117.8%32.0115.3%34.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds117.8%115.3%Housed %of Beds

Dec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98MECOSTARelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused 21111.117.5%8.22488.611.3%5.4Unsentenced Felons[A]

1,2633.025.4%11.99943.219.0%9.1Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]21228.829.5%13.817545.943.0%20.6Sentenced Felons[C]26116.727.6%12.922420.826.7%12.8Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

Boarded In[E]Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

1,9478.646.81,64110.947.9Total Population70.9%66.072.6%66.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds70.9%72.6%Housed %of Beds

Dec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98MENOMINEERelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused

654.61.9%0.7644.52.2%0.9Unsentenced Felons[A]3941.35.0%1.83871.72.9%1.2Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]

61102.734.5%12.475110.052.4%21.5Sentenced Felons[C]24930.756.3%20.220330.642.2%17.3Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

635.01.7%0.6Boarded In[E]97.80.6%0.21233.50.2%0.1Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

78419.135.974121.341.0Total Population87.6%41.0100.0%41.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds87.6%100.0%Housed %of Beds

Report from electronically reported JPIS data Printed 06/15/00, Page 15 of 23

Page 166: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

*No Reporting 1998/99 : Ionia,Monroe,Oceana,Shiawassee, Wexford.

*No Reporting 1999: Arenac. No Jails: Luce,Oscoda. No Reporting 1998: Baraga,Bay,Jackson,Kalamazoo,Kent.

Dec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98MIDLANDRelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused 3598.28.1%8.03668.77.6%8.8Unsentenced Felons[A]

1,8121.17.3%7.21,6631.04.3%5.0Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]20095.244.3%43.822488.745.9%53.2Sentenced Felons[C]38528.327.2%26.938728.227.1%31.4Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

14.0Boarded In[E]2Other[F]

Boarded Out3095.87.9%7.843110.610.0%11.6Sentenced Felons[G]2569.35.2%5.13974.55.1%5.9Sentenced Misd.[H]

2,81314.098.82,72315.9115.9Total Population100.8%98.0118.3%98.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds

87.7%100.4%Housed %of BedsAug-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98MISSAUKEE

RelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused 556.19.7%1.97513.410.4%2.8Unsentenced Felons[A]

1871.05.1%1.02711.54.9%1.3Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]3976.344.4%8.75489.154.9%14.7Sentenced Felons[C]5929.731.6%6.27128.723.1%6.2Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

927.27.7%1.51526.94.1%1.1Boarded In[E]591.41.5%0.3653.62.6%0.7Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

40813.719.655116.126.8Total Population81.7%24.0111.7%24.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds81.7%111.7%Housed %of Beds

thruthruMONROERelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused

Unsentenced Felons[A]Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]Sentenced Felons[C]Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]Boarded In[E]Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

Total Population# of Beds & Total %of Beds

Housed %of BedsDec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98MONTCALM

RelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused 23013.49.1%8.924914.69.6%9.6Unsentenced Felons[A]

1,1072.911.8%11.51,0414.312.2%12.2Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]18663.133.7%32.921678.446.1%46.0Sentenced Felons[C]39433.639.9%39.035531.230.0%29.9Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

1430.61.9%1.9913.80.3%0.3Boarded In[E]1509.33.6%3.51273.11.8%1.8Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

2,08115.997.71,99718.399.8Total Population113.6%86.0116.0%86.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds113.6%116.0%Housed %of Beds

Report from electronically reported JPIS data Printed 06/15/00, Page 16 of 23

Page 167: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

*No Reporting 1998/99 : Ionia,Monroe,Oceana,Shiawassee, Wexford.

*No Reporting 1999: Arenac. No Jails: Luce,Oscoda. No Reporting 1998: Baraga,Bay,Jackson,Kalamazoo,Kent.

Apr-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98MONTMORENCYRelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused

230.76.8%1.9801.93.0%1.0Unsentenced Felons[A]1350.83.2%0.93560.93.0%1.0Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]

3103.712.9%3.61860.19.1%3.0Sentenced Felons[C]2829.522.9%6.45129.313.4%4.4Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]5652.654.1%15.121734.871.4%23.5Boarded In[E]

1Other[F]Boarded Out

Sentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

24617.127.972214.732.9Total Population69.8%40.082.3%40.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds69.8%82.3%Housed %of Beds

Dec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98MUSKEGONRelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused

1,72629.555.0%111.52,29329.160.3%182.0Unsentenced Felons[A]4,3925.027.8%56.34,3275.222.9%69.2Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]

20659.113.8%27.924852.912.5%37.6Sentenced Felons[C]16213.22.9%5.824916.83.8%11.5Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

103.00.0%0.1322.70.1%0.2Boarded In[E]715.70.5%1.11084.80.4%1.3Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

6,56713.3202.77,25714.8301.8Total Population59.8%339.0123.7%244.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds59.8%123.7%Housed %of Beds

Dec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98NEWAYGORelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused 23518.96.3%9.737217.010.2%17.9Unsentenced Felons[A]

1,9902.69.7%15.01,7182.97.8%13.7Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]96119.417.4%26.887116.016.0%28.2Sentenced Felons[C]

18443.114.0%21.620349.414.9%26.2Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]70840.851.4%79.379436.144.9%79.0Boarded In[E]1047.21.2%1.813839.86.1%10.8Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]

1Sentenced Misd.[H]3,31817.7154.23,31219.8175.8Total Population

72.7%212.082.9%212.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds72.7%82.9%Housed %of Beds

Dec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98OAKLANDRelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused

7,49366.073.2%1,366.58,01260.072.7%1,294.6Unsentenced Felons[A]12,39913.124.7%460.411,89012.322.6%402.2Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]

Sentenced Felons[C]Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]Boarded In[E]

1,0604.10.6%11.98124.20.5%9.1Other[F]Boarded Out

39198.21.4%25.6183179.83.8%66.9Sentenced Felons[G]850.90.1%2.55964.60.4%7.6Sentenced Misd.[H]

20,99931.91,866.920,95631.91,780.4Total Population112.7%1,656.0106.9%1,665.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds111.0%102.5%Housed %of Beds

Report from electronically reported JPIS data Printed 06/15/00, Page 17 of 23

Page 168: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

*No Reporting 1998/99 : Ionia,Monroe,Oceana,Shiawassee, Wexford.

*No Reporting 1999: Arenac. No Jails: Luce,Oscoda. No Reporting 1998: Baraga,Bay,Jackson,Kalamazoo,Kent.

thruthruOCEANARelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused

Unsentenced Felons[A]Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]Sentenced Felons[C]Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]Boarded In[E]Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

Total Population# of Beds & Total %of Beds

Housed %of BedsDec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98OGEMAW

RelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused 12740.416.0%5.32168.418.9%8.0Unsentenced Felons[A]8151.18.7%2.97884.39.0%3.8Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]

58101.937.0%12.36361.032.1%13.6Sentenced Felons[C]26317.333.1%11.030715.433.5%14.2Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

515.40.6%0.21340.43.1%1.3Boarded In[E]1214.14.5%1.51852.43.3%1.4Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]

216.50.2%0.1Sentenced Misd.[H]1,38912.333.21,5749.442.4Total Population

127.7%26.0163.1%26.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds127.7%162.7%Housed %of Beds

Dec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98ONTONAGONRelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused

327.813.4%1.14120.321.0%2.1Unsentenced Felons[A]2333.626.8%2.22742.626.0%2.6Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]

11103.232.9%2.71095.732.0%3.2Sentenced Felons[C]3129.326.8%2.22234.321.0%2.1Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

Boarded In[E]111.0Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

30810.18.23489.410.0Total Population43.2%19.052.6%19.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds43.2%52.6%Housed %of Beds

Dec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98OSCEOLARelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused

7512.67.7%3.010816.916.2%5.1Unsentenced Felons[A]5834.720.2%7.96753.420.3%6.4Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]

8855.732.1%12.64680.022.2%7.0Sentenced Felons[C]34517.840.1%15.715530.941.3%13.0Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

Boarded In[E]161.0Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

1,09213.439.299012.731.5Total Population53.0%74.076.8%41.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds53.0%76.8%Housed %of Beds

Report from electronically reported JPIS data Printed 06/15/00, Page 18 of 23

Page 169: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

*No Reporting 1998/99 : Ionia,Monroe,Oceana,Shiawassee, Wexford.

*No Reporting 1999: Arenac. No Jails: Luce,Oscoda. No Reporting 1998: Baraga,Bay,Jackson,Kalamazoo,Kent.

thruthruOSCODARelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused

Unsentenced Felons[A]Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]Sentenced Felons[C]Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]Boarded In[E]Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

Total Population# of Beds & Total %of Beds

Housed %of BedsDec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98OTSEGO

RelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused 1244.35.2%2.2986.94.3%1.6Unsentenced Felons[A]6601.18.1%3.45450.94.9%1.8Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]

6285.036.0%15.26655.731.0%11.5Sentenced Felons[C]29225.645.5%19.229818.145.8%17.0Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

325.70.2%0.11224.61.6%0.6Boarded In[E]153.50.2%0.13032.06.2%2.3Other[F]

Boarded Out542.81.7%0.74205.04.6%1.7Sentenced Felons[G]

1142.33.1%1.3446.01.6%0.6Sentenced Misd.[H]1,17212.642.21,05711.837.1Total Population

124.1%34.0109.1%34.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds118.2%102.4%Housed %of Beds

Dec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98OTTAWARelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused 88415.215.9%41.181513.814.8%34.5Unsentenced Felons[A]

4,1027.431.7%81.93,3296.728.1%65.3Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]34165.722.8%59.035865.630.1%69.9Sentenced Felons[C]

1,64116.128.5%73.61,44514.725.7%59.8Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]Boarded In[E]

2834.51.1%2.91872.11.3%3.0Other[F]Boarded Out

Sentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

6,99613.4258.55,96513.3232.5Total Population70.6%366.0114.0%204.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds70.6%114.0%Housed %of Beds

Dec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98PRESQUE ISLERelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused

642.23.4%0.5528.25.0%1.0Unsentenced Felons[A]2411.17.5%1.12422.07.4%1.5Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]

20132.742.5%6.211101.220.8%4.2Sentenced Felons[C]7932.043.8%6.48928.338.6%7.8Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]1334.82.1%0.36528.628.2%5.7Boarded In[E]104.30.7%0.190.4Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

42714.214.646813.720.2Total Population63.5%23.087.8%23.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds63.5%87.8%Housed %of Beds

Report from electronically reported JPIS data Printed 06/15/00, Page 19 of 23

Page 170: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

*No Reporting 1998/99 : Ionia,Monroe,Oceana,Shiawassee, Wexford.

*No Reporting 1999: Arenac. No Jails: Luce,Oscoda. No Reporting 1998: Baraga,Bay,Jackson,Kalamazoo,Kent.

Dec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98ROSCOMMONRelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused 1157.14.2%2.31584.63.5%1.7Unsentenced Felons[A]7791.04.7%2.67271.04.5%2.2Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]

7973.025.1%13.87986.640.9%20.0Sentenced Felons[C]16820.115.8%8.79727.217.6%8.6Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]48219.847.2%25.924522.631.3%15.3Boarded In[E]

713.51.3%0.7380.60.2%0.1Other[F]Boarded Out

1175.01.1%0.6286.50.8%0.4Sentenced Felons[G]615.20.5%0.3562.01.2%0.6Sentenced Misd.[H]

1,70112.254.91,35112.548.9Total Population61.0%90.071.9%68.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds60.0%70.4%Housed %of Beds

Oct-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98SAGINAWRelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused

1,85639.935.3%220.02,12837.534.7%218.8Unsentenced Felons[A]6,1506.721.1%131.45,9615.616.1%101.7Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]

44990.920.1%125.159477.320.1%126.4Sentenced Felons[C]1,40324.118.7%116.52,28823.223.1%145.2Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

4997.61.6%10.26888.52.5%16.0Boarded In[E]28017.23.0%18.956414.03.4%21.6Other[F]

Boarded Out1127.00.1%0.4Sentenced Felons[G]425.80.0%0.31226.00.0%0.2Sentenced Misd.[H]

10,19219.6622.811,60419.5629.9Total Population128.9%483.0154.0%409.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds128.8%154.0%Housed %of Beds

Dec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98ST. CLAIRRelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused 52835.927.5%59.760133.424.3%53.9Unsentenced Felons[A]18122.84.3%9.421524.96.5%14.4Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]27498.517.8%38.621153.414.4%31.9Sentenced Felons[C]25732.69.6%20.920828.07.5%16.6Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]11116.02.4%5.114126.74.2%9.2Boarded In[E]

23.01511.50.2%0.5Other[F]Boarded Out

175124.325.9%56.2196105.528.7%63.5Sentenced Felons[G]12278.012.5%27.112993.914.2%31.4Sentenced Misd.[H]

1,65055.5217.01,71646.2221.4Total Population145.6%149.0153.8%144.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds

89.7%87.8%Housed %of BedsDec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98ST. JOSEPH

RelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused 42913.411.5%13.849811.811.1%16.3Unsentenced Felons[A]

1,5542.07.7%9.31,6642.68.4%12.3Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]26386.039.8%47.9244115.647.9%70.3Sentenced Felons[C]

1,01616.032.2%38.793414.826.6%39.1Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]15225.98.5%10.29130.95.8%8.5Boarded In[E]

275.90.3%0.4235.20.2%0.3Other[F]Boarded Out

Sentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

3,44115.0120.33,45415.9146.8Total Population84.1%143.0102.7%143.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds84.1%102.7%Housed %of Beds

Report from electronically reported JPIS data Printed 06/15/00, Page 20 of 23

Page 171: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

*No Reporting 1998/99 : Ionia,Monroe,Oceana,Shiawassee, Wexford.

*No Reporting 1999: Arenac. No Jails: Luce,Oscoda. No Reporting 1998: Baraga,Bay,Jackson,Kalamazoo,Kent.

Dec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98SANILACRelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused 12911.64.8%4.211611.13.5%3.6Unsentenced Felons[A]

1,0647.824.2%21.41,1237.024.2%24.7Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]8236.69.2%8.19040.99.6%9.8Sentenced Felons[C]

17565.234.1%30.119553.329.9%30.5Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]33426.826.7%23.639828.532.5%33.1Boarded In[E]1861.61.0%0.91250.70.3%0.3Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

1,97017.088.32,04716.9102.0Total Population74.2%119.085.7%119.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds74.2%85.7%Housed %of Beds

Dec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98SCHOOLCRAFTRelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused

3010.75.4%0.83514.28.0%1.1Unsentenced Felons[A]1243.712.8%1.91941.35.8%0.8Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]

3934.126.2%3.94846.437.7%5.2Sentenced Felons[C]11512.428.2%4.26217.321.7%3.0Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

3940.527.5%4.13642.026.8%3.7Boarded In[E]331.0Other[F]

Boarded Out11Sentenced Felons[G]321.0Sentenced Misd.[H]

35414.514.938114.613.8Total Population67.7%22.062.7%22.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds67.7%62.7%Housed %of Beds

thruthruSHIAWASSEERelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused

Unsentenced Felons[A]Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]Sentenced Felons[C]Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]Boarded In[E]Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

Total Population# of Beds & Total %of Beds

Housed %of BedsDec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98TUSCOLA

RelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused 2037.06.2%3.82478.28.8%5.8Unsentenced Felons[A]

1,8931.110.4%6.41,7071.411.1%7.3Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]13098.044.2%27.212585.349.8%32.8Sentenced Felons[C]47319.638.9%23.937317.527.5%18.1Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

216.50.2%0.1437.30.6%0.4Boarded In[E]910.60.2%0.1608.32.1%1.4Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

2,7109.561.52,5168.965.8Total Population76.9%80.082.3%80.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds76.9%82.3%Housed %of Beds

Report from electronically reported JPIS data Printed 06/15/00, Page 21 of 23

Page 172: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

*No Reporting 1998/99 : Ionia,Monroe,Oceana,Shiawassee, Wexford.

*No Reporting 1999: Arenac. No Jails: Luce,Oscoda. No Reporting 1998: Baraga,Bay,Jackson,Kalamazoo,Kent.

Dec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruSep-98VAN BURENRelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused 5997.415.9%22.12077.516.8%15.9Unsentenced Felons[A]

2,0311.512.9%17.94921.39.5%9.0Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]33854.943.6%60.710328.142.5%40.3Sentenced Felons[C]67316.226.3%36.621610.725.8%24.5Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

3311.40.7%1.01712.52.0%1.9Boarded In[E]4312.30.6%0.9296.33.5%3.3Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

3,71710.2139.21,0647.394.9Total Population131.3%106.089.5%106.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds131.3%89.5%Housed %of Beds

Dec-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98WASHTENAWRelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused

1,73013.025.1%77.01,97012.121.4%64.7Unsentenced Felons[A]3,8613.311.5%35.44,6442.512.1%36.5Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]

46598.736.3%111.243291.837.9%114.4Sentenced Felons[C]1,34720.023.0%70.41,44817.123.8%71.8Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

13420.72.6%7.914118.22.6%7.8Boarded In[E]3614.01.5%4.64476.92.2%6.5Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

7,89814.2306.59,08211.6301.7Total Population94.9%323.0106.2%284.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds94.9%106.2%Housed %of Beds

Oct-99thruJan-99Dec-98thruJan-98WAYNERelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused

14,33027.750.9%1,367.816,02929.847.4%1,306.8Unsentenced Felons[A]5,7477.75.1%137.46,4456.94.6%127.0Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]3,14786.630.3%815.83,69396.434.4%947.8Sentenced Felons[C]4,82419.511.4%307.15,26122.311.5%316.9Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]

Boarded In[E]88618.52.3%60.767630.12.1%56.6Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

28,93428.52,688.832,10431.62,755.1Total Population93.6%2,874.095.9%2,874.0# of Beds & Total %of Beds93.6%95.9%Housed %of Beds

thruthruWEXFORDRelsavLOS% of ADPADPRelsavLOS% of ADPADPHoused

Unsentenced Felons[A]Unsentenced Misdemeanants[B]Sentenced Felons[C]Sentenced Misdemeanants[D]Boarded In[E]Other[F]

Boarded OutSentenced Felons[G]Sentenced Misd.[H]

Total Population# of Beds & Total %of Beds

Housed %of Beds

Report from electronically reported JPIS data Printed 06/15/00, Page 22 of 23

Page 173: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Individuals Determined PA-511 Eligible during Fiscal Year 99Offender

CountLegal StatusCrime ClassCountyCCAB

Appendix E Individuals Determined P.A. 511 Eligible During Fiscal Year

Page 174: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Individuals Determined PA-511 Eligible during Fiscal Year 99Offender

CountLegal StatusCrime ClassCountyCCAB1UnsentencedFelonyALLEGANAllegan/Barry

124SentencedFelonyALLEGANAllegan/Barry9SentencedMisdemeanorALLEGANAllegan/Barry2SentencedFederalALLEGANAllegan/Barry1UnsentencedFelonyBARRYAllegan/Barry

81SentencedFelonyBARRYAllegan/Barry1UnsentencedMisdemeanorBARRYAllegan/Barry6SentencedMisdemeanorBARRYAllegan/Barry2UnsentencedFelonyBAYBay

301SentencedFelonyBAYBay1UnsentencedMisdemeanorBAYBay

443SentencedMisdemeanorBAYBay1SentencedNot ReportedBAYBay

69SentencedFelonyBERRIENBerrien234SentencedMisdemeanorBERRIENBerrien

1Not ReportedMisdemeanorBERRIENBerrien81SentencedFelonyCALHOUNCalhoun1UnsentencedMisdemeanorCALHOUNCalhoun

13SentencedMisdemeanorCALHOUNCalhoun15UnsentencedFelonyCASSCass

128SentencedFelonyCASSCass41UnsentencedMisdemeanorCASSCass58SentencedMisdemeanorCASSCass1SentencedCivilCASSCass4SentencedFelonyALGERCentral UP2UnsentencedMisdemeanorALGERCentral UP

33SentencedMisdemeanorALGERCentral UP16SentencedFelonySCHOOLCRAFTCentral UP1UnsentencedMisdemeanorSCHOOLCRAFTCentral UP

56SentencedMisdemeanorSCHOOLCRAFTCentral UP32SentencedFelonyCLINTONClinton2Not ReportedFelonyCLINTONClinton

99SentencedMisdemeanorCLINTONClinton2Not ReportedMisdemeanorCLINTONClinton1Not ReportedCivilCLINTONClinton1Not ReportedNot ReportedCLINTONClinton

52UnsentencedFelonyCHIPPEWAEastern UP23SentencedFelonyCHIPPEWAEastern UP1Not ReportedFelonyCHIPPEWAEastern UP

36UnsentencedMisdemeanorCHIPPEWAEastern UP101SentencedMisdemeanorCHIPPEWAEastern UP

6Not ReportedMisdemeanorCHIPPEWAEastern UP5Not ReportedNot ReportedCHIPPEWAEastern UP1UnsentencedFelonyLUCEEastern UP4SentencedFelonyLUCEEastern UP7UnsentencedMisdemeanorLUCEEastern UP

31SentencedMisdemeanorLUCEEastern UP11UnsentencedFelonyMACKINACEastern UP10SentencedFelonyMACKINACEastern UP10UnsentencedMisdemeanorMACKINACEastern UP

Page 175: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Individuals Determined PA-511 Eligible during Fiscal Year 99Offender

CountLegal StatusCrime ClassCountyCCAB27SentencedMisdemeanorMACKINACEastern UP1Not ReportedMisdemeanorMACKINACEastern UP1SentencedFederalMACKINACEastern UP1SentencedCivilMACKINACEastern UP1Not ReportedNot ReportedMACKINACEastern UP2UnsentencedFelonyEATONEaton

94SentencedFelonyEATONEaton17SentencedMisdemeanorEATONEaton

178UnsentencedFelonyGENESEEGenesee408SentencedFelonyGENESEEGenesee

2UnsentencedMisdemeanorGENESEEGenesee140SentencedMisdemeanorGENESEEGenesee

1UnsentencedFederalGENESEEGenesee1SentencedFelonyGRATIOTGratiot8UnsentencedFelonyHURONHuron

17SentencedFelonyHURONHuron41UnsentencedMisdemeanorHURONHuron81SentencedMisdemeanorHURONHuron2UnsentencedNot ReportedHURONHuron3SentencedNot ReportedHURONHuron5UnsentencedFelonyINGHAMIngham County/Lansing

285SentencedFelonyINGHAMIngham County/Lansing6SentencedMisdemeanorINGHAMIngham County/Lansing1UnsentencedFelonyIONIAIonia/Montcalm

54SentencedFelonyIONIAIonia/Montcalm4Not ReportedFelonyIONIAIonia/Montcalm1UnsentencedMisdemeanorIONIAIonia/Montcalm

17SentencedMisdemeanorIONIAIonia/Montcalm1Not ReportedNot ReportedIONIAIonia/Montcalm

28SentencedFelonyMONTCALMIonia/Montcalm155SentencedMisdemeanorMONTCALMIonia/Montcalm

2SentencedNot ReportedMONTCALMIonia/Montcalm42SentencedFelonyISABELLAIsabella36SentencedMisdemeanorISABELLAIsabella1SentencedNot ReportedISABELLAIsabella6UnsentencedFelonyJACKSONJackson

132SentencedFelonyJACKSONJackson1UnsentencedMisdemeanorJACKSONJackson

310SentencedMisdemeanorJACKSONJackson173UnsentencedFelonyKALAMAZOOKalamazoo397SentencedFelonyKALAMAZOOKalamazoo

3Not ReportedFelonyKALAMAZOOKalamazoo80UnsentencedMisdemeanorKALAMAZOOKalamazoo98SentencedMisdemeanorKALAMAZOOKalamazoo3Not ReportedMisdemeanorKALAMAZOOKalamazoo1UnsentencedCivilKALAMAZOOKalamazoo

34SentencedCivilKALAMAZOOKalamazoo6Not ReportedNot ReportedKALAMAZOOKalamazoo

Page 176: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Individuals Determined PA-511 Eligible during Fiscal Year 99Offender

CountLegal StatusCrime ClassCountyCCAB357UnsentencedFelonyKENTKent811SentencedFelonyKENTKent

2Not ReportedFelonyKENTKent1UnsentencedMisdemeanorKENTKent

11SentencedFelonyLAKELake1UnsentencedMisdemeanorLAKELake

35SentencedMisdemeanorLAKELake85SentencedFelonyLAPEERLapeer/Tuscola

192SentencedMisdemeanorLAPEERLapeer/Tuscola2SentencedNot ReportedLAPEERLapeer/Tuscola3Not ReportedNot ReportedLAPEERLapeer/Tuscola

116SentencedFelonyTUSCOLALapeer/Tuscola1UnsentencedMisdemeanorTUSCOLALapeer/Tuscola

60SentencedMisdemeanorTUSCOLALapeer/Tuscola1Not ReportedCivilTUSCOLALapeer/Tuscola

92UnsentencedFelonyMACOMBMacomb545SentencedFelonyMACOMBMacomb

1Not ReportedFelonyMACOMBMacomb7UnsentencedMisdemeanorMACOMBMacomb

167SentencedMisdemeanorMACOMBMacomb5UnsentencedFelonyMARQUETTEMarquette

41SentencedFelonyMARQUETTEMarquette1UnsentencedMisdemeanorMARQUETTEMarquette

154SentencedMisdemeanorMARQUETTEMarquette2UnsentencedFederalMARQUETTEMarquette2Not ReportedNot ReportedMARQUETTEMarquette5UnsentencedFelonyMASONMason

61SentencedFelonyMASONMason1Not ReportedFelonyMASONMason2UnsentencedMisdemeanorMASONMason

47SentencedMisdemeanorMASONMason26SentencedFelonyMECOSTAMecosta1UnsentencedMisdemeanorMECOSTAMecosta

109SentencedMisdemeanorMECOSTAMecosta58SentencedFelonyMIDLANDMidland2Not ReportedFelonyMIDLANDMidland2UnsentencedMisdemeanorMIDLANDMidland

96SentencedMisdemeanorMIDLANDMidland1SentencedNot ReportedMIDLANDMidland

163UnsentencedFelonyMONROEMonroe179SentencedFelonyMONROEMonroe113UnsentencedMisdemeanorMONROEMonroe140SentencedMisdemeanorMONROEMonroe

4UnsentencedNot ReportedMONROEMonroe4SentencedNot ReportedMONROEMonroe

47UnsentencedFelonyMUSKEGONMuskegon229SentencedFelonyMUSKEGONMuskegon45UnsentencedMisdemeanorMUSKEGONMuskegon

527SentencedMisdemeanorMUSKEGONMuskegon1Not ReportedNot ReportedMUSKEGONMuskegon

Page 177: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Individuals Determined PA-511 Eligible during Fiscal Year 99Offender

CountLegal StatusCrime ClassCountyCCAB6UnsentencedFelonyCHEBOYGANNEMCOG

35SentencedFelonyCHEBOYGANNEMCOG3UnsentencedMisdemeanorCHEBOYGANNEMCOG

65SentencedMisdemeanorCHEBOYGANNEMCOG1SentencedNot ReportedCHEBOYGANNEMCOG2UnsentencedFelonyCRAWFORDNEMCOG

17SentencedFelonyCRAWFORDNEMCOG8SentencedMisdemeanorCRAWFORDNEMCOG2UnsentencedFelonyOTSEGONEMCOG

26SentencedFelonyOTSEGONEMCOG1Not ReportedFelonyOTSEGONEMCOG1UnsentencedMisdemeanorOTSEGONEMCOG

111SentencedMisdemeanorOTSEGONEMCOG2Not ReportedMisdemeanorOTSEGONEMCOG3SentencedFelonyBENZIENWMCOG1SentencedMisdemeanorBENZIENWMCOG1UnsentencedFelonyCHARLEVOIXNWMCOG

17SentencedFelonyCHARLEVOIXNWMCOG1UnsentencedMisdemeanorCHARLEVOIXNWMCOG

117SentencedMisdemeanorCHARLEVOIXNWMCOG1UnsentencedFelonyEMMETNWMCOG

27SentencedFelonyEMMETNWMCOG147SentencedMisdemeanorEMMETNWMCOG

1UnsentencedFelonyKALKASKANWMCOG12SentencedFelonyKALKASKANWMCOG18SentencedMisdemeanorKALKASKANWMCOG5UnsentencedFelonyMANISTEENWMCOG

51SentencedFelonyMANISTEENWMCOG2UnsentencedMisdemeanorMANISTEENWMCOG4SentencedMisdemeanorMANISTEENWMCOG

21SentencedFelonyMISSAUKEENWMCOG57SentencedMisdemeanorMISSAUKEENWMCOG10UnsentencedFelonyWEXFORDNWMCOG70SentencedFelonyWEXFORDNWMCOG25UnsentencedMisdemeanorWEXFORDNWMCOG

239SentencedMisdemeanorWEXFORDNWMCOG70UnsentencedFelonyOAKLANDOakland

791SentencedFelonyOAKLANDOakland1Not ReportedFelonyOAKLANDOakland1UnsentencedMisdemeanorOAKLANDOakland

59SentencedMisdemeanorOAKLANDOakland18SentencedNot ReportedOAKLANDOakland33SentencedFelonyOSCEOLAOsceola

212SentencedMisdemeanorOSCEOLAOsceola2SentencedNot ReportedOSCEOLAOsceola1UnsentencedFelonyOTTAWAOttawa

201SentencedFelonyOTTAWAOttawa581SentencedMisdemeanorOTTAWAOttawa

Page 178: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Individuals Determined PA-511 Eligible during Fiscal Year 99Offender

CountLegal StatusCrime ClassCountyCCAB285UnsentencedFelonySAGINAWSaginaw199SentencedFelonySAGINAWSaginaw

3Not ReportedFelonySAGINAWSaginaw46UnsentencedMisdemeanorSAGINAWSaginaw63SentencedMisdemeanorSAGINAWSaginaw2Not ReportedMisdemeanorSAGINAWSaginaw2UnsentencedCivilSAGINAWSaginaw2SentencedCivilSAGINAWSaginaw

372UnsentencedNot ReportedSAGINAWSaginaw470SentencedNot ReportedSAGINAWSaginaw13Not ReportedNot ReportedSAGINAWSaginaw2UnsentencedFelonySANILACSanilac

57SentencedFelonySANILACSanilac19UnsentencedMisdemeanorSANILACSanilac71SentencedMisdemeanorSANILACSanilac20UnsentencedFelonyST. CLAIRSt. Clair

226SentencedFelonyST. CLAIRSt. Clair12UnsentencedMisdemeanorST. CLAIRSt. Clair82SentencedMisdemeanorST. CLAIRSt. Clair7UnsentencedFelonyST. JOSEPHSt. Joseph

80SentencedFelonyST. JOSEPHSt. Joseph9UnsentencedMisdemeanorST. JOSEPHSt. Joseph

60SentencedMisdemeanorST. JOSEPHSt. Joseph1UnsentencedFelonyANTRIMThirteenth Circuit

19SentencedFelonyANTRIMThirteenth Circuit3UnsentencedMisdemeanorANTRIMThirteenth Circuit

21SentencedMisdemeanorANTRIMThirteenth Circuit5UnsentencedFelonyGRAND TRAVERSEThirteenth Circuit

74SentencedFelonyGRAND TRAVERSEThirteenth Circuit11UnsentencedMisdemeanorGRAND TRAVERSEThirteenth Circuit

198SentencedMisdemeanorGRAND TRAVERSEThirteenth Circuit1UnsentencedFelonyLEELANAUThirteenth Circuit

17SentencedFelonyLEELANAUThirteenth Circuit17SentencedMisdemeanorLEELANAUThirteenth Circuit8SentencedFelonyARENACThirty-Fourth Circuit

23SentencedMisdemeanorARENACThirty-Fourth Circuit14SentencedFelonyOGEMAWThirty-Fourth Circuit4SentencedMisdemeanorOGEMAWThirty-Fourth Circuit1UnsentencedFelonyROSCOMMONThirty-Fourth Circuit

36SentencedFelonyROSCOMMONThirty-Fourth Circuit1UnsentencedMisdemeanorROSCOMMONThirty-Fourth Circuit

20SentencedMisdemeanorROSCOMMONThirty-Fourth Circuit14SentencedFelonyBARAGATri-County1UnsentencedMisdemeanorBARAGATri-County

44SentencedMisdemeanorBARAGATri-County4Not ReportedMisdemeanorBARAGATri-County

26SentencedFelonyHOUGHTONTri-County177SentencedMisdemeanorHOUGHTONTri-County

8SentencedMisdemeanorKEWEENAWTri-County5SentencedFelonyALCONATwenty-Sixth Circuit

Page 179: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Individuals Determined PA-511 Eligible during Fiscal Year 99Offender

CountLegal StatusCrime ClassCountyCCAB2SentencedMisdemeanorALCONATwenty-Sixth Circuit2UnsentencedFelonyALPENATwenty-Sixth Circuit9SentencedFelonyALPENATwenty-Sixth Circuit4SentencedFelonyMONTMORENCYTwenty-Sixth Circuit1SentencedMisdemeanorMONTMORENCYTwenty-Sixth Circuit4SentencedFelonyPRESQUE ISLETwenty-Sixth Circuit2UnsentencedFelonyVAN BURENVan Buren

90SentencedFelonyVAN BURENVan Buren2UnsentencedMisdemeanorVAN BURENVan Buren

55SentencedMisdemeanorVAN BURENVan Buren44UnsentencedFelonyWASHTENAWWashtenaw/Ann Arbor26SentencedFelonyWASHTENAWWashtenaw/Ann Arbor31UnsentencedMisdemeanorWASHTENAWWashtenaw/Ann Arbor29SentencedMisdemeanorWASHTENAWWashtenaw/Ann Arbor1UnsentencedNot ReportedWASHTENAWWashtenaw/Ann Arbor5Not ReportedNot ReportedWASHTENAWWashtenaw/Ann Arbor

9020SentencedFelonyWAYNEWayne1UnsentencedFelonyDELTAWest Central UP

11SentencedFelonyDELTAWest Central UP2UnsentencedMisdemeanorDELTAWest Central UP

150SentencedMisdemeanorDELTAWest Central UP2SentencedFelonyDICKINSONWest Central UP8UnsentencedMisdemeanorDICKINSONWest Central UP

263SentencedMisdemeanorDICKINSONWest Central UP6SentencedFelonyGOGEBICWest Central UP

39SentencedMisdemeanorGOGEBICWest Central UP2UnsentencedFelonyIRONWest Central UP2SentencedFelonyIRONWest Central UP

159SentencedMisdemeanorIRONWest Central UP4SentencedFelonyMENOMINEEWest Central UP

32SentencedMisdemeanorMENOMINEEWest Central UP2SentencedFelonyONTONAGONWest Central UP

26SentencedMisdemeanorONTONAGONWest Central UP

25,599 Statewide Total

Page 180: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Individuals Determined PA-511 Eligible during Fiscal Year 99Offender

CountLegal StatusCrime ClassCountyCCAB

Statewide Summary:1597UnsentencedFelonyStatewide

15752SentencedFelonyStatewide577UnsentencedMisdemeanorStatewide

6660SentencedMisdemeanorStatewide3UnsentencedFederalStatewide3SentencedFederalStatewide3UnsentencedCivilStatewide

38SentencedCivilStatewide24,633 Subtotal:

21Not ReportedFelonyStatewide21Not ReportedMisdemeanorStatewide2Not ReportedCivilStatewide

379UnsentencedNot ReportedStatewide505SentencedNot ReportedStatewide38Not ReportedNot ReportedStatewide

25,599 Total:

Above table excludes Oakland County pretrial services.

Page 181: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Individuals Determined PA-511 Eligible during the period Oct 1999 thru Dec 1999Offender

CountLegal StatusCrime ClassCountyCCAB

Appendix FIndividuals Determined P.A. 511 Eligible

During October 1999-December 1999

Page 182: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Individuals Determined PA-511 Eligible during the period Oct 1999 thru Dec 1999Offender

CountLegal StatusCrime ClassCountyCCAB

33SentencedFelonyALLEGANAllegan/Barry3SentencedMisdemeanorALLEGANAllegan/Barry1SentencedFelonyBARRYAllegan/Barry

28SentencedFelonyBAYBay157SentencedMisdemeanorBAYBay20SentencedFelonyBERRIENBerrien75SentencedMisdemeanorBERRIENBerrien14SentencedFelonyCALHOUNCalhoun8SentencedMisdemeanorCALHOUNCalhoun

16SentencedFelonyCASSCass1UnsentencedMisdemeanorCASSCass

13SentencedMisdemeanorCASSCass5SentencedFelonyALGERCentral UP

11SentencedMisdemeanorALGERCentral UP2UnsentencedFelonySCHOOLCRAFTCentral UP5SentencedFelonySCHOOLCRAFTCentral UP

15SentencedMisdemeanorSCHOOLCRAFTCentral UP9SentencedFelonyCLINTONClinton

27SentencedMisdemeanorCLINTONClinton11UnsentencedFelonyCHIPPEWAEastern UP4SentencedFelonyCHIPPEWAEastern UP1Not ReportedFelonyCHIPPEWAEastern UP6UnsentencedMisdemeanorCHIPPEWAEastern UP

23SentencedMisdemeanorCHIPPEWAEastern UP1UnsentencedMisdemeanorLUCEEastern UP

10SentencedMisdemeanorLUCEEastern UP2UnsentencedFelonyMACKINACEastern UP3SentencedFelonyMACKINACEastern UP3UnsentencedMisdemeanorMACKINACEastern UP3SentencedMisdemeanorMACKINACEastern UP

14SentencedFelonyEATONEaton3SentencedMisdemeanorEATONEaton

33UnsentencedFelonyGENESEEGenesee89SentencedFelonyGENESEEGenesee5UnsentencedMisdemeanorGENESEEGenesee

50SentencedMisdemeanorGENESEEGenesee1UnsentencedMisdemeanorHURONHuron

15SentencedMisdemeanorHURONHuron2UnsentencedFelonyINGHAMIngham County/Lansing

60SentencedFelonyINGHAMIngham County/Lansing2SentencedMisdemeanorINGHAMIngham County/Lansing3SentencedFelonyIONIAIonia/Montcalm3UnsentencedMisdemeanorIONIAIonia/Montcalm2SentencedMisdemeanorIONIAIonia/Montcalm6SentencedFelonyMONTCALMIonia/Montcalm

15SentencedMisdemeanorMONTCALMIonia/Montcalm19SentencedFelonyJACKSONJackson18SentencedMisdemeanorJACKSONJackson

Page 183: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Individuals Determined PA-511 Eligible during the period Oct 1999 thru Dec 1999Offender

CountLegal StatusCrime ClassCountyCCAB

44UnsentencedFelonyKALAMAZOOKalamazoo87SentencedFelonyKALAMAZOOKalamazoo29UnsentencedMisdemeanorKALAMAZOOKalamazoo13SentencedMisdemeanorKALAMAZOOKalamazoo1UnsentencedCivilKALAMAZOOKalamazoo3SentencedCivilKALAMAZOOKalamazoo

106UnsentencedFelonyKENTKent211SentencedFelonyKENTKent

1SentencedFederalKENTKent4SentencedFelonyLAKELake7SentencedMisdemeanorLAKELake

24SentencedFelonyLAPEERLapeer/Tuscola14SentencedMisdemeanorLAPEERLapeer/Tuscola9SentencedFelonyTUSCOLALapeer/Tuscola1UnsentencedMisdemeanorTUSCOLALapeer/Tuscola

22SentencedMisdemeanorTUSCOLALapeer/Tuscola17UnsentencedFelonyMACOMBMacomb78SentencedFelonyMACOMBMacomb1UnsentencedMisdemeanorMACOMBMacomb

31SentencedMisdemeanorMACOMBMacomb3UnsentencedFelonyMARQUETTEMarquette

13SentencedFelonyMARQUETTEMarquette1UnsentencedMisdemeanorMARQUETTEMarquette

39SentencedMisdemeanorMARQUETTEMarquette7SentencedFelonyMASONMason7SentencedMisdemeanorMASONMason4SentencedFelonyMECOSTAMecosta2UnsentencedMisdemeanorMECOSTAMecosta

18SentencedMisdemeanorMECOSTAMecosta16SentencedFelonyMIDLANDMidland1UnsentencedMisdemeanorMIDLANDMidland

14SentencedMisdemeanorMIDLANDMidland46UnsentencedFelonyMONROEMonroe50SentencedFelonyMONROEMonroe67UnsentencedMisdemeanorMONROEMonroe47SentencedMisdemeanorMONROEMonroe16UnsentencedFelonyMUSKEGONMuskegon49SentencedFelonyMUSKEGONMuskegon7UnsentencedMisdemeanorMUSKEGONMuskegon

90SentencedMisdemeanorMUSKEGONMuskegon4UnsentencedFelonyCHEBOYGANNEMCOG

13SentencedFelonyCHEBOYGANNEMCOG2UnsentencedMisdemeanorCHEBOYGANNEMCOG

17SentencedMisdemeanorCHEBOYGANNEMCOG1UnsentencedFelonyCRAWFORDNEMCOG6SentencedFelonyCRAWFORDNEMCOG7SentencedMisdemeanorCRAWFORDNEMCOG2UnsentencedFelonyOTSEGONEMCOG2SentencedFelonyOTSEGONEMCOG4UnsentencedMisdemeanorOTSEGONEMCOG

Page 184: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Individuals Determined PA-511 Eligible during the period Oct 1999 thru Dec 1999Offender

CountLegal StatusCrime ClassCountyCCAB

19SentencedMisdemeanorOTSEGONEMCOG1SentencedFelonyCHARLEVOIXNWMCOG1UnsentencedFelonyMISSAUKEENWMCOG1SentencedFelonyMISSAUKEENWMCOG

26UnsentencedFelonyOAKLANDOakland141SentencedFelonyOAKLANDOakland10SentencedMisdemeanorOAKLANDOakland1UnsentencedNot ReportedOAKLANDOakland1SentencedNot ReportedOAKLANDOakland7SentencedFelonyOSCEOLAOsceola2UnsentencedMisdemeanorOSCEOLAOsceola

50SentencedMisdemeanorOSCEOLAOsceola24SentencedFelonyOTTAWAOttawa

134SentencedMisdemeanorOTTAWAOttawa47UnsentencedFelonySAGINAWSaginaw24SentencedFelonySAGINAWSaginaw10UnsentencedMisdemeanorSAGINAWSaginaw4SentencedMisdemeanorSAGINAWSaginaw

45UnsentencedNot ReportedSAGINAWSaginaw46SentencedNot ReportedSAGINAWSaginaw1Not ReportedNot ReportedSAGINAWSaginaw7SentencedFelonySANILACSanilac1UnsentencedMisdemeanorSANILACSanilac9SentencedMisdemeanorSANILACSanilac

22SentencedFelonyST. CLAIRSt. Clair2UnsentencedMisdemeanorST. CLAIRSt. Clair2SentencedMisdemeanorST. CLAIRSt. Clair3UnsentencedFelonyST. JOSEPHSt. Joseph

12SentencedFelonyST. JOSEPHSt. Joseph2UnsentencedMisdemeanorST. JOSEPHSt. Joseph8SentencedMisdemeanorST. JOSEPHSt. Joseph5SentencedFelonyANTRIMThirteenth Circuit4SentencedMisdemeanorANTRIMThirteenth Circuit3UnsentencedFelonyGRAND TRAVERSEThirteenth Circuit5SentencedFelonyGRAND TRAVERSEThirteenth Circuit

10UnsentencedMisdemeanorGRAND TRAVERSEThirteenth Circuit35SentencedMisdemeanorGRAND TRAVERSEThirteenth Circuit1UnsentencedFelonyLEELANAUThirteenth Circuit1SentencedMisdemeanorLEELANAUThirteenth Circuit1SentencedFelonyARENACThirty-Fourth Circuit2SentencedMisdemeanorARENACThirty-Fourth Circuit3SentencedFelonyOGEMAWThirty-Fourth Circuit1SentencedMisdemeanorOGEMAWThirty-Fourth Circuit

14SentencedFelonyROSCOMMONThirty-Fourth Circuit7SentencedMisdemeanorROSCOMMONThirty-Fourth Circuit1UnsentencedFelonyBARAGATri-County1SentencedFelonyBARAGATri-County

12SentencedMisdemeanorBARAGATri-County7SentencedFelonyHOUGHTONTri-County

Page 185: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

Individuals Determined PA-511 Eligible during the period Oct 1999 thru Dec 1999Offender

CountLegal StatusCrime ClassCountyCCAB

51SentencedMisdemeanorHOUGHTONTri-County1SentencedMisdemeanorKEWEENAWTri-County2SentencedFelonyALCONATwenty-Sixth Circuit1UnsentencedMisdemeanorALCONATwenty-Sixth Circuit1UnsentencedFelonyALPENATwenty-Sixth Circuit2SentencedFelonyALPENATwenty-Sixth Circuit1UnsentencedFelonyMONTMORENCYTwenty-Sixth Circuit1UnsentencedFelonyPRESQUE ISLETwenty-Sixth Circuit2UnsentencedFelonyVAN BURENVan Buren

34SentencedFelonyVAN BURENVan Buren41SentencedMisdemeanorVAN BURENVan Buren37UnsentencedFelonyWASHTENAWWashtenaw/Ann Arbor8SentencedFelonyWASHTENAWWashtenaw/Ann Arbor

17UnsentencedMisdemeanorWASHTENAWWashtenaw/Ann Arbor4SentencedMisdemeanorWASHTENAWWashtenaw/Ann Arbor

1708SentencedFelonyWAYNEWayne7SentencedFelonyDICKINSONWest Central UP

12UnsentencedMisdemeanorDICKINSONWest Central UP49SentencedMisdemeanorDICKINSONWest Central UP22SentencedMisdemeanorGOGEBICWest Central UP12SentencedMisdemeanorIRONWest Central UP6SentencedMisdemeanorONTONAGONWest Central UP

4,903 Total:

Statewide Summary:413UnsentencedFelonyStatewide

2938SentencedFelonyStatewide192UnsentencedMisdemeanorStatewide

1260SentencedMisdemeanorStatewide1SentencedFederalStatewide1UnsentencedCivilStatewide3SentencedCivil

4,808 Subtotal:1Not ReportedFelonyStatewide

46UnsentencedNot ReportedStatewide47SentencedNot ReportedStatewide1Not ReportedNot ReportedStatewide

4,903 Total:

Page 186: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

New CCAB Program Enrollments FY99 -- All Funding vs Community Corrections Funding -- Community Corrections Funding -- All

Comm CorrProb/Res Plans & FundingTotal Services Services SourcesProgram TypeCountyCCAB

Appendix GNew CCAB Program Enrollments FY99 –

All Funding Sources vs. Community Corrections Funding

Page 187: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

New CCAB Program Enrollments FY99 -- All Funding vs Community Corrections Funding -- Community Corrections Funding -- All

Comm CorrProb/Res Plans & FundingTotal Services Services SourcesProgram TypeCountyCCAB

22224 Hour StructuredALLEGANAllegan/Barry646464Case ManagementALLEGANAllegan/Barry111Community ServiceALLEGANAllegan/Barry

114114114Intensive SupervisionALLEGANAllegan/Barry33324 Hour StructuredBARRYAllegan/Barry

616161Case ManagementBARRYAllegan/Barry151515Community ServiceBARRYAllegan/Barry888888Intensive SupervisionBARRYAllegan/Barry151515Mental HealthBARRYAllegan/Barry262626Substance AbuseBARRYAllegan/Barry

419419419Community ServiceBAYBay272727EducationBAYBay01Employment & TrainingBAYBay06Intensive SupervisionBAYBay03OtherBAYBay

130130161Substance AbuseBAYBay70707024 Hour StructuredBERRIENBerrien

233233233Intensive SupervisionBERRIENBerrien44444424 Hour StructuredCALHOUNCalhoun

110110110Intensive SupervisionCALHOUNCalhoun20202024 Hour StructuredCASSCass696969Community ServiceCASSCass565656Intensive SupervisionCASSCass

125125125OtherCASSCass545454Substance AbuseCASSCass363636Community ServiceALGERCentral UP808080Community ServiceSCHOOLCRAFTCentral UP111Intensive SupervisionSCHOOLCRAFTCentral UP

131131131Community ServiceCLINTONClinton05EducationCLINTONClinton

595959Employment & TrainingCLINTONClinton019OtherCLINTONClinton075Substance AbuseCLINTONClinton

818181Community ServiceCHIPPEWAEastern UP156156156Intensive SupervisionCHIPPEWAEastern UP333333Community ServiceLUCEEastern UP181818Intensive SupervisionLUCEEastern UP494949Community ServiceMACKINACEastern UP232323Intensive SupervisionMACKINACEastern UP111Pre-Trial ServicesMACKINACEastern UP

Page 188: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

New CCAB Program Enrollments FY99 -- All Funding vs Community Corrections Funding -- Community Corrections Funding -- All

Comm CorrProb/Res Plans & FundingTotal Services Services SourcesProgram TypeCountyCCAB

04424 Hour StructuredEATONEaton373737Community ServiceEATONEaton191919Employment & TrainingEATONEaton444Mental HealthEATONEaton3310Substance AbuseEATONEaton

21921921924 Hour StructuredGENESEEGenesee298298298Community ServiceGENESEEGenesee194194194Intensive SupervisionGENESEEGenesee

444Mental HealthGENESEEGenesee243243243Pre-Trial ServicesGENESEEGenesee848484Substance AbuseGENESEEGenesee111Substance AbuseGRATIOTGratiot

111125Community ServiceHURONHuron333EducationHURONHuron

112112112Intensive SupervisionHURONHuron161616Substance AbuseHURONHuron78787824 Hour StructuredINGHAMIngham County/Lansing

128128128Community ServiceINGHAMIngham County/Lansing353535Employment & TrainingINGHAMIngham County/Lansing232323Intensive SupervisionINGHAMIngham County/Lansing545454Substance AbuseINGHAMIngham County/Lansing383838Community ServiceIONIAIonia/Montcalm111Intensive SupervisionIONIAIonia/Montcalm

121212Substance AbuseIONIAIonia/Montcalm115115115Community ServiceMONTCALMIonia/Montcalm717171Intensive SupervisionMONTCALMIonia/Montcalm4441Substance AbuseMONTCALMIonia/Montcalm

101010Case ManagementISABELLAIsabella222222Community ServiceISABELLAIsabella017EducationISABELLAIsabella03Employment & TrainingISABELLAIsabella

171717Intensive SupervisionISABELLAIsabella464646Mental HealthISABELLAIsabella474750Substance AbuseISABELLAIsabella43434324 Hour StructuredJACKSONJackson

274274274Community ServiceJACKSONJackson115115115Intensive SupervisionJACKSONJackson

0146Substance AbuseJACKSONJackson

Page 189: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

New CCAB Program Enrollments FY99 -- All Funding vs Community Corrections Funding -- Community Corrections Funding -- All

Comm CorrProb/Res Plans & FundingTotal Services Services SourcesProgram TypeCountyCCAB

31731731724 Hour StructuredKALAMAZOOKalamazoo112Case ManagementKALAMAZOOKalamazoo

949494Community ServiceKALAMAZOOKalamazoo219219219Employment & TrainingKALAMAZOOKalamazoo219219219Intensive SupervisionKALAMAZOOKalamazoo196196196Pre-Trial ServicesKALAMAZOOKalamazoo28210272379Substance AbuseKALAMAZOOKalamazoo42042042024 Hour StructuredKENTKent262626Case ManagementKENTKent

242242242Community ServiceKENTKent109109109Employment & TrainingKENTKent858585Intensive SupervisionKENTKent

141141141Mental HealthKENTKent422422422Pre-Trial ServicesKENTKent157157157Substance AbuseKENTKent404040Community ServiceLAKELake01EducationLAKELake01Employment & TrainingLAKELake01OtherLAKELake111Pre-Trial ServicesLAKELake118Substance AbuseLAKELake

206206220Community ServiceLAPEERLapeer/Tuscola014EducationLAPEERLapeer/Tuscola

252525Intensive SupervisionLAPEERLapeer/Tuscola444Mental HealthLAPEERLapeer/Tuscola01OtherLAPEERLapeer/Tuscola9932Substance AbuseLAPEERLapeer/Tuscola0117Community ServiceTUSCOLALapeer/Tuscola

232323EducationTUSCOLALapeer/Tuscola08Employment & TrainingTUSCOLALapeer/Tuscola

262626Intensive SupervisionTUSCOLALapeer/Tuscola888OtherTUSCOLALapeer/Tuscola028Substance AbuseTUSCOLALapeer/Tuscola

1616120Community ServiceMACOMBMacomb0112Intensive SupervisionMACOMBMacomb

303037OtherMACOMBMacomb238238889Substance AbuseMACOMBMacomb132132143Case ManagementMARQUETTEMarquette

032Community ServiceMARQUETTEMarquette015EducationMARQUETTEMarquette

Page 190: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

New CCAB Program Enrollments FY99 -- All Funding vs Community Corrections Funding -- Community Corrections Funding -- All

Comm CorrProb/Res Plans & FundingTotal Services Services SourcesProgram TypeCountyCCAB

0139Employment & TrainingMARQUETTEMarquette363636Intensive SupervisionMARQUETTEMarquette01Mental HealthMARQUETTEMarquette1159Substance AbuseMARQUETTEMarquette

113113113Community ServiceMASONMason656565Intensive SupervisionMASONMason111Mental HealthMASONMason557Pre-Trial ServicesMASONMason

132132141Community ServiceMECOSTAMecosta111Pre-Trial ServicesMECOSTAMecosta

12121224 Hour StructuredMIDLANDMidland999Case ManagementMIDLANDMidland

242424Community ServiceMIDLANDMidland888Employment & TrainingMIDLANDMidland111Intensive SupervisionMIDLANDMidland

424268Mental HealthMIDLANDMidland777OtherMIDLANDMidland

862066285Substance AbuseMIDLANDMidland17172924 Hour StructuredMONROEMonroe

117117123Community ServiceMONROEMonroe179179265EducationMONROEMonroe

01Employment & TrainingMONROEMonroe44155Intensive SupervisionMONROEMonroe02OtherMONROEMonroe

1051887120Substance AbuseMONROEMonroe98989824 Hour StructuredMUSKEGONMuskegon

469469469Community ServiceMUSKEGONMuskegon165165165Intensive SupervisionMUSKEGONMuskegon

062Pre-Trial ServicesMUSKEGONMuskegon0174Substance AbuseMUSKEGONMuskegon

159159159Case ManagementCHEBOYGANNEMCOG919191Community ServiceCHEBOYGANNEMCOG05EducationCHEBOYGANNEMCOG333Employment & TrainingCHEBOYGANNEMCOG01Intensive SupervisionCHEBOYGANNEMCOG06Mental HealthCHEBOYGANNEMCOG

979797OtherCHEBOYGANNEMCOG161632Substance AbuseCHEBOYGANNEMCOG

Page 191: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

New CCAB Program Enrollments FY99 -- All Funding vs Community Corrections Funding -- Community Corrections Funding -- All

Comm CorrProb/Res Plans & FundingTotal Services Services SourcesProgram TypeCountyCCAB

272727Case ManagementCRAWFORDNEMCOG141414Community ServiceCRAWFORDNEMCOG03EducationCRAWFORDNEMCOG01Mental HealthCRAWFORDNEMCOG555OtherCRAWFORDNEMCOG06Substance AbuseCRAWFORDNEMCOG

155155155Case ManagementOTSEGONEMCOG110110110Community ServiceOTSEGONEMCOG

02EducationOTSEGONEMCOG017Intensive SupervisionOTSEGONEMCOG

474747OtherOTSEGONEMCOG010Substance AbuseOTSEGONEMCOG22224 Hour StructuredBENZIENWMCOG222Community ServiceBENZIENWMCOG444Intensive SupervisionBENZIENWMCOG111Pre-Trial ServicesBENZIENWMCOG113Substance AbuseBENZIENWMCOG44424 Hour StructuredCHARLEVOIXNWMCOG

898989Community ServiceCHARLEVOIXNWMCOG014EducationCHARLEVOIXNWMCOG01Employment & TrainingCHARLEVOIXNWMCOG

555555Intensive SupervisionCHARLEVOIXNWMCOG113Mental HealthCHARLEVOIXNWMCOG01OtherCHARLEVOIXNWMCOG

5050120Substance AbuseCHARLEVOIXNWMCOG22224 Hour StructuredEMMETNWMCOG

107107107Community ServiceEMMETNWMCOG017EducationEMMETNWMCOG01Employment & TrainingEMMETNWMCOG

808080Intensive SupervisionEMMETNWMCOG2210Mental HealthEMMETNWMCOG016OtherEMMETNWMCOG

6161149Substance AbuseEMMETNWMCOG8810Community ServiceKALKASKANWMCOG

151515Intensive SupervisionKALKASKANWMCOG335Substance AbuseKALKASKANWMCOG

10101824 Hour StructuredMANISTEENWMCOG262626Community ServiceMANISTEENWMCOG111EducationMANISTEENWMCOG

545454Intensive SupervisionMANISTEENWMCOG

Page 192: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

New CCAB Program Enrollments FY99 -- All Funding vs Community Corrections Funding -- Community Corrections Funding -- All

Comm CorrProb/Res Plans & FundingTotal Services Services SourcesProgram TypeCountyCCAB

224Mental HealthMANISTEENWMCOG666Pre-Trial ServicesMANISTEENWMCOG

191933Substance AbuseMANISTEENWMCOG66624 Hour StructuredMISSAUKEENWMCOG

272729Community ServiceMISSAUKEENWMCOG01Employment & TrainingMISSAUKEENWMCOG

414141Intensive SupervisionMISSAUKEENWMCOG111Pre-Trial ServicesMISSAUKEENWMCOG

555563Substance AbuseMISSAUKEENWMCOG17171824 Hour StructuredWEXFORDNWMCOG

114114192Community ServiceWEXFORDNWMCOG130130130Intensive SupervisionWEXFORDNWMCOG

778Mental HealthWEXFORDNWMCOG333333Pre-Trial ServicesWEXFORDNWMCOG

175175221Substance AbuseWEXFORDNWMCOG3902919939024 Hour StructuredOAKLANDOakland

111Case ManagementOAKLANDOakland590590590Community ServiceOAKLANDOakland

01EducationOAKLANDOakland206206206Employment & TrainingOAKLANDOakland

09Intensive SupervisionOAKLANDOakland02OtherOAKLANDOakland08Substance AbuseOAKLANDOakland0124 Hour StructuredOSCEOLAOsceola

262262262Community ServiceOSCEOLAOsceola111111Intensive SupervisionOSCEOLAOsceola558OtherOSCEOLAOsceola222Substance AbuseOSCEOLAOsceola

424424424Community ServiceOTTAWAOttawa387387387Intensive SupervisionOTTAWAOttawa14114114124 Hour StructuredSAGINAWSaginaw740740740Case ManagementSAGINAWSaginaw

111Community ServiceSAGINAWSaginaw111EducationSAGINAWSaginaw

149149149Employment & TrainingSAGINAWSaginaw161161161Intensive SupervisionSAGINAWSaginaw111111OtherSAGINAWSaginaw

1,14111411141Pre-Trial ServicesSAGINAWSaginaw0116Substance AbuseSAGINAWSaginaw

Page 193: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

New CCAB Program Enrollments FY99 -- All Funding vs Community Corrections Funding -- Community Corrections Funding -- All

Comm CorrProb/Res Plans & FundingTotal Services Services SourcesProgram TypeCountyCCAB

2232Community ServiceSANILACSanilac023Intensive SupervisionSANILACSanilac

171731Substance AbuseSANILACSanilac707015824 Hour StructuredST. CLAIRSt. Clair

103103103Community ServiceST. CLAIRSt. Clair016EducationST. CLAIRSt. Clair

555555Intensive SupervisionST. CLAIRSt. Clair555Mental HealthST. CLAIRSt. Clair

171717Pre-Trial ServicesST. CLAIRSt. Clair160160205Substance AbuseST. CLAIRSt. Clair74747424 Hour StructuredST. JOSEPHSt. Joseph434343Community ServiceST. JOSEPHSt. Joseph242424Mental HealthST. JOSEPHSt. Joseph292929Substance AbuseST. JOSEPHSt. Joseph77724 Hour StructuredANTRIMThirteenth Circuit111Community ServiceANTRIMThirteenth Circuit04EducationANTRIMThirteenth Circuit04Employment & TrainingANTRIMThirteenth Circuit

272727Intensive SupervisionANTRIMThirteenth Circuit06OtherANTRIMThirteenth Circuit111Pre-Trial ServicesANTRIMThirteenth Circuit

121277Substance AbuseANTRIMThirteenth Circuit25252524 Hour StructuredGRAND TRAVERSEThirteenth Circuit404041Community ServiceGRAND TRAVERSEThirteenth Circuit023EducationGRAND TRAVERSEThirteenth Circuit020Employment & TrainingGRAND TRAVERSEThirteenth Circuit

187187187Intensive SupervisionGRAND TRAVERSEThirteenth Circuit1121Mental HealthGRAND TRAVERSEThirteenth Circuit022OtherGRAND TRAVERSEThirteenth Circuit

3737459Substance AbuseGRAND TRAVERSEThirteenth Circuit33324 Hour StructuredLEELANAUThirteenth Circuit03EducationLEELANAUThirteenth Circuit03Employment & TrainingLEELANAUThirteenth Circuit

262626Intensive SupervisionLEELANAUThirteenth Circuit05OtherLEELANAUThirteenth Circuit6672Substance AbuseLEELANAUThirteenth Circuit666Community ServiceARENACThirty-Fourth Circuit111Intensive SupervisionARENACThirty-Fourth Circuit

131313Mental HealthARENACThirty-Fourth Circuit282828Substance AbuseARENACThirty-Fourth Circuit

Page 194: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

New CCAB Program Enrollments FY99 -- All Funding vs Community Corrections Funding -- Community Corrections Funding -- All

Comm CorrProb/Res Plans & FundingTotal Services Services SourcesProgram TypeCountyCCAB

44424 Hour StructuredOGEMAWThirty-Fourth Circuit141414Community ServiceOGEMAWThirty-Fourth Circuit01EducationOGEMAWThirty-Fourth Circuit222Employment & TrainingOGEMAWThirty-Fourth Circuit222Intensive SupervisionOGEMAWThirty-Fourth Circuit111Mental HealthOGEMAWThirty-Fourth Circuit777Substance AbuseOGEMAWThirty-Fourth Circuit

13131324 Hour StructuredROSCOMMONThirty-Fourth Circuit434343Community ServiceROSCOMMONThirty-Fourth Circuit03EducationROSCOMMONThirty-Fourth Circuit888Employment & TrainingROSCOMMONThirty-Fourth Circuit

131313Intensive SupervisionROSCOMMONThirty-Fourth Circuit888Mental HealthROSCOMMONThirty-Fourth Circuit

313131Substance AbuseROSCOMMONThirty-Fourth Circuit0924 Hour StructuredBARAGATri-County

696969Case ManagementBARAGATri-County474756Community ServiceBARAGATri-County04Employment & TrainingBARAGATri-County1128Mental HealthBARAGATri-County01Substance AbuseBARAGATri-County05624 Hour StructuredHOUGHTONTri-County

208208208Case ManagementHOUGHTONTri-County210210211Community ServiceHOUGHTONTri-County

02EducationHOUGHTONTri-County010Employment & TrainingHOUGHTONTri-County02Intensive SupervisionHOUGHTONTri-County111Mental HealthHOUGHTONTri-County335OtherHOUGHTONTri-County0124 Hour StructuredKEWEENAWTri-County888Case ManagementKEWEENAWTri-County888Community ServiceKEWEENAWTri-County333Case ManagementALCONATwenty-Sixth Circuit222Community ServiceALCONATwenty-Sixth Circuit01EducationALCONATwenty-Sixth Circuit222Intensive SupervisionALCONATwenty-Sixth Circuit222Mental HealthALCONATwenty-Sixth Circuit337Substance AbuseALCONATwenty-Sixth Circuit

121212Case ManagementALPENATwenty-Sixth Circuit555Mental HealthALPENATwenty-Sixth Circuit5512Substance AbuseALPENATwenty-Sixth Circuit

Page 195: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

New CCAB Program Enrollments FY99 -- All Funding vs Community Corrections Funding -- Community Corrections Funding -- All

Comm CorrProb/Res Plans & FundingTotal Services Services SourcesProgram TypeCountyCCAB

555Case ManagementMONTMORENCYTwenty-Sixth Circuit111111Mental HealthMONTMORENCYTwenty-Sixth Circuit113Substance AbuseMONTMORENCYTwenty-Sixth Circuit444Case ManagementPRESQUE ISLETwenty-Sixth Circuit444Mental HealthPRESQUE ISLETwenty-Sixth Circuit114Substance AbusePRESQUE ISLETwenty-Sixth Circuit

707070Community ServiceVAN BURENVan Buren111Intensive SupervisionVAN BURENVan Buren01Substance AbuseVAN BURENVan Buren

60606024 Hour StructuredWASHTENAWWashtenaw/Ann Arbor313131Case ManagementWASHTENAWWashtenaw/Ann Arbor

190190190EducationWASHTENAWWashtenaw/Ann Arbor171717Employment & TrainingWASHTENAWWashtenaw/Ann Arbor

144144144Intensive SupervisionWASHTENAWWashtenaw/Ann Arbor818181Pre-Trial ServicesWASHTENAWWashtenaw/Ann Arbor2121160Substance AbuseWASHTENAWWashtenaw/Ann Arbor

56856880624 Hour StructuredWAYNEWayne3,18931893260Case ManagementWAYNEWayne1,95019501950Community ServiceWAYNEWayne

302302302Intensive SupervisionWAYNEWayne1,81918191819OtherWAYNEWayne

671671671Pre-Trial ServicesWAYNEWayne474611179Substance AbuseWAYNEWayne0124 Hour StructuredDELTAWest Central UP

151151151Community ServiceDELTAWest Central UP116Intensive SupervisionDELTAWest Central UP

139139139Community ServiceDICKINSONWest Central UP878787Intensive SupervisionDICKINSONWest Central UP222Substance AbuseDICKINSONWest Central UP

111144Community ServiceGOGEBICWest Central UP116116116Community ServiceIRONWest Central UP151515Intensive SupervisionIRONWest Central UP202020Community ServiceMENOMINEEWest Central UP03Intensive SupervisionMENOMINEEWest Central UP3326Community ServiceONTONAGONWest Central UP

28,2262,83825,38834,088Totals::

Page 196: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

New CCAB Program Enrollments Oct 99 thru Dec 99 -- All Funding vs Community Corrections Funding -- Community Corrections Funding -- All

Comm CorrProb/Res Plans & FundingTotal Services Services SourcesProgram TypeCountyCCAB

Appendix HNew CCAB Program Enrollments Oct 99 thru Dec 99

All Funding Sources vs. Community Corrections Funding

Page 197: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

New CCAB Program Enrollments Oct 99 thru Dec 99 -- All Funding vs Community Corrections Funding -- Community Corrections Funding -- All

Comm CorrProb/Res Plans & FundingTotal Services Services SourcesProgram TypeCountyCCAB

11124 Hour StructuredALLEGANAllegan/Barry242424Case ManagementALLEGANAllegan/Barry333Community ServiceALLEGANAllegan/Barry

363636Intensive SupervisionALLEGANAllegan/Barry888Case ManagementBARRYAllegan/Barry777Intensive SupervisionBARRYAllegan/Barry

133133133Community ServiceBAYBay888EducationBAYBay02Intensive SupervisionBAYBay

212129Substance AbuseBAYBay29292924 Hour StructuredBERRIENBerrien757575Intensive SupervisionBERRIENBerrien15151524 Hour StructuredCALHOUNCalhoun111111Intensive SupervisionCALHOUNCalhoun11124 Hour StructuredCASSCass777Community ServiceCASSCass

191919Intensive SupervisionCASSCass242424OtherCASSCass999Substance AbuseCASSCass

161616Community ServiceALGERCentral UP282828Community ServiceSCHOOLCRAFTCentral UP333333Community ServiceCLINTONClinton03EducationCLINTONClinton

141414Employment & TrainingCLINTONClinton01OtherCLINTONClinton020Substance AbuseCLINTONClinton

181818Community ServiceCHIPPEWAEastern UP272727Intensive SupervisionCHIPPEWAEastern UP999Community ServiceLUCEEastern UP111Intensive SupervisionLUCEEastern UP444Community ServiceMACKINACEastern UP888Intensive SupervisionMACKINACEastern UP888Community ServiceEATONEaton5510Substance AbuseEATONEaton

707070Community ServiceGENESEEGenesee363636Intensive SupervisionGENESEEGenesee333Mental HealthGENESEEGenesee

434343Pre-Trial ServicesGENESEEGenesee252525Substance AbuseGENESEEGenesee

Page 198: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

New CCAB Program Enrollments Oct 99 thru Dec 99 -- All Funding vs Community Corrections Funding -- Community Corrections Funding -- All

Comm CorrProb/Res Plans & FundingTotal Services Services SourcesProgram TypeCountyCCAB

01Community ServiceHURONHuron191919Intensive SupervisionHURONHuron222Substance AbuseHURONHuron

23232324 Hour StructuredINGHAMIngham County/Lansing323232Community ServiceINGHAMIngham County/Lansing101010Employment & TrainingINGHAMIngham County/Lansing666Intensive SupervisionINGHAMIngham County/Lansing999Substance AbuseINGHAMIngham County/Lansing888Community ServiceIONIAIonia/Montcalm

191919Community ServiceMONTCALMIonia/Montcalm111Intensive SupervisionMONTCALMIonia/Montcalm

25252524 Hour StructuredJACKSONJackson999Community ServiceJACKSONJackson

121212Intensive SupervisionJACKSONJackson016Substance AbuseJACKSONJackson

77777724 Hour StructuredKALAMAZOOKalamazoo333Case ManagementKALAMAZOOKalamazoo

171717Community ServiceKALAMAZOOKalamazoo373737Employment & TrainingKALAMAZOOKalamazoo515151Intensive SupervisionKALAMAZOOKalamazoo393939Pre-Trial ServicesKALAMAZOOKalamazoo595971Substance AbuseKALAMAZOOKalamazoo

10010010024 Hour StructuredKENTKent666Case ManagementKENTKent

737373Community ServiceKENTKent252525Employment & TrainingKENTKent171717Intensive SupervisionKENTKent222222Mental HealthKENTKent

105105105Pre-Trial ServicesKENTKent787878Substance AbuseKENTKent11124 Hour StructuredLAKELake888Community ServiceLAKELake222Substance AbuseLAKELake

191919Community ServiceLAPEERLapeer/Tuscola04EducationLAPEERLapeer/Tuscola999Intensive SupervisionLAPEERLapeer/Tuscola556Substance AbuseLAPEERLapeer/Tuscola028Community ServiceTUSCOLALapeer/Tuscola

101010EducationTUSCOLALapeer/Tuscola01Employment & TrainingTUSCOLALapeer/Tuscola

Page 199: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

New CCAB Program Enrollments Oct 99 thru Dec 99 -- All Funding vs Community Corrections Funding -- Community Corrections Funding -- All

Comm CorrProb/Res Plans & FundingTotal Services Services SourcesProgram TypeCountyCCAB

222Intensive SupervisionTUSCOLALapeer/Tuscola04Substance AbuseTUSCOLALapeer/Tuscola3313Community ServiceMACOMBMacomb08Intensive SupervisionMACOMBMacomb999OtherMACOMBMacomb

4242151Substance AbuseMACOMBMacomb363640Case ManagementMARQUETTEMarquette011Community ServiceMARQUETTEMarquette04EducationMARQUETTEMarquette036Employment & TrainingMARQUETTEMarquette555Intensive SupervisionMARQUETTEMarquette013Substance AbuseMARQUETTEMarquette

252525Community ServiceMASONMason888Intensive SupervisionMASONMason

161619Community ServiceMECOSTAMecosta111Employment & TrainingMECOSTAMecosta111Pre-Trial ServicesMECOSTAMecosta99924 Hour StructuredMIDLANDMidland111Case ManagementMIDLANDMidland555Community ServiceMIDLANDMidland02Mental HealthMIDLANDMidland111OtherMIDLANDMidland

20713114Substance AbuseMIDLANDMidland55624 Hour StructuredMONROEMonroe

343451Community ServiceMONROEMonroe8484119EducationMONROEMonroe1177Intensive SupervisionMONROEMonroe

3342933Substance AbuseMONROEMonroe43434324 Hour StructuredMUSKEGONMuskegon535353Community ServiceMUSKEGONMuskegon484848Intensive SupervisionMUSKEGONMuskegon013Pre-Trial ServicesMUSKEGONMuskegon031Substance AbuseMUSKEGONMuskegon

424242Case ManagementCHEBOYGANNEMCOG222222Community ServiceCHEBOYGANNEMCOG07EducationCHEBOYGANNEMCOG05Mental HealthCHEBOYGANNEMCOG

252525OtherCHEBOYGANNEMCOG669Substance AbuseCHEBOYGANNEMCOG

Page 200: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

New CCAB Program Enrollments Oct 99 thru Dec 99 -- All Funding vs Community Corrections Funding -- Community Corrections Funding -- All

Comm CorrProb/Res Plans & FundingTotal Services Services SourcesProgram TypeCountyCCAB

111111Case ManagementCRAWFORDNEMCOG999Community ServiceCRAWFORDNEMCOG03EducationCRAWFORDNEMCOG222OtherCRAWFORDNEMCOG05Substance AbuseCRAWFORDNEMCOG

363636Case ManagementOTSEGONEMCOG111111Community ServiceOTSEGONEMCOG01EducationOTSEGONEMCOG01Intensive SupervisionOTSEGONEMCOG111OtherOTSEGONEMCOG012Substance AbuseOTSEGONEMCOG01Substance AbuseEMMETNWMCOG111Intensive SupervisionMANISTEENWMCOG111Intensive SupervisionMISSAUKEENWMCOG01Substance AbuseMISSAUKEENWMCOG01Community ServiceWEXFORDNWMCOG111Substance AbuseWEXFORDNWMCOG

69696924 Hour StructuredOAKLANDOakland848484Community ServiceOAKLANDOakland323232Employment & TrainingOAKLANDOakland151536Intensive SupervisionOAKLANDOakland

354354654Pre-Trial ServicesOAKLANDOakland565656Community ServiceOSCEOLAOsceola222Intensive SupervisionOSCEOLAOsceola222Pre-Trial ServicesOSCEOLAOsceola

565656Community ServiceOTTAWAOttawa858585Intensive SupervisionOTTAWAOttawa24242424 Hour StructuredSAGINAWSaginaw535353Case ManagementSAGINAWSaginaw262626Employment & TrainingSAGINAWSaginaw191919Intensive SupervisionSAGINAWSaginaw

128128128Pre-Trial ServicesSAGINAWSaginaw022Substance AbuseSAGINAWSaginaw05Community ServiceSANILACSanilac441024 Hour StructuredST. CLAIRSt. Clair01EducationST. CLAIRSt. Clair444Intensive SupervisionST. CLAIRSt. Clair333Mental HealthST. CLAIRSt. Clair555Substance AbuseST. CLAIRSt. Clair

Page 201: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

New CCAB Program Enrollments Oct 99 thru Dec 99 -- All Funding vs Community Corrections Funding -- Community Corrections Funding -- All

Comm CorrProb/Res Plans & FundingTotal Services Services SourcesProgram TypeCountyCCAB

55524 Hour StructuredST. JOSEPHSt. Joseph111Community ServiceST. JOSEPHSt. Joseph666Mental HealthST. JOSEPHSt. Joseph44424 Hour StructuredANTRIMThirteenth Circuit02Employment & TrainingANTRIMThirteenth Circuit444Intensive SupervisionANTRIMThirteenth Circuit3327Substance AbuseANTRIMThirteenth Circuit66624 Hour StructuredGRAND TRAVERSEThirteenth Circuit

111111Community ServiceGRAND TRAVERSEThirteenth Circuit07EducationGRAND TRAVERSEThirteenth Circuit03Employment & TrainingGRAND TRAVERSEThirteenth Circuit

373737Intensive SupervisionGRAND TRAVERSEThirteenth Circuit08Mental HealthGRAND TRAVERSEThirteenth Circuit02OtherGRAND TRAVERSEThirteenth Circuit88121Substance AbuseGRAND TRAVERSEThirteenth Circuit11124 Hour StructuredLEELANAUThirteenth Circuit111Intensive SupervisionLEELANAUThirteenth Circuit225Substance AbuseLEELANAUThirteenth Circuit111Community ServiceARENACThirty-Fourth Circuit111Intensive SupervisionARENACThirty-Fourth Circuit111Mental HealthARENACThirty-Fourth Circuit222Substance AbuseARENACThirty-Fourth Circuit11124 Hour StructuredOGEMAWThirty-Fourth Circuit222Community ServiceOGEMAWThirty-Fourth Circuit111Mental HealthOGEMAWThirty-Fourth Circuit11124 Hour StructuredROSCOMMONThirty-Fourth Circuit

181818Community ServiceROSCOMMONThirty-Fourth Circuit07EducationROSCOMMONThirty-Fourth Circuit111Employment & TrainingROSCOMMONThirty-Fourth Circuit111Intensive SupervisionROSCOMMONThirty-Fourth Circuit333Mental HealthROSCOMMONThirty-Fourth Circuit888Substance AbuseROSCOMMONThirty-Fourth Circuit01124 Hour StructuredHOUGHTONTri-County

585858Case ManagementHOUGHTONTri-County535353Community ServiceHOUGHTONTri-County05Employment & TrainingHOUGHTONTri-County777Mental HealthHOUGHTONTri-County

101010OtherHOUGHTONTri-County0124 Hour StructuredKEWEENAWTri-County112Community ServiceKEWEENAWTri-County

Page 202: BIANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PURSUANT TO … · Higher risk is indicated by an offender’s criminal history; offenders convicted of previous felonies indicate a higher risk

New CCAB Program Enrollments Oct 99 thru Dec 99 -- All Funding vs Community Corrections Funding -- Community Corrections Funding -- All

Comm CorrProb/Res Plans & FundingTotal Services Services SourcesProgram TypeCountyCCAB

111Community ServiceALCONATwenty-Sixth Circuit222Case ManagementALPENATwenty-Sixth Circuit222Mental HealthALPENATwenty-Sixth Circuit02Substance AbuseALPENATwenty-Sixth Circuit111Case ManagementMONTMORENCYTwenty-Sixth Circuit222Mental HealthMONTMORENCYTwenty-Sixth Circuit111Substance AbuseMONTMORENCYTwenty-Sixth Circuit111Case ManagementPRESQUE ISLETwenty-Sixth Circuit111Mental HealthPRESQUE ISLETwenty-Sixth Circuit

393939Community ServiceVAN BURENVan Buren111Intensive SupervisionVAN BURENVan Buren

27272724 Hour StructuredWASHTENAWWashtenaw/Ann Arbor111Case ManagementWASHTENAWWashtenaw/Ann Arbor

707070EducationWASHTENAWWashtenaw/Ann Arbor535353Intensive SupervisionWASHTENAWWashtenaw/Ann Arbor373737Pre-Trial ServicesWASHTENAWWashtenaw/Ann Arbor1152Substance AbuseWASHTENAWWashtenaw/Ann Arbor

45457424 Hour StructuredWAYNEWayne916916916Case ManagementWAYNEWayne321321321Community ServiceWAYNEWayne858585Intensive SupervisionWAYNEWayne

318318318OtherWAYNEWayne216216216Pre-Trial ServicesWAYNEWayne

55140Substance AbuseWAYNEWayne303030Community ServiceDICKINSONWest Central UP303030Intensive SupervisionDICKINSONWest Central UP333Substance AbuseDICKINSONWest Central UP9922Community ServiceGOGEBICWest Central UP

111111Community ServiceIRONWest Central UP06Community ServiceONTONAGONWest Central UP

587953253477270 Totals: