Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Beryllium Health Surveillance inU.S. Department of Energy Facilities
Beryllium Health Surveillance inBeryllium Health Surveillance inU.S. Department of Energy FacilitiesU.S. Department of Energy Facilities
Arthur W. Stange, Ph.D.Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education
-- IRSST, BERYLLIUM 2005 IRSST, BERYLLIUM 2005 --
March 8, 2005
U.S. DOE Beryllium Health IssuesA Chronology
U.S. DOE Beryllium Health IssuesU.S. DOE Beryllium Health IssuesA ChronologyA Chronology
1933: First description of acute beryllium disease in the literature (Weber and Engelhardt1, Germany)
1943: U.S. PHS published NIH Bulletin 1812, “The Toxicology of Beryllium,” stating that beryllium metal was not toxicBeryllium first used at the University of Chicago Metallurgical Laboratory “Site B”
1946: First U.S. beryllium disease (chronic) cases reported in fluorescent light bulb industry (Hardy and Tabershaw3, Massachusetts)
1947: U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) founded
March 8, 2005
1948: Occupational exposure limit of 2 µg/m3 was proposed by Merril Eisenbud (by analogy with lead, mercury and cadmium)
1949: AEC established the “Advisory Committee on Beryllium”, chaired by Dr. Harriet Hardy
1951: AEC began funding the “Beryllium Case Registry”,directed by Dr. Hardy
1955: ACGIH tentatively adopted the proposed beryllium limit1956: AEC published “Recommendations for the Control of
Beryllium Hazards4”, and placed it in vendor contracts
U.S. DOE Beryllium Health IssuesA Chronology
U.S. DOE Beryllium Health IssuesU.S. DOE Beryllium Health IssuesA ChronologyA Chronology
March 8, 2005
1956: Destructive testing of beryllium sub-assemblies at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Site 300AEC contracted with Brush Wellman and Beryllium Corp. for 200,000 lbs. of beryllium/year (beginning in 1958)
1959: Breslin & Harris5 (AEC) published “Health Protection in Beryllium Facilities: Summary of Ten Years Experience”
1972: U.S. NIOSH and OSHA adopt the 2 µg/m3 standard1977: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) founded1978: DOE creates beryllium taskforce to study new proposed
OSHA carcinogenic beryllium standard1984: First case of chronic beryllium disease (CBD) at DOE
Rocky Flats Plant
U.S. DOE Beryllium Health IssuesA Chronology
U.S. DOE Beryllium Health IssuesU.S. DOE Beryllium Health IssuesA ChronologyA Chronology
March 8, 2005
1987: NJMRC beryllium-LPT pilot program at Rocky Flats1991: DOE approves/funds beryllium testing at Rocky Flats1992: DOE approves/funds Rocky Flats former worker testing
U.S. Congress, Public Law 102-484, Section 31626
1993: DOE implements Former Worker Programs1997: DOE Notice 440.17 “Interim Chronic Beryllium Disease
Prevention Program (CBDPP)” is published2000: DOE CBDPP becomes effective at all sites
U.S. Congress passes the EEOICPA2001: EEOICPA makes first CBD claim award
U.S. DOE Beryllium Health IssuesA Chronology
U.S. DOE Beryllium Health IssuesU.S. DOE Beryllium Health IssuesA ChronologyA Chronology
March 8, 2005
Purpose and Objective:Reduce the number of current workers exposed to berylliumPerform comprehensive inventory and hazard assessments for beryllium by qualified industrial hygienistsMinimize the levels of beryllium exposureMinimize the potential for exposure to berylliumEstablish medical surveillance protocols to ensure earlydetection of CBD
The Department of EnergyCurrent Worker CBDPP
The Department of EnergyThe Department of EnergyCurrent Worker CBDPPCurrent Worker CBDPP
March 8, 2005
05
101520
253035
Y-12
RFETS
KCP
Pantex
LLNL
CBD Sensitized
Current Worker CBDPPCurrent Worker CBDPPCurrent Worker CBDPP
March 8, 2005
Nationwide Beryllium and Former Worker Programs
Public Law 102-484, Section 3162 (1992)
Nationwide Beryllium and Nationwide Beryllium and Former Worker ProgramsFormer Worker Programs
Public Law 102-484, Section 3162 (1992)
Purpose and Objective:Identify the hazardous substances and radioactive materials to which DOE current and former employees may have been exposedDetermine the appropriate number, scope, and frequency of medical evaluations required to evaluate exposuresImplement medical exams and tests for those DOE employees who are subject to significant health risks as the result of their work at DOE facilities
March 8, 2005
.
... .
..
. .. ...
.
.
.
.
...
.. .. ...
..
.DOE Site/Facility ParticipationDOE Site/Facility ParticipationDOE Site/Facility Participation
March 8, 2005
Nationwide Beryllium SurveillanceNationwide Beryllium Surveillance
22,774 workers tested (12/31/2004)4,932 Y-129,619 Rocky Flats (RFETS)
698 Mound3,243 Kansas City (KCP)1,093 Pantex
338 Iowa Army Ammunition (IAAP)1,804 Lawrence Livermore (LLNL)1,047 Other DOE Sites
CBD cases = 205; Sensitivity cases = 714
March 8, 2005
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
Y-12RFETS
Mound
KCP
Pantex
IAAP
LLNL
CBD Sensitized
Nationwide Beryllium SurveillanceNationwide Beryllium Surveillance
March 8, 2005
Former Worker ProgramsFormer Worker ProgramsFormer Worker Programs
~22,000 workers tested (12/31/2004)3,242 K-253,194 Hanford2,175 Idaho2,113 LANL1,344 Nevada Test Site1,734 Oak Ridge and K-25 Construction1,573 Paducah1,793 Portsmouth2,936 Savannah River
CBD cases = 27; Sensitivity cases = 259
March 8, 2005
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
K-25Han
fordIdahoLANL
NTSOR Const
r.Padu
cah
Portsmouth SRS
CBD Sensitized
Former Worker ProgramsFormer Worker ProgramsFormer Worker Programs
March 8, 2005
* 23 cases of CBD identified by NJMRC prior to June 1991
Rocky Flats Y-12 Kansas City06/91-12/04 12/93-12/04 03/00-12/04
Number Tested 9,619 4,932 3,243Sensitized cases 344 147 68CBD cases 123* 48 1
Lymphocyte Proliferation Test ResultsLymphocyte Proliferation Test ResultsLymphocyte Proliferation Test Results
March 8, 2005
Number NumberTested Sensitized Prevalence
Beryllium Machinist 201 24 11.94%Health Physics Technician 42 5 11.90%Construction Trades 191 19 9.95%Decontamination &
Decommissioning 157 12 7.64%General Laborer 483 27 5.59%Administrative 2,254 98 4.35% Security 288 4 1.39%
Overall 5,173 235 4.54%
* Rocky Flats (6/91-12/97); Some individuals held more than one job title.
Prevalence of Beryllium Sensitizationby Job Title*
Prevalence of Beryllium SensitizationPrevalence of Beryllium Sensitizationby Job Title*by Job Title*
March 8, 2005
CBD more prevalent than DOE initially thoughtCBD cases are not restricted to those whose job title indicated beryllium workRetesting finds cases of sensitization and CBD after initial normal test(s)
Lessons LearnedLessons LearnedLessons Learned
March 8, 2005
Many workers sensitized to beryllium will likely go on to develop CBDCompliance with the OSHA Permissible Exposure Limit of 2 µg/m3 does not rule out the possibility of CBD
Lessons LearnedLessons LearnedLessons Learned
March 8, 2005
Be-LPT is efficacious in medical surveillance of beryllium-exposed individuals
Lessons LearnedLessons LearnedLessons Learned
March 8, 2005
Continue analyses of current and former worker surveillance data to determine:
frequency of retestingduration of retestingrate of progression from sensitization to CBD and CBD to disability
Investigation of pre- and post-Beryllium Rule populations
Future WorkFuture WorkFuture Work
March 8, 2005
AEC/DOE quickly recognized beryllium as a potential health hazard and action was takenDOE recognized sensitivity and CBD as serious health problems within their facilitiesSensitivity and CBD can be found in worker populations not directly exposed to berylliumSensitivity and CBD are a function of the conditions of exposure
ConclusionsConclusionsConclusions
March 8, 2005
1. Weber H., and W. E. Engelhardt. Application of the Research on Dusts from Beryllium Production. Zentrabl Gewerbehof Unfallverhuet. 1933. 10: 41-47.
2. Hyslop F., Palmes E.D., Alford W.C., et al. The toxicology of beryllium. Nat Institute of Health (NIH) Bulletin No 181. U.S. Public Health Service, 1943.
3. Hardy H.L., and I.R. Tabershaw. Delayed Chemical Pneumonitis Occurring in Workers Exposed to Beryllium Compounds. The Journal of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology. 1946. 28:197-211.
4. United States Atomic Energy Commission. AEC Recommendations for the Control of Beryllium Hazards. November 1, 1956. NV0706073. Washington, DC.
5. Breslin A.J., and W.B. Harris. Health protection in beryllium facilities; summary of ten years of experience. Archives of Industrial Health. June, 1959. 19(6):596-648.
6. U.S. Congress. The Defense Authorization Act of 1993, Public Law 102-484, Section 3162. Washington, DC.
7. U.S. Department of Energy. July 15, 1997. Notice 440.1. Interim Chronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Program. Washington, DC: US Department of Energy.
ReferencesReferencesReferences