76
1 Beyond the Lifestyle Center: Redeveloping Strip Malls Within A Community Context 2009 Ohio Planning Conference Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio September 24, 2009

Beyond the Lifestyle Center - Regonline

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

1

Beyond the Lifestyle Center:Redeveloping Strip Malls Within A Community Context

2009 Ohio Planning Conference Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio

September 24, 2009

2

IntroductionCity of Cuyahoga FallsCity of Cuyahoga Falls

Sue Sue TrubyTruby, Director of Development, Director of Development

Fred Guerra, AICP Planning DirectorFred Guerra, AICP Planning Director

MSI DesignMSI Design

Andrew Andrew OverbeckOverbeck, AICP, AICP

BialoskyBialosky + Partners+ Partners

Jack Jack BialoskyBialosky, AIA, LEED AP, AIA, LEED AP

David David CraunCraun, LEED AP, LEED AP

3

Presentation OutlinePlanning Impetus: Downtown and Planning Impetus: Downtown and State Road Shopping CenterState Road Shopping Center

Enabling Code ChangesEnabling Code Changes

Strategic PlanningStrategic Planning

Portage Crossing Development PlanPortage Crossing Development Plan

State Road Shopping Center State Road Shopping Center DemolitionDemolition

4

MSI Design

Bialosky + Partners

Robert L. Stark Enterprises

Project Team

5

Crocker Park

6

Crocker Park

7

Eton Collection

8

Eton Collection

9

Planning Imeptus: State Road + Downtown

10

State Road Shopping Center: 2007

11

State Road Shopping Center: 1950s

Credit: Akron Beacon Journal

12

State Road Shopping Center

Credit: Akron Beacon Journal

13

State Road Shopping Center

Credit: Akron Beacon Journal

14

State Road Shopping Center

15

Existing Character: Natural Features

Downtown

16

Existing Character: Parking Garages

Downtown

17

Existing Character: Front Street

Downtown

18

Existing Character: Front Street

Downtown

19

Regional Context MapRegional Context Map

Retail Leakage

20

Regional Shopping DestinationsRegional Shopping Destinations

Retail Leakage

21

Regional Shopping Destinations Popular Regional Shopping Destinations Popular

with Cuyahoga Falls Residentswith Cuyahoga Falls Residents

Retail Leakage

22

Code Changes to Enable Redevelopment

23

Master Planning + Code Amendments

24

Master Planning + Code Amendments

Cuyahoga River AreaMixed Use CentersMixed Use Centers

MUMU--6 Districts6 Districts

MUMU--5 Districts5 Districts

Mixed Residential Mixed Residential NeighborhoodsNeighborhoods

RR--6 Residential Districts6 Residential Districts

RR--5 Residential District5 Residential District

State-Portage Trail AreaMixed Use CentersMixed Use Centers

MUMU--4 Districts4 Districts

MUMU--3 Districts3 Districts

Mixed Residential Mixed Residential NeighborhoodsNeighborhoods

RR--5 Residential Districts5 Residential Districts

RR--4 Residential Districts4 Residential Districts

25

MU-5, Urban Center. This district is intended for walkable commercial and mixed-use areas on a large scale in an urban setting, and creates unique destinations complimentary to downtown. It balances significant pedestrian connections to adjacent areas with the need to accommodate traffic and parking. The district may include commercial uses that are incompatible with neighborhood centers,but avoid uses that detract from downtown as the regional focus of the community. It is designed to function as a single, walkable district for patrons. It may be closely associated with an adjacent mixed-density residential neighborhood and/or incorporate dwelling units into the district.MU-6, Downtown. This district is intended to preserve the downtown as the regional focal point of the City, and a destination for the region. The district is characterized by a diverse mix of commercial, employment, entertainment, cultural, civic and residential uses. It is intended to be highly pedestrian oriented and integrated with adjacent areas, but promotes innovative techniques to ensure the high accessibility of the district to the region.

R-4, Urban Density Residential. This is a compact residential district in urban and suburban environments, adjacent to walkablecenters and offering urban services, characterized by smaller lots, and high pedestrian connectivity, including a range of dwelling types in appropriate locations.R-5, Mixed Density Residential. This is an urban residential district integrated into other mixed-use urban environments and buffering lower-density neighborhoods from busy corridors, characterized by a range of dwelling types, smaller lots, and high pedestrian connectivity.R-6, Urban Mixed Density Residential. This is an urban residential district characterized by denser, compact, dwellings, all walkable to urban civic areas and urban commercial centers.

Downtown – Cuyahoga River Area

26

State Road – State/Portage Trail AreaMU-3, Sub-Urban Center. This district is intended for walkable commercial and mixed-use areas on a large scale in a sub-urban setting. It offers a design and land use alternative to shopping centers, strip malls and commercial corridors. It balances significant pedestrian connections to adjacent areas with the need to accommodate traffic and parking. The district may include uses that function as adestination for the region, but is designed to function as a single, walkable district for patrons. It may be closely associated with an adjacent mixed-density residential neighborhood and/or incorporate dwelling units into the district.MU-4, Sub-Urban Corridor. This district is intended for corridors that connect different districts over longer linear distances. It has a transportation corridor as its primary focal point. Commercial uses and site designs that may not easily assimilate into the design and development patterns of other mixed-use districts may be appropriate in this district. The district is characterized by a variety of uses, but all uses present a consistent and compatible presence along the length of the corridor.

R-3, Sub-Urban Density Residential. This is a low-density residential district characterized by large lots organized around a neighborhood focal point within walking distance of nearly all of the dwelling units.R-4, Urban Density Residential. This is a compact residential district in urban and suburban environments, adjacent to walkablecenters and offering urban services, characterized by smaller lots, and high pedestrian connectivity, including a range of dwelling types in appropriate locations.R-5, Mixed Density Residential. This is an urban residential district integrated into other mixed-use urban environments and buffering lower-density neighborhoods from busy corridors, characterized by a range of dwelling types, smaller lots, and high pedestrian connectivity.

27

RM, Mixed-Density Residential Overlay. This district is intended for walkable new urban neighborhoods that place a range of dwelling types with varying densities in close proximity to neighborhood centers. It is an overlay district to be applied to a portion of one or more residential zoning districts, to create an integrated, mixed-density neighborhood. It requires greater attention to community design for increased and mixed-density to integrate into a cohesive neighborhood. Mixed density neighborhoods generally are no greater than ¼mile in diameter placing nearly all dwellings within ½ mile of the neighborhood center. Low-density dwellings and/or natural open space are at the edge of the neighborhood and higher density dwellings are used to create transitions to the neighborhood Center. The resulting zoning districts shall be designated by the base-zoning district, followed by “RM” (i.e. R-3RM).

Overlay District

28

Mixed-Use Center Design StandardsFaçade StandardsMassing & ScaleMaterial SpecificationsPedestrian Access & CirculationsParking Design, Exterior Lighting, Landscaping and Signage

Residential Neighborhood DesignGeneral Building Design Standards

MaterialsRoofsAttachmentsAttached GaragesExtensions/Projections

Access & CirculationParkingExterior Lighting

General Design Standards

29

Strategic PlanningDowntownDowntown

State RoadState Road

Opportunities and ConstraintsOpportunities and Constraints

ConnectionsConnections

30

Strategic Planning

Plan Study AreasPlan Study Areas

STATE ROAD

DOWNTOWN

31

Increase the amount of residential living opportunities downtown

Provide better access to riverfront

Promote a mix of active uses including, commercial, residential and civic uses downtown

Increase the pedestrian friendliness

Make downtown a destination 365 days a year

Downtown – Planning Concepts

32

Five Minute Walking Radius

Downtown – Strategic Plan

33

Streets and Highways

Downtown – Strategic Plan

34

Zoning

MU-6

MU-5

MU-4

MU-2

R-6

R-5

R-4

E-1

Legend

Downtown – Strategic Plan

35

Historic Character: Front Street 1949

Downtown – Strategic Plan

36

Front Street BenchmarksFront Street Benchmarks

Downtown – Strategic Plan

37

Front Front ““MainMain”” Street SectionStreet Section

Downtown – Strategic Plan

38

Architectural Style: FaArchitectural Style: Faççade Preserved ade Preserved –– New Construction BehindNew Construction Behind

Downtown – Strategic Plan

39

Riverfront Housing SectionRiverfront Housing Section

Downtown – Strategic Plan

40

Residential BenchmarksResidential Benchmarks

Downtown – Strategic Plan

41

Redevelopment must be additive to planning efforts in the downtown area

Redevelop site with greater emphasis on residential and service-based retail

Reinsert the street grid and improve access from surrounding neighborhoods

Make center accessible via numerous modes of transportation

State Road - Planning Concepts

42

Streets

State Road – Strategic PlanSt

ate

Roa

d

Portage Trail

Graham Road

43

Building Diagram

State Road – Strategic Plan

44

Five Minute Walking Radius

State Road – Strategic Plan

45

Zoning

MU-4

R-5

R-4

Legend

Stat

e R

oad

Portage Trail

Graham Road

State Road – Strategic Plan

46

New Circulation: Roadways

Graham Road

Stat

e R

oad

Silverlake Avenue

Portage Trail13

thSt

reet

State Road – Strategic Plan

47

New Land Uses

Graham Road

Stat

e R

oad

Silverlake Avenue

Portage Trail13

thSt

reet

State Road – Strategic Plan

48

Graham Road

Stat

e R

oad

Silverlake Avenue

Portage Trail13

thSt

reet

State Road – Strategic Plan

49

State Road Plan

Graham Road

Stat

e R

oad

Silverlake Avenue

Portage Trail13

thSt

reet

State Road – Strategic Plan

50

Potential Community Learning Campus

Graham Road

Stat

e R

oad

Silverlake Avenue

Portage Trail13

thSt

reet

State Road – Strategic Plan

51

State Road: Combined Plan

Graham Road

Stat

e R

oad

Silverlake Avenue

Portage Trail13

thSt

reet

Graham Road

Stat

e R

oad

Silverlake Avenue

Portage Trail

13th

Stre

et

State Road – Strategic Plan

52

Combined Downtown and State Road Plans

Connecting to Downtown

53

Combined Downtown and State Road Master Plans: Connectivity

Connecting to Downtown

54

Portage Crossing Development Plan

55

State Road Shopping Center – Milestones

2008 – Strategic Plan

August 2008 – State Road Shopping Center Acquired

November 2008 – RFP Issued

December 2008 – RFP Responses From Developers

May 2009 – Developer Selection Made

May 2009 – Portage Crossing Unveiled at ICSC Las Vegas

May to Present – Preliminary Site Planning + Retail Leasing

56

Portage Crossing: Before

57

Portage Crossing: After

58

Portage Crossing: Phasing

59

Portage Crossing: Retail Character

60

Portage Crossing: Retail Character

61

Portage Crossing: Retail Character

62

Portage Crossing: Retail Character

63

Portage Crossing: Retail Character

64

Portage Crossing: Retail Character

65

Portage Crossing: Residential Character

66

Portage Crossing: Residential Character

67

Portage Crossing: Residential Character

68

State Road Shopping Center Demolition

69

State Road Shopping Center Demolition

70

State Road Shopping Center Demolition

71

State Road Shopping Center Demolition

72

State Road Shopping Center Demolition

73

State Road Shopping Center Demolition

74

Portage Crossing: Milestones

August to November 2009 –Demolition, Asbestos Removal, Soil Remediation and Demolition Activities

Spring 2010 – Phase 1 Ground Breaking

Spring 2011 – Phase 1 Building Shells Substantially Complete

Summer 2011 – Phase 1 Project Open

75

Questions

76