90
LIFE-Nature-2005 Restoration of the Wetlands of Zahorie Lowland prepared by: Jaromír ŠÍBL – project manager

Beneficiary and partners

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

LIFE-Nature-2005 Restoration of the Wetlands of Zahorie Lowland prepared by: Jaromír ŠÍBL – project manager. Beneficiary and partners. State Nature Conservancy of SR Slovak Water Management Enterprise BROZ. Duration + budget. start: February 2005 end: December 2008 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Beneficiary and partners

LIFE-Nature-2005

Restoration of the Wetlands of Zahorie Lowland

prepared by: Jaromír ŠÍBL – project manager

Page 2: Beneficiary and partners

Beneficiary and partners

State Nature Conservancy of SR

Slovak Water Management Enterprise

BROZ

Page 3: Beneficiary and partners

Duration + budget

start: February 2005

end: December 2008

total budget: 624,000 EURO

EC contribution: 50%

Page 4: Beneficiary and partners
Page 5: Beneficiary and partners

Objectives

General: development of NATURA 2000 network

Specific:

improve habitat conditions of wetlands degraded by drainage

reach / maintain favourable conservation status of species and habitats targeted

public awareness on wetlands conservation / restoration

Page 6: Beneficiary and partners

NATURA 2000

- 8 proposed Sites of Community Importance

Habitats: semi-natural pine, oak, birch and alder forests pine monucultures inland sand dunes dry grasslands and heaths wetlands meadows running waters

Page 7: Beneficiary and partners

Species (all species recorded): higher plants - more than 500 fish - 30 amphibians - 13 reptiles - 6 birds - 48 mammals - 24

Species of Community interest (Annex II of Habitats Directive)

higher plants - 1 beetles - 6 butterflies - 3 dragonflies - 4 cyclostomes and fish - 7 amphibians - 1 mammals - 7 birds (Annex I of Birds Directive) - 48

Page 8: Beneficiary and partners
Page 9: Beneficiary and partners
Page 10: Beneficiary and partners
Page 11: Beneficiary and partners
Page 12: Beneficiary and partners
Page 13: Beneficiary and partners
Page 14: Beneficiary and partners
Page 15: Beneficiary and partners
Page 16: Beneficiary and partners
Page 17: Beneficiary and partners
Page 18: Beneficiary and partners
Page 19: Beneficiary and partners
Page 20: Beneficiary and partners
Page 21: Beneficiary and partners
Page 22: Beneficiary and partners
Page 23: Beneficiary and partners
Page 24: Beneficiary and partners
Page 25: Beneficiary and partners
Page 26: Beneficiary and partners
Page 27: Beneficiary and partners
Page 28: Beneficiary and partners
Page 29: Beneficiary and partners
Page 30: Beneficiary and partners
Page 31: Beneficiary and partners
Page 32: Beneficiary and partners
Page 33: Beneficiary and partners
Page 34: Beneficiary and partners
Page 35: Beneficiary and partners
Page 36: Beneficiary and partners
Page 37: Beneficiary and partners
Page 38: Beneficiary and partners
Page 39: Beneficiary and partners
Page 40: Beneficiary and partners
Page 41: Beneficiary and partners
Page 42: Beneficiary and partners
Page 43: Beneficiary and partners
Page 44: Beneficiary and partners
Page 45: Beneficiary and partners
Page 46: Beneficiary and partners
Page 47: Beneficiary and partners
Page 48: Beneficiary and partners
Page 49: Beneficiary and partners
Page 50: Beneficiary and partners
Page 51: Beneficiary and partners
Page 52: Beneficiary and partners
Page 53: Beneficiary and partners
Page 54: Beneficiary and partners
Page 55: Beneficiary and partners

Threats

drainage of wetlands, regulations of watercourses

unsustainable forest management (clearcuts, pine monocultures)

fish migration obstacled by weir at Rudava River

lack of management of meadows

lack of awareness

Page 56: Beneficiary and partners
Page 57: Beneficiary and partners
Page 58: Beneficiary and partners
Page 59: Beneficiary and partners
Page 60: Beneficiary and partners

Problems - Consequences

Lack of scientific information on MTA´s biodiversity (inventories)

Unsustainable forest management (in terms of biodiversity)

- large scale clear-cuts - planting pine monocultures - increased danger of forest fires – loss of biodiversity Deterioration of water regime - drainage of wetlands,

stream regulations - interruption of fish migration routes (barriers)- loss of biodiversity - loss of retention capacity of the

landscape – increased danger of climatic extremes (drought, floods)

Page 61: Beneficiary and partners

Actions

A.1. Management Plans for 8 project sites elaborated

deadline: 31/12/2007

status: on-going

outputs:- botanical and zoological inventories carried- GIS database developed- draft Management plans elaborated for 4 project

sites

Page 62: Beneficiary and partners

A.2. Education and training of project personnel

deadline: 31/07/2007

status: on-going

outputs:- study visit to Czech repulic (2 persons) acomplished - study visit to Poland (11 persons) acomplished

Page 63: Beneficiary and partners
Page 64: Beneficiary and partners
Page 65: Beneficiary and partners
Page 66: Beneficiary and partners

A.3. Amendments to forest management plans for 7 project sites

deadline: 31/12/2006

status: on-going

outputs:- proposals elaborated for 3 project sites,- draft proposals elaborated for 4 project sites

Page 67: Beneficiary and partners
Page 68: Beneficiary and partners

C.1. Implementation of specific restoration and management measures

deadline: 31/03/2008

status: on-going

outputs:- Bahno - dead trees removed from 2,8 ha (100%)- Vanišovec - 140 m of drainage canals filled (100%)- Zelienka - 90 m of drainage canals filled (60%)- Jasenácke - 20 m of drainage canals filled (50%)- Kotlina - restoration works start in September 2006

Page 69: Beneficiary and partners
Page 70: Beneficiary and partners
Page 71: Beneficiary and partners
Page 72: Beneficiary and partners
Page 73: Beneficiary and partners
Page 74: Beneficiary and partners
Page 75: Beneficiary and partners
Page 76: Beneficiary and partners

C.2. Construction of the fish by-pass at Rudava River

deadline: 30/11/2007

status: on-going

outputs:

- the technical documentation for the construction project revised, construction budget updated

Page 77: Beneficiary and partners
Page 78: Beneficiary and partners

C.3. Restoration of lowland hay meadows along Rudava River

deadline: 30/09/2008

status: on-going

outputs:

- base line survey carried on the butterfly species targeted

- restoration works started at the area of 12 ha

Page 79: Beneficiary and partners
Page 80: Beneficiary and partners
Page 81: Beneficiary and partners
Page 82: Beneficiary and partners
Page 83: Beneficiary and partners

E.1. Produce educational materials on the project for general public and for media

deadline: 31/10/2008 status: on-going

outputs:- 5 articles published, 1 press release, 3 TV and 1 radio broadcasts released- interim project website established, new website

under preparation- film/video/DVD producer selected

Page 84: Beneficiary and partners
Page 85: Beneficiary and partners
Page 86: Beneficiary and partners
Page 87: Beneficiary and partners

E.2. Workshops and public meetings

deadline: 31/10/2008 status: on-going

outputs:- 1 public meeting prepared

Page 88: Beneficiary and partners

F.1. Project management + monitoring

status: on-going

F.2. Bookkeeping

status: on-going

F.3 Auditing

status: pending

F.4 After LIFE - Conservation Plan

status: pending

Page 89: Beneficiary and partners

Project focus in 2006

Management Plans + Restoration Projects Forest management plans

wetland restoration - filling the drainage ditches and canals) at 4 project sites

documentation for construction permit of fish by-pass at Rudava River

restoration of degraded meadows at pSCI Rudava

Page 90: Beneficiary and partners

Thank you for your attention !