Bettering service supply relationships in Indian agro-food SME’s

  • Upload
    amargov

  • View
    214

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/14/2019 Bettering service supply relationships in Indian agro-food SMEs

    1/16

    VIABLE AGRO-INDUSTRYMODELS FOR SMES ANDSUPPLY RELATIONSHIPS IN

    THE INDIAN CONTEXT.Presentation by

    Amarnath Govindarajan

    Sandwalk Consultancy

    UEL.

  • 8/14/2019 Bettering service supply relationships in Indian agro-food SMEs

    2/16

    PROBLEM STATEMENT

    Indian agro-industrial SMEs have beenfinding it difficult to source products thatmeet international standards.

    Seasonal variations, fluctuating demandissues are not suitably addressed at thesupply side.

    Lack of communication channels, informationexchange between stakeholders. One enddoes not know the other!

    (Rao, 2007)

  • 8/14/2019 Bettering service supply relationships in Indian agro-food SMEs

    3/16

    ACTION PLAN

    Study prevalent models and identify a modelappropriate for an SME.

    Identify factors/components on the supplyside of the model that need to becustomized.

    Address academic issues involved withcustomization.

    Identify tools and methodologies that can

    help the process.

  • 8/14/2019 Bettering service supply relationships in Indian agro-food SMEs

    4/16

    EXISTING MODELS

    Co-operative, government organization,private MNC contracting and VAC models areprevalent.

    The co-operative and governmentorganization models are ruled out.

    Both are top-heavy, very large scale models.Difficult to emulate at SME level.

    (Gandhi, Kumar, & Marsh, 2001)

  • 8/14/2019 Bettering service supply relationships in Indian agro-food SMEs

    5/16

    THE MNC PARTNERING MODEL

    PepsiCo introducedcontract farming inthe Indian state ofPunjab.

    Used informalcontracts to buy backproducts fromfarmers.

    Company invest inbuilding relationshipswith

    suppliers.(producers)

  • 8/14/2019 Bettering service supply relationships in Indian agro-food SMEs

    6/16

    PEPSICO PARTNERING MODEL

    Capable of absorbing losses for three yearsbefore profitable operations. ( Rs.40 millionper year). Mostly uni-product.

    Heavy industrial backing, and marketinginfrastructure has been seen as importantfactors that led to success.

    Ruled out for SMEs.

  • 8/14/2019 Bettering service supply relationships in Indian agro-food SMEs

    7/16ITC E-CHOUPAL OR VAC MODEL

    Adapted from (Gandhi, Kumar, & Marsh, 2001)

  • 8/14/2019 Bettering service supply relationships in Indian agro-food SMEs

    8/16

    VAC MODEL KEY ENABLERS

    Implementing agencyaccess to Information-Communicationtechnologies, and

    infrastructure set-upat every village level.

    Financial viability forlarge scaleprocurement moneysaved on intermediaryexpenses.

  • 8/14/2019 Bettering service supply relationships in Indian agro-food SMEs

    9/16

    ISSUES IN ADOPTING THE VAC MODELFOR SMES

    Problems Costs incurred on setting up ICT infrastructure

    is prohibitive at SME levels.

    Intensive organizational skills and resourcesneed to be deployed to assure last mileconnectivity and mass-reach out.

    Lead-in time before profitable operations isminimum 3 years.

  • 8/14/2019 Bettering service supply relationships in Indian agro-food SMEs

    10/16

    PROPOSED SOLUTION FORADOPTING THE VAC MODEL FOR SMES

    Substitute market intermediaries for ICT. Deploylimited ICT for educating/informing theintermediaries.

    The SMEs will begin working within the existingsystem and incrementally improve services.

    Resource requirements are much lesser.

  • 8/14/2019 Bettering service supply relationships in Indian agro-food SMEs

    11/16

    THE CHALLENGE

    Getting the intermediaries/suppliers to work oncompany requirements while a ready mademarket is available.

    Appropriate Service System Design for suppliers andSupplier Development.

    Evolving a framework/model that will assist

    substituting mass ICT presence with intermediaries.

  • 8/14/2019 Bettering service supply relationships in Indian agro-food SMEs

    12/16

    ACADEMIC ISSUES

    Adopting a two-level bi-directional supply chain.

    Adapted from (Sampson, 2000)

  • 8/14/2019 Bettering service supply relationships in Indian agro-food SMEs

    13/16

    ACADEMIC ISSUES

    Supply Relationships Supply base issues

    Supply chainintegration

    Partnering andVendor Development

    Supply ChainApproach to

    Service Design Service blueprinting

    (Sampson, 2000)

  • 8/14/2019 Bettering service supply relationships in Indian agro-food SMEs

    14/16

    PROJECT DELIVERABLES

    Overview of present models in Indian agro-industry and positioning VAC model as apt forSMEs with required changes. (750 words)

    A brief review of academic issues involved(1500 words)

    Methodology & Findings (1250 words) Supply Chain Management Tools

    Appropriate Service System Design

  • 8/14/2019 Bettering service supply relationships in Indian agro-food SMEs

    15/16

    REFERENCES

    Gandhi, V., Kumar, G., & Marsh, R. (2001).

    Agroindustry for Rural and Small Farmer

    Development : Issues and Lessons from india.

    International Food and Agribusiness Management

    Review , 331-344.

    Rao, N. (2007). A framework for implementing

    information and communication technologies in

    agricultural development in India. TechnologicalForecasting & Social Change , 491-518.

    Sampson, S. E. (2000). Customer-Supplier Duality

    And bi-directional supply chains in service

    organizations. International Journal of Service

  • 8/14/2019 Bettering service supply relationships in Indian agro-food SMEs

    16/16

    THANK YOUSuggestions/Questions/Comments.