Bhsc mr mukusha

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

1. Biography:Mukusha Jowere lectures in the following Philosophy courses at Great Zimbabwe University:African Philosophy, Theory of Knowledge, Philosophy of Education, Introduction to Problems ofPhilosophy and Survey of Major Philosophical Trends. He is also a specialist in InternationalHuman Rights Exchange (IHRE) and a Peer Educator.Contact:Great Zimbabwe University, Box 1235 Masvingo, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy &Religious StudiesE-mail [email protected]@yahoo.com1 2. UBUNTU/UNHU: A PHILOSOPHICAL REFLECTIONBY MR J MUKUSHA: Philosophy Lecturer in the Department of Philosophy & Religious Studies,Faculty of Arts, Great Zimbabwe University, Masvingo, Zimbabwe; PhD Student at theUniversity of South Africa (UNISA).Email address: [email protected] as a cradle of humanity entails the notion of ubuntu or unhu. This paper seeks to addressthe centrality of ubuntu/unhu with regards to personal identity in Zimbabwe and Africa in itsgenerality. The paper also alludes to the dialectical antithetical relationship between thebiological human being and the social human being, that is, the person. Of interest, in thispaper, is the sheer emphasis on the ubuntu/unhu communitarian cosmogony. Thus, the paperdraws some philosophical parallel lines matching the Cartesian mind-body problem and thecogito ergo sum. The issue of culture comes into the fray as an indispensable variable withregards to personal identity in Zimbabwe and Africa at large. Hence, the pivotal role of aplethora of initiation rituals and ceremonies in African Traditional Culture acts as theepistemological and metaphysical informal pedagogical curriculum whose subject matter isembedded in ubuntu/unhu - the crux of this paper.KEY WORDS: Ubuntu, unhu, humanity, identity, personal, cosmogony, Cartesian, culture, AfricaIntroductionThis paper attempts to address the concept of ubuntu/unhu covering a variety of aspects.Aspects of importance include the conceptual analysis of the term ubuntu/unhu, ubuntu as aphilosophy, ubuntu metaphysics, ubuntu epistemology, ubuntu personal identity, ubuntulanguage, ubuntu politics, ubuntu ethics/axiology and ubuntu education. A conclusion marksthe end of this ontological presentation.Ubuntu/Unhu Conceptual AnalysisEtymologically, ubuntu is made up of the prefix ubu- and the stem ntu. Ramose (1999) notesthat the idea of ubu- evokes the concept of be-ing in general. Ubu- and ntu are mutually2 3. founding in the sense that they are two aspects of be-ing as a one-ness and an indivisiblewhole-ness. It therefore means that human existence is a complete package that can not beunderstood in part in the African biosphere. In Africa, ubuntu is expressed in its variant forms,for instance, unhu, umuntu, abatho and so on showing the common denominator of the stem ntu. Augmenting this position, Wright (1984:171) posits, the African view of man denies thatpersons can be defined by focusing on this or that physical or psychological characteristic of thelone individual. Rather, man is defined by reference to the environing community. Thus,ubuntu/unhu expresses the identity of man in Africas human cosmogony. In other words,ubuntu/unhu is both a measure of personal identity and a socio-cultural barometer inZimbabwe and Africa in general. The major challenge here is whether Zimbabweans or Africansin general can be accorded ubuntu/unhu in its pragmatic sense. Do we qualify to be describedand understood under the banner of ubuntu/unhu given the impact of cultural invasion and theperilous effects of globalization? For Asante Keita and Abarry (1996) going back to sangofawould be the best possible answer. This implies the need to revisit our African TraditionalCulture in a bid to remain relevant in the contemporary world and the future. In the same vein,Chung (2007:328) remarks, For Zimbabwe to renew itself, it needs to re-examine its heritagefrom the past and to create a new culture and values for the future. This new culture shoulddeal with the need to emphasize on the importance of African heritage and traditional culturein the contemporary world that will enable positive meaningful development in Zimbabwe andAfrica in general.Ubuntu/Unhu as a PhilosophyThe notion of ubuntu/unhu represents a fundamental African philosophical worldview therebyrepresenting an indispensable way of life in Africa. In other words, ubuntu/unhu should beproperly understood through its metaphysical and epistemological geography in Zimbabwe andAfrica at large. Cascading the worthiness of ubuntu/unhu philosophy, Ramose (1999:49)purports, The be-ing of an African in the universe is inseparably anchored upon ubuntuUbuntu then is the wellspring flowing with African ontology and epistemology. Thus, theidentity of a human being in Africa is an aggregate of a number of factors that include onesmetaphysical and epistemological commitments. Keita Asante in Asante and Abarry (1996:256)notes, The Afrocentric enterprise is framed by cosmological, axiological, and aesthetic issues.With regards to knowledge, Mukusha (2011:7) notes, In Africa this knowledge cosmogony isembedded in African philosophy, which is traditionally epistemologically highly nourishing.Conversely, this implies that the lack of ubuntu knowledge inevitably negatively impact onones identity as a human being worth of a person. In order for one to be identified asmunhu/umuntu/batho/muntu with ubuntu/unhu, he or she has to have worthwhile3 4. gknowledge. Without unhu/ubuntu one is not a human person but just a human being amongother forms of being in the universe, hence, haasi munhu ane hunhu. Even Peters (1973)reinforces that knowledge or education is some sort of process leading to the development of adesirable state of mind in a morally unobjectionable manner. Thus, failing the moral test whichis ever present like the unseen but present Judeo-Christian God renders individuals in Africa tobe disqualified as human persons. Hence, knowledge becomes one of the major determinantsof ones identity. Mararike (2001:5) emphasizes, Knowledge of our history and culture aresome of our key rallying points. An individual who is found wanting knowledge wise is referredto as dununu(fool) thereby discrediting ones humanity in certain instances/situations in life.Given such a position, it therefore implies that in one way or another we become matununu(fools) due to our sheer lack of ubuntu/unhu especially in this contemporary competitivecapitalist economically driven world. An appeal to sangofa would abate our ubuntu/unhudegree of vulnerability. The renowned Greek philosophic sage, Socrates in Akinpelu (1981),Schofield (1972) and Stumpf and Fieser (2008) once accepted that the best man is the one whoadmits that he is ignorant whilst one who pretends to know everything is a fool. It is importantfor Zimbabweans to accept that they will remain fools if they think that they are knowledgeableabout the ubuntu/unhu content. The researcher urges Zimbabweans and Africans in general tocontinue thriving for ubuntu as a sure way of restoring their ontological identity.Ubuntu/Unhu MetaphysicsUbuntu/unhu metaphysics encompasses issues pertaining to ontology and spirituality. Kim andSosa (1995) define metaphysics as the study of reality whilst OHear (1985) conceptualizesmetaphysics as going beyond the banalities of nature, the material world in issues of existence,language and questions about reality. From an African perspective, ubuntu/unhu metaphysics istripartite in nature. Ramose (1999) stresses that the ubuntu understanding of be-ing involvesthree levels of human ex-istence the onto-triadic structure of being. These three parts in theunderstanding of ubuntu/unhu include the living umuntu, those beings who have passed awayfrom the world of living and the yet-to-be born. Failure to honour either of the triadic ubuntuaspects would negatively affect ones identity. Robert Birt cited in Gordon (1997:205) says,Every struggle for human liberation is invariably a struggle for a liberated identity. Withregard to the living dead, Ramose (1999) is of the view that these continue to live despite theirdeparture from the world of the living. Hence, disregarding the living dead is just like one ofIsaac Newtons law of motion that to every reaction there is an equal and opposite reaction, inthis case, militating against ones identity as a full human person. In Zimbabwe, the respect forheroes and heroines whether declared or non- declared, is a sure way of safe guarding ourhumanity. However, a clear antithesis is envisaged when one irresponsibly denigrates those4 5. who sacrificed their lives for instance, in the struggle for liberation. Such a fish type offorgetting very recent things, those things of yesterday - kukanganwa chazuro nehope willinevitably discredit ones ubuntu/unhu ending up attaining an irrespective status known asfish-ntu. The researcher coins the term fish-ntu to refer to those who have poor memory justlike a fish that forgets the hooks scratch in five seconds with regards to various forms ofsacrifices Africans have under gone thereby denoting their rational cultural inadequacies. Thisresearch also urges every individual to avoid becoming fish-ntu due to the lack and/or loss ofubuntu/unhu. But in the western existentialist view, fish-ntu may be quite applicable.Therefore, let us guard against degenerating into fish-ntu for the good of our human dignity asZimbabweans and Africans in general.Ubuntu/Unhu Personal IdentityThe question of personal identity is a contested issue in the history of philosophy. Scholarsgenerally put on different spectacles in their conception of ubuntu, some wear acommunitarian conception whilst others dress on liberalist lenses in their interpretation of thenotion of ubuntu/unhu. Sandel (1998:x) states, Communitarianism is another name formajoritarianism - the idea that rights should rest on the values that predominate in any givencommunity at any given time. In Africa, the concept of ubuntu/unhu is user friendly under thecommunitarian interpretation. Ifeanyi A. Menkiti cited in Wright (1984:171) says, John Mbitisummed up the African view of the person in the statement: I am because we are, and sincewe are therefore I am. This categorically depicts the difference between the Cartesian cogitoergo sum, I think therefore I am/exist (OConnor 1964; Harrison-Barbet 2001) and thecommunitarian African conception of a person that emphasizes on the consensus model.Hence, Ramose (1999:53) posits, Umuntu ngumuntu ngabantu (Motho ke motho ka bantu)ahumane, respectful and polite attitude towards others. This implies that ones ubuntu/unhu isa totality of his/her environing community whereby the society has the power to strip off onespersonhood in cases where that particular person lacks ubuntu/unhu a complete one-ness.This brings the issue of a biological human being vis--vis a biological cultural human person.Therefore, ubuntu/unhu identity goes beyond the rationalist mind-body problem. Thedialectical and antithetical parallelism explains the invaluable role of ubuntu/unhu as thethermometer, barometer and compass in determining African humanity. In the same vein,Menkiti in Wright (1984) endorses that there is a possibility of one losing his/her personalidentity or personhood due to the inadequacy of other traits of ubuntu/unhu.Ubuntu/Unhu AxiologyThe ethical texture of a human being in Africa plays a fundamental role in defining onesidentity. Issues pertaining to taboos, rituals, traditional ceremonies are of great value in spellingout ones identity, somewhat like socio-cultural taboos. Hence, Steve Biko in Coetzee and Roux5 6. (2003:84) clarifies that, A culture is essentially the societys composite answer to the variedproblems of life. In light of this, ubuntu/unhu becomes a cultural and metaphysical expressionof personal identity in indigenous Africa. Issues such as circumscion, marriage, rainmakingceremonies are indispensable cultural traditional pedagogical stencils that help in thesustenance of African humanity, ontology, epistemology, logic and axiology. Mazrui in Asanteand Abarry (1996:210) notes, culture as a system of inter-related values, active enough toinfluence and condition perception, judgement, communication and behaviour in a givensociety. Even in areas of development, the exercise of ubuntu/unhu may go a long way inaccomplishing set goals as well as being used as points of reference. Mararike (2001:7) echoes,Human development should be perceived as a mirror. An object is as far behind the mirror asit is in front of it. Thus Africa can forge as far ahead as her people are able to source back forinspiration in their history and culture. Ubuntu/Unhu is, therefore, a source and guide of apeoples inspiration and aspirations. This implies that lack of sufficient ubuntu/unhu impactsnegatively on an individual(s) goal attainment. For instance, institutional inspirations arecaptured in mission statements and core values of which failure to factor in the ubuntu/unhunotion in policy making and implementation will result in abortive programmes. In this case,fortunately, for Great Zimbabwe University (GZU) whose ubuntu/unhu is expressed in itscaption: A centre of excellence in creative arts, culture and technology which is pragmaticallyconstantly rekindled through cultural festivals such as the culture week, and the much awaitedeffective establishment of the Institute of Heritage Studies. This expresses the ubuntu/unhutexture at GZU and not the fish-ntu henceforth leading to the production of not onlygraduates but graduates with ubuntu/unhu in their conduct. Coetzee and Roux (2003:259) alsoechoes, the heritage was the media-culture in which members of the same society relatedto one another. The concept of ubuntu/unhu is incomplete without emphasizing on hard workthat is equals to Kantian deontology- the duty for duty ethical philosophy that results in thecultivation of ubuntu/unhu self-reliance. Nyerere (1968:5) remarks, Mgeni siku mbili; siku yatatu mpe jembe- or in English, Treat your guest as a guest for two days, on the third day givehim a hoe! This expresses the notion of ubuntu/unhu in African personhood or personalidentity. One becomes a complete be-ing by virtue of ones commitment to work/duty- deon.Ubuntu/Unhu LanguageIn this axiological arena, language use is a symbol of identity- you are identified by the natureof your language with regard to ones personhood or personal identity. Fasold (1987:1) notes,The sociolinguistics of society is about the social importance of language to groups of people,from small sociocultural groups of a few hundred people to entire nations. Language plays apivotal role in personal identity in Zimbabwe and Africa. In recognition of the value of6 7. language, Ramose (1999) states that language of ubuntu focuses the entire epistemologicaldomain towards the ontology of ubu-Rheomode- philosophical language of ubuntu creatinga new structure that is not prone toward fragmentation as the present one. Language useshould express a continuous flow of one-ness and not that of fragmentation that violates thetotality of ubuntu/unhu reality. Language use in private and public spheres of life expressesones nature of ubuntu/unhu, for instance, bedroom language must be different from a lectureroom and other official gathering forms of language. Hence, there is need to censor oneslanguage use in different contexts of life as a means of sustaining appropriate ubuntu/unhudiscourse for the upholding of social cohesion, solidarity, peace and general societalhomogeneity. In this respect, African Traditional Religion (ATR) has important norms, values andstandards that guide our conduct in life. Hence, ATR should not be treated negatively like whatShorter in Verstraelen (1998:88) says that, ATR was pictured as the empire of Satan ratherthan Africas Old Testament or the seed ground of the eternal Logos. ATR and African cultureshould be respected as socio-cultural libraries for the proper expression and nourishment ofAfricas ubuntu/unhu package. In confirmation, Pradel (2000:3) notes, Traditional religion,comments the theologian John Mbiti, dominates all aspects of the individuals life andexercises the strongest influence on his being. Ubuntu/Unhu is incomplete without the respectfor African Traditional Religion, therefore, to a large extent, we are incomplete human personsdue to the fact that we denigrate African Traditional Religion for the well marketed Judeo-Christian religious ethos that are literally better positioned for the Israelites though with someoverlap here and there in the African context.Ubuntu/Unhu PoliticsThe political turmoil currently affecting the African continent and Zimbabwe in particular islargely as a failure to infuse ubuntu/unhu in our political democracy. An over dose of theEurocentric existentialist that is Sartrean in approach to politics is negatively affecting issuespertaining to political competitiveness. For instance, sacrificing the whole nation of Zimbabweunder sanctions is a clear indication of lack of ubuntu/unhu politics. On sanctions, Shively(2008:412) explains, A form of non military coercion that is often used by the United States,even in dealing with friends, is the imposition of economic sanctions Imposition of aneconomic sanction consists of a state or group of states deliberately withholding normaleconomic relations to punish another state. However, what is of value is to guard against theexploitation of resources by the outsiders as well as the care of our heritage both tangible and7 8. intangible. Mararike (2001:5) categorically hints, For Africa to sustain political independence,there is an urgent need to own, control and utilize her tangible and intangible assets.Ubuntu/Unhu political identity in Zimbabwe and Africa in general can only be sustained if bothtangible and intangible forms of heritage are owned and controlled by the indigenous people ofAfrica, without which ubuntu/unhu notion becomes a logical contradiction. Of note, amongtangible forms of heritage are minerals and the land in the definition of personhood or personalidentity in Africa. In this respect, Moyana (2002:153) strongly reiterates, Eviction from onesland symbolized the uprooting of ones soul from his ones and ones conversion from afreeman into a status comparable to upgraded slavery. In simple terms, being landless is a signof lack of ubuntu/unhu ending up in ones vulnerability to exploitative forces of neocolonialism.Mararike (2001:22) also observes, Land is the mother, father and children of all Africans.Without control and ownership of land, Africa will for ever remain a client of other nations. Incrude terms, Africans will remain sububuntu/unhu- maboora ngoma, if not complete fish-ntuin their failure to own and control tangible resources such as land. Herbst (1990:4) remarks,For instance, Colin Leys, in his study of the political economy of Kenya, called the African statesimply a sort of sub-committee of the international bourgeoisie. This kind of relationship isdehumanizing if not killing African identity in the realm of humanity. Africans are betteridentified with their land than with some artificially sermonized capitalistic creeds such as thehuman rights issue without the land- the pragmatic and essentialist playground of ubuntu/unhupraxis. Hence, Hatchard and Ogowewo (2003:6) reiterate, The most prized right of any politicalcommunity is the right to govern itself. Ones ubuntu/unhu identity in Africa is improved if thecontinent is left to exercise meaningful freedom by the unforgiving imperialist neocolonialistforces.Ubuntu/Unhu EducationGenerally, ubuntu/unhu curriculum is left in the hands of informal education that is not givenserious recognition in the contemporary world. As a word of advice to the curricularists, there isneed to merge ubuntu/unhu aspects in all facets of the curriculum if education is to be moremeaningful to Zimbabweans and Africans in general. Zvobgo (1999:111) observes, On attainingindependence, most African countries found themselves landed with an education system thatneeded extensive surgery in order to turn it into a tool that serves the needs and aspirations ofthe majority of the people. For most, the operation has been a traumatic one, bedeviled withsometimes conflicting demands of politics and economics. This reveals the need for anubuntu/unhu surgery in the education curricula so that indigenous knowledge is appropriatelymerged with foreign content. Nyerere (1968:44) stresses, education should have aproportionate relevance to the society we are trying to create childrenlearned by living and8 9. doing. Education should be for the cultivation of full citizenship and social responsibility. ForFalola (2002:571) Nationalism is a conception of self-determination that implies the right of apeople to express and maintain its specific cultural and political identity. In addition, Graig(1999:38) observes, Citizenship connotes the civil, political, social and economic rights whichindividuals presently possess, or ought to possess, within society. In this case, the educationcurricula should uphold those individual rights from a communitarian point of view as a way ofsustaining societal homogeneity. Wanjohi (1981:xvi) notes, Mutual social responsibility was avirtue that was given a high priority. Such a curriculum will enable learners to engage in amore dialectical self reflective manner than to rely only on a monofocal diasporean westernunderstanding of oneself where ubuntu/unhu is not a whole-ness but fragmented. Du Bois(1996:34) notes, Students of Africa, especially since the ivory-sugar-cotton-Negro complex ofthe nineteenth century, became hag-ridden by the obsession that nothing civilized is Negroidand every evidence of high culture in Africa must be white or at least yellow. Let theZimbabwean and African education curricula depict Lawton (1983)s view that curriculum is aselection from culture, in this case, ubuntu/unhu culture. This will achieve Awoniyi (1979:3)sposition that, no educational system stands apart from the society which establishes it.Education draws inspiration and nourishment from a society, but in turn contributes to thegrowth, renewal and development of that society. Therefore, ubuntu/unhu should be acurriculum therapy for the renewal and development of African identity and humanity ingeneral. The key issue is that, African education emphasized social responsibility, joborientation, political participation and spiritual and moral values. Children learnt by doingwere engaged in participatory education through ceremonies, rituals, imitation, recitation anddemonstration (Fafunwa and Aisiku 1982). This was/is an ubuntu/unhu informal curriculumthat was/is pedagogically second to none in its attempt to produce an appropriateubuntu/unhu identity that should be infused in the current education curricula.ConclusionThe presentation nostalgically addressed ubuntu/unhu philosophical reflection metaphysically,epistemologically, axiologically, politically, socially and educationally with a strong inclinationtowards personal identity or personhood. Some parallel lines have been drawn in view of thewestern and African conception of ubuntu/unhu identity. The communitarian notion ofubuntu/unhu seems plausible in dealing with a myriad of problems affecting Zimbabwe andAfrica as a continent. Sangofa seems to be the best answer to African woes in different forumsof life.9 10. REFERENCESAkinpelu, J.A. (1981). An Introduction to Philosophy of Education. London: Macmillan.Asante, M.K. & Abarry, A.S. (Eds). (1996). African Intellectual Herritage: A Book of Sources.Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Awoniyi, T.A. (1979). Principles and Practice of Education. London: Hodder & Stoughton Ltd.Chung, F. (2007). Re-Living the Second Chimurenga: Memories from Zimbabwes LiberationStruggle. Harare: Weaver Press.Coetzee, P.H. & Roux, A.P.J. (Eds). (2003) The African Philosophy Reader. Cape Town: OxfordUniversity Press of Southern Africa.Du Bois, W.E. (1996). The World and Africa: An Inquiry into the part which Africa has playedin World History. New York: International Publishers.Fafunwa, A.B. & Aisiku, J.U. (Eds). (1982). Education in Africa: A Comparative Survey. London:George Allen & UnWin.Falola, T. (Ed). (2002). African Politics in Post imperial Times: The essays of Richard L. Sklar.Asmara: Africa World Press, Inc.Fasold, R. (1987). The Sociolinguistics of Society. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Inc.Gordon, L.R. (Ed). (1997). Existence in Black: An Anthology of Black Existential Philosophy.London & New York: Routledge.Graig, P.P. (1999). Administrative Law. London: Sweet & Maxwell Limited.Harrison-Barbet, A. (2001). Mastering Philosophy. London: Palgrave.Hatchard, J. & Ogowewo, T.I. (2003). Tackling the Unconstitutional Overthrow of Democracies:Emerging Trends in the Commonwealth. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.Herbst, J. (1990). State Politics in Zimbabwe. Harare: UZ Publications.10 11. Kim, J. & Sosa, E. (1995). A Companion to Metaphysics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Lawton, D. (1983). Curriculum Studies and Educational Planning. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Mararike, C.G. (2001). Africas Heritage: Our Rallying Point: The Case of Zimbabwes LandIssue. Harare: Best Practices Books.Moyana, H.V. (2002). The Political Economy of Land in Zimbabwe. Gweru: Mambo Press.Mukusha, J. (2011). Presocratic Epistemology an Equivalent to African Knowledge Cosmogony: AnEpistemic Legitimacy. Berlin: VDMVerlag Dr. Muller & Co. KG.Nyerere, J.K. (1968). Ujamaa Essays on Socialism. Dar es Salaam: Oxford University Press.OConnor, D.J. (Ed). (1964). A Critical History of Western Philosophy. New York: The Free Press.OHear, A. (1985). What Philosophy Is: An Introduction to Contemporary Philosophy. London:Penguin Books.Peters, R.S. (1973). Authority, Responsibility and Education. London: George Allen & Unwin.Pradel, L. (2000). African Beliefs in the New World. Asmara: Africa World Press, Inc.Ramose, M.B. (1999). African Philosophy Through Ubuntu. Harare: Mond Books.Sandel, M.J. (1998). Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress.Schofield, H. (1972). The Philosophy of Education. London: George Allen & Unwin.Shively, W.P. (2008). Power & Choice: An Introduction to Political Science. New York: McGraw-Hill.Stumpf,S.E. & Fieser, J. (2008). Socrates to Sartre and Beyond: A History of Philosophy. NewYork: McGraw Hill.Verstraelen, F.J. (1998). Zimbabwean Realities and Christian Responses. Gweru: Mambo Press.Wanjohi, G.J. (Transl). (1981). The Child and His Environment in Black Africa. Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press.Wright, R.A. (Ed). (1984) . African Philosophy. New York: University Press of America.Zvobgo, R.J. (1999). The Post-Colonial State and Educational Reform (Zimbabwe, Zambia andBotswana). Harare: Zimbabwe Publishing House.11 12. 12