1
Conclusion The combination effect of BGB-283 and MEKi was positively correlated to pMEK activation levels induced by MEKi as single agent (Figure 1,2). This data was consistent with previous findings that disruption of RAF-mediated MEK reactivation is required for effective inhibition of MAPK pathway in KRAS mutant tumors (Piro Lito, et al., Cancer Cell. 2014). Addition of BGB-283 in the presence of selumetinib (AZD6244) potently inhibited RAF-dependent MEK phosphorylation and led to sustained inhibition of ERK activity. BGB-283 and selumetinib showed synergistic effect in inhibiting proliferation of several RAS mutant NSCLC cell lines and exhibited enhanced antitumor activity in K-RAS mutant NSCLC and CRC xenograft models compared to monotherapies. Combining RAF inhibitor BGB-283 and MEKi could be a promising strategy in treating RAS mutated cancers. Figure 5. (A) Combination of AZD6244 and BGB-283 demonstrated enhanced antitumor efficacy than each single agent alone and achieved 88% to 100% overall response rate (PR+CR) in Calu-6 xenograft model. (B) Combining BGB-283 and AZD6244 enhanced the antitumor activities of both compounds and achieved >100% TGI and 88% PR in HCT116 (KRAS G13D ) CRC xenograft model. (C) Pharmacodynamics (PD) studies conducted in Calu-6 xenograft model showed that combination of AZD-6244 with increased doses of BGB-283 significantly inhibited ERK phosphorylation. (*, p<0.05 vs. vehicle control; ^, p<0.05 vs. AZD6244 single treatment). BGB-283 Effectively Enhances MEK Inhibitor Induced Tumor Suppression in RAS Mutant Cancers Xi Yuan 1 , Zhiyu Tang 1 , Rong Du 1 , Shing-Hu Cheung 1 , Jing Wei 1 , Yuan Zhao 1 , Yunguang Du 1 , Rui Hao 1 , Xiaoxia Hu 1 , Wenfeng Gong 1 , Yong Liu 1 , Yajuan Gao 1 , Min Wei 1,* , Changyou Zhou 1 , Lai Wang 1 , Lusong Luo 1 1 BeiGene (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing 102206, China; *Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract #669 Introduction Mutations in K-RAS, which drives constitutive activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway, is one of the most frequent genetic alterations in human cancers. Pharmacological targeting RAS mutants directly is extremely challenging and targeted inhibition of RAS downstream effector MEK has shown limited clinical activity in suppressing the progression of RAS mutant tumors. The reduced sensitivity of RAS-mutated cancer cells to MEK inhibitors (MEKi) is associated with feedback phosphorylation of MEK and rebound of phosphorylated ERK levels after prolonged treatment. Three-tiered kinase module of RAF/MEK/ERK is integrated with negative feedback loops and generates a biological circuit serving as a negative feedback amplifier (NFA). Such NFA confers the robustness of the signalling pathway and makes it difficult to effectively inhibit the mediators within the circuit (Sturm OE, et al., Sci Signal. 2010). It is suggested that combining therapeutics that block multiple nodes within the feedback loops could disable the NFA function. In this study, we showed that combining BGB-283, a second generation BRAF inhibitor (Abstract #4692), and a series of MEKi could achieve better therapeutic effect of the latter. Figure 2. The effect of different MEKis on the MEK/ERK pathway was investigated in Calu-6 cells using (A) western blot and (B) HTRF assay. AZD6244, PD0325901, and AS703026 treatment effectively reduced pERK levels but stimulated a robust MEK phosphorylation through feedback mediated by RAFs activation. In contrast, GSK1120212 and RO5126766 had minimal effect on MEK phosphorylation. BGB-283 but not PLX4032 potently inhibits AZD6244-induced pMEK upregulation Day 0 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 0 2 4 6 8 DMSO BGB283 1 μM AZD6244 1 μM AZD6244 1 μM+BGB283 1μM cell number (*10000) Day 0 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 0 2 4 6 8 10 DMSO PLX4032 1 μM AZD6244 1 μM AZD6244 1 μM+PLX4032 1 μM cell number (*10000) 0.01 1 100 10000 0 50 100 150 200 concentration (nM) 0.01 1 100 10000 0 50 100 150 200 concentration (nM) relative p-MEK (%) 0.01 1 100 10000 0 50 100 150 200 concentration (nM) 1 h 6 h 24 h 3 μM AZD6244 0.6 μM PD0325901 1 μM AS703026 15 nM GSK1120212 0.5 μM RO5126766 0.01 1 100 10000 -100 0 100 200 300 AZD6244 AS703026 PD0325901 GSK1120212 RO5126766 MEKi concentration (nM) % pMEK (1 h) + + + + + A B GAPDH ERK pERK pMEK MEK GAPDH ERK pERK pMEK MEK 1 h 24 h A 1 μM AZD6244 1 μM PLX4032 1 μM BGB-283 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 1 h 6 h 24 h 48 h pERK ERK pMEK MEK BRAF CRAF GAPDH B Figure 3. (A) BGB-283 inhibited AZD6244-induced MEK phosphorylation in Calu-6 cells with IC 50 of 2.9 μM, 0.9 μM, and 0.6 μM for 1, 6, and 24 h treatment, respectively. In contrast, PLX4032 (vemurafenib) not only failed to inhibit but further induced MEK phosphorylation under the same conditions. (1 μM AZD6244 induced pMEK level was set as 100%.) (B) Combination of BGB-283 and AZD-6244 treatment led to sustained inhibition of both MEK and ERK phosphorylation for up to 48 h. BGB-283 but not PLX4032 potentiates the inhibitory effect of AZD6244 on proliferation of Cau-6 cells Figure 4. 1 μM BGB-283 and 1 μM AZD6244 as single agent showed partial inhibition on proliferation of Calu-6 cells. Combined treatment with BGB-283 and AZD6244 effectively blocked cell proliferation, which was concomitant with sustained inhibition of pMEK/pERK (Figure 2B). No such effect was observed when cells were treated with AZD6244 in combination of PLX4032. Table 1. Synergistic effect was observed in combination of BGB- 283 and AZD6244 (Selumetinib) in RAS mutant NSCLC cell lines. Cell Line Mutations Number of Cells with EOHSA Average EOHSA per Cell Max EC 50 Shift for Selumetinib * Calu-6 KRAS, p53 43 (77%) 22 28 fold ↓ A549 KRAS, CDKN2A 23 (85%) 11 5 fold ↓ NCI-H2122 KRAS, p53, CDKN2A 28 (50%) 13 16 fold ↓ NCI-H23 KRAS, p53, STK11 45 (80%) 18 10 fold ↓ SW1573 KRAS, PIK3CA, CDKN2A, NF2 47 (83%) 18 64 fold ↓ Sk-Lu-1 KRAS, p53, CDKN2A 43 (77%) 10 51 fold ↓ Calu-1 KRAS 18 (67%) 4 N/A NCI-H1299 NRAS 12 (44%) 6 N/A NCI-H358 KRAS 14 (52%) 6 N/A The synergistic effect of BGB-283 and AZD6244 on cell proliferation was assessed in RAS mutant cells using EOHSA analysis. Various doses of BGB-283 were combined across a range of concentrations of AZD6244 to generate 9 × 9 matrix (Figure 1). Each combination was then scored to identify anti-proliferative effects that were greater than the effect of each individual component. Table 2. No significant synergy was detected in combination of PLX4032 and AZD6244 in K/N-RAS mutant cells. Cell Line Mutations Number of Cells with EOHSA Average EOHSA per Cell Max EC 50 Shift for Selumetinib* Calu-6 KRAS, p53 33 (57%) 9 1 fold ↓ A549 KRAS, CDKN2A 8 (30%) 3 2 fold ↑ NCI-H2122 KRAS, p53, CDKN2A 8 (14%) 7 25 fold ↑ NCI-H23 KRAS, p53, STK11 45 (80%) 7 1 fold ↓ SW1573 KRAS, PIK3CA, CDKN2A, NF2 11% 3 N/A Sk-Lu-1 KRAS, p53, CDKN2A 51 (91%) 7 43 fold ↓ Calu-1 KRAS 7 (26%) 3 N/A NCI-H1299 NRAS 6 (22%) 3 N/A NCI-H358 KRAS 5 (19%) 1 N/A * Combinations with EOHSA ≥ 10 & Max EC50 shift ≥ 5 are considered to have synergy, highlighted in green Combination of BGB-283 and AZD6244 shows improved efficacy in KRAS mutant xenograft models 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 0 10 20 30 Average tumor volume (mm3) Days vehicle AZD6244 25 mg/kg BGB-283 5 mg/kg BGB-283 10 mg/kg BGB-283 15 mg/kg BGB-283 2.5 mg/kg + AZD6244 25 mg/kg BGB-283 5 mg/kg + AZD6244 25 mg/kg BGB-283 10 mg/kg + AZD6244 25 mg/kg A 0 400 800 1200 1600 2000 0 6 12 18 24 Average tumor volume (mm3 Days vehicle AZD6244 25 mg/kg BGB-283 5 mg/kg BGB-283 5 mg/kg + AZD6244 25 mg/kg B C 0.0E+00 2.0E+05 4.0E+05 6.0E+05 p-ERK level (mean ±SEM ) -12% 70%* 28% 50% AZD6244 (mpk) BGB-283 (mpk) 95%*^ 84%*^ 25 5 10 25 2.5 25 5 25 10 Figure 1. Heat maps showed that effect of combining BGB-283 and (A) AZD6244, (B) PD0325901, (C) AS703026, (D) GSK1120212, and (E) RO5126766 was evaluated by EHOSA analysis for percent inhibition of cell proliferation. BGB-283 effectively increased AZD6244, PD0325901 and AS703026 activity in Calu-6 cells (KRAS Q61K ). However, no obvious synergy was detected in combing BGB-283 with GSK1120212 or RO5126766. HCT116 Calu-6 Calu-6 Differential combination effect of BGB-283 with MEKis is correlated with pMEK feedback levels BGB-283 but not PLX4032 synergizes with AZD6244 in inhibiting RAS mutant cell proliferation 1 μM AZD6244+PLX4032 1 μM AZD6244+BGB-283

BGB-283 Effectively Enhances MEK Inhibitor Induced …beigeneltd.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/BGB-283-669-AACR-2015… · inhibiting proliferation of several RAS mutant NSCLC cell

  • Upload
    vumien

  • View
    216

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: BGB-283 Effectively Enhances MEK Inhibitor Induced …beigeneltd.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/BGB-283-669-AACR-2015… · inhibiting proliferation of several RAS mutant NSCLC cell

Conclusion ● The combination effect of BGB-283 and MEKi was positively

correlated to pMEK activation levels induced by MEKi as single agent (Figure 1,2). This data was consistent with previous findings that disruption of RAF-mediated MEK reactivation is required for effective inhibition of MAPK pathway in KRAS mutant tumors (Piro Lito, et al., Cancer Cell. 2014).

● Addition of BGB-283 in the presence of selumetinib (AZD6244) potently inhibited RAF-dependent MEK phosphorylation and led to sustained inhibition of ERK activity.

● BGB-283 and selumetinib showed synergistic effect in inhibiting proliferation of several RAS mutant NSCLC cell lines and exhibited enhanced antitumor activity in K-RAS mutant NSCLC and CRC xenograft models compared to monotherapies.

● Combining RAF inhibitor BGB-283 and MEKi could be a promising strategy in treating RAS mutated cancers.

Figure 5. (A) Combination of AZD6244 and BGB-283 demonstrated enhanced antitumor efficacy than each single agent alone and achieved 88% to 100% overall response rate (PR+CR) in Calu-6 xenograft model. (B) Combining BGB-283 and AZD6244 enhanced the antitumor activities of both compounds and achieved >100% TGI and 88% PR in HCT116 (KRASG13D) CRC xenograft model. (C) Pharmacodynamics (PD) studies conducted in Calu-6 xenograft model showed that combination of AZD-6244 with increased doses of BGB-283 significantly inhibited ERK phosphorylation. (*, p<0.05 vs. vehicle control; ^, p<0.05 vs. AZD6244 single treatment).

BGB-283 Effectively Enhances MEK Inhibitor Induced Tumor Suppression in RAS Mutant Cancers

Xi Yuan1, Zhiyu Tang1, Rong Du1, Shing-Hu Cheung1, Jing Wei1, Yuan Zhao1, Yunguang Du1, Rui Hao1, Xiaoxia Hu1, Wenfeng Gong1, Yong Liu1, Yajuan Gao1, Min Wei1,*, Changyou Zhou1, Lai Wang1, Lusong Luo1

1BeiGene (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing 102206, China; *Correspondence: [email protected]

Abstract #669

Introduction Mutations in K-RAS, which drives constitutive activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway, is one of the most frequent genetic alterations in human cancers. Pharmacological targeting RAS mutants directly is extremely challenging and targeted inhibition of RAS downstream effector MEK has shown limited clinical activity in suppressing the progression of RAS mutant tumors. The reduced sensitivity of RAS-mutated cancer cells to MEK inhibitors (MEKi) is associated with feedback phosphorylation of MEK and rebound of phosphorylated ERK levels after prolonged treatment. Three-tiered kinase module of RAF/MEK/ERK is integrated with negative feedback loops and generates a biological circuit serving as a negative feedback amplifier (NFA). Such NFA confers the robustness of the signalling pathway and makes it difficult to effectively inhibit the mediators within the circuit (Sturm OE, et al., Sci Signal. 2010). It is suggested that combining therapeutics that block multiple nodes within the feedback loops could disable the NFA function. In this study, we showed that combining BGB-283, a second generation BRAF inhibitor (Abstract #4692), and a series of MEKi could achieve better therapeutic effect of the latter.

Figure 2. The effect of different MEKis on the MEK/ERK pathway was investigated in Calu-6 cells using (A) western blot and (B) HTRF assay. AZD6244, PD0325901, and AS703026 treatment effectively reduced pERK levels but stimulated a robust MEK phosphorylation through feedback mediated by RAFs activation. In contrast, GSK1120212 and RO5126766 had minimal effect on MEK phosphorylation.

BGB-283 but not PLX4032 potently inhibits AZD6244-induced pMEK upregulation

Day 0 Day 1 Day 2 Day 30

2

4

6

8 DMSOBGB-­283  1  μMAZD6244  1  μMAZD6244  1  μM+BGB-­283  1μM

cell

num

ber (

*100

00)

Day 0 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 40

2

4

6

8

10 DMSOPLX4032  1  μMAZD6244  1  μMAZD6244  1  μM+PLX4032  1  μM

cell

num

ber (

*100

00)

0.01 1 100 100000

50

100

150

200

concentration (nM)0.01 1 100 100000

50

100

150

200

concentration (nM)

rela

tive

p-M

EK (%

)

0.01 1 100 100000

50

100

150

200

concentration (nM)

1 h 6 h 24 h

3 μM AZD6244 0.6 μM PD0325901

1 μM AS703026 15 nM GSK1120212 0.5 μM RO5126766

0.01 1 100 10000-100

0

100

200

300

AZD6244AS703026PD0325901

GSK1120212RO5126766

MEKi concentration (nM)

% p

ME

K (1

h)

−−−−−

+ −−−−

−+ − −−

−− + −−

−− −+ −

−− −− +

A B

GAPDH

ERK

pERK

pMEK

MEK

GAPDH

ERK

pERK

pMEK

MEK

1 h

24 h

A

1 µM AZD6244 1 µM PLX4032 1 µM BGB-283

− − −

+ − −

− + −

− − +

+ + −

+ − +

− − −

+ − −

− + −

− − +

+ + −

+ − +

− − −

+ − −

− + −

− − +

+ + −

+ − +

− − −

+ − −

− + −

− − +

+ + −

+ − +

1 h 6 h 24 h 48 h

pERK

ERK

pMEK

MEK

BRAF

CRAF

GAPDH

B

Figure 3. (A) BGB-283 inhibited AZD6244-induced MEK phosphorylation in Calu-6 cells with IC50 of 2.9 μM, 0.9 μM, and 0.6 μM for 1, 6, and 24 h treatment, respectively. In contrast, PLX4032 (vemurafenib) not only failed to inhibit but further induced MEK phosphorylation under the same conditions. (1 μM AZD6244 induced pMEK level was set as 100%.) (B) Combination of BGB-283 and AZD-6244 treatment led to sustained inhibition of both MEK and ERK phosphorylation for up to 48 h.

BGB-283 but not PLX4032 potentiates the inhibitory effect of AZD6244 on proliferation of Cau-6 cells

Figure 4. 1 μM BGB-283 and 1 μM AZD6244 as single agent showed partial inhibition on proliferation of Calu-6 cells. Combined treatment with BGB-283 and AZD6244 effectively blocked cell proliferation, which was concomitant with sustained inhibition of pMEK/pERK (Figure 2B). No such effect was observed when cells were treated with AZD6244 in combination of PLX4032.

Table 1. Synergistic effect was observed in combination of BGB-283 and AZD6244 (Selumetinib) in RAS mutant NSCLC cell lines.

Cell Line Mutations Number of Cells with

EOHSA

Average EOHSA per

Cell

Max EC50 Shift for

Selumetinib * Calu-6 KRAS, p53 43 (77%) 22 28  fold  ↓ A549 KRAS, CDKN2A 23 (85%) 11 5  fold  ↓

NCI-H2122 KRAS, p53, CDKN2A 28 (50%) 13 16  fold  ↓ NCI-H23 KRAS, p53, STK11 45 (80%) 18 10  fold  ↓

SW1573 KRAS, PIK3CA, CDKN2A, NF2 47 (83%) 18 64  fold  ↓

Sk-Lu-1 KRAS, p53, CDKN2A 43 (77%) 10 51  fold  ↓ Calu-1 KRAS 18 (67%) 4 N/A

NCI-H1299 NRAS 12 (44%) 6 N/A NCI-H358 KRAS 14 (52%) 6 N/A

The synergistic effect of BGB-283 and AZD6244 on cell proliferation was assessed in RAS mutant cells using EOHSA analysis. Various doses of BGB-283 were combined across a range of concentrations of AZD6244 to generate 9 × 9 matrix (Figure 1). Each combination was then scored to identify anti-proliferative effects that were greater than the effect of each individual component.

Table 2. No significant synergy was detected in combination of PLX4032 and AZD6244 in K/N-RAS mutant cells.

Cell Line Mutations Number of Cells with

EOHSA

Average EOHSA per

Cell

Max EC50 Shift for

Selumetinib* Calu-6 KRAS, p53 33 (57%) 9 1  fold    ↓ A549 KRAS, CDKN2A 8 (30%) 3 2  fold  ↑

NCI-H2122 KRAS, p53, CDKN2A 8 (14%) 7 25  fold  ↑ NCI-H23 KRAS, p53, STK11 45 (80%) 7 1  fold  ↓

SW1573 KRAS, PIK3CA, CDKN2A, NF2 11% 3 N/A

Sk-Lu-1 KRAS, p53, CDKN2A 51 (91%) 7 43  fold  ↓ Calu-1 KRAS 7 (26%) 3 N/A

NCI-H1299 NRAS 6 (22%) 3 N/A NCI-H358 KRAS 5 (19%) 1 N/A

*  Combinations  with  EOHSA  ≥  10  &  Max  EC50  shift  ≥  5  are  considered  to  have  synergy, highlighted in green

Combination of BGB-283 and AZD6244 shows improved efficacy in KRAS mutant xenograft models

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

0 10 20 30

Aver

age

tum

or v

olum

e (m

m3)

Days

vehicle AZD6244 25 mg/kg BGB-283 5 mg/kg BGB-283 10 mg/kg BGB-283 15 mg/kg BGB-283 2.5 mg/kg + AZD6244 25 mg/kg BGB-283 5 mg/kg + AZD6244 25 mg/kg BGB-283 10 mg/kg + AZD6244 25 mg/kg

A

0

400

800

1200

1600

2000

0 6 12 18 24

Aver

age

tum

or v

olum

e (m

m3

Days

vehicle AZD6244 25 mg/kg BGB-283 5 mg/kg BGB-283 5 mg/kg + AZD6244 25 mg/kg

B C

0.0E+00

2.0E+05

4.0E+05

6.0E+05

p-ER

K le

vel (

mea

n ±

SEM

) -12%

70%*

28%

50%

AZD6244 (mpk) BGB-283 (mpk)

95%*^ 84%*^

− −

25 −

− 5

− 10

25 2.5

25 5

25 10

Figure 1. Heat maps showed that effect of combining BGB-283 and (A) AZD6244, (B) PD0325901, (C) AS703026, (D) GSK1120212, and (E) RO5126766 was evaluated by EHOSA analysis for percent inhibition of cell proliferation. BGB-283 effectively increased AZD6244, PD0325901 and AS703026 activity in Calu-6 cells (KRASQ61K). However, no obvious synergy was detected in combing BGB-283 with GSK1120212 or RO5126766.

HCT1

16

Calu

-6

Calu

-6

Differential combination effect of BGB-283 with MEKis is correlated with pMEK feedback levels

BGB-283 but not PLX4032 synergizes with AZD6244 in inhibiting RAS mutant cell proliferation

1 µM AZD6244+PLX4032 1 µM AZD6244+BGB-283